VS heeft beslag gelegd op 5 miljard dollar van Venezuela voor medicijnaankopen

De Trump administratie heeft het bij
wijze van spreken uitgeschreeuwd: Maduro onthoudt de bevolking de
noodzakelijke medicijnen….. Eenzelfde schreeuwerige houding
gebruikte de Trump administratie voor de humanitaire hulp die
‘Maduro’ tegenhield aan de grens met Colombia, waar 4 vrachtwagens
met overbodige humanitaire hulp uit de VS werden tegengehouden,
volgens de Trump administratie bevonden zich daar ook medicijnen
tussen…..

Ten eerste was er al voldoende
humanitaire hulp in het land, zo lieten het Rode Kruis en de VN
weten, die samen met het Venezolaanse leger allang bezig waren met de
verspreiding van die goederen…. Ten tweede werd de claim van deze
fascistische administratie dat zich medicijnen tussen die goederen
bevonden, tegengesproken door USAID, NB een overheidsorgaan in de VS
dat verantwoordelijk is voor het samenstellen en de verzending van de
humanitaire hulpgoederen!!

Nu blijkt uit een artikel van Paul
Dobson, eerder gepubliceerd op Venezuelanalysis (door mij
overgenomen van Information Clearing House, de foto komt van Venezuelanalysis), dat dezelfde
schreeuwerige Trump administratie beslag heeft gelegd op maar liefst
5 miljard dollar van Venezuela voor de aankoop van medicijnen…..

Kortom de VS wil een staatsgreep
forceren in Venezuela en heeft daarbij schijt aan het mensenleed en
de doden, die worden veroorzaakt door haar meer dan schunnige
optreden tegen in feite het Venezolaanse volk……. En waarvoor
beste bezoeker? Voor de bijna grootste olievoorraad ter wereld en een
enorme voorraad coltan, van groot belang voor de productie van
smartphones! Bovendien voert Maduro een zoveel mogelijk
socialistisch bewind en daarmee teken je als regering in feite je
doodvonnis, die door de VS zal worden voltrokken, zeker als het bewuste land in Latijns-Amerika
ligt…..

Lees het volgende artikel en geeft het
door, de reguliere (massa-) media liegen keihard mee met de VS en
zijn daarmee mede verantwoordelijk voor de grote ellende in
Venezuela, die één op één is veroorzaakt door eerst de illegale
economische oorlog van de VS tegen Venezuela en later de sancties die zoals gezegd ook worden gesteund door de EU en waarbij enorme kapitalen aan Venezolaanse tegoeden werden bevroren, anders gezegd gestolen….. Zo ook de Venezolaanse tegoeden voor medicijnaankopen door de VS……..

De illegale economische oorlog werd gevoerd door levensmiddelenbedrijven (met VS supermarktketens in Venezuela) en farmaceuten onder druk te zetten, geen of zo min mogelijk levensmiddelen en medicijnen te leveren aan Venezuela…….. Ofwel je veroorzaakt grote tekorten aan voedsel en medicijnen, waarbij de wereld en daarmee het Venezolaanse volk wordt verteld dat haar regering de bevolking voedsel en medicijnen onthoudt……

Zoals gezegd: deze illegale economische oorlog is ingeruild voor de zogenaamde officiële
sancties van de VS tegen het volk van Venezuela, want daar komt het op neer…… Uitermate schunnig dat ook de EU en
Canada de VS steunen met haar, wat je niet anders kan noemen dan, terreur tegen het Venezolaanse
volk…….

Vanmorgen meldde de NOS nieuwsredactie op Radio1 dat het  Rode Kruis nu ook humanitaire hulpgoederen gaat leveren aan Venezuela, een heel smerige leugen daar zoals hierboven al aangegeven, het Rode Kruis eerder al bekendmaakte dat het humanitaire hulpgoederen verstrekt in Venezuela* en daarbij zelfs aangaf dat de humanitaire hulp uit de VS overbodig was….. Later meer over deze smerige anti-Venezolaanse propaganda van de NOS.

Maduro:
US Withholding $5bn of Medical Supplies in ‘Criminal’ Measure

Maduro’s
accusations came at a government re-launch of the pharmaceutical
sector.
President Nicolas Maduro at the Jipana medical supply warehouse in Miranda State (@NicolasMaduro / Twitter)

President
Nicolas Maduro at the Jipana medical supply warehouse in Miranda
State (@NicolasMaduro / Twitter)


By
Paul Dobson

March
21, 2019 “Information
Clearing House
” – The US government is withholding
US $5 billion which was meant for the purchase of medicines and raw
materials used in medical production, President Nicolas Maduro
claimed Wednesday.


Speaking
from Miranda State, Maduro denounced that US authorities “have
‘kidnapped’ US $5 billion [in] one of the most criminal, brutal,
fascist economic measures which has been seen in the economic history
of the world.” “Trump is the person responsible,” he added.


US
and European governments have been working on freezing Venezuelan
assets in recent months, including 
CITGO,
the US-based subsidiary of state oil firm PDVSA, as well as US $1.2
billion worth of
 gold
held in the Bank of England
.
According to Washington, these assets are being held to finance a
“future government” led by
 self-declared
“Interim President” Juan Guaido
 and
to avoid alleged corruption on the part of the current government. US
Vice President Mike Pence recently urged other countries to apply
similar measures against Venezuelan assets.


The
asset freezes have come alongside sanctions, with an 
oil
embargo
 imposed
in late January and sanctions against the 
mining
sector
 announced
earlier this week.


Maduro’s
accusations coincided with a visit by a delegation from the office of
the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. The delegation
is in Venezuela doing preliminary investigative work and meeting with
pro- and anti-government actors in preparation for a possible future
visit by UN High Commissioner Michelle Bachelet.


While
conclusions have yet to be announced, Bachelet did state this week
that US-led financial measures, including the withholding of assets
and
 sanctions “contribute
to the worsening of the economic situation [in Venezuela] and will
impact on human rights and wellbeing of the people.”


Bachelet
also expressed her “great concern for the magnitude and gravity of
the repercussions of the actual crisis on human rights, which also
constitutes a dynamic factor in regional destabilization” and
underlined the “deteriorating” condition of the health system. In
addition to condemning US-led sanctions, Bachelet also took aim at
the Maduro government, criticizing what she termed legal
irregularities in the detention of citizens by certain branches of
the state security forces.


On
Thursday, the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva also 
approved a
resolution presented by the Non-Aligned Movement regarding the
negative impact of sanctions on Venezuelan human rights.

Pharmaceutical
sector re-launched

Speaking
from the Jipana automatised medical supply warehouse, Maduro
announced the revamping of the public-sector pharmaceutical industry
as the government looks to overcome severe shortages in the country’s
medical sector. Maduro had previously identified the pharmaceutical
industry as playing a key role in any solution to the current
economic crisis.

Jipana
is the largest of five warehouses built with Chinese assistance that
help supply the
 Barrio
Adentro health program
,
public hospitals, dental clinics and pharmacies. The other four are
located in Barinas, Lara, Aragua and Anzoátegui States.


As
part of his plans to stimulate the industry, Maduro announced the
creation of a public-private workgroup which will look to fix
consumer prices and cost structures, as well as iron out distributive
and productive bottlenecks in the sector, hinting at the expansion of
a subsidy program based on the
 Homeland
Card
 program
for “those who need it.”


Likewise,
the president once again urged the Venezuelan pharmaceutical industry
to work towards replacing imports with nationally produced goods.
Venezuela’s medical industry is heavily dependent on imports,
especially of raw materials and active principles used in medicine
production. Access to the global financial system has been hindered
by US-led sanctions limiting the country’s ability to pay for
imported medicine and exasperating pre-existing shortages in the
industry.


In
this context, Maduro highlighted international support and trade
deals in supplying Venezuelan hospitals and pharmacies, particularly
from Cuba, China, Russia, Iran, Turkey, Belarus, as well as the World
Health Organisation (WHO).


The
Venezuelan leader told the nation that “various” tonnes of
medicine to supply the public sector medical network are due to
arrive next week from Russia as part of the new bilateral agreements.
In late February, 7.5 tonnes of medicine arrived from Moscow with the
support of the WHO and the Pan-American Health Organisation, while
weeks before over 
900
tonnes
 of
medicine from Cuba and China also arrived at Venezuelan ports.


Russian
authorities have continued to back the elected Venezuelan government
despite mounting pressure from Washington for Moscow to recognise
Guaido. Both countries held talks centered on Venezuela this week in
Rome, but no concrete agreements were reached.


“No,
we did not come to a meeting of minds,” U.S. special
representative
 Elliot
Abrams
 told
reporters. “Who gets the title of president” in Venezuela is
still a point of contention between the countries, he added. Russian
spokespersons agreed that the meeting had been unsuccessful, telling
press, “We failed to narrow positions.”


This
article was originally published by “
Venezuelanalysis

============================================

* Zie: ‘Venezuela zou humanitaire hulp weigeren, het echte verhaal ziet er ‘iets anders’ uit‘ (180 graden anders, wel te verstaan) en: ‘Venezuela: 4 belangrijke zaken aangaande humanitaire hulp waarover de reguliere media niet berichten

Zie ook:

Venezuela: VS ministerie van BuZa publiceert per ongeluk een lijst met sadistische terreurdaden tegen het Venezolaanse volk

Venezolaanse ambassade in Washington belaagd, er mag zelfs geen voedsel worden gebracht….

