VS vermoordt zoals gewoonlijk straffeloos burgers in geheime Somalische oorlog

Amnesty
International heeft onderzoek gedaan in Somalië naar luchtaanvallen
van de VS op het gebied dat in handen is van al-Shabaab. Al
jaren steunt de VS de Somalische regering in de vrijwel onbekende, of
geheime oorlog tegen al-Shabaab….. Sinds Trump in het Witte Huis
zit, is de VS bemoeienis met Somalië een stuk agressiever…..

Niet
vreemd dus dat Amnesty concludeert dat bij de luchtaanvallen van de
VS een groot aantal burgerslachtoffers werd (en wordt) vermoord…… Alweer
zoals gewoonlijk, ontkent de VS dat het burgerslachtoffers
maakt……

Amnesty
dringt aan bij de VS en de Somalische regering op meer onderzoek
naar dergelijke moorden, voorts pleit deze mensenrechtenorganisatie aan op meer transparantie, bovendien zou het
eenvoudig moeten zijn voor gemeenschappen melding te maken van
dergelijke moorden.

Helaas
mensen, je kan er donder op zeggen dat het laatste niet zal gebeuren,
men vindt het allang prima dat de wereldgemeenschap geen of weinig
weet heeft van de VS terreur in Somalië, immers de VS oorlogsmisdaden
liggen wat betreft de Trump administratie al veel te veel onder het ‘wereld vergrootglas…..’

Daarover
gesproken: vorige week dinsdag werd bekend gemaakt dat de VS een aantal
functionarissen van het Internationaal Strafhof (ICC) de toegang tot de VS
heeft ontzegd, daar zij onderzoek doen naar oorlogsmisdaden van de
VS, voorts heeft de VS aangekondigd andere maatregelen te zullen nemen tegen het ICC, als dit Strafhof doorgaat met haar onderzoek naar oorlogsmisdaden door de VS begaan……

Het volgende artikel (dat ik te lang heb laten liggen) komt van Common Dreams en werd door mij overgenomen van Anti-Media, de prent komt van Africa Times:

US
Killing Civilians With ‘Impunity’ in Hidden War on Somalia:
Report

Amnesty report says U.S. air strikes kill civilians in Somalia

March
19, 2019 at 10:13 pm

Written
by 
Eoin
Higgins

(CD) —
A human rights group is accusing the United States of waging a shadow
air war in Somalia that is killing civilians with abandon.

Amnesty
International issued its findings on the African war Tuesday
evening in a report titled 
The
Hidden US War in Somalia 
(pdf).

The
U.S. has been covertly engaging in conflicts in Somalia for decades,
but in April 2017, the Donald Trump administration upped airstrikes
and attacks targeted at the rebel group Al-Shabaab.

The
human rights advocacy group studied five of more than 100 strikes on
Somalia over the past two years and found that 14 civilians were
killed in the attacks. Eight others were injured, the report says.

These
five incidents were carried out with Reaper drones and manned
aircraft in Lower Shabelle,” Amnesty said in a press release, “a
region largely under Al-Shabaab control outside the Somali capital
Mogadishu.”

The
U.S. military denied to Amnesty that any civilians have been killed
as a result of American operations in Somalia.

However,
Amnesty’s report claims its methodology is sound and that the
evidence is overwhelming.

The
attacks appear to have violated international humanitarian law,”
the organization said, “and some may amount to war crimes.”

In
comments provided to the media, Brian Castner, the group’s senior
crisis advisor on arms and military operations, claimed that the
continued airstrikes are also a sign of the Trump administration’s
aggressive use of military action across the world.

The
civilian death toll we’ve uncovered in just a handful of strikes
suggests the shroud of secrecy surrounding the US role in Somalia’s
war is actually a smokescreen for impunity,” Castner said.

Amnesty
is calling for an official government investigation into the killings
and airstrikes and urging people to add their name to a 
petition to
Congress to force action. Ella Knight, an Amnesty researcher
concentrating on military, security and police, said that pushing for
oversight is key.

The
U.S. government must ensure investigations into all credible
allegations of civilian casualties are carried out with
accountability for those responsible for violations and reparation
made to the victims and survivors,” said Knight.

The
mission doesn’t end with U.S. and Somali accountability, Knight
added. She argued it’s the responsibility of both governments to
make it easier and safer for communities affected by the war to
publicly acknowledge civilian casualties.

Both
the US and Somali governments need to put an end the lack of
transparency and must do more to enable affected communities to
self-report civilian casualties,” Knight said. “Without this,
justice is likely to remain elusive.”

By Eoin
Higgins
 / Creative
Commons
 / Common
Dreams
 / Report
a typo

================================

Zie ook:

VS bombardementen: 62 vermoorde stadsbewoners in Somalië

De VS heeft 500 militairen ingezet in Somalië, het imperium breidt zich verder uit……

VS illegaal militair ingrijpen in Niger, ofwel de uitspattingen van een imperium met expansiedrift

VS ‘helden’ helpen Somalische troepen bij het vermoorden van kinderen, één van de specialiteiten van deze helden……….

Geheime oorlogvoering van de VS in Afrika duurt voort, het aantal VS operaties in Afrika is zelfs groter dan in het Midden-Oosten

Jeroen Leenaers (CDA): Somalië is ‘veilig’ voor vluchtelingen………….‘ en in het verlengde daarvan: ‘Jeroen Leenaers (CDA EU): ‘veilige landen’ moeten asielzoekers terugnemen, anders zwaait er wat…….. OEI!!!‘ en: ‘Amnesty International beschuldigt Nederland van het schenden van de mensenrechten, door Somaliërs terug te sturen……

VS, in 2016 vermoordde de VS 24.000 mensen, uit landen die op de lijst van inreisverboden staan…….

VS pleegt aanslag op een leider van al-Shabaab, geen ‘onschuldige slachtoffers…..’

VS bombardementen: 62 vermoorde stadsbewoners in Somalië

Afgelopen
weekeinde heeft de VS bij 2 bombardementen op de stad Gandarshe 62 mensen vermoord, zo meldde US African Command (AFRICOM)……..
Volgens AFRICOM waren deze 62 mensen allen lid van de
terreurorganisatie al-Shabaab……

AFRICOM stelt niet alleen dat alle doden Al-Shabaab terroristen waren, maar
stelt ook dat met deze bombardementen een complot werd voorkomen
(ofwel een terreuraanslag, in wat voor vorm dan ook). Met die claim, waar geen flinter aan bewijs voor werd geleverd, legitimeert het Pentagon deze laatste massamoord door de VS terreurluchtmacht…… 

Uiteraard
tref je bij het bombarderen van een stad, niet alleen verdachten,
maar zeer zeker een (groot) aantal burgers……. Bovendien weten we
uit eerdere claims van de VS dat er geen burgerslachtoffers werden
vermoord (dat laatste woord gebruikt men al helemaal niet) bij VS
bombardementen, dit keer op keer een forse leugen bleek te zijn……

Zoals
al zo vaak op deze plek betoogd: de VS dient zich terug te trekken op
eigen bodem, sluit alle meer dan 800 militaire VS bases over de
wereld, zodat de grootste terreurentiteit op onze kleine aarde, de VS geen
verdere ellende kan aanrichten (kunnen we meteen de uiterst
agressieve VS terreurorganisatie NAVO ontmantelen en eindelijk eens echt aan de bevordering van vrede gaan werken, zonder massamoorden en andere vreselijke oorlogsmisdaden te begaan!)

De VS moet eindelijk worden aangeklaagd voor al haar oorlogsmisdaden, liever vandaag dan morgen! Internationaal Strafhof (ICC) ga aan het werk!!!

US
Airstrikes Kill 62 People in Coastal Somali Town

December
17, 2018 at 10:38 pm

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

(ANTIWAR.COM— Over
the weekend, US warplanes carried out at least six airstrikes against
the coastal town of Gandarsh, Somalia. US African Command
(Africom)
 says
62 people were killed in the strikes, and all were “terrorists”
 from
al-Shabaab.

34
people were killed on Saturday, and 28 more on Sunday. The identities
of the slain are not clear, and there is no way to verify Africom’s
claims. This is, however, standard operating procedure for them, to
both label all slain as militants, and to say they don’t think any
civilians were killed or wounded.

This
often doesn’t remain the case, however. When the US is striking a
large number of people inside a populated area, it’s very unusual
not to have some civilians killed along the way. Yet in remote places
like Somalia, it often takes days to find that out.

In
the meantime, the Pentagon has virtually total control over the
narrative, and sticks to formulaic releases meant to spin the strikes
as legal, claiming they preempted a plot, without providing any
evidence of such a plot.

