Als ‘de
oorlog’ tegen drugs en terreur, zoals eind 40er en begin 50er jaren van de vorige eeuw de de oorlog van McCarthy tegen het communisme, kan de
opgeklopte angst voor het Coronavirus worden gezien als een
psychologische oorlogsvoering…… Oorlogsvoering die wordt gebruikt
door de zittende president of premier om daar politiek voordeel mee
te behalen……..
Het volk
wordt met een berg leugens voorgehouden dat de zittende regering het
beste met hen voorheeft en dat de gezaaide angst voor een bepaalde zaak (veelal zonder meer op basis van
leugens) werkelijk een bedreiging vormt voor iedere burger….. Neem
de angst voor moslim terreur, de kans dat je daardoor wordt getroffen
is vele malen kleiner dan dat je op straat wordt doodgereden……
Door het volk zo te manipuleren dat het grootste deel de leugens
gelooft, kan men vervolgens extra bevoegdheden geven aan geheime
diensten en kan men de burgerrechten inperken, dit met de simpele
dooddoener dat men e.e.a. doet om de burgers juist te
beschermen…….
Niet
alleen de geheime diensten profiteren van dergelijke opgeklopte
hysterie (waarbij ze ook nog eens een groot aantal fouten maken, maar
dat terzijde), ook de politie en in geval van moslim radicalisme
zelfs het leger, krijgen meer bevoegdheden en geld……. Je snapt
wel dat daarbij ook de wapenindustrie garen spint, zoals ook
oliemaatschappijen profiteren als de VS weer eens een illegale oorlog
start (oorlog ‘gelegitimeerd’ met leugens)
Ook de
Coronacrisis kan gezien worden als een soort oorlog, een oorlog tegen
het virus waarbij men alles uit kast trekt om de burgerrechten af te
breken….. Er wordt gezegd dat maatregelen e.d. in het
belang zijn van de volksgezondheid, echter dat is maar zeer de vraag,
neem het lange thuiszitten van velen zoals ouderen, waardoor hun
weerstand achteruitkachelt en ze veel meer bevattelijk zijn voor
bijvoorbeeld een griepvirus of…. COVID-19!!! Om nog maar te zwijgen over de psychologische gezondheid van deze ouderen……
Uiteraard
is de grootste winstmaker in deze de steenrijke farmaceutische
maffia, die godbetert ook nog eens gigantische kapitalen krijgt toegestopt
als men maar probeert een vaccin te produceren, terwijl de grote farmaceuten vanaf dag één al bezig waren met het ontwikkelen van een vaccin, immers de eerste die met een werkend vaccin komt is spekkoper…… Bij de top van die bedrijven moet men zich kapot hebben gelachen bij het ontvangen van miljarden aan overheidsgeld (belastinggeld…) voor de ontwikkeling van een vaccin, waar men allang mee bezig was…….
Intussen
is zo ongeveer alles wel uit de kast getrokken om de mensen bang te
maken en te houden en goochelt men zelfs met cijfers, die later vaak
niet blijken te kloppen….. Neem Nederland, hoeveel doden zijn er de
eerste maanden echt overleden aan het Coronavirus, dit daar er
destijds amper testen voorhanden waren, maar men in de media en
politiek blindelings de cijfers met grote aantallen patiënten
overnam, nogmaals: terwijl er amper of geen testmateriaal beschikbaar
was…… Het is dan ook vrijwel zeker dat een groot aantal doden
als Coronapatiënt werden meegeteld, terwijl ze alleen één of een paar van
de symptomen hadden, die ook bij een normale griep voorkomen, zoals
koorts, last van luchtwegen, bijholtes en hoofdpijn (waar de laatste
2 bijna onoverkomelijk aan elkaar zijn verbonden)
Kevin
Ryan, die het hieronder opgenomen artikel schreef voor The Guardian gaat dieper in op e.e.a. waarbij hij ook wijst op de
smerige rol die Bill Gates speelt, ook de
Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie (WHO) krijgt onder uit de kan en
uiteraard blijft de rol van de farmaceuten niet onbesproken.
Jammer
dat Ryan niet wijst op het feit dat men bij de grote farmaceuten het vaccineren tegen Corona
niet ziet als iets eenmaligs, maar als een jaarlijks terugkerende operatie die als de griep kan worden bestreden met een injectie (die
als met het griepvirus regelmatig niet of slecht zal werken…)…. Als dat inderdaad gaat gebeuren zal men
een Coronapaspoort nodig hebben om ‘mee te mogen doen in de
maatschappij….’
