Ash Carter – De Azijnpisser

Obama vergroot ‘werkgebied’ van speciale VS-doodseskaders……. De ‘man’ verdient nog een Nobelprijs!!

Posted on December 1, 2016June 14, 2024 by Willem Wachtmeester

VS terreur op groter plan: Obama, de winnaar van de Nobelprijs voor de Vrede laat psychopathische moordenaars los op zo ongeveer de hele wereld! Tijd dat massamoordenaar Obama wordt aangeklaagd bij het Internationaal Strafhof!

Hier het artikel daarover op Information Clearing House van 30 november 2016 (onder dit artikel kan u klikken voor een ‘Dutch’ vertaling, dit neemt wel enige tijd in beslag):

Obama
Extends Global Reach of US Special Operations Death Squads

By
Patrick Martin

November
29, 2016 “Information
Clearing House”
– “WSWS” (World Socialist Web Site) – In major actions reported only briefly by the establishment
press, President Obama has given vast new scope to the Pentagon’s
Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), authorizing it to carry out
assassinations across the globe.

The
units of JSOC have long been employed by the chiefs of the six major
regional military commands, such as Centcom, which covers the Middle
East and Central Asia, to conduct counter-terrorism operations. One
such unit, Seal Team Six, carried out the assassination of Al Qaeda
leader Osama bin Laden in May 2011.

Obama
has approved a proposal to give JSOC independent authority to operate
outside the regional commands, essentially as a globalized
assassination force. JSOC units will bypass the regional commanders
and report directly to Special Operations Command (SOCOM) in the
Pentagon.

According
to the Washington
Post,
“The missions could occur well beyond the battlefields of places
like Iraq, Syria and Libya, where Joint Special Operations Command
(JSOC) has carried out clandestine operations in the past. When
finalized, it will elevate JSOC from being a highly-valued strike
tool used by regional military commands to leading a new multi-agency
intelligence and action force.”

The
mandate of the new formation, to be called the “Counter-External
Operations Task Force,” or Ex-Ops in Pentagon jargon, will embrace
the entire planet. This means US military death squads could be sent
to virtually any location, from European cities to South American
jungles, including the United States itself.

According
to the Post,
a reorganization making counter-terrorism an independent, global
command has been discussed in the Pentagon for 15 years, since the
9/11 terrorist attacks, but it was always rejected on the grounds
that it would cause friction with the regional commanders and create
duplication in command structures.

The
newspaper did not address the question of why now, a
decade-and-a-half later, the Obama administration has decided to
press forward with the new global counter-terrorism initiative. The
decision is likely, at least in part, a response to the debacle of
the US “war on terror” from the standpoint of the global aims of
American imperialism.

The
US wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria and repeated drone
strikes in other countries, including Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia,
have inflicted catastrophic levels of death and destruction, but they
have not achieved the hoped-for hegemonic control of the region and
its vast energy resources. Obama’s decision represents a
determination to escalate US military violence in Central Asia, the
Middle East, North Africa and beyond.

Another
likely consideration is the possibility that the ongoing military
offensives against Islamic State territories in Syria and Iraq, and
particularly the siege of Mosul, could lead to thousands of ISIS
militants turning to terrorist attacks outside the Middle East.

Defense
Secretary Ashton Carter traveled to Paris last month with SOCOM
Commander Raymond Thomas for talks with security officials from
several European countries. A major topic was the impact on Europe of
a sudden weakening in the military position of ISIS in Iraq and
Syria. Carter told his European counterparts that JSOC “has been
put in the lead” of countering ISIS external operations, the first
mention of the impending Pentagon reorganization.

The Post report
sought to present the Obama-approved reorganization as an effort to
set limits on the operations of special forces under the incoming
Trump administration, including “approval by several agencies
before a drone strike and ‘near certainty’ that no civilians will
be killed guidelines.” But these restrictions are for cosmetic
purposes only and have not stopped the mass slaughter of civilians by
drone missile warfare.

Moreover,
Trump is not bound in any way by executive orders issued by Obama.
The fascistic president-elect has already made his intentions clear,
as far as US Special Forces operations are concerned. He has vowed to
order the killing of the wives and children of suspected ISIS
fighters, a war crime under the Geneva Conventions.

The
latest White House orders serve to facilitate these homicidal
intentions. Less than a month ago, Obama was campaigning against the
election of Trump, denouncing him as unfit to be commander-in-chief
and as a menace to the world. Now, as Foreign
Policymagazine
reported, Obama is “handing the incoming Trump team tools to wage
war that no president has held before.”