Venezuela: ultieme couppoging van Guaidó mislukt

Trump vermoordde al 40.000 Venezolaanse burgers

Venezuela: in geheime zitting in Washington is gesproken over een militaire inval

VS legt nog meer sancties op aan de bevolking van Venezuela, Cuba en Nicaragua

Venezuela is nog lang niet verslagen door de VS

Venezolaanse regering treft nieuwe regeling voor hulpgoederen van het Rode Kruis, ‘onafhankelijk NOS’ brengt alweer fake news

Venezuela: onafhankelijke journalisten ontmaskeren leugens over dit land bij presentatie voor de VN

Venezuela: 15 doden door sabotage elektriciteitsnet

Venezuela: het VS volk wordt weer een oorlog in gelogen, zoals eerder in Irak, Libië en Syrië

Venezuela: humanitaire hulp stunt van de VS ingegeven om de kruistocht tegen Maduro een versnelling te geven

Jill Stein (US Green Party): de VS maakt zich druk over armoede in Venezuela terwijl de armen thuis kunnen doodvallen….

Venezuela Aid Live >> Roger Waters (Pink Floyd) terecht tegen benefietconcert

Venezuela: Abrams vindt een meerderheid in de VN Veiligheidsraad genoeg voor een gedwongen regeringswisseling

VS huurlingen bezig met wapentransport gearresteerd in Haïti

Venezuela: VS bedrijf dat wapens smokkelde is gelinkt aan CIA ‘Black Site’ centra

Congreslid Ilhan Omar fileert het monster Elliot Abrams, de speciale gezant van de VS voor Venezuela

Venezuela >> de media willen het socialisme definitief de nek omdraaien

BBC World Service radio >> fake news and other lies about Venezuela‘ (bericht van dit blog)

Joel Voordewind (CU 2de Kamer) bakt de ‘Venezolaanse vluchtelingencrisis’ op Curaçao wel erg bruin en van Ojik (GL 2de Kamer) schiet een Venezolaanse bok

Venezolaanse verandering van regime bekokstoofd door VS en massamedia

Guaidó is een ordinaire couppleger van de VS, e.e.a. gaat volledig in tegen de Venezolaanse constitutie

Venezuela >> regime change: ‘de 12 stappen methode’ die de VS gebruikt

Venezuela >> VS economische oorlogsvoering met gebruikmaking van o.a. IMF en Wereldbank

VS couppleger in Venezuela belooft VS Venezolaanse olie als hij de macht heeft overgenomen

Pompeo: US Military Obligated to “Take Down” the Iranians in Venezuela

(de opgeblazen oorlogshitser en oorlogsmisdadiger Pompeo beweert dat Hezbollah werkzaam is in Venezuela en daar een leger heeft dat gezien zijn woorden amper onderdoet voor de gezamenlijke NAVO troepen… ha! ha! ha! Ook hier is totaal geen bewijs voor deze belachelijke beschuldiging…)

Halliburton en Chevron hebben groot belang bij ‘regime change’ in Venezuela

Mike Pence (vicepresident VS) gaf Guaidó, de door de VS gewenste leider, groen licht voor de coup in Venezuela

VS coup tegen Maduro in volle gang……..

Antiwar Hero Medea Benjamin Disrupts Pompeo Speech on Venezuela

Venezuela’s Military Chief, Foreign Allies Back Maduro

Als de VS stopt met spelen van ‘politieagent’ en het vernielen van de wereld, zullen de slechte krachten winnen……

VS weer op oorlogspad in Latijns-Amerika: Venezuela het volgende slachtoffer…….

Venezuela: VS verandering van regime mislukt >> de Venezolanen wacht een VS invasie

Vast Majority of Democrats Remain Silent or Support Coup in Venezuela

Trump wilde naast de economische oorlogsvoering tegen Venezuela dat land daadwerkelijk militair aanvallen……

Venezolaanse regionale verkiezingen gehekeld door westen, terwijl internationale waarnemers deze als eerlijk beoordeelden……….

Venezuela: Target of Economic Warfare

Venezuela: de anti-propaganda van John Oliver (en het grootste deel westerse massamedia) feilloos doorgeprikt

Venezuela: ‘studentenprotest’ wordt uitgevoerd door ingehuurde troepen………

Abby Martin Busts Open Myths on Venezuela’s Food Crisis: ‘Shelves Fully Stocked’‘ (zie ook de video in dat artikel!)

Rex Tillerson waarschuwt Venezuela voor een coup en beschuldigt China van imperialisme…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Edwin Koopman (VPRO Bureau Buitenland) over Venezolaanse verkiezingen met anti-Maduro propaganda bij de ‘onafhankelijke NOS…..

EU neemt uiterst hypocriet sancties tegen de Venezolaanse regering Maduro………

Venezuela ontwricht, wat de reguliere media u niet vertellen……..

VS steunt rechtse coalitie (MUD) in Venezuela………

Venezuela’s US-Backed Opposition Turns Up The Violence Following Assembly Vote

10 Things You Need to Know About the Terrorist Attack in Venezuela

Venezuelans in the Streets to Support Constituent Assembly

What Mainstream Media Got Wrong About Venezuela’s Constituent Assembly Vote‘ (met mogelijkheid tot directe vertaling)

The Left and Venezuela‘ (met mogelijkheid tot directe vertaling)

Rondje Venezuela schoppen op Radio1………

Karabulut (SP) blij dat ze Maduro eindelijk ook kan schoppen………

Venezuela moet en zal ‘verlost’ worden van Maduro, met ‘oh wonder’ een dikke rol van de VS en de reguliere westerse media

Venezolaanse regering treedt terecht op tegen de uiterst gewelddadige oppositie!!

VS couppleger in Venezuela belooft VS Venezolaanse olie als hij de macht heeft overgenomen

Om
ten overvloede te laten zien, wat een enorme schoft Guaidó is, je
weet wel de figuur die de VS als ‘president’ van Venezuela wil zien
en voor hem bezig is met een staatsgreep in dat land, heeft hij de VS
laten weten dat de grote oliemaatschappijen van de VS de beschikking
zullen krijgen over de Venezolaanse olievoorraad………

Daarbij
maakte de fascistische plork Guaidó bekend dat dit goed zou zijn voor
het Venezolaanse volk dat hij zo heeft verraden……. Alsof de
ploert niet weet dat de economische oorlog van de VS, de EU en een
paar Latijns-Amerikaanse staten, Venezuela naar de rand van de
afgrond hebben gebracht en velen in ellende hebben gestort……

Dan
opmerken dat de beschikking over de Venezolaanse olievoorraad (tegen
een appel en een ei) door de oliemaffia van de VS goed zou zijn voor
de bevolking is een gotspe!!! Kortom: de VS heeft Venezuela naar de
rand van faillissement gebracht en krijgt daarvoor als beloning een
giga deal ten gunste van haar oliemaffia……… (VS
oliemaatschappijen, als Halleburton en Chevron, die ook al kapitalen
verdienden aan de oorlog in Irak….*)

Uiteraard
zal Guaidó als hij daadwerkelijk de macht in handen gespeeld krijgt
door de VS, het staatsoliebedrijf de
Venezolaanse oliemaatschappij Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA),

privatiseren en oude wetgeving veranderen waarin is verordonneerd dat
de winning door buitenlandse oliemaatschappijen voor 51% tegoed komt
aan PDVSA…… Je snapt dat dit percentage niet zal worden verhoogd,
maar aanzienlijk zal worden verlaagd. alsof dat in het belang is van
het Venezolaanse volk………

Kortom
Guaidó is niet alleen door de VS geselecteerd als vervanger voor
Maduro, maar ook als stroman voor de grote oliemaatschappijen…….
Wat verder niet vergeten moet worden is dat Venezuela beschikt over
grote hoeveelheden coltan, daarvoor is afgelopen jaar zelfs een
fabriek geopend in Venezuela >> coltan is een erts dat van
groot belang is voor de vervaardiging van smartphones, ofwel twee neokoloniale vliegen in één klap……..

Nogmaals
wil ik erop wijzen dat het ronduit schandalig is dat de westerse
landen zich zo hysterisch gedragen tegen Venezuela, alsof daar een
genocide plaatsvindt….. Sterker nog: een plaatsvindende genocide in
Jemen laat datzelfde westen koud, terwijl men na Rwanda uitermate
hypocriet beloofde dat dit nooit weer zou gebeuren……**

Nee
het westen heeft alleen aandacht voor wingewest Venezuela en zal geen
traan laten als de VS en de NAVO (o.a. vanuit Colombia, waar de NAVO
2 militaire bases heeft) Venezuela aanvallen en daarbij grote
aantallen burgers vermoorden met hun dan illegale oorlog tegen
dat soevereine land……

Hoe
is ‘t allemaal mogelijk mensen, om schijtziek van te worden!!

Juan
Guaido Promises Oil Deals for US Gas Giants If He Takes Power

February
5, 2019 at 3:14 pm

Written
by 
Jim
Carey

(GPA– Making
the empires ambitions clear, US stooge Juan Guaidó has promised
Venezuelan oil to US corporations.

