Tag: CIA

About CIA

Subscribe Feeds

John Kiriakou, een CIA klokkenluider, werd een visum voor GB geweigerd……..

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Op dit moment is John Kiriakou te horen op BBC World Service in het programma HARDtalk (na het nieuws van 14.00 u., onze tijd). Kiriakou maakte bekend, dat de CIA zich schuldig maakte aan marteling en dan m.n. waterboarding. In eerste instantie was hij overtuigd door de leugens, dat marteling aanslagen helpt voorkomen. Toen hij begreep dat dit onzin was, hing hij de zaak aan de grote klok…….

Kiriakou kreeg 2,5 jaar gevangenisstraf, voor het naar buiten brengen van een zaak, die de VS overheid glashard ontkende, al waren de bewijzen overweldigend. Dit daat de VS al decennia lang martelde en dat meestal in het buitenland, sterker nog: in de VS werden buitenlandse veiligheidsdiensten geleerd, hoe men het beste kan martelen…… Volgens Kiriakou bestaat er dan ook een gat in de VS wetgeving, die dit soort barbaarse, inhumane en totaal onzinnige zaken mogelijk maakt……

Kiriakou kreeg van de Britse overheid geen toestemming om Groot-Brittannië in te reizen voor het BBC interview…… Toevallig werd vanmorgen in Groot-Brittannië bekend gemaakt, dat de regering Blair al in 2002 wist dat gevangen in Guantanamo Bay werden gemarteld, twee hoge Britse ambtenaren van MI5 waren daar in 2002 zelfs getuige van……….. Normaal wordt HARDtalk van te voren aangekondigd op de site van BBC W.S., vandaag niet………

Klokkenluiders dienen niet alleen nationaal beschermd te worden, maar ook internationaal, zo maakt deze zaak ten overvloede nog eens duidelijk

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels., die u onder dit bericht terugvindt, dit geldt niet voor het label Kiriakou.

Ps: Als ik me niet vergis, verdedigden de Hoop Scheffer en Balkenende het waterboarden en stelde dit geteisem, dat waterboarden geen marteling is……. Je zou ze alsnog………

Assad, de 2006 plannen voor de omverwerping van zijn bewind………

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Al vaker hier aangekaart: de westerse aanzet tot de opstand in Syrië. In het volgende artikel van Information Clearing House (ICH), wordt zelfs het jaar 2006 genoemd, als het jaar waarin de eerste aanzet tot de omverwerping van het Assad regime werd voorbereid (voor een vertaling, die wel wat tijd in beslag neemt, kan u onder dit artikel op Dutch klikken):

Divide et Impera

The Imperialist Violence in Syria, Part 3 of 7 – Part 1
 

By Kim Petersen and B. J. Sabri



From The WikiLeaks Files:


A December 13, 2006 cable, “Influencing the SARG [Syrian government] in the End of 2006,” indicates that, as far back as 2006 – five years before “Arab Spring” protests in Syria – destabilizing the Syrian government was a central motivation of US policy. The author of the cable was William Roebuck, at the time chargé d’affaires at the US embassy in Damascus. The cable outlines strategies for destabilizing the Syrian government. In his summary of the cable, Roebuck wrote:

We believe Bashar’s weaknesses are in how he chooses to react to looming issues, both perceived and real, such as the conflict between economic reform steps (however limited) and entrenched, corrupt forces, the Kurdish question, and the potential threat to the regime from the increasing presence of transiting Islamist extremists. This cable summarizes our assessment of these vulnerabilities and suggests that there may be actions, statements, and signals that the USG can send that will improve the likelihood of such opportunities arising.

 

This cable suggests that the US goal in December 2006 was to undermine the Syrian government by any available means, and that what mattered was whether US action would help destabilize the government, not what other impacts the action might have. In public the US was in favor of economic reform, but in private the US saw conflict between economic reform and “entrenched, corrupt forces” as an “opportunity.” In public, the US was opposed to “Islamist extremists” everywhere; but in private it saw the “potential threat to the regime from the increasing presence of transiting Islamist extremists” as an “opportunity” that the US should take action to try to increase.


Roebuck lists Syria’s relationship with Iran as a “vulnerability” that the US should try to “exploit.” His suggested means of doing so are instructive:

Possible action:

PLAY ON SUNNI FEARS OF IRANIAN INFLUENCE: There are fears in Syria that the Iranians are active in both Shia proselytizing and conversion of, mostly poor, Sunnis. Though often exaggerated, such fears reflect an element of the Sunni community in Syria that is increasingly upset by and focused on the spread of Iranian influence in their country through activities ranging from mosque construction to business….

Roebuck thus argued that the US should try to destabilize the Syrian government by coordinating more closely with Egypt and Saudi Arabia to fan sectarian tensions between Sunni and Shia, including by the promotion of “exaggerated” fears of Shia proselytizing of Sunnis, and of concern about “the spread of Iranian influence” in Syria in the form of mosque construction and business activity.

By 2014, the sectarian Sunni-Shia character of the civil war in Syria was bemoaned in the United States as an unfortunate development. But in December 2006, the man heading the US embassy in Syria advocated in a cable to the secretary of state and the White House that the US government collaborate with Saudi Arabia and Egypt to promote sectarian conflict in Syria between Sunni and Shia as a means of destabilizing the Syrian government. At that time, no one in the US government could credibly have claimed innocence of the possible implications of such a policy…

It was easy to predict then that, while a strategy of promoting sectarian conflict in Syria might indeed help undermine the Syrian government, it could also help destroy Syrian society. But this consideration does not appear in Roebuck’s memo at all, as he recommends that the US government cooperate with Saudi Arabia and Egypt to promote sectarian tensions.1


From the US Congress


The US path to destroy Syria is long. On 12 April 2003, twenty-four days after the US invasion of Iraq, a Zionist representative from New York, Eliot T. Engle, sponsored the Syria Accountability Act (SAA). The charge was Syria’s involvement of terrorism, aiding Saddam Hussein (meaning Iraq) escaping sanctions, helping the insurgency against the US invasion of Iraq, supporting of Hezbollah, chemical weapons, and so on. (We have to go on record on an important issue. Saying “a Zionist representative” is not a vacuous namedropping—it is a political statement indicative of how Israel passes its policy aims in Syria and the Arab world through the American legislative system.) The Act was passed in December 2003. Invoking the omnipresent pretext of American national security and pretending “constitutional” presidential privileges on foreign policy, George Bush essentially turned the Israeli policy toward Syria into a policy of the United States. (For reading: Statement by the President on H.R. 1828)

In his article, “The Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003: Two Years On,” David Schenker, from the Zionist-imperialist think tank, the Washington Institute, recalled his experience in testifying before the House of Representatives (7 June 2006). He wrote, “Syria has proven a tough nut to crack. The SAA has helped, although the Legislation itself is not sufficient to compel a change in Syrian behavior. The Bush Administration has adopted some steps, but the challenge is how to leverage the SAA in conjunction with other tools at the Administration’s disposal—multilateral efforts in particular—to ratchet up the pressure on Syria to force behavioral change.” “Ratchet up pressure” is the key phrase as to what US neocons/Zionists believe they must do in Syria, not only in connection to Lebanon, but also, obviously, in relation what Syria represents for Israel—a rejectionist state of Israel that must be destroyed.


The Assassination of Rafiq Hariri


The assassination of Rafiq Hariri (a billionaire, dual citizen of Saudi Arabia and Lebanon, and a former prime minister of Lebanon) on 14 February 2005 is the paramount example of how the United States, Western Europe, and Israel plan their subversion against the Arab states that do not obey US diktat, or resist US-backed Israeli colonialist-imperialism. The assassination offers a very interesting angle with regard how pretexts are developed and used. Let us see why Hariri was killed. On 2 September 2004, the UNSC issued resolution 1559 calling on Syria to withdraw its remaining forces from Lebanon. Syria complied but only partially and slowly.

