Fidel Castro 13 augustus 1926 – 25 november 2016

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor fidel castro

‘Een groot man’ is heen, dit cliché is zeker van toepassing op Fidel Castro. Hij bevrijdde Cuba van een gewetenloze dictator, die het volk onder de duim hield middels enorme mensenrechtenschendingen en de maffia uit de VS op alle mogelijke manieren faciliteerde.

Castro heeft een eind gemaakt aan de enorme armoede waarin het Cubaanse volk leefde voor de revolutie. Hij en zijn getrouwen brachten het Cubaanse volk gratis gezondheidszorg, gratis onderwijs (en van een hoog niveau!), onderdak tegen een grijpstuiver en misschien wel het belangrijkst van al: een menselijk bestaan en waardigheid.

Weer wordt er internationaal (o.a. BBC World Service) gewezen op de mensenrechtenschendingen onder het Castro bewind, echter degenen die dit het hardst roepen, bevinden zich voor een groot deel in landen, waar de mensenrechten op veel grover manier werden en/of worden vertrapt…….

Neem de VS: vanaf de tijd dat Castro en zijn getrouwen, waaronder Ché Guevara, de macht in Cuba overnamen van onmens en schoft Batista, is het aantal mensenrechtenschendingen in de VS allang niet meer te tellen, neem het latente ‘racisme’, de enorme discriminatie van de gekleurde bevolking, daarvoor hoef je alleen maar naar de bemensing van de gevangenissen te kijken…… Om maar te zwijgen over de illegale oorlogen begonnen door de VS, de door de VS geregisseerde opstanden tegen meestal democratisch gekozen regeringen in een groot aantal landen, opstanden die tot een coup moesten leiden….. Eén van de mislukte pogingen tot omverwerping van een regime, was die tegen… Cuba!

Over de VS gesproken: in feite heeft dit ‘land’ Castro grote diensten bewezen, juist door de inzet tegen het Castro bewind, vergeet niet dat veel Cubanen de VS verantwoordelijk hielden voor het Batista regime en de daarmee gepaard gaande armoede en enorme repressie. Met andere woorden, de houding van de VS, versterkte de populariteit van Castro en zijn bewind.

De CIA beraamde een groot aantal aanslagen tegen Castro, aanslagen die hun weerslag hadden op de manier waarop het Castro bewind Cuba regeerde, immers een aanslag lag altijd op de loer……. Daarmee kan je stellen, dat de VS deels verantwoordelijk was (en is) voor de inperking van vrijheden op Cuba.

Het boycotten van Cuba door de VS, is misschien wel het schandaligst van al. Een land boycotten dat de georganiseerde misdaad uit NB de VS zelf een halt toeriep…… Een land boycotten, daar het een eind maakte aan het onmenselijke bewind van Batista, dat (alweer) NB zwaar werd gesteund door de VS…….. Een land boycotten daar het bewind de bevolking weer een reden gaf om te leven………..

Cuba heeft ondanks alle tegenwerking vele landen geholpen tegen gewetenloze dictators, zo hielp Cuba het ANC in haar strijd tegen het smerige apartheidsbewind in Zuid-Afrika. Mandela’s eerste buitenlandse reis, nadat hij president werd van Zuid-Afrika, was die naar Cuba!

Dank Fidel!

Zie ook: ‘Gert Oostindie met ongezouten Castro kritiek op de landelijke ‘nieuws en actualiteitenzender……’

Marietje Schaake (D66) wil EU leger, zodat ‘we’ eindelijk de politieke unie kunnen doordrukken en Oekraïne bij kunnen staan……..

Het grote nieuws gisteren: er moet een EU leger komen, men noemde dit een Europees leger, maar dat zou betekenen dat Rusland en Oekraïne ook meedoen……. Nu na de Brexit de totstandkoming van een politieke unie verder weg lijkt dan ooit, heeft men verzonnen, dat gezien ‘alle dreiging’ er een EU leger moet komen, de volgende grote stap na invoering van de vermaledijde euro, die tot niets anders kan leiden dan een…. politieke unie!! Niet voor niets hebben de verantwoordelijk ministers van de EU lidstaten besloten, dat het tot zo’n leger moet komen…..

Gistermorgen was Schaake van de D66 EU (neo-) liberale fractie, op BNR te horen met een pleidooi voor zo’n leger (na het nieuws van 8.00 u.)……… Volgens Schaake dreigt er gevaar aan de EU oostgrens en in het Midden-Oosten, die een dergelijk leger rechtvaardigen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! De NAVO heeft tegen de afspraken in, zich steeds verder richting Moskou uitgebreid en staat nu voor het grootste deel van de Russische westgrens…… Met andere woorden: wie vormt er een gevaar voor wie??!!!

Daar ontbreken nog een paar stukken, o.a. de Oekraïens-Russische grens. Vandaar dat Hillary Clinton als minister van Buitenlandse Zaken het groene licht gaf voor het veroorzaken van een opstand tegen de democratisch gekozen president Janoekovytsj en diens regering….. Janoekovytsj moest weg, daar hij de VS onwelgevallig was en niet ‘vroeg’ om een lidmaatschap van de NAVO…… Met 4 miljard dollar kocht Clinton zich de opstand en uiteindelijke coup……

Uiteraard alles nauwkeurig gecoördineerd door o.a. de CIA. De rest is geschiedenis, al heeft e.e.a. aan veel mensen het leven gekost, daar de door de VS geparachuteerde Porosjenko neonazi junta ook het oosten in handen wil hebben, het oosten waar net als in De Krim de bevolking tegen de door de VS geïnstalleerde junta was…. Deze junta bombardeert op en af steden in Oost-Oekraïne, steden waar Oekraïners wonen………. Dat door een junta, die NB de door hen democratisch gekozen regering verving………

Hetzelfde geldt voor het Midden-Oosten, de VS heeft daar de lont in het kruitvat gedaan, niet alleen in Irak, maar ook in Syrië, net als in Oekraïne heeft de VS daar de opstand op poten gezet. De eerste VS plannen om Assad weg te krijgen, dateren al van 2006…….. Moet u nagaan, dan noem ik de illegale oorlog van de VS tegen Libie niet eens (een oorlog waarmee de VS ten overvloede nog eens bewees, dat zij de ‘NAVO touwen’ bedienen…..

Schaake zou dan ook beter kunnen zeggen dat de VS als de donder de NAVO uit moet en dat verdere samenwerking met de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde, de VS, moet worden gestopt……. Niet Rusland viel deze eeuw al drie keer illegaal een ander land binnen, of bombardeerde een land, zoals Libië zo’n 80 jaar terug in de geschiedenis, maar de VS…..

Moet u nagaan: alle terreur waar men in de politiek ‘zo bezorgd over is’, is direct veroorzaakt door de immense terreur die de VS heeft gezaaid in Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en nu weer Syrië….. Om over andere Afrikaanse landen als Soedan maar te zwijgen……..

Schaake stelde het eens te zijn, met de wil een hoofdkantoor voor in eerste instantie ‘Europese’ (lees: EU) militaire samenwerking, kortom een enorm diepe put voor EU belastinggeld……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Bovendien hebben we al zo’n kantoor, het NAVO hoofdkantoor in Brussel!!

Schaake herhaalde de leugen nog eens: zo’n EU leger is nodig , in een tijd dat er reële dreigingen zijn aan onze grenzen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Meervoud, dat ‘dreigingen’, waarschijnlijk ziet de trut de vluchtelingen ook als een reële dreiging……

Op Radio1 deed oud-generaal Nico Tak nog in duit in de zak. Hij reageerde na het nieuws van 9.00 u. op het bericht, dat ook ‘toevallig’ gisteren bekend werd gemaakt, dat de Russen met hun straaljagers veelvuldig het luchtruim van EU landen schendt…… ha! ha! ha! ha! Vreemd, als er een Russische bommenwerper over de Noordzee vliegt, in een gebied waar dat mag, staan de media bol van dit nieuws, maar als er daadwerkelijk een straaljager in het luchtruim van een land komt, horen we dat niet…

Moet u nagaan, het gaat dan om incidenten die 400 keer per jaar voorkomen, aldus Tak…….. Al sprak Tak wel over ‘in de nabijheid van het luchtruim’ van NAVO landen…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Tja, als je met de NAVO voor bijna de hele westgrens van Rusland staat, komen er een ongelofelijk aantal straaljagers in de nabijheid van ‘NAVO-luchtruim’, ook al vliegen ze in het Russische luchtruim!! Jezus wat een oplichter!!

Uiteraard vertelde hufter Tak er niet bij, dat de NAVO veel verder gaat dan Rusland, niet alleen tegen de afspraken in uitbreiden richting Russische grens, maar ook met het schenden van Russisch luchtruim, of met marineschepen in de Russische territoriale wateren varen. De NAVO houdt de ene grootscheepse oefening na de andere aan de Russische grens…… Benieuwd wat Tak zou zeggen als de Russen dat langs onze grens zouden doen……..

Uiteraard is ook Tak voor een EU leger, dit vanwege alweer: alle dreigingen……. Voorts stelde Tak dat we meer moeten bijdragen aan de NAVO en daarover gesproken: zonder de VS in de NAVO, kunnen we het wel vergeten in de EU, mocht Rusland ons aanvallen. Precies de leugen, die men ten tijde van de Koude Oorlog hanteerden, Rusland zou veel sterker zijn, achteraf bleek dat een welbewuste leugen te zijn, een leugen om…… geld los te krijgen!! Alleen Groot-Brittannië, Frankrijk, Duitsland en Italië, geven al 7 keer meer uit aan defensie, dan Rusland…….. Tak weet dondersgoed, dat m.n. het grote aantal oefeningen langs de Russische grens, een enorm kapitaal kosten, juist daardoor moet het NAVO-budget worden vergroot…….

Zo ongeveer de grootste leugen van Tak was de bewering, dat de NAVO zich niet met de samenwerking van landen op militair gebied bemoeit….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! De NAVO heeft na 1991 niet anders gedaan, dan landen te overtuigen lid te worden van de NAVO, ook al had de NAVO beloofd, dit niet te doen!!!

Tak begon noch over de responders op Russische toestellen die de Russen uitzetten als ze over ‘NAVO gebied vliegen en dat dit zeer gevaarlijk is. Ja hij ziet de toestellen dan wel op de radar, maar weet zogenaamd niet hoe hard ze vliegen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Dat rekent de radarinstallatie zelfs voor je uit!! Plag dacht dat ‘t nodig was te zeggen, dat het vorig jaar mis ging, toen Russische jagers in het Turkse luchtruim werden neergeschoten…….. Turkije gaf godverdomme toe, dat het loog en dat de Russische toestellen in Syrisch luchtruim vlogen….. Wat zeg ik Turkije? Erdogan zelf!!

Trouwens, in het begin noemde ik Oekraïne, een EU leger is natuurlijk een ‘mooie manier’ om Oekraïne bij te kunnen staan, met de slachting die de Porosjenko junta in in Oost-Oekraïne aanricht, immers de NAVO mag daar nu in feite niets doen, daar Oekraïne geen lid is van de NAVO…….

Joris Voorhoeve was gistermorgen te gast in Standpunt NL, ‘uiteraard’ met het EU leger ‘Europees leger’ als onderwerp. De neoliberale presentator Kockelman is uiteraard een groot voorstander, hij houdt ten slotte niet voor niets Rusland verantwoordelijk voor het opschuiven van de NAVO, tot aan de Russische grens. Naast Voorhoeve was ‘een groot tegenstander’, oud-generaal de Kruif te horen in de uitzending, deze grootlobbyist voor het militair-industrieel complex, werd voor zijn ‘verdiensten’ door terreurentiteit VS onderscheiden met een hoge medaille…….

Aanvankelijk dacht ik dat de Kruif tegen een EU leger was, maar gezien, zijn verdere woorden, zal hij bepaald niet gaan janken, mocht het zover komen.

Voorhoeve, ook al een grootlobbyist van hetzelfde complex, is uiteraard groot voorstander van een EU leger, het aantal soldaten kan niet groot genoeg zijn als het aan ‘onze’ Joris ligt…… Voorhoeve is tevens groot voorstander van een politieke Europese Unie en zoals gezegd, het één leidt vanzelf tot het ander!!

