Fox News veroordeelt eigen presentator voor belachelijke uitlatingen aangaande Ilhan Omar

Jeannine
Pirro, een Fox presentator van de ‘show’ ‘Justice with Judge
Jeannine’ (ha! ha! ha!), heeft tijdens deze show afgelopen zaterdag
gesteld dat het dragen van een hidjab door Omar aan kan geven dat
ze de VS constitutie geweld aandoet……

Deze
uitlating ontketende terecht veel protest, niet alleen van de ‘gewone kijker’ maar
ook van vooraanstaande joden en joodse organisaties, die het met Omar
eens zijn wat betreft haar kritiek op de staat Israël, waarmee ze o.a. volkomen terecht stelt dat de staat Israël veel te veel invloed heeft
op de politiek in de VS. Men stelt e.e.a. in verband met de hetze in de VS tegen de islam (islamofobie) en het racisme tegen gekleurde VS
burgers…..

Volgens
Pirro heeft Omar haar denkbeelden* niet uit de Democratische Partij** en
daarbij vroeg ze zich af waar ze haar denkbeelden dan vandaan heeft, waarmee Pirro Omar in feite beschuldigt haar denkbeelden te halen van moslim extremistische sites….. 
Gelukkig hebben figuren als Bernie Sanders gesteld dat Omar geen
antisemiet is, als ze kritiek levert op de staat Israël
 en de
verbintenis met de VS politiek……
**

Opvallend
toch dat zelfs Fox de uitlatingen van Pirro niet tolereert, nu nog
even de daad bij het woord voegen en Pirro ontslaan!!

Fox
News Condemns Host’s Comments About Ilhan Omar

March
11, 2019 at 10:34 pm

Written
by 
Middle
East Eye

Host
Jeannine Pirro said Omar may not support the US Constitution because
she wears a hijab.

(MEE— Fox
News has condemned recent comments by 
host
Jeannine Pirro 
about
US Democratic Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, which prompted accusations of
racism and Islamophobia, as well as calls for Pirro to resign, over
the weekend.

Pirro,
host of the Fox News show “Justice with Judge Jeannine”, on
Saturday said the fact Omar wears a headscarf (hijab) may mean she
doesn’t support the US Constitution.

Late
on Sunday, Fox News released a statement condemning the host’s
comments, US media outlets reported.

We
strongly condemn Jeanine Pirro’s comments about Rep. Ilhan Omar,”
the US cable news network said, as 
reported
by The Hill
.
“They do not reflect those of the network and we have addressed the
matter with her directly.”

On
Monday, Omar herself thanked the network for its statement.

Thank
you, @FoxNews. No one’s commitment to our constitution should be
questioned because of their faith or country of birth,” she wrote
on Twitter.

Ilhan Omar
@IlhanMN

Thank you, @FoxNews. No one’s commitment to our constitution should be questioned because of their faith or country of birth. https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/10/media/jeanine-pirro-ilhan-omar/index.html 

13.3K

5:27 PM – Mar 11, 2019

Fox News’ Jeanine Pirro questions Ilhan Omar’s hijab

Fox News’ Jeanine Pirro questioned Saturday whether Congresswoman Ilhan Omar’s Islamic religious beliefs stand in opposition to the US Constitution.

cnn.com

Pirro’s
segment on Omar came after days of controversy over the
congresswoman’s criticism of Israel and questions she raised about
the influence exerted by pro-Israel lobby groups on US politics.

Omar
faced several days of attacks from US journalists, commentators,
pro-Israel groups and others, including members of her own Democratic
Party, who accused her of anti-Semitism.

Jewish-
and Muslim-American activists 
came
to her defence
,
however, saying Omar never said anything anti-Semitic.

In
a time of rampant Islamophobia and anti-black racism coming from the
halls of power, [the] Democratic leadership … needs to be standing
with black Americans and not scapegoating them,” said Rabbi Alissa
Wise, deputy director of Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), during a rally last
week.

Top
Democratic presidential contenders Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris and
Elizabeth Warren 
also
issued statements
 denouncing
Islamophobic attacks against Omar and highlighting the distinction
between anti-Semitism and criticism of Israel.

On
her show on Saturday, Pirro said Omar did not get her “anti-Israel
sentiment” from the Democratic Party.

