Facebook (en Twitter) onderdrukt meningsvorming door het verwijderen van (echt) onafhankelijke media

Jake
Johnson schreef op Common Dreams een artikel over de grote zuivering
van de alternatieve (echt) onafhankelijke media op Facebook en
Twitter. Het gaat hier niet alleen om het onderuithalen van de vrijheid op meningsuiting, zelfs het vormen van een mening wordt geweld aangedaan…….

Met
de reinste kul argumenten stellen deze organisaties dat ze accounts
met ‘spam’ en ‘onecht gedrag’, hebben verwijderd, ofwel Facebook
heeft ‘het gedrag van het nepaccounts hebben’ gecensureerd, accounts die
gebruikt zouden worden om de advertentie-inkomsten op te
vijzelen……

Uiteraard
gaat het Facebook, Twitter en anderen daar helemaal niet om, nee de berichtgeving in de
alternatieve media moet worden geblokkeerd, berichtgeving die ingaat tegen de
veelal van ‘fake news’ (nepnieuws) bolstaande berichtgeving door de
reguliere massamedia……. Ofwel Facebook en Twitter hebben laten
zien dat ze allesbehalve onafhankelijke organisaties zijn en geven daarbij
juist de haat- en angstzaaiende massamedia*, die zoals gezegd ook nog
eens liegen en bedriegen, alle ruimte op hun platforms….. 

Facebook heeft zelfs samengewerkt met de Saoedische reli-fascistische dictatuur en werkt voorts o.a. samen met de Atlantic Council, een lobbyorgaan van terreurorganisatie NAVO (zie de links onderaan in dit bericht)…..

Nogmaals: censuur is een onderdeel van beleid in fascistische dictaturen!! Je kan dan ook niet anders concluderen dan de gang naar censuur is een grote stap richting dictatuur, waar overheden tegenwoordig ook nog eens bijna elke stap en elk gesproken en geschreven woord van een individu kunnen volgen……. De nazi’s hadden zich met deze bijna totale controle, de vieze bloederige poten nog eens extra afgelikt…..

Lees
het volgende artikel van Jake Johnson, waarin hij o.a. Anti-Media
noemt als één van de getroffen (echt) onafhankelijke mediaorganen,
een organisatie die alles uit en te na controleert voor
publicatie:

Published
on Friday, October 12, 2018 by
Common
Dreams

Facebook
Accused of ‘Full-Frontal Suppression of Dissent’ After Independent
Media Swept Up in Mass Purge

The
massive shutdown affected many progressive sites devoted to covering
war, police brutality, and other issues neglected by the corporate
media

by
Jake
Johnson, staff writer

"Those who demanded Facebook and other Silicon Valley giants censor political content—something they didn't actually want to do—are finding that content that they themselves support and like end up being repressed," noted The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald in response to Facebook's announcement. "That's what has happened to every censorship advocate in history." (Photo: Legal Loop)

“Those
who demanded Facebook and other Silicon Valley giants censor
political content—something they didn’t actually want to do—are
finding that content that they themselves support and like end up
being repressed,” noted The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald in
response to Facebook’s announcement. “That’s what has happened
to every censorship advocate in history.” (Photo: Legal Loop)

After
Facebook 
announced on
Thursday that it shut down and removed hundreds of pages and accounts
that it vaguely accused of spreading “spam” and engaging in
“inauthentic behavior,” some of the individuals and
organizations caught up in the social media behemoth’s dragnet
disputed accusations that they were violating the platform’s rules
and raised alarm that Facebook is using its enormous power to silence
independent political perspectives that run counter to the corporate
media’s dominant narratives.

While
it is reasonable to assume that some of the more than 800 total pages
and accounts shut down by Facebook were engaged in overtly fraudulent
behavior—such as the use of fake accounts and bots to generate ad
revenue—numerous independent media 
outlets
that cover a wide array of issues
 say
they were swept up in the massive purge despite never using such
tactics.

