CEO General Motors ontvangt 22 miljoen dollar voor het ontslaan van duizenden arbeiders en het sluiten van 5 fabrieken….

Je ziet pas goed waar aandeelhouders voor staan als het gaat om het ontslaan van arbeiders, de aandelenkoers van een bepaald bedrijf waar men flink snijdt in het aantal banen, gaan als een speer de lucht in…….
De CEO van General Motors (GM), Mary Barra, heeft 15.000 banen geschrapt, waarbij uiteraard een groot aantal arbeiders op straat komt te staan en er 5 fabrieken in Noord-Amerika worden gesloten, terwijl de fabrieken in Mexico en China ongemoeid blijven…..
Alsof Barra prestaties van niveau heeft neergezet, werd ze in 2017 beloond met het meer dan achterlijk hoge inkomen van 22 miljoen dollar…… Reken maar gerust dat Barra, ondanks haar belachelijk hoge salaris, zal worden beloond voor het schrappen van banen en fabrieken….
Dat de koers van GM na dit nieuws niet fiks de hoogte inging, heeft van alles te maken met de ‘niet zo florissante positie’ van GM.
Lees het volgende artikel van J.T. Crowe waarin veel kritiek is te lezen op GM, dat eerder met staatssteun op de been moest worden gehouden (tja, soms heeft Trump gelijk)

Appalling: General Motors CEO Collects $22 Million Salary While Cutting 15,000 Jobs

Posted by JT Crowe | Dec 7, 2018 | News
General Motors CEO Mary Barra might be the most unpopular CEO in the United States right now after GM announced it is slashing up to 15,000 jobs and closing up to five plants in North America.
Barra has been shredded from all sides for the decision, including from President Donald Trump.
Appalling: General Motors CEO Collects $22 Million Salary While Cutting 15,000 Jobs
(hare kwaadaardigheid Mary Barra)
Very disappointed with General Motors and their CEO, Mary Barra, for closing plants in Ohio, Michigan and Maryland. Nothing being closed in Mexico & China. The U.S. saved General Motors, and this is the THANKS we get! We are now looking at cutting all @GMsubsidies, including… for electric cars. General Motors made a big China bet years ago when they built plants there (and in Mexico) – don’t think that bet is going to pay off. I am here to protect America’s Workers!”
On Tuesday, West Virginia Democrat Richard Ojeda, who is considering a presidential run in 2020, blasted Barra on Twitter for her $22 million salary, a number that was confirmed by Politifact. Barra’s salary is in fact 295 times higher than the average GM salaried worker’s $74,000.
At General Motors, CEO Mary Barra ‘took home almost 22 MILLION DOLLARS last year alone (295x your company’s average employee).” he tweeted.
He then slammed Barra and GM in another tweet, lambasting the company and its CEO for their corporate greed for cutting jobs and closing plants after receiving a bailout and tax breaks that kept the company afloat during the Great Recession.
(Let op: bij het volgende Twitterbericht hoort een video van bijna 2 minuten, die ik helaas niet kan overnemen, hier de link naar het origineel op Money & Markets)
I’m in Detroit at General Motors HQ.

We bailed you out.
We gave you tax breaks.

Your workers are the reason your CEO took home almost 22 MILLION DOLLARS last year alone (295x your company’s average employee).

And this is how you repay them?

While mourners gathered at the Washington National Cathedral to pay their respects to President George H.W. Bush on Wednesday, Barra met with members of Congress whose constituencies will be most impacted by the layoffs and plant closings.

GM surpassed Ford in 1927 to become the world’s largest automaker and the company soared for decades. Things began to slow in the 1980s and 1990s before falling apart during the great recession that began in 2008.
GM abandoned four of its North American brands in exchange for a federal bailout, and in that bailout is where much of the bad blood toward Barra and GM now resides.
Per Ozy:

Now, after a resurgent decade, GM again finds itself in a precarious position, and so does Barra. GM “has to be the most thoroughly disliked company in Washington right now,” Rep. Debbie Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, told CNN. In the past week, Barra has been publicly scolded by President Donald Trump and now privately confronted by congressional delegations from each of the three states where the plants targeted for closure are located — Michigan, Ohio and Maryland. GM’s shake-up is the result of a variety of factors, including the massive market shift from sedans to sport utility vehicles, not to mention the tariffs on imported steel imposed by the Trump administration earlier this year, which GM claims have cost it around $1 billion.

The 56-year-old Barra, who Forbes recently ranked as the fifth most powerful woman in the world, has faced such fire before. Just days into her new job as GM’s CEO in January 2014, a crisis involving an ignition switch malfunction in older vehicles resulting in 124 deaths threatened to upend the company’s post-bailout success, and Barra was called to publicly testify before Congress on the matter. But the stark remarks that Barra, a GM lifer who earned a Stanford MBA on a GM fellowship and spent 33 years with the company before becoming its CEO, made at an internal town hall meeting at the time were perhaps more significant. “I never want to put this behind us,” she told her company. “I want to put this painful experience permanently in our collective memories.”

