Christchurch aanslag: witte nationalistische terreur >> een uitvoerproduct van de VS

De
terreuraanslag tegen 2 moskeeën
 in Christchruch (Nieuw-Zeeland) werd
door witte nationalisten gepleegd. Volgens Paul J. Becker en Art
Jipson is het witte nationalisme dat tot deze en andere
terreuraanslagen tegen moslims heeft geleid, een product van de VS.
De terrorist die in Christchurch schoot, ziet de witte nationalisten
(fascisten) in de VS dan ook als groot voorbeeld….

Trump
stelde eerder dat het nationalisme geen grote problemen oplevert*,
echter de uitkomsten van een onderzoek door de Universiteit van
Chicago en de VN laten het tegenovergestelde zien…..

Het
geweld van witte nationalisten, wat mij betreft in veel gevallen
niets anders dan fascisme, neemt toe in het westen. Niet vreemd als
je ziet dat deze nationalisten de xenofobie die leeft bij een fiks deel van de diverse westerse bevolkingen en de bij deze groepen gekweekte anti-immigratie gevoelens voeden met haat- en angstzaaierij tegen/voor vreemdelingen, of die haat- en angstzaaierij nu tegen/voor hun geloof, huidskleur, of land van
oorsprong wordt gevoerd……

Over
fascisme gesproken: ook in de EU wordt deze ‘ideologie’ steeds groter
en het is niet ondenkbaar dat fascisten binnen afzienbare tijd (10 tot 20 jaar) zelfs
de grootste fractie in het EU parlement zullen vormen……..

Het
volgende artikel werd eerder gepubliceerd op The Conversation en werd
door mij overgenomen van Anti-Media (de tweede foto komt van The Conversation):

Born
in the USA, White Nationalism is Now a Global Terror Threat

March
29, 2019 at 8:52 am

Written
by 
The
Conversation

(CONVERSATION) — The
recent massacre of 
50
Muslim worshippers at two mosques
 in
Christchurch, New Zealand is the latest confirmation that white
supremacy is a 
danger
to democratic societies across the globe
.

Despite
President Donald Trump’s suggestion that 
white
nationalist terrorism is not a major problem
,
recent data from the 
United
Nations
University
of Chicago
 and
other sources show the 
opposite.

As
more people 
embrace
a xenophobic and anti-immigrant worldview
,
it is fueling hostility and violence toward those deemed “outsiders”
– whether because of their religion, skin color or national origin.

Transnational
violence

Most
of the Western world
 –
from Switzerland and Germany to the United
States, 
Scandinavia and New
Zealand
 –
has witnessed a 
potent
nationalist strain
 infecting
society in recent years.

Driven
by fear over the loss of white primacy, 
white
nationalists
 believe
that white identity should be the organizing principle of Western
society.

Every
people in the world can have their own country except white people,”
the 
American
Freedom Party’s William Daniel Johnson
 told
the Chicago Sun Times after the New Zealand attack. “We should have
white ethno-states.”

In
researching our upcoming book on 
extremism –
our joint area of 
academic
expertise
 –
we found that hate crimes have risen alongside the global spread of
white nationalism. Racist attacks on 
refugees,
immigrants, Muslims and Jews
 are
increasing worldwide at an alarming rate.

Scholars
studying the internationalization of hate crimes call this dangerous
phenomenon “
violent
transnationalism
.”


Polish
right-wing nationalists at a rally in Lodz, Sept. 12,
2015.
 Reuters/Marcin
Stepien/Agencja Gazeta

In
Europe, white violence appears to have been 
triggered by
the sudden increase, in 2015, of refugees fleeing war in Syria and
elsewhere in the Middle East.

Ultra-nationalists
across the continent – including 
politicians at
the 
highest
rungs of power
 –
used the influx as 
evidence of
the imminent “
cultural
genocide

of white people.

White
nationalism is a US export

This
disturbing international trend, in its modern incarnation, was born
in the United States.

Since
the 1970s, a small, vocal cadre of American white supremacists have
sought to 
export
their ideology of hate
.
Avowed racists like 
Ku
Klux Klan wizard David Duke
,
Aryan Nations founder 
Richard
Butler
 and
extremist author 
William
Pierce
 believe
the white race is 
under
attack worldwide
 by
a cultural invasion of immigrants and people of color.

