VN: 2017 meer dan 10.000 burgerslachtoffers in Afghanistan >> het land dat Nederland veilig heeft verklaard……..

Gisteren bracht Jason Ditz op ANTIWAR de uitkomsten van een VN onderzoek waaruit blijkt dat er in 2017, meer dan 10.000 Afghanen het slachtoffer zijn geworden van de
voortdurende oorlog in hun land….. Zo zouden er 3438 burgers zijn
omgekomen, ofwel vermoord en 7015 Afghanen gewond zijn geraakt, waaronder uiteraard veel
zwaargewonden…… 

De VN komt wel met heel precieze cijfers, terwijl Afghanistan voor een groot deel in handen is van de Taliban. Gebieden die niet of
slecht zijn te controleren op het werkelijke aantal doden en
gewonden, dus ga er maar gerust vanuit dat het echte aantal
slachtoffers veel hoger licht……….

Beste
bezoeker: naar dat land zet Nederland vluchtelingen uit, dit daar het
land volgens de ambtsberichten van Buitenlandse Zaken ‘veilig
is…..’ Ja ik weet ‘t: het is geen onderwerp om over te lachen, anders zou je je daadwerkelijk
hartstikke dood lachen……… 

Moet je nagaan: in ‘onze regering’ zitten ook nog eens figuren die zich christelijk durven te noemen (ach ja, dom van mij, echte christenen moet je zoeken met een hele grote schijnwerper, misschien dat je dan geluk hebt…..)…….

Dezelfde regering (en de voorgaande regeringen) die maar al te graag Nederlandse militairen inzet voor de illegale oorlog die de VS tegen Afghanistan begon……. 

Als je denkt dat alle nabestaanden van de door de VN aangegeven meer dan 3.400 dodelijke slachtoffers hun geliefden wel zullen vergeten, heb je het mis, gegarandeerd dat daar minstens een paar mensen tussen zitten die wraak willen nemen op het westen voor hun verlies…… 

Tja en dan komen de terreuraanslagen in West-Europa weer om de hoek kijken, waarvan de autoriteiten, ‘opiniemakers, deskundigen’ en reguliere media durven te beweren, dat die aanslagen niets te maken hebben met de door het westen gevoerde illegale oorlogen (die zij niet als illegaal zien) in het Midden-Oosten en Afrika……. ‘Illegale oorlog’, zo ongeveer de ultieme vorm van terreur……. Voor nu nemen vooral de terreuraanslagen* tegen de autoriteiten en westerse doelen in Afghanistan toe.

Het voorgaande blijft uiteraard niet zonder consequenties: mensen ontvluchten niet voor niets Afghanistan, ze vluchten voor geweld dat door het westen wordt uitgeoefend en het geweld dat dit oproept >> dan durft buitenlandse Zaken te zeggen dat Afghanistan veilig is…..

UN:
Over 10,000 Afghan Civilian Casualties in 2017

February
16, 2018 at 5:54 am

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

(ANTIWAR.COM— The
UN has offered their official accounting of Afghan civilian
casualties in 2017 on Thursday, with 
more
than 10,000 casualties including 3,438 killed, and 7,015 wounded
.
The overall toll was 9% lower than the previous year.

The
decrease was mostly the result of fewer civilian deaths in the course
of ground combat, likely because the fighting on the ground was not
in s densely populated areas in 2017 as it was in 2016.

Airstrikes,
however, rose quite a bit in 2017, mostly the result of President
Trump’s ordered escalation, and killed 295 people overall, a 7
percent increase over the prior year.


2018
is already shaping up to be a bad year, potentially worse than the
record deaths of 2016, with

January
and early February seeing a pronounced increase in high-profile
attacks in the capital city of Kabul, and many of those attacks
designed to inflict large numbers of casualties. With the US
escalation continuing apace, the airstrikes are also liable to
continue to rise.

By Jason
Ditz
 /
Republished with permission / 
ANTIWAR.COM / Report
a typo

============================================

* Door ons terreuraanslagen genoemd, anders dan de aanslagen tegen burgers, kan je deze ook verzetsdaden noemen…… Vergeet niet dat de nazi-bezetting van Nederland tijdens WOII ook sprak van terreur, als ons verzet een aanslag pleegde…….

Netanyahu moet worden opgepakt voor corruptie, niet voor grootschalige misdaden tegen de menselijkheid, aldus Israëlische politie……

Oh! Netanyahu got Capone on tax evasion, not on crimes against humanity!

En dan is het maar de vraag of Palestijnenslachter Netanyahu, echt zal worden vervolgd voor o.a. omkoping en fraude……..

Netanyahu moet worden opgepakt voor corruptie, niet voor grootschalige misdaden tegen de menselijkheid, aldus Israëlische politie……

 Feb 15

Oh! Netanyahu got Capone on tax evasion, not on crimes against humanity!

En dan is het maar de vraag of Palestijnenslachter Netanyahu, echt zal worden vervolgd voor o.a. omkoping en fraude……..

Zijlstra’s leugen is vervolgbaar onder de Neurenbergse principes……

De NAVO oorlogsagenda blootgelegd met de Nederlandse leugen over de agressie van Putin……

Op BBC
World Service radio werd vanmorgen in
‘News Hour Extra’ één grote anti-Rusland propaganda show
opgevoerd, uiteraard gecombineerd met het ophemelen van de VS en de
NAVO, plus een groot pleidooi voor meer geld naar defensie, uh
oorlogsvoering….. Dit met 
een aantal ‘deskundigen’ (allen anti-Rusland), waaronder Clingendael oorlogshitser en flapdrol de luxe Zandee……

De naam
van het programma werd eerder ter discussie gesteld, en naar aanleiding van inzendingen gedaan door luisteraars (dat moet je maar geloven) wordt de naam veranderd van ‘News
Hour Extra’ in ‘The Real Story…..’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Maak er maar ‘
Propaganda Hour Extra’ van! Blijkbaar moet de nieuwe naam van te voren al aangeven dat je hier niet met nepnieuws te maken krijgt, belachelijk!!

Op
Information Clearing House bracht men (ook al vandaag) een artikel
over de leugen van Zijlstra, een leugen die volgens de schrijver Finian
Cunningham 2 jaar oud is, echter deze dateert niet alleen uit 2006, maar wordt sinds die tijd regelmatig aangehaald door Zijlstra (plus andere vooral VVD politici) en een aantal reguliere media organen!!

Volgens
Cunningham legt dit ten overvloede nog eens de NAVO oorlogsagenda
bloot. Zo werd de door de VS op poten gezette opstand die in de
Oekraïense coup resulteerde, omgedraaid in agressie en expansiedrift
van Rusland…… Uiteraard overgoten met de VS propagandamachine
leugens over een annexatie van De Krim en het binnenvallen van
Rusland in Oost-Oekraïne…….. Beiden flagrante leugens waar geen nanometer bewijs voor is!

Voorts
komt Cunningham met andere voorbeelden die dit beeld staven, al moet
ik zeggen dat er voorbeelden te over zijn, neem alleen al de expansie
van de NAVO richting Moskou, waar de NAVO nu, in tegenspraak met
gesloten overeenkomsten (met Gorbatsjov), voor een groot deel van de Russische
westgrens staat…….. Cunningham komt met de leugen van de voormalig minister van buitenlandse zaken in Polen, Sikorski: hij zou naar eigen zeggen persoonlijk hebben gehoord dat Rusland en Polen in een overleg Oekraïne onder elkaar verdeeld hadden………. Een leugen die na doorprikken naarstig werd ingetrokken door deze liegende hufter…… Sikorski is overigens een ‘christendemocraat’, die van zijn god blijkbaar keihard mag liegen en ophitsen tot oorlog…….  

Terecht stelt Cunningham dat de Nederlandse regering de leugen gebruikt van de geheime diensten dat ze een aan de Russische regering gelieerde groep zou hebben gehackt en hebben gezien dat de Russen de Democraten in de VS hebben gehackt (zodat niet hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton, maar Trump de verkiezingen heeft gewonnen), iets waarvoor alweer geen flinter bewijs is geleverd…….. Een smerige leugen die wordt gebruikt voor het propageren van de ‘Sleepwet’ die hier ter discussie staat en waar volgende maand in een referendum, tegelijk met de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen, over gestemd kan worden.

Ondanks een kleine uitglijder (waar het echte feit het verhaal in feite
alleen nog meer ondersteunt), een prima analyse! Hierin stelt Cunningham onder meer dat de leugen van Zijlstra in feite aanzet tot oorlog en dat is strafbaar onder de ‘Neurenbergse principes…’

Dutch
Lies Over Putin’s ‘Aggression’ Expose NATO War Agenda

By
Finian Cunningham

February
15, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – Netherlands Prime Minister Mark
Rutte was this week forced to bear a parliamentary vote of no
confidence after his foreign minister finally came clean over a
dangerous lie he has been telling for two years concerning Russian
President Vladimir Putin.