Ryan wijst verder op de geheime diensten die een
rol spelen in de Coronacrisis en die uiteraard hun bol uitgaan bij de
zware inperking van burgerrechten in heel veel landen en waar censuur tegenwordig al een normaal verschijnsel is in westerse ‘democratieën’, wordt ook daar met de Coronacrisis weer een stap extra gezet……..
Het volgende is
een lang artikel (dat ik overnam van Information Clearing House), maar het is meer dan de moeite van het lezen waard en
zal bij velen de ogen openen, mensen die zich nog weinig hebben verdiept in de materie, zo wordt nog eens gewezen op het feit dat de geheime diensten van de VS al op de hoogte waren van dit virus, voordat China de wereld waarschuwde in de eerste week van afgelopen januari……
Onder het artikel kan je kiezen voor een ‘Dutch vertaling’ al neemt dat wel enige tijd in beslag.
Is
the Coronavirus Scare a Psychological Operation?
By
Kevin Ryan
June 12,
2020 “Information
Clearing House”
– Governments have used psychological warfare throughout
history to manipulate public opinion, gain political advantage, and
generate profits. Western governments have engaged in such tactics in
the war on terrorism as well as in its predecessor, the war on
communism.
In both
cases, state-sponsored
terrorism and propaganda were used to distort the public’s
perception of the threats, leading to increased governmental control
of society and huge financial benefits for corporations.
It appears that the
same kinds of effects are being seen as a result of the COVID-19
pandemic.
Many of the features
and outcomes seen in the war on terrorism and the war on communism
are evident in this new “war on death.”
Therefore, it’s
reasonable to wonder if the extreme response to COVID-19, and its
associated virus SARS-COV-2, could be another psychological operation
against the public.
Considering facts
about the disease and the disproportionate response
emphasizes the possibility.
If COVID-19 has been
co-opted for manipulation of the public, through hyping the threat
and pushing exploitive solutions, who is behind it and who benefits?
Let’s first review
what features and outcomes the “coronavirus scare’ shares in
common with the “red scare” that drove the perceived threat of
communism and the “Muslim scare” behind the perceived threat of
terrorism. Here are a dozen characteristics that these perceived
threats share.
-
Fear-based
and globally directed -
Media
saturation with bias toward fear -
Data
manipulation and propaganda
-
Censorship of
opposing views -
Intelligence
agency control
of information -
Preceded
by exercises
mimicking the threat -
Series
of claims made that are later
proven false -
Response threatens
democracy -
Large increase
in wealth and power for a few; increase in social
inequality -
Increased
government control of the public and reduced individual freedoms -
Response kills
far more than the original threat - Evidence for
manufactured events (see below)
There are also
differences between the COVID-19 pandemic response and the “wars”
on communism and terrorism. One difference is that, for the virus,
agencies dedicated to public health have taken the lead. Although the
central characters that hyped the communism threat and the terrorism
threat were sometimes the
same people, they tended to represent military, diplomatic, or
intelligence agencies.
The primary actors
driving the coronavirus lockdowns and associated control mechanisms
are political leaders. However, the directives
being acted upon come from the World Health Organization
(WHO), an agency of the United Nations ostensibly responsible for
international public health.
Others controlling the
coronavirus scare are national health agencies, most notably the US
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the United
Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS).
Are these agencies
acting solely in the interest of public health?
The
WHO
The common impression
is that the entire matter began in reaction to events in China but
even that is not clear. For example, the virus is said to have
originated in the city of Wuhan and the first, limited, lockdown
occurred in that area from January to March.
China has since said
that it warned the WHO about the virus during the first week of
January. However, it is known that U.S. intelligence agencies
were aware of the potential outbreak even before that, in
November 2019. A Chinese spokesman later suggested that the U.S.
military might have brought
the virus to Wuhan during the military games held there in
October.
The first instance of
an entire country being locked down for the coronavirus was in Italy.
This occurred on March 9th based
on advice from the Italian government’s coronavirus adviser
Walter Ricciardi, who said, “The
situation risks going out of control and these measures are necessary
to keep the spread at bay.”
Ricciardi, a WHO
committee member, later admitted that Italy
had inflated the death counts from the virus, stating:
“The way in
which we code deaths in our country is very generous in the sense
that all the people who die in hospitals with the coronavirus are
deemed to be dying of the coronavirus.”