The ruse to get Syria out of Lebanon—which was a part of Greater Syria in history until France, using its Sykes-Picot mandate over Syria, severed it and made it an independent state in 1943—had, therefore, to be achieved by other means. The assassination of Hariri was that specific means. With the accusation that Syria was behind the assassination, the stage was set to force Syria’s complete withdrawal from Lebanon under the threat of enforcing resolution 1559 by military means. Forty-five days after the assassination (5 April 2005), Syria began its withdrawal from Lebanon and completed it by the end of that month.


Who ordered the assassination of Hariri?


Since neither Syria nor Hezbollah had stakes in the assassination of Hariri, who benefited from it? Our logical answer is Israel and the United States. [2] Considering the long list of objectives of these two states in the situation of all Arab states, proving this assertion is a matter of deductive reasoning.

Having briefly described the path the United States took in the quest to destabilize Syria, it is important to see its current methods of war. If the US plans in Syria were insufficient to raise alarm, we have to deal with other features applied on the Syrian theater of death (and before that in Afghanistan and Iraq). We are talking about an imperialist instrument of war: vocabulary as a weapon of mass confusion. Many terms and phrases had been coined to make people conform to Washington’s indoctrination. But do terms such as “moderate,” “extremist,” “moderate Arab states—who are they?”, “Islamic,” Islamist,” “dictator,” “democracy,” “no role for Assad in the future of Syria,” “Sunni,” “Alawite,” “Shiite,” “ISIS,” “stop the Iranian occupation of Syria,” “IS,” “DAESH,” “U.S. hitting ISIS,” etc., have any tangible meaning outside the world of imperialist propaganda?


Let us examine some of these terms. Does the diction “a future for Syria without Assad” have any meaning? Would that be a re-made Syria with a bankrupt sectarian system similar to the one a criminal named George W. Bush and his Zionist neocons installed in Iraq? Would the US bring Noah Feldman or others to write a “constitution” for Syria? (Feldman is a Zionist lawyer from New York and a theoretician on “Islamic terrorism,” “Jihad,” and on so-called Islamic democracy. He authored the sectarian constitution for Iraq while this was under active US military occupation led by Paul Bremer. Bremer’s constitution, as the Iraqis call it, has become the cornerstone and foundation for the partition of Iraq on approximate confessional and ethnic lines.3


Or, would it be a so-called Islamic state swearing allegiance to US imperialism, to Al Saud, and to the British-installed al-Thani ruling family of Qatar? What is the implication of saying that Assad is the problem, yet names behind state policies such as Obama, Erdogan, Hollande, Merkel, Turki al-Faisal, or Bandar Bin Sultan go unmentioned in this context? What does the Syrian “moderate opposition” mean in the US imperialist lexicon, if not groups financed and supported by Washington? And for clarity’s sake, we ask, moderate in what?


Again, what is the US game in Syria?


Let us cite Condoleezza Rice. Rice is the quintessential dual-face American hypocrite when the issue is US interventions. Although the first quotation we cite below is about Iraq, its philosophy and intent applies to US policy in Syria.

Rice, describing in petty melodramatic terms (similar to those one can find in a cheap romance novel) how she confronted her master criminal boss on the sectarian violence that the United States designed and implemented in Iraq, wrote the following [Italics are ours]:

“So what’s your plan, Condi?” The president was suddenly edgy and annoyed. “We’ll just let them kill each other, and we’ll standby and try to pick the pieces?”

I was furious at the implication….”No, Mr. President,” I said, trying to stay calm. “We just can’t win by putting our forces in the middle of their blood feud. If they want to have a civil war we’re going to have to let them.”4

Comment: 1) Rice is shameful. She made her criminal boss look caring. 2) Rice, daughter of a Presbyterian minister who presumably taught her not to lie, lied big. First, calling sectarian infighting “civil war” is deception because these are two different entities. Sectarian strife within a nation pits a community against another with dissimilar beliefs or ethnic origins. Civil conflict is between political factions within a nation regardless of sectarian or confessional beliefs. The US uses both terms interchangeably to obfuscate the nature of its interference in the pursuit of specific policy objectives. 


Besides, there never was any sectarian infighting between Arab Sunni and Shiite Muslims in Iraq until the US invasion and occupation fomented it to preempt resistance to its occupation. 3) Rice and her neocon masters thrive when sectors of a nation they occupy engage in violent infighting—it provides them easier means of control. This happened in the Philippines, Korea, Viet Nam, Iraq, and it is now happening in Libya and Syria through mercenaries and proxies. That is why we often hear US imperialists and Arab stooges talking about things like “Assad wants to make an Alawite state,” “ISIS is a fact,” “Kurds want their own state and so do the Assyrians and the Armenians,” and so on. Regardless of terminology or concepts, the US strategy is unexceptional—it is an ancient Roman imperial and military strategy: Divide et Impera.


With regard to how US duality works in the Syrian example, let us consider the exchange she had with Syrian Foreign Minister, Walid Muollem:

“… I delivered my point about Syria’s interference in Lebanon, and its failure to stop terrorists in their country from crossing their borders into Iraq.”

“it’s hard to stop them,” he said, but I was having none of it.

“They’re coming through Damascus airport,” I countered.5

Comment: We know what US exceptionalism means: it is okay for the US to interfere in the affairs of every country in the world, but others are not permitted to do so except with US approval. It is not okay that volunteers cross Syria into Iraq to fight the US invasion force, but it is okay for America’s stooges to allow weapons and mercenaries to Syria through Turkish and Jordanian airports.


In recalling the documented history of US interference in the affairs of myriad countries including its staunchest ally Britain (read, “Harold Wilson, Lyndon Johnson and the Vietnam War, 1964-68”), the present authors state the following:

The violence in Syria is not an accidental product of uncontrolled events, is not a result of a civil war, is not because the Syrian state is ruled by despotic elites—but it is a result of a combined American-Israeli geopolitical strategy to install a new Syrian regime at the order of Tel Aviv and Washington. Syria, therefore, is not but another link—after Iraq, Libya, and Yemen— in the US and Israeli quest to dismantle the Arab system of nation, and to end the Palestinian Question permanently.


Let us now examine what was cooking in the US pot against Syria 60 years ago. In his outstanding research on the CIA plotting and machinations against the Arab nations including Syria during the 1950s, California State University history professor, Hugh Wilford, wrote the following:

On August 21, 1956, Foster Dulles convened GAMMA, a top-secret task force with representatives from State, Defense, and the CIA … GAMMA’s main contribution was to agree to a proposal to send the eminent foreign service veteran Loy Henderson on a tour of the Middle East that seemed intended to incite military aggression against Syria by its Arab neighbors…. Henderson told a meeting in the White House that he had discovered a deep sense of anxiety about Syria in the region, yet little concerted will to act; only Turkey, a NATO ally, showed much appetite for intervention….”6


Let us fast forward to the US occupation of Iraq. On page 473 of his book, The Twilight War(Penguin Press, New York, 2012), David Crist (a historian from the US imperialist establishment) writes, “’Recock’ became the word of the day at CENTCOM. The United States would get out of Iraq and prepare for the next war in the global fight against terrorism, with rumors circulating that Syria was next. The U.S. military concurred.”

Why Syria “was next” on the US list of priorities? Has Syria ever harmed or threatened the national security of the United States? No. But because Israel strongly influences US foreign policy (read, John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy”) toward the Arab states, and because Syria is the last Arab state resisting Israeli imperialism there are two concrete answers.7

First, Israel wants to weaken Syria and dismember it, as it wanted done to Iraq by American neocon Zionists. Dismembering Syria should expose the Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah that depends on Syria for support. The second is more complex. First, controlling Syria enters in the logic of American quest of global hegemony. Second, to carve out a Kurdish autonomous region to be joined with the areas controlled by Iraqi Kurds creating a Kurdish State potentially at the service of US imperialism and Israel.8, 9 Third, Syria’s eastern regions and Israeli-occupied Golan Heights have sizeable oil deposits. (Read, “World powers must recognize Israeli annexation of Golan Heights”; “Huge oil discovery in Golan Heights – Israeli media”). 4) From an imperialist perspective, the geopolitical re-design of the region would help expand plans for the strategic control of world resources and distribution.