Joris zou Joris niet zijn, als hij niet ook een draak aanwees. Mag u één keer raden wie de draak van sint Joris is??? Juist: Putin! De Baltische Staten lopen gevaar, aldus Voorhoeve…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Mocht u denken dat Voorhoeve gelijk heeft, zou ik u aanraden het hiervoorgaande nog eens te lezen.

Voorhoeve en de Kruif stelden verder, precies als Tak eerder die ochtend, dat de NAVO, zonder de VS niet tegen Rusland op kan………… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Nogmaals (en het kan niet genoeg gezegd worden): Groot-Brittannië, Frankrijk, Duitsland en Italië geven gezamenlijk jaarlijks al 7 keer meer uit aan Defensie, dan Rusland…….. Van deze vier landen, hebben er twee ‘eiguh gemaakte’ patat, uh kernwapens, t.w. Frankrijk en GB…….. Alsof oplichters en oorlogshitsers Voorhoeve, de Kruif en Tak die informatie niet hebben, wat een geteisem!!

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label N. Tak.

Angela Merkel: ‘tegenstanders TTIP zijn in feite anti-VS activisten…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten bericht vandaag dat de Duitse premier Merkel, tegenstanders van het TTIP verdrag met de VS, in feite anti-VS activisten noemt……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Het valt me alleszins mee, dat ze de tegenstanders van TTIP in de VS, niet meteen als Russische spionnen afschilderde.

De VS waar men een regering en ‘oppositie’ heeft, die is gekocht dor het bedrijfsleven, wil men TTIP getekend hebben, voordat Obama het Witte Huis verlaat. Dit verdrag staat uitsluitend ten dienste van het bedrijfsleven en ja, die hebben de verkiezing van Obama 4 jaar gelden veilig gesteld…… Niet voor niets had de VS zo’n grote bek over de veroordeling van Apple door de EU, Apple dat 13 miljard moet betalen aan Ierland (die dat geld niet wil, terwijl de bevolking daar in dikke armoede leeft…..). Een grote bek van de VS, terwijl Apple in feite de belastingen in eigen land, de VS, heeft ontdoken en daarmee ook de enorme groep arme burgers in datzelfde VS benadeelt……..

Demo gegen CETA und TTIP in Berlin. (Foto: dpa)

Demo gegen CETA und TTIP in Berlin. (Foto: dpa)

Gezien de lamme houding van Merkel t.o.v. de VS, ‘zou je kunnen denken’, dat Merkel wordt gechanteerd door de VS…… Neem het schandaal over de telefoontaps op haar persoonlijke telefoon door de NSA, waar zogenaamd grote verontwaardiging over ontstond, terwijl men geen sancties tegen de VS nam……..

De aanvankelijke meer constructieve benadering van Merkel t.a.v. Rusland, is intussen bijna geheel omgedraaid. De VS, waar de verkiezingen één groot toneelspel zijn, geregisseerd door het bedrijfsleven, stelt Rusland nu verantwoordelijk voor bemoeienis met deze verkiezingen door hacken van bepaalde computers…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! De VS heeft vandaag dan ook gesteld, de sancties tegen Rusland te versterken…….. De VS heeft intussen van de EU geëist, mee te gaan in het versterken van de sancties tegen Rusland, vanwege dit akkefietje….. Voordat de VS zelfs met deze eis kwam, had Merkel al gesteld voor strengere sancties te zijn………

Ernstiger nog: met een ‘executive order’ van 1 april 2015, behoudt de VS zich het recht voor militair in te grijpen, als een ander land haar overheidscomputers hackt……. Levensgevaarlijk gezien de huidige status quo, waarin het overduidelijk is, dat de VS oorlog zoekt met Rusland en daar alles voor uit de kast trekt……… Bovendien volkomen belachelijk, aangezien, de geheime diensten van de VS niet anders doen dan (overheids-) computers van andere landen hacken…..

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

Kwam gisteren op het blog van Stan van Houcke een lijst met oorlogen tegen, die de VS sinds WOII heeft gevoerd. Voor velen geen nieuws maar het is schokkend om alles nog eens op een rij te zien, een gruwelijk naslagwerk over de daden van de grootste terreur entiteit op aarde: de VS…….

US
Has Killed More Than 20 Million In 37 Nations Since WWII

After
the catastrophic attacks of September 11 2001 monumental sorrow and a
feeling of desperate and understandable anger began to permeate the
American psyche. A few people at that time attempted to promote a
balanced perspective by pointing out that the United States had also
been responsible for causing those same feelings in people in other
nations, but they produced hardly a ripple. Although 

Americans
understand in the abstract the wisdom of people around the world
empathizing with the suffering of one another, such a reminder of
wrongs committed by our nation got little hearing and was soon
overshadowed by an accelerated “war on terrorism.”

But
we must continue our efforts to develop understanding and compassion
in the world. Hopefully, this article will assist in doing that by
addressing the question “How many September 11ths has the United
States caused in other nations since WWII?” This theme is developed
in this report which contains an estimated numbers of such deaths in
37 nations as well as brief explanations of why the U.S. is
considered culpable.

The
causes of wars are complex. In some instances nations other than the
U.S. may have been responsible for more deaths, but if the
involvement of our nation appeared to have been a necessary cause of
a war or conflict it was considered responsible for the deaths in it.
In other words they probably would not have taken place if the U.S.
had not used the heavy hand of its power. The military and economic
power of the United States was crucial.

This
study reveals that U.S. military forces were directly responsible for
about 10 to 15 million deaths during the Korean and Vietnam Wars and
the two Iraq Wars. The Korean War also includes Chinese deaths while
the Vietnam War also includes fatalities in Cambodia and Laos.

The
American public probably is not aware of these numbers and knows even
less about the proxy wars for which the United States is also
responsible. In the latter wars there were between nine and 14
million deaths in Afghanistan, Angola, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, East Timor, Guatemala, Indonesia, Pakistan and Sudan.

But
the victims are not just from big nations or one part of the world.
The remaining deaths were in smaller ones which constitute over half
the total number of nations. Virtually all parts of the world have
been the target of U.S. intervention.

The
overall conclusion reached is that the United States most likely has
been responsible since WWII for the deaths of between 20 and 30
million people in wars and conflicts scattered over the world.

To
the families and friends of these victims it makes little difference
whether the causes were U.S. military action, proxy military forces,
the provision of U.S. military supplies or advisors, or other ways,
such as economic pressures applied by our nation. They had to make
decisions about other things such as finding lost loved ones, whether
to become refugees, and how to survive.

And
the pain and anger is spread even further. Some authorities estimate
that there are as many as 10 wounded for each person who dies in
wars. Their visible, continued suffering is a continuing reminder to
their fellow countrymen.

It
is essential that Americans learn more about this topic so that they
can begin to understand the pain that others feel. Someone once
observed that the Germans during WWII “chose not to know.” We
cannot allow history to say this about our country. The question
posed above was “How many September 11ths has the United States
caused in other nations since WWII?” The answer is: possibly
10,000.

Comments
on Gathering These Numbers


Generally
speaking, the much smaller number of Americans who have died is not
included in this study, not because they are not important, but
because this report focuses on the impact of U.S. actions on its
adversaries.

An
accurate count of the number of deaths is not easy to achieve, and
this collection of data was undertaken with full realization of this
fact. These estimates will probably be revised later either upward or
downward by the reader and the author. But undoubtedly the total will
remain in the millions.

The
difficulty of gathering reliable information is shown by two
estimates in this context. For several years I heard statements on
radio that three million Cambodians had been killed under the rule of
the Khmer Rouge. However, in recent years the figure I heard was one
million. Another example is that the number of persons estimated to
have died in Iraq due to sanctions after the first U.S. Iraq War was
over 1 million, but in more recent years, based on a more recent
study, a lower estimate of around a half a million has emerged.

Often
information about wars is revealed only much later when someone
decides to speak out, when more secret information is revealed due to
persistent efforts of a few, or after special congressional
committees make reports

Both
victorious and defeated nations may have their own reasons for
underreporting the number of deaths. Further, in recent wars
involving the United States it was not uncommon to hear statements
like “we do not do body counts” and references to “collateral
damage” as a euphemism for dead and wounded. Life is cheap for
some, especially those who manipulate people on the battlefield as if
it were a chessboard.

To
say that it is difficult to get exact figures is not to say that we
should not try. Effort was needed to arrive at the figures of 6six
million Jews killed during WWI, but knowledge of that number now is
widespread and it has fueled the determination to prevent future
holocausts. That struggle continues.

The
author can be contacted at 
jlucas511@woh.rr.com

37
VICTIM NATIONS

Afghanistan

The
U.S. is responsible for between 1 and 1.8 million deaths during the
war between the Soviet Union and Afghanistan, by luring the Soviet
Union into invading that nation. (1,2,3,4)

The
Soviet Union had friendly relations its neighbor, Afghanistan, which
had a secular government. The Soviets feared that if that government
became fundamentalist this change could spill over into the Soviet
Union.

In
1998, in an interview with the Parisian publication Le Novel
Observateur, Zbigniew Brzezinski, adviser to President Carter,
admitted that he had been responsible for instigating aid to the
Mujahadeen in Afghanistan which caused the Soviets to invade. In his
own words:

According
to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began
during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded
Afghanistan on 24 December 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded
until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that
President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the
opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I
wrote a note to the President in which I explained to him that in my
opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.”
(5,1,6)

Brzezinski
justified laying this trap, since he said it gave the Soviet Union
its Vietnam and caused the breakup of the Soviet Union. “Regret
what?” he said. “That secret operation was an excellent idea. It
had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you
want me to regret it?” (7)

The
CIA spent 5 to 6 billion dollars on its operation in Afghanistan in
order to bleed the Soviet Union. (1,2,3) When that 10-year war ended
over a million people were dead and Afghan heroin had captured 60% of
the U.S. market. (4)

The
U.S. has been responsible directly for about 12,000 deaths in
Afghanistan many of which resulted from bombing in retaliation for
the attacks on U.S. property on September 11, 2001. Subsequently U.S.
troops invaded that country. (4)

Angola

An
indigenous armed struggle against Portuguese rule in Angola began in
1961. In 1977 an Angolan government was recognized by the U.N.,
although the U.S. was one of the few nations that opposed this
action. In 1986 Uncle Sam approved material assistance to UNITA, a
group that was trying to overthrow the government. Even today this
struggle, which has involved many nations at times, continues.

U.S.
intervention was justified to the U.S. public as a reaction to the
intervention of 50,000 Cuban troops in Angola. However, according to
Piero Gleijeses, a history professor at Johns Hopkins University the
reverse was true. The Cuban intervention came as a result of a CIA –
financed covert invasion via neighboring Zaire and a drive on the
Angolan capital by the U.S. ally, South Africa1,2,3). (Three
estimates of deaths range from 300,000 to 750,000 (4,5,6)

Argentina:
See South America: Operation Condor

Bangladesh:
See Pakistan

Bolivia

Hugo
Banzer was the leader of a repressive regime in Bolivia in the 1970s.
The U.S. had been disturbed when a previous leader nationalized the
tin mines and distributed land to Indian peasants. Later that action
to benefit the poor was reversed.

Banzer,
who was trained at the U.S.-operated School of the Americas in Panama
and later at Fort Hood, Texas, came back from exile frequently to
confer with U.S. Air Force Major Robert Lundin. In 1971 he staged a
successful coup with the help of the U.S. Air Force radio system. In
the first years of his dictatorship he received twice as military
assistance from the U.S. as in the previous dozen years together.

A
few years later the Catholic Church denounced an army massacre of
striking tin workers in 1975, Banzer, assisted by information
provided by the CIA, was able to target and locate leftist priests
and nuns. His anti-clergy strategy, known as the Banzer Plan, was
adopted by nine other Latin American dictatorships in 1977. (2) He
has been accused of being responsible for 400 deaths during his
tenure. (1)

Also
see: See South America: Operation Condor

Brazil:
See South America: Operation Condor

Cambodia

U.S.
bombing of Cambodia had already been underway for several years in
secret under the Johnson and Nixon administrations, but when
President Nixon openly began bombing in preparation for a land
assault on Cambodia it caused major protests in the U.S. against the
Vietnam War.

