9/11 en de voorkennis van de aanslagen in de VS

Brasscheck
TV heeft afgelopen week een aantal video’s en geluidsfragmenten
gepubliceerd waarin duidelijk te zien en te horen is dat de aanslagen op o.a. het
WTC in 2001 een door de VS zelf georganiseerde zaak is……

Ook
het volgende artikel en video van Brasscheck TV gaat door op deze
weg, in de video zie je bijvoorbeeld een man, die zogenaamd
toevallig aanwezig was en kort na deze aanslagen al het verhaal
ophangt dat de VS tot op de dag van vandaag volhoudt, ondanks het grote aantal
deskundigen die van dit verhaal gehakt hebben gemaakt (dat de
vliegtuigen een zo heftige brand hebben veroorzaakt dat de Twin Towers
zijn ingestort, iets dat volgens deze deskundigen alleen met
explosieven bereikt kan worden, springstoffen vooral in de basis van
de torens en gebouw 7 van het WTC….) Zelfs presentatoren van
nieuwszenders wisten vlak na de aanval al te vertellen wat er gebeurd
was, althans wat de toenmalige en opvolgende VS regeringen de wereld
willen laten geloven dat er gebeurd is……

De
redactie van Brasscheck TV destijds kwam een paar uur na de aanslagen
tot de conclusie dat het een ‘inside job’ moet zijn geweest, ofwel
dat de VS zelf de zaak heeft georganiseerd. Volgens de redactie kon
dit niet anders, gezien de
enorme organisatie die nodig was om e.e.a. te regelen, een ‘job’ waar
de luchtdefensie van de VS bij betrokken moet zijn geweest….
Uiteraard was onderdeel van het oordeel dat Brasscheck gaf, de
hiervoor aangehaalde figuren die met voorkennis de gebeurtenissen
‘beoordeelden’ voor de camera’s.

Onder
het geheel nog een video van Brasscheck waarin men het geldspoor van
deze aanslagen volgt 
(follow
the money) om bij de daders en handlangers te komen. Zo hebben ‘de
eigenaren’ (lease contract voor 99 jaar) van de Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein en zijn bedrijf Silverstein Properties plus een paar andere
miljonairs kapitalen verdiend aan deze aanslagen, waarvoor ze een paar dagen
tevoren nog verzekeringen hadden afgesloten……

De
daders hadden de idee dat de servers en harde schijven van de Deutsche Bank vernietigd zouden zijn nadat de gebouwen waren
ingestort, echter een gespecialiseerde Duitse firma (destijds het
enige bedrijf ter wereld) heeft toch informatie van de harde schijven enz.
kunnen achterhalen, daaruit blijkt dat de computers van de Deutsche
Bank vlak voor de aanslagen werden overgenomen door een derde. Men
kon zien dat vlak voor de aanslagen een bedrag van 100 miljoen dollar
van eigenaar veranderde…….

Uit
transacties kon men later afleiden dat o.a. wapenfabrikanten flink
garen hebben gesponnen bij de aanslagen, waaruit blijkt dat er
voorkennis moet zijn geweest over de aanslagen, ook
aandelenhandelaren hebben grote bedragen ‘verdiend’ met voorkennis
van de aanslagen…..

Het
bedrijf Ptech komt een aantal keren terug in de video en wordt genoemd
als sponsor van terreurgroepen….. Zelfs de NAVO heeft geprofiteerd
van de aanslagen. Ex-CIA agent Robert Bear is ervan overtuigd dat men zelfs in het
Witte Huis van te voren op de hoogte moet zijn geweest van de destijds nog komende
aanslagen op 11 september 2001……..

Nogmaals
zoals al vaak op deze plek gesteld: zie wie er profiteert van
dergelijke aanslagen en beste bezoeker, die mensen vindt je vooral in
de VS! Zo profiteerden en profiteren wapenfabrikanten nog steeds van
de meer dan belachelijke oorlog tegen terreur (war on terror)……
Hetzelfde geldt voor de geheime diensten die er kapitalen bijkregen
en intussen bevoegdheden hebben die thuishoren in de eerste beste
dictatuur….. Ook de politie heeft geprofiteerd van de 9/11
aanslagen, in de VS begint de politie meer en meer op een militaire
macht te lijken, zoveel extra geld is daar in deze machtshandhaver
van de overheid gestoken……. George W. Bush profiteerde daar hij voor de aanslagen te boek stond als de minst populaire president ooit…. De beurs lag al op z’n reet voor de aanslagen, maar na de aanslagen werd en wordt er gesteld dat de beurs op z’n reet ging door die aanslagen……. Mensen er zijn wat betreft de profiterende organisaties en bedrijven nog veel meer namen te noemen >> zie de video.