Crist’s revelation impels us to reflect on the motives and ideologies that underlie all anti-Arab actions taken by the United States. What we have today in Syria (and Iraq, Yemen, Sudan, Libya, and Palestine) is an accurate reproduction of age-old tested policies by the West at the expense of nations targeted for reasons rooted in the politics of imperialism, colonialism, Zionism, and piracy of resources. In Syria, however, the situation is a little bit more intricate due to the presence of a long list of operators never seen before in a single regional war, not even in Afghanistan.


Kim Petersen is a former editor of the Dissident Voice newsletter. He can be reached atkimohp@inbox.com

B. J. Sabri is an observer of the politics of modern colonialism, imperialism, Zionism, and of contemporary Arab issues. He can be reached at b.j.sabri@aol.com

Next: Part 4 of 7

NOTES

  1. Robert Naiman, “WikiLeaks Reveals How the US Aggressively Pursued Regime Change in Syria, Igniting a Bloodbath,” Truth-out, 9 October 2015

  3. See Kim Petersen, “Syria in the Imperialist Crosshairs,” Dissident Voice, 26 October 2005.

  4. Note: since the dawn of Islam in Iraq (early 7th century) until the US invasion (2003), and regardless what administrative geopolitical form distinguished it, there have never been confessional lines in all Arab regions of Iraq or ethnic lines separating the various communities. However, historically, and during the rule of the Ottoman Turks, Arab Shiite Muslims formed a relative majority in the South of Iraq and Sunnis in the rest. After WWII, the lines between Arab Shiite and Sunni Muslims became integrated due to internal migrations and economic development. The US deliberately created the lines when it imposed a No-Fly Zone on specific regions of Iraq in 1991 after the war for Kuwait. As for the Kurdish regions, with the exception of Sulaymaniya and Erbil with a Kurdish Majority, most of the north of Iraq was inhabited by a mixture of ethnic Groups including Arabs, Assyrians, Armenians, Turkoman, Kurds, and Yezidis. The US arbitrarily delineated Kurdish areas when it imposed the non-fly Zone on the north of Iraq in 1991.

  5. Condoleezza Rice, No Higher Honor, Crown Publishers, New York, 2011, p. 544, 561

  6. Rice, 561

  7. Hugh Wilford, America’s Great Game: The CIA’s Secret Arabists and the Shaping of the Modern Middle East, Basic Books, New York, 2013, p. 273

  8. Note: Lebanon cannot be described as a resister state. Resistance to Israel in Lebanon follows confessional lines. 1) The Saudi-controlled faction led by Saad Hariri is in line with the policy of accommodation adapted by Al Saud vs. Israel. 2) Christians are divided in two camps: the Faranjia and Aoun camp that opposes Israel; and the Geagea and Jmail (supported by Saudi Arabia) that seeks accommodation and had very close relations with Ariel Sharon and Menachem Begin during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon). The Jumblatt Druze faction (supported by Al Saud) has been known for continuous zigzagging on the issue of the resistance to Israel. This leaves only Hezbollah as the real opponent of Israeli settler-imperialism. Outside the Arab world, Iran is the only other remaining state that opposes Israel.

  9. The Kurdish Question in Iraq goes beyond the scope of this work. Succinctly, there is a US-Kurdish connection in the context of imperialism, dependency; Iraqi Kurdish politician Masoud Barzani has collaborated in turning a potential Kurdish state into a tool at the service of US imperialism and Israel.

  10. In his article, “To defeat ISIS, Create a Sunni State,” John Bolton stated, “The Kurds still face enormous challenges, with dangerously uncertain borders, especially with Turkey. But an independent Kurdistan that has international recognition could work in America’s favor.” [Italics added]

Click for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French, translation- Note- Translation may take a moment to load.

Zie ook: ‘Jan Jaap de Ruiter (Tilburg ‘University’): Assad is een groter gevaar dan IS…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘

       en: ‘Koenders: ‘Assad moet terecht staan in Den Haag………’ OEI!!!‘

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt. Dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Hezbollah’.

De VS, een duivels imperium, dat achter haar psychopathisch moordende troepen staat??

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Het volgende artikel van ICH handelt over de steun van de VS burgers voor het leger. Joachim Hagopian legt uit, waar de VS bevolking zich achter schaart: illegale oorlogen, terroristische aanslagen, massamoord enz. enz. Om de VS tegen je te krijgen als land, is m aar weinig nodig, zo betoogt Hagopian, die verder wijst op de inmenging in binnenlandse politiek door de VS, of de sancties en boycots, die de VS instelt, als een (democratisch gekozen) regime niet naar de pijpen van de VS danst (zie o.a. Chili, Oekraïne en Syrië)……

Intussen benemen zich dagelijks 22 VS veteranen het leven, dit vanwege de ‘geweldige zorg’ die zij ontvangen van een natie, die achter haar troepen staat………..

Beste mensen, het is een aardige lap tekst, met veel links, maar uitermate de moeite waard, als u denkt dat u alles wel weet, zal u net als ikzelf vreemd opkijken, al geef ik toe dat ik eigenlijk nergens meer van sta te ‘kijken’, om dat woord nog maar eens te gebruiken…. Onder het bericht kan u klikken voor een vertaling, al neemt dat enige tijd in beslag.

It’s
Time to Stop “Supporting Our Troops”


By
Joachim Hagopian

December
13, 2015 “Information
Clearing House”
– With the 115 year old tradition of the
annual Army-Navy football classic on
Saturday, the so called “America’s game” and “rivalry for the
ages” is now once again upon us. This occasion never fails to pay
reverent homage to America’s so called “cream of the crop”
elitist military
academies and
always from the president to celebrities Americans give tribute to
our armed forces. At this time we hear that familiar patriotic mantra
“support our troops” mindlessly repeated. So it seems appropriate
now to take a cold hard look to examine what it actually means to
“support our troops.”


As
both a West Point graduate and critic
of the American Empire,
to me the “support
our troops”
sentiment
has long outworn its propagandized welcome. US Empire has been using
that contrite expression to brainwash Americans and justify its wars
and violence for far too long. It sprang up during this last decade’s
protracted war losses in Iraq and Afghanistan. Never was it ever
heard during the Vietnam
War when
our combat veterans returned home feeling defeated and suffering
from untreated PTSD symptoms, shunned by a nation that had
bitterly turned against them and their war, particularly by their own
peer group. Fast forward to four decades and three war defeats
later, and our government is still sending Americans off to
fight and die inAfghanistan (9800
currently) and Iraq (3500
with another 100 on the way), and now in Syria (50
just proposed with more on the way while war-hawk Bobbsy twins McCain
and Graham are calling for 20,000 more troops in Syria). But this
century’s wars we keep hearing red, white and blue, flag waving
Americans urging us to “support our troops.”


Over
the long haul, supporting our troops has resulted in the United
States being the most warring, aggressive nation on earth, bar none.
As we’re about to enter 2016, our ultraviolent country will be
killing other human beings somewhere on this planet for 223 out of
the last 240 total years the US has been in existence. That’s 93%
of our time as
a nation-turned-Empire we’ve been destroying human life. That’s
certainly nothing to be proud of. Yet it’s “our troops” who’ve
been the murdering culprit. No compassionate, rational person could
possibly place blindly obedient support behind such rampantly wanton
disregard and contempt for fellow human life.

Another
fact that Americans can’t be proud of is knowing that the most
warring nation on earth just since World War II alone has murdered up
to 30
million people around
the globe with an estimated 90%
of them being civilians.
Having initiated 201 out of the total of 240 armed conflicts
from the end of WWII to 2001, it then follows that between those
years the US Empire of Chaos and Destruction has murdered 27 million
innocent people whose lives have tragically been cut short through no
fault of their own for simply living in the wrong place at the wrong
time belonging to the wrong ethnic nationality targeted by America’s
full spectrum dominance and global superpower hegemony. And that was
before the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

And
what does it take to be targeted
as a US foreign enemy? Any country whose leaders choose to
support their own citizens’ well-being, independence and quality of
life over US Empire’s fascist transnational corporate interests is
attacked economically through sanctions and embargos, politically
through propaganda lies and threats, or militarily though unnatural
disasters/weather warfare, occupied invasions involving
long term bloody conflict or acts
of terrorism, coups and assassinations. Just ask Cuba,
Venezuela, Haiti, Panama, Iran, Syria, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Yemen,
Somalia, Sudan, Congo North Korea, Donbas, Palestine or Russia just
to name more than a dozen.

