Facebook keurde advertenties goed die waren gericht op neonazi’s

Het
hieronder opgenomen artikel, geschreven door Julia Angwin, met hulp
van Madeleine Varner en Ariana Tobin, werd op 14 september 2017
gepubliceerd op Pro Publica.

In dit
artikel wordt aangegeven dat Facebook in 2017 advertenties goedkeurde
die waren gericht op neonazi’s. Vergelijk dat eens met het Facebook
censuurprogramma waar men alternatieve media die de leugens
doorprikken van de reguliere (massa-) media weert van haar platform, waarbij alternatieve nieuwssites, vredesactivisten en hun Facebook accounts,
milieuactivistische accounts en links politieke accounts meer en meer worden geblokkeerd of zelfs geheel worden verwijderd……

Na
Charlottesville, waar een anti-nazi betoger werd vermoord door een
neo-nazi, stelde Zuckerberg (baas Facebook) dat er geen plaats is
voor haatzaaierij op Facebook……

Bij het
aanbieden van advertenties kijkt Facebook of er genoeg lezers zijn,
daarbij kan je zelf ook groepen aandragen en vreemd genoeg werden
antisemitische groepen als potentiële lezers aangemerkt…..

Jammer
dat de schrijvers weer beginnen over de $100,000 aan advertenties die
later aan Rusland werden toegeschreven, alsof die het verschil
maakten tijdens de VS presidentsverkiezingen van 2016….. (ach, het is dan ook een artikel van een paar jaar terug) Het
werkelijke aantal advertenties die mensen echt manipuleerden om voor
de één dan wel de ander te kiezen, was veel groter, zelfs zo groot
dat de $100,000 voor advertenties in het niet vallen, of die nu wel of niet door de
Russische overheid werden betaald…….

Het is
nu al zo zot, dat Facebook onlangs bekend maakte dat leugens in
advertenties van de Republikeinen of Democraten worden
toegestaan…… Terwijl Facebook stelt geen fake news meer te
brengen…… (>> knettergek!!)

Lees het
weliswaar gedateerde, maar wat betreft het huidige Facebook nog
steeds ter zake doende artikel van ProPublica en verbaas je over deze
onverkwikkelijke Facebook-zaak en het meer dan belachelijke beleid
dat Facebook nog steeds voert en zoals je kon lezen in feite zelfs heeft opgevoerd:

Facebook
Enabled Advertisers to Reach ‘Jew Haters:

After
being contacted by ProPublica, Facebook removed several anti-Semitic
ad categories and promised to improve monitoring.

by Julia
Angwin
Madeleine
Varner
 and Ariana
Tobin

Sept. 14, 2017, 4 p.m. EDT

Tobias
Schwarz/AFP/Getty Images

Want
to market Nazi memorabilia, or recruit marchers for a far-right
rally? Facebook’s self-service ad-buying platform had the right
audience for you. 

Until
this week, when we asked Facebook about it, the world’s largest
social network enabled advertisers to direct their pitches to the
news feeds of almost 2,300 people who expressed interest in the
topics of “Jew hater,” “How to burn jews,” or, “History of
‘why jews ruin the world.’”

To
test if these ad categories were real, we paid $30 to target those
groups with three “promoted posts” — in which a ProPublica
article or post was displayed in their news feeds. Facebook approved
all three ads within 15 minutes.

After
we contacted Facebook, it removed the anti-Semitic categories —
which were created by an algorithm rather than by people — and said
it would explore ways to fix the problem, such as limiting the number
of categories available or scrutinizing them before they are
displayed to buyers.

There
are times where content is surfaced on our platform that violates our
standards,” said Rob Leathern, product management director at
Facebook.

In
this case, we’ve removed the associated targeting fields in
question. We know we have more work to do, so we’re also building
new guardrails in our product and review processes to prevent other
issues like this from happening in the future.”

Facebook’s
advertising has become a focus of national attention since it
disclosed last week that it had discovered $100,000 worth of ads
placed during the 2016 presidential election season by 
“inauthentic”
accounts that appeared to be affiliated with Russia
.

Like
many tech companies, Facebook has long taken a hands off approach to
its advertising business. Unlike traditional media companies that
select the audiences they offer advertisers, Facebook generates its
ad categories automatically based both on what users explicitly share
with Facebook and what they implicitly convey through their online
activity.

Traditionally,
tech companies have contended that it’s not their role to censor
the Internet or to discourage legitimate political expression. In the
wake of the violent protests in Charlottesville by right-wing groups
that included self-described Nazis, Facebook and other tech companies
vowed to strengthen their monitoring of hate speech.

Facebook
CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote
 at
the time that “there is no place for hate in our community,” and
pledged to keep a closer eye on hateful posts and threats of violence
on Facebook. “It’s a disgrace that we still need to say that
neo-Nazis and white supremacists are wrong — as if this is somehow
not obvious,” he wrote. 

But
Facebook apparently did not intensify its scrutiny of its ad buying
platform. In all likelihood, the ad categories that we spotted were
automatically generated because people had listed those anti-Semitic
themes on their Facebook profiles as an interest, an employer or a
“field of study.” Facebook’s algorithm automatically transforms
people’s declared interests into advertising categories.

Here
is a screenshot of our ad buying process on the company’s 
advertising
portal
:

This
is not the first controversy over Facebook’s ad categories. Last
year, ProPublica was 
able
to block an ad
 that
we bought in Facebook’s housing categories from being shown to
African-Americans, Hispanics and Asian-Americans, raising the
question of whether such ad targeting violated laws against
discrimination in housing advertising. After ProPublica’s article
appeared, Facebook built a system that it said would 
prevent
such ads from being approved
.

Last
year, ProPublica also collected a list of the advertising categories
Facebook was providing to advertisers. We downloaded 
more
than 29,000 ad categories
 from
Facebook’s ad system — and found categories ranging from an
interest in “Hungarian sausages” to “People in households that
have an estimated household income of between $100K and $125K.”

At
that time, we did not find any anti-Semitic categories, but we do not
know if we captured all of Facebook’s possible ad categories, or if
these categories were added later. A Facebook spokesman didn’t
respond to a question about when the categories were introduced.

Last
week, acting on a tip, we logged into Facebook’s automated ad
system to see if “Jew hater” was really an ad category. We found
it, but discovered that the category — with only 
2,274
people in it
 —
was 
too
small
 for
Facebook to allow us to buy an ad pegged only to Jew haters.

Facebook’s
automated system suggested “Second Amendment” as an additional
category that would boost our audience size to 119,000 people,
presumably because its system had correlated gun enthusiasts with
anti-Semites.

Instead,
we chose additional categories that popped up 
when
we typed in “jew h”
:
“How to burn Jews,” and “History of ‘why jews ruin the
world.’”

Then
we added a category that Facebook suggested 
when
we typed in “Hitler
”:
a category called “Hitler did nothing wrong.” All were described
as “fields of study.”

These
ad categories were tiny. 
Only
two people
 were
listed as the audience size for “
how
to burn jews
,”
and just one for “History of ‘
why
jews ruin the world.’”
 Another
15 people comprised the viewership for “
Hitler
did nothing wrong
.”

Facebook’s
automated system told us that we still didn’t have a large enough
audience to make a purchase. So we added “German Schutzstaffel,”
commonly known as the Nazi SS, and the “Nazi Party,” which were
both described to advertisers as groups of “employers.” Their
audiences were larger: 
3,194
for the SS
 and 2,449
for Nazi Party
.

Still,
Facebook said we needed more — so we added people with an interest
in the National Democratic Party of Germany, a far-right,
ultranationalist political party, with its much 
larger
viewership of 194,600
.

Once
we had our audience, we submitted our ad — which promoted
an 
unrelated
ProPublica news article
.
Within 15 minutes, Facebook approved our ad, with one change. In 
its
approval screen
,
Facebook described the ad targeting category “Jew hater” as
“Antysemityzm,” the Polish word for anti-Semitism. Just to make
sure it was referring to the same category, we bought two additional
ads using the term “Jew hater” in combination
with 
other termsBoth times,
Facebook changed the ad targeting category “Jew hater” to
“Antisemityzm” in its approval.

Here
is one of our approved ads from Facebook:

A
few days later, Facebook sent us 
the
results of our campaigns
.
Our three ads reached 5,897 people, generating 101 clicks, and 13
“engagements” — which could be a “like” a “share” or a
comment on a post.

Since
we contacted Facebook, most of the anti-Semitic 
categories
have disappeared
.

Facebook
spokesman Joe Osborne said that they didn’t appear to have been
widely used. “We have looked at the use of these audiences and
campaigns and it’s not common or widespread,” he said.

We
looked for analogous advertising categories for other religions, such
as “Muslim haters.” Facebook didn’t have them.

Update,
Sept. 14, 2017:
 This
story has been updated to include the Facebook spokesman’s name.


Julia
Angwin

Julia Angwin is
a senior reporter at ProPublica. From 2000 to 2013, she was a
reporter at The Wall Street Journal, where she led a privacy
investigative team that was a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize in
Explanatory Reporting in 2011 and won a Gerald Loeb Award in 2010.

 Julia.Angwin@propublica.org 

 @JuliaAngwin

Ariana
Tobin

Ariana
is an engagement editor and reporter at ProPublica, where she works
to cultivate communities to inform our coverage.

 ariana.tobin@propublica.org 

@Ariana_Tobin

=====================================

Zie ook:

Hunter Biden zit in de Oekraïense ‘witwas val’‘ 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez grilt Zuckerberg over misleidende advertenties op Facebook: liegen in verkiezingstijd is toegestaan

VS presidentschap wordt gekocht met 100 dollar per uitgebrachte stem

Michael Bloombergs deelname aan de verkiezingen laten nog eens zien hoe ondemocratisch de VS presidentsverkiezingen zijn

Media en politiek bepalen waar wel en niet over gesproken wordt >> over manipulatie en desinformatie gesproken

Tulsi Gabbard (Democratische presidentskandidaat) en de gestoken verkiezingen

Hillary Clinton manipuleert democratische voorverkiezingen

Niet Rusland maar Trump beïnvloedt nu al de verkiezingen in Groot-Brittannië

Ollongren (D66 minister) manipuleerde bevolking met beschuldiging Russische manipulatie door desinformatie en nepnieuws‘ (zie ook de links in dat bericht naar meer berichten over Ollongrens leugens)

WaPo waarschuwt voor Russische digitale controle over de hersenen van VS burgers

Trump tracht met fake news het volk te manipuleren en daarmee de EU te schande te maken

ALEC is een extreem rechtse lobbyclub: corruptie tot op het hoogste niveau en (echte) beïnvloeding van verkiezingen

Geheime diensten in westen geven toe dat spioneren via het G5 netwerk praktisch onmogelijk is……..

Bram van Ojik, de Trump van ‘GroenLinks’, wenst geen zaken te doen met Huawei…… OEI!!!

Federale rechter stelt ten overvloede dat DNC geen grond heeft voor zaak te tegen Trumps verkiezingsteam

Britse regering weigert RT en Sputnik voor conferentie over persvrijheid….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

1984 het boek van George Orwell: niet langer fictie…….