Eén
ding is zeker; de aanslagen van 11 september 2001 zijn een heel
smerige zaak waar de VS zelf de hand in heeft gehad…… (er zouden overigens ook miljarden aan staatsschulden van de VS zijn verdampt bij deze
aanslagen…..) 

9/11 And The News Media Puppet Show


It’s
scary to admit this, but we were one of the first – if not the first
– to publicly state that 9/11 could NOT have been anything but an
inside job.

We made that statement in writing via email to the
Brasscheck list before noon on 9/11.

Why were we so
sure?

Logistics. The world runs on logistics.

Nothing
this complicated could have been executed without extensive planning
and control over the operation of country’s air defense.

Also,
when we saw the early and well coordinated media disinfo campaign
coming from all the television networks we knew the event had to have
been prearranged.

(We were also the first to call attention to
the existence of “crisis actors” though we did not call
them that at the time.)

Copied all over the Internet, this
Brasscheck video has been seen well over 5 million times.

THE
9/11 SOLUTION

HOW THE MYTH WAS SOLD

AN
ORIGINAL BRASSCHECKTV.COM PRODUCTION

We
produced this in 2003 and released it in time for the second year
anniversary of 9/11.

It’s
been viewed over 5 million times.

It’s
also been taken down dozens of times by various hosting companies
trying to obscure how many times it’s actually been viewed.

Notice
that in perfectly coordinated fashion, the top US TV news networks
pinned the crime of 9/11 on Osama bin Laden before the dust had even
settled.

Here’s
everything you need to know about TV news:

Anchormen
(and women) are just actors.

They
may have dabbled in news reporting at one time in their lives, but
they are hired for their ability to convey stories credibly…whether
they know what they’re talking about or not and whether it’s true
or not.

The
ability to credibly speak utter nonsense to millions night after
night is a relatively rare skill and is very highly paid.

That’s
what newsreaders get their big salaries for and they understand that
to keep the paychecks coming, they’ve got to keep reading the
‘news’ – whatever is handed to them to read – and make it
sound believable without question.

The
real power in the newsroom is held by the person who hands the news
reader the script, selects the guest “experts” and tells the
reporters on the street who to talk to.

To
pull off the scam you saw in this video requires a grand total of
just three people (one for each of the clips.) Three “embedded”
news directors in the employ of an intelligence agency.

All
year long these people collect two paychecks, one from the TV network
and one from the Agency.

When
needed, they do what needs to be done – as they all clearly did in
perfectly coordinated fashion the first hours after the 9/11 attack.

Ready
to to deeper down the rabbit hole?

Check
out this live news report, 
just
hours before John F. Kennedy was assassinated.

Video:https://www.brasscheck.com/video/the-9-11-solution/


Brasscheck TV


P.S.
We can’t make this unique news service available without the help of
our subscribers.

​​​​​​​

Please
consider joining the ranks of BrasscheckTV.com supporters


Thanks!


Details
here:
https://www.brasscheck.com/video/donate-to-brasscheck-tv/

=============================

THE
9/11 BONANZA 
FOLLOWING THE MONEY

(hier de link naar de tekst bij dit bericht)

===================================

Zie ook:

9/11 voorkennis verzwegen in officiële rapporten

9/11: New Yorkse brandweercommandanten vragen een nieuw onderzoek naar de aanslagen op het het WTC in 2001

9/11 No Question, It Was Controlled Demolition

9/11: de teller voor het aantal door VS/NAVO gedode mensen staat intussen op meer dan 2,5 miljoen

SPECIAL REPORT – More Censored 9/11 History

First The Explosion And Then The “Planes”

9/11 “The Palestinians cheered” hoax

9/11 Wiring The Buildings

Hier nog wat onderbroekbom berichten:

De onderbroekbom-leugen ten behoeve van onveilige body scanners‘ 

De onderbroekbom: één grote leugen, die duizenden vliegveld bodyscanners heeft ‘opgeleverd’‘ 


Onderbroekbom (25 december 2009) een enorm onzin verhaal, weer zijn we voorgelogen…….


Azijnpisser eist per direct strengere anti-terreurmaatregelen!!!


Een onderbroekbom
Voor meer berichten over 9/11 klik op het label 911, direct onder dit bericht (het kan zijn dat je na een aantal berichten het laatste telkens herhaald ziet, dan even opnieuw onder het laatst gelezen bericht op hetzelfde label klikken).