In
one particular theater of US counter-terrorism operations, Somalia,
Obama has taken additional action to escalate the carnage by
declaring the Islamist group al-Shabab to be part of the armed
conflict authorized by the US Congress in 2001 after the 9/11
attacks.

The
legal maneuver, reported Monday by the New
York Times,
demonstrates the infinitely expandable scope of the US-declared “war
on terror.” The Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF),
passed by Congress on September 14, 2001, approved military action
against Al Qaeda and associated forces, including the Taliban regime
in Afghanistan.

The
2001 AUMF has been interpreted by the Bush and Obama administrations
as a blanket authorization for military action wherever the president
claims to find a connection to Al Qaeda, no matter how tenuous.
Al-Shabab was not founded until 2007, six years after the 9/11
attacks, in response to the US-backed invasion of Somalia by
Ethiopian troops. It has never conducted operations outside of East
Africa.

The Times noted
that the Somalia decision was one of a series of Obama actions
expanding the military’s authority, including broadening the scope
of air strikes in Afghanistan and approving air strikes against
Sirte, the Libyan city held by supporters of ISIS. More than 400 air
strikes followed, pounding into rubble a city already devastated by
five years of civil war following the 2011 US-NATO bombing campaign.

The
preparations to reinforce the pseudo-legal basis of the war in
Somalia no doubt began well before the election, when Obama expected
to hand off authority to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
But it has continued uninterrupted after Trump’s victory, and as
the Times reported,
it is “a move that will strengthen President-elect Donald J.
Trump’s authority to combat thousands of Islamist fighters in the
chaotic Horn of Africa nation.”

Earlier
this month, the British-based Guardian reported
that “Barack Obama will not tighten the rules governing US drone
strikes ahead of Donald Trump’s inauguration.” An Amnesty
International USA official, Naureen Shah, told the newspaper, “Obama
has normalized the idea that presidents get to have secret
large-scale killing programs at their disposal.”

These
events shed a new and sinister light over the reports of frequent
closed-door discussions between Obama and Trump during the three
weeks since the November 8 election. “They’ve been talking
regularly on any number of issues,” Trump campaign manager
Kellyanne Conway said on CNN’s “State of the Union” program
Sunday.

Obama
was at pains, in his first post-election statement, to dismiss the
bitter vituperation of the election campaign, declaring that the
electoral struggle between the Democrats and Republicans was merely
“an intramural scrimmage.” This is profoundly true: both parties
represent the same class, the American financial aristocracy, and its
global interests, defended in the final analysis by death and
destruction inflicted by the American military machine.

Click
for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French,
translation- Note- Translation
may take a moment to load.

Zoals u kon lezen: het wachten is op de eerste illegale militaire psychopathische VS acties, middels een doodseskader, tegen burgers in de EU, ik wed, dat dit binnen een paar jaar zal gebeuren….. Sterker nog, de mogelijkheid bestaat dat dit al is gebeurd en/of momenteel plaatsvindt………

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: AUFM, Ex-Ops, JSOC, R. Thomas, SOCOM en WSWS.

Untitled Post

Posted on October 31, 2016June 14, 2024 by Willem Wachtmeester

VS: China is een gevaar, terwijl ~~China~~, uh de VS dat land omsingeld heeft met 400 bases………..

Afgelopen vrijdag in de tweede editie van Information Clearing House, een interview met John Pilger, o.a. filmmaker. Zijn nieuwe film, ‘The Coming War on China’, handelt o.a. over de agressie van de VS tegen China en de VS staatspropaganda (inclusief haat- en angstzaaien), die één op één wordt overgenomen door de reguliere media in de VS (en langzaam maar zeker ook die in de rest van het westen), propaganda waarmee China als een bedreiging wordt neergezet…….

Volgens Pilger en zoals u zelf wellicht al elders heeft gezien of gelezen, wordt zoals gezegd China als een bedreiging afgeschilderd voor de VS, in de reguliere media aldaar……… Terwijl tegelijkertijd, de VS met maar liefst 400 militaire bases China omsingeld houdt, iets wat uiteraard geen aandacht krijgt in diezelfde media. Zoals dat hier gaat, als de reguliere mediaorganen het hebben over Oekraïne en De Krim, de feiten worden welbewust achtergehouden. Zo spreekt men nog steeds over de annexatie van De Krim, terwijl dat land in een door internationale waarnemers goedgekeurd en geldig referendum massaal koos voor aansluiting bij Rusland!*

Hier het artikel (waaronder u voor een vertaling kan klikken >> dutch):

“Confronting
China”

By
John Pilger

October
28, 2016 “Information
Clearing House”
–

TJC: Please
tell us about your new film, The
Coming War on China.

