Epsteins pedoseksuele netwerk was al lang bekend, onder andere ABC hield de berichtgeving tegen

Weer een nieuw hoofdstuk in het drama Epstein, de eerder al veroordeelde kindermisbruiker en beheerder van een pedonetwerk, die op 10 auguistus dood in zijn cel werd aagetroffen. Volgens de autoriteiten suïcide, echter het is meer dan duidelijk dat Epstein is ‘gesuïcideerd’ (lees: vermoord), zodat machtige vip’s buitenschot konden blijven, figuren als Bill Clinton, Donald Trump en prins Andrew (het Britse koningshuis)…… Ongeveer een maand geleden lekte uit dat de reguliere media al langer op de hoogte waren van dit kindermisbruik schandaal…… 

Fairness bracht een artikel over ABC ‘nieuwsanker’ Amy Robach, die al 3 jaar geleden een onderzoek had gedaan naar Epstein en zijn machtige pedovrienden, waar de massamedia in de VS al lang wisten van zijn pedonetwerk….. (vergeet niet dat Epstein daar eerder al voor werd veroordeeld!) Robach had o.a. een interview gedaan met Virginia Roberts, één van de vrouwen die Epstein aanklaagde voor meervoudige verkrachting door hemzelf en vrienden van Epstein…… Robach werd ter verantwoording geroepen en daar gaf men haar te verstaan, dat niemand Epstein kent en dat het een dom verhaal was, kortom niet publiceer waardig. ‘Vreemd genoeg’ bemoeide ook het paleis, ofwel het Britse koningshuis zich met de zaak en was men bij ABC als de dood dat hen een interview met kroonprins William (dus de beoogd Brits troonopvolger) en Kate Middleton zou worden ontzegd…. (‘lekker belangrijk ook, een interview met deze groot-uitkeringstrekkers….’)

Robach is zoals verwacht flink pissig over de gang van zaken, volgens haar hebben zij en haar collega’s Virginia Roberts overgehaald de openbaarheid in te gaan, nadat ze 12 jaar lang ‘ondergedoken’ had gezeten. Volgens Robach had Roberts foto’s en andere bewijzen voor haar aantijgingen aan het adres van Epstein en prins Andrew…. Robach verzuchtte dat ze alles had, zelfs dat Bill Clinton gebruik had gemaakt van het pedoseksnetwerk……

In het boek van Edward Herman en Noam Chomsky, ‘Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media’, stellen zij dat er vijf voorwaarden zijn voor hetr publiceren van artikelen, waarvan er twee in het onderstaande artikel worden genoemd: sourcing en flak. Met sourcing wordt bedoeld de afhankelijkheid van de reguliere (massa) media van bronnen waarover ze als een soort subsidie berichten mogen publiceren, dus over machtige figuren als politici, beroemdheden en (grote) bedrijven, maar wel met een ‘nette berichtgeving…..’ Hetzelfde wat we hier zien met de ‘fotoshoot’ van het koningshuis, een beloning voor het niet ‘journalistiek’ lastigvallen van het meer dan belachelijke koningshuis (dat thuishoort in de middeleeuwen)……  

Met ‘flak’ bedoelen Herman en Chomsky, negatieve reacties op media berichten die bijvooebeeld slecht uitpakken voor beroemdheden en politici. Iets dat kan uitmonden in het boycotten van media, of agressieve telefoontjes, aanklachten bij justitie, smaadcampagnes tegen journalisten of het medium waar ze voor werken, tot zelfs aanvallen van boze bewonderaars van een beroemdheid die de oren (meestal terecht) in het openbaar zijn gewassen….. 

Door deze zaken zullen veel mediaorganen liever geen ruzie krijgen met machtige figuren, daar dit hen geld kan kosten en precies daar draait hem om in medialand, maakt niet uit wat je schrijft als het maar gelezen wordt, zoals het overnemen van alle leugens die de CIA, NSA en andere geheime diensten in de VS en daarbuiten brengen, als de VS weer eens een land illegaal wil binnenvallen…… Je zou zelfs kunnen stellen dat men uit angst deze leugens overneemt, echter dat is pure nonsens, immers de eigenaren van de reguliere (massa-) media, plutoicraten en onvesteringsmaatschappijen hebben belang bij de huidige status quo: zoveel mogelijk oorlogvoeren: goed voor het militair-industrieel complex, waarin  aandelen heeft…. Verder totaal vrijbaan voor grote bedrijven waarin men natuurlijk ook aandelen heeft…. (zoals ons koningshuis grootaandeelhouder is van klimaatverkrachter Shell) Bovendien wenst men alleen de in het westen aangehangen neolibarale politiek te steunen, immers altijd goed voor de portemonnee……

Het voorgaande zet nog eens extra vraagtekens bij de leugens van die media en de westerse poltiek over ‘fake news’ (nepnieuws) en andere desinformatie, waarmee men NB de nog overgebleven echte media op het sociale netwerk de mond wil snoeren….. Terwijl diezelfde media, dus de reguliere westerse media, aantoonbaar vele meters aan nepnieuws en andere desinformatie hebben geproduceerd, waarmee het volk wordt bedrogen, bijvoorbeeld om de illegale oorlogen van de VS mee te ‘legitimeren…..’