The
US-backed Venezuelan “government” of Juan Guaidó has said there
will be plenty of money to be made for Wall Street under a government
without the current President, Nicolas Maduro.

According
to reports, this offer was made during a meeting between US officials
and delegates of the Guaidó cabinet in Washington. Apparently,
Guaidó has promised that if he should take control of the actual
levers of state power in Venezuela he would end the control over
Venezuelan oil projects 
currently
given to the state
 oil
company, PDVSA.

The
current law in Venezuela states that any projects involving
Venezuelan oil that PDVSA must have, at least, a 51% stake. According
to the delegates in Washington, this is the best way to reinvigorate
Venezuelan oil production.

In
an interview following their official meetings in Washington, one
Guaidó envoy, Carlos Vecchio, explained this strategy as a part of a
broader policy “to go to an open economy.” Vecchio then went on
to say that this “openness” would be what brings the oil sector
back and reassured US speculators that “the majority of the oil
production that we want to increase will be with the private sector.”

While
this is obviously the reason backs the Guaidó “government” it is
stunning to hear it so openly. Vecchio was just as brazen when asked
about whether PDVSA’s North American subsidiary, Citgo would go
bankrupt or not.

Vecchio
explained that Guaidó “wants to keep the operation running”
which likely reflects on recent moves by Guaidó and his cheerleaders
to try to 
hand
control of Citgo’s
 US
assets and profits to the fraudulent president. This has been a
common measure proposed by many analysts to try to create a slightly
less-illegal-looking way to steal Venezuelan money.

Yet
now that we have confirmation that Guaidó does, in fact, intend to
immediately begin selling off rights to Venezuela’s resources if he
should ever get power, we know exactly where Citgo’s profits will
go in the future. Guaidó may desperately want to control some Citgo
and PDVSA assets for now, but he is also all too willing to sell them
to Wall Street should he get the chance.

This
idea that selling off PDVSA to companies like Exxon – one of the
oil giants kicked out of Venezuela by Hugo Chavez – will somehow
make things better for average citizens of the country, is obviously
ridiculous. Beyond the sheer stupidity and obvious theft, however,
this narrative put forth by Guaidó and the US media totally
whitewashes what is, for all intents and purposes, a 
US
economic blockade
 of
Venezuela and the host of sanction on the nation’s oil industry.

This
pattern of abusive sanctions on Venezuelan oil production has carried
on for years and continues to be a regular tactic imperial powers use
on Venezuela. The Trump regime just enacted their own new sanctions
in this vein last week, strictly restricting the export of oil, which
is expected to further 
harm
the Venezuelan economy
 and
people.

All
of this lays bare just what the US is doing to Venezuela. Washington
has no real concern of the average people actually being hurt in
Venezuela. Instead, Washington is out to rip whatever resources it
can away from the Venezuelan people.

The
oil coming out of the ground in Venezuela could easily be in the
global market right now if it weren’t for Washington’s meddling.
If that oil was on the market, the Bolivarian government would likely
return to deploying the policies they’ve always championed like
public housing, subsidized medicine, price controls, health care, and
other social welfare programs. Looking at it this way, it becomes
obvious the only people holding the Venezuelan people back is the
same people promising freedom, the opposition’s supposed “friends
in Washington”

Op-ed
by 
Jim
Carey
 / Creative
Commons
 / Geopolitics
Alert
 / Report
a typo

====================================

Zie: Halliburton en Chevron hebben groot belang bij ‘regime change’ in Venezuela


**
Niet alleen de Saoedische terreurcoalitie, inclusief mededaders VS en
GB, zouden vervolgd moeten worden door het Internationaal Strafhof in
Den Haag (het ICC), maar ook de westerse landen die op de hoogte zijn
van de genocide in Jemen, maar daar niet op reageren, of erger nog als
Nederland wapens dan wel onderdelen voor wapensystemen leveren aan
de Saoedische terreurcoalitie die deze genocide uitvoert…….

Zie ook:

Tirannie op de straten van Washington, een vergelijking met de start van nazi-Duitsland

Pence to offer ‘carrots’ to Venezuela military, warnings to judges

Venezuela: VS ministerie van BuZa publiceert per ongeluk een lijst met sadistische terreurdaden tegen het Venezolaanse volk

Venezolaanse ambassade in Washington belaagd, er mag zelfs geen voedsel worden gebracht….

Congreslid Ilhan Omar fileert het monster Elliot Abrams, de speciale gezant van de VS voor Venezuela

Venezuela >> de media willen het socialisme definitief de nek omdraaien

Joel Voordewind (CU 2de Kamer) bakt de ‘Venezolaanse vluchtelingencrisis’ op Curaçao wel erg bruin en van Ojik (GL 2de Kamer) schiet een Venezolaanse bok

BBC World Service radio >> fake news and other lies about Venezuela‘ (bericht van dit blog)

Venezolaanse verandering van regime bekokstoofd door VS en massamedia

Venezuela zou humanitaire hulp weigeren, het echte verhaal ziet er ‘iets anders’ uit

Guaidó is een ordinaire couppleger van de VS, e.e.a. gaat volledig in tegen de Venezolaanse constitutie

Venezuela >> regime change: ‘de 12 stappen methode’ die de VS gebruikt

Venezuela >> VS economische oorlogsvoering met gebruikmaking van o.a. IMF en Wereldbank

Pompeo: US Military Obligated to “Take Down” the Iranians in Venezuela

(de opgeblazen oorlogshitser en oorlogsmisdadiger Pompeo beweert dat Hezbollah werkzaam is in Venezuela en daar een leger heeft dat gezien zijn woorden amper onder doet voor de gezamenlijke NAVO troepen… ha! ha! ha! Ook hier is totaal geen bewijs voor deze belachelijke beschuldiging…)

Mike Pence (vicepresident VS) gaf Guaidó, de door de VS gewenste leider, groen licht voor de coup in Venezuela

VS coup tegen Maduro in volle gang……..

Antiwar Hero Medea Benjamin Disrupts Pompeo Speech on Venezuela

Venezuela’s Military Chief, Foreign Allies Back Maduro

Als de VS stopt met spelen van ‘politieagent’ en het vernielen van de wereld, zullen de slechte krachten winnen……

VS weer op oorlogspad in Latijns-Amerika: Venezuela het volgende slachtoffer…….

Venezuela: VS verandering van regime mislukt >> de Venezolanen wacht een VS invasie

Vast Majority of Democrats Remain Silent or Support Coup in Venezuela

Trump wilde naast de economische oorlogsvoering tegen Venezuela dat land daadwerkelijk militair aanvallen……

Venezolaanse regionale verkiezingen gehekeld door westen, terwijl internationale waarnemers deze als eerlijk beoordeelden……….

Venezuela: Target of Economic Warfare

Venezuela: de anti-propaganda van John Oliver (en het grootste deel westerse massamedia) feilloos doorgeprikt

Venezuela: ‘studentenprotest’ wordt uitgevoerd door ingehuurde troepen………

Abby Martin Busts Open Myths on Venezuela’s Food Crisis: ‘Shelves Fully Stocked’‘ (zie ook de video in dat artikel!)

Rex Tillerson waarschuwt Venezuela voor een coup en beschuldigt China van imperialisme…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Edwin Koopman (VPRO Bureau Buitenland) over Venezolaanse verkiezingen met anti-Maduro propaganda bij de ‘onafhankelijke NOS…..

EU neemt uiterst hypocriet sancties tegen de Venezolaanse regering Maduro………

Venezuela ontwricht, wat de reguliere media u niet vertellen……..

VS steunt rechtse coalitie (MUD) in Venezuela………

Venezuela’s US-Backed Opposition Turns Up The Violence Following Assembly Vote

10 Things You Need to Know About the Terrorist Attack in Venezuela

Venezuelans in the Streets to Support Constituent Assembly

What Mainstream Media Got Wrong About Venezuela’s Constituent Assembly Vote‘ (met mogelijkheid tot directe vertaling)

The Left and Venezuela‘ (met mogelijkheid tot directe vertaling)

Rondje Venezuela schoppen op Radio1………

Karabulut (SP) blij dat ze Maduro eindelijk ook kan schoppen………

Venezuela moet en zal ‘verlost’ worden van Maduro, met ‘oh wonder’ een dikke rol van de VS en de reguliere westerse media

Venezolaanse regering treedt terecht op tegen de uiterst gewelddadige oppositie!!


Zie ook VS terreurbeleid tegen Bolivia:

NOS met fake news over Bolivia

Bolivianen eisen hun president terug


Bolivia: staatsgreep maakt eind aan succesvol presidentschap Evo Morales


Bolivia: bewijs op tafel dat VS aanstuurt op een coup

Bolivia’s Evo Morales ‘unhurt’ after helicopter emergency landing

The US EMBASSY in Bolivia continues carrying out covert actions to support the coup d’état against President Evo Morales.

Bolivia Closes 2018 Among The Highest Economic Growth Rates

Bolivia’s Remarkable Socialist Success Story: President Evo Morales has transformed his country’s economy with an unapologetically left-wing agenda.

Halliburton en Chevron hebben groot belang bij ‘regime change’ in Venezuela

Naast
een paar grote supermarktketens uit de VS, zijn er nog 2
oliemaatschappijen uit de VS werkzaam in Venezuela, Halliburton en
Chevron, beiden hebben groot belang bij een verandering van regering, waar het gewenste regime er een moet zijn met een neoliberaal fascistische inslag….. Echter ook andere maatschappijen in
de olie-industrie, hebben grote belangen bij een
verandering van regime in Venezuela, waar de olie-industrie nu nog is genationaliseerd….. 

