Ondanks
Martin Luther King Day op 21 januari in de VS, een officiële vrije
dag, is er verder maar weinig veranderd in de VS, sinds de moord op
MLK (waar maar één dader voor aangewezen kan worden: de FBI).
Wat betreft de discriminatie van de gekleurde bevolking geldt hetzelfde: er is over het geheel gezien weinig veranderd, ondanks de acties van Martin Luther King en de officiële MLK dag, plus 2 termijnen Obama, de eerste gekleurde
president van de VS…… De VS regering en zelfs de FBI eert MLK wel schijnheilig,
maar zou hem haten als hij nog leefde (zie ook het neerschieten van
gekleurden door de VS politie, waarbij de meerderheid van de
slachtoffers niet eens bewapend was en is, immers dit gaat bijna
dagelijks door in de VS…).
King was
niet alleen een mensenrechtenactivist, maar ook een groot leider in
het verzet tegen de VS oorlog in Vietnam, daarmee verdubbelde hij de
inzet van de VS overheid en de FBI hem tot zwijgen te brengen……..
De FBI
begon overigens al met het onderzoeken en dwarsbomen van King in
1955, je kan dan ook niet anders concluderen dan dat King werd gezien als een
staatsvijand in de ogen van FBI en de opvolgende regeringen destijds…..
Vooral de corrupte psychopaat Hoover, hoofd van de FBI had het niet
op met King en dat heeft hij meermaals laten weten…. In de ogen van
Hoover was King een communist…..
De
schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen artikel Matt Agorist, stelt
volkomen terecht dat King ook heden ten dage als een gevaarlijke en
invloedrijke staatsvijand zou zijn behandeld, dat zijn Facebook
pagina al lang verwijderd zou zijn geweest (plus zijn Twitteraccount,
Ap.) en hij te maken zou hebben met censuur en zeker zou zijn gedemoniseerd door de reguliere massamedia in de VS….
Lees het
artikel van Agorist en geeft het door, veel te veel mensen in
Nederland hebben de foute idee dat het allemaal wel goed zit in de VS
wat betreft de behandeling van gekleurden….. Bovendien zijn er hele volksstammen die
geloven dat de sociale media alleen maar kul en poezenfilmpjes laten
zien, terwijl juist daar het echte nieuws is te vinden en waar de betekenis van
dat nieuws wordt gebracht. Intussen lopen de reguliere massamedia braaf aan de
leiband van hun rijke meesters, grote bedrijven en regeringen,
waarbij men geen schroom heeft fake news en desinformatie te brengen,
om zo het volk achter de machthebbers en rustig te houden…… Zelfs
de illegale oorlogen van de VS (en haar terreurorganisatie NAVO) tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en
Syrië worden door de media verdedigd als was het motief
medemenselijkheid, waar het in werkelijkheid gaat om massamoorden en het veilig stellen van westerse belangen, zoals de olieproductie, waarbij alleen deze eeuw al meer dan 2,5
miljoen mensen om het leven werden gebracht…….
Het volgende artikel komt van The Free Thought Porject en werd zoals gezegd geschreven door Matt Agorist (mijn excuus, bij plaatsing vergeten The Free Thought Project te noemen):
If
Dr. King Was Alive Today, His Facebook Page Would Be Deleted, And
He’d Be Censored
Martin
Luther King Jr.’s pro-peace and antiwar stance would have made him an
enemy to today’s establishment and he would have been censored.
By Matt
Agorist January
21, 2019
When
most people think of the great man, born Michael King on January
15, 1929, they see an advocate for peace, who is celebrated by the US
government — honored every year in January, on the third Monday.
However,
what the government tells us and what this great man did are two
separate stories and had Dr. King been alive today, he would have
been an enemy to the establishment who would have made every move
they could to silence him.
Dr.
King’s position as the leader of the Civil Rights Movement began
after his election as spokesman for the Montgomery Improvement
Association in December of 1955. What also started in that December
of 1955 was
the FBI’s investigation into him.
Like
all those who stand against government-sanctioned violence, Dr. King
was an enemy of the state. The fact that he’s celebrated today by
the same state that persecuted him is quite Orwellian.
According
to a report out of Stanford University titled, Martin
Luther King, Jr. and the Global Freedom Struggle,
the FBI had it out for Dr. King as soon as he began making waves.
The
U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) began monitoring Martin
Luther King, Jr., in December 1955, during his involvement with
the Montgomery
bus boycott,
and engaged in covert operations against him throughout the 1960s.
FBI director J. Edgar Hoover was personally hostile toward King,
believing that the civil rights leader was influenced by Communists.