Het westen vervolgt journalist Assange, Rusland laat journalist vrij na onrust over diens gevangenschap‘ (zie daarin ook de links naar andere berichten over Assange)

De sterkste beïnvloeding van de VS presidentsverkiezingen wordt als volkomen ‘legaal’ en normaal gezien

Avaaz valt met fake news en desinformatie ‘fake news en desinformatie‘ aan……’ (zie in dat bericht ook de link naar een ander artikel met een smerige rol van Avaaz)

Rob Jetten (D66 fractievoorzitter) liegt een fikse slag in de rondte in EU verkiezingspraatje

EU verkiezingen: manipulatie ook door lobbyisme is misdadig, zelfs Bas Eickhout (GroenLinks) doet hieraan mee

‘Intel processors al 10 jaar zo lek als een mandje, Intel niet een bedrijf uit Rusland of China, maar uit….. de VS!

Gelekte documenten tonen aan dat Google en Pinterest censuur uitoefenen

Facebook stelt klimaatsceptisch Daily Caller aan als ‘factchecker…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate: nog overtuigd van bestaan daarvan? Lees dit!‘ 

Robert Mueller lijdt aan dementie en maakt van Russiagate een nog belachelijker verhaal

Putin vraagt en Trump levert: een lijst met ‘alle goede zaken die Trump voor Rusland regelde’

Facebook Purges Independent Media for “Political Disinformation”

Facebook Blocks Links to Free Speech Competitor ‘Minds’

Voor de demonstraties en moord in Charlottesville, klik op het label met die plaatsnaam, direct onder dit bericht.

Beste bezoeker, dit was het voor vandaag, morgen meer berichten, maak er zo mogelijk een mooie dag van.

VS subsidiëring van neonazi’s in Oekraïne, neonazi’s die ook fascisten uit de VS trainen……

De VS
subsidieert neo-nazi’s in Oekraïne, neonazi’s die ook neonazi’s uit de VS
trainen…… Waar bronnen in het Pentagon toegeven ‘het mogelijk te achten’ dat militaire adviseurs van de VS leden van het neonazi-bataljon Azov hebben getraind (en waarschijnlijk nog trainen) in Oekraïne…… Ofwel de VS traint indirect de neonazi’s in eigen land…….

De FBI
heeft 4 neonazi’s (eufemistisch ‘white supremacists’ genoemd) van de Rise Above Movement
(RAM) aangeklaagd die werden getraind door het Oekraïense Azov
bataljon, een neonazi militie die officieel deel uitmaakt van de
Oekraïense nationale garde (o.a. onder de verkorting ‘Azan’), een bataljon dat ook als legeronderdeel
vecht in Oost-Oekraïne, vechtend tegen de burgers die zich terecht verzetten
tegen de neonazi-junta van Porosjenko, de zogenaamde president van
Oekraïne…… Voorts zitten er vrijwilligers uit o.a. uit de VS, Brazilië, Polen en Frankrijk in het neonazi-bataljon in Oost-Oekraïne…. (eerder was er al sprake van Nederlandse motorkleuters van de ‘Hells Angels’, of soortgelijke suffe brommerjongens, die mee zouden vechten aan de kant van de neonazi’s in Oost-Oekraïne….) 

Het is overigens niet voor het eerst dat de VS samenwerkt met (neo-) nazi’s, begin 50er jaren gebruikte de VS ex-nazi collaborateurs uit o.a. Oekraïne in de strijd tegen het communisme, tijdens de destijds al bestaande Koude Oorlog……. 

Onbegrijpelijk dat de EU, de NAVO en de VS (al is dat uiteindelijk de baas van de NAVO) Oekraïne steunen, men moet overal in het westen weten, dat de uiterst corrupte juntaleider Porosjenko* in feite een neonazi is……. Dezelfde Porosjenko die door de VS (destijds onder minister van BuZa Hillary Clinton) in het zadel is geholpen, nadat men een opstand in dat land organiseerde….. De VS trok daar ‘maar liefst’ 4 miljard dollar voor uit…….

Terug naar de FBI aanklacht: deze luidt dat het Azov bataljon de VS fascisten heeft getraind
en geradicaliseerd…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Hoe kan je de neonazi’s
in de VS nog verder radicaliseren? Dat fascistische geteisem is
jaarlijks goed voor vele doden in de VS……. 

Het
laatste is ook de enige kritiek die ik heb op het hieronder opgenomen
artikel van Max Blumenthal, eerder gepubliceerd op MintPress News,
Een uitgebreid artikel waarin Blumenthal volkomen terecht waarschuwt
voor de groeiende macht van de fascisten in de VS en Europa……. Uit zijn artikel blijkt eens te meer dat de VS de neonazi’s in Oekraïne steunt, dezelfde VS die Israël keer op keer uit de wind houdt en critici van Israël verwijdt antisemitisch te zijn, terwijl de door haar gesteunde neonazi’s in Oekraïne ronduit de schurft hebben aan Joden……… (overigens: ook Israël zou de neonazi-junta in Oekraïne steunen……)

In de EU
kan je stellen dat Hongarije, Roemenië, Polen, Italië en Oostenrijk
een fascistische regering hebben…… Waar tegelijkertijd in de andere Oost-Europese
landen en de rest van de EU het fascisme met elke verkiezing groeit,
de enige uitzondering is Groot-Brittannië, waar Ukip verloor bij
de laatste verkiezingen. (echter het is maar de vraag hoe de volgende
verkiezingen daar zullen verlopen voor de fascisten, zeker als je
ziet dat het plan May, het Chequers plan of deal, de Britten in het
pak heeft genaaid, met een Brexit die geen Brexit meer is, maar een
lidmaatschap van de EU waar de Britten in feite niets meer te zeggen
hebben, maar zich wel aan de regels moeten houden……)

Het is dan ook de hoogste tijd dat linkse, ‘anarchistische’ en alternatieve krachten zich gaan organiseren tegen het fascisme, als het aan de EU of haar lidstaten ligt, gebeurt er niets, terwijl het fascisme in het (ook recente) verleden bewezen dood en verderf heeft verspreid over de wereld……. 

An
Inside Look at How US-Funded Fascists in Ukraine Mentor US White
Supremacists

Ukraine | Azov Nazi

November
15, 2018 at 7:12 pm

Written
by 
Max
Blumenthal

(MPN
Last month, an unsealed
 FBI
indictment
 of
four American white supremacists from the Rise Above Movement (RAM)
declared that the defendants had trained with Ukraine’s Azov
Battalion, a neo-Nazi militia officially incorporated into the
country’s national guard. The training took place after the white
supremacist gang participated in violent riots in Huntington Beach
and Berkeley, California and Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017.

The
indictment stated that the Azov Battalion “is believed to have
participated in training and radicalizing United States-based white
supremacy organizations.”

After
a wave of racist violence across America that culminated in the
massacre of twelve Jewish worshippers at a Pittsburgh synagogue, the
revelation that violent white supremacists have been traveling abroad
for training and ideological indoctrination with a well-armed
neo-Nazi militia should cause extreme alarm.

Not
only are white supremacists from across the West flocking to Ukraine
to learn from the combat experience of their fascist
brothers-in-arms, they are doing so openly — chronicling their
experiences on social media before they bring their lessons back
home. But U.S. law enforcement has done nothing so far to restrict
the flow of right-wing American extremists to Azov’s bases.

There
is one likely explanation for the U.S. government’s hands-off
approach to Azov recruitment: the extremist militia is fighting
pro-Russian separatists as a front-line proxy of Washington. In fact,
the United States has directly armed the Azov Battalion, forking over
anti-tank rocket launchers and even sending a team of Army officers
to meet in the field with Azov commanders in 2017.

Though
Congress 
passed
legislation
 this
year forbidding military aid to Azov on the grounds of its white
supremacist ideology, the Trump administration’s authorization of
$200 million in offensive weaponry and aid to the Ukrainian military
makes it likely new stores of weapons will wind up the extremist
regiment’s hands. When 
queried by
reporters about evidence of American military training of Azov
personnel, multiple U.S. army spokespersons admitted there was no
mechanism in place to prevent that from happening.

Today,
Azov boasts combat experience, unlimited access to light weapons, and
supporters honeycombed throughout the upper echelons of Ukraine’s
military and government. No longer just a militia, the organization
has developed into a political juggernaut that can overpower
Ukraine’s government. Two years ago, the group 
flexed
its muscle
 on
the streets of Kiev, bringing out 10,000 supporters to demand that
the government bend to their will or face a coup.

With
its military experience and weapons, Azov has the ability to
blackmail the government and defend themselves politically against
any opposition. They openly say that if the government will not
advance an ideology similar to theirs, they will overthrow it,”
Ivan Katchanovski, a professor of political science at the University
of Ottawa and leading expert on Ukraine’s far-right, commented to
me. He continued, explaining:Rusla

Currently
the organizations that are fascist are stronger in Ukraine than in
any other country in the world. But this fact is not reported by
Western media because they see these organizations as supportive of
the geopolitical agenda against Russia. So condemnations are limited
to violence or human rights abuses.”

The
revelations of collaboration between violent American white
supremacists and a neo-Nazi militia armed by the Pentagon add another
scandalous chapter to a long history of blowback that dates back to
the 1950’s, when the CIA rehabilitated several Ukrainian Nazi
collaborators as anti-communist assets in the Cold War.

The
almost unbelievable story exposes an axis of fascism that stretches
across the Atlantic, from the Ukrainian capital of Kiev to the
sun-washed suburbs of Southern California, where some of the most
rabid modern white supremacist gangs were born.

The
white nationalist Fight Club

This
October, four members of the RAM gang — Robert Rundo, Benjamin
Drake Daley, Michael Paul Mirelis, and Aaron Eason — were arrested
by FBI agents. They were accused of “using the internet to
encourage, promote, participate in, and carry out riots” from
Huntington Beach to Berkeley, California. Four other members had been
arrested in connection with their participation in the white
supremacist riot in Charlottesville, Virginia, where a
counter-protester, Heather Heyer, was killed in a vehicular homicide
by a white supremacist.

RAM
first appeared in the national limelight during a celebration of
Donald Trump’s election victory in Huntington Beach in March 2017.
As about one hundred far-right activists marched along the beach
donned in red “Make America Great Again” caps and waving Trump
flags, they were confronted by a small group of masked anti-racist
counter-demonstrators. When a melee ensued, RAM
members 
assaulted their
outnumbered opponents, pummeling them into submission and even
attacking a local reporter. Afterwards, Orange County
police 
arrested several
anti-racist demonstrators, but the RAM gang walked free.

RAM
markets itself as a self-defense organization that protects the free
speech of white Americans against an onslaught of “Cultural
Marxism,”  a classic anti-Semitic trope. Its founders
emphasize a vaguely anti-consumerist Fight Club mentality along with
a rigorous dedication to mixed martial arts. Its co-founder, Rundo,
operates an online clothing and apparel company,
Right
Brand Clothing, that hawks slickly designed t-shirts promoting

European
Brotherhood
,”
stickers emphasizing a straight-edge “
nationalist
lifestyle
,”
and 
ethically
sourced
 designer
Demagogue
pants

(yes, white supremacists apparently care about sweatshops). RAM
members can be seen at the site modeling their gear with a clean-cut
“fashy” look that contrasts sharply with the stereotypical image
of skinheads in jackboots.