People
around the world have been victimized for well over a century by
American Empire’s willful rape and pillage of their lands in the
name of stolen natural resources and inhumane forced slave labor, and
those are the nations whose puppet dictators willingly succumbed and
acquiesced to US demands and pressures. In fact in the tradition of
the British Empire, North America’s entire domestic and foreign
history has been made of genocidal
killing,
enslaving, stealing and subjugating other darker-skinned races into
death and submission. Given this context with the bigger picture
perspective, “supporting our troops” is really supporting mass
murder around the world. So bearing that sobering, grim reality in
mind, it’s time for Americans to cease and desist with their
jingoistic rah-rah that only adds insult to injury to the rest of the
victimized world.


In
2008 the US spent more
money every 5 seconds to wage an immoral, unlawful war in Iraq than
the average working American earned all year long. 80% of America’s
taxes are earmarked towards funding the annual Pentagon budget to
wage war around the world. When that kind of war investment
misappropriating US citizenry’s hard-earned tax dollars places such
lopsided priority over the well-being of its own people, with over a
decade of wearing
down an overextended military forced
into fighting three, four and even five consecutive combat tours on
two simultaneous warfronts, it also overburdened and decimated
America’s middle class. 


And now for the first time in nearly a half century, the US
middle class is no longer a majority in
the United States. A large chunk of it died when sinking into an
expanding lower class of impoverished, poverty-stricken
Americans barely
making ends meet.
Half the respondents in a recent survey say they either break even or
make less than their cost of living


expenses.
As anoligarchy the
US federal government no longer acts in the best interests of its
citizens.

But
considering the costs of war to victim nations where since 2003 the
US has killed over a million people in Iraq alone, this figure
released from a
study earlier this year is
admittedly a conservative estimate. The study concludes that up to
two million in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan have been killed by
America’s wars. These colossal crimes against humanity constitute
supporting the US federal government as well as its military troops a
moral crime. America’s complete and utter destruction of the
world’s second and third largest oil producers in Iraq and Libya,
turning them into failed states because their one time US allied
leaders moved away from the US
petrodollar is
unconscionable, yet that’s the tragic outcome of blindly supporting
our troops. More than any other single country, the US today is
responsible for allowing ISIS tomake
billions in profit
from stolen oil from
Iraq and Syria financing the biggest terrorist group on the planet.
And US partners-in-crime Turkey and Israel are
the two biggest buyers of terrorist oil. So in effect supporting our
troops is also supporting both crimes against humanity as well as
worldwide terrorism.

Supporting
our troops has contributed to the world becoming far more
armed and dangerous today than
at any prior time in our recorded human history. Our nation is also
responsible forspearheading
the biggest arms race in
history where it’s not just the US Empire spending so many billions
on weapons of mass destruction but due to Empire aggression it has
forced Russia and China to answer by also significantly increasing
their military spending. A dozen years ago the US
defense budget nearly equaled the
rest of the world combined. But during this century’s two
protracted US wars plus smaller secret ones around the world,
America’s military expenditures have soared to $682
billion in 2012 from
$417.4 in 2003. The exponential rise of American aggression likewise
has pressured the unilaterally declared US enemies Russia and China
to significantly increase their military spending as well. The US has
gone from spending near half (46%) of the world’s military amount
in 2003 to just 35%
in 2014 due
to Russia and China dramatically expanding their military budgets. In
fact following America’s lead, both the world’s annual arms sales
as well as its military budgets have exponentially skyrocketed
amongst dozens of countries all seemingly gearing up for “the big
one.” Not surprisingly, at 31% the US
is also the biggest arms dealer on
the planet followed by Russia’s 27% with China accounting for 5%
during the period from 2010-2014 that totaled a 16% increase from
arms sold from 2005-2009.

Events
and developments have escalated tensions and confrontations between
the US and Russia and China in recent weeks. With the US backing NATO
member Turkey
recklessly shootingdown
a Russian fighter jet resulting in a Russian rescue helicopter also
brought down last month, in addition to the probable ISIS bomb taking
down the Russian
airliner killing
all 224 onboard a month and a half ago, the US
Navy destroyer skirting
inside the twelve nautical mile range of built up Chinese islands in
the South China Sea, the United States and the West appear to be
baiting Putin and the East into World
War III.
And with nuclear powers going directly head-to-head in Syria, Ukraine
and Asia, self-annihilation of the human race becomes a very real and
grave risk culminating after a quarter century of US Empire
belligerently operating as the sole global superpower and “global
village” bully.  

Out
of nearly 200 countries no other nation on earth has more than a few
military bases outside its own country except the United States. In
contrast to the rest of the world, the US sends 1.5
million military occupiers on active duty to over
a thousand military installations on
every continent throughout the globe. Just this week the Pentagon
announced a worldwide
expansion of military bases without
specifying a total number under the auspices of secrecy. West Africa,
East Africa and Afghanistan are slotted for full scale bases.
Meanwhile US Special Forces that covertly operate by stealth surprise
often at night in guerilla-type, fast strike operations are busily
secretly committing acts of terror in over 135
nations globally,
that’s about 75% of the all world’s nations.

Let’s
look at the way our federal government supports our troops. After
sending over 6800
US soldiers (along
with 7000 civilian contractors) to their early graves fighting in
America’s two longest running wars in the nation’s history,
leaving one million wounded personnel filing VA claims ranging from
life threatening physical injuries to emotionally crippling PTSD
traumas and scars, the feds have betrayed our patriots serving our
country by treasonously targeting all returning combat veterans as
the biggest
enemy threat on
American soil. Indeed veterans, gun owners and dissidents are
deemed to pose a greater danger than even the feds’ own
created terrorist monster ISIS that Obama’s open border policy
facilitates easy access to establishing terrorist cells inside
America.

Those
veterans seeking help are customarily snowed under by lethal
Big Pharma poison,
fast becoming addicted and even more unstable. Many are haplessly
waiting and dying on lists for medical services that often don’t
come soon enough. Exposing forty veterans who died awaiting services
on invisible lists at the Phoenix VA hospital alone triggered a
major scandal
last year.
For several years running on average twenty-two
veterans have been killing themselves each
and every day in the United States. The overloaded Veterans
Administration has been caught grossly ill-prepared to adequately
deal with the sheer enormity of the problem with so many severely
damaged ex-soldiers in dire need of long term assistance and care.
One study predicts that up to nearly a half
million veterans
will end up with criminal cases in the court system.

With
nearly half (44%)
of Congress millionaires and so few (19%)
ever serving in uniform now, the DC warmongers are ever-at-the-ready
to send young men and women from America’s lower class into harm’s
way fighting Obama’s dirty little secret wars in multiple combat
zones around the world that the public never even hears about. Yet
you’ll see next to none of their own sons or daughters fighting in
some far off war. The
way our own government has used, abused and not supported our troops
is despicable.

And
then a sizeable percentage of those Americans who are so vocal in
their claims of “supporting
our troops,”
are too frequently disingenuous. Often hypocrites merely mouth the
same banal platitudes year after year from their ivory-towered,
pretend world, living so far removed and disaffected from actual war
conditions or even knowing anyone who wears a military uniform. Never
fathoming the tragic insanity or bloody lifelong consequences that US
wars ravage on millions worldwide, permanently damaging all involved,
Americans who haven’t a clue will glibly pay lip service, “We owe
so much to our soldiers who fight to keep us safe and free.” What
bubble, planet or century are they living on or in?

