Skip to content
De Azijnpisser

De Azijnpisser

COMMENTAAR OP NIEUWS, POLITIEK EN MEDIA, ZOVEEL MOGELIJK DAGELIJKS. WILLEM WACHTMEESTER.

Tag: C. Rice

About C. Rice

Subscribe Feeds

Georgië: de VS bezig met de herhaling van de Oekraïne truc

Posted on March 13, 2023June 14, 2024 by Willem Wachtmeester

(On
the top right hand side of this page you can choose for a translation
in the language of your choice in Google Translate
)

 

De opstandige jongeren in Georgië zijn daartoe aangezet door de VS die de premier van het land willen vervangen voor een anti-Russische pro-VS – EU ‘gezindte’ figuur, Salome Zurabisjvili, de president van Georgië, hebben ze al in hun zak. 

Scott Ritter heeft een uitvoerig artikel geschreven over deze zaak, niet in de laatste plaats daar hij getrouwd is met een vrouw met wortels in Georgië. 

Eerst schrijft hij over zijn vrouw en schoonouders die uit hun woonplaats Sukhumi halsoverkop moesten vluchten toen in 1993 de Abchaziërs (ook aangeduid als Abchazen) de stad veroverden nadat ze de omliggende regio al in het bezit hadden. De Abchazische ‘rebellen’ zaaiden dood en verderf en kunnen beter worden aangeduid als meedogenloze terroristen…… 

De vlucht van Georgiërs heeft door de kou in de bergen nog eens aan duizenden het leven gekost…. 

Dit is overigens een andere zaak dan die van Zuid-Ossetië in 2008, dat zich afscheidde van Georgië, nadat het Georgische leger dit omstreden deel van Georgië aanviel en daarbij grote aantallen slachtoffers maakte onder de daar vooral al generaties lang wonende etnische Russen….. Waarna het Russische leger orde op zaken stelde en het Georgische leger in korte tijd wist te verslaan….. Destijds brachten de zogenaamde onafhankelijke westerse (massa-) media en de meeste westerse politici ook al anti-Russische propaganda, waarmee men Rusland de zwarte piet toespeelde zonder in te gaan op de terreur van het Georgische leger tegen de etnische Russen aldaar…….

Tijdens het kijken naar de jonge Georgiërs en hun eis tot het terugnemen van Sukhumi, zag Ritter dat er iets niet klopte aan de scène die zich voor hem ontvouwde. Er miste een ingrediënt aan ‘de soep van emoties’ die was te zien en dat ingrediënt was zijn land >> the United States of America…… 

De demonstratie die deze boze jonge Georgiërs voor het parlementsgebouw hadden gebracht, was van origine niet de roep om actie te ondernemen voor de bevrijding van Sukhumi, maar veeleer een protest tegen een voorgestelde wet waarmee media en niet-gouvernementele organisaties die meer dan 20% van hun inkomsten uit het buitenland krijgen zich moeten registreren als ‘agenten van buitenlandse beïnvloeding’ (wat hier als ‘buitenlandse agenten’ wordt aangeduid). Een wet die gemodelleerd is op de VS >> Foreign Agents
Registration Act (FARA) uit 1938, die mensen verplicht aan te geven wanneer zij in de VS lobbyen ten behoeve van buitenlandse regeringen of (buitenlandse) politieke entiteiten. Een wet die in de VS werd gebruikt tegen de zogenaamde staatszenders Russia Today (RT) en Sputnik, waarvoor in het westen geen ophef ontstond, totdat Rusland hetzelfde deed en de boel explodeerde….. De rest van het westen volgde prompt met de censuur op RT en Sputnik….. Terwijl zeker RT in de VS, Duitsland en Groot-Brittannië werd bemenst door respectievelijk VS, Duitse en Britse journalisten en opiniemakers……

Critici van deze wet in Georgië verklaarden dat als de wet zou worden aangenomen, een wet die ze belachelijk maakten als een pro-Russische wetgeving, die het doel zou verhinderen dat Georgië lid zou kunnen worden van de NAVO en de Europese Unie (EU), waarbij men erop wees dat de buitenlandse agenten wet in 2012 door Rusland werd aangenomen tegen niet-gouvernementele organisaties (Ngo’s) die het werk van oppositieleden ondersteunden….. Vergeet hierbij niet dat organisaties als terreurorganisaties NSA maar vooral de CIA (geheime diensten van de VS) en andere overheidsorganisaties van de VS de boel in niet VS welgevallige landen destabiliseren met het steunen van gewelddadige groeperingen en het organiseren van opstanden, iets wat bijvoorbeeld de CIA een paar jaar geleden volmondig heeft toegegeven….. (zo meer daarover)

Ritter stelt dat de Georgische critici gelijk hebben, de praktische uitwerking van de buitenlandse agenten wet zou hebben aangegeven hoe Georgische politiek en bestuur werd ‘overspoeld’ met buitenlands geld en invloed. Deze dreiging kwam echter niet van Rusland (zoals je al begrepen zal hebben na het voorgaande) maar uit de VS, die jaarlijks 40 miljoen dollar via het Verenigde Staten Agentschap voor Internationale Ontwikkeling (United States Agency for
International Development >> USAID) deed toekomen aan oppositie en anti-regeringsgroeperingen in Georgië om te gebruiken voor een ‘zachte staatsgreep’ in dat land, ofwel geld bedoelt om de huidige regering te vervangen voor een regering die de VS doelstellingen zou volgen en niet die van Georgië, inclusief het openen van een tweede front tegen Rusland…..

Het eerste front is uiteraard Oekraïne, waar de VS middels de CIA voor 2014 een opstand organiseerde, regisseerde en betaalde met 5 miljard dollar, met het doel de pro-Russische democratisch gekozen president en regering ten val te brengen (ook onder regie van de CIA)…… In 2014 resulteerde dit inderdaad in een coup tegen de democratisch gekozen president Janoekovytsj en de daaropvolgende massamoord op etnische Russen, plus de oorlog tegen deze mensen in Oost-Oekraïne….. Kortom een oorlog tegen de afgescheiden staatjes Luhansk en Donetsk, wat volgens de VN begin vorig jaar al tot de dood van meer dan 14.000 etnische Russen heeft geleid, ofwel die mensen werden vermoord door het nazi-leger van Oekraïne, dit zonder dat er 8 jaar lang enige strafmaatregel als sancties werden genomen door het westen tegen de fascistische dictatuur van eerst de door de VS geparachuteerde corrupte fascistische juntaleider Porosjenko en later de corrupte fascistische ‘president’ Zelensky……. (gekozen terwijl de meeste oppositiepartijen waren verboden en velen werden geïntimideerd niet te gaan stemmen….)

Jammer dat Ritter vooral wijst naar USAID en niet naar de CIA die wel degelijk ook een hoofdrol speelt in Georgië. Terwijl het toch heel duidelijk is dat wat de CIA deed in Oekraïne, waarbij ook USAID een rol speelde en waarbij hetzelfde scenario wordt gevolgd als dat nu wordt gebruikt in Georgië…… 

Het is dan ook duidelijk dat de VS achter de opstandige jongeren staat en deze heeft gemobiliseerd, het is dan ook te verwachten dat de VS middels de CIA en haar contacten in Georgië met USAID zal proberen een algehele opstand te bewerkstelligen en daar op zeker al druk doende mee is…..