RAM’s
careful attention to its public image has not stopped its members
from putting their crude neo-Nazi ideology on display at rallies,
however. During the Huntington Beach riot, for example, RAM’s
Robert Boman was seen waving a sign reading “Da Goyim Know.” This
alt-right slogan refers to the white nationalist understanding of the
supposed Jewish plot to dominate the world.

Rise Above Movement | Da Goyim Know

Screenshot
| YouTube

I’m
a big supporter of the Fourteen, I’ll say that,” RAM’s Rundo
proclaimed into a camera in Huntington Beach. The gang leader was
referring to the notorious 14-word slogan coined by convicted white
supremacist terrorist David Lane, which has become a rallying cry for
fascists across the globe: “We must secure the existence of our
people and a future for white children.”

Two
months after the violence in Huntington Beach, two RAM members
were 
photographed in
the same spot dousing literature they dubbed as “Cultural Marxist”
with lighter fluid and setting it ablaze. Among the volumes they
torched were “The Diary of Anne Frank,” “The 9/11 Commission
Report,” and “Schindler’s List.” Besides evoking memories of
the early days of Nazi Germany, the spectacle cast the group’s
purported devotion to free speech in an extremely ironic light.

Rise Above Movement

Photo
| Northern California Anti-Racist Action

Following
RAM’s highly publicized street battles, the group became the
subject of intense media scrutiny. In October 2017, the investigative
outlet ProPublica produced a 
video that
exposed the identities of RAM’s core membership and wondered why
they had not been investigated by law enforcement for their violent
actions in Huntington Beach and elsewhere.

But
the media coverage of RAM glossed over the group’s attraction to a
burgeoning trans-Atlantic conglomeration of white supremacists that
centered on U.S.-allied Ukraine as the base for a fascist reconquest
of Europe. By the Spring of 2018, RAM leadership was barnstorming
through Germany and Italy and heading east to meet fascist cohorts
from across the West at a conference in Kiev.

RAM’s
Ukrainian hate-cation

Buried
in the FBI indictment of RAM members are details of their meetings
with one of the key figures in Ukraine’s neo-Nazi Azov Battalion
militia.

In
August, according to the indictment, RAM members published photos on
Instagram showing themselves meeting with Olena Semanyaka, the leader
of the international department of the Ukrainian National Corps,
which functions as a civilian arm of the Azov Battalion:

 Rise Above Movement | Ukraine

The
indictment also referenced a video of RAM co-founder Benjamin Drake
Daley performing a crossed-forearm salute to the Southern
California-based white supremacist Hammerskin gang while in Ukraine:

 Rise Above Movement | Ukraine

RAM’s
Gab account provides additional details of the group’s 
foray
through Ukraine
 this
May. The trip centered around the Paneuropa conference, an event that
brings together fascists from across the West to encourage
international collaboration. It is hosted at the Reconquista Club in
Kiev, and included an MMA competition.

One
of our guys has hadthe honor to be the first American to compete in
the pan european organization Reconquista in Ukraine!”
RAM 
declared on
its Gab account. “This was a great experience meeting
nationalist[s] that came [sic] as far as Portugal and Switzerland to
take part.”

Rise Above Movement | Ukraine MMA

Robert
Rundo, left, of the Rise Above Movement competes at Azov’s
Reconquista Club in Kiev, Ukraine. Photo | Gab

The
visit, which followed on the heels of meetings with white
supremacists in Germany and with Italy’s fascist CasaPound party,
highlighted the centrality of Ukraine to international fascist
organizing. Further, the Paneuropa conference, where fascists build
connections across national borders, revealed the Azov Battalion as
much more than a militia fighting for control of a sliver of
contested territory in eastern Ukraine.

Semanyaka
did not respond to an interview request delivered through Facebook
messenger; however, she 
told
Radio Free Europe’s
 Christopher
Miller that RAM “came to learn our ways” and showed interest in
learning how to create youth forces in the way Azov has.

Today,
Azov leaders openly acknowledge that were it not for the U.S.-backed
coup that unfolded in Kiev’s Maidan Square in 2014, their
organization would never have developed into the powerhouse it is. As
Semanyaka said this year, according to a 
summary:

The
Ukrainian nationalist movement would have never reached such a level
of development unless the war with Russia had begun. For the first
time since the Second World War, nationalist formations have managed
to create their own military wings, the brightest example being the
Azov regime of the National Guard of Ukraine.”

The
right-wing revolution on the Maidan

The
2013-14 Maidan revolt was the cataclysmic event that Ukraine’s
already potent ultra-nationalist camp had been waiting for. The
protests erupted in Kiev’s Maidan Square after the democratically
elected President Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign an economic
association agreement with the EU. Celebrated in the West as a
pro-Western movement guided by tech-savvy middle-class youth,
EuroMaidan depended heavily for its success on phalanxes of
black-masked hardmen from Right Sector (see appendix at bottom), an
ultra-nationalist party that did battle with the government’s
Berkut riot police.

Along
with Right Sector, the leadership of the far-right Svoboda Party
assumed a prominent role at the Maidan, dubbing the protests a
“Revolution of Dignity.” Svoboda co-founder Oleh Tyahnybok —
who had once 
demanded an
investigation of the “Jewish-Muscovite mafia” that he saw
controlling Ukraine — appeared on stage at the square 
beside U.S.
Senators John McCain and Chris Murphy when they arrived to encourage
the protesters.

Another
key figure in Ukraine’s neo-Nazi scene was Andriy Biletsky. A
university Ph.D. who stressed physical violence as a means to
revolutionary change, Biletsky led the Patriot of Ukraine militia, an
early forerunner of Azov that attacked migrant camps and menaced
foreigners. In a manifesto published during the height of the Maidan
clashes, Biletsky outlined his post-revolutionary agenda: “The
historic mission of our nation in this critical moment is to lead the
White Races of the world in a final crusade for their survival,”
he 
wrote.
“A crusade against the Semite-led Untermenschen.”


Ukaine | Right Sector

Members
of the Right Sector practice street fighting in central Kiev,
Ukraine, Feb. 3, 2014. Darko Bandic | AP


In
May 2014, Right Sector and an assortment of far-right forces banded
together to 
massacre their
opponents in Odessa, attacking a pro-separatist protest camp with
iron pipes then 
burning
the fleeing protesters alive
 after
they took shelter in a local trade union building. Over 40
pro-separatist Ukrainian citizens were consumed in the flames. The
U.S. and EU studiously looked the other way, legitimizing the
violence and setting the stage for more.

Behind
the scenes, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and
Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt were carefully 
stage
managing
 the
opposition, positioning the pliable Arseniy Yatsenyuk as the future
leader of a U.S. client-state. Meanwhile, billionaire-backed U.S.
soft-power entities like the 
Omidyar
Network
 and Open
Society Foundation
 plowed
money into the opposition, providing it with high-tech organizing
capacity and establishing new media outlet 
Hromadske overnight.

Given
the amount of U.S. investment in regime change in Ukraine, it was
necessary for American pundits who cheered on the operation to
downplay or simply deny the central role neo-Nazi forces played in
making it all possible. In perhaps the most absurd attempt at
whitewashing the fascist presence, the neoconservative pundit James
Kirchick described Right Sector in an article for 
Foreign
Affairs
 as
Putin’s
imaginary Nazis
.”
Meanwhile, groups like the Anti-Defamation League — which
supposedly exist to battle anti-Semitism — 
refused to
support a congressional effort to ban arms to groups affiliated with
Right Sector, because “the focus should be on Russia.”

With
all the cover he needed from Washington, Biletsky organized the
“imaginary Nazis” of Patriot of Ukraine, Right Sector, and
assorted football ultras into a real militia called the Azov
Battalion. Together, they fought under the neo-Nazi Wolfsangel
symbol, which also happens to be incorporated into the 
logo of
the U.S.-based Aryan Nations.

On
the frontlines of eastern Ukrainian flashpoints, Azov did battle with
Russian-speaking separatists and set up 
government-sponsored
indoctrination camps
 for
children and teens closer to the country’s interior, instructing
ten year olds on marksmanship and the evils of foreigners.

Azan
was subsequently absorbed into Ukraine’s military as a national
guard unit, and began appearing in the field with PSRL-1 rocket
launchers 
supplied under
the watch of the U.S. Department of Defense. In November 2017, Azov
leadership received a team of U.S. Army officers for training and
logistical discussions (see photo below and to the right).

Azov Nazi

Members
of the Azov Battalion display the Nazi salute, left. U.S. Army
officers visit the Azov Battalion in the field, right.

By
the time Congress approved a ban on arms to Azov this year, the Trump
administration had already 
authorized a
new shipment of offensive weapons to the Ukrainian military,
including advanced Javelin anti-tank missiles. As in Syria — where
the CIA-backed Free Syrian Army functioned as a de facto “weapons
farm” for jihadist groups, including Jabhat al-Nusra and ISIS —
any new U.S. arms are likely to wind up in the possession of Azov,
the congressional ban notwithstanding.

It’s
very corrupt in Ukraine and money can be stolen — the same as in
Syria where extremist fighters got guns from U.S.-backed units,”
said Katchanovski. “Azov can just establish new political fronts so
they can circumvent the U.S. prohibitions.”

Foreign
fighters for fascism

The
Azov Battalion has received not only U.S. weapons, but also volunteer
American military veterans like Brian Boyenger. “It’s not
illegal,” Boyenger 
told Ukraine
Today
 interviewer
of his presence in an Azov camp. “From a U.S. perspective, as long
as you’re not fighting with a terrorist group or committing war
crimes or things like that. It is legal — mostly I’ve been
serving as kind of like an advisor.”

Azov
has also 
welcomed
Islamist fighters
 from
Chechnya to continue their long war against Russia in a new theater.
A sniper from Sweden with “
typical
neo-Nazi views
,”
Mikael Skillt, has been assigned to oversee an entire Azov regiment.
And neo-Nazis from 
as
far away as Brazil
 have
flocked to Ukraine to join the fascist crusade. One foreign fighter
from France, a young anti-Semite named Gregoire Moutaux, returned
from a Ukrainian militia camp in 2016 “
armed
to the teeth and ready to strike

synagogues, mosques and the 2016 soccer championships when he was
arrested on the Ukrainian border by national police.

To
consolidate its political influence over the country, the Azov
Battalion established a National Druzhina, or street patrol unit. A
slickly produced 
recruitment
video
 released
in 2017 featured drone footage of National Druzhina members marching
in formation into Kiev as Biletsky, their ideological guide, impelled
them to “restore Ukrainian order” to a corrupted society. The
street patrol was openly backed by Interior Minister Arsen Avakov, a
powerful patron of Azov who belongs to the ruling party of Ukrainian
President Petro Poroshenko.

This
year, the National Druzhina and state-funded neo-Nazi militias like
C14 (the “14” represents the notorious “fourteen words”
mantra) staged a serie of 
lethal pogroms against
the local Roma population, 
vandalized the
offices of insufficiently pliant politicians, 
stormed city
council meetings, and even 
suedthe Hromadske station
that was established with U.S. funding for describing their members
as neo-Nazis.

Their
connection to power is why they can commit any crime and they will
never be punished,” Katchanovski said of Azov and its various
street-muscle brigades. “Because they have the police and senior
police members like [Vadym] Troyan, they can intimidate people and
intimidate politicians with impunity.” (Once a member of Azov,
Troyan now serves as Ukraine’s 
Deputy
Minister of Interior
).