Many have noted the
inordinate influence of billionaire Bill Gates on the activities and
direction of the WHO. As of 2017, this influence was seen as
troubling, with health
advocates fearing that:
because the
Gates Foundation’s money comes from investments in big business, it
could serve as a Trojan horse for corporate interests to undermine
WHO’s role in setting standards and shaping health policies.”
Gates has been called
a ruthless schemer by his Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen and Allen
is not alone in that assessment.
Despite engaging in a
costly “public charm offensive,” Gates is seen by many as
a predatory
and monopolistic opportunist hiding behind a false front of
philanthropy. With regard to the coronavirus scare and Gates’
stated goal of vaccinating the entire world population, however,
people should be most concerned that he has worked diligently on
mechanisms of population
control.
Of course, no one
person controls the world yet so who is supposed to be running WHO,
apart from Bill Gates? The face of the WHO is Dr. Tedros Adhanom*, the
director-general of the organization. Tedros has a poor history of
ethics in leadership, with many accusations having been made against
him including that he covered-up epidemics in the past.
Alarms about Tedros
began to go off immediately after his appointment in 2017, when he
named Robert Mugabe, the former dictator of Zimbabwe, as a goodwill
ambassador to the WHO. Mugabe’s rule over Zimbabwe was dominated by
“murder,
bloodshed, torture, persecution of political opponents,
intimidation and vote-rigging on a grand scale.” This appointment
indicated that Tedros’ judgment of goodwill was dubious at best.
A letter from a group
of American doctors that same year described why Tedros has become
known as “Dr.
Cover Up.”
They wrote:
“Your
silence about what is clearly a massive cholera epidemic in Sudan
daily becomes more reprehensible. The inevitable history that will be
written of this cholera epidemic will surely cast you in an
unforgiving light.”
They added that Tedros
was “fully
complicit in the terrible suffering and dying that continues to
spread in East Africa.”
Problems at WHO didn’t
start with Tedros, however.
After the H1N1
pandemic of 2009, evidence came to light that the WHO had exaggerated
the danger and had spread fear and confusion rather than helpful
information. It was later learned that “Italy,
Germany, France and the U.K. made
secret agreements with pharmaceutical companies”
that “obliged
the countries to buy vaccinations only if the WHO raised the pandemic
to a level 6.”
The WHO then proceeded
to change its guidelines for defining a pandemic in order to
accommodate those contracts, thereby increasing the public’s fear
despite the fact that the pandemic never became a serious threat.
Although WHO has been
praised for its work to reduce some illnesses like polio, it has also
been found that drugs and vaccines recommended by WHO have been
“found
to be harmful and without significant clinical effect.”
A comprehensive view
suggests that the WHO is more of a corporate interest agency than an
organization committed to preserving public health. That’s not
surprising due to the fact that 80% of WHO’s funding comes from
“voluntary contributions” provided by private donors including
pharmaceutical companies and industry groups like Bill Gates’
Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI).
Since the worldwide
response to COVID-19 has been directed and coordinated by an
organization that works on behalf of multi-national corporations that
stand to benefit, the idea that the coronavirus scare could be a
psychological operation seems plausible.
The
CDC
In the US, the CDC is
also heavily influenced by corporate and political interests. This
became clear when, in 2016, a group of senior scientists within the
CDC filed an ethics complaint against the agency making that exact
claim. They wrote:
It appears
that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside
parties and rogue interests.”
The scientists noted
that, in order to pursue political objectives, “definitions
were changed and data cooked”
at CDC, even to the point of misrepresenting data to Congress.
Like the WHO, the CDC
has a history of pushing harmful vaccines. An example was covered in
a 60 Minutes
episode exposing the harm done by the Swine Flu vaccine in
1976 and CDC’s urging that all Americans be injected with that
harmful vaccine. The report revealed that the illness was hyped based
on very questionable data and the vaccine caused neurological damage.
The current Director
of CDC is retired US Army doctor Robert Redfield, who is known for
having led the Pentagon’s disastrous response to HIV-AIDS in the
1980s.
A devout
catholic, Redfield saw AIDS as the product of an immoral society. For
many years, he championed a much-hyped remedy that was discredited in
tests. That debacle led
to his removal from the job in 1994.”
Public health reporter
Laurie Garrett remarked:
“Redfield
is about the worst person you could think of to be heading the CDC at
this time. He lets his prejudices interfere with the science, which
you cannot afford during a pandemic.”