Verder stelt Ritter in zijn artikel volkomen terecht dat het de VS geen bliksem interesseert als hierdoor Georgiërs het leven zullen verliezen (zoals het de VS geen reet interesseert dat er Oekraïners, waaronder etnische Russen en Russische militairen om het leven komen), immers het gaat ook hier om het belang van de VS >> de oorlog die deze terreurentiteit voert tegen Rusland, met het doel om haar hegemonie over de wereld te bewaren…… Het interesseert de VS al evenmin dat het de boel steeds verder destabiliseert in Europa, één van de doelen is zelfs om de EU economie in het slop te helpen wat de VS economie alleen maar ten goede zal komen….. (vandaar ook de handelsoorlog van de VS tegen China, het land dat ook het beoogde uiteindelijke militaire doel is van de VS, meer nog dan Rusland……)

Ritter zegt er niets over maar reken gerust dat politici uit de EU lidstaten ook in deze slippendragers zijn van de VS en de president van Georgië stroop om de mond smeren en Irakli Garibasjvili, de pro-Russische premier van Georgië, onder druk zetten de banden met Rusland te verbreken……

Lees het verder uitstekende artikel van Scott Ritter waarin je verder nog een aankondiging vindt van Ritter dat hij morgen, 14 maart 2023, via YouTube op dit artikel in zal gaan (als het klopt zal dat om 20.00 u. morgenavond plaatsvinden) en waarin hij vragen van het publiek zal beantwoorden.

(als
je het Engels niet machtig bent, zet dan de tekst in Google translate
dat
je rechts bovenaan deze pagina ziet staan,
eerst
om in het Engels door in het menu van Google translate op Engels te
klikken, waarna je weer kan klikken op die vertaalapp en je dan
bovenaan in het menu Nederlands ziet staan, klik daarop en de hele
tekst staat in het Nederlands, de vertaling is van een redelijk goede
kwaliteit
.)

 

Farewell, Sukhumi

Georgian protesters unwittingly imperil their nation’s survival

Scott Ritter

13 hr ago

Georgians protest against foreign agent registration legislation, March 2023

“Sokhumi!” Sokhumi!” Sokhumi!”

The
shouts ring out from the assembled crowds of Georgian youth in
Rustaveli Plaza, in front of the parliament building in the Georgian
capital of Tbilisi. Sukhumi (
Sokhumi is the
Georgian pronunciation) is the capital of Abkhazia, the breakaway
Georgian territory which separated after a year-long war that left
thousands of dead on each side, and hundreds of thousands of Georgians
without a home.

“Sokhumi!” “Sokhumi!” “Sokhumi!”

Those
words resonated with me more than most Americans. My wife was born and
raised in Sukhumi, and I travelled to Sukhumi in the summer of 1991 in a
successful bid to convince her to marry me.

Sukhumi was where my
wife’s parents met, married, and made a life together, raising a family
while pursuing a career teaching at the local university.

Sukhumi
was where my wife’s father, Bidzina, along with the other male faculty
from the Sukhumi Institute of Subtropical Agronomy, was drafted into the
Georgian military at the age of 62, serving in a unit tasked with
guarding a strategic bridge heading south out of the city. He and his
fellow draftees defended the bridge through artillery attacks that
deafened him, and aerial bombardment that eventually wounded him in the
back.

Despite his wounds, Bidzina helped his fellow academics
defend the bridge to the last, holding it open for the last wave of
refugees to escape the murderous wrath of the Abkhazian rebels who
captured the city from the Georgian defenders in late September 1993.
Only after he ran out of ammunition did Bidzina retreat from his post,
joining the long line of human detritus in their long road of flight
over the mountains, to safety.

Georgian forces surrendering to the Abkhaz on September 27, 1993, and their bodies after being executed later that same day.

My
wife’s family’s home was taken over by the victorious Abkhaz, along
with those of hundreds of thousands of others who were either killed, or
else fled for their lives.

Bidzina rarely talked about his
wartime experience. Once I was able to get him to relate what had
happened during the retreat from Sukhumi. He told me of how many of the
women and children had been forced to flee for their lives in their
night clothes, and how they perished in the freshly fallen snow that
covered the mountains they had sought refuge in.

Bidzina spoke of
coming across the bodies of frozen mothers hugging their children in a
desperate attempt to pass life-saving warmth to their now lifeless
bodies, of carrying newly orphaned infants in his arms, only to come
across more—too many for one man to carry. The pain in his eyes as he
left the rest of the sentence unspoken—that to save some, he had to
leave others to their fate—was haunting then, and haunts me in my
memories today.

There was a reason he hugged his granddaughters so close…

“Sokhumi!” “Sokhumi!” “Sokhumi!”

More
than those who chanted those words, I knew the pain caused by the loss
of that city, and Abkhazia as a whole. For decades, I watched as my
wife’s family suffered with the knowledge that all they had worked for
in life had been abandoned to an enemy who had no intention of allowing
them to return. Bidzina and his wife, Lamara, both died thousands of
miles away from their homeland, condemned to be buried under the foreign
soil of a country they were grateful to for taking them in, but which
was, and could never be, their homeland.

“Sokhumi!” “Sokhumi!” “Sokhumi!”

As
I watched these angry young Georgians demand that their government act
to return “unconquered” Georgia to its control, I knew something wasn’t
right with the scene unfolding before me. There was an ingredient
missing from the soup of emotions on display, and that ingredient was my
country—the United States of America.

 

The
demonstration that brought these angry young Georgians before the
parliament building did not originate as a call to action regarding the
liberation of Sukhumi, but rather to protest a proposed law which would
have required media and nongovernmental organizations that receive more
than 20% of their funding from foreign sources to register as agents of
foreign influence. The law was modeled on the US Foreign Agents
Registration Act (FARA) of 1938, which requires people to disclose when
they lobby in the US on behalf of foreign governments or political
entities.

Critics of the law declared that, if passed, the
legislation—which they derided as a pro-Russian law, could hinder
Georgia’s goals of joining NATO and the European Union, noting that the
foreign agents bill was similar in intent to one enacted in Russia in
2012 that paved the way for the Russian government to close down
numerous non-governmental organizations (NGOs) accused of supporting the
work of opposition politicians.

In many ways, the critics were
correct—the practical outcome of the foreign agents bill would have been
to expose the extent to which Georgian politics and governance had
become overrun with foreign money and influence. The threat, however,
didn’t come from Russia, but rather the United States, which uses the
$40 million in aid funneled through the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID) every year to conduct what amounts to a
“soft coup” in Georgia designed to displace the current government with
one that will be compliant to American—not Georgian—goals and
objectives—including the establishment of a “second front” against
Russia.

All of this is done, according to Samantha Power, the
Director of USAID, to build “a country with free expression, a free
press, & a path to Euro-Atlantic integration.”

But what she
really means is a country that suppresses any dissent as
“disinformation,” uses the media as state-sponsored propaganda, and
removes from power any politician or political party that dares impede
Georgia’s absorption into the US-led NATO sphere of influence.

Georgia’s
Prime Minister, Irakli Garibashvili, does not want an expanded war with
Russia—especially one that drags Georgia into the conflict.

As
such, Samantha Power and her minions at USAID believe the prime minister
of Georgia must now be removed and replaced with an anti-Russian (i.e.,
pro-war) leader cut from the same pro-American cloth as Georgia’s
US-backed President, Salome Zurabishvili.

To accomplish this,
USAID funds programs designed to foment a “bottom-up” transformation of
Georgian society and politics by empowering “diversity” at the
grass-roots level, suppressing opposing points of view in the name of
building “societal resilience to disinformation,” and seizing control of
the electoral process so that the US-controlled “diversity” movements
can prevail in local elections and, by extension, national elections.

The
Georgian foreign agents bill would have exposed the level to which
these USAID-funded programs, and other related US and EU-funded
activities, had infiltrated Georgian society. For that reason, the US
mobilized its paid activists to take to the streets, forcing the
Georgian Prime Minster to pull the plug on the legislation in the
interests of public safety.

Former Supreme Court Justice Louis
Brandeis once famously observed that “Sunlight is said to be the best of
disinfectants,” implying by extension that democracy thrives in an
atmosphere of total transparency.

The fact that Samantha Power and
USAID do not want any sunlight shone on the extent to which their
activities have corrupted Georgian sovereignty is proof positive of the
extent to which the disease of American-funded “soft power” has infected
the Georgian nation.