Halbe
Zijlstra quit in shame on Monday as the country’s foreign minister
after 
admitting that
a story he had peddled about personally hearing Putin plotting to
create a “greater Russia” was false. That then forced premier
Rutte to endure a “no confidence” motion from parliamentarians.
In the end, Rutte 
survived the
vote. If a majority had voted against his leadership, his coalition
government may have collapsed.

But
the deep damage done to the Dutch authorities will not be so easily
repaired by Rutte’s survival as premier. What has been exposed this
week is a senior member of government recklessly telling bare-faced
lies in an attempt to slander Russia, poison international relations,
and ratchet up already dangerous geopolitical tensions.

Zijlstra
had claimed two years ago, in 2016, that he had personally witnessed
Russian leader Vladimir Putin boasting about creating a “greater
Russia” which, it is claimed, would incorporate Ukraine, the Baltic
states, Belarus and Kazakhstan.

The
newly resigned Dutch top diplomat claimed he heard Putin making the
remarks while present with others at the Russian leader’s dacha
(summer house) back in 2006. 

This
week, Zijlstra finally came clean and admitted before parliament that
he hadn’t in fact been present at the alleged gathering. He still
maintains, however, that a confidant who was among the guests at
Putin’s dacha informed him of the alleged “greater Russia”
plan. But how can we now trust the word of a self-confessed liar?

Zijlstra’s
boss, Prime Minister Rutte, also sought to downplay the debacle,
claiming that his foreign minister had made “a big mistake” –
but that “lying was not a deadly sin”.

Rutte
is in for a rude awakening due to his complacent thinking. For indeed
his government has been caught telling a very grave lie whose
ramifications concern issues of war and peace in Europe.

Disgraced
former minister Zijlstra stands accused of gross distortion of
Russia’s foreign policy.

Since
the US and European-backed illegal coup in Ukraine in early 2014,
geopolitical reality has been turned upside-down. American and
European corporate media have peddled relentless anti-Russia
propaganda accusing Moscow of “aggression” and “expansionism”
in Europe.

This
torrent of Russophobia spewed out by Washington, the Pentagon, NATO
and the European Union has created the worst crisis in relations with
Russia since the Cold War ended nearly three decades ago. There are
real fears that the mounting crisis could escalate into an all-out
war involving nuclear powers.

Zijlstra’s
offense therefore is not merely a “mistaken” lie. His flagrant
public distortion has contributed directly to the grave deterioration
in geopolitical relations. One could even argue such reprehensible
remarks amount to incitement of war, which is a cardinal crime under
Nuremberg legal principles.

Lamentably,
the mendacious senior Dutch politician is not an isolated case.
Recall how former Polish foreign minister Radek Sikorski was caught
out telling similar defamatory lies about Russia in 2014.

Sikorski,
who has been an ardent supporter of NATO force build-up against
Russia, reportedly claimed that he personally overheard Vladimir
Putin in 2008 plotting to annex Ukrainian territory in a covert plot. 

Sikorski claimed that he heard Putin propositioning then Polish Prime
Minister Donald Tusk with a carve-up deal of Ukraine between Poland
and Russia.


Sikorski
was obliged to swiftly 
retract the
claims published in US media, and awkwardly admitting that he was not
present at the alleged meeting with Putin, and that his quoted
remarks were meant as a “surreal joke”.

But,
again, this is no joke or mistake. It is deadly serious
disinformation by senior government officials, which is recklessly
inciting war tensions with Russia. Sikorski is prominently associated
with pro-NATO think-tanks like the hawkish American Enterprise
Institute. He is married to Anne Applebaum who makes a living from
writing anti-Russian screeds for news outlets like the Washington
Post.


Zijlstra
and Sikorski join the ranks of Russophobia regurgitated by other
European foreign ministers like Britain’s Boris Johnson who issued
the outlandish 
claim earlier
this year that Russia is “targeting” British infrastructure; or
French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian who has 
impugned Russia
for chemical weapons use in Syria – only for the French President
Emmanuel Macron to 
admit this
week that his government has actually no evidence about the use of
such weapons in Syria.

Macron
has made his own contribution to Russophobia by leveling
unsubstantiated allegations that his presidential election campaign
last year was “hacked” by Kremlin agents. He has since banned
Russian news media from attending his press conferences.


All
these senior government figures are irresponsibly fueling a climate
of demonization against Russia which is compounding other unhinged
claims made by politicians in Washington and the Baltic states.
Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite, for example,
recently 
claimed that
Russian Iskander missiles based on Russian sovereign territory of
Kaliningrad were targeting half of Europe, an alarmist claim which
has been amplified by US secretary of defense James Mattis in the
Pentagon’s recent 
Nuclear
Posture Review
.

The
climate of hysteria – based on false, fevered official claims –
is militating against normal political and diplomatic relations,
which is, in turn, exacerbating the war in Ukraine and leading to
wider war tensions with Russia across Europe.

A
good question is why the ousted Dutch minister decided to own up this
week to his lies about Putin.

The
answer may be related to the bigger credibility crisis of the Dutch
government and its NATO allies with regard to the whole Russophobia
propaganda war.


Next
month, the Netherlands is to hold a national 
referendum on
extending powers of Dutch state intelligence to monitor public
electronic communications. To convince the Dutch public to vote for
more snooping powers, the authorities are relying on the hackneyed
claims about Russian “meddling” and “interference”.


It
seems significant that Dutch media 
reported last
month that the country’s secret services allegedly “hacked into”
Russian state hackers who were allegedly penetrating the American
Democratic party’s databases during the US presidential elections
back in 2015-2016. As usual, no evidence was provided to support the
claims. We know from other credible 
reports that
the Democratic party was quite possibly not hacked at all, but rather
was leaked from inside by a Democrat staffer. So the Dutch intel
story smearing Russia is highly dubious.

But
it seems that the purported “good deed” performed by the Dutch
intelligence services was pitched in the media as a way to ingratiate
bona fides with the Netherlands public. The aim being to dispose the
public toward voting in the referendum next month to give the Dutch
state more intrusive powers over citizens to “protect” them from
“nefarious Russians”.

Now,
if the Dutch minister had held on to his office any longer there was
a risk that his lies may have become public embarrassingly close to
the March referendum, which could have resulted in the public
rejecting the authorities’ desire for more snooping powers.

Perhaps
then the decision was taken in high office for the minister to take
the fall now in order to get rid sooner of an embarrassing story
concerning his lies over Russia.

Whatever
the explanation about the timing, the admission of Dutch government
lying about Russian aggression in Europe is nevertheless an
illuminating and appalling insight into how Russophobia and war is
being fomented by the US and its European NATO allies.

Abominably,
European government officials are willing to risk plunging millions
of citizens into a war with Russia based on lies and warped,
self-serving prejudices.


This
article was originally published by “
Strategic
Culture Foundation

-See
Also –

U.S.
Democrats push $1 billion bill for election security

=====================================

Zie ook: ‘Zijlstra heeft gelogen, liegt en zal blijven liegen, al helemaal als het over Rusland gaat…….

       en: ‘Zijlstra terecht afgetreden wegens anti-Russische propaganda, nu Rutte nog……..

       en: ‘Zijlstra de VVD leugenaar wordt beweend, nu even de andere kant!‘ (cartoons en prenten)

Nederland terreurstaat……….

De zaak met de cokewitte ridder Marco Kroon maakte nogmaals duidelijk dat ook Nederland zich bedient van terreur. Al was het in dit geval ‘persoonlijke terreur’ van Kroon, houdt Nederland wel degelijk ook geheime militaire acties waarbij het de opzet is om ‘tegenstanders’ te doden………

Uiteraard gaat het dan altijd om verdachten en zoals onze ‘democratische wetgeving’ stelt: een verdachte heeft recht op verdediging en een eerlijke rechtsgang……… Met het vermoorden van verdachten maakt Nederland zich schuldig aan standrechtelijke executies, ofwel oorlogsmisdaden, ofwel grootschalige terreur…….. Zoals de VS middels drones het ene bloedbad na het andere aanricht, waarbij godbetert meer dan 90 % van de slachtoffers, niet eens verdacht is…….

Daar wij, het klootjesvolk, nooit iets te horen krijgen over geheime militaire missies, kan je concluderen dat er ook bij die missies niet verdachte personen worden uitgeschakeld….

