Aanstelling Michele Flournoy als minister van ‘defensie’ onder Biden, heeft niets met feminisme van doen

De aanstelling van Michele Flournoy als
minister van defensie (lees: oorlog), b
ejubeld
als voorbeeld voor gelijkheid van man en vrouw*,
heeft niets van doen met
feminisme, zo betoogt Caitlin Johnstone volkomen terecht in een artikel over deze
aanstelling, de kop boven haar artikel luidt dan ook: ‘This Isn’t
Feminism, It’s Imperialism In Pumps’.

Flournoy
heeft een heel smerige geschiedenis achter zich bij het Pentagon en ‘zou een baken
zijn geweest voor internationale militaire samenwerking’ (o.a. in
hulp bij militaire staatsgrepen in het buitenland)…… Onder Obama
heeft Flournoy een topfunctie vervuld op dat Pentagon en als zodanig
is ze medeverantwoordelijk voor de coup in Honduras tegen de democratisch gekozen president Zelaya en die in Oekraïne
tegen de democratisch gekozen* president Janoekovytsj…… Voorts is de VS mede verantwoordelijk voor de illgele oorlog tegen Libië, die dat eens rijkste land van Afrika in diepe ellende heeft gestort zodat het nu tot de armste landen van dat continent behoort…… Ofwel
‘feminist’ Flournoy staat tot ver over de pumps in het bloed van mensen die zijn
omgekomen door VS ingrijpen in die periode…….

Caitlin
ergert zich aan de kwalificaties die Flournoy worden toegedicht, zo
zou haar gematigde (‘moderate’) zienswijze steun verzekeren van beide partijen
(Democraten en Republikeinen, Ap) en dat in een positie die door
de senaat moet worden goedgekeurd……. (de senaat die vooralsnog in
handen is van de Republikeinen en dat hoogstwaarschijnlijk zal
blijven)

Het
woord ‘gematigd’ in samenhang met Michele Flournoy is als de
gematigdheid van de zogenaamde gematigde rebellen in Syrië, die
het westen zo bejubelde (zowel in politiek als media), maar die uiteindelijk moordenaars, verkrachters,
martelbeulen en slavenhandelaars/houders bleken te zijn…..
(overigens werden mensen die dit van meet af aan stelden afgedaan als
Assad propagandisten door die westerse politiek en media….)…..

Flournoy
is een bloeddorstige en oorlogswinstmaker aldus Caitlin, die teven de
uitspraak van Medea Benjamin en Nicholas JS Davies aanhaalt die haar
een ‘angel of death’ noemen en die als leider van het ministerie met
de belachelijke aanduiding ‘defensie’ (lees: oorlog) het overzicht zal hebben over
dezelfde agenda van haar voorgangers, de eenzijdige globale
overheersing van de VS, die verantwoordelijk was en is voor rivieren
gevuld met bloed en dat min of meer op dezelfde manier als die
voorgangers…… Niet zo vreemd als je nagaat dat Joe Biden al ver
voor de verkiezingen de Trump administratie slapheid verweet in het
optreden tegen staten als Iran en Venezuela…… Terwijl de immense
terreur van de Trump administratie in de vorm van sancties al enorm
veel doden heeft gekost, in Venezuela zou dit al aan 50.000
mensen het leven hebben gekost…… Als je die terreur
afschildert als slapheid is er van Biden maar één ding te
verwachten: oorlog tegen die landen!!!

Caitlin stelt in haar artikel uiterst sarcastisch (maar alweer volkomen terecht) dat ‘de VS trots mag zijn’, er komt een intersectioneel kabinet met vrouwen die o.a massamoordenaar zijn………. Uiteraard gaat ze verder in op de rol man en vrouw en wat dit betekent in de dagelijkse politieke en ambtelijke praktijk. 

Lees
het volgende schrijven van Caitlin en zegt het voort, tijd dat de
wereld inziet dat oorlogsmisdadigers Biden en Flournoy verantwoordelijk zullen zijn voor
de volgende golf van VS terreur over de wereld en dat deze alweer een stuk groter zal zijn dan onder Trump…….. Maar ja wat wil je? De VS is immers het Vierde Rijk en tevens verreweg de grootste terreurentiteit ter wereld…… In het westen roept men halleluja over de winst van Biden, maar aan hoeveel arme drommels zal dit het leven kosten…???

This
Isn’t Feminism, It’s Imperialism In Pumps

by Caitlin
Johnstone

“President-elect
Joe Biden is expected to take a historic step and select a woman to
head the Pentagon for the first time, shattering one of the few
remaining barriers to women in the department and the presidential
Cabinet,” reads a
new
report from the AP
.
“Michele Flournoy, a politically moderate Pentagon veteran, is
regarded by U.S. officials and political insiders as a top choice for
the position.”

“Seen
as a steady hand who favors strong military cooperation abroad,
Flournoy, 59, has served multiple times in the Pentagon, starting in
the 1990s and most recently as the undersecretary of defense for
policy from 2009 to 2012,” says the AP. “She serves on the
board of Booz Allen Hamilton, a defense contractor, which could raise
concerns from some lawmakers. But her moderate views would likely
ensure wide bipartisan support in a position that requires Senate
confirmation.”


AP Politics



@AP_Politics

President-elect Joe Biden is expected to take a historic step and select a woman to head the Pentagon for the first time. U.S. officials and political insiders regard Michele Flournoy as a top choice for the job. http://apne.ws/yb51l0v

Biden likely to break barriers, pick woman to lead PentagonWASHINGTON
(AP) — President-elect Joe Biden is expected to take a historic step
and select a woman to head the Pentagon for the first time, shattering
one of the few remaining barriers to women in…

apnews.com

2,767


827 people are talking about this

This
word “moderate” which the AP news agency keeps bleating is
of course complete nonsense. Standing in the middle ground between
two corporatist warmongering parties does not make you a moderate, it
makes you a corporatist warmonger. Flournoy is no more “moderate”
than the “moderate rebels” in Syria which mass media
outlets like AP praised for years until it became undeniable that
they were
largely
Al Qaeda affiliates
;
the only reason such a position can be portrayed as mainstream and
moderate is because vast fortunes have been poured into making it
that way.

As
we
discussed
recently
,
Flournoy is a bloodthirsty imperialist and war profiteer who peace
activists Medea Benjamin and Nicolas JS Davies

accurately labeled

an “angel of death” for the American empire. As leader of
the laughably titled Department of “Defense” she can be
expected to oversee the same agendas of unipolar global domination at
the expense of rivers of blood as her predecessors, in more or less
exactly the same ways.

There
is nothing special or noteworthy about a murderous ghoul rising to
the top of a war machine that can only be run by murderous ghouls.
But because Michele Flournoy is a woman, we will see her appointment
as “Defense” Secretary applauded and upheld as a major
landmark for women by a political/media class which has never cared
about women beyond their ability to turn the gears of the machine.

And
of course establishment narrative managers are already greasing the
wheels for that applause.


Mieke Eoyang



@MiekeEoyang

White progressives training their fire on women and women of color who are under consideration to lead the nat sec departments makes me deeply uncomfortable about their allyship for those communities.

Especially when the nat sec community is dominated by white men.

2,243

2,773 people are talking about this

“White
progressives training their fire on women and women of color who are
under consideration to lead the nat sec departments makes me deeply
uncomfortable about their allyship for those communities,”
tweeted
MSNBC contributor Mieke Eoyang. “Especially when the nat sec
community is dominated by white men.”

It’s
only going to get dumber from here, folks.

Let’s
clear this up before the girl power parade starts:the first woman to
head the US war machine will not be a groundbreaking pioneer of
feminist achievement. She will be a mass murderer who wears Spanx.
Her appointment will not be an advancement for women, it will be
imperialism in pumps.

Modern
mainstream feminism has abandoned women’s interests so thoroughly and
completely in almost all spheres of importance that it has largely
become only superficially distinct from the patriarchy it purports to
oppose. The plight of mothers, elderly women, young girls, caregivers
and wives have been almost entirely shuffled out of popular
discourse, with focus instead shifted onto discussions about whether
women are being adequately rewarded for their service to the God of
Capitalism, or how they’re just as qualified as men to murder
thousands of people at a time.

Instead
of fighting to correct the societal imbalances which have resulted
from millennia of male domination of society, mainstream feminism now
promotes and applauds the very worst aspects of those imbalances.
Instead of fighting to help women out of the impossible situation
where they’re expected to simultaneously be successful capitalists
and good mothers in an economic system where families can’t survive
on a single income and children and the elderly are being neglected,
we’re getting headlines about murderous warmongers “breaking
barriers” and think pieces about how
women
should be allowed to inherit dukedoms
.


Helen Lewis



@helenlewis

Why can’t a girl inherit a dukedom? In Britain, there’s a new frontier for feminism—the aristocracy. I met the campaigners trying to drag the peerage into the 21st century (and got to pet a horse). https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/11/feminist-aristocrats-who-want-daughters-rights/617067/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share 

When Discrimination Targets the Privileged

The feminist aristocrats fighting for the right of daughters to inherit peerages

theatlantic.com

548


265 people are talking about this

In
a system where dominant cultural narratives are
always
being deliberately twisted

toward the advantage of the powerful, healthy collective impulses
consistently wind up being diverted and corrupted until they find
themselves unwittingly serving the very forces they set out to push
back against. Movements toward racial equality have been twisted into
support for the Democratic Party whose austerity policies and legal
authoritarianism disproportionately hurt racial minorities worse than
anyone else. Movements to elect a Democratic Socialist get funneled
into support for the idiotic Russia conspiracies of the
#Resistance.
Movements to fight patriarchy wind up amplifying the most unhealthy
aspects of patriarchy.