The CDC is an agency
within the department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Alex Azar,
a lawyer and former pharmaceutical company executive, was appointed
as Secretary of DHHS in 2017. Azar has deep connections to the
pharmaceutical industry and is known for having engaged in price
gouging with his former employer.
Azar is also known for
leading the DHHS response to the anthrax scare of 2001, the first
known bioterrorism attack on the United States. The anthrax attacks
were targeted against members of Congress and the media that were
dissenting voices in the national discussion about the Patriot Act,
the oppressive legislation introduced immediately after the 9/11
attacks.
Although Muslims were
first blamed through highly questionable evidence, it was ultimately
found that the weaponized anthrax came from U.S.
military laboratories.
Azar was instrumental
in defining the National Biodefense Strategy in 2018, working closely
with John Bolton, Trump’s National Security Advisor. Bolton, a
neocon and member of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC),
has a long history of pushing authoritarian policies and war.
In the US the person
most visibly in charge of the COVID-19 response is Anthony Fauci, who
is the long-time director of the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Like Redfield, Dr. Fauci is a Catholic
and has said that values he learned in his Jesuit education continue
to guide him.
After weeks of Fauci
having led the coronavirus response in the US, it was learned that
his NIAID had funded “gain
of function” research at the Wuhan laboratory where the
SARS-COV-2 virus is suspected of having originated.
Fauci’s response to
questions about that inexplicable coincidence was simply to denounce
“conspiracy theories” rather than addressing the questions
directly, much as others did when questioned about 9/11
foreknowledge.
Whether SARS-COV-2 was
genetically engineered in a laboratory, like the NIAID-funded Wuhan
lab, is a subject that has become of interest
to many scientists.
The Wuhan laboratory
is not the only place the US supports work like this, however, as the
Pentagon funds such labs in 25 countries across the world. Located in
places such as Eastern Europe, the Middle East, South East Asia, and
Africa, these labs isolate and manipulate viruses like the bat
coronaviruses from which SARS-COV-2 originated. This
bat-research program is further coordinated by a group
called EcoHealth Alliance (EHA).
The manipulation of
viruses for gain of function at US funded labs is, like the origin of
the weaponized anthrax at US labs, evidence that bioterrorism and
pandemics can be manufactured events. This is another way in which
the coronavirus scare could reflect the war on terrorism and war on
communism, both of which were driven by manufactured
terrorist events.
It is remarkable that
Fauci funded work to manipulate coronaviruses then became the voice
of the coronavirus pandemic response while also working closely with
Bill Gates’ GAVI initiative. Fauci has boasted that NIAID and GAVI
work together to push vaccines with “outright
collaboration between us in setting
the standard of what is needed.”
This makes it easier
to see that a new pattern of hyped pandemics resulting in increased
population control and global vaccinations is not only possible but
would be a very lucrative business model.
The
NHS and Corporate Nations
By now it’s well
known that the initial projections for deaths due to COVID-19 were
massively overestimated and one academic paper was responsible for
the panic. The lead author of that paper, Neil Ferguson of Imperial
College, has since resigned in disgrace from his government advisory
position. Much like the US government’s explanation for destruction
of the World Trade Center buildings, his estimates were based on
computer models that cannot be shared with the public.
As in the US, UK
intelligence agencies have taken a leading role in managing the
coronavirus scare. The terrorism expert who is expected to be the
next chief of MI6 was selected to lead a new “biosecurity
centre” to evaluate the coronavirus threat and “enable rapid
intervention.”
Additionally, the UK
intelligence agency known as Government Communication Headquarters
(GCHQ) was granted powers over the NHS’s
computer systems. GCHQ is known for engaging in illegal
activities related to population control mechanisms such as mass
surveillance.
Totalitarian outcomes
are further enabled with billionaire Peter Thiel’s CIA-initiated
company Palantir managing the databases used by both
the CDC and UK’s NHS that drive COVID-19 decision making.
For perspective, in
2009, Thiel said, “I
no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible,”
providing another clue that public health and awareness are not the
main priorities behind the coronavirus scare.
The data behind the
COVID-19 pandemic was never reliable, with test kits
being inaccurate, government policies inflating
the death counts, and the media focusing solely on fear-based
predictions that are repeatedly proven false.
Recently, scientists
and government leaders from other countries, including Russia,
Germany and Denmark, have begun speaking out about how the
coronavirus threat has been exaggerated.