JP: The
Coming War on China is
my 60th film and perhaps one of the most urgent. It continues the
theme of illuminating the imposition of great power behind a facade
of propaganda as news. In 2011, President Obama announced a
‘pivot to Asia’ of US forces: almost two-thirds of American naval
power would be transferred to Asia and the Pacific by 2020.

The
undeclared rationale for this was the ‘threat’ from China, by
some measure now the greatest economic power. The Secretary of
Defense, Ash Carter, says US policy is to confront those ‘who see
America’s dominance and want to take that away from us’.

The
film examines power in both countries and how nuclear weapons, in
American eyes, are the bedrock of its dominance. In its first
‘chapter’, the film reveals how most of the population of the
Marshall Islands in the Pacific were unwittingly made into nuclear
guinea pigs in a programme whose secrets – and astonishing archive
– are related to the presence of a missile base now targeting
China. The
Coming War on China will
be released in cinemas in the UK on December 1st and broadcast on ITV
(in the UK) on December 6th.

TJC: How
do you assess Australia’s role in America’s ‘Pivot to Asia’?

JP:
Australia is virtually the 51st state of the US. Although China
is Australia’s biggest trader, on which much of the national
economy relies, ‘confronting China’ is the diktat from
Washington. The Australian political establishment, especially the
military and intelligence agencies, are fully integrated into what is
known as the ‘alliance’, along with the dominant Murdoch media. I
often feel a certain sadness about the way my own country – with
all its resources and opportunities – seems locked into such an
unnecessary, dangerous obsequious role in the world. If the ‘pivot’
proceeds, Australia could find itself fighting, yet again, a great
power’s war.

TJC: With
regards to the British and American media, how can the US get away
with selling China as a

threat when it is encircling China?

JP:
That’s a question that goes to the heart of modern-day propaganda.
China is encircled by a ‘noose’ of some 400 US bases, yet the
news has ignored this while concentrating on the ‘threat’ of
China building airstrips on disputed islets in the South China Sea,
clearly as a defence to a US Navy blockade.

TJC: Obama’s
visit to Japan, and particularly to Hiroshima, was a really cynical
act. What was your impression of Japan and the political situation
there?

JP:
Japan is an American colony in all but name – certainly in terms of
its relationship with the rest of the world and especially China. The
historian Bruce Cumings explores this in an interview in the film.
Within the constraints of American dominance, indeed undeterred
by Washington, Japan’s current prime minister Shinzo Abe has
developed an extreme nationalist position, in which contrition for
Japanese actions in the Second World War is anathema and the post-war
‘peace constitution’ is likely to be changed.

Abe
has gone as far as boasting that Japan will use nuclear weapons if it
wants. In any US conflict with China, Japan – which last year
announced its biggest ever ‘defence’ budget – would play a
critical role. There are 32 US military installations on the Japanese
island of Okinawa, facing China. However, there is a sense in modern
Asia that power in the world has indeed moved east and peaceful
‘Asian solutions’ to regional animosities are possible.

TJC:
Do you think the new trade and investment deals like the
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and especially
the Transpacific Partnership (TPP) will affect China’s business
operations?

JP:
It’s difficult to say, but I doubt it. What is remarkable about the
rise of China is the way it has built, almost in the blink of an eye,
a trade, investment and banking structure that rivals that of the
Bretton Woods institutions. Unknown to many of us, China is
developing its ‘New Silk Road’ to Europe at an astonishing pace.
China’s response to threats from Washington is a diplomacy that’s
tied to this development, and which includes a burgeoning alliance
with Russia.

T.J.
Coles is
the author of Britain’s
Secret Wars (2016,
Clairview Books).

“Click
for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French,
translation- Note- Translation
may take a moment to load.

* Die internationale waarnemers worden nu meer en meer afgeschilderd als onbetrouwbaar. Zo hoorde ik vorige week een discussie op BBC World Service, waar men sprak over waarnemers als onbetrouwbaar….. Tja, zo kan je alsnog als agressor zeggen, dat democratische verkiezingen in een land dat je toch al wilt aanvallen, ongeldig zijn!!