Kortom: Nederland is net als de VS, andere NAVO lidstaten, Israël en Saoedi-Arabië een terreurstaat!!

‘Alweer iets waar we trots op kunnen zijn……’

Toevoeging na plaatsing bericht: dom, vergeet ik nog de illegale oorlogen van de VS te noemen, oorlogen waar ook Nederland keer op keer aan meedoet. Uiteraard zijn die illegale oorlogen wel de ultieme vorm van terreur……… (het gaat hierbij om de oorlogen tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië)

Zie ook: ‘Marco Kroon, de cokewitte ridder, valt nogmaals door de mand, dit keer door een moord in Afghanistan……….

Voor meer berichten over deze zaken, klik op het label Marco Kroon of drones, direct onder dit bericht.

Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

Tijdens
de illegale oorlog tegen Syrië
 zijn meerdere pogingen gedaan het
Syrische bewind te beschuldigen van gifgasaanvallen tegen de eigen bevolking en ondanks dat deze aanvallen na onderzoek stuk voor stuk
werden toegewezen aan de ‘gematigde rebellen’ (lees door het westen
gesteunde psychopathische moordenaars, verkrachters en martelbeulen),
houden de westerse reguliere media en het grootste deel van de
westerse politici vol dat Syrië
 ‘ofwel Assad’ de schuldige was…….

Uit
een groot aantal aanwijzingen zou volgens Moon of Alabama blijken dat
men o.a. samen met de White Helmets (onderdeel van Al Qaida Syrië dat door de VS van ‘de zwarte lijst’ is gehaald…) en CNN bezig
is een nieuwe ‘false flag’ operatie op touw te zetten, waarbij Syrië weer zal
worden aangewezen als dader van een gifgasaanval……

In het volgende artikel wordt o.a. uitgelegd dat chlorine amper slachtoffers maakt, terwijl men bij meerdere aanvallen met dit gas, sprak over het uiterst dodelijke sarin gas…….. Zoals men ook vorig jaar bij de aanval op Khan Sheikhoun, waarbij een voorraad chlorine van Al Qaida Syrië werd geraakt, stelde dat de Syrische luchtmacht sarin gas zou hebben ingezet, ook dit was alweer een leugen van enorme proporties….. 

Een bericht eerder gepubliceerd op Moon of Alabama, zoals overgenomen op Information Clearing House 15 februari 2018:

Syria
– New ‘Chemical Weapons’ Fake Planned – Chlorine Though Will Not Do

By
Moon Of Alabama

February
15, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” –  During the seven years of
the war on Syria several accusations were made that the government
that it had used ‘chemical weapons’ against the attacking extremists.
The Syrian government denied to have ever released any chemicals. The
implausible to murky ‘evidence’ of such incidents always came from
foreign paid  propaganda groups and extremists on the ground.
They were likely staged to incriminate the government and to thereby
induce military attacks by foreign states.

We
currently see several reports which in their combination look like
preparations for of another fake ‘chemical weapon’ incident.


On
February 13 the 
Russian
Center for the Reconciliation of Opposing Sides in Syria
 noted a
warning of an upcoming false-flag ‘chemical attack’ incident:

“On
the evening of February 12, a resident from the Serakab settlement
located in the Idlib province called the Russian Center for
Reconciliaition to notify (the center) about a chemical weapons
attack that could be staged to provide footage for a foreign TV
channel,” the statement reads. “The caller said that
earlier on February 12, Jabhat al-Nusra members travelling in three
cars had brought more than 
20
chlorine gas cylinders
 and
personal protective equipment to Serakab,” the Center added.

“According
to the caller, members of the local While Helmets branch wore
personal protective equipment while rehearsing first aid provision to
civilians suffering from chemical poisoning,” the Russian Center
said.

“The caller pointed out that 
all
the proceedings had been filmed by professional reporters who used a
mic with the CNN logo, while commenting on the actions being taken by
the White Helmets
,”
the statement said, adding that in between takes, the reporters had
consulted with some people over a satellite telephone in English.

The White
Helmets
 are
a mostly 
British
funded
 propaganda
organization embedded with Hayat Tahreer Al-Sham, the current
incarnation of al-Qaeda in Syria which rules Idleb governorate. The
head of al-Qaeda in Syria, Abu Jaber Al-Sheikh, lauded
(
videoalternative)
the 
White
Helmets
 as
the “hidden soldiers of our revolution”.


CNN is
currently embedded with al-Qaeda and is 
producing White
Helmets
 propaganda
in Idleb governorate:

CNN
Today‏ @cnntoday – 
12:23
AM – 14 Feb 2018

EXCLUSIVE
report
 from
@arwaCNN in #Idlib Syria
 and
@holmescnn has #TheBreakdown on more fighting in #Ghouta #Afrin
#DeirEzzor

The
Russian warning is not the only sign that another fake chemical
weapon attack is coming up.


The
Israeli government is 
pushing “top
secret” disinformation into the public which preemptively blames
the Syrian government for any upcoming incident. It is also attempts
to influence foreign governments on the issue:

According
to a 
“Top
secret”
 cable
sent to Israeli ambassadors earlier this week, Israel fears that the
Assad regime will use the chemical weapons it still has left in a way
which might spill over to Israeli territory. The contents of the
cable were 
shared
with me by senior Israeli officials
.

[T]he
strategic division in the Israeli ministry of foreign affairs sent
the ‘Top Secret” cable to 15 Israeli embassies around the world,
including in Washington.

One of the more unusual
instructions in the cable was 
to
pass a strong message regarding the Israeli concern that the chemical
weapons left at the disposal of the Assad regime might be used
against rebel forces
 …

On
Tuesday the 
White
Helmets
 were
again 
trying to
get more foreign powers involved in fighting the Syrian government:

France
should stop talking about red lines and focus on real action to
persuade the main actors in Syria’s conflict to agree a ceasefire,
[Abdulrahman Almawwas], the vice-president of the Syria Civil
Defence, or “White Helmets”, said on Tuesday.

Speaking
after meeting senior French officials, 
including
Macron’s chief diplomatic adviser, 
Almawwas
said France needed to put pressure on the main protagonists, such as
pushing for a no-fly zone, even though he acknowledged France had few
options.

Only
hours after Abdulrahman Almawwas spoke with Macron’s chief
diplomatic adviser, the French president 
issued a
statement which set up a ‘red line’ trap:

On
chemical weapons, I set a red line and I reaffirm that red line,”
Macron told reporters. “If we have 
proven
evidence
 that
chemical weapons proscribed in treaties are used, 
we
will strike the place where they are made
.”

Today, our
agencies, our armed forces have not established that chemical
weapons, as set out in treaties, have been used against the civilian
population
.”

Setting
red lines is a trap for oneself as it includes an invitation to
others to break them. Anyone can release ‘chemical weapons’ in
insurgent controlled areas in Syria and blame the Syrian government –
thus potentially triggering the French ‘red line’. So far though
France has “not established” that a real chemical weapon
incident ever happened. Of note in Macron’s statement was also the
threat to strike at “the place where they are made”. That
place would likely be outside of Syria. The French Foreign Ministry
noted Macorn’s inconvenient choice of words, intervened and today
clarified
his remarks:

France’s
foreign minister on Wednesday sought to clarify his government’s
position on the use of chemical weapons in Syria saying that 
Paris
would only strike if the attacks were lethal and carried out by
government forces
.

“(The
president) confirmed that he would proceed to military strikes
against regime installations if there was a new use of chemical
weapons by Bashar al-Assad’s forces 
when
these attacks are lethal and regime’s responsibility is proven
,”
Jean-Yves Le Drian told lawmakers.

Al-Qaeda
will have no problem to create a “lethal” chemical weapon
attack. They have killed ten-thousands of Syrian without any remorse.
To “prove” that the Syrian government did it will be the
task of the White Helmets and its 
CNN and Atlantic
Council
 collaborators.

Chlorine
though will not do.

Source: Chlorine
– Properties
 (vid)
– 
bigger

In
their last attempt to smear the Syrian government for using ‘chemical
weapons’ those organizations 
hyped
the remains
of
a few 107mmm rockets which allegedly carried chlorine gas and were
fired against the Takfiri held areas of east-Ghouta. (Unmentioned
were the thousands of grenades 
fired by
east-Ghouta Takfiris against civilians in Damascus.)

If
those rockets had held chlorine they would have had no effect on
anyone.

Chlorine
gas is hardly ever deadly. It is 2.5 times heavier than air with a
distinct yellow-green color and a strong bleach odor. Chlorine gas
will only kill those submerged in a high concentration cloud. If one
sees or smells it one simply walks away from the cloud and thereby
stays safe. Chlorine was used as the first chemical weapon in World
War I because it would creep downwards into deep enemy ditches. Even
then it was soon found to be ineffective as a weapon and replaced
with other chemicals.