Citgo staat ook achter de coup die de VS middels Guaidó bezig is te plegen in Venezuela, terwijl dat bedrijf een
dochter is van de Venezolaanse oliemaatschappij Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA), een
staatsbedrijf…… Te gek voor woorden natuurlijk dat deze firma achter
de wil tot verandering van regeringsideologie staat, zelfs als dit
bedrijf zich niet op Venezolaanse bodem bevindt….. Je snapt dat deze steun vooral is ingegeven om de olie-industrie in Venezuela te privatiseren, zodat de bedrijven weer met megawinsten naar huis kunnen….. 

Bij
zo ongeveer alle directe acties van de VS die erop gericht zijn hen
niet welgevallige regeringen ten val te brengen, dus militair
ingrijpen, worden smerig valse verklaringen afgelegd dat men
democratie en vrijheid wil brengen….. Niet nodig uit te leggen dat
dit eigenlijk nooit lukt, wat wel lukt is het vermoorden van grote aantallen burgers, een land in puin leggen en veelal een land in chaos dompelen (als de VS vertrekt en zelfs als de VS blijft, zie Afghanistan en Irak…..)……

Als
de chaos niet al te groot is, zoals wel het geval met de illegale
oorlog tegen Libië, dus landen als Afghanistan en Irak, beiden
illegaal aangevallen door de VS, hebben bedrijven van de VS voorrang
bij het herstel van de infrastructuur, gebouwen en bij hervatting van de oliewinning….
Zo verdiende Halliburton maar liefst 39.5 miljard dollar aan de
illegale oorlog tegen Irak……

Het
voorgaande, dus de valse grond voor het aanvallen van een land, geldt niet voor Venezuela, openlijk stellen figuren als
Bolton (die eerder achter de couppoging van 2002 tegen Chavez stond)
dat de enorme olievoorraad van dit land een reden is voor militair
ingrijpen door de VS, wat niet wil zeggen dat e.e.a. niet gepaard
gaat met valse aantijgingen aan het adres van de regering die moet
wijken, zoals vermeende mensenrechtenschendingen door dit land, ‘onvrijheid’ en economisch
wanbeleid…..* Terwijl de VS voldoende goede banden onderhoudt met
landen die openlijk schijt hebben aan deze zaken, neem Saoedi-Arabië,
de Golfstaten, Egypte en andere landen die met dictatoriale hand
worden bestuurd
…..

De
couppleger die de VS kocht, Guaidó heeft al voor zijn couppoging aangegeven dat hij
de olie-industrie wil privatiseren……

Overigens heeft de VS nog een andere belangrijke grondstof van Venezuela op het oog: coltan, dat wordt gebruikt bij de vervaardiging van smartphones…….

Lees
het volgende uitgebreide artikel van Whitney Webb, eerder
gepubliceerd op Mintpress News en door mij overgenomen van Anti-Media, waarin hij dieper op deze zaak
ingaat en onder meer aangeeft dat de CIA de partij van Guaidó heeft gesubsidieerd…… Voorts het bericht 
dat Chevron met de door Trump
ingestelde sancties tegen Iran een extra winst behaalde van meer dan
4 miljard dollar……. Moet toegeven dat me dit onwaarschijnlijk
lijkt, immers de sancties tegen Iran, die ook de olie-export van dat
land treft, is iets te kort van kracht om een dergelijke megawinst te
behalen, het lijkt me dan ook eerder een winst die behaald werd met
de eerdere sancties van de VS tegen Iran. Maakt niet uit: het
artikel verliest daarmee niets aan waarde:

These
Are the US Companies Backing the Venezuelan Coup Attempt

February
4, 2019 at 1:09 pm

Written
by 
Whitney
Webb

(MPN— For
much of the past twenty years, critics of U.S. foreign policy have
noted that it is often countries with sizeable oil reserves that most
often find themselves the targets of U.S.-backed “humanitarian”
interventions aimed at “restoring democracy.” Analysis of the
nearly two-decades-long U.S. effort aimed at regime change and
“democracy promotion” in Venezuela has long linked such efforts
to the fact that the South American country has the world’s largest
proven oil reserves.

However,
the current U.S. effort to topple the government led by Chavista
politician Nicolás Maduro has become notable for the openness of the
“coup architects” in admitting that putting American corporations
– Chevron and Halliburton chief among them — in charge of
Venezuelan oil resources is the driving factor behind this aggressive
policy.

Last
week, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) – a key player in the Trump
administration’s push for regime change in Caracas – 
tweeted:

Biggest
[American] buyers of Venezuelan oil are Valero Energy & Chevron.
Refining heavy crude from Venezuela supports great jobs in Gulf
Coast. For the sake of these U.S. workers I hope they will begin
working with administration of President [Juan] Guaidó & cut off
illegitimate Maduro regime.”

In
January, the U.S. government recognized Juan Guaidó of
the 
U.S.-funded
and CIA-linked
 Popular
Will Party as the “legitimate” president of the country.

Marco Rubio

@marcorubio

Biggest buyers of Venezuelan oil are @ValeroEnergy & @Chevron. Refining heavy crude from supports great jobs in Gulf Coast.

For the sake of these U.S. workers I hope they will begin working with administration of President Guaido & cut off illegitimate Maduro regime.


3,093

1:34 PM – Jan 24, 2019

A
few hours after Rubio’s tweet, National Security Adviser John
Bolton — who 
actively
supported
 the
U.S.-backed failed Venezuela coup in 2002 — 
appeared
on 
Fox
News
 and
told host Trish Regan the following: “We’re looking at the oil
assets. That’s the single most important income stream to the
government of Venezuela. We’re looking at what to do to that.”

Though
that was a stunning admission in and of itself, Bolton didn’t stop
there. He continued:

We’re
in conversation with major American companies now that are either in
Venezuela, or in the case of Citgo here in the United States. I think
we’re trying to get to the same end result here…. It will make a
big difference to the United States economically if we could have
American oil companies really invest in and produce the oil
capabilities in Venezuela.”

 

Bolton’s
statements have garnered considerable attention in the alternative
media community for their boldness, since leaked cables and documents
have traditionally been the means through which the actual
motivations of U.S. wars have been revealed. Largely overlooked,
however, is the fact that Bolton stated that the Trump administration
is working closely “with major American companies now that are
either in Venezuela, or in the case of Citgo, here in the United
States.”

Given
that Citgo is largely owned by Venezuela’s state oil company
Petroleos de Venezuela SA (PDVSA), Bolton’s statement reveals that
the corporations backing Washington’s regime-change push are those
currently operating in Venezuela.

At
present, there are only two American major oil and oil service
companies with a significant presence in Venezuela – Chevron and
Halliburton. However, Chevron is by far the leading American investor
in Venezuelan oil projects, with Halliburton having 
written
off
 much
of its remaining business interests in the country just last year —
losing hundreds of millions of dollars as a result.

These
two companies have long been “
historic
partners

and have had a solid business relationship between them for decades.
In addition, both have reaped the benefits of past U.S. interventions
abroad — such as the Iraq War, where the U.S. government “opened”
that country’s nationalized oil industry to American oil companies
with military force.

Now
with Venezuela’s nationalized oil industry in the crosshairs,
Chevron and Halliburton are again set to benefit from Washington’s
regime-change policies abroad. Furthermore, as Bolton’s recent
statements suggest, these companies are also the top corporate
sponsors of the current U.S.-backed coup to topple the government in
Caracas.

Profitable
but not Rockefeller-profitable

Chevron’s
history in Venezuela is long and storied, as its presence in the
country dates back more than a century. Over that time, Chevron’s
presence in Venezuela has remained a constant despite the rule of
drastically different governments, from military dictatorships to the
socialist Chavista movement.

For
much of its history in Venezuela, Chevron has had to deal with the
Venezuelan government’s laws regarding oil production,
particularly 
a
1943 law
 that
held that foreign companies could not make greater profits from oil
than they paid to the Venezuelan state. A few decades later in the
1960s, foreign corporations were made to manage their oil extraction
projects in Venezuela by working closely with the Venezuelan Oil
corporation, which later gave way to the current state oil company
PDVSA, created in 1976. It was around this period that Halliburton
first began work in Venezuela.

However,
foreign corporations — particularly American ones — disliked
having to settle for minority stakes in PDVSA projects and longed for
the early days of Venezuela oil extraction when companies like
Rockefeller-owned Standard Oil made wild profits off their Venezuelan
oil assets.

After
the “apertura petrolera” (or “oil opening” to foreign
investment) in the early 1990s — and especially under the
U.S.-backed government of Rafael Caldera, the president who
immediately preceded Hugo Chávez — it seemed that the
privatization of PDVSA was soon to become a reality and companies
like Chevron, ExxonMobil and Halliburton enjoyed the “golden age”
of American oil interests in Venezuela. However, Caldera’s fall
from grace and the rise of Chavismo quickly shattered this
decades-long dream of U.S. corporations and politicians.