“Facebook
has removed the pages of several police
accountability/watchdog/critic groups, including Cop Block, the Free
Thought Project, and Police the Police,” 
Washington
Post 
journalist
Radley Balko 
noted in
a tweet following Facebook’s announcement. “They’ve also
apparently severely restricted activity for the Photography Is Not a
Crime page.”

Activist,
comedian, and political commentator Lee Camp argued that Facebook’s
purge is clear evidence that the “purging of anti-establishment
thought is upon us” and described the account shutdowns as
“full-frontal suppression of dissent.”

Lee Camp [Redacted]

@LeeCamp

Everyone, this is MASSIVELY important. American censorship is reaching a new level. Sites like Anti-Media, Free Thought Project and others, have been ripped down by Facebook today. The purging of anti-establishment thought is upon us. https://twitter.com/AntiMedia/status/1050476321191669760 

Lee Camp [Redacted]

@LeeCamp

NOT ONLY were great journalistic sites like @AntiMedia and @TFTPROJECT banned from Facebook in yesterday’s PURGE of dissident voices, but simultaneously their Twitter accounts & the accounts of their editors were SUSPENDED, like @CareyWedler. Full-frontal suppression of dissent!

Speaking
to
 journalist
Alex Rubinstein after they found out Facebook shut down their
pages—some of which had hundreds of thousands of followers—the
founders of Police the Police, the Free Thought Project, and other
now-shuttered pages denied Facebook’s hazy charge of “fraudulent”
activity and accused the company of attempting to suppress dissenting
voices that refuse to toe the corporate line.

“Our
approach generally is to cover stories and angles that corporate
media underreport or misreport and to amplify activist and anti-war
voices and stories. All of our content is professionally fact-checked
and edited,” said Nicholas Bernabe, founder of 
The
Anti-Media
,
a self-described “anti-establishment” website whose
Facebook page was shut down along with hundreds of others on
Thursday. “I can only speculate that these suspensions were a
coordinated effort to stifle our message ahead of the coming
elections.”

While
some of the pages Facebook removed on Thursday 
were
affiliated with right-wing sites
 that
were spreading patently false stories, censorship opponents have long
warned of the “
slippery
slope

of empowering corporate giants to suppress certain kinds of content,
given that the suppression almost always expands far beyond the
original target.

“Those
who demanded Facebook and other Silicon Valley giants censor
political content—something they didn’t actually want to do—are
finding that content that they themselves support and like end up
being repressed,” 
noted The
Intercept
‘s
Glenn Greenwald in response to Facebook’s announcement. “That’s
what has happened to every censorship advocate in history.”

Though
Facebook has yet to release a full list of the pages and accounts it
removed, 
several
individuals affected
 by
the purge have taken to other social media platforms to denounce the
social media giant for squashing pages that took years to develop.

Rachel Blevins@RachBlevins

Facebook took down my page with nearly 70,000 followers, labeling it as “spam,” when I have spent 4 years working to build that page up and using it to post the articles I wrote and videos of my reporting. This is so incredibly wrong and is affecting hundreds of similar pages.

This
work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
License

=================================

* Media die met dat angst en haatzaaien niet zelden in feite indirect oproepen tot geweld…..

Zie ook:

Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert

Facebooks zuivering van de alternatieve (nieuws) media staat nog in de kinderschoenen

Facebook censureert de waarheid over Columbus en de verovering van de Amerika’s…….

Facebook censuur gestuurd door het westers militair-industrieel complex en de NAVO in het bijzonder……….

Why the Coordinated Alternative Media Purge Should Terrify Everyone‘ (Tyler Durden op Zero Hedge)

First They Came for Alex Jones — We Told You We Were Next — We Were‘ (Matt Agorist op The Free Thought Project)

Facebook en Twitter verwijderen nu volledige accounts………

The US military’s vision for state censorship

Wie het nieuws controleert, controleert de wereld……

Facebook en Twitter verwijderen de eerlijke journalistiek en oprechte opinie >> censuur…..