Think
about this, she’s not getting this anti-Israel sentiment doctrine
from the Democrat Party, so if it’s not rooted in the party, where
is she getting it from? Think about it. Omar wears a hijab, which
according to the Quran 33:59 tells women to cover so they won’t get
molested,” she said in the segment.

Is
her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to
sharia law? Which in itself is antithetical to the United States
Constitution?”

The
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) on Sunday called for
Pirro to be fired.

Such
an open and un-American expression of religious bigotry should be
rejected by any media outlet seeking even a modicum of credibility,”
said the group’s national executive director, Nihad Awad, in a
statement.

Jeanine
Pirro should be fired, and Fox News should apologise to its viewing
audience.”

In
a statement of her own, responding to the criticism, Pirro said she
“did not call Rep. Omar un-American”.

My
intention was to ask a question and start a debate, but of course
because one is Muslim does not mean you don’t support the
Constitution,” she said, as reported by US media outlets.

By MEE
staff
 Republished
with permission / 
Middle
East Eye
 / Report
a typo

=============================================

  De denkbeelden waarover Omar zo onder vuur ligt, kritiek op o.a. Israël en waarvoor men haar zelfs in de Democratische Partij een antisemiet durft te noemen.

**  Dacht dat Omar lid was van een kleinere politieke partij, t.w. de Minnesota Demcratic-Farmer-Labor Party, blijkbaar is dit toch een onderdeel van de Democratische Partij. Overigens heeft Omar zitting in het lagerhuis van Minnesota voor deze partij. Blijkbaar probeert de Democratische partij bij lokale en regionale verkiezingen de indruk te wekken dat haar partij die aan deze verkiezingen meedoet andere belangen behartigt dan de landelijke partij…… In Nederland pleitte men er een paar jaar geleden voor, de landelijke partijpolitiek los te koppelen van regionale en lokale afdelingen, daar ze veelal een ander beleid voorstaan….. Politici? Eens oplichters……..


***
Het is al zo zot, dat de zwaar corrupte Palestijnenslachter Netanyahu
in 2015 het gore lef had om het Congres in de VS toe te spreken en de
politiek van Obama t.a.v. Israël en het Midden-Oosten te
veroordelen…… Geen regulier massamediaorgaan durfde toen te
stellen dat Israël de VS politiek beïnvloedt en manipuleert, terwijl
ze amper een jaar later de tent uitgingen vanwege de zogenaamde
bemoeienis van Rusland met de presidentsverkiezingen in de VS,
beschuldigingen waarvoor zelfs na 2 jaar geen flinter aan bewijs werd geleverd….. Terwijl iedereen kan weten (dus zeker de
massamedia) dat Israël dit wel degelijk heeft gedaan, sterker nog daarvoor is zelfs een video beschikbaar……… Zie:

Zie ook:

Ilhan Omar: Obama zette kinderen in een kooi en kwam weg met moord

Madeline Albright ‘gegrild’ over illegale interventies en sancties van de VS

Congreslid Ilhan Omar fileert het monster Elliot Abrams, de speciale gezant van de VS voor Venezuela

AIPAC, een pro-Israël lobbygroep, koopt leden van het VS congres om met 4 miljoen dollar per jaar

Mijn excuus voor de belabberde weergave van het Twitterbericht, krijg het niet op orde, door op dit Twitterbericht te klikken, krijg je het origineel te zien.

Israël en VS werken samen in tegenwerken van critici op beleid t.a.v. Palestijnen

Kamel
Hawwash, de schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen artik
el, is een criticus van het VS beleid t.a.v. de Palestijnen en als zodanig werd
hem de toegang tot de fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël geweigerd.
Hawwash is allesbehalve een uitzondering….. Als je je mond opendoet en Israël volkomen terecht bekritiseert voor de terreur die dit land dag
in dag uit, 365 dagen per jaar uitoefent op de Palestijnen (en dat als sinds de illegale stichting
van Israël
 in 1948), kan je het vergeten, je komt de zogenaamde democratische straat Israël niet in……..

