Britse banken steunen kolenverbranding met 25 miljard pond

Dacht
dak ik uit m’n stoel donderde toen ik gisteren een kop van een
Unearthed artikel las: (de 4 grootste) Britse banken steunen de
kolenindustrie met maar ‘liefst’ 25 miljard pond (ons miljard, dus
Engels biljoen).

Door het
financieren van o.a. nieuwbouw van kolencentrales dragen de banken bij aan
de vernietiging van de aarde zoals wij die kennen en waar de gevolgen van de klimaatverandering intussen al duizenden slachtoffers hebben gemaakt…. Vergeet niet (wat men bij die banken al lang is vergeten) dat wij na het volledig ‘losbarsten’ van de bankencrisis de banken op de been moesten houden met vele miljarden van ons belastinggeld……  

Moet je
nagaan: 4 jaar na het Klimaatakkoord van Parijs, waar ook de
bankwereld beterschap beloofde, dit jammer genoeg onder door henzelf
opgestelde criteria, ofwel geldig tot de deur achter de laatste
klimaatganger in Parijs werd gesloten….. (hetzelfde kan je stellen van de grote oliemaatschappijen, waar Shell het klimaatakkoord van Parijs op 8 punten niet nakomt…..*)

De banken moeten als de oliemaatschappijen dan ook betalen voor de gevolgen van de klimaatverandering die zij met leningen mogelijk hebben gemaakt, sterker nog: als de oliemaatschappijen zouden de grofgraaiers van de banken terecht moeten staan voor het Internationaal Strafhof (ICC) wegens massamoord en grootschalige vernietiging van natuur, plus de vernietiging van roerende en onroerende goederen……..

Moet je nagaan: The Royal Bank of Scotland is in feite een staatsbank, ofwel ook op andere manieren subsidieert de Britse regering het verbranden van steenkool, zoals onze regering dat ook nog steeds doet en dan durft zijne VVD leugenachtige hufterigheid Rutte te zeggen dat Nederland voorop loopt op duurzaam gebied….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ach ja, eens een leugenaar…….

Voor de begeleidende staatjes, zie het origineel (bijzonder lullig van Unearthed dat je deze niet kan overnemen…..)

Revealed:
UK banks’ £25 billion support for global coal

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Revealed: UK banks’ £25 billion support for global coal

UK
banks have supported companies building new coal plants with
financing worth almost £25 billion since the Paris climate deal,
according to data gathered by environmental organisations Urgewald
and BankTrack and shared with Unearthed.


In
2015, world leaders agreed to ensure finance reduced greenhouse gas
emissions, but new data shows that HSBC, Standard Chartered, Barclays
and Royal Bank of Scotland continued to support firms investing in
coal.


The
data shows that those four banks supported companies with plans to
build new coal plants to the tune of $31.8 billion or £24.7 billion
between 2016 and 2019.


Between
them, these companies plan to build 174 gigawatts of new coal plants,
equivalent to the total operating capacity of the EU and Australia
put together. However, industry data is not yet sufficiently
transparent to calculate how much of the money is used directly for
coal plant construction. 


The
plans include the Adani megamine in Australia, a controversial new
coal plant in Germany and huge coal expansion in Indonesia.


Over
the period, HSBC was the biggest coal financer out of all UK banks,
with its support worth £8.4 billion. This consisted of £2.1 billion
of loans and £6.1 billion of underwriting.


Underwriting
is what banks do when companies issue bonds on the public markets. An
underwriting bank purchases bonds and then sells them on.


Despite
positioning themselves as concerned about climate change Barclays and
Standard Chartered actually increased the amount of support they
provided in the last two years, compared to 2014-2016.


The
figure for Barclays rose from £2.8 billion to £5.8 billion and the
figure for Standard Chartered rose from £2.5 billion to £6.6
billion.


HSBC,
meanwhile, has decreased its support for companies building new coal
plants from £8.7 billion to £6.1 billion.