That
a few rockets with a few pounds of chlorine would have no ‘lethal’
effect is also obvious from 
official
reports
during
the U.S. occupation of Iraq:

The
first documented chlorine attack was Oct. 21, 2006, in Ramadi, a
Multinational Force Iraq spokeswoman said. In that attack, terrorists
drove a car bomb with 12 120 mm mortar shells and 
two
100-pound chlorine tanks
.
The attack 
wounded three
Iraqi policemen and a civilian.

The
first attack that received media attention was at Taji, where
terrorists remotely detonated a 5-ton truck packed with 100 pounds of
high explosives and 
two
1-ton chlorine tanks
.
The attack 
killed
one civilian
 and
wounded 114 others.

The most recent attack was June 3
against Forward Operating Base Warhorse, in Diyala province. Again, a
suicide car bomber launched the attack, and officials estimate it
included 
two
tanks of chlorine
 and
1,000 pounds of explosive. The cloud from the attack blew over
Warhorse and 
sickened 65
servicemembers, Multinational Force Iraq officials said. 
All
were examined and returned to duty. 


A
Multinational Force Iraq spokesman said there are anecdotal reports
that 
while
the blasts from the attacks have killed, few have died solely from
the gas
.
“We hear that an old man and some babies may have been killed, but
we can’t pin that down,” the spokesman said.

If
literally tons of chlorine were used in attacks in Iraq with no
deadly effect how could a few pounds on top of some small rockets
kill anyone?


On
February 2 the U.S. Secretary of Defense Mattis acknowledge the
practical uselessness of chlorine by putting it into a “separate
category” than other chemical weapons. He also 
noted that
he has no evidence of any such weapon use:

Q: Is there evidence of chlorine gas weapons used — evidence of chlorine gas weapons?

           SEC. MATTIS: I think that’s, yes —

Q:
No, I know, I heard you.

SEC.
MATTIS: I think it’s been used repeatedly. And that’s, as you know,
 a
somewhat separate category
,
which is why I broke out the sarin as another — yeah.

Q: So
there’s credible evidence out there that both sarin and chlorine —

SEC.
MATTIS: 
No,
I have not got the evidence, not specifically. I don’t have the
evidence.

What
I’m saying is that other — that 
groups
on the ground, NGOs, fighters on the ground have said that sarin has
been used
.
So we are looking for evidence. 
I
don’t have evidence, credible or uncredible.

NGOs
and “fighters on the ground” claimed to have evidence of
chemical weapon attacks. But just like the French agencies and armed
forces Macron mentioned, Mattis and the DoD have none.


The
Takfiris of al-Qaeda, the 
White
Helmets
 propaganda
shop and its media acolytes may well prepare, as the Russians report,
another fake chemical attack stunt. The Israeli government is busy
preparing the public relations ground. But the French government,
having trapped itself with ‘red line’ nonsense, then set the mark
higher at ‘lethal’ attacks.

Chlorine
is, as shown above, hardly ever lethal. But al-Qaeda will have no
qualms about coming up with a few corpses to prove the ‘lethality’ of
a fake incident.

We
also have seen how, with some outside help, a harmless chlorine
release can be faked in an allegedly deadly sarin attack. Such
happened in April 2017 in the Khan Sheikhun incident.


Multiple
early on-the-ground reports by local witnesses and Turkish
officials 
spoke
of chlorine release
 and
chlorine affected patients. Only a day later were these claims turned
into an alleged “sarin attack”. Real evidence was never
obtained from the al-Qaeda ruled grounds where that incident
happened. 


discredited
investigation
 was
inconclusive. It claimed some “sarin-like substance” may
have been involved but it 
could
not even explain
 why
more than 50 casualties of the claimed incident arrived at far away
hospitals BEFORE it had happened at all:

The
admission times of the [hospital] records range between 0600 and 1600
hours. Analysis of the aforementioned medical records revealed
that 
in
57 cases, patients were admitted in five hospitals before the
incident in Khan Shaykhun
 (at
0600, 0620 and 0640 hours).

One
has to agree with Secretary of Defense Mattis on this – some corpses
shown to CNN by “NGOs” and “fighters on the ground”
are not real evidence. Neither are discredited investigations. If the
al-Qaeda Takfiris and its supporters want to come up with some
believable fake they must set their standard much higher.

This
article was originally published by “
Moon
Of Alabama
” 

===============================

Zie ook: ‘Gifgasaanval Idlib: de komende ‘kindslachtoffers’ worden getraind door terreurgroep White Helmets………

       en: ‘Al Jazeera filmde een onderdeel van de ‘gifgasshow’ in Kahn Sheikhoun………..

       en: ‘Vlaamse pater roept op niet langer de westerse anti-Syrië propaganda te geloven!

       en: ‘Syrische nonnen spreken zich uit tegen de oorlogspropaganda van westerse mogendheden en de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

       en:  Tulsi Gabbard (VS congres Hawaï): Trump is de beschermende Big Brother van Al Qaida

       en: Exactly how the US trained and armed ISIS

       en: ‘CNN en andere media met doorzichtige oorlogspropaganda tegen de Syrische regering

       en: Voorbeeld BBC en AD propaganda inzake Idlib (Syrië)

       en: ‘John Bolton geeft terreurgroepen in Syrië de opdracht een false flag gifgasaanval uit te voeren

        en: ‘Ghouta: een gifgas false flag en VS chef Guterres eist staakt het vuren van pro-Syrische strijdgroepen op Oost-Ghouta……

        en: ‘Rusland heeft geen aanval uitgevoerd op VS troepen in Syrië…..

        en: ‘Hondsdolle VS valt Russische tank aan in poging de Russen te provoceren……

        en: ‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

        en: ‘Syrië: VS en Israëlische agressie dreigt de wereld in een oorlog te storten……

        en: ‘Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld

        en: ‘Rusland voorspelde ‘de gifgasaanval’ in Oost-Ghouta en de reactie daarop van de VS…..

        en: ‘Rusland beschuldigd GB van het regisseren gifgasaanval Douma en zegt daar bewijzen voor te hebben

        en: ‘In Douma vond geen gifgasaanval plaats aldus gelauwerd journalist Robert Fisk…..

        en: ‘De OPCW inspecteurs en hun werk in Douma n.a.v. ‘gifgasaanval…’

        en: ‘Wapenfabrikanten die de illegale raketbeschietingen op Syrië mogelijk maakten, zagen hun aandelen met 10 miljard stijgen………

        en: ‘OPCW team in Douma stelt dat Syrië en Rusland niets hebben veranderd dan wel verwijderd op de plaats van de ‘gisfgasaanval’

        en: ‘The Guardian met propaganda over Syrië, die zo uit Orwells 1984 zou kunnen komen……

        en: ‘Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!

        en: ‘US Aggression in Syria – an Imperialist Blueprint

        en: ‘Syrian ‘Rebels’ Used Sarin Nerve Gas Sold By Britain

        en: ‘Foreign Ministry: Some Western officials are complicit in the crimes of terrorists against civilians in Damascus and its countryside

        en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

        en: ‘Nieuwe ‘as van kwaad’: VS, GB en Frankrijk uit op oorlog met Syrië en Noord-Korea……..

Voor meer berichten met gifgas, sarin gas, chlorine of false flag operaties, klik op de betreffende labels, direct onder dit bericht.

Hondsdolle VS valt Russische tank aan in poging de Russen te provoceren……

Anti-Media
bracht gisteren het ANTIWAR bericht
dat het uiterst agressieve VS, de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde, met een drone een Russische T-72 tank in Syrië heeft uitgeschakeld, waarbij drie militairen omkwamen…… Dit nadat de VS vorige week in Syrië, naar het zich laat aanzien 100 Russische militaire adviseurs heeft vermoord….. 

Voor
beide zaken kwam de VS met het excuus dat dit uit zelfverdediging
was. De schrijver van het artikel, Jason Ditz stelt terecht het
uiterst vreemd te vinden dat bij ‘een aanval’ op aan de VS gelieerde
terreurgroepen, 100 strijders aan Russische kant werden uitgeschakeld, zonder dat er ook
maar één dode ‘aan VS kant’ is gevallen, ofwel: die strijders werden willens en
wetens aangevallen door de VS.

De
drone zou de tank hebben aangevallen, daar deze een gevaar vormde
voor de drone…… ha! ha! ha! ha! Zo’n drone kan vanaf grote
afstand een tank, ander voertuig of gebouw vernietigen, prettige
wedstrijd als je met een tank zo’n drone wilt uitschakelen…….