By Jason
Ditz
 /
Republished with permission / 
ANTIWAR.COM / Report
a typo

=================================

Zie ook:

VS vermoordt zoals gewoonlijk straffeloos burgers in geheime Somalische oorlog

De VS heeft 500 militairen ingezet in Somalië, het imperium breidt zich verder uit……

VS illegaal militair ingrijpen in Niger, ofwel de uitspattingen van een imperium met expansiedrift

Geheime oorlogvoering van de VS in Afrika duurt voort, het aantal VS operaties in Afrika is zelfs groter dan in het Midden-Oosten

VS ‘helden’ helpen Somalische troepen bij het vermoorden van kinderen, één van de specialiteiten van deze helden……….

Jeroen Leenaers (CDA): Somalië is ‘veilig’ voor vluchtelingen………….‘ en in het verlengde daarvan: ‘Jeroen Leenaers (CDA EU): ‘veilige landen’ moeten asielzoekers terugnemen, anders zwaait er wat…….. OEI!!!‘ en: ‘Amnesty International beschuldigt Nederland van het schenden van de mensenrechten, door Somaliërs terug te sturen……

VS, in 2016 vermoordde de VS 24.000 mensen, uit landen die op de lijst van inreisverboden staan…….

VS pleegt aanslag op een leider van al-Shabaab, geen ‘onschuldige slachtoffers…..’

Geheime oorlogvoering van de VS in Afrika duurt voort, het aantal VS operaties in Afrika is zelfs groter dan in het Midden-Oosten

Het bericht met deels de bovenstaande kop lag tot mijn schaamte nog op de stapel concepten, ik vond het terug bij nazoeken van een artikel dat afgelopen woensdag werd gepubliceerd op Vice News door Nick Turse, het eerdere artikel van dezelfde schrijver is getiteld: ‘U.S. SECRET WARS IN AFRICA RAGE ON, DESPITE TALK OF DOWNSIZING’. Zoals gezegd: afgelopen woensdag publiceerde Turse het ander artikel over de VS oorlogsvoering in Afrika, dit keer met de titel: ‘EXCLUSIVE: THE U.S. HAS MORE MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFRICA THAN THE MIDDLE EAST’. Als eerste het artikel van Turse dat op 26 juli jl. werd gepubliceerd, daarna een korte inleiding tot het laatste artikel van Turse. (waarin wordt gesteld dat de militaire operaties in de VS niet geheim moeten worden gehouden en dat door een hoge VS militair)

Oktober
vorig jaar liepen 4 VS militairen in een hinderlaag waarbij ze
omkwamen, dit gaf nogal wat ophef in de VS, waarop het Pentagon
aangaf het aantal troepen in Afrika te verminderen…

Niet
eens een jaar later blijkt er van dit voornemen, troepenvermindering
in Afrika, niets terecht te zijn gekomen……. De VS vecht (dat
vechten wordt ontkend, ondanks alle bewijzen daarvoor, zoals de 4
militairen die in Niger werden gedood) in de volgende Afrikaanse
landen Kameroen,
Kenia, Libië, Mali, Mauritanië, Niger, Somalië en Tunesië…

Vreemd ook dat in het rijtje landen Zuid-Soedan ontbreekt, terwijl ook daar VS militairen opereren……. De president van Soedan, Omar al-Bashir, is bepaald geen vriend van de VS en ondanks dat de VS een wapenembargo heeft ingesteld tegen Zuid-Soedan*, werkt de VS, in het ‘niet-zo-geheim’, samen met het terreurbewind in Zuid-Soedan…….

Generaal
Thomas Waldhauser, hoofd Africa Command (AFRICOM), zei tijdens een Pentagon
conferentie afgelopen mei, dat ondanks alle moeilijkheden de VS
militairen hun werk geweldig 
doen over het hele continent Afrika……. (beter had hij gezegd: dat de VS militairen hun werk uiterst gewelddadig doen, immers het gaat om grootschalige terreur in landen waar de VS niets te zoeken heeft, terreur waarmee de VS zelfs terreur kweekt! Tja als je dat erbij zou zeggen kan je moeilijk volhouden dat de VS goed werk verricht in Afrika….) 

Lees
het volgende artikel van Nick Turse, zoals eerder geplaatst op
The Intercept:

U.S.
SECRET WARS IN AFRICA RAGE ON, DESPITE TALK OF DOWNSIZING

 Nick
Turse
July
26 2018, 7:15 p.m.

An American Special Forces soldier trains Nigerien troops during an exercise on the Air Base 201 compound, in Agadez, Niger, April 14, 2018. Hundreds of American troops are working feverishly to complete a $110 million airfield that will be used to strike extremists in West and North Africa, a region where most Americans have no idea the country is fighting. (Tara Todras-Whitehill/The New York Times)

LAST
OCTOBER, FOUR
 U.S. soldiers – including two
commandos – were killed in an ambush in Niger. Since then, talk of
U.S. special operations in Africa has centered on missions being
curtailed and troop levels cut.

Press
accounts have suggested that 
the
number of special operators on the front lines has been reduced
,
with the head of U.S. Special Operations forces in Africa directing
his troops to 
take
fewer risks
.
At the same time, a “
sweeping
Pentagon review

of special ops missions on the continent may result in drastic cuts
in the number of commandos operating there. U.S. Africa Command has
apparently been asked to consider the impact on counterterrorism
operations of 
cutting
the number of Green Berets, Navy SEALs, and other commandos
 by
25 percent over 18 months and 50 percent over three years.

Analysts have
already stepped forward to 
question or criticize the
proposed cuts.

Anybody
that knows me knows that I would disagree with any downsizing in
Africa,”

Donald
Bolduc, a former chief of U.S. commandos on the continent, 
told
Voice of America
.

While
the review was reportedly ordered this spring and troop reductions
may be coming, there is no evidence yet of massive cuts, gradual
reductions, or any downsizing whatsoever. In fact, the number of
commandos operating on the continent has barely budged since 2017.
Nearly 10 months after the debacle in Niger, the tally of special
operators in Africa remains essentially unchanged.

According
to figures provided to The Intercept by U.S. Special Operations
Command (SOCOM), 16.5 percent of commandos overseas are deployed in Africa.
This is about the same percentage of special operators sent to
the continent in 2017 and represents a major increase over
deployments during the first decade of the post-9/11 war on terror.
In 2006, for example, 
just
1 percent of all U.S. commandos deployed overseas were in
Africa
 –
fewer than in the Middle East, the Pacific, Europe, or Latin America.
By 2010, the number had risen only slightly, to 3 percent.

Today,
more U.S. commandos are deployed to Africa than to any other region
of the world except the Middle East. Back in 2006, there were only 
70
special operators deployed across Africa
.
Just four years ago, there were still just 700 elite troops on the
continent. Given that an average of 8,300 commandos are deployed
overseas in any given week, according to SOCOM spokesperson Ken
McGraw, we can surmise that roughly 1,370 Green Berets, Navy SEALs,
or other elite forces are currently operating in Africa.

The
Pentagon won’t say how many commandos are still deployed in Niger,
but the total number of troops operating there is roughly the same as
in October 2017 when two Green Berets and two fellow soldiers
were 
killed
by Islamic State militants
.
There are 800 Defense Department personnel currently deployed to the
West African nation, according to Maj. Sheryll Klinkel, a Pentagon
spokesperson. “I can’t give a breakdown of SOF there, but it’s
a fraction of the overall force,” she told The Intercept. There are
now also 
500
American military personnel
 –
including Special Operations forces — in Somalia.  At the
beginning of last year, AFRICOM told Stars and Stripes, 
there
were only 100
.

None
of these special operations forces are intended to be 
engaged
in direct combat operations
,”
said Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security
Affairs Robert S. Karem, while speaking about current troop levels in
Niger during a May Pentagon press briefing on the investigation into
the deadly October ambush. Despite this official policy, despite the
deaths in Niger, and despite the supposed curbs on special operations
in Africa, U.S. commandos there keep finding themselves in situations
that are indistinguishable from combat.

In
December, for example, Green Berets fighting alongside local forces
in Niger reportedly 
killed
11 ISIS militants
 in
a firefight. And last month in Somalia, a member of the Special
Operations forces, 
Staff
Sgt. Alexander Conrad, was killed
 and
four other Americans were wounded in an attack by members of the
Islamist militant group Shabaab. Conrad’s was the second death of a
U.S. special operator in Somalia in 13 months. Last May, a Navy
SEAL, 
Senior
Chief Petty Officer Kyle Milliken, was killed
,
and two other American troops were wounded while carrying out a
mission there with local forces.