One would think that the Georgian people had
built up antibodies to the American infection, having suffered through a
short but violent war with Russia in August 2008 brought on by American
exhortations to militarily confront Russia as a prerequisite for
joining NATO. This message was passed to former Georgian President
Mikhail Saakashvili by then-US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
during her July 9, 2008 trip to Georgia. The stated goal of the visit
was to discuss the prospects of Georgia joining NATO, during which time
the senior US diplomat publicly declared America’s support upholding
Georgia’s “territorial integrity.”  

Click here for more info.

Up
until Secretary Rice’s July 2008 visit, Saakashvili had regular
meetings with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, where they discussed
the possibilities for a negotiated solution to the problem of returning
the breakaway territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia to Georgian
sovereign control. In the immediate aftermath of his meeting with Rice,
Saakashvili terminated all communications with Medvedev.

The
extent to which Condoleezza Rice encouraged Saakashvili to provoke a
military conflict with Russia is a matter of dispute. The US State
Department contends that Rice cautioned Saakashvili from taking any
precipitous actions against the Russians, while the former Georgian
President insists Rice had given him the green light to take action.

Regardless,
when Saakashvili sent the Georgian army rolling into South Ossetia on
the morning of August 7, the US was not willing to back up the alleged
exhortations of Condoleezza Rice with military force. While some
participants in the emergency meeting in the White House Situation Room
that was convened in the aftermath of the Georgian incursion, and
Russian response, urged the US military to carry out operations in
support of the Georgian military, such as bombing the Roki tunnels that
connected South Ossetia with North Ossetia, and through which the
Russians were sending troops and supplies to support their
counterattack, then-US National Security Advisor Steve Hadley silenced
the room by asking the simple question, “Are we prepared to go to war
with Russia over Georgia?”

The answer was a resounding “No.”

For
Georgia, this was a bitter pill to swallow. Afterall, Georgians had
paid a blood price for American loyalty, sacrificing 35 killed and 300
wounded while supporting America’s post-9/11 wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan.

To this now must be added 180 dead soldiers, and
another 1,174 more wounded, in Georgia’s short five-day defeat at the
hands of the Russian military, who quickly pushed the Georgians out of
South Ossetia, before pushing into Georgia proper, halting just outside
the capital of Tbilisi.

Russian tanks on the road to Tbilisi, August 2008

America
is fully prepared to let Georgians die for our causes, whether on the
soil of far way lands that pose no threat to Georgia, or on Georgian
soil in pursuit of American geopolitical ambition.

But we will never sacrifice a single American life in defense of Georgia.

You
see, in the minds of American officials like Samantha Power and
Condoleezza Rice, Georgia exists only to do the bidding of its American
master.

The Georgian youth shouting “Sokhumi!” “Sokhumi!” Sokhumi!” into
the evening air in Tbilisi’s Rustaveli Plaza labor under the misguided
notion that there exists some sort of fraternal bond between them and
the American people.

They couldn’t be more wrong.

To
the extent Americans know anything about Georgia and Georgian culture,
this “knowledge” is limited to a superficial appreciation of Georgian
cuisine and dance that can be encapsulated into what I call the “five
K’s”—
Khinkali, Khachapouri, Khvanchkara, Kartuli, and Khoroumi.

Khinkali,
or Georgian dumplings, are a mainstay in Russian and/or Georgian
restaurants, a popular appetizer made of twisted dough stuffed with
minced meat (traditionally lamb, but also beef and pork mixed), onions,
chili pepper, salt, and cumin which, because the meat is uncooked when
placed in the dough, produces a savory broth when boiled. Connoisseurs
of
Khinkali know to suck the broth from the dough
ball, lest it explode when cut into, and to leave the thick twisted knot
on their plate as evidence of their conquest (because you can’t eat
just one).

Khinkali (left) and Adjarian Khachapouri (right)

Khachapouri is
the delicious Georgian cheese bread which has various variations,
depending upon where in Georgia it is being made. Adjarian
Khachapouri,
consisting of a thick boat-shaped bread loaf containing cheese topped
by an egg, is very popular. My wife’s family is more particular to
Imeruli
Khachapouri, where a thin layer of cheese
is placed between two thin layers of dough to produce a pizza-like crust
filled with a buttery-cheese center that bursts with flavor when
consumed. There are, as one can imagine, various variations of these
theme.

And what better to wash down a fine Georgian meal of Khinkali and Khachapouri than a bottle of Khvanchkara, a Georgian semi-sweet red wine. Named after the village where the winery is established, Khvanchkara wine
dates to a process perfected in the 1880’s by Dmitri Kipiani, a member
of the Georgian nobility, who in 1907 entered his wine, at that time
called “The Kipiani Wine,” in the European Wine Festival, where it took
home the Gold Grand Prize. In 1927 the Kipiani winery was taken over by
new management (it was, after all Soviet times, when nobility were
openly frowned upon—or worse). Renamed “Khvanchkara, Ltd,” the new
winery continued the tradition of Kipiani, producing a wine which was
identical to that of its predecessor in every way except the name.

The
Kipiani Wine had caught the attention of a young Seminarian-turned
revolutionary named Ioseb Dzhugashvili—better known as Joseph Stalin—and
when it reemerged as
Khvanchkara, Stalin (by then
three years into his tenure as the leader of the Soviet Union) adopted
it as one of his favorite wines, serving it at every meal and function.
Today
Khvanchkara is known more by the notoriety of the man who once consumed it than its actual bona fides as an award-winning wine.

The
Georgian National Ballet (formerly the Georgian State Dance Company,
formed in 1945 by Iliko Sukhishvili and Nino Ramishvili) serves as the
primary exporter of traditional Georgian dances to the rest of the
world. Two dances in particular stand out in the minds of most
non-Georgians who attend a performance. First is the traditional
Georgian wedding dance, know as the
Kartuli. The
combination of grace and chivalry that defines Georgian women and men,
respectively, is on display throughout the performance as the performers
glide across the stage, mesmerizing all who watch.

But it is the Khoroumi,
a traditional dance born from the Georgian martial tradition, that
entices most, especially its dramatic concluding sword dance. It is also
in the roots of the
Khoroumi that the tragic reality of the Georgian nation can be deciphered.

The Georgian National Ballet perform the Khoroumi

The Khoroumi is derived from the history of the Diaokh, an 8th-century
BC tribal union located in northeastern Anatolia, and the Colchis, best
known from Greek mythology as the destination of Jason and the
Argonauts, and home to Medea and the Golden Fleece. Ancient Diaokh was
defeated by the precursors of modern-day Armenia, the Urartians, while
Colchis succumbed to successive invasions by the Persians, Armenians,
and Romans.

The reality is that history did not
provide the ancient Georgians with many opportunities to dance the
victorious sword dance that has become the defining moment of the
Khoroumi.

It is of interest to note that the version of the Khoroumi made
popular by the Georgian National Ballet is an amalgam drawn from
variations popular in Adjaria, among the Laz, and in Guria.

Adjaria
is a predominantly Muslim region of Georgia that borders Turkey, and is
home to Batumi, Georgia’s principal port city on the Black Sea coast.
Formerly an Ottoman territory, Adjaria was taken by the Russians after
the 1876-1878 war with Turkey, recaptured by the Ottomans in 1918 (and
later the Turks in 1921), before eventually incorporated into what
became the Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic under the Treaty of Kars,
Article 6 of which holds that Turkey is a guarantor of Adjarian autonomy
(something modern-day Georgian nationalists should bear in mind.)

The
Laz trace their heritage back to the Colchis and consist of Georgian
peoples who settled in the Trabzon region of modern Turkey. Afforded a
modicum of autonomy under the Byzantines, the Laz eventually were
absorbed by a succession of Georgian principalities and kingdoms, during
which time they were imprinted with their Georgian cultural identity,
before being occupied by the Ottoman Empire in the 17
th century.
For the next 200 years the Laz resisted Ottoman rule, fighting to hold
on to their Georgian heritage, before finally being crushed in the
mid-19
th century. Today the Laz reside primarily
in Turkey, with both their language and cultural identity in danger of
becoming extinct.