Het volgende artikel dat zoals gezegd werd gepubliceerd op Fairness, heb ik overgenomen van Antii-Media:

ABC’s
Epstein Story Didn’t Kill Itself

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor ABC’s Epstein Story Didn’t Kill Itself

December
13, 2019 at 8:32 pm

Written
by 
Fairness
& Accuracy in Reporting

(FAIR) — Multimillionaire
predator Jeffrey Epstein died in suspicious circumstances at a
Manhattan correctional facility on August 10. The wealthy and
powerful New York financier, a convicted sex offender, stands accused
by dozens of women and girls of trafficking, rape and sexual abuse.

He
was an enormously influential and well-connected man who counted as
friends 
billionaire
business owners
Hollywood
stars
British
royals
,
and even top media figures like 
Katie
Couric
 and Charlie
Rose
—with
some of his associates falling under suspicion of condoning or even
participating in a pedophile ring.

I’ve
known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” said fellow tycoon Donald
Trump (
New
York
10/28/02),
adding: “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I
do, and many of them are on the younger side.” Former President
Bill Clinton was 
also
close
 with
Epstein.

New
York (
10/28/02)
hyped Jeffrey Epstein as a “relentless brain” with a “keen eye
for the ladies.”

Epstein’s
crimes shocked the public, and his arrest, trial and mysterious death
were major stories for much of 2019. But last month, leaked footage
emerged showing that corporate media knew much about these crimes
years previously. Discussing one of his accusers, 
ABC
News
 anchor
Amy Robach was 
caught
on camera
 lambasting
executives at her network for killing her investigations into the sex
offender because of Epstein’s connections. The clip was originally
leaked to infamous right-wing troll James O’Keefe, who has a long
history of producing bogus stories
(
FAIR.org4/1/103/14/1112/12/1510/21/16),
but 
ABC employees,
including 
Robach
herself
,
have confirmed its authenticity.

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor ABC’s Epstein Story Didn’t Kill Itself

Amy
Robach: “I’ve had the [Epstein] story for three years.”

In
the video, Robach complains:

I’ve
had the story for three years. I’ve had this interview with
[Epstein complainant] Virginia Roberts. We would not put it on the
air. First of all I was told, “Who is Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows
who that is. This is a stupid story.” Then the palace found out
that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew, and threatened
us in a million different ways. We were so afraid we wouldn’t be
able to interview Kate and Will that it also quashed the story. And
then Alan Dershowitz was also implicated in it because of the
planes.”

The
planes” is a reference to the celebrity attorney’s frequent trips
on Epstein’s 
infamous
private jet
,
which he used for trafficking. A visibly exasperated Robach
continued, revealing the level of detail of her investigation:

She
told me everything, she had pictures, everything. She was in hiding
for 12 years. We convinced her to come out. We convinced her to talk
to us. It was unbelievable what we had; Clinton, we had everything. I
tried for three years to get it on to no avail, and now it’s all
coming out and it’s like these new revelations, and I freaking had
all of it!… What we had was unreal.

Robach’s
comments about being pressured into killing the story by powerful
people ABC relied upon are a perfect example of the
perils of access journalism. In their influential book Manufacturing
Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media
, Edward Herman
and Noam Chomsky identified “sourcing” and “flak” as two of
the five key filters that dictate what makes the news and what does
not.

By
sourcing, Herman and Chomsky are referring to corporate media’s
reliance on powerful official sources (like politicians, celebrities
and corporations) to essentially subsidize them by providing them
with free content, such as interviews, soundbites, statistics and
pictures. Journalists are therefore caught up in a symbiotic
relationship with the powerful, where elite sources grant “scoops”
in exchange for preferential treatment. The royal family, Robach
claims, successfully used the influence it had, quashing the story by
threatening to cut off access.

It
is also particularly easy for the powerful to generate flak—negative
responses to media content. Flak can take the form of boycotts, angry
phone calls, lawsuits, smear campaigns and more. One particularly
alarming form of “flak” was the 
2018
US mail bombing attempt
,
where a Trump supporter sent a bomb to 
CNN headquarters
in response to its negative coverage of the president.

Robach
brought up Dershowitz, a 
famously
litigious
 lawyer,
as a reason for her silencing. But 
ABC could
reasonably expect great resistance from many of those connected to
Epstein, one more example of how stories scrutinizing the powerful
are discouraged in the modern media landscape.

ABC
News
 would
later claim
 that
they never nixed the story, stating that at the time of Robach’s
comments,

not
all of our reporting met our standards to air, but we have never
stopped investigating the story.  Ever since we’ve had a team
on this investigation and substantial resources dedicated to it. That
work has led to a two-hour documentary and six-part podcast that will
air in the new year.”