Between
2015 and 2017, there were also 
at
least 10 previously unreported attacks
 on
American troops in West Africa, the New York Times revealed in March.
Meanwhile, Politico recently reported that, for at least five years,
Green Berets, Navy SEALs, and other commandos — operating under a
little-understood budgetary authority known as Section 127e that
funds classified programs — 
have
been involved in reconnaissance and “direct action” combat
raids
 with
local forces in Cameroon, Kenya, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Niger,
Somalia, and Tunisia. Indeed, in a 2015 briefing obtained by The
Intercept, Bolduc, then the special ops chief in Africa, noted that
America’s commandos were not only conducting “surrogate” and
“combined” “counter violent extremist operations,” but also
“unilateral” missions.

While
media reports have focused on the possibility of imminent reductions,
the number of commandos deployed in Africa is nonetheless up 96
percent since 2014 and remains fundamentally unchanged since the
deadly 2017 ambush in Niger. And as the June death of Conrad in
Somalia indicates, commandos are still operating in hazardous areas.
Indeed, at the May Pentagon briefing, Gen. Thomas Waldhauser, the
chief of U.S. Africa Command, drew attention to special operators’
“high-risk missions” under “extreme conditions” in Africa. 
America’s commandos, he said, “are doing 
a
fantastic job across the continent
.”

Top
photo: An American Special Forces soldier trains Nigerien troops
during an exercise on the Air Base 201 compound, in Agadez, Niger, on
April 14, 2018.

We
depend on the support of readers like you to help keep our nonprofit
newsroom strong and independent. 
Join Us 

*
Volgens de NRC exporteerde de VS al minimaal wapens naar
Zuid-Soedan…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Het is de redactie blijkbaar
nog niet opgevallen dat de VS ook via omwegen een land vol kan
proppen met wapens (zoals de CIA al zo vaak heeft geregeld), desnoods (of zelfs het liefst) aan elkaar
bekampende groeperingen……

========================================

De VS heeft meer militaire operaties
in Afrika dan in Midden-Oosten

Hier het tweede artikel van Nick Turse op Vice News, een artikel dat zoals gezegd afgelopen woensdag werd gepubliceerd. Met iets meer actuele informatie. Gezegd moet worden dat Turse bij de aanvang van dit bericht een fout maakt, hij doelt duidelijk op een hinderlaag die in oktober 2017 plaatsvond, terwijl je uit z’n schrijven zou kunnen opmaken dat het om oktober 2018 gaat, in het artikel hierboven wordt ook oktober 2017 aangehaald.

In dit bericht schrijft Turse over het grote aantal militaire operaties die de VS uitvoert in Afrika, operaties die de operaties van de VS in het Midden-Oosten ver overtreffen, al is het aantal VS militairen in het Midden-Oosten veel groter.

Mijn excuus voor de belabberde weergave, krijg het niet op orde.

EXCLUSIVE:
THE U.S. HAS MORE MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFRICA THAN THE MIDDLE EAST

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor EXCLUSIVE: THE U.S. HAS MORE MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFRICA THAN THE MIDDLE EAST

By Nick
Turse
 Dec
12, 2018

The
deadly ambush in Niger last October that left four U.S. serviceman
dead prompted months of hand-wringing inside the Pentagon. But that
botched operation, which drew national attention to U.S.
counterterror operations throughout Africa should not have shocked
military leadership, the former commander of U.S. Special Operations
forces in Africa told VICE News.

These
weren’t the first casualties, either. We had them in Somalia and
Kenya,” said retired Brig. Gen. Donald Bolduc, who served as
commander of Special Operations Command Africa (SOCAFRICA) from 
April
2015
 to June
2017
,
in an interview with VICE News. “We had them in Tunisia. We had
them in Mali. We had them in Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon, and Chad. But
those were kept as quiet as possible. Nobody talked about it.”

Indeed,
two separate military efforts — named Juniper Shield and Obsidian
Nomad — that were 
set
to intersect but failed
 to
on the night of the deadly ambush near Tongo Tongo in Niger were part
of a pattern of expansion on the African continent that has made it
the most active U.S. military theatre in the world. The United States
has conducted more than 30 named operations and activities in Africa
over the last three years, according to documents obtained by VICE
News. While more troops are deployed to, and engaged in combat in,
the Greater Middle East, the sheer number of named efforts in Africa
actually surpasses that region.

VICE
News reviewed documents from the U.S. Army, Africa Command, and
Special Operations Command Africa, and conducted interviews with
current and former military personnel and experts familiar with
America’s “war on terror” in Africa. These documents and
testimony paint a startling picture of a sprawling, labyrinthine, and
at times chaotic shadow war on the African continent, in which
commandos are endangered by a lack of resources and “assistance”
operations blur with combat.

Africa
has more named operations than any other theater, including CENTCOM
[the command that oversees the Middle East],” Buldoc confirmed to
VICE News. “But remains under-resourced for doing what it’s been
directed to do.”

SECRETIVE
AND SPRAWLING

In
2017, U.S. troops carried out an average of nearly 10 missions per
day —
3,500
exercises, programs, and engagements for the year
 —
across the African continent, according to Gen. Thomas Waldhauser,
the AFRICOM commander.

These
efforts — carried out in at least 
33
countries
 —
range from capture-or-kill commando raids to more banal training
missions. Americans are also gathering intelligence, involved in
surveillance and reconnaissance missions carried out by drones,
engaged in construction projects, and accompanying allies on tactical
operations.

There
are also now 
34
U.S. military outposts
 on
the continent, concentrated in the north and west and the Horn of
Africa, according to a recent report by The Intercept.

US operations Africa

This
March 2018 briefing authored by Africa Command Science Advisor Peter
Teil outlines current U.S. military operations throughout the African
continent. (Nick Turse for VICE News).

Through
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), AFRICOM provided VICE News
with a list of 21 named operations conducted between January 1, 2016
and September 25, 2018. According to a separate March 2018 briefing,
authored by Africa Command Science Advisor Peter Teil and also
obtained via FOIA, eight current operations in North and West Africa
were aimed at countering the Islamic State and Boko Haram and
assisting local allies and French counterterrorism efforts. Six
operations in East Africa focused on defeating al Shabaab, assisting
the African Union Mission in Somalia, and counter-piracy. Two
theater-wide efforts focused on crisis response in the event U.S.
government personnel or facilities are threatened, while one
operation — Echo Casemate — provides support to French and U.N.
forces in the troubled Central African Republic.

A
separate Defense Department document, marked “For Official Use
Only,” that appears to have been posted online inadvertently, lists
12 named activities not on AFRICOM’s list, including eight in the
east and another four in the northwest.

Taken
together, these documents represent the most current and complete
record of named U.S. operations and activities recently conducted on
the continent, offering a window into a collection of
little-understood, often overlapping, military efforts unknown to
most Americans.

SPREAD
THIN, AND BLURRING LINES

US operations Africa

Somali
soldiers are on patrol at Sanguuni military base, where an American
special operations soldier was killed by a mortar attack on June 8,
about 450 km south of Mogadishu, Somalia, on June 13, 2018. – More
than 500 American forces are partnering with African Union Mission to
Somalia (AMISOM) and Somali national security forces in
counterterrorism operations, and have conducted frequent raids and
drone strikes on Al-Shabaab training camps throughout Somalia.
(MOHAMED ABDIWAHAB/AFP/Getty Images).

The
proliferation of so many concurrent counterterrorism efforts courts
danger, said Bill (William) Hartung, the director of the Arms and Security
Project at the Center for International Policy (ASPCIP).

Running
so many operations with combat implications without making them known
to the American public is both unwise and ultimately undemocratic. It
is no way to run foreign policy in a democracy,” he said. “And
running sensitive operations that are secret, or simply not widely
publicized, increases the risks of failure, because they are not
subject to public debate or adequate scrutiny.”

Bolduc
also criticized the lack of transparency on the part of AFRICOM.
“What we’re doing shouldn’t be a mystery,” he said.

Alice
Hunt Friend, the principal director for African affairs in the Office
of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy from 2012 to 2014, said
the risks are compounded by the way these operations tend to blur
between “assistance” and combat.

If
the primary military activity in a country is assistance, then as we
saw in Niger, U.S. combat-related resources are not readily on hand,”
Friend explained.

Among
the operations that provide “assistance” are the classified 127e
programs. These secretive efforts are “aimed at assisting foreign
forces who support U.S. counterterrorism operations,” said Friend.