To the north of Adjaria is the
Georgian region of Guria, which has known its fair share of trials and
tribulations over the centuries. In the 17
th century,
Gurian princes were compelled to pay an annual tribute to their Ottoman
masters of 56 young girls and boys. And, during the 1876-1878 war
between Russia and the Ottomans, Guria served as the frontline, and was
laid to waste. Guria was considered to be the most ethnically
homogeneous region of all Georgia, leading to a strong sense of national
identity which proved to be its undoing.

The Gurian
peasantry revolted against Russian nobility in 1902, and again in 1905,
before being slaughtered by the Cossacks dispatched by the Tsar to bring
them to heel. From 1918 until 1921, Guria once again took a leading
role in helping create the short-lived Democratic Republic of Georgia,
before being crushed by the Red Army and transformed into the Georgian
Soviet Socialist Republic.

The Gurians are neighbored to the
north by two other Georgian peoples—the Svans and the Mingrelians. The
Svans settled in the mountainous region of northern Georgia, while the
Mingrelians occupied the valleys and plains of north of Guria. Like
Guria, both Svanetti and Mingrelia are considered hotbeds of Georgian
nationalism. It was the Svans who, in the summer of 1989, famously
emerged from their mountain redoubt in
Zemo Svaneti, shirtless, to march on Sukhumi to stamp out unrest among the Abkhazian minority.

And
it is a Mingrelian scholar, Zviad Gamsakhurdia, who is considered by
many to be the father of Georgian nationalism and who served as
Georgia’s first president following independence from the Soviet Union
in 1991. It was under Gamsakhurdia’s leadership that Georgia sought to
violently suppress South Ossetian independence to preserve Georgian
sovereignty and territorial integrity in the aftermath of the collapse
of Soviet authority, setting the scene for Georgia’s short, tragic war
with Russia in 2008.

Today the crowds of young Georgians gather in Tbilisi, shouting “Sokhumi! Sokhumi!” “Sokhumi” to
entice the Georgian government to recapture Abkhazia through force of
arms, thereby fulfilling the larger NATO-driven objective of opening a
second front with Russia. Lest they become too nostalgic over
perceptions of Georgian nationalistic military might, however, history
provides a stark reminder that all is not what it seems to be.

In
September 1993, when the fate of Sukhumi hung in the balance, it was
Mingrelian militias under the control of Loti Kobalia, a Gamsakhurdia
loyalist, who blocked the train carrying Georgian reinforcements to
Abkhazia, disarming them, and dooming the Sukhumi garrison—and the
civilian population they protected—to defeat.

And in October
1993, after the fall of Sukhumi, tens of thousands of Georgian refugees
who were fleeing for their lives had to make the journey through the
mountains of
Zemo Svaneti, where armed gangs of
their erstwhile Svan allies set up roadblocks, robbing the desperate
Georgians of whatever possessions they had managed to bring with them,
before sending them on a journey over the snow-covered Kodori Gorge,
where scores of women, children, and the elderly perished of exposure
and starvation.

Georgian refugees from Sukhumi make their way over the mountains while fleeing from Abkhaz forces, October 1993

Sukhumi,
the capitol of Abkhazia where my wife was born and raised, is no longer
under Georgian control. Yes, it was the Abkhaz militias, backed by
Russia, the Chechens, Armenians, and other northern Caucasus peoples who
carried out the attacks that led to the slaughter of thousands of
Georgian civilians and the ethnic cleansing of more than 200,000 others,
including my wife, her brother, and their parents.

Yes, it was
the policies of Soviet ideologues such as Mikhail Andreyevich Suslov
that helped foster and nurture the separatist imaginations of the Abkhaz
and other northern Caucasus peoples as a counter to nascent Georgian
nationalism.

But the origins of the Abkhazian conflict of
1992-93 can be traced to the nationalistic excesses of Georgians as
well. It was the criminal gangs of Jaba Ioseliani’s paramilitary
Mkhedrioni (“Horsemen”),
whom Eduard Shevardnadze unleashed on Sukhumi in August 1992, that
transformed what had been a political dispute between Georgia and its
Abkhaz minority into a Civil War which Georgia eventually lost.

Georgians
betraying Georgians is a theme, it seems, one that cost Georgia its
Abkhazian territories, including the city of Sukhumi, in 1993, and which
today appears hell-bent on setting up Georgia for its lemming-like
effort to provoke Russia into a war that Georgia cannot win, and which,
if it occurs, it will not survive as a modern, viable nation state.

Yes, you brave sons and daughters of Georgia—chant your slogans, eat your Khinkali and Khachapouri, drink your Kvanchkara, and watch your women dance the Kartuli, before regaling yourself with the masculine drama of the Khoroumi.

But keep in mind that the Khoroumi is
the dance of a defeated people whose ambitions of glory were, always
and inevitably, crushed by the power of larger neighbors.

Russia is a larger neighbor.

  

Scott Ritter will discuss this article and answer audience questions on Episode 53 of Ask the Inspector.

The youth of Georgia would do well to consider the following: few, if any, Americans can appreciate the role of Khinkali and Khachapouri in Georgian life, or the history of Georgian wine-making that is encapsulated in Kvanchkara, the social intricacies of the Kartuli, and the painful history behind the Khoroumi.

To most Americans, it is just food, wine, and some funny dancing.

This is the reality of the society you Georgians are betting your future on—America doesn’t care about you.

Americans don’t even really like you. We barely tolerate your food and wine, and we view your culture as a mere curiosity.

History clearly shows that we are definitely not going to die for you.

You exist only to serve our larger geopolitical goals and objectives.

You are nothing more than part of the “belt of instability” being installed by the United States along Russia’s periphery.

Reflect on that for a moment—Georgia’s American purpose is to generate regional instability. Who pays the price?

Not America.

Georgia.

Georgia is but a smaller version of Ukraine, another cog in the American “belt of instability.”

Reflect on that as you act on the American-driven goal of opening a second front against Russia.

Reflect on the fate of Ukraine.

Reflect on the hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian dead.

Reflect on the tens of millions of displaced and homeless Ukrainian people.

Reflect on the trillion-plus dollars of infrastructure damage to Ukraine.

Reflect on the Ukrainian territory now permanently lost.

Reflect
on the fact that Ukraine will, as was the case with Afghanistan before
it (and South Vietnam before that), ultimately be abandoned to its fate
by its good “friends,” the Americans.

And understand that what Russia has done to Ukraine in a year can be accomplished against Georgia in less than a month.

Georgia
will lose Abkhazia and South Ossetia for good–forever. Russia may very
well take Poti for good measure, along with Gori and Kutaisi. And why
not? If Georgia wants to transform itself into a permanent military
threat to Russia, then Russia is obliged to permanently remove that
threat.

Once Georgia begins being carved up, Turkey may take
Adjaria. This is not idle speculation—Turkish President Recep Erdogan
has been making statements about Turkey’s historic claim to Batumi under
the terms of Attaturk’s “National Contract,” or
Misak-i Milli, of 1920, which set forth the terms of the founding of the post-Ottoman modern Turkish Republic.

Once
Georgia begins to be partitioned, there is not a damn thing either the
United States, the European Union, or NATO can or will do about it.

Georgia will cease to exist as a viable modern nation state.

Guaranteed.

Why? Once again, I remind the people of Georgia—America doesn’t like you.

We are not your friend.

We are using you.

And when we are done using you, we will abandon you.

I’ll leave every Georgian reading this to reflect on the following:

Russian women can knead the dough used to make Khinkali with
the same patient skill as the women of Georgia, because they have
Georgian friends and relatives with whom they grew up doing just that as
an act of social bonding.

Russian women can appreciate the intricacies associated with making the different styles of Khachapouri, because they have vacationed in Georgia, and know the pleasant culinary vagaries of its different regions.