After
the video went viral, 
CBS
News
 fired
its producer
 Ashley
Bianco after 
ABC contacted
them, asserting (
possibly
incorrectly
)
that she had leaked the tape during her time working on Robach’s
show. Top executives at 
ABC are
reportedly “
freaking
out

over the anonymous employee’s identity, spending far more energy
and resources trying to find the leaker than in investigating why it
enabled a serial sexual predator to continue offending.

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor ABC’s Epstein Story Didn’t Kill Itself

Former
producer Ashley Bianco (MK, 
11/8/19),
who denies sharing the Robach tape with anyone outside ABC News.

Perhaps
even more worryingly, corporate media rivals have largely not touched
the story. Neither Robach’s revelation nor Bianco’s termination
have been reported on by 
MSNBCCNNCBS or
the 
New
York Times
,
nearly a month after the video first leaked. Thus the story of a
major media outlet covering up the crimes of a monster, with the only
person to face any sanction being the alleged whistleblower, 
whom two outlets combined to punish, appears not to qualify as a
newsworthy event to much of the press.

Indeed,
Epstein’s team managed to convince many supposedly reputable
outlets, including the 
Huffington
Post 
(11/17/17), Forbes (10/2/13)
and the 
National
Review
 (7/10/13)
to publish puff pieces about him (
New
York Times
7/21/19).
(Epstein 
pled
guilty
 to
charges connected to sexual abuse of minors in 2008.) 
Forbes 
described him as “one of the largest backers of cutting-edge
science around the world,” making no mention of his criminal past.
The stated writer was paid $600 by a PR firm to attach his name to
the pre-fab article and run it on the site, perhaps the most
blatantly unethical sponsorship practice there could be.

ABC’s
decision to spike the Epstein exposé in order not to embarrass or
implicate his powerful associates, thereby effectively enabling his
crimes, is a perfect example of the danger of access journalism.
Robach predicted, “There will come a day where we will realize
Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever
known.” Thanks to our corporate media system, that day was delayed
by at least three years.

By Alan
MacLeod
 /
Republished with permission / 
FAIR.org / Report
a typo

=================================

Zie ook:

Epstein was een agent van de Mossad en werd gebruikt om politici te chanteren

 

Jeffrey Epstein: bewakers die fraudeerden weigerden een ‘plea deal’

Prince Andrew: het voorbeeld dat koningshuizen eindelijk moeten worden opgedoekt

Epstein vermoord volgens patholoog-anatoom

Jeffrey Epstein en Ghislaine Maxwell werkten mede voor de militaire geheime dienst van Israël

Kindermisbruikers beschermd door overheden‘ (met links naar een groot aantal video’s)

Donald Trump – Jeffey Epstein: you’ve got to grab them by the pussy


‘WHAT THE EPSTEIN CASE REVEALS, “PEOPLE ARE OVERLOOKING THE CHILDREN…” (video van Brasscheck TV):

´Russiagate, ‘couppoging tegen Trump’ en kindermisbruik netwerk Epstein zijn gekoppeld´

Prince Andrew ontkent kennis kindermisbruiknetwerk Epstein, maar……..

Jeffrey Epstein waarschijnlijk op ‘loonlijst’ Mossad, de Israëlische geheime dienst

Jeffrey Epstein (exploitant kindermisbruik netwerk) ‘overleden aan suïcide’

Jeffrey Epstein, beheerder van een kindermisbruiknetwerk ‘is gesuïcideerd’ ofwel vermoord

Jeffrey Epstein: seksueel wangedrag van welgestelden veelal onder de pet gehouden

Jeffrey Epsteins kleine zwarte pedo-boek met namen als Bill Clinton, David Koch, Courtney Love, prins Andrew en Tony Blair

Jeffrey Epsteins kleine zwarte pedo-boek met namen als Bill Clinton, David Koch, Courtney Love, prins Andrew en Tony Blair

Miljardair
Jeffrey Epstein werd afgelopen zaterdag gearresteerd vanwege het
beheren van een pedo-netwerk en het bezit van duizenden naaktfoto’s
van minderjarige meisjes.

Dit
soort zaken komen één of twee keer per jaar voor, echter zelden met zoveel
bekende welgestelden als klant. Er zou sprake
zijn van een klein zwart boekje waarin de namen te lezen zijn van oorlogsmisdadiger Bill Clinton
(….), David Koch (van het Koch Brothers imperium), Courtney Love,
de Britse prins Andrew en één van de grootste schoften van de
laatste 20 jaar: Tony Blair.

Lees het
volgende artikel van Tyler Durden, zoals gepubliceerd op Zero Hedge
en zie hoe welgestelden denken werkelijk overal mee weg te kunnen
komen:

Before
SHTF, Let’s Revisit Jeffrey Epstein’s Little Black Book

by Tyler
Durden

Mon,
07/08/2019 – 17:45

With
the Saturday arrest of Jeffrey Epstein – who is reportedly
offering to name elite pedophiles in exchange for leniency, a
leaked copy of the billionaire sex predator’s “
little
black book

may provide some insight into some very rich individuals who should
be nervous right about now.

The
book was smuggled out of Epstein’s residence by his former house
manager, Alfredo Rodriguez, who was busted trying to sell it in 2009
for $50,000 – only to get caught, charged with obstruction of
justice, and die in prison after 18 months from a ‘long
illness.’ 

According
to an 
FBI
affidavit
,
Rodriguez described the address book and the information contained
within it as the “Holy Grail” or “Golden Nugget”
to unraveling Epstein’s sprawling child-sex network. But despite
having been subpoenaed for everything he had on his former boss,
Rodriguez didn’t share it with the FBI or Palm Beach Police
Department detectives investigating Epstein. Instead, he tried to
make a $50,000 score by covertly peddling the black book to one of
the attorneys launching lawsuits at Epstein on behalf of his victims.
Gawker

According
to a 2015 Gawker article, Epstein’s little black book
contains hundreds of names that a hobnobbing socialite
billionaire might keep on hand, 
however
around 50 of the entries were circled by Rodriguez – “including
those of many of Epstein’s suspected victims and
accomplices,” 
according
to the report. 

Some
of the names in the book include: 

Ralph
Fiennes
Alec Baldwin
David Blaine
Jimmy Buffett
Courtney
Love
Charlie Rose
Mike Wallace
Barbara Walters
Ehud
Barak
Tony Blair
David Koch
John Gutfreund
Prince
Andrew

And
of course:

Bill
Clinton and Donald Trump

About
50 of the entries, including those of many of Epstein’s suspected
victims and accomplices as well as 
Trump,
Love, Barak, Dershowitz, and others
,
were circled by Rodriguez.

In
addition to the names above, as well as scores of apparent underage
victims in Florida, New Mexico, California, Paris, and the United
Kingdom listed under the rubric of “massage,” the circled
entries include:

  • Billionaire
    Leslie Wexner

  • Former
    New Mexico Governor Bruce King

  • Former
    New Mexico Governor and Democratic presidential hopeful Bill
    Richardson

  • Peter
    Soros, the nephew of George Soros

  • Former
    Miss Sweden and socialite New York City doctor Eva Andersson Dubin

Some
of the circled entries include additional notes—one address in New
York City, for instance, is marked as an “apt. for models,”
and two names bear the marking “witness.” –
Gawker

When
asked why his name might have been circled, longtime Epstein
associate Alan Dershowitz said in 2015: “I’ve never seen the
book and I have no idea what it means. I was neither a victim nor a
material witness—I never witnessed any crimes or participated in
any crimes, and I can prove it.”

Vicky Ward@VickyPJWard

Replying to @VickyPJWard

I urge you to back and read @jkbjournalist’s 3-part series “Perversion of Justice” that started all of this. It is a stunning expose on this egregious miscarriage of justice: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article220097825.html 

How a future Trump Cabinet member gave a serial sex abuser the deal of a lifetime

Jeffrey Epstein avoided a lifetime sentence for underage human and sex trafficking and abuse. Learn how the deal drafted by then prosecutor Alexander Acosta and Epstein’s defense team made the…

miamiherald.com

Vicky Ward@VickyPJWard

If you thought was powerful, just wait for the fallout from this. There is more yet to come. I promise you that.


5,517

5:00 PM – Jul 8, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Dershowitz
joined a 2017 motion brought by filmmaker and author Mike
Cernovich to unseal records from a 2015 defamation case
 brought
by Epstein victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre against British
socialite Ghislaine Maxwell. Giuffre says Maxwell helped
Epstein traffic herself and other underage girls to sex parties at
the billionaire pedophile’s many residences.

The full scope of Epstein’s international sex trafficking ring.

In
a Monday afternoon statement, Bill Clinton’s Press Secretary Angel
Ureña tweeted that the former president “knows nothing about
the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some
years ago,” and claims that he has only flown on the “Lolita
Express” four times, with Secret Service detail “on every
leg of every trip.”

Angel Ureña@angelurena

Statement on Jeffrey Epstein.


1,156

12:27 AM – Jul 9, 2019

Trump,
meanwhile
,
was reportedly the “only one” to help a prosecuting
attorney representing one of Epstein’s alleged victims. The President
is also said to have 
booted
Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club
 after
he was found trying to recruit underage girls. 

One
theory on Epstein’s racket is described below
 by
Twitter user @quantian1

Quantian@quantian1

So, apologies in advance, but I want to do a quick little THREAD to explain my theory of what the Epstein story really is. I promise this isn’t some crazy Pizzagate conspiracy about space lizards, just a neat little explanation that IMO perfectly fits the known facts (0/13):

Quantian@quantian1

(1/13) Let’s take as our starting points two givens.

(A.) You are a committed, unrepentant pedophile

(B.) Because of your old job in private banking, you are very connected to lots of very, very wealthy people

We’ll also assume a goal:

(Z.) You want to become very rich


476

Twitter Ads info and privacy

91 people are talking about this

Quantian@quantian1

Replying to @quantian1

(2/13) The obvious route is, well, obvious: you could just be a pimp, offering underage prostitute services to very rich people. This has two problems: you’re very disposable (see: DC madam), and it’s also not super lucrative. You can’t charge millions of dollars up front.

Quantian@quantian1

(3/13) The second level though follows instantly: You don’t need to charge up front, just get them to have underage sex, and then blackmail them afterwards for hush money. Better ROI, but you’re still a liability, and producing and receiving big bribe money raises big questions.


403

Twitter Ads info and privacy

47 people are talking about this

Quantian@quantian1

Replying to @quantian1

(4/13) So, what to do? Well, the second idea has some merits. First, you need to recruit people in. Have lots of massive parties at your spacious home (check), invite top academics, artists, politicians to encourage people to come (check), and supply lots of young women (check)

Quantian@quantian1

(5/13) You don’t even have to do anything, and most people invited might even be totally unaware of the real purpose of the parties! But, sooner or later, some billionaire will get handsy, she’ll escort him to a room with a hidden camera, things happen. Morning after, you strike.


388

Twitter Ads info and privacy

49 people are talking about this

Quantian@quantian1

Replying to @quantian1

(6/13) You inform him she was really 15, but you offer him a nice, neat way to buy your silence: a large allocation to your hedge fund, which charges 2/20 (check). To ensure nobody else asks questions, you also take the extraordinary step of demanding power of attorney (check)

Quantian@quantian1

(7/13) The fund is offshore in a tax haven (check) and nobody will see the client list (check). Of course, you don’t really know anything about investing, instead making up some nonsense about currency trading (check), and nobody on Wall Street has ever traded with you (check)


460

Twitter Ads info and privacy

48 people are talking about this

Quantian@quantian1

Replying to @quantian1

(8/13) The fund itself doesn’t need investment personnel (check), only some back office people to process the wires (check). You don’t want to money from non-pedophiles, or they’ll notice you’ve just put it in a S&P 500 fund, so you reject all incoming inquiries (check)

Quantian@quantian1

(9/13) A $20 million wire from Billionaire X to you with no obvious reason will raise many questions, and the IRS will certainly want to know what you did to warrant it. A $5 million quarterly fee for managing $1 billion in assets? Nobody bats an eye.


518

Twitter Ads info and privacy

68 people are talking about this

Quantian@quantian1

Replying to @quantian1

(10/13) Because of this structure, you’re extraordinarily secretive about client lists (check) because they aren’t clients, they’re pedophiles paying you bribes, and they also are very secretive, which is why no letters or return streams ever leak (check)

Quantian@quantian1

(11/13) Occasionally you may also try this trick on other people: important political figures, mayors, prosecutors, etc. They don’t invest in the fund, but it’s nice to have them in your pocket. Others (academics, artists, etc.) can just be bought with money as a PR smokescreen.


403

Twitter Ads info and privacy

56 people are talking about this

Quantian@quantian1

Replying to @quantian1

(12/13) And, of course, the scam can be kept going as long as people are willing to pay, which is forever. If you’re ever caught, just lean on some of your other friends in government to lean on the prosecutor to get you a sweetheart deal. There’s almost zero risk.

Quantian@quantian1

(13/13) And the last piece of the puzzle is the evidence. You’d want it somewhere remote, but accessible: a place the US can’t touch but you have an excuse to visit all the time to update. Remember that offshore fund?

I bet there’s a *very* interesting safe deposit box there.


1,254

Epstein’s
“little black book” can be seen here: 

Voor een vergroting van deze afbeelding, zie het origineel of gebruik de zoomfunctie in het menu van jouw computer/ laptop/ notebook/ tablet of smartphone.

De lettercombinatie SHTF in de kop van het Zero Hedge artikel staat voor: ‘Shit Hits the Fan’. (ofwel: before the shit hits the fan >> vóór de stront de ventilator raakt. Normaal is de zegswijze: ‘when the shit hits the fan’)

Zie ook:

Epstein vermoord volgens patholoog-anatoom

Jeffrey Epstein en Ghislaine Maxwell werkten mede voor de militaire geheime dienst van Israël

Kindermisbruikers beschermd door overheden

Donald Trump – Jeffey Epstein: you’ve got to grab them by the pussy

´Russiagate, ‘couppoging tegen Trump’ en kindermisbruik netwerk Epstein zijn gekoppeld´

Prince Andrew ontkent kennis kindermisbruiknetwerk Epstein, maar……..

Jeffrey Epstein waarschijnlijk op ‘loonlijst’ Mossad, de Israëlische geheime dienst‘ 

Jeffrey Epstein (exploitant kindermisbruik netwerk) ‘overleden aan suïcide’

Jeffrey Epstein, beheerder van een kindermisbruiknetwerk ‘is gesuïcideerd’ ofwel vermoord

Jeffrey Epstein: seksueel wangedrag van welgestelden veelal onder de pet gehouden‘ 

De film over de pro-Israëlische lobby in de VS, die Israël verboden wil zien………

THE
ELECTRONIC INTIFADA (EI) heeft de 4 delen van ‘The Lobby – USA’ op
haar site gezet. In de film is te zien hoe sterk de Israël lobby is in de VS en hoe ongelofelijk smerig dit geteisem handelt. Middels lastercampagnes, spionage en intimidatie van burgers die zich voor Palestijnse rechten uitspreken
en die Israël vanwege haar ongebreidelde terreur bekritiseren, probeert men hen de mond te snoeren door hen af te schilderen als antisemieten……. 

Ofwel op grond van kritiek op de fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël, wil men critici  afschilderen als antisemieten, lullig genoeg lukt dit in de meeste gevallen, al is het met behulp van de westerse reguliere media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici…… Let wel: dat hele label ‘antisemitisch’ is vooral belachelijk als men dit Palestijnen en andere arabieren aanwrijft, daar ook zij semieten zijn!!

Een ‘mooi
voorbeeld’ van een lastercampagne is die tegen Jeremy Corbyn de Labour leider, hij wordt al anderhalf jaar lang
voor antisemiet uitgemaakt, met hulp van o.a. ‘onafhankelijk
zendgemachtigde’ BBC, dit ondanks de band die Corbyn heeft met Joden die kritisch zijn op Israël, zoals de band met onze inmiddels overleden Hajo Meijer, NB een Holocaust overlever, die werkte voor Een Ander Joods Geluid……. In de Britse dagbladen is eveneens amper of geen weerwoord te vinden, Corbyn moet en zal de volgende verkiezingen
verliezen, daar zetten zich zelfs collega’s van Corbyn voor in,
verraders als opperschoft Tony Blair………

Ook in ons land zijn pro-Israëlische zionisten fanatiek bezig tegen mensen die kritiek hebben op het moorddadige beleid van Israël, o.a. Stan van Houcke is sinds kort het doelwit van zionisten ofwel fascisten als Leon de Winter…….

Voor het artikel van Durden heb
ik zelf de video’s overgenomen van YouTube (die van het originele artikel kan ik niet overnemen), ik geef ze i.t.t. tot het artikel op Zero Hedge wel alle 4 weer,
plus nog een video, met de titel: ‘Evidence
the Israel Lobby Control the US Government’. Mensen lees en
verwonder je hoe machtig de pro-Israël lobby in feite is, verwondering ook hoe men dergelijke haatcampagnes kan voeren en het gore lef heeft mensen die opkomen voor de rechten van Palestijnen, als antisemitisch weg te zetten…… 

Lees,
zie en geeft het door, tijd dat de ogen van de wereldbevolking
opengaan en dat Israël wordt aangepakt voor de vreselijke terreur die
het in haar illegaal gestichte staat en op de West Bank en de
Gazastrook uitoefent, inclusief een enorm aantal massamoorden, niet alleen vlak
voor en na de illegale stichting van Israël, maar tot op de dag van vandaag…

Israëlische
leiders als Netanyahu en Lieberman hadden in Scheveningen al jaren hun levenslange gevangenisstraf moeten uitzitten, en dat beste
bezoeker, heeft totaal niets met antisemitisme te maken, maar alles
met gerechtigheid voor de gepleegde oorlogsmisdaden als massamoord en bijvoorbeeld het opsluiten en martelen van Palestijnse mensen en zelfs
hun kinderen……. 

Voorts zouden deze leiders terecht moeten staan voor zaken als het onthouden van water aan de Palestijnen, dit door vernieling van de bronnen (in de Gazastrook) en afdammingen in de Jordaan, t.b.v. de illegale Israëlische nederzettingen op de West Bank, waar Israël zich overigens totaal illegaal als bezettingsmacht bevindt, zoals nazi-Duitsland zich illegaal in ons land ophield van mei 1940 tot mei 1945

De 4 docu-films in het artikel hieronder werden door Al Jazeera gemaakt, echter deze mochten niet worden uitgezonden van Qatar, dit onder druk van Israël, Saoedi-Arabië en de VS……. De feiten in de documentaire werden o.a. verkregen door infiltratie >> een journalist gaf zich uit als een pro-Israëlische vrijwilliger in Washington.

Over censuur gesproken: ook Facebook doet mee aan pro-Israëlische lobby en het platform heeft al honderden accounts van Palestijnen verwijderd…….

En je weet het: als men een documentaire wil verbieden wil men zaken verborgen houden, ofwel Israël geeft in feite toe dat het een barbaars, inhumaan beleid voert t.a.v. de Palestijnen……. Dit alles (met nog een herhaling: het kan niet genoeg gezegd worden) in een illegaal gestichte staat op het grondgebied van die Palestijnen, dat te boek zou moeten staan als Palestina en niet als Israël!

Watch
the film the Israel lobby didn’t want you to see

The
Electronic Intifada
 2
November 2018

Update: On
6 November, The Electronic Intifada published the final two episodes
of
 The
Lobby – USA. 
You
can 
watch
episodes three and four here
.

The
Electronic Intifada has obtained a complete copy of 
The
Lobby – USA
,
a four-part undercover investigation by Al Jazeera into Israel’s
covert influence campaign in the United States.

We
are releasing the leaked film simultaneously with
France’s 
Orient XXI and
Lebanon’s 
Al-Akhbar,
which have respectively subtitled the episodes in 
French and Arabic.

The
film was made by Al Jazeera during 2016 and was completed in
October 2017.

But
it was 
censored after
Qatar, the gas-rich Gulf emirate that funds Al Jazeera, came under
intense 
Israel
lobby pressure
 not
to air the film.

Although
Al Jazeera’s director-general claimed last month that there were
outstanding legal issues with the film, his assertions have
been 
flatly
contradicted by his own journalists
.

In
March, The Electronic Intifada was the 
first
to report
 on
any of the film’s specific content. We 
followed
this in August
 by
publishing the first extract of the film, and 
shortly
after
 Max
Blumenthal at the 
Grayzone
Project
released others.

Since
then, The Electronic Intifada has released 
three
other extracts
,
and several other journalists have watched the entire film and
written about it – including 
Alain
Gresh
 and Antony
Loewenstein
.

Now
The Electronic Intifada can reveal for the first time that it has
obtained all four parts of the film.

You
can watch the first two parts in the video embeds above and below. (deel 3 en 4 onder dit artikel van EI)

To
get unprecedented access to the Israel lobby’s inner workings,
undercover reporter “Tony” posed as a pro-Israel volunteer
in Washington.

The
resulting film exposes the efforts of Israel and its lobbyists to spy
on, smear and intimidate US citizens who support
Palestinian human rights, especially BDS – the boycott,
divestment and sanctions movement.

It
shows that Israel’s semi-covert 
black-ops government
agency, the 
Ministry
of Strategic Affairs
,
is operating this effort in collusion with an extensive network
of US-based organizations.

These
include the 
Israel
on Campus Coalition
The
Israel Project
 and
the 
Foundation
for Defense of Democracies
.

Censored
by Qatar

The
film was suppressed after the government of Qatar came under intense
pressure not to release it – ironically from the very same lobby
whose influence and antics the film exposes.

Clayton
Swisher, Al Jazeera’s head of investigations, 
revealed in
an article for 
The
Forward
 in
March that Al Jazeera had sent more than 70 letters to individuals
and organizations who appear in or are discussed in the film,
providing them with an opportunity to respond.

Only
three did so. Instead, pro-Israel groups have endeavored to suppress
the film that exposes the lobby’s activities.

In
April, Al Jazeera’s management was 
forced
to deny a claim
 by
the hard-right Zionist Organization of America that the film had been
canceled altogether.

In
June, The Electronic Intifada 
learned
that a high level source
 in
Doha had said the film’s indefinite delay was due to “national
security” concerns of the Qatari government.

Covert action

As revealed
in a clip published by The Electronic Intifada earlier this week
,
the film shows Julia

Reifkind
– then an Israeli embassy employee – describing her typical work
day as “mainly gathering intel, reporting back to Israel … to
report back to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of
Strategic Affairs.”

She
discusses the Israeli government “giving our support” to front
groups “in that behind-the-scenes way.”

Reifkind
also admits to using fake Facebook profiles to infiltrate the circles
of Palestine solidarity activists on campus.

The
film also reveals that US-based groups coordinate their efforts
directly with the Israeli government, particularly its 
Ministry
of Strategic Affairs
.

Run
by a former military intelligence officer, the ministry is in charge
of 
Israel’s
global campaign of covert sabotage
 targeting
the BDS movement.

The
film shows footage of the very same ex-military intelligence
officer, 
Sima
Vaknin-Gil
,
claiming to have mapped Palestinian rights activism “globally. Not
just the United States, not just campuses, but campuses and
intersectionality and labor unions and churches.”

She
promises to use this data for “offense activity” against
Palestine activists.

Jacob
Baime, executive director of the Israel on Campus Coalition, claims
in the undercover footage that his organization uses “corporate
level, enterprise-grade social media intelligence software” to
gather lists of Palestine-related student events on campus,
“generally within about 30 seconds or less” of them being
posted online.

Baime
also admits on hidden camera that his group “coordinates” with
the Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs.

Baime
states that his researchers “issue early warning alerts to our
partners” – including Israeli ministries.

Baime’s
colleague Ian Hersh admits in the film to adding Israel’s “Ministry
of Strategic Affairs to our operations and intelligence brief.”

Psychological warfare”


Baime
describes how his group has used anonymous websites to
target activists.

With
the anti-Israel people, what’s most effective, what we’ve found
at least in the last year, is you do the opposition research, put up
some anonymous website, and then put up targeted Facebook ads,”
Baime explains in 
part
three of the film
.

Canary
Mission is a good example,” he states. “It’s
psychological warfare.”

The
film names, for the first time, 
convicted
tax evader
 Adam
Milstein
 as
the multimillionaire funder and mastermind of Canary Mission – an
anonymous smear site targeting student activists.

The
Electronic Intifada 
revealed
this in a clip in August
.

Eric
Gallagher, then fundraising director for The Israel Project, is seen
in the undercover footage admitting that “Adam Milstein, he’s the
guy who funds” Canary Mission.

Milstein
also funds The Israel Project, Gallagher states.

Gallagher
says that when he was working for 
AIPAC,
Washington’s most powerful Israel lobby group, “I was literally
emailing back and forth with [Adam Milstein] while he was in jail.”

Despite
not replying to Al Jazeera’s request for comment,
Milstein 
denied that
he and his family foundation “are funders of Canary Mission” on
the same day The Electronic Intifada published the clip.

Since
then, Josh Nathan-Kazis of 
The
Forward
 has identified
several other groups
 in
the US who fund Canary Mission.

Suppressed film

In
March, The Electronic Intifada 
published the
first details of what is in the film.

We
reported that it showed Sima Vaknin-Gil claiming to have leading
neoconservative think tank the Foundation for Defense of Democracies
working for her ministry.

The
undercover footage shows Vaknin-Gil claiming that “We have FDD.
We have others working on” projects including “data gathering,
information analysis, working on activist organizations, money trail.
This is something that only a country, with its resources, can do
the best.”

As
noted in part one of the documentary, the existence of the film and
the identity of the undercover reporter became known after footage he
had shot for it was used in Al Jazeera’s 
The
Lobby
 –
about Israel’s covert influence campaign in the UK –
aired in early 2017.

Since
then, Israel lobbyists have heavily pressured Qatar to prevent
the US film from airing.

Foreign agent”


Clayton
Swisher, Al Jazeera’s head of investigations, 
first
confirmed in October 2017 
that
the network had run an undercover reporter in the US Israel
lobby at the same time as in the UK.

Swisher
promised the film would be released “very soon,” but it never
came out.

Multiple
Israel lobby sources 
told Israel’s Haaretz newspaper
in February that they had received assurances from Qatari leaders
late last year that the documentary would not be aired.

Qatar denied
this
,
but the paper stood by its story.

Swisher’s
op-ed in 
The
Forward
 was
his first public comment on the matter since he had announced
the documentary.

In
it, he refutes Israel lobby allegations about the film and expresses
frustration that Al Jazeera had not aired it, apparently due to
outside pressure.

Several
pro-Israel lawmakers in Washington have 
piled
on more pressure by pushing
 the

Department
of Justice to force Al Jazeera to register as a “foreign agent”
under a counterespionage law dating from the 1930s.

The
Israel lobby goes to Doha

While
the film was delayed, a 
wave
of prominent pro-Israel figures
 visited
Qatar at the invitation of its ruler, Emir 
Tamim
bin Hamad Al Thani
.

They
have included some of the most right-wing and extreme figures among
Israel’s defenders in the US, 
such
as
 Harvard
law professor Alan Dershowitz and Morton Klein, the head of the
Zionist Organization of America.

Swisher
wrote in 
The
Forward
 that
he ran into Dershowitz at a Doha restaurant during one of these
visits, and invited the professor to a private viewing of the film.

I
have no problem with any of the secret filming,” Swisher says
Dershowitz told him afterwards.

And
I can even see this being broadcast on PBS” –
the US public broadcaster.

Yet
it appears that Israel lobby efforts to quash the film were
successful – until now.

Tags: The
Lobby–USA
 Al
Jazeera
 Orient
XXI
 Al-Akhbar
(Lebanon)
 Qatar Israel
Lobby
 Max
Blumenthal
 The
Grayzone Project
 Alain
Gresh
 Antony
Loewenstein
 BDS Zionist
Organization of America
 Julia
Reifkind
 Ministry
of Strategic Affairs
 Ministry
of Foreign Affairs
 Sima
Vaknin-Gil
Jacob
Baime
 Ian
Hersh
 Adam
Milstein
 Canary
Mission
 The
Israel Project
 Israel
on Campus Coalition
 Foundation
for Defense of Democracies
 Eric
Gallagher
 AIPAC Josh
Nathan-Kazis
 The
Forward
 Clayton
Swisher
 Haaretz Tamim
bin Hamad Al Thani
 Alan
Dershowitz
 Morton
Klein

Deel 3 en 4 van The Lobby – USA

Hier de video Evidence the Israel Lobby Control the US Government’:

Zie ook:

Kritiek op Israël wordt door een leger van Israëlische trollen bevochten

Israël misbruikt de aanslag op de synagoge in Pittsburgh voor demonisering van steun aan de Palestijnen…….

Google Maps veegt Palestijns gebied van de kaart

Israël zet snelle reactiemacht op poten tegen anti-Israëlische kritiek

Jeremy Corbyn wordt gedemoniseerd als antisemiet…….

Britse justitie gaat ‘hate crimes’ van Labour onderzoeken

Israël en VS werken samen in tegenwerken van critici op beleid t.a.v. Palestijnen