F. William Engdahl heeft een uitvoerig artikel geschreven over de betrouwbaarheid van de farmaceuten die COVID-vaccins maken, waarbij hij zich in de kop afvraagt of we de wetenschap van de farmaceutische industrie moeten vertrouwen, dit daar dr. Fauci ‘eeuwigdurend’ hoofd van de National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) het publiek meermaals heeft voorgehouden wat betreft deze vaccins de wetenschap te vertrouwen.
De vraag van Engdahl is des te belangrijker daar eigenlijk niemand van de reguliere (massa-) media vragen stelt bij de wetenschappelijke staat van dienst, opgebouwd door de belangrijkste vertegenwoordigers van de farmaceutische industrie (uiteraard vooral doelend op de makers van de vaccins die worden gebruikt tegen COVID-19)……. In het kort, zo stelt Engdahl, is dat ondoorgrondelijk en extreem alarmerend, alleen dit zou voor regeringen al voldoende moeten zijn om de bevolking niet met dwang te onderwerpen aan ‘radicale, ongeteste experimentele injecties’, zonder dat deze zijn onderworpen aan langdurige dierproeven en andere testmethodes die aangeven dat het vaccin veilig is…..*
Het vaccin van Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) werd afgelopen april in de VS door de Centers for Disease Cotrol and Prevention (CDC) en de Food and Drug Administration (FDA) op pauze gezet vanwege bloedklontering die een zestal mensen had getroffen, zes op zeven miljoen vaccinaties. Fauci gebruikte deze pauzering als teken dat de wetenschap de boel strak in de gaten houdt en bij het minste of geringste aan de noodrem trekt…… Letterlijk zei hij dat we in deze worden ‘geregeerd door de wetenschap’ en niet vanwege welke andere overweging dan ook, alsof de ‘wetenschap’ achter deze vaccins zaligmakend is en daar twijfelt Engdahl volkomen terecht sterk aan.
Deze pauzering zou zoals gezegd het publiek gerust moeten stellen dat de overheid ‘ultra voorzichtig’ is met de experimentele COVID-19-vaccins, die nooit langdurig zijn getest op mensen (zoals bij alle andere vaccins vijf tot tien jaar) en alleen vanwege de nood (de Coronacrisis) toestemming voor gebruik kregen van de FDA….. Niet vreemd dus dat de FDA het vaccin van Janssen weer toeliet nadat Johnson & Johnson akkoord ging met het opnemen van bloedklontering in de lijst van bijwerkingen……
Tegelijkertijd aldus Engdahl gebruiken de concurrerende vaccinmakers Pfizer en Moderna de uiterst experimentele genetische mRNA techniek, echter voor deze fabrikanten geen pauzering van deze vaccins door de ‘wetenschap’, nadat bleek dat deze vaccins hebben geleid tot honderdduizenden alarmerende ernstige bijwerkingen, inclusief meerdere duizenden doden, die werden geregistreerd door de databank van de CDC >> VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System)……. (een organisatie als ons Lareb)
Onder de bijwerkingen registreerde de CDC trombocytopenie syndroom met of zonder trombose, het syndroom van guillain-barré, myocarditis, pericarditis en de dood….. Voor de week van 16 juli registreerde de VAERS een alarmerend aantal van 9.125 doden na vaccinatie met COVID-19-vaccins sinds afgelopen december >> nooit eerder in de geschiedenis zijn er zoveel doden gemeld na inzet van welk vaccin dan ook, echter de media (en in de EU: ook de politiek) zijn daarover oorverdovend stil……
De woorden van Fauci zijn volgens Engdahl dan ook hoogst misleidend en opzettelijk manipulatief, alsof er een vaststaande zaak is die we ‘De Wetenschap’ kunnen noemen, zoals het Vaticaan (hoewel dat ook oplichters zijn, Ap), terwijl de wetenschap juist nooit rust door continu vragen te blijven stellen en hypothesen te verwerpen voor nieuwe inzichten….. Echter als het gaat om de ‘wetenschap’ hebben de grote farmaceuten (Big Pharma), in feite een kartel, een geschiedenis van fraude, het vervalsen van eigen tests, als ook het omkopen van artsen en medische beambten om hun eigen medicijnen te promoten, ondanks dat de door hen onderzochte ‘wetenschappelijke’ resultaten vaak hun aannames van veiligheid tegenspreken…..
