Tag: A. Dulles

About A. Dulles

Subscribe Feeds

VS propaganda door de CIA geënt op de leest van nazi-Duitsland en daarmee van oorlogsmisdadiger Goebbels

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

The
Splendid Blond Beast (Money, Law and Genocide in the Twentieth
Century) is een boek van Christopher Simpson. Onderwerp de verplaatsing van hooggeplaatste nazi oorlogsmisdadigers, die na WOII
werden beschermd door de VS en daar aan het werk werden gezet….. De VS liet dossiers van deze
oorlogsmisdadigers verdwijnen, zodat ze niet konden worden berecht en daarna werden gecontracteerd door de VS…. Eén van de
hoofdverantwoordelijken was Allen Dulles*, in eerste
instantie ‘Director of the Central Intelligence’ (DCI) van de Office of Strategic Services (OSS) en daarna van de
opvolger van die geheime dienst, de Central Intelligence Agency (CIA**) die in 1947 werd opgericht. 

bol.com | The Splendid Blond Beast (ebook), Christopher Simpson | 9781504043496 | Boeken
 

Hier een
samenvatting van het boek The Splendid Blond Beast:

From a
National Jewish Book Award–winning author: The “revelatory and
shocking” investigation into the CIA’s liberation of Nazi war
criminals (Kirkus Reviews)

How did Gen, Karl Wolff, one of the
highest-ranking members of the Nazi Party’s Waffen-SS, who personally
oversaw the deportation of three hundred thousand Jews to the
Treblinka extermination camps, escape prosecution at the Nuremberg
trials? As revealed in this groundbreaking investigation—culled
from recently uncovered archival documents—the answer lies within
the US government, which buried reports on the Final Solution and was
complicit in the recruitment of Nazi war criminals, all to protect
the world economy. Among the key players was CIA director Allen
Dulles, who was not only instrumental in Wolff’s exoneration but also
responsible for installing former slave-labor specialists into
positions of power in postwar Germany.

In this damning exposé
of American government malfeasance, author Christopher Simpson traces
the roots of mass murder as an instrument of financial gain and state
power, from the Armenian genocide during World War I to Hitler’s
Holocaust through the practice of genocide today. Detailing how the
existing structures of international law and commerce have encouraged
mass killings, corporate looting, and profiteering at the expense of
innocent victims, The Splendid Blond Beast is a disturbing and
profound book about the success of evil in our time.

The
award-winning author of Blowback and Science of Coercion, Simpson
also served as research director for Marcel Ophüls’s Oscar-winning
documentary, Hôtel Terminus: The Life and Times of Klaus Barbie.

Ja
ongelofelijk als je leest dat een oorlogsmisdadiger als SS
generaal Karl Wolff, die verantwoordelijk was voor de deportatie van
minstens 300.000 Joden naar Treblinka, zo berechting en straf
kon ontlopen…… Alles ‘voor het hogere doel de wereldeconomie te
redden’, waar massamoord een instrument werd voor financieel gewin en
het bestendigen van de staatsmacht, dit van de Armeense genocide, de
Holocaust tot de hedendaagse genocides (zoals die in Jemen, Ap), aldus Simpson….. Simpson legt
in zijn boek gedetailleerd uit hoe de structuren van internationale
wetgeving en commercie (in het westen): massamoorden, zakelijke plundering en het
profiteren over de rug van slachtoffers hebben aangemoedigd……

Eén en
ander werd (en wordt nog steeds) gebruikt: -voor illegale oorlogsvoering en -eerder ook voor propaganda
tegen de Sovjet-Unie, -voor de strijd tegen anti-koloniale activisten
en tegen -progressieve groeperingen die zogenaamd Sovjet pionnen waren….. (allen vormen van propaganda) Uiteraard gaat het om groeperingen die zich hebben verzet tegen het inhumane en
bloeddorstige kapitalisme en tegen de ongelijke behandeling van niet
alleen arme (t.o.v. rijke) landen, maar ook tegen het
allesoverheersende racisme in de VS…… (vergeet daarbij niet dat kapitalisme en fascisme elkaar deels overlappen…..) Moet nog gemeld worden dat men nu i.p.v. de Sovjet-Unie, Rusland misbruikt om mensen te demoniseren als Russische trollen wanneer zij niet welgevallig commentaar leveren op de huidige inhumane status quo en de illegale oorlogsvoering door het westen (onder aanvoering van de VS) in landen waar dit westen niets te zoeken heeft…… (zoals de illegale oorlogen van de VS tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië, Syrië en waar de VS in feite de oorlog in Oost-Oekraïne heeft veroorzaakt met de door haar georganiseerde en met 4 miljard dollar betaalde ‘opstand’ en coup tegen de democratisch gekozen president Janoekovytsj….)  

Propaganda
USA

An
interview with Christopher Simpson

                Filmed
in the 1980s

Books by Christopher Simpson

The Splendid Blond Beast: This
groundbreaking investigation into the CIA’s post – world War II
liberation and recruitment of Nazi war criminals – including the
pivotal role played by CIA director Allen Dulles – races the roots
not only of US government malfeasance, but of mass murder as an
instrument of financial gain and state power, from the Armenian
genocide during World War I to Hitler’s Holocaust through the
practice of genocide today.

Blowback: The true story of how US
intelligence organizations employed Nazi war criminals in clandestine
warfare and propaganda against the USSR, anticolonial
revolutionaries, and progressive movements worldwide that were
claimed to be Soviet pawns.

Science of Coercion: Drawing on
long-classified documents from the Pentagon, the CIA, and other
national security agencies, Simpson exposes secret government-funded
research into psychological warfare and reveals that many of the most
respected pioneers in the field of communication science were
knowingly complicit as their findings were employed for the purposes
of propaganda, subversion, intimidation, and counterinsurgency during
the Cold 

War era.

Click here to support
Brasscheck

==================================

*
Allen Dulles was o.a. verantwoordelijk voor de coup van 1953 in Iran
(in feite de oorzaak voor de opkomst van de moellahs in Iran en
de staatsgreep tegen de Sjah-dictator in 1978), de staatsgreep in
Guatemala in 1954 en de mislukte Bay of Pigs invasie in Cuba, de
mislukking waarvoor president John F. Kennedy hem ontsloeg als
directeur van de CIA. Vreemd genoeg mocht deze psychopathische schoft
deelnemen aan de Warren Commissie die de moord op John F. Kennedy
onderzocht….. Hoe meer dan doortrapt kan je een zo belangrijke
moord onderzoeken en het dan gek vinden dat zovelen hierin een
bevestiging zagen en zien dat de CIA betrokken was bij de moord op
Kennedy en dat dit in feite het ware complot was, niet voor niets was de CIA de eerste die de term ‘complottheorie’ in de wereld bracht en dat was juist daar zoveel mensen in de VS en daarbuiten volkomen terecht het officiële verhaal van de moord op Kennedy niet geloofden……. Overigens was Dulles ook verantwoordelijk voor het aanstellen van
nazi-tuig in het naoorlogse Duitsland…… Juist dat, het verzadigd zijn van nazi’s in het lokale, regionale en landelijk bestuurde Duitsland, was één van de hoofdredenen voor de Baader Meinhof Gruppe om tekeer te gaan tegen de Duitse leiding van de samenleving.

** Zie: ‘CIA
70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen,
media manipulatie enz. enz………‘  

Voorbeelden van VS (en CIA) terreur:

‘VS
vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van
WOII……..‘ Tot het jaar 2000, deze eeuw zijn er
intussen ruim meer dan 2,5 miljoen moorden aan toe te voegen, moorden
begaan door de VS en de NAVO (waar deze terreurorganisatie altijd onder
militair opperbevel stond en staat van de VS…)….

‘VS
buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en
oorlogen……….‘

‘List
of wars involving the United States‘

De onderbroekbom: één grote leugen, die duizenden vliegveld bodyscanners heeft ‘opgeleverd’

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Michael
Chertoff was de topgraaier van Homeland Security (DHS) toen een
‘terrorist’, Umar
Farouk Abdulmutallab, werd aangehouden vanwege een niet werkende
onderbroekbom. Deze Nigeriaan was in Amsterdam opgestapt
en werd zonder een boardingpass (‘instapkaart’) na interventie van
een VS beambte toegelaten tot het vliegtuig……

E.e.a. gebeurde op 25 december 2009 en Brasscheck TV herhaalde een eerder bericht met video’s, waar ik al eens een bericht over schreef, echter het kan bepaald geen kwaad deze zaak nog eens op te halen en te laten zien hoe Rusland wordt gedemoniseerd en het publiek bang wordt gemaakt voor dat land en voor terreuraanslagen, maar bovendien waar zaken als de onderbroekbom toe kunnen leiden, zeker na alle hysterie over ‘Russiagate’, de grote leugen over Russische bemoeienis met een groot aantal politieke zaken in het westen…… 

Ondanks de vele uren die al over ‘Russiagate’ zijn volgeluld, aangevuld met de vele meters aan geschreven dossiers door de VS en andere overheden, plus het enorme aantal artikelen die hierover verschenen in de reguliere westerse media, is voor Russiagate geen millimeter aan bewijs geleverd……. Hetzelfde geldt eigenlijk ook voor de onderbroekbom, terwijl er van meet af aan grote twijfels waren over dit verhaal, zelfs onder de getuigen in het vliegtuig, daarover zo meer.

