Groeiend kwaad, al slapend zien we niet wat er werkelijk gebeurt, ofwel The Matrix in afgezwakte vorm

Tyler
Durden heeft op Zero Hedge een artikel geplaatst van John Whitehead,
eerder gepubliceerd op de site van The Rutherford Institute.

In het
artikel schrijft Whitehead over de films van John Carpenter, waar hij
zijn schrijven m.n. baseert op de film ‘They Live’, een film van meer dan
30 jaar geleden. Hoewel 30 jaar oud, ziet Whitehead in de film
opvallende overeenkomsten met de huidige politiestaat die men VS
pleegt te noemen. Met gebruik van media als de tv prent men de bevolking zaken in als gehoorzaam te zijn en bang te zijn, dit door boodschappen die je normaal niet ziet, maar die de hoofdpersoon met een speciale bril wel kan zien. Voorts heeft de tv dan ook nog het effect op mensen hun zorgen even opzij te zetten, iets dat zonder meer gebeurt met de argeloze kijker….

Men jaagt de mens angst aan voor ‘het onbekende’, ofwel voor bijvoorbeeld terroristen in een ver land, aanvallen op publiek door éénlingen, of zelfs angst voor buren die men niet kent. Alles gevoed met series, films en programma’s over daadwerkelijke misdaad, zoals Opsporing Verzocht (fopsnorren verkocht*). Let wel het gaat hier om de bevolking van de VS, de manier waarop de maatschappij daar is ingericht en hoe de reguliere massamedia worden beheerst door plutocraten en grote investeringsmaatschappijen, hoe Hollywood middels films en series het volk angst aanjaagt middels wat je niet anders kan zien dan een vorm van hersenspoelen….. 

De VS is maar al te vaak het slachtoffer in deze films en series, terwijl de VS een paar keer is aangevallen: Pearl Harbour, in feite niet behorend tot de VS en een aanval die voorkomen had kunnen worden, maar die men expres liet gebeuren zodat de VS zich in WOII kon mengen….. Verder uiteraard 9/11, waarvan intussen meer dan duidelijk is dat deze terroristische aanslagen werden georganiseerd en geregisseerd door de VS zelf…. Niet moeilijk te bedenken dat we in Nederland en de rest van het westen dezelfde kant opgaan, zie alleen al al het fake news en manipulaties in onze reguliere media, voorafgaand en tijdens de illegale oorlogen die de VS deze eeuw begon, waarbij meer dan 2,5 miljoen mensen zijn omgekomen, ofwel feitelijk vermoord door de VS en haar hielenlikkende NAVO-partners, waaronder Nederland (en ja daar betalen we met z’n allen aan mee…)…..

Hoe is het mogelijk dat er zoveel films en series zijn die zogenaamd aantonen dat het westen slachtoffer is van terreur en het onbekende, zodat het terecht lijkt dat het westen met grootschalige terreur ingrijpt in landen waar we niets, maar dan ook helemaal niets te zoeken hebben…??? De werkelijkheid is volkomen omgedraaid, de VS en haar NAVO-partners gebruiken grootschalige terreur in het Midden-Oosten, Afrika en Latijns-Amerika (sinds kort ook met NAVO troepen uit Europa), deze terreur roept logischerwijs agressie op bij de nabestaanden van het enorme aantal slachtoffers…  Hoe meer van deze films en series vertoond worden, hoe meer de mens angst krijgt voor het bestaan en achter de ongebreidelde westerse agressie gaat staan, terwijl geen hond nog ziet dat de terreur die we zelf uitoefenen van een grootte is, waarbij aanslagen in het westen in het niet vallen…… Gevolg van die westerse terreur: het kweken van aanslagen in het westen en enorme vluchtelingenstromen (waar dan schunnig genoeg zelfs angst wordt gekweekt voor die vluchtelingen)…… 

Kortom we laten ons leven en beseffen niet dat e.e.a. zich voltrekt over ons bestaan, we dromen vrij te zijn, maar zijn dat in werkelijkheid allesbehalve…..

Carpenter
is in zijn films altijd sterk anti-autoritair en hij laat de kijker
zien hoe de mens in feite slaapt terwijl onzichtbare machten zich het leven van de slapenden toe-eigenen, dit geldt des te meer voor de
film ‘They Live’.

Vanmorgen hoorde ik dat een geschifte generaal het internet van Nederland wil bewaken, lees: zuiveren van kritiek, waarvoor hij dan het sprookje aanhaalt dat ‘men’ (lees: Rusland) ons manipuleert via de sociale media….. Als iets dergelijks doorgang zou vinden, kunnen we het laatste restje echt objectieve journalistiek vaarwel zeggen en worden we alleen nog volgepropt met neoliberale leugens…….

Lees het volgende uitstekende artikel en de rillingen zullen je over de rug lopen (ach ja, het is het hele jaar Halloween):

They
Live, We Sleep: Beware The Growing Evil In Our Midst

by Tyler
Durden

Wed,
10/30/2019 – 00:05

Authored
by John Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,

You
see them on the street. You watch them on TV.
 You
might even vote for one this fall. 
You
think they’re people just like you. 
You’re
wrong.
 Dead
wrong.”


They Live

We’re
living in two worlds, you and I.

There’s
the world we see (or are made to see) and then there’s the one we
sense (and occasionally catch a glimpse of), the latter of which is a
far cry from the propaganda-driven reality manufactured by the
government and its corporate sponsors, including the media.

Indeed,
what most Americans perceive as life in America—privileged,
progressive and free—is a far cry from reality,
 where
economic inequality is growing, real agendas and real power are
buried beneath layers of Orwellian doublespeak and corporate
obfuscation, and “freedom,” such that it is, is meted out in
small, legalistic doses by militarized police armed to the teeth.

All
is not as it seems.

This
is the premise of 
John
Carpenter’s film 
They
Live
,
which was released more than 30 years ago, and remains unnervingly,
chillingly appropriate for our modern age.

Best
known for his horror film 
Halloween,
which assumes that there is a form of evil so dark that it can’t be
killed, Carpenter’s larger body of work is infused with a strong
anti-authoritarian, anti-establishment, laconic bent that speaks to
the filmmaker’s concerns about the unraveling of our society,
particularly our government.

Time
and again, Carpenter portrays the government working against its own
citizens, 
a
populace out of touch with reality
,
technology run amok, and a future more horrific than any horror film.


In Escape
from New York
,
Carpenter presents fascism as the future of America.