Facebook verlaat ‘tranding news’ voor ‘brekend nieuws’ van 80 reguliere mediaorganen, ofwel nog meer ‘fake news…..’

Facebook komt met nieuwsshows van betrouwbare media als CNN en Fox News…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Censuur op het internet met vliegende start in de VS, ‘het land van het vrije woord….’

Facebook en NAVO werken samen in censuur op niet welgevallig nieuws……

Facebook helpt Saoedi-Arabië: doodstraf door onthoofding van vrouw die het waagde kritiek te uiten…..

Aanval op alternatieve media ‘succesvol’: meer en meer sites worden van het net geweerd………

ThinkProgress eiste censuur van Facebook en werd inderdaad gecensureerd…. ha! ha! ha! ha!

VS staatscensuur op Facebook (ook in de EU)

Facebook stelt perstituee van New York Times aan als censuur-agent…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Het echte Facebook schandaal: manipulatie van de gebruikers en gratis diensten voor eertijds presidentskandidaat Obama…….

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook doneerde aan de politici die hem in de VS aan de tand voelden >> in het EU parlement maakte hij gebruik van megalomane EU politici…..

Facebook wil samen met door Saoedi-Arabië gesubsidieerde denktank censureren…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Media Too Busy Defending John McCain to Report the News That Actually Affects You‘ Onder andere aandacht voor PRISM.

Westerse massa misleiding in aanloop naar WOIII……

VS gebruikt sociale media om ‘fake comment’ te verspreiden en de bevolking te hersenspoelen met leugens, ofwel ‘fake news….’

Eis een nee tegen censuur op het internet!‘ 

Facebook Purges Independent Media for “Political Disinformation”

Facebook Blocks Links to Free Speech Competitor ‘Minds’

AVG: Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (geleid door Aleid Wolfsen PvdA) niet berekend op EU wetgeving…….

Facebook e.a. hebben lak aan AVG (GDPR), misbruik persoonsgegevens gaat gewoon door…….

Kind van 4 getaserd en één van 3 onder dwang gekatheteriseerd……. Dagelijkse terreurpraktijk in politiestaat VS……

Dat de VS de laatste decennia is veranderd in een politiestaat zal velen niet verbazen. Echter waar dit mee gepaard gaat, doet je de haren ten berge stijgen.

Het volgende artikel van Information Clearing House ontving ik afgelopen woensdag en hierin een aantal voorbeelden, van wat je als burger in de VS kan overkomen en hoe je daar tegen te verzetten (indien mogelijk). De leeftijden van de mensen in de voorbeelden, lopen uiteen van 3 jaar tot 95 jaar oud……..

Zo kan het kinderen van 4 jaar overkomen, dat ze door de politie of andere overheidsambtenaren worden geboeid (van handen en/of voeten) of getaserd (dat is een grove marteling!), ook kan het voorkomen, dat ze onder schot worden gehouden……… Dit omdat ze niet gehoorzamen en/of kinderachtig gedrag vertonen…….

Een 3 jarige jongen, die nog niet zindelijk was en dus niet in staat was een urine monster af te geven, werd door sociaal werkers tegen de grond gehouden, waarna een ‘verpleger’ hem schreeuwend van de pijn een katheter in de penis aangebracht………

Wat u ervan vindt weet ik niet, maar voor mij is dit alles een heel smerige vorm van overheidsterreur!!.

Zoals al vaak op deze plek gezegd: aan zo’n ‘land’ levert Nederland niet alleen haar burgers uit, maar ook burgers uit andere landen…….. Dezelfde VS waar men het ‘plea bargain’ hanteert: je kan in veel gevallen beter schuld bekennen, zelfs al heb je niet gedaan, waarvan je wordt verdacht, daar je anders grote kans loopt een fiks hogere straf te krijgen (nogmaals: ook al ben je onschuldig…)……

Lees en huiver (onder het artikel kan u voor een ‘Dutch vertaling’ klikken, dit neemt wel enige tijd in beslag):

