John Bolton heeft beloofd dat Iran voor 2019 onder een ander regime zal leven…….

Met de benoemingen van John Bolton, een gewetenloze
psychopaat en zijn collega psychopaat Pompeo, kan je gerust
stellen dat Trump een oorlogskabinet heeft gevormd, zo betoogt Robert
Mackey terecht. Op 23 maart jl. publiceerde hij een
artikel op The Intercept, over de benoeming van Bolton.

Hierin vertelt Mackey o.a. dat Bolton aan
gevluchte Iraniërs in de VS heeft beloofd dat voor 2019 Iran een
andere regime zal hebben (een door de VS gewenst regime, zoals je begrijpt….) en hij dan feest komt vieren in
Teheran…….. 

Naast psychopaat is deze misdadiger ook nog eens
ongelofelijk dom immers in Irak is er nog steeds geen vrede, ondanks
de meer dan achterlijke vaststelling van zijne domme hufterigheid en oorlogsmisdadiger Bush
dat de ‘mission accomplished’ was, is het in feite nog steeds oorlog
in Irak, een oorlog die intussen aan dik meer dan 1,5 miljoen mensen het leven heeft gekost……….

Hoe denkt topidioot Bolton dan Iran in
een jaar tijd te kunnen verslaan? Iran heeft een uitermate goed
getraind leger, dit i.t.t. tot het leger dat Saddam Hoessein in Irak
ter beschikking stond….. Kernraketten gebruiken tegen Iran staat zo te horen niet op de
verlanglijst van Bolton, daar hij zelf feest wil vieren in Teheran, al zal het me niet verbazen als Bolton denkt dat een zwaar radioactief besmet gebied binnen een paar maanden ‘schoon waait’. Voorts zijn er nog de nieuwe tactische kernwapens van de VS, kernwapens die op het slagveld gebruikt moeten gaan
worden en daar alleen ‘een beperkt gebied’ zwaar radioactief besmet zouden maken…….. 

Dan is er nog de vraag wat Rusland en
China zullen doen, als de VS een oorlog tegen Iran begint (met
de kans dat de VS ook een tweede front opent op Noord-Korea), gezien de
troepenopbouw her en der…….

The
Intercept

ROBERT
MACKEY

Here’s
John Bolton Promising Regime Change in Iran by the End of 2018

Pandeli Majko, Former Prime Minister of Albania, John Bolton, Former United States Ambassador to the United Nations, Deputy Chief of U.S. Mission David Muniz, Maryam Rajavi, President elect of the Iranians Resistance, Tirana, Albania 20/03/2017 - Maryam Rajavi addressed her greeting at Nowruz celebration, the Iranian New Year, which was held at Tirana Albania with PMOI members and guests from Albania, France and United States. Maryam Rajavi said, This Nowruz harbingers end of religious dictatorship and advent of the spring of freedom. (Photo by Siavosh Hosseini/NurPhoto) *** Please Use Credit from Credit Field ***(Sipa via AP Images)

March
23 2018, 8:38 p.m.

AMONG
THOSE MOST
 alarmed
by President Donald Trump’s selection of 
John
Bolton
 as
his new national security adviser on Thursday were supporters of the
Iran nuclear deal, the 2015 international agreement that curbed
Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for a partial lifting of
economic sanctions.

Rob
Malley, who coordinated Middle East policy in the Obama
administration, observed that Bolton’s appointment, along with the
nomination of Iran deal critic Mike Pompeo as secretary of state,
seemed to signal that the agreement would most likely be “
dead
and buried

within months. Trita Parsi, leader of the National Iranian American
Council 
wrote
on Twitter
:
“People, let this be very clear: The appointment of Bolton is
essentially a declaration of war with Iran. With Pompeo and Bolton,
Trump is assembling a WAR CABINET.”

Their
alarm was understandable. Bolton, who made his name as a belligerent
member of George W. Bush’s State Department and a Fox News
contributor, has not only 
demanded that
the Trump administration withdraw from the nuclear deal, he also
previously advocated 
bombing
Iran instead
.
Bolton has spent the better part of a decade 
calling
for
 the
United States to help 
overthrow the
theocratic government in Tehran and hand power to a cult-like group
of Iranian exiles with no real support inside the country.

John Bolton

@AmbJohnBolton

Withdrawing from the Iran should be a top @realDonaldTrump administration priority.

Just
eight months ago, at a Paris gathering, Bolton told members of the
Iranian exile group, known as the Mujahedeen Khalq, MEK, or People’s
Mujahedeen, that the Trump administration should embrace their goal
of immediate regime change in Iran and recognize their group as a
“viable” alternative.

The
outcome of the president’s policy review should be to determine
that the Ayatollah Khomeini’s 1979 revolution will not last until
its 40th birthday,” 
Bolton
said
.
(The 40th anniversary of the Iranian revolution will be on February
11, 2019.) “The declared policy of the United States should be the
overthrow of the mullahs’ regime in Tehran,” Bolton added. “The
behavior and the objectives of the regime are not going to change
and, therefore, the only solution is to change the regime itself.”

As
the Iranian expatriate journalist Bahman Kalbasi noted, Bolton
concluded his address to the exiles with a rousing promise: “And
that’s why, before 2019, we here will celebrate in Tehran!”

Bahman Kalbasi

@BahmanKalbasi

8 months ago among MEK supporters tells them they will overthrow ’s regime and celebrate in with Bolton himself present, “before 2019”

To
understand how extraordinary it is that the man about to become the
president’s most senior national security official made this
promise to the MEK, it is important to know that, until recently, the
Iranian dissidents had spent three decades trying to achieve their
aims through violence, including terrorist attacks.

After
members of the MEK helped foment the 1979 revolution, in part
by 
killing
American civilians
 working
in Tehran, the group then lost a bitter struggle for power to the
Islamists led by the revolution’s leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah
Khomeini. With its leadership forced to flee Iran in 1981, the MEK’s
members set up a government-in-exile in France and established a
military base in Iraq, where they were given arms and training by
Saddam Hussein, as part of a strategy to destabilize the government
in Tehran that he was at war with.

In
recent years, as 
The
Intercept has reported
,
the MEK has poured millions of dollars into reinventing itself as a
moderate political group ready to take power in Iran if
Western-backed regime change ever takes place. To that end,
it 
lobbied
successfully
 to
be removed from the State Department’s 
list
of foreign terrorist organizations
 in
2012. The Iranian exiles achieved this over the apparent opposition
of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in part by paying 
a
long list of former U.S. officials
 hefty
speaking fees of between $10,000 to $50,000 for hymns of praise like
the one Bolton delivered last July.

But, according
to Ariane Tabatabai
,
a Georgetown University scholar, the “cult-like dissident group”
— whose married members were reportedly 
forced
to divorce and take a vow of lifelong celibacy
 —
“has no viable chance of seizing power in Iran.”

If
the current government is not Iranians’ first choice for a
government, the MEK is not even their last — and for good reason.
The MEK supported Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq War. The
people’s discontent with the Iranian government at that time did
not translate into their supporting an external enemy that was firing
Scuds into Tehran, using chemical weapons and killing hundreds of
thousands of Iranians, including many civilians. Today, the MEK is
viewed negatively by most Iranians, who would prefer to maintain the
status quo than rush to the arms of what they consider a corrupt,
criminal cult.

Despite
such doubts that the MEK’s political wing, the National Council of
Resistance of Iran, is any more reliable than Ahmad Chalabi’s Iraqi
National Congress proved to be, spending lavishly on paid
endorsements has earned the group a bipartisan roster of Washington
politicians willing to sign up as supporters. At 
a
previous gala
,
in 2016, Bolton was joined in singing the group’s praises by
another former U.N. ambassador, 
Bill
Richardson
; a
former attorney general, 
Michael
Mukasey
; the
former State Department spokesperson 
P.J.
Crowley
; the
former Homeland Security adviser 
Frances
Townsend
; the
former Rep. 
Patrick
Kennedy
,
D-R.I.; and the former Vermont Gov. 
Howard
Dean
.
That Paris gala was hosted by 
Linda
Chavez
,
a former Reagan administration official.

At
a similar event this January, the backdrop behind former Speaker of
the House Newt Gingrich, as he praised MEK leader Maryam Rajavi, made
the aim of the group’s investment in American politicians clear.

Newt Gingrich, Auvers sur Oise, France 19/01/2018 - Maryam Rajavi and Newt Gingrich in a conference on January 19, 2018 in the office of NCRI, Auvers sur Oise, north of Paris speaks to support the uprising of the Iranian people for regime change. Newt Gingrich, Former Speaker of the United States House of Representatives said this is the opportunity that Iranian diaspora and people inside Iran have to get rid of this dictatorship. Rom/TME/SIPA (Sipa via AP Images)

Newt
Gingrich addressed a Paris conference of the Iranian exile group
known as the MEK in January.

 Photo:
Sipa via AP Images

Unsurprisingly,
leading figures from among the exile group’s Washington
followers have expressed delight over Bolton’s impending elevation
to the White House

Alireza Jafarzadeh


@A_Jafarzadeh

.@AmbJohnBolton has the right vision and great understanding of the whole region especially the threat from the Iranian regime and the need for a . https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/976948306927607810 

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Shirin Nariman@ShirinNariman

Congratulations to @AmbJohnBolton for the new post. Well deserved. https://twitter.com/orgiac/status/976950153469886464 

At
the group’s celebration of Nowruz, the Persian New Year, in Albania
on Tuesday, Rajavi was 
joined
on stage
 by
Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City.

Maryam Rajavi

@Maryam_Rajavi

Mr. Giuliani reiterated that unlike other countries in the region, there is an alternative to the ruling regime in Iran. Thus, its overthrow will lead to peace and tranquillity in a region that has been severely threatened by the clerical regime.

Although
the official announcement from the White House was not made until
Thursday, Giuliani told the group, to loud applause, that Bolton “is
going to be President Trump’s national security adviser.”

In
case there was any doubt among the exiles that Bolton might not
advise Trump to overthrow Iran’s government, Giuliani assured them
that “if anything, John Bolton has become more determined that
there needs to be regime change in Iran, that the nuclear agreement
needs to be burned, and that you need to be in charge of that
country.”

Moments
later, Giuliani led the crowd in chanting “regime change.”

Despite
the fact that Trump ran for office as a critic of the decision to
invade Iraq, Bolton still refuses to call the preemptive attack a
mistake.

That
position stunned even Fox News’s Tucker Carlson, during an
interview two weeks ago. After Carlson 
pointed
out
 that
Bolton had called for regime change in Iraq, Libya, Iran, and Syria,
and the first of those had been “a disaster,” Bolton disagreed,
saying, “I think your analysis is simple-minded, frankly.”

I
think the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, that military action, was a
resounding success,” Bolton told Carlson. The chaos that followed
in Iraq, he said, was caused by a poorly executed occupation that
ended too soon. On the bright side, Bolton said, the mistakes the
U.S. made in Iraq offered “lessons about what to do after a regime
is overthrown” in the future.