The
U.S. has not only kept silent about the wave of ultra-nationalist
violence sweeping across Ukraine, it has been complicit in
legitimizing the perpetrators. This November, America House Kyiv —
a U.S. government-funded cultural center — 
hosted
a speech
 by
a uniformed leader of the neo-Nazi C14 gang, Serhiy Bondar. Months
earlier, Republican House Majority Leader Paul Ryan and the
NATO-funded Atlantic Council 
hosted Andriy
Parubiy, the speaker of the Ukrainian parliament and co-founder of
the fascist Social-National party, for a friendly exchange on Capitol
Hill.

C14 Ukraine

Serhiy
Bondar, a member of Ukraine’s neo-Nazi C14 militia, is hosted by
the U.S.-funded America House in Kiev. Screenshot | YouTube

Given
the free rein and open acceptance right-wing extremists enjoy in
post-Maidan Ukraine, it is no wonder the country has become a haven
for fascists from across the West.

The
grand Reconquista strategy

As
the international secretary of Azov’s National Corps, Olena
Semanyaka has emerged as one of the most prolific publicists of
Eastern European fascism. With jet black hair and a faintly gothic
look, she brands herself as a “traditionalist,” emulating her
hero, Julius Evola, the late Italian occultist philosopher who
espoused a “racism of the spirit.” Though she has been
photographed bearing a Nazi flag and throwing up a sieg heil salute,
Semanyaka has also been a 
welcome
guest
 on
Ukrainian nationalist TV to promote her campaign for the release of
Ukrainian nationalist activists held by Russia.

Semanya Nazi Ukraine

Semanya,
upper left corner of Nazi flag, dispalys the Nazi salute. On the
right, Semanyaka is shown during an appearance on Ukrainian state TV.

In
her role with Azov, Semanyaka organizes conferences aimed at
popularizing the concept of “the great European Reconquista” —
a pan-European fascist-nationalist takeover that begins in the former
Soviet satellite states and ultimately sweeps through Western Europe
on the strength of anti-foreigner resentment.

Semanyaka laid
out
 the
fascist grand strategy in Kiev at a December 2016 gathering of Black
Metal fans from across Europe called the “
Pact
of Steel
”:

For
the first time [in] a long period, the success of the Right in
Western Europe — the rise of the Right because of refugee influx
and terror — gives the chance for the realization of our ‘pact of
steel’ between East and West, between Western and Eastern European
nationalists.”

She
continued:

Our
main task today is to show to Western nationalists, to inform them
that Putin’s Russia is no alternative to the EU of the West and
that the only ally for them is an alternative axis of European
integration which is being formed now in Kiev, Central and Eastern
Europe, as a springboard for the all-European reconquest, for the new
Europe between the EU and neo-Soviet neo-Bolshevik Putin’s Russia.”

Semanyaka
and other Ukrainian fascist ideologues refer to the regional
springboard for the European reconquest as the “Intermarium.”
This is a concept originally envisioned after World War One by Polish
military leader Jozef Pilsudski, who imagined a confederation of
countries from the Baltic to the Black Sea as a counter-weight to
German and Russian aggression. Though his idea never materialized,
Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the failure of the EU and
NATO to prevent it revived interest in the Intermarium. One of the
biggest boosters of the alliance, the right-wing Polish President
Andrzej Duda, saw it primarily through the prism of regional
security. The extreme right in Ukraine, however, understood the
Intermarium as an ethnically pure base for exporting their revolution
to the rest of Europe.

The
first Intermarium 
conference was
held in Kiev in January 2016 under the banner of Azov’s National
Corps. Semanyaka headlined the event alongside Biletsky, the Azov
founder, welcoming far-right activists from Poland and the Baltic
States. Within a year, the concept was promoted at an 
officially
sanctioned event
 at
the Latvian embassy in Kiev. There, the Latvian ambassador welcomed a
who’s who of the Ukrainian fascist scene, from Svoboda to National
Corps representatives like Semanyaka, for a ceremony honoring Peter
Radzins, a Latvian general who advocated for the Intermarium.

Organized
by Latvia’s far-right National Alliance party, a member of the
country’s governing coalition, the spectacle provided Azov leaders
with the sheen of international legitimacy. As Matthew Kott, an
academic expert on the European far-right, 
argued,
Latvia’s “membership in the EU and NATO allows it to act as a
Trojan horse for increasing the clout of the far-right in the
Euro-Atlantic community.”

While
historical tensions between the Intermarium nations are still
simmering, Semanyaka has pleaded with her international allies to
heed the call of the late pro-Hitler British Blackshirt leader Oswald
Mosley for a “great act of oblivion…of all our former struggles,
conflicts, historical enmity. What we need,” she argued, “is the
revival of a sense of the new European aristocracy, a new European
unity as a real basis for the union I am talking about.”

There
are no historical grievances between American white supremacists and
their cohorts in Ukraine. After all, the U.S. government has made
itself the main guarantor of Ukraine’s security, going as far as
directly arming Azov in its bid to bleed Russia. And decades before
the U.S. backed extremists in contemporary Ukraine, the CIA ran a
program to rehabilitate former Nazi collaborators from the country as
anti-communist intelligence assets. Backing Ukrainian fascists is a
grand American tradition, indeed.

This
November, during the latest 
Paneuropa
conference
 organized
by Semanyaka as a safe space for fascists from across the West, she
played host to one of the most prominent self-styled intellectuals of
America’s white nationalist movement, Greg Johnson.

Azov Nazi Ukraine

Gregory
Johnson promotes his “White Nationalist Manifesto” at Azov’s
Reconquista Club in Kiev, Nov. 2018. Screenshot | YouTube

I
think that what’s happening in Ukraine is a model and an
inspiration for nationalists of all white nations and I wanted to
learn as much as possible about what you’re doing here and see as
much as possible,” Johnson 
told his
rapt audience. “And I’m enormously impressed and I’m taking
notes.”

Johnson
is a highbrow racist who publishes a journal, 
Counter-Currents,
that advances what he calls “white identity politics.” Like the
Rise Above Movement leaders before him, he was clearly inspired by
his visit to Kiev. “I’m already planning to come back,”
Johnson 
exclaimed during
a break-out session. “I’m very impressed with what I’ve seen
here. I want to come back and learn more.”

APPENDIX

Svoboda
Party
: Originally called the Social-National Party of Ukraine, a
Ukrainian political party with long history of anti-Semitism. Led
by Oleh Tyahnybok, Svoboda played a prominent role in the
2013-2014 Maidan uprising, where Tyahnybok shared the stage with U.S.
Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Chris Murphy (D-CT). Andriy
Parubiy
, who had co-founded the Social-National Party of Ukraine,
is now Speaker of Parliament.

Azov
Battalion
: 3,000-member neo-Nazi formation in Ukraine’s
National Guard. Azov began as a paramilitary, originally formed out
of the Patriot of Ukraine neo-Nazi gang led by Andriy
Biletsky,
 and is now a Ukrainian National Guard unit. The
battalion’s logo incorporates the neo-Nazi Wolfsangel and black sun
symbols. Biletsky is now a member of Ukrainian Parliament. Vadim
Troyan
, another  Azov veteran, is now Deputy Interior
Minister.

Ukrainian
National Corps
: Azov’s civilian arm, responsible, among other
things, for coordinating with and recruiting neo-Nazis and white
supremacists from around the world. The international outreach is led
by Olena Semanyka, who’s been photographed with a
swastika flag.

National
Druzhina
: Azov’s street patrol organization, established in
January 2018 with the aim of “restoring Ukrainian order” to the
streets. The National Druzhina — whose members pledge personal
loyalty to Biletsky — has been involved in pogroms against the
Roma, LGBT, and other activists.

Right
Sector
: Loose formation of neo-Nazis and football ultras, which
supplied street muscle to the 2013-2014 Maidan uprising. Later
involved in lethal suppression of anti-Maidan movements in places
like Odessa.

C14:
Ukrainian neo-Nazi gang that receives government funding and has been
responsible for some of the lethal Roma pogroms as well as anti-LGBT
violence. The 14 is a reference to the Fourteen Word slogan of white
supremacy. Led by Serhiy Bondar, who spoke at America
House, a cultural center funded by the U.S. government.

By Max
Blumenthal
 /
Republished with permission / 
MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo
 

=====================================

* De Porosjenko kliek heeft al vele kapitalen aan EU gelden verdonkeremaand, terwijl het land zo goed als failliet is…… Porosjenko schijnt ook in Nederland bankrekeningen te hebben, waar veel van zijn middels diefstal verkregen geld is gestald……. (uiteraard tegen een zeer voordelig belastingtarief) Deze noot heb ik na plaatsing verbeterd, de zin zat enigszins krom in elkaar.

Voor meer berichten over Oekraïne en andere zaken in het bovenstaande, klik op de betreffende labels, direct onder dit bericht (jammer genoeg mag ik maar 200 tekens gebruiken voor die labels). Let wel: na een aantal berichten wordt het laatst getoonde herhaalt, dan even opnieuw op het betreffende label onder dat laatst gelezen bericht klikken.

De evolutie van politiestaat VS o.a. te zien in het buitenspel zetten van burgerrechten in steden als Boston en Charlottesville

Gisteren
bracht John Whitehead een opiniestuk op de site van The Rutherford
Institute, waarin hij aangeeft ‘hoe makkelijk’ hele steden op slot
kunnen worden gedaan…..

In zijn
woonplaats Charlottesville maakte hij het zelf mee: een jaar geleden
waren er rellen in Charlottesville waarbij een fascist een moord
pleegde op een demonstrant die zich tegen de fascistisch parade in
Charlottesville keerde*. Dezelfde dag een jaar later werd voorafgegaan door het met veel bombarie op slot gooien van de stad, waarbij de bewoners werden geacht zoveel mogelijk in huis te blijven. De noodtoestand en de staat van beleg werden afgekondigd, zonder dat daar ook maar één aanwijsbare reden voor was (bijvoorbeeld de aankondiging van de neonazi’s dat ze weer een parade zouden houden in Charlottesville…)…. 

De
politie in de VS is in hoge mate gemilitariseerd, inclusief
automatische wapens die de VS o.a. gebruikt in haar illegale
oorlogen in het Midden-Oosten en Afrika…… Hetzelfde geldt voor
een deel van het rollend materieel van de politie: pantserwagens en
zelfs een klein soort tank….. Dit nog naast de National Guard, in feite een paramilitaire organisatie met reservisten, die bij grote rellen e.d. regelmatig te zien is in de straten van de
VS en de beschikking heeft over een veel groter deel van het oorlogstuig dat de VS in het buitenland gebruikt (zoals gezegd in illegale oorlogen), dus ook tanks en ‘oorlogshelikopters…….’ 