Deze
zaken duiden erop dat de VS bezig is een oorlog uit te lokken met
Rusland (zie ook de doorlopende NAVO oefeningen langs de Russische
grens, waarbij onlangs straaljagers van de VS hun transponders hebben
uitgezet…..)

Hoelang
blijven de westerse regeringen de psychopathische massamoordenaar VS
steunen en dat wat betreft Nederland gvd met ons belastinggeld!!!

US
Drone Destroys Russian Tank in Syria, Killing Three

February
14, 2018 at 6:17 am

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

(ANTIWAR.COM) — As
details continue to emerge of last week’s US attacks on pro-Syrian
forces, it appears that 
dozens,
or by some accounts scores
,
of the slain were actually Russian military contractors working for
the Syrian government. The raises the stakes about US attacks in
Syria fueling a direct conflict with Russia.

Over
the weekend, the US struck again, with officials now confirmed that a
US MQ-9 Reaper drone attacked and destroyed a Russian T-72 tank in
Eastern Syria, in what 
US
officials are claiming was an act of “self-defense.

Lt.
Gen. Jeffrey Harrigian says the drone saw the tank “that took a
shot at us,” and that he believes the US rules of engagement
allowed for the tank to be destroyed in self-defense to protect the
drone. Three people within were killed.

As
to who they killed, US officials are no more forthcoming than they
ever are, with Lt. Gen. Harrigian saying the US is “not going to
speculate” on who they killed, and that they flat out don’t know
whose tank it was, or who was driving it.

Which
isn’t a great excuse because tanks are usually well-marked as to
their owners/operators, and while both Russia and Syria are two of
the top three extent operators of such tanks, there are massively
different ramifications for the US to have destroyed a Syrian tank of
Russian origin or to have deliberately attacked and destroyed a
Russian tank.

While
the US has claimed all of its recent attacks on pro-Syrian forces in
the country as “self-defense,” the claim rings hollow since
they’ve killed in excess of 100 people while sustaining no
casualties of their own, and doubly so in this latest case because
they were defending a drone by killing three soldiers of unknown
origin.

By Jason
Ditz
 /
Republished with permission / 
ANTIWAR.COM / Report
a typo

===================================

Zie ook: ‘Rusland heeft geen aanval uitgevoerd op VS troepen in Syrië…..

        en: ‘Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

        en: ‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

        en: ‘Syrië: VS en Israëlische agressie dreigt de wereld in een oorlog te storten……

Zijlstra de VVD leugenaar wordt beweend, nu even de andere kant!

Hier een aantal prenten, cartoons van Links_huftertje, die ik je niet wil onthouden:

 Feb 12

Ook in alle gemeenteraden dadelijk………..

 Feb 12

Bij de VVD wordt nooit gelogen.

 Feb 12

Integriteit ?

      

 Feb 12

Onze man in Moskou……….vol

 Feb 12

Alternatieve feiten en Halbe waarheden

Zie ook: ‘Zijlstra heeft gelogen, liegt en zal blijven liegen, al helemaal als het over Rusland gaat…….

       en: ‘Zijlstra terecht afgetreden wegens anti-Russische propaganda, nu Rutte nog……..

       en: ‘Zijlstra’s leugen is vervolgbaar onder de Neurenbergse principes……

Venezuela: VS verandering van regime mislukt >> de Venezolanen wacht een VS invasie

Na alle moeite die de VS zich al 20 jaar getroost om een eind te maken aan het democratisch gekozen socialistisch bewind van Venezuela, wijst alles erop dat de VS bezig is met Peru, Colombia en Brazilië, van wie de laatste twee landen grenzen aan Venezuela, een invasie voor te bereiden in dat land……..

Er hebben in 2017 al vier grote militaire oefeningen plaats gevonden in Latijns Amerika en zelfs de NAVO schijnt nu een militaire basis te hebben in Brazilië, waarschijnlijk dezelfde als de ‘tijdelijke’ militaire VS basis in Brazilië, in de buurt waar Venezuela, Brazilië en Colombia aan elkaar grenzen…… Zoals gezegd: vorig jaar hebben er maar liefst 4 grote militaire oefeningen plaatsgevonden, met deelname van Colombia, Brazilië en Peru, alles o.l.v. de VS….. Eén van die oefeningen, ‘Operation: America United’ was zelfs de grootste militaire oefening ooit gehouden in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika (Latijns Amerika)………

Overigens heeft de VS al militaire bases in Colombia en het Caraïbisch gebied, onderhoudt daarnaast innige banden met andere landen in de buurt van Venezuela, wat dat betreft is Venezuela al omsingeld met VS militaire bases (uiteraard speelt ook Nederland weer ‘een mooie rol’ in deze…)
De VS is al meer dan 18 jaar bezig met een economische oorlog tegen Venezuela, al heeft deze tot nu toe weinig of niets opgeleverd wat betreft ‘regime change’. Al onder ‘vredesduif’ Obama heeft de VS deze oorlog verscherpt en VS bedrijven ‘dringend aangeraden’ hun supermarktketens in Venezuela niet langer te bevoorraden. Hetzelfde deed de VS met buitenlandse investeerders en je weet het waarschijnlijk wel, als de VS dreigt, gehoorzamen de bedrijven en instellingen, daar ze het anders wel kunnen vergeten als bedrijf of instelling……..

Als gevolg van deze boycot is er niet alleen een groot tekort aan levensmiddelen, maar bijvoorbeeld ook aan medicijnen. Daarmee kan de VS ten overvloede nog eens worden aangewezen als een terreurstaat, die schijt heeft aan ellende onder de gewone bevolking en aan mensenrechten, zoals dit gestolen land al zo vaak elders heeft laten zien, maar zeker in Zuid- en Midden-Amerika…….

De gewelddadige demonstraties in Venezuela van vorig jaar, werden ook al door de VS georganiseerd, waar zelfs gewapende groepen uit het buitenland werden ingezet tegen politie en leger van Venezuela……

In 2002 heeft er al een militaire coup plaatsgevonden in Venezuela, die met hulp van de (arme) bevolking de kop werd ingedrukt, een coup die zoals gewoonlijk werd geregisseerd door de CIA…….
Een militaire coup nu lijkt zeer onwaarschijnlijk ,daar het leger voor het overgrote deel achter de socialistische regering Maduro staat.
Lees het volgend uitstekende en sterk onderbouwde artikel dat duidelijk maakt waar de VS mee bezig is t.a.v. Venezuela, een artikel van Kevin Zeese en Maragaret Flowers, door Anti-Media overgenomen van Consortium News:

US Regime Change Fails in Venezuela: Military Coup or Invasion Next?