Daarna gaat Engdahl los met een aantal voorbeelden waaruit blijkt dat de ‘wetenschap’ van de farmaceuten totaal onbetrouwbaar is, daarbij wijst hij o.a. op medicijnen die uit de handel zijn genomen voor de klachten waarvoor ze werden ontworpen, terwijl die middelen wel worden voorgeschreven voor andere klachten (‘off-label gebruik’).
Verder een aantal voorbeelden van grote fouten die je ook hier als welbekend mag veronderstellen, zoals asbest in babytalkpoeder, maar ook zaken als het overspoelen van de markt met het opiaat oxycodon, zaken waarvoor deze farmaceuten worden beboet met enorme bedragen, waarbij deze farmaceuten het liever niet laten uitlopen op een veroordeling, maar daarvoor schikken, zodat ze in feite de handen deels in ‘onschuld’ kunnen wassen……
Engdahl wijst voorts ook op het bestaan van ronduit corruptie, waar figuren die een belang hebben in een bedrijf, subsidies toekennen aan dat bedrijf……
Jammer dat Engdahl niet wijst op het feit dat deze farmaceuten bij de regeringen van landen waar hun vaccin wordt gebruikt hebben geëist dat ze niet aansprakelijk mogen worden gesteld voor ernstige bijwerkingen of het nu om de korte, de middellange dan wel lange termijn gaat…… Alsof je alleen een auto kan kopen als je bij de koop een verklaring tekent waarin te lezen is dat je de fabrikant nooit aansprakelijk kan stellen voor ernstige technische gebreken die tot zwaar letsel of zelfs de dood kunnen leiden, zo’n fabrikant zou heel snel failliet gaan, echter als het om de volksgezondheid gaat tekent elke regering voor die clausule…… In het artikel van Engdahl zoals gezegd zaken waarbij de farmaceuten wel kapitalen hebben moeten betalen voor ernstige bijwerkingen van door hen ontwikkelde medicijnen…….
Tot slot nog het volgende: vanmorgen werd bekend gemaakt dat Pfizer haar vaccin tegen COVID met 4 dollar per vaccin in prijs gaat verhogen…. Dit terwijl Pfizer, ondanks een enorme bak subsidie het vaccin heeft ontwikkeld en al enorme winsten heeft geboekt op het vaccin, dit jaar staat de teller al op meer dan 20 miljard dollar!!**
Eerst de inleiding op het artikel zoals door mij per mail ontvangen:
In
the past months leading governments around the world have resorted,
sometimes, to actual police state measures to force citizens to take an
experimental vaccine or gene-changing injection alleged to protect
against an illness whose mortality is that of the seasonal flu. There
are three
major drug companies in the West presently approved under dubious
conditions to administer the jabs, and now we are being told that that
is not even enough and that annual booster shots will be necessary as
well as masks, even for the vaccinated. I want to share with you some
research I have done on the three companies that suggest that we
urgently need far more transparency from government, WHO and national
health authorities on medications we are being increasingly forced to
take in the name
of public pandemic health.
Should We Trust ‘The Science’ of the Pharma Industry?
By F. William Engdahl
The
forever-head of the US NIAID, Tony Fauci, has repeatedly demanded that
the public “trust the science” as he shifts his own science opinion from
one positon to another. What is never mentioned in mainstream media in
the West or almost anywhere in the world is the scientific
record of the major global vaccine making pharmaceutical giants. In
short, it is abysmal and alarming in the extreme. That alone should
prohibit governments from pushing radical untested experimental
injections on their populations without extensive long-term animal and
other testing to assure their safety.
This
past April as the US vaccination program was in high gear, the Biden
chief covid adviser, 80-year-old Fauci, head of the National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) since 1984, announced that the
US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) had decided to order a “pause” on giving the
Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) vaccine in order to examine reports of
blood clots. It turned out that there were six reported blood clot cases
of some seven million who then had had the J&J covid jab. Fauci in
his press remarks declared, “one of the things that’s, I think, such a
good thing about our system here, is that we’re ruled by the science,
not by any other consideration.”[i] There is good reason to question Fauci.
That
was supposed to reassure people that the authorities were being
ultra-careful with the experimental covid medications which, after all,
never have been mass-tested on humans before and have only gotten
“emergency use authorization,” provisional FDA approval. The FDA quickly
lifted the
pause as J&J agreed to print that its vaccine could cause blood
clots.