The Michigan native’s subsequent bold actions matched her words as she used the crisis as an opportunity to fire underperforming executives, redirect the company’s culture and streamline a bloated organization the way she had once reduced a 10-page dress code policy as the company’s head of HR to two words: “Dress appropriately.”

Mary is as strong as they come,” the legendary investor Warren Buffett once observed of Barra. “She is as good as I’ve seen.”

Barra, the first female CEO at a major automaker, has continued to act decisively to run a smaller, more profitable company, even when that has meant closing GM’s struggling European operation, abandoning markets in places like South Africa and Russia, and selling its Germany subsidiary Opel-Vauxhall. She has also steered the company in some risky but promising directions, from the $1 billion purchase of Cruise Automation in 2016 to help the company cement its position in the autonomous driving market to the recent narrowing of its manufacturing to SUVs and trucks. “The reality is that in the sedan market, the Camrys and the Accords and the Civics of the world have dominated that space forever,” says Kelley Blue Book executive analyst Akshay Anand. “And that was not something that was going to change overnight.”

Such moves, however, can require some ruthlessness. The recent layoffs blindsided many workers — right before the Thanksgiving holiday. “These were very difficult decisions,” Barra said in a statement released Wednesday after meeting with members of Congress, where she claimed that many hourly employees at the impacted U.S. plants would have the chance to work at other GM plants. Still, as GM employees brace for the future after the company endures yet another cataclysmic event, this particular “painful experience” may be one that Barra and remaining GM employees want to put behind them and not commit to their “collective memories.”

================================
Zie ook: ‘GM CEO verdient 22 miljoen dollar voor het sluiten van fabrieken en het ontslaan van arbeiders

Ron Paul maakt gehakt van Pompeo’s uitspraak dat sancties een paar miljoen dode Iraniërs waard zijn…..

Oorlogsmisdadiger en fascistische psychopaat Pompeo, momenteel VS minister van buitenlandse zaken, liet vorige week weten dat de sancties tegen Iran, die een ‘regime change’ moeten veroorzaken, een paar miljoen doden waard zijn……. Precies zoals hare kwaadaardigheid en collega fascist van de democraten Albright liet weten dat de 500.000 kinderen die in Irak overleden ten gevolge van de VS sancties tegen dat land in de 90er jaren, het waard zijn geweest……. Wat een enorme rotschoft moet je zijn, als je dergelijke woorden uit de vuilbek durft te laten vallen…….

Ron Paul, een republikein die eerder in het huis van afgevaardigden zat, heeft gehakt gemaakt van de uitspraak die Pompeo deed voor de BBC. Met een aantal vragen geeft hij precies aan waar de schoen wringt en godzijdank noemt hij de ‘situatie’ in Jemen bij de naam: een genocide die uitgevoerd wordt door (met een toevoeging van mij) de Saoedische terreurcoalitie, militair gesteund door de VS….. Een genocide waar de Trump administratie geen seconde van wakker ligt, nee men gaat de Houthi’s die hun burgers proberen te beschermen tegen de terreur van die coalitie, aanmerken als terroristen…..*
De redactie van Money and Markets die een artikel publiceerde geschreven door J.T. Crowe (die ook verantwoordelijk is voor het volgende) over de woorden van Paul, was zo laf om nog even te refereren aan de woorden van de hoogste leider in Iran, waarin deze de VS dreigt met oorlog…… Ofwel Paul kan wel wat zeggen, maar Iran dreigt zelf met oorlog….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Alsof zo’n dreiging ook maar een moment serieus is te nemen, dan nog: de VS voert al een economische oorlog tegen Iran, dat is voor de hele wereld wel duidelijk en je weet het >> wie de bal kaatst……..
Terecht trekt Paul een vergelijking tussen de VS en Iran, waar Iran niet het ene na het andere land in puin gooit in illegaal begonnen oorlogen….. Niet Iran maar de VS steunt de genocide in Jemen en Iran vecht niet in Jemen, zoals de VS wel doet…….. Niet Iran organiseert opstanden elders, maar de VS…… Over de zogenaamde terreur die Iran zou steunen: als er één land is op de wereld dat daadwerkelijk overal en nergens terreur zaait, is het de VS wel, de VS de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde, met intussen een onafzienbaar aantal oorlogsmisdaden op haar naam….**

Beste bezoeker, lees het volgende artikel en oordeel zelf:

Ron Paul Lashes Out at Trump Admin, ‘Neocons’ Over Iran Starvation Policy

Ron Paul Lashes Out at Trump Admin, ‘Neocons’ Over Iran Starvation Policy
Posted by JT Crowe | Nov 13, 2018 | News
Retired Libertarian and Republican Congressman Ron Paul is asking a question in his weekly column about the Trump administration’s ‘neoconservative’ policy regarding how to handle the situation with Iran: Is it normal?
Some context, per the Ron Paul Institute:

It’s not often that US Government officials are honest when they talk about our foreign policy. The unprovoked 2003 attack on Iraq was called a “liberation.” The 2011 US-led destruction of Libya was a “humanitarian intervention.” And so on.