Om zaken als de onderbroekbom tegen te gaan werden op vliegvelden tegen een enorm kapitaal ‘full body scanners’ geplaatst…… Volgens deskundigen zijn deze scanners gevaarlijk voor de gezondheid……

Chertoff
vertegenwoordigde toevallig ook het bedrijf die de gevaarlijke
bodyscanners levert, scanners die te vinden op veel vliegvelden….. Ofwel Chertoff profiteert van die scanners…… Schiphol schafte na het incident met de onderbroekbom 60 ProVision bodyscanners van de Amerikaanse fabrikant L-3 Communications aan, i.p.v. eerst eens de regels te verstevigen, regels waarmee iemand zonder instapkaart, echt nooit weer in een vliegtuig kan plaatsnemen……. (Nederland had al lang een strafrechtelijk onderzoek naar deze zaak in moeten stellen…..)

Het is
dan ook niet moeilijk te bedenken dat de VS deze ‘aanslag’ zelf heeft
georganiseerd, met het doel deze ‘full body scanners’ op de
vliegvelden te krijgen…… 

Twee advocaten die aan boord waren van
de bewuste vlucht met de onderbroekbom zijn ervan overtuigd dat de VS zelf de hand had in
deze ‘aanslag…’

Volgens
de tweede video van Brasscheck TV, hieronder opgenomen, is e.e.a.
mede het gevolg van het opnemen van nazi’s door de VS na WOII, waar
deze nazi’s al in 1943 werden gepolst door Allen Dulles, die in
Zwitserland overleg voerde met nazi-kopstukken. Dulles was destijds het hoofd van wat nu de CIA is (deze
terreurorganisatie werd in 1947 opgericht)…..

De
nazi’s werden met grote graagte opgenomen in de geheime diensten van
de VS en bepaalden mede het beleid dat tot zoveel ellende heeft
geleid…… Neem alleen al de communistenjacht van McCarthey die in 1950 begon en de bescherming van fascistische dictaturen in
Latijns-Amerika door de VS, sterker nog: de VS heeft na WOII diverse
staatsgrepen tegen democratisch gekozen regeringen georganiseerd in
dat deel van de wereld, waarna een door de VS uitgekozen fascist werd
geparachuteerd als leider van zo’n land….*

Terug
naar de ‘onderbroekbom’: vreemd genoeg zijn veel getuigenverklaringen
verdwenen en Chertoff wordt nog steeds niet vervolgd voor zijn
overduidelijke smerige klus….. Verwonder je nogmaals hoe het mogelijk is dat met een dergelijk smerig spel, in feite een ‘false flag operatie’, de VS een bedrijf stinkend rijk maakte door de productie van gevaarlijke scanners en de hysterie over terroristen verder voedde, niet alleen ten behoeve van bedrijven, maar ook voor de geheime diensten die steeds meer macht en geld weten te verzamelen, door de angst erin te houden bij de bevolking…….. Vergeet niet dat de kans dat je omkomt bij een verkeersongeluk ongeveer een miljoen keer groter is dan dat je omkomt bij een terreuraanslag………

REMEMBER
THE UNDERWEAR BOMBER?

A
TOTAL FRAUD

WHEN
WILL MICHAEL CHERTOFF BE INVESTIGATED?

It’s
December 22, the anniversary of the “underwear bomber”

He
– and Michael Chertoff – are the reason why air travelers are now
forced to go through medically untested body scanners.

In
case you forgot, the “need” for this “security” equipment was
based on a total fraud.

Good
insight into how the criminals in the FBI make eye witnesses accounts
disappear.

Michael
Chertoff is involved with the company that makes this equipment and
shilled aggressively both before and after this bogus event.

Michael
Chertoff: The profiteer behind the scam.

===================================

* Zie: ‘VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..‘ en: ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en: ‘List of wars involving the United States‘ en: ‘CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………‘

Zie ook: 

‘De onderbroekbom-leugen ten behoeve van onveilige body scanners‘ 

 
‘Onderbroekbom (25 december 2009) een enorm onzin verhaal, weer zijn we voorgelogen…….‘


‘Azijnpisser eist per direct strengere anti-terreurmaatregelen!!!‘


‘Een onderbroekbom‘

John Fitzgerald Kennedy, de samenzwering tot moord in 5 video’s: geen theorie >> de echte samenzweringstheorie is dat hij ‘werd vermoord door Lee Harvey Oswald’

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Brasscheck
TV bracht de afgelopen weken 4 artikelen en video’s over de moord op
John F. Kennedy (JFK), op 22 november jl. 55 jaar geleden. Hierbij gaat Brasscheck TV in op de volgende
punten:

  • Het feest van de samenzweerders de avond voor de moord op Kennedy
    met H.L. Hunt (‘olietycoon’), J. Edgar Hoover, Richard Nixon en
    Lyndon B. Johnson, ten huize van ‘olietycoon’ C. Murchison.

  • De
    voorbereiding van het volk op de aanstaande moord op Kennedy.

  • Wat
    gebeurde er met de getuigen

  • De
    strijd om het lijk van Kennedy na de moord, waarbij bewijsmateriaal
    verdween. Voorts de vreemde samenstelling van de stoet voorafgaand
    aan de moord.

  • Het
    ‘korte proces’ tegen Lee Harvey Oswald, die ook door de media zonder
    enige kritiek werd aangewezen als de moordenaar.

Afgelopen
week hoorde ik op BBC World Service radio nog eens de officiële lezing van de moord op Kennedy, waar men de officiële gelogen lezing over de gang van zaken nog steeds volgt, terwijl het overduidelijk is dat het de moord op Kennedy ‘de vrucht is’ van een echte
samenzwering en niet een theorie, zoals de CIA al snel na de moord de wereld inhielp….. (de CIA noemde de twijfels aan de officiële lezing een ‘samenzweringstheorie’, hiermee werd deze term
zelfs geïntroduceerd……)

Uit het volgende blijkt nogmaals dat niet alleen het militair-industrieel complex een groot belang had en heeft bij het voeren van oorlog, ook de oliemaffia had en heeft daar belang bij >> destijds ging het om de oorlog tegen Noord-Vietnam, die Kennedy zou hebben willen afblazen, daarnaast was er nog veel meer haat tegen hem, o.a. vanwege het Varkensbaai-incident in 1961, de poging om de Cubaanse revolutionaire regering omver te werpen….)…….

The
big party before the JFK assassination


Where
were H.L. Hunt, J. Edgar Hoover, Richard Nixon, and Lyndon B. Johnson
the night before the assassination of John F. Kennedy?

Witnesses
put them all together as a party at the home of Clint Murchison, the
Texas oil tycoon who controlled local law enforcement and J. Edgar
Hoover.

THE
PARTY BEFORE THE ASSASSINATION

AND THE MISSING
FINGERPRINT

THERE’S
NO MYSTERY HERE, NEVER WAS

The
meeting in Dallas the night before the assassination included:

H.L.
Hunt
J. Edgar Hoover
Richard Nixon
Lyndon B. Johnson

…At
the home of Clint Murchison, the Texas oil tycoon.

Murchison
owned J. Edgar Hoover, Lyndon B. Johnson, and State of Texas law
enforcement and stood to lose a fortune if Kennedy changed the oil
depletion allowance and faced the very real possibility of jail time
should then-Vice President Johnson be indicted, which gave the
appearance of being a certainty.

Nixon
and others involved claimed not to remember where he was that night.

The
fingerprint found in the Book Depository sniper’s nest and
suppressed by the FBI belonged to LBJ’s henchman who was convicted
in at least one murder and was suspected of committing several others
on Johnson’s behalf.

But
it doesn’t matter who did what, what weapon they used, and what
position they fired from.

That’s
like asking which janitor they sent and whether he used a wire or
nylon brush.

The
mountains of minutia, endless conferences, books and assassination
experts including Oliver Stone’s artfully loopy movie all obscure
the basic points.

  1. The
    CIA was facing a thorough gutting at the hands of Kennedy as were
    their close colleagues in organized crime and the oil industry

  1. The
    Pentagon and the scumbags who supply them were facing the loss of
    billions upon billion of of dollars in profits and payoffs if
    Kennedy turned off the Vietnam gravy train.

  1. Hoover
    and Johnson knew each other very well, hated Kennedy and had very
    strong self-preservation reasons to want him dead. Both had been
    involved in political murders separately – and were to collaborate
    on future ones.

Recall
that Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King were both assassinated
during the Johnson-Hoover regime and that Johnson was the president
during the infamous USS Liberty incident. Robert Kennedy, like his
brother, and Martin Luther King were murdered after they started
talking against war in Vietnam. Another too rarely mentioned
connection.)

These
people – the CIA, organized crime, the Pentagon, Hoover and Johnson
– were all murderers and they did what murderers do.

With
Hoover in charge of the FBI and Johnson in control of the Federal
government and Texas law enforcement, there was no investigation of
the crime and any evidence that contradicted the manufactured “lone
nut” theory was altered and in some cases outright destroyed.

Ongoing
media suppression was carried out by the CIA and the cooperative and
craven US news media.

It
didn’t matter how good or bad your evidence is if you don’t
control the process and it’s the new leader who controls the
process.

Attorney
Allen Dulles, the CIA head who supervised numerous coups and
assassinations in other countries and had a grudge against Kennedy
for firing him, understood this simple principle better than anyone.

That’s
it. The beginning, middle and end of the story.

Discussions
about the minutia of the specific mechanics of the operation are
nothing more than a distraction and far off the key points which are:

    1.
    When push comes to shove, the military-industrial complex is in
    control of the US

    2.
    A criminally minded CIA and organized crime figures in the US and
    abroad collaborate on projects of mutual interest (drug running,
    assassination, the suppression of dissent) on a daily basis as they
    have done since WW II.