Russian men can discard the Khinkali tops with abandon, devouring slices of Khachapouri,
because eating Georgian food is second nature to them—they have done so
all their life. Georgian cuisine is not foreign to them—it is
their cuisine,
because every Russian city of note has at least one Georgian
restaurant. And they can do this while chasing each savory bite with a
sip of
Kvanchkara, all the while discussing the
legacy of Stalin with a level of detail and passion that only comes from
being raised in the shadows of a shared legacy.

Georgians and Russians bled together in the Great Patriotic War.

Georgians and Russians suffered together in the Gulag.

Georgians and Russians studied together in the same universities.

Georgians and Russians have married and raised families together.

Russians watched the Kartuli and Khoroumi being performed just like Georgians watched Swan Lake and The Nutcracker Suite,
with a mutual appreciation of the cultural and historical importance
and relevance of each step, each gesture, each movement, because it was
their shared culture.

In 1829, a Russian poet, Alexander
Sergeyevich Pushkin, wrote “Upon the Hills of Georgia,” following the
rejection of a marriage proposal. He joined the Russian Army, and was
sent to serve in Georgia where, in the foothills of the southern
Caucasus Mountains, along the banks of the Aragvi River, he penned this
classic verse of unfulfilled love.

Dark falls upon the hills of Georgia,

I hear Aragva’s roar.

I’m sad and light, my grief – transparent,

My sorrow is suffused with you,

With you, with you alone…My melancholy

Remains untouched and undisturbed,

And once again my heart ignites and loves

Because it can’t do otherwise.

Statues to Alexander Pushkin (left) and Mikhail Lermontov (right) in Tbilisi, Georgia

Pushkin
knew and understood Georgia. He had read Shota Rustaveli, and from such
a foundation he was able to write a poem about unrepentant love, set in
the beauty of Georgia, as told by a man whom many have come to
recognize as representing the very soul of Russia.

Pushkin’s words
served as an inspiration for other Russian writers, such as Mikhail
Yuryevich Lermontov, another Russian officer who spent time in Georgia,
and who became known as “the poet of the Caucasus.”

My point is simply this—Russians know Georgia. Russians understand Georgia. Russians love Georgia.

The
fact of the matter is, despite all of the difficulties between Russia
and Georgia, Russia is, and forever will be, a better friend to Georgia
than America.

“Sokhumi!” “Sokhumi!” “Sokhumi!”

The
people of Georgia have allowed themselves to be seduced by the illusion
of American friendship into believing that the road to Sukhumi runs
through Washington, DC and Brussels, when all along all they had to do
was keep the road to Moscow open, and Sukhumi could be theirs again.

I
watch in sorrow as the misguided youth of Georgia chant the name of a
city they have never known and, because of their misguided actions, will
never know. And as I listen to their foolish words, I understand that,
unless Georgia changes course, my family and I, together with all of
Georgia, must bid the city we know and love farewell, because if Georgia
opens a second front against Russia, Sukhumi will be lost to us
forever.

The fall of Sukhumi to Abkhaz rebels and their allies, September 27, 1993

=================================================

Zie ook: ‘WDR 5 over Russische trollenfabrieken‘ (voor meer info over Oekraïne zie de berichten onder de links in die post en de links naar oujdere berichten over Oekraïne hieronder!!)

‘De Cubacrisis en de VS blokkade van dat land: we zijn anno 2022 op een zelfde punt aangeland‘

‘Westerse
waarschuwingen voor ‘Russische propaganda’ terwijl we verdrinken in
propaganda van de VS en andere westerse landen…….
‘

‘Oekraïne: belangrijke punten die niet mogen worden vergeten, ondanks de propagandawals die over ons heen wordt gereden‘

‘NAVO akkoord met plan tegen groeiende Russische dreiging, ofwel: NAVO bereidt zich voor op oorlog‘

‘Belgische
legercommandant Hofman beschuldigt Rusland van opstoken complottheorieën
rond militair Conings, om zo een cyberleger af te dwingen en liegt
voorts ‘en passant’ over marinefregat
‘

‘NAVO operatie Sea Breeze: oefening in aanval op Rusland‘

‘Stoltenberg (NAVO) speelt de vermoorde onschuld en doet of hij serieus wil overleggen met Rusland‘

‘Voltallige
top van de Strijdkrachten dient per direct ontslagen te worden, ze
hebben zich niet met angst- en haatzaaierij tot het volk te richten
‘ En dat in een zogenaamde democratie…. Zie wat dat betreft ook:

‘Psst.nl, oplichters uit het leger die het volk proberen op te jutten meer geld voor Defensie te eisen‘

‘Geheime dienst VS: Russische spionnen betalen Taliban voor aanvallen VS doelen in Afghanistan…. ha! ha! ha! ha!’
De militaire missies in het buitenland worden door de legertop gezien
als oefeningen in de werkelijkheid…….. Moet je nagaan: daarbij
vallen niet alleen veel burgerslachtoffers, maar ook Nederlandse
militairen!!

‘Tony
Blinken (VS minister van BuZa) liegt als hij zegt dat de VS alleen met
toestemming van het volk geweld gebruikt in het buitenland
‘ 

‘VS en Japan stoken samen de ‘oorlogsboel’ op over de Oost-Chinese Zee‘ (8 november 2018)

‘Kernwapens in Europa: Rode Kruis >> Nederland moet het VN kernwapenverbod tekenen‘ Moet je nagaan >> Nederland heeft dat verdrag niet getekend!!

‘UFO rapport van DNI: welkom voer voor Koude Oorlog beleidsmakers‘ (en zie de berichten onder de links in die post!!)

‘Brief aan de Russische bevolking over ‘Defender 2020’, de zoveelste militaire NAVO oefening langs de grens van hun land‘

‘Porosjenko (Oekraïne) roept de NAVO op tot oorlog tegen Rusland‘

‘Professor Stephen Cohen prikt door de Putin – Trump hysterie heen, hysterie als gevolg van ‘vredesbesprekingen….’‘

Watch: Professor Stephen Cohen Schools Neocon in CNN Debate on Russiagate (7,5 minuut genieten)

‘Vluchtelingencrisis EU één op één veroorzaakt door de VS (met hulp van de NAVO)…..‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht!!)

‘MH17 vliegramp: wat je niet zou mogen weten over Maleisië, het JIT en Oekraïne…‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht!!)

‘Oekraïne,
Georgië en Moldavië hebben oud bondgenootschap doen herleven, in
voorbereiding op NAVO lidmaatschap en verdere actie tegen
Rusland……..
‘

‘De Krim, Georgië en Syrië >> de anti-Russische propaganda…..‘

Archived: UncategorizedTagged: Abchazië, C. Rice, censuur, CIA, coup, FARA, Georgië, I. Garibasjvili, massamoord, NAVO, Oekraïne, oorlog, Ritter, RT, Rusland, S. Power, S. Zurabisjvili, USAID, VS buitenlands beleid, Zuid-OssetiëLeave a Comment on Georgië: de VS bezig met de herhaling van de Oekraïne truc

Irak oorlog: 16 jaar na 20 maart 2003 ontkent de perschef van Bush dat er is gelogen om Irak binnen te vallen…..

Posted on March 21, 2019June 14, 2024 by Willem Wachtmeester

Het gore
lef wat sommigen hebben is niet zelden ten hemel schreiend, zoals de
perschef van president Bush (deze oorlogsmisdadiger en top-idioot mag zich president blijven noemen). Ari Fleischer (de perschef) nam het besluit e.e.a. via Twitter de wereld in
te helpen, waarschijnlijk als reactie op de dreigementen van de VS
tegen het Internationaal Strafhof dat men actie zal nemen tegen de
functionarissen, die zich bezig houden met onderzoek naar VS
oorlogsmisdaden…….

