Het
is al tijden duidelijk dat Iran het volgende land na Syrië is, waar
de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde, ofwel de VS zal toeslaan om een
verandering van regime door te voeren. Anders gezegd: de VS zal Iran voor een groot deel kapot bombarderen en in stukken opdelen, zodat het in de nabije toekomst
geen kans heeft om ook nog maar enige factor van betekenis te spelen in het Midden-Oosten……..

Israël
is al een paar jaar bezig om de boel in het westen op te hitsen tegen
Iran, zie in de afgelopen tijd de tocht van de psychopathische rotschoft en Israëlische premier Netanyahu, de
Palestijnenslachter, langs de parlementen van EU lidstaten en het
EU parlement……

Terwijl
Netanyahu het ene bloedbad na het andere aanricht onder de
Palestijnen en naar goeddunken Syrische bases aanvalt (zogenaamd
vanwege bevoorrading van Hezbollah in Libanon….), wijst hij met z’n
in bloed gedrenkte armen (beter: poten) naar Iran als
grote agressor…….

Waarschijnlijk
heeft de VS nu al groepen in Iran opgezet tegen de regering en mocht
deze vaak door de VS beproefde methode niet lukken (wat alweer hoogst
waarschijnlijk niet zal gebeuren, zoals dit ook in Syrië niet lukte),
is het zeer waarschijnlijk dat de VS Iran zal aanvallen, gesteund
door de Israëlische terreurluchtmacht….

Als
dit gebeurd zullen op zeker terreurgroepen als IS en Al Qaida op de
grond vechten tegen Iraanse troepen, zij aan zij met VS troepen
gesteund door een paar NAVO landen, als Australië, Groot-Brittannië,
Polen en Hongarije……. (waar je niet hoeft op te kijken als ook Rutte 3 niet minstens haar steun aan de VS zal uitspreken….)

Overigens is dit bepaald niet de eerste vorm van agressie die de VS tegen het Iraanse volk zal gebruiken, neem de door de CIA toegegeven coup tegen de democratisch gekozen regering Mossadegh in 1953 en de smerige economische oorlogsvoering van de VS tegen dit land…….

Lees
het volgende artikel van Caitlin Johnstone, waarin zij uitlegt waarom
de VS Iran zal aanvallen.

The
Phenomenon Known as “Qanon”

June
23, 2018 at 4:20 pm

Written by Caitlin
Johnstone

(CJ Opinion) — I
have been saying
all year that
the 8chan
phenomenon known as “QAnon” is
bogus, and as time has gone on the evidence has become overwhelming
that it is an establishment psyop designed to herd the populist right
into accepting the narratives and agendas of the establishment
orthodoxy. Whether they’re claiming that every capitulation
the Trump administration makes to longstanding neoconservative
agendas is
actually brilliant 4-D chess strategy, or saying that Julian Assange
isn’t really trapped in the Ecuadorian embassy, QAnon enthusiasts
are constantly regurgitating talking points which just so happen to
fit in very conveniently with the interests of America’s defense
and intelligence agencies.

A
recent “Q drop” (a fancy name for an anonymous user posting text
onto a popular internet troll message board with zero
accountability) makes
this more abundantly clear than ever,
with text reading as follows:

Free
Iran!!!
Fight
Fight
Fight
Regime change.
People have
the power.
We stand with you.
Q

Once
you’re cheering for a longtime neoconservative agenda to be
accomplished in one of George W Bush’s “Axis
of Evil”
countries, you are cheering for the establishment. Or, to put it more
clearly to Q followers, you are cheering for the deep state.

So
now you have conspiracy-minded populist right wingers being
manipulated into supporting the same standard Bush administration
globalist agendas that Alex Jones built his career on attacking. The
support for regime change interventionism in Iran isn’t limited to
the QAnon crowd, having now gone fully mainstream throughout Trump’s
base, and I’d like to address a few of the arguments here that they
have been bringing to me:

“Iran
is nowhere near the same thing as Iraq, Libya or Syria!”