In The
Thing
, a
remake of the 1951 sci-fi classic of the same name, Carpenter
presupposes that increasingly we are all becoming dehumanized.


In Christine,
the film adaptation of Stephen King’s novel about a demon-possessed
car, technology exhibits a will and consciousness of its own and goes
on a murderous rampage.


In In
the Mouth of Madness
,
Carpenter notes that evil grows when people lose “the ability to
know the difference between reality and fantasy.”


And
then there is Carpenter’s 
They
Live
,
in which two migrant workers discover that the world is not as it
seems. In fact, the population is actually being controlled and
exploited by aliens working in partnership with an oligarchic elite.
All the while, the populace—blissfully unaware of the real agenda
at work in their lives—has been lulled into complacency,
indoctrinated into compliance, bombarded with media distractions, and
hypnotized by subliminal messages beamed out of television and
various electronic devices, billboards and the like.


It
is only when homeless drifter John Nada (played to the hilt by
the 
late
Roddy Piper
)
discovers a pair of doctored sunglasses—Hoffman lenses—that Nada
sees what lies beneath the elite’s fabricated reality: control and
bondage.


When
viewed through the lens of truth, the elite, who appear human until
stripped of their disguises, are shown to be monsters who have
enslaved the citizenry in order to prey on them.


Likewise, billboards
blare out hidden, authoritative messages
:
a bikini-clad woman in one ad is actually ordering viewers to “MARRY
AND REPRODUCE.” Magazine racks scream “CONSUME” and “OBEY.”
A wad of dollar bills in a vendor’s hand proclaims, “THIS IS YOUR
GOD.”


When
viewed through Nada’s Hoffman lenses, some of the other hidden
messages being drummed into the people’s subconscious include: NO
INDEPENDENT THOUGHT, CONFORM, SUBMIT, STAY ASLEEP, BUY, WATCH TV, NO
IMAGINATION, and DO NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY.

This
indoctrination campaign engineered by the elite in 
They
Live
 is
painfully familiar to anyone who has studied the decline of American
culture.


A
citizenry that does not think for themselves, obeys without question,
is submissive, does not challenge authority, does not think outside
the box, and is content to sit back and be entertained is a citizenry
that can be easily controlled.

In
this way, the subtle message of 
They
Live
 provides
an apt analogy of our own distorted vision of life in the American
police state, what philosopher Slavoj Žižek refers to
as 
dictatorship
in democracy
,
“the invisible order which sustains your apparent freedom.”


We’re
being fed a series of carefully contrived fictions that bear no
resemblance to reality.

The
powers-that-be want us to feel threatened by forces beyond our
control (terrorists, 
shootersbombers).



They
want us afraid and dependent on the government and its militarized
armies for our safety and well-being.



They
want us distrustful of each other, divided by our prejudices, and at
each other’s throats.



Most
of all, they want us to continue to march in lockstep with their
dictates.


Tune
out the government’s attempts to distract, divert and befuddle us
and tune into what’s really going on in this country, and you’ll
run headlong into an unmistakable, unpalatable truth: the moneyed
elite who rule us view us as expendable resources to be used, abused
and discarded.

In
fact, a study conducted by Princeton and Northwestern University
concluded that the 
U.S.
government does not represent the majority of American citizens
.
Instead, the study found that the government is ruled by the rich and
powerful, or the so-called “economic elite.”
 Moreover,
the researchers concluded that policies enacted by this governmental
elite nearly always favor special interests and lobbying groups.


In
other words, we are being 
ruled
by an oligarchy
 disguised
as a democracy, and arguably on our way towards fascism—a form of
government where private corporate interests rule, money calls the
shots, and the people are seen as mere subjects to be controlled.


Not
only do you have to be rich—or beholden to the rich—to get
elected these days, but 
getting
elected is also a surefire way to get rich
.
As 
CBS
News
 reports,
“Once in office, members of Congress enjoy access to connections
and information they can use to increase their wealth, in ways that
are unparalleled in the private sector. And once politicians leave
office, their connections allow them to profit even further.”


In
denouncing this blatant corruption of America’s political system,
former president Jimmy Carter blasted the process of getting
elected—to the White House, governor’s mansion, Congress or state
legislatures—as “
unlimited
political bribery

a subversion of our political system as a payoff to major
contributors, who want and expect, and sometimes get, favors for
themselves after the election is over.”


Rest
assured that when and if fascism finally takes hold in America, the
basic forms of government will remain: Fascism will appear to be
friendly. 
The
legislators will be in session. 

There will be elections, and the news
media will continue to cover the entertainment and political trivia.
Consent of the governed, however, will no longer apply. Actual
control will have finally passed to the oligarchic elite controlling
the government behind the scenes.

Sound
familiar?

Clearly,
we are now ruled by an oligarchic elite of governmental and corporate
interests.

We
have moved into “corporatism” (
favored
by Benito Mussolini
),
which is a halfway point on the road to full-blown fascism.


Corporatism
is where the few moneyed interests—not elected by the
citizenry—rule over the many. In this way, it is not a democracy or
a republican form of government, which is what the American
government was established to be. It is a top-down form of government
and one which has a terrifying history typified by the developments
that occurred in totalitarian regimes of the past: police states
where everyone is watched and spied on, rounded up for minor
infractions by government agents, placed under police control, and
placed in detention (a.k.a. concentration) camps.

For
the final hammer of fascism to fall, it will require the most crucial
ingredient: the majority of the people will have to agree that it’s
not only expedient but necessary.

But
why would a people agree to such an oppressive regime?


The
answer is the same in every age: fear.


Fear
makes people stupid
.


Fear
is the method most often used by politicians to increase the power of
government. And, as most social commentators recognize, an atmosphere
of fear permeates modern America: fear of terrorism, fear of the
police, fear of our neighbors and so on.

The
propaganda of fear has been used quite effectively by those who want
to gain control, and it is working on the American populace.

Despite
the fact that we are 17,600 times more likely to die from heart
disease than from a terrorist attack; 11,000 times more likely to die
from an airplane accident than from a terrorist plot involving an
airplane; 1,048 times more likely to die from a car accident than a
terrorist attack, and 
8
times more likely to be killed by a police officer than by a
terrorist
 ,
we have handed over control of our lives to government officials who
treat us as a means to an end—the source of money and power.


As
the Bearded Man in 
They
Live
 warns, “They
are dismantling the sleeping middle class. 

More and more people are
becoming poor. We are their cattle. We are being bred for slavery.”