There
is little awareness today of the scope of these bombings and the
human suffering involved.

Immense
damage was done to the villages and cities of Cambodia, causing
refugees and internal displacement of the population. This unstable
situation enabled the Khmer Rouge, a small political party led by Pol
Pot, to assume power. Over the years we have repeatedly heard about
the Khmer Rouge’s role in the deaths of millions in Cambodia
without any acknowledgement being made this mass killing was made
possible by the the U.S. bombing of that nation which destabilized it
by death , injuries, hunger and dislocation of its people.

So
the U.S. bears responsibility not only for the deaths from the
bombings but also for those resulting from the activities of the
Khmer Rouge – a total of about 2.5 million people. Even when
Vietnam latrer invaded Cambodia in 1979 the CIA was still supporting
the Khmer Rouge. (1,2,3)

Also
see Vietnam

Chad

An
estimated 40,000 people in Chad were killed and as many as 200,000
tortured by a government, headed by Hissen Habre who was brought to
power in June, 1982 with the help of CIA money and arms. He remained
in power for eight years. (1,2)

Human
Rights Watch claimed that Habre was responsible for thousands of
killings. In 2001, while living in Senegal, he was almost tried for
crimes committed by him in Chad. However, a court there blocked these
proceedings. Then human rights people decided to pursue the case in
Belgium, because some of 

Habre’s torture victims lived there. The
U.S., in June 2003, told Belgium that it risked losing its status as
host to NATO’s headquarters if it allowed such a legal proceeding
to happen. So the result was that the law that allowed victims to
file complaints in Belgium for atrocities committed abroad was
repealed. 

However, two months later a new law was passed which made
special provision for the continuation of the case against Habre.

Chile

The
CIA intervened in Chile’s 1958 and 1964 elections. In 1970 a
socialist candidate, Salvador Allende, was elected president. The CIA
wanted to incite a military coup to prevent his inauguration, but the
Chilean army’s chief of staff, General Rene Schneider, opposed this
action. The CIA then planned, along with some people in the Chilean
military, to assassinate Schneider. This plot failed and Allende took
office. President Nixon was not to be dissuaded and he ordered the
CIA to create a coup climate: “Make the economy scream,” he
said.

What followed were guerilla warfare, arson, bombing,
sabotage and terror. ITT and other U.S. corporations with Chilean
holdings sponsored demonstrations and strikes. Finally, on September
11, 1973 Allende died either by suicide or by assassination. At that
time Henry Kissinger, U.S. Secretary of State, said the following
regarding Chile: “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a
country go communist because of the irresponsibility of its own
people.” (1)

During
17 years of terror under Allende’s successor, General Augusto
Pinochet, an estimated 3,000 Chileans were killed and many others
were tortured or “disappeared.” (2,3,4,5)

Also
see South America: Operation Condor

China
An estimated 900,000 Chinese died during the Korean War. For more
information, See: Korea.

Colombia

One
estimate is that 67,000 deaths have occurred from the 1960s to recent
years due to support by the U.S. of Colombian state terrorism. (1)

According
to a 1994 Amnesty International report, more than 20,000 people were
killed for political reasons in Colombia since 1986, mainly by the
military and its paramilitary allies. Amnesty alleged that “U.S.-
supplied military equipment, ostensibly delivered for use against
narcotics traffickers, was being used by the Colombian military to
commit abuses in the name of “counter-insurgency.” (2) In 2002
another estimate was made that 3,500 people die each year in a U.S.
funded civilian war in Colombia. (3)

In
1996 Human Rights Watch issued a report “Assassination Squads in
Colombia” which revealed that 

CIA agents went to Colombia in 1991
to help the military to train undercover agents in anti-subversive
activity. (4,5)

In
recent years the U.S. government has provided assistance under Plan
Colombia. The Colombian government has been charged with using most
of the funds for destruction of crops and support of the paramilitary
group.

Cuba

In
the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba on April 18, 1961 which ended after
3 days, 114 of the invading force were killed, 1,189 were taken
prisoners and a few escaped to waiting U.S. ships. (1) The captured
exiles were quickly tried, a few executed and the rest sentenced to
thirty years in prison for treason. These exiles were released after
20 months in exchange for $53 million in food and medicine.

Some
people estimate that the number of Cuban forces killed range from
2,000, to 4,000. Another estimate is that 1,800 Cuban forces were
killed on an open highway by napalm. This appears to have been a
precursor of the Highway of Death in Iraq in 1991 when U.S. forces
mercilessly annihilated large numbers of Iraqis on a highway. (2)

Democratic
Republic of Congo (formerly Zaire)

The
beginning of massive violence was instigated in this country in 1879
by its colonizer King Leopold of Belgium. The Congo’s population
was reduced by 10 million people over a period of 20 years which some
have referred to as “Leopold’s Genocide.” (1) The U.S. has been
responsible for about a third of t

hat many deaths in that nation in
the more recent past. (2)

In
1960 the Congo became an independent state with Patrice Lumumba being
its first prime minister. He was assassinated with the CIA being
implicated, although some say that his murder was actually the
responsibility of Belgium. (3) But nevertheless, the CIA was planning
to kill him. (4) Before his assassination the CIA sent one of its
scientists, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, to the Congo carrying “lethal
biological material” intended for use in Lumumba’s assassination.
This virus would have been able to produce a fatal disease indigenous
to the Congo area of Africa and was transported in a diplomatic
pouch.

Much
of the time in recent years there has been a civil war within the
Democratic Republic of Congo, fomented often by the U.S. and other
nations, including neighboring nations. (5)

In
April 1977, Newsday reported that the CIA was secretly supporting
efforts to recruit several hundred mercenaries in the U.S. and Great
Britain to serve alongside Zaire’s army. In that same year the U.S.
provided $15 million of military supplies to the Zairian President
Mobutu to fend off an invasion by a rival group operating in Angola.
(6)

In
May 1979, the U.S. sent several million dollars of aid to Mobutu who
had been condemned 3 months earlier by the U.S. State Department for
human rights violations. (7) During the Cold War the U.S. funneled
over 300 million dollars in weapons into Zaire (8,9) $100 million in
military training was provided to him. (2) In 2001 it was reported to
a U.S. congressional committee that American companies, including one
linked to former President George Bush Sr., were stoking the Congo
for monetary gains. There is an international battle over resources
in that country with over 125 companies and individuals being
implicated. One of these substances is coltan, which is used in the
manufacture of cell phones. (2)


Dominican
Republic

In
1962, Juan Bosch became president of the Dominican Republic. He
advocated such programs as land reform and public works programs.
This did not bode well for his future relationship with the U.S., and
after only 7 months in office, he was deposed by a CIA coup. In 1965
when a group was trying to reinstall him to his office President
Johnson said, “This Bosch is no good.” Assistant Secretary of
State Thomas Mann replied “He’s no good at all. If we don’t get
a decent government in there, Mr. President, we get another Bosch.
It’s just going to be another sinkhole.” Two days later a U.S.
invasion started and 22,000 soldiers and marines entered the
Dominican Republic and about 3,000 Dominicans died during the
fighting. The cover excuse for doing this was that this was done to
protect foreigners there. (1,2,3,4)

East
Timor

In
December 1975, Indonesia invaded East Timor. This incursion was
launched the day after U.S. President Gerald Ford and Secretary of
State Henry Kissinger had left Indonesia where they had given
President Suharto permission to use American arms, which under U.S.
law, could not be used for aggression. Daniel Moynihan, U.S.
ambassador to the UN. said that the U.S. wanted “things to turn out
as they did.” (1,2) The result was an estimated 200,000 dead out of
a population of 700,000. (1,2)

Sixteen
years later, on November 12, 1991, two hundred and seventeen East
Timorese protesters in Dili, many of them children, marching from a
memorial service, were gunned down by Indonesian Kopassus shock
troops who were headed by U.S.- trained commanders Prabowo Subianto
(son in law of General Suharto) and Kiki Syahnakri. Trucks were seen
dumping bodies into the sea. (5)

El
Salvador

The
civil war from 1981 to1992 in El Salvador was financed by $6 billion
in U.S. aid given to support the government in its efforts to crush a
movement to bring social justice to the people in that nation of
about 8 million people. (1)

During that time U.S. military
advisers demonstrated methods of torture on teenage prisoners,
according to an interview with a deserter from the Salvadoran army
published in the New York Times. This former member of the Salvadoran
National Guard testified that he was a member of a squad of twelve
who found people who they were told were guerillas and tortured them.
Part of the training he received was in torture at a U.S. location
somewhere in Panama. (2)

About
900 villagers were massacred in the village of El Mozote in 1981. Ten
of the twelve El Salvadoran government soldiers cited as
participating in this act were graduates of the School of the
Americas operated by the U.S. (2) They were only a small part of
about 75,000 people killed during that civil war. (1)

According
to a 1993 United Nations’ Truth Commission report, over 96 % of the
human rights violations carried out during the war were committed by
the Salvadoran army or the paramilitary deaths squads associated with
the Salvadoran army. (3)

That
commission linked graduates of the School of the Americas to many
notorious killings. The New York Times and the Washington Post
followed with scathing articles. In 1996, the White House Oversight
Board issued a report that supported many of the charges against that
school made by Rev. Roy Bourgeois, head of the School of the Americas
Watch. That same year the Pentagon released formerly classified
reports indicating that graduates were trained in killing, extortion,
and physical abuse for interrogations, false imprisonment and other
methods of control. (4)

Grenada

The
CIA began to destabilize Grenada in 1979 after Maurice Bishop became
president, partially because he refused to join the quarantine of
Cuba. The campaign against him resulted in his overthrow and the
invasion by the U.S. of Grenada on October 25, 1983, with about 277
people dying. (1,2) It was fallaciously charged that an airport was
being built in Grenada that could be used to attack the U.S. and it
was also erroneously claimed that the lives of American medical
students on that island were in danger.

Guatemala

In
1951 Jacobo Arbenz was elected president of Guatemala. He
appropriated some unused land operated by the United Fruit Company
and compensated the company. (1,2) That company then started a
campaign to paint Arbenz as a tool of an international conspiracy and
hired about 300 mercenaries who sabotaged oil supplies and trains.
(3) In 1954 a CIA-orchestrated coup put him out of office and he left
the country. During the next 40 years various regimes killed
thousands of people.

In
1999 the Washington Post reported that an Historical Clarification
Commission concluded that over 200,000 people had been killed during
the civil war and that there had been 42,000 individual human rights
violations, 29,000 of them fatal, 92% of which were committed by the
army. The commission further reported that the U.S. government and
the CIA had pressured the Guatemalan government into suppressing the
guerilla movement by ruthless means. (4,5)

According
to the Commission between 1981 and 1983 the military government of
Guatemala – financed and supported by the U.S. government –
destroyed some four hundred Mayan villages in a campaign of genocide.
(4)

One of the documents made available to the commission was a
1966 memo from a U.S. State Department official, which described how
a “safe house” was set up in the palace for use by Guatemalan
security agents and their U.S. contacts. This was the headquarters
for the Guatemalan “dirty war” against leftist insurgents and
suspected allies. (2)

Haiti

From
1957 to 1986 Haiti was ruled by Papa Doc Duvalier and later by his
son. During that time their private terrorist force killed between
30,000 and 100,000 people. (1) Millions of dollars in CIA subsidies
flowed into Haiti during that time, mainly to suppress popular
movements, (2) although most American military aid to the country,
according to William Blum, was covertly channeled through Israel.

Reportedly,
governments after the second Duvalier reign were responsible for an
even larger number of fatalities, and the influence on Haiti by the
U.S., particularly through the CIA, has continued. The U.S. later
forced out of the presidential office a black Catholic priest, Jean
Bertrand Aristide, even though he was elected with 67% of the vote in
the early 1990s. The wealthy white class in Haiti opposed him in this
predominantly black nation, because of his social programs designed
to help the poor and end corruption. (3) Later he returned to office,
but that did not last long. He was forced by the U.S. to leave office
and now lives in South Africa.