    3.
    The US news media – as well as the vast majority of academia –
    is an impotent joke.

These
are the three elements that have guided and controlled the US since
Kennedy’s assassination and they can, and continue to, get away
with just about anything.

Preparing
the public mind for the JFK Assassination

This
is easily one of the strangest and most shocking “coincidences”
of the JFK assassination.

A
newscaster was handed this elaborate story to read just hours before
Kennedy was killed.

PREPARING
THE PUBLIC MIND

NORMALIZING THE IDEA
OF PRESIDENTIAL ASSASSINATION

CREATING
EXPECTATIONS

The
week before Kennedy was assassinated the news media, national and
local to Dallas, went into overdrive about two subjects:

  1. How
    many people hated the Kennedys and wanted to do them harm

  1. How
    “reckless” Kennedy was in not strictly following security
    protocols (a similar charge was made about his son’s adherence to
    aviation safety and who died in a highly mysterious plane accident
    just as he was about to enter political life.)

Just
hours before Kennedy was murdered in cold blood, this bizarre script
was read in the two and a half minutes before Kennedy took the stage
for a breakfast talk in Fort Worth.

Just
think of how strange this is.

Who
would write such a script? Who would order it to be read before a
presidential appearance?

Just
a few hours after this live newscast Kennedy was assassinated by a
“lone nut” just like the one described in the local Texas
newsfeed.

What
happened to witnesses of the JFK assassination?

You’ve
probably heard that many eye witnesses to the Kennedy assassination
had very short lives – after the assassination.

Here’s
the story of one of them: a plainclothes detective with the Dallas
Police Department.

Mind
blowing testimony.

WHY
WEREN’T THERE ANY WITNESSES?

THERE WERE …DOZENS
OF THEM HERE’S ONE THEY KILLED

NO EYEWITNESSES?
BULLSHIT!

There
were dozens of eyewitnesses to the Kennedy assassination including
trained ones like police officers. They were ordered to keep their
mouths shut about what they saw – and most did. Those who did not
were warned, harassed, and if they were persistent enough,
eliminated. One too-seldom discussed example. It was a hyperorganized
coup, all in the name of the Vietnam War’s depopulation agenda.

The
fight over Kennedy’s body

exas
law is pretty simple.

Anyone
murdered in Texas – regardless of who he is – gets a Texas autopsy.

But
when Kennedy was shot, the Secret Service stormed the hospital and
literally battled Texas officials for the casket.

And
that was only the beginning of the strangeness relating to the
post-assassination handling of Kennedy’s body.

STEALING
JFK’S BODY

MAKING THE EVIDENCE GO
AWAY

“WITH
UNSEEMLY HASTE”

The
Dallas police stood down.

The
Secret Service stood down.

Kennedy’s
car was put at the front of the procession (an absolute violation)
and there were no guards to his side and back to protect him.

In
spite of a heightened security alert, ALL normal security procedures
were toned down.

The
scores of eye witnesses who heard, and in some cases saw, shots from
the right of the President’s car were ignored.

The
rifle that was originally found in the Texas School Book Depository
did not match the casings that were found there.

Then
the President’s body, one of the most important pieces of evidence
in the crime, was literally stolen from the lawful possession of the
State of Texas and handed over to two grossly incompetent career Navy
physicians who had no experience in pathology or performing
autopsies.

That’s
our story so far.

Can
there possibly be any doubt that:

a)
there was more than one shooter on the scene

b)
those in charge of the local police and the Secret Service arranged
things in such a way as to facilitate the shooting and

c) eye witnesses were discouraged from reporting and the forensic exam was deliberately botched to maintain the one man, one bullet theory

The
short trial of Lee Harvey Oswald

What
Lee Harvey Oswald said after he was arrested and how he was
“convicted” by the news media and dishonest prosecutors and
police.

THE
SHORT TRIAL OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD

TRIED BY THE PRESS,
EXECUTED BY A FORMER NIXON EMPLOYEE

“NOTHING
TO SEE HERE, MOVE ALONG”

The
last hours of the life of Lee Harvey Oswald before he was executed on
live TV by Jack Ruby.

Jack
Ruby was a gangster, a Chicago guy who was sent to Dallas to operate
and who used a strip club as his headquarters where he interacted
daily with Dallas police giving them free liquor and prostitutes.

Very
rarely spoken about was his role as a major market maker for
narcotics dealing in Dallas

Previous
to that, in Chicago, he’d worked as an enforcer for the Hearst
newspaper chain during the sometimes violent competition for shelf
space on news stands.

In
his spare time away from California’s race tracks which he was
known to frequent, he also spent time as a “campaign worker” for
Richard Nixon’s first Congressional campaign.

Jack
Ruby at the nexus of organized crime, US politics, corrupt police,
the illegal drug trade, and dishonest news media – and most
probably the CIA that works closely with all these parties.

“Nothing
to see here, move along”

More
about Jack
Ruby: https://riversong.wordpress.com/the-jack-ruby-connection/

====================================
Zie ook: ‘Martin Luther King jr. vermoord door de overheid, aldus rechter……..‘

‘JFK de moord: de macht van de geheime diensten gecombineerd met die van het militair-industrieel complex‘

‘J.F. Kennedy vermoord door Lyndon Johnson en z’n maten in misdaad, geheime diensten en politiek…..‘

‘Kabinet ‘wil kunnen hacken’, zonder daar melding van te maken………. Hoe bedoelt u, ‘politiestaat??’‘ 

Voor meer berichten over J.F. Kennedy klik op dat label, direct onder dit bericht.

J.F. Kennedy vermoord door Lyndon Johnson en z’n maten in misdaad, geheime diensten en politiek…..

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

De avond voor de moord op J.F. Kennedy, vond er overleg plaats in Dallas, op een feest van oliebaron Clint Murchison. Aanwezig: Edgar Hoover (destijds hoofd FBI), L.B. Johnson (de democratische vicepresident, die door de dood van Kennedy werd benoemd tot president en die in tegenstelling tot Kennedy voor deelname was van de VS aan de oorlog in Vietnam), R. Nixon (de latere republikeinse president, ook al voorstander van de oorlog tegen Noord-Vietnam) en H.L. Hunt (een andere oliebaron).

De oliebaronnen vreesden grote verliezen, door een beslissing van Kennedy over olievoorraden. Het militair-industrieel complex had alle belang bij de VS deelname aan de oorlog tegen Noord-Vietnam, dit complex werd na de dood van Kennedy uiterst kundig bediend door eerst L.B. Johnson en later R. Nixon….. (Overigens is een oorlog altijd goed voor oliemaatschappijen, immers het verbruik van benzine, diesel en kerosine gaat als een pijl omhoog…)

Een aantal belangrijke punten, die ook in de film ‘JFK’ van Oliver Stone terug te vinden zijn: De CIA plus hun collega’s in de georganiseerde misdaad en de olie industrie vreesde te worden aangepakt door de regering Kennedy. Het Pentagon en de wapenindustrie zagen grote toekomstige winsten en steekgelden verdampen, als Kennedy de oorlog tegen Noord-Vietnam zou afblazen. Daarnaast hadden L.B. Johnson en E. Hoover de pest aan Kennedy en hadden persoonlijke belangen bij de dood van Kennedy, beiden waren afzonderlijk betrokken bij een aantal politieke moorden……

De broer van Kennedy, Robert en Martin Luther King werden vermoord onder het bewind van Johnson en Hoover, waarbij het opvallend is dat beiden fel gekant waren tegen de oorlog in Vietnam…….

Voor een totaaloverzicht en verdere details zie de volgende video en tekst daaronder, gepubliceerd door Brasscheck TV:

The
party before the assassination

AND THE MISSING
FINGERPRINT

Assassination
studies

THERE’S
NO MYSTERY HERE, NEVER WAS

The
meeting in Dallas the night before the assassination of J.F. Kenedy
included:

H.L.
Hunt
J. Edgar Hoover
Richard Nixon
Lyndon B. Johnson

The
big party before the JFK assassination

…At
the home of Clint Murchison, the Texas oil tycoon.

Murchison
owned J. Edgar Hoover, Lyndon B. Johnson, and State of Texas law
enforcement and stood to lose a fortune if Kennedy changed the oil
depletion allowance and faced the very real possibility of jail time
should then-Vice President Johnson be indicted, which gave the
appearance of being a certainty.

Nixon
and others involved claimed not to remember where he was that night.

The
fingerprint found in the Book Depository sniper’s nest and
suppressed by the FBI belonged to LBJ’s henchman who was convicted
in at least one murder and was suspected of committing several others
on Johnson’s behalf.

But
it doesn’t matter who did what, what weapon they used, and what
position they fired from.

That’s
like asking which janitor they sent and whether he used a wire or
nylon brush.

The
mountains of minutia, endless conferences, books and assassination
experts including Oliver Stone’s artfully loopy movie all obscure
the basic points.

  1. The
    CIA was facing a thorough gutting at the hands of Kennedy as were
    their close colleagues in organized crime and the oil industry

  1. The
    Pentagon and the scumbags who supply them were facing the loss of
    billions upon billion of of dollars in profits and payoffs if
    Kennedy turned off the Vietnam gravy train.

  1. Hoover
    and Johnson knew each other very well, hated Kennedy and had very
    strong self-preservation reasons to want him dead. Both had been
    involved in political murders separately – and were to collaborate
    on future ones.

Recall
that Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King were both assassinated
during the Johnson-Hoover regime and that Johnson was the president
during the infamous USS Liberty incident. Robert Kennedy, like his
brother, and Martin Luther King were murdered after they started
talking against war in Vietnam. Another too rarely mentioned
connection.)