Not
only did Chávez end any possibility of PDVSA’s privatization,
he 
also
weakened
 what
remaining influence transnational oil companies had over the state
oil company. For instance, he appointed independent oil experts to
PDVSA’s board of directors, upending years of precedent where PDVSA
managers with close ties to international companies had been
responsible for controlling the board’s membership.

Chávez
further restricted corporate ownership on some oil projects to 49
percent and fired PDVSA’s then-president, replacing him with a
political ally. These drastic changes, among others, led to a strike
among many long-time PDVSA workers, a strike that immediately
preceded the failed U.S.-backed coup attempt in April 2002.

Following
the coup, Chávez dismantled a joint venture originally established
in 1996 between PDVSA and the Venezuelan subsidiary of the U.S.-based
company SAIC, known as INTESA.

INTESA,
per the agreement, had controlled all of PDVSA’s company data (and
its secrets), which it 
then
fed
 to
the U.S. government and U.S. oil corporations until Chávez destroyed
it. This is hardly surprising given that the managers of SAIC at the
time included two former U.S. secretaries of defense and two former
CIA directors. Though obviously a smart move for Chávez, it weakened
an advantage of U.S. corporations who had inside information on PDVSA
while INTESA was operational.

The
tensions between the Chavista government and the U.S. government
along with U.S. corporations only grew from there before reaching a
crescendo in 2007. That year, Chávez 
announced
a decree
 that
would nationalize the remaining oil extraction sites under foreign
company control, giving PDVSA a minimum 60 percent stake in all of
those ventures. U.S. oil companies ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips left
their Venezuelan operations behind as a result, losing billions in
the process. The president of ExxonMobil at the time was Rex
Tillerson — who would later become President Donald Trump’s first
secretary of state.

Yet,
during this time, Chevron, unique among American oil companies, saw
an opportunity and spent the next several years cultivating close
ties to the Chavista government and Chávez himself.

Through
the efforts of Chevron executive Ali Moshiri, Chevron blazed a new
trail that would later serve as a model for foreign oil companies
seeking to do business in Chavista-led Venezuela. Halliburton and
another U.S.-based oil services company, Schlumberger, also decided
to continue business in Venezuela.

During
this time, the Venezuelan government through PDVSA and
Chevron 
entered
into
 several
joint ventures
,
one of the most important of which became known as Petropiar, which
blends Venezuela’s heavy crude oil with other substances to make it
more easily transportable. However, Chevron — due to Chávez’s
reforms of the oil sector — was forced to settle for minority
stakes in all of these ventures.

Halliburton,
which has historically been a main operator for Chevron-owned oil
fields, again partnered with Chevron’s post-2007 ventures in
Venezuela and 
operates the
Petropiar and Petroboscan oil fields that both have minority Chevron
ownership.

For
years, Chevron’s bet on Chavismo paid off and the profits rolled
in. Moshiri even appeared in public on several occasions with Chávez,
who once even called the Chevron executive “
a
dear friend
.”
However, following Chávez’s death in 2013 and the beginning of the
U.S-backed economic siege of Venezuela soon after — first through
joint oil-price manipulation in cooperation with Saudi Arabia and
then through sanctions — the profits of PDVSA, and thus Chevron,
have fallen dramatically. During this time, Houston-based
Schlumberger drastically 
scaled
back
 its
operations in Venezuela.

Since
then, relations between the Maduro-led government and Chevron have
deteriorated precipitously and now, with the current U.S. coup in
motion, Chevron is poised to turn on the Chavista government with the
hopes that profits will not only improve but exceed what they were
during the heights of the Chevron-Chávez partnership.

Betting
on regime change

As
oil production has lagged and profits have continued to slide,
tensions between Chevron and the Maduro government have grown
dramatically since 2017, when the Maduro-led government 
began
arresting
 employees
of Petropiar — the joint venture between Chevron and PDVSA —
during a controversial corruption probe. For Chevron, the issue
exploded after the Venezuelan government last April 
arrested two
Chevron employees working at Petropiar, who were detained for seven
weeks for their alleged role in fraud. Those tensions — in
combination with worries that Chevron’s Venezuela operations could
become unprofitable in less than five years — resulted in 
a
report
 published
by the 
Wall
Street Journal
 claiming
that Chevron was considering leaving Venezuela entirely.

However,
despite media speculation in the U.S., Chevron denied that it was
planning to leave Venezuela anytime soon, with Clay Neff, Chevron’s
president for Africa and Latin America, 
telling Bloomberg,
“we’re committed to Venezuela and we plan to be there for many
years to come,” and adding that reports that Chevron would soon
leave the country were “not accurate.” “We’ve been in the
country for almost 100 years, we know how to operate, we’re a very
experienced operator and we’re committed to our partner PDVSA,”
Neff declared.

Halliburton’s
activities in Venezuela have also taken a hard hit in recent years,
with the company losing over $1 billion in investments since 2017. In
2017, Halliburton was forced to write off $647 million in Venezuelan
investments and then was forced to sell $312 million more last year —
its last remaining investments. Halliburton’s chief financial
officer, Christopher Weber, 
told
the 
New
York Times
 last
year that “the collapse of the Venezuelan currency and the
worsening political climate,” as well as U.S. sanctions, were
responsible for the decision. Halliburton later said 
in
a statement
 that
it planned on “maintaining its presence in Venezuela and is
carefully managing its go-forward exposure.”

Since
both Halliburton and Chevron announced their plans to “weather the
storm” despite growing tensions, it has become more and more
evident that both companies have found the U.S. government’s
promise of increased control over Venezuela’s oil sector through
privatization much more appealing than facing the prospect of
maneuvering around recently imposed U.S. sanctions on PDVSA — which
have been in the works for months — as well as the prospect of
dwindling profits stemming from the continued decline of the
Venezuelan economy and the degradation of its oil-sector
infrastructure.

This
raises the possibility that Chevron and Halliburton had decided to
ride out the Venezuelan economic crisis and growing tensions with
Maduro because it was betting on an aggressive regime-change policy
toward the country. Indeed, some analysts 
have
stated
 that
planning on the current iteration of regime-change policy in
Venezuela only began this past November, around the same time that
Chevron decided to stick it out despite falling profits.

The
fact that Chevron’s operations in Venezuela are 
expected
to collapse
 in
less than five years, as a result of the country’s oil sector and
larger economic woes, lends further support to the possibility that
Chevron sought to back a Washington-based effort to dramatically
alter the Venezuelan government.

In
Halliburton’s case, the fact that the company has already lost over
a billion dollars in its Venezuelan investments since 2017 offers a
different motive, one that involves not only recouping those losses
but also gaining increased contracts in a post-coup Venezuela.

Halliburton
executives surely remember the 
$39.5
billion
 in
profits they made following the U.S. invasion of Iraq. It is worth
pointing out that, in media reports, Halliburton has stated its
commitment “
to
the market in Venezuela
,”
signaling that it is interested in retaining a role in the country’s
oil sector regardless of who governs it.

It
should then come as no surprise that recent U.S. government sanctions
on Venezuela’s oil sectors included exemptions for both Halliburton
and Chevron. Equally unsurprising is the fact that the U.S.-backed
“president” of Venezuela — Juan Guaidó — has already
signaled his plans to open up Venezuela’s state oil assets to
foreign corporations if he succeeds in ousting Maduro.

According
to 
oil
rating agency S&P Global Platts
,
Guaidó has already made “plans to introduce a new national
hydrocarbons law that establishes flexible fiscal and contractual
terms for projects adapted to oil prices and the oil investment
cycle.” This plan would also create a “new hydrocarbons agency”
that will “offer bidding rounds for projects in natural gas and
conventional, heavy and extra-heavy crude” to international oil
corporations.

The
clear message here is that the U.S.-backed “president” of
Venezuela is already signaling to his Washington backers that he will
quickly privatize Venezuela’s state oil company if he succeeds in
taking power, a move that has long been 
a
key component
 of
the platform of Venezuela’s U.S.-funded opposition, of which Guaidó
is part.

Bolton’s
recent statements have made it clear that Chevron and Halliburton are
set to be the main benefactors of this privatization effort, as both
are heavily invested in Venezuela and Chevron the only U.S. oil
company still active in the country. The historically close
relationship of both companies to the U.S. government, and covert
coordination with the U.S. government in undermining or overthrowing
governments in the recent past, also hint at their likely role in the
current U.S. “meddling” in Venezuela.

Boosting
profits through foreign intervention

If
the U.S. succeeds in ousting Maduro and putting Guaidó in his place,
it will only be the latest example of U.S. government policy that
directly benefits the bottom lines of Chevron and Halliburton. In
Chevron’s case, the company’s growth to become one of the largest
oil companies in the world has consistently been aided by the U.S.
establishment, regardless of whether Democrats or Republicans held
the presidency. Indeed,
 as Seeking
Alpha
 noted
:

Chevron’s
stocks gained a combined 247% under Presidents Reagan and George HW
Bush. Under President George W Bush, its shares rose by 157%.
Meanwhile, Chevron’s shares picked up 222% and 112% under
Presidents Clinton and Obama, respectively.”

Notably,
Chevron has also worked with past U.S. presidents in undermining
democratically-elected governments in order to advance its business
interests, with the most recent example taking place in Haiti. 
Cables
published by WikiLeaks
 showed
that Chevron, in 2006 and 2007, partnered with ExxonMobil and the
U.S. government to undermine the presidency of former Haitian
president René Préval after he forged a deal with Chávez’s
PetroCaribe alliance that allowed Haiti to buy subsidized Venezuelan
oil.