February 14, 2018 at 10:27 am
Written by Consortium News
(CN) — Several signals point to a possible military strike on Venezuela, with high-ranking officials and influential politicians making clear that it is a distinct possibility.
Speaking at his alma mater, the University of Texas, on February 1, Secretary of State Tillerson suggested a potential military coup in in the country. Tillerson then visited allied Latin American countries urging regime change and more economic sanctions on Venezuela. Tillerson is also reportedly considering banning the processing or sale of Venezuelan oil in the United States and is discouraging other countries from buying Venezuelan oil.
In a series of tweets, Senator Marco Rubio, the Republican from Florida, where many Venezuelan oligarchs live, openly called for a military coup in Venezuela. “The world would support the Armed Forces in #Venezuela if they decide to protect the people & restore democracy by removing a dictator,” the former presidential candidate tweeted.
How absurd — remove an elected president with a military coup to restore democracy? Does that pass the straight face test? This refrain of Rubio and Tillerson seems to be the nonsensical public position of U.S. policy.
The U.S. has been seeking regime change in Venezuela since Hugo Chavez was elected in 1998. Trump joined Presidents Obama and Bush before him in continuing efforts to change the government and put in place a U.S.-friendly oligarch government.
They came closest in 2002 when a military coup removed Chavez. The Commander-in-Chief of the Venezuelan military announced Chavez had resigned and Pedro Carmona, of the Venezuelan Chamber of Commerce, became interim president. Carmona dissolved the National Assembly and Supreme Court and declared the Constitution void. The people surrounded the presidential palace and seized television stations, Carmona resigned and fled to Colombia. Within 47 hours, civilians and the military restored Chavez to the presidency. The coup was a turning point that strengthened the Bolivarian Revolution, showed people could defeat a coup and exposed the US and oligarchs.
U.S. Regime Change Tactics Have Failed In Venezuela
The U.S. and oligarchs continue their efforts to reverse the Bolivarian Revolution. The United States has a long history of regime change around the world and has tried all of its regime change tools in Venezuela. So far they have failed.
Economic War
Destroying the Venezuelan economy has been an ongoing campaign by the US and oligarchs. It is reminiscent of the US coup in Chile which ended the presidency of Salvador Allende. To create the environment for the Chilean coup, President Nixon ordered the CIA to “make the economy scream.”
Henry Kissinger devised the coup noting a billion dollars of investment were at stake. He also feared the “the insidious model effect” of the example of Chile leading to other countries breaking from the United States and capitalism. Kissinger’s top deputy at the National Security Council, Viron Vaky, opposed the coup saying, “What we propose is patently a violation of our own principles and policy tenets .… If these principles have any meaning, we normally depart from them only to meet the gravest threat … our survival.”
These objections hold true regarding recent US coups, including in Venezuela and Honduras, Ukraine and Brazil, among others. Allende died in the coup and wrote his last words to the people of Chile, especially the workers, “Long live the people! Long live the workers!” He was replaced by Augusto Pinochet, a brutal and violent dictator.
For decades the US has been fighting an economic war, “making the economy scream,” in Venezuela.
Wealthy Venezuelans have been conducting economic sabotage aided by the US with sanctions and other tactics. This includes hoarding food, supplies and other necessities in warehouses or in Colombia while Venezuelan markets are bare. The scarcity is used to fuel protests, e.g. “The March of the Empty Pots,” a carbon copy of marches in Chile before the September 11, 1973 coup. Economic warfare has escalated through Obama and under Trump, with Tillerson now urging economic sanctions on oil.
President Maduro recognized the economic hardship but also said sanctions open up the opportunity for a new era of independence and “begins the stage of post-domination by the United States, with Venezuela again at the center of this struggle for dignity and liberation.” The second-in-command of the Socialist Party, Diosdado Cabello, said, “[if they] apply sanctions, we will apply elections.”
Opposition Protests
Another common US regime change tool is supporting opposition protests. The Trump administration renewed regime change operations in Venezuela and the anti-Maduro protests, which began under Obama, grew more violent. The opposition protests included barricades, snipers and murders as well as widespread injuries. When police arrested those using violence, the US claimed Venezuela opposed free speech and protests.
The opposition tried to use the crack down against violence to achieve the U.S. tactic of dividing the military. The U.S. and western media ignored opposition violence and blamed the Venezuelan government instead. Violence became so extreme it looked like the opposition was pushing Venezuela into a Syrian-type civil war. Instead, opposition violence backfired on them.
Violent protests are part of U.S. regime change repertoire. This was demonstrated in the U.S. coup in Ukraine, where the U.S. spent $5 billion to organize government opposition including U.S. and EU funding violent protesters. This tactic was used in early US coups like the 1953 Iran coup of Prime Minister Mossadegh. The U.S. has admitted organizing this coup that ended Iran’s brief experience with democracy. Like Venezuela, a key reason for the Iran coup was control of the nation’s oil.
Funding Opposition
There has been massive U.S. investment in creating opposition to the Venezuelan government. Tens of millions of dollars have been openly spent through USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy and other related US regime change agencies. It is unknown how much the CIA has spent from its secret budget, but the CIA has also been involved in Venezuela. Current CIA director, Mike Pompeo, said he is “hopeful there can be a transition in Venezuela.”
The United States has also educated leaders of opposition movements, e.g. Leopoldo López was educated at private schools in the US, including the CIA-associated Kenyon College. He was groomed at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and made repeated visits to the regime change agency, the National Republican Institute.
Elections
While the US calls Venezuela a dictatorship, it is in fact a strong democracy with an excellent voting system. Election observers monitor every election.
In 2016, the economic crisis led to the opposition winning a majority in the National Assembly. One of their first acts was to pass an amnesty law. The law described 17 years of crimes including violent felonies and terrorism committed by the opposition. It was an admission of crimes back to the 2002 coup and through 2016. The law demonstrated violent treason against Venezuela. One month later, the Supreme Court of Venezuela ruled the amnesty law was unconstitutional. U.S. media, regime change advocates and anti-Venezuela human rights groups attacked the Supreme Court decision, showing their alliance with the admitted criminals.
Years of violent protests and regime change attempts, and then admitting their crimes in an amnesty bill, have caused those opposed to the Bolivarian Revolution to lose power and become unpopular. In three recent elections Maduro’s party won regional, local and the Constituent Assembly elections.
The electoral commission announced the presidential election will be held on April 22. Maduro will run for re-election with the United Socialist Party. Opposition leaders such as Henry Ramos and Henri Falcon have expressed interest in running, but the opposition has not decided whether to participate. Henrique Capriles, who narrowly lost to Maduro in the last election, was banned from running for office because of irregularities in his campaign, including taking foreign donations. Capriles has been a leader of the violent protests. When his ban was announced he called for protests to remove Maduro from office. Also banned was Leopoldo Lopez, another leader of the violent protests who is under house arrest serving a thirteen year sentence for inciting violence.
Now, the United States says it will not recognize the presidential election and urges a military coup. For two years, the opposition demanded presidential elections, but now it is unclear whether they will participate. They know they are unpopular and Maduro is likely to be re-elected.
Is War Against Venezuela Coming?
A military coup faces challenges in Venezuela as the people, including the military, are well educated about US imperialism. Tillerson openly urging a military coup makes it more difficult.
The government and opposition recently negotiated a peace settlement entitled “Democratic Coexistence Agreement for Venezuela.” They agreed on all of the issues including ending economic sanctions, scheduling elections and more. They agreed on the date of the next presidential election. It was originally planned for March, but in a concession to the opposition, it was rescheduled for the end of April. Maduro signed the agreement even though the opposition did not attend the signing ceremony. They backed out after Colombian President Santos, who was meeting with Secretary Tillerson, called and told them not to sign. Maduro will now make the agreement a public issue by allowing the people of Venezuela to sign it.
Not recognizing elections and urging a military coup are bad enough, but more disconcerting is that Admiral Kurt Tidd, head of Southcom, held a closed door meeting in Colombia after Tillerson’s visit. The topic was “regional destabilization” and Venezuela was a focus.
A military attack on Venezuela from its Colombian and Brazilian borders is not far fetched. In January, the NY Times asked, “Should the US military invade Venezuela?” President Trump said the US is considering US military force against Venezuela. His chief of staff, John Kelly, was formerly the general in charge of Southcom. Tidd has claimed the crisis, created in large part by the economic war against Venezuela, requires military action for humanitarian reasons.
War preparations are already underway in Colombia, which plays the role of Israel for the US in Latin America. The coup government in Brazil, increased its military budget 36 percent, and participated in Operation: America United, the largest joint military exercise in Latin American history. It was one of four military exercises by the US with Brazil, Colombia and Peru in Latin America in 2017. The US Congress ordered the Pentagon to develop military contingencies for Venezuela in the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act.
While there is opposition to US military bases, James Patrick Jordan explains, on our radio show, the US has military bases in Colombia and the Caribbean and military agreements with countries in the region; and therefore, Venezuela is already surrounded.
The United States is targeting Venezuela because the Bolivarian Revolution provides an example against U.S. imperialism. An invasion of Venezuela will become another war-quagmire that kills innocent Venezuelans, U.S. soldiers and others over control of oil. People in the United States who support the self-determination of countries should show solidarity with Venezuelans, expose the U.S. agenda and publicly denounce regime change. We need to educate people about what is really happening in Venezuela to overcome the false media coverage.
Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers co-direct Popular Resistance. [This article originally appeared at https://popularresistance.org and is republished with authors’ permission.]
By Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers / Republished with permission / Consortium News / Report a typo

==================================

Ter herinneren aan de enorme agressie van de VS: ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en: List of wars involving the United States

Zie ook:
Halliburton en Chevron hebben groot belang bij ‘regime change’ in Venezuela

Mike Pence (vicepresident VS) gaf Guaidó, de door de VS gewenste leider, groen licht voor de coup in Venezuela

VS coup tegen Maduro in volle gang……..

VS weer op oorlogspad in Latijns-Amerika: Venezuela het volgende slachtoffer…….

Als de VS stopt met spelen van ‘politieagent’ en het vernielen van de wereld, zullen de slechte krachten winnen……

VS zet Latijns-Amerikaanse landen tegen elkaar op en is bezig met voorbereiding invasie Venezuela

Trump wilde naast de economische oorlogsvoering tegen Venezuela dat land daadwerkelijk militair aanvallen……

Venezolaanse regionale verkiezingen gehekeld door westen, terwijl internationale waarnemers deze als eerlijk beoordeelden……….