Honduras

In
the 1980s the CIA supported Battalion 316 in Honduras, which
kidnapped, tortured and killed hundreds of its citizens. Torture
equipment and manuals were provided by CIA Argentinean personnel who
worked with U.S. agents in the training of the Hondurans.
Approximately 400 people lost their lives. (1,2) This is another
instance of torture in the world sponsored by the U.S. (3)

Battalion
316 used shock and suffocation devices in interrogations in the
1980s. Prisoners often were kept naked and, when no longer useful,
killed and buried in unmarked graves. Declassified documents and
other sources show that the CIA and the U.S. Embassy knew of numerous
crimes, including murder and torture, yet continued to support
Battalion 316 and collaborate with its leaders.” (4)

Honduras
was a staging ground in the early 1980s for the Contras who were
trying to overthrow the socialist Sandinista government in Nicaragua.
John D. Negroponte, currently Deputy Secretary of State, was our
embassador when our military aid to Honduras rose from $4 million to
$77.4 million per year. Negroponte denies having had any knowledge of
these atrocities during his tenure. However, his predecessor in that
position, Jack R. Binns, had reported in 1981 that he was deeply
concerned at increasing evidence of officially sponsored/sanctioned
assassinations. (5)

Hungary

In
1956 Hungary, a Soviet satellite nation, revolted against the Soviet
Union. During the uprising broadcasts by the U.S. Radio Free Europe
into Hungary sometimes took on an aggressive tone, encouraging the
rebels to believe that Western support was imminent, and even giving
tactical advice on how to fight the Soviets. Their hopes were raised
then dashed by these broadcasts which cast an even darker shadow over
the Hungarian tragedy.“ (1) The Hungarian and Soviet death toll was
about 3,000 and the revolution was crushed. (2)

Indonesia

In
1965, in Indonesia, a coup replaced General Sukarno with General
Suharto as leader. The U.S. played a role in that change of
government. Robert Martens,a former officer in the U.S. embassy in
Indonesia, described how U.S. diplomats and CIA officers provided up
to 5,000 names to Indonesian Army death squads in 1965 and checked
them off as they were killed or captured. Martens admitted that “I
probably have a lot of blood on my hands, but that’s not all bad.
There’s a time when you have to strike hard at a decisive moment.”
(1,2,3) Estimates of the number of deaths range from 500,000 to 3
million. (4,5,6)

From 1993 to 1997 the U.S. provided Jakarta with
almost $400 million in economic aid and sold tens of million of
dollars of weaponry to that nation. U.S. Green Berets provided
training for the Indonesia’s elite force which was responsible for
many of atrocities in East Timor. (3)

Iran

Iran
lost about 262,000 people in the war against Iraq from 1980 to 1988.
(1) See Iraq for more information about that war.

On
July 3, 1988 the U.S. Navy ship, the Vincennes, was operating withing
Iranian waters providing military support for Iraq during the
Iran-Iraq war. During a battle against Iranian gunboats it fired two
missiles at an Iranian Airbus, which was on a routine civilian
flight. All 290 civilian on board were killed. (2,3)

Iraq

A.
The Iraq-Iran War lasted from 1980 to 1988 and during that time there
were about 105,000 Iraqi deaths according to the Washington Post.
(1,2)

According
to Howard Teicher, a former National Security Council official, the
U.S. provided the Iraqis with billions of dollars in credits and
helped Iraq in other ways such as making sure that Iraq had military
equipment including biological agents This surge of help for Iraq
came as Iran seemed to be winning the war and was close to Basra. (1)
The U.S. was not adverse to both countries weakening themselves as a
result of the war, but it did not appear to want either side to win.

B:
The U.S.-Iraq War and the Sanctions Against Iraq extended from 1990
to 2003.

Iraq
invaded Kuwait on August 2, 1990 and the U.S. responded by demanding
that Iraq withdraw, and four days later the U.N. levied international
sanctions.

Iraq
had reason to believe that the U.S. would not object to its invasion
of Kuwait, since U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, had told
Saddam Hussein that the U.S. had no position on the dispute that his
country had with Kuwait. So the green light was given, but it seemed
to be more of a trap.

As
a part of the public relations strategy to energize the American
public into supporting an attack against Iraq the daughter of the
Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S. falsely testified before Congress that
Iraqi troops were pulling the plugs on incubators in Iraqi hospitals.
(1) This contributed to a war frenzy in the U.S.

The
U.S. air assault started on January 17, 1991 and it lasted for 42
days. On February 23 President H.W. Bush ordered the U.S. ground
assault to begin. The invasion took place with much needless killing
of Iraqi military personnel. Only about 150 American military
personnel died compared to about 200,000 Iraqis. Some of the Iraqis
were mercilessly killed on the Highway of Death and about 400 tons of
depleted uranium were left in that nation by the U.S. (2,3)

Other
deaths later were from delayed deaths due to wounds, civilians
killed, those killed by effects of damage of the Iraqi water
treatment facilities and other aspects of its damaged infrastructure
and by the sanctions.

In
1995 the Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. reported that
U.N sanctions against on Iraq had been responsible for the deaths of
more than 560,000 children since 1990. (5)

Leslie
Stahl on the TV Program 60 Minutes in 1996 mentioned to Madeleine
Albright, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. “We have heard that a half
million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died
in Hiroshima. And – and you know, is the price worth it?”
Albright replied “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price
– we think is worth it.” (4)

In
1999 UNICEF reported that 5,000 children died each month as a result
of the sanction and the War with the U.S. (6)

Richard
Garfield later estimated that the more likely number of excess deaths
among children under five years of age from 1990 through March 1998
to be 227,000 – double those of the previous decade. Garfield
estimated that the numbers to be 350,000 through 2000 (based in part
on result of another study). (7)

However,
there are limitations to his study. His figures were not updated for
the remaining three years of the sanctions. Also, two other somewhat
vulnerable age groups were not studied: young children above the age
of five and the elderly.

All
of these reports were considerable indicators of massive numbers of
deaths which the U.S. was aware of and which was a part of its
strategy to cause enough pain and terror among Iraqis to cause them
to revolt against their government.

C:
Iraq-U.S. War started in 2003 and has not been concluded


Just
as the end of the Cold War emboldened the U.S. to attack Iraq in 1991
so the attacks of September 11, 2001 laid the groundwork for the U.S.
to launch the current war against Iraq. While in some other wars we
learned much later about the lies that were used to deceive us, some
of the deceptions that were used to get us into this war became known
almost as soon as they were uttered. There were no weapons of mass
destruction, we were not trying to promote democracy, we were not
trying to save the Iraqi people from a dictator.

The
total number of Iraqi deaths that are a result of our current Iraq
against Iraq War is 654,000, of which 600,000 are attributed to acts
of violence, according to Johns Hopkins researchers. (1,2)

Since
these deaths are a result of the U.S. invasion, our leaders must
accept responsibility for them.

Israeli-Palestinian
War

About
100,000 to 200,000 Israelis and Palestinians, but mostly the latter,
have been killed in the struggle between those two groups. The U.S.
has been a strong supporter of Israel, providing billions of dollars
in aid and supporting its possession of nuclear weapons. (1,2)


Korea,
North and South


The
Korean War started in 1950 when, according to the Truman
administration, North Korea invaded South Korea on June 25th.
However, since then another explanation has emerged which maintains
that the attack by North Korea came during a time of many border
incursions by both sides. South Korea initiated most of the border
clashes with North Korea beginning in 1948. The North Korea
government claimed that by 1949 the South Korean army committed 2,617
armed incursions. It was a myth that the Soviet Union ordered North
Korea to attack South Korea. (1,2)


The
U.S. started its attack before a U.N. resolution was passed
supporting our nation’s intervention, and our military forces added
to the mayhem in the war by introducing the use of napalm. (1)

During
the war the bulk of the deaths were South Koreans, North Koreans and
Chinese. Four sources give deaths counts ranging from 1.8 to 4.5
million. (3,4,5,6) Another source gives a total of 4 million but does
not identify to which nation they belonged. (7)


John
H. Kim, a U.S. Army veteran and the Chair of the Korea Committee of
Veterans for Peace, stated in an article that during the Korean War
“the U.S. Army, Air Force and Navy were directly involved in the
killing of about three million civilians – both South and North
Koreans – at many locations throughout Korea…It is reported that
the U.S. dropped some 650,000 tons of bombs, including 43,000 tons of
napalm bombs, during the Korean War.” It is presumed that this
total does not include Chinese casualties.

Another
source states a total of about 500,000 who were Koreans and
presumably only military. (8,9)


Laos


From
1965 to 1973 during the Vietnam War the U.S. dropped over two million
tons of bombs on Laos – more than was dropped in WWII by both
sides. Over a quarter of the population became refugees. This was
later called a “secret war,” since it occurred at the same time
as the Vietnam War, but got little press. Hundreds of thousands were
killed. Branfman make the only estimate that I am aware of , stating
that hundreds of thousands died. This can be interpeted to mean that
at least 200,000 died. (1,2,3)


U.S.
military intervention in Laos actually began much earlier. A civil
war started in the 1950s when the U.S. recruited a force of 40,000
Laotians to oppose the Pathet Lao, a leftist political party that
ultimately took power in 1975.

Also
See Vietnam

Nepal


Between
8,000 and 12,000 Nepalese have died since a civil war broke out in
1996. The death rate, according to Foreign Policy in Focus, sharply
increased with the arrival of almost 8,400 American M-16 submachine
guns (950 rpm) and U.S. advisers. Nepal is 85 percent rural and badly
in need of land reform. Not surprisingly 42 % of its people live
below the poverty level. (1,2)

In
2002, after another civil war erupted, President George W. Bush
pushed a bill through Congress authorizing $20 million in military
aid to the Nepalese government. (3)


Nicaragua


In
1981 the Sandinistas overthrew the Somoza government in Nicaragua,
(1) and until 1990 about 25,000 Nicaraguans were killed in an armed
struggle between the Sandinista government and Contra rebels who were
formed from the remnants of Somoza’s national government. The use
of assassination manuals by the Contras surfaced in 1984. (2,3)


The
U.S. supported the victorious government regime by providing covert
military aid to the Contras (anti-communist guerillas) starting in
November, 1981. But when Congress discovered that the CIA had
supervised acts of sabotage in Nicaragua without notifying Congress,
it passed the Boland Amendment in 1983 which prohibited the CIA,
Defense Department and any other government agency from providing any
further covert military assistance. (4)


But
ways were found to get around this prohibition. The National Security
Council, which was not explicitly covered by the law, raised private
and foreign funds for the Contras. In addition, arms were sold to
Iran and the proceeds were diverted from those sales to the Contras
engaged in the insurgency against the Sandinista government. (5)
Finally, the Sandinistas were voted out of office in 1990 by voters
who thought that a change in leadership would placate the U.S., which
was causing misery to Nicaragua’s citizenry by it support of the
Contras.


Pakistan


In
1971 West Pakistan, an authoritarian state supported by the U.S.,
brutally invaded East Pakistan. The war ended after India, whose
economy was staggering after admitting about 10 million refugees,
invaded East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and defeated the West
Pakistani forces. (1)

Millions
of people died during that brutal struggle, referred to by some as
genocide committed by West Pakistan. That country had long been an
ally of the U.S., starting with $411 million provided to establish
its armed forces which spent 80% of its budget on its military. $15
million in arms flowed into W. Pakistan during the war. (2,3,4)

Three
sources estimate that 3 million people died and (5,2,6) one source
estimates 1.5 million. (3)


Panama


In
December, 1989 U.S. troops invaded Panama, ostensibly to arrest
Manuel Noriega, that nation’s president. This was an example of the
U.S. view that it is the master of the world and can arrest anyone it
wants to. For a number of years before that he had worked for the
CIA, but fell out of favor partially because he was not an opponent
of the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. (1) It has been estimated that
between 500 and 4,000 people died. (2,3,4)


Paraguay:
See South America: Operation Condor


Philippines


The
Philippines were under the control of the U.S. for over a hundred
years. In about the last 50 to 60 years the U.S. has funded and
otherwise helped various Philippine governments which sought to
suppress the activities of groups working for the welfare of its
people. In 1969 the Symington Committee in the U.S. Congress revealed
how war material was sent there for a counter-insurgency campaign.
U.S. Special Forces and Marines were active in some combat
operations. The estimated number of persons that were executed and
disappeared under President Fernando Marcos was over 100,000. (1,2)


South
America: Operation Condor


This
was a joint operation of 6 despotic South American governments
(Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay) to share
information about their political opponents. An estimated 13,000
people were killed under this plan. (1)


It
was established on November 25, 1975 in Chile by an act of the
Interamerican Reunion on Military Intelligence. According to U.S.
embassy political officer, John Tipton, the CIA and the Chilean
Secret Police were working together, although the CIA did not set up
the operation to make this collaboration work. Reportedly, it ended
in 1983. (2)


On
March 6, 2001 the New York Times reported the existence of a recently
declassified State Department document revealing that the United
States facilitated communications for Operation Condor. (3)


Sudan


Since
1955, when it gained its independence, Sudan has been involved most
of the time in a civil war. Until about 2003 approximately 2 million
people had been killed. It not known if the death toll in Darfur is
part of that total.