These
people – the CIA, organized crime, the Pentagon, Hoover and Johnson
– were all murderers and they did what murderers do.

With
Hoover in charge of the FBI and Johnson in control of the Federal
government and Texas law enforcement, there was no investigation of
the crime and any evidence that contradicted the manufactured “lone
nut” theory was altered and in some cases outright destroyed.

Ongoing
media suppression was carried out by the CIA and the cooperative and
craven US news media.

It
didn’t matter how good or bad your evidence is if you don’t
control the process and it’s the new leader who controls the
process.

Attorney
Allen Dulles, the CIA head who supervised numerous coups and
assassinations in other countries and had a grudge against Kennedy
for firing him, understood this simple principle better than anyone.

That’s
it. The beginning, middle and end of the story.

Discussions
about the minutia of the specific mechanics of the operation are
nothing more than a distraction and far off the key points which are:

  1.  When
    push comes to shove, the military-industrial complex is in control
    of the US

    2.
    A criminally minded CIA and organized crime figures in the US and
    abroad collaborate on projects of mutual interest (drug running,
    assassination, the suppression of dissent) on a daily basis as they
    have done since WW II.

    3.
    The US news media – as well as the vast majority of academia –
    is an impotent joke.

These
are the three elements that have guided and controlled the US since
Kennedy’s assassination and they can, and continue to, get away
with just about anything.

– Brasscheck

=========================

Zie ook: ‘JFK de moord: de macht van de geheime diensten gecombineerd met die van het militair-industrieel complex‘

       en: ‘Martin Luther King jr. vermoord door de overheid, aldus rechter……..‘

       en: ‘Georganiseerde misdaad en overheid, wat is het verschil tussen die twee? Een uiterst hilarische lezing van Michael Parenti over de moord op JFK!‘

       en: ‘Kabinet ‘wil kunnen hacken’, zonder daar melding van te maken………. Hoe bedoelt u, ‘politiestaat??’‘

JFK de moord: de macht van de geheime diensten gecombineerd met die van het militair-industrieel complex

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Het volgende artikel geschreven door Ray McGovern was nog niet gepubliceerd of Trump beloofde ook de rest van de JFK documenten vrij te geven, terwijl hij eerder onder druk van de CIA en NSA 300 pagina’s achterhield.

Daarmee was de kop van het McGovern artikel achterhaald, al moeten we eerst nog zien, of Trump kan leveren, immers de geheime diensten hebben hem bijna volledig in hun macht gekregen met de Russia-gate leugens*.

Verder een artikel met alweer toch een aantal nieuwe feiten, waaruit de conclusie bijna niet is te vermijden dat de CIA heeft meegewerkt aan de moord op J.F. Kennedy, uiteraard in opdracht en samenwerking met het militair-industrieel complex. Kennedy was van plan de aanwezige troepen uit Zuid-Vietnam terug te trekken, dat zou deze industrie een paar miljard dollar aan winst kosten…… Uiteraard was de mislukte invasie op Cuba een stevige plank aan de doodskist van Kennedy, men heeft hem nooit vergeven dat hij geen troepen stuurde naar Cuba om de gevangen genomen militairen te bevrijden, sterker nog: Kennedy ontsloeg de verantwoordelijken voor het Bay of Pigs incident…..

Truman, de ex-president plaatste een maand na de moord op Kennedy een artikel in de Washington Post, waarin hij pleitte de macht van de CIA aan banden te leggen, dit werd niet herhaald in de late editie van deze krant en werd gemeden door de rest van de reguliere media in de VS, terwijl Truman NB de CIA had opgezet in 1947……….

Lees het volgende (verder) prima artikel:

The
Deep State’s JFK Triumph Over Trump

October
30, 2017 at 9:27 am

Written
by Ray
McGovern

Fifty-four
years after President Kennedy’s assassination, the CIA and FBI
demanded more time to decide what secrets to keep hiding – and a
chastened President Trump bowed to their power, observes ex-CIA
analyst Ray McGovern.

(CN) — It
was summer 1963 when a senior official of CIA’s operations
directorate treated our Junior Officer Trainee (JOT) class to an
unbridled rant against President John F. Kennedy. He accused
JFK, among other things, of rank cowardice in refusing to send U.S.
armed forces to bail out Cuban rebels pinned down during the
CIA-launched invasion at the Bay of Pigs, blowing the chance to drive
Cuba’s Communist leader Fidel Castro from power.

It
seemed beyond odd that a CIA official would voice such scathing
criticism of a sitting President at a training course for those
selected to be CIA’s future leaders. I remember thinking to
myself, “This guy is unhinged; he would kill Kennedy, given the
chance.”

Our
special guest lecturer looked a lot like E. Howard Hunt, but more
than a half-century later, I cannot be sure it was he. Our notes
from such training/indoctrination were classified and kept under lock
and key.

At
the end of our JOT orientation, we budding Agency leaders had to make
a basic choice between joining the directorate for substantive
analysis or the operations directorate where case officers run spies
and organize regime changes (in those days, we just called the
process overthrowing governments).

I
chose the analysis directorate and, once ensconced in the brand new
headquarters building in Langley, Virginia, I found it strange that
subway-style turnstiles prevented analysts from going to the
“operations side of the house,” and vice versa. Truth be told, we
were never one happy family.

I
cannot speak for my fellow analysts in the early 1960s, but it never
entered my mind that operatives on the other side of the turnstiles
might be capable of assassinating a President – the very President
whose challenge to do something for our country had brought many of
us to Washington in the first place. But, barring the emergence of a
courageous whistleblower-patriot like Daniel Ellsberg, Chelsea
Manning or Edward Snowden, I do not expect to live long enough to
learn precisely who orchestrated and carried out the assassination of
JFK.

And
yet, in a sense, those particulars seem less important than two main
lessons learned: (1) If a President can face down intense domestic
pressure from the power elite and turn toward peace with perceived
foreign enemies, then anything is possible. The darkness of
Kennedy’s murder should not obscure the light of that basic truth;
and (2) There is ample evidence pointing to a state execution of a
President willing to take huge risks for peace. While no
post-Kennedy president can ignore that harsh reality, it remains
possible that a future President with the vision and courage of JFK
might beat the odds – particularly as the American Empire
disintegrates and domestic discontent grows.

I
do hope to be around next April after the 180-day extension for
release of the remaining JFK documents. But – absent a gutsy
whistleblower – I wouldn’t be surprised to see in April,
a Washington
Post banner
headline much like the one that appeared Saturday: “JFK
files: The promise of revelations derailed by CIA, FBI.”

The
New Delay Is the Story

You
might have thought that almost 54 years after Kennedy was murdered in
the streets of Dallas – and after knowing for a quarter century the
supposedly final deadline for releasing the JFK files – the CIA and
FBI would not have needed a six-month extension to decide what
secrets that they still must hide.

Journalist
Caitlin Johnstone hits
the nail on the head in
pointing out that the biggest revelation from last week’s limited
release of the JFK files is “the fact that the FBI and CIA still
desperately need to keep secrets about something that happened 54
years ago.”

What
was released on Oct. 26, was a tiny fraction of what had remained
undisclosed in the National Archives. To find out why, one needs
to have some appreciation of a 70-year-old American political
tradition that might be called “fear of the spooks.”

That
the CIA and FBI are still choosing what we should be allowed to see
concerning who murdered John Kennedy may seem unusual, but there is
hoary precedent for it.  After JFK’s assassination on Nov. 22,
1963, the well-connected Allen Dulles, whom Kennedy had fired as CIA
director after the Bay of Pigs fiasco, got himself appointed to the
Warren Commission and took the lead in shaping the investigation of
JFK’s murder.

By
becoming de
facto head
of the Commission, Dulles was perfectly placed to protect himself and
his associates, if any commissioners or investigators were tempted to
question whether Dulles and the CIA played any role in killing
Kennedy. When a few independent-minded journalists did succumb to
that temptation, they were immediately branded – you guessed it –
“conspiracy theorists.”

And
so, the big question remains: Did Allen Dulles and other
“cloak-and-dagger” CIA operatives have a hand in John Kennedy’s
assassination and subsequent cover-up? In my view and the view of
many more knowledgeable investigators, the best dissection of the
evidence on the murder appears in James Douglass’s 2008 book, JFK
and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters.

After
updating and arraying the abundant evidence, and conducting still
more interviews, Douglass concludes that the answer to the big
question is Yes. Reading Douglass’s book today may help
explain why so many records are still withheld from release, even in
redacted form, and why, indeed, we may never see them in their
entirety.

Truman:
CIA a Frankenstein?

When
Kennedy was assassinated, it must have occurred to former President
Harry Truman, as it did to many others, that the disgraced Allen
Dulles and his associates might have conspired to get rid of a
President they felt was soft on Communism – and dismissive of the
Deep State of that time. Not to mention their vengeful desire to
retaliate for Kennedy’s response to the Bay of Pigs fiasco. (Firing
Allen Dulles and other CIA paragons of the Deep State for that fiasco
simply was not done.)

Exactly
one month after John Kennedy was killed, the Washington
Post published
an op-ed by Harry Truman titled “Limit CIA Role to Intelligence.”
The first sentence read, “I think it has become necessary to take
another look at the purpose and operations of our Central
Intelligence Agency.”

Strangely,
the op-ed appeared only in the Post’s early
edition on Dec. 22, 1963. It was excised from that day’s later
editions and, despite being authored by the President who was
responsible for setting up the CIA in 1947, the all-too-relevant
op-ed was ignored in all other major media.