In
this regard, we’re not so different from the oppressed citizens
in 
They
Live
.


From
the moment we are born until we die, we are indoctrinated into
believing that those who rule us do it for our own good. The truth is
far different.

Despite
the truth staring us in the face, we have allowed ourselves to become
fearful, controlled, pacified zombies.

We
live in a perpetual state of denial, insulated from the painful
reality of the American police state by wall-to-wall entertainment
news and screen devices.


Most
everyone keeps their heads down these days while staring zombie-like
into an electronic screen, even when they’re crossing the street.
Families sit in restaurants with their heads down, separated by their
screen devices and unaware of what’s going on around them. Young
people especially seem dominated by the devices they hold in their
hands, oblivious to the fact that they can simply push a button, turn
the thing off and walk away.

Indeed,
there is no larger group activity than that connected with those who
watch screens—that is, television, lap tops, personal computers,
cell phones and so on. In fact, a Nielsen study reports that American
screen viewing is at an all-time high. For example, the 
average
American watches approximately 151 hours of television per month
.



The
question, of course, is what effect does such screen consumption have
on one’s mind?


Psychologically
it is 
similar
to drug addiction
.
Researchers found that “almost immediately after turning on the
TV, 
subjects
reported feeling more relaxed
,
and because this occurs so quickly and the tension returns so rapidly
after the TV is turned off, people are conditioned to associate TV
viewing with a lack of tension.” Research also shows that
regardless of the programming, viewers’ brain waves slow down, thus
transforming them into a more passive, nonresistant state.


Historically,
television has been used by those in authority to quiet discontent
and pacify disruptive people. “Faced with severe overcrowding and
limited budgets for rehabilitation and counseling, 
more
and more prison officials are using TV to keep inmates quiet
,”
according to 
Newsweek.


Given
that the majority of what Americans watch on television is provided
through 
channels
controlled by six mega corporations
,
what we watch is now controlled by a corporate elite and, if that
elite needs to foster a particular viewpoint or pacify its viewers,
it can do so on a large scale.

If
we’re watching, we’re not doing.


The
powers-that-be understand this. As television journalist Edward R.
Murrow warned in a 1958 speech:

We
are currently wealthy, fat, comfortable and complacent
.
We have currently a built-in allergy to unpleasant or disturbing
information. Our mass media reflect this.
 But
unless we get up off our fat surpluses and recognize that television
in the main is being used to distract, delude, amuse, and insulate
us, then television and those who finance it, those who look at it,
and those who work at it, may see a totally different picture too
late.

This
brings me back to 
They
Live
,
in which the real zombies are not the aliens calling the shots but
the populace who are content to remain controlled.


When
all is said and done, the world of 
They
Live 
is
not so different from our own. As one of the characters points out,
“The poor and the underclass are growing. Racial justice and human
rights are nonexistent. They have created a repressive society and we
are their unwitting accomplices. 

Their intention to rule rests with
the annihilation of consciousness. We have been lulled into a trance.
They have made us indifferent to ourselves, to others. We are focused
only on our own gain.”


We,
too, are focused only on our own pleasures, prejudices and gains. Our
poor and underclasses are also growing. Racial injustice is growing.
Human rights is nearly nonexistent. We too have been lulled into a
trance, indifferent to others.

Oblivious
to what lies ahead, we’ve been manipulated into believing that if
we continue to consume, obey, and have faith, things will work out.
But that’s never been true of emerging regimes. And by the time we
feel the hammer coming down upon us, it will be too late.


So
where does that leave us?

The
characters who populate Carpenter’s films provide some insight.

Underneath
their machismo, they still believe in the ideals of liberty and equal
opportunity. Their beliefs place them in constant opposition with the
law and the establishment, but they are nonetheless freedom fighters.

When,
for example, John Nada destroys the alien hyno-transmitter in 
They
Live
,
he restores hope by delivering America a wake-up call for freedom.

That’s
the key right there: 
we
need to wake up.


Stop
allowing yourselves to be easily distracted by pointless political
spectacles and pay attention to what’s really going on in the
country.

The
real battle for control of this nation is not being waged between
Republicans and Democrats in the ballot box.

As
I make clear in my book 
Battlefield
America: The War on the American People
the
real battle for control of this nation is taking place on roadsides,
in police cars, on witness stands, over phone lines, in government
offices, in corporate offices, in public school hallways and
classrooms, in parks and city council meetings, and in towns and
cities across this country.


The
real battle between freedom and tyranny is taking place right in
front of our eyes, if we would only open them.

All
the trappings of the American police state are now in plain sight.

Wake
up, America.


If
they live (the tyrants, the oppressors, the invaders, the overlords),
it is only because “we the people” sleep.

Tag:
Politics

==========================

* Uitspraak van en met dank aan Dave de Borst.

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

Het is 70 jaar gelden dat de CIA met ‘haar heilzame werk’ begon. 70 jaar waarin de CIA:

  • staatsgrepen pleegde, o.a. tegen Iran (destijds Perzië), Congo, Chili en Brazilië. 
  • ‘false flag’ operaties leidde, operaties zogenaamd uitgevoerd door vijanden van de VS, zodat de VS ‘acties’ tegen haar onwelgevallige, veelal democratisch gekozen regimes kon beginnen……. (niet zelden door het voeren van illegale oorlogen)
  • honderden (wellicht nog veel meer) verdachten martelde (en martelt), dit vooral in het buitenland en buitenlandse regimes (veelal niet democratisch gekozen) leerde ‘hoe het best kan worden gemarteld……. 
  • drugsoperaties leidde, zodat men met de opbrengsten geheime missies in het buitenland kon bekostigen……..
  • oud-nazi’s uit de gevangenis houden en hen zelfs naar de VS te brengen om daar hun werk voort te zetten. Voorts leidde de CIA een netwerk van 600 ex-nazi agenten in het door de Sovjet-Unie bezette deel van Duitsland, De dagelijkse leiding van deze nazi’s was in handen van Reinhard Gehlen, voormalig hoofd van de nazi-inlichtingendienst voor de Sovjet-Unie……

Er zijn nog veel meer zaken te noemen, waarvoor ik naar het onderstaande artikel van Anti-Media wil verwijzen

Happy
Birthday CIA: 7 Truly Terrible Things the Agency Has Done in 70 Years

September
18, 2017 at 5:26 pm

Written
by 
Carey
Wedler

(ANTIMEDIA) —
On
Monday, President Trump 
tweeted birthday
wishes to the Air Force and the CIA. Both
became 
official organizations
70 years ago on September 18, 1947, with the implementation of the
National Security Act of 1947.