Top
Photo: At a 2017 celebration of Nowruz, the Persian New Year, in
Albania, Maryam Rajavi, the MEK leader and self-styled
president-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, met
international supporters including John Bolton, second from left, a
former United States
Ambassador
to the United Nations. Bolton was flanked by Pandeli Majko, a former
prime minister of Albania, far left, and David Muniz, the deputy
chief of the U.S. Embassy in Albania.

=============================

Bij het tweede weergegeven Twitterbericht hoort een video die ik niet kan overnemen, hier de link naar het originele artikel.

Zie ook: ‘John Bolton, nationaal veiligheidsadviseur, alsof de duivel zelf is benoemd……..

       en: ‘Rex Tillerson (VS BuZA) geeft toe dat de VS een staatsgreep wil uitvoeren in Iran…….. Het is nog ‘iets te rustig’ in dat gebied……..

       en: ‘Lt. General McInerney says Obama helped build ISIS with Weapons from Benghazi

       en: ‘VS liegt schaamteloos om het westen verder op te zetten tegen Iran……..

      en: ‘Iraanse protesten allesbehalve compleet spontaan (zoals VS ambassadeur bij de VN Haley durfde te stellen…)….

       en: ‘Protesten Iran opgezet door de VS en Israël

       en: ‘Iran, de protesten en wat de media je niet vertellen………

       en: ‘De VS gaf meer dan 1 miljoen dollar uit om protesten tegen Iraans bewind uit te buiten (en te organiseren)

       en: ‘Het verborgen motief achter de Israëlische agressie tegen Iran en Syrië

       en: ‘VS bewandelt dezelfde weg richting Iran, als die voor de illegale oorlog tegen Irak in 2003, aldus één van de verantwoordelijken voor die oorlog……..

       en: ‘Netanyahu vergelijkt Iran met nazi-Duitsland en stelt dat Iran een bedreiging is voor de wereldvrede….. ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Washington uit op oorlog met Iran……

       en: ‘Oliemaatschappijen weigeren n.a.v. VS sancties de jet van Iraanse minister af te tanken

       en: ‘Israël bezig met voorbereiding op meerdere fronten oorlog…….. (met hulp van de VS

       en: ‘Saoedi-Arabië dreigt Iran aan te vallen voor vanuit Jemen afgevuurde ‘raketten’ op Saoedische ‘doelen……….’

       en: ‘VS rechter gelast Iran miljarden te betalen aan de families van 911 slachtoffers…..

       en: ‘Iran moet hangen en Iran-deal moet van tafel……. Israël speelt wolf in schaapskleren

       en: ‘VS ambtenaren: Israël zoekt steun VS voor oorlog tegen Iran…….

       en: ‘Netanyahu en Bolton stoken het vuur in het Midden-Oosten verder op: Iran moet en zal vallen…..

       en: ‘Trump beloofde geen extra oorlog in het Midden-Oosten >> toch heeft hij het pad vrijgemaakt voor oorlog tegen Iran……

       en: ‘VS ‘laat zien op vrede uit te zijn’ door dreiging Iran te vermorzelen……

      en: ‘Iran: wanneer heeft dit land voor het laatst een ander land aangevallen? 200 jaar geleden…..

Mijn excuus voor de af en toe belabberde weergave.

John Bolton, nationaal veiligheidsadviseur, alsof de duivel zelf is benoemd……..

Mensen
ik had het bericht, waarin wordt ‘gesproken’ over de vervanging van figuren rond het beest
Trump, ‘nog niet gepubliceerd’
* of men maakte bekend dat
McMaster, zelf al een enorme ploert van formaat, werd  afgezet door
het beest, om plaats te maken voor John Bolton, ofwel de duivel
zelf….. (zo niet dan toch één van diens trouwste medewerkers…)

Bolton
schreef onlangs ‘geheel toevallig een’ opiniestuk’ in de Wall Street Journal
dat de VS Noord-Korea moet aanvallen…. uit zelfbehoud!!! ha! ha!
ha! ha! ha! Alsof Noord-Korea ooit ook maar een miljoenste van een
seconde een gevaar is geweest voor de VS……. Ja ik lach wel, maar
deze opperploert is werkelijk een gevaar voor de hele wereld…….

Alsof
je een oorlogsmisdadiger, die je minstens als terrorist moet zien,
minister van defensie maakt…. Oh ja, deze benoeming is in feite nog erger…!!

Bolton
is één van de hoofdverantwoordelijken voor de illegale oorlog tegen
Irak, waar hij de massavernietigingsfabel bleef herhalen als
ambassadeur bij de VN……… Al moest je ofwel een topidioot zijn
om dit te geloven, dan wel een kwaadaardige collaborateur van de VS, of lobbyist van andere westerse regeringen zijn die achter deze illegale oorlog stonden (zoals de reguliere westerse media….)…. Hoewel een lobbyist van het militair-industrieel complex, of een combi van het e.e.a. heel goed mogelijk is………

Met
Pompeo, een andere opperschoft op Buitenlandse Zaken, een groot
voorstander van oorlog tegen Iran en Noord-Korea, laat zich raden wat
er op het ‘menu staat…..’ (één of het liefst twee illegale oorlogen,
misschien zelfs met het gebruik van ‘tactische’ kernwapens, zodat deze getest kunnen worden in de praktijk…….)

Ik
hoef je niet te vertellen wat hiervan het gevolg zal zijn….. Och,
waarom ook niet: Rusland zal dit zeker niet pikken en waarschijnlijk
zal China al evenmin op de handen blijven zitten, ofwel
WOIII zal dan een voldongen feit zijn………

Hoe
is het mogelijk dat de westerse media zo relatief gelaten reageren op
deze laatste benoemingen…..??? Ach ja, die zien niet eens de
grootschalige terreur die de VS uitoefent op een explosief deel van
de wereld….. Sterker: nog steeds durft men daar niet te stellen
dat de VS meehelpt aan een genocide op de sjiitische bevolking van
Jemen……

Darius Shahtahmasebi noemt Bolton America’s Worst Nightmare, ik zou een stap verder willen gaan en hem daarom de ergste nachtmerrie voor de wereld willen noemen…..

America’s
Worst Nightmare

March
23, 2018 at 11:45 am

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed) — John
Bolton’s inclusion in the Trump administration as Donald Trump’s
new national security advisor is nothing short of a nightmare.

Bolton,
a former U.N. ambassador under George W. Bush, will be replacing
General H.R. McMaster as Trump’s national security advisor, who
replaced former “disgraced” national security advisor Michael
Flynn. When the president struck a Syrian airbase in April 2017, it
was McMaster who drew up and briefed Trump on the
 strike
proposals
,
one of which was
 reportedly
very extensive
.

McMaster
was also
 reportedly one
of the main backers of a secret plan to give North Korea’s Kim
Jong-un a “bloody nose strike,” a limited strike to dismantle its
nuclear ambitions without risking an all-out war.

However,
despite this, it appears McMaster wasn’t hawkish enough for Donald
Trump’s needs. While McMaster
 publicly
berates Iran
 and
North Korea on a regular basis, he persistently warned against
Trump’s plan to completely derail the Joint Comprehensive Plan of
Action (JCPOA) formed with Iran in 2015. He also later
 denied the
claims that the Trump administration was looking to deliver the
“bloody nose strike” on North Korea, perhaps indicating he was
not completely on board with the idea after all (or had decided
otherwise at that particular juncture in history).

Enter
John Bolton. Less than month ago, he wrote an op-ed article published
by the 
Wall
Street Journal 
(WSJ) entitled “The
Legal Case for Striking North Korea First” — an idea so bad, it
seems, that about a week later, the 
WSJ published
a counter viewpoint simply entitled “Striking North Korea First Is
a Bad Proposal.”

In
Bolton’s short-sighted op-ed — aside from the fact that he offers
no real legal analysis at all (those who do consider it a legal
analysis must explain why the argument of preemptive self-defense
applies to the U.S. but not to North Korea, which faces American
aggression near
its borders on a routine basis) — it’s also quite telling that he
relies on the evidence of CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who 
alleged in
January that Pyongyang was only “a handful of months” away from
being able to strike the American mainland with nukes.

It
is no coincidence that next in line for Donald Trump’s secretary of
state position is Pompeo himself.

Together,
Bolton and Pompeo will be able to advise Trump on anti-North Korean
and anti-Iranian platforms so hawkish there is no telling what’s to
come (though we have a fairly decent idea).

As
some of you may know, John Bolton’s hawkishness has already led to
some of the most despicable 
foreign
policy agendas
 of
our generation.

We
are confident that Saddam Hussein has hidden weapons of mass
destruction and production facilities in Iraq,”
 Bolton
famously
 said in
2002 while serving as President George W. Bush’s undersecretary of
state for Arms Control and International Security. He also called
Hussein a “threat to the region” and claimed he needed to be
“disarmed.”

But
the end of the story is clear here. And if Saddam Hussein does not
co-operate we have made it clear this is the last chance for him…I
think the Iraqi people would be unique in history if they didn’t
welcome the overthrow of this dictatorial regime,”
 he
added.

Even
when this rationale for invading Iraq and destabilizing an entire
region turned out to be one of the worst editions of “fake news”
ever to sting the planet, in 2015 – some 12 years later – Bolton
still 
claimed the
Iraq War was worth it and said that, conversely, the worst decision
involving Iraq was the “
2011
decision to withdraw U.S. and coalition forces.

In 2016, he then
 changed
his mind
 to
say that the only mistake of the Iraq War was that the U.S. did not
get rid of Saddam Hussein sooner.

If
John Bolton leads the cheers to invade Iran or North Korea, who will
hold him accountable?

Apparently
having learned no lessons at all from the criminal invasion of Iraq,
Bolton also wrote a 
New
York Times
 op-ed entitled
“To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran” in 2015. He made it quite
clear that “only military action” could accomplish what was
required to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. In Bolton’s
eyes, the JCPOA doesn’t cut it.

He
also openly
 called
for the assassination
 of
Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, only to later condemn
the
 Obama
administration
 for
doing just that (an invasion is bad if a Democrat does it, and 
vice
versa, of course
,
depending on who you are running against).

John
Bolton is also a
 strong
anti-Russian
,
drone-warfare
 supporting imperialist
who once also appeared to call
 for
the invasion of Cuba
.

He
is now going to be advising Donald Trump, a seventy-one-year-old
 mass
murdering
 narcissist
 with
an attention span of
 two
to four minutes
,
on matters of national security.