The
United States is diversifying, but it remains 
77
percent white
.
White supremacists, however, have long contended that the
country’s 
demographic
changes
 will lead
to an extermination of the white race and culture
.

The
alt-right
– an umbrella term describing modern online white supremacist
movement – uses the same language. And it has expanded this
20th-century xenophobic worldview to portray refugees, Muslims and
progressives as a threat, too.

Alt-right
leaders like Richard Spencer, 
extremist
Jared Taylor
 and
the Neo-Nazi Daily Stormer editor 
Andrew
Anglin
 also use
social media
 to share
their ideology and recruit members
 across
borders.

They
have found 
a
global audience
 of
white supremacists who, in turn, have also 
used
the internet
 to
share their ideas, encourage violence and 
broadcast
their hate crimes worldwide
.

The
hatred that led to violence in Pittsburgh and Charlottesville is
finding new adherents around the world,” 
Jonathan
Greenblatt
 of
the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a civil liberties watchdog, told USA
Today after the New Zealand attack.

Indeed,
it appears that this attack was not just focused on New Zealand; it
was intended to have a global impact.”

Rising
racist violence

We
know the alleged New Zealand mosque shooter’s hatred of Muslims was
inspired by American white nationalism – he 
said
so on Twitter
.

His
online “manifesto” includes references to cultural conflicts that
the author believed would eventually lead the United States to
separate along ethnic, political and racial lines.

The
alleged attacker also wrote that 
he
supports President Donald Trump
“as
a symbol of renewed white identity.”

Trump
and other right-wing politicians like French 
presidential
candidate Marine Le Pen
 and Dutch
opposition leader Geert Wilders
 have blamed the
very real problems of modern life – growing economic instability,
rising inequality and 
industrial
decay
 –
on immigrants and people of color.

That
narrative has added further hostility into the existing undercurrent
of intolerance in increasingly multicultural societies like the
United States.

Hate
crimes against Muslims, immigrants and people of color have been 
on
the rise in the U.S. since 2014
.

In
2015, the 
Southern
Poverty Law Center documented 892 hate crimes
.
The next year, it counted 917 hate crimes. In 2017 – the year Trump
took office stoking nationalist sentiment with promises 
to
build walls, deport Mexicans and ban Muslims
 –
the U.S. saw 954 white supremacist attacks.

One
of them was a violent clash between counterprotesters and white
nationalists over the removal of a 
confederate
statue in Charlottesville
,
Virginia. The 2017 “Unite the Right” rally, which killed one
person and injured dozens, amplified the ideas of modern white
nationalists 
nationally
and worldwide
.

Last
year, white nationalists killed at least 50 people in the United
States. Their victims included 
11
worshippers at a Pittsburgh synagogue
two
elderly black shoppers in a Kroger parking lot
 in
Kentucky and 
two
women practicing yoga in Florida
.

The
years 2015, 2016 and 2018 were the United States’ deadliest years
for 
extremist
violence since 1970
,
according to the Anti-Defamation League.

All
perpetrators of deadly 
extremist
violence in the U.S. in 2018
 had
links to white nationalist groups. That made 2018 “a particularly
active year for right-wing extremist murders,” the Anti-Defamation
League says.

Nationalist
terror is a danger to the domestic security of the United States and,
evidence shows, a global terror threat that endangers the very nature
of global democratic society.

By Paul
J. Becker
 and Art
Jipson
 / Creative
Commons
 / The
Conversation

========================================

*
Niet zo vreemd dat Trump het nationalisme niet als een bedreiging
ziet, immers hij is zelf een nationalist en gezien veel van zijn
uitlatingen, zoals zijn haat- en angstzaaien tegen/voor vluchtelingen en de woorden van waardering die hij uitspreekt voor
figuren als Bolsonaro, de fascistische president van Brazilië, kan je
ook Trump als fascistisch aanduiden……

Zie ook:

Christchurch terreuraanslag: de normalisatie van anti-moslim terreur en westerse oorlogsvoering in moslimlanden

Christchurch terreuraanslag: maatschappij niet gebaat bij censuur op fascisme

Christ Church >> fascistische terreuraanslag >> 49 doden……

Thierry Baudet (FVD) ging ook na de terreuraanslag gisteren door met verkiezingscampagne‘ (met een verwijzing naar de aanslag in Christchurch)

Het label SPLC direct onder dit bericht staat voor ‘Southern Poverty Law Center’.