Yet
at the same time, rival vaccine makers, Pfizer and Moderna, both using a
hyper-experimental genetic treatment known as mRNA, were not being
paused by “the science” despite the fact that hundreds of thousands of
alarming vaccine-related severe reactions, including official data of
several thousand deaths from both, had been recorded by CDC data base,
VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System).
According
to the CDC such “adverse” events, post-vaccine, include anaphylaxis,
thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, Guillain-Barre Syndrome,
myocarditis, pericarditis, and death. For the week of July 16 the CDC
VAERS reported an alarming 9,125 reported deaths since late December
from
the COVID-19 vaccinations. Never in history have such high death totals
been associated with any vaccine, yet the media is deafeningly silent
about this. [ii]
Their dismal science record
The
wording of Fauci is precise and deliberately manipulative. It suggests
that there exists some fixed thing we can call “The Science,” like some
Vatican religious dogma, whereas the real scientific method is one of
continuous questioning, overturning past hypotheses with newly proven
ones, adjusting. Yet when it comes to “Science,” the handful of giant
vaccine makers, sometimes known as Big Pharma, a cartel not unlike Big
Oil, have a record of fraud, deliberate doctoring of their own tests, as
well as widespread bribing of doctors and medical officials to promote
their various drugs despite “Science” results that contradict their
assertions of safety. A look at the major global pharmaceutical giants
is instructive.
J&J
We
begin with the Johnson & Johnson Company of New Jersey. On July 21,
2021 J&J and three other smaller drug makers agreed to pay a
staggering $26 billion damages to a group of US states for their role in
causing America’s opioid epidemic. Of that J&J will pay $5 billion.
The CDC estimates that use of the highly-addictive opioids as
painkillers caused at least 500,000 deaths between 1999 and 2019.
Johnson & Johnson is accused of pushing the deadly painkillers for
excessive use and downplaying their addiction risks. They knew better.[iii]
The
same J&J is in a huge legal battle for knowingly using a carcinogen
in its famous baby powder. A 2018 Reuters investigation found J&J
knew for decades that asbestos, a known carcinogen, lurked in its baby
powder and other cosmetic talc products. The company is reportedly
considering legally splitting its baby powder division into a small
separate company that would then declare bankruptcy to avoid large
payouts. [iv] The J&J covid vaccine, unlike that from Pfizer and Moderna,
does not use mRNA genetic alteration.
The
two global covid vaccine makers which have by far the largest market to
date are the two being personally promoted by Fauci. These are from
Pfizer in alliance with the tiny German BioNTech company under the name
Comirnaty, and from the US biotech
Moderna.
Pfizer
Pfizer,
one of the world’s largest vaccine makers by sales, was founded in 1849
in the USA. It also has one of the most criminal records of fraud,
corruption, falsification and proven damage. A 2010 Canadian study
noted, “Pfizer has been a “habitual offender,” persistently engaging in
illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and
suppressing adverse trial results.” [v] That’s serious. Note that Pfizer has yet to make fully public details of its covid vaccine studies for
external examination.