Zie ook: ‘Deutschland verschärft die Gangart gegen China‘ (Duitsland stopt met toenadering tot China; met grote instemming van de VS terreurentiteit)

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Cumings’.

Westerse bemoeienis met Syrië en de anti-Russische propaganda leugens (in de media)………

Posted on February 22, 2016June 14, 2024 by Willem Wachtmeester

Het volgende artikel vond ik afgelopen vrijdag op Information Clearing House, hierin aandacht voor de smerige westerse anti-Rusland / anti-Assad propaganda. Enorme leugens, die desnoods een paar dagen later onderuit worden gehaald met nieuwe leugens, als het zo uitkomt. Als één van de laatste ‘wapenfeiten’ op dat gebied, de totaal ongefundeerde leugen dat Rusland ziekenhuizen zou hebben gebombardeerd, o.a. een ziekenhuis van Artsen Zonder Grenzen (MSF)…… U kan voor een vertaling onder het artikel klikken op Dutch, dat neemt wel enige tijd in beslag:

Russia
Lances the Poison in Syria

By
Finian Cunningham

February
18, 2016 “Information
Clearing House”
– “SCF”
– Less than five months after Russian President Vladimir
Putin ordered military intervention in Syria, the five-year war has
been completely transformed. Peace is far from certain as a tentative
truce this week will attest. The conflict may even escalate. But what
Russia’s intervention has certainly achieved is to squeeze out into
the open the poisonous forces of regime change that have brought
Syria to its dire condition.

Not
only is the Syrian state pulled back from the brink of collapse into
a terrorist-run failed entity, as befell «NATO liberated» Libya,
but the Russian air strikes like a surgical operation have lanced the
noxious inflammation festering in Syria. All sorts of poisons are now
oozing and being exposed, primarily the nefarious roles played by
Western powers, their regional allies, and the toxic lies propounded
by the Western news media to cover for crimes against peace.

If
it were not for the gravity of human suffering, the situation could
be seen as almost comical, owing to the Western contortions to hide
reality. Western governments and their servile media are falling over
themselves with ever-changing stories and spin, accusing Russian
military operations of all sorts of crimes: killing civilians,
hitting hospitals, exacerbating the refugee crisis, targeting
«moderate rebels», or «propping up a dictator».

This
week, the Western media rushed to implicate Russia or the allied
Syrian army in striking hospitals and schools in Azaz and Maarat
al-Numan near the Turkish border. Some 11 people were killed at the
latter facility, which is supported by the French medical group
Doctors Without Borders (DWB). No evidence was presented to support
the high-flown claims in the Western media accusing Russia. Russia
denied any involvement, while the Syrian government said that the
US-led forces carried out the attacks. Meanwhile, all week Turkish
military were launching hundreds of artillery volleys across the
border into the very area around Azaz where the hospitals were hit.
But Western media did not question Turkey about its violation of
Syrian sovereignty or the possibility that the errant strikes could
have been inflicted by Turkish forces, perhaps even as a false flag
to impute Russia.

Last
week, the US military spokesman Colonel Steve Warren blamed Russia
for air strikes on two hospitals in Aleppo City. Russian defense
ministry spokesman General Igor Konashenkov responded by saying that
Russian aircraft were not active in the city that day, Wednesday, and
that Russian surveillance data in fact showed that two US warplanes
had bombed Aleppo.

It
is not clear who did strike the DWB-supported hospital in this week.
But one established relevant fact is that it was the Americans
who bombed a
DWB hospital in Afghanistan last October, killing some 30 staff and
patients. Also, in Yemen, the US-backed Saudi bombing coalition
striking that country have routinely
hit DWB and other hospitals on numerous dates over recent
months, as even confirmed by DWB.

One
other feat of narrative-contortion was given by
US envoy to Syria Brett McGurk, who told Congressional lawmakers last
week that Russia was «directly helping Islamic State terrorists»
from its military intervention in Syria. Another warped spiel was
that of US government-owned outlet Voice
of America which claimed that
Russia’s air strikes were pushing moderate rebels to join the ranks
of extremist militia.

Any
and all narratives are hastily churned out, it seems, to avoid the
obvious, real story: Russia has saved Syria from a covert war of
aggression waged by foreign powers who have been using terrorist
proxies for the objective of regime change.