After
spending years as a wartime intelligence agency called the Office of
Strategic Services, the agency was solidified as a key player in the
federal government’s operations with then-President Harry Truman’s
authorization.

In
the seventy years since, the CIA has committed a wide variety of
misdeeds, crimes, coups, and violence. Here are seven of the worst
programs they’ve carried out (that are known to the public):

    1.
    Toppling governments around the world
     —
    The CIA is best known for its first coup, Operation Ajax, in 1953,
    in which it ousted the democratically elected leader of Iran,
    Mohammed Mossadegh, reinstating the autocratic Shah, who favored
    western oil interests. That operation, which the CIA now 
    admits to
    waging with British intelligence, ultimately resulted in the 
    1979
    revolution
     and
    subsequent U.S. hostage crisis. Relations between the U.S. and Iran
    remain strained to this day, aptly described by the CIA-coined term
    blowback.”

But
the CIA has had a hand in 
toppling a
number of other democratically elected governments, from Guatemala
(1954) and the Congo (1960) to the Dominican Republic (1961), South
Vietnam (1963), Brazil (1964), and Chile (1973). The CIA has aimed to
install leaders who appease American interests,
often 
empowering oppressive, violent
dictators
.
This is only a partial list of countries where the CIA covertly
attempted to exploit and manipulate sovereign nations’ governments.

  1. Operation
    Paperclip 

    In one of the more bizarre CIA plots, the agency and other
    government departments employed Nazi scientists both within and
    outside the United States to gain an advantage over the
    Soviets. As 
    summarized by NPR:

The
aim [of Operation Paperclip] was to find and preserve German weapons,
including biological and chemical agents, but American scientific
intelligence officers quickly realized the weapons themselves were
not enough.

They
decided the United States needed to bring the Nazi scientists
themselves to the U.S. Thus began a mission to recruit top Nazi
doctors, physicists and chemists — including Wernher von Braun, who
went on to design the rockets that took man to the moon.

They
kept this plot secret, though they 
admitted to
it upon the release of 
Operation
Paperclip: The Secret Intelligence Program That Brought Nazi
Scientists To America
 by
Annie Jacobsen. In a book review, the CIA wrote that “
Henry
Wallace, former vice president and secretary of commerce, believed
the scientists’ ideas could launch new civilian industries and
produce jobs.” 

They
praised the book’s historical accuracy, noting “that the
Launch Operations Center at Cape Canaveral, Florida, was headed by
Kurt Debus, an ardent Nazi
.” They acknowledged that “General
Reinhard Gehlen, former head of Nazi intelligence operations against
the Soviets, was hired by the US Army and later by the CIA to operate
600 ex-Nazi agents in the Soviet zone of occupied Germany
.”

Remarkably,
they noted that Jacobsen “understandably questions the morality
of the decision to hire Nazi SS scientists,
” but praise her for
pointing out that it was done to fight Soviets. They also made sure
to add that the Soviets hired Nazis, too, apparently justifying their
own questionable actions by citing their most loathed enemy.

  1. Operation
    CHAOS
     —
    The FBI is widely known for its 
    COINTELPRO schemes
    to undermine 
    communist
    movements in the 1950s and anti-war, civil rights
    ,
    and 
    black
    power
     movements
    in the 1960s, but the CIA has not been implicated nearly as deeply
    because, technically, the CIA cannot legally engage in domestic
    spying. But that was of little concern to President Lyndon B.
    Johnson as opposition to the Vietnam war grew. According to
    former 
    New
    York Times
     journalist
    and Pulitzer Prize-winner Tim Weiner, as documented in his extensive
    CIA 
    historyLegacy
    of Ashes
    ,
    Johnson instructed then-CIA Director Richard Helms to break the law:

In
October 1967, a handful of CIA analysts joined in the first big
Washington march against the war. The president regarded protesters
as enemies of the state. He was convinced that the peace movement was
controlled and financed by Moscow and Beijing. He wanted proof. He
ordered Richard Helms to produce it.

Helms
reminded the president that the CIA was barred from spying on
Americans. He says Johnson told him: ‘I’m quite aware of that.
What I want for you is to pursue this matter, and to do what is
necessary to track down the foreign communists who are behind this
intolerable interference in our domestic affairs…’

Helms
obeyed. Weiner wrote:

In
a blatant violation of his powers under the law, the director of
central intelligence became a part-time secret police chief. The CIA
undertook a domestic surveillance operation, code-named Chaos. It
went on for almost seven years… Eleven CIA officers grew long hair,
learned the jargon of the New Left, and went off to infiltrate peace
groups in the United States and Europe
.”

According
to Weiner, “the agency compiled a computer index of 300,000
names of American people and organizations, and extensive files on
7,200 citizens. It began working in secret with police departments
all over America
.” Because they could not draw a “clear
distinction” between the new far left and mainstream opposition to
the war, the CIA spied on every major peace organization in the
country. President Johnson also wanted them to prove a connection
between foreign communists and the black power movement. “The
agency tried its best
,” Weiner noted, ultimately noting that
the CIA never found a shred of evidence that linked the leaders
of the American left or the black-power movement to foreign
governments.

  1. Infiltrating
    the media
     — Over the years, the CIA has successfully
    gained influence in the news media, as well as popular media like
    film and television. Its influence over the news began almost
    immediately after the agency was formed. As Weiner explained, CIA
    Director Allen Dulles established firm ties with newspapers:

Dulles
kept in close touch with the men who ran the New York Times, The
Washington Post, and the nation’s leading weekly magazines. He
could pick up the phone and edit a breaking story, make sure an
irritating foreign correspondent was yanked from the field, or hire
the services of men such as Time’s Berlin bureau chief and
Newsweek’s man in Tokyo
.”

He
continued:

It
was second nature for Dulles to plant stories in the press. American
newsrooms were dominated by veterans of the government’s wartime
propaganda branch, the Office of War Information…The men who
responded to the CIA’s call included Henry Luce and his editors at
Time, Life, and Fortune; popular magazines such as Parade, the
Saturday Review, and Reader’s Digest; and the most powerful
executives at CBS News. Dulles built a public-relations and
propaganda machine that came to include more than fifty news
organizations, a dozen publishing houses, and personal pledges of
support from men such as Axel Springer, West Germany’s most
powerful press baron
.”