Al moet aan het voorgaande worden toegevoegd dat de ‘gewone’ politie meer en meer wordt gemilitariseerd en daarmee de beschikking krijgt over steeds meer oorlogsmaterieel en er steeds minder verschil is te zien tussen de politie en de National Guard….. Uiteraard ‘met dank’ aan de lobby van de wapenfabrikanten…………

De VS is
dan ook verworden tot een politiestaat en dat al enige jaren, het
ontbreekt nog net aan volledige censuur, al wordt daar met hulp van
Facebook en Google hard aan gewerkt…..** Hoewel de VS keer op keer als excuus voor militair ingrijpen aanvoert dat het democratie wil brengen, terwijl in eigen land ‘de democratie’ wordt gekocht met enorme bakken geld en het buitenspel zetten van grote groepen (arme en veelal gekleurde) kiezers……

De
schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen artikel van The Rutherford Institute, John Whitehead, is het ‘niet helemaal eens’ met het
voorgaande, hij ziet de VS transformeren in een politiestaat. Whitehead gaat o.a. in op de manier waarop de bevolking monddood wordt gemaakt en op bepaalde momenten zelfs geen vrijheid van bewegen heeft in de eigen stad…… Voorts noemt hij o.a. Göring die na WOII op het proces van Neurenberg aangaf wat er nodig is om een bevolking te manipuleren. 

Lees en
oordeel zelf:

From
Boston to Ferguson to Charlottesville: The Evolution of a Police
State Lockdown

August
17, 2018 at 8:17 am

Written
by 
John
Whitehead

It
takes a remarkable force to keep nearly a million people quietly
indoors for an entire day, home from work and school, from
neighborhood errands and out-of-town travel. It takes a remarkable
force to keep businesses closed and cars off the road, to keep
playgrounds empty and porches unused across a densely populated place
125 square miles in size. This happened … not because armed
officers went door-to-door, or imposed a curfew, or threatened
martial law. All around the region, for 13 hours, people locked up
their businesses and ‘sheltered in place’ out of a kind of
collective will. The force that kept them there wasn’t external –
there was virtually no active enforcement across the city of the
governor’s plea that people stay indoors. 
Rather,
the pressure was an internal one – expressed as concern, or
helpfulness, or in some cases, fear – felt in thousands of
individual homes.
 —
Journalist Emily Badger, “The Psychology of a Citywide Lockdown”

(RI) — It
has become way too easy to lockdown this nation.

Five
years ago, 
the
city of Boston was locked down
 while
police carried out a military-style manhunt for suspects in the 2013
Boston Marathon explosion.

Four
years ago, the city of Ferguson, Missouri, was locked down, with
government officials deploying a massive SWAT team, an armored
personnel carrier, men in camouflage pointing heavy artillery at the
crowd, smoke bombs and tear gas 
to
quell citizen unrest
 over
a police shooting of a young, unarmed black man.

Three
years ago, 
the
city of Baltimore was put under a military-enforced lockdown
 after
civil unrest over police brutality erupted into rioting. More than
1,500 national guard troops were deployed while residents were
ordered to stay inside their homes and put under a 10 pm curfew.

This
year, it was my 
hometown
of Charlottesville, Va., population 50,000, that was locked
down
 while
government officials declared a state of emergency and enacted
heightened security measures tantamount to martial law, despite the
absence of any publicized information about credible threats to
public safety.

As
Tess Owen 
reports for Vice:

One
year after white supremacists paraded through the streets, the face
of downtown Charlottesville was transformed once again – 
this
time with checkpoints, military-style camps for National Guard, and
state police on every corner.
 When
residents woke up Saturday, all entrances to the downtown mall were
blocked off, apart from two checkpoints, where police looked through
people’s bags for lighters, knives or any other weapons. Up above,
standing atop a building site, two national guard members
photographed the individuals coming in and out… A National Guard
encampment was set up in McGuffey Park, between the children’s
playground and the basketball court, where about 20 military police
officers in camouflage were snoozing in the shade of some trees. A
similar encampment was set up a few blocks away.

More
details from journalist Ned Oliver:

Downtown
Charlottesville felt like the green zone of a war-torn city
Saturday.
 More
than a thousand local and state police officers barricaded 10 blocks
of the city’s popular pedestrian district, the Downtown Mall, to
prepare for the one-year anniversary of the white supremacist rally
last year that left dozens injured and one dead. To enter, people had
to submit to bag checks and searches at one of two checkpoints…
Preparations aside, unlike last year, no white supremacist groups had
said they were going to visit the city, and, by week’s end, none
had. Instead, it was a normal day on the mall except for the heavy
security, a military helicopter constantly circling overhead, and
hundreds of police officers milling around.

Make
no mistake, this was a militarized exercise in intimidation, and it
worked only too well.

For
the most part, the residents of this city—once home to Thomas
Jefferson, the nation’s third president, author of the Declaration
of Independence, and champion of the Bill of Rights—welcomed the
city-wide lockdown, the invasion of their privacy, and the
dismantling of every constitutional right intended to serve as a
bulwark against government abuses.

Yet
for those like myself who have studied emerging police states, the
sight of any American city placed under martial law—its citizens
essentially under 
house
arrest
 (officials
used the Orwellian phrase “shelter in place” in Boston to
describe the 
mandatory
lockdown
), military-style
helicopters equipped with thermal imaging devices
 buzzing
the skies, 
tanks
and armored vehicles
 on
the streets, and 
snipers perched
on rooftops, while thousands 
of
black-garbed police swarmed the streets
 and
SWAT teams carried out house-to-house searches—leaves us in a
growing state of unease.

Watching
the events of the lockdown unfold, I couldn’t help but think of
Nazi Field Marshal Hermann Goering’s remarks during the Nuremberg
trials. As Goering noted:

It
is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a
democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to
the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell
them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of
patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in
every country.
(Goering was een vuile fascistische ploert, maar dit is wel een waarheid als een koe!!!)

As
the events in Charlottesville have made clear, it does indeed work
the same in every country.

Whatever
the threat to so-called security—whether it’s civil unrest,
school shootings, or alleged acts of terrorism—government officials
will capitalize on the nation’s heightened emotions, confusion and
fear as a means of extending the reach of the police state.

These
troubling developments are the outward manifestations of an inner,
philosophical shift underway in how the government views not only the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but “we the people,” as
well.

What
this reflects is a move away from a government bound by the rule of
law to one that seeks total control through the imposition of its own
self-serving laws on the populace.

Unfortunately,
it doesn’t take much for the American people to march in lockstep
with the government’s dictates, even if it means submitting to
martial law, having their homes searched, and being stripped of one’s
constitutional rights at a moment’s notice.

In
Charlottesville, most of the community fell in line, 
except
for one gun-toting, disabled, 71-year-old war veteran
 who
was arrested for purchasing cans of Arizona iced tea, a can of bug
spray and razor blades, all of which were on the City’s list of
temporarily prohibited, potentially “dangerous” items.
Incidentally, the veteran’s guns (not among the list of prohibited
items) caused no alarm.

Talk
about draconian.

This
continual undermining of the rules that protect civil liberties will
inevitably have far-reaching consequences on a populace that not only
remains ignorant about their rights but is inclined to sacrifice
their liberties for phantom promises of safety.

Be
warned: these lockdowns are just a precursor to full-blown martial
law.

The
powers-that-be want us acclimated to the sights and sounds of a
city-wide lockdown with tanks in the streets, military encampments in
cities, Blackhawk helicopters and armed drones patrolling overhead.

They
want us to accept the fact that in the American police state, we are
all potentially guilty, all potential criminals, all suspects waiting
to be accused of a crime.

They
want us to be meek and submissive.

They
want us to report on each other.

They
want us to be grateful to the standing armies for their so-called
protection.

They
want us to self-censor our speech, self-limit our movements, and
police ourselves.

As
Glenn Greenwald notes in 
The
Intercept
:

Americans
are now so accustomed to seeing police officers decked in camouflage
and Robocop-style costumes, riding in armored vehicles and carrying
automatic weapons first introduced during the U.S. occupation of
Baghdad, that it has become normalized… The dangers of domestic
militarization are both numerous and manifest. To begin with… it
degrades the mentality of police forces in virtually every negative
way and subjects their targeted communities to rampant brutality and
unaccountable abuse… 
Police
militarization also poses grave and direct dangers to basic political
liberties, including rights of free speech, press and assembly.

(!!!)

Make
no mistake: these are the hallmarks of a military occupation.

Militarized
police. Riot squads. Camouflage gear. Black uniforms. Armored
vehicles. Mass arrests.

Pepper
spray. Tear gas. Batons. Strip searches. Surveillance cameras. 
Kevlar vests. Drones. Lethal
weapons.
 Less-than-lethal
weapons unleashed with deadly force.
 Rubber
bullets. Water cannons. Stun grenades. Arrests of journalists. 
Crowd
control tactics
. Intimidation
tactics. Brutality.


We
are already under martial law, held at gunpoint by a standing army.

Take
a look at the pictures from Charlottesville, from Baltimore, from
Ferguson and from Boston, and then try to persuade yourself that this
is what freedom in America is supposed to look like.

A
standing army—something that propelled the early colonists into
revolution—strips the American people of any vestige of freedom.

It
was for this reason that those who established America vested control
of the military in a civilian government, with a civilian
commander-in-chief. They did not want a military government, ruled by
force. Rather, they opted for a republic bound by the rule of law:
the U.S. Constitution.

Unfortunately,
with the Constitution under constant attack, the military’s power,
influence and authority have grown dramatically. Even the 
Posse
Comitatus Act of 1878
,
which makes it a crime for the government to use the military to
carry out arrests, searches, seizure of evidence and other activities
normally handled by a civilian police force, was greatly weakened by
both Barack Obama and George W. Bush, who ushered in 
exemptions
allowing troops to deploy domestically and arrest civilians
 in
the wake of alleged terrorist acts.

Now
we find ourselves struggling to retain some semblance of freedom in
the face of police and law enforcement agencies that 
look
and act like the military
 and
have just as little regard for the Fourth Amendment, laws such as the
NDAA that allow the military to arrest and indefinitely detain
American citizens, and military drills that acclimate the American
people to the sight of armored tanks in the streets, military
encampments in cities, and combat aircraft patrolling overhead.

We’ve
already gone too far down this road.

Add
these lockdowns onto the list of other troubling developments that
have taken place over the past 30 years or more, and the picture
grows even more troubling: the expansion of the military industrial
complex and its influence in Washington DC, the rampant surveillance,
the corporate-funded elections and revolving door between lobbyists
and elected officials, the militarized police, the loss of our
freedoms, the injustice of the courts, the privatized prisons, the
school lockdowns, the roadside strip searches, the military drills on
domestic soil, the fusion centers and the simultaneous fusing of
every branch of law enforcement (federal, state and local), the
stockpiling of ammunition by various government agencies, the active
shooter drills that are indistinguishable from actual crises, the
economy flirting with near collapse, etc.

Suddenly,
the overall picture seems that much more sinister.

The
lesson for the rest of us is this: once a free people allows the
government to make inroads into their freedoms or uses those same
freedoms as bargaining chips for security, it quickly becomes a
slippery slope to outright tyranny. And it doesn’t really matter
whether it’s a Democrat or a Republican at the helm, because the
bureaucratic mindset on both sides of the aisle now seems to embody
the same philosophy of authoritarian government.

Remember,
a police state does not come about overnight.

It
starts small, perhaps with a revenue-generating red light camera at
an intersection.