But
these activities often consist of far more than assistance, said
Bolduc. Classified 127e programs are “direct action” efforts,
which are defined by the Pentagon as “short-duration strikes and
other small-scale offensive actions conducted as a special operation
in hostile, denied, or diplomatically sensitive environments.”

Such
direct-action missions were carried out in Cameroon, Kenya, Libya,
Mali, Niger, Somalia, and Tunisia in recent years, as well as two
nations where the 127e programs have now ended, Ethiopia and
Mauritania, said Bolduc.

US operations Africa

Through
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), AFRICOM provided VICE News
with a list of 21 named operations conducted between January 1, 2016
and September 25, 2018. Above is the list. (Nick Turse for VICE
News.)

The
Department of Defense declined to provide details about these
activities because many were “ongoing,” said Navy Commander
Candice Tresch, a Pentagon spokesperson.

We
are extremely lucky that there have not been more situations like
Niger,” said Hartung. “Running dozens of missions where U.S.
troops are liable to be thrust into combat roles is an extremely
risky approach, putting both their lives and our interests at risk.”

Buldoc
expressed particular concern over what he explained was a persistent
lack of support from the Pentagon. “When I left command, I had 96
missions and 886 tasks associated with those missions in 28 different
countries, in an area that was two and a half times the size of the
United States,” Bolduc said. “I was under-resourced in personnel
recovery. I was under-resourced in ISR [intelligence, surveillance,
and reconnaissance assets]. And I was under resourced in medical
support — the three key things that I needed.”

For
years, the special operations community and its 
supporters have
expressed concern over 
deployment
rates, 
operations
tempo, and the amount of resources being allocated to direct action
missions. “Most SOF units are employed to their sustainable
limit,” 
General
Raymond Thomas
 (III), the Special Operations Command chief, told members of Congress last
spring.

In
June, the New York Times reported that Secretary of Defense James
Mattis and Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., the chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, had grown concerned that commandos across the globe
were 
spread
too thin
.
And the resources afforded to the team ambushed in Niger in 2017, for
example — who relied on contracted medical evacuation services,
French airpower, and lightly armored vehicles — have been
criticized as inadequate and dangerous.

Bolduc,
the former SOCAFRICA commander, laid much of the blame of the Niger
ambush on such deficits and a failure to adequately support local
allies. “That lack of resources — as well as fundamentally
misunderstanding the environment, the situation, and the threat —
meant that we were unable to help our partners solve a regional
problem. Because we didn’t provide an adequate military and
security response, the threat got stronger and more effective. The
direct result was the ambush of our SOF team in October 2017.”

Africa
Command’s official investigation, however, concluded that the “direct
cause of the enemy attack in Tongo Tongo is that the enemy achieved
tactical surprise there, and our forces were outnumbered
approximately three to one,” according to AFRICOM’s former chief
of staff, and now the head of the U.S. Army in Africa, Maj. Gen.
Roger Cloutier.

DRAWING
DOWN — SORT OF

The
Pentagon told VICE News that the total number of troops assigned to
AFRICOM — about 7,200 personnel — would be cut by less than 10
percent over several years, as it reviews its priority areas on the
continent and reorients itself toward great power rivals.

There
are, by comparison, roughly 
24,000
troops
 deployed
to Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, although President Trump recently
suggested that U.S. troops might be 
withdrawn from
the Middle East due to lower oil prices.

US military operations Africa

President
Donald Trump with, from left, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, Trump,
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford and Marine
Corps Commandant Gen. Robert Neller, speaks during a briefing with
senior military leaders in the Cabinet Room at the White House in
Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2018. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

Pentagon
spokesperson Tresch said that the ambush in Niger had nothing to do
with the Defense Department’s decision to modestly decrease troop
levels in Africa. She said the move is predicated on the
 National
Defense Strategy
,
released earlier this year, which calls for increased focus on
near-peer competitors. The Trump administration is reportedly poised
to unveil a broader 
strategy
for Africa
 specifically
focused on countering the influence of Russia and China on the
continent.

As
we prioritize where we need to place concentrations of troops, there
were certain specialties — especially in the Special Operations
arena — that we didn’t necessarily need employed in Africa,”
AFRICOM’s Senior Enlisted Leader Chief Master Sergeant
 Ramon
Colon-Lopez
 told
VICE News.

Few,
if any, troops will be cut from hotspots like Libya and Somalia, nor
Djibouti, whose bases also play a pivotal role in U.S. operations in
Yemen and the greater Middle East. Nor will any region of the
continent see all U.S. forces removed. Troop drawdowns in West Africa
will be marked by a shift from tactical-level support to a greater
emphasis on advising, training and intelligence-sharing, the Pentagon
said.

Bolduc,
who supports robust military and diplomatic engagement on the
continent, warned that any significant cuts to special operations
forces would irreparably harm U.S. interests in Africa. 

“We’re
becoming risk averse and it’s slowing down the amount of support we
provide to our partner nations in training, advising, assisting, and
accompanying them,” he said. “We’re basically ceding our
strategic leverage and relationship with our African partners to the
Chinese and the Russians.”

But
Friend said there was greater risk in small teams of special
operators conducting far flung and secretive missions on the
continent.

The
fact that American forces were out in the field like that made them
vulnerable to [ISIS in the Greater Sahara] attacks. If they’re not
forward and not out there, it’s much harder to attack them,” she
said. “So, one of the choices in front of DoD decision-makers is
‘do we want to keep forces forward?’ and therefore ‘what kind
of support do we need to give them?,’” Friend said.


Cover
image: Malian soldiers take part in training at the Kamboinsé
general Bila Zagre military camp near Ouagadougo in Burkina Faso
during a military anti-terrorism exercise with US Army instructors on
April 12, 2018. (ISSOUF SANOGO/AFP/Getty Images)

==================================

Zie ook:

VS vermoordt zoals gewoonlijk straffeloos burgers in geheime Somalische oorlog

VS bombardementen: 62 vermoorde stadsbewoners in Somalië

De VS heeft 500 militairen ingezet in Somalië, het imperium breidt zich verder uit……

VS illegaal militair ingrijpen in Niger, ofwel de uitspattingen van een imperium met expansiedrift

VS ‘helden’ helpen Somalische troepen bij het vermoorden van kinderen, één van de specialiteiten van deze helden……….

Jeroen Leenaers (CDA): Somalië is ‘veilig’ voor vluchtelingen………….‘ en in het verlengde daarvan: ‘Jeroen Leenaers (CDA EU): ‘veilige landen’ moeten asielzoekers terugnemen, anders zwaait er wat…….. OEI!!!‘ en: ‘Amnesty International beschuldigt Nederland van het schenden van de mensenrechten, door Somaliërs terug te sturen……

VS, in 2016 vermoordde de VS 24.000 mensen, uit landen die op de lijst van inreisverboden staan…….

VS pleegt aanslag op een leider van al-Shabaab, geen ‘onschuldige slachtoffers…..’

De VS heeft 500 militairen ingezet in Somalië, het imperium breidt zich verder uit……

Alsof de VS niet genoeg oorlog voert*, heeft intussen het aantal militairen in Somalië uitgebreid naar een totaal van 500……. Eerder werd al bekend gemaakt dat de VS het Somalische leger meehelpt met het vermoorden van kinderen…..**

Dit is overigens het grootste aantal VS militairen in Somalië, sinds de VS zich in 1993 schielijk terugtrok, nadat VS 18 militairen werden gedood……

Volgens Jason Ditz, de schrijver van het onderstaande ANTIWAR artikel, is het niet duidelijk waarom de VS zich in deze oorlog stort, terwijl hij maar al te  vaak schrijft over de illegale oorlogen, die de VS her en der begint. Zo moeilijk is het niet, de VS stelt elk gebied dat het van strategisch belang acht, ofwel vanwege grondstoffen ‘veilig’ onder haar beheer…… Zelfs de macht breken van niet welgezinde regimes kunnen voldoende reden zijn voor de VS om haar grootschalige moorddadige, terreur uit te oefenen, dit middels één van de grootste oorlogsmisdaden: een illegale oorlog beginnen……..

Overigens maakt de VS gebruik van een groot aantal tactieken om haar zin door te drijven, zo zijn daar door de CIA georganiseerde -opstanden, -coups -cyberterrorisme (zie de Vault 7 documenten op Wikileaks) en -economische oorlogsvoering (zoals tegen het bewind Maduro in Venezuela…..)…….

Kortom de VS is omgevormd tot een imperium met een ongebreidelde, uiterst gewelddadige expansiedrift…….. Een imperium dat dood en ellende zaait waar het ingrijpt…… De VS? De grootste terreurentiteit op aarde en dat is al zo sinds WOII, vanaf die tijd heeft de VS tot nu toe 22 miljoen mensen vermoord!!!