Furthermore,
Chevron also 
benefited
greatly
 from
the U.S. invasion of Iraq and its representatives were among those
who met with then-Vice President Dick Cheney in 2003 to plan Iraq’s
“postwar” — i.e., post-invasion — industry that led Chevron
to acquire ownership of several Iraqi oil fields. Notably, the family
of then-President George W. Bush is one of Chevron’s 
largest
shareholders
.
In addition, then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice was 
a
Chevron executive
 throughout
the 1990s, and was in charge of public policy for its board of
directors immediately prior to joining the Bush administration. Rice
even had a Chevron oil tanker named in her honor in 1993.

Though
Chevron greatly benefited from the Bush administration’s
destruction of Iraq, Halliburton came away the biggest winner from
the Iraq war, making 
$39.5
billion
 off
the conflict and its aftermath after being awarded numerous,
lucrative contracts to “rebuild” the country. This outcome is
unsurprising given that Cheney served as the company’s CEO for
decades and retained $34 million in company stock throughout his
tenure as U.S. vice president.

Iraq
had been targeted by the Bush administration soon after Bush came to
power, particularly following the formation of Cheney’s 2001 Energy
Task Force, which called for the privatization of Iraq’s
then-nationalized oil resources and reviewed maps of Iraq’s oil
fields and lists of companies seeking contracts with Baghdad years
before the war officially began.

Investing
in a gung-ho president

Chevron’s
hopes for a continued U.S. government policy that favors its growth
domestically and globally have continued under the Trump
administration and have been visible for some time, as evidenced by
its 
$500,000
donation
 to
Trump’s inaugural committee and their top executive’s praise for
the “pro-business environment” cultivated by the Trump
administration. Indeed, in March 2017, then-Chevron CEO John
Watson 
told CNBC that
he had already met with White House staff on “multiple occasions”
in just the first three months of the administration and had been
“encouraged by those meetings.” “We’ve seen a more
pro-business environment … I think the approach they’re taking
toward business — toward enabling our economy to grow again — is
a real positive,” Watson added.

Halliburton
too has long had high hopes for Trump given that the president 
held
between $50,000 and $100,000
 in
company stock up until December 2016, when he sold his personal
stocks to avoid “conflicts of interest” during his presidency.
However, some of Trump’s earliest policy proposals were described
by the media as 
directly
benefiting
 Halliburton,
including his administration’s push to open more publicly-held
lands in the U.S. to oil drilling.

Furthermore,
the recent scandal that forced Trump’s secretary of the interior,
Ryan Zinke, 
to
resign
 involved
Zinke’s 
alleged
corrupt dealings
 with
Halliburton chairman David Lesar, suggesting that the Trump
administration’s potential for a conflict of interest with
Halliburton did not magically dissipate following Trump’s sale of
his personal investments.

Since
the early days of the administration, both Halliburton and Chevron
have benefited directly from several Trump administration policies,
both foreign and domestic. For instance, Chevron and
Halliburton 
benefited
substantially
 from
the Trump administration’s tax cuts, which were
 recently
found
 to
have had “no major impact” on economic growth or company hiring
practices but instead enabled mega-corporations to 
buy
back stocks en masse
 in
order to increase their companies’ stock prices. After the passage
of those tax cuts, Chevron executives
 urged
governments
 around
the world to implement similar legislation.

In
addition, consider Trump’s 2017 decision to withdraw from the
Extractive Industries

Transparency
Initiative (EITI), which 
Reuters explained
as
 “a
global standard for governments to disclose their revenues from oil,
gas, and mining assets, and for companies to report payments made to
obtain access to publicly owned resources, as well as other
donations.” 
Bloomberg noted at
the time that the Trump administration’s decision to withdraw had
followed “a long lobbying battle waged by the American Petroleum
Institute, Exxon Mobil Corp. and Chevron Corp.”

The
involvement of top U.S. oil corporations like Chevron in the
administration’s decision to withdraw from the EITI led Corinna
Gilfillan, head of the U.S. Office at NGO Global Witness, to state
that it was “Exxon and Chevron’s preference for secrecy that
[had] made it impossible for the U.S. to comply.” Gilfillan
then 
told Common
Dreams
:

When
major Russian and Chinese oil companies are disclosing more
information about their deals around the world than their
U.S. counterparts, you have got to ask: what are Exxon and
Chevron so desperate to hide?”

However,
Chevron, for its part, has not agreed with every Trump policy, as the
company did lob
considerable
criticism
 at
the Trump administration last June over his imposition of steel
tariffs during the first phase of the ongoing “trade war” with
China. Yet, that criticism disappeared a few months later, when
another Trump policy – his draconian sanctions targeting Iran’s
oil sector – took effect. As
the Washington
Examiner
 noted
 this
past November, Trump’s sanction policy targeting Iranian oil “has
proved a lucrative one for the shareholders who own oil companies
such as ExxonMobil and Chevron,” resulting in a jump for those
companies’ third-quarter earnings “that topped Wall Street
expectations by wide margins.”

The Examiner went
onto note that Trump’s sanctions on Iranian oil exports led
Chevron’s net income to more than double to $4.1 billion, with cash
from operations reaching “the highest it has been in nearly five
years.”

However,
Halliburton’s reaction to Trump’s Iran policy is more mixed,
given its considerable business interests in Iran and the fact that
it 
had
benefited
 from
the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) approved by the previous administration of
Barack Obama. Yet, if the Trump administration’s regime-change
policy targeting Iran succeeds, Halliburton will be among the top
beneficiaries of that policy as well, given its already established
presence in the country.

Now,
with Venezuela’s massive oil resources in the Trump
administration’s crosshairs, Chevron stands to gain once again from
Trump’s foreign policy, which has been guided by oil politics in
several instances.

Trump
ready to test out his “Take the Oil” intervention policy

Though
Trump has yet to make bold, Boltonesque public statements regarding
the clear link between Venezuelan oil and his administration’s
regime-change policy, his past statements regarding U.S.
interventions in oil-rich nations elsewhere show that Trump has long
backed U.S. intervention in foreign nations if it meant that the U.S.
could secure that country’s natural resources, namely oil.

For
instance, in 2011, Trump
 told
the 
Wall
Street Journal
 that
he would support U.S.-backed intervention in Libya if the U.S. could
“take the oil.” In the eight years since the U.S.-backed
intervention, Libya remains without a central government and is now
the site of rampant terrorist activity, a massive illegal arms trade,
and a booming slave trade.

Then,
in 2016, candidate Trump again asserted that the U.S. should “take
the oil” when intervening or invading foreign nations.
Trump
 told NBC
News
 in
September 2016 that the terror group Daesh (ISIS) emerged only
because the U.S. had not taken Iraq’s oil after the 2003 invasion.

Trump
also stated, with regard to Iraq, that:

We
go in, we spent $3 trillion. We lose thousands and thousands of
lives, and then look, what happens is we get nothing. You know, it
used to be the victor belong the spoils. Now, there was no victor
there, believe me. There was no victory. But I always said, take the
oil.”

While
Trump has not publicly touted his “take the oil” policy in
relation to the current situation in Venezuela, he has done so
privately during several White House meetings early on in his
presidency. According to 
the Wall
Street Journal
:

Mr.
Trump requested a briefing on Venezuela in his second day in office,
often speaking to his team about the suffering of Venezuelan people
and the country’s immense potential to become a rich nation
through its oil reserves.”

Thus,
Bolton’s as well as Senator Rubio’s frank admissions that the
Trump administration’s Venezuela regime-change policy is about the
oil and giving that oil to American companies, are clearly aligned
with a policy that the president himself has long supported.

Washington’s
gift to Big Oil: privatize PDVSA, no matter the human cost

As
with Iraq, Libya and other U.S. oil-motivated interventions of the
past, the destruction of Venezuela’s nationalized oil industry and
its privatization to American oil companies — especially Chevron
and Halliburton — is the guiding factor behind the U.S.’ current
regime-change policy targeting Caracas. While past administrations
attempted to obfuscate their “wars for oil” as “restoring
democracy,” Trump administration officials and other “coup
architects” have recently “gone off script” and overtly stated
the guiding principle behind its Venezuela policy.

However,
the timing of the Trump administration’s regime-change push in
Venezuela is key. While companies like Chevron and Halliburton have
been hemorrhaging profits in recent years, they have so far withstood
the fallout due to the record high production of U.S. shale oil. Yet,
the “golden age” of U.S. shale is quickly disappearing, with 
top
industry insiders
 like
Harold Hamm along with 
Halliburton’s
rival company
,
Schlumberger, expecting shale output growth to slow by as much as 50
percent 
this
year
.
Hamm is 
a
close confidant
 of
President Trump.

If
this comes to pass, American oil companies will be in a bad way. Yet,
if Guaidó comes to power and privatizes PDVSA, U.S. oil companies —
with Chevron and Halliburton leading the pack — stand to make
record profits in the world’s most oil rich nation, as they did in
Iraq following the privatization of its national oil industry after
U.S. intervention.