When
that is implemented without opposition, perhaps next will be
surveillance cameras on public streets. License plate readers on
police cruisers. More police officers on the beat. Free military
equipment from the federal government. Free speech zones and zero
tolerance policies and curfews. SWAT team raids. Drones flying
overhead. City-wide lockdowns.

No
matter how it starts, however, it always ends the same.

Remember,
it’s a slippery slope from a questionable infringement justified in
the name of safety to all-out tyranny.

These
are no longer warning signs of a steadily encroaching police state.

As
I make clear in my book 
Battlefield
America: The War on the American People
, the
police state has arrived.

By John
Whitehead / Republished with permission / 
Rutherford
Institute
 / Report
a typo

===============================

* Zie: 

FBI ‘legt link’ tussen links-radicalen en islamistische terroristen, de tijden van McCarthy zijn terug……..

Among the Racists‘ (met mogelijkheid tot vertaling)

Before Trump, Clinton Democrats Invoked the Term ‘Alt-Left’ to Demonize Critics

Charlottesville: wat er fout ging voor de verzamelde gewelddadige en bewapende fascisten……….

Charlottesville: twee schuldigen? Of is het de taak van eenieder te vechten tegen fascisme?‘ 


Charlottesville: Trump haalt antifascisten toch onderuit………

Neonazi terreuraanslag in VS, westerse media spreken ‘op hun best’ over ‘een daad van agressie……’


** Met deze censuur wordt tevens de berichtgeving van de reguliere media als enig zaligmakend neergezet en daarmee wordt de hersenspoeling van het volk geïnstitutionaliseerd…. Zie wat dat betreft ook: 

Censuur op het internet met vliegende start in de VS, ‘het land van het vrije woord….


Eis een nee tegen censuur op het internet!‘ 


Facebook wil samen met door Saoedi-Arabië gesubsidieerde denktank censureren…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!


Trump wijst elke bezuiniging af op de hulp van de VS voor de genocide die Saoedi-Arabië uitvoert in Jemen

FBI ‘legt link’ tussen links-radicalen en islamistische terroristen, de tijden van McCarthy zijn terug……..

De FBI zal gedacht hebben dat Antifa iets te hard aan de weg timmert, u weet wel, zoals tijdens de rellen in Charlottesville, waar deze groep het opnam voor de gekleurde VS burgers en zich verzette tegen rechtse extremisten of beter gezegd fascisten, waar de laatsten jaarlijks gemiddeld 30 mensen vermoorden…..

Nu heeft de FBI historisch al een hekel aan alles wat naar links ruikt, dus 2 vliegen in 1 klap: Antifa werkt samen met islamitische terroristen…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ten eerste moeten deze terroristen niets weten van linkse politiek en ten tweede hebben leden van Antifa niets met deze reli-fascistische figuren…… Ten derde; als er nu één vorm van organisatie samenwerkt met IS en andere terreurgroepen als Al Qaida, zijn het de geheime diensten in de VS wel!!

Bovendien als je ziet hoe de geheime diensten als CIA en NSA in het buitenland opereren, kan je dit niet anders kwalificeren dan terreur!! Trouwens als je hoort waar de FBI zich o.a. schuldig aan maakt in de VS, kan je ook dat veelal niet anders zien dan terreur…….

Nadat de jacht is geopend op moslims in de VS, op een manier die ‘McCarthey waardig’ is, heeft de FBI nu, als ten tijde van McCarthy, de jacht op links voor heropend verklaard met een haat en angst campagne tegen mensen die in de VS als links worden gezien…….

Vergeet bij dit alles niet, dat de VS de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde is, die niet alleen zorgt voor grootschalige terreur in diverse buitenlanden, maar met die terreur, nieuwe terreur creëert, terreur zoals die in EU landen plaatsvond…… (dit daar de meeste EU landen meewerken aan die VS terreur….)

Zie ook:

De evolutie van politiestaat VS o.a. te zien in het buitenspel zetten van burgerrechten in steden als Boston en Charlottesville

Censuur op het internet met vliegende start in de VS, ‘het land van het vrije woord….

Eis een nee tegen censuur op het internet!‘ 

Facebook wil samen met door Saoedi-Arabië gesubsidieerde denktank censureren…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Oekraïne is helemaal niet fascistisch, aldus Anneleen Spiessens……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Nee, hoe verzin je ‘t???

Afgelopen zaterdag op VRT1, in het veelal interessante programma ‘Interne Keuken’, Anneleen Spiessens die zich bezighoudt met het bestuderen van de vertalingen die in de Russische media worden gemaakt van teksten geplaatst in The Guardian, The Wall Street Journal, Le Monde en Le Figaro……… U snapt ‘m al, daar komen de Russische vertalingen niet best ui! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Misschien moet mevrouw Spiessens eens de artikelen van die kranten bestuderen op het waarheidsgehalte! Neem het nieuws n.a.v. 911, of nieuws in aanloop van de illegale oorlogen tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië, dat was bepaald gekleurd en zelfs vals gekleurd, ofwel bomvol ‘fake news’. Ik moet toegeven dat The Guardian wat meer de waarheid vertelt, vergeleken met de rest……

Vond ‘t gelul van Spiessens verder niet interessant, totdat ze opmerkte dat Oekraïne in het geheel niet fascistisch is…….. Mensen je kon me oprapen, jezus! Zelfs de juntaleider van Oekraïne, de zwaar corrupte Porosjenko is een neonazi-vriend en daarmee een fascist!! Mensen met een andere mening dan die van de junta en die deze menig hebben geventileerd, zijn intussen in fikse aantallen uit het land vertrokken (althans als ze daar de mogelijkheid toe hebben), daar hen het leven onmogelijk wordt gemaakt…….. Dat gebeurt niet alleen door fascistische knokploegen, maar ook door de geheime dienst en de politie!! Journalisten die niet pal achter de junta staan, kunnen het wel vergeten, of ze worden afgetuigd, niet alleen dat ze kunnen ook in de cel verdwijnen, op grond van belachelijke aanklachten…….

Politieke partijen die iets te links ruiken, zijn verboden, of wordt het werken onmogelijk gemaakt……. Neofascisten kunnen openlijk en ongestoord in uniform met runentekens rond paraderen, als het ze zo uitkomt.

Dat Oekraïne in de oorlog meewerkte met de nazi’s, had alleen te maken met de haat tegen de Russen, aldus mw. Spiessens….. Half Oost-Europa was voor de oorlog al fascistisch en had geen moeite met nazi-Duitsland dat de boel kwam overnemen (van Russische bemoeienissen was toen nog geen sprake….)….

De Oekraïense junta wordt daarbovenop gecontroleerd door neonazi’s en als klap op de vuurpijl vechten neonazi-bataljons in het oosten van het land, tegen wat eerder de eigen bevolking was. Dit nazi geteisem schendt keer op keer de wapenstilstanden, weigerden (met belachelijke smoezen) de zware wapens terug te trekken en hebben al grote delen van steden in puin gelegd……….

Daarover gesproken: Oost-Oekraïne, de opstandelingen (aangeduid als ‘pro-Russisch’) zijn uiteraard fout…… Normaal toch dat je akkoord gaat met een door de VS georganiseerde en betaalde staatsgreep (met 4 miljard dollar!!) tegen de door jouw democratisch gekozen president* en vervolgens doet of er niets aan de hand is als er een fascistische (corrupte) junta wordt geïnstalleerd…… Nee volgens Spiessens is Oekraïne helemaal niet fascistisch en zitten de Russen in Oost-Oekraïne……. En beste bezoeker, daar bedoelde ze niet een enkele Russische vrijwilliger mee, maar het Russische leger!! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Als het Russische leger in Oost-Oekraïne zou zitten, wat door westerse ‘deskundigen’ al wordt beweerd vanaf het moment dat Oekraïne een oorlog begon tegen haar eigen burgers, zou heel Oekraïne al fascistenvrij zijn geweest en dat in een poep en een scheet!

Uiteraard werd De Krim over dezelfde VS-kam geschoren door mevrouw Spiessens: ofwel in feite is er sprake van een annexatie. Terwijl de bevolking, ook de oorspronkelijke, massaal koos voor aansluiting bij Rusland en dat in een door internationale waarnemers als eerlijk bestempeld referendum!! Wie wil er in godsnaam in een door fascisten geregeerd land leven…??? Oh ja, dat is volgens Spiessens niet waar…..

Overigens begon het programma met een opsomming door één van de presentatoren van wat er tegenwoordig allemaal als fascistisch wordt genoemd. Daarbij haalde hij de meest belachelijke dingen aan, als de smurfen die zelfs fascistisch zouden zijn….. Lullig voor die presentator, maar het fascisme groeit ook met de dag. Niet alleen is het neoliberalisme in feite fascistisch, maar ook meer en meer landen worden ‘geregeerd’ door wat je toch echt fascisten moet noemen….. Lullig genoeg voor deze presentator, maar bij de rest van de onderwerpen in Interne Keuken, kwam telkens weer het fascisme bovendrijven!!

Over die fascistisering: neem Hongarije onder de fascist Orbán en zijn Fidesz partij, of wat dacht u van Polen met haar PiS (partij)? Alle tekenen dat deze regeringen fascistisch zijn, liggen er dik bovenop. Trouwens neem Nederland en Frankrijk: na de verkiezingen riep men hosanna, daar de PVV en Front National niet als de grootste partijen uit de bus kwamen. Echter Front National (FN) wist wel 4 keer zo groot te worden en ook Wilders won flink wat zetels. Waar bij de Franse parlementsverkiezingen nog opgemerkt moet worden, dat meer dan de helft van de kiezers niet eens kwam opdagen bij de stembus…… Nog een klein zetje en de volgende keer stemmen ze FN……….

Kijk naar de VS, goed bezien kan je Trump gerust een fascist noemen, dat bleek wel uit zijn opmerkingen na de neonazi-parade en het extreme (dodelijke) geweld van deze schoften in Charlottesville…… Trouwens ook de vervolging van illegale immigranten (uit Zuid- en Midden-Amerika), is in feite een vervolging van minderheden die veelal meer dan tien jaar in de VS leven…..Om over de Filipijnen en de psychopathisch fascistische president Duterte maar te zwijgen…….. (ook Israël en Saoedi-Arabië kan je tegenwoordig ronduit fascistisch noemen…….)

* President Janoekovytsj was volgens Spiessens corrupt en werd daarom afgezet, terwijl ze Porosjenko niet noemde, deze schoft heeft in zijn eerste jaar als juntaleider al meer bij elkaar gestolen van het Oekraïense volk, dan Janoekovytsj in zijn ‘hele termijn’, geld (belastinggeld en buitenlandse subsidies, zoals die van de EU) dat overigens deels in Nederland werd gestald, ‘uiteraard’ tegen een voordelig tarief…..

SS heropgericht? ‘Nee hoor’, gewoon het Israëlische leger in de dagelijkse praktijk…….

De volgende foto komt van het blog van Stan van Houcke, die deze plaatste onder de titel: ‘The Courageous Zionist Army’ . En inderdaad ‘een bijzonder heldhaftig optreden’ van een stel fascistische psychopaten, ook wel aangeduid als het ‘Israëlische leger……….’