Op-ed
Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

==============================================

*
Zie: ‘Wereld Oorlog III: is deze nog te ontwijken?‘ 

Zie ook: ‘NEOCONS ARE BACK WITH A BIG WAR BUDGET AND BIG WAR PLANS‘ (een column van Ron Paul, overgenomen van Stan van Houcke)

        en: ‘Noord-Korea en de VS: de planning van de VS om Rusland en China aan te vallen met kernraketten……..

        en: ‘Wereldoorlog III: is deze nog te ontwijken?

        en: ‘John Bolton heeft beloofd dat Iran voor 2019 onder een ander regime zal leven…….

        en: ‘VS nu definitief op oorlogspad tegen China…..

        en: ‘Netanyahu en Bolton stoken het vuur in het Midden-Oosten verder op: Iran moet en zal vallen…..

       en: ‘Trump beloofde geen extra oorlog in het Midden-Oosten >> toch heeft hij het pad vrijgemaakt voor oorlog tegen Iran……‘  

Heleen Mees, Trump heeft gelijk met zijn handelsoorlog tegen China……….

Heleen Mees, je weet wel, die de kredietcrisis/bankencrisis niet zag aankomen en daarna doodleuk stelde dat de spaardrift van consumenten en China de schuldigen waren, i.p.v. de inhalige banken die zeker in de VS werkelijk iedereen een hypotheek aansmeerden…….. De VS kredietverstrekkers begonnen de slechte leningen (zoals deze hypotheken) te bundelen en verkochten deze aan de hijgerige banken in de EU en andere landen waar men niet te nauw keek naar de enorme schulden onder de bevolking en de onmogelijkheid deze geleende gelden ooit terug te krijgen…….. (van een kale kip….)

Deze Mees, overigens ook bekend als stalker in de VS, vindt dat Trump gelijk heeft met zijn importheffing op Chinees staal en aluminium…. Ze heeft begrip voor deze actie daar China alle banen uit de VS inpikte met haar export naar de VS……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Mees durft zich econoom (jurist en publicist van nare schrijfsels) te noemen en heeft niet begrepen dat een handelsoorlog heel goed de aanleiding kan zijn voor een echte oorlog…….

Hoe is het mogelijk dat een econoom niet heeft gezien hoe de grote bedrijven uit de VS langzaam maar zeker hun fabrieken verplaatsten richting China en andere lagelonenlanden, terwijl de eigenaren spuug hemel rijk zijn en minstens een deel van het jaar in de VS wonen, raakten miljoenen hun baan kwijt…. Dat noemt Mees ‘het inpikken van banen door China…….’

De miljonairs en miljardairs die  verantwoordelijk waren voor de enorme ‘outsourcing’ (uitbesteding van werk naar lagelonenlanden) van fabrieken en/of enorme automatisering (die wel degelijk veel banen heeft gekost en zal kosten) worden voor al deze uitbuiterij hartelijk bedankt door Trump met een fikse belastingverlaging en uitsluiting van buitenlandse concurrentie………..

Econoom Mees heeft er blijkbaar geen probleem mee dat deze door Trump begonnen handelsoorlog, wel eens kan zorgen voor juist een vergroting van de werkloosheid en een nog grotere armoede in de VS…..

Intussen chanteert de Trump administratie de EU, als deze niet voldoet aan de eisen van de VS, zal dit middels een enorme genocide gestolen land, waarschijnlijk in mei importheffingen leggen op een fiks aantal producten uit de EU……..

Zie ook: ‘De VS: de meest ‘vergeven’ voedselindustrie ter wereld……. VS importheffing op staal is een zegen voor de EU bevolking!

        en: ‘Witte Huis met grote bek over Chinese importheffingen, terwijl de VS zelf meerdere producten dumpt op de wereldmarkt…..

Voor meer berichten waarin hufter Mees voorkomt, klik op het label met haar naam, direct onder dit bericht.

Puigdemont de gevluchte Catalaanse politicus is gearresteerd door de Duitse politie…….

WDR 5 meldt zojuist dat de gevluchte Catalaanse politicus Carles Puigdemont door de Duitse politie werd gearresteerd toen hij zich in een auto bevond in de buurt van Hamburg.

Je kan er donder op zeggen dat de Spaanse geheime dienst Puigdemont in de gaten heeft gehouden en de Duitse politie heeft gewaarschuwd….. Ofwel: de Spaanse staat is haar boekje te buitengegaan door geheimagenten in te zetten in het buitenland (België) om daar een onderdaan te bespieden (voor hetzelfde geld had men hem om laten leggen….)….. Ongelofelijk dat de politie in Duitsland blijkbaar gemene zaak hebben gemaakt met de Spaanse autocratische regering……

Hoe kan een ‘democratie’ als Duitsland een buitenlandse politicus arresteren, alleen op grond van een gehouden referendum over de onafhankelijkheid van Catalonië, waarna hij de onafhankelijkheid uitriep van Catalonië…….. De onafhankelijkheid van Catalonië, godbetert een wens die al een paar honderd jaar bestaat bij het Catalaanse volk….. Alleen het houden van het referendum, het ultieme democratische gereedschap, was al teveel voor Rajoy…….

Puigdemont had geen andere keus dan de onafhankelijkheid uitroepen, daar Rajoy van de fascistische Partido Popular, al in 2006 Catalonië een groot deel van de autonomie afnam…….

Daartegen werd geen woord van protest gegeven door de EU, of in dit geval door Duitsland…… Geen commentaar van de EU (of Duitsland) op Rajoy toen hij het referendum onmogelijk probeerde te maken, geen protest tegen het keiharde geweld van de politie tegen de Catalaanse bevolking, toen zij ter stembus gingen en in demonstraties daarna……Echter als Rajoy zich op Duits grondgebied bevindt, wordt hij wel gearresteerd……. Alleen dit feit is al genoeg om uit de EU te stappen, we hebben meer dan genoeg aan een organisatie als de EEG!!

Schande!!

Zie ookSpaanse verkiezingen: Steven Adolf (schrijver, journalist en ‘Spanje kenner’) slaat de plank volkomen mis

        en: ‘Spaanse regering hekelt ‘gewelddadige protesten’ in Catalonië

        en: ‘Puigdemont godzijdank vrij burger!!

        en: ‘Puigdemont mag volgens de Duitse rechter worden uitgeleverd aan Spanje…… Alweer een zwarte dag voor de EU….

        en: ‘Duitse procureur generaal wil Puigdemont uitleveren……..


          en:Catalonië onafhankelijk: waarom hoor je EU landen (en de EU zelf) niet over de zware inperking van de democratie in Spanje?

        en: ‘Spain’s Suppression of the Catalonia Independence Movement Is Backfiring

        en: ‘Spanje bewijst het gelijk van Catalonië’s wens voor onafhankelijkheid……

        en: ‘Spanje denkt met fascistisch geweld de roep om onafhankelijkheid van Catalonië de kop in te kunnen drukken…….


       en: ‘Catalaanse onafhankelijkheid door een andere bril dan die van de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

        en: ‘Spaanse koning Felipe VI waant zich met commentaar op Catalaanse onafhankelijkheidsstreven in lang vervlogen tijden……

        en:  ‘Timmermans (PvdA EU) over Catalonië: proportioneel geweld is soms gerechtvaardigd…….. AUW!!!

        en: ‘Timmermans (PvdA EU): “There can be no human rights without the rule of law….”

       en: ‘Bankenmaffia chanteert het Catalaanse volk……..

       en: ‘Rajoy neemt gas terug, maar verklaart in feite tegelijkertijd dat hij het Catalaanse parlement buiten werking zal stellen……….

       en: ‘Geert Mak over Catalonië: de Catalanen slaan aperte nonsens uit…….. Hoor wie het zegt… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘BBC World Service en hoogleraar Radboud met gekleurd ‘Catalaans commentaar…….’

       en: ‘Catalonië: Karel de Gucht >> de EU moet zich uitspreken tegen ondemocratisch Spaans geweld!

       en: ‘Catalonië en Puigdemont gefeliciteerd met de dikke overwinning van de onafhankelijkheid coalitie!

       en: ‘Catalonië: Spaanse koning Flip VI roept Catalanen in zijn kersttoespraak op tot verdraagzaamheid en en eenheid……..

Oorlogszuchtige TV dominees……..

Dagelijks worden miljoenen christenen
in de VS gehersenspoeld door TV dominees met een uitgesproken mening
over de fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël en de vaststelling dat Iran moet worden
vernietigd…. Deze ‘christenen’ keerden zich zelfs tegen de nucleaire deal met Iran………

Het publiek dat deze misdadige dominees bereiken, vertegenwoordigt een groot deel van de kiezers in de
VS….. ‘Misdadigers’ daar dit geteisem voor het overgrote deel
multimiljonair is en vooral goed voor zichzelf zorgt…….

Waarom worden dit soort figuren amper
of niet aangepakt en krijgen ze zelfs belastingvoordelen? Simpel,
daar ze o.a. het keiharde buitenlandbeleid van de VS verdedigen en
uitdragen, beter gezegd propaganderen…… Ofwel deze predikers zijn
oorlogshitsers, die lullig genoeg vele miljoenen burgers hersenspoelen met hun religieuze gif………….. Bovendien zaaien ze met deze hersenspoeling angst en haat tegen alles wat links of islamitisch is en/of zich tegen Israël keert, waar de TV dominees Israël steunen in alles wat deze moorddadige fascistische apartheidsstaat flikt en uitdraagt………

Over onrechtmatige beïnvloeding van verkiezingen gesproken: vergeleken met de leugens over deze beïnvloeding door de  Russen, zelfs als deze waar zouden zijn (wat meer dan eens bewezen niet zo is..), is de invloed van de TV dominees gigantisch veel groter….. Sterker nog: daar kunnen de gevolgen van die leugens, (‘invloed uitoefenen op VS kiezers’ door Rusland) niet eens in de schaduw staan bij de directe beïnvloeding van de verkiezingen, door deze zogenaamde christelijke dominees……. (dominees die zich niet eens houden aan wat hun here jezus hen in de bijbel heeft voorgeschreven………)

Gezien het voorgaande, kan je de TV dominees medeverantwoordelijk houden voor de vele massamoorden door de VS gepleegd!! (sinds het einde van WOII heeft de VS meer dan 22 miljoen mensen vermoord…..)……… Het lullige bij dit alles is, dat de administraties van de opvolgende presidenten in de VS maar al te graag de ‘christelijke’ kaart spelen……..

Hier de video van Brasscheck TV: 

Christians
for War

AN
EXAMPLE OF THE DAILY ON AIR MADNESS

Religion
Inc.
The
“War on Terror” is a Fraud

TRAITORS
WITH A RELIGIOUS TAX EXEMPTION

(This
was aired when Obama was President.)

Every
day US televangelists are on TV telling their Christian viewers that
they are “required” to support Israel and that countries like
Iran merit total destruction.

The
problem is tens of millions consume this garbage every day and people
with these beliefs constitute the biggest voting block in America.

Why
are these crooks (Bakker was jailed for a massive financial fraud)
given a tax exemption for their broadcasting operations?