A
true feminism would work toward a reversal of all the unhealthy
aspects of society which were put there by social engineers without
any input from women.

All
around the world for thousands of years, wherever a civilization
sprang up, the larger, stronger gender was naturally in a position to
assert dominance over the way that civilization was run. Leadership
systems were invented by men, social hierarchies were invented by
men, marriage was invented by men, family structural norms were
designed by men, money was invented by men, war was invented by men,
and men invented religions which just so happened to have patriarchal
gods who all agreed that the way men had set things up was indeed
right and just.

Women
were essentially property throughout most of this, and thus had very
little input into how any of it was set up. Generation after
generation after generation of women were born into this
male-engineered society, over thousands and thousands of years, into
a system so deeply and extensively normalized that it’s almost
impossible to imagine what our society might look like had it not
been dominated entirely by men throughout its history.

And
then, very, very recently in the grand scheme of things, a healthy
impulse emerged among women to cease being second-class citizens, and
to instead stand as equals with their brothers.

In
response, after much whining and foot-dragging, the men who ran
things said in effect, “Right. Okay. You want equality? Fine. The
jobs we invented are over there, the capitol building for the
government we invented is over there, the bank for the economic
system we invented is across the street, the Department of War is two
blocks that way, and the Church of the Patriarchal God is around the
corner. Welcome to equality!”

And
some rich guys standing by watching leaned in and whispered to each
other, “Sweet, double the workforce! We can halve their wages!”


Caitlin Johnstone 


@caitoz

Biden Will Have The Most Diverse, Intersectional Cabinet Of Mass Murderers Ever Assembled

“2021, here we come!”https://caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/biden-will-have-the-most-diverse 

Biden Will Have The Most Diverse, Intersectional Cabinet Of Mass Murderers Ever Assembled

Well
you’ll be happy to know that the next US president and his crack team
of ventriloquists are assembling a cabinet of mass murderers that’s as
diverse, inclusive and intersectional as America…

caitlinjohnstone.substack.com

2,223

955 people are talking about this

We
should not be cheering for women rising to the top of a psychopathic
war machine. We should be dismantling that war machine and rolling
back all the conditions which led to it.

True
feminism, which is interested in guiding the world toward balance and
heath in a way that benefits women and their children, would make
this a priority.

Push
against the celebrations of women being elevated to positions which
go directly against the interests of women. Do not let mass murder
and psychopathy become the landmark for success in the kind of world
we are creating for our daughters. Oppose this madness and push for
the kind of world we all know deep down we ought to have.

____________________________

Thanks
for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make
sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list
for at 
my
website
 or on
Substack
,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My
work is 
entirely
reader-supported
,
so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around,
liking me on 
Facebook,
following my antics on 
Twitter, throwing
some money into my tip jar on 
Patreon or Paypal,
purchasing some of my 
sweet
merchandise
,
buying 
my
new book Poems For Rebels
 or
my old book 
Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do
with this platform, 
click
here
.
Everyone, racist platforms excluded, 
has
my permission
 to
republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else
I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

#biden,
#feminism,
#imperialism,
#michele-flournoy,
#news,
#politics,
#war,
#women

Caitlin
Johnstone

| November 15, 2020 at 3:28 am | Tags:
biden,
feminism,
imperialism,
michele
flournoy
,
news,
Politics,
war,
women
| Categories:
Article,
News
| URL:
https://wp.me/p9tj6M-2nY

===============================================

* Flournoy is bepaald niet de enige vrouw die Biden (ofwel zijn poppenspelers) in zijn team wil hebben, naast zijn keus voor Kamala Harris als vicepresident, schijnt hij nog meer vrouwen te willen aanstellen. Dit is overduidelijk een gebaar naar de vrouwlijke achterban van de Democraten, daar een groot deel van die vrouwen Elizabeth Warren als president hadden willen zien….. (en zij was zonder meer een veel slimmere en intelligentere president geweest dan de dementerende kraai Biden…..) Harris is uiteraard een groot gebaar naar de gekleurde bevolking in de VS……..

** Met de nadruk op ‘democratisch gekozen’, daar de VS immers altijd schermt met de leugen dat ze de democratie over de aarde willen verspreiden met haar staatsgrepen en illegale oorlogen, terwijl de praktijk het tegenovergestelde laat zien……. (hetzij door een democratisch gekozen president af te zetten, dan wel een dictator te installeren…..)

Zie ook: ‘Team Biden voor meer censuur op het internet

Green New Deal, ofwel linkse tak van de Democraten niet verantwoordelijk voor mager resultaat dat de partij boekte (bij de verkiezingen) voor het Congres

De hypocrisie van ‘liberale en linkse’ Democratische stemmers

Democratie is meer dan verkiezingen alleen: tijd dat politici dat in hun oren knopen

Met de winst van Biden is het fascisme in de VS bepaald niet weggestemd

Biden (de gekozen VS president) al bezig met aanstelling van door Republikeinse eisen geschikte ‘kabinetsleden’‘ 

Het electorale college in de VS, met ‘kiesmannen’, werd opgetuigd om de slavernij te laten voortbestaan’

VS militarisme marcheert door: geen discussie of media aandacht voor Washingtons oorlog tegen de wereld

VS moordmachine weer in handen van ‘volwassen en bekwame leiding’‘ 

Joe Biden president, echter de peperdure campagne was zo slecht dat de senaat in handen blijft van de Republikeinen……‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht!!)

En ter zijde: De EPA heeft toestemming gegeven om dicamba te herintroduceren op de VS markt, leuk vooruitzicht daar Biden TTIP zal tekenen

Bidens puppeteers verwijten Trump slap buitenlands optreden‘ 

NewsGuard, het nieuwste wapen van Big Brother VS tegen de alternatieve media

NewsGuard
is het nieuwste wapen waarmee de VS overheid, haar geheime diensten,
het militair-industrieel complex, oligarchen, de grote
(corrupte) bedrijven, de financiële sector en dan m.n. de banken, de farmaceutische maffia en uiteraard
de reguliere massamedia de bevolking verder willen manipuleren en waarmee de
alternatieve media de oorlog wordt verklaard….. Sterker nog:
vertegenwoordigers van deze organisaties/bedrijven zijn verbonden aan
NewsGuard…..

NewsGuard
wordt als het straks tegenzit standaard als app ingebouwd in alle
computers en smartphones die in de VS of door VS bedrijven worden
geproduceerd….. Sterker nog Microsoft gebruikt deze app al….

Met
platforms als Facebook en Twitter, die nu al op grote schaal accounts
verwijderen, is de toekomst klaar voor grootschalige
geschiedvervalsing en het brengen van propaganda op een schaal waar
zelfs Goebbels niet van durfde dromen….. Nu al wordt SafeGuard gebruikt door openbare bibliotheken, scholen en universiteiten in de
VS……

Het
zal je niet verbazen dat NewsGuard uiteraard geen moeite heeft met
fake news (nepnieuws) en desinformatie in de reguliere massamedia,
zoals die op CNN en de Washington Post (WaPo), waar aantoonbaar een groot aantal kul
verhalen werden gebracht, waarvoor deze ‘fake news’ organen nooit een rectificatie plaatsten, alles zonder daar ook maar enige kritiek voor te
hebben gekregen van NewsGuard…… Waar collega ‘s van deze VS nieuwsmedia met grote graagte de leugens van deze twee hebben geholpen door verdere verspreiding van die leugens…… (zoals je begrijpt geldt dit ook voor de rest van de westerse massamedia)


Het voorgaande is niet zo vreemd als je ziet dat de reguliere massamedia in handen zijn van oligarchen en grote investeringsgroepen, groepen die het grootste belang hebben bij het bewaren van de huidige status quo en het opjagen van winsten met propaganda, zoals die voor de wapenfabrikanten, waaronder ik ook de fabrikanten reken die rollend, varend en vliegens oorlogstuig produceren….. 


Overigens zijn ook publieke zendgemachtigden al lang niet meer onafhankelijk, ze worden grotendeels door de staat betaald en je weet het: wiens brood men eet diens woord men spreekt!! (klik voor de gein op het label NOS, direct onder dit bericht)


Schokkend te lezen dat het American Enterprise Institute (AEI) al 4 jaar voor 911 pleitte voor een nieuws Pearl Harbour, om meer steun te verkrijgen voor het militaire apparaat en de terreur die het in het buitenland uitoefent (alleen deze eeuw al meer dan 2,5 moorden….)…..

Lees
het uitstekende relaas van Whitney Webb over griezelorganisatie NewsGuard,
die gegarandeerd ook in de rest van het westen zal worden geïntroduceerd, althans als dat nog nodig is, nadat bedrijven als
Microsoft de NewsGuard app al hebben overgenomen……. (let op: als je gisteren mijn bericht met de volgende titel hebt gelezen: ‘
Britse militaire geheime dienst bedient zich van moddergooien en andere manipulaties om Europese en VS politiek te manipuleren, zo blijkt uit gelekte documenten, op basis van een artikel van William Blumenthal en Mark Ames, zal het je opvallen dat een paar afbeeldingen gebruikt door Webb, een dag eerder door Blumenthal en Ames in hun artikel werden gebruikt, zoals Webb ook een paar kleine delen overnam van de tekst daarbij)

NewsGuard
Launches War on Alternative Media

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor NewsGuard Launches War on Alternative Media


January
9, 2019 at 10:39 pm

Written
by 
Whitney
Webb

(MPN) —
Soon after the social media “purge” of independent media sites
and pages this past October, a top neoconservative insider — Jamie
Fly — 
was
caught
 stating
that the mass deletion of anti-establishment and anti-war pages on
Facebook and Twitter was “just the beginning” of a concerted
effort by the U.S. government and powerful corporations to silence
online dissent within the United States and beyond.