So, in a way, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was refreshingly honest last week when, speaking about newly-imposed US sanctions, he told the BBC that the Iranian leadership “has to make a decision that they want their people to eat.” It was an honest admission that new US sanctions are designed to starve Iranians unless the Iranian leadership accepts US demands.

His statement also reveals the lengths to which the neocons are willing to go to get their “regime change” in Iran. Just like then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said it was “worth it” that half a million Iraqi children died because of our sanctions on that country, Pompeo is letting us know that a few million dead Iranians is also “worth it” if the government in Tehran can be overthrown.

Paul notes that the U.S. Secretary of State has demanded that Iran “act like a normal country.” Iran essentially threatened war against the U.S. over the sanctions, but does that mean the citizens of Iran have to suffer, Paul asks, and is that normal?

Is it normal to threaten millions of people with starvation if their leaders refuse to bow down to US demands? Is the neoconservative obsession with regime change “normal” behavior? Is training and arming al-Qaeda in Syria to overthrow Assad “normal” behavior? If so, then perhaps Washington’s neocons have a point. As Iran is not imposing sanctions, is not invading its neighbors, is not threatening to starve millions of Americans unless Washington is “regime-changed,” perhaps Iran is not acting “normal.”

It all depends on what your definition of “normal” is, Paul says.

The continued Saudi genocide in Yemen does not bother Washington a bit. In fact, Saudi aggression in Yemen is viewed as just another opportunity to strike out at Iran. By making phony claims that Yemen’s Houthis are “Iran-backed,” the US government justifies literally handing the Saudis the bombs to drop on Yemeni school buses while claiming it is fighting Iranian-backed terrorism! Is that “normal”?

Millions of Yemenis face starvation after three years of Saudi attacks have destroyed the economy and a Saudi blockade prohibits aid from reaching the suffering victims, but Secretary Pompeo recently blamed Yemeni starvation on, you guessed it: Iran!

And in a shocking display of cynicism, the US government is reportedly considering listing Yemen’s Houthis as a “terrorist” organization for the “crime” of fighting back against Saudi (and US) aggression. Labeling the Yemeni resistance a “terrorist” organization would effectively “legalize” the ongoing Saudi destruction of Yemen, as it could be justified as just another battle in the “war on terror.” It would also falsely identify the real culprits in the Yemen tragedy as Iran, which is repeatedly and falsely called the “number one sponsor of terrorism” by Pompeo and the rest of the Trump Administration neocons.

So yes, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told one wicked truth last week. But before he demands that countries like Iran start acting “normal” or face starvation, perhaps he should look in the mirror. Are Pompeo and the neocons “normal”? I don’t think so.

Editor’s note: Is Ron Paul ignoring the fact that Iran has threatened the U.S. and then openly mocked the sanctions put in place, or is he right about the Iranian people being unduly targeted by the Trump administration? Share your thoughts below, and keep scrolling down to read more about the ongoing dispute with Iran on Money & Markets.

======================================
* Zie: Trump administratie staat op het punt de Houthi’s in Jemen op de terreurlijst te zetten…….‘ (zie ook de links in dat bericht)

** Alleen deze eeuw heeft de VS in/met: -illegale oorlogen, -geheime militaire operaties, -standrechtelijke executies van verdachten middels drones (waar meer dan 90% van de slachtoffers niet eens werd verdacht, dus veelal vrouwen en kinderen), -door haar georganiseerde opstanden en -staatsgrepen, al ruim meer dan 2 miljoen mensen vermoord…….

Zie ook:
VS, Saoedi-Arabië en Israël willen Iraanse bewind verdrijven met terreur, moord, sabotage en manipulatie van het nieuws…

Frankrijk beschermt Iran tegen de ‘politieagent’ van de wereld, de VS

VS vermoordt Iraniërs met sancties, EU doodstil…….

The New Tyranny of the Dollar

Saoedi-Arabië vindt zich een baken van licht tegen het duister verspreidende Iran….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Jeremy Bowen (BBC correspondent) vindt Iran een gevaar voor het Midden-Oosten

Trump volgt het scenario van deep state: oorlog met Iran ‘is onvermijdelijk….’

Rudy Giuliani viert het sterven van Iraniërs en stelt desondanks dat het Iraanse bewind door de VS geweldloos zal ondergaan…….

Iraanse protesten gezien door de propaganda bril van de VS en de rest van het westen……..

Protesten Iran opgezet door de VS en Israël

Iraanse protesten allesbehalve compleet spontaan (zoals VS ambassadeur bij de VN Haley durfde te stellen…)….

US Empire Is Running The Same Script With Iran That It Ran With Libya, Syria

Nikki Haley (VS ambassadeur in de VN) bedreigt sjiitisch Iran met militair ingrijpen……‘ (klik ook op de links onder dat bericht)

VS liegt schaamteloos om het westen verder op te zetten tegen Iran……..

Reagan middels manipulaties tot president gekozen; waarom de gijzelaars in Iran moesten wachten op hun vrijheid….

Saoedi-Arabië beschuldigt Houthi’s en Iran van raketbeschieting en noemt dit een oorlogsverklaring…………