The
state-owned Royal Bank of Scotland exited the global coal sector last
year, providing no financing at all for companies building new coal
plants from January to September.

Four
years since Paris


In
2015 at the United Nations climate conference in Paris, leaders
signed an agreement including a commitment to “making finance flows
consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and
climate-resilient development”.


The
UK will next year host next year’s annual climate conference,
billed as the most important since Paris because world leaders are
meant to upgrade pledges made in 2015.


Greig
Aitken, coal campaigner at BankTrack, told Unearthed:
“One year out from the UK’s hosting of the UN Climate Summit, if
Barclays, HSBC and Standard Chartered don’t act rapidly to rein in
their financing of coal expansion companies, the UK government should
take steps or risk turning up in Glasgow with coal dust on their
faces thanks to our big fossil banks.

Compared
to their European counterparts, UK banks have stubbornly failed for
several years to adequately respond to the worsening climate
emergency by at least introducing policy restrictions to
significantly curb their sponsoring of coal expansion around the
world. Cosmetic policy tweaks no longer cut it.”


The
data, which was gathered from financial databases at Bloomberg and
Refinitiv and from company reporting, is part of a bigger report that
Urgewald and BankTrack plan to publish on the financing of new coal
plants globally. They shared the UK information with Unearthed in
advance of the final report.


It
is based on Urgewald’s list of 258 companies with known coal plant
expansion plans, 51 of which received financial support from UK
banks.


Between
2017 and 2019, the Finnish state-owned energy company Fortum received
more funding from UK banks than any other company with coal expansion
plans. It received £2.5 billion from Barclays, mainly in loans, and
£1.7 billion in loans from Royal Bank of Scotland, which is itself
state-owned.


Fortum
recently agreed to take control of the German energy company Uniper
in a 2.3 billion euro deal, meaning it will take over the company’s
numerous coal plants.


According
to Urgewald’s data, Fortum makes only 5% of its revenue from coal
and only 3% of the power it produces is from coal. However, Uniper is
involved in a controversial plan to build a new coal plant in
Germany.


The
plant, Datteln 4, is controversial because of the German government’s
plan to abandon coal as an energy source by 2038. According to a
report from Reuters, the 1.1 gigawatt plant will be allowed to enter
service despite the government’s commission recommending that no
new coal plants be brought into use.


A
spokesperson for Fortum said: “We don’t invest in Uniper because
of coal but despite coal. Our goal is to create a leader in Europe’s
energy transition. The energy transition will require significant
investments in the coming decades not only in renewables, but also in
gas, energy storage, and other flexibility solutions to provide
security of supply.”


A
Uniper spokesperson said that Fortum’s finances were a matter for
Fortum but added that the Datteln 4 project had not received any
“bilateral loans” from UK banks.


Another
state-owned company is second on the list. Perusahaan Listrik Negara
(PLN), an Indonesian government-owned utility company, received £1.8
billion in support from HSBC and £746m from Standard Chartered.


Coal
plants owned by PLN, amounting to 20 gigawatts, already emit 74
million tonnes of CO2 a year, or around 14% of the country’s total
emissions. It plans to develop another 10 gigawatts of coal plants.

According
to a 2015 report from Greenpeace
,
pollution from coal plants has caused the premature deaths of 6,500
people in Indonesia per year. That same report predicted that if
plants currently planned in the country are built, this could rise to
28,300.


Standard
Chartered and Barclays have also provided financial support to the
Indian coal firm Adani. Standard Chartered made a $150m corporate
loan in 2017 and a $600m corporate loan in 2019, while Barclays and
Standard Chartered both underwrote bonds in 2017 and 2019.


The
company is well-known for its mega-mine expansion plans in Australia,
where it is building a massive coal mine. The mine will produce 2.3
billion tonnes of coal over 60 years, according to Adani, making it
one of the largest in the world.