The
list of Pfizer crimes has gotten longer since 2010. It is currently
engaged in lawsuits related to charges its Zantac heartburn medication
is contaminated with a cancer-causing substance. As well, Pfizer
received the biggest drug-related fine in US history in 2009 as part of a
$2.3 Billion plea deal for mis-promoting medicines Bextra and Celebrex
and paying kickbacks to compliant doctors. Pfizer pleaded guilty to the
felony of marketing four drugs including Bextra “with the intent to
defraud or mislead.” They were forced to withdraw their arthritis
painkiller Bextra in the USA and EU for causing heart attacks, strokes,
and serious skin disease. [vi]
Clearly
in a move to boost revenue, Pfizer illegally paid doctors kickbacks for
“off-label” use of more than one of its drug which resulted in patients
being injured or killed. Among them were Bextra (valdecoxib); Geodon
(ziprasidone HCl), an atypical antipsychotic; Zyvox
(linezolid), an antibiotic; Lyrica (pregabalin), a seizure medication;
its famous Viagra (sildenafil), an erectile dysfunction drug; and
Lipitor (atorvastatin), a cholesterol drug. [vii]
In
another court trial, Pfizer subsidiaries were forced to pay $142
million and release company documents that showed it was illegally
marketing gabapentin for off-label use. “Data revealed in a string of
U.S. lawsuits indicates the drug was promoted by the drug company as a
treatment for
pain, migraines and bipolar disorder – even though it wasn’t effective
in treating these conditions and was actually toxic in certain cases,
according to the Therapeutics Initiative, an independent drug research
group at the University of British Columbia. The trials forced the
company to release all of its studies on the drug, including the ones it
kept hidden.” [viii]
In
2004 Pfizer subsidiary Warner-Lambert was forced to pay $430 to settle
criminal charges and civil liability arising from its fraudulent
marketing practices with respect to Neurontin, its brand for the drug
gabapentin. Originally developed for the treatment of epilepsy,
Neurontin was
illegally promoted off-label for the treatment of neurological pain, and
in particular for migraine and bipolar disorder – even though it wasn’t
effective in treating these conditions and was actually toxic in some
cases. Neurontin for unapproved uses made up some 90% of the $2.7
billion in sales in 2003. [ix]
A
New York Times report disclosed in 2010 that Pfizer “…paid about $20
million to 4,500 doctors and other medical professionals in the United
States for consulting and speaking on its behalf in the last six months
of 2009.” It paid another $15.3 million to 250 academic medical
centers and other research groups for clinical trials. In the US legal
practice it is seldom that corporate executives actually doing the
criminal deeds are prosecuted. The result is that court fines can be
treated as “business costs” in this cynical milieu. In eight years of
repeated malfeasance through 2009, Pfizer accumulated just under $3
billion in fines and civil penalties, about a third of one year’s net
revenues. [x]
In
2020 as its covid vaccine was in development, Pfizer paid $13,150,000
in lobbying Congress and officials in Washington among others. Also
notable is the fact that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation own
shares of both Pfizer and their partner in the leading mRNA vaccine,
BioNTech of
Germany. [xi]
Moderna
The
third covid vaccine producer today with FDA Emergency Use Authorization
(EUA) is Moderna of Cambridge, Massachusetts. It has yet to be sued for
illegal practices unlike J&J or Pfizer. But that fact is likely
only because before its EUA for its mRNA experimental vaccine, in its
ten
years existence since 2010 it had failed to get FDA approval to market a
single medicine, despite repeated failed attempts. However Moderna has a
red neon sign that reads “conflict of interest” that should give pause.
Moderna
and Fauci’s NIAID have collaborated on development of vaccines using
Moderna’s mRNA platform and NIAID of Fauci on coronaviruses including
MERS, since at least November, 2015. On January 13, 2020, before the
first case of a supposed Wuhan, China “novel coronavirus” was even
detected in the United States, Fauci’s NIAID and Moderna signed an
updated cooperation agreement which described them as co-owners of a
mRNA based coronavirus and that they had finalized a sequence for
mRNA-1273, the vaccine now being given to millions for supposedly
averting the novel coronavirus. [xii]
That means that Fauci’s NIAID and perhaps Fauci personally (it’s
allowed in the US) stood to reap huge financial benefits from emergency
approval of the Moderna jab, yet Fauci has never admitted to the
conflict publicly when he was Trump corona adviser, nor as Biden’s.
Ten
days later on January 23, 2020 Moderna announced it was granted funding
by CEPI, a vaccine fund created by Bill Gates’ foundation along with
Davos WEF among others, to develop an mRNA vaccine for the Wuhan virus. [xiii]
Moderna
was created by a venture capitalist, Noubar Afeyan along with Harvard
professor Timothy A. Springer, and others. In 2011 Afeyan recruited
French businessman and former Eli Lilly executive Stephane Bancel as CEO
of the new Moderna. Despite having no medical or science degree nor any
experience running a drug development operation, Bancel lists himself as
co-patent holder for a hundred patents of Moderna tied to the different
vaccines. Beginning in 2013 the tiny Moderna was receiving grants from
the Pentagon to develop its mRNA technology. As of 2020 just prior to
its receiving emergency use authorization from the US Government FDA,
fully 89% of Moderna revenues were from US Government grants. This is
hardly an experienced company yet it holds the fate of millions in its
hands. As Fauci says, “Trust the Science.”