The
CIA’s influence had not waned by 1977 when journalist Carl
Bernstein 
reported on
publications with CIA agents in their employ, as well as “
more
than 400 American journalists who in the past twenty five years
have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence
Agency.”

The
CIA has also successfully 
advised
on and influenced
 numerous
television shows, 
such
as
 Homeland and 24 and films like Zero
Dark Thirty 
and Argo,
which push narratives that ultimately favor the agency. According to
Tricia Jenkins, author of 
The
CIA in Hollywood: How the Agency Shapes Film & Television
a
concerted agency effort began in the 1990s to counteract negative
public perceptions of the CIA, but their influence reaches back
decades. In the 1950s, filmmakers produced films 
for the
CIA
,
including the 1954 film adaptation of George Orwell’s 
Animal
Farm
.

Researchers
Tom Secker and Matthew Alford, whose work has been 
published in
the 
American
Journal of Economics and Sociology
,
say their recent Freedom of Information Act requests have shown that
the CIA — along with the military — have 
influenced over
1,800 films and television shows, many of which have nothing to do
with CIA or military themes.

  1. Drug-induced
    Mind control
     –
    In the 1950s, the CIA began experimenting with drugs to determine
    whether they might be useful in extracting information.
    As 
    Smithsonian
    Magazine
     has noted of
    the MKUltra project:

The
project, which continued for more than a decade, was originally
intended to make sure the United States government kept up with
presumed Soviet advances in mind-control technology. It ballooned in
scope and its ultimate result, among other things, was illegal drug
testing on thousands of Americans
.”

Further:

The
intent of the project was to study ‘the use of biological and
chemical materials in altering human behavior,’ 
according
to
 the
official testimony of CIA director Stansfield Turner in 1977. The
project was conducted in extreme secrecy, Turner said, because of
ethical and legal questions surrounding the program and the negative
public response that the CIA anticipated if MKUltra should become
public.

Under
MKUltra, the CIA gave itself the authority to research how drugs
could:’ ‘promote the intoxicating effects of alcohol;’ ‘render
the induction of hypnosis easier;’ ‘enhance the ability of
individuals to withstand privation, torture and coercion;’ produce
amnesia, shock and confusion; and much more. Many of these questions
were investigated using unwitting test subjects, like drug-addicted
prisoners, marginalized sex workers and terminal cancer patients–
‘people who could not fight back,’ 
in
the words of
 Sidney
Gottlieb, the chemist who introduced LSD to the CIA.

Further,
as Weiner noted:

Under
its auspices, seven prisoners at a federal penitentiary in Kentucky
were kept high on LSD for seventy-seven consecutive days. When the
CIA slipped the same drug to an army civilian employee, Frank Olson,
he leaped out of the window of a New York Hotel.”

Weiner
added that senior CIA officers destroyed “almost all of the
records” of the programs, but that while the “evidence that
remains is fragmentary…it strongly suggests that use of secret
prisons for the forcible drug-induced questioning of suspect agents
went on throughout the 1950s.

Years
later, the CIA would be accused of distributing crack-cocaine into
poor black communities, though this is currently less substantiated
and 
supported mostly
by accounts of those who claim to have been involved.

  1. Brutal
    torture tactics
     —
    More recently, the CIA was 
    exposed for
    sponsoring abusive, disturbing terror tactics against detainees at
    prisons housing terror suspects. An extensive 2014 Senate report
    documented agents committing sexual abuse, forcing detainees to
    stand on broken legs, waterboarding them so severely it sometimes
    led to convulsions, and imposing forced rectal feeding, to name a
    few examples. Ultimately, the agency had very little actionable
    intelligence to show for their torture tactics but 
    lied to
    suggest they did, according to the torture report. Their torture
    tactics 
    led the
    International Criminal Court to suggest the CIA, along with the U.S.
    armed forces, could be guilty of war crimes for their abuses.

    7.
    Arming radicals — The CIA has a long habit of arming
    radical, extremist groups that view the United States as enemies. In
    1979, the CIA set out to support Afghan rebels in their bid to
    defeat the Soviet occupation of the Middle Eastern country. As
    Weiner wrote, in 1979, “Prompted by Zbigniew Brzezinski,
    President Carter signed a covert-action order for the CIA to provide
    the Afghan rebels with medical aid, money, and propaganda.

As
Weiner detailed later in his book:

The
Pakistani intelligence chiefs who doled out the CIA’s guns and
money favored the Afghan factions who proved themselves most capable
in battle. Those factions also happened to be the most committed
Islamists. No one dreamed that the holy warriors could ever turn
their jihad against the United States
.”

Though
some speculate the CIA directly armed Osama bin Laden, that is yet to
be fully proven or admitted. What is clear is that western
media 
revered him
as a valuable fighter against the Soviets, that he 
arrived to
fight in Afghanistan in1980, and that al-Qaeda emerged from the
mujahideen, who were beneficiaries of the CIA’s program. Stanford
University has 
noted that Bin
Laden and Abdullah Azzam, a prominent Palestinian cleric,
established
Al Qaeda from the fighters, financial resources, and training and
recruiting structures left over from the anti-Soviet war
.”
Much of those “structures” were provided by the agency.
Intentionally or not, the CIA helped fuel the rise of the terror
group.

Weiner
noted that as the CIA failed in other countries like Libya, by the
late 1980s “Only the mujahideen, the Afghan holy warriors, were
drawing blood and scenting victory. The CIA’s Afghan operation was
now a $700-million-dollar-a-year-program
” and represented 80%
of the overseas budget of the clandestine services. “The CIA’s
briefing books never answered the question of what would happen when
a militant Islamic army defeated the godless invaders of
Afghanistan
,” though Tom Twetten, “the number two man in
the clandestine service in the summer of 1988
,” was tasked with
figuring out what would happen with the Afghan rebels. “We don’t
have any plan
,” he concluded.

Apparently
failing to learn their lesson, the CIA adopted nearly the exact same
policy in Syria decades later, arming what they called “moderate
rebels” against the Assad regime. Those groups
ultimately 
aligned with
al-Qaeda groups. One CIA-backed faction made headlines last year
for 
beheading a
child (though President Trump cut off the CIA program in June, the
military 
continues to
align with “moderate” groups).

Unsurprisingly,
this list is far from complete. The CIA has engaged in a wide variety
of 
extrajudicial
practice
,
and there are likely countless transgressions we have yet to learn
about.

As
Donald Trump cheers the birthday of an agency he himself
once 
criticized,
it should be abundantly clear that the nation’s covert spy agency
deserves scrutiny and skepticism — not celebration.