SWIFT betalingssysteem raakt monopolie (gelukkig) kwijt

Het SWIFT (internationaal)
betalingssysteem heeft door het psychopathisch terreur gedrag van de
VS haar beste tijd gehad. De VS gebruikte SWIFT o.a. om een
staatsgreep in Iran te forceren, door Iran in 2012 uit te sluiten van SWIFT (met de sancties
die de VS Iran heeft opgelegd, wil Trump Iran opnieuw uitsluiten van SWIFT…..).

Ofwel: de VS gebruikt SWIFT als
terreurwapen tegen staten die de VS niet welgevallig zijn….
Gelukkig heeft de VS daarmee in haar eigen staart gebeten, zo heeft
China al een eigen intern systeem en Rusland heeft haar eigen internationale betalingssysteem ‘gelanceerd’: SPFS, waar het land nu overlegt met China, Turkije en Iran voor deelname aan dit systeem.

Met haar handelen isoleert de VS zich
steeds meer, volkomen terecht stelt Tom Luongo in het hieronder opgenomen artikel (door Tyler Durden ‘geredigeerd’ en op Zero Hedge geplaatst) dat de bankwereld
pas echt wakker zal worden als de VS de Duitse Bank zou willen
straffen voor het handelen in Russische energie (gas en/of olie) en
die bank zou daarop besluiten om van SWIFT op SPFS over te stappen.

Ongelofelijk dat de
VS denkt werkelijk iedereen de valse VS wet voor te kunnen schrijven (en te belachelijk voor woorden dat men de VS over de wereld als een psychopathische
massamoordenaar tekeer laat gaan…)…..

For
Russia, Change Comes SWIFTly

by Tyler
Durden

Sat,
11/03/2018 – 22:05

Authored
by Tom Luongo,

During
the ruble crisis of 2014/15 Russia announced in the wake of U.S. and
European sanctions over reunifying with Crimea that it would begin
building a domestic electronic financial transfer system, an
alternative to 
SWIFT.

That
system, System for Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS), is not
only now functioning in Russia, according to 
a
report from RT 
it
now handles the financial transfer data for more than half of
Russia’s institutions.

According
to Anatoly Aksakov, head of the Russian parliamentary committee
on financial markets:

The
number of users of our internal financial messages’ transfer system
is now greater than that of those using SWIFT. We’re already
holding talks with China, Iran and Turkey, along with several other
countries, on linking our system with their systems,” Aksakov said.

They
need to be properly integrated with each other in order to avoid any
problems with using the countries’ internal financial messaging
systems.”

This
is a follow up to last month’s boast by the Russians that their
system was seeing a lot of international interest.  How much of
this is boast and how much of it is reality remains to be seen, but
the important point here is that the minute the U.S. weaponized SWIFT
for use in its foreign policy, something like this was bound to
occur.

China
has its own internal system.  And other countries are building
theirs as well.

The
SWIFT Cost

A
common theme on this blog is that 
control
is an illusion.  Power is ephemeral. 
 The
best way to exercise your power is to have it but never use it. 
Because once you do use it you define for your enemies the costs of
their lack of compliance to your edicts.


And
if there is one thing humans are good at it is responding to known
incentives.  Once we can calculate the cost of one behavior over
another we can then decide which one is more important to us.

Once
costs of staying in SWIFT rise above the benefits of building your
own alternative, you build an alternative.

SWIFT
is a market power similar to a CEO having billions in restricted
stock in their company.  A lot of hay is made about the net
worth of people like Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg.

Quoting
their net worth by multiplying their known holdings times the current
price of the stock is useless.  Because they can’t sell it. 
It is market power or perceived wealth that evaporates the moment
they signal to the market their intention to sell.

In
reality, if they tried to sell their stock all at once the value of
the stock would plummet as buyers would run for the hills and they
would realize far less than their stated net worth before the selling
began.

So,
if anything they are a captive of their own success, needing to
manage the creation carefully to avoid damaging its reputation,
market position and, ultimately, its business.

SWIFT
is a monopoly system, a monopoly born of convenience and inertia
thanks to it being neutral to whims of international political
spats. 
 Enter
the late stage of imperial thinking in the U.S. where our control
over world affairs is waning first in the hearts and minds of various
people around the world and then in policy and you have the beginning
of the end of SWIFT as the only international financial transfer
system.

Back
in 2010, I remember Jim Sinclair banging his shoe on the table about
our threatening Switzerland over opening up its customer data looking
for ‘tax cheats’ under FATCA.  He said then that the Obama
administration was idiotic for doing this.

