Niets nieuws voor de regelmatige lezer van dit blog, maar de
Universiteit van Californië en die van Arizona, plus het bedrijf
Illumnia Inc, hebben na onderzoek geconcludeerd dat het Coronavirus,
of COVID-19 en ook aangeduid als het SARS-CoV-2 virus, al tenminste 2
maanden eerder viraal moet zijn geweest, al zou de mate van
besmetting in die 2 maanden zijn opgelopen……
Jammer
dat de onderzoekers alleen naar de de stad Wuhan in de provincie Hubei wijzen, daar er zich ook in Frankrijk al in november 2019
minstens 2 met COVID-19 besmette personen bevonden, zo bleek uit
herbeoordeling van bloedmonsters in het voorjaar van 2020….. (monsters
die men in november 2019 heeft afgenomen……..)
Voorts
stellen de onderzoekers dat het virus niet werd verspreid door vis en
ander zeevoedsel op de ‘natte markt’ van Wuhan……
Fort Detrick waar zich een paar van de VS militaire laboratoria bevinden
Langzaam
maar zeker gaat het verhaal richting wat men eerder een
complottheorie noemde >> het virus zou ontsnapt zijn uit het
laboratorium van Fort Detrick in de VS, daar in juli 2019 deze basis
met de grootste spoed werd gesloten, nadat een gevaarlijk virus was
ontsnapt, nooit heeft men gezegd om welk virus het hier ging, laat
staan dit met bewijzen heeft aangegeven…….
De
mogelijkheid dat het virus daarna door militairen is verspreid in
Wuhan is zeer groot, daar in oktober 2019 de Militaire
Wereldspelen plaatsvonden in Wuhan…… Wereldspelen, die bezocht
werden door militairen uit een groot aantal landen, waaronder
Frankrijk, ofwel…..
Vergeet
niet dat de mutatie die het virus onderging voordat deze toesloeg in
2019 een vreemde is, immers dit virus was al vele jaren bekend, maar
was nooit zo heftig als de variant die als eerste zou zijn opgedoken
in Wuhan, waarvan we nu moeten afwachten of deze daar als eerste is ontstaan……. Mutaties van virussen gaan over het algemeen geleidelijk, zo wordt het vaccin voor het griepvirus jaarlijks aangepast voor de mutatie die virussen het jaar daarvoor hebben ondergaan (het Coronavirus is m.i. ook en griepvirus, al gaat het dan wel om een heftig virus)
(Nederlandse soldaatjes, kijk ze netjes marcheren ttijdens de opening van de spelen in Wuhan)
Veronderstel
dat binnen afzienbare tijd inderdaad zal blijken dat het virus uit
Fort Detrick komt, benieuwd of men dan ook mensen uit de VS zal
uitschelden op straat, zoals de Nederlanders van Chinese komaf
overkwam nadat men bekend maakte dat het Coronavirus uit China
kwam….. (reken maar niet dat dit dan zal gebeuren……)
Tot slot: de militaire basis Fort Detrick is ‘gelukkig weer geopend voor verder onderzoek naar biologische wapens als besmettellijke ziekten….’ (volgens de autoriteiten zoekt men daar naar middelen om de bevolking te beschermen tegen besmettelijke ziekten….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja nadat men eerst een dodelijk virus heeft ontwikkeld zoekt men naar een middel waarmee men de eigen bevolking kan beschermen tegen dat virus!!*)
Novel
coronavirus circulated undetected months before first COVID-19 cases
in Wuhan, China
Study dates emergence to
as early as October 2019; Simulations suggest in most cases zoonotic
viruses die out naturally before causing a pandemic
- Date:
-
March 18,
2021 - Source:
-
University of
California – San Diego - Summary:
-
Using
molecular dating tools and epidemiological simulations, researchers
estimate that the SARS-CoV-2 virus likely circulated undetected for
two months before the first human cases of COVID-19 were described
in Wuhan, China in late-December 2019.
Coronavirus
illustration (stock image). Credit:
© rost9 / stock.adobe.com
Using molecular
dating tools and epidemiological simulations, researchers at
University of California San Diego School of Medicine, with
colleagues at the University of Arizona and Illumina, Inc., estimate
that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was likely circulating undetected for at
most two months before the first human cases of COVID-19 were
described in Wuhan, China in late-December 2019.
Writing in the March 18, 2021
online issue of Science,
they also note that their simulations suggest that the mutating virus
dies out naturally more than three-quarters of the time without
causing an epidemic.
“Our study was designed to
answer the question of how long could SARS-CoV-2 have circulated in
China before it was discovered,” said senior author Joel O.
Wertheim, PhD, associate professor in the Division of Infectious
Diseases and Global Public Health at UC San Diego School of Medicine.
“To answer this question, we
combined three important pieces of information: a detailed
understanding of how SARS-CoV-2 spread in Wuhan before the lockdown,
the genetic diversity of the virus in China and reports of the
earliest cases of COVID-19 in China. By combining these disparate
lines of evidence, we were able to put an upper limit of mid-October
2019 for when SARS-CoV-2 started circulating in Hubei province.”
Cases of COVID-19 were first
reported in late-December 2019 in Wuhan, located in the Hubei
province of central China. The virus quickly spread beyond Hubei.
Chinese authorities cordoned off the region and implemented
mitigation measures nationwide. By April 2020, local transmission of
the virus was under control but, by then, COVID-19 was pandemic with
more than 100 countries reporting cases.