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

===================================

Moet u nagaan, dan durft men nog te spreken over ‘fake news’ en een land als Rusland de schuld voor veel internet ellende te geven en te beschuldigen van agressief gedrag………….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Zie ook: ‘CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

        en: ‘VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

        en: ‘CIA erkent dat Israël samen met Saoedi-Arabië ‘vecht tegen terreur’, die ze NB zelf hebben georganiseerd……..

        en: ‘VS centraal commando werkt in Syrië samen met IS en verklaarde Rusland de oorlog………

        en: ‘Al Qaida de bondgenoot van de VS in de strijd tegen…… terrorisme! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘ (intussen heeft de VS ‘Al Qaida Syrië’ van de zwarte lijst met terreurorganisaties gehaald!!)

       en: ‘CIA valt nogmaals door de mand als wapenleverancier van IS…….

      en: ‘Van Baalen (VVD EU topgraaier) het is moeilijk te zien wie je moet steunen: Al Qaida, Al Qaida of Al Qaida……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: ‘Massamedia VS vergeven van CIA ‘veteranen’, alsof die media nog niet genoeg ‘fake news’ ofwel leugens brengen……..

Syrië, de catastrofale en illegale interventie van de VS……

Darius Shahtahmasebi is een mensenrechten activist, jurist en schrijver met het Midden-Oosten als specialisme.

In het volgende artikel, dat ik overnam van Anti-Media, buigt Shahtahmasebi zich over de illegale bemoeienis van de VS met Syrië en de vele leugens waarmee figuren als ex-VS-minister van BuZa John Kerry de aanwezigheid van de VS in dat land probeerde te legitimeren (en dat ging behoorlijk ver, zoals u in het artikel kan lezen.

Kerry is zo’n ongelofelijk hufter, dat hij de zaak volkomen omdraaide (en nog steeds omdraait). Als je hem moet geloven, is Rusland niet legaal op Syrische bodem daar Assad in de ogen van de VS niet de legitieme president van Syrië is….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Als het over verkiezingen gaat, kunnen de VS overheid, inclusief Kerry, beter de eerste 100 jaar de vuilbek dichthouden, wat in dat gestolen land gebeurd (middels de op 1 na grootste genocide ooit), heeft al lang niets meer met democratie te maken!!

Voorlopig werd Assad met een fikse meerderheid in 2014 tot president verkozen, in door internationale waarnemers als eerlijk beoordeelde verkiezingen!! Zo wil oud-VS-president Carter wil al jaren niet meer als waarnemer werken voor verkiezingen in de VS, daar deze verkiezingen in zijn ogen niet eerlijk en democratisch verlopen, terwijl hij dit wel in diverse andere landen heeft gedaan…….

Bovendien zou Rusland zich in Syrië niet bezig houden met het bestrijden van IS, iets dat de VS wel zou doen. Toen Rusland eind september 2015 de Syrische regering te hulp schoot in de strijd tegen IS en andere terreurgroepen (‘gematigde rebellen’ aangestuurd door Al Qaida en Saoedi-Arabië), was IS sterker dan ooit, ondanks dat de VS al meer dan een jaar deze terreurgroep ‘bestreed’, o.a. middels een enorm aantal bombardementen……. (waarover VS veteranen en andere getuigen vertelden, dat niet zelden delen van de woestijn werden gebombardeerd, waar geen mens te vinden was…..)

Zelfs de export van ‘IS olie’ naar Turkije werd niet aangepakt door de VS…… Na 2 maanden van Russische hulp aan het Syrische leger werd er (veel) meer bereikt tegen IS, dan de VS en haar coalitiegenoten in meer dan 1 jaar voor elkaar kregen en lag de IS oliehandel zo goed als op de reet…….

Ach wat zou ik nog toevoegen, lees de volgende uitstekende analyse van Shahtahmasebi:

America’s
Catastrophic — and Illegal — Intervention in Syria Must Be
Stopped

August
3, 2017 at 11:36 am

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed)  Toward
the end of last year, 
leaked
audio
 of
then-Secretary of State John Kerry went viral across the independent
media because it appeared to confirm that the U.S. was watching ISIS
and allowing the group to grow in order to exert pressure on the
Syrian government, a
 long-time
adversary
 of
the Obama administration.

However,
more stunning than this apparent admission was the fact that Kerry
confirmed what 
Anti-Media has
been
 warning
about for some time now
 regarding
the legality of America’s Syrian operation. In the leaked audio,
speaking to Syrian opposition members at a meeting that took place at
the Dutch mission to the United Nations, Kerry stated:

The
problem is that the Russians don’t care about international law,
but we do. And we don’t have the basis – 
our
lawyers tell us
 –
unless we have the
U.N. Security Council Resolution, which the Russians can veto, and
the Chinese, or unless we are under attack from the folks there, or
unless we are invited in. 
Russia is invited in
by the legitimate regime
 –
well it’s
illegitimate in our mind – but by the regime. And so they were
invited in and we are not invited in. We’re flying in airspace
there where they can turn on the air defenses and we would have a
very different scene. The only reason they are letting us fly is
because we are going after ISIL. If we were going after Assad, those
air defenses, we would have to take out all the air defenses, 
and
we don’t have the legal justification, frankly, unless we stretch
it way beyond the law
.” [emphasis
added]

As
a lawyer who is extremely concerned with human rights and
international law, I could have told John Kerry this for free. Though
this devastating truth is evident to anyone who has a basic
understanding of international legal principles, the fact that the
U.S. is still 
pressing
ahead
 with
this strategy despite being informed of the illegality of the
operation by their lawyers is quite telling on its own.

It
is laughable that before stating this damning fact, Kerry alleged
that the Russians don’t care about international
law, but “we do” — before he went on to explain that Russia was
acting within the bounds of international law while the U.S. wasn’t.

In
all likelihood, the real reason Russia and Syria allow American
aircraft to fly in Syria’s airspace is not that they are targeting
ISIS, as Kerry pondered, but because there is very little that Russia
and Syria can do without risking an all-out war with the world’s
largest military superpower.

It
is almost like saying that Iraq ‘welcomed’ the U.S. invasion in
2003 because there was little that Saddam Hussein’s military could
do to stop it. Make no mistake, a country’s inability to drive the
U.S. out of its country 
does
not
 equate
to tacit acceptance of its military presence. The schoolyard bully is
not welcomed by the silent kids he or she wails upon. In fact,
Syria’s president
 has
made it
 quite
clear that the U.S. has invaded its territory, and this alone should
be all the knowledge we need to oppose yet another American-led war
in the Middle East. Just because the U.S. is targeting ISIL and not
Assad, does not legitimize America’s operations at all, especially
in light of Kerry’s own assessment of the operation as referred to
above.