Please
go look at a globe and think a little harder about your position
here. Iran is a target for regime change for the exact same reasons
its neighbors Iraq and Syria have been; it occupies and extremely
strategically significant location in an oil-rich region that the
US-centralized empire wants full control of. Thinking this one is
different because its government isn’t secular is the product of
many years of Islamophobic propaganda; the plutocrats and their
allied intelligence and defense agencies don’t care what religion
sits on top of their oil, and Saudi Arabia proves it. Any argument
made against Iranian theocracy could be made even more strongly
against KSA theocracy, but you don’t see Sean Hannity advocating
the overthrow of the Saudi royals, do you?

“But
this regime change intervention would be completely different!”

No
it wouldn’t. There has never been a US-led regime change
intervention in the Middle East that wasn’t disastrous. Cheering
for regime change interventionism in Iran is cheering for all the
destabilization, chaos, terror, death, rape and slavery that always
necessarily comes with such interventions. Wanting to inflict that
upon the world is monstrous.

“This
is different, though! This one is led by Trump! Look at all that he’s
accomplished in North Korea!”

Okay,
three things:

All
that Trump has done with North Korea is take the very first step in
the most rudimentary beginnings of peace talks. I fully support him
in taking that step, but you can’t legitimately treat it as an
“accomplishment” which proves that he is a strategic genius
capable of facilitating the impossible task of non-disastrous regime
change in Iran.

Even
if Trump does help bring abiding peace to the Korean Peninsula, it
won’t legitimize regime change interventionism in Iran. Hell, even
if Trump gets North Korea to denuclearize (and he won’t), it still
wouldn’t legitimize regime change interventionism in Iran. US-led
regime change interventionism is always disastrous, especially in
the easily destabilized geopolitical region of the Middle East.

Neocons
are always wrong about foreign policy. Always. There’s no reason
to believe Trump spearheading a longstanding neocon agenda would
work out any better than Bush or any other neocon.

“Well
what about the Iranians in Iran who want regime change?”

What
about them? The fact that some Iranians want their government changed
has nothing to do with you or your government. The Fox News
and Washington
Post pundits
who keep pointing out the fact that Iran, like America, contains
people who are unhappy with its current system of government are only
ever trying to galvanize the west against Tehran. There’s no good
reason for you to be acting as a pro bono CIA propagandist running
around telling westerners how great it would be if the Mullahs were
gone.

“Well
I don’t want the US to intervene, I just want the Iranians to free
themselves!”

Two
things:

This
administration is already currently engaged in regime change
interventionism in Iran in the form of escalated
CIA covert operations and
harsh economic sanctions, and its involvement
with Iranian terror cult MEKsuggests
it may run far deeper than that in a similar way to US involvement
with extremist groups in Syria, Libya and Ukraine.

Why
say anything, then? Ever stop to ask yourself why you’re always
cheering for Iranians to overthrow their government? Why constantly
cheerlead for something which requires zero western involvement?
Whom does that help? Do you think Iranians don’t already know that
America hates their government?

All
you’re doing is helping to signal boost the pro-regime change
propaganda that US defense and intelligence agencies have been
seeding into American public consciousness for many years. Your “Yay,
free Iran!” sentiments aren’t helping Iranians, they’re helping
the western propagandists target western audiences. You’re just
helping the public get more okay with any actions taken against the
Iranian government, in exactly the same way Russiagaters help
manufacture support for escalations against Russia.

Sherry Lynn@mssherrylyn

Iran is Next! #FREEIRAN #Qanon

2:38 PM – Jun 19, 2018

Come
on, people. Think harder. This one isn’t difficult. It’s not a
random coincidence that you’re all being paced into supporting
regime change in the final target named seventeen years ago in
General Wesley Clark’s famous “seven
countries in five years”
list of neocon regime change agendas. The only thing that has changed
is the face on the agenda.

Iran
is not different from the other regime change targets of Iraq, Libya
or Syria. Barack Obama served George W Bush’s third and fourth
terms, and Donald Trump is serving his fifth. They were strong-armed
in different ways by America’s unelected power establishment into
advancing different regime change agendas depending on where their
political support came from and public sentiment at the time, but
it’s all been pointed at the exact same region for the exact same
reasons.

Leave
Iran alone. Leave the Iranian people alone. There is no legitimate
reason for you to be cheering for regime change in Iran, and anyone
who tells you otherwise is an evil piece of shit. Reject them.

Support Caitlin’s
work on Patreon or Paypal.

Opinion by Caitlin
Johnstone /
Republished with permission / Steemit / Report
a typo