While
a few, relatively uneventful months in the online news sphere have
come and gone since Fly made this ominous warning, it appears that
the neoconservatives and other standard bearers of the
military-industrial complex and the U.S. oligarchy are now poised to
let loose their latest digital offensive against independent media
outlets that seek to expose wrongdoing in both the private and public
sectors.

As MintPress
News
 Editor-in-Chief
Mnar Muhawesh 
recently
wrote
MintPress was
informed that it was under review by an organization called Newsguard
Technologies, which described itself to 
MintPress as
simply a “news rating agency” and asked Muhawesh to comment on a
series of allegations, several of which were blatantly untrue.
However, further examination of this organization reveals that it is
funded by and deeply connected to the U.S. government,
neo-conservatives, and powerful monied interests, all of whom have
been working overtime since the 2016 election to silence dissent to
American forever-wars and corporate-led oligarchy.

More
troubling still, Newsguard — by virtue of its deep connections to
government and Silicon Valley — is lobbying to have its rankings of
news sites installed by default on computers in U.S.
public libraries, schools, and universities as well as on all
smartphones and computers sold in the United States.

In
other words, as Newsguard’s project advances, it will soon become
almost impossible to avoid this neocon-approved news site’s ranking
systems on any technological device sold in the United States. Worse
still, if its efforts to quash dissenting voices in the U.S. are
successful, Newsguard promises that its next move will be to take its
system global.

Red
light, green light . . .

Newsguard
has received considerable attention in the mainstream media of late,
having been the subject of a 
slew
of articles
 in
the 
Washington
Post, the Hill
the
Boston Globe, Politico, Bloomberg, Wired, 
and
many others just over the past few months. Those articles portray
Newsguard as using “old-school journalism” to fight “fake news”
through its reliance on nine criteria allegedly intended to separate
the wheat from the chaff when it comes to online news.

Newsguard
separates sites it deems worthy and sites it considers unreliable by
using a color-coded rating — green, yellow, or red — and more
detailed “nutrition labels” regarding a site’s credibility or
lack thereof. Rankings are created by Newsguard’s team of “trained
analysts.” The color-coding system may remind some readers of the
color-coded terror threat-level warning system that was created after
9/11, making it worth noting that Tom Ridge, the former secretary of
Homeland Security (DHS) who oversaw the implementation of that system under
George W. Bush, is on Newsguard’s 
advisory
board
.

As
Newsguard releases a new rating of a site, that rating automatically
spreads to all computers that have installed its news ranking browser
plug-in. That plug-in is currently available for free for the most
commonly used internet browsers. NewsGuard directly markets the
browser plug-in to libraries, schools and internet users in general.

According
to 
its
website
,
Newsguard has rated more than 2,000 news and information sites.
However, it plans to take its ranking efforts much farther
by 
eventually
reviewing
 “the
7,500 most-read news and information websites in the U.S.—about 98
percent of news and information people read and share online” in
the United States in English.

recent
Gallup study,
 which
was supported and funded by Newsguard as well as the Knight
Foundation (itself a major investor in Newsguard), stated that a
green rating increased users likelihood to share and read content
while a red rating decreased that likelihood. Specifically, it found
63 percent would be less likely to share news stories from red-rated
websites, and 56 percent would be more likely to share news from
green-rated websites, though the fact that Newsguard and one of its
top investors funded the poll makes it necessary to take these
findings with a grain of salt.

However,
some of the rankings Newsguard itself has publicized show that it is
manifestly uninterested in fighting “misinformation.” How else to
explain the fact that the 
Washington
Post
 and CNN both
received high scores even though both have written stories or made
statements that later proved to be entirely false? For example,
CNN 
falsely
claimed
 in
2016 that it was illegal for Americans to read WikiLeaks releases and
illegally colluded with the DNC to craft presidential debate
questions.

In
addition, in 2017, CNN published 
a
fake story
 that
a Russian bank linked to a close ally of President Donald Trump was
under Senate investigation. That same year, CNN was forced to retract
a report that the Trump campaign had been tipped off early about
WikiLeaks documents damaging to Hillary Clinton when it later learned
the alert was about material already publicly available.

The Washington
Post
,
whose $600 million 
conflict
of interest with the CIA
 goes
unnoted by Newsguard, has also published false stories since the 2016
election, including 
one
article
 that
falsely claimed that “Russian hackers” had tapped into Vermont’s
electrical grid. It was later found that the grid itself was never
breached and the “hack” was only an isolated laptop with a minor
malware problem. Yet, such acts of journalistic malpractice are
apparently of little concern to Newsguard when those committing such
acts are big-name corporate media outlets.

NewsGuard


@NewsGuardRating

Can you distinguish between propaganda and a free press? NewsGuard can help.


6

4:15 PM – Nov 6, 2018

See NewsGuard’s other Tweets

Furthermore,
Newsguard gives a high rating to 
Voice
of America
,
the U.S. state-funded media outlet, even though its former acting
associate director 
said that
the outlet produces “fluff journalism” and despite the fact that
it was recently reformed to “provide news that supports our [U.S.]
national security objectives.” However, 
RT receives
a low “red” rating
 for
being funded by the Russian government and for “raising doubts
about other countries and their institutions” (i.e., including
reporting critical of the institutions and governments of the U.S.
and its allies).

Keeping
the conversation safe for the corporatocracy

Newsguard describes
itself
 as
an organization dedicated to “restoring trust and accountability”
and using “journalism to fight false news, misinformation and
disinformation.” While it 
repeatedly
claims
 on
its website that its employees “have no political axes to grind”
and “care deeply about reliable journalism’s pivotal role in
democracy,” a quick look at its co-founders, top funders and
advisory board make it clear that Newsguard is aimed at curbing
voices that hold the powerful — in both government and the private
sector — to account.

Newsguard
is the latest venture to result from the partnership between Steven
Brill and Louis Gordon Crovitz, who currently serve as co-CEOs of the
group. Brill is a long-time journalist — published
in 
TIME and The
New Yorker
,
among others — who most recently founded the Yale Journalism
Initiative, which 
aims
to encourage
 Yale
students who “aspire to contribute to democracy in the United
States and around the world” to become journalists at top U.S. and
international media organizations. He first teamed up with Crovitz in
2009 
to
create
 Journalism
Online
,
which sought to make the online presence of top American newspapers
and other publishers profitable, and was also 
the
CEO of the company
 that
partnered up with the TSA to offer “registered” travelers the
ability to move more quickly through airport security — for a
price, of course.

While
Brill’s past does not in itself raise red flags, Crovitz — his
partner in founding 
Journalism
Online
,
then Press+, and now Newsguard — is the last person one would
expect to find promoting any legitimate effort to “restore trust
and accountability” in journalism. In the early 1980s.
Crovitz 
held a
number of positions at Dow Jones and at the 
Wall
Street Journal
,
eventually becoming executive vice president of the former and the
publisher of the latter before both were sold to Rupert Murdoch’s
News Corp in 2007. He is also a board member of 
Business
Insider
,
which has received 
over
$30 million
 from Washington
Post
 owner
Jeff Bezos in recent years.

In
addition to being a member of the Council on Foreign Relations,
Crovitz proudly notes in his bio, 
available
on Newsguard’s website
,
that he has been an “editor or contributor to books published by
the American Enterprise Institute and Heritage Foundation.” Though
many 
MintPress readers
are likely familiar with these two institutions, for those who are
not, it is worth pointing out that the American Enterprise Institute
(AEI) is one of the most influential neoconservative think tanks in
the country and its “scholars,” directors and fellows have
included neoconservative figures like Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle,
John Bolton and Frederick Kagan.

During
the George W. Bush administration, AEI was instrumental in promoting
the invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq and has since
advocated for militaristic solutions to U.S. foreign policy
objectives and the expansion of the U.S.’ military empire as well
as the “War on Terror.”

During
the Bush years, AEI was also closely associated with the now defunct
and controversial neoconservative organization known as the Project
for a New American Century (PNAC), which presciently called, four
years before 9/11, for a “new Pearl Harbor” as needed to rally
support behind American military adventurism.

The
Heritage Foundation, like AEI, was also supportive of the war in Iraq
and has pushed for the expansion of the War on Terror and U.S.
missile defense and military empire. Its corporate donors over the
years have included Procter & Gamble, Chase Manhattan Bank, Dow
Chemical, and Exxon Mobil, among others.

Crovitz’s
associations with AEI and the Heritage Foundation, as well as his
ties to Wall Street and the upper echelons of corporate media, are
enough to make any thinking person question his commitment to being a
fair watchdog of “legitimate journalism.” Yet, beyond his
innumerable connections to neoconservatives and powerful monied
interest, Crovitz has 
repeatedly
been accused
 of
inserting misinformation into his 
Wall
Street Journal
 columns,
with groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation accusing him of
repeatedly
getting his facts wrong

on NSA surveillance and other issues. Some of the blatant falsehoods
that have appeared in Crovitz’s work have never been corrected,
even when 
his
own sources 
called
him out
 for
misinformation.