They’re
political propagandists pure and simple

=======================================

Hier nog een video van Rob Muntz over TV dominees:

VS verloor meer dan 21 biljoen dollar, alleen aan oorlogsvoering al meer dan 11 biljoen >> ‘mooi voorbeeld voor ‘zuinige’ NAVO partners….’

Professor
Mark Skidmore van de Michigan State University ging uitzoeken waar
6,5 biljoen dollar was gebleven, 6,5 biljoen die niet waren goedgekeurd door
het Congres en kwam er achter dat het werkelijke bedrag veel groter
was dan eerder aangegeven en uiteindelijk uitkomt op 21 biljoen (in VS aangeduid als 21 triljoen dollar) niet goedgekeurde uitgaven….

Voor het ‘defensie’ budget bedroeg dit bedrag al meer dan 11 biljoen……. En
dan wil Trump dat de andere NAVO partners hun budgetten verder
opschroeven……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Moet je nagaan: de VS het land dat
graag woorden gebruikt als ‘corrupte regering’ en ‘democratie brengen’ als een regime niet
in de smaak valt…… 

Ongelofelijk!

Vergeet voorts niet dat de VS alleen deze eeuw al 4 illegale oorlogen is gestart, oorlogen die een enorm beslag leggen op het defensie uh oorlogsbudget…… De VS geeft alleen al 4 keer zoveel aan defensie uit dan Rusland en China samen! De NAVO lidstaten Groot-Brittannië, Frankrijk, Duitsland en Italië geven al meer dan 3 keer zoveel uit aan defensie dan Rusland……. En maar zeiken om meer geld en dat om de ongebreidelde terreur van de VS en het uitlokken van oorlogen elders te steunen………

Overigens heeft Trump het leger ‘carte blanche’ gegeven om naar eigen goeddunken extra personeel of wapens in te zetten, zodat controle op de uitgegeven gelden nog veel moeilijker zal worden…….

Hier
de video van Brasscheck TV over deze zaak: 

$21
trillion missing from the federal buget

WHERE
DID IT GO?

Government
corruption

FEDERAL
BLACK BUDGETS

Professor
Mark Skidmore of Michigan State University set out to prove Catherine
Austin Fitts and her claims of “missing trillions” and “black
budgets” was wrong.

Instead,
he discovered the hole was even bigger than that.

The
Army alone had $11.5 trillion missing.

Some
individual unsupported journal adjustments are SIX TIMES the total
annual budget of the Army.

A
overall 1% error in government budgets is considered “normal.”

Theese
numbers are astronomical.

How
can you do a proper evaluation of numbers with figures like this? All
spending needs to be a approved by Congress.

It
looks like there’s a whole lot of money flowing in and a whole lot
of money flowing out”…completely outside the rule of law.

===========================

Hier nog een artikel van Forbes over deze zaak:

Has
Our Government Spent $21 Trillion Of Our Money Without Telling Us?

Laurence
Kotlikoff 
CONTRIBUTOR

I
am co-authoring this column with Mark Skidmore, a Professor of
Economics at Michigan State University. 

No
Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of
Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of
the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published
from time to time.”
 ~
Article I, Section 9, Clause 7, The US Constitution

On
July 26, 2016, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) issued a
report “Army General Fund Adjustments Not Adequately Documented or
Supported”.  The report indicates that for fiscal year 2015
the Army failed to provide adequate support for $6.5 trillion in
journal voucher adjustments.  
According to
the GAO’s Comptroller General, “Journal vouchers are
summary-level accounting adjustments made when balances between
systems cannot be reconciled. Often these journal vouchers are
unsupported, meaning they lack supporting documentation to justify
the adjustment or are not tied to specific accounting
transactions…. For an auditor, 
journal
vouchers are a red flag
 for
transactions not being captured, reported, or summarized correctly.”

(Note,
after Mark Skidmore began inquiring about OIG-reported
unsubstantiated adjustments, the OIG’s webpage, which 
documented, albeit in a highly incomplete manner, these unsupported
“accounting adjustments,”  was mysteriously taken
down. Fortunately, Mark copied the July 2016 report and all other
relevant OIG-reports in advance and reposted them 
here.
Mark has repeatedly tried to contact Lorin Venable, Assistant
Inspector General at the Office of the Inspector General.  He
has emailed, phoned, and used LinkedIn to ask Ms. Venable about OIG’s
disclosure of unsubstantiated adjustments, but she has not
responded.)

Given
that the entire Army budget in fiscal year 2015 was $120 billion,
unsupported adjustments were 54 times the level of spending
authorized by Congress.  The July 2016 report indicates that
unsupported adjustments are the result of the Defense Department’s
“failure to correct system deficiencies.” The result,
according to the report, is that data used to prepare the year-­end
financial statements were unreliable and lacked an adequate audit
trail. The report indicates that just 170 transactions accounted for
$2.1 trillion in year—end unsupported adjustments.  No
information is given about these 170 transactions.  In addition
many thousands of transactions with unsubstantiated adjustments 
were, according to the report, removed by the Army.

There
is no explanation concerning why they were removed nor their
magnitude. The July 2016 report states, “In addition, DFAS
(Defense Finance and Accounting Service) Indianapolis personnel did
not document or support why DDRS (The Defense Department Reporting
System) removed at least 16,513 of 1.3 million feeder file records
during the Third Quarter.”

An
appendix to the July 2016 report shows $2 trillion in changes to the
Army General Fund balance sheet due to unsupported adjustments. On
the asset side, there is $794 billion increase in the Army’s Fund
Balance with the U.S. Treasury.  There is also an increase of
$929 billion in the Army’s Accounts Payable. This information raises
additional major questions. First, what is the source of the
additional $794 billion in the Army’s Fund Balance? This adjustment
represents more than six times appropriated spending. 

Second,
do these transfers represent a flow of funds to the Army beyond those
authorized by Congress? Third, were these funds authorized and if so
when and by whom? Fourth, what is the source of these funds? Finally,
the $929 billion in Accounts Payable appears to represent an amount
owed for items or services purchased on credit. What entities have
received or will receive payment?

The
July 2016 report is not the only such report of unsubstantiated
adjustments. Mark Skidmore and Catherine Austin Fitts, former
Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development,  conducted
a search of government websites and found similar reports dating back
to 1998.  While the documents are incomplete, original
government sources indicate
 $21
trillion
 in
unsupported adjustments have been reported for the Department of
Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the
years 1998-2015.

While
government budgets can be complex, our government, like any business,
can track receipts and payments and share this information in ways
that can be understood by the public.  The ongoing occurrence
and gargantuan nature of unsupported, i.e., undocumented, U.S.
federal government expenditures as well as sources of funding for
these expenditures should be a great concern to all tax payers.

Taken
together these reports point to a failure to comply with basic
Constitutional and legislative requirements for spending and
disclosure. We urge the House and Senate Budget Committee to initiate
immediate investigations of unaccounted federal expenditures as well
as the source of their payment.

PS,
On December 11, 2017 we learned that the key documents had been
reposted on the OIG website, but with different URLs. On October 5,
2017 we discovered that the link to the report “Army General Fund
Adjustments Not Adequately Documented or Supported” had been
disabled. Within a several days, the links to other OIG documents we
identified in our search were also disabled. The sequential
non-random nature of this disabling process suggests a purposeful
decision on the part of OIG to make key documents unavailable to the
public via the website, as opposed to website reorganization, etc. We
also revisited the website intermittently to see whether the
documents had been reposted under different URLs—until very
recently they had not been reposted. The OIG link to the most report
“Army General Fund Adjustments Not Adequately Documented or
Supported”, which indicates $6.5 trillion in unsupported
adjustments, can now be found 
here:
We are currently searching the OIG website for the other reports and
will share the links 
here once
we have completed the search.

……….nogmaals: ongelofelijk!!!

VS gebruikt sociale media om ‘fake comment’ te verspreiden en de bevolking te hersenspoelen met leugens, ofwel ‘fake news….’

De
algehele hysterie over ‘fake news’ (of: ‘nepnieuws’) is compleet en al dik meer dan een jaar gaande, waarbij de
sociale media werden aangewezen als de verspreiders, terwijl de echte
makers en verspreiders van nepnieuws juist de reguliere media zijn, zie de berichtgeving voorafgaand aan
de illegale oorlogen tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië, plus de
berichtgeving over Oekraïne (en ga nog maar een tijd door…….)

Nu
is er nieuws opgedoken over de VS overheid (en het leger) die al
actief negatief nieuws over de overheid en bijvoorbeeld het leger te
lijf gaan met een fiks aantal verzonnen personen, die meerdere
identiteiten hebben op het internet, personages die het echte nieuws
onderuit moeten halen. Het leger van de VS heeft al een klein
legertje aan personen samengesteld om hun werk te doen. Overigens heeft Israël al eerder aangekondigd kritiek en negatief nieuws op/over deze fascistische apartheidsstaat aan te zullen vallen met een ‘snelle reactiemacht…..’* 

Overigens dient opgemerkt te worden dat de VS en Israël nog iets verder gaan dan alleen kritiek aan te vallen, daar ze actief nepnieuws zullen verspreiden die bijvoorbeeld de uitgeoefende staatsterreur (in binnen en buitenland) moeten rechtvaardigen…… 

Topmilitairen van de VS zien in deze vorm van volksverlakkerij een belangrijk wapen om de
bevolking te beïnvloeden, bijvoorbeeld (weer) met het schoonpraten van de
grootschalige terreur die dit leger op meerdere plaatsen in de wereld
uitoefent…….

Lees
de volgende stap in het vervolmaken van de Big Brother staat zoals
door George Orwell beschreven, alleen gaat de werkelijkheid  straks
nog veel verder dan hij ooit had kunnen dromen…….

(door de immense technologische vooruitgang nadat zijn boek 1984 in 1949 werd gepubliceerd)

What
the Media Isn’t Telling You About Social Media

March
20, 2018 at 9:12 pm

Written
by 
Corbett
Report

(CORBETT) — Now
openly admitted, governments and militaries around the world employ
armies of keyboard warriors to spread propaganda and disrupt their
online opposition. Their goal? To shape public discourse around
global events in a way favourable to their standing military and
geopolitical objectives. Their method? The weaponization of social
media.

TRANSCRIPT:

It
didn’t take long from the birth of the world wide web for the
public to start using this new medium to transmit, collect and
analyze information in ways never before imagined. The first message
boards and clunky “Web 1.0” websites soon gave way to “the
blogosphere.” The arrival of social media was the next step in this
evolution, allowing for the formation of communities of interest to
share information in real time about events happening anywhere on the
globe.

But
as quickly as communities began to form around these new platforms,
governments and militaries were even quicker in recognizing the
potential to use this new medium to more effectively spread their own
propaganda.

Their
goal? To shape public discourse around global events in a way
favourable to their standing military and geopolitical objectives.

Their
method? The Weaponization of Social Media.

This
is 
The
Corbett Report
.