Voor de zoveelste keer: wanneer wordt de VS aangeklaagd bij het Internationaal Strafhof (ICC) in Den Haag?? Zolang dat niet gebeurd is dit hof een aanfluiting……

The
US Has Quietly Deployed More Than 500 Troops to Somalia

November
20, 2017 at 6:01 am

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

The
US now has more troops in Somalia than at any other time since 1993
.

(ANTIWAR.COM) — One
of the many quiet escalations in countries where US military
operations on the ground hadn’t really been well publicized in the
first place, officials say that the US has more than doubled the
number of ground troops in Somalia this year, and
 now
have over 500 troops there
.

This
is the most troops the US have had in the country since 1993, when
the Black Hawk Down incident killed 18 US soldiers and led to a quick
withdrawal from the nation. This year was also the first year since
1993 that any US troops died in Somalia.

This
escalation has involved a soaring number of US airstrikes in Somalia,
not to mention a number of joint ground operations with Somali
forces, mostly against al-Shabaab fighters, but many of them with
very unclear goals.

But
the goals of the whole US operation in Somalia aren’t exactly clear
anyhow, with some vague interest in fighting al-Shabaab, and possibly
the ISIS affiliate in Puntland, but little
 sign
that the operation is anything but escalation for escalation’s
sake
.

By Jason
Ditz
 /
Republished with permission / 
ANTIWAR.COM / Report
a typo

============================================

*  Waardoor de VS een schuld heeft opgebouwd die bijna niet meer in cijfers is uit te drukken, het is dat de dollar nog steeds als internationaal betaalmiddel en als valuta voor de oliehandel wordt gehanteerd, anders was dit ‘land’ al lang failliet verklaard……

** Zie: ‘VS ‘helden’ helpen Somalische troepen bij het vermoorden van kinderen, één van de specialiteiten van deze helden……….

Zie ook:

VS vermoordt zoals gewoonlijk straffeloos burgers in geheime Somalische oorlog

VS bombardementen: 62 vermoorde stadsbewoners in Somalië

VS illegaal militair ingrijpen in Niger, ofwel de uitspattingen van een imperium met expansiedrift

Geheime oorlogvoering van de VS in Afrika duurt voort, het aantal VS operaties in Afrika is zelfs groter dan in het Midden-Oosten

Jeroen Leenaers (CDA): Somalië is ‘veilig’ voor vluchtelingen………….‘ en in het verlengde daarvan: ‘Jeroen Leenaers (CDA EU): ‘veilige landen’ moeten asielzoekers terugnemen, anders zwaait er wat…….. OEI!!!‘ en: ‘Amnesty International beschuldigt Nederland van het schenden van de mensenrechten, door Somaliërs terug te sturen……

VS, in 2016 vermoordde de VS 24.000 mensen, uit landen die op de lijst van inreisverboden staan…….

VS pleegt aanslag op een leider van al-Shabaab, geen ‘onschuldige slachtoffers…..’

PS: het is maar de vraag of het nog steeds om 500 militairen gaat in Somalië, daar het Pentagon zonder inmenging van het congres extra troepen mag inzetten, dit is te danken aan het beest Trump……

Jeroen Leenaers (CDA): Somalië is ‘veilig’ voor vluchtelingen…………..

Op 4 juli jl. bracht ANTIWAR het bericht dat de VS Somalië voor de tweede keer bombardeerde. Althans daar moeten we op vertrouwen…… De laatste opmerking daar het Pentagon, zoals u wellicht weet, allesbehalve betrouwbaar is…..

Overigens werd bij de melding van het bombardement alleen gesteld dat doelen van al-Shabaab werden gebombardeerd, dus niet welk specifiek doel werd getroffen……..

Je kan er donder op zeggen dat de luchtmacht van de VS veel vaker bombardeert, sinds het beest Trump het leger de vrije hand heeft gegeven voor het inzetten van middelen en personeel (militairen) waar het haar uitkomt……..

Daarnaast voert de VS in Somalië de ene standrechtelijke executie na de andere uit. Bij deze terreur drone aanvallen ligt het aantal slachtoffers dat niet eens verdacht is op meer dan 90%……..

Eén ding is weer zeker: Somalië is allesbehalve veilig en vluchtelingen zouden niet teruggestuurd moeten worden naar een land dat in oorlog verkeert…….

Volgens CDA’s ‘rentmeester van god’, EU grofgraaier Leenaers, die de woorden van jezus ten aanzien van vluchtelingen wel bijzonder vreemd interpreteert, is Somalië veilig voor vluchtelingen…..* Ze zouden de klootzak daar moeten droppen!

US
Airstrike Hits Somalia

July
4, 2017 at 6:46 am

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

(ANTIWAR.COM) — Pentagon
officials have confirmed that they carried out an airstrike Sunday
morning inside the country of Somalia, and that they were trying to
target the al-Shabaab insurgency, saying they were after “specific
militant targets.”

What
they actually hit, however, isn’t at all clear, with no word yet
out of Somalia on the results of the strike, and the Pentagon
insisting that they are still “
assessing
the results,

and holding out the idea they might provide information in the future
“as appropriate.”

In
practice, however, the Pentagon has recently been very tight-lipped
about the results of airstrikes, especially those strikes that didn’t
go according to plan, meaning that “al-Shabaab was targeted” may
well be the last we ever hear about the incident.

The
Trump Administration has given the Pentagon increased autonomy to
carry out operations in several places around the world, including in
Somalia, and this is the second such strike in a little over a month.
The previous strike was said to kill eight militants. As far as this
strike, it’s anyone’s guess.

By Jason
Ditz
 /
Republished with permission / 
AntiWar.com / Report
a typo

======================================

* Zie: ‘Jeroen Leenaers (CDA EU): ‘veilige landen’ moeten asielzoekers terugnemen, anders zwaait er wat…….. OEI!!!

Zie ook:

VS vermoordt zoals gewoonlijk straffeloos burgers in geheime Somalische oorlog

VS bombardementen: 62 vermoorde stadsbewoners in Somalië

De VS heeft 500 militairen ingezet in Somalië, het imperium breidt zich verder uit……

VS illegaal militair ingrijpen in Niger, ofwel de uitspattingen van een imperium met expansiedrift

Geheime oorlogvoering van de VS in Afrika duurt voort, het aantal VS operaties in Afrika is zelfs groter dan in het Midden-Oosten

VS ‘helden’ helpen Somalische troepen bij het vermoorden van kinderen, één van de specialiteiten van deze helden……….

Jeroen Leenaers (CDA EU): ‘veilige landen’ moeten asielzoekers terugnemen, anders zwaait er wat…….. OEI!!!‘ en in het verlengde daarvan: ‘Amnesty International beschuldigt Nederland van het schenden van de mensenrechten, door Somaliërs terug te sturen……

VS, in 2016 vermoordde de VS 24.000 mensen, uit landen die op de lijst van inreisverboden staan…….

VS pleegt aanslag op een leider van al-Shabaab, geen ‘onschuldige slachtoffers…..’

Amnesty International beschuldigt Nederland van het schenden van de mensenrechten, door Somaliërs terug te sturen……

De VS oorlog in Somalië en wat u niet hoort in de reguliere (nep-) media………

Volgens Reuters heeft de VS afgelopen zondag een luchtaanval uitgevoerd op al-Shabaab in Somalië. Regeringswoordvoerders van de VS gingen niet specifiek in op wat voor soort aanval het ging, een aanval met drones, of een ‘normaal luchtbombardement’.

Zoals gewoonlijk berichtten de reguliere media over deze zaak*, zonder ook maar te hebben gevraagd naar het waarom en hoe (zoals gezegd). (en vaak zonder te vragen naar het aantal onverdachte slachtoffers, onverdacht daar de VS zich het recht voorbehoudt mensen die zij verdenken, met drones standrechtelijk, dus zonder enige rechtspraak, te vermoorden)

Vreemd genoeg is de invloed van al-Shabaab in Somalië bijna tot nul gereduceerd, ook heeft deze islamitische terreurgroep nooit enig westers doel aangevallen…….

Reuters sprak over al-Shabaab als zijnde gelinkt aan Al Qaida. Als zodanig zou al-Shabaab een doelwit zijn van de VS, dit vanwege de aanslagen van 911 in 2001. Echter in 2001 bestond al-Shabaab niet eens!!