Zelfs mensen van joodse komaf met kritiek op het inhumane fascistische beleid van Israël, wordt de toegang tot dat land ontzegd……

‘Niet vreemd dus’ dat Palestijnen
die kritiek leveren op Israël allesbehalve veilig zijn, zij lopen
grote kans te worden gearresteerd en gevangen te worden gezet…… Zo
zitten er in Israël naar schatting 500 Palestijnen, inclusief vrouwen
en kinderen vast, alleen voor het feit dat ze kritiek hadden op Israël en dat toevertrouwden aan de sociale media……* 

Beste
bezoeker het kan nog gekker: Israël en de VS werken samen en
wisselen namen uit, zo kan je het als niet VS burger wel vergeten
naar de VS te reizen (wat altijd een slecht idee is), wanneer je kritiek
hebt geleverd op het fascistische apartheidsbewind in Israël……

Kortom
zowel Israël als de VS gebruiken fascistische methoden om mensen te
weren (en/of hen het leven onmogelijk te maken)………

Daarover
gesproken: het meest smerige is wel dat je met kritiek op de grootschalige terreur van Israël wordt ‘afgemaakt’ als antisemiet…… Ach ja,
fascistische staten werpen altijd elke kritiek van zich en bestraffen
degenen die zich daar schuldig aan maken….. Weten we tenminste waar
we aan toe zijn zowel met zowel Israël als met de VS, beiden fascistische
terreurstaten! (waar de VS nog niet geheel klaar is met de fascistisering van de maatschappij)

Supporting
Palestine Can Now Get You Denied Entry to the US

October
17, 2018 at 11:22 am

Written
by 
Middle
East Eye

I
have been a severe critic of the current US administration’s policy
towards the Palestinians. But does this make me a possible security
threat to the US? Of course not.

(MEE— In
April 2017, while travelling for a routine family holiday to
Jerusalem, I was 
denied
entry
 upon
arrival at Tel Aviv airport. Israeli authorities’ official –
and bizarre – explanation for the entry denial was: I had attempted
to “gain illegal entry”. However, being British citizens, we are
normally allowed to travel to Israel without a visa. We have it
issued at the entry point and I had obtained it on many occasions
before.

But
as I came to realise later the real reason was due to my role as vice
chair of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), a UK-based
organisation that campaigns peacefully for Palestinian rights and
which upholds the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaign
against Israel’s occupation.

BDS
Promoters Denied

In
March 2017, Israel passed the “
BDS
law
“, which
allowed it to deny entry to those engaged in BDS movement promotion.
My colleague and PSC chair, 
Hugh
Lanning
,
was denied entry soon after the law was passed. Another colleague,
Anwar Makhlouf, head of the Palestinian Federation of Chile, was also
denied entry at the Allenby Bridge based on the same law.

When
I contacted both the British embassy in Tel Aviv and the foreign
office in London for an explanation, I received the same reply: this
was a sovereign decision for Israel. This meant Britain did not even
acknowledge that Israel has no sovereignty over the occupied
Palestinian Territories. The UK’s position is what gives Israel the
green light to conduct its policy with total impunity.

Even
pro-Palestine Jewish foreign nationals, who are supposedly entitled
to go to Israel
 by
the Law of Return (which grants citizenship to Jews from anywhere in
the world) have been denied entry, and even denied permission to
board their flights to Israel.

In
July 2017, five members of an 
interfaith
delegation
 were
denied permission to board a Lufthansa flight at Washington DC’s
Dulles International Airport that would ultimately take them to Tel
Aviv. Among them was Rabbi Alissa Wise of Jewish Voice for Peace
(JVP), who said in a statement: “Israel denied me the ability to
travel there because of my work for justice for Palestinians, even
though I’m Jewish and a rabbi.”

She
added: “I’m heartbroken and outraged. This is yet another
demonstration that democracy and tolerance in Israel only extends to
those who fall in line with its increasingly repressive policies
against Palestinians.”

Last
July, Ariel Gold, co-director of BDS campaign group Code Pink, 
was
denied entry
 at
Ben Gurion airport despite obtaining a visa in advance to take a
course at the Hebrew University. Her deportation, and those of
others, are normally ordered by Israeli Minister of Security Gilan
Erdan, and Israeli Minister of Interior Aryeh Deri.

The
most recent case of entry denial involved 
Lara
Alqasem
,
a 22-year-old Palestinian-American student, despite the fact that she
has recently been granted a student visa for her masters’ degree in
the Hebrew University. Alqasem spent days in detention at Tel Aviv
airport struggling to be allowed to join the course she had
registered for.

At
the time of writing, Alqasem was planning a second appeal to Israeli
courts. She stood her ground, refusing to bow to the demands by Erdan
to renounce the BDS movement.

When
I was denied entry to Israel last year, the Israeli interrogator had
printed many pages of my tweets and challenged me about a small
number of them. However, because they were presented to me in Hebrew
I declined the opportunity to comment.