This
is where I got the maxim, 
once
you go nuclear you have no other option.
  

And
he was right.

Then
Iran was cut out of SWIFT in 2012 to effect regime change which also
failed.  And that woke the world up to the reality.  The
U.S. and Europe will attempt to destroy your livelihood if you dare
oppose its unilateral demands.

Our
political and financial elites, 
The
Davos Crowd
,
will stop at literally nothing to ensure your compliance.

Too
bad that SWIFT is just code.  It’s just an encrypted messaging
system.  And like the push to stifle alternative voices on
social media – de-platforming Alex Jones and Gab for examples – the
solution to authoritarian control is not fighting fire with fire, but
technology.

And
that’s exactly what Russia has done.  
They
applied themselves, spent the money and wrote their own code.  
Code
is, after all, hard to control.

De-coding
SWIFT’s Power

It
is also what is happening all over the Internet communications supply
chain right now. 
 The
infrastructure independent content producers need to resist corporate
control is being built and will see their businesses rise as so many
more people are now 
woke to
the reality of the situation.

As
Russian banks and businesses reap the benefits of no longer existing
under SWIFT’s Sword of Damocles, others will see the same benefits.

I’ve
been making this point all year, the more the Trump administration
uses tariffs and sanctions to achieve its political goals the more it
will ultimately weaken the U.S.’s position worldwide.  It
won’t happen overnight.

It
will build, gradually, steadily until one day the threat will no
longer be there.

We
may have already reached that moment as President Trump has ruled out
pressuring SWIFT to cut Iran out of the system.  Too bad his
evil Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin doesn’t agree with him.

But, Mnuchin
is living in the past, he doesn’t respect the resistance that’s
forming to U.S. financial hegemony.  He will though when it
proves ineffectual.

Russia’s
SPFS will gain clients across Iran, Turkey, China and the rest of its
close trading partners.  This will accelerate the
de-dollarization of Russia’s main trade, hydrocarbons, since many
of these countries are major buyers of Russian oil.

When
you hear the announcement from a German bank under sanctions from the
U.S. for trading in Russian energy that it will use SPFS as its
transfer system, that will be the real wake up call to the markets.

Change
then will comes, forgive the obvious pun, swiftly.


*  *


Join
my Patreon
 if
you want to understand how swiftly things change.

Tag
Business
Finance

==========================

Zie ook:

Trump gelooft zijn geheime diensten inzake Iran niet meer‘ 

Trump administratie chanteert en bedreigt de EU over ‘schending’ onterechte VS-sancties tegen Iran‘ (zie ook de links in dat bericht)

Iran houdt zich aan nucleair verdrag, ondanks VS agressie

Frankrijk beschermt Iran tegen de ‘politieagent’ van de wereld, de VS

VS vermoordt Iraniërs met sancties, EU doodstil…….

The New Tyranny of the Dollar

Mijn excuus voor de fout in de kop, hier stond onterecht monopoly te lezen, wat uiteraard monopolie moet zijn; mijn excuus. 

Tekst aangepast op 9 november 2018, na controle van meerdere andere berichten. (was ervan overtuigd dat Rusland haar systeem voor een groot deel nog moest optuigen)

Derivatenhandel die mede de grote bankencrisis in 2008 veroorzaakte, weer terug (van amper weggeweest..)…….

Derivaten die ons zoveel ellende hebben veroorzaakt, zijn in de VS weer op het niveau van voor de grote banken-, of kredietcrisis van 2008, een crisis die mede werd veroorzaakt door de handel in derivaten…… Overigens was de handel in 2014 zelfs nog groter dan voor de bankencrisis  van 2008……

In Nederland kregen derivaten pas een slechte naam, na het misdadig handelen van Vestia bestuurder Staal, echter Vestia was allesbehalve alleen als woningcorporatie, die dit wanproduct gebruikte om te gokken op de financiële markten…… Ook bestuurders van gemeenten vonden het wel kies om met gemeenschapsgeld een gok te wagen……. Aan deze zaken werd geen eind gemaakt door CDA leeghoofd Spies in Balkenende 4, wel bepaalde ze dat men dit niet met te grote bedragen mocht doen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Door de crisis van 2008 zijn over de wereld meer dan 100 miljoen mensen in de ellende gestort, de verantwoordelijken, waaronder bankiers, zijn amper of helemaal niet aangepakt en men is intussen nog steeds bezig met deze smerige derivaten, alsof er niets is gebeurd………… De meeste slachtoffers zitten nog steeds in de drek……..