The
role of finance in driving climate change has come under increasing
scrutiny over the last year. In the UK, the issue is of particular
concern given British banks’ outsize influence globally – the UK
banking sector is the largest in Europe and the fourth largest in the
world.


Last
month, Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of England, warned that the
global financial system is backing projects that will raise the
temperature of the planet by more than 4C, far above the 2C limit
pledged in the Paris agreement.


Labour
has promised to give the Bank extra powers to monitor City firms’
progress on carbon emissions.


Banks
have looked to address this issue, introducing restrictions on their
finance policy restrictions in the last two years which have ended
all direct ‘project finance’ to new coal mines and coal plants
globally.


This
data, however, shows that they have continued to use corporate
finance, loaning money to firms involved in coal development and
underwriting loans to those companies.


A
spokesperson for Standard Chartered told 
Unearthed: “Not
having seen the report or its methodology we can’t comment on the
specific figures, but as you are probably aware we 
announced
last year
 that
we will no longer finance new coal power plant projects and we are
revisiting our approach to clients who are dependent on coal for
business revenues (more to come on that later).”


A
spokesperson for Barclays also pointed to the bank’s new policy on
project finance, saying it agrees “with the objective of reducing
financing for coal-powered energy production”.


They
added that they disputed the findings of the report, saying:
“Barclays has comprehensive criteria and controls in place for our
energy related financing, and we firmly believe in supporting the
transition to a low carbon economy.”

An
HSBC spokesperson said: “HSBC recognises the role of the financial
sector in addressing climate change. We do not support new thermal
coal mines and have not financed any new coal fired power plants
anywhere since April 2018.”

======================================

* Zie: Shell houdt zich niet aan het klimaatakkoord: 8 bewijzen

Zie ook: 

Milieugroepen buitengesloten van klimaattop Madrid

Het grootste olieveld ter wereld: niet in Saoedi-Arabië maar in de VS >> het Permian-bekken

Britse regering geeft na 2 jaar eindelijk rapport vrij over Britse schalie-olie- en schaliegaswinning

Klimaattop Madrid: de grote vervuilers hebben veel te veel invloed

Frans Timmermans (PvdA, Europese Commissie) wakker geschrokken: wil geheel hypocriet belasting op kerosine

Klimaattop Madrid bij voorbaat mislukt

Shell en Exxon die ondanks eigen onderzoek niets hebben ondernomen tegen klimaatverandering, willen met subsidie CO2 opslaan in lege gasvelden

Uniper (energiebedrijf van Finse staat) bezig met rechtszaak tegen Nederlandse staat voor sluiten kolencentrales

IETA, lobbygroep van oliemaatschappijen en andere grote vervuilers, manipuleert klimaattoppen

Exxon in VS onder vuur vanwege de al decennialang voorradige kennis over de menselijke hand in de klimaatverandering

Rutte 3 heeft gelogen over subsidies: jaarlijks 2,5 miljard euro belastinggeld naar olie, kolen en gas

Bas Eickhout (‘GroenLinks’ EU) was vanuit Bonn wel tevreden over het Rutte 3 regeerakkoord……….‘ (dezelfde Eickhout die als grofgraaier in de EU stemde voor het langer toestaan van het kankerverwekkende gif glyfosaat, onderdeel van Roundup…..)

Universiteit van Cambridge overstag: 6 miljoen pond voor onderzoek naar oliewinning t.b.v. Shell

Amazonegebied in brand, Black Rock verdient daar vele miljoenen mee‘ 

Kees Verhoeven (D66 2de Kamer) wil een grote EU, maar ‘alleen op de grote onderwerpen…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Klaas Valkering (CDJA en ‘hip haar’): het CDA heeft een eigen duurzaam beleid……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

PvdA, CDA en VVD willen zich niet bij het klimaatakkoord van Parijs neerleggen!!!!

Monsanto vergiftigt niet alleen de wereld, maar heeft zelfs de moordenaars bv Blackwater opgekocht……..