Worst
of all, as the U.S.’ past interventions in Iraq and Libya and
elsewhere have shown, Washington stands willing to kill untold
thousands of innocent people in Venezuela — either through 
direct
military intervention
 or a
proxy war
 —
to benefit American oil companies. Will the American people let yet
another presidential administration destroy an entire nation for
Chevron, Halliburton and other powerful American corporations?

==================================

* Het gaat hier niet om economisch wanbeleid. De deplorabele toestand van de economie is één op één te danken aan de eerst stiekeme economische oorlogsvoering van de VS tegen Venezuela, die intussen is veranderd in een openlijke economische oorlogsvoering middels sancties, een oorlog waar ook Canada en de EU zich bij hebben aangesloten, naast fascistisch geregeerde landen als Brazilië, Colombia, Guatemala en Honduras…… (ja ook Nederland bevindt zich weer in ‘goed gezelschap…’)

Zie ook:

Joel Voordewind (CU 2de Kamer) bakt de ‘Venezolaanse vluchtelingencrisis’ op Curaçao wel erg bruin en van Ojik (GL 2de Kamer) schiet een Venezolaanse bok

BBC World Service radio >> fake news and other lies about Venezuela‘ (bericht van dit blog)

Venezolaanse verandering van regime bekokstoofd door VS en massamedia

Venezuela zou humanitaire hulp weigeren, het echte verhaal ziet er ‘iets anders’ uit

Guaidó is een ordinaire couppleger van de VS, e.e.a. gaat volledig in tegen de Venezolaanse constitutie

Venezuela >> regime change: ‘de 12 stappen methode’ die de VS gebruikt

Venezuela >> VS economische oorlogsvoering met gebruikmaking van o.a. IMF en Wereldbank

VS couppleger in Venezuela belooft VS Venezolaanse olie als hij de macht heeft overgenomen

Pompeo: US Military Obligated to “Take Down” the Iranians in Venezuela

(de opgeblazen oorlogshitser en oorlogsmisdadiger Pompeo beweert dat Hezbollah werkzaam is in Venezuela en daar een leger heeft dat gezien zijn woorden amper onder doet voor de gezamenlijke NAVO troepen… ha! ha! ha! Ook hier is totaal geen bewijs voor deze belachelijke beschuldiging…)

Mike Pence (vicepresident VS) gaf Guaidó, de door de VS gewenste leider, groen licht voor de coup in Venezuela

VS coup tegen Maduro in volle gang……..

Antiwar Hero Medea Benjamin Disrupts Pompeo Speech on Venezuela

Venezuela’s Military Chief, Foreign Allies Back Maduro

Als de VS stopt met spelen van ‘politieagent’ en het vernielen van de wereld, zullen de slechte krachten winnen……

VS weer op oorlogspad in Latijns-Amerika: Venezuela het volgende slachtoffer…….

Venezuela: VS verandering van regime mislukt >> de Venezolanen wacht een VS invasie

Vast Majority of Democrats Remain Silent or Support Coup in Venezuela

Trump wilde naast de economische oorlogsvoering tegen Venezuela dat land daadwerkelijk militair aanvallen……

Venezolaanse regionale verkiezingen gehekeld door westen, terwijl internationale waarnemers deze als eerlijk beoordeelden……….

Venezuela: Target of Economic Warfare

Venezuela: de anti-propaganda van John Oliver (en het grootste deel westerse massamedia) feilloos doorgeprikt

Venezuela: ‘studentenprotest’ wordt uitgevoerd door ingehuurde troepen………

Abby Martin Busts Open Myths on Venezuela’s Food Crisis: ‘Shelves Fully Stocked’‘ (zie ook de video in dat artikel!)

Rex Tillerson waarschuwt Venezuela voor een coup en beschuldigt China van imperialisme…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Edwin Koopman (VPRO Bureau Buitenland) over Venezolaanse verkiezingen met anti-Maduro propaganda bij de ‘onafhankelijke NOS…..

EU neemt uiterst hypocriet sancties tegen de Venezolaanse regering Maduro………

Venezuela ontwricht, wat de reguliere media u niet vertellen……..

VS steunt rechtse coalitie (MUD) in Venezuela………

Venezuela’s US-Backed Opposition Turns Up The Violence Following Assembly Vote

10 Things You Need to Know About the Terrorist Attack in Venezuela

Venezuelans in the Streets to Support Constituent Assembly

What Mainstream Media Got Wrong About Venezuela’s Constituent Assembly Vote‘ (met mogelijkheid tot directe vertaling)

The Left and Venezuela‘ (met mogelijkheid tot directe vertaling)

Rondje Venezuela schoppen op Radio1………

Karabulut (SP) blij dat ze Maduro eindelijk ook kan schoppen………

Venezuela moet en zal ‘verlost’ worden van Maduro, met ‘oh wonder’ een dikke rol van de VS en de reguliere westerse media

Venezolaanse regering treedt terecht op tegen de uiterst gewelddadige oppositie!!


Voor VS terreur tegen Bolivia:

NOS met fake news over Bolivia

Bolivianen eisen hun president terug


Bolivia: staatsgreep maakt eind aan succesvol presidentschap Evo Morales


Bolivia: bewijs op tafel dat VS aanstuurt op een coup

Bolivia’s Evo Morales ‘unhurt’ after helicopter emergency landing

The US EMBASSY in Bolivia continues carrying out covert actions to support the coup d’état against President Evo Morales.

Bolivia Closes 2018 Among The Highest Economic Growth Rates

Bolivia’s Remarkable Socialist Success Story: President Evo Morales has transformed his country’s economy with an unapologetically left-wing agenda.

Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………

Naar nu blijkt heeft Hillary Clinton de macht over het Democratic National Committee (DNC) in 2015 in feite overgenomen, nadat ze dit comité redde met een financiële injectie uit het Hillary Victory Fund……

Het DNC had die tekorten te danken aan voormalig wanpresterend voorzitter Wasserman Schultz en het gebrek aan toezicht op dit comité door Obama.

Dat hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton de voorverkiezingen ten koste van de andere Democratische kandidaat Sanders op een heel smerige manier heeft gewonnen, was geen geheim, echter met deze nieuwe feiten wordt nog eens bewezen dat niet de Russen, maar juist het DNC en dan m.n. Clinton een wel heel smerig spel heeft gespeeld……… Niet vreemd dus, dat figuren als Seth Rich, die deel uitmaakte van het Clinton team, uit pure frustratie zaken hebben gelekt naar de pers…….

Donna
Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against
Bernie

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie

November
2, 2017 at 10:18 am

Written
by 
Jake
Johnson

(COMMONDREAMS) — In
an explosive and “
deeply
disturbing

piece
for 
Politico Magazine on
Thursday, former interim chair of the Democratic National Committee
(DNC) Donna Brazile drew upon her brief experience at the
organization’s helm to reveal the extent to which the 2016
nomination process was “rigged” in favor of former Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton.

In
her account, Brazile details the deep “internal corruption” of
the DNC, the role the ostensibly neutral governing body played as a
“fundraising clearing house” for the Clinton team, and how those
dynamics unfairly handicapped primary challenger Bernie Sanders.

Many
of the DNC’s most deeply embedded issues, Brazile notes, spring
both from former chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s poor management
and former President Barack Obama’s neglect, which left the
committee deeply in debt.

In
August 2015, the Clinton campaign—along with the joint fundraising
vehicle with the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund—came to an agreement
with the committee to begin to pay off this debt, which had soared to
$24 million. In exchange, the DNC’s finances were placed “fully
under the control” of the Clinton team, “which seemed to confirm
the suspicions of the Bernie camp,” Brazile writes.

When
the party chooses the nominee, the custom is that the candidate’s
team starts to exercise more control over the party,” Brazile
observed. “This victory fund agreement, however, had been
signed…just four months after Hillary announced her candidacy and
nearly a year before she officially had the nomination.”

Brazile
goes on to describe the terms of the agreement, which she describes
as “unethical”:

The
agreement…specified that in exchange for raising money and
investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances,
strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of
refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it
would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was
required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing,
budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.

Brazile
concludes the piece, which is an adapted excerpt from her forthcoming
book, by detailing a conversation she had with Sen. Bernie Sanders
(I-Vt.) shortly after she found the “cancer” at the heart of the
DNC—this so-called “Joint Fundraising Agreement.”

How
much control Brooklyn had and for how long was still something I had
been trying to uncover for the last few weeks. By September 7, the
day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart,”
Brazile writes. “I explained that the cancer was that she had
exerted this control of the party long before she became its
nominee….Bernie took this stoically. He did not yell or express
outrage. Instead he asked me what I thought Hillary’s chances
were.”

Unsurprisingly,
Brazile’s account immediately caught fire on social media,
provoking a mixture of outrage and vindication—particularly given
that it comes from a “
stalwart
establishment insider who 
admitted
to
 passing
debate topics to the Clinton team during her time as
CNN contributor.

Shame
on the DNC, on Hillary Clinton, and every Democratic operative
responsible for this bullshit. What a mess,” 
The
Intercept
‘s
Shaun King wrote on Twitter.