Gisteren bracht Anti-Media het bericht dat zoals gezegd de derivatenhandel weer op grote hoogten wankelt……………….

Wall
Street Derivatives That Helped Crash the Economy in 2008 Are Back —
in a Big Way

November
1, 2017 at 4:47 pm

Written
by 
Shaun
Bradley

(ANTIMEDIA) —
The
U.K.’s Financial Conduct Agency recently fined Merrill Lynch 
$45
million
,
once again sparking concerns over the 
massive derivatives
market.

The
wealth management division of Bank of America failed to report more
than 68 million derivatives transactions dating all the way back to
2014. It had already been forced to pay 
$20
million
 in
2015 for an earlier offense. Despite major players throughout the
financial industry paying a total of over $350 billion in fines since
the 2008 crisis, those same institutions are still thriving and have
amassed more than a 
$1
trillion in profits
.

The
current penalties amount to little more than a slap on the wrist for
these megabanks and have become a normal part of doing business. It’s
no surprise that the same reckless behavior that 
helped lead
to the Great Recession is still rampant. The global derivatives
market was reportedly as large as $
1.5
quadrillion
 in
2016, and things haven’t improved much since
then. 
Collusion between
large financial institutions, central banks, and governments around
the world has fostered an environment with almost zero
accountability. Hopefully, as more people become educated about the
possible dangers associated with complex financial derivatives, it
will be easier to prevent wild speculation like what is seen today.

Derivatives are
one of the most complex and least understood financial instruments.
Instead of establishing their value through a share of a company’s
profits or a future dividend, derivatives are essentially side bets
made between third parties. Commodity 
futures
contracts
 are
an example of a simple derivative. Farmers have used them to protect
themselves against price changes that could significantly impact
their businesses from season to season.

However,
these financial tools aren’t just limited to hard assets and can be
used to speculate on every industry, asset, and currency in the world
financial system. The growing attention from regulators on the
derivatives market may uncover what many investors and economists
previously warned about. In 2003, Warren Buffett infamously
classified derivatives as ‘weapons of mass destruction’ and
‘time-bombs.’

He
doubled down on the assertion during a more recent interview, 
saying:

At
some point they are likely to cause big trouble…Derivatives lend
themselves to huge amounts of speculation…The problem arises when
there is a discontinuity in the market for some reason or
another…When the markets closed like it was for a few days after
9/11 or in World War I the market was closed for four or five months
– anything that disrupts the continuity of the market when you have
trillions of dollars of nominal amounts outstanding and no ability to
settle up and who knows what happens when the market reopens
.”

derivatives

Merrill
Lynch and Bank of America haven’t been the only ones prosecuted
over their derivatives exposure and practices. Deutsche Bank
is 
poised
to lose
 $60
billion for using currency derivatives to speculate on U.S. inflation
rates, the ‘London Whale’ scandal ended up costing JPMorgan $920
million, and just a month ago, Citi was 
ordered to
close $2 billion worth of derivatives taken over during the collapse
of Lehman Brothers. These potentials for volatile swings in market
valuations can quickly undermine the solvency of institutions that
hold a majority of the pensions, savings accounts, and retirement
funds for the public.

derivatives

The
first 
overview
report
 on
the E.U. derivatives market was just published by the Europe Security
and Markets Authority. It found that the nominal value of derivative
holdings within the European Union was valued at $536 trillion.
London alone handles 
nearly
40%
 of
all interest-rate derivative trades for the European Union, and
uncertainty continues to grow about the impact Brexit will have on
the strength of major European banks.

Confidence
in the current system seems to be eroding with each failed promise
and debt crisis. If faith in central planning is 
shaken
again
 like
in 2008, the result could impact the daily lives of almost everyone.
The once responsible stewards of the public’s wealth have been
corrupted by power, greed, and self-preservation. The that have been
perpetually fined trivial amounts by inept regulators will continue
to make trillions while the savers and retirees suffer as a result.

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

==========================================

Zie ook: ‘Liesbeth Spies, Spies pakt ‘t derivaten probleem ‘goed’ aan

        en: ‘Derivaten deel 85: lokale overheden investeerden ook in derivaten

Monsanto vergiftigt niet alleen de wereld, maar heeft zelfs de moordenaars bv Blackwater opgekocht……..