Truman
clearly believed that the spy agency had lurched off in what Truman
thought were troubling directions. He began his op-ed by
underscoring “the original reason why I thought it necessary to
organize this Agency … and what I expected it to do.” It would be
“charged with the collection of all intelligence reports from every
available source, and to have those reports reach me as President
without Department ‘treatment’ or interpretations.”

Truman
then moved quickly to one of the main things clearly bothering
him. He wrote “the most important thing was to guard against
the chance of intelligence being used to influence or to lead the
President into unwise decisions.”

It
was not difficult to see this as a reference to how one of the
agency’s early directors, Allen Dulles, tried to trick President
Kennedy into sending U.S. forces to rescue the group of invaders who
had landed on the beach at the Bay of Pigs in April 1961 with no
chance of success, absent the speedy commitment of U.S. air and
ground support. The planned mouse-trapping of the then-novice
President Kennedy had been underpinned by a rosy “analysis”
showing how this pin-prick on the beach would lead to a popular
uprising against Fidel Castro.

Wallowing
in the Bay of Pigs

Arch-Establishment
figure Allen Dulles was offended when young President Kennedy, on
entering office, had the temerity to question the CIA’s Bay of Pigs
plans, which had been set in motion under President Dwight
Eisenhower. When Kennedy made it clear he would not approve
the use of U.S. combat forces, Dulles set out, with supreme
confidence, to give the President no choice except to send U.S.
troops to the rescue.

Coffee-stained
notes handwritten by Allen Dulles were discovered after his death and
reported by historian Lucien S. Vandenbroucke. In his notes, Dulles
explained that, “when the chips were down,” Kennedy would be
forced by “the realities of the situation” to give whatever
military support was necessary “rather than permit the enterprise
to fail.”

The
“enterprise” which Dulles said could not fail was, of course, the
overthrow of Fidel Castro. After mounting several failed operations
to assassinate Castro, this time Dulles meant to get his man, with
little or no attention to how Castro’s patrons in Moscow might
react eventually. (The next year, the Soviets agreed to install
nuclear missiles in Cuba as a deterrent to future U.S. aggression,
leading to the Cuban Missile Crisis).

In
1961, the reckless Joint Chiefs of Staff, whom then-Deputy Secretary
of State George Ball later described as a “sewer of deceit,”
relished any chance to confront the Soviet Union and give it, at
least, a black eye. (One can still smell the odor from that
sewer in many of the documents released last week.)

But
Kennedy stuck to his guns, so to speak. A few months after the
abortive invasion of Cuba — and his refusal to send the U.S.
military to the rescue — Kennedy fired Dulles and his
co-conspirators and told a friend that he wanted to “splinter the
CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.” Clearly,
the outrage was mutual.

When JFK
and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters came
out, the mainstream media had an allergic reaction and gave it almost
no reviews. It is a safe bet, though, that Barack Obama was given a
copy and that this might account in some degree for his continual
deference – timorousness even – toward the CIA.

Could
fear of the Deep State be largely why President Obama felt he had to
leave the Cheney/Bush-anointed CIA torturers, kidnappers and
black-prison wardens in place, instructing his first CIA chief, Leon
Panetta, to become, in effect, the agency’s lawyer rather than take
charge? Is this why Obama felt he could not fire his clumsily
devious Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who had to
apologize to Congress for giving “clearly erroneous” testimony
under oath in March 2013? Does Obama’s fear account for his
allowing then-National Security Agency Director Keith Alexander and
counterparts in the FBI to continue to mislead the American people,
even though the documents released by Edward Snowden showed them –
as well as Clapper – to be lying about the government’s
surveillance activities?

Is
this why Obama fought tooth and nail to protect CIA Director John
Brennan by trying to thwart publication of the comprehensive Senate
Intelligence Committee investigation of CIA torture, which was

based
on original Agency cables, emails, and headquarters memos?
[See here and here.]

The
Deep State Today

Many
Americans cling to a comforting conviction that the Deep State is a
fiction, at least in a “democracy” like the United States.
References to the enduring powers of the security agencies and other
key bureaucracies have been essentially banned by the mainstream
media, which many other suspicious Americans have come to see as just
one more appendage of the Deep State.

But
occasionally the reality of how power works pokes through in some
unguarded remark by a Washington insider, someone like Sen. Chuck
Schumer, D-New York, the Senate Minority Leader with 36 years of
experience in Congress. As Senate Minority Leader, he also is an ex
officio member
of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is supposed to oversee
the intelligence agencies.

During
a Jan. 3, 2017 interview with MSNBC’S Rachel Maddow, Schumer told
Maddow nonchalantly about the dangers awaiting President-elect Donald
Trump if he kept on “taking on the intelligence community.” She
and Schumer were discussing Trump’s sharp tweeting regarding U.S.
intelligence and evidence of “Russian hacking” (which both
Schumer and Maddow treat as flat fact).

Schumer said:
“Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have
six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.  So even for a
practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he’s being really
dumb to do this.”

Three
days after that interview, President Obama’s intelligence chiefs
released a nearly evidence-free “assessment” claiming that the
Kremlin engaged in a covert operation to put Trump into office,
fueling a “scandal” that has hobbled Trump’s presidency. On
Monday, Russia-gate special prosecutor Robert Mueller indicted
Trump’s one-time campaign manager Paul Manafort on unrelated money
laundering, tax and foreign lobbying charges, apparently in the hope
that Manafort will provide incriminating evidence against Trump.

So,
President Trump has been in office long enough to have learned how
the game is played and the “six ways from Sunday” that the
intelligence community has for “getting back at you.” He appears
to be as intimidated as was President Obama.

Trump’s
awkward acquiescence in the Deep State’s last-minute foot-dragging
regarding release of the JFK files is simply the most recent sign
that he, too, is under the thumb of what the Soviets used to call
“the organs of state security.”

Ray
McGovern works with the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in
inner-city Washington.  During his 27-year career at CIA, he
prepared the President’s
Daily Brief for
Nixon, Ford, and Reagan, and conducted the one-on-one morning
briefings from 1981 to 1985.  He is co-founder of Veteran
Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

By Ray
McGovern /
Republished with permission / Consortium
News / Report
a typo

===============================================

* Zie o.a.: ‘Walls Closing in on Russiagate Conspiracy Theorists: Evidence Mounts That DNC Emails Provided to WikiLeaks By Inside Source‘ en: ‘WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Drops Russiagate Shell!!!‘ (video).

Zie ook: ‘Martin Luther King jr. vermoord door de overheid, aldus rechter……..‘

       en: ‘J.F. Kennedy vermoord door Lyndon Johnson en z’n maten in misdaad, geheime diensten en politiek…..‘

       en: ‘Georganiseerde misdaad en overheid, wat is het verschil tussen die twee? Een uiterst hilarische lezing van Michael Parenti over de moord op JFK!‘     

       en: ‘Newsweek erkent ‘false flag’ operatie van de VS tegen de Sovjet Unie……‘

       en: ‘Kabinet ‘wil kunnen hacken’, zonder daar melding van te maken………. Hoe bedoelt u, ‘politiestaat??’‘

Zie ook de volgende links, die weliswaar niets met Kennedy te maken hebben maar die wel aangeven hoe groot de macht de reguliere VS media en vooral de geheime diensten hebben, iets dat weer eens goed duidelijk werd door de leugens over ‘Russiagate’ (alleen dat woord is al een leugen op zich en werd voor het eerst gebruikt voor de Russische oligarchen die eind 90er jaren hun geld witwasten in het westen):

             ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..‘ (een vervolg op het bovenstaande bericht)

       en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election‘

       en: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information‘

       en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election‘

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media‘

       en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence‘

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘

       en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump‘

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media‘

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence‘

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’‘

       en: ‘New York Times met schaamteloze anti-Russische propaganda en ‘fake news….’‘

       en: ‘BBC World Service: Rusland heeft VS verkiezingen gemanipuleerd……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘

       en: ‘Hoe Clinton en haar team de wereld op scherp hebben gezet >> Did Hillary Scapegoat Russia to Save Her Campaign?‘

       en: ‘Brekend nieuws: door Rusland betaalde reclames van Shell, Calvé pindakaas, AH boerenkool en Hema worst >> doel Rutte 3 ten val te brengen!!!‘

PS: Kennedy en dan met name zijn broer Robert gingen ook behoorlijk tekeer tegen de maffia en volgens een aantal deskundigen zou de maffia hebben samengewerkt met de geheime dienst. Lee Harvey Oswald, die Kennedy als zou hebben vermoord, werd door Jack Ruby doodgeschoten, deze zou lid van de maffia zijn geweest of daar hechte banden mee hebben gehad………

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Het is 70 jaar gelden dat de CIA met ‘haar heilzame werk’ begon. 70 jaar waarin de CIA:

  • staatsgrepen pleegde, o.a. tegen Iran (destijds Perzië), Congo, Chili en Brazilië. 
  • ‘false flag’ operaties leidde, operaties zogenaamd uitgevoerd door vijanden van de VS, zodat de VS ‘acties’ tegen haar onwelgevallige, veelal democratisch gekozen regimes kon beginnen……. (niet zelden door het voeren van illegale oorlogen)
  • honderden (wellicht nog veel meer) verdachten martelde (en martelt), dit vooral in het buitenland en buitenlandse regimes (veelal niet democratisch gekozen) leerde ‘hoe het best kan worden gemarteld……. 
  • drugsoperaties leidde, zodat men met de opbrengsten geheime missies in het buitenland kon bekostigen……..
  • oud-nazi’s uit de gevangenis houden en hen zelfs naar de VS te brengen om daar hun werk voort te zetten. Voorts leidde de CIA een netwerk van 600 ex-nazi agenten in het door de Sovjet-Unie bezette deel van Duitsland, De dagelijkse leiding van deze nazi’s was in handen van Reinhard Gehlen, voormalig hoofd van de nazi-inlichtingendienst voor de Sovjet-Unie……

Er zijn nog veel meer zaken te noemen, waarvoor ik naar het onderstaande artikel van Anti-Media wil verwijzen

Happy
Birthday CIA: 7 Truly Terrible Things the Agency Has Done in 70 Years

September
18, 2017 at 5:26 pm

Written
by Carey
Wedler

(ANTIMEDIA) —
On
Monday, President Trump tweeted birthday
wishes to the Air Force and the CIA. Both
became official organizations
70 years ago on September 18, 1947, with the implementation of the
National Security Act of 1947.

After
spending years as a wartime intelligence agency called the Office of
Strategic Services, the agency was solidified as a key player in the
federal government’s operations with then-President Harry Truman’s
authorization.

In
the seventy years since, the CIA has committed a wide variety of
misdeeds, crimes, coups, and violence. Here are seven of the worst
programs they’ve carried out (that are known to the public):

    1.
    Toppling governments around the world     —
    The CIA is best known for its first coup, Operation Ajax, in 1953,
    in which it ousted the democratically elected leader of Iran,
    Mohammed Mossadegh, reinstating the autocratic Shah, who favored
    western oil interests. That operation, which the CIA now     admits to
    waging with British intelligence, ultimately resulted in the     1979
    revolution     and
    subsequent U.S. hostage crisis. Relations between the U.S. and Iran
    remain strained to this day, aptly described by the CIA-coined term
    “    blowback.”

But
the CIA has had a hand in toppling a
number of other democratically elected governments, from Guatemala
(1954) and the Congo (1960) to the Dominican Republic (1961), South
Vietnam (1963), Brazil (1964), and Chile (1973). The CIA has aimed to
install leaders who appease American interests,
often empowering oppressive, violent
dictators.
This is only a partial list of countries where the CIA covertly
attempted to exploit and manipulate sovereign nations’ governments.

  1. Operation
    Paperclip     —
    In one of the more bizarre CIA plots, the agency and other
    government departments employed Nazi scientists both within and
    outside the United States to gain an advantage over the
    Soviets. As     summarized by NPR:

“The
aim [of Operation Paperclip] was to find and preserve German weapons,
including biological and chemical agents, but American scientific
intelligence officers quickly realized the weapons themselves were
not enough.

“They
decided the United States needed to bring the Nazi scientists
themselves to the U.S. Thus began a mission to recruit top Nazi
doctors, physicists and chemists — including Wernher von Braun, who
went on to design the rockets that took man to the moon.”

They
kept this plot secret, though they admitted to
it upon the release of Operation
Paperclip: The Secret Intelligence Program That Brought Nazi
Scientists To America by
Annie Jacobsen. In a book review, the CIA wrote that “Henry
Wallace, former vice president and secretary of commerce, believed
the scientists’ ideas could launch new civilian industries and
produce jobs.” 

They
praised the book’s historical accuracy, noting “that the
Launch Operations Center at Cape Canaveral, Florida, was headed by
Kurt Debus, an ardent Nazi.” They acknowledged that “General
Reinhard Gehlen, former head of Nazi intelligence operations against
the Soviets, was hired by the US Army and later by the CIA to operate
600 ex-Nazi agents in the Soviet zone of occupied Germany.”

Remarkably,
they noted that Jacobsen “understandably questions the morality
of the decision to hire Nazi SS scientists,” but praise her for
pointing out that it was done to fight Soviets. They also made sure
to add that the Soviets hired Nazis, too, apparently justifying their
own questionable actions by citing their most loathed enemy.

  1. Operation
    CHAOS     —
    The FBI is widely known for its     COINTELPRO schemes
    to undermine     communist
    movements in the 1950s and anti-war, civil rights    ,
    and     black
    power     movements
    in the 1960s, but the CIA has not been implicated nearly as deeply
    because, technically, the CIA cannot legally engage in domestic
    spying. But that was of little concern to President Lyndon B.
    Johnson as opposition to the Vietnam war grew. According to
    former     New
    York Times     journalist
    and Pulitzer Prize-winner Tim Weiner, as documented in his extensive
    CIA     history, Legacy
    of Ashes    ,
    Johnson instructed then-CIA Director Richard Helms to break the law:

“In
October 1967, a handful of CIA analysts joined in the first big
Washington march against the war. The president regarded protesters
as enemies of the state. He was convinced that the peace movement was
controlled and financed by Moscow and Beijing. He wanted proof. He
ordered Richard Helms to produce it.

“Helms
reminded the president that the CIA was barred from spying on
Americans. He says Johnson told him: ‘I’m quite aware of that.
What I want for you is to pursue this matter, and to do what is
necessary to track down the foreign communists who are behind this
intolerable interference in our domestic affairs…’”

Helms
obeyed. Weiner wrote:

“In
a blatant violation of his powers under the law, the director of
central intelligence became a part-time secret police chief. The CIA
undertook a domestic surveillance operation, code-named Chaos. It
went on for almost seven years… Eleven CIA officers grew long hair,
learned the jargon of the New Left, and went off to infiltrate peace
groups in the United States and Europe.”

According
to Weiner, “the agency compiled a computer index of 300,000
names of American people and organizations, and extensive files on
7,200 citizens. It began working in secret with police departments
all over America.” Because they could not draw a “clear
distinction” between the new far left and mainstream opposition to
the war, the CIA spied on every major peace organization in the
country. President Johnson also wanted them to prove a connection
between foreign communists and the black power movement. “The
agency tried its best,” Weiner noted, ultimately noting that
“the CIA never found a shred of evidence that linked the leaders
of the American left or the black-power movement to foreign
governments.”

  1. Infiltrating
    the media     — Over the years, the CIA has successfully
    gained influence in the news media, as well as popular media like
    film and television. Its influence over the news began almost
    immediately after the agency was formed. As Weiner explained, CIA
    Director Allen Dulles established firm ties with newspapers:

“Dulles
kept in close touch with the men who ran the New York Times, The
Washington Post, and the nation’s leading weekly magazines. He
could pick up the phone and edit a breaking story, make sure an
irritating foreign correspondent was yanked from the field, or hire
the services of men such as Time’s Berlin bureau chief and
Newsweek’s man in Tokyo.”

He
continued:

“It
was second nature for Dulles to plant stories in the press. American
newsrooms were dominated by veterans of the government’s wartime
propaganda branch, the Office of War Information…The men who
responded to the CIA’s call included Henry Luce and his editors at
Time, Life, and Fortune; popular magazines such as Parade, the
Saturday Review, and Reader’s Digest; and the most powerful
executives at CBS News. Dulles built a public-relations and
propaganda machine that came to include more than fifty news
organizations, a dozen publishing houses, and personal pledges of
support from men such as Axel Springer, West Germany’s most
powerful press baron.”

The
CIA’s influence had not waned by 1977 when journalist Carl
Bernstein reported on
publications with CIA agents in their employ, as well as “more
than 400 American journalists who in the past twenty five years
have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence
Agency.”

The
CIA has also successfully advised
on and influenced numerous
television shows, such
as Homeland and 24 and films like Zero
Dark Thirty and Argo,
which push narratives that ultimately favor the agency. According to
Tricia Jenkins, author of The
CIA in Hollywood: How the Agency Shapes Film & Television, a
concerted agency effort began in the 1990s to counteract negative
public perceptions of the CIA, but their influence reaches back
decades. In the 1950s, filmmakers produced films for the
CIA,
including the 1954 film adaptation of George Orwell’s Animal
Farm.

Researchers
Tom Secker and Matthew Alford, whose work has been published in
the American
Journal of Economics and Sociology,
say their recent Freedom of Information Act requests have shown that
the CIA — along with the military — have influenced over
1,800 films and television shows, many of which have nothing to do
with CIA or military themes.

  1. Drug-induced
    Mind control     –
    In the 1950s, the CIA began experimenting with drugs to determine
    whether they might be useful in extracting information.
    As     Smithsonian
    Magazine     has noted of
    the MKUltra project:

“The
project, which continued for more than a decade, was originally
intended to make sure the United States government kept up with
presumed Soviet advances in mind-control technology. It ballooned in
scope and its ultimate result, among other things, was illegal drug
testing on thousands of Americans.”

Further:

“The
intent of the project was to study ‘the use of biological and
chemical materials in altering human behavior,’ according
to the
official testimony of CIA director Stansfield Turner in 1977. The
project was conducted in extreme secrecy, Turner said, because of
ethical and legal questions surrounding the program and the negative
public response that the CIA anticipated if MKUltra should become
public.

“Under
MKUltra, the CIA gave itself the authority to research how drugs
could:’ ‘promote the intoxicating effects of alcohol;’ ‘render
the induction of hypnosis easier;’ ‘enhance the ability of
individuals to withstand privation, torture and coercion;’ produce
amnesia, shock and confusion; and much more. Many of these questions
were investigated using unwitting test subjects, like drug-addicted
prisoners, marginalized sex workers and terminal cancer patients–
‘people who could not fight back,’ in
the words of Sidney
Gottlieb, the chemist who introduced LSD to the CIA.”

Further,
as Weiner noted:

“Under
its auspices, seven prisoners at a federal penitentiary in Kentucky
were kept high on LSD for seventy-seven consecutive days. When the
CIA slipped the same drug to an army civilian employee, Frank Olson,
he leaped out of the window of a New York Hotel.”