Het volgende bericht kwam ik tegen op het blog van Stan van Houcke. In dit bericht (uit 2013), dat van Counter Current News (slecht werkende site) komt, wordt uitgelegd dat Monsanto, de grote gifmengers en gentech schoften, het agressief paramilitaire bedrijf Blackwater (later ‘Ex Services’ en nu ‘Academi’ genoemd) opkocht. Blackwater werkte o.a. voor multinationals als Monsanto, Chevron en banken als Barclays en Deutsche Bank. Blackwater heeft zich in het verleden o.a. schuldig gemaakt aan diverse oorlogsmisdaden en terrorisme in het algemeen. Daar Blackwater een privé onderneming is, die weliswaar veel voor het ministerie van defensie (lees: ministerie van oorlog) in de VS werkt, kan de regering van de VS daarmee alle claims over oorlogsmisdaden en terrorisme afwijzen en daarmee Blackwater zoveel mogelijk smerige zaken laten uitvoeren………

Het laat zich raden waarom Monsanto een bedrijf als Blackwater opkocht, immers het bedrijf heeft er belang bij, dat haar zaden overal worden verkocht en dat regeringen de boeren houden aan hun contracten met Monsanto. Zo heeft een groot aantal boeren in India zich het leven benomen, daar ze volkomen failliet gingen door hun contract met Monsanto. Dat zit zo: Monsanto verkoopt zaden aan boeren, waarbij die boeren ervoor tekenen, dat zij niet zelf de zaden vermeerderen (zoals ze al duizenden jaren hebben gedaan en doen). Monsanto belooft die boeren gouden bergen, als zij hun zaden afnemen, echter als het tegenzit, bijvoorbeeld door grote droogte, of slecht weer, houden de boeren geen geld over om zaden te kopen voor het volgende seizoen….. Uiteraard geeft Monsanto grote kortingen op de eerste levering, zoals een heroïne dealer dat doet met zijn klanten……

Het laat zich raden, dat er ontwikkelingslanden zijn, die hun boeren niet gaan lastigvallen met de claims van Monsanto, dan is het uiteraard erg handig, als je een goedgetrainde ploeg psychopaten achter de hand hebben, om hun claims ‘wat meer kracht’ bij te zetten………..

Naast dit alles heeft Monsanto nog te maken met milieugroepen, die (volkomen terecht) tegen gentech zijn en bovendien tegen het op grote schaal verspreiden van zwaar gif over de aarde, door dit klote bedrijf……… Altijd handig om een stel psychopaten achter de hand te hebben, om je belangen veilig te stellen, ja toch….???

Monsanto
and Blackwater

Yes,
Monsanto Actually DID Buy the BLACKWATER Mercenary Group!

February
2, 2013 2:39 pm·

monsanto

Reports
that the huge multinational corporation
Monsanto bought the largest mercenary army in the world might have
seemed ridiculous on the surface. But it turns out
that’s exactly what
happened.

A
report authored by Jeremy Scahill for 
The
Nation
 revealed
that Blackwater, later called Xe Services and more recently
“Academi”, had been sold to Monsanto.

The
clandestine intelligence service was renamed in 2009 after it
became notorious and synonymous with numerous reports of
abuses in Iraq, including massacres of civilians.

The
group, originally founded in 1997 by former Navy SEAL officer
Erik Prince, remains the largest private contractor of the
U.S. Department of State “security
services.” It exists in its functional capacity, so that the
state may engage in
terrorism while giving the government the opportunity to deny
it, because those carrying out the war crimes are not directly
reporting to members of the U.S. military hierarchy.

A
number of military and former CIA officers are said to work
for the mercenary group formerly known as Blackwater. The
purpose
 has always been to increase profit
selling their nefarious services-ranging from information and
intelligence to infiltration, political lobbying and paramilitary
training – for other governments, banks
and multinational corporations.

Scahill
indicates that the group does business with multinationals,
like Monsanto, Chevron, and financial giants such as Barclays and
Deutsche Bank, but that this is done through two companies owned by
Erik Prince, owner of Blackwater: Total Intelligence Solutions and
Terrorism Research Center. These officers and directors share the
group.