This animosity increased after April 1964, when King called the FBI
‘‘completely ineffectual in resolving the continued mayhem and
brutality inflicted upon the Negro in the deep South’’ (King, 23
April 1964). Under the FBI’s domestic counterintelligence program
(COINTELPRO) King was subjected to various kinds of FBI surveillance
that produced alleged evidence of extramarital affairs, though no
evidence of Communist influence.
With
a state that owes its very existence to the monopoly it holds on the
use of violence, anyone who is pro-peace is a potential threat. This
was the case in the 20th century just as it is the case in
the 21st century. The fact that Americans take off of work one day in
January, does not negate the reality that this struggle continues.
In
fact, the government is still very engaged in fighting the antiwar
and pro-peace narrative King so eloquently espoused. And they have no
qualms talking about this in the open.
After deleting
the pages of
hundreds of antiwar and pro-peace media and activist outlets in
October, last week, Facebook made
another giant move to silence. This
time, they had no problem noting that they went after pages whose
specific missions were “anti-corruption” or “protest”
movements.
“Some
of the Pages frequently posted about topics like anti-NATO
sentiment, protest movements, and anti-corruption,”
Facebook’s head of cybersecurity policy, Nathaniel Gleicher wrote
in the blog post. “We are constantly
working to detect and stop this type of activity because
we don’t want our services to be used to manipulate people.”
Facebook purged hundreds more pages today. This time, they claim it is folks who are “anti-corruption” and who “protest” who are the problem. To the ministry of truth, standing against criminal politicians is now deemed a crime. Shit is getting serious.cbsnews.com/news/facebook-…
Make
no mistake, because Dr. King broke through the divisive paradigm and
bridged the gap between different cultures so well, he would
undoubtedly been a target of these tech giant censors who aim to keep
you divided. The Atlantic
Council would
have likely had a special committee devoted to solely silencing his
“dangerous” talks of peace.
Like
Dr. King, however, many activists of today are unafraid of speaking
truth to power, even when faced with police action and censorship.
Like
the activists of today, Dr. King’s activism was often met with
brutal backlash from police. Just like the protesters of today, who
peacefully march in solidarity to end police violence and war, the
protesters of the 50s and 60s were met with violence from the police.
Attacks
against non-violent protesters are nothing new. In the 60s, as the
marches increased, so did the attacks against non-violent
demonstrators.
“There
may be some tear gas ahead. But I say to you today, that I’d rather
die on the highways of Alabama, than make a butchery of my
conscience,” said
Dr. King in his famous speech just prior to the Selma-Montgomery
march in which protesters were met with such violence from police
that the day would be forever remembered as “Bloody
Sunday.”
The
first march took place on March 7, 1965, and it gained the
nickname “Bloody Sunday” after its 600 marchers were attacked at
the Edmund Pettus Bridge after leaving Selma; state troopers and
county posse attacked the unarmed marchers with billy clubs and tear
gas.
Does
this type of police reaction to protests sound familiar?
Dr.
King was no stranger to police and being arrested, in fact, during
his 12-year run as the leader of the civil rights movement, he
was arrested 30 times.
Today,
there is a good chance Dr. King would be referred to as a ‘thug’
by a large portion of society — and police — for his activism.
Dr.
King, like many of the protesters of today, stood against state
violence and war. Those who wage the wars and initiate the violence,
delegating a single day in January to honor a man who stood
against their very tactics, is defamatory to this struggle for peace,
to say the least.
So,
while you are out there today, enjoying the day off, remember that
this struggle is far from over. There are countless individuals
continuing to try to live in the way Dr. King advocated for and who
face constant bombardment from the establishment for doing so.
As
long as innocence is lost to those who claim to protect it, the
conflict remains. As long as people of all races are harassed,
kidnapped, locked in cages or killed over victimless crimes, our
strife will persist.
Not
until the corruptions ceases, not until all the troops are
brought home, not until a person can do with their own body as they
see fit, not until the brute force changes to compassion, will the
perpetual struggle of Dr. King and all those before and after him, be
complete.
“Peace
is not merely a distant goal that we seek, but a means by which we
arrive at that goal.” – Martin Luther King, Jr.
Spread
the love
Matt
Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former
intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior
experience gives him unique insight into the world of government
corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an
independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on
mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at
Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow
@MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and
now on Facebook.
===========================
Hier nog een korte video waarin het geweld tegen gekleurden wordt weergegeven:
Zie ook:
‘NAVO, het grootste militaire verbond maakt zich schuldig aan grootschalige terreur i.p.v. de vrede te bewaren‘ (o.a. geluidsfragmenten met het protest van King tegen de oorlog in Vietnam)
‘Martin Luther King: de moord van 50 jaar geleden door de VS overheid uiterst beperkt herdacht‘
‘Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: 8 wijze lessen!‘
‘Martin Luther King jr. vermoord door de overheid, aldus rechter……..‘
‘De oorlog tegen het arme deel van de VS bevolking‘
φ