Facebook.
Twitter. YouTube. Snapchat. Instagram. Reddit. “Social media” as
we know it today barely existed fifteen years ago. Although it
provides new ways to interact with people and information from all
across the planet virtually instantaneously and virtually for free,
we are only now beginning to understand the depths of the problems
associated with these new platforms. More and more of the original
developers of social media sites like Facebook and Twitter admit
they 
no
longer use social media
 themselves
and actively keep it away from their children, and now they are
finally admitting the reason why: social media was designed
specifically to take advantage of your psychological weaknesses and
keep you addicted to your screen.

SEAN
PARKER
:
If the thought process that went into building these
applications—Facebook being the first of them to really understand
it—that thought process was all about “How do we consume as much
of your time and conscious attention as possible?” And that means
that we need to sort of give you a little dopamine hit every once in
a while because someone liked or commented on a photo or a post or
whatever, and that’s gonna get you to contribute more content and
that’s gonna get you more likes and comments. So it’s a social
validation feedback loop. I mean it’s exactly the kind of thing
that a hacker like myself would come up with, because you’re
exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology. And I think that
we—the inventors/creators, you know, it’s me, it’s Mark, it’s
Kevin Systrom at Instagram, it’s all of these people—understood
this consciously and we did it anyway.

It
should be no surprise, then, that in this world of social media
addicts and smartphone zombies, the 24/7 newsfeed is taking up a
greater and greater share of people’s lives. Our thoughts, our
opinions, our knowledge of the world, even our mood are increasingly
being influenced or even determined by what we see being posted,
tweeted or vlogged. And the process by which these media shape our
opinions is being carefully monitored and analyzed, not by the social
media companies themselves, but by the US military.

MARINA
PORTNAYA
:
When the world’s largest social media platform betrays its users,
there’s going to be outrage.

ABC
HOST: 
The
study to see whether Facebook could influence the emotional state of
its users on that news feed.

CNN
ANCHOR
:
It allowed researchers to manipulate almost 700,000 users’ news
feeds. Some saw more positive news about their friends, others saw
more negative.

CNN
GUEST
:
Well I’m not surprised. I mean we’re all kind of lab rat than the
big Facebook experiment.

PORTNAYA: But
it wasn’t only Facebook’s experiment. It turns out the
psychological study was connected to the US government’s research
on social unrest.

MORNING
JOE GUEST
:
This is really kind of creepy.

PORTNAYA:
And it gets worse. What you may not know is that the US Department of
Defense has reportedly spent roughly $20 million conducting studies
aimed at learning how to manipulate online behavior in order to
influence opinion. The initiative was launched in 2011 by the
Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, otherwise
known as DARPA. The program is best described as the US media’s
effort to become better at detecting and conducting propaganda
campaigns via social media. Translation: When anti-government
messages gain ground virally, Washington wants to find a way to
spread counter opinion.

SOURCE: US
military harnesses social media to manipulate online behaviour

The
DARPA document that details the Pentagon’s plans for influencing
opinions in the social media space is called “
Social
Media in Strategic Communication
.”
DARPA’s goal, according to 
their
own website
,
is “to develop tools to help identify misinformation or deception
campaigns and counter them with truthful information.”

Exactly
what tools were developed for this purpose and how they are currently
being deployed is unclear. 

But Rand Walzman, the program’s creator,
admitted last year that the project lasted four years, cost $50
million and led to the publication of over 200 papers. The papers,
including “
Incorporating
Human Cognitive Biases in a Probabilistic Model of Retweeting
,”
Structural
Properties of Ego Networks
,”
and “
Sentiment
Prediction using Collaborative Filtering
,”
make the thrust of the program perfectly clear. Social media users
are lab rats being carefully scrutinized by government-supported
researchers, their tweets and Facebook posts and Instagram pictures
being analyzed to determine how information spreads online, and, by
implication, how the government and the military can use these social
media networks to make their own propaganda “go viral.”

As
worrying as this research is, it pales in comparison to the knowledge
that governments, militaries and political lobby groups are already
employing squadrons of foot soldiers to wage information warfare in
the social media battlespace.

AL-JAZEERA
ANCHOR
:
The Pentagon’s got a new plan to counter anti-American messages in
cyberspace. It involves buying software that will enable the American
military to create and control fake online personas—fake people,
essentially—who will appear to have originated from all over the
world. The plan is being undertaken by CENTCOM (US Central Command),
and the objective of the online persona management service is to
combat enemy propaganda by influencing foreign social media websites.
CENTCOM has hired a software development company called “Ntrepid,”
and, according to the contract, the California-based company will
initially provide 50 user licenses, each of which would be capable of
controlling up to 10 fake personas. US law forbids the use of this
type of technology, called “sockpuppets,” against Americans, so
all the personas will reportedly be communicating in languages like
Arabic, Persian and Urdu.

SOURCE: Persona
Online Management, Fake Online Personas, Sock Puppets, Astroturfing
Bots, Shills

CTV
ANCHOR
:
So is it okay to have the government monitor social media
conversations and then to wade in and correct some of those
conversations? With more on this, let’s go to technology expert
Carmi Levy. He’s on the line from Montreal. Carmi, do you think the
government’s monitoring what you and I are saying right now? Is
this whole thing getting out of line, or what?

[…]

CARMI
LEVY: It opens up a bit of a question. I’d like to call it a
Pandora’s box about, you know, what exactly is the government’s
aim here, and what do they hope to accomplish with what they find
out? And as they accumulate this information online—this data on
us—where does that data go? And so I think as much as we should
applaud the government for getting into this area, the optics of it
are potentially very Big Brother-ish. And the government really does
need to be a little bit more concrete on what its intentions are and
how it intends to achieve them.

SOURCE: CTV
Confirms Government(s) employing Internet Trolls, Shills & PR
Agents to ‘correct misinformation’
 

4WWL
REPORTER
:
New evidence that government-owned computers at the Army Corps of
Engineers office here in New Orleans are being used to verbally
attack critics of the Corps comes in an affidavit from the former
editor-in-chief of nola.com. Jon Donley, who was laid off this past
February, tells us via satellite from Texas, in late 2006 he started
noticing people presenting themselves as ordinary citizens defending
the Corps very energetically.

JON
DONLEY
:
What stuck out, though, was the wording of the comments was in many
ways mirroring news releases from the Corps of Engineers.

[…]

SANDY
ROSENTHAL
:
These commenters tried to discredit these people . . .

4WWL
REPORTER
:
And when Rosenthal investigated, she discovered the comments were
coming from users at the internet provider address of the Army Corps
of Engineers offices here in New Orleans. She blamed the Corps for a
strategy of going after critics.

 ROSENTHAL:
In the process of trying to obscure the facts of the New Orleans
floodings, one of their tactics was just verbal abuse.

SOURCE: Government
Sock Puppets

NAFTALI
BENNETT
Mo’etzet
Yesha
,
in conjunction with My Israel, has arranged an instruction day for
Wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in
Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the
world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza flotilla, we
want to be there. We want to be the guys who influence what is
written there, how it’s written, and to ensure that it’s balanced
and Zionist in the nature.

SOURCE: Course:
Zionist Editing on Wikipedia

These
operations are only the visible and publicly-admitted front of a vast
array of military and intelligence programs that are attempting to
influence online behaviour, spread government propaganda, and disrupt
online communities that arise in opposition to their agenda.

That
such programs exist is not a matter of conjecture; it is mundane,
established, documented fact.

In
2014, an internal document was leaked from GCHQ, the British
equivalent of the NSA. The document, never intended for public
release, was entitled “
The
Art of Deception: Training for a New Generation of Online Covert
Operations

and bluntly stated that “We want to build Cyber 
Magicians.”
It then goes on to outline the “magic” techniques that must be
employed in influence and information operations online, including
deception and manipulation techniques like “anchoring,” “priming”
and “branding” propaganda narratives. After presenting a map of
social networking technologies that are targeted by these operations,
the document then instructs the “magicians” how to deceive the
public through “attention management” and behavioural
manipulation.

That
governments would turn to these strategies is hardly a shocking
development. In fact, the use of government shills to propagate
government talking points and disrupt online dissent has been openly
advocated on the record by high-ranking government officials for the
past decade.

In
2008, Cass Sunstein, a law professor who would go on to become
Obama’s information “czar,” co-authored a paper entitled
Conspiracy
Theories
,”
in which he wrote that the “best response” to online “conspiracy
theories” is what he calls “cognitive infiltration” of groups
spreading these ideas.

Government
agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social
networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine
percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual
premises, causal logic or implications for political action. In one
variant, government agents would openly proclaim, or at least make no
effort to conceal, their institutional affiliations. […] In another
variant, government officials would participate anonymously or even
with false identities.”

It
is perhaps particularly ironic that the idea that government agents
are actually and admittedly spreading propaganda online under false
identities is, to the less-informed members of the population, itself
a “conspiracy theory” rather than an established conspiracy fact.

Unsurprisingly,
when confronted about his proposal, Sunstein pretended to not
remember having written it and then pointedly refused to answer any
questions about it.

LUKE
RUDKOWSKI
:
My name is Bill de Burgh from Brooklyn College, and I know you’ve
written many articles. But I think the most telling one about you is
the 2008 one called “Conspiracy Theories,” where you openly
advocated government agents infiltrate activist groups of 9/11 Truth
and also stifle dissent online. I was wondering why do you think it’s
the government’s job, or why do you think the government should go
after family members who have questions and 9/11 responders who are
lied to about the air, survivors whose testimony conflicts, and also
government whistleblowers that were gagged because they released
information that contradicts the official story.

CASS
SUNSTEIN
:
I think it was Ricky who said I’d written hundreds of articles and
I remember some and not others. That one I don’t remember very
well. I hope I didn’t say 
that.
But whatever was said in that article, my role in government is to
oversee federal rule-making in a way that is wholly disconnected from
the vast majority of my academic writing, including that.

[…]

RUDKOWSKI:
I just want to know is it safe to say that you retract saying that
conspiracy theories should be banned or taxed for having an opinion
online. Is it safe to say that?

SUNSTEIN:
I don’t remember the article very well. So I hope I didn’t say
either those things.

RUDKOWSKI:
But you did and it’s written. Do you retract them?

SUNSTEIN:
I’m focused on my job.

SOURCE: Obama
Information Czar Cass Sunstein Confronted on Cognitive Infiltration
of Conspiracy Groups

Now,
a decade on from Sunstein’s proposal, we know that military psyops
agents, political lobbyists, corporate shills and government
propagandists are spending vast sums of money and employing entire
armies of keyboard warriors, leaving comments and shaping
conversations to change the public’s opinions, influence their
behaviour, and even alter their mood. And they are helped along in
this quest by the very same technology that allows the public to
connect on a scale never before possible.

Technology
is always a double-edged sword, and sometimes it can be dangerous to
wield that sword at all. There are ways to identify and neutralize
the threat of online trolls and shills, but the phenomenon is not
likely to go away any time soon.