Ongelofelijk wat ploert Fleischer durft te zeggen, terwijl de hele wereld weet (of kan weten) dat de
VS heeft gelogen, leugens die meer dan 2 miljoen Irakezen het leven
heeft gekost, ofwel die mensen zijn in feite vermoord door de
VS……

Fleischer
doet net of de geheime diensten van de VS, Israël en nog een paar
landen zeker wisten dat er massavernietigingswapens lagen in Irak,
weliswaar klopte dit niet, maar dat is iets anders dan liegen, aldus de hufter….. ha!
ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Alsof
die geheime diensten ook maar de neiging hebben om de waarheid te vertellen,
jezus!!

De
wapeninspecteurs van de VN, o.l.v. Blix, hebben uit en te na gewezen op
het feit dat Irak (onder Saddam Hoessein) geen
massavernietigingswapens had en deze zelfs niet voor hen verborgen kon
hebben…..

Overigens liet de Hoop Scheffer, oorlogsmisdadiger van het CDA, vorig jaar weten nog steeds achter de illegale oorlog tegen Irak te staan, ondanks het enorme aantal slachtoffers, een land dat voor een groot deel in puin ligt en waar de oorlog nog lang niet is afgelopen…… Irak, een land waarnaar Nederland vluchtelingen deporteert, rechtstreeks de oorlog in, dit op basis van ambtsberichten van Buitenlandse Zaken, terwijl hetzelfde ministerie nog steeds een negatief reisadvies voor Irak afgeeft….

Caitlin
Johnstone schreef op haar site een uiterst scherp artikel over
deze zaak en laat van Fleischer en anderen geen spaan heel, lezen
mensen, het gaat hier om geschiedvervalsing van de eerste orde, ook
de reguliere (massa-) media doen net of hun neus bloedt als het om de
illegale Irak oorlog gaat, terwijl zij deze oorlog op valse feiten
van A tot Z hebben gepropageerd, waar de kennis over het tegendeel voor het oprapen lag…….. (over het brengen van fake news gesproken….)

On
the Anniversary Of The Iraq Invasion, Bush Press Secretary Claims
Bush Didn’t Lie

by Caitlin
Johnstone

On
the sixteenth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, as the US
government 
threatens
punitive action
 against International
Criminal Court investigators for attempting to look into US war
crimes, former George W Bush administration Press Secretary Ari
Fleischer has decided to 
publish
a Twitter thread
 claiming
that Bush did not lie to the world about Iraq.

Here
is a transcript of the full thread by Fleischer:

The
Iraq war began sixteen years ago tomorrow. There is a myth about the
war that I have been meaning to set straight for years. After no WMDs
were found, the left claimed “Bush lied. People died.” This
accusation itself is a lie. It’s time to put it to rest.
 

The
fact is that President Bush (and I as press secretary) faithfully and
accurately reported to the public what the intelligence community
concluded. The CIA, along with the intelligence services of
Egypt, France, Israel and others concluded that Saddam had WMD. We
all turned out to be wrong. That is very different from lying.
 

After
the war, a bipartisan group was created to determine what went wrong,
particularly why the intelligence community’s conclusions about Iraq
were so different from what was found on the ground after the
war. The group of experts was named the Robb-Silberman
commission. It’s report was issued in March 2005. 
It
can be found in full here
.
Its key finding was that that a “major intelligence failure”
took place. It also stated that no intelligence service was pressured
by the Bush Administration to conclude that Saddam had WMDs.
 

Here
are the key quotes from their report:
 

“Overall
Commission Finding: The Intelligence Community’s performance in
assessing Iraq’s pre-war weapons of mass destruction programs was a
major intelligence failure.
 

Nuclear
Weapons Summary Finding: The Intelligence Community seriously
misjudged the status of Iraq’s alleged nuclear weapons program in the
2002 NIE* and other pre-Iraq war intelligence products. This
misjudgment stemmed chiefly from the Community’s failure to analyze
correctly Iraq’s reasons for attempting to procure high-strength
aluminum tubes.
 

Biological
Warfare Summary Finding: The Intelligence Community seriously
misjudged the status of Iraq’s biological weapons program in the 2002
NIE and other pre-war intelligence products. The primary reason
for this misjudgment was the Intelligence Community’s heavy reliance
on a human source–codenamed ‘Curveball’–whose information later
proved to be unreliable.
 

Chemical
Warfare Summary Finding: The Intelligence Community erred in its 2002
NIE assessment of Iraq’s alleged chemical warfare program. The
Community’s substantial overestimation of Iraq’s chemical warfare
program was due chiefly to flaws in analysis and the paucity of
quality information collected. In the case of Iraq, collectors of
intelligence absorbed the prevailing analytic consensus and tended to
reject or ignore contrary information. The result was ‘tunnel vision’
focusing on the Intelligence Community’s existing assumptions. The
Intelligence Community did not make or change any analytic judgments
in response to political pressure to reach a particular conclusion,
but the pervasive conventional wisdom that Saddam retained WMD
affected the analytic process. The CIA took too long to admit
error in Iraq, and its Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation, and
Arms Control Center actively discouraged analysts from investigating
errors.
 

Finally,
we closely examined the possibility that intelligence analysts were
pressured by policymakers to change their judgments about Iraq’s
nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs. The analysts
who worked Iraqi weapons issues universally agreed that in no
instance did political pressure cause them to skew or alter any of
their analytical judgments.”
 

That
is what the investigators reported, after been given full access to
people throughout the intelligence community. Which leads me to
conclude that there was a liar and his name was Saddam Hussein. He
created an elaborate system of lies to fool western intelligence
services and he succeeded. He wanted us to believe he had WMDs.
 

The
allegaton that “Bush lied. People died” is a liberal myth
created to politically target President Bush. I understand the anger
that was felt after no WMDs were found. But that doesn’t justify
calling the President a liar. I can only hope that serious historians
and other experts do their homework and resist falling for this myth.

Ari Fleischer
✔
@AriFleischer

The Iraq war began sixteen years ago tomorrow. There is a myth about the war that I have been meaning to set straight for years. After no WMDs were found, the left claimed “Bush lied. People died.” This accusation itself is a lie. It’s time to put it to rest.

11.2K

2:44 AM – Mar 20, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Ari
Fleischer is lying. It is an absolute proven fact that George W Bush
and his administration 
lied
extensively
 about
the degree of certainty in intelligence regarding Saddam Hussein
possessing weapons of mass destruction, having ties to Al Qaeda, and
seeking nuclear weapons, all of which (along with Vice President
Cheney’s claim that the US invaders would be “
greeted
as liberators
“)
proved false. The Bush administration did not know the things they
claimed to know with any degree of certainty, but they claimed that
they were certain in order to manufacture support for war. Claiming
to know something you do not know is lying, especially when it’s to
advance an ulterior motive.

“Evidence
from intelligence sources, secret communications and statements by
people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects
terrorists, including members of Al Qaeda,” Bush 
claimed
in January 2003
.
“Secretly, and without fingerprints, he could provide one of his
hidden
 
weapons
to terrorists, or help them develop their own.”

“Simply
stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass
destruction,” Cheney 
claimed
in August 2002
.
“There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our
friends, against our allies, and against us.”

“The
United States knows that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction,”
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld 
said
in December 2002
.
“Any country on the face of the earth with an active
intelligence program knows that Iraq has weapons of mass
destruction.”

“We
are absolutely sure they have continued to develop weapons of mass
destruction, and we are sure they have in their possession weapons of
mass destruction,” Secretary of State Colin Powell 
said
in December 2002
.

“My
colleagues, every statement I make today is backed up by sources,
solid sources,” Powell told the United Nations Security Council
in his infamous 
Iraq
presentation
 in
February 2003. “These are not assertions. What we’re giving
you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence.”

“People
will continue to debate this issue, but there is no doubt in my
mind,” Powell said in the same presentation. “These illicit
procurement efforts show that Saddam Hussein is very much focused on
putting in place the key missing piece from his nuclear weapons
program, the ability to produce fissile material.”