Israel’s
arrests of Palestinians for social media posts have soared. In May,
the Palestinian Prisoners’ Centre for Studies (PPC) said that
Israel had 
detained
s
ome
500 Palestinians, including women and children, because of their
social media posts. In 2015,
 Dareen
Tatour
,
a Palestinian poet, was detained for three years, before her release
last month, for writing a poem, entitled “Resist my people,
resist.”

US
Ban?

Entry
denial due to BDS movement promotion is an established Israeli
policy. I wonder, however, if my activity on social media, and
my op-eds on the Palestinian conflict, were the reasons behind being
denied boarding of a US-bound plane at Heathrow airport in August.

US
authorities have thus far refused to provide me with an explanation
as to why this happened despite having initially secured approval
through the visa waiver (ESTA) scheme, just as any other British
citizen is normally entitled to do.

ESTA
entitles the holder to travel to the US without a visa for a two-year
period. I had obtained this in the past and travelled to the US to
attend conferences connected to my academic work without any problem,
the last time being in 2015.

My
trip was planned at short notice to spend Eid Al-Adha with relatives
in America. Having obtained my ESTA, I made my way to Heathrow to
board a Virgin Atlantic flight to Seattle on 17 August. Upon
arriving, I tried to check-in via the terminals but could not.

I
was informed by a member of staff that I would not be allowed to
travel since my ESTA had been declined, despite its initial approval.
No explanation was given. I was then told that I could apply for
a visa at the American Consulate in London.

I
was shocked and devastated. I had now missed the window for my
holiday and lost a substantial amount of money, which was not
recoverable.

What
could possibly have changed since my last trip to the US? My
immediate answer was that there was a new administration in the White
House, with little tolerance for foreigners and which is blindingly
supportive of Israel.

However,
I decided to investigate further before my hunch was confirmed. I
wrote to the US ambassador in London and completed a “redress”
request directly to the US Department for Homeland Security.

A
couple of weeks later, the embassy responded through its Customs and
Border Protection Attache saying: “Whilst the Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) are unable to discuss any person’s denial of an
ESTA or their admission into the US due to security/privacy policy
laws, I can confirm that you will require Non-Immigrant visa should
you wish to travel to the US in the future.”

The
“redress” response, which arrived a few days later, was almost
unintelligible.

Trump’s
America

In
the absence of an explanation, I am left with the conclusion that
Trump’s America does not tolerate criticism of its policies and
that it works very closely with Israel, sharing intelligence about
individuals who are deemed undesirable for both countries.

It
is safe to assume that Israeli authorities have supplied US
authorities with names of individuals like myself who have been
denied entry because of their advocacy for the Palestinian people.
However, for the US to then deny them entry based on this peaceful
work is very troubling.

I
have been a 
severe
critic
 of
the current US administration’s policy towards the Palestinians.
But does this make me a possible security threat to the US? Of course
not. However, it helps Israel to further bully its critics into
silence if they fear being denied entry to other countries that
Israel can influence.

Neither
denial of entry to Israel nor to the US will silence supporters of
the Palestinian people. In fact, this will embolden us to be even
more vocal in our criticism of apartheid Israel.

By Kamel
Hawwash
 Republished
with permission / 
Middle
East Eye
 / Report
a typo

===================================

*
Vraag me af of Facebook de Israëlische
 autoriteiten waarschuwt voor
kritiek op het beleid t.a.v. Palestijnen, daar ze al een enorm aantal
accounts van Palestijnen hebben verwijderd van hun platform……. En
dan durft supergraaier en opperhufter Zuckerberg met droge ogen te
beweren dat Facebook onafhankelijk is……..

Zie ook:

Kritiek op Israël wordt door een leger van Israëlische trollen bevochten

Israël misbruikt de aanslag op de synagoge in Pittsburgh voor demonisering van steun aan de Palestijnen…….

Google Maps veegt Palestijns gebied van de kaart

De film over de pro-Israëlische lobby in de VS, die Israël verboden wil zien………

Israël zet snelle reactiemacht op poten tegen anti-Israëlische kritiek

Jeremy Corbyn wordt gedemoniseerd als antisemiet…….

Britse justitie gaat ‘hate crimes’ van Labour onderzoeken

Voor meer berichten over Facebook censuur, klik op het betreffende label, direct onder dit bericht.