Since
the inside coup of 9/11 was perpetrated, US citizens have become the
murderous neocons’ war on terror victims as well, terrorized by
their own international crime cabal government and militarized police
state that’s effectively stolen their freedom and civil liberties
while the guilty treasonously continue violating sworn oaths to
uphold and protect both the Constitution and American people. Yet too
many brainwashed, dumbed down and clueless in America don’t seem to
get it. Maybe it’s because they’re bombarded 24/7 by MSM
lies and disinformation that
never expose the ugliness of war as it really is. The ruling elite
controls all aspects of mass media, engaging in widespread censorship
of films, television and video games where violence
and war are only glorified.
Military, CIA and FBI liaisons control every aspect of what comes out
of Hollywood these days.

But
over four decades of a volunteer
army comprised
of less than half of one percent of the total US population also
contributes greatly to the widening disconnect between the 99+%
civilian population and the less than 1% Americans in uniform. The
atrocities and horror that the imperialistic Empire’s killing
machine has inflicted on Third World nations half a world away may as
well be billions of miles away on another planet or galaxy. Out of
sight, out of mind goes many civilians’ insulated, tunnel version
reality.


Those
currently in uniform need to be reminded that they have a sworn duty
to protect America from domestic and foreign enemies. As citizens who
no longer live in a democratic republic but now a totalitarian police
state, they need to recognize that their federal government has
adiabolical
agenda to
enslave and eliminate fellow Americans. Instead of criminalizing
dissent,
the real domestic enemy has become the federal government and all
Americans need to accept this tragic development. Therefore, both
those already in uniform as well as those ready to sign up and allow
themselves to become their crime cabal’s latest cannon fodder in
the elite’s wars need to stand up and be counted as patriots loyal
to their nation and
fellow citizens rather than adhere to blind obedience to their
psychopathic masters. It’s no longer okay to support the troops
when they’re misdirected into committing treason against their own
citizenry. Military personnel need to take responsibility for their
actions and do what’s right by both their Constitution as well as
humanity.

2015
has been a tumultuous year when by globalist
design terrorism
has expanded to all corners of the earth, spreading death, war and
destruction in its wake. Meanwhile, feeling its economic prowess
slipping away in the face of the emerging
power of Eastern rivals China
and Russia, the United States government has already conceded losing
its war to retain the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.
The DC crime syndicate knows its days in power are numbered. Since
the psychopaths ruling the planet are unwilling to relinquish their
ruthless power of absolute control, they realize that using their
Manchurian puppet president and his overstretched US Empire to
recklessly do their dirty planetary bidding to successfully destroy
the world’s most powerful nation sending Empire into rapid freefall
decline on the way to one world government can only be achieved
by igniting
World War III against
the Eastern powers just as their Ponzi-rigged, house of cards,
debt-based global economy implodes on itself. So this late in the
power elite’s endgame when we’re still hearing “support the
troops,” in actuality it’s time to fight for our lives in support
of humanity’s struggle for survival and good ultimately triumphing
over evil.

Joachim
Hagopian is a
West Point graduate and former US Army officer. He has written a
manuscript based on his unique military experience
entitled “Don’t
Let The Bastards Getcha Down.” It
examines and focuses on US international relations, leadership
and national security issues. After the military, Joachim earned
a master’s degree in Clinical Psychology and worked as a
licensed therapist in the mental health field for more than a
quarter century. He now concentrates on his writing and has a
blog site at http://empireexposed.blogspot.co.id/.



Click
for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French,
translation- Note- Translation
may take a moment to load.

Zie ook:

‘VS steunt rechtse coalitie (MUD) in Venezuela………‘

‘John Kerry eist referendum in Venezuela, ofwel de volgende stap in VS terreur……‘

‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘

‘List of wars involving the United States‘

‘NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………‘

‘VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………‘

‘De war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan over het algemeen gedacht‘

‘9/11: de VS heeft niets geleerd……‘
‘VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..‘

‘CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………‘

‘Terreuraanslag in Iran moet acties uitlokken die de VS tot een oorlog met Iran ‘dwingen’‘

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande op één van de volgende labels, onder dit bericht: VS buitenlandbeleid, NAVO, illegale oorlog, staatsgreep, massamoord, terreur, drones (standrechtelijke executies middels dit vliegend tuig, waarbij 90% niet verdachten worden vermoord, niet genoemd in bovenstaand artikel….), Chili, Afghanistan, Irak, Syrië, PTSS, suïcide, propaganda, en/of CIA.  



Mijn excuus voor de belabberde weergave.

VS visumplicht nu ook voor mensen die na 2011 o.a. in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Irak en….. Iran waren!!!

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

BBC World Service nieuws van gisteren (radio 1.30 u.) meldde dat de VS de visumplicht gaat uitbreiden voor personen die na 2011 o.a. Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syrië, Irak en…. Iran bezochten.

Alsof er na de omwenteling van het moorddadige sjah regime* ooit terreur werd uitgeoefend door Iran, anders dan door ‘studenten’, die VS ambassade personeel gijzelden in eigen land……. Het is wel duidelijk: het is voor de VS nog niet genoeg wat betreft de oorlogen in het Midden-Oosten, zoals in Syrië, Irak en Jemen (waar je eigenlijk Afghanistan ook bij op moet tellen), waar de VS een hoofdrol speelt, nu zelfs openlijk met inzet van de NAVO. Wat betreft de grote bloedbaden in Jemen, daar steunt de VS de schuldige, het moordenaars regime van Saoedi-Arabië…. Het zou me niets verbazen als de VS rekening houdt met een inval in Iran….. Hoe zit het met de vloot in de Perzische Golf, is die nog altijd op volle sterkte???

Di alles n.a.v. de ontwikkelingen in Syrië, waar Turkije, naast de welhaast openlijke steun voor IS en andere soennitische terreurgroepen, nu ook een hoofdrol speelt, na het neerschieten van een Russische jager in Syrisch luchtruim…… Maar ook het bombardement door de VS, van een Syrische militaire basis….. Of nogmaals Turkije, met de totaal illegale inval in Noord-Irak. Gezien deze zaken, zou het me niet verbazen, als ook Iran ‘op het lijstje staat’, waar men zogenaamd een verandering van regime wenst, lees: een VS marionet parachuteren als dictator…. Zodat na het land decennia in de tijd terug te hebben gebombardeerd, bedrijven uit de VS en andere westerse bedrijven, weer dikke opdrachten voor de wederopbouw kunnen binnenslepen en de olie en gasvoorraden voor het westen zijn veiliggesteld……

* Een staatsgreep in 1953 gepleegd tegen de democratisch gekozen premier Mossadegh en diens regering, deze staatsgreep werd georganiseerd en geregisseerd door de CIA (in Iran dat toen nog Perzië heette)…….. Overigens werd de staatsgreep die Khomeini in datzelfde land ‘leidde’ (1979), bevochten door de linkse moedjahedien, benieuwd wie het mogelijk heeft gemaakt dat hen de overwinning werd ontstolen, om het zacht te zeggen: ‘het zou me niet verbazen’, als dat de….. CIA was…….

Zie ook het volgende bericht op Information Clearing House: ‘America’s Creeping War in Syria‘

Zie ook: ‘VS bombardeert Syrische militaire basis, Nederlandse media doodstil……..‘

        en: ‘Turkije levert wapens en munitie aan IS en andere terreurgroepen……….‘

        en: ‘Erdogan, de kalief van Turkije, wil oorlog met Rusland……. De NAVO applaudisseert aan de zijlijn….‘

        en: ‘Turkije valt Noord-Irak binnen, kortom een oorlogsverklaring aan het adres van Irak, gesteund door de NAVO en haar meester de VS………‘

Voor meer berichten over/met visumplicht, VS buitenlands beleid, CIA, Syrië, Irak, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Khomeini en/of oorlogshitsers, klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.

Martin Luther King jr. vermoord door de overheid, aldus rechter……..

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Uiteraard had iedereen, met drie hersencellen al begrepen, dat Martin Luther King (jr). de mensenrechtenactivist, die zich zo inzette voor gelijke rechten voor de gekleurden in de VS, werd vermoord door de overheid van de VS.