Powell was
not nearly as certain
 as
he claimed to be. None of them were. Facts revealed after the
invasion prove that for all their public claims of complete and total
certainty that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, was aiding and
abetting Al Qaida, and was developing nuclear weapons, behind the
veil of government secrecy there was nothing like certainty at all.

For
starters, Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, who was cited in Powell’s
presentation and who Fleischer refers to by the code name “Curveball”
in the above thread, 
was
known to have been lying
 about
bioweapons long before the invasion. Despite the confident assertions
made by the Bush administration about Janabi’s claims to the public,
no American personnel were present when he made those claims, and
he 
told
the 
Guardianin
2011
 that
the BND (the German intelligence agency who interrogated him) had
known he was lying all along.

“The
BND [German intelligence] knew in 2000 that I was lying after they
talked to my former boss, Dr Bassil Latif, who told them there were
no mobile bioweapons factories,” Janabi said. “For 18
months after that they left me alone because they knew I was telling
lies even though I never admitted it.

Believe
me, back then, I thought the whole thing was over for me. Then all of
a sudden [in the run up to the 2003 invasion] they came back to me
and started asking for more details about what I had told them. I
still don’t know why the BND then passed on my information to the CIA
and it ended up in Powell’s speech.”

Colonel
Lawrence Wilkerson was Powell’s chief of staff and helped him prepare
his UN presentation on Iraq. When asked on MSNBC if he believed he
was lied to about Janabi following the 2011 revelation,
Wilkerson 
told
Cenk Uygur
 that
“I cannot come to any other conclusion, especially when I have
discovered that no US personnel were present when Curveball was
interrogated by the BND, the German intelligence service. That we
accepted that, that we even had a head of the European division for
the CIA, Tyler Drumheller, who at the last minute during Powell’s
preparation, during my preparation of the secretary, had told both
Tenet and McLaughlin that Curveball might not be reliable. That
information was never relayed to the Secretary of State, or to me. I
have some serious doubts about it now. I think there was some
manipulation of this material, and there was some outright lying.”

When asked
by Uygur
 who
he thought lied to him, Wilkerson said one of WINPAC’s two WMD
experts at the time may have been answering directly to Dick Cheney’s
office.

A declassified
report from 2002
 titled Iraq:
Status of WMD Programs 
reveals
that while the Bush administration was making its claims of absolute
certainty regarding the dangers posed by the Iraqi government, behind
the scenes it was damn near the opposite. Some choice excerpts:

“Our
assessments rely heavily on analytic assumptions and judgment rather
than hard evidence. 

The evidentiary base is particularly sparse for
Iraqi nuclear programs.”

“We
range from 0% to about 75% knowledge on various aspects of their
program.”

“Our
knowledge of the Iraqi (nuclear) weapons program is based
largely—perhaps 90%—on analysis of imprecise intelligence.”

“We
cannot confirm the identity of any Iraqi facilities that produce,
test, fill, or store biological weapons.”

“Our
knowledge of what biological weapons the Iraqis are able to
produce is nearly complete. Our knowledge of how and where they
are produced is nearly 90% incomplete.”

“We
do not know the status of enrichment capabilities. We do not know
with confidence the location of any nuclear-weapon-related
facilities.”

“Please
take a look at this material as to what we don’t know about WMD. It
is big.” (That one was from Rumsfeld.)

“We
don’t know with any precision how much we don’t know.”

This
is not the language of certainty. Yet certainty was presented to the
public to manufacture support for a war which murdered a million
Iraqis.

The
2002 
Downing
Street memo
,
made public in 2005, reveals a secret meeting between senior
officials of the British government, intelligence and defense
agencies discussing what they knew about America’s plans for war.
The 
text
of the document
 contains
an assertion by the head of MI6 that Bush had already determined that
the invasion of Iraq would take place, and it was only a matter of
fixing bits of intelligence around a narrative to make the case.

“Military
action was now seen as inevitable,” the document reads. “Bush
wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the
conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were
being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN
route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi
regime’s record. There was little discussion in Washington of the
aftermath after military action.”

“It
seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action,
even if the timing was not yet decided,” the document quotes
Foreign Secretary Jack Straw as saying. “But the case was thin.”

In
a 
2008
hearing before the House Judiciary Committee
,
attorney and author Vincent Bugliosi pointed out that the fact
that Bush lied about Iraq could be proven by the difference between
the classified 2002 National Intelligence Estimate and its
declassified white paper which was made available to the public.
 
The
classified version contained dissents from the consensus and language
which made it clear that the reader was reading assessments and
opinions by the CIA and other intelligence agencies, whereas the
unclassified version saw these things deleted, presenting the
assessments as absolute fact.

“The
evidence that he lied about weapons of mass destruction, by the way,
which is not the basis for this book, are right in front of
me,” 
Bugliosi
said
.
“I have it right here. Here is the evidence. This document here
is the National Intelligence Estimate. I didn’t name it before. I
talked about a classified report. This is it right here. October 1st,
2002, classified NIE report. It is called Iraq’s Continuing
 
Programs
of Weapons of Mass Destruction. In this document right here, the CIA
and 15 other U.S. intelligence agencies use words like this, ‘we
assess that’ or ‘we judge that’ Hussein has weapons of mass
destruction. This document here is the white paper that was given to
you folks here in Congress and the American people. And the words ‘we
assess that’ or ‘we judge that’ were removed, meaning that you folks
here heard a fact, and in fact, it was only an opinion.

“Number
two, on nuclear weapons, this document right here, the classified
report has several important dissents. This document right here, the
white paper that you folks were given and the American people, all of
those dissents were deleted.”

Over
and over and over again we saw the same thing: uncertainty presented
as certainty. Guesses presented as fact. Opinions presented as proof.
That’s a lie. Bush lied. We know this with as much certainty as his
administration was pretending to have in the lead-up to the Iraq
invasion. There was a pre-existing agenda to invade Iraq, and
justifications were advanced to provide an excuse for that invasion
with such extreme aggression that now-National Security Advisor John
Bolton literally 
threatened
to murder an international official’s children
 for
making diplomacy work with Saddam.

Here
are a few more 
courtesy
of 
Vox
:

In
October 2002, Bush said that Saddam Hussein had a 
“massive
stockpile”
 of
biological weapons. But as 
CIA Director
George Tenet
 noted
in early 2004, the CIA had informed policymakers it had “no
specific information on the types or quantities of weapons agent or
stockpiles at Baghdad’s disposal.” The “massive stockpile”
was just literally made up.

In
December 2002, Bush declared, 
“We
do not know whether or not [Iraq] has a nuclear weapon.”
 That
was not what the National Intelligence Estimate said. As Tenet would
later testify, “We said that Saddam did not have a nuclear weapon
and probably would have been unable to make one until 2007 to 2009.”
Bush did know whether or not Iraq had a nuclear weapon — and lied
and said he didn’t know to hype the threat.

On
CNN in September 2002, Condoleezza Rice claimed that aluminum tubes
purchased by Iraq were “only really suited for nuclear weapons
programs.” This was 
precisely
the opposite of what nuclear experts at the Energy Department
 were
saying; they argue that not only was it very possible the tubes were
for nonnuclear purposes but that it was very likely they were too.
Even more dire assessments about the tubes from other agencies were
exaggerated by administration officials — and in any case, the
claim that they’re “only really suited” for nuclear weapons is
just false.

On
numerous occasions, Dick Cheney cited a report that 9/11 conspirator
Mohammed Atta had met in Prague with an Iraqi intelligence officer.
He said this after 
the
CIA and FBI concluded that this meeting never took place
.

More
generally on the question of Iraq and al-Qaeda, on September 18,
2001, Rice 
received
a memo summarizing intelligence on the relationship
,
which concluded there was little evidence of links. Nonetheless Bush
continued to 
claim
that Hussein was “a threat because he’s dealing with
al-Qaeda”
 more
than a year later.
 