For
example, in a 
WSJ opinion
piece 
that
was written by Crovitz in 2012, Crovitz was accused of making
“fantastically false claims” about the history of the internet by
the very people he had cited to support those claims.

As TechDirt wrote
at the time:

Almost
everyone he [Crovitz] sourced or credited to support his argument
that the internet was invented entirely privately at Xerox PARC and
when Vint Cerf helped create TCP/IP, has spoken out to say he’s
wrong. And that list includes both
 Vint
Cerf, himself,
 and Xerox.
Other sources, including Robert Taylor (who was there when the
internet was invented) and
 Michael
Hiltzik
,
have rejected Crovitz’s spinning of their own stories.”

The
oligarch team’s deep bench

While
Brill and Crovitz’s connections alone should be enough cause for
alarm, a cursory examination of Newsguard’s 
advisory
board

makes it clear that Newsguard was created to serve the interests of
American oligarchy. Chief among Newsguard’s advisors are Tom Ridge,
the first Secretary of Homeland Security under George W. Bush and
Ret. General Michael Hayden, a former CIA director, a former NSA
director and principal at 
the
Chertoff Group
,
a security consultancy seeking to “advise corporate clients and
governments, including foreign governments” on security matters
that was co-founded by former Homeland Security Secretary Michael
Chertoff, who also currently serves as the 
board
chairman
 of
major weapons manufacturer BAE systems.

Another
Newsguard advisor of note is Richard Stengel, former editor
of 
Time magazine,
a “
distinguished
fellow

at the Atlantic Council and Undersecretary of State for Public
Diplomacy under President Barack Obama. At a panel discussion hosted
last May by the Council on Foreign Relations, Stengel 
described his
past position at the State Department as “
chief
propagandist

and also stated that he is “
not
against propaganda. Every country does it and they have to do it to
their own population and I don’t necessarily think it’s that
awful
.”

(de video, waarvan de still in het hieronder weergegeven artikel kan ik niet overnemen, zie daarvoor het origineel)

Embedded video

William Craddick@williamcraddick

At a Council on Foreign Relations forum about “fake news,” former Editor at Time Magazine Richard Stengel directly states that he supports the use of propaganda on American citizens – then shuts the session down when challenged about how propaganda is used against the third world


1,278

8:42 PM – May 11, 2018

Other
Newsguard advisors include Don Baer, former White House
communications director and advisor to Bill Clinton and 
current
chairman
 of
both PBS and the influential PR firm Burson Cohn & Wolfe as well
as Elise Jordan, former communications director for the National
Security Council and former speech-writer for Condoleezza Rice, as
well as the 
widow of
slain journalist Michael Hastings — who was writing an exposé on
former CIA director John Brennan at the time of his suspicious death.

A
look at Newguard’s investors further illustrates the multifarious
connections between this organization and the American political and
corporate elite. While Brill and Crovitz themselves are the company’s
top investors, one of Newsguard’s 
most
important investors
 is
the Publicis Groupe. Publicis is the 
third
largest
 global
communications company in the world, with more than 80,000 employees
in over 100 countries and an annual revenue of over €9.6 billion
($10.98 billion) in 2017. It is no stranger to controversy, as one of
its subsidiaries, 
Qorvis,
recently came under fire for 
exploiting U.S.
veterans at the behest of the Saudi government and also helped the
Saudi government to “
whitewash
its human rights record and its genocidal war in Yemen after
receiving $6 million from the Gulf Kingdom in 2017.

Furthermore,
given its size and influence, it is unsurprising that the Publicis
Groupe counts many powerful corporations and governments among its
clientele. Some of its 
top
clients
 in
2018 included pharmaceutical giants Eli Lilly, Merck, Pfizer and
Bayer/Monsanto as well as Starbucks, Procter & Gamble, McDonalds,
Kraft Heinz, Burger King, and the governments of Australia and Saudi
Arabia. Given its influential role in funding Newsguard, it is
reasonable to point out the potential conflict of interest posed by
the fact that sites that accurately report on Publicis’ powerful
clients — but generate bad publicity — could be targeted for such
reports in Newsguard’s ranking.

In
addition to the Publicis Groupe, another major investor in Newsguard
is the Blue Haven Initiative, which is the venture capital “impact
investment” fund of the 
wealthy
Pritzker family
 —
one of the top 10 wealthiest families in the U.S., best known as the
owners of the Hyatt Hotel chain and for being the 
second
largest
 financial
contributors to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.


Other
top investors include 
John
McCarter
,
a long-time executive at U.S. government contractor Booz Allen
Hamilton, as well as 
Thomas
Glocer
,
former CEO of Reuters and a member of the boards of pharmaceutical
giant Merck & Co., financial behemoth Morgan Stanley, and the
Council on Foreign Relations, as well as a member of the Atlantic
Council’s International Advisory Board.

Through
these investors, Newsguard managed to raise 
$6
million
 to
begin its ranking efforts in March of 2018. Newsguard’s actual
revenues and financing, however, have not been disclosed despite the
fact that it requires the sites it ranks to disclose their funding.
In a display of pure hypocrisy, Newsguard’s United States
Securities and Exchange Commission 
Form
D
 —
which was filed March 5, 2018 — states that the company “declined
to disclose” the size of its total revenue.

Why
give folks a choice?

While
even a quick glance at its advisory board alone would be enough for
many Americans to decline to install Newsguard’s browser extension
on their devices, the danger of Newsguard is the fact that it is
diligently working to make the adoption of its app 
involuntary.
Indeed, if voluntary adoption of Newsguard’s app were the case,
there would likely be little cause for concern, given that its
website attracts barely more than 
300
visits per month
 and
its social-media following is relatively small, with just over
2,000 
Twitter
followers
 and
barely 500 
Facebook
likes
 at
the time of this article’s publication.

To
illustrate its slip-it-under-the-radar strategy, Newsguard has gone
directly to state governments to push its browser extension onto
entire state public library systems, even though its website suggests
that individual public libraries are welcome to install the extension
if they so choose. The first state to install Newsguard on 
all
of its public library computers
 across
its 51 branches was the state of Hawaii — which was the first to
partner with Newsguard’s “news literacy initiative,” just last
month.

NewsGuard

@NewsGuardRating

Aloha, Hawaiian libraries! The state has added the NewsGuard extension to the computers patrons use in all its public libraries. Thanks to for sponsoring news literacy. http://bigislandnow.com/2018/12/17/libraries-join-newsguard-in-news-literacy-partnership/ 


10

11:49 PM – Dec 17, 2018

According
to 
local
media
,
Newsguard “now works with library systems representing public
libraries across the country, and is also partnering with middle
schools, high schools, universities, and educational organizations to
support their news literacy efforts,” suggesting that these
Newsguard services targeting libraries and schools are soon to become
a compulsory component of the American library and education system,
despite Newsguard’s glaring conflicts of interest with massive
multinational corporations and powerful government power-brokers.

Notably,
Newsguard has a powerful partner that has allowed it to start finding
its way into public library and school computers throughout the
country. As part of its new “Defending Democracy” initiative,
Microsoft announced last August that it would be partnering with
Newsguard to actively market the company’s ranking app and other
services to libraries and schools throughout the country.
Microsoft’s 
press
release
 regarding
the partnership states that Newsguard “will empower voters by
providing them with high-quality information about the integrity and
transparency of online news sites.”

Since
then, Microsoft has 
now
added
 the
Newsguard app as a built-in feature of Microsoft Edge, its browser
for iOS and Android mobile devices, and is unlikely to stop there.
Indeed, as a 
recent
report
 in
favor of Microsoft’s partnership with Newsguard noted, “we could
hope that this new partnership will allow Microsoft to add NewsGuard
to Edge on Windows 10 [operating system for computers] as well.”

Newsguard,
for its part, seems confident that its app will soon be added by
default to all mobile devices. On its website, the organization 
notes
that
 “NewsGuard
will be available on mobile devices when the digital platforms such
as social media sites and search engines or mobile operating systems
add our ratings and Nutrition Labels directly.” This shows that
Newsguard isn’t expecting its rating systems to be offered as a
downloadable application for mobile devices but something that social
media sites like Facebook, search engines like Google, and mobile
device operating systems that are dominated by Apple and Google will
“directly” integrate into nearly every smartphone and tablet sold
in the United States.

Boston
Globe
 article
on Newsguard from this past October makes this plan even more clear.
The 
Globe wrote at
the time:

Microsoft
has already agreed to make NewsGuard a built-in feature in future
products, and [Newsguard co-CEO] Brill said he’s in talks with
other online titans. The goal is to have NewsGuard running by default
on our computers and phones whenever we scan the Web for news.”

This
eventuality is made all the more likely given the fact that, in
addition to Microsoft, Newsguard is also closely connected to Google,
as Google has been a partner of the Publicis Groupe 
since
2014
,
when the two massive companies joined Condé Nast to create a new
marketing service called La Maison that is “focused on producing
engaging content for marketers in the luxury space.” Given Google’s
power in the digital sphere as the dominant search engine, the
creator of the Android mobile operating system, and the owner of
YouTube, its partnership with Publicis means that Newsguard’s
rating system will soon see itself being promoted by yet another of
Silicon Valley’s most powerful companies.

Furthermore,
there is an effort underway to integrate Newsguard into social media
sites like Facebook and Twitter. Indeed, as Newsguard was launched,
co-CEO Brill stated that he 
planned
to sell
 the
company’s ratings of news sites to Facebook and Twitter. Last
March, Brill told 
CNN that
“We’re asking them [Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft and Google] to
pay a fraction of what they pay their P.R. people and their lobbyists
to talk about the problem.”