Run
for Your Life: The American Police State Is Coming to Get You



By
John W. Whitehead



We’ve
reached the point where state actors can penetrate rectums and
vaginas, where judges can order forced catheterizations, and where
police and medical personnel can perform scans, enemas and
colonoscopies without the suspect’s consent. And these procedures
aren’t to nab kingpins or cartels, but people who at worst are
hiding an amount of drugs that can fit into a body cavity. In most of
these cases, they were suspected only of possession or ingestion.
Many of them were innocent… But these tactics aren’t about
getting drugs off the street… 
These
tactics are instead about degrading and humiliating a class of people
that politicians and law enforcement have deemed the enemy.
” – Radley
Balko
The
Washington Post

April
19, 2017 “Information
Clearing House
” –  Daily, all across America,
individuals who dare to resist—or even question—a police order
are being subjected to all sorts of government-sanctioned abuse
ranging from forced catheterization, forced blood draws, roadside
strip searches and cavity searches, and other foul and debasing acts
that degrade their bodily integrity and leave them 
bloodied and
bruised.

Americans
as young as 4 years old are being 
leg
shackled
handcuffedtasered and held
at gun point
 for
not being quiet, not being orderly and just being childlike—i.e.,
not being compliant enough.

Government
social workers actually 
subjected
a 3-year-old boy to a forced catheterization
 after
he was unable to provide them with a urine sample on demand (the boy
still wasn’t potty trained). The boy was held down, 
screaming
in pain
,
while nurses forcibly inserted a tube into his penis to drain his
bladder—all of this done because the boy’s mother’s boyfriend
had failed a urine analysis for drugs.

Americans
as old as 95 are being beaten, shot and killed for questioning an
order, 
hesitating
in the face of a directive
,
and 
mistaking
a policeman crashing through their door for a criminal
 breaking
into their home—i.e., not being submissive enough.

Consider
what happened to David Dao, the United Airlines passenger who was
accosted by three police, forcibly wrenched from his seat across the
armrest, bloodying his face in the process, and dragged down the
aisle by the arms 
merely
for refusing to relinquish his paid seat
 after
the airline chose him randomly to be bumped from the flight—after
being checked in and allowed to board—so that airline workers could
make a connecting flight.

Those
with ADHD, autism, hearing impairments, dementia or some other
disability that can hinder communication in the slightest way are in
even greater danger of having their actions misconstrued by police.
Police 
shot
a 73-year-old-man with dementia seven times
 after
he allegedly failed to respond to orders to stop approaching and
remove his hands from his jacket. The man was unarmed and had been
holding a crucifix.

Clearly,
it no longer matters where you live.

Big
city or small town: it’s the same scenario being played out over
and over again in which government agents, hyped up on their own
authority and the power of their uniform, ride roughshod over the
citizenry who—in the eyes of the government—are viewed as having
no rights.

Our
freedoms—especially the Fourth Amendment—continue to be torn
asunder by the prevailing view among government bureaucrats that they
have the right to search, seize, strip, scan, spy on, probe, pat
down, taser, and arrest 
any individual
at 
any time
and for the 
slightest provocation.

Forced
cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws, forced
breath-alcohol tests, forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans,
forced inclusion in biometric databases—these are just a few ways
in which Americans continue to be reminded that we have no control
over what happens to our bodies during an encounter with government
officials.

For
instance, during a “routine” traffic stop for allegedly “rolling”
through a stop sign, Charnesia Corley was thrown to the ground,
stripped of her clothes, and forced to spread her legs while Texas
police officers subjected her to a 
roadside
cavity probe
,
all because they claimed to have smelled marijuana in her car.

Angel
Dobbs and her 24-year-old niece, Ashley, were pulled over by a Texas
state trooper for allegedly flicking cigarette butts out of the car
window. Insisting that he smelled marijuana, the trooper proceeded to
interrogate them and search the car. Despite the fact that both women
denied smoking or possessing any marijuana, the police officer then
called in a female trooper, who carried out a roadside cavity
search, 
sticking
her fingers into the older woman’s anus and vagina
,
then performing the same procedure on the younger woman, wearing the
same pair of gloves. No marijuana was found.