Het volgende bericht kwam ik tegen op het blog van Stan van Houcke. In dit bericht (uit 2013), dat van Counter Current News (slecht werkende site) komt, wordt uitgelegd dat Monsanto, de grote gifmengers en gentech schoften, het agressief paramilitaire bedrijf Blackwater (later ‘Ex Services’ en nu ‘Academi’ genoemd) opkocht. Blackwater werkte o.a. voor multinationals als Monsanto, Chevron en banken als Barclays en Deutsche Bank. Blackwater heeft zich in het verleden o.a. schuldig gemaakt aan diverse oorlogsmisdaden en terrorisme in het algemeen. Daar Blackwater een privé onderneming is, die weliswaar veel voor het ministerie van defensie (lees: ministerie van oorlog) in de VS werkt, kan de regering van de VS daarmee alle claims over oorlogsmisdaden en terrorisme afwijzen en daarmee Blackwater zoveel mogelijk smerige zaken laten uitvoeren………

Het laat zich raden waarom Monsanto een bedrijf als Blackwater opkocht, immers het bedrijf heeft er belang bij, dat haar zaden overal worden verkocht en dat regeringen de boeren houden aan hun contracten met Monsanto. Zo heeft een groot aantal boeren in India zich het leven benomen, daar ze volkomen failliet gingen door hun contract met Monsanto. Dat zit zo: Monsanto verkoopt zaden aan boeren, waarbij die boeren ervoor tekenen, dat zij niet zelf de zaden vermeerderen (zoals ze al duizenden jaren hebben gedaan en doen). Monsanto belooft die boeren gouden bergen, als zij hun zaden afnemen, echter als het tegenzit, bijvoorbeeld door grote droogte, of slecht weer, houden de boeren geen geld over om zaden te kopen voor het volgende seizoen….. Uiteraard geeft Monsanto grote kortingen op de eerste levering, zoals een heroïne dealer dat doet met zijn klanten……

Het laat zich raden, dat er ontwikkelingslanden zijn, die hun boeren niet gaan lastigvallen met de claims van Monsanto, dan is het uiteraard erg handig, als je een goedgetrainde ploeg psychopaten achter de hand hebben, om hun claims ‘wat meer kracht’ bij te zetten………..

Naast dit alles heeft Monsanto nog te maken met milieugroepen, die (volkomen terecht) tegen gentech zijn en bovendien tegen het op grote schaal verspreiden van zwaar gif over de aarde, door dit klote bedrijf……… Altijd handig om een stel psychopaten achter de hand te hebben, om je belangen veilig te stellen, ja toch….???

Monsanto
and Blackwater

Yes,
Monsanto Actually DID Buy the BLACKWATER Mercenary Group!

February
2, 2013 2:39 pm·

monsanto

Reports
that the huge multinational corporation
Monsanto bought the largest mercenary army in the world might have
seemed ridiculous on the surface. But it turns out
that’s exactly what
happened.

A
report authored by Jeremy Scahill for 
The
Nation
 revealed
that Blackwater, later called Xe Services and more recently
“Academi”, had been sold to Monsanto.

The
clandestine intelligence service was renamed in 2009 after it
became notorious and synonymous with numerous reports of
abuses in Iraq, including massacres of civilians.

The
group, originally founded in 1997 by former Navy SEAL officer
Erik Prince, remains the largest private contractor of the
U.S. Department of State “security
services.” It exists in its functional capacity, so that the
state may engage in
terrorism while giving the government the opportunity to deny
it, because those carrying out the war crimes are not directly
reporting to members of the U.S. military hierarchy.

A
number of military and former CIA officers are said to work
for the mercenary group formerly known as Blackwater. The
purpose
 has always been to increase profit
selling their nefarious services-ranging from information and
intelligence to infiltration, political lobbying and paramilitary
training – for other governments, banks
and multinational corporations.

Scahill
indicates that the group does business with multinationals,
like Monsanto, Chevron, and financial giants such as Barclays and
Deutsche Bank, but that this is done through two companies owned by
Erik Prince, owner of Blackwater: Total Intelligence Solutions and
Terrorism Research Center. These officers and directors share the
group.

One
of those partners is Cofer Black, who was known for his brutality
as one of the directors of the CIA.

He
is alleged to have been the one who made contact with Monsanto back
in 2008 as director of Total Intelligence. Black entered into
the contract with the company in order to spy on and
infiltrate organizations of animal
rights
 activists, anti-GM and other dirty
activities of the biotech giant, according to sources close to
Academi.

Monsanto
executive Kevin Wilson declined to comment, when asked directly by
Scahill about this. But he later confirmed to 
The
Nation
 that
the company had in fact hired Total Intelligence in 2008 and
2009.