Each
of us must find our own answer to the question of how best to
incorporate these technologies into our life. But the next time you
find yourself caught up in an argument with an online persona that
may or may not be a genuine human being, it might be better to ask
yourself if your efforts are better spent engaging in the argument or
just turning off the computer.

Creative
Commons
 / Corbett
Report
 / Report
a typo

==========================================

* Zie: ‘Israël zet snelle reactiemacht op poten tegen anti-Israëlische kritiek

Zie ook: ‘Jeremy Corbin wordt gedemoniseerd als antisemiet…….

        en: ‘Facebook wil samen met door Saoedi-Arabië gesubsidieerde denktank censureren…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: ‘Het echte Facebook schandaal: manipulatie van de gebruikers en gratis diensten voor eertijds presidentskandidaat Obama…….

        en: ‘Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook doneerde aan de politici die hem in de VS aan de tand voelden >> in het EU parlement maakte hij gebruik van megalomane EU politici…..

        en: ‘Facebook stelt perstituee van New York Times aan als censuur-agent…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘AVG: Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (geleid door Aleid Wolfsen PvdA) niet berekend op EU wetgeving…….

       en: ‘Facebook e.a. hebben lak aan AVG (GDPR), misbruik persoonsgegevens gaat gewoon door…….

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Wie het nieuws controleert, controleert de wereld……

       en: ‘Westerse massa misleiding in aanloop naar WOIII……

       en: ‘Facebook verlaat ‘tranding news’ voor ‘brekend nieuws’ van 80 reguliere mediaorganen, ofwel nog meer ‘fake news…..’

       en: ‘Facebook komt met nieuwsshows van betrouwbare media als CNN en Fox News…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Congres VS geeft akkoord voor verdere steun aan de Saoedische genocide in Jemen……

Afgelopen woensdag besloot een meerderheid van het congres de steun aan de genocide die
Saoedi-Arabië en de VS in Jemen uitvoeren, voort te zetten…… Eén
lichtpunt: voor het eerst worden er grote vraagtekens geplaatst bij
de enorme terreur die de VS uitoefent en heeft uitgeoefend in het
Midden-Oosten en Afrika…..

Lullig
genoeg werd er niet gesproken over de VS militairen die in Jemen op
de grond meevechten, alsof die militairen niet bestaan…….

De
schrijver van het volgende artikel, Jon Queally, noemt de gaande
zijnde genocide een burgeroorlog, echter zonder Saoedi-Arabië was er
al lang geen sprake meer geweest van een burgeroorlog en zeker niet
van een genocide…. Bovendien is Saoedi-Arabië allesbehalve een binnenlandse Jemenitische partij…… Zelfs als de VS en Groot-Brittannië hun steun voor de Saoedische agressie een paar jaar geleden hadden ingetrokken, was het voor Saoedi-Arabië al een heel
stuk moeilijker, of zelfs onmogelijk geweest deze genocide uit te voeren…… 

Steun voor de Saoedische agressie die bestaat uit: munitie leveringen (waaronder clusterbommen), wapenleveringen, (inclusief vliegtuigen, raketten, pantservoertuigen en tanks), militair advies, training, het door de VS aftanken van Saoedische straaljagers tijdens bombardement missies op Jemen (het in de lucht aftanken van deze jagers, zodat ze zo effectief mogelijk de sjiieten kunnen bombarderen en beschieten…..) en tot slot het helpen door de VS met de blokkade op zee voor de door de Houthi’s beheerste gebieden (deze blokkades en die op land zorgen ervoor dat de leveringen van hulpgoederen aan de noodlijdende bevolking van Jemen uiterst moeizaam verlopen, hulpgoederen voor de sjiitische bevolking die lijdt aan honger, dorst, cholera en difterie…..)…….

Tja, de winsten voor het militair-industrieel complex en de zucht naar wereldoverheersing door de VS, gaan ver voor op mensenrechten en vooral op het leven van mensen…….

Hoe
lang blijft de wereld toekijken, voordat het actie onderneemt tegen
Saoedi-Arabië, toekijkt hoe de sjiieten in Jemen worden afgeslacht
door de reil-fascistische dictatuur Saoedi-Arabië en de grootste
terreurentiteit op aarde, de VS……… Dezelfde aarde die
hysterisch de leugens herhaalt over Oost-Ghouta, terwijl het doodstil
blijft over een gaande zijnde genocide, waar 22 miljoen mensen in ernstig gevaar verkeren , wat een hypocrisie!!

Sleep Saoedi-Arabië (plus haar arabisch-soennitische coalitiegenoten), de VS en GB eindelijk voor het Internationaal Strafhof (ICC)!!

Blood
of Thousands on Their Hands’: Congress Votes to Continue US-Backed
Yemen War

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor ‘Blood of Thousands on Their Hands’: Congress Votes to Continue US-Backed Yemen War

March
21, 2018 at 10:44 am

Written
by 
Jon
Queally

(CD— While
44 U.S. Senators on Tuesday were applauded by peace groups for voting
in favor of a resolution that would have allowed Congress to begin
reclaiming its war-making authority and ended the U.S. military’s
backing of Saudi Arabia’s assault on Yemen, it was ultimately not
enough to overcome entrenched opposition from the 45 Republicans and
10 Democrats who voted against it.

Introduced
by Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), and Mike Lee
(R-Utah), the resolution (
SJ
Res. 54
)
would have ended the tacit military support—including targeting
assistance, refueling, and intelligence sharing—of the Saudi’s
campaign to wage war on Yemen, a nation currently embroiled in a
civil war and experiencing one of the worst humanitarian crises on
the planet.

The
final tally was 55-44 against the resolution, with only Sen. John
McCain (R-Ariz.) not casting a vote.

While
five Republicans voted for the measure, the 10 Democrats senators who
joined with the Republican majority to block it were: Coons (D-DE);
Cortez Masto (D-NV); Donnelly (D-IN); Heitkamp (D-ND); Jones (D-AL);
Manchin (D-WV); Menendez (D-NJ); Nelson (D-FL); Reed (D-RI); and
Whitehouse (D-RI).

Iona
Craig, the foreign correspondent who this year won a prestigious
George Polk Award for her coverage in Yemen, said that those who
voted against the effort will now have the “blood of thousands”
of Yemenis on their hands as the war continues and the crises
worsens.

Iona Craigأيونا كريچ

@ionacraig

The US Senate held the fate of millions of Yemenis in its hands. By voting to table they’ve not just killed a resolution. Those 55 senators will have the blood of thousands, who will die as a result of US support for the Saudi-led intervention in Yemen, on their hands.

See
the 
full
roll call 
listed
below:

Anti-war
groups, while disappointed with the outcome, celebrated the vote and
heralded it as an important step in terms of getting congressional
lawmakers to final assert themselves against an executive branch that
has been allowed to wage war with nearly no restraint over the last
17 years.

Because
of the leadership put forth by Sens. Bernie Sanders, Mike Lee, and
Chris Murphy — and the tireless advocacy of hundreds of thousands
of Americans — the U.S. Senate was today finally forced to confront
America’s unauthorized role in Yemen’s deadly civil war,” Kate
Kizer, policy director for Win Without War, in a 
statement.

We
commend the 44 Senators who agreed that U.S. military support for the
Saudi-led coalition is unconstitutional, counterproductive, and
doesn’t serve U.S. national security interests,” she added.
“Today’s vote should serve as a sober reminder to Saudi Arabia
that it must immediately move to resolve this conflict
diplomatically, and that American support for its war in Yemen is not
unlimited.”

Kate
Gould, legislative director on Middle East policy for the Friends
Committee on National Legislation (FCNL), 
said that
despite the resolution’s failure, the “groundswell of grassroots
activism to end this war is not going to let up until this illegal
war ends, and U.S. pilots stop fueling U.S.-made bombers to rein down
U.S.-made bombs on schools, hospitals and neighborhoods. The U.S.
must stop literally fueling the deliberate killing and starvation of
countless civilians in Yemen, and support a peaceful solution to end
this crisis.”

By Jon
Queally
 / Creative
Commons
 / Common
Dreams
 / Report
a typo

=================================

Zie ook: ‘VS vecht in Jemen, Pentagon loog weer eens >> Congres eindelijk ‘wakker’

        en: Koenders nog steeds stil: Saoedi-Arabië bezig met etnische zuivering op eigen bodem en nog steeds levert het westen wapens aan terreurstaat S-A…..

        en: ‘Saoedi-Arabië pakt een enorm aantal mensen op…….

        en: ‘Saoedi-Arabië moordt eigen sjiitische burgers uit….. Tijd voor een handelsdelegatie met Koenders, Rutte en W.A.!!

        en: ‘Saoedi-Arabië vermoordde minstens 20 bruiloftsgangers in Jemen

        en: ‘Agressie vanwege een vermeende gifgasaanval op Douma, terwijl de tienduizenden kinderen die in Jemen worden vermoord middels een genocide blijkbaar niet meetellen……

        en: ‘Saoedi-Arabië dreigt Iran aan te vallen voor vanuit Jemen afgevuurde ‘raketten’ op Saoedische ‘doelen……….’

        en:  ‘VS doet planning van de Saoedische genocide in Jemen…..

        en: ‘VS rol in Jemen gaat verder dan eerder gemeld, ofwel nog meer VS hulp bij Saoedische genocide op sjiieten…..

        en: ‘Jemen: meer VS steun voor genocide op sjiieten met grote levering ‘slimme munitie’ aan Saoedi-Arabië……

        en: ‘Jemen: BBC propaganda voor genocide door Saoedische coalitie……..

        en: ‘Mike Pompeo (ex-CIA, VS min. van BuZa en ‘christen’) liegt openlijk over genocide in Jemen

        en: ‘Saoedi-Arabië geeft toe in Jemen gruwelijke oorlogsmisdaden te hebben begaan…. ‘ (en daarmee is ten overvloede nog eens duidelijk gemaakt dat ook de VS meewerkt aan oorlogsmisdaden en deze ook zelf begaat in Jemen…..)

        en: ‘Jemen: de vergeten genocide en haar kinderslachtoffers………

Sudan, de laatst levende noordelijke witte neushoorn is overleden, alweer een waanzinnige prestatie op naam van de mens…….

Het
zat er al een tijd aan te komen,het overlijden van Sudan, de laatst
levende noordelijke witte neushoorn. Sudan leefde de laatste jaren
van zijn leven in het Keniase wildpark Ol Pejeta Conservancy en werd
24/7 bewaakt door gewapende beveiligers…….

De
hoorn van een neushoorn brengt in landen als Vietnam en China wel tot
€ 40.000,– op….. China begint eindelijk met stappen tegen deze
barbarij en het suffe geloof in krachten van deze hoorn.