Leila
Tarantino was subjected to two roadside strip searches in plain view
of passing traffic during a routine traffic stop, while her two
children—ages 1 and 4—waited inside her car. During the second
strip search, presumably in an effort to ferret out drugs, a 
female
officer “forcibly removed” a tampon from Tarantino
.
Nothing illegal was found.

David
Eckert was forced to undergo 
an
anal cavity search, three enemas, and a colonoscopy
 after
allegedly failing to yield to a stop sign at a Wal-Mart parking lot.
Cops justified the searches on the grounds that they suspected Eckert
was carrying drugs because his “posture [was] erect” and “he
kept his legs together.” No drugs were found.

Meanwhile,
four Milwaukee police officers were charged with carrying out rectal
searches of suspects on the street and in police district stations
over the course of several years. One of the officers was accused of
conducting searches of men’s anal and scrotal areas,
often 
inserting
his fingers into their rectums
 and
leaving some of his victims with bleeding rectums.

Incidents
like these—sanctioned by the courts and conveniently overlooked by
the legislatures—teach Americans of every age and skin color the
painful lesson that there are no limits to what the government can do
in its so-called “pursuit” of law and order.

If
this is a war, then “we the people” are the enemy.

As
Radley Balko notes in 
The
Washington Post
,
“When you’re at war, it’s important to dehumanize your enemy.
And there’s nothing more dehumanizing than forcibly and painfully
invading someone’s body — 
all
the better if you can involve the sex organs
.”

The
message being beaten, shot, tasered, probed and slammed into our
collective consciousness is simply this: it doesn’t matter if
you’re in the right, it doesn’t matter if a cop is in the wrong,
it doesn’t matter if you’re being treated with less than the
respect you deserve or the law demands.

The
only thing that matters to the American police state is that you
comply, submit, respect authority and generally obey without question
whatever a government official (anyone who wears a government
uniform, be it a police officer, social worker, petty bureaucrat or
zoning official) tells you to do.

This
is what happens when you allow the government to call the shots: it
becomes a bully.

As
history shows, this recipe for disaster works every time: take police
officers hyped up on their own authority and the power of the badge,
throw in a few court rulings suggesting that security takes
precedence over individual rights, set it against a backdrop of
endless wars and militarized law enforcement, and then add to the mix
a populace distracted by entertainment, out of touch with the
workings of their government, and more inclined to let a few sorry
souls suffer injustice than to challenge the status quo.

It
is not only under Nazi rule that 
police
excesses are inimical to freedom
,”
warned former Supreme Court justice Felix Frankfurter in a 1946
ruling in 
Davis
v. United States
:
“It is easy to make light of insistence on scrupulous regard for
the safeguards of civil liberties when invoked on behalf of the
unworthy. It is too easy. History bears testimony that by such
disregard are the rights of liberty extinguished, heedlessly at
first, then stealthily, and brazenly in the end.”

In
other words, if it could happen in Nazi Germany, it can just as
easily happen here.

It is happening
here.

Unfortunately,
we’ve been marching in lockstep with the police state for so long
that we’ve forgotten how to march to the tune of our own
revolutionary drummer. In fact, we’ve even forgotten the words to
the tune.

We’ve
learned the lessons of compliance too well.

For
too long, “we the people” have allowed the government to ride
roughshod over the Constitution, equating patriotism with blind
obedience to the government’s dictates, no matter how
unconstitutional or immoral those actions might be.

As
historian Howard Zinn recognized:

Our
problem is civil obedience. Our problem is the numbers of people all
over the world who have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their
government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed
because of this obedience… Our problem is that people are obedient
all over the world, in the face of poverty and starvation and
stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is that people are
obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while
the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem…
people are obedient, all these herdlike people.

What
can you do?

It’s
simple but as I detail in my book 
Battlefield
America: The War on the American People
,
the consequences may be deadly.