Human
rights groups have complained that U.S. policies have helped to
prolong the Sudanese civil war by supporting efforts to overthrow the
central government in Khartoum. In 1999 U.S. Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright met with the leader of the Sudan People’s
Liberation Army (SPLA) who said that she offered him food supplies if
he would reject a peace plan sponsored by Egypt and Libya.

In
1978 the vastness of Sudan’s oil reservers was discovered and
within two years it became the sixth largest recipient of U.S,
military aid. It’s reasonable to assume that if the U.S. aid a
government to come to power it will feel obligated to give the U.S.
part of the oil pie.


A
British group, Christian Aid, has accused foreign oil companies of
complicity in the depopulation of villages. These companies – not
American – receive government protection and in turn allow the
government use of its airstrips and roads.


In
August 1998 the U.S. bombed Khartoum, Sudan with 75 cruise míssiles.
Our government said that the target was a chemical weapons factory
owned by Osama bin Laden. Actually, bin Laden was no longer the
owner, and the plant had been the sole supplier of pharmaceutical
supplies for that poor nation. As a result of the bombing tens of
thousands may have died because of the lack of medicines to treat
malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases. The U.S. settled a lawsuit
filed by the factory’s owner. (1,2)


Uruguay:
See South America: Operation Condor

Vietnam

In
Vietnam, under an agreement several decades ago, there was supposed
to be an election for a unified North and South Vietnam. The U.S.
opposed this and supported the Diem government in South Vietnam. In
August, 1964 the CIA and others helped fabricate a phony Vietnamese
attack on a U.S. ship in the Gulf of Tonkin and this was used as a
pretext for greater U.S. involvement in Vietnam. (1)


During
that war an American assassination operation,called Operation
Phoenix, terrorized the South 

Vietnamese people, and during the war
American troops were responsible in 1968 for the mass slaughter of
the people in the village of My Lai.


According
to a Vietnamese government statement in 1995 the number of deaths of
civilians and military personnel during the Vietnam War was 5.1
million. (2)


Since
deaths in Cambodia and Laos were about 2.7 million (See Cambodia and
Laos) the estimated total for the Vietnam War is 7.8 million.


The
Virtual Truth Commission provides a total for the war of 5 million,
(3) and Robert McNamara, former Secretary Defense, according to the
New York Times Magazine says that the number of Vietnamese dead is
3.4 million. (4,5)


Yugoslavia


Yugoslavia
was a socialist federation of several republics. Since it refused to
be closely tied to the Soviet Union during the Cold War, it gained
some suport from the U.S. But when the Soviet Union dissolved,
Yugoslavia’s usefulness to the U.S. ended, and the U.S and Germany
worked to convert its socialist economy to a capitalist one by a
process primarily of dividing and conquering. There were ethnic and
religious differences between various parts of Yugoslavia which were
manipulated by the U.S. to cause several wars which resulted in the
dissolution of that country.


From
the early 1990s until now Yugoslavia split into several independent
nations whose lowered income, along with CIA connivance, has made it
a pawn in the hands of capitalist countries. (1) The dissolution of
Yugoslavia was caused primarily by the U.S. (2)


Here
are estimates of some, if not all, of the internal wars in
Yugoslavia. All wars: 107,000; (3,4)

Bosnia
and Krajina: 250,000; (5) Bosnia: 20,000 to 30,000; (5) Croatia:
15,000; (6) and

Kosovo:
500 to 5,000. (7)


NOTES


Afghanistan

1.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003),
p.135.

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_
terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

3.Soviet
War in
Afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

4.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.76

5.U.S
Involvement in Afghanistan,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in
Afghanistan)

6.The
CIA’s Intervention in Afghanistan, Interview with Zbigniew
Brzezinski, Le Nouvel Observateur, Paris, 15-21 January 1998, Posted
at globalresearch.ca 15 October
2001, 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html

7.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.5

8.Unknown
News, 
http://www.unknownnews.net/casualtiesw.html

Angola

1.Howard
W. French “From Old Files, a New Story of the U.S. Role in the
Angolan War” New York Times 3/31/02

2.Angolan
Update, American Friends Service Committee FS, 11/1/99 flyer.

3.Norman
Solomon, War Made Easy, (John Wiley & Sons, 2005) p. 82-83.

4.Lance
Selfa, U.S. Imperialism, A Century of Slaughter, International
Socialist Review Issue 7, Spring 1999 (as appears in Third world
Traveler www.
thirdworldtraveler.com/American_Empire/Century_Imperialism.html)

5.
Jeffress Ramsay, Africa , (Dushkin/McGraw Hill Guilford Connecticut),
1997, p. 144-145.

6.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.54.

Argentina
: See South America: Operation Condor

Bolivia

1.
Phil Gunson, Guardian, 5/6/02,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/archive
/article/0,4273,41-07884,00.html

2.Jerry
Meldon, Return of Bolilvia’s Drug – Stained Dictator,
Consortium,
www.consortiumnews.com/archives/story40.html.

Brazil
See South America: Operation Condor

Cambodia

1.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/ .

2.David
Model, President Richard Nixon, Henry Kissinger, and the Bombing of
Cambodia excerpted from the book Lying for Empire How to Commit War
Crimes With A Straight Face, Common Courage Press, 2005,
paper
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/American_Empire/Nixon_Cambodia_LFE.html.

3.Noam
Chomsky, Chomsky on Cambodia under Pol Pot,
etc.,
http//zmag.org/forums/chomcambodforum.htm.

Chad

1.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
151-152 .

2.Richard
Keeble, Crimes Against Humanity in Chad, Znet/Activism
12/4/06
http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=11560&sectionID=1).

Chile

1.Parenti,
Michael, The Sword and the Dollar (New York, St. Martin’s Press,
1989) p. 56.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
142-143.

3.Moreorless:
Heroes and Killers of the 20th Century, Augusto Pinochet Ugarte,

http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/pinochet.html

4.Associated
Press,Pincohet on 91st Birthday, Takes Responsibility for Regimes’s
Abuses, Dayton Daily News 11/26/06

5.Chalmers
Johnson, Blowback, The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (New
York: Henry Holt and Company, 2000), p. 18.

China:
See Korea

Colombia

1.Chronology
of American State Terrorism, p.2

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html).

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
163.

3.Millions
Killed by Imperialism Washington Post May 6,
2002)
http://www.etext.org./Politics/MIM/rail/impkills.html

4.Gabriella
Gamini, CIA Set Up Death Squads in Colombia Times Newspapers Limited,
Dec. 5,
1996,
www.edu/CommunicationsStudies/ben/news/cia/961205.death.html).

5.Virtual
Truth Commission, 1991

Human
Rights Watch Report: Colombia’s Killer Networks–The
Military-Paramilitary Partnership).

Cuba

1.St.
James Encyclopedia of Popular Culture – on Bay of Pigs
Invasion
http://bookrags.com/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion.

2.Wikipedia http://bookrags.com/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion#Casualties.

Democratic
Republic of Congo (Formerly Zaire)

1.F.
Jeffress Ramsey, Africa (Guilford Connecticut, 1997), p. 85

2.
Anup Shaw The Democratic Republic of Congo,
10/31/2003)
http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/Africa/DRC.asp)

3.Kevin
Whitelaw, A Killing in Congo, U. S. News and World
Report
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/doubleissue/mysteries/patrice.htm

4.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p
158-159.

5.Ibid.,p.
260

6.Ibid.,p.
259

7.Ibid.,p.262

8.David
Pickering, “World War in Africa,
6/26/02,
www.9-11peace.org/bulletin.php3

9.William
D. Hartung and Bridget Moix, Deadly Legacy; U.S. Arms to Africa and
the Congo War, Arms Trade Resource Center, January ,
2000
www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/congo.htm


Dominican
Republic

1.Norman
Solomon, (untitled) Baltimore Sun April 26,
2005
http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/history/2005/0426spincycle.htm
Intervention
Spin Cycle

2.Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Power_Pack

3.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p.
175.

4.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.26-27.


East
Timor

1.Virtual
Truth Commission,
 http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/date4.htm

2.Matthew
Jardine, Unraveling Indonesia, Nonviolent Activist, 1997)

3.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

4.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p.
197.

5.US
trained butchers of Timor, The Guardian, London. Cited by The Drudge
Report, September 19,
1999. 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/indon.htm


El
Salvador

1.Robert
T. Buckman, Latin America 2003, (Stryker-Post Publications Baltimore
2003) p. 152-153.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
54-55.

3.El
Salvador,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Salvador#The_20th_century_and_beyond)

4.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.


Grenada

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p. 66-67.

2.Stephen
Zunes, The U.S. Invasion of
Grenada,
http://wwwfpif.org/papers/grenada2003.html .


Guatemala

1.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

2.Ibid.

3.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.2-13.

4.Robert
T. Buckman, Latin America 2003 (Stryker-Post Publications Baltimore
2003) p. 162.

5.Douglas
Farah, Papers Show U.S. Role in Guatemalan Abuses, Washington Post
Foreign Service, March 11, 1999, A 26


Haiti

1.Francois
Duvalier,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Duvalier#Reign_of_terror).

2.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p 87.

3.William
Blum, Haiti 1986-1994: Who Will Rid Me of This Turbulent
Priest,
http://www.doublestandards.org/blum8.html


Honduras

1.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p. 55.

2.Reports
by Country: Honduras, Virtual Truth
Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/honduras.htm

3.James
A. Lucas, Torture Gets The Silence Treatment, Countercurrents, July
26, 2004.

4.Gary
Cohn and Ginger Thompson, Unearthed: Fatal Secrets, Baltimore Sun,
reprint of a series that appeared June 11-18, 1995 in Jack
Nelson-Pallmeyer, School of Assassins, p. 46 Orbis Books 2001.

5.Michael
Dobbs, Negroponte’s Time in Honduras at Issue, Washington Post,
March 21, 2005


Hungary

1.Edited
by Malcolm Byrne, The 1956 Hungarian Revoluiton: A history in
Documents November 4,
2002
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB76/index2.htm

2.Wikipedia
The Free
Encyclopedia,
http://www.answers.com/topic/hungarian-revolution-of-1956


Indonesia

1.Virtual
Truth Commission 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.

2.Editorial,
Indonesia’s Killers, The Nation, March 30, 1998.

3.Matthew
Jardine, Indonesia Unraveling, Non Violent Activist Sept–Oct, 1997
(Amnesty) 2/7/07.

4.Sison,
Jose Maria, Reflections on the 1965 Massacre in Indonesia, p.
5.
http://qc.indymedia.org/mail.php?id=5602;

5.Annie
Pohlman, Women and the Indonesian Killings of 1965-1966: Gender
Variables and Possible Direction for Research,
p.4,
http://coombs.anu.edu.au/SpecialProj/ASAA/biennial-conference/2004/Pohlman-A-ASAA.pdf

6.Peter
Dale Scott, The United States and the Overthrow of Sukarno,
1965-1967, Pacific Affairs, 58, Summer 1985, pages
239-264.
http://www.namebase.org/scott.

7.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.30.


Iran

1.Geoff
Simons, Iraq from Sumer to Saddam, 1996, St. Martins Press, NY p.
317.

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html.

3.BBC
1988: US Warship Shoots Down Iranian
Airliner
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/default.stm )


Iraq

Iran-Iraq
War

1.Michael
Dobbs, U.S. Had Key role in Iraq Buildup, Washington Post December
30, 2002, p
A01 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A52241-2002Dec29?language=printer

2.Global
Security.Org , Iran Iraq War
(1980-1980)
globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/iran-iraq.htm.