On
Wednesday, Gallup
 released
a poll
 that
will likely be used as a major selling point to social media giants.
The poll — funded by Newsguard and the Knight Foundation, which is
a top investor in Newsguard and has 
recently
funded
 a
series of Gallup polls relating to online news — seems to have been
created with the intention of manufacturing consent for the
integration of Newsguard with top social media sites.

This
is because the promoted findings from the study are as follows:“89%
of users of social media sites and 83% overall want social media
sites and search engines to integrate NewsGuard ratings and reviews
into their news feeds and search results” and “69% would trust
social media and search companies more if they took the simple step
of including NewsGuard in their products.” However, a disclaimer at
the end of the poll states that the results, which were based on the
responses of 706 people each of whom received $2 to participate, “may
not be reflective of attitudes of the broader U.S adult population.”

With
trust at Facebook nose-diving and Facebook’s censorship of
independent media already well underway, the findings of this poll
could well be used to justify its integration into Facebook’s
platform. The connections of both Newsguard and Facebook to the
Atlantic Council make this seem a given.

Financial
censorship

Another
Newsguard service shows that this organization is also seeking to
harm independent media financially by targeting online revenue.
Through a service called 
“Brandguard,” which
it describes as a “brand safety tool aimed at helping advertisers
keep their brands off of unreliable news and information sites while
giving them the assurance they need to support thousands of
Green-rated [i.e., Newsguard-approved] news and information sites,
big and small.”

At
the time the service was announced last November, Newsguard co-CEO
Brill stated that the company was “in discussions with the ad tech
firms, leading agencies, and major advertisers” eager to adopt a
blacklist of news sites deemed “unreliable” by Newsguard. This is
unsurprising given the leading role of the Publicis Groupe, one of
the world’s largest advertising and PR firms, has in funding
Newsguard. As a consequence, it seems likely that many, if not all,
of Publicis’ client companies will choose to adopt this blacklist
to help crush many of the news sites that are unafraid to hold them
accountable.

It
is also important to note here that Google’s connection to Publicis
and thus Newsguard could spell trouble for independent news pages
that rely on Google Adsense for some or all of their ad-based
revenue. Google Adsense has long been targeting sites
like 
MintPress by
demonetizing articles for information or photographs it deemed
controversial, including 
demonetizing
one article
 for
including a photo showing U.S. soldiers involved in torturing Iraqi
detainees at the infamous Abu Ghraib prison.

Since
then, Google — a U.S. military contractor — has repeatedly tried
to shutter ad access to 
MintPress articles
that involve reporting that is critical of U.S. empire and military
expansion. 
One
article
 that
has been repeatedly flagged by Google details how many
African-Americans have questioned whether the Women’s March has
aided or harmed the advancement of African-Americans in the United
States. Google has repeatedly claimed that the article, which was
written by African-American author and former 
Washington
Post
 bureau
chief Jon Jeter, contains “dangerous content.”

Given
Google’s already established practice of targeting factual
reporting it deemed controversial through Adsense, Brandguard will
likely offer the tech giant just the excuse it needs to cut off sites
like MintPress, and other pages equally critical of
empire, altogether.

An
action plan for the genuine protection of journalism

Though
it is just getting started, Newsguard’s plan to insert its app into
every device and major social-media network is a threat to any news
site that regularly publishes information that rubs any of
Newsguard’s investors, partners or advisors the wrong way. Given
its plan to rank the English-language U.S. news sites that account
for 98 percent of U.S. digital news consumption, Newsguard’s agenda
is of the utmost concern to every independent media page active in
the United States and beyond — given Newsguard’s promise to take
its project global.

By
linking up with former CIA and NSA directors, Silicon Valley Giants,
and massive PR firms working for some of the most controversial
governments and corporations in the world, Newsguard has betrayed the
fact that it is not actually seeking to “restore trust and
accountability” in journalism, but to “restore trust and
accountability” in news outlets that protect the existing power
structure and help shield the corporate-led oligarchy and
military-industrial complex from criticism.

Not
only is it trying to tank the reputations of independent media
through its biased ranking system, Newsguard is also seeking to
attack these alternative voices financially and by slipping its
ranking system by default onto all computers and phones sold in the
U.S.

However,
Newsguard and it agenda of guarding the establishment from criticism
can be stopped. By supporting independent media and unplugging from
social media sites committed to censorship, like Facebook and
Twitter, we can strengthen the independent media community and keep
it afloat despite the unprecedented nature of these attacks on free
speech and watchdog journalism.

Beyond
that, a key way to keep Newsguard and those behind it on their toes
is to hold them to

account
by pointing out their clear conflicts of interest and hypocrisy and
by derailing the narrative they are carefully crafting that Newsguard
is “non-partisan,” “trustworthy,” and true guardians against
the scourge of “fake news.”

While
this report has sought to be a starting point for such work, anyone
concerned about Newsguard and its connections to the war machine and
corrupt corporations should feel encouraged to point out the
organization’s own conflicts of interests and shady connections via
its 
Twitter and Facebook pages
and the 
feedback
section
 on
Newsguard’s website. The best way to defeat this new tool of the
neocons is to put them on notice and to continue to expose Newsguard
as a guardian of empire, not a guardian of journalism.

By Whitney
Webb
 / Creative
Commons
 / MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo

======================================

Zie ook:

Russiagate geslaagd: geen impeachment van Trump, waar Clinton en haar team na bewezen misdaden vrijuit gaan…..

Warren (democratisch presidentskandidaat) toont met hulp van Facebook aan dat dit bedrijf niet hoort te gaan over wat wel en niet is toegestaan

WhatsApp beperking in strijd tegen fake news

Massamedia VS vallen keihard door de mand met ‘vers’ geschoten Russiagate bok >> publiek wordt om vertrouwen gevraagd

Jacht in VS op alternatief (echt) nieuws in volgend stadium: journalist wordt vastgehouden zonder aanklacht

New York Times te kakken gezet met haar berichtgeving over Russische manipulatie voor midterm verkiezingen

Netflix censureert aflevering van humoristisch programma, ‘na een geldig verzoek’ op grond van Saoedische wetgeving….

Bedrijf dat voor ‘Russische bots’ waarschuwde, heeft een leger met nep-Russische bots


VS begint ‘troll farm’, alsof Hollywood en de massamedia al niet genoeg VS propaganda maken……….

Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen

Facebook: uit gelekte documenten worden de steeds veranderende regels voor censuur op dit platform openbaar gemaakt: Facebook als geheime tak van de VS overheid

Facebooks departement voor censuur: een hoognodige uitleg over een maatregel die alleen in een dictatuur thuishoort

Two More Spiegel Employees Out After Fake News Scandal Expands‘ Ofwel: het zoveelste ‘gevalletje fake news’, gebracht door de reguliere massamedia……..

Facebook censureert foto’s van verhongerende Jemenitische kinderen als ‘sexual content’

Google manipuleerde VS presidentsverkiezingen van 2016 en censureert niet alleen linkse/alternatieve sociale media

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

Google Maps veegt Palestijns gebied van de kaart

Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert

Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen

Bolsonaro, de fascistische nieuwe president van Brazilië, werd volgens Avaaz en fake news brengers als de NYT gekozen door manipulatie via WhatsApp

Facebooks zuivering van de alternatieve (nieuws) media staat nog in de kinderschoenen

Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax‘ (Russiagate, de enorme leugen op basis waaraan we de huidige censuurgolf te danken hebben……)

The US military’s vision for state censorship

Israël en VS werken samen in tegenwerken van critici op beleid t.a.v. Palestijnen

Facebook censureert de waarheid over Columbus en de verovering van de Amerika’s…….

Facebook censuur gestuurd door het westers militair-industrieel complex en de NAVO in het bijzonder……….

Why the Coordinated Alternative Media Purge Should Terrify Everyone‘ (Tyler Durden op Zero Hedge)

First They Came for Alex Jones — We Told You We Were Next — We Were‘ (Matt Agorist op The Free Thought Project)

CNN, de grote brenger van ‘fake news!!!’

Facebook en Twitter verwijderen nu volledige accounts………

Facebook (en Twitter) onderdrukt meningsvorming door het verwijderen van (echt) onafhankelijke media

Wie het nieuws controleert, controleert de wereld……

Facebook en Twitter verwijderen de eerlijke journalistiek en oprechte opinie >> censuur…..

Facebook verlaat ‘tranding news’ voor ‘brekend nieuws’ van 80 reguliere mediaorganen, ofwel nog meer ‘fake news…..’

Facebook komt met nieuwsshows van betrouwbare media als CNN en Fox News…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Censuur op het internet met vliegende start in de VS, ‘het land van het vrije woord….’

Facebook en NAVO werken samen in censuur op niet welgevallig nieuws……

Facebook helpt Saoedi-Arabië: doodstraf door onthoofding van vrouw die het waagde kritiek te uiten…..

Aanval op alternatieve media ‘succesvol’: meer en meer sites worden van het net geweerd………

ThinkProgress eiste censuur van Facebook en werd inderdaad gecensureerd…. ha! ha! ha! ha!

VS staatscensuur op Facebook (ook in de EU)

Facebook stelt perstituee van New York Times aan als censuur-agent…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Het echte Facebook schandaal: manipulatie van de gebruikers en gratis diensten voor eertijds presidentskandidaat Obama…….