Weiner
added that senior CIA officers destroyed “almost all of the
records” of the programs, but that while the “evidence that
remains is fragmentary…it strongly suggests that use of secret
prisons for the forcible drug-induced questioning of suspect agents
went on throughout the 1950s.”

Years
later, the CIA would be accused of distributing crack-cocaine into
poor black communities, though this is currently less substantiated
and supported mostly
by accounts of those who claim to have been involved.

  1. Brutal
    torture tactics     —
    More recently, the CIA was     exposed for
    sponsoring abusive, disturbing terror tactics against detainees at
    prisons housing terror suspects. An extensive 2014 Senate report
    documented agents committing sexual abuse, forcing detainees to
    stand on broken legs, waterboarding them so severely it sometimes
    led to convulsions, and imposing forced rectal feeding, to name a
    few examples. Ultimately, the agency had very little actionable
    intelligence to show for their torture tactics but     lied to
    suggest they did, according to the torture report. Their torture
    tactics     led the
    International Criminal Court to suggest the CIA, along with the U.S.
    armed forces, could be guilty of war crimes for their abuses.

    7.
    Arming radicals — The CIA has a long habit of arming
    radical, extremist groups that view the United States as enemies. In
    1979, the CIA set out to support Afghan rebels in their bid to
    defeat the Soviet occupation of the Middle Eastern country. As
    Weiner wrote, in 1979, “Prompted by Zbigniew Brzezinski,
    President Carter signed a covert-action order for the CIA to provide
    the Afghan rebels with medical aid, money, and propaganda.    ”

As
Weiner detailed later in his book:

“The
Pakistani intelligence chiefs who doled out the CIA’s guns and
money favored the Afghan factions who proved themselves most capable
in battle. Those factions also happened to be the most committed
Islamists. No one dreamed that the holy warriors could ever turn
their jihad against the United States.”

Though
some speculate the CIA directly armed Osama bin Laden, that is yet to
be fully proven or admitted. What is clear is that western
media revered him
as a valuable fighter against the Soviets, that he arrived to
fight in Afghanistan in1980, and that al-Qaeda emerged from the
mujahideen, who were beneficiaries of the CIA’s program. Stanford
University has noted that Bin
Laden and Abdullah Azzam, a prominent Palestinian cleric,
“established
Al Qaeda from the fighters, financial resources, and training and
recruiting structures left over from the anti-Soviet war.”
Much of those “structures” were provided by the agency.
Intentionally or not, the CIA helped fuel the rise of the terror
group.

Weiner
noted that as the CIA failed in other countries like Libya, by the
late 1980s “Only the mujahideen, the Afghan holy warriors, were
drawing blood and scenting victory. The CIA’s Afghan operation was
now a $700-million-dollar-a-year-program” and represented 80%
of the overseas budget of the clandestine services. “The CIA’s
briefing books never answered the question of what would happen when
a militant Islamic army defeated the godless invaders of
Afghanistan,” though Tom Twetten, “the number two man in
the clandestine service in the summer of 1988,” was tasked with
figuring out what would happen with the Afghan rebels. “We don’t
have any plan,” he concluded.

Apparently
failing to learn their lesson, the CIA adopted nearly the exact same
policy in Syria decades later, arming what they called “moderate
rebels” against the Assad regime. Those groups
ultimately aligned with
al-Qaeda groups. One CIA-backed faction made headlines last year
for beheading a
child (though President Trump cut off the CIA program in June, the
military continues to
align with “moderate” groups).

Unsurprisingly,
this list is far from complete. The CIA has engaged in a wide variety
of extrajudicial
practice,
and there are likely countless transgressions we have yet to learn
about.

As
Donald Trump cheers the birthday of an agency he himself
once criticized,
it should be abundantly clear that the nation’s covert spy agency
deserves scrutiny and skepticism — not celebration.

Creative
Commons / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

===================================

Moet u nagaan, dan durft men nog te spreken over ‘fake news’ en een land als Rusland de schuld voor veel internet ellende te geven en te beschuldigen van agressief gedrag………….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Zie ook: ‘CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………‘

        en: ‘VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..‘

        en: ‘CIA erkent dat Israël samen met Saoedi-Arabië ‘vecht tegen terreur’, die ze NB zelf hebben georganiseerd……..‘

        en: ‘VS centraal commando werkt in Syrië samen met IS en verklaarde Rusland de oorlog………‘

        en: ‘Al Qaida de bondgenoot van de VS in de strijd tegen…… terrorisme! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘ (intussen heeft de VS ‘Al Qaida Syrië’ van de zwarte lijst met terreurorganisaties gehaald!!)

       en: ‘CIA valt nogmaals door de mand als wapenleverancier van IS…….‘

      en: ‘Van Baalen (VVD EU topgraaier) het is moeilijk te zien wie je moet steunen: Al Qaida, Al Qaida of Al Qaida……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘

      en: ‘Massamedia VS vergeven van CIA ‘veteranen’, alsof die media nog niet genoeg ‘fake news’ ofwel leugens brengen……..‘

WOII >> geallieerden waren wel op de hoogte van de nazi-Duitse doodskampen!!! Collaboratie van de VS en GB met de nazi’s…….

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Op 5 mei ontving ik een artikel van Information Clearing House (ICH) over de rol van de VS en GB tijdens WOII en dan m.n. de wetenschap bij de geallieerden over de doodskampen van nazi-Duitsland……

Na decennialange weigering, heeft de VN eindelijk het archief vrijgegeven van een oorlogsmisdaden commissie die de Europese archieven over de holocaust door de nazi’s tijdens WOII onderzocht. Londen en Washington hebben het vrijgeven van dit archief jarenlang proberen tegen te houden.

Niet zo vreemd als je bedenkt dat uit de vrijgegeven documenten blijkt dat er een geheime band bestond tussen de regeringen van de VS en Groot-Brittannië met de leiders van nazi-Duitsland……..

Uit de documenten blijkt verder dat de geallieerden al ver voor het eind van WOII op de hoogte waren van de nazi-vernietigingskampen, iets dat men na die oorlog altijd ontkende……

Voorts werpen de documenten meer licht op de weigering van de geallieerden een front in het westen te openen, zodat de Russen enigszins konden worden ontzet. Niet zo vreemd, daar men de ‘communisten’ weliswaar zag als partner in de strijd tegen de nazi’s, maar men een bijna even grondige afkeer had van de zogenaamd communistische Sovjet Unie…….

Ook nog eens aandacht voor de goede banden van VS multinationals met nazi-Duitsland, waar deze bedrijven fiks hadden geïnvesteerd in o.a. IG Farben, de fabrikant van Zyklon B, het gas waarmee de joden werden vermoord. Firma’s als Ford, IBM (niet genoemd in het artikel), ITT (speelde later een rol in de smerige CIA staatsgreep tegen het Chileense bewind van Allende op 11 september 1973), GM en Du Pont investeerden zwaar in Duitse bedrijven als het hiervoor genoemde IG Farben (waar ook nazi-prins Bernhard, voor werkte, Bernhard, de zelf gedroomde Nederlandse stadhouder van Hitler…), Krupp Stahl en Daimler……..

Verder kan u lezen over de inspanningen van de geallieerden na WOII, om nazi’s Duitsland uit te smokkelen.

De schrijver ziet terecht een overeenkomst met de huidige tijd, waarin Rusland wordt gedemoniseerd, terwijl de NAVO agressief aan haar grens staat…..

Lezen mensen! U kunt desgewenst onder het ICH artikel klikken voor een ‘Dutch vertaling’:

The
Deep History of US, Britain’s Never-Ending Cold War On Russia

By
Finian Cunningham

May
04, 2017 “Information
Clearing House” – After decades of delaying, the United
Nations finally released archives from the Second World War-era war
crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust. The source of
those archives on Nazi war crimes were Western governments, including
those in exile at the time of the war, such as the Belgian, Polish
and Czechoslovakian. The time period covered is 1943-1949. Washington
and London had long sought to halt the release. Why?

Notably,
the landmark publication of the files last month was given scant
Western media coverage. Surprisingly, perhaps, because the story that
can be gleaned from the documents tells of a hidden history of the
Second World War, namely the systematic collusion between the
American and British governments and the Nazi Third Reich.

As
a report in Deutsche
Welle remarked
on the released archives: «The files make clear that [Western]
Allied forces knew more about the Nazi concentration camp system
before the end of the war than has generally been thought».

This
revelation points to more than just «knowledge» among the Western
allies of Nazi-era crimes; it points more damningly to state
collusion. This would also explain why Washington and London have
been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

There
has long been a controversial
debate among
Western nations about why the US and Britain in particular did not do
more to bomb the Nazi infrastructure of death camps and railroads.
Washington and London have often made the claim that they did know
the full extent of the horror being perpetrated by the Nazis until
the very end of the war when extermination centers such as at
Auschwitz and Treblinka were liberated – by the Soviet Red Army, it
should be noted too.

However,
what the latest release of UN Holocaust files shows is that
Washington and London were indeed well aware of the Nazi Final
Solution in which millions of European Jews and Slavic people were
being systematically worked to death or exterminated in gas chambers.
So the question again is: why did the US and Britain not direct more
of their aerial bombing campaign to destroy the Nazi infrastructure?

One
possible answer is that these Western allies had a callous disregard
for the Nazi victims. Washington and London establishments were
themselves accused of harboring antisemitic prejudices, as can be
seen from the scandals when both these governments spurned thousands
of European Jewish refugees during the Second World War, in effect
sending many of them to their deaths under the Nazi regime.