One
of those partners is Cofer Black, who was known for his brutality
as one of the directors of the CIA.

He
is alleged to have been the one who made contact with Monsanto back
in 2008 as director of Total Intelligence. Black entered into
the contract with the company in order to spy on and
infiltrate organizations of animal
rights
 activists, anti-GM and other dirty
activities of the biotech giant, according to sources close to
Academi.

Monsanto
executive Kevin Wilson declined to comment, when asked directly by
Scahill about this. But he later confirmed to 
The
Nation
 that
the company had in fact hired Total Intelligence in 2008 and
2009.

According
to Monsanto, this was only to keep track of “public
disclosure” of its opponents. He asserted, however, that Total
Intelligence was a “totally separate entity from Blackwater,”
even though it is just one of the myriad of names and forms the
massive mercenary group has adopted over the years.

Scahill
himself, however, says that he has copies of emails from Cofer
Black. They explain that after the meeting with Wilson for
Monsanto, where he explains to other former CIA agents, using their
Blackwater e-mails, that the discussion with Wilson was that Total
Intelligence had become “Monsanto’s intelligence arm,” spying
on activists and other actions, including “our people to legally
integrate these groups.”

In
all, Monsanto paid Total Intelligence $ 127,000 in 2008 and $
105,000 in 2009. After these details began to leak out, they seem
to have buried the paper trail, and perhaps utilized yet another
front for Blackwater to provide the same services.

Activists
have claimed to have confronted agents of Monsanto who roughly fit
the description of mercenaries with the group. Whatever name they
are utilizing at this point, it seems reasonable that if they have
been used in the past – and if they have repeatedly changed their
names and added sub-groups to their organization –
that they have only done the same thing once again.

Monsanto
has been criticized by an array of environmental, peace and even
health activists for their production of toxic poisons spilling
from Agent Orange to PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), as well as
their more common business in selling pesticides, hormones and
genetically modified seeds.

Almost
simultaneously with the publication of
this article in The Nation, the Via Campesina reported the purchase
of 500,000 shares of Monsanto, for more than $23 million by the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which with this action completed
the outing of the mask of “philanthropy.” Another association
that is not surprising.

It
is a marriage between the two most brutal monopolies in the history
of industrialism: Bill Gates controls more than 90 percent of the
market share of proprietary computing and Monsanto about 90 percent
of the global transgenic seed market and most global commercial
seed. There does not exist in any other industrial sector
monopolies so vast, whose very existence is a negation of the
vaunted principle of “market competition” of capitalism. Both
Gates and Monsanto are very aggressive in defending their
ill-gotten monopolies.

Although
Bill Gates might try to say that the Foundation is not linked to
his business, all it proves is the opposite: most of their
donations end up favoring the commercial investments of the tycoon,
not really “donating” anything, but instead of paying taxes to
the state coffers, he invests his profits in where it is favorable
to him economically, including propaganda from their
supposed good intentions.
On the contrary, their “donations” finance projects as
destructive as geoengineering or replacement of natural community
medicines for high-tech patented medicines in the poorest areas of
the world. What a coincidence, former Secretary of Health Julio
Frenk and Ernesto Zedillo are advisers of the Foundation.

Like
Monsanto, Gates is also engaged in trying to destroy rural farming
worldwide, mainly through the “Alliance for a Green Revolution in
Africa” (AGRA). It works as a Trojan horse to deprive poor
African farmers of their traditional seeds, replacing them with the
seeds of their companies first, finally by genetically modified
(GM). To this end, the Foundation hired Robert Horsch in 2006, the
director of Monsanto. Now Gates, airing major profits, went
straight to the source.

Blackwater,
Monsanto and Gates are three sides of the same figure: the
war machine on the
planet and most people who inhabit it, are peasants, indigenous
communities, people who want to share information and
knowledge or any other who does not want to be in the aegis of
profit and the destructiveness of capitalism.