Vreemd genoeg, volgens een artikel van Shahtahmasebi op Anti-Media, zijn alle terreurgroepen in Syrië geen doel van de VS, hoewel ze allen zijn gelinkt aan Al Qaida, behalve één dan: IS………

De VS verdedigt haar terroristische aanslagen (middels drones, luchtbombardementen en/of terreur via troepen op de grond) altijd met het argument, dat men deze uitvoert vanwege zelfverdediging, echter de VS troepen lopen alleen gevaar als ze weer eens illegaal een land binnenvallen (= extreme terreur!), waar ze niets te zoeken hebben, dan wel militair foute regimes steunen.

Saoedi-Arabië heeft de corrupte Somalische regering omgekocht en voor 50 miljoen dollar heeft deze regering de banden met Iran verbroken en assisteert S-A bij haar genocide op de sjiitische bevolking in Jemen……. Ook de VS biedt S-A hulp bij deze genocide, met drone aanvallen (die het ook al vanaf Obama op Somalië uitvoert), raketbeschietingen, bombardementen en geheime militaire acties op de grond…….

Shahtahmasebi maakt één kapitale fout in zijn artikel, volgens hem is Somalië een tussenstation voor wapenleveranties uit Iran voor de (sjiitische) Houthi rebellen. Ten eerste is dat in tegenspraak met zijn eerder genoemde deal tussen S-A en de Somalische regering en ten tweede zijn er nooit bewijzen geleverd voor deze wapenleveranties, al houden de westerse afhankelijke massamedia en het merendeel van de westerse politici vol dat dit wel zo is………

Somalië is strategisch uiterst belangrijk gelegen, één van de hoofdoorzaken voor het geweld van de VS en haar terreurpartner S-A…… Hetzelfde geldt overigens voor Jemen.

Lees dit verder prima artikel van Shahtahmasebi, waarin hij verder spreekt over een groot aantal militaire bases van de VS op Afrikaans grondgebied:

What
You Aren’t Being Told About The US’ War in Somalia

July
5, 2017 at 2:34 pm

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA)  On
Sunday, the U.S. military carried out an airstrike in Somalia against al-Qaeda-linked terror group al-Shabaab, U.S. officials said on
Monday, as 
reported by Reuters.

Officials
did not specify whether it was a drone strike, and the Pentagon has
not disclosed any additional information about the strike. The U.S.
has been 
drone-striking Somalia
for some time now, a policy Barack Obama escalated.

As
is usually the case, the media 
reports these
developments without questioning the underlying narrative, and
millions of ordinary Americans go about their day without so much as
batting an eyelid. Just another day in Africa, right?

However,
even 
Reuters acknowledged
that al-Shabaab has been pushed out of Mogadishu, Somalia’s capital
city, and has lost control of most of the country’s cities and
towns.
 Further, according to
the 
Guardian, al-Shabaab
has never been implicated in any plots to strike the U.S. or Europe.

So
why is this group a concern for the United States? Is it simply
because they are aligned with al-Qaeda?

Consider
this
 passage from
the 
Intercept’s Glenn
Greenwald from March of last year:

Since
2001, the U.S. government has legally justified
its 
we-bomb-wherever-we-want approach
by pointing to the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force
(AUMF), enacted by Congress in the wake of 9/11 to authorize the
targeting of al Qaeda and ‘affiliated’ forces. But al Shabaab did
not exist in 2001 and had nothing to do with 9/11. Indeed, the group
has not tried to attack the U.S. but instead, as the
 New
York Times’
Charlie
Savage 
noted in
2011, ‘is focused on a parochial insurgency in Somalia.’ As a
result, reported Savage, even ‘the [Obama] administration does not
consider the United States to be at war with every member of the
Shabaab.’”

While
we are on the topic, try conducting a Google search on 
any
of the rebel groups
 currently
being supported – and not targeted – by the United States and its
allies in Syria. Try to find one that isn’t aligned with al-Qaeda.
It’s almost 
impossible.
The only major group in Syria that is currently not backed by
al-Qaeda in some way, shape, or form is ISIS.

Somalia
was one of the seven countries four-star General Wesley
Clark
 identified years
ago as a target of American military intervention following the
September 11 attacks in 2001. It is also one of the countries that
made it onto Trump’s infamously
 revised
travel ban
,
which is now being enforced courtesy of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Although
under Barack Obama the U.S. was
 waging
a covert war
 in
Somalia rife with drone strikes and Special Forces on the ground,
Donald Trump has
 ramped
up
 this operation alongside
a number of other conflicts, particularly in Iraq and Syria. Trump
has also approved the deployment of regular U.S. troops to Somalia
for the first time since 1994. One of these troops has already
been
 killed in
a clash with the terror group.

To
put it simply, these American troops are not just advising and
training local troops, they are
 also directly
involved
 in
combat missions. As these clashes intensify, expect more American
deaths to come, and expect further deployments.

Such
deployments will also likely lead increased air strikes because the
U.S. argues that such strikes are

needed
to defend their troops from Islamic militants. However, even the 
New
York Times, 
an
establishment media outlet, can see
 right
through
 this
circular reasoning:

In
its public announcements, the Pentagon sometimes characterizes the
operations as ‘self-defense strikes,’ though some analysts have
said this rationale has become a self-fulfilling prophecy. 
It
is only because American forces are now being deployed on the front
lines in Somalia that they face imminent threats from the
Shabab.
” [emphasis
added]

To
recap, the United States essentially identified a group that poses no
threat to the United States or Europe and targeted it with drone
strikes over the course of Obama’s presidency. As we have seen
across the globe, drone strikes actually help turn small
 insurgent
groups into a very formidable forces
 due
to the instability these strikes create and the innocent lives they
take. In some instances, drone strikes targeting and eradicating a
group’s leaders can actually cause a more
 violent
person
 to
rise up and take control.

Did
America’s representatives of so-called democracy ever debate this
war in Somalia? What do ordinary Americans even know about Somalia or
al-Shabaab? Most Americans probably aren’t even aware that although
there is a central government of sorts, the country has been widely
regarded as a lawless, 
failed
state
.
Can the average American point to Somalia on a map?

Indeed,
locating Somalia on a world map would aid the reader in understanding
the geostrategic importance of such a country. As 
Geopolitical
Futures
 has explained:

Somalia’s
northern coast borders the Gulf of Aden, which leads to Bab
el-Mandeb, a narrow chokepoint through which all maritime traffic
from the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean must pass. Avoiding
this strait would take all goods from the Persian Gulf – including
oil – around the entire African continent to reach European and
American markets. It is also a valuable staging ground for navies to
project power on to the Arabian Peninsula.

Somalia
is so important that Saudi Arabia
 offered $50
million to its government to break ties with Iran. Not surprisingly,
Somalia is now one of the countries
 assisting Saudi
Arabia in its invasion of Yemen, the poorest country in the Arab
world.

That
being said, Somalia is allegedly a transit point in
 a
supposed weapons route
 from
Iran to Yemen that supplies the Yemeni opposition with weaponry to
combat Saudi-led forces in the war-torn country. If the U.S.-backed
Saudi-led coalition is unsuccessful in crushing the Yemeni
resistance, and if a government is established in Yemen that aligns
itself with Tehran, the U.S. could slowly begin to lose strategic
maritime position and influence in this vital region.

In
this context, Somalia’s proximity to Yemen means the North African
nation is one of those strategic maritime areas the U.S. cannot
afford to lose.

Somalia
is also reportedly
 sitting on substantial
unexploited
 reserves
of oil, as well as
 about 25
percent of the world’s known uranium reserves.

Somalia’s
recently elected president, who was chosen in an election
 paid for
by the U.S. and the E.U., is 
supportive of
American military assistance even though his people are, in most
cases, banned from visiting the United States.

Further,
as 
Truthout observes,
Somalia is just one of many African locations in which the U.S.
military has asserted itself:

The
US Africa Command oversees a vast array of ‘outposts’ —
categorized in Pentagon-speak as ‘consisting of two forward
operating sites [including the one official base in Djibouti], 13
cooperative security locations, and 31 contingency locations.’
 Secret documents in 2015 listed thirty-six outposts ‘scattered
across 24 African countries.  These include low-profile
locations — from Kenya to South Sudan to a shadowy Libyan airfield
— that have never previously been mentioned in published reports.
 Today, according to an AFRICOM spokesperson, the number of
these sites has actually swelled to 46, including ’15 enduring
locations.’
’”

The
problem with this region, from the perspective of America’s
warmongering class, is the underlying power struggle between the
United States and China. China is investing heavily in Africa and has
also signaled its intention to
 build
military bases
 in
Africa’s strategic areas. In turn, the U.S. needs to assert itself
as much as possible to counter the rise of the Chinese presence in
Africa. China has 
invested over
$200 billion in Africa to date, and Somalia
 regards China
as a “vital ally.”