Stephen Colbert probeerde zonder enige humor Tulsi Gabbard in het rechtse kamp te drukken n.a.v. de illegale VS oorlog tegen Syrië

De show
van Stephen Colbert is een propaganda orgaan voor de rechtse
democraten en is dat in feite al heel lang. Daarmee staat Colbert ook achter de
illegale oorlogen die onder de democratische ‘vredesduif’ Obama werden aangegaan, dit onder regie van zijn rechterhand destijds Hillary Clinton
(minister van BuZa), een oorlogsmisdadiger van formaat…..

Colbert
had onlangs de democraat Tulsi Gabbard in zijn show en in
tegenstelling tot de omgang met andere politici van de Democratische Partij,
was dit geen gesprek met opgeklopte ‘humor’.

Colbert
probeerde Gabbard zelfs in het kamp te duwen van fascist David Duke
(voormalig Ku Klux Klan top), en dat van rechtse rotzakken als Steve Bannon en Matt
Gaetz……

Wat
betreft de illegale oorlogen van de VS, liet Colbert ten overvloede in zijn gesprek
met Gabbard blijken dat hij die volledig steunt, ondanks het enorme
aantal doden en landen die in puin achterblijven als de VS klaar is
met haar grootschalige terreur tegen in feite de bevolking van de
landen die het illegaal aanvalt…..

Ook de illegale oorlog van de VS tegen het bewind van Assad kwam ter sprake, waar Gabbard Colbert fijntjes liet weten dat de CIA in 2011 de ‘opstand’ tegen Assad heeft georganiseerd en geregisseerd en dat de oorlog van de VS in dat land niet gericht was tegen IS, maar tegen het bewind van Assad, waar ze ook de wapenleveringen aan terreurgroepen als IS en militaire training door de VS aan die terreurgroepen noemde….. 

Jammer dat ze Assad wel een dictator noemt, terwijl hij met grote meerderheid democratisch tot president werd verkozen in 2014, een verkiezing die door internationale waarnemers als eerlijk en goed werd beoordeeld…… 

Vergeet voorts niet dat onder Assad alle geloven hand in hand naast elkaar leefden, een zaak die door handelingen van de VS bijna de nek werd omgedraaid…. Gelukkig leven de teruggekeerde vluchtelingen, in de gebieden die door het reguliere Syrische leger worden gecontroleerd, weer vreedzaam naast elkaar, ongeacht het geloof dat men aanhangt……

Helaas
voor Colbert, maar hij is geen partij voor Gabbard die hem flink bij
de lurven had >> lezen en zien mensen!!

Colbert
Smears Tulsi Gabbard To Her Face While Telling Zero Jokes

by Caitlin
Johnstone

Hawaii
Congresswoman and Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi
Gabbard 
recently
appeared
 on The
Late Show with Stephen Colbert
,
where instead of the light, jokey banter about politics and who she
is as a person that Democratic presidential candidates normally
encounter on late night comedy programs, the show’s host solemnly ran
down a list of textbook beltway smears against Gabbard and made her
defend them in front of his audience.

Normally
when a Democratic Party-aligned politician appears on such a show,
you can expect jokes about how stupid Trump is and how badly they’re
going to beat the Republicans, how they’re going to help ordinary
Americans, and maybe some friendly back-and-forth about where they
grew up or something. Colbert had no time to waste on such things,
however, because this was not an interview with a normal Democratic
Party-aligned politician: this was a politician who has been loudly
and consistently criticizing US foreign policy.

After
briefly asking his guest who she is and why she’s running for
president, Colbert 
jumped
right into it
 by
immediately bringing up Syria and Assad, the primary line of attack
employed against Gabbard by establishment propagandists in American
mainstream media.

Colbert:
Do you think the Iraq war was worth it?

Gabbard:
No.