How
many countries does the U.S. have to invade illegally before its
people decide it’s time to do something about it?

The
2003 invasion of Iraq had no U.N. Security Council Resolution, and
the country has been 
plagued
with rampant violence
 ever
since. If the Russians had not been 
duped out
of vetoing the misused 
U.N.
Security Council Resolution 1973
 with
regard to the Libyan conflict in 2011, then Libya would not be
the 
failed
state
 it
is today. The Libyan resolution did not authorize regime change and
was specifically worded so as to be concerned with protecting
civilians on the ground. NATO used the authorization to transform
itself into the air force of 
al-Qaeda-linked
rebels
 and
pounded Libya until Muammar Gaddafi had been 
assassinated.

Under
President Trump, the U.S.’ bombing campaign in Syria makes
even 
Obama
pale in comparison
.
The U.N.
 estimated that
in just the first week of America’s ramped up illegal bombing
campaign in Raqqa, airstrikes killed 300 civilians.

Even
if the U.S. does have some legal justification to bomb Syria,
shouldn’t we 
still oppose
military intervention? The U.S. has waged war in a number of
countries since the attacks of September 11, and 
millions
of people
 have
died as a result of these American-led conflicts. 
Terror
attacks
 still
run rampant; part and parcel of the vicious cycle of 
violence
responding to violence
 across
the globe.

In
areas that have been liberated by the Syrian government, 
hundreds
of thousands
 of
displaced Syrians are returning home. In Aleppo, in a
Christian-inclined district that was besieged by fanatic rebels who
abhor religious diversity, a Cathedral just
 reopened with
a Mozart-inspired concert – something that would have been
 almost
impossible
 under
rebel-held rule.

It
is also worth pondering why it is that the U.S., a majority Christian
nation, is siding with
 Islamist
rebels
 against a
government that
 protects the
rights of Christians. It makes no sense outside of a 
geopolitical
lens
,
and Trump supporters who openly profess to be “good American
Christians” should take note of this damning fact.

Forget
the legality of the war for a minute, forget the
 mounting
death toll
 that
is only able to accrue courtesy of your taxpayer dollars, and take a
moment to figure out where we are
 headed
as a species
.

The
U.S. has not only placed itself in a worldwide conflict with no
foreseeable end that will 
continue
to line
 the
pockets of the arms-dealing class for centuries to come, but it is
also bombing the same territory as another nuclear power
with 
complete
polar opposite interests
.
It is a powder keg that has been waiting a few years to ignite, and
the two nuclear powers are becoming ever closer to bombing the
 exact
same location
 with
different ambitions as to which party to the conflict should emerge
as the victor.

The
potential for this conflict to dramatically escalate should be high
enough to warrant a mobilization of effective resistance. If you
don’t want your sons, daughters, partners, parents, and friends to
go and die in Syria propping up a failing empire concerned only with
money and resources, now is the time to act. You can’t afford to
wait until body bags of loved ones come parading home before you
decide that enough is enough — by
 then
it may be too late
.

Before
anyone accuses me of sounding the alarm prematurely — and though
the corporate media has attempted to accuse Trump of conceding to
Putin inside Syria — can anyone name another conflict in which two
nuclear-armed powers were bombing the same country with completely
different intentions that was also concluded and de-escalated in a
timely, safe, secure, and low-risk manner?

Didn’t
think so.

The
battle against ISIS is still ongoing and involves multiple state
actors attempting to hoard as much Syrian territory as physically
possible. It is clear that the U.S. has no legal or moral right to be
inside Syria in the first place, so does it seem fair to endanger
countless more lives in order for the U.S. to gift its proxies a
chunk of Syrian territory after ISIS’ downfall?

Opinion
Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

VS dreigt Rusland ‘voor het hacken van de verkiezingen in de VS…….’ WOIII alweer dichterbij…….

Afgelopen vrijdag werd bekendgemaakt, dat de VS de sancties tegen Rusland aanscherpt, Rusland zou zich via hacken met de verkiezingen (en voorverkiezingen) in de VS hebben bemoeit…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Alsof er ook nog maar iets eerlijk is, als het gaat om verkiezingen in de VS, zelfs ex-president Carter wil niet toezien op die verkiezingen in de VS, iets dat hij veelvuldig wel in het buitenland wel heeft gedaan (Carter heeft zich overigens ook gedrenkt in het bloed van onschuldigen, toen hij president was, ‘maar dat terzijde….’)….

Het stemmen door veel VS burgers wordt expres bemoeilijkt, bovendien zijn de stemcomputers die worden gebruikt gemakkelijk te manipuleren…… Dit en nog veel meer, bijvoorbeeld het feit, dat de verkiezingen in de VS in feite gekocht worden door het bedrijfsleven, zegt meer dan genoeg over de ‘democratische’ verkiezingen in de VS…… Voor manipulatie van haar verkiezingen, heeft de VS Rusland niet nodig, de VS zelf is kundig genoeg om er een ondemocratisch zootje van te maken……

Weet u trouwens wie kwam met de beschuldiging, dat Rusland zou hebben geprobeerd de verkiezingen te beïnvloeden? De NSA! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! De NSA, u weet wel de totaal onbetrouwbare eheime dienst van de VS, die denkt het recht te hebben de vrienden van de VS te mogen bespioneren, zelfs tot en met de regeringsleiders van die bevriende landen!!!

Trouwens wat heeft Rusland dan bereikt met dit hacken? Dat de Democratische partij op de gedachte kwam Sanders af te serveren?? ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Rusland zou juist belang hebben gehad met de verkiezing van Sanders tot democratisch presidentskandidaat!! Terwijl zakkenwasser Sanders juist verloor vanwege smerige manipulaties door de top van de Democraten, inclusief Hillary Clinton………

De VS eist trouwens van de EU, dat het meegaat met het verscherpen van de sancties tegen Rusland…… De Duitse premier Merkel was dit keer de VS voor, met een pleidooi (n.a.v. deze ‘hackzaak’ in de VS) de sancties tegen Rusland te verscherpen……..