In
August 2002, 
Dick
Cheney declared
,
“Simply stated, there’s no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has
weapons of mass destruction.” But as 
Corn
notes
,
at that time there was “no confirmed intelligence at this point
establishing that Saddam had revived a major WMD operation.” Gen.
Anthony Zinni, who had heard the same intelligence and attended
Cheney’s speech, would 
later
say in a documentary
,
“It was a total shock. I couldn’t believe the vice president was
saying this, you know? In doing work with the CIA on Iraq WMD,
through all the briefings I heard at Langley, I never saw one piece
of credible evidence that there was an ongoing program.”

In
2007 General Wesley Clark 
told Democracy
Now
 that
he’d actually been informed of the decision to invade Iraq
immediately after 9/11, while the crosshairs were turning on
Afghanistan and well before the public narrative was being amped up
in demand of an invasion of Iraq. His comments read as follows:

About
ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary
Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to
say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work
for me, and one of the generals called me in.
 

He
said, “Sir, you’ve got to come in and talk to me a second.”
I said, “Well, you’re too busy.” He said, “No, no.”
He says, “We’ve made the decision we’re going to war with Iraq.”
This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, “We’re going
to war with Iraq? Why?” He said, “I don’t know.” He
said, “I guess they don’t know what else to do.” So I said,
“Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to
al-Qaeda?” He said, “No, no.” He says, “There’s
nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with
Iraq.” He said, “I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do
about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down
governments.” And he said, “I guess if the only tool you
have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail.”
 

So
I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were
bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with
Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He
reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said,
“I just got this down from upstairs” — meaning the
Secretary of Defense’s office — “today.” And he said,
“This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven
countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon,
Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is
it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well,
don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I
said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t
show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”

Iraq,
Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. If you’ve been
following the behaviors of the US war machine, Iraq won’t be the only
painfully familiar name on that list.

Ari Fleischer
✔
@AriFleischer

It remains important to learn what we’ve attacked and where. How widespread?
In addition to military targets, I hope we targeted Assad’s palace in Damascus. Leave him alive but destroy his prestige. Leave him without a home, as Assad has left millions of Syrians w/o theirs.

1,914

2:12 AM – Apr 14, 2018 · New York, USA

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Ari Fleischer
✔
@AriFleischer

“In the last few months of 2018, Iran officially entered a deep recession.” Time to step up the sanctions… https://en.radiofarda.com/a/iran-official-figures-alarming-unemployment-2019/29698225.html …

941

1:36 PM – Jan 10, 2019

Iran’s Official Figures Indicate Alarming Unemployment Rate Later This Year

The official unemployment rate has reached 27 percent among young Iranians and over 40 percent among university graduates, says Omid Ali Parsai, chairman of the Iranian Statistical Center.

en.radiofarda.com






Ari
Fleischer is a liar. He 
was
in the thick
 of
the Bush administration’s campaign to sell the Iraq war to the
American public, and to this day he 
continues trying to
sell
 them
on 
new
acts
 of depraved
US interventionism
.
He’s just as much a warmongering neocon inside as he was when he was
behind a podium defending Bush’s wars in the press room, so it’s no
wonder he wants to preserve the image of his insatiable death cult.
Fleischer wants to preserve his legacy, yes, but he also wants to
preserve support for the war machine whose feet he worships at, hence
his ham-fisted attempt at narrative manipulation regarding the
unforgivable Iraq invasion.

The
responses to Fleischer’s Twitter thread have been overwhelmingly
negative, though, so it doesn’t look like anyone’s buying it. In our
new political landscape, where the image of George W Bush is
being 
continually
rehabilitated
,
that gives me a bit of hope.

These
monsters lied to start a war which snuffed out a million human lives
and destabilized an entire region, and they did it right in front of
our faces. The fact that they’re now trying to lie about the thing we
all watched them do is as insulting as it is infuriating. Never let
them pull the wool over your eyes, and never forget what they did.
Forgiveness is 
highly
overrated
.

Thanks
for reading! My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you
enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me
on
 Facebook,
following my antics on
 Twitter, throwing
some money into my hat on 
Patreon or Paypal, purchasing
some of my 
sweet
merchandise
, buying
my new book 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
,
or my previous book 
Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see
the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for
my 
website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Caitlin
Johnstone
 |
March 20, 2019 at 3:25 pm | Tags: 
Ari
Fleisher
, bush, george
w bush
, invasion, iraq, lied, news, Politics, war |
Categories: 
Article, News |
URL: 
https://wp.me/p9tj6M-1Bl

* NIE: National Intelligence Estimate

===============================

Voor meer berichten over de illegale oorlog tegen Irak, klik op het labels Irak, direct onder dit bericht. Let
wel: na een aantal berichten wordt het laatst gelezen bericht telkens
herhaald, dan onder het laatst gelezen bericht even opnieuw op het
gekozen label klikken, enz. enz.

Archived: UncategorizedTagged: A. Fleischer, Al Qaida, Blix, BND, C. Johnstone, C. Rice, Cheney, CIA, Clark, Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld, FBI, G. Tenet, George W. Bush, Irak, MI6, NSC, V. Bugliosi, VS buitenlands beleid, WolfowitzLeave a Comment on Irak oorlog: 16 jaar na 20 maart 2003 ontkent de perschef van Bush dat er is gelogen om Irak binnen te vallen…..

Latest blog posts

  • Ex-topambtenaar zet premier Schoof te kakken. Verder aandacht voor de strijd van terreurgroepen in Syrië
    by De Azijnpisser
    December 6, 2024
  • Bhopal giframp 3 december 1984: 40 jaar onrecht en het eind is nog lang niet in zicht……
    by Willem Wachtmeester
    December 3, 2024
  • De opzet van Israël: na de genocide en etnische zuivering de Gazastrook toevoegen aan de illegaal gestichte Israëlische staat
    by Willem Wachtmeester
    December 2, 2024
  • Het is admiraal Bauer nu geheel en al in de oorlogszuchtige bol geslagen: hij blijft waarschuwen voor een oorlog van Rusland tegen het westen, een oorlog die de VS en haar NAVO-vazallen zelf uitlokken…..
    by Willem Wachtmeester
    November 30, 2024
  • Halsema had gelijk volgens de ‘rechter’: zionistische terreur in A’dam leidt tot verbod op pro-Palestijnse demonstratie tegen de genocide
    by Willem Wachtmeester
    November 30, 2024
  • In plaats van een beloofde kritische omgang met farmaceuten is de PVV voorstander van het stoppen met subsidie voor Ge-Bu
    by Willem Wachtmeester
    November 25, 2024

Recent Comments

  1. Willem Wachtmeester on Hoe lang wil ‘onze’ koning nog koning zijn: ofwel onvervalste Oranje propaganda
  2. Anoniem on Hoe lang wil ‘onze’ koning nog koning zijn: ofwel onvervalste Oranje propaganda
  3. Willem Wachtmeester on Loek Wachtmeester 21 juni 1993 – 12 mei 2023
  4. Willem Wachtmeester on Loek Wachtmeester 21 juni 1993 – 12 mei 2023
  5. Willem Wachtmeester on Loek Wachtmeester 21 juni 1993 – 12 mei 2023 (an update for English readers and readers from other languages)

Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010

Mijn zoon Loek

MUZIEK 'LIKES' VAN MIJN LIEVE ZOON LOEK VIA SPOTIFY EN MIJN 'LIKES' OP SPOTIFY, SHAZAM EN YOUTUBE

Allereerst een lijst met nummers die mijn lieve zoon Loek maakte voordat hij op 12 mei 2023 deze wereld verliet.

©2025 De Azijnpisser

Powered by WordPress//Theme AnaLog by Il Jester//Top ⌅
nl Nederlands
nl Nederlandsen Englishru Русскийes Españolzh-CN 简体中文fr Françaisde Deutschhi हिन्दीit Italianopt Português