U.S.
Iraq War and Sanctions

1.Ramsey
Clark, The Fire This Time (New York, Thunder’s Mouth), 1994,
p.31-32

2.Ibid.,
p. 52-54

3.Ibid.,
p. 43

4.Anthony
Arnove, Iraq Under Siege, (South End Press Cambridge MA 2000). p.
175.

5.Food
and Agricultural Organizaiton, The Children are Dying, 1995 World
View Forum, Internationa Action Center, International Relief
Association, p. 78

6.Anthony
Arnove, Iraq Under Siege, South End Press Cambridge MA 2000. p. 61.

7.David
Cortright, A Hard Look at Iraq Sanctions December 3, 2001, The
Nation.


U.S-Iraq
War 2003-?

1.Jonathan
Bor 654,000 Deaths Tied to Iraq War Baltimore Sun , October 11,2006

2.News http://www.unknownnews.net/casualties.html


Israeli-Palestinian
War

1.Post-1967
Palestinian & Israeli Deaths from Occupation & Violence May
16,
2006 
http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/2006/05/post-1967-palestinian-israeli-deaths.html)

2.Chronology
of American State Terrorism

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html


Korea

1.James
I. Matray Revisiting Korea: Exposing Myths of the Forgotten War,
Korean War Teachers Conference: The Korean War, February 9,
2001
http://www.truman/library.org/Korea/matray1.htm

2.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p. 46

3.Kanako
Tokuno, Chinese Winter Offensive in Korean War – the Debacle of
American Strategy, ICE Case Studies Number 186, May,
2006
http://www.american.edu/ted/ice/chosin.htm.

4.John
G. Stroessinger, Why Nations go to War, (New York; St. Martin’s
Press), p. 99)

5.Britannica
Concise Encyclopedia, as reported in
Answers.com
http://www.answers.com/topic/Korean-war

6.Exploring
the Environment: Korean
Enigma
www.cet.edu/ete/modules/korea/kwar.html)

7.S.
Brian Wilson, Who are the Real Terrorists? Virtual Truth
Commisson
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

8.Korean
War Casualty Statistics 
www.century
china.com/history/krwarcost.html
)

9.S.
Brian Wilson, Documenting U.S. War Crimes in North Korea (Veterans
for Peace Newsletter) Spring, 2002) 
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/


Laos

1.William
Blum Rogue State (Maine, Common Cause Press) p. 136

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

3.Fred
Branfman, War Crimes in Indochina and our Troubled National Soul

www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2004/08/00_branfman_us-warcrimes-indochina.htm).


Nepal

1.Conn
Hallinan, Nepal & the Bush Administration: Into Thin Air,
February 3, 2004

fpif.org/commentary/2004/0402nepal.html.

2.Human
Rights Watch, Nepal’s Civil War: the Conflict Resumes, March 2006 )

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/03/28/nepal13078.htm.

3.Wayne
Madsen, Possible CIA Hand in the Murder of the Nepal Royal Family,
India Independent Media Center, September 25,
2001
http://india.indymedia.org/en/2002/09/2190.shtml.


Nicaragua

1.Virtual
Truth Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.

2.Timeline
Nicaragua
www.stanford.edu/group/arts/nicaragua/discovery_eng/timeline/).

3.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism,
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html.

4.William
Blum, Nicaragua 1981-1990 Destabilization in Slow Motion

www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/Nicaragua_KH.html.

5.Wikipedia,
the Free
Encyclopedia,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Contra_Affair.


Pakistan

1.John
G. Stoessinger, Why Nations Go to War, (New York: St. Martin’s
Press), 1974 pp 157-172.

2.Asad
Ismi, A U.S. – Financed Military Dictatorship, The CCPA Monitor,
June 2002, Canadian Centre for Policy
Alternatives 
http://www.policyaltematives.ca)www.ckln.fm/~asadismi/pakistan.html

3.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003),
p.123, 124.

4.Arjum
Niaz ,When America Look the Other Way by,

www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=2821&sectionID=1

5.Leo
Kuper, Genocide (Yale University Press, 1981), p. 79.

6.Bangladesh
Liberation War , Wikipedia, the Free
Encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Liberation_War#USA_and_USSR)


Panama

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’s Greatest Hits, (Odonian Press 1998) p. 83.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.154.

3.U.S.
Military Charged with Mass Murder, The Winds
9/96,
www.apfn.org/thewinds/archive/war/a102896b.html

4.Mark
Zepezauer, CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.83.

Paraguay
See South America: Operation Condor


Philippines

1.Romeo
T. Capulong, A Century of Crimes Against the Filipino People,
Presentation, Public Interest Law Center, World Tribunal for Iraq
Trial in New York City on August
25,2004.
http://www.peoplejudgebush.org/files/RomeoCapulong.pdf).

2.Roland
B. Simbulan The CIA in Manila – Covert Operations and the CIA’s
Hidden Hisotry in the Philippines Equipo Nizkor Information –
Derechos, derechos.org/nizkor/filipinas/doc/cia.


South
America: Operation Condor

1.John
Dinges, Pulling Back the Veil on Condor, The Nation, July 24, 2000.

2.Virtual
Truth Commission, Telling the Truth for a Better
America
www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/condor.htm)

3.Operation
Condor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Condor#US_involvement).


Sudan

1.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang, (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003), p.
30, 32,34,36.

2.The
Black Commentator, Africa Action The Tale of Two Genocides: The
Failed US Response to Rwanda and Darfur, 11 August
2006
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/091706X.shtml.


Uruguay
See South America: Operation Condor


Vietnam

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine:Common Courage
Press,1994), p 24

2.Casualties
– US vs NVA/VC,
http://www.rjsmith.com/kia_tbl.html.

3.Brian
Wilson, Virtual Truth
Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

4.Fred
Branfman, U.S. War Crimes in Indochiona and our Duty to Truth August
26, 2004

www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=6105&sectionID=1

5.David
K Shipler, Robert McNamara and the Ghosts of
Vietnam
nytimes.com/library/world/asia/081097vietnam-mcnamara.html


Yugoslavia

1.Sara
Flounders, Bosnia Tragedy:The Unknown Role of the Pentagon in NATO in
the Balkans (New York: International Action Center) p. 47-75

2.James
A. Lucas, Media Disinformation on the War in Yugoslavia: The Dayton
Peace Accords Revisited, Global Research, September 7, 2005
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=
viewArticle&code=LUC20050907&articleId=899

3.Yugoslav
Wars in 1990s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_wars.

4.George
Kenney, The Bosnia Calculation: How Many Have Died? Not nearly as
many as some would have you think., NY Times Magazine, April 23, 1995

http://www.balkan-archive.org.yu/politics/
war_crimes/srebrenica/bosnia_numbers.html
)

5.Chronology
of American State Terrorism

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/
ChronologyofTerror.html.

6.Croatian
War of Independence,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatian_War_of_Independence

7.Human
Rights Watch, New Figures on Civilian Deaths in Kosovo War, (February
7, 2000) 
http://www.hrw.org/press/2000/02/nato207.htm.

Related Posts:

https://www.popularresistance.org/us-has-killed-more-than-20-million-in-37-nations-since-wwii/

Jammer dat Oekraïne en Syrie niet werden genoemd in de lijst, bovendien is er nog een groot aantal landen waar de VS tekeer is gegaan, o.a. middels illegale geheime operaties van speciale VS moordcommando’s…….

Zie ook:

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

Bang voor Amerika

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

VS heeft Rusland al 3 keer met oorlog gedreigd, de laatste 2 keer in de afgelopen 1,5 week……‘ (bericht van 5 oktober 2018)

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht aantreft. Helaas kan ik daar maar 140 tekens kwijt en kan dus niet eens alle landen opnemen, die hier werden genoemd (het label illegale oorlog’ duidt op de illegale oorlog tegen Irak).

Na kritiek de tekst in de kop aangepast op 24 november 2016. (toegevoegd: sinds ‘het einde van‘ WOII……..)

De VS maakt zich op voor oorlog tegen Rusland en daarmee voor WOIII……..

Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten bracht vanmorgen een artikel waarin wordt gemeld dat de VS zich opmaakt voor oorlog tegen Rusland……. Voor de regelmatige lezer van alternatieve media en van dit blog geen verrassing, het grote verschil is, dat de regering van de VS nu openlijk spreekt over oorlogvoering tegen Rusland…… Daarmee wordt het verhaal in de reguliere afhankelijke media organen doorgeprikt, dat het een complottheorie is, te waarschuwen voor het gevaar dat het tot een oorlog met Rusland komt en daarmee WOIII een feit zal zijn…….  

Joseph Francis Dunford, marinier generaal en de joint chiefs of staff voorzitter, zei in een hoorzitting van het congres, dat een vliegverbod instellen in Syrië tot een oorlog met Syrië en Rusland zal leiden. Dunford stelde dat hij een dergelijke beslissing niet op zich kon nemen. Oorlogshitser John McCain drong er bij Dunford op aan zijn woorden te relativeren, zie begin van de volgende video:

Al een aantal dagen probeerde ‘hardline’ senator Graham Dunford te bewegen de afzetting van de Syrische president Assad als militair doel aan te wijzen. Graham wees Dunford erop, dat het de ‘hardliners’ er om gaat, te weten of Assad nog aan het bewind zal zijn, als Obama het Witte Huis verlaat. Dunford duidelijk vermoeid, verzocht of hij zich aan de politieke druk mocht onttrekken, zie:

De Washington Post berichtte dat de geheime diensten en delen van het Pentagon Obama willen bewegen, toestemming te geven militaire vliegvelden in Syrië te bombarderen. De kans daarop is uitermate klein, de Post stelde, dat daarom leden van het Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken, de CIA en de generale staf een paar andere opties hebben ‘gelanceerd’. Zoals het bestoken van de landingsbanen van de vliegvelden door/met vliegtuigen, kruisraketten en andere lange afstandswapens….. Dit zou met vliegtuigen van de VS coalitie en haar oorlogsschepen moeten worden uitgevoerd. Een andere mogelijkheid is levering van modern wapentuig aan internationale ‘strijders’ (lees; moorddadige terroristen)………

Daar het Witte Huis niets wenst te doen, zonder een resolutie van de VN Veiligheidsraad*, stellen de ‘hardliners’, dat de VS aanvallen zou kunnen doen, die niet terug te leiden zijn naar de VS (daar heeft de VS ruime ervaring mee, ook in Syrië!)….  Dit plan wordt gesteund door de CIA en de vice voorzitter van de generale staf generaal Paul Selva. Met andere woorden: de VS wil aanvallen uitvoeren, die niet terug te leiden zijn naar de eigen (terreur) legermacht en daarmee het eigen volk (en de rest van de wereld) te besodemieteren………

Dat het de VS ernst is, blijkt wel uit het feit, dat de VS de belangrijkste NAVO leden consulteert met deze plannen. Vandaag vindt er in Berlijn een Syrië overleg plaats in het Duitse ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken, tussen de directeuren van deze ministeries uit Groot-Brittannië, Frankrijk Italië en een VS delegatie. Volgens bronnen in de VS zal daar ook worden gesproken over het verzwaren van de sancties tegen Syrië en Rusland……

Onder de tegenstanders tegen verregaand ingrijpen in Syrië zou ook John Kerry zich bevinden, die nog niet de onderhandelingsteams uit Genève wil terugtrekken. Echter gezien zijn leugenachtige geroeptoeter over Ruslands rol in Syrië, zal die tegenstand niet lang aanhouden……

Der Flugzeugträger USS Dwight D. Eisenhower im Juni 2016 in der Straße von Gibraltar, auf seinem Weg ins Mittelmeer. (Foto: Michael R. Gendron/US Navy/dpa)

Der
Flugzeugträger USS Dwight D. Eisenhower im Juni 2016 in der Straße
von Gibraltar, auf seinem Weg ins Mittelmeer. (Foto: Michael R.
Gendron/US Navy/dpa)

McCain vreest intussen het verlies van ‘activa’ in Syrië, waarmee hij de door de VS getrainde en bewapende terroristen bedoelt…… Dunford weigerde aanvankelijk te zeggen, dat de aanval op een hulpkonvooi en loodsen met hulpgoederen op 17 september jl., door de Russen en het Syrische leger werd gepleegd, waarna hij onder druk van senator Graham stelde dat ‘het een mogelijkheid kan zijn……’ Dit terwijl duidelijk is, dat dit konvooi door terreurgroepen op de grond werd aangevallen en niet werd gebombardeerd door de Russen en Syriërs…..