In
February 2016, an editorial in Nature magazine criticized Moderna for
not publishing any peer-reviewed papers on its technology, unlike most
other emerging and established biotech companies. The company remains
ultra-secretive. That same year, 2016 Moderna got $20 million from the
Gates
Foundation for vaccine development using mRNA. [xiv]
Up
to its receiving EUA approval for its covid mRNA product in December
2020 Moderna had only made losses since its founding. Then curiously,
following a March 2020 personal meeting with then-President Trump where
Bancel told the president Moderna could have a vaccine ready in
a matter of months Moderna luck changed.
On
May 15, Trump announced creation of Operation Warp Seed to rollout a
covid19 vaccine by December. The head of the Presidential group was a
30-year R&D veteran of the large UK drug firm GSK, Moncef Slaoui. In
2017 Slaoui had resigned from GSK and joined the board of none other
than
Moderna. Under Slaoui’s Warp Speed, some $22 billion of US taxpayer
money was thrown at different vaccine makers. Moderna was a prime
recipient, a brazen conflict of interest but nobody seemed to care.
Slaoui funneled some $2 billion in government funds to his old company,
Moderna, to develop the mRNA covid vaccine. Only under public criticism
did Slaoui sell his stock in Moderna, making millions in profit from
Moderna’s role as a covid vaccine leading candidate. Shortly after
resigning at
the end of the Trump presidency, Slaoui was fired by his old firm GSK
from a company subsidiary following charges of sexual harassment of a
female employee. [xv]
In
February 2020 Trump Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar,
invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) to
exempt Moderna, Pfizer, J&J and any future covid makers from any and
all liability arising from damage or death caused by their vaccines for
the Wuhan coronavirus. The legal protection lasts until 2024. If the
vaccines are so good and safe, why is such a measure needed? Azar was
former head of the US drug giant Eli Lilly.[xvi]
There are some serious
questions that must be raised openly regarding the vaccine makers who
are now pushing experimental highly controversial gene-edited
formulations in human experiments.
Endnotes:
[i] Fauci’s Latest ‘Trust the Science’ Argument Is at Odds With His Last One, April 14, 2021, https://redstate.com/sister-
[ii]
Jim Hoft, CDC Quietly Deletes 6 000 COVID Vaccine Deaths From Its CDC
Website Total in One Day — Caught by Internet Sleuths, July 22, 2021, https://www.thegatewaypundit.
[iii] COVID Vaccine Maker Johnson & Johnson To Pay $26 Billion As Settlement For Causing Opioid Epidemic,
July 22, 2021, https://greatgame&india.com/
[iv] Megan Redshaw, J&J Eyes Bankruptcy Maneuver in Bid to Skirt Liability in Baby Powder Lawsuits,
Global Research, July 20, 2021, https://www.globalresearch.ca/
[v] Robert G. Evans, Tough on Crime? Pfizer and the CIHR, 1 May, 2010, https://europepmc.org/article/
[vi] Ethan Huff, Pfizer, a habitual offender that persistently engages in illegal activity, study warns,
March 24, 2021, https://pharmaceuticalfraud.
[vii] Robert G. Evans, op cit.
[viii] Ibid.
[ix] Pfizer Admits Guilt in Promotion of Neurontin–Agrees to Pay $430 Million, October 26, 2006, https://ahrp.org/pfizer-
[x] Robert G. Evans, op cit.
[xi] Keith Speights, 4 Coronavirus Vaccine Stocks the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Is Betting On, September 24, 2020, https://www.msn.com/en-us/
[xii] NIH-Moderna Confidential Agreements, https://www.documentcloud.org/
[xiii]
Business Wire, Moderna Announces Funding Award from CEPI to Accelerate
Development of Messenger RNA (mRNA) Vaccine Against Novel Coronavirus,
January 23, 2020, https://investors.modernatx.
[xiv] Nature Biotechnology, Research not fit to print, 5 February, 2016, https://www.nature.com/
[xv] Dan Mangan, GSK fires Trump Covid vaccine chief Moncef Slaoui for ‘substantiated’ sexual harassment claims
March 24, 2021, https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/
[xvi] SWFI, COVID: Pfizer, Moderna, and Other Vaccine Makers Get Legal Immunity for Some Time, January 15, 2021, https://www.swfinstitute.org/
============================
* Lullig dat Engdahl dierproeven aanhaalt, daar deze totaal overbodig
zijn geworden, sterker nog ‘de wetenschap’ heeft aangetoond dat
dierproeven niet geschikt zijn om de effecten daarvan toepasbaar te maken op
de reacties van het menselijk lichaam, bovendien zijn er uitstekende nieuwe methodes
die veel meer betrouwbaar zijn, zoals proeven op menselijke cellen en
met computermodellen…..