The outcomes of the
coronavirus scare have included huge windfalls for
billionaires, financial
institutions, and corporations. Legislation being passed in
response to COVID-19 is largely beneficial
to corporate interests. The outcomes for everyone else have
been fear, unemployment, poverty, loss of freedoms, grave risks to
democracy, and death.
How this is possible
is related to the fact that governments, and the nations they
represent, are no longer what they were. In many ways, corporations
have replaced
governments as the drivers of public policy and, as with
Peter Thiel’s Palantir, the public’s interest is not their
concern. Meanwhile, over two dozen companies have become larger
and more powerful than many national governments.
As a result,
governments are now false fronts for corporations and the decisions
they make, for example to lockdown citizens and remake their
economies, are driven by profit-based strategies indifferent to
public interests.
In summary, the
features and outcomes of the coronavirus scare reflect those of
previous psychological operations including the war on terrorism and
its predecessor, the war on communism.
The people and
agencies driving the coronavirus scare have a history of unethical
behaviors, including hyping pandemics to push vaccines, and appear to
seek long-term profits through implementation of a highly controlled
society. Therefore, the response to COVID-19, if not the virus
itself, can be seen as a psychological operation used to drive those
outcomes.
– “Source“
–
Click for
Spanish,
German,
Dutch,
Danish,
French,
translation- Note- Translation
may take a moment to load.
===================================
* De volledige naam van deze man: Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
Zie ook:
‘Ausweis bitte! COVI-PASS ‘noodzakelijk’ bij aantonen ‘immuniteit’ voor Coronavirus‘
‘KLM
krijgt 3,4 milard euro voor vliegtuigoverlast, terwijl zorgmedewerkers
kunnen barsten, een applausje vindt men in Rutte 3 voldoende‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht over de politieke leugens aangaande Schiphol, KLM en Lelystad Airport)
‘Pandemieën zijn het resultaat van natuurvernietiging, een waarschuwing van de VN, de WHO en het WWF‘
‘Corona-angst: psychologische oorlogsvoering tegen de bevolking‘
‘Nederland chanteert alweer Antilliaanse eilanden: nu voor hulp bij Coronacrisis‘
‘Rinke van den Brink (NOS redacteur gezondheidszorg) over EU reactie op Coronavirus en loflied op Rutte en RIVM….‘ Een volkomen ten onrecht loflied (zie ook de links in dat bericht)
‘Zeg nee tegen de Corona spoedwet!‘ (een bericht met daaraan verbonden een petitie tegen die ‘nood-spoedwet’, lees en teken deze petitie ajb!)
‘Rutte 3 wil ongrondwettelijke noodmaatregelen legitimeren met spoedwet‘
‘Anti-racisme demonstratie in Amsterdam reden voor hysterische ophef‘ (en de schreeuw om maatregelen die het recht op demonstreren moet uitrangeren….)
The Science of Fear: How The Elitists Use it to Control Us & How to Break Free
‘Transport nucleair afval via Amsterdam naar uitermate gevaarlijke opslag‘
(met aandacht voor de aantasting van burgerrechten tijdens de
Coronacrisis, zo mochten in Duitsland maar 35 mensen protesteren tegen
dit transport….)
‘Coronavirus: we worden behandeld als een kind met een tere ziel dat niet te veel mag weten‘
‘Privacy en vrijheid van meningsuiting slachtoffer van het Coronavirus: neem de verplichte volg-app‘
‘Trump vraagt om absolute macht tijdens de Coronacrisis‘
‘Wereldbevolking moet afhankelijk worden gemaakt van vaccins in combinatie met een ‘vaccinatiepaspoort’‘ (zie ook de video’s in dat bericht, waarvan de hieronder getoonde er één is)
Forced vaccinations for all. And that means you. A triumph for authoritarians (een video uit 2018, zeker zien mensen!):
‘Politie schiet 13 jarige jongen dood bij handhaven avondklok i.v.m. Coronavirus‘
‘Ton Wilthagen (universiteit Tilburg) wil dat de verkiezingen voor de Tweede Kamer worden uitgesteld‘
En terzijde: ‘Senator Rick Scott (vriend van Trump) wil sancties voor landen die i.v.m. het Coronavirus medische hulp krijgen van Cuba‘
Voor
nog veel meer berichten over het Coronavirus, klik op het betreffende label, direct
onder dit bericht.