Venezuela: ‘studentenprotest’ wordt uitgevoerd door ingehuurde troepen………

Venezuela: Target of Economic Warfare

Venezuela moet en zal ‘verlost’ worden van Maduro, met ‘oh wonder’ een dikke rol van de VS en de reguliere westerse media

Venezolaanse regering treedt terecht op tegen de uiterst gewelddadige oppositie!!

Venezuela ontwricht, wat de reguliere media u niet vertellen……..

VS steunt rechtse coalitie (MUD) in Venezuela………






The Left and Venezuela‘ (met mogelijkheid tot directe vertaling)


Venezuela: VS verandering van regime mislukt >> de Venezolanen wacht een VS invasie

Na
alle moeite die de VS zich al 20 jaar getroost om een eind te maken
aan het democratisch gekozen socialistisch bewind van Venezuela,
wijst alles erop dat de VS bezig is met Peru, Colombia en Brazilië, van wie de laatste twee landen grenzen aan Venezuela, een invasie voor te bereiden in dat land……..

Er
hebben in 2017 al vier grote militaire oefeningen plaats gevonden in Latijns Amerika en
zelfs de NAVO schijnt nu een militaire basis te hebben in
Brazilië, waarschijnlijk dezelfde als de ‘tijdelijke’ militaire VS basis in Brazilië, in de buurt waar Venezuela, Brazilië en Colombia aan elkaar grenzen…… Zoals gezegd: vorig jaar hebben er maar liefst 4 grote militaire oefeningen plaatsgevonden, met deelname van Colombia, Brazilië en Peru, alles o.l.v. de VS….. Eén van die oefeningen, ‘Operation: America United’ was zelfs de grootste militaire oefening ooit gehouden in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika (Latijns Amerika)………

Overigens heeft de VS al militaire bases in Colombia en het Caraïbisch gebied, onderhoudt daarnaast innige banden met andere landen in de buurt van Venezuela, wat dat betreft is Venezuela al omsingeld met VS militaire bases (uiteraard speelt ook Nederland weer ‘een mooie rol’ in deze…)

De
VS is al meer dan 18 jaar bezig met een economische oorlog tegen
Venezuela, al heeft deze tot nu toe weinig of niets opgeleverd wat betreft ‘regime change’. Al
onder ‘vredesduif’ Obama heeft de VS deze oorlog verscherpt en VS
bedrijven ‘dringend aangeraden’ hun supermarktketens in Venezuela
niet langer te bevoorraden. Hetzelfde deed de VS met buitenlandse
investeerders en je weet het waarschijnlijk wel, als de VS dreigt, gehoorzamen de bedrijven en instellingen, daar ze het anders wel
kunnen vergeten als bedrijf of instelling……..

Als gevolg van deze boycot is er niet alleen een groot tekort aan levensmiddelen, maar bijvoorbeeld ook aan medicijnen. Daarmee kan de VS ten overvloede nog eens worden aangewezen als een terreurstaat, die schijt heeft aan ellende onder de gewone bevolking en aan mensenrechten, zoals dit gestolen land al zo vaak elders heeft laten zien, maar zeker in Zuid- en Midden-Amerika…….

De gewelddadige demonstraties in Venezuela van vorig jaar, werden ook al door de VS georganiseerd, waar zelfs gewapende groepen uit het buitenland werden ingezet tegen politie en leger van Venezuela……

In 2002 heeft er al een militaire coup plaatsgevonden in Venezuela, die met hulp van de (arme) bevolking de kop werd ingedrukt, een coup die zoals gewoonlijk werd geregisseerd door de CIA…….

Een
militaire coup nu lijkt zeer onwaarschijnlijk ,daar het leger voor het
overgrote deel achter de socialistische regering Maduro staat.

Lees
het volgend uitstekende en sterk onderbouwde artikel dat duidelijk maakt waar de VS mee bezig is
t.a.v. Venezuela, een artikel van Kevin Zeese en Maragaret Flowers, door
Anti-Media overgenomen van Consortium News:

US
Regime Change Fails in Venezuela: Military Coup or Invasion Next?

February
14, 2018 at 10:27 am

Written
by 
Consortium
News

(CN) — Several
signals point to a possible military strike on Venezuela, with
high-ranking officials and influential politicians making clear that
it is a distinct possibility.

Speaking
at his alma mater, the University of Texas, on February 1, Secretary
of State Tillerson 
suggested a
potential military coup in in the country. Tillerson
then 
visited
allied Latin American countries
 urging
regime change and more economic sanctions on Venezuela. Tillerson is
also reportedly considering banning the processing or sale of
Venezuelan oil in the United States and is discouraging other
countries from buying Venezuelan oil.

In
a series of tweets, Senator 
Marco
Rubio
,
the Republican from Florida, where many Venezuelan oligarchs live,
openly called for a military coup in Venezuela. “The world would
support the Armed Forces in 
#Venezuela if
they decide to protect the people & restore democracy by removing
a dictator,” the former presidential candidate 
tweeted.

How
absurd — remove an elected president with a military coup to
restore democracy? Does that pass the straight face test? This
refrain of Rubio and Tillerson seems to be the nonsensical public
position of U.S. policy.

The
U.S. has been 
seeking
regime change
 in
Venezuela since Hugo Chavez was elected in 1998. Trump 
joined
Presidents Obama and Bush
 before
him in continuing efforts to change the government and put in place a
U.S.-friendly oligarch government.

They
came closest in
 2002
when a military coup removed Chavez.
 The
Commander-in-Chief of the Venezuelan military announced Chavez had
resigned and 
Pedro
Carmona
,
of the Venezuelan Chamber of Commerce, became interim president.
Carmona dissolved the National Assembly and Supreme Court and
declared the Constitution void. The people surrounded the
presidential palace and seized television stations, Carmona resigned
and fled to Colombia. Within 47 hours, civilians and the military
restored Chavez to the presidency. 
The
coup was a turning point
 that
strengthened the Bolivarian Revolution, showed people could defeat a
coup and exposed the US and oligarchs.

U.S.
Regime Change Tactics Have Failed In Venezuela

The
U.S. and oligarchs continue their efforts to reverse the Bolivarian
Revolution. The United States has a long history of regime change
around the world and has tried all of its regime change tools in
Venezuela. So far they have failed.

Economic
War

Destroying
the Venezuelan economy has been an ongoing campaign by the US and
oligarchs. It is 
reminiscent
of the US coup in Chile 
which
ended the presidency of Salvador Allende. To create the environment
for the Chilean coup, President Nixon ordered the CIA to “make
the economy scream.”

Henry
Kissinger devised the coup noting a billion dollars of investment
were at stake. He also feared the “the insidious model effect” of
the example of Chile leading to other countries breaking from the
United States and capitalism. Kissinger’s top deputy at the
National Security Council, Viron Vaky, opposed the coup saying,
“What we propose is patently a violation of our own principles and
policy tenets .… If these principles have any meaning, we normally
depart from them only to meet the gravest threat … our survival.”

These
objections hold true regarding recent US coups, including in
Venezuela and Honduras, Ukraine and Brazil, among others. Allende
died in the coup and 
wrote
his last words to the people of Chile
,
especially the workers, “Long live the people! Long live the
workers!” He was replaced by Augusto Pinochet, 
a
brutal and violent dictator
.

For
decades the 
US
has been fighting an economic war
,
“making the economy scream,” in Venezuela.

Wealthy
Venezuelans have been conducting economic sabotage aided by the US
with sanctions and other tactics. This includes 
hoarding
food, supplies and other necessities
 in
warehouses or in Colombia while Venezuelan markets are bare. The
scarcity is used to fuel protests, e.g. “The March of the Empty
Pots,” a carbon copy of marches in Chile before the September 11,
1973 coup. Economic warfare has escalated 
through
Obama
 and under
Trump
,
with Tillerson now urging economic sanctions on oil.

President
Maduro recognized the economic hardship but also said 
sanctions
open up the opportunity for a new era of independence
 and
“begins the stage of post-domination by the United States, with
Venezuela again at the center of this struggle for dignity and
liberation.” The second-in-command of the Socialist Party, 
Diosdado
Cabello, said,
 “[if
they] apply sanctions, we will apply elections.”

Opposition
Protests

Another
common US regime change tool is supporting opposition protests.
The 
Trump
administration renewed regime change operations
 in
Venezuela and the anti-Maduro protests, which began under Obama, grew
more violent. The opposition protests included barricades,
snipers and murders as well as widespread injuries. When police
arrested those using violence, the US claimed Venezuela opposed free
speech and protests.