Gisteren vielen m’n ogen bijna uit m’n hoofd, toen ik las, dat een rechter al 15 jaar geleden had bepaald, dat King werd vermoord door de overheid van de VS!!!

Bron: Brasscheck TV,

Zie ook:

‘Als Martin Luther King nog zou leven was hij onderwerp van censuur en was zijn Facebook pagina verwijderd‘

‘NAVO, het grootste militaire verbond maakt zich schuldig aan grootschalige terreur i.p.v. de vrede te bewaren‘ (o.a. geluidsfragmenten met het protest van King tegen de oorlog in Vietnam)

‘Thomas Merton >> een kritische rk geestelijke vermoord in hetzelfde jaar als Robert F. Kennedy en Martin Luther King‘

‘Fred Hampton 30 augustus 1948 – 4 december 1969 >> mensenrechtenactivist vermoord door FBI en Chicago politie‘

‘Martin Luther King: de moord van 50 jaar geleden door de VS overheid uiterst beperkt herdacht‘

‘Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: 8 wijze lessen!‘

‘Martin Luther King jr. vermoord door de overheid, aldus rechter……..‘

‘De langzame moord op de ideeën van Martin Luther King…………….. Ofwel: Dr. Martin Luther Kings lessen willens en wetens verzwegen….‘

‘De oorlog tegen het arme deel van de VS bevolking‘

‘JFK de moord: de macht van de geheime diensten gecombineerd met die van het militair-industrieel complex‘

‘J.F. Kennedy vermoord door Lyndon Johnson en z’n maten in misdaad, geheime diensten en politiek…..‘

‘Georganiseerde misdaad en overheid, wat is het verschil tussen die twee? Een uiterst hilarische lezing van Michael Parenti over de moord op JFK!‘

‘Kabinet ‘wil kunnen hacken’, zonder daar melding van te maken………. Hoe bedoelt u, ‘politiestaat??’‘

‘Martin Luther King misbruikt door Radio1‘

‘Geëxecuteerd middels suïcide, de manier om van lastige VIP’s af te komen…….‘

‘Nam Kurt Cobain zijn eigen leven? Niet volgens een flink aantal mensen‘

‘Paul Scheffer, het media-orakel met een ‘vlijmscherpe analyse’ over het racistische optreden van de politie in de VS……… AUW!!!‘

Voor meer berichten met/over Martin Luther King, J.F. Kennedy (ook vermoord, alleen in dit geval in opdracht van de CIA), moord, standrechtelijke executies, sociale ongelijkheid, emancipatie, racisme, discriminatie, mensenrechten en/of CIA, klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.

Matthew Barzun, VS ambassadeur voor Groot-Brittannië, is trots op wat de VS wereldwijd presteert……. AUW!!!

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Gistermiddag in ‘Hardtalk’ op BBC World Service (radio), de VS ambassadeur voor Groot-Brittannië, Matthew Barzun. Deze kwast heeft geen andere kwaliteit, dan stinkend rijk zijn en voor Obama’s verkiezing en herverkiezing te hebben gedoneerd. Hier een ‘opmerkelijke’ uitlating van de ‘ambassadeur’: Barzun zei dat hij trots is op de VS en wat dat land wereldwijd doet op het gebied van de vrede en de democratie…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! x 500.000!!!

Wat een idioot: de VS brengt wereldwijd oorlog over miljoenen, slacht er enorme hoeveelheden mensen af en brengt i.p.v. democratie, chaos en instabiliteit!!! Om nog maar te zwijgen over het vernietigen van een enorm aantal gebouwen, huizen, nutsvoorzieningen, ziekenhuizen en een fiks deel van de infrastructuur, dat is weer goed voor de ‘contractors’ die als een stel parasieten achter de troepen aansjokken……….

Na die uitlating van Barzun kreeg ik een dermate hevige en lange lachaanval, dat ik de rest van het gesprek niet meer heb kunnen volgen…… Zoals u ziet, heb ik (voor sommigen jammer genoeg) e.e.a. overleefd.

Ongelofelijk wat een klootzak die Barzun!!!

Voor berichten over/met Afghanistan, Irak, Libië, Jemen, Oekraïne, Syrië, staatsterreur, terreur, democratie, illegale oorlog, CIA, opstand en/of staatsgreep (ook een ‘fijne manier van doen’, vaak gebruikt door de VS: een opstand op poten zetten en daarna een staatsgreep plegen, uiteraard met CIA hulp, zoals in Oekraïne…), klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.

VS weigert drie van haar in Syrië omgekomen soldaten terug te nemen….. Ofwel de VS valt alweer door de ‘terreur mand!!!’

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Las gisteren op het blog van Stan van Houcke, dat de VS weigert 3 van haar militairen (‘special forces’ dan wel CIA) op te halen uit Syrië. De 3 waren daar omgekomen bij een bombardement van Rusland op een commandocentrum van Al Qaida, op 6 oktober j.l., nabij de Syrische plaats al-Latamneh. De soldaten waren uitgerust met een militair insigne, dat sterk lijkt, op dat van IS……. Het gaat volgens het bericht om minstens 3 van deze soldaten….

Kortom de VS dondert alweer keihard door de mand. Eerder bleek al uit satellietbeelden, dat de VS, als het IS stellingen bombardeert, in werkelijkheid vaak plekken in de woestijn bombardeert, waar geen hond te vinden is……* Dit nog naast de vele malen, dat de VS is betrapt op het leveren van wapens en het verlenen van hand en spandiensten aan zowel Al Qaida, als IS (= ISIS)…..

Sinds de Russen IS, Al Qaida, al-Nusra en andere terreurgroepen bombarderen in Syrië, heeft het bereikt, wat de VS in ruim meer dan een jaar niet is gelukt (vanaf augustus 2014): deze terreurgroepen echt flinke klappen toebrengen………..

Nog even een uitspraak van de Britse oud-ambassadeur voor Syrië, Peter Ford: hij stelde onlangs (vandaag gepubliceerd op ICH)  dat alle gewapende oppositie groepen die in Syrië vechten, dus ook die wij ‘gematigd’ noemen, bestaan uit radicale islamieten, die niet, of amper verschillen van IS……. Klik wat dat betreft ook op het label al-Nusra, onder dit bericht.

Hier het artikel van de site van van Houcke (overgenomen van de site ‘What Does It Mean.com):

U.S. and ISIS

October 6, 2015

Obama Refuses To Accept US Soldiers Bodies Killed By Russian Airstrikes In Syria

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A grim new Ministry of Defense (MoD)
report circulating in the Kremlin today states that the Obama regime
has refused to repatriate the bodies of at least 3 suspected US Special
Forces/Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) soldiers killed by devastating Aerospace Forces air attacks upon an al Qaeda command-and-control center in the Syrian village of al-Latamneh that caused the deaths of over 134 terrorists and forced another estimated 3,000 of these enemy forces to flee to Jordan.

According to this report, and which we had previously reported on too,
Russian combat commanders in Syria had feared the loss of American
troops due to Aerospace Forces attacks on terrorist bases as these US
Special Forces operating illegally in this war zone as commanders were
ordered by the Obama regime to wear a combat designation patch on their uniforms that is nearly identical to that worn by ISIS/ISIL troops thus putting their lives in grave danger, and which at least 3 of the terrorists killed in al-Latamneh were wearing. 


US Special Forces Patch (left) ISIS/ISIL Patch (right)

Immediately after Aerospace Forces attacks had destroyed the al Qaeda
forces in al-Latamneh, this report continues, intelligence unites of the
Syrian Arab Army (SAA) identified these suspected American troops based upon their finding of “highly skilled”
forgeries of their identification documents upon their bodies and, most
importantly, satellite phones in their possession showing numerous
calls made to various US military bases in Jordan, Bahrain and the
United States. 

Important to note, this report says, is that the Obama regime started working with al Qaeda in Syria this past August after this terror group changed its name to al-Nusra Front at
the request of the Pentagon in an attempt to keep hidden from the
America people why its government was now working with the terror group
it had been at war with since 11 September 2001 after they had killed
over 3,000 innocent Americans.

