Hier nog meer bewijs dat Rusland niets te maken had met het hacken en manipuleren van de VS verkiezingen, terwijl het merendeel van de westerse politici en de reguliere westerse media glashard het tegengestelde (tegen beter weten in) blijven volhouden….
Information Clearing House (ICH) publiceerde het volgende artikel van Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) op 26 juli jl. Onder het artikel kan u klikken voor het volledige bericht op ICH en onder dat origineel kan u klikken voor een vertaling:
SUBJECT:
Was the “Russian Hack” an Inside Job?
Executive
Summary
Forensic
studies of “Russian hacking” into Democratic National Committee
computers last year reveal that on July 5, 2016, data was leaked
(not hacked) by
a person with physical access to DNC computers, and then doctored to
incriminate Russia.
After
examining metadata from the “Guccifer 2.0” July 5, 2016 intrusion
into the DNC server, independent cyber investigators have concluded
that an insider copied DNC data onto an external storage device, and
that “telltale signs” implicating Russia were then inserted.
Key
among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the
conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at
a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of
equal importance, the forensics show that the copying and doctoring
were performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far,
mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent
studies [see here and here].
Independent
analyst Skip Folden, a retired IBM Program Manager for Information
Technology US, who examined the recent forensic findings, is a
co-author of this Memorandum. He has drafted a more detailed
technical report titled “Cyber-Forensic Investigation of ‘Russian
Hack’ and Missing Intelligence Community Disclaimers,” and sent
it to the offices of the Special Counsel and the Attorney
General. VIPS member William Binney, a former Technical Director
at the National Security Agency, and other senior NSA “alumni” in
VIPS attest to the professionalism of the independent forensic
findings.
The
recent forensic studies fill in a critical gap. Why the FBI
neglected to perform any independent forensics on the original
“Guccifer 2.0” material remains a mystery – as does the lack of
any sign that the “hand-picked analysts” from the FBI, CIA, and
NSA, who wrote the “Intelligence Community Assessment” dated
January 6, 2017, gave any attention to forensics.
NOTE:
There has been so much conflation of charges about hacking that we
wish to make very clear the primary focus of this Memorandum. We
focus specifically on the July 5, 2016 alleged Guccifer 2.0 “hack”
of the DNC server. In earlier VIPS memoranda we addressed the
lack of any evidence connecting the Guccifer 2.0 alleged hacks and
WikiLeaks, and we asked President Obama specifically to disclose any
evidence that WikiLeaks received DNC data from the
Russians [see here and here].
Addressing
this point at his last press conference (January 18), he described
“the conclusions of the intelligence community” as “not
conclusive,” even though the Intelligence Community Assessment of
January 6 expressed “high confidence” that Russian intelligence
“relayed material it acquired from the DNC … to WikiLeaks.”
Obama’s
admission came as no surprise to us. It has long been clear to us
that the reason the U.S. government lacks conclusive evidence of a
transfer of a “Russian hack” to WikiLeaks is because there was no
such transfer. Based mostly on the cumulatively unique technical
experience of our ex-NSA colleagues, we have been saying for almost a
year that the DNC data reached WikiLeaks via a copy/leak by a DNC
insider (but almost certainly not the same person who copied DNC data
on July 5, 2016).
From
the information available, we conclude that the same inside-DNC,
copy/leak process was
used at two different times, by two different entities, for two
distinctly different purposes:
-(1)
an inside leak to WikiLeaks before Julian Assange announced on June
12, 2016, that he had DNC documents and planned to publish them
(which he did on July 22) – the presumed objective being to expose
strong DNC bias toward the Clinton candidacy; and
-(2)
a separate leak on July 5, 2016, to pre-emptively taint anything
WikiLeaks might later publish by “showing” it came from a
“Russian hack.”
Voor het volledige artikel en de namen van de deskundigen (plus mogelijkheid tot vertaling), klik op de volgende link:
Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence
Zie ook: ‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..‘
en: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information‘
en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election‘
en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump‘
en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media‘
en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘
en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘
en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘
en: ‘CIA speelt zoals gewoonlijk vuil spel: uit Wikileaks documenten blijkt dat CIA zelf de verkiezingen manipuleerde, waar het Rusland van beschuldigde……..‘
en: ‘‘Russische bemoeienis’ met de Nederlandse verkiezingen….. Waaruit blijkt nu die manipulatie, gezien de verkiezingsuitslag?‘
en: ‘CIA malware voor manipulaties en spionage >> vervolg Wikileaks Vault 7‘
en: ‘Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)
en: ‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia‘
en: ‘Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!‘
en: ‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd‘
en: ‘‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!‘
en: ‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!‘
en: ‘VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!‘
en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump‘
en: ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..‘
en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election‘
en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election‘
en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….‘
en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte‘
en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….‘
en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘
en: ‘WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’‘
en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..‘
en: ‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….‘