That’s
it in a nutshell. Russia should be commended, if objective analysis
were to prevail. But objective analysis must not prevail in Western
media narratives because that would expose the toxic role of their
governments and their own criminal complicity in distorting the
conflict in Syria.

In
a recent «backgrounder» on the Syrian war, here is how the
British state-owned BBC «explained» what’s
happening: «More
than 250,000 Syrians have lost their lives in four-and-a-half years
of armed conflict, which began with anti-government protests before
escalating into a full-scale civil war. More than 11 million others
have been forced from their homes as forces loyal to President Bashar
al-Assad and those opposed to his rule battle each other – as well
as jihadist militants from so-called Islamic State».

The BBC tells
it like a guileless fairytale, which in its simplistic telling is
itself guileful. Note how in the BBC narrative the
«jihadist militants» appear from nowhere as if they are an
accidental walk-on sideshow; and how, as if by magic,
«anti-government protests escalated into a full-scale civil war».

This
is the kind of toxic nonsense that Western governments and their
evidently dutiful news media have been pumping into the consciousness
of their public’s minds for the past five years.

But
now that Russia has entered the fray, the poison is oozing out from
the Syrian wound.

The
Turkish state of Recep Tayyip Erdogan this week is shelling Syrian
territory in what any fair-minded person would describe as an act of
aggression towards a sovereign country. Ankara is claiming it is
attacking «terrorist» Syrian Kurdish militia, the YPG. Not
unrelated is the fact that the YPG last week inflicted heavy losses
on the jihadist mercenaries that Ankara has been supporting, when the
Kurds took over Menagh airbase.

NATO
member Turkey has reportedly hit
Kurdish villages in Aleppo Province causing civilian casualties, as
well as Syrian army positions and Russia’s airbase in Latakia, whom
the Kurdish YPG have been liaising with.

Saudi
Arabia is sending fighter
jets to the NATO airbase at Incirlik in Turkey’s Adana Province,
allegedly to begin combat operations against the Islamic State terror
group in Syria. Turkey and Saudi Arabia are readying a
ground invasion of Syria, with the approval of the Pentagon.

If
we step back from the commotion, it is patent that what is unfolding
here is flagrant aggression, which the Syrian government has
protested to the United Nations Security Council. But with the US,
Britain and France – executive powers in the regime-change war on
Syria – the UNSC will simply bury the legitimate protests from
Damascus.

The
unavoidable conclusion is that NATO – the US-led military alliance
supposedly maintaining global security – has openly become a
belligerent in the Syrian war. The obvious factor is that Russia’s
intervention has cut off the Turkish-Saudi-NATO channels to the
regime-change terrorist brigades inside Syria. Turkey’s murderous
shoot-down of a Russian bomber jet last November – with apologetics
from Washington and other NATO members – was the initial, desperate
response to Russian success in thwarting the covert war.

The
severance of the NATO mercenaries in Aleppo from their lifeline in
Turkey is further evidence of Russia’s deep incision into the
poison. Turkey and Saudi Arabia’s war mobilization and their
tortuous pretexts is straining credulity and straining Western media
efforts at trying to sanitize what is going on.

US
Defense Secretary Ashton Carter may have publicly endorsed the
plan for Saudi and Turkish military intervention in Syria under the
laughable guise of «fighting terrorism». But it is also clear that
Washington has become unnerved by the runaway train wreck it is
riding with these two rogue states. France and Germany are also
calling for Turkey to cease its cross-border shelling of Syria.

US
Vice President Joe Biden, who only weeks ago was in Ankara chumming
it up with the Erdogan regime, reportedly phoned
Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu last weekend urging him to
call off the artillery fire into Syria.

Voice
of America reported: «US
officials say there is little to be done to counter militarily the
Russian-backed Assad offensive and they argue the vicious
five-year-long Syrian civil war that has left upwards of 250,000 dead
won’t be resolved by the clash of arms but through a negotiated
political settlement».

US
Secretary of State John Kerry desperately wants «peace talks» in
Geneva because he knows the covert war is on a losing streak. Peace
talk is just a cover for political wrangling for regime change. But
the Russians are having none of it. Moscow is going to wipe out the
foreign-backed mercenaries and stick to the principle of Syrian
sovereignty for mapping the country’s political future. The US
State Department is in a bind. It has backed a loser, but the
impetuous, irrational Erdogan and Saudi clients are not giving up on
their regime change fantasies.