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook doneerde aan de politici die hem in de VS aan de tand voelden >> in het EU parlement maakte hij gebruik van megalomane EU politici…..

Facebook wil samen met door Saoedi-Arabië gesubsidieerde denktank censureren…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Media Too Busy Defending John McCain to Report the News That Actually Affects You‘ Onder andere aandacht voor PRISM.

Westerse massa misleiding in aanloop naar WOIII……

VS gebruikt sociale media om ‘fake comment’ te verspreiden en de bevolking te hersenspoelen met leugens, ofwel ‘fake news….’

Eis een nee tegen censuur op het internet!‘ 

Facebook e.a. hebben lak aan AVG (GDPR), misbruik persoonsgegevens gaat gewoon door…….

Jeremy Corbyn wordt gedemoniseerd als antisemiet…….

Facebook: verrijking van oliemaatschappijen en andere grote bedrijven, plus wereldwijde corruptie…….

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Facebook Purges Independent Media for “Political Disinformation”

Facebook Blocks Links to Free Speech Competitor ‘Minds’

Voor nog meer berichten over Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft en censuur, klik op het betreffende label direct onder dit bericht.

Noord-Koreaans ‘bedrog met nucleaire deal’ is fake news o.a. gebracht door de New York Times

In
een artikel op
The Nation bericht Tim Shorrock over een
artikel in de New York Times, geschreven door David Sanger, éen
‘journalist die in het verleden vaak als bron fungeerde voor lekken over het
VS buitenlandbeleid t.a.v. Noord-Korea (ofwel men lekte officiële documenten naar Sanger).

Deze
Sanger bracht dat artikel in de NYT en daarin wordt gesteld dat Pyongyang zich niet aan de afspraken houdt die met Trump zijn
gemaakt en waarin voorts wordt gesteld dat Noord-Korea nog steeds raketten
ontwikkeld. Een en ander n.a.v. een door de rechtse denktank Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS) opgesteld rapport

Uitvoerig
legt Shorrock uit dat het rapport van een enorm ‘fake news’ (nepnieuws) niveau is.
Zo zijn de getoonde foto’s van de sites in Noord-Korea, van 2 maanden
voor de gesprekken tussen Trump en Kim Yung-un………

Bovendien
zo stelt Shorrock, zijn er geen verdragen getekend over het
raketprogramma van Noord-Korea en zoals het in de dagelijkse praktijk
gaat: totdat er zaken zijn getekend gaat men door waar men mee bezig
was, of het nu om de strijd over het bezit van een gebied gaat, of
zoals in dit geval het werken aan middellange- en langeafstandsraketten…….

Lees
het volgende verhaal en intussen een cliché op deze plek: geeft het
ajb door, laat je niet langer besodemieteren door instituten als CSIS
of het Haagse Centrum voor Strategische Studies (HCSS) met hun
oorlogshitserij op basis van leugens en halve en verdraaide waarheden…… Instituten die fungeren als grootlobbyist van het militair-industrieel complex, de NAVO en het uiterst gewelddadige, terroristische buitenlandbeleid van de VS in het groot….. (waar de NAVO onder opperbevel staat van de VS…..)

NUCLEAR
ARMS AND PROLIFERATION

NORTH KOREA
MEDIA
BIAS

How
‘The New York Times’ Deceived the Public on North Korea

Stretching
the findings of a think-tank report on Pyongyang’s missile bases is
a reminder of the paper’s role in the lead-up to the Iraq War.

By Tim
Shorrock

NOVEMBER
16, 2018


NYT Headquarters

(Photo
by Haxorjoe at en.wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0)

The New
York Times 
may
still have a Judith Miller problem—only now it’s a David Sanger
problem.

Miller,
of course, is the former 
Times reporter who
helped build the case for the 2003 US invasion of Iraq
with
a series of reports based on highly questionable sources bent on
regime change. The newspaper 
eventually
admitted
 its
errors but didn’t specifically blame Miller, who left the paper
soon after the mea culpa and is now a 
commentator
on Fox News
.

Now,
Sanger, who over the years has been 
the
recipient of dozens of leaks from US intelligence
 on
North Korea’s weapons program and the US attempts to stop it, has
come out with his own 
doozy
of a story
 that
raises serious questions about his style of deep-state journalism.

The
article may not involve the employment of sleazy sources with an ax
to grind, but it does stretch the findings of the 
Center
for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
,
a think tank that is deeply integrated with the military-industrial
complex and plays an instrumental role in US media coverage on Korea.

Controversy
is raging,” South Korea’s
progressive 
Hankyoreh newspaper declared on
Wednesday about the 
Times report,
which it called “riddled with holes and errors.”

Sanger’s
story, which appeared on Monday underneath the ominous headline “In
North Korea, Missile Bases Suggest a Great Deception,” focused on 
a
new study from CSIS’s “Beyond Parallel” project
about
the Sakkanmol Missile Operating Base, one of 13 North Korean missile
sites, out of a total of 20, that it has identified and analyzed from
overhead imagery provided by 
Digital
Globe
,
a private satellite contractor.

None
of the 20 sites has been officially acknowledged by Pyongyang, but
the network is “long known to American intelligence agencies,”
wrote Sanger.

Sakkanmol,
according to CSIS, “is an undeclared operational missile base for
short-range ballistic missiles” a little over 50 miles (85
kilometers) north of the border and therefore “one of the closest
to the demilitarized zone (DMZ) and Seoul.” Pyongyang’s highly
publicized decommissioning last summer of the Sohae satellite launch
facility “obscures the military threat to U.S. forces and South
Korea from this and other undeclared ballistic missile bases.”

Its
authors added a huge caveat at the end: “Some of the information
used in the preparation of this study may eventually prove to be
incomplete or incorrect.”

But
the 
Times ignored
the warning and took the report several steps further. According to
Sanger, that analysis of the missile base shows that North Korea is
“moving ahead with its ballistic missile program” despite pledges
made by Kim Jong-Un to President Trump at their 
Singapore
summit on June 12
 to
eliminate his nuclear and missile programs if the United States ends
its “hostile policy” and agrees to forge a new relationship with
North Korea.

The
“new commercial satellite images” of the undeclared missile
sites, Sanger concluded darkly, suggest that North Korea “has been
engaged in a great deception.”

While
North Korea has offered to dismantle a major launching site, he
asserted, it continues “to make improvements at more than a dozen
others that would bolster launches of conventional and nuclear
warheads.” That finding “contradicts Mr. Trump’s assertion that
his landmark diplomacy is leading to the elimination” of the
North’s nuclear weapons and missiles, Sanger concluded.

The
implication was that North Korea, by continuing to build missiles
after the Singapore summit, is lying to the United States and is
therefore untrustworthy as a negotiating partner—and that Trump, by
proclaiming that he has neutralized Kim’s threats, has been
deceived. The 
Times-CSIS
report was immediately picked up by major media outlets and repeated
almost verbatim on 
NBC
Nightly News
 and
NPR, with little additional reporting.

A
leading Democrat, Senator Edward Markey of Massachusetts, seized on
the report to argue that President Trump is “getting played” by
North Korea. “We cannot have another summit with North Korea—not
with President Trump, not with the Secretary of State—unless and
until the Kim regime takes concrete, tangible actions to halt and
roll back its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs,”
he 
said in
the statement.

But
even a cursory analysis of the imagery should have raised questions.
On Monday night, a 
Korean
news outlet
 pointed
out that all the photos analyzed in the CSIS report are dated March
29, 2018—almost two and a half months 
before Trump
and Kim met in Singapore on June 12.

The
dates make Sanger’s claim that North Korea is “moving ahead” on
missile production 
after its
pledges to Trump laughable; indeed, they make his story look like a
serious attempt to deceive the American public about the real
progress that has been made in ending the standoff.

In
fact, as discussion swirled on Twitter, it became clear that Sanger
was exaggerating the report. Arms-control experts immediately
questioned his assertions, arguing that he had ignored the fact that
North Korea and the United States have yet to sign any agreement
under which the North would give up its nuclear weapons and missiles.
And in the absence of an agreement, it’s status quo for both North
Korea and the United States.

North
Korea’s missile program “is NOT deception,” Vipin Narang, an
associate professor of political science at MIT, 
posted soon
after the story was published. Narang, who 
writes
occasionally for the 
Times editorial
page
on
North Korea, pointed out that Kim Jong-un has never offered to stop
producing ballistic missiles and in fact had ordered more to be
produced in January 2018.

Unless
and until there is a deal” with Trump, he wrote, “Kim would be a
fool to eliminate and stop improving [them].… So the
characterization of ‘deception’ is highly misleading. There’s
no deal to violate.” (Like other US analysts, Narang did not
question the CSIS report itself, calling it “excellent.”)

The
CSIS report was denounced by the government of South Korean President
Moon Jae-in as “nothing new,” and Kim Eui-kyeom, its chief
spokesperson, took particular exception to the 
Times
use of the term “deception.” To his credit, Sanger acknowledged
the criticism and quoted the statement in full.

North
Korea has never promised to dismantle its missile bases, nor has it
ever joined any treaty that obligates it to dismantle them,” said
Kim. “So calling this a ‘deception’ is not appropriate. If
anything, the existence of these missile bases highlights the need
for negotiation and dialogue, including those between the North and
the United States, to eliminate the North Korean threat.”

Hankyoreh,
in its analysis, 
objected to
Sanger’s claim that Sakkanmol and other missile bases are “hidden.”
It reported that South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff had identified
the base as the source for a short-range missile launched by North
Korea on March 10, 2016.