According
to Monsanto, this was only to keep track of “public
disclosure” of its opponents. He asserted, however, that Total
Intelligence was a “totally separate entity from Blackwater,”
even though it is just one of the myriad of names and forms the
massive mercenary group has adopted over the years.

Scahill
himself, however, says that he has copies of emails from Cofer
Black. They explain that after the meeting with Wilson for
Monsanto, where he explains to other former CIA agents, using their
Blackwater e-mails, that the discussion with Wilson was that Total
Intelligence had become “Monsanto’s intelligence arm,” spying
on activists and other actions, including “our people to legally
integrate these groups.”

In
all, Monsanto paid Total Intelligence $ 127,000 in 2008 and $
105,000 in 2009. After these details began to leak out, they seem
to have buried the paper trail, and perhaps utilized yet another
front for Blackwater to provide the same services.

Activists
have claimed to have confronted agents of Monsanto who roughly fit
the description of mercenaries with the group. Whatever name they
are utilizing at this point, it seems reasonable that if they have
been used in the past – and if they have repeatedly changed their
names and added sub-groups to their organization –
that they have only done the same thing once again.

Monsanto
has been criticized by an array of environmental, peace and even
health activists for their production of toxic poisons spilling
from Agent Orange to PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), as well as
their more common business in selling pesticides, hormones and
genetically modified seeds.

Almost
simultaneously with the publication of
this article in The Nation, the Via Campesina reported the purchase
of 500,000 shares of Monsanto, for more than $23 million by the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which with this action completed
the outing of the mask of “philanthropy.” Another association
that is not surprising.

It
is a marriage between the two most brutal monopolies in the history
of industrialism: Bill Gates controls more than 90 percent of the
market share of proprietary computing and Monsanto about 90 percent
of the global transgenic seed market and most global commercial
seed. There does not exist in any other industrial sector
monopolies so vast, whose very existence is a negation of the
vaunted principle of “market competition” of capitalism. Both
Gates and Monsanto are very aggressive in defending their
ill-gotten monopolies.

Although
Bill Gates might try to say that the Foundation is not linked to
his business, all it proves is the opposite: most of their
donations end up favoring the commercial investments of the tycoon,
not really “donating” anything, but instead of paying taxes to
the state coffers, he invests his profits in where it is favorable
to him economically, including propaganda from their
supposed good intentions.
On the contrary, their “donations” finance projects as
destructive as geoengineering or replacement of natural community
medicines for high-tech patented medicines in the poorest areas of
the world. What a coincidence, former Secretary of Health Julio
Frenk and Ernesto Zedillo are advisers of the Foundation.

Like
Monsanto, Gates is also engaged in trying to destroy rural farming
worldwide, mainly through the “Alliance for a Green Revolution in
Africa” (AGRA). It works as a Trojan horse to deprive poor
African farmers of their traditional seeds, replacing them with the
seeds of their companies first, finally by genetically modified
(GM). To this end, the Foundation hired Robert Horsch in 2006, the
director of Monsanto. Now Gates, airing major profits, went
straight to the source.

Blackwater,
Monsanto and Gates are three sides of the same figure: the
war machine on the
planet and most people who inhabit it, are peasants, indigenous
communities, people who want to share information and
knowledge or any other who does not want to be in the aegis of
profit and the destructiveness of capitalism.

So
why were so many media outlets, editorialists and bloggers
clamoring to say that the purchase was a “hoax”?

That’s
a good question. The more cynical among us might suspect
a financial incentive from Monsanto itself to such “journalists.”
Monsanto indeed has hired a public relations team to seek out
critical blogs and
websites reporting on their crimes against both Nature and
humankind. We have seen this first hand in comments on
PoliticalBlindSpot.com articles on Monsanto. It is not beyond the
realm of possibilities that they have created blogs where
seemingly legitimate authors write organic thoughts, observations
and rebuttals. The public presumes these are real-world people,
when in fact they are working PR for the company.

But
the core argument of those who claim that the Monsanto purchase of
Blackwater is not true lies in the fact that we can only officially
document Blackwater being hired by Monsanto for years. Immediately
following this extensive work that Blackwater did for Monsanto,
they sold the company. Because of the nature of how the sale
transpired, it is impossible to document who the sale was to. The
obvious and logical conclusion to insiders (particularly in the
private security industry), however, is that the sale was in fact
to Monsanto who had been employing the group.

Xe
(now 
Academi)
has, indeed, been purchased
,
and while there’s no way of DOCUMENTING who the new owners really
are, the logical conclusion would be that Monsanto, who had been
employing them prior to the sale are the new owners. This, of
course, would also make sense of the secrecy surrounding the deal
and the identity of the new owners. The
 company
was bought out
 by
private investors via private equity companies that don’t have to
divulge any of their dealings, with Bank of America providing much
of the 
$200
million in financing
 for
the deal.