De
hoogste tijd dat er in alle landen waar deze hoorns en andere onderdelen
van dieren worden gebruikt als geneeskrachtige of kracht schenkende
voorwerpen, aan de kinderen op school wordt onderwezen dat dit je reinste kul
is, zoals al lang geleden wetenschappelijk werd aangetoond……..
Een mooie taak voor de VN, doen ze eens echt iets wat er toe
doet……

Wat betreft de westerse miljonairs die denken recht te hebben deze dieren te vermoorden en onderdelen van deze dieren mee naar huis te nemen, zoals de zoons van het beest Trump, ‘zou je bijna wensen’ dat er een prijs op hun hoofd wordt gezet, zodat ze zelf afgeslacht worden…..

Het vogende artikel ontving ik gisteren van het Care2 team:

What
We Can Learn From the Death of Sudan, the Last Male Northern White
Rhino

Across
the globe, wildlife advocates are mourning the death of
Sudan, 
the
last surviving male northern white rhino
.

Caregivers brought
Sudan to 
Kenya’s
Ol Pejeta Conservancy
,
where a 24/7 armed security detail protected him from 
poachers.

While
extremely sad, Sudan’s death was not unexpected. The 45-year-old
rhino had suffered a series of 
age-related
complications
,
and after taking a sudden turn for the worse, he
was euthanized on March 19.

Sudan’s
death leaves just two remaining individuals of this majestic
species: his daughter Najin and his granddaughter Fatu, both of
whom live in the Conservancy.

RHINOS
AT RISK

And
they’re not the only 
rhinos at
risk of extinction. In fact, all 
five
of the world’s rhino species
 are
in trouble, according to the IUCN*.

  • The
    near threatened 
    white
    rhino
     has
    two sub-species — northern and southern. As noted above, just two
    northern rhinos remain, and there are roughly 20,000 southern
    rhinos.

  • The
    critically endangered 
    black
    rhino
     has
    four sub-species: One of them went extinct in 2011, and just over
    5,000 individuals remain.

  • The
    vulnerable 
    greater
    one-horned rhino
     has
    a population of around 3,500.

  • The
    critically endangered 
    Sumatran
    rhino
     numbers
    100.

  • The
    critically endangered 
    Javan
    rhino
     has
    a population of just 67.

Zacharia
Mutai, Sudan’s keeper, 
explains
why rhinos are endangered
:

So
sad because we end up losing such kinds of species because of human
failure. People used to kill rhinos because of their horns, and many
people have been believing that they’re used as medicine, but it
doesn’t cure anyone at all.

Mutai
is referring to the belief that rhino horns have medicinal value. But
they’re actually made of 
keratin,
the same material in human hair and fingernails, as well as turtle
beaks and horse hooves.

Rhino
horn is most often ground up for use in traditional Asian
medicine, especially in China and Vietnam. According to
the 
International
Rhino Foundation
,
the powder is added to food or brewed in a tea, which is “guaranteed”
to be a powerful aphrodisiac, a hangover cure or a treatment for
cancer, fever, rheumatism and gout.

One
rhinoceros horn has an estimated value of between $30,000 and $40,000
— and that’s precisely why poachers love them.

The
organization 
Save
The Rhino
 believes
that more than 7,245 African rhinos have been lost to poaching in
just a decade. In South Africa, 1,028 rhinos were killed in
2017, which equals just about three rhino deaths every single day.

POACHING
PREVENTION

So
what can we do to prevent this unnecessary slaughter?

Writing
for CNN, 
Jill
Filipovic notes
 that
“The response to poaching has to be holistic and global –
addressing, among other things, economic need and lack of
opportunity.” She’s referring to the fact that
some people rely on poaching as a matter of survival.
Living in poverty — perhaps with a starving family — they will do
anything to get money.

But Filipovic
goes on to suggest a bigger approach: The Kenya Wildlife Service
needs to be controlled and refocused. The group has been accused by
Human Rights Watch and others of 
deaths
and disappearances
;
KWS has consistently 
denied
the accusations
.

A
global approach also means looking to China, which has provided the
demand for rhino horns for decades. The country 
banned
ivory last year
,
but government officials must do more to protect this
incredible creature.

And
in the U.S., photos of Donald Trump’s sons with their African game
kills aren’t improving the situation. Legislators need to ensure
that these wild animals are more than trophies for the rich.

Discouragingly,
a new advisory board created to reshape U.S. law on the importation
of the body parts of African elephants, lions and rhinos is loaded
with 
trophy
hunters

close-up of Sudan the rhino

A
LASTING LEGACY

So
what does the death of Sudan tell us?

It
is not enough to simply blame the poachers. The countries involved
need to band together in what Filipovic calls a “holistic and
global approach.”

Although
scientists around the world are working to develop 
in
vitro fertilization
** techniques,
it’s probably too late for the northern white rhino. Sudan’s
death means that this majestic sub-species may follow the northern
black rhino into extinction, if the international community fails to
act.

Photo
Credit: 
Screenshot/New
York Times

IUCN: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.

** In vitro fertilization: reageerbuisbevruchting.

Novitsjok (novichok) uitgelegd door wetenschappers, Groot-Brittannië zit ‘goed fout….’

Op deze
plek heb ik een paar artikelen en berichten gebracht over de aanslag
op ex-dubbelspion Skripalski en zijn dochter. Keer op keer blijkt het
hele novitsjok (novichok) verhaal doorgestoken kaart om Rusland nog
verder te demoniseren.

VVD volksverlakker Rutte stelde eerder nog dat hij onomstotelijk bewijs wil zien voor de Russische verantwoordelijkheid (en nee, dat had ik niet verwacht), echter een theekransje met leiders van EU landen was voldoende om z’n mening om te doen slaan, zo werd vanmorgen gemeld….. Het ‘bewijs’ dat Groot-Brittannie opvoert is nu wel voldoende voor het pedant onzelfstandige ventje……

Ook in
het volgende artikel van Moon of Alabama op Information Clearing House, wordt het novitsjok verhaal
doorgeprikt als onzin (o.a. met ‘de onthulling’ dat de georganiseerde misdaad in Rusland ook over dit soort gif beschikt):

Russian
Scientists Explain ‘Novichok’ – High Time For Britain To Come Clean

By
Moon Of Alabama

March
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” –
  A
week ago we 
asked if
‘Novichok’ poisons are real. The answer is now in: It is ‘yes’ and
‘no’. Several Russian scientist now say that they once researched and
developed lethal poisons but they assert that other countries can and
have copied these. ‘Novichok’, they say,  is a just western
propaganda invention. They see the British accusations as a cynical
plot against Russia. The people who push the ‘Novichok’ accusations
have political and commercial interests.


The
British Prime Minister Theresa May 
insinuated that
the British-Russian double agent Sergej Skripal and his daughter
Yulia, who 
collapsed
on March 4
 on
a public bench in Salisbury, were affected by a ‘Russian’ nerve
agent:

It
is now clear that Mr Skripal and his daughter were poisoned with a
military-grade nerve agent
 of
a type developed by Russia
.
It is part of a group of nerve agents 
known
as Novichok
.

Theresa
May’s claims are highly questionable. 

Maria Zakharova, spokeswomen of the Russian Foreign Ministry: “‘Novichok’ has never been used in the USSR or in Russia as something related to the chemical weapon research” – bigger

A
highly potent nerve agent would hurt anyone who comes in contact with
it. But the BBC reported that a doctor who administered first aid to
the collapsed Yulia Skripal for 30 minutes was 
not
affected at all
.
Another doctor, Steven Davies who heads the emergence room of the
Salisbury District Hospital, 
wrote in
a letter the London Times:

“… no
patients have experienced symptoms of nerve agent poisoning in
Salisbury
 and
there have only been ever been three patients with significant
poisoning.”

The
name ‘Novichok’ comes from 
a
book
 written
by Vil Mirzayanov, a 1990s immigrant to the U.S. from the former
Soviet Union. It describe his work at Soviet chemical weapon
laboratories and lists the chemical formulas of a new group of lethal
substances.


AFP interviewed the
author of the ‘Novichok’ book about the Salisbury incident:

Mirzayanov,
speaking at his home in Princeton, New Jersey, said he is convinced
Russia carried it out as a way of intimidating opponents of President
Vladimir Putin.
The
only other possibility, he said, would be that someone used the
formulas in his book to make such a weapon
.

“Russia
did it”, says Mirzanyanov, “OR SOMEONE WHO READ MY BOOK”
 

                                 

               

A
‘Novichok’ nerve agent plays a role in the current seasons of the
British-American spy drama 
Strike
Back
 which
broadcasts on British TV. Theresa May might have watched 
this
clip
 (vid)
from the series. Is it a source of her allegations?

The
Russian government rejects the British allegations and demands
evidence which Britain has not provided. Russia joined the Chemical
Weapon Convention in 1997. By 2017 it had 
destroyed all
its chemical weapons and chemical weapon production facilities. Under
the convention only very limited amounts of chemical weapon
agents 
are
allowed
 to
be held in certified laboratories for defense research and testing
purposes. The U.S. has such laboratories at Fort Detrick
in Frederick, Maryland, the British lab is in Porton Down, a few
miles from Salisbury. The Russian lab is in 
Shikhany in
the southern Saratov Oblast. The Organisation for the Prohibition of
Chemical Weapons (OPCW) audits these laboratories and their declared
stocks “down to the milligram level”.


The
spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry and famous 
high
heels folk dancer
 (vid)
Maria Zakharova explains in
a
TV interview
 (vid,
English subtitles) that ‘Novichok’ was not and is not the name of any
Soviet or Russian program. The word was introduced in the “west”
simply because it sounded Russian.


Western
media claimed that Vil Miranzayanov is the developer of the
‘Novichok’ chemicals. It turns out that this is not the case.
Interviews with two retired Russian chemists, both published only
yesterday, tell the real story. The Russia news agency RIA
Novostni 
talked
with
 Professor
Leonid Rink (
machine
translation
):

Did
you have anything to do with creating what the British authorities
call the “Novice”?


Yes. This was the basis of my doctoral dissertation.

At
that time I worked in Shikhany, in the branch of GosNIIOKhT (State
Research Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology, during Soviet
times was engaged in the development of chemical weapons), was a
leading researcher and head of the laboratory.

Professor
Rink says that:

  • ‘Novichok’
    or ‘novice’ was never used as a program name. New Soviet formulas
    had alphanumeric codes.

  • Several
    new nerve agents were developed in Shikhany in the 1970s and 80s.

  • These
    new substances can cause immediate deadly reactions when applied to
    humans.

  • Vil
    Mirzayanov was head of the chromatographer group, chemists who deals
    with the separation and analysis of various mixtures of substances.
    He was responsible for environmental control and not a developer of
    any new substances.

The Associated
Press 
summarizes other
parts of the interview with Professor Rink:

Rink
told Russia’s state RIA Novosti news agency Tuesday that Britain
and other western nations easily could have synthesized the nerve
agent after chemical expert Vil Mirzayanov emigrated to the United
States and revealed the formula.

Echoing
Russian government statements, Rink says it wouldn’t make sense for
Moscow to poison Sergei Skripal, a military intelligence officer who
spied for Britain, because he was a used asset “drained” by both
Russia and Britain.