Austrian general, Matthias Ghalem, who in August was leading
international troops in the occupied Golan Heights, this report notes,
confirmed the Obama regimes “unholy” alliance with al Qaeda by reporting that the leader
of the al-Nusra terrorist group had met with two CIA officers as well
as Saudi deputy minister of defense Prince Salman bin Sultan in Jordan’s
capital city of Amman.

General Ghalem further reported that al-Nusra Front leader Abu-Mohammad al-Jolani signed a financial-military contract with the CIA at this meeting where also attending were two deputies of Obama regime official Robert Stephen Ford who was the former US ambassador to Syria.

Upon being notified by the SAA of these
suspected American war dead, this report continues, MoD intelligence
coordinators contacted their US counterparts and provided all relevant
information about these bodies and their possessions whereupon the
Pentagon then cut off all contact stating that they were not authorized
to discuss this matter any further. 

As to the final disposition of these
believed to be bodies of American soldiers this report doesn’t say, but,
if past protocols are followed, they would be sent to Moscow where
further MoD forensic examinations would be made, a secret agreement
reached to repatriate them to the US, and an announcement by the
Pentagon that these men were killed in either a plane crash or training
accident. 

On the other hand, though, this may not
be the case as the Obama regime has (obviously) gone mad and we’re not
in normal times anymore—and as, perhaps, best stated by Foreign Ministry
spokeswoman Maria Zakharova who earlier today in lamenting the West’s smear campaign against Russia stated: 

“Blaming
the Russian Air Force for the death of civilians, and even more
sinisterly, the death of children, is pure propaganda. If you show a kid
who’s bringing bread to his family hiding from Russian bombings, then
show a kid whose parents have been beheaded by IS [militants], against
whom our guys, our servicemen are fighting for in the region.”

Like those of the children and their parents in Syria who refused to renounce their Christian faith and were then tortured and crucified to death while calling the name of Jesus by these American supported terrorists. 

And even though the Obama regime, along
with its media lapdogs, still refuse to call this war what it is, the
same cannot be said about Saudi Arabia, whose top clerics have now issued a call for jihad against Russia characterizing the Federations actions as an “Orthodox Christian crusade”…which in fact it actually is. 

As to when our world changed and Russia
became the global protector of Christianity against Islamic madmen,
while at the same time the United States has become the protector of
Islamic terrorists devoted to wiping Christianity out, is anyone’s
guess—but with Russia now having ordered one of its main intelligence ships that coordinates nuclear strikes to Syria, the SSV 231 Vasily Nikitich Tatishchev, one can, also, clearly see where this whole mess is going to end up.  

Other reports to read on the September 2015 War include: Putin Authorizes Air Strikes On “American Interests” As Thousands Of Russian Troops Pour Into Syria   Fears Explode In Russia After Obama Orders Sudden 9/11 Type War Drill   Russian Troops Put On Combat Alert Over Obama Regime False Flag Fears  Putin Activates Shocking “Defend Israel” Atomic War Plan  US-EU Refuse To Accept Massive List Of 87,000 Islamic Terrorists From Russia  CIA Breaks With Obama, Vows To Help Russia Defeat ISIL/ISIS  Russian Atomic Bombers Ordered To “First-Strike Zones” As Germany Nears Collapse  Russian Report States Total Defeat Of US Military Would Take 3 Weeks  Obama In Ecstasy As “Nuclear Tsunami” Ignites Islamic End Times Fears  Russia Begins September War, Issues Dire Warning To Britain

Other reports to read on the October 2015 War include: Putin Orders Military Draft Of 150,000 As Russian Air Fury Pounds Syria  Oregon Mass Shooter On Terror List Obama Refused To Take From Russia  Putin Orders Syrian Ground War To Begin As NATO Masses Forces

October 6, 2015 © EU and US all rights
reserved.  Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted
under the condition it is linked back to its original source at
WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

[Ed. Note: Western governments and
their intelligence services actively campaign against the information
found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many
catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly
disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know
the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those
governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a
longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit
and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]

It’s All Right There In Front Of You! But Who Has Eyes To See Anymore?

They Are Going To Come For You…Why Are You Helping Them?

Return To Main Page


http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1923.htm

Mijn excuus voor de opmaak, deze kreeg ik niet op orde.

* Het maakt het militair-industrieel complex niet uit, dat
er niets van belang wordt geraakt met haar bommen, als ze maar gebruikt
worden….. Bovendien heeft dit complex er alle belang bij, dat de
situatie in Syrië en in het Midden-Oosten in het groot, instabiel
blijft, dat is goed voor de omzet!! Vergeet hierbij niet, dat politici van de VVD en de PvdA (plus CDA en D666) grootlobbyisten zijn van het militair-industrieel complex….

Zie ook: ‘Wijninga HCSS: Rusland en het Syrische leger bevechten alleen het ‘Vrije’ Syrische Leger….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘

       en:  ‘Farid Shawky 6 jaar, vermoord, met dank aan Saoedische bemoeienis in Jemen…….‘

       en: ‘VS bombardeert ‘burgerlijke infrastructuur’ in Syrië, ofwel de zoveelste oorlogsmisdaad begaan door de VS…….‘

Voor meer berichten over/met ISIS, Al Qaida, al- Nusra, Syrië, Rusland, Turkije (ook een goede bondgenoot van IS en Al Qaida, zoals Saoedi-Arabië), terreur en/of VS, klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.

Anne Frank, stek van haar boom wordt geplant op Ground Zero, New York……..

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Ik wist niet wat ik hoorde, toen afgelopen maandag (voor 17.00 u.) in het BNR media overzicht werd gemeld, dat 1 stek van de boom, waarop Anne Frank had uitgekeken vanuit het Achterhuis, zal worden geplant op Ground Zero in New York……. Waar slaat ‘t godverdomme op??!!! Hebben nazi’s de aanslagen in 2001 bedacht en geregisseerd, i.p.v. de CIA en de NSA???

Trouwens als ik me niet vergis, waren er wonderwel amper, of geen Joodse slachtoffers te betreuren bij die aanslagen……… Als het om de herdenking gaat van het grote aantal slachtoffers dat daar viel, kan er beter een stek worden geplant in Vietnam, Cambodja, Laos, Indonesië en Irak, waar de VS zo ongehoord en illegaal tekeer ging………….. Waar er ook nog een paar gereserveerd kunnen worden, voor de grote hoeveelheid doden in Zuid- en Midden-Amerika, die daar door toedoen van illegaal VS ingrijpen zijn gevallen……… Intussen zijn er door VS bemoeienis een enorm aantal doden gevallen in Syrië, daar de VS daar islamitische terreurorganisaties van wapens en training voorzag……

Zie bijvoorbeeld: ‘Indonesië, Untung-putsch: 2 oktober 1965, de dag dat de grote slachting begon……….‘

Zie ook: ‘‘Anne’ het toneelstuk…….‘

        en: ‘Anne Frank, of het grote geld verdienen over de rug van een nazi-slachtoffer………..‘

        en: ‘Achterhuis van Anne Frank als decor voor een spel, héééél educatief en héééél plat geldgraaien………‘

        en: ‘Dagboek Anne Frank: of geld verdienen over de rug van een vermoorde meid……‘

        en: ‘Anne Frank Stichting schiet er mijlenver naast wat betreft discriminatie……‘

        en: ‘Anne Frank opnieuw uitgenomen, nu door Ilja Pfeijffer‘

Voor meer berichten met/over Anne Frank, 911, CIA, Vietnam, Indonesië, Cambodja, Laos, Irak, Syrie en/of VS, klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.

Indonesië, Untung-putsch: 2 oktober 1965, de dag dat de grote slachting begon……….