Als het mee zit, kan je binnenkort in de VS gestraft worden voor alleen het plaatsen van deze foto, daar het antisemitisch zou zijn……. Netanyahu, de leider van de fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël, had geen commentaar op de neonazi’s in Charlottesville, hij vindt de witte racistische psychopaten wel tof……. Tja, de vijand van mijn vijand is mijn vriend……. De neonazi’s hebben een nog grotere hekel aan alles wat op arabier lijkt, zodat men de joden het leven wel wil gunnen…. Ook al waren er in Charlottesville ‘koren’ met antisemitische leuzen te horen……….

                

PS: begin 90er jaren maakte een groep Israëlische officieren bekend, dat zij les kregen uit het handboek van de SS………

Charlottesville: wat er fout ging voor de verzamelde gewelddadige en bewapende fascisten……….

Het hieronder opgenomen artikel verscheen eerder op Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) en werd gisteren op Anti-Media gepubliceerd. De schrijver, Jeffrey Tucker, stelt: ‘sociale en politieke bewegingen kunnen niet volledig de gevolgen bepalen van door hen gedane inspanningen. Acties worden gevolgd door tegenacties, die niet verwacht noch bedoeld zijn. Dit omdat geen beweging of groep, hoe groot en machtig ook de menselijke geest kan beheersen van anderen die geen deelgenoot zijn van hun zaak’.

Schermafbeelding 2017-08-16 om 07.37.16

Het doel van de KKK, neonazi’s en andere extreem rechtse, fascistische bewegingen, was de gelederen te sluiten, het protest tegen het voornemen om het standbeeld van Robert E. Lee te verwijderen, was een excuus om dit doel te bereiken: ‘Unite the Right…’ Het beest Trump en anderen, zoals een fiks aantal ‘journalisten en intellectuelen’ in ons land, stellen dat er veel ‘goedwillende mensen’ onder deze fascisten waren te vinden en wijzen ‘alt-left’ (ofwel: ‘Antifa’) aan als mede verantwoordelijkenvoor de ontstane ellende…… Alsof deze mensen, net als de fascisten in de VS, de ene na de andere moord begaan……… Tucker betoogt dat de deelnemers aan dit ‘Unite the Right’ evenement, alle verschillen die men had met de neonazi’s en KKK leden, opzij wilden zetten en zich zo als een politieke eenheid te tonen…….

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor photos of the riots in charlottesville

Deze foto heb ik op 23 december 2017 geplaatst toen ik zag dat een eerdere foto door Google is verwijderd, hier de tekst bij die eerdere foto, die ik niet terug kan vinden: Zie
de eerste vrouw in uniform, rechts naast de gekleurde man, op haar
bedrukte shirt, kan je nog net een swastika zien…….. Volgens
velen, zelfs intellectuelen in Nederland, moet je dat geteisem de
vrijheid geven hun mening te uiten…….. Walgelijk! 

Lees dit uitstekende artikel van Jeffrey Tucker, waarin hij betoogt, dat ‘alt-right’ haar doel heeft gemist, voorts stelt hij dat het standbeeld van Lee meer symboliseert, dan de persoon zelf (opgenomen een video, die ik al eerder in een bericht heb opgenomen, Tucker adviseert die eerst te zien, voor zijn artikel te lezen):

Charlottesville
Effect: 5 Ways the ‘Unite the Right’ Marches Totally Backfired

August
18, 2017 at 8:11 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(FEE) —
It’s
a rule of social and political movements that they cannot fully
control the outcome of their efforts. Actions cause reactions, many
of them unanticipated and certainly unintended. This is because no
group, no matter how powerful, can control the human minds of others
not part of their cause.

This
is why so many movements driven by a revolt ethos and revolutionary
intentions have created so many unforeseen messes that are often the
opposite of their stated aims.

So
it is with the “Unite the Right” (alt-right, fascist, white
supremacist, revanchist, Nazi, and so on) marchers who descended on
the peaceful Virginia town of Charlottesville in August. Before
you read on, I would strongly suggest that you watch this video on
the march. It is truth telling, and it provides the context you need.

Donald
Trump and many others like to say that there were “good people”
marching too, but this ignores the entire title of the rally. The
“Unite the Right” theme meant that anyone participating was
necessarily putting aside differences with the Nazis and the Klan in
order to achieve the goal of becoming a national political presence
(the controversy over the statue of Robert E. Lee was only the
excuse).

The
aftermath of the march has been a fallout very different from what
they expected.

Statues
Torn Down

Only
a few years ago, the idea of toppling the statues of Confederate
generals strewn throughout the South would have been unthinkable.
Charlottesville was a test case: perhaps this Lee statue should go,
simply because it seems to be a distraction from the progress the
citizens want and an unnecessary reminder of a painful past. The city
council voted to remove it. This precipitated the rally.

To
be sure, there are defensible arguments for recognizing the
Confederate dead. But the protesters were not drawn from a heritage
society like the Sons of Confederate Veterans (my great-grandfather
was a medic in a Southern troop, and I’m named after Jefferson
Davis), but rather the hardest and most bitter among the hard-right,
anti-liberal ideologues. That association has further fueled the
anti-statue movement among activists, and today none are safe. They
are being torn down in the dead of night, all over the country,
stricken down by city councils all over the South, and condemned as
never before. None will likely survive this.

Should
the statues stay or not? These statues have a complex history. They
were not erected to honor the Confederate dead following the war or
even at the end of Reconstruction. Most appeared in the early 1920s
to send a message that the race-relation liberalization that happened
between 1880 and 1900 would not return. The progress and normalcy
would be replaced by a racist/statist/”progressive” movement
rallying around new eugenic laws, zoning, white supremacy, forced
exclusion, state segregation and so on – policies supported not by
the people but by white elites infected with demographic fear and
pseudo-science. This is when a movement started putting up these
statues, not to honor history but as a symbol of intimidation and
state control of association.

The
statue in Charlottesville statue went up the same year that
immigration restrictions went into place for explicit eugenic
reasons, and Jim Crow laws were tight and an entire population group
faced what amounted to an attempted extermination (that is not an
exaggeration but a description of a well-documented reality).

In
other words, Lee (a tragic figure in many ways) was then being
drafted by a wicked movement he would likely have never supported,
despite all his failings. So the controversy over whether it should
stay or go is not really about the war that occurred a half-century
before the statue went up but a symbol of racial control. This is the
memory we are dealing with here. It’s very similar to how the
Neo-Nazis today are abusing his tragic legacy in service of their
dangerous agenda.

Public
Revulsion

During
the presidential campaign in 2015, Hillary Clinton famous attacked
the “deplorables” who were supporting Trump, including hard
racists and fascists. The result was outrage: it seemed that she was
calling all Trump supporters these names. In fact, Trump supporters –
so many were just people disgusted by the policies of his predecessor
and wanted fundamental change in government – took on the name
“deplorable.”

Most
people in those days – never forget that most regular people do not
follow 4chan or Twitter – had no idea of the burgeoning movement of
hard-right ideologues that was gathering at the time, using Trump for
their own purposes.

The
Charlottesville “Unite the Right” march changed everything. What
we saw from online videos and news reports was what looked like a
dangerous paramilitary force, none from the city, with optics from
the interwar period, carrying torches, Nazi-style insignias, flags,
and screaming anti-Semitic and racist slogans. This was not anything
like a Tea Party protest. It was something completely different and
truly terrifying for the residents of this idyllic town.

In
other words, it looked deplorable. It was the breakout of this
movement into the mainstream. But instead of fueling some kind of
white revolution, the results have been the exact opposite. This
movement seems anti-American, filled with hate, unchecked by normal
civil engagement, truly dangerous to public order, and of strange
foreign origin. This did not look like free speech; it looked like a
threat. It was not about demanding freedom but rather demanding
power.

This
is what accounts for the shock and disorientation among conservative
and Republican commentators who want nothing to do with these people
and the ideas behind it. From my point of view, this is a very good.
From the point of view of this movement, it is presumably not what
they were going for.

What’s
fascinating to me is how these people got to this point of no return,
forgetting to check themselves with observations such as: “do you
think it is wise that we parade around like the very people the US
went to war to defeat only 70 years ago?”

To
understand that requires we plunge into the kind of group psychology
that leads to such fanatic movements – too much to take on here.

Government
Crackdown

The
marchers used Virginia’s open-carry laws and protections for free
speech and association to their advantage. They also used the plea
for tolerating their ideas in order to get a hearing. The ACLU, I
believe, was right in fighting for the speech rights of the marchers.

That
said, this was not a march about human rights; it was a march about
threats to others and a demand for power. It has prompted Justice
Department investigations, a resignation from the board of the ACLU,
and a widespread questioning of how this fiasco that resulted in so
much mayhem was ever tolerated to begin with.

We
are nearly guaranteed to see an increase in government surveillance
of hate groups, of monitoring of our online communications, of
restrictions on political organizing – all in reaction and response
and to the cheers of a terrified public.

It
is precisely events like this that cause people to lose freedoms, not
gain them. If any participants in the “Unite the Right” really
believed they were fighting for freedom, they have achieved the
opposite. But there is also this: groups like this thrive in
persecution. They never go away, especially this one because so much
of its ethos is about how they have been suppressed and oppressed.
Make them victims and they thrive ever more.

Boost
to the Left

The
true tragedy of many responses to the march was the false choice it
set up: that the only alternative to the alt-right is the leftist
antifa. Or conversely, if you hate the leftist antifa, you have no
choice but to back the alt-right. This is sheer nonsense. Most of the
people resisting what had all the appearances of a Nazi invasion were
regular citizens, not antifa. There is nothing “leftist” about
resenting the vision of Nazis taking over public spaces.

It
was a true inspiration to see the response from the merchant class,
condemning racism and fascism in no uncertain terms. Business loves
peace and friendship, not hate and civil unrest.

However,
politically, it is unclear whether this response will find a voice.
The people most in opposition to the rise of the Nazi movement in
America has been the left, and the fallout could actually boost the
prospects of the Bernie Sanders movement, as revulsion leads to an
embrace of its seeming opposite.

Incidentally,
this is precisely why it is so important for libertarians to speak
out with truth and courageous conviction. We simply cannot allow the
left to be the only ideological voice of oppositional.

Trump’s
Legacy

It
is probably too early to say what will define Trump’s legacy in
office, but his defense of the marchers, and the equation of their
bad elements with the other bad elements that opposed them, might be
it. It was the very statement that the most indefensible aspects of
the alt-right truly wanted. And it was thus no surprise that even
some of Trump’s previous defenders bailed on him in the days
following.

You
cannot give up your credibility on basic issues like human rights and
the dignity of every human life and expect to maintain political
support over the long run. We are too far down the path toward peace
and universal emancipation to go there. The future is bright and not
grim and bloody, as these marchers and their backers imagine.

Many
people have predicted the end of the Trump approach before, but
something does seem different this time. It’s very sad because
Trump has many good ideas – ideas that are evidently not that
important to him – and represents too many good causes (for
which he has done very little) for this to happen. But when you
choose to die on a hill of bigotry and intolerance, there is not
enough credibility remaining for anything else.

No
movement based on the aspiration to rule and oppress others can fully
anticipate how their activities will play out over time. In this
respect, the alt-right has done a terrible disservice to itself and
perhaps to everyone else as well.

The
question is: what are people who love human rights and liberty for
all going to do about it? In the end, the only really effective
resistance comes in the what we believe and how we live our lives. We
have seen what we do not love. The real issue is whether we can find
and then build what it is we truly do love.