So
why were so many media outlets, editorialists and bloggers
clamoring to say that the purchase was a “hoax”?

That’s
a good question. The more cynical among us might suspect
a financial incentive from Monsanto itself to such “journalists.”
Monsanto indeed has hired a public relations team to seek out
critical blogs and
websites reporting on their crimes against both Nature and
humankind. We have seen this first hand in comments on
PoliticalBlindSpot.com articles on Monsanto. It is not beyond the
realm of possibilities that they have created blogs where
seemingly legitimate authors write organic thoughts, observations
and rebuttals. The public presumes these are real-world people,
when in fact they are working PR for the company.

But
the core argument of those who claim that the Monsanto purchase of
Blackwater is not true lies in the fact that we can only officially
document Blackwater being hired by Monsanto for years. Immediately
following this extensive work that Blackwater did for Monsanto,
they sold the company. Because of the nature of how the sale
transpired, it is impossible to document who the sale was to. The
obvious and logical conclusion to insiders (particularly in the
private security industry), however, is that the sale was in fact
to Monsanto who had been employing the group.

Xe
(now 
Academi)
has, indeed, been purchased
,
and while there’s no way of DOCUMENTING who the new owners really
are, the logical conclusion would be that Monsanto, who had been
employing them prior to the sale are the new owners. This, of
course, would also make sense of the secrecy surrounding the deal
and the identity of the new owners. The
 company
was bought out
 by
private investors via private equity companies that don’t have to
divulge any of their dealings, with Bank of America providing much
of the 
$200
million in financing
 for
the deal.

New
York-based USTC Holdings said it will acquire Xe and its core
operating subsidiaries, but did not disclose the price or terms of
the agreement in a statement.

USTC
Holdings is an investor consortium led by private equity firms
Forte Capital Advisors and Manhattan Partners.

Various
researchers have been trying to document the buy via a paper trail,
but so far without much luck. That, of course, is the point.

One
thing 
that
is known
:
Forte Capital Advisors is the baby of long-time Blackwater ally
Jason De Yonker:

DeYonker
has unique experience with the Company that dates back to
its founding in the late 1990s. He advised the Company through
development of its early business plan and expansion of the
Moyock training facility as well as supporting negotiations of
its first training contracts with U.S. government agencies.
Between 1998 and 2002, Mr. DeYonker co-managed Xe founder,
Erik Prince’s family office which included management of
Mr. Prince’s portfolio companies.

What
does that mean? The guy is a 
glorified
accountant
.

Prior
to joining Forté, Jason co-managed a +$100 million family office.
In addition to actively managing various platform companies, Jason
was a part of the executive team responsible for family wealth
management.

Jason
has spent the last 18 years advising on various mergers,
acquistions and divestitures with an aggregate transaction value
greater than $1 billion. Jason’s experience include: transaction
advisory, portfolio management, real estate development, venture
capital and cross border dealings. Jason began his career with
Arthur Andersen Corporate Finance Group, and was a Director in
Deloitte & Touche’s Corporate Finance Group. He also was the
Finance Director for the West Family Trust, a venture capital group
focused on cross-border transactons.

Jason
recieved a Bachelor of Business Administration, with a
concentration in finance and accounting, from the Univeristy of
Michigan.

The
other investor? It looks like the very junior partner will
be 
Manhattan
Partners
,
a private equity company – a shop that gathers money
from anonymous rich investors and uses the pool of cash
to  leverage buyouts of big companies they wouldn’t have
been able to take over on their own.

Manhattan
Partners invests in “compelling growth and 
special
situation transactions
,”
but this will be their first known foray into defense industries
– 
WarIsBusiness.com
reports
 (via
Spencer Ackerman
):

Manhattan
Growth Partners is led by Dean Bosacki and Patrick McBride. Bosacki
serves on the board of “the world’s largest 
commencement
photography
 business,”
among other companies. Manhattan Growth Partners, which describes
itself as “a progressive thinking private equity firm,” also
holds a majority interest in Hugo Naturals, a line of organic,
vegan-friendly soaps, lotions, scents and soy candles sold at Whole
Foods and other greenwashed retailers.