————————————
Zie ook: ‘Met COVID-19 besmette zorgmedewerkers mogen ondanks symptomen gewoon doorwerken…….‘
‘Coronavirus: alarmerend aantal dodelijke slachtoffers mRNA vaccins‘ (en zie ook de reactie onder dat bericht)
‘Coronacrisis: Australische militairen moeten de straten en huizen van o.a. moslims in Sydney controleren‘ zie wat betreft Australië en de Coronamaatregelen ook:
‘Frankrijk en Griekenland voeren vaccinatieplicht in voor verpleegkundigen en verzorgenden‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht!!)
‘COVID-vaccin slachtoffers openen website na censuur van media die imago van vaccinmakers belangrijker achten dan volksgezondheid‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht!!) (!!!!)
‘Coronavaccinaties: de staf van ziekenhuizen wil deze bij verpleegkundigen verplicht stellen‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht!!)
‘Coronavirus:
Diederik Gommers (IC arts) zou het mooi vinden dat mensen worden
ingeënt met het AZ vaccin nadat ze tekenden voor het risico dat ze
lopen…..‘ (ik bedoel maar…. ha! ha! ha! ha!)
‘Pfizer Coronavirus vaccin: wat je niet wordt verteld over de vaccins tegen COVID-19‘
‘COVID-19: gezonde mensen maken elkaar niet ziek‘
‘Coronabeslommeringen: ook na vaccinatie kan je het virus doorgeven, plus de zoveelste blunder van CDA minister de Jonge‘
(het na dit bericht gebrachte nieuws dat je niet besmettelijk bent na
vaccinatie, schijnt grote onzin te zijn en zou gebaseerd zijn op een
foute interpretatie van een bericht uit de VS, lijkt me ook logisch daar
dr Fauci eerder al meldde dat gevaccineerden nog lang besmettelijk
blijven en zich aan de Coronamaatregelen dienen te houden…..)
‘Coronavirus, PCR test: leugens en onzin‘ (een artikel van Mario Ortiz Buijsse)
‘Pfizer Coronavirus vaccin: wat je niet wordt verteld over de vaccins tegen COVID-19‘
‘Vaccin AstraZeneca in twee delen voor 90% beschermend tegen COVID-19 en de bijwerkingen…… (?)‘
‘Coronavirus: opmerking bij vaccins‘ (weggecensureerd, zie het bericht voor verdere info)
‘Ausweis bitte! COVI-PASS ‘noodzakelijk’ bij aantonen ‘immuniteit’ voor Coronavirus‘ (o.a. over het eerste bedrijf dat bezig is met het ontwikkelen van zo’n pas……)
‘Remdesivir: een amper werkend medicijn voor 1,6 miljard dollar: per patiënt $ 3,200.–, echte kosten $ 10.– per persoon……‘ (ook Fauci was aanvankelijk voor behandeling met dit middel…..)
‘Wereldbevolking moet afhankelijk worden gemaakt van vaccins in combinatie met een ‘vaccinatiepaspoort’‘ (zie ook de video’s in dat bericht, waarvan de hieronder getoonde er één is)
Forced vaccinations for all. And that means you. A triumph for authoritarians (een video uit 2018, zeker zien mensen!):
‘VS geeft 1 miljard dollar voor vaccin tegen COVID-19 aan Britse farmaceut‘ (een bericht van 25 mei 2020!!!!)
‘GSK
koopt belang in Duitse ontwikkelaar Coronavaccin CureVac, terwijl
minister de Jonge waarschijnlijk alweer een bok heeft geschoten‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht)
‘De WHO is bijkans overgenomen door de grote farmaceuten; juist van groot belang door de Coronacrisis‘
‘Coronavirus: farmaceuten zijn nu al doende de prijs voor een vaccin op te drijven‘ (bericht van maart dit jaar)
‘Judy Mikovits, biochemicus in microbiologie, gevangengezet op aanwijzing van de farmaceuten‘ (!!!!) (een bericht uit 2019 dat over het griepvirus gaat en waarvan je de haren te berge zullen rijzen…..)