Colbert:
Do you think that our involvement in Syria has been worth it?

Gabbard:
No.

Colbert:
Do you think that ISIS could have been defeated without our
involvement and without our support of the local troops there?

Gabbard:
There are two things we need to address in Syria. One is a regime
change war that was first launched by the United States in 2011,
covertly, led by the CIA. That is a regime change war that has
continued over the years, that has increased the suffering of the
Syrian people, and strengthened groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS,
because the CIA was using American taxpayer dollars to provide arms
and training and equipment to these terrorist groups to get them to
overthrow the government. So that is a regime change war that we
should not have been engaging.

Colbert:
So, but if it is someone like Bashar al-Assad, who gasses his own
people, or who engages in war crimes against his own people, should
the United States not be involved?

Gabbard:
The United States should not be intervening to overthrow these
dictators and these regimes that we don’t like, like Assad, like
Saddam Hussein, like Gaddafi, and like Kim Jong Un. There are bad
people in the world, but history has shown us that every time the
United States goes in and topples these dictators we don’t like,
trying to end up like the world’s police, we end up increasing the
suffering of the people in these countries. We end up increasing the
loss of life, but American lives and the lives of people in these
countries. We end up undermining our own security, what to speak of
the trillions of dollars of taxpayer money that’s spent on these wars
that we need to be using right here at home.

Like
I said, this is not a normal presidential candidate. How often do you
see a guest appear on a network late night talk show and talk about
the CIA arming terrorists in Syria and the fact that US military
interventionism is completely disastrous? It just doesn’t happen. You
can understand, then, why empire propagandist Stephen Colbert 
spent
the rest of the interview
 informing
his TV audience that Tulsi Gabbard is dangerous and poisonous.

This was unwatchable. Colbert just went down the list of scripted Gabbard smears (Assad, David Duke) then sermonized about how US military intervention is a force for good in this world. All without telling a single joke. Late night “comedy” shows are propaganda for livestock.

Colbert twice interjected the State Dept.’s line about the alleged Assad chemical attack on his own people; Tulsi then corrected him saying several of the groups, including al Qaeda & ISIS, had been trained by the US and had been reported as being a part of those alleged chemical

Colbert:
You got some heat for meeting with Bashar al-Assad. Do you not
consider him a war criminal? Why did you meet with that man?

Gabbard:
In the pursuit of peace and security. If we are not willing to meet
with adversaries, potential adversaries, in the pursuit of peace and
security, the only alternative is more war. That’s why I took that
meeting with Assad. In pursuit of peace and security. 

Colbert:
Do you believe he is a war criminal? Do you believe he gassed his own
people or committed atrocities against his own people?

Gabbard:
Yes. Reports have shown that that’s a fact.

Colbert:
So you believe the intelligence agencies on that. Because I head that
you did not necessarily believe those reports.

The
reason I call Colbert a propagandist and not simply a liberal empire
loyalist who happens to have been elevated by billionaire media is
because these are carefully constructed narratives that he is
reciting, and they weren’t constructed by him.

Trying
to make it look to the audience as though Gabbard is in some way
loyal to Assad has been a high-priority agenda of the mainstream
media ever since she announced her presidential candidacy.

We
saw it in 
her
recent appearance
 on The
View
,
where John McCain’s sociopathic daughter called her an “Assad
apologist” and demanded that Gabbard call Assad an enemy of the
United States. We saw it in her recent 
CNN
town hall
,
where a consultant 
who
worked on Obama’s 2008 campaign
 was
presented as an ordinary audience member to help CNN’s Dana Bash
paint Gabbard’s skepticism of intelligence reports about an alleged
chemical weapons attack by the Syrian government as something that is
weird and suspicious, instead of the only sane position in a
post-Iraq invasion world. We saw it in 
her
appearance
 on
MSNBC’s 
Morning
Joe
 last
month, where the entire panel piled on her in outrage that she
wouldn’t call Assad an enemy of the United States. It’s such a common
propaganda talking point that the 
New
York Times

Bari Weiss famously 
made
a laughingstock of herself
 by
repeating it as self-evident truth on 
The
Joe Rogan Experience
 without
having the faintest clue what specific facts it was meant to refer
to, just because she’d heard establishment pundits saying it so much.