Not
excluding the above factor of Western racist insouciance, there is a
second more disturbing factor. That the Western governments, or at
least powerful sections, were loath to hamper the Nazi war effort
against the Soviet Union. Notwithstanding that the Soviet Union was a
nominal «ally» of the West for the defeat of Nazi Germany.

This
perspective harks to a radically different conception of the Second
World War in contrast to that narrated in official Western versions.
In this alternative historical account, the rise of the Nazi Third
Reich was deliberately fomented by American and British rulers as a
bulwark in Europe against the spread of communism. Adolf Hitler’s
rabid anti-Semitism was matched only by his detest of Marxism and the
Slavic people of the Soviet Union. In the Nazi ideology, they were
all «Untermenschen» (subhumans) to be exterminated in a «Final
Solution».

So,
when Nazi Germany was attacking the Soviet Union and carrying out its
Final Solution from June 1941 until late 1944, little wonder then
that the US and Britain showed a curious reluctance to commit their
military forces fully to open up a Western Front. The Western allies
were evidently content to see the Nazi war machine doing what it was
originally intended to do: to destroy the primary enemy to Western
capitalism as represented by the Soviet Union. This is not to say
that all American and British political leaders shared or were even
aware of this tacit strategic vision. Leaders like President Franklin
Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill appeared to be
genuinely committed to defeating Nazi Germany. Nevertheless, their
individual views must be set against a background of systematic
collusion between powerful Western corporate interests and Nazi
Germany.

As
American author David Talbot documented in
his book, The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA and the
Rise of America’s Secret Government (2015), there were massive
financial links between Wall Street and the Third Reich, going back
several years before the outbreak of the Second World War.

Allen
Dulles, who worked for the Wall Street law firm Sullivan and Cromwell
and who later headed up the American Central Intelligence Agency, was
a key player in the linkage between US capital and German industry.
American industrial giants, such as Ford, GM, ITT and Du Pont were
invested heavily in German industrial counterparts like IG Farben
(manufacturer of Zyklon B, the poisonous gas used in the Holocaust),
Krupp Steel and Daimler. American capital, as well as British, was
thus integrated into the Nazi war machine and the latter’s
dependence on the system of slave labor as provided by the Final
Solution.

This
would explain why the Western allies did so little to disrupt the
Nazi infrastructure with their undoubted formidable aerial bombing
capacity. Far more damning than mere inertia or indifference owing to
racist prejudice towards the Nazi victims, what emerges is that the
Americans and British capitalist elite were invested in the Third
Reich. Mainly for the purpose of eliminating the Soviet Union and any
kind of genuinely socialist global movement. Bombing Nazi
infrastructure would have been tantamount to deleting Western assets.

To
this end, as the war was drawing to a close and the Soviet Union
looked poised to roll up the Third Reich singlehandedly, the
Americans and British belatedly stepped up their war efforts from
western and southern Europe. The goal was one of salvaging Western
assets remaining in the Nazi regime. Allen Dulles, the director of
the-soon-to-be-formed American Central Intelligence Agency,
extricated top Nazis and their gold looted from Europe in secret
surrender deals known as Operation Sunrise. Britain’s military
intelligence MI6 was also involved in the clandestine American effort
to salvage Nazi assets via ratlines. The bad faith on display to the
Soviet «allies» heralded the chill of the ensuing Cold War that
immediately followed the Second World War.

Significant
and damning testimony of what was going down was given recently in a
BBC interview by
Ben Ferencz, the most senior surviving US prosecutor from the
Nuremberg trials. At age 98, Ferencz was still able to lucidly recall
how scores of Nazi war criminals were let off the hook by the
American and British authorities. Ferencz cited US General George
Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third
Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong
enemy». Patton’s candid expression of deeper animosity towards the
Soviet Union than towards Nazi Germany was consistent with how the US
and British ruling class had been colluding with Hitler’s Third
Reich in a geo-strategic war against the Soviet Union and worker-led
socialist movements arising across Europe and America.

In
other words, the Cold War which the US and Britain embarked on after
1945 was but a continuation of hostile policy towards Moscow that was
already underway well before the Second World War erupted in 1939 in
the form of a build up of Nazi Germany. For various reasons, it
became expedient for the Western powers to liquidate the Nazi war
machine, along with the Soviet Union. But as can be seen, the Western
assets residing in the Nazi machine were recycled into American and
British Cold War posture against the Soviet Union. It is a truly
damning legacy that American and British military intelligence
agencies were consolidated and financed by Nazi crimes.

The
recent release of UN Holocaust files – in spite of American and
British prevarication over many years – add more evidence to the
historical analysis that these Western powers were deeply complicit
in the monumental crimes of the Nazi Third Reich. They knew about
these crimes because they had helped facilitate them. And the
complicity stemmed from Western hostility towards Russia as a
perceived geopolitical rival.

This
is not a mere historical academic exercise. Western complicity with
Nazi Germany also finds a corollary in the present-day ongoing
hostility from Washington, Britain and their NATO allies towards
Moscow. The relentless build up of NATO offensive forces around
Russia’s borders, the endless Russophobia in Western propagandistic
news media, the economic blockade in the form of sanctions based on
tenuous claims, are all deeply rooted in history.

The
West’s Cold War towards Moscow preceded the Second World War,
continued after the defeat of Nazi Germany and persists to this day
regardless of the fact that the Soviet Union no longer exists. Why?
Because Russia is a perceived rival to Anglo-American capitalist
hegemony, as is China or any other emerging power that undermines
that desired unipolar hegemony.

American-British
collusion with Nazi Germany finds its modern-day manifestation in
NATO collusion with the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine and jihadist
terror groups dispatched in proxy wars against Russian interests in
Syria and elsewhere. The players may change over time, but the root
pathology is American-British capitalism and its hegemonic addiction.

The
never-ending Cold War will only end when Anglo-American capitalism is
finally defeated and replaced by a genuinely more democratic system.

This
article was first published by SCF –

Click
for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French,
translation- Note- Translation
may take a moment to load.

==================

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: Ferencz en D. Talbot. Heb ook het label ‘Bayer’ toegevoegd, de gentech gifmenger maakte tijdens WOII gebruik van concentratiekampgevangenen voor medicijnproeven. Gegarandeerd dat ook in dat bedrijf ‘westers kapitaal’ werd geïnvesteerd……

EU van meet af aan een VS product, reden te meer de EU vaarwel te zeggen!

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

In tegenstelling tot wat algemeen wordt aangenomen, was de VS vanaf het begin een groot voorstander van een verenigd Europa.

Obama mengde zich bij zijn bezoek aan Groot-Brittannië totaal onterecht in binnenlandse aangelegenheden, hij had zelfs het gore lef, de Britten voor te houden, dat zij tegen een ‘Brexit’ moesten stemmen. Journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard schreef daarop in The Telegraph een artikel over de bemoeienis van de VS met de EU en met de vorming van dit bondgenootschap.

Jean Monnet, een Frans econoom zou één van de stichters zijn van de EU, echter hij kreeg veel van zijn plannen al mee, toen hij tijdens de oorlog werkte voor president Roosevelt. Ook Robert Schuman, een Franse minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, wordt door velen als één van de EU stichters gezien. Echter ‘De Schumanverklaring‘ van 9 mei 1950 werd opgetuigd in Washington, m.n. door minister van BuZA Dean Achesan. Het begon allemaal (de EU, Ap) in Washington, zo verklaarde de secretaris van Schuman later.

Overigens heeft de VS al vlak na de oorlog Frankrijk op het hart gebonden overeenstemming te bereiken met Duitsland, dit resulteerde uiteindelijk zelfs in de dreiging van de VS, dat de Marshallhulp aan Frankrijk zou worden stopgezet, als de Fransen niet snel zouden aanschuiven……..

Zoals bekend: de verhoudingen van Frankrijk met de VS waren onder de Gaulle (destijds de Franse president), op z’n zachtst gezegd niet best. De Gaulle verdacht Monnet er zelfs van een VS spion te zijn, wat hij volgens Evans-Pritchard eigenlijk ook was…….

De CIA steunde in het geheim een aantal decennia financieel de vorming en bestendiging van de EU….. Dit gebeurde onder meer via de ‘American Committee for a United Europe’ (ACUE), o.l.v. generaal William J. Donovan, stroomde er geld naar de EU, in 1958 was 53,5% van de EU fondsen afkomstig van ACUE. In de top van ACUE hadden o.a. CIA directeuren W.B. Smith en A. Dulles zitting, verder waren een aantal oude OSS (voorloper CIA) agenten werkzaam binnen ACUE, agenten die dan weer wel, dan weer niet voor de CIA werkten.

Zoals we weten wordt de VS heden ten dage geregeerd door de grote bedrijven, waarvan het militair-industrieel complex wel de machtigste is. Met de TTIP kunnen deze bedrijven ook hier de macht overnemen, hoewel grote bedrijven nu al veel invloed hebben, zowel binnen de afzonderlijke EU landen, als binnen het EU parlement……….. Lullig genoeg worden we zowel op landelijk, als op EU niveau geregeerd door politici die voor een fiks deel zelf lobbyen voor bedrijven, waarbij een aantal van deze politici daar bijna openlijk blijk van geven………

Evans-Pritchard citeert o.a. uit een lijvig onderzoek en uit vrijgekomen geheime stukken van het VS ministerie van BuZa.

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, alleen de labels: CIA, Frankrijk, lobbyisten, militair-industrieel complex, Roosevelt, TTIP en VS buitenlands beleid, geven extra berichten.

Bron o.a. Information Clearing House.

nl Nederlands
nl Nederlandsen Englishru Русскийes Españolzh-CN 简体中文fr Françaisde Deutschhi हिन्दीit Italianopt Português