By Jeffrey
A. Tucker
 / Creative
Commons
 / FEE.org / Report
a typo

=========================================================

Zie
ook: 

Before
Trump, Clinton Democrats Invoked the Term ‘Alt-Left’ to Demonize
Critics

Among
the Racists

(met mogelijkheid tot vertaling)

Neonazi
terreuraanslag in VS, westerse media spreken ‘op hun best’ over ‘een
daad van agressie……’

Charlottesville:
Trump haalt antifascisten toch onderuit………

Charlottesville:
twee schuldigen? Of is het de taak van eenieder te vechten tegen
fascisme?
‘ 


De evolutie van politiestaat VS o.a. te zien in het buitenspel zetten van burgerrechten in steden als Boston en Charlottesville

Standbeelden, waarom niet of zo weinig voor de slachtoffers uit de geschiedenis…?

De terreuraanval in Charlottesville van een fascist op een vreedzaam demonstrerende vrouw, zou zogenaamd alles te maken hebben met het verwijderen van een standbeeld van Robert E. Lee. Dit deed bij mij de vraag rijzen waarom er in de VS, maar ook hier zo weinig standbeelden voor de slachtoffers uit de geschiedenis zijn te vinden, terwijl men voor de grootste schoften een overvloed aan standbeelden heeft geplaatst……

Als je op het net bijvoorbeeld zoekt naar standbeelden voor de genocide op de oorspronkelijke bevolking van de VS, de ‘indianen’, kan je er niet makkelijk ook maar één vinden, mij lukte dit niet in een kwartier tijd (altijd tijdgebrek)…… Wel kan je standbeelden van indianen kopen, zelfs van fiberglas, alleen zijn die bedoeld voor thuis, of op z’n hoogst als verfraaiing van een winkel e.d…….

In Nederland heb je dan wel het monument tegen de slavernij, maar waarom heeft niet elke zich respecterende stad een standbeeld voor alle Indonesiërs die door Nederland werden vermoord in de loop van zo’n 3 eeuwen??? Nederland, althans de welgestelden hebben zich in die tijd helemaal scheel verdiend in dat door de Nederlanders gesmede monster Indonesië……… (‘monster’, daar er teveel volkeren ‘onder één dak moeten leven’, dat zal altijd ellende blijven geven; waar een klein land als het onze ‘al niet groot in kan zijn….’)

Behoorlijk hypocriet om wel de Nederlandse slachtoffers door de Japanse bezetting van Indonesië te herdenken, maar geen minuut tijd voor het lot van het enorme aantal slachtoffers onder de Indonesische bevolking, die Nederland tot 1949 heeft gemaakt………..

Charlottesville: twee schuldigen? Of is het de taak van eenieder te vechten tegen fascisme?

Sinds de gebeurtenissen in Charlottesville, waar een fascist een jonge vrouw vermoordde en andere neonazi’s met wapens en knuppels tekeergingen, is er een discussie losgebarsten waarin ook linkse antifascisten* (Antifa) verantwoordelijk worden gesteld voor het geweld…….. Terwijl je kan stellen dat zij zich zelf en andere demonstranten verdedigden tegen het fascistische geteisem, dat zelfs met wapens rondliep in Charlottesville……..

Die antifascisten, o.a. door Clinton cs aangeduid als ‘alt-left’ (dit al tijdens de voorverkiezingen van het presidentschap in de VS vorig jaar), bevechten terecht het fascisme, waarbij ze tot nu toe niet  één dodelijk slachtoffer hebben gemaakt, dit i.t.t. tot de neonazi’s die vanaf het jaar 2000 tot 2016 in de VS al 49 mensen hebben vermoord …….

Na WOII zou het de taak van eenieder moeten zijn, zich te verzetten tegen het opnieuw opkomende fascisme………

Bent u van mening, dat links schuld heeft aan de gebeurtenissen in Charlottesville, dan raad ik ook u aan, de hieronder opgenomen video te bekijken. Onder het begeleidende artikel kan u klikken voor een vertaling:

This
Vice News Documentary from Charlottesville Is Horrifying

Watch
it and share it.

By
Jack Holmes

August
16, 2017 “Information
Clearing House
” – Hundreds of white
supremacists 
marched
with torches in an American city Friday night
.
They arrived the next day brandishing weapons and armor. One white
supremacist 
allegedly
murdered an anti-racist protester
 in
the street with his car and injured several others. This is what
really happened when you peel back all the rhetoric flying in the
aftermath, and after you tune out the first reprehensible response
from the President of the United States, and his subsequent update to
it 
that
was two days late and a dollar short
.


Vice News, to the outlet’s immense credit, was on the ground to document the events in Charlottesville this weekend. Reporter Elle Reeve even embedded, for a time, with white supremacist leader Chris Cantwell. What she found speaks for itself, but keep an eye out for the little things. Like, say, how many guns these white supremacists have

The
question before us is obvious. Is this the country we’ve built for
ourselves? And can we allow it to continue this way?


Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

==============================

* Bestaan er eigenlijk nog rechtse antifascisten?

Zie ook:

Before Trump, Clinton Democrats Invoked the Term ‘Alt-Left’ to Demonize Critics

Among the Racists‘ (met mogelijkheid tot vertaling)

Neonazi
terreuraanslag in VS, westerse media spreken ‘op hun best’ over ‘een
daad van agressie……’

Charlottesville:
Trump haalt antifascisten toch onderuit………

Charlottesville: twee schuldigen? Of is het de taak van eenieder te vechten tegen fascisme?

Charlottesville: wat er fout ging voor de verzamelde gewelddadige en bewapende fascisten……….

De evolutie van politiestaat VS o.a. te zien in het buitenspel zetten van burgerrechten in steden als Boston en Charlottesville

Charlottesville: Trump haalt antifascisten toch onderuit………

Nadat Trump in een voor hem gemaakte tekst afstand nam van de neonazi’s die hem al als Führer vereerden, gaf hij gisteren alsnog de antifascisten mede de schuld van de ellende in Charlottesville……

Charlottesville, waar één van de neonazi’s een terreuraanslag pleegde, door met een auto op vreedzame demonstranten in te rijden en daarbij een vrouw vermoordde……. Vanaf het jaar 2000 tot 2016, voerden deze neonazi’s in de VS 26 aanvallen uit en begingen maar liefst 49 moorden……. De beweging die zich verzet tegen het neonazi-geweld, Antifa heeft bij mijn weten nooit één dodelijk slachtoffers gemaakt…….

Ook bij de protesten tegen de Dakota Acces Pipeline (DAPL), waar de oorspronkelijke bewoners* terecht protesteerden tegen het aanleggen van een oliepijpleiding, over/onder voor hen respectievelijk heilige grond en water, waren deze neonazi’s met geweld bezig tegen de vreedzame demonstranten……. Me dunkt, ook gezien de geschiedenis van WOII, een nobele zaak: vechten tegen deze neonazi’s, die niet anders zijn dan inhumane psychopathische schoften, die anderen het licht in de ogen niet gunnen…….

Gisteren in het megasuffe Mediaforum op Radio1, Catherine Keyl, deze hufter stelde dat Trump niet op de hoogte was van de neonazi’s in Charlottesville…. Wel Keyl, Trump zelf heeft jou ongelijk gegeven! Keyl ging overigens fiks tekeer tegen Antifa en stelde dat deze even gewelddadig waren…… Alsof Antifa al vele dodelijke slachtoffers heeft gemaakt…… Uiteraard noemde ze het inrijden door een neonazi op vreedzame demonstranten geen terreuraanslag, dat laatste woord kwam in haar gezwets niet voor………

Op de Post Online durfde Sietske Bergsma te stellen, dat ze liever met de neonazi’s te maken had, dan met de mensen van Antifa…… Alsof de laatsten verantwoordelijk zijn voor 49 doden deze eeuw, of zelfs voor meer doden dan de neonazi’s………. Alsof de antifascisten een terreuraanslag pleegden, i.p.v. de neonazi’s….. Eén ding is zeker, Bergsma is een aanhanger van het fascisme, dat heeft ze uit en te na aangegeven!!

Langzaam maar zeker weet het fascisme steeds meer aanhang te winnen onder de bevolking in de VS en de EU, lullig genoeg schijnt iedereen dat normaal te vinden. Het is onze plicht te vechten tegen het fascisme, een plicht die voortvloeit uit de vreselijke terreur die Duitsland en Italië voor en tijdens WOII op miljoenen hebben doen neerdalen, o.a. met een genocide op de joden, Roma en Sinti………

Hier een korte reactie van Moon of Alabama op het gebeuren in Charlottesville (onder het artikel kan u klikken voor een vertaling):

Charlottesville:
What You Wish Upon Others, You Wish Upon Yourself

By
Moon Of Alabama

August
14, 2017 “Information
Clearing House
” – U.S. “liberals” cuddle fascists
and right-wing religious extremists in Libya, Syria, Ukraine,
Venezuela and elsewhere.

      

But
when similar movements appear on their own streets they are outraged.

The
person 
in the
center on the above picture drove his car into a crowd of
counter-protesters in Charlottesville killing one and wounding
several.

Politicians
and media hail such persons when they appear, often hired by the CIA,
to overthrow the government of some foreign country. They condemn the
same mindset and actions at home. But 
glorification of
right-wing violence elsewhere hands justification to right-wing
groups at home.

Above:
Fascist torch march 
in Kiev
January 28 2017. Then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Republican
Senator McCain, The New York Times, the Washington Post and many
“liberals” supported the above nazis.

Above:
Fascist torch march 
in Charlottesville,
August 11 2017. Former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton,
Republican Senator McCain, the New York Times, the Washington Post
and many “liberals” condemned the above nazis.

You
can not have only one of these. 

To
claim, as “liberals” do now, that such marches as in
Charlottesville, “is not what and who we are”, is a lie.
Ask people from outside the U.S. how the empire appears and acts
towards them.

The
U.S. uses fascism, religious extremism, torture, targeted killing and
many other vile instruments of power in its quest for global
dominance. All of these methods and ideologies, all of them, will one
day come home.

This
article was first published by
 Moon
Of Alabama
 

Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

=============================

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor fakkeloptocht nazi-duitsland

Oekraïense neonazi’s herdenken SS divisie (onder goedkeuring van de corrupte juntaleider Porosjenko en de EU!)

* De oorspronkelijke bewoners van Noord-Amerika (plus die in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika) die middels de grootste genocide ooit bijna werden uitgeroeid……… (waarbij een aantal stammen daadwerkelijk werden uitgemoord……..)

Zie ook:

Neonazi terreuraanslag in VS, westerse media spreken ‘op hun best’ over ‘een daad van agressie……’

Charlottesville: twee schuldigen? Of is het de taak van eenieder te vechten tegen fascisme?

Charlottesville: wat er fout ging voor de verzamelde gewelddadige en bewapende fascisten……….

Before Trump, Clinton Democrats Invoked the Term ‘Alt-Left’ to Demonize Critics

Among the Racists‘ (met mogelijkheid tot vertaling)

Mijn excuus voor de vormgeving.

De evolutie van politiestaat VS o.a. te zien in het buitenspel zetten van burgerrechten in steden als Boston en Charlottesville