Stop
being so obedient. 
Stop being so compliant and herdlike. Stop
kowtowing to anyone and everyone in uniform. Stop perpetuating the
false notion that those who work for the government—the president,
Congress, the courts, the military, the police—are in any way
superior to the rest of the citizenry. Stop playing politics with
your principles. Stop making excuses for the government’s growing
list of human rights abuses and crimes. Stop turning a blind eye to
the government’s corruption and wrongdoing and theft and murder.
Stop tolerating ineptitude and incompetence by government workers.
Stop allowing the government to treat you like a second-class
citizen. Stop censoring what you say and do for fear that you might
be labeled an extremist or worse, unpatriotic. Stop sitting silently
on the sidelines while the police state kills, plunders and maims
your fellow citizens.

Stop
being a slave.

As
anti-war activist Rosa Luxemburg concluded, “Those who do not move,
do not notice their chains.”

You
may not realize it yet, but you are not free.

If
you believe otherwise, it is only because you have made no real
attempt to exercise your freedoms.

Had
you attempted to exercise your freedoms before now by questioning a
police officer’s authority, challenging an unjust tax or fine,
protesting the government’s endless wars, defending your right to
privacy against the intrusion of surveillance cameras, or any other
effort that challenges the government’s power grabs and the
generally lopsided status quo, you would have already learned the
hard way that the police state has no appetite for freedom and it
does not tolerate resistance.

This
is called authoritarianism, a.k.a. totalitarianism, a.k.a.
oppression.

As
Glenn Greenwald 
notes for
the 
Guardian:

Oppression
is designed to compel obedience and submission to authority. Those
who voluntarily put themselves in that state – by believing that
their institutions of authority are just and good and should be
followed rather than subverted – render oppression redundant,
unnecessary. Of course people who think and behave this way encounter
no oppression. That’s their reward for good, submissive behavior.
They are left alone by institutions of power because they comport
with the desired behavior of complacency and obedience without
further compulsion. But the fact that good, obedient citizens do not
themselves perceive oppression does not mean that oppression does not
exist.

Get
ready to stand your ground or run for your life, because the American
police state is coming to get you.

Constitutional
attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of 
The
Rutherford Institute
.
His new book 
Battlefield
America: The War on the American People
 (SelectBooks,
2015) is available online at www.amazon.com. Whitehead can be
contacted at 
johnw@rutherford.org.

Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

=========================

Nog één opmerking: mensen we moeten oppassen, dat we hier niet dezelfde kant opgaan….. Onder het mom van de strijd tegen terreur, worden onze rechten in groot tempo afgebroken en voor we het weten, zitten we hier ook in een politiestaat, één waarvan Hitler had kunnen dromen toen hij ons land binnenviel…….. Dit terwijl de geheime diensten en politie in binnen en buitenland hun werk niet doen. Neem de aanslag van gisteravond in Parijs, de dader was al een paar jaar in het vizier van de geheime dienst en de politie (voor de zoveelste keer)………. Reken maar dat men niet alleen in Frankrijk om nog meer antiterreurmaatregelen zal schreeuwen, maatregelen die een politiestaat in wording ten goede komen……….

Zie ook:

Taser pilot project mislukt en toch mag de politie dit dodelijke martelwapen blijven gebruiken……..

Demente bejaarde van 73 getaserd: politie en verplegend personeel wisten niet dat dit tegen de regels is…….

Taser martelwerktuig maakt zoveelste slachtoffer, politie NL werkt gewoon door met dit barbaarse onding…….

Hans Schoones (politievakbond) wil het stroomstootwapen, niet de verlengde wapenstok…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Taser wapen onschadelijk? Een enorme leugen!

Segers, god’s eigen rentmeester wil martelen met stroomstootwapens

Teeven tasert softdrugsgebruikers

Opstelten en Teeven bestrijden de door henzelf veroorzaakte ellende

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt (nog) niet voor de labels: Balko en Zinn. .

Mijn excuus voor de vormgeving, kreeg e.e.a. niet op orde.