De Russische minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Lavrov, stelde dat de VS duidelijk niet de terroristen van al-Nusra (en andere terreurgroepen) wenst te bombarderen. De VS wil deze groepen gebruiken voor ‘een plan B’ om Assad af te zetten…… Zie de volgende video:

* Wat ik overigens zwaar betwijfel…..

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Marc Jansen zag tijdens de Russische verkiezingen geen onregelmatigheden, die er volgens hem wel waren……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Gistermorgen was ‘Ruslandkenner’ Marc Jansen te gast in de Kots Nieuwsshow (‘NPO‘ Radio1>> ha! ha!). Deze enorme flapdrol beweert dat Putin een nieuw superministerie van staatsveiligheid wil vormen. Uiteraard uiterst angstwekkend als je Jansen moet geloven, die meteen Stalin van stal haalde en deze daardoor vergeleek met Putin…….

Hier de tekst van de ‘Radio1 Gemist’ webpagina over het geheel aan onversneden anti-Russische propaganda:

Een
superministerie van staatsveiligheid; wil Poetin terug naar de oude
KGB?

Russische
president Poetin is van plan en superministerie van staatsveiligheid
op te richten en dat doet denken aan de oude KGB. Het wordt 1
organisatie waarin zowel binnenlandse als buitenlandse
veiligheidsdiensten worden ondergebracht. Het idee alleen al doet
menigeen huiveren. Want een soortgelijk ministerie bestond er onder
het bewind van Stalin. En naar de gruwelen uit die tijd wil niemand
terug.

Marc
Jansen is hier om uitleg te geven. Hij is Ruslandkenner. en net terug
uit Rusland, want hij was er als waarnemer bij de verkiezingen van
vorige week.

Vreemd dat je Jansen nooit hoort over de VS, waar de regering de veiligheidsdiensten keer op keer niet in de hand heeft en waar organisaties als de CIA al groter zijn, dan alle Russische geheime diensten bij elkaar!! Daar behoef je geen ‘Amerikakenner’ te zijn, even verdiepen in de materie is voldoende….. Dan heb je in de VS nog de DIA, (DEA, is ook nog al eens buiten het land bezig), NSA en nog een hele zwik aan geheime overheidsorganisaties (aangevuld met particuliere ‘inlichtingen’ organisaties), die allen schijt hebben mensenrechten, recht op privacy en aan welke rechtstaat dan ook…….. Overigens schijnt zelfs de FBI tegenwoordig wel eens ‘voet op buitenlandse bodem te zetten…’

Dat alles is pas griezelig Jansen, zeker als je daarnaast ziet, wat de VS flikt: de laatste 16 jaar is deze vereniging van terreurstaten 4 keer een illegale oorlog begonnen, waar die in Irak en Syrië intussen aan meer dan 2 miljoen mensen het leven heeft gekost…… Waar de VS ook nog eens de opstand in Oekraïne op poten heeft gezet en geregisseerd, waarna de staatsgreep tegen het democratisch gekozen bewind van Janoekovytsj volgde….. E.e.a. leidde tot de vreselijke burgeroorlog, die de door het westen geparachuteerde corrupte grofgraaier en neonazi-vriend Porosjenko tegen de bevolking in het oosten van dat land voert……… Maar nee, dat vindt Jansen helemaal niet griezelig…….. 

Dat was het nog niet mensen, zoals u in de kop kon lezen, Jansen is een week geleden voor de OVSE ook nog eens als waarnemer bij de Russische verkiezingen geweest. Jansen had zelf geen onregelmatigheden aangetroffen, als enkele kleine incidenten (zoals die ook in Nederland voor kunnen komen). 

U begrijpt dat Jansen niet kon vertrekken, zonder toch even deze verkiezingen door de stront te trekken, dus stelde hij dat het opkomstpercentage veel hoger was, dan werkelijk het geval was….. Nee, dat had Jansen niet zelf geconstateerd, maar dat ‘had hij gehoord……’ Volgens Jansen zou het opkomstpercentage maar 40% zijn, terwijl het officiële cijfer op 48% staat…. Van ‘analisten’ had Jansen begrepen, dat er toch zwaar gerommeld was met de verkiezingen….. U weel wel ‘analisten’ als die van lobby-instituten voor het militair-industrieel complex en voor de NAVO (en daarmee voor het buitenlandbeleid van de VS), zoals Clingendael of Bellingcat……….. (waar men dit ook nog eens van achter het bureau bedenkt……)

De hoogste tijd, dat we de waarnemers voor verkiezingen in het buitenland eens goed onder de loep nemen, jezus christus!! 

Jansen werd door presentatoren Mieke van der Weij en Jan Mom hartelijk bedankt voor het bijpraten ‘over de situatie in Rusland….’  ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Zie ook: ‘Russische verkiezingen in westen dominant verslagen met anti-Putin propaganda……..

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels die u onder dit bericht aantreft, dat geldt net voor het label ‘Bellingcat’. Zie vooral de berichten onder het label Marc Jansen.

Ex-CIA agent verklaart Al Qaida als een VS vinding…….

Gisteren ontving ik een video van Brasscheck TV, met dr. Michael Scheuer, ex-CIA agent. Hij stelt onder meer, dat de pro-Israël lobby in de VS, het land in oorlogen dwingt, om zo de vijanden van Israël te verzwakken. Het excuus dat de VS gebruikt, ‘democratie brengen’ klopt van geen kant aldus deze ex-CIA agent. Dit zou je nu toch als algemeen bekend moeten achten, al is de grootschalige terreur die de VS brengt, voor velen nog onbekend, dat is dan weer te danken aan de reguliere westerse afhankelijke media…… De VS brengt geen democratie maar gigantische chaos, aldus Scheuer….. Al Qaida heeft volgens hem nooit bestaan….

Scheuer stelt verder, dat de VS de afgelopen 20 jaar niet anders heeft gedaan dan tirannie steunen in Afrika en het Midden-Oosten (dat is overigens al veel langer, neem de steun aan de Taliban in de 80er jaren, of het omverwerpen in 1953 van het Perzische Mossadegh bewind, met steun van de VS en hulp van de CIA….)…..

Voorts vertelt Scheuer over de oorlogen die de VS voert/voerde terroristen tegen het westen kweekt.

Genoeg, oordeel zelf, hier de video (opvallend: als het interview op 9.44 min. staat, krijgt u de mouw van een VS uniform te zien, waarop een jing jang teken is te zien….), het interview duurt 11 minuten en is, helaas voor een aantal van u, niet ondertiteld:

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Scheuer’.

‘Turkije-coup’ en invasie Syrië georganiseerd door CIA en…… Erdogan, aldus prof. Chossudovsky

Op deze plek heb ik al eens gewezen op de vraag, wie het meest heeft geprofiteerd van de mislukte ‘coup’ in Turkije, daar is maar één antwoord op: Erdogan*! Deze reli-fascistische psychopaat heeft na de coup in feite de totale macht in Turkije verworven, iets dat het komende jaar vervolmaakt zal worden.

Het volgende artikel werd geschreven door Michel Chossudovsky. Hierin de stelling dat de de ‘mislukte coup’ werd georganiseerd door de de CIA en Erdogan, zodat hij en de totale macht kan grijpen in Turkije en met een lam excuus Syrië kon binnenvallen…..

Hier het volledige artikel (u kan onder het artikel klikken voor een vertaling, dat neemt wel enige tijd in beslag):

US-NATO-Turkey
Invasion of Northern Syria



CIA
“Failed” Turkey Coup Lays Groundwork for Broader Middle East War?



By
Prof Michel Chossudovsky

September
01, 2016 “
Information
Clearing House

– “
GR” – In
mid-July, President Erdogan pointed his finger at the CIA, accusing
US intelligence of having supported a failed coup directed against
his government. Turkish officials pointed to a deterioration of
US-Turkey relations following Washington’s refusal to extradite
Fethullah Gülen, the alleged architect of the failed coup.

Erdogan’s
Justice Minister Bekir Bozdag was categorical:

If
the US does not deliver (Gulen), 
they
will sacrifice relations with Turkey for the sake of a terrorist” 

Public
opinion was led to believe that 
relations
with the US had not only deteriorated, but that Erdogan had vowed to
restore “an axis of friendship” with Moscow, including
“cooperation in the defence sector”. This was a hoax.


Turkey’s
Invasion of Syria

The
implementation of the Turkish invasion required routine consultations
with the US and NATO, coordination of military logistics,
intelligence, communications systems, coordination of ground and air
operations, etc. To be effectively carried out these military
endeavors required a cohesive and “friendly” US-Turkey
relationship.


We
are not dealing with a piecemeal military initiative.
Turkey’s 
Operation
Euphrates Shield 
could
not have taken place without the active support of the Pentagon,
which ultimately calls the shots in the war on Syria.

The
likely scenario is that from mid July to mid-August US, NATO and
Turkish officials were actively involved in planning the next stage
of the war on Syria: an (illegal) invasion led by Turkish
ground-forces, backed by the US and NATO.

Map
of the Turkish-led offensive in the northern Aleppo Governorate,
showing the ongoing developments in west of Euphrates River. Source
Wikipedia

The
Failed Coup Sets the Stage for a Ground Invasion


1.
Massive purges within the armed forces and government were
implemented in the immediate wake of the July coup. They had been
planned well in advance.  ”
Arrested
immediately were 2,839 army personnel with 2,745 Judges and
Prosecutors
 ordered
detained… 
In
under a week 60,000 people had been fired or detained and 2,300
institutions closed” … 

  (See Felicity Arbuthnot, Global
Research,
 August 2, 2016)

2.The
coup was intended to fail. Erdogan had advanced knowledge of the coup
and so did Washington. There was no conspiracy directed by the CIA
against Erdogan. Quite the opposite, the failed coup was in all
likelihood engineered by the CIA in liaison with Erdogan. It was
intended to consolidate and reinforce the Erdogan regime as well as
rally the Turkish people behind their president and his military
agenda “in the name of democracy”.

3.
The purges within the Armed Forces were intended to get rid of
members of the military hierarchy who were opposed to an invasion of
Syria. Did the CIA assist Erdogan in establishing the lists of
military officers, judges and senior government officials to be
arrested or fired? The Turkish media was also targeted, many of which
were closed down.


4.
Erdogan used the July 15 coup to accuse Washington of supporting the
Gulen movement while seeking a fake rapprochement with Moscow. He
flew to St Petersburg on August 9, for a behind closed doors meeting
with President Putin. In all likelihood, the scenario of a rift
between Ankara and Washington coupled with the “my friend Putin”
narrative had been approved by the Obama administration. It was part
of a carefully designed intelligence ploy coupled with media
disinformation. President Erdogan, vowed according to Western media
reports:
to
restore an ‘axis of friendship’ between Ankara and Moscow amid a
growing rift between Turkey and the West.”


5.
While “mending the fence” with Russia, Turkey’s military and
intelligence apparatus was involved in planning the invasion of
Northern Syria in liaison with Washington and NATO headquarters in
Brussels. 
The
underlying objective is to ultimately confront and weaken Syria’s
military allies: Russia, Iran and Hezbollah.

In
St Petersburg in the immediate wake of the July 15 failed coup,
Erdogan thanked his “dear friend” Vladimir Putin.

The
fact Mr Putin called me the next day after the coup attempt was a
very strong psychological factor,” he said at a joint press
conference.  “The axis of friendship between Moscow and Ankara
will be restored,” he said.Telegraph,
August 7, 2016

Did
Putin know that the failed coup, covertly supported by the CIA, was
meant to fail?
 One
suspects that Russian intelligence was aware of the ploy and was also
informed regarding Turkey’s invasion plans:

Your
visit today, despite a very difficult situation regarding domestic
politics, indicates that we all want to restart dialogue and restore
relations between Russia and Turkey,” Mr Putin said as
the pair met in the city’s Constantine Palace.