Washington
is being ensnared in its own toxic contradictions. It has led the
criminal scheme for regime change in Syria, instrumented by Turkey
and Saudi Arabia in weaponizing radical jihadist mercenaries. As
the New York Times recently admitted: «The
Russians have cut off may of the pathways the CIA has been using for
a not-very-secret effort to arm rebel [that is, terrorist] groups».

Russian
Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev told the
Munich Security Conference last weekend that Syria was in danger of
escalating into all-out international war. His warnings were scoffed
by Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir as being alarmist – this
from an advocate of foreign aggression on Syria!

Medvedev’s
warnings are not at all alarmist. They are realist. Frighteningly
realist. Russia’s intervention in Syria is demonstrating the
complete lawlessness of Washington and its NATO and regional allies.
Syria is not in the grip of a «civil war» as the Western media
fabricate. Syria is in the crosshairs of foreign powers and their
criminal project to destroy a country for their twisted geopolitical
ambitions.

Before
Russia’s operation, Syria was a shackled patient being amputated
upon, injected with all kinds of poisons and generally being
violated. The Western media were the orderlies who pulled a screen
across this obscenity so that the public would not know. This vile
charade can no longer be concealed. The US-led NATO, Arab, terrorist
covert war on Syria is there for all to see, and it is largely down
to Russia for exposing the despicable crime.

The
truth is no guarantee of peace. But in order to eventually arrive at
a peace, we at least need to learn of truth.

Click
for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French,
translation- Note- Translation
may take a moment to load.

-See more at:http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44259.htm#sthash.syQRL10g.dpuf

Zie ook: ‘‘Perstituees’ aan het werk, ofwel de reguliere westerse afhankelijke media van dag tot dag…..‘

en: ‘Breedlove (NAVO) ‘spreekt weer eens uit de nek’: Rusland moet aanvoer hulpgoederen bombarderen!!‘

en: ‘CIA erkent dat Israël samen met Saoedi-Arabië ‘vecht tegen terreur’, die ze NB zelf hebben georganiseerd……..‘

en: ‘VS centraal commando werkt in Syrië samen met IS en verklaarde Rusland de oorlog………‘

en: ‘CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………‘

en: ‘Al Qaida de bondgenoot van de VS in de strijd tegen…… terrorisme! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘ (intussen heeft de VS ‘Al Qaida Syrië’ van de zwarte lijst met terreurorganisaties gehaald!!)

en: ‘CIA valt nogmaals door de mand als wapenleverancier van IS…….‘

en: ‘Van Baalen (VVD EU topgraaier) het is moeilijk te zien wie je moet steunen: Al Qaida, Al Qaida of Al Qaida……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘

Klik voor meer berichten volgend uit het voorgaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: McGurk en Warren.

Ash Carter’s (VS BuZa) leugens over IS olieleveranties aan Turkije

Posted on February 4, 2016June 14, 2024 by Willem Wachtmeester

De volgende video vond ik op de site van Information Clearing House. Hierin zet de VS minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, Ash Carter zichzelf te kakken, aangaande de VS wetenschap over de olieleveringen van IS aan NAVO partner Turkije.

E.e.a. kwam pas echt in de openbaarheid, nadat Rusland Syrië te hulp schoot. Dit is één van de vele bewijzen van het gore spel, dat de VS in het Midden Oosten speelt, met o.a. trainingen en leveringen van wapens aan terreurgroepen als IS in Syrië en Irak. Overigens naar nu blijkt steunt ook Nederland dezelfde (‘gematigde’) terreur-oppositie al langere tijd, dit via Saoedi-Arabië…….*

Zie de ploert stumperen:

Watch
Ash Carter Lie About Why He Let Turkey Supply ISIL with Oil

(Video):

One
of the most embarrassing things to come out of the Russian military
venture in Syria is the huge convoy supply lines of oil moving
between Turkey and ISIS positions.

Watch America’s finest
mumble their way through explanations of why they have let this go on
for two years.

Priceless.

Carter deserves an Academy
Award.

McCain, Carter and the rest of the Washington insiders
clearly knew about ISIS oil trading all along.

Posted
February 03, 2015

* Zie: ‘Koenders steunt ‘gematigde Syrische terreur-oppositie’ via Saoedi-Arabië‘

Zie ook: ‘Koenders wil zich bij illegale oorlogvoering in Syrië wel aan het oorlogsrecht houden….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt, dit geldt niet voor de labels ‘Ash Carter’ en ‘McCain’.

Laatst bijgewerkt op 5 februari 2016.