Shaun King 

@ShaunKing

If you ask ANYONE who is close to operations of the DNC today they will tell you that things are still a complete mess there financially. https://twitter.com/blakehounshell/status/926044671029268480 

Since
the election, it is not clear that the DNC has dealt with these
problems yet,” 
writes Clio
Chang of 
Splinter
News
,
building on King’s point. “Tom Perez was installed as DNC chair
over Keith Ellison, a move that was 
largely
seen
 as
giving Democratic elites more control over the party….The DNC is
not doomed to repeat the problems of the past, but from Brazile’s
account, it’s clear that the organization requires a major
reckoning.”

Nina Turner 

@ninaturner

Oooooweeee! “You can put truth in the river 5 days after lie, truth gone catch.” -Grandma

Thank you @donnabrazile https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774 


Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC

When I was asked to run the Democratic Party after the Russians hacked our emails, I stumbled onto a shocking truth about the Clinton campaign.

politico.com

By Jake
Johnson
 / Creative
Commons
 / Common
Dreams
 / Report
a typo

==========================================

Zie ook:

Twitter Admits It Censored Tweets About the #DNCLeak Ahead of

Het volgende artikel werd gisteren door Anti-Media gepubliceerd:

Democrats
in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary

November
3, 2017 at 1:42 pm

Written
by 
Kevin
Gosztola

(SHADOWPROOFEvidence
that the Democratic National Committee rigged the 2016 presidential
primary in favor of Hillary Clinton has been known for well over a
year. But the leadership of the Democratic Party has refused to
address evidence, preferring to “move forward” by coercing
Democrats who supported Bernie Sanders into uniting with the very
elements of the party responsible for losing to President Donald
Trump.

Now,
former interim DNC chair Donna Brazile has given credence to claims
that the DNC rigged the primary, which is what members of the Sanders
campaign and supporters have repeatedly asserted—even though most
DNC officials or Clinton supporters treat such claims as the product
of sexism or downright foolishness.

Brazile found
a copy
 of
the joint fundraising agreement between the DNC, Hillary Victory
Fund, and Hillary For America. It was signed by former CEO of the DNC
Amy Dacey and Robby Mook, who was Clinton’s campaign manager. The
Clinton campaign’s legal counsel, Marc Elias, was copied.

It
specified that Clinton would “control the party’s finances,
strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of
refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it
would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was
required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing,
budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.” Now, former interim
DNC chair Donna Brazile has given credence to claims that the DNC
rigged the primary, which is what members of the Sanders campaign and
supporters have repeatedly asserted—even though most DNC officials
or Clinton supporters treat such claims as the product of sexism or
downright foolishness.

The
agreement was inked in August 2015, which was months before the first
votes were ever cast in the primary.

As
Brazile put it, “The funding arrangement with HFA and the victory
fund agreement was not illegal, but it sure looked unethical. If the
fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party
before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was
not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s
integrity.”

A
story from Politico in May 2016 
revealed how
the Clinton campaign setup a fundraising operation through state
party apparatuses that was essentially money laundering. States only
kept less than a half percent of $82 million raised. This was a
method to circumvent campaign finance limits. It also put Sanders at
a disadvantage, as the state parties weren’t fairly making these
funds available to his campaign.

DNC
chair Tom Perez appeared on CNBC and was asked about what Brazile
wrote. “Well, hey, we’re moving forward. We’re building, you
know, I’ve been asked that question a number of times since I
started.”

Perez
suggested he would ensure plans for the nomination process in 2020
were fair and transparent. The primary debate schedule would be set
in advance before any officially declared candidates are known. But
what if DNC officials already have a candidate for 2020 in mind, like
they did with Clinton?

In
October, as 
widely
reported
,
Perez “stripped a number of longtime party officials of their
‘at-large’ delegate status or leadership positions, while
appointing a slate of 75 new members that include[d] Clinton campaign
veterans, lobbyists, and neophytes.” Many of those demoted were
progressives who backed Sanders or Minnesota Representative Keith
Ellison when he ran against Perez for DNC chair.

Some
of the people tied to corporate interests, who were granted
superdelegate votes, included Joanne Dowdell, who was a registered
lobbyist for News Corp (which owns Fox News) and Manuel Ortiz, a
lobbyist for CITGO Petroleum Corporation and Citigroup. And ten
other 
newly
appointed
 superdelegates
had previously registered as federal lobbyists.

Indiana
Democratic Representative Andre Carson also was on CNN and asked what
he thought of Brazile’s allegations. Initially, Carson refused to
address them and said he knew Brazile and would probably read her
forthcoming book. Wolf Blitzer pressed him, and Carson deflected. He
maintained he had no knowledge of any fundraising deal between the
Clinton campaign and DNC.

If
what Donna Brazile is saying in this new book is true, I assume you’d
be pretty upset that there was this formal arrangement to use the
DNC, the assets of DNC, which are considerable, to help this one
presidential candidate and in the process hurt others who may want to
challenge her for the nomination,” Blitzer added.

It
did not visibly bother Carson at all. Addressing Clinton and Sanders
supporters, Carson answered, “Going forward, we need to come
together. Though we may have our differences and different approaches
in terms of methodology. We have to come together and use our numbers
to make sure we don’t re-elect Donald Trump or see another Donald
Trump rise.”

This
strategy for unity, which involves forcing conformity among Sanders
supporters, 
failed at
the Democratic National Convention, and it failed to ensure Clinton
had the turnout among working class people of color and young people
that was necessary to defeat Trump, especially in swing states. It
has, however, helped officials obstruct accountability, transparency,
or any transformation away from the very centrist agenda that has
ensured the party remains weak.

One
of the few Democrats to recognize reality was Democratic Senator
Elizabeth Warren. She 
appeared on
CNN and emphatically answered, “Yes,” when asked if she thought
the DNC rigged the primary. She said the Democratic Party needed to
be “held accountable.”

Warren
was hounded throughout the 2016 Democratic primary by Sanders
supporters for remaining silent about who she supported. Her silence
was regarded as a favor to the Clinton campaign that was intended to
help the campaign ensure the scales did not tip against them in key
New England states.

What
Warren said flustered several Democrats, including Joy Ann Reid, a
Democrat and MSNBC host with quite the following on Twitter.

Reid
contended, “The question is: what does the DNC actually do, and can
it, even if it wanted to, rig 50+ primaries for any given candidate?”
She added, “Even if one objects to the [joint fundraising
agreement], as Donna did, it didn’t hurt Sanders financially. By
April, he’d raised as much as [Clinton].” She insisted Clinton
won the nomination because she received more votes than Sanders.

However,
what those in denial refuse to confront is that Clinton may have
received more votes because citizens believed it was impossible for
Sanders to win, since the news media kept reporting Clinton had so
many more superdelegates than him. Plus, whether Sanders was able to
overcome the impact of an unethical fundraising agreement does not
change the reality that it made the primary unfair.

Hillary
Rosen, a prominent Democratic Party strategist who regularly appears
on CNN, insisted Democrats could not reckon with Brazile’s
allegations when attention must be paid to the GOP’s tax proposals.
She also misleadingly argued Brazile could not find any evidence that
the system was rigged against Sanders, which is not what Brazile
wrote. Brazile said she could not find any evidence to support
widespread claims until she came across the joint fundraising
agreement.

The
voters chose Hillary Clinton, not Bernie Sanders, and it had nothing
to do with any staff person at the DNC,” Rosen asserted.

In
May 2016, Rosen said, “Bernie Sanders is losing this race, and
instead of taking it like a man, he’s working the ref. He’s
encouraging his people to think that the system is rigged. The system
he signed up for as an independent to run in a Democratic primary.
This constant sort of whining and complaining about the process is
just really the most harmful thing, in some ways, he could do because
he’s encouraging his supporters to think that the process actually
is cheating them, and they’re not.” So, Rosen has an interest in
maintaining her denial of reality.

The
reality is hundreds of superdelegates pledged their allegiance to
Clinton before votes were cast in Iowa, a limited number of debates
were scheduled to ensure voters had the least amount of exposure to
Clinton opponents, the DNC and Clinton campaign falsely accused the
Sanders campaign of “stealing” voter file data, and Democratic
women supporting Sanders faced 
forms
of retaliation
 for
not supporting Clinton.

By Kevin Gosztola /
Republished with permission / 
Shadow
Proof
 / Report
a typo

================================

Zie ook: ‘WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….

        en: ‘Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!

        en: ‘Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

        en: ‘New York Times: eerste Israëlische inval in Gazastrook sinds 2014 >> fake news!

        en: ‘Noord-Koreaans ‘bedrog met nucleaire deal’ is fake news o.a. gebracht door de New York Times

       en: ‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

       en: ‘Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

       en: ‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

      en: ‘‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

      en: ‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

      en: VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

      en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

      en: ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

      en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

      en: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

      en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

      en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

      en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

      en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

       en: ‘CIA de ware hacker en manipulator van verkiezingen, ofwel de laatste Wikileaks documenten……...’

       en: ‘CIA speelt zoals gewoonlijk vuil spel: uit Wikileaks documenten blijkt dat CIA zelf de verkiezingen manipuleerde, waar het Rusland van beschuldigde……..

      en: ‘CIA malware voor manipulaties en spionage >> vervolg Wikileaks Vault 7

       en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

       en: ‘Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

       en: ‘RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

       en: ‘WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’

       en:  ‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

       en:  ‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

       en:  ‘CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

       en: ‘CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

       en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

Zie vervolgens ook:

Was Democratic Primary Rigged Against Bernie Sanders? Elizabeth Warren Says ‘Yes’