He
claims Britain’s use of the name Novichok for the nerve agent is
intended to convince the public that Russia is to blame.

The
English-Russian magazine The Bell 
interviews another
Russian scientists involved in the issue:

The
Bell was able to find and speak with Vladimir Uglev, one of the
scientists who was involved in developing the nerve agent referred to
as “Novichok”. […] Vladimir Uglev, formerly a scientist with
Volsk branch of GOSNIIOKHT (“State Scientific-Research Institute
for Organic Chemistry and Technology”), which developed and tested
production of new lethal substances since 1972, spoke for the first
time about his work as early as the 1990s. He left the institute in
1994 and is now retired.

– The
Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs insists that there was no
research nor development of any substance called “Novichok”, not
in Russia, nor in the USSR. Is that true?


In
order to make it easier to understand the subject matter, I will not
use the name “Novichok” which has is now commonly used by
everyone to describe those four substances which were conditionally
assigned to me to develop over a period of several years. Three of
these substances are part of the “Foliant” program, which was led
by Pyotr Kirpichev, a scientist with GOSNIIOKHT (State
Scientific-Research Institute for Organic Chemistry and Technology).
The first substance of a new class of organophosphorous chemical
agents, I will call it “A-1972”, was developed by Kirpichev in
1972. In 1976, I developed two substances: “B-1976” and “C-1976”.
The fourth substance, “D-1980”, was developed by Kirpichev in the
early 1980s. All of these substances fall under the group referred to
as “Novichkov”, but that name wasn’t given to the substances by
GOSNIIOKHT.

All
four chemical agents are “FOS” or organophosphorous compounds
which have a nerve paralyzing effect, but they differ in their
precursors, how they were discovered and in their usage as agents of
chemical warfare.

The
four substances were developed by Pyotr Kirpichev and Vladimir Uglev.
These substances were not readily usable by the military as they
could not be safely transported and used in the field like 
binary
chemical weapons
 can.
Once synthesized they were extremely dangerous. Professor Leonid
Rink, working later in a different group, tackled the problem but did
not succeed. Uglev confirms that Vil Miranzayanov was not involved in
the development at all. His group was responsible chemical analysis
and for environmental control around the laboratory.

Vladimir Uglev, via The Bell – bigger

Vladimir
Uglev, like Renk and Miranzayanov, notes that these agents “of a
type developed by Russia” can now be produced by any
sufficiently equipped laboratory, including private ones.

Uglev
mentions a criminal use of one of the agents in the 1990s:

One
of these substances was used to poison the banker, Ivan Kivelidi and
his secretary in 1995. A cotton ball, soaked in this agent, was
rubbed over the microphone in the handset of Kivelidi’s telephone.
That specific dose was developed by my group, where we produced all
of the chemical agents, and each dose which we developed was given
its own complete physical-chemical passport. It was therefore not
difficult to determine who had prepared that dose and when it was
developed. Naturally, the investigators also suspected me. I was
questioned several times about this incident.

Journalist
Mark Ames, who worked in Moscow at that time, 
remarks:

This
muddles the narrative a bit —”novichok” used in 1995
Moscow mafia poison hit on top mobster Ivan Kivelidi. So:
1)
novichok [is] in mob hands too
2) used during reign of #1
Mobfather Boris Yeltsin, Washington’s vassal

Uglev
further notes that blood samples from the Salisbury victims, which
Moscow demands but Britain has not handed over, can show what agent
(if any) were involved and “where the specific dose was produced
and by whom.”


A
new article in the New Scientists 
confirms the
claims by the Russian scientists that the ‘Novichok’ agents which may
have affected the Skripals may have been produced elsewhere:

Weapons
experts have told New Scientist that a number of countries legally
created small amounts of Novichok after it was revealed in 1992 and a
production method was later published.

In
2016 Iranian scientists, in cooperation with the
OPCW, 
published production
and detection methods for such agents. It is likely that the various
government labs secretly re-developed and produced these chemicals
for their own purposes even prior to the Iranian publication.

[UPDATE]
In an interview with Deutsche Welle British Foreign
Minister Boris Johnson 
admits that
Proton Down had (illegal?)  ‘Novichok’ agents when the incident
in Salisbury happened:

DW:
You argue that the source of this nerve agent, Novichok, is Russia.
How did you manage to find it out so quickly? 
Does
Britain possess samples of it?

Boris
Johnson: Let me be clear with you … When I look at the evidence, I
mean the people from Porton Down, the laboratory …

DW: So
they have the samples …

Boris
Johnson: 
They
do.
 And
they were absolutely categorical and I asked the guy myself, I said,
“Are you sure?” And he said there’s no doubt.

But
Porton Down did not agree with the British government to claim that
the supposed nerve agent was “made by Russia.” It 
only
agreed to the compromise formulation
 “of
a type developed by Russia” i.e. it could have been made
anywhere. [End Update]


The
claims by the British government that a. the Skripals were affected
by a nerve agent and that b. Russia was involved in the Skripal
incident because it has some exclusive access to these agents seem
both baseless. Unless there is significant further evidence the
British incrimination of Russia looks like a cynical plot invented
for political and/or commercial purposes.


As
usual in the military-industrial complex the people who push such
scares, are the ones who profit from them.


The
British Morning Star 
points to
one former British military intelligence officer, Colonel (rtd)
Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, as a common protagonist in the Skripal
case, in the claims of Syrian chemical weapon use and in commercial
interests around chemical weapon defense:

Quoted
daily by multiple media outlets on the Skripal case, de
Bretton-Gordon has become a very public expert, relied upon for
unbiased comment and analysis by the British and foreign media on
chemical weapon threats from Salisbury to Syria.

He
is a former assistant director of Intelligence Surveillance and
Reconnaissance Land Forces with the Ministry of Defence. Before that
de Bretton-Gordon was commanding officer of Britain’s Chemical,
Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Regiment and Nato’s
Rapid Reaction CBRN Battalion.

While
his CBRN background is often mentioned, his military intelligence
links are rarely referred to publicly.

Long
before the Salisbury event, de Bretton-Gordon was urging greater
government expenditure on chemical protection counter-measures and
equipment.

de Bretton-Gordon is managing director CBRN of
Avon Protection Systems, based in Melksham, Wiltshire.

In
2017, the company made £50m from its US military contracts and a
further £63.3m from other “protection and defence” revenue.

The
former(?) army intelligence officer is also deeply involved in the
“moderate rebels” chemical weapon scams in Syria:

On
April 29 2014, the [Daily Telegraph] reported that it “obtained
soil samples collected from sites of chemical attacks inside Syria by
Dr Ahmad — a medic whose real identity cannot be revealed for his
own protection — who had previously received training in sample
collection by western chemical weapons experts.

Mr
de Bretton-Gordon, a British chemical weapons expert and director of
Secure Bio, a private company, was one of the trainers.”

And
who carried out the tests? None other than de Bretton-Gordon himself.

The
“White Helmets” propaganda group in Syria was founded and
is run by the former(?) British army intelligence officer James Le
Mesurier with British and U.S. government money. His former(?)
colleague de Bretton-Gordon is running the parallel Syria chemical
weapon scam. Both profit from their government financed operations.


Other
British agents involved in the Skripal case are 
Pablo
Miller
 who recruited Skripal
for the MI6. He was a friend of Skripal, also lived in Salisbury and
worked for Christopher Steele, the former(?) MI6 agent who produced
the ‘dirty dossier’ about Donald Trump for the Clinton campaign. Both
are 
involved with
Russian mafia emigres in Britain like Boris Berezovski and the
deceased Alexander Litvinenko who’s father 
says that
he was killed by an MI6 or CIA guy.


While
the British government blamed the Russians just a week after the
incident in Salisbury happened it now seems interested in delaying
any further investigations. It took more than two weeks after the
incident for the British government to invite the OPCW to help with
the case. The head of the OPCW says 
it
will take another three weeks
 for
the organization to analyze the samples the British laboratory now
handed over. The British police requires 
several
months
 to
find out what happened to the Skripals.


How
could the British government be sure of “Russian”
involvement within a week and even expel Russian diplomats when the
primary chemical experts on the issue will need three weeks for their
first analyses and the British police predicts a several months long
investigation?


The
Russian scientist and their government have explained their history
and position in relation to ‘Novichoks’ and the Skripal incident. It
is high time now for the British government, its scientists at Porton
Down and its greedy mafia of former(?) British intelligence officer
and their criminal Russian emigres to come clean about their own
roles in it.


This
article was originally published by “
Moon
of Alabama

Previous Moon
of Alabama reports on the Skripal case:

George
Galloway’ Interviews Peter Hitchens on Russia and the Salisbury
Poisoning

Ex-mayor
of London Ken Livingstone comments on UK-Russia scandal over Skripal
case.

==================================

Zie ook: ‘Rusland schuldig verklaard voor aanslag op Skripal, echter onafhankelijke controle van ‘het bewijsmateriaal’ wordt geweigerd……

       en: ‘Novitsjok (Novichok) een Russisch chemische wapen >> één grote leugen, zoals de massavernietigingswapen van Saddam Hoessein

       en: ‘Rusland verlangt terecht een excuus van de Britse regering voor valse beschuldiging ‘aanslag’ op Skripal…..

       en: ‘Skripal: geen (onomstotelijk) bewijs voor Russische schuld en toch stuurt Rutte 2 Russische diplomaten het land uit……..

       en: ‘Stef Blok (VVD minister BuZa): de Russische schuld voor de aanslag op Skripal is ‘plausibel…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Rusland mag niet deelnemen aan onderzoek naar ‘aanslag met novitsjok’ op Skripal

       en: ‘Brits ministerie van Buitenlandse Zalen geeft toe dat Porton Down niet heeft gezegd dat ‘novitsjok’ uit Rusland komt….. Blok (VVD) alweer met 10 km/u. finaal uit de ‘novitsjok-bocht’

       en: ‘Russisch zenuwgas verhaal is nonsens ook aldus Jeremy Corbyn….. Jimmy Dore met commentaar!

       en: ‘OPCW bevestigt: novitsjok (novichok) van aanslag op Skripal komt uit Rusland……

       en: ‘Skripal: wat journalisten echt zouden moeten vragen aangaande ‘de aanslag met gifgas’

       en: ‘Skripal false flag operatie zakt als soufflé in elkaar…….

       en: ‘Nieuwe ‘novitsjok aanslag’ nadat de Skripal vergiftiging definitief kan worden afgeschreven als false flag operatie

       en: ‘Skripal: GB klaagt 2 Russen aan voor vergiftiging middels een sci-fi techniek: de 2 waren tegelijk op 1 plek, waar 1 Rus te zien was……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Skripal vergiftiging roept steeds meer vraagtekens op…..

       en: ‘Joël Voordewind (ChristenUnie, Tweede Kamer) eist actie n.a.v. false flag actie Skripal