The
opposition tried to use the crack down against violence to achieve
the U.S. tactic of  dividing the military. The 
U.S.
and western media ignored opposition violence
 and
blamed the Venezuelan government instead. Violence became so extreme
it looked like the 
opposition
was pushing Venezuela into a Syrian-type civil war
.
Instead, opposition violence backfired on them.

Violent
protests are part of U.S. regime change repertoire. This was
demonstrated in the 
U.S.
coup in Ukraine
,
where the U.S. spent $5 billion to organize government opposition
including 
U.S.
and EU funding violent protesters
.
This tactic was used in early US coups like the 
1953
Iran coup
 of
Prime Minister Mossadegh. 
The
U.S. has admitted
 organizing
this 
coup
that ended Iran’s brief experience with democracy
.
Like Venezuela, a key reason for the Iran coup was control of the
nation’s oil.

Funding
Opposition

There
has been 
massive
U.S. investment in creating opposition to the Venezuelan
government
.
Tens of millions of dollars have been openly spent through USAID, the
National Endowment for Democracy and other related US regime change
agencies. It is unknown how much the CIA has spent from its secret
budget, but the 
CIA
has also been involved in Venezuela.
 Current
CIA director, Mike 
Pompeo,
said

he is “hopeful there can be a transition in Venezuela.”

The United
States has also educated leaders of opposition movements
,
e.g. 
Leopoldo
López
 was
educated at private schools in the US, including the CIA-associated
Kenyon College. He was groomed at the Harvard Kennedy School of
Government and made repeated visits to the regime change agency, the
National Republican Institute.

Elections

While
the US calls Venezuela a dictatorship, it is in fact a strong
democracy with an excellent voting system. Election observers monitor
every election.

In
2016, the economic crisis led to the opposition winning a majority in
the National Assembly. One of their first acts was to 
pass
an amnesty law
.
The law described 17 years of crimes including violent felonies and
terrorism committed by the opposition. It was an admission of crimes
back to the 2002 coup and through 2016. The law demonstrated violent
treason against Venezuela. One month later, the Supreme Court of
Venezuela 
ruled
the amnesty law was unconstitutional
.
U.S. media, regime change advocates and anti-Venezuela human rights
groups 
attacked
the Supreme Court decision
,
showing their alliance with the admitted criminals.

Years
of violent protests and regime change attempts, and then admitting
their crimes in an amnesty bill, have caused those opposed to the
Bolivarian Revolution to lose power and become unpopular.  In
three recent elections Maduro’s party 
won
regional, 
 local and
the 
Constituent
Assembly
 elections.

The
electoral commission announced the 
presidential
election will be held on April 22
.
Maduro will run for re-election with the United Socialist Party.
Opposition leaders such as Henry Ramos and Henri Falcon have
expressed interest in running, but the 
opposition
has not decided whether to participate
Henrique
Capriles, who narrowly lost to Maduro in the last election, was
banned from running for office

because of irregularities in his campaign, including taking foreign
donations. 
Capriles has
been a leader of the violent protests. When his ban was announced he
called for protests to remove Maduro from office. Also banned
was 
Leopoldo
Lopez
,
another leader of the violent protests who is under house
arrest 
serving
a thirteen year sentence for inciting violence
.

Now,
the United States says it will not recognize the presidential
election and urges a military coup. For two years, the opposition
demanded presidential elections, but now it is unclear whether they
will participate. They know they are unpopular and Maduro is likely
to be re-elected.

Is
War Against Venezuela Coming?

A
military coup faces challenges in Venezuela as the people, including
the military, are well educated about US imperialism. Tillerson
openly urging a military coup makes it more difficult.

The
government and opposition recently negotiated a peace settlement
entitled “Democratic Coexistence Agreement for Venezuela.”
They 
agreed
on all of the issues
 including
ending economic sanctions, scheduling elections and more. 
They
agreed on the date of the next presidential election.
 It
was originally planned for March, but in a concession to the
opposition, it was  rescheduled for the end of April. 
Maduro
signed the agreement
 even
though the 
opposition
did not attend
 the
signing ceremony. They backed out after Colombian President Santos,
who was meeting with Secretary Tillerson, called and told them not to
sign. 
Maduro
will now make the agreement a public issue
 by
allowing the people of Venezuela to sign it.

Not
recognizing elections and urging a military coup are bad enough, but
more disconcerting is that 
Admiral
Kurt Tidd, head of Southcom, held a closed door meeting in
Colombia
 after
Tillerson’s visit. The topic was “regional destabilization” and
Venezuela was a focus.

A
military attack on Venezuela from its Colombian and Brazilian borders
is not far fetched. In January, 
the
NY Times asked
,
“Should the US military invade Venezuela?” President 
Trump
said the US is considering US military force
 against
Venezuela. His chief of staff, John Kelly, was formerly the general
in charge of Southcom. 
Tidd
has claimed the crisis
,
created in large part by the economic war against Venezuela, requires
military action for humanitarian reasons.

War
preparations are already underway
 in
Colombia, which plays the role of Israel for the US in Latin America.
The coup government in Brazil, 
increased
its military budget 36 percent
,
and participated in 
Operation:
America United
,
the largest joint military exercise in Latin American history. It
was 
one
of four military exercises by the US
 with
Brazil, Colombia and Peru
 in
Latin America in 2017. The US 
Congress
ordered the Pentagon to develop military contingencies
 for
Venezuela in the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act.

While
there is 
opposition
to US military bases
James
Patrick Jordan explains, on our radio show,
 the
US has military bases in Colombia and the Caribbean and military
agreements with countries in the region; and therefore, Venezuela is
already surrounded.

The
United States is targeting Venezuela because the Bolivarian
Revolution provides an example against U.S. imperialism. An
invasion of Venezuela will become another war-quagmire that kills
innocent Venezuelans, U.S. soldiers and others over control of oil.
People in the United States who support the self-determination of
countries should show solidarity with Venezuelans, expose the U.S.
agenda and publicly denounce regime change. We need to educate people
about what is really happening in Venezuela to overcome the false
media coverage.

Kevin
Zeese and Margaret Flowers co-direct 
Popular
Resistance
.
[This article originally appeared
at 
https://popularresistance.org and
is republished with authors’ permission.]

By Kevin
Zeese and Margaret Flowers
 /
Republished with permission / 
Consortium
News
 / Report
a typo

==================================

Ter herinneren aan de enorme agressie van de VS: ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en:  ‘List of wars involving the United States

Zie ook:

Halliburton en Chevron hebben groot belang bij ‘regime change’ in Venezuela

Mike Pence (vicepresident VS) gaf Guaidó, de door de VS gewenste leider, groen licht voor de coup in Venezuela

VS coup tegen Maduro in volle gang……..

VS weer op oorlogspad in Latijns-Amerika: Venezuela het volgende slachtoffer…….

Als de VS stopt met spelen van ‘politieagent’ en het vernielen van de wereld, zullen de slechte krachten winnen……

VS zet Latijns-Amerikaanse landen tegen elkaar op en is bezig met voorbereiding invasie Venezuela

Trump wilde naast de economische oorlogsvoering tegen Venezuela dat land daadwerkelijk militair aanvallen……

Venezolaanse regionale verkiezingen gehekeld door westen, terwijl internationale waarnemers deze als eerlijk beoordeelden……….

Venezuela: ‘studentenprotest’ wordt uitgevoerd door ingehuurde troepen………‘ 

Venezuela: Target of Economic Warfare

Venezuela moet en zal ‘verlost’ worden van Maduro, met ‘oh wonder’ een dikke rol van de VS en de reguliere westerse media

Venezolaanse regering treedt terecht op tegen de uiterst gewelddadige oppositie!!


Venezuela ontwricht, wat de reguliere media u niet vertellen……..

VS steunt rechtse coalitie (MUD) in Venezuela………

Venezuela’s US-Backed Opposition Turns Up The Violence Following Assembly Vote

10 Things You Need to Know About the Terrorist Attack in Venezuela

Venezuelans in the Streets to Support Constituent Assembly

What Mainstream Media Got Wrong About Venezuela’s Constituent Assembly Vote‘ (met mogelijkheid tot directe vertaling)

The Left and Venezuela‘ (met mogelijkheid tot directe vertaling)

Rondje Venezuela schoppen op Radio1………

Karabulut (SP) blij dat ze Maduro eindelijk ook kan schoppen………

EU neemt uiterst hypocriet sancties tegen de Venezolaanse regering Maduro………

Abby Martin Busts Open Myths on Venezuela’s Food Crisis: ‘Shelves Fully Stocked’‘ (zie ook de video in dat artikel!)

Venezuela: de anti-propaganda van John Oliver (en het grootste deel westerse massamedia) feilloos doorgeprikt