Het meest lullige aan de hele zaak, is dat op 1 april 2015 de VS een ‘executive order’ van kracht werd, waarmee de VS zich het recht voorbehoudt, militair in te grijpen, als overheidscomputers van de VS door andere landen worden gehackt……. Gezien de huidige status quo, waar we zo ongeveer op de rand van de vulkaan dansen, daar de VS bewust oorlog zoekt met Rusland, is die laatste order levensgevaarlijk voor de hele wereld….. Immers met deze lamme beschuldiging aan het adres van Rusland, zou de VS deze ‘order’ kunnen gebruiken als reden om Rusland aan te vallen…….. Op dat moment zal WOIII een feit zijn…….

Al betogen een aantal deskundigen, dat we al middenin WOIII zitten en gezien de situatie in de wereld, zitten deze deskundigen ‘er niet ver naast…..’ Echter naar mijn mening is voor het spreken van WOIII, een gewapend conflict tussen de wereldmachten nodig, waar ik dan aan toe moet voegen, dat je al bijna van zo’n conflict zou kunnen spreken, gezien de illegaal gevoerde oorlog tegen Syrië, door de VS, een ander aantal NAVO landen en dictatoriale staten als Saoedi-Arabië en Turkije……… Waarbij je nog de grote NAVO oefeningen langs de Russische grens moet optellen, inclusief het raketschild, dat de VS op een paar plekken langs die grens opstelt, agressie waarop Rusland gelukkig nog niet met geweld heeft gereageerd……

De VS, zowel als Groot-Brittannië hebben te kennen gegeven, dat men kernwapens niet meer ziet als alleen afschrikkingswapen, maar zich het recht voorbehouden, deze bij een eerste aanval in te zetten……… De aankondiging voor het begaan van één van de grootste oorlogsmisdaden, is om schijtziek van te worden….. Gezien het hiervoor genoemde eerste klap uitdelen met kernraketten, is dit raketschild een enorme uitdaging aan het adres van de Russen, die zoiets niet moeten proberen in de buurt van de VS…….

* Zie: ‘Angela Merkel: ‘tegenstanders TTIP zijn in feite anti-VS activisten…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Jimmy Carter, een uiterst lamme analyse van Willem Post (hoe kan ‘t ook anders?)……

Willem Post was vanmiddag te horen op Radio1, daar gaf hij een ‘analyse’ over het presidentschap van Jimmy Carter (90 jaar), dit n.a.v. diens opname in het ziekenhuis. De grote inflatie en werkloosheid onder Jimmy Carter zouden Reagan ( de volgende president van de VS) zijn winst hebben gegeven……

Carter stelde in zijn verkiezingscampagne dat het afgelopen moest zijn met het liegen van machthebbers in de VS, daar wreven de journalisten zich ‘natuurlijk’ in de handen, daar je altijd compromissen moet sluiten in de politiek, aldus Post. Je zou verwachten dat Post dan met voorbeelden zou komen, daar hij in feite stelt, dat ook Carter zou hebben gelogen, maar niets van dat alles…… Leuk ook, dat Post ervan uitgaat, dat zittende regeringen altijd liegen, terwijl hij in zijn andere suffe commentaren alleen Rusland, Griekenland en andere in zijn ogen foute regeringen, dan wel dictators, beschuldigt van liegen, dat zal je hem niet horen zeggen over onze regering, dan wel die van de VS…….. Maar ‘het was zo goed als gezegd’, ook Carter heeft gelogen, dat laatste blijft hangen en daar gaat ‘t om bij geschiedvervalsing……..

Al vrij vlot in het gesprek stelde Post, dat het presidentschap van Carter een inktzwart presidentschap was…….. Ja, hij noemde nog wel de eerste vorderingen met gesprekken tussen de Israëliërs en de Palestijnen, plus de verdere pogingen om tot vrede te komen in het Midden-Oosten, dat laatste was volgens Post toch eigenlijk mislukt, hoewel Carter wel vrede tussen Israël en Egypte voor elkaar kreeg…. Me dunkt geen geringe prestatie, waar je nog zijn inzet voor het arme deel van de VS en de wereld in het algemeen, bij op moet tellen. Een inzet ook t.b.v. goede huisvesting en sanitaire voorzieningen, voor arme mensen, waar dan ook, Carter was wat dat betreft eigenlijk de eerste grote machthebber, die e.e.a. op de ‘wereldkaart’ zette……..

Zelf was ik benieuwd naar wat Post zou zeggen over de gijzeling in 1979 van VS ambassadepersoneel in Iran, dit gebeurde onder Carter. Eerst stelde Post, dat dit 3 jaar duurde, maar even later werd dit teruggebracht naar ruim een jaar (14 maanden, om precies te zijn). Volgens Post werd er later gezegd, dat Reagan en zijn mannen die gijzeling hebben misbruikt, maar dat is nooit bewezen……… Godverdomme! Dat is wel bewezen: Carter had in het geheim een overeenkomst gesloten met het Iraanse bewind, waar de gijzelaars vrij zouden komen voor de verkiezingen. Met de ‘Iran-Contra-Affaire’ (ook wel ‘Irangate’ genoemd), bekonkelden Reagan en zijn staf, dat de gijzelaars pas na de verkiezingen zouden vrijkomen, zodat hij Carter daar mee onderuit kon halen en de verkiezingen kon winnen (in feite een staatsgreep). In ruil daarvoor kregen de Iraniërs grote hoeveelheden wapens (tegen betaling). Met dat geld werden illegale acties van o.a. Oliver North in Midden-Amerika bekostigd, zo werden de psychopathische ‘Contra’s’, die zich uiterst gewelddadig verzetten tegen de Nicaraguaanse regering van wapens en training voorzien, terwijl die Nicaraguaanse regering er een was, die zich voor het eerst sinds vele decennia inzette voor het volk. Een en ander werd geregeld via de door de CIA geparachuteerde president van Panama, Noriega (de coke-president die later terechtstond in de VS)……

Een en ander is intussen door diverse deskundigen uit en te na bewezen, maar dat past niet in het suffe pro-VS gelul van oliebol Post…….

Post kon er niet onderuit, Carter toch nog als uiterst humaan en sociaal weldenkend persoon af te schilderen, maar dat was van na zijn presidentschap, aldus Post. Al stelde hij nog wel enigszins sarcastisch, dat Carter zich de laatste decennia ook heeft ingezet voor de Palestijnen, iets dat hij gemeen heeft met van Agt (die daarvoor door Post en zijn colega’s wordt gehekeld)…….

Jezus wat een enorme berenlul, die Post!!

Voor meer berichten over Willem Post, Reagan, Iran en/of Nicaragua klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.