In
another example, China is already using large investments
to 
squeeze the
U.S. out of Pakistan, a former U.S. client state. While there is much
to be made of China’s intentions and its actions, there is a
noticeable difference in that currently, China opts for alternative
ways of spreading its influence — as opposed to relentlessly
bombing nations into submission.

To
some countries, China might be a breath of fresh air in comparison to
its American counterpart.  

 Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo 

====================================

* Dat is te zeggen: alleen in de VS, in Nederland werd deze aanval niet eens genoemd, althans ik vind er niets over terug in de reguliere flutmedia………

PS: onlangs durfde CDA ‘rentmeester van god’ Leenaers te zeggen, dat ook Somalië veilig is, hier de link, al staat zijn uitlating aangaande Somalië niet in het bericht genoemd, waar wel Afghanistan als ‘veilig’ terug is te vinden….. Zie: ‘Jeroen Leenaers (CDA EU): ‘veilige landen’ moeten asielzoekers terugnemen, anders zwaait er wat…….. OEI!!!

Jemenitische rebellen en Iran slachtoffer van internationale leugens, aanvankelijk zelfs uit VN burelen……..

Mensen hier een vergeten concept, maar nog even actueel: de beschuldiging dat Iran de Houthi rebellen zou voorzien van wapens en munitie. Deze leugen is al eerder doorgeprikt maar gezien het feit dat men in de reguliere media deze leugen nog steeds propageert, kan het niet genoeg herhaald worden, vindt u ‘ook niet?’ Hier het artikel van Information Clearing House (u kunt onder dit artikel klikken voor een vertaling, dat kost wel wat tijd) :

How
False Stories of Iran Arming the Houthis Were Used to Justify War
in Yemen

By
Gareth Porter

January
02, 2015 “
Information
Clearing House

– “
Truth
Out

– Peace talks between the Saudi-supported government of Yemen and
the Houthi rebels ended in late December without any agreement to
end the bombing campaign started by Saudi Arabia and its Gulf
allies with US support last March. The rationale for the Saudi-led
war on Houthis in Yemen has been that the Houthis are merely
proxies of Iran, and the main alleged evidence for that conclusion
is that Iran has been arming the Houthis for years.

The
allegation of Iranian arms shipments to the Houthis – an
allegation that has often been mentioned in press coverage of the
conflict but never proven – was reinforced by a
report released last June
 by a panel of experts created
by the UN Security Council: The report concluded that Iran had
been shipping arms to the Houthi rebels in Yemen by sea since at
least 2009. But an investigation of the two main allegations of
such arms shipments made by the Yemeni government and cited by the
expert panel shows that they were both crudely constructed ruses.

Diplomatic
cables released by WikiLeaks reveal that the story of the arms
onboard the ship had been concocted by the government.

The
government of the Republic of Yemen, then dominated by President
Ali Abdullah Saleh, claimed that it had seized a vessel named
Mahan 1 in Yemeni territorial waters on October 25, 2009, with a
crew of five Iranians, and that it had found weapons onboard the
ship. The UN expert panel report repeated the official story that
authorities had confiscated the weapons and that the First
Instance Court of Sana’a had convicted the crew of the Mahan 1 of
smuggling arms from Iran to Yemen.

But
diplomatic cables from the US Embassy in Yemen released by
WikiLeaks in 2010 reveal that, although the ship and crew were
indeed Iranian, the story of the arms onboard the ship had been
concocted by the government. On October 27, 2009, the US
Embassy sent
a cable
 to the State Department noting that the Embassy
of Yemen in Washington had issued a press statement announcing the
seizure of a “foreign vessel carrying a quantity of arms and
other goods….” But
another cable
 dated November 11, 2009, reported that the
government had “failed to substantiate its extravagant public
claims that an Iranian ship seized off its coast on October 25 was
carrying military trainers, weapons and explosives destined for
the Houthis.”

Furthermore,
the cable continued, “sensitive reporting” – an obvious
reference to US intelligence reports on the issue – “suggests
that the ship was carrying no weapons at all.”

follow-up
Embassy cable
 five days later reported that the
government had already begun to revise its story in light of the
US knowledge that no arms had been found on board. “The ship
was apparently empty when it was seized,” according to the
cable. “However, echoing a claim by Yemen Ambassador al-Hajj,
FM [Foreign Minister] Qaairbi told Pol Chief [chief of the US
Embassy’s political section] on 11/15 the fact that the ship was
empty indicated the arms had already been delivered.”

President
Saleh had hoped to use the Mahan 1 ruse to get the political
support of the US for a war to defeat the Houthis.

President
Saleh had hoped to use the Mahan 1 ruse to get the political
support of the US for a war to defeat the Houthis, which he was
calling “Operation Scorched Earth.” But as
a December 2009 cable noted
, it was well known among Yemeni
political observers that the Houthis were awash in modern arms and
could obtain all they needed from the huge local arms market or
directly from the Yemeni military itself.

Unlike
the government’s story of the Mahan 1 and its phantom weapons, the
official claim that a ship called the Jihan 1, seized on January
23, 2013, had arms onboard was true. But the totality of the
evidence shows that the story of an Iranian arms shipment to the
Houthis was false.

The
ship was stopped in Yemeni waters by a joint patrol of the Yemeni
Coast Guard and the US Navy, and an inspection found a cache of
weapons and ammunition. The cargo including man-portable
surface-to-air missiles, 122-millimeter rockets, rocket-propelled
grenade launchers, C-4 plastic explosive blocks and equipment for
improvised explosive devices.

Some
weeks later, the UN expert panel inspected the weaponry said to
have been found on board the Jihan 1 and found labels stuck on
ammunition boxes with the legend “Ministry of Sepah” –
the former name of the Iranian military logistics ministry. The
panel report said the panel had determined that “all
available information placed the Islamic Republic of Iran at the
centre of the Jihan operation.”

But
except for those labels, which could have been affixed to the
boxes after the government had taken possession of the arms,
nothing about the ship or the weapons actually pointed to Iran.
All of the crew and the businessmen said to have arranged the
shipment were Yemenis, according to the report. And the expert
panel cited no evidence that the ship was Iranian or that the
weapons were manufactured in Iran.

The
expert panel cited no evidence that the ship was Iranian or that
the weapons were manufactured in Iran.

The
case rested on the testimony of the Yemeni crew members of the
Jihan 1 – then still in government custody – who said they had
sailed from Yemen to the Iranian port of Chabahar, had been taken
to another Iranian port and then ferried by small boat to the
Jihan 1 sitting off the Iranian coast. But although the panel said
it had access to “waypoint data retrieved from Global
Positioning System (GPS) devices,” it did not cite any such
data that supported the crew members’ story. In fact, the panel
acknowledged that it had “no information regarding the
location at which the Jihan was loaded with arms….”

A
crucial fact about the cargo, moreover, points not to Iran but to
Yemen itself as the origin of the ship: The weapons on the ship
were hidden under diesel fuel tanks and could be accessed only
after those tanks had been emptied. The expert panel referred to
that fact but failed to discuss its significance. But the June
2013report
of a UN Security Council Monitoring Group
 on Somalia and
Eritrea said that Jihan 1’s crew members had “divulged to a
diplomatic source who interviewed them in Aden that the diesel was
bound for Somalia.” An unnamed Yemeni official confirmed that
fact, which the crew members had kept from the Security Council
expert panel, according to the UN Monitoring Group report.

The
fact that the Jihan 1 was headed for Somalia indicates that the
ship was engaged in a commercial smuggling operation – not a
politically motivated delivery. The lucrative business of
smuggling diesel fuel from Yemen to Somalia had long been combined
with arms smuggling to the same country across the Gulf of Aden
from Yemen, as the Monitoring Group report made clear. The
Monitoring Group report explained that the reason authorities in
the Puntland region of Somalia had made it illegal to import
petroleum products was that arms had so often been smuggled into
ports on its coast hidden under diesel fuel.

The
same UN Monitoring Group report also revealed that a series of
arms shipments had been smuggled to Somalia in late 2012 – just
before the Jihan 1 was seized – in which rocket-propelled grenade
launchers were the primary component and IED components and
electrical detonators were also prominent. Those were also major
components of the Jihan 1 weapons shipment. The report said
information received from the Puntland authorities and its own
investigation had “established Yemen as a principal source of
the these shipments.”