New
York-based USTC Holdings said it will acquire Xe and its core
operating subsidiaries, but did not disclose the price or terms of
the agreement in a statement.

USTC
Holdings is an investor consortium led by private equity firms
Forte Capital Advisors and Manhattan Partners.

Various
researchers have been trying to document the buy via a paper trail,
but so far without much luck. That, of course, is the point.

One
thing 
that
is known
:
Forte Capital Advisors is the baby of long-time Blackwater ally
Jason De Yonker:

DeYonker
has unique experience with the Company that dates back to
its founding in the late 1990s. He advised the Company through
development of its early business plan and expansion of the
Moyock training facility as well as supporting negotiations of
its first training contracts with U.S. government agencies.
Between 1998 and 2002, Mr. DeYonker co-managed Xe founder,
Erik Prince’s family office which included management of
Mr. Prince’s portfolio companies.

What
does that mean? The guy is a 
glorified
accountant
.

Prior
to joining Forté, Jason co-managed a +$100 million family office.
In addition to actively managing various platform companies, Jason
was a part of the executive team responsible for family wealth
management.

Jason
has spent the last 18 years advising on various mergers,
acquistions and divestitures with an aggregate transaction value
greater than $1 billion. Jason’s experience include: transaction
advisory, portfolio management, real estate development, venture
capital and cross border dealings. Jason began his career with
Arthur Andersen Corporate Finance Group, and was a Director in
Deloitte & Touche’s Corporate Finance Group. He also was the
Finance Director for the West Family Trust, a venture capital group
focused on cross-border transactons.

Jason
recieved a Bachelor of Business Administration, with a
concentration in finance and accounting, from the Univeristy of
Michigan.

The
other investor? It looks like the very junior partner will
be 
Manhattan
Partners
,
a private equity company – a shop that gathers money
from anonymous rich investors and uses the pool of cash
to  leverage buyouts of big companies they wouldn’t have
been able to take over on their own.

Manhattan
Partners invests in “compelling growth and 
special
situation transactions
,”
but this will be their first known foray into defense industries
– 
WarIsBusiness.com
reports
 (via
Spencer Ackerman
):

Manhattan
Growth Partners is led by Dean Bosacki and Patrick McBride. Bosacki
serves on the board of “the world’s largest 
commencement
photography
 business,”
among other companies. Manhattan Growth Partners, which describes
itself as “a progressive thinking private equity firm,” also
holds a majority interest in Hugo Naturals, a line of organic,
vegan-friendly soaps, lotions, scents and soy candles sold at Whole
Foods and other greenwashed retailers.

So
what does this all mean? Did Monsanto actually buy Blackwater? The
answer is yes, but indirectly. The purchase was made through shell
company and a pair of private equity firms. At the end of the
day, it would seem the logical conclusion is that in spite of
arguments to the contrary, Monsanto in fact did by the Blackwater
mercenary group… or at least the renamed Blackwater Xe, and
now Academi Services group. The big question, now
is 
why?

(Article
by M. David, Jackson Marciana and I.A. Jamal; image via #Op309
Media
)

http://countercurrentnews.com/2013/02/monsanto-actually-did-buy-the-blackwater-group/#

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt. Dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Blackwater’, 

Deutsche Bank maakt schietend reclame in België!

Al enige tijd op de Belgische tv: reclame van de Deutsche Bank, waarin een pistool wordt afgeschoten op te hoge kosten…… Een omkering van wat Duitsland in WOI en II in België deden, toen werden de prijzen juist ‘omhoog geschoten…….’

Je vraagt je werkelijk af, wie er verantwoordelijk is voor een dergelijke domme reclame. Vreemd ook dat niemand in België zich daar druk om maakt…….

Banken, de grote boeven

Naar nu blijkt hebben grote banken als JP Morgan, Deutsche Bank en Barclays, onderling afspraken gemaakt over de berekening van rente aan en van klanten.

Het houdt maar niet op, als het over de gore streken van banken gaat, ondertussen mag de grote onderlaag in de maatschappij boeten voor alle smerige deals, disfunctioneren en ronduit frauduleus handelen. Nogmaals blijkt wat een geweldige prestatie de toezichthouders hebben neergezet…..

En maar ouwehoeren over hervormingen in arbeidsrecht, de zorg en de huren………

Bron: BBC World Service.