South
Korean and overseas news outlets at the time dedicated significant
coverage to the launch, noting the presence of an underground Scud
missile base in the Sakkanmol area.”

Leon
Sigal, the author of a book about North Korea and a former member of
the 
New
York Times
 editorial
board, sharply disagreed with Sanger’s assertion that North Korea
is now “moving ahead with its ballistic missile program.” Writing
Tuesday in 
38
North
,
Sigal said the CSIS report notes that “only minor infrastructure
changes were observed” at the missile site since Kim came to power
in December 2011. That’s hardly progress.

Sigal
also noted the absence of a US–North Korea agreement inhibiting the
“deployment of missiles by Pyongyang, never mind requiring their
dismantlement. Nor has Washington yet offered the necessary
reciprocal steps that might make such a deal possible.”

In
a biting comment on his former employer, he added that “substituting
tendentious hyperbole for sound reporting may convince editors to
feature a story on page one, but it is a disservice to readers.”

Taking
note of the response from the Moon government and arms-control
experts, Christine Ahn, the founder of Women Cross DMZ and a strong
advocate for engagement with the North, 
called on
the newspaper to correct the story. “The @nytimes should write a
retraction,” she said. “They just made real Trump’s allegations
of #fakenews.”

On
Tuesday, as she predicted, Trump used the story to launch another
attack on the media. “The story in the New York Times concerning
North Korea developing missile bases is inaccurate,” he 
tweeted.
“We fully know about the sites being discussed, nothing new—and
nothing happening out of the normal. Just more Fake News. I will be
the first to let you know if things go bad!”

Less
than two hours later, the 
Times communications
office put a short statement out on Twitter defending Sanger’s
reporting. “The New York Times stands by our story, which is based
on satellite imagery analyzed by experts,” it stated in a 
post that
linked to Trump’s earlier blast.

Sanger,
who is 
interviewed
frequently
 for
national security conferences and documentaries on North Korea, did
not respond to e-mails asking for comment on his story.


Like
many of his North Korea stories over the years, Sanger’s account of
what he basically described as a betrayal by Kim Jong-un seemed
perfectly timed to interject public skepticism of the North at a
crucial moment for the US negotiations with both Koreas to resolve
the nuclear standoff and pave the way for a final peace settlement on
the Korean Peninsula.


Over
the past month, while 
the
two Koreas have made spectacular leaps in reducing military
tensions
 along
their border, the US dialogue with North Korea has stalled. The
primary issues dividing them are Trump’s insistence on keeping his
pressure campaign of economic sanctions in place until the North
denuclearizes, and the North’s demand that Trump join the two
Koreas in publicly declaring an end to the Korean War.


South
Korea has also pushed for such a declaration, saying that it would
assure the North that it can eventually disarm without fear of attack
or invasion from the United States (its position on the end-of-war
declaration has been harshly criticized in Washington, including by
CSIS analysts).

The
differences came into stark relief last week, when North Korea
abruptly 
canceled a
planned meeting in New York between Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
and North Korean Workers’ Party Vice Chairman Kim Yong-chol. In a
bid to get them back on track, President Moon this week sent his
unification minister, Cho Myoung-gyon, to Washington, where he is
meeting with Pompeo, congressional leaders, and, 
according to
Yonhap News, top officials at CSIS.

South
Korean officials are 
confident the
US–North Korea talks will resume, and point to the steps Pyongyang
has taken since the Singapore summit. They include North Korea’s
decommissioning of a major satellite launch facility; its destruction
of the tunnels where its nuclear weapons were tested; its return of
American dead from the Korean War; and its unprecedented cooperation
with South Korea and the US-controlled UN Command 
to
remove guard posts and firearms in the DMZ
.

On
Tuesday, John Bolton, Trump’s hawkish national-security
adviser, 
toldreporters
in Asia that Trump “is prepared to have a second summit” with Kim
in early 2019. And on Thursday, in a brief meeting in Singapore with
President Moon, Vice President Mike Pence asked that South Korea
“communicate and talk more closely with North Korea” to help
bring this about, Moon’s spokesman told reporters.


The
most glaring problem with the 
Times story
was Sanger’s characterization of CSIS as a neutral organization (“a
major think tank”) and his failure to disclose that it receives
enormous funding from the US government as well major military
contractors. Nor did he mention that CSIS and its key analysts
provide a kind of anchor to the 
Times
coverage of Korea; they often appear near the lead of a story to
explain its political significance. That is particularly true
of 
Victor
Cha
,
one of the authors of the report.

Cha, the director for
Asian affairs at the National Security Council in the George W. Bush
White House, was briefly considered last year by President Trump for
US ambassador to Seoul (apparently his hawkish views weren’t enough
to get him the job).

In
his interview with Sanger for the 
Times article,
Cha seemed to be pushing for a more aggressive stance against North
Korea. “It’s not like these bases have been frozen,” he said.
“Work is continuing. What everybody is worried about is that Trump
is going to accept a bad deal—they give us a single test site and
dismantle a few other things, and in return they get a peace
agreement” that formally ends the Korean War.

Cha
continued to defend the report as the criticism intensified, and took
special umbrage at South Korea’s response. “How can [South Korea]
defend NK’s undisclosed operational missile bases?” he 
asked in
a heated exchange on Twitter that caught the attention of 
Charles
Knight
,
an analyst with the Project on Defense Alternatives. “Seriously,
how contorted can these rationalizations for NK weapons possession
get??”

Knight,
in an e-mail, said he had concluded that Cha has been “enabled”
by Sanger and the editors of the 
Times to
“be the agent of the opening salvo of an offensive by the most
reactionary elements of the US national security and foreign policy
establishment against the Korean diplomacy of both the Trump
administration and South Korea.”

Here’s where the
contractor money that pours into CSIS comes in: Providing the
justification for a tougher policy of sanctions and military threats
would be very much in tune with the defense and intelligence
companies that support the think tank.

According
to 
the
CSIS page for “corporation and trade association donors,”
they
include Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics,
L-3, Rockwell, General Atomics, and Booz Allen Hamilton. CSIS is also
funded by several Asian defense giants, including Japan’s
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and South Korea’s Samsung Electronics
and Korea Aerospace Industries.

All of these companies
have a stake in US military options focused on North Korea, including
monitoring its military activities, building missile-defense systems
and providing weapons, ships, drones, and aircraft for offensive
military operations when they become necessary.

As
I reported in 2017 for 
Newstapa/The
Korea Center for Investigative Journalism
,
“As the South Korean and US militaries have become more integrated
in the face of North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs, CSIS has
become an important forum where military collaboration—especially
on the industrial side—is thrashed out and decided.”

In 2016, for example,
CSIS sponsored a conference on “U.S.-Korea Defense Acquisition
Policy and the International Security Environment” that drew
high-ranking officials from the South Korean government and its
military industry. In opening the conference, CSIS’s CEO John
Hamre, a former Deputy Secretary of Defense, declared, “We’ve
been military partners for 70 years but we are now going to be
business partners in a very new way.”

Digital
Globe, the satellite company that supplied the imagery for the CSIS
report, is not a donor to the think tank. But it has a special
relationship with US intelligence as an 
important
contractor for the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
,
one of the primary collection agencies for the US government.
According to CSIS report, Joseph Bermudez Jr., its primary author, is
a former “senior all-source analyst for DigitalGlobe’s Analysis
Center.”

The
Moon government, while a donor to CSIS, did not seem impressed with
the Digital Globe imagery. In his critique of the 
Times story,
Moon’s spokesperson Kim Eui-kyeom pointed out that the source for
the CSIS analysis is a “commercial satellite” vendor. “The
intelligence authorities of South Korea and the U.S. have far more
detailed information from military satellites and are closely
monitoring [it],” he said.

In
the end, the Sanger story was widely derided in the circle of people
who closely follow North Korea. Once these doubts were voiced,
both 
The
Wall Street Journal
 and The
Washington Post
 avoided
the 
Times
claim of deception and played down its dire conclusions that North
Korea is cheating on the agreement it reached with Trump last June.

That’s a good
development, indicating that Sanger’s questionable scoop probably
won’t mushroom out of control and add fuel to a conflict, as Judith
Miller’s phony reporting did at the advent of the Iraq War. And
Sanger’s role as a leading expert on North Korea and US
intelligence may take a hit.

In
an age of baseless allegations of fake news devaluing the work of
journalists worldwide, it’s extremely lamentable that the New York
Times—which is meant to be a nuanced and quality outlet—spun the
CSIS story in the egregious way it did,” Chad O’Carroll, the CEO
of Korea Risk Group, a Seoul-based organization that analyzes North
Korea, 
tweeted on
Tuesday.

Correction:
The passage discussing a Twitter exchange involving Victor Cha and
Charles Knight was garbled in the editing process; it has now been
corrected.

Tim
Shorrock
TWITTER
Tim
Shorrock is a Washington, DC–based journalist and the author
of 
Spies
for Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing
.

==========================================

Zie ook:

Haags Centrum voor Strategische Studies (HCSS): stelt dat Noord-Korea nog steeds raketten bouwt

Trump steunt Saoedi-Arabië verder in haar barbaarse terreur tegen het verhongerende Jemenitische volk, o.a. met een enorme wapendeal……

Trump is op bezoek in Saoedi-Arabië en zal daar een wapendeal van maar liefst 350 miljard dollar tekenen met deze reli-fascistische dictatuur…… Dit bedrag wordt o.a. door Anti-Media genoemd, als som voor een totaalpakket, een aantal andere nieuwssites spreken echter over 100 miljard dollar, ook dat bedrag is van groteske proporties……

Onder Obama lag er nog een embargo op bepaalde militaire apparatuur en munitie voor Saoedi-Arabië, maar Trump heeft dit bezwaar opzij gezet, zodat S-A straks Jemen desgewenst geheel plat kan leggen met de nieuwste wapens uit de VS…… De genocide die S-A aan het plegen is op de sjiitische bevolking van Jemen, kan wel wat extra hulp gebruiken………

Dat Saoedi-Arabië een hongersnood heeft veroorzaakt in Jemen, zal Trump aan de vieze reet roesten. Overigens ook andere westerse politici (zoals Nederland in de persoon van PvdA flapdrol Koenders) en de reguliere massamedia maken hier geen woord aan vuil. Afgelopen week werd bekend gemaakt dat de cholera heeft toegeslagen in dit door S-A, IS en Al Qaida geterroriseerde Jemen, ook dat feit kan niet rekenen op belangstelling in het westen…….

In het volgende artikel van Anti-Media, gisteren gepubliceerd, betoogt schrijver Darius Shahtahmasebi, dat Saoedi-Arabië achter de verkiezing van Hillary Clinton stond, maar nu haar kaarten op Trump heeft gezet. Sterker nog, Shahtahmasebi stelt dat S-A de herverkiezing van Trump in 2020 (mits hij niet wordt afgezet voor die tijd) nu al veilig stelt met deze wapendeal.

Saoedi-Arabië investeert als tegenprestatie 200 miljard dollar in de infrastructuur van de VS,…… Het aanpakken van de slechte staat van de VS infrastructuur in de Roestbelt staten*, was één van de beloften die Trump in zijn verkiezingscampagne heeft gedaan, een belofte die door S-A zal worden ingelost……. Voorts zal S-A het vestigen van bedrijven uit de VS in haar land bevorderen.

Ongelofelijk dat op dit soort berichten zo lam wordt gereageerd in het westen, zeker als je de hysterie zag bij de Giro555 inzameling tegen de hongersnood in landen als Jemen……. Blijkbaar is het belangrijker om de hielen van de nummers 1 en 2 verspreiders van grootschalige terreur te likken, respectievelijk de VS en Saoedi-Arabië……

Trump steunt verder het voornemen van Saoedi-Arabië om een bondgenootschap als de NAVO op te richten, waar ook andere dictaturen als die van de Golfstaten en Egypte deel van uit kunnen maken…..

Zoals in het artikel hieronder genoemd, het delen van informatie over terreur tussen Trump en Rusland, een niet meer dan normale zaak, wordt in het westen als veel belangrijker gezien en deed de gemoederen in het westen alweer tot hysterisch niveau stijgen…..** Om precies als de reguliere media nog maar te zwijgen over het enorme aantal burgerslachtoffers dat de VS maakt met bombardementen op o.a. Mosul en doelen in Syrië (waar wat betreft de laatst genoemde, de VS ook nog eens illegaal oorlog voert. De bombardementen op Mosul vinden plaats in de in feite nog steeds voortdurende illegale oorlog die de VS in 2003 begon tegen Irak, ook al is de regering daar intussen een VS vazal….).

Trump/Saudi
Arabia 2020

Trump/Saudi Arabia 2020

May
19, 2017 at 4:52 pm

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA) Whether
or not ongoing Russiagate conspiracy theories
 have
any truth to them
,
the more pertinent reality is that Saudi Arabia
vehemently
 supported Hillary
Clinton’s bid to become president of the United States in 2016, and
that same country is now well on its way to supporting Donald Trump’s
re-election bid for 2020.

From Alternet’s Max
Blumenthal
:

Ahead
of the White House meeting [earlier this March], the Saudis 
hired a
D.C.-based consulting group, Booz Allen Hamilton, to compose a
special presentation for the president. Prince Salman walked Trump
through the Powerpoint slideshow the firm prepared, outlining a plan
to invest at least $200 billion in American infrastructure and open
up new business opportunities for U.S. companies inside the kingdom.
In exchange, Trump was asked to ink the largest weapons deal in
history, forking over the advanced missile defense systems and heavy
weapons the Obama had administration had refused to sell. The weapons
would then be used to pulverize Yemen.

Blumenthal
continues:

Trump
reportedly accepted Salman’s pitch, 
but only
on the condition that Saudis plow their infrastructure
investments
 into
the Rust Belt swing states — Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin —
 that
held the key to his 2020 presidential victory
.
So far, Trump’s foes in the Democratic Party and the organized
liberal “resistance” have shrugged at the reports of his
collusion with a foreign theocracy to secure re-election, obsessing
instead over nebulous claims of his illicit ties to
Russia.
” [emphasis
added]

Unsurprisingly,
Trump is holding up his end of the bargain and is set to announce a
massive arms deal package to Saudi Arabia,
 worth
$350 billion
.
Because these types of arrangements were
 widely
seen as deal-breakers
 in
supporting Hillary Clinton in the first place, it is unclear how
Trump’s nationalist support base will feel about him being so cozy
with one of the most 
radical
Islamic countries
 on
the planet.

Make
no mistake, this overwhelming support for Saudi Arabia is just the
beginning. 
According
to the 
Washington
Post
:

Mr.
Trump is expected to announce enhanced U.S. support for the kingdom
and its Gulf allies, including help with the formation of a defense
alliance that U.S. officials say could 
evolve
into an ‘Arab NATO.
’”

Yet
the media deems all of this to be a non-issue and instead is madly
obsessed with incessant claims of 
almost
non-existent 
collusion
with the Russian government.

Saudi
Arabia directly
 sponsors the
terror group ISIS while Russia has been
 one
of the only governments
 most
heavily
 involved
in its demise
.
Saudi Arabia is launching a war of aggression in neighboring Yemen —
the poorest country in the Arab world —
 committing
genocide and blatant war crimes in the process
 (while
conveniently 
avoiding al-Qaeda
and ISIS).

Further,
recent allegations have emerged that Saudi Arabia is
 at
war with its own civilian population
,
too.

Watch
out though; Trump gave Russia some
 information
on a suspected ISIS terror plot
.

How
scandalous.

Creative
Commons
 Anti-Media Report
a typo

=============================

*  De Roestbelt bestaat o.a. uit de staten Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin, staten waar afgelopen november massaal voor Trump werd gestemd.

** Het feit dat Trump Israël als bron noemde, schijnt heiligschennis te zijn, terwijl het al decennia lang bekend is, dat Israël (zelf grootproducent van terreur en wapenleverancier aan uiterst dubieuze regimes) goed is ingevoerd wat betreft het verzamelen van informatie over terreurgroepen. Nogmaals: het is niet meer dan normaal, dat landen elkaar steunen in de strijd tegen terreur (ook al wordt die door eigen westers handelen veroorzaakt). Vergeet daarbij niet, dat Rusland Syrië te hulp schoot in de strijd tegen terreur die in 2011  door de VS, Groot-Brittannië, Saoedi-Arabië en Turkije werd losgelaten op Syrië……. Zelfs IS en Al Qaida werden daarin geholpen door die partijen. Alles voor het ‘heilige doel’: de regering van Assad ten val brengen, dezelfde regering die de verschillende religieuze groepen (inclusief christenen) vreedzaam wist te verenigen……..

Zie
ook: ‘Jemen:
elke 10 minuten sterft een kind onnodig >> verantwoordelijken:
Saoedi-Arabië, de VS en GB

 
     
en:
Saoedische
coalitie vermoord met 2 bombardementen op Jemen, 9 vrouwen en 1
kind……… Aanvallen gesteund door het westen…….

 
     
en:
Jemen
en Saoedi-Arabië: leugens van de ‘onafhankelijke’ NOS voor ‘het
goede doel……….’

 
     
en:
Ploumen
acht het mogelijk dat Nederlandse wapensystemen worden gebruikt door
S.A. in Jemen…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

 
     
en:
Saoedi-Arabië
bombardeert begrafenis ceremonie in Jemen, VS ‘heroverweegt’
wapenleveranties………

 
     
en:
Witte
Huis juristen waarschuwden Obama al in 2015 voor aanklachten wegens
oorlogsmisdaden

 
     
en:
(met mogelijkheid tot vertaling in ‘Dutch’): ‘
U.S.
and U.K. Continue to Participate in War Crimes, Targeting of Yemeni
Civilians

 
     
en:
VS
heeft reden gefabriceerd om de Houthi rebellen in Jemen te
bombarderen…….

 
     
en:
Ali
Al Shihabi: Saoedi-Arabie begaat geen oorlogsmisdaden in Jemen…….
ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

 
     

 
     
en:
Jemen
300.000 cholera patiënten en de valse berichtgeving door de westerse
reguliere media…….
‘ 

 
   
en:
BBC
leugens, ofwel ‘fake news’ over de smerige oorlog tegen het volk van
Jemen……

 
     
en:
Genocide
op Houthi’s in Jemen: daders Saoedi-Arabië, de VS en de Arabische
Emiraten………….

 
     
en:
Alan
Johnston (BBC): de cholera uitbraak in Jemen is te danken aan de
burgeroorlog…… AUW!!

      en: ‘Jemen ‘kerstweek bombardementen’: meer dan 100 vermoorde burgers, de daders >> de Saoedische coalitie o.l.v. de VS……

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u hieronder terug kan vinden.