SARS-CoV-2 is a zoonotic
coronavirus, believed to have jumped from an unknown animal host to
humans. Numerous efforts have been made to identify when the virus
first began spreading among humans, based on investigations of
early-diagnosed cases of COVID-19. The first cluster of cases — and
the earliest sequenced SARS-CoV-2 genomes — were associated with the
Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, but study authors say the market
cluster is unlikely to have marked the beginning of the pandemic
because the earliest documented COVID-19 cases had no connection to
the market.
Regional newspaper reports suggest
COVID-19 diagnoses in Hubei date back to at least November 17, 2019,
suggesting the virus was already actively circulating when Chinese
authorities enacted public health measures.
In the new study, researchers used
molecular clock evolutionary analyses to try to home in on when the
first, or index, case of SARS-CoV-2 occurred. “Molecular clock”
is a term for a technique that uses the mutation rate of genes to
deduce when two or more life forms diverged — in this case, when the
common ancestor of all variants of SARS-CoV-2 existed, estimated in
this study to as early as mid-November 2019.
Molecular dating of the most recent
common ancestor is often taken to be synonymous with the index case
of an emerging disease. However, said co-author Michael Worobey, PhD,
professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at University of
Arizona: “The index case can conceivably predate the common
ancestor — the actual first case of this outbreak may have occurred
days, weeks or even many months before the estimated common ancestor.
Determining the length of that ‘phylogenetic fuse’ was at the heart
of our investigation.”
Based on this work, the researchers
estimate that the median number of persons infected with SARS-CoV-2
in China was less than one until November 4, 2019. Thirteen days
later, it was four individuals, and just nine on December 1, 2019.
The first hospitalizations in Wuhan with a condition later identified
as COVID-19 occurred in mid-December.
Study authors used a variety of
analytical tools to model how the SARS-CoV-2 virus may have behaved
during the initial outbreak and early days of the pandemic when it
was largely an unknown entity and the scope of the public health
threat not yet fully realized.
These tools included epidemic
simulations based on the virus’s known biology, such as its
transmissibility and other factors. In just 29.7 percent of these
simulations was the virus able to create self-sustaining epidemics.
In the other 70.3 percent, the virus infected relatively few persons
before dying out. The average failed epidemic ended just eight days
after the index case.
“Typically, scientists use the
viral genetic diversity to get the timing of when a virus started to
spread,” said Wertheim. “Our study added a crucial layer on
top of this approach by modeling how long the virus could have
circulated before giving rise to the observed genetic diversity.
“Our approach yielded some
surprising results. We saw that over two-thirds of the epidemics we
attempted to simulate went extinct. That means that if we could go
back in time and repeat 2019 one hundred times, two out of three
times, COVID-19 would have fizzled out on its own without igniting a
pandemic. This finding supports the notion that humans are constantly
being bombarded with zoonotic pathogens.”
Wertheim noted that even as
SARS-CoV-2 was circulating in China in the fall of 2019, the
researchers’ model suggests it was doing so at low levels until at
least December of that year.
“Given that, it’s hard to
reconcile these low levels of virus in China with claims of
infections in Europe and the U.S. at the same time,” Wertheim
said. “I am quite skeptical of claims of COVID-19 outside China
at that time.”
The original strain of SARS-CoV-2
became epidemic, the authors write, because it was widely dispersed,
which favors persistence, and because it thrived in urban areas where
transmission was easier. In simulated epidemics involving less dense
rural communities, epidemics went extinct 94.5 to 99.6 percent of the
time.
The virus has since mutated
multiple times, with a number of variants becoming more
transmissible.
“Pandemic surveillance wasn’t
prepared for a virus like SARS-CoV-2,” Wertheim said. “We
were looking for the next SARS or MERS, something that killed people
at a high rate, but in hindsight, we see how a highly transmissible
virus with a modest mortality rate can also lay the world low.”
Co-authors include: Jonathan Pekar
and Niema Moshiri, UC San Diego; and Konrad Scheffler, Illumina, Inc.
Funding for this research came, in
part, from the National Institutes of Health (grants AI135992,
AI136056, T15LM011271), the Google Cloud COVID-19 Research Credits
Program, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the University of
Arizona and the National Science Foundation (grant 2028040).
======================================
* Zie o.a.: ‘Coronavirus: militaire laboratoria werken aan biologische wapens als virussen >> waarom heeft niemand daar commentaar op?‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht!!)
Zie
ook: ‘Study Suggests Covid-19 Was In The U.S. Weeks Earlier Than
Thought, Before First Public Cases In China‘ (dit artikel van 1
december 2020 stelt wel dat het virus al weken eerder in de VS werd
gevonden, vóór de eerste melding in China, eind december 2020….)
‘Coronavirus: China door het slijk halen‘
‘Coronavirus: alles wijst erop dat dit virus uit een militair laboratorium van de VS komt‘
‘VS
loopt achter de ‘Coronafeiten’ aan en geeft nu zelfs Rusland de schuld
van het manipuleren van de verkiezingen door haar humanitaire hulp‘ (humanitaire hulp aan de VS wel te verstaan, een beschuldiging van uiterst onbeschofte proporties., maar ja het gaat dan ook om de VS, de grootste terreurentiteit ter wereld……)
‘Coronavirus: hysterische en belachelijke beschuldigingen aan adres China‘
‘Coronavirus tragedie misbruikt voor racisme en het zaaien van haat”
‘Coronavirus hysterie: de nieuwe anti-Chinese campagne in de VS bestaat (alweer) uit leugens‘
‘Antrax ‘aanvallen’ na 911, de antrax kwam uit VS overheidsvoorraad, verspreid door………‘