So
what does this all mean? Did Monsanto actually buy Blackwater? The
answer is yes, but indirectly. The purchase was made through shell
company and a pair of private equity firms. At the end of the
day, it would seem the logical conclusion is that in spite of
arguments to the contrary, Monsanto in fact did by the Blackwater
mercenary group… or at least the renamed Blackwater Xe, and
now Academi Services group. The big question, now
is 
why?

(Article
by M. David, Jackson Marciana and I.A. Jamal; image via #Op309
Media
)

http://countercurrentnews.com/2013/02/monsanto-actually-did-buy-the-blackwater-group/#

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt. Dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Blackwater’, 

Banken ‘hebben echt geleerd van de door hen veroorzaakte crisis….’ Nieuw: bankfraude met valutakoersen!!!

Bij het terugluisteren van een programma op Radio5, hoorde ik afgelopen zondag het NOS nieuws van 19.00 u., dat vorige week woensdag werd gebracht. Hierin het nieuws dat de banken Citigroup (Citibank van CDA druiloor Ruding), JPMorgan Chase, The Royal bank Of Scotland en Barclays zijn veroordeeld tot een gezamenlijke boete van 5,8 miljarddollar, voor het manipuleren van de valutakoersen…….

Gelukkig nog maar even, voordat de topgraaiers van ABN Amro zich ook weer in het grote gore spel van de banken kan mengen, een spel waarbij o.a. de gewone consument zoveel mogelijk wordt uitgezogen en een oor wordt aangenaaid met financiële producten, waar geen hond iets van begrijpt……….

Op het bericht, waar de onderstaande link naar verwijst, kreeg ik een reactie van Aleke Engels, die verwees o.a. naar een YouTube filmpje van André Stemvee ‘Graaien graaien graaien’ Klik op deze link mensen, prachtig en uiterst humoristisch!

Zie ook: ‘ABN Amro naar de beurs…… Weg miljarden aan belastinggeld, maar feest bij de top, volgend jaar een dikke loonsverhoging en dito bonus!!

        en: ‘Citigroup betaalt 100 miljoen in een schikking met justitie VS om verdere vervolging te voorkomen i.z. Libor schandaal……..

        en: ‘Ruding (CDA, o.a. ex- Citibank) leest Nederland de les en wil meer armslag voor de banken……

        en: ‘Onno Ruding (CDA): salarissen normeren is gevaarlijk……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: ‘Ruding herkent veel uit het boek van Luyendijk ‘Dit kan niet waar zijn….’ Dat verbaast me niets…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: ‘Ruding alweer over een mank schuldenpaard getild

        en: ‘Ruding alweer over een mank schuldenpaard getild 2

        en: ‘Ruding: ‘de burger wil hervormingen…….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: ‘Onno Ruding leest de les… zandzakken voor de deur!

        en: ‘De bankencode, de Jager en Ruding

        en: ‘De bankencode of hoe er niets verandert

Voor meer berichten over Ruding, ABN Amro, JPMorgan Chase en/of Barclays, klik op het betreffende label, onder dit bericht.

Banken, de grote boeven

Naar nu blijkt hebben grote banken als JP Morgan, Deutsche Bank en Barclays, onderling afspraken gemaakt over de berekening van rente aan en van klanten.

Het houdt maar niet op, als het over de gore streken van banken gaat, ondertussen mag de grote onderlaag in de maatschappij boeten voor alle smerige deals, disfunctioneren en ronduit frauduleus handelen. Nogmaals blijkt wat een geweldige prestatie de toezichthouders hebben neergezet…..

En maar ouwehoeren over hervormingen in arbeidsrecht, de zorg en de huren………

Bron: BBC World Service.