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Vandaag is het 50 jaar geleden, dat in Indonesië een door de CIA opgezette staatsgreep (de ‘Untung-putsch’) en een slachting begon in Indonesië, een staatsgreep tegen de toenmalig democratisch gekozen regering van Soekarno…….. De VS had (en heeft) de pest aan socialisten en communisten, had Indonesië nodig voor grondstoffen en steunpunt in de smerige oorlog tegen Noord-Vietnam, dat waren de redenen voor deze staatsgreep. Het was tevens het teken voor het oppakken van iedereen waarvan men maar de idee had, dat die ‘linkse sympathieën’ had. Onder de slachtoffers o.a. Chinezen (die vaak al generaties lang Indonesiër waren), leraren, vakbondsmensen, studenten en intellectuelen. In totaal werden er naar schatting bijna een miljoen mensen op de vreselijkste manieren afgeslacht, verkracht, doodgemarteld en onder vreselijke omstandigheden gevangen gezet, waar velen al snel crepeerden……. De VS zorgden er voor dat moordenaar en fascist Soeharto het bewind overnam, onder het bloederige bewind van deze psychopathische dictator voltrok zich de, voor die tijd, grootste slachting sinds de Tweede Wereldoorlog.

Dit was één van de vele door de VS en dan m.n. door de CIA opgezette staatsgrepen, die in feite een verschrikkelijke dood voor velen betekenden. De laatste keer dat de CIA dit deed (voor zover bij mij bekend) is de opstand en de staatsgreep tegen/op de democratisch gekozen regering van Oekraïne, de regering Janoekovytsj. De aanzet daartoe moet net iets na die van Syrië zijn geweest, ook daar heeft de VS de opstand op touw gezet, die opstand (in Syrië) was, zoals we intussen weten ‘iets minder succesvol’ en de staatsgreep tegen Assad mislukte. Volgens een rapport van de VN, uit mei van dit jaar, zouden er in Oekraïne toen al 6.000 doden te betreuren zijn geweest, burgers, opstandelingen (die de VN ‘volkomen neutraal’ pro-Russische separatisten durft te noemen) en militairen………. Het aantal doden in Syrië is intussen opgelopen tot ver boven de 200.000……..

Voor meer berichten over Soekarno, Indonesië, CIA, Oekraïne, Viktor Janoekovytsj en/of Petro Porosjenko, klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.  

Van de Camp wil ‘treinmarshal’ op internationale treinen in de EU…….. OEI!!!!

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Het was al weer even stil, rond de houten CDA leernicht van de Camp, dus leek het hem een goed plan, eens met een dapper verhaal de media te halen. Na een lang weekeinde hersenstormen was hij eruit: er moeten ‘treinmarshals’ op de internationale treinen in de EU. Waarom? Nou simpel, er is één voorbeeld van een idioot die dacht tekeer te kunnen gaan in een internationale trein, genoeg redenen om willens en wetens wapens aan boord van die treinen te brengen, samen met de bedieners van die wapens: ‘treinmarshals’. Dit naar voorbeeld van de ‘airmarshals’ op internationale vluchten. Vervolgens blijft er één voorbeeld over: de aanslagen op (landelijke) treinen in Spanje…….. Dat er sinds 2001 praktisch niets meer is gebeurd aan boord van vliegtuigen, is volgens van de Camp het bewijs, dat deze methode werkt….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Van de Camp was even vergeten naar de jaren voor 2001 te kijken en te zien, hoeveel toestellen er in de jaren voorafgaand aan 911 werden gekaapt……… Anders had hij kunnen zeggen, dat het effect zelfs met terugwerkende kracht functioneert!!! Bovendien waren de autoriteiten gewaarschuwd voor 911 en toch werd er niet ingegrepen…….. Het gaat te ver om hier verder op in te gaan, maar dat de CIA en NSA betrokken waren bij 911 is een zaak, waar intussen zoveel bewijs voor is, dat zelfs degenen die het aanvankelijk sarcastisch over ‘complotdenkers’ hadden, dit ‘wat minder’ luid laten horen……..

Een ‘treinmarshal’ zal van de Camp, die veel met internationale treinen reist, een veilig gevoel geven, zo liet hij parmantig weten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja, het zou nogal dom zijn, om je eigen plan de grond in te boren en te zeggen dat het eigenlijk nonsens is, zo’n ‘treinmarshal!!’

Van de Camp noemde zelf het voorbeeld van metrotreinen, waar naast de nationale treinen van Spanje, aanslagen op werden gepleegd, te weten die van 2005 in Londen……. Terwijl van de Camp liet weten, het ongewenst te vinden, om op metro’s en nationale treinen ‘treinmarshals’ in te zetten…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Je zou trouwens ook de fascistische aanslag op het station van Bologna als voorbeeld kunnen nemen. Al werd de bewaking van stations daarna een aantal jaren verscherpt, men dacht er niet over om alles en iedereen te gaan controleren, na die aanslag……… Daarover gesproken, ook het beveiligen van treinstations, als waren het internationale vliegvelden, ziet van de Camp niet zitten, hoewel hij daar nog wel wat mogelijkheden zag, dit n.a.v. de dakloze zwartrijder, die in Rotterdam werd gearresteerd een paar weken geleden…… Dan zijn er nog de treinkapingen in Nederland, door Molukse jongeren in de 70er jaren, ook toen verschenen er niet permanent gewapende, niet geüniformeerde agenten op de trein…..

Goed hè, van de Camp wil gewapende figuren aan boord van internationale treinen, terwijl alle aanslagen tot nu toe (althans die gelukt zijn), werden gedaan op ‘lokale metro’s’, of landelijke treinen en juist die wenst hij niet verder ‘dan mogelijk’ te beveiligen. Ja, een treinreis moet nog wel te doen zijn, zonder enorme wachttijden voor het instappen, anders zou treinvervoer wel eens snel kunnen verdwijnen, dan wel teruggebracht worden tot een niveau, waarop treinvervoer eigenlijk niet meer levensvatbaar is….. Hé, die van de Camp, z’n vriend, familie of bekenden, hebben toch niet toevallig aandelen in luchtvaartmaatschappijen…….??? Zelf mag hij dat niet, maar hij kan ze aan een zaakwaarnemer in bewaring geven, voor de tijd, dat hij in de politiek zit………  

Ira Helsloot een op dit vlak deskundig hoogleraar (Radboud), maakte gehakt van het verhaal dat van de Camp afstak en stelde dat er dus enorme kosten gemaakt moeten worden, omdat er één geval bekend is, waarbij een ‘terrorist’ aan boord van een trein werd gepakt, die daar iets van plan was….. Van de Camp werd echt pissig en stelde dat dit weer eens een wetenschapper was, die vanachter zijn bureau adviezen geeft……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Helsloot is deskundig op dat terrein en van de Camp is politiek grofgraaier in Brussel, wie van de twee heeft meer recht van spreken denkt u???? Nee, van de Camp weet vanuit het pluche, wat deskundig verantwoord is in de EU…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Jezus wat een flapdrol!!! Even later verantwoordde van de Camp zich, met de woorden dat Helsloot een fatalist is en dat hij politieke verantwoordelijkheid heeft…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Overigens kreeg van de Camp ook weerwoord van FNV vakbondsman van den Dungen, die sprak voor treinpersoneel, deze kwam met dezelfde kritiek als Helsloot en stelde dat je bij dit soort maatregelen al het treinverkeer moet beveiligen. Zo van: terroristen zijn niet dom, als ze zien dat een internationale trein onmogelijk is, waarom zouden ze dan niet een dubbeldekstrein in de spits nemen…..?? Over de mogelijkheid, dat er een op afstand bedienbare bom ‘aan boord’ van een trein gebracht kan worden, werd niet eens gesproken….. Of wat moet één ‘treinmarshal’ uitrichten tegen tien terroristen, of sturen we met elke internationale trein 20 van die ‘marshals’ mee?????

Van de Camp? Knotsknettergek!! Waarschijnlijk voelt hij zich pas echt veilig als iedereen 24/7 in de gaten wordt gehouden in een maatschappij, die dan onleefbaar zal blijken te zijn………..

Voor meer berichten met/over terreur, terroristen, Bologna, veiligheid, Molukkers, onveiligheidsgevoel en/of van de Camp, klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.