Mr
Putin on Tuesday said Russia would “step by step” lift sanctions,
… Mr Erdogan in turn promised to back major Russian energy projects
in Turkey, including the construction of the country’s first
nuclear power station and a gas pipeline to Europe.

He
also said the two countries would step up 
“cooperation
in the defence sector,” but did not elaborate.

The
Putin-Erdogan Saint Petersburg meeting was interpreted by the media
as a rapprochement with Moscow in response to the alleged involvement
of the CIA in the failed coup.

According
to the Washington
Post
, an improvised about-turn in US-NATO-Turkey relations had
occurred despite Erdogan’s “friendly” encounter with Putin:

NATO
went out of its way Wednesday to insist that Turkey — 
whose
president this week visited Moscow and promised a new level of
cooperation with the man he repeatedly called his “dear
friend,”
 Russian
President Vladi­mir Putin — remains 
a
“valued ally” whose alliance membership “is not in question.”

In
a statement posted on its website, NATO said it was responding to
“speculative press reports regarding NATO’s stance regarding the
failed coup in Turkey and Turkey’s NATO membership.”

A
nonsensical report. In actuality, the Pentagon, NATO, the Turkish
High Command and Israel are in permanent liaison. Israel is a de
facto member of NATO, it has a comprehensive bilateral military and
intelligence relationship with Turkey.

With
the invasion of  the border area of Northern Syria and the
influx of Turkish tanks and armoured vehicles,  the
Turkey-Russia relationship is in crisis. And that is the ultimate
objective of US foreign policy.

Russian
forces are acting on behalf of their Syrian ally.

How
will the Kremlin and Russia’s High Command respond to what
constitutes a US-Turkey-NATO ground invasion of Syria?

How
will they confront Turkish and allied forces? One assumes that Russia
will avoid direct military confrontation.

After
the US, Turkey is NATO’s heavy weight.

Sofar
the Turkish op is limited to a small border territory. Nonetheless it
constitutes and important landmark in the evolution of the Syria war:
invasion of a sovereign country in derogation of international law.
Washington’s endgame remains “regime change” in Damascus.

Is
the military initiative a preamble for a larger military undertaking
on the part of Turkey supported by US-NATO? In many regards, Turkey
is acting as a US proxy:

Turkey’s
incursion was backed by US air-cover, drones, and embedded special
forces per the WSJ. These were there largely to prevent Russia and
Syria from even thinking about taking action against the invading
forces.

Turkey
is moving into Syria not just with its own military, but with
thousands of “rebel opposition groups” including US-backed FSA
brigades allied with AlQaeda/Nusra/Sham and the child head-chopping
al-Zinki who are reported to form the vanguard. 
Syrian
territory is outright being turned over to them by the Turkish
military, simply exchanging control from one group of terrorist
jihadis (ISIS) to others
 who
are more media acceptable and more direct proxies of the Erdogan
regime, the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

That
said, ISIS has not resisted the Turkish advance at all – simply
“melting away” (or exchanging one set of uniforms for
another
?). (Moon
 of Alabama

Do
the SAA Syrian forces have the military capabilities of confronting
Turkish ground forces without Russian and Iranian support? How will
Tehran react to  the influx of Turkish forces? Will it come to
the rescue of its Syrian ally?

An
“incident” could be used as a pretext to justify a broader
NATO-led war. Article 5 of the Washington Treaty (NATO’s founding
document) states under the doctrine of “collective security” that
an attack against one member state of the Atlantic Alliance (e.g.
Turkey) is an attack against all members states of the Atlantic
Alliance.

Dangerous
crossroads. With the incursion of Turkish ground forces, military
confrontation with Syria’s allies, namely Iran and Russia, is a
distinct possibility which could lead to a  process of
escalation beyond Syria’s borders.

The
Erdogan-Jo Biden Meeting
 

From
Washington’s perspective, this ground invasion sets the stage for a
possible annexation of part of Northern Syria by Turkey. It also
opens the door for the deployment of US-NATO ground force operations
directed against central and southern Syria.

Erdogan
met up with Vice President Biden on August 23, following the influx
of Turkish tanks into Northern Syria. The invasion is carefully
coordinated with the US which provided extensive air force
protection. There is no rift between Ankara and Washington, quite the
opposite:

It
[is] difficult to believe that Turkey truly suspected the US of an
attempted decapitation of the nation’s senior leadership in a
violent, abortive coup just last month, only to be conducting joint
operations with the US inside Syria with US military forces still
based within Turkish territory.

What
is much more likely is that the coup was staged to feign a
US-Turkish fallout, draw in Russia and allow Turkey to make sweeping
purges of any elements within the Turkish armed forces that might
oppose a cross-border foray into Syria, a foray that is now
unfolding.  (See The
New Atlas
, Global Research, August 24, 2016)

Media
reports convey the illusion that the Biden-Erdogan meetings were
called to discuss the extradition of the alleged architect of the
failed coup Gulen. This was a smokescreen. Jo Biden who had also met
Erdogan back in January, gave the green-light on behalf of Washington
for a joint US-Turkey-NATO military incursion into Syria.


The
Kurdish Question

The
invasion is not directed against Daesh (ISIS) which is protected by
Ankara, it is geared towards fighting SAA forces as well as Kurdish
YPG forces, which are “officially” supported by the US. The US
supported ISIS-Daesh and Al Qaeda affiliated rebels are working hand
in glove with the Turkish invaders.


The
invasion is also part of a longstanding project by Turkey of 
creating
a “safe-haven” within Northern Syria
 (see
map above) which can be used to extend US-NATO-Turkey military
operations Southwards into Syria’s heartland.

Washington
has warned its
Kurdish allies not to confront Turkish forces:

Biden
said the Kurds, who Turkey claims intend to establish a separate
state along a border corridor in conjunction with Turkey’s own
Kurdish population, “cannot, will not, and under no circumstances
will get American support if they do not keep” what he said was a
commitment to return to the east.

Washington
will no doubt eventually clash with Ankara with regard to Turkey’s
project of territorial expansion in Northern Syria. Washington’s
longstanding objective is to create a Kurdish State in Northern
Syria, within the framework of a territorial breakup of both Syria
and Iraq. (see US National War Academy map below). In a bitter irony,
this “New Middle East” project also consists in annexing part of
Turkey to the proposed Kurdish State. In other words, Turkey’s  New
Ottoman objective of territorial expansion  encroaches upon
Washington’s design to fragment Iraq, Syria, Iran  as well as
Turkey. In other words, America’s ultimate imperial design is to
weaken Turkey as a regional power.

The
Pentagon has defined a military roadmap: “The road to Tehran goes
through Damascus.” The invasion of Northern Syria creates
conditions for a broader war.

Moreover,
on the US agenda is a longstanding objective, namely  to wage
war on Iran. In this regard, US military strategy largely consists in
creating conditions  for America’s staunchest allies (Turkey,
Saudi Arabia, Israel) to confront Iran, and act indirectly on behalf
of US interests. i.e. “do the job for us”.


MAP
OF THE NEW MIDDLE EAST

Note: This map was prepared by Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters. It was
published in the Armed Forces Journal in June 2006, Peters is a
retired colonel of the U.S. National War Academy. (Map Copyright
Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters
2006).  

Although
the map does not officially reflect Pentagon doctrine, it has been
used in a training program at NATO’s Defense College for
senior military officers. This map, as well as other similar maps,
has most probably been used at the National War Academy as well as in
military planning circles.  

The
failed coup was indeed supported by the CIA, but the failure was
coordinated with President Erdogan. It was an intelligence op which
was meant to fail and mislead public opinion.



Michel
Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics
(emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the
Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal, Editor of
Global Research.


Copyright
© Prof
Michel Chossudovsky
, Global Research, 2016


Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

* Zie: ‘Erdogan heeft coup zelf op poten gezet om zo de totale macht te grijpen…….

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op een van de labels, die u onder dit bericht aantreft.

CNN in milde bewoordingen over ‘zelfmoordterroristen’ en zelfs embedded bij terreurgroepen……

Kwam afgelopen maandag op het blog van Stan van Houcke een artikel tegen, waarin wordt verteld, dat CNN zich plotsklaps uiterst gematigd uitlaat over suïcide-terroristen en zelfs embedded is bij terreurgroepen in Syrië……

Clarissa Ward van CNN was al zo’n 14 keer embedded bij een paar van deze terreurgroepen in Syrië….. Geheel gesluierd, of anders flink in het zwart met alleen handen en gezicht onbedekt….

Daarmee steunt CNN het uiterst agressieve buitenlandbeleid van de VS, die immers de smerigste terreurgroepen steunt*. Tot voor een maand of tien geleden zelfs IS, dat o.a. training en wapens ontving van de VS……… In de niet reguliere nieuwsmedia, zoals in het bericht met > <, wordt in feite aangetoond, dat dit in feite nog steeds het geval is…….

Alles voor het hoger doel: Assad verjagen en het land opdelen, zodat Israël zich nooit meer zorgen hoeft te maken over Syrië…….. Israël beschoot een paar dagen geleden overigens stellingen van het reguliere Syrische leger, daar deze de Israëlische legerposten, op de door Israël illegaal bezette Golanhoogten, onder vuur zouden hebben genomen……

Eerder nam Israël al gewonde ISIS psychopaten op in veldhospitalen op diezelfde Golanhoogten, vanwaar ze na te zijn opgeknapt terug Syrië in konden gaan…….

Het is intussen wel duidelijk, dat de VS nu echt werk gaat maken met het verdrijven van Assad, zelfs al lokt het daarmee een oorlog met Rusland uit……. De VS dat nu troepen op de grond heeft in Syrië, heeft het reguliere Syrische leger gewaarschuwd geen terreurgroepen aan te vallen, die door hen worden gesteund…….. Mochten er VS militairen op de grond worden geraakt, is het bal, daar kan je donder op zeggen en weet u wat? Er zijn al VS militairen in Aleppo!!

In dit geheel kan Israël, dat in feite al op (illegaal bezet) Syrisch grondgebied staat, een ‘mooie rol’ spelen!!

Hier de link naar het (hele) artikel op het blog van van Houcke: ‘CNN Normalizes Suicide Bombers and Embeds Reporters with ISIS and Al Qaeda

* Overigens is de VS verreweg de grootste terreurorganisatie ter wereld!!!

Zie ook: ‘Hammelburg met ‘een frisse kijk’ op Aleppo…….. VS neemt terreur-voortouw in Syrië…..

        en: ‘Top U.S. commander skeptical of military cooperation with Russia in Syria

        en: ‘A Lawless Plan to Target Syria’s Allies

        en: ‘US Hawks Advance a War Agenda in Syria

        en: ‘Provoking Nuclear War by Media

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Ward’.

De psychopaten achter de schermen van de agressieve VS buitenlandpolitiek…..

Mensen, het is even ‘een zit’, maar liefst 1 uur en 32 minuten, waarmee u wel een ‘fraai’ beeld krijgt van wie er op de achtergrond mede verantwoordelijk is voor de uiterst agressieve buitenlandpolitiek van de VS.

‘Mede verantwoordelijk’: daar psychopaten als George W. Bush, sigaarkloot Clinton en Obama, uiteindelijk het laatste woord hebben.

De video zit af en toe wat knullig in elkaar, maar dit doet niets af aan het gedegen verhaal (helaas zonder ondertiteling):

Zie ook:

Jeffrey Epstein: seksueel wangedrag van welgestelden veelal onder de pet gehouden

Psychopaten maken de dienst uit, de hoogste tijd om daar verandering in te brengen!

Psychopathic Behavior and Leaders By James G. Long

The Disturbing Link Between Psychopathy And Leadership By Victor Lipman

Neoliberalisme, ofwel de inhumane, keiharde maatschappij anno 2015

Rutte’s commentaar op Hans de Boer, wat een hypocriet!!

Hans de Boer vindt uitkeringsgerechtigden luie labbekakkers…….

NAVO verder op oorlogspad, dat noemen Rob de Wijk en een groot aantal politici: ‘slapen…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Rob de Wijk verklaart met veel oorlogsretoriek de oorlog aan Kremlintrollen in Europa, ofwel haatzaaien tegen mensen die nadenken!!……….

Milieusceptici zijn gevaarlijke psychopaten

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.