A
key piece of evidence confirming that those arms had originated in
Yemen was a communication from the Bulgarian government to the UN
Monitoring Group indicating that all the rocket-propelled grenade
rounds and propellant charges in one lot manufactured in Bulgaria
and seized in Somalia had been delivered to the Yemeni armed
forces in 2010.

The
information in the Monitoring Group report thus points to Yemeni
arms smugglers as the source of the cargo of weapons and diesel
fuel aboard the Jihan 1. When the arms were seized by the joint
US-Yemen patrol, the Yemeni government evidently decided to
exploit it by creating a new story of an Iranian arms shipment to
the Houthis, and later used the Yemeni crew to provide the details
to the UN expert panel.

The
Somalia and Eritrea Monitoring Group’s report created an obvious
problem for the official story of the Jihan 1, and the Yemeni
government’s anti-Iran, Western backers sought to give the story a
new twist.Reuters
quoted a “Western diplomat”
 as citing the Jihan
1 arms shipment as evidence that Iran had actually been involved
in supplying arms to al-Shabaab terrorists in Somalia. The
anonymous source noted that the cargo had included C-4 explosives
such as were used by al-Shabaab for terrorist bombings, whereas
the Houthis were not known to carry out such operations. But that
claim was hardly credible, because al-Shabaab had close ties to
al-Qaeda and was therefore an enemy of Iran. It has not been
repeated except in pro-Saudi and pro-Israeli media outlets.

The
Jihan 1 story and the broader narrative of intercepted Iranian
arms shipments to the Houthis, as recycled by the UN Security
Council expert panel, have nevertheless become key pieces of the
widely accepted history of the regional conflicts involving Iran.

Gareth
Porter (@GarethPorter) is
an independent investigative journalist and historian writing on
US national security policy.  His latest book, 
Manufactured
Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare
,
was published in February 2014.



Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt. Dat geldt niet voor het label ‘Ali Abdullah Saleh’.

VS pleegt aanslag op een leider van al-Shabaab, geen ‘onschuldige slachtoffers…..’

Vannacht in het Radio1 nieuws van 02.00 u. het bericht dat de VS in Somalië een moordaanslag* heeft gepleegd op een leider van al-Shabaab. Volgens het Pentagon werden er geen onschuldige omstanders getroffen bij deze aanslag, al kon het Pentagon niet bevestigen, of de leider inderdaad was getroffen……….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Dus de psychopathische beulen, die standrechtelijke executies uitvoeren op verdachten middels drones**, hebben wel slachtoffers zien liggen, weten dat dit ‘geen onschuldige omstanders’ zijn, maar weten niet, of het beoogde doel is geraakt……..

Eén ding is zeker, ook met deze (illegale) executie(s) heeft de VS nieuwe mensen de weg naar terrorisme gewezen……..

Trouwens over terreur gesproken, als er nu één ‘land’ is dat de komende 500 jaar de strot moet dichthouden over terrorisme, is het de VS wel, wat de machthebbers van dit gestolen land aan terreurdaden hebben aangericht, gaat elke verbeelding te boven!!!

*  Je kan een dergelijke (illegale) moordaanslag niet anders bestempelen, dan ernstige terreur!

** Al werd er in het bericht niet over een ‘drone’ gesproken, neem ik aan, dat dit, ‘zoals gewoonlijk’ wel het geval is.

Mijn excuus: vergeet ik nog te schrijven, dat er anders dan in dit bericht, er geen woord van kritiek te horen was in het Radio1 nieuws. Alles werd opgelepeld als een logische gang van zaken…….

Zie ook:

VS vermoordt zoals gewoonlijk straffeloos burgers in geheime Somalische oorlog

VS bombardementen: 62 vermoorde stadsbewoners in Somalië

De VS heeft 500 militairen ingezet in Somalië, het imperium breidt zich verder uit……

VS illegaal militair ingrijpen in Niger, ofwel de uitspattingen van een imperium met expansiedrift

Geheime oorlogvoering van de VS in Afrika duurt voort, het aantal VS operaties in Afrika is zelfs groter dan in het Midden-Oosten

VS ‘helden’ helpen Somalische troepen bij het vermoorden van kinderen, één van de specialiteiten van deze helden……….

Jeroen Leenaers (CDA): Somalië is ‘veilig’ voor vluchtelingen………….‘ en in het verlengde daarvan: ‘Jeroen Leenaers (CDA EU): ‘veilige landen’ moeten asielzoekers terugnemen, anders zwaait er wat…….. OEI!!!‘ en: ‘Amnesty International beschuldigt Nederland van het schenden van de mensenrechten, door Somaliërs terug te sturen……

VS, in 2016 vermoordde de VS 24.000 mensen, uit landen die op de lijst van inreisverboden staan…….

Amnesty International beschuldigt Nederland van het schenden van de mensenrechten, door Somaliërs terug te sturen……

Vannacht in het BBC World Service nieuws van 01.30 u. (radio), het bericht dat Amnesty International de Nederlandse overheid beschuldigt van het schenden van de mensenrechten, door Somaliërs te deporteren naar door terreurgroep Al Shabaab gecontroleerd gebied in Somalië, waar de kans om vermoord te worden levensgroot is…..

In het Radio1 nieuws van 10.00 u. vanmorgen, werd dit bericht ‘enigszins anders’ weergegeven: volgens de nieuwslezer waarschuwt Amnesty International, Nederland en andere landen, geen mensen meer uit te zetten, naar Somalië……. Kijk dat is toch een behoorlijk verschil, één ding is zeker voor de luisteraars van BBC W.S. (en dat zijn er nogal wat wereldwijd) staan we weer eens ‘lekker’ te kakken…… Natuurlijk heeft de Amsterdamse VVD schoft Teeven geen probleem met het deporteren van mensen, naar boven genoemd gebied…….

Zie ook:

VS vermoordt zoals gewoonlijk straffeloos burgers in geheime Somalische oorlog

VS bombardementen: 62 vermoorde stadsbewoners in Somalië

De VS heeft 500 militairen ingezet in Somalië, het imperium breidt zich verder uit……

VS illegaal militair ingrijpen in Niger, ofwel de uitspattingen van een imperium met expansiedrift

Geheime oorlogvoering van de VS in Afrika duurt voort, het aantal VS operaties in Afrika is zelfs groter dan in het Midden-Oosten

VS ‘helden’ helpen Somalische troepen bij het vermoorden van kinderen, één van de specialiteiten van deze helden……….

Jeroen Leenaers (CDA): Somalië is ‘veilig’ voor vluchtelingen………….‘ en in het verlengde daarvan: ‘Jeroen Leenaers (CDA EU): ‘veilige landen’ moeten asielzoekers terugnemen, anders zwaait er wat…….. OEI!!!

VS, in 2016 vermoordde de VS 24.000 mensen, uit landen die op de lijst van inreisverboden staan…….

VS pleegt aanslag op een leider van al-Shabaab, geen ‘onschuldige slachtoffers…..’

Ethiopische hongernood van 2010-2011, eiste niet 130.000 maar minstens 260.000 doden

In het Radio1 nieuws van 01.00 u. vannacht, het bericht dat een onderzoek naar de hongersnood in Ethiopië stelt, dat deze hongersnood dubbel zoveel slachtoffers eiste, dan eerst geschat (deze hongersnood heerste overigens in de hele Hoorn van Afrika), de uitkomst van dit onderzoek spreekt van 260.000 i.p.v. 130.000 slachtoffers. Volgens de onderzoekers is het grote aantal slachtoffers te danken aan het bijzonder traag opgang komen van hulp uit ‘westerse’ landen, bovendien zorgden de ‘goede’ gelovige islamieten van al-Shabaab, dat veel van de hulpgoederen de hongerende bevolking niet bereikten, dat was namelijk de wil van allah……. Aan dat laatste konden westerse regeringen natuurlijk niets doen, zij waren veel te druk met het brengen van democratie en vrijheid in Irak en Afghanistan plus het opbouwen van die landen, middels zware bombardementen en het winnen van ‘hart en geest’ van de burgers in die landen, door willekeur, ontvoeringen, martelingen, executies en het beschieten van o.a. onschuldige burgers. Dit alles heeft intussen geresulteerd in een burgeroorlog in Irak en hetzelfde kan je van Afghanistan zeggen, met de zekerheid, dat de militante Taliban in Afghanistan aan de macht zal komen, zo gauw het westen dat land heeft verlaten………. In Afghanistan zijn overigens wel successen geboekt, nadat de opiumproductie plat lag onder de Taliban, is de productie nu weer naar ongekende hoogte gestegen en de ‘warlords’, die daar schathemelrijk van worden, zijn afgeladen met westerse wapens, echt een waanzinnig succes………