This
is an organized smear by the mass media attempting to marry Gabbard
in the eyes of the public to a Middle Eastern leader whom the
propagandists have already sold as a child-murdering monster, and
Colbert is participating in it here just as much as the serious news
media talking heads are. It’s been frustrating to watch Gabbard 
fold
to this smear campaign
 by
acting like it’s an established fact that Assad “gases his own
people” and not the hotly contested empire-serving narrative she
knows it is.

Gabbard
is being targeted by this smear because she challenges US political
orthodoxy on military violence (the glue which holds the empire
together), so no amount of capitulation will keep them from trying to
prevent the public from trusting her words.

(de video in het volgende Twitterbericht kan ik niet overnemen, zie hiervoor het origineel)

The journalist interrogating Tulsi seems to believe that US forces in Syria are fighting Assad. Tulsi corrects her, says those troops were deployed there to fight ISIS. These people don’t even know what’s happening in the places they want the US to occupy

2:11

640K views

“I
don’t know whether America should be the policemen of the world,”
Colbert 
said after
Gabard defended her position.

“It
is my opinion that we should not be,” Gabbard replied, causing
Colbert to launch into a stuffy, embarrassing sermon on the virtues
of interventionism and US hegemony that would make Bill Kristol
blush.

“If
we are not, though, nature abhors a vacuum, and if we are not
involved in international conflicts, or trying to quell international
conflicts, certainly the Russians and the Chinese will fill that
vacuum. And we will step away from the world stage in a significant
way that might destabilize the world, because the United States,
however flawed, is a force for good in the world in my opinion. Would
you agree with that?”

Again,
this is a 
comedy show.

Gabbard
explained that in order to be a force for good in the world the
United States has to actually do good, which means not raining fire
upon every nation it dislikes all the time. 
Colbert
responded
 by
reading off his blue index card to repeat yet another tired
anti-Gabbard smear.

“You’ve
gotten some fans in the Trump supporter world: David Duke, Steve
Bannon, and, uh, Matt, uh, Gaetz, is that his name? Matt Gaetz? What
do you make of how much they like you?”

This
one is particularly vile, partly because Gabbard
has 
repeatedly and unequivocally
denounced David Duke, who has a 
long-established
and well-known history
 of
injecting himself into the drama of high-profile conversations in
order to maintain the illusion of relevance, and partly because it’s
a completely irrelevant point that is brought up solely for the
purpose of marrying Tulsi Gabbard’s name to a former Ku Klux Klan
leader. Colbert 
only brought
this up (and 
made Newsweek totally
squee
)
because he wanted to assist in that marrying. The fact that there are
distasteful ideologies which also happen to oppose US interventionism
for their own reasons does not change the undeniable fact that US
military interventionism is consistently disastrous and never helpful
and robs the US public of resources that are rightfully theirs.

This
interview was easily Colbert’s most blatant establishment rim job
I’ve ever seen, surpassing even the time 
he
corrected his own audience
 when
they cheered at James Comey’s firing to explain to them that Comey is
a good guy now and they’re meant to like him. Colbert’s show is
blatant propaganda for human livestock, and the fact that this is
what American “comedy” shows look like now is nauseating.

When
Tulsi Gabbard first announced her candidacy 
I
predicted
 that
she’d have the narrative control engineers scrambling all over
themselves to kill her message, and it’s been even more spectacular
than I imagined. I don’t agree with everything she says and does, but
by damn this woman is shaking up the establishment narrative matrix
more than anybody else right now. She’s certainly keeping it
interesting.

__________________________

Thanks
for reading! My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you
enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me
on
 Facebook,
following my antics on
 Twitter, throwing
some money into my hat on 
Patreon or Paypalpurchasing
some of my 
sweet
merchandise
, buying
my new book 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
,
or my previous book 
Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see
the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for
my 
website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Caitlin
Johnstone
 |
March 13, 2019 at 12:38 pm |

Tags: ColbertLate
Show
MSMPoliticspropagandaTulsi
Gabbard
 |
Categories: 
ArticleNews |
URL: 
https://wp.me/p9tj6M-1AH

====================================

Zie ook: