Nikki Haley treedt terug als VS ambassadeur bij de VN

Mooi
nieuws gisteren, toen bekend werd gemaakt dat hare kwaadaardigheid
Nikki Haley terugtreedt als ambassadeur bij de VN. Deze duivel draait
werkelijk alles om als het over de feiten gaat die de ongebreidelde
terreur van de VS, Israël en Saoedi-Arabië in de dagelijkse praktijk laat zien (overigens ook wat betreft andere
zaken, maar de genoemde drie zijn wel het belangrijkst).

Nu
maar afwachten welke ploert het beest Trump nu weer zal aanstellen
als vervanger, die per 1 januari 2019 ‘in functie’ zal treden…….
Slechter dan Haley is vrijwel onmogelijk. (althans dat hoop ik toch…)

Daarover
gesproken: Trump stelde dat Haley het voor elkaar kreeg dat de VS
weer wordt gerespecteerd…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Met
‘gerespecteerd’ bedoelt het beest bang zijn voor de VS en daar hebben
de landen waar de VS de pik op heeft, alle redenen toe, echter dat is
bepaald niet alleen de ‘verdienste van Haley of Trump. 

Met leugens en/of
false flag operaties heeft de VS al sinds WOII (en zelfs nog ver
daarvoor, maar laat ik me beperken tot het einde van WOII) illegale
oorlogen gevoerd tegen landen die in de verste verte geen partij zijn
voor de VS, dit nog naast de geheime militaire operaties die de VS
(volkomen illegaal) uitvoert waar het maar uitkomt…… Verder is daar nog het organiseren van opstanden en coups in diverse buitenlanden van de VS….. Dan het feit dat de VS met drone-terreur al duizenden
mensen heeft vermoord, voor meer dan 90% overigens niet eens
verdachte personen, dus veelal vrouwen en kinderen…… Om nog maar te zwijgen over het ontvoeren, martelen en gijzelen van verdachten door de VS (CIA)…….

Sinds
WOII heeft de VS intussen al meer dan 22 miljoen mensen
vermoord…….

Respect?
Volkomen terechte angst!!

Hier
een artikel van Tyler Durden over het aftreden van Haley, met veel
feiten over haar smerige optredens in de VN, eerder gepubliceerd op
Zero Hedge:

Nikki
Haley Resigns as UN Ambassador

October
9, 2018 at 7:59 am

Written
by 
Tyler
Durden

(ZHE— Update
(11:00 am ET):
 During
their joint press conference, Trump offered effusive praise of Haley,
saying she earned the respect of foreign diplomats during her time as
UN ambassador. He added that “maybe” she will be coming back at
some point, and that she could have “her pick” of jobs in the
administration.

When
her turn came, Haley praised the administration’s “follow-through”
on its foreign policy aims and her success in cutting $1.3 billion
from the UN budget.

countries
may not like what we do but they respect what we do. They know that
if we say we’re going to do something we follow it through.”

In
a recap of her stint as UN ambassador, Haley praised Trump’s
decision to move the US embassy in Israelfrom Tel Aviv to Jerusalem,
saying 
we
will put our embassy where we want to put our embassy.”

She
also offered praise for other senior administration figures,
including Jared and Ivanka, claiming that Jared was a “hidden
genius” for his work on the revamped Nafta deal (now officially
known as USMCA).

Before
leaving her position at the end of the year, Haley said she hopes to
make sure “everything is in the right place” for when the next
ambassador arrives. And while she “doesn’t have anything set”
on what she’s doing next, she did confirm that “no I will not be
running in 2020” adding that she’s a “believer in term limits”
and wants to give “someone else a shot.”

When
reporters pressed her about her reasons for leaving, Haley denied
that she was leaving for “personal reasons” and reiterated her
claim that she felt it was time to “step aside” and that 
the
truth is I want to make sure this administration has the strongest
person to fight.”

When
reporters reverted to questioning Trump, the president said his
administration had avoided serious foreign policy pitfalls – like
the outbreak of a hot war with North Korea – that many of Trump’s
critics had warned would be all but inevitable should he set foot in
the Oval Office.

Look
at North Korea, it was a potentially devastating problem and now it’s
looking very good.”

Haley,
Trump said, played an important role in reestablishing international
respect for the US.

We
are respected again – that I can tell you. Very much respected
again. Even if you look at the votes in the United Nations – where
we would normally get no votes we are getting very strong votes now.”

He
added that the way in which Haley is leaving her position is “the
right way to do it.”

It’s
a great position – I think she’s helped make it a much better
position. I think it’s become a more glamorous position than it was
a few years ago. She’s made it a more important position. So I can
say we have very many people who want to do it and they are very good
people.”

Trump
also revealed that ‘we’re talking about three or four different
locations’ for the upcoming summit with North Korea, adding that
he’d love to remove sanctions but that “we have to get
something.”
 “Eventually
we’ll have meetings on US soil and on their soil also.

I
think North Korea is going to be a very economically successful
country. Banks are calling they’re wanting to go there…and that’s
one of the reasons we’re having very successful conversations.”

Asked
about the timeline for naming a successor to Haley, Trump said he
expects to appoint someone within the next “two or three weeks.”
Asked about the missing Saudi journalist, Trump said he knows
“nothing” about the situation but that he would be asking the
Saudis for more information.

Unable
to restrain himself from taking a shot at his former rival Hillary
Clinton, Trump answered a question about Hillary Clinton’s warnings
on how to handle Saudi Arabia with “I guess that’s why she lost.”
Meanwhile, Trump said Pompeo’s latest meeting with China 
(a
meeting that ended in a dramatic public confrontation)
 went
“very well.”

Turning
to the often uncomfortable subject of the timing of a US-China trade
deal, Trump insisted that “China wants to make a deal, but they’re
not ready yet. 
That’s
why I’ve canceled a couple of meetings.”

After
a few more kind words for Haley, the president wrapped up the press
conference.

While
Trump says he’s sad to see Haley go, at least one person is excited
by the news.

Nassim Nicholas Taleb


@nntaleb

Christmas came early. https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1049671372962783234 

Nassim Nicholas Taleb


@nntaleb

The replacement of psychopathic pedophrastic low-IQ maximally neocon ambassador by someone who can potentially be a neocon is excellent news.https://twitter.com/DanielLMcAdams/status/1049678995476877312 

Daniel McAdams@DanielLMcAdams

I wrote this just over a year ago about Nikki Haley. Glad to see it come to pass, but worried about her replacement…http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/neocon-watch/2017/september/15/nikki-haley-meltdown-assad-must-goand-war-with-north-korea/ 

View image on Twitter

* *
*

Update
(10:40 am ET): 
Trump
has confirmed to a reporter that Haley will be leaving her post at
the end of the year, saying only that she wants to “take a break”
and that “we hate to lose her”. The president reportedly said he
will pick Haley’s replacement in “two-three weeks” or “sooner.”

  • TRUMP
    SAYS HALEY HAD PREVIOUSLY SAID SHE WANTS TO TAKE A BREAK

  • TRUMP
    SAYS `WE HATE TO LOSE’ HALEY, WILL BE LEAVING AT YEAR-END

  • TRUMP
    SAYS WILL NAME HALEY SUCCESSOR IN 2-3 WEEKS OR SOONER

The
president added that Haley told him ‘six months ago’ that she
would be leaving at the two-year mark.

Jennifer Epstein

@jeneps

Trump says Haley will leave the UN and administration at the end of the year but would be happy to have her back in any capacity, per @justinsink in the Oval. Trump says she told him 6 months ago that she wanted to leave at the 2-year mark.

Haley
confirms that she will depart on good terms and that she will
campaign for Trump in 2020.

Jennifer Jacobs


@JenniferJJacobs

Replying to @JenniferJJacobs

TRUMP says Haley “has been very special to me” and “is a fantastic person.”

Hate to lose her, he says.

She can come back in any capacity, he says.

Jennifer Jacobs


@JenniferJJacobs

HALEY: “No, I’m not running in 2020.”

She says she will campaign for TRUMP in 2020.

”It has been the honor of a lifetime” to be UN ambassador, she says.

Unsurprisingly,
rumors are circulating in the White House press corp that the timing
of Haley’s resignation is “suspicious” and may have something
to do with the Brett Kavanaugh controversy.

Jennifer Jacobs

@JenniferJJacobs

Exactly.

I have no indication Nikki Haley resigned because of discontent over Kavanaugh’s confirmation, but the timing hints that — and White House aides are aware of that.

Jacqueline Alemany

@JaxAlemany

Sources close to the WH echo this sentiment — that the timing doesn’t make sense. A source adds that it allows people to say Kavanaugh might have played a role. https://twitter.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/1049666864656343041 

Others
are speculating that South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham could soon
take a job in the Trump cabinet (possibly attorney general?) after
the midterms, allowing Haley to fill his old senate seat.

In
a statement to reporters, Haley said her experience as UN ambassador
has been “the honor of a lifetime” and that the US would put its
embassy where it wants and that “there are a number of people who
would like to do this…it is a much more glamorous position than it
was a few years ago.”

* *
*

Two
weeks after President Trump issued another fiery rebuke of globalism,
the United Nations and its attendant institutions during his second
speech before the UN General Assembly, 
Axios is
reporting that the president has accepted the resignation of UN
Ambassador Nikki Haley.

Haley,
the former governor of South Carolina who has been with the
administration since the beginning, reportedly discussed her
resignation with Trump during a visit to the White House last
week. 
Her
desire to leave her post apparently shocked several senior
administration officials. Haley was an early and frequent critic of
then-candidate Trump before she conceded and joined his
administration.

Haley
refused to comment on reports of her resignation after walking by a
group of reporters in the West Wing.

Alex Mallin

@alex_mallin

Haley just walked by a group of reporters in the West Wing, I asked her if the report is true and she did not answer. She walked through a door leading towards the West Wing.

Jonathan Swan

@jonathanvswan

Scoop: Trump has accepted Nikki Haley’s resignation https://www.axios.com/donald-trump-nikki-haley-resignation-d25b64a9-264e-483a-a79b-ae8a48e367db.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=twsocialshare&utm_campaign=organic 

But
in what appeared to be a confirmation of the report, Press Secretary
Sarah Huckabee Sanders announced that Haley would make an appearance
with Trump in the Oval Office at 10:30 am ET. The event will be open
to the press pool.

Sarah Sanders


@PressSec

President Trump and Ambassador Nikki Haley will meet in the Oval Office at 10:30am this morning. This event will be open to the pool.

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Trump also teased the 10:30 meeting with a tweet.

Donald J. Trump


@realDonaldTrump

Big announcement with my friend Ambassador Nikki Haley in the Oval Office at 10:30am.

Readers
can watch the press conference on the live feed below:

Most
recently, Haley oversaw the US’s withdrawal from a UN human rights
council over its “chronic bias against Israel.”

I
want to make it crystal clear that this step is not a retreat from
human rights commitments,” Haley said at the time. “On the
contrary, we take this step because our commitment does not allow us
to remain a part of a hypocritical and self-serving organization that
makes a mockery of human rights.”

At
one point, Haley was rumored to be a top pick to replace Rex
Tillerson as Secretary of State – a job that ultimately went to
Secretary Mike Pompeo. Media reports detailed a fraught relationship
between Haley and Tillerson as they jockeyed to be the face of the
administration’s foreign policy. Tillerson’s aides reportedly
asked her to pre-clear any public remarks with Washington.

While
she has mostly avoided conflict with Trump since joining the
administration, Trump did accuse her of getting “ahead of the
curve” after she said earlier this year that the administration
would impose sanctions on Russian companies found to be aiding the
Syrian government’s chemical weapons program after a deadly
chemical attack in April, as 
the
New York Times
reminds
us.

On
April 15, Ms. Haley announced that the administration would place
sanctions on Russian companies found to be assisting Syria’s
chemical weapons program — part of a menu of options to retaliate
against a suspected gas attack that killed dozens on April 7. But the
next day, 
the
White House announced that Mr. Trump had decided not to go forward
with the sanctions, contradicting what Ms. Haley had said. The White
House said she had gotten “ahead of the curve.”

She
also broke with the administration line when she said last December
that women accusing Trump of sexual improprieties deserved “to be
heard” and that “they should be dealt with.”

And
in December 2017, Ms. Haley said that women who had accused Mr. Trump
of sexual misconduct “should be heard,” a surprising break from
the administration’s longstanding assertion that the accusations
were false and that voters rightly dismissed them when they elected
Mr. Trump. 
They
should be heard, and they should be dealt with,” Ms. Haley told
CBS. “And I think we heard from them prior to the election. And I
think any woman who has felt violated or felt mistreated in any way,
they have every right to speak up.”

As
Axios pointed out, Haley wrote an op-ed last month challenging
allegations in the infamous anonymous NYT op-ed alleging that a group
of senior administration officials had formed an internal
“resistance” movement against Trump to protect the nation from
his most dangerous impulses.


By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

=====================================

Ook aangaande Iran heeft Haley zich beschuldigd aan oorlogshitserij, lees het volgende artikel dat ik eerder vandaag publiceerde en klik op de de links onder dat bericht: ‘Trump volgt het scenario van deep state: oorlog met Iran ‘is onvermijdelijk….’

Voorts:

Iraanse protesten allesbehalve compleet spontaan (zoals VS ambassadeur bij de VN Haley durfde te stellen…)….

Nikki Haley (VS ambassadeur in de VN) bedreigt sjiitisch Iran met militair ingrijpen……‘ 

Lees wat betreft de ongebreidelde VS terreur:

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

List of wars involving the United States‘ 

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….    

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

Voor meer berichten met Haley, klik op het label met haar naam, direct onder dit bericht.

Chinese marine troeft VS af in Zuid-Chinese Zee

De VS
rekent de Zuid-Chinese Zee tot haar territoriale wateren, althans
anders kan je niet concluderen als je ziet dat de VS China keer op
keer uitdaagt in een gebied dat China ‘iets meer gerechtigd dan de
VS’, ziet als haar territoriale wateren…….

Eindelijk
heeft China besloten dat het genoeg is geweest en heeft de torpedobootjager
USS Decator, een schip met geleide raketten aan boord, weggejaagd uit haar territoriale wateren!

China
wordt door de westerse wereld beschuldigd van ‘expansiedrift’, door
het opspuiten van eilandjes in de Zuid-Chinese Zee. Echter gezien het
grote aantal militaire bases van terreurentiteit VS rond een deel van
haar grondgebied, kan je niet anders dan China gelijk geven, immers de
VS heeft ruim voldoende bewezen totaal onbetrouwbaar te zijn en
uiterst agressief te opereren en dat in een fiks deel van de
wereld…… 

Trouwens over expansiedrift gesproken, als er voor die claim één land in aanmerking komt is het wel de VS, met haar meer dan 800 militaire bases over de wereld en dat voor een ‘land’ dat zoals gezegd ten overvloede heeft bewezen uiterst agressief te werk te gaan, neem alleen al: 

  • alle illegale oorlogen die het is begonnen. 
  • het organiseren van staatsgrepen in vele landen, veelal voorafgegaan door door de VS georganiseerde opstanden, zoals in Libië, Oekraïne en Syrië (waarin de CIA in beide gevallen, dus zowel opstand als coup, een grote rol speelde). 
  • het uitvoeren van geheime militaire operaties. 
  • het hacken zelfs van bevriende regeringen (zoals de telefoon van de Duitse premier Merkel).
  • het manipuleren van de bevolking via diverse media in binnenland en in vele buitenlanden*
  • het voeren van de oorlog tegen drugs**
  • het vermoorden van verdachten middels drones, waarbij godbetert meer dan 90% van de slachtoffers niet eens werd verdacht, dus veelal vrouwen en kinderen…….

Vanaf het einde van WOII heeft de VS ruim meer dan 22 miljoen mensen vermoord……***

Gelukkig
dat China en Rusland intussen schoon genoeg hebben van de VS terreur
en niet meer terugdeinzen om de spierballen te laten zien (zo heeft Rusland de door de VS en NAVO lidstaten gevreesde S-300 raketten geleverd aan Syrië, dit tegen de agressie van Israël, de VS en een paar hielenlikkende NAVO partners. Het is de
hoogste tijd dat de VS zich volledig terugtrekt op eigen (gestolen)
bodem en daar blijft, ofwel: Yankee go home (and stay there)!!

Chinese
Warship Intercepts US Guided-Missile Destroyer in South China Sea

October
1, 2018 at 10:19 pm

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

(ANTIWAR.COM— US
naval operations in the South China Sea are built primarily around
needling China. China has built up a number of islands and claims
ownership of them. The US insists China doesn’t own them, and also
that they’re not really islands, so the USS Decatur, a
guided-missile destroyer, was sent to sail past one of the islands,
as a way to thumbing their nose at Chinese claims.

That
doesn’t work for China, who sent one of their own destroyers to
intercept the American ship, which was just 12 nautical miles off the
Spratly Islands. China called the US ship’s presence a “threat”
and said the Chinese ship was sent there to tell them to leave.

US
officials are now 
furious as
well, both because they intend to keep sailing past those islands to
spite China, and 
because
they say China’s ship was “unsafe” in getting so close to them
,
forcing the USS Decatur to move to prevent a collision.

US
officials tend to over-emphasize the “unsafe” operations of
anyone confronting US warships, especially pushed when tensions are
mounting, as the US-China tensions have been in recent weeks.

Two
destroyers 45 yards from one another is close, but not unnavigable.
China’s ship forced the US ship to turn, which was the whole point
of the interception, to chase the USS Decatur out of what China
considers their territorial waters.

Generally,
a ship passing 12 miles from a small island would barely be noticed,
and China has previously ignored such operations. The Pentagon,
however, have emphasized that they are explicitly flouting Chinese
territorial claims with such sail-bys, and China apparently felt
obliged to respond.

By Jason
Ditz
 /
Republished with permission / 
ANTIWAR.COM / Report
a typo

========================================

*    Zie:

CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

‘VS ‘ministerie van propaganda’ had supervisie over meer dan 800 films en minstens duizend tv series……..

Iran: moderne oorlogspropaganda ingezet door VS tegen ‘ongehoorzaam land…

VS en GB brengen propaganda die moet verdoezelen wat er echt gebeurt in Syrië…….. Door VS gebombardeerde ‘gifgasfabriek’ niet bestaand….

**  Deze ‘oorlog tegen drugs’ (o.a. gevoerd door de DEA middels de import in de VS van enorme hoeveelheden drugs) heeft aan een groot aantal mensen het leven gekost…… Zie ook: De war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan over het algemeen gedacht

*** Zie:

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

Bang voor Amerika

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

De VS, een duivels imperium, dat achter haar psychopathisch moordende troepen staat??

Professor Boyle: Obama de oorlogsmisdadiger die alle wetten met voeten heeft getreden, zou levenslang gevangen moeten zitten in Den Haag

Professor
Boyle geeft al 41 jaar lang onderwijs aan de Harvard Law School,
waar ook Obama studeerde. Volgens Boyle heeft Obama alle regels
aangaande de rechtsstaat geschonden, sterker nog: Obama heeft
zelfs de grondwet van de VS geschonden…….

Boyle
stelt dat e.e.a Obama veel zwaarder is aan te rekenen dan
bijvoorbeeld Bush en Trump, daar hij rechten heeft gestudeerd. Dit
alles terwijl Obama tijdens diens presidentschap letterlijk stelde
dat hij zeer goed is in het vermoorden van mensen…….

Niet
alleen vermoordde Obama een groot aantal mensen in de illegale
oorlogen die hij begon tegen Libië en Syrië*, maar ook de duizenden
mensen die hij vermoordde met zijn ‘drone programma’, waar meer dan
90% van de slachtoffers niet eens als verdacht te boek stond, dus
je raadt het al: vooral vrouwen en kinderen……  

Daarnaast breidde Obama het aantal militairen in Afghanistan fiks uit en ook daar beging de VS, zoals overal waar deze grootste terreurentiteit oorlog voert, enorme oorlogsmisdaden…. Zoals het bombarderen van een Artsen zonder Grenzen (MSF) ziekenhuis en dat een uur lang, terwijl het VS oppercommando meermaals werd gevraagd te stoppen met bombarderen……..

Lees dit
helaas enigszins krom geschreven artikel dat wel een heel duidelijk
beeld geeft hoe Obama niet alleen wetten met voeten heeft getreden,
maar ook zijn verkiezingsbeloften heeft geschonden (al vanaf zijn
eerste termijn….)…

Ofwel: gezien het voorgaande had ook Obama levenslang gevangen moeten zitten in Den Haag……

Denouncing
Obama

By
Professor Francis A. Boyle

University
of Illinois College of Law, Before the Foellinger Auditorium,
September 7, 2018

 (Transcript
revised)


September
14, 2018 
Information
Clearing House
” –  I
am Francis Boyle, Professor of Law here at the College of Law. I’m
the Senior Professor at the College of Law. I’ve taught here 41
years in a row without a break. I know Obama. He was behind me at
Harvard Law School. Obama abandoned and betrayed every Principle
about the Rule of Law that I learned at Harvard Law School including
the United States Constitution.

I
was fairly disposed towards Obama. When the Black Law Students
brought him over here to the Law School from Springfield to speak, I
went over there. I sat next to Obama. I introduced myself to Obama. I
told Obama I couldn’t stay. I had to go home for dinner with my
family. He said he understood. I wished him well and I shook his
hand. I was the only Law Professor there that day. I am here to
condemn Obama as a war criminal and worse.

The
University of Illinois is giving him an “ethics in government”
award. This is a sick joke and a demented fraud! The University of
Illinois, for its own typical bootlicking reasons, wants to whitewash
all of Obama’s international crimes. Obama should be sitting in a
jail cell in The Hague with the International Criminal Court and not
here getting some bogus “ethics in government” award from the
bootlickers of the University of Illinois campus bigwigs.

I’m
not the only one to say that. Obama and I had the same Jurisprudence
Teacher – Philosophy of Law – at Harvard Law School, Professor
Roberto Unger, the founder of the Critical Legal Studies Movement.
What did our Teacher say about Obama on BBC Hard Talk and elsewhere?:
“Obama is a disaster!” Again, Professor Unger, our teacher, said:
“Obama is a disaster!” I agree with Professor Unger, one of the
great philosophers of law in the post-World War 2 era. And I’ve
been teaching Jurisprudence since I came here in 1978.

Now
don’t just take Professor Unger’s words for it. What does
Professor Noam Chomsky have to say about Obama and his drone murder
extermination campaign against Muslims, Arabs, Asians of Color all
over the world? Here’s Professor Noam Chomsky: “…particularly
to the drone assassinations, the most extreme terrorist campaign of
modern times – which have killed more than 5,000 people, including
U.S. citizens and hundreds of children.” That is Noam Chomsky, one
of the great intellectuals in the world and a personal hero of mine
when he was leading the forces of opposition to the Vietnam War that
I was opposing as a young man. That’s how Chomsky referred to
Obama’s drone murder campaign: “…the most extreme terrorist
campaign of modern times…” That’s amazing to think of! That’s
the person here that the University of Illinois is whitewashing. That
figure today on his drone murder extermination campaign is up to at
least ten thousand. Trump is just continuing it.

Indeed,
Trump is just continuing across the board policies that Obama put in
place. The difference between Trump and Obama and Obama and Bush Jr.
is that Obama knows better. He’s a magna cum laude graduate of
Harvard Law School just like I am. Obama has abandoned and betrayed
every known Principle of the Rule of Law that I ever learned at
Harvard Law School including the United States Constitution which he
doesn’t give diddly-squat about. Indeed referring to his drone
murder extermination campaign Obama bragged: “…I’m really good
at killing people!” Those are Obama’s own words. That’s the man
the University of Illinois is whitewashing today with their “ethics
in government” award. Indeed Obama murdered four U.S. citizens at
least that we know of, including Mr. Awlaki and his 16 year old son
who was completely innocent of anything. Obama is a monster! He’s a
criminal! As I said he should be in jail, not getting some bogus
“ethics” award from the bootlickers at the University of Illinois
administration.

Let’s
review his record. The first thing Obama does when he comes into
office, Bush Jr. has about 26,000 troops in Afghanistan, and Obama
escalates that immediately by 100,000 troops. 100,000 extra troops
murdering, killing, exterminating Afghans all up and down. We don’t
even have a body count because the Pentagon won’t give us the
numbers. My estimate maybe a million people. Obama is like Genghis
Khan and His Mongol Horde, raping, robbing, pillaging and murdering
all over the world innocent men, women, and children. That’s the
guy they’re giving their “ethics in government” award to.

After
he had done his genocidal work in Afghanistan, Obama moved on to
Libya in order to steal their oil. Obama launched his war against
Libya and exterminated about 50,000 Libyans – needlessly for no
reason except Obama wanted to steal Libya’s oil. Indeed it was
outright genocide for Black Africans living in Libya that Obama
perpetrated upon them. Obama destroyed Libya as a State completely.
It no longer exists and we the have the massive refugee crisis coming
out of Libya with thousands of Africans – Blacks, and Arabs –
drowning in the Mediterranean all thanks to Obama this war criminal.

After
he was done with Libya, then Obama moved on to Syria and destroyed
Syria. He worked with his jihadi terrorists to overthrow the
government of Syria and create a total catastrophe. Maybe 500,000
Syrians have been murdered because of Obama, and that country is a
catastrophe today. The battles still go on. We have no idea what’s
going to happen over there. 


Just like he did in Libya, Obama used
jihadi extremists to wage his wars for him. And America in Libya,
became the air force for Obama’s jihadi extremists. Then he turned
them on Syria and there the death and destruction by Obama goes on
today. A second state that Obama has pretty much destroyed all by
himself with his jihadi extremists – Genghis Khan and His Horde of
Mongols.

Now,
we come to Yemen started by Obama. Massive death and destruction in
Yemen right now as we speak today. Obama supported Saudi Arabia and
the UAE against Yemen and has killed close to 10,000 Houthis.
Outright genocide. All to steal their oil and set off a humanitarian
catastrophe in Yemen. Maybe 2 million Yemenis over there are
suffering from cholera. It’s the largest outbreak of cholera in the
world today. And they are starving. Obama starved them to death.
There’s an embargo on them right now. They can’t even eat. Obama
started this policy.

I
could go on here forever but I’m not going to because I teach
Obama’s atrocities to my law students. I think we could have no
better indication of where Obama really stands than the eulogy he
gave last weekend in honor of the war criminal and warmonger John
McCain. John McCain was a war criminal. He bombed Hanoi killing
innocent civilians when he was shot down. Outright war criminal. And
when he got home McCain mongered for every war the U.S. ever waged
since then including in Syria and supporting Obama’s Nazis in
Ukraine. Let us recall John McCain’s theme song: “Bomb, bomb,
bomb! Bomb, bomb, Iran!” Sixty million people and McCain did his
best to start a war against them and kill them. Obama then appeared
there to give a eulogy in support of this long-standing war criminal
and warmonger.

Who
else was there? Bush Jr. another Genghis Khan and His Horde of
Mongols. They’re best buddies – Bush Jr and Obama. Who else did
they trot out to honor McCain? Henry Kissinger! The three of them,
yes, they all spoke right after each other: Kissinger, Bush Jr., and
Obama. Kissinger of the genocidal Vietnam War. Murdering 58,000 young
men of my generation and exterminating 3 million Vietnamese. I call
him Hank Half-An-Eichmann Kissinger. I say that from personal
experience. I went through the exact same Ph.D. program at Harvard
that produced Kissinger before me. They gave me Kissinger’s Old
Office at Harvard’s Center for International Affairs. 


“There but
for the grace of God go I!” So here we have three major warmongers
and war criminals honoring a fourth. You have Kissinger, Bush Jr. and
Obama honoring McCain. Well as I say: Warbirds of a feather flock
together!

I
have one message for Obama that I want to deliver him here today
personally as a lawyer and a law professor and a graduate of Harvard
Law School:

Hey!
Hey!
Obama say!
How many kids!
Did you kill today!

Hey!
Hey!
Obama say!

How many kids!
Did you kill today!

Hey!
Hey!
Obama say!

How many kids!
Did you kill today!

Thank
you.



Francis
Anthony Boyle is a professor of international law at the University
of Illinois College of Law. He has served as counsel for Bosnia and
Herzegovina and has been a staunch supporter of the rights of
indigenous peoples and Palestinians.

=============================================

* In feite begon Obama ook de oorlog tegen de bevolking van Oost-Oekraïne. Immers zijn minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, hare kwaadaardigheid Hillary Clinton, heeft de opstand op poten gezet, die tot het afzetten van de democratisch gekozen president Janoekovytsj leidde…… De neonazi-junta die na deze coup werd geïnstalleerd, met de uitermate corrupte Porosjenko aan het roer, was de keus van Obama en Clinton………. 

VS nog steeds bereid Rusland en China te vernietigen met kernwapens……..

Uit
onlangs vrijgegeven documenten blijkt dat de VS al in de 60er jaren
plannen had om Rusland en China aan te vallen met kernwapens…….

Ongelofelijk
te lezen dat men moedwillig burgerdoelen wilde aanvallen om zo de
economie hard te treffen. McNamara was de grote architect van de
plannen, dit onder de ‘vredelievende’ president John F.
Kennedy……

Wat dat
laatste betreft stelt Whitney Webb in het hieronder opgenomen
artikel, eerder gepubliceerd op MintPress News, dat McNamara tijdens WOII ook
verantwoordelijk was voor de aanvallen met brandbommen op 67 Japanse steden…… In een documentaire uit 2003 stelde McNamara dat er bij zo’n bombardement op Tokio in één nacht ‘maar
liefst’ 100.000 burgers werden verbrand, inclusief vrouwen en
kinderen, daar was hij nog steeds trots op…..

Voorts
was McNamara verantwoordelijk voor de deelname van de VS aan de
Vietnamoorlog. Hij was de architect achter de false flag operatie die
bekend staat als het ‘Tonkin incident’, waarmee de VS ‘een reden had’
om zich verder in die oorlog te mengen. In Vietnam kwamen naar
schatting minstens 3 miljoen mensen om het leven, in buurlanden Laos
en Cambodja vermoordde de VS nog eens 1 miljoen mensen….. McNamara
verklaarde in 1964 dat hij er (alweer) trots op was dat zijn naam verbonden blijft aan de Vietnamoorlog, die ook nog eens aan 58.000 VS militairen het
leven kostte…..

Je denkt
misschien, ach plannen van meer dan 50 jaar geleden, niets om je druk
om te maken, echter onder Trump heeft de VS gesteld een eerste aanval
met kernwapens niet uit te sluiten, zelfs als reactie op een
cyberaanval…… Ook hare kwaadaardigheid May, godbetert premier van
Groot-Brittannië, liet een paar jaar geleden weten een eerste aanval
met kernwapens niet uit te sluiten……

De geschiedenis met de agressie van de VS (zonder meer de grootste
terreurentiteit op aarde) laat vanaf WOII zien dat dit gestolen land meer dan 22 miljoen
mensen heeft vermoord in: illegale oorlogen en door de VS (CIA) opgezette
opstanden en staatsgrepen…..* Bij die moorden kunnen nu nog eens duizenden moorden opgeteld worden, moorden die de VS
pleegt op verdachten met gebruikmaking van drones…… Gezien deze geschiedenis moet gevreesd worden dat er nog steeds dergelijke plannen liggen…..
Daarnaast heeft de VS in de geschiedenis al laten zien het gebruik van kernwapens niet
uit de weg te gaan, zie Hiroshima en Nagasaki…..

Lees en
huiver:

Declassified
Docs Reveal Pentagon Plan to Drop Nuclear Bombs on the USSR and China

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Declassified Docs Reveal Pentagon Plan to Drop Nuclear Bombs on the USSR and China

September
3, 2018 at 11:33 am

Written
by 
Whitney
Webb

(MPN— Recently
declassified documents shed light on a U.S. nuclear war plan
developed in 1964 by the Pentagon’s Joint Staff to bomb Russia –
then the Soviet Union – and China with nuclear weapons so
extensively that it would destroy them “as viable societies.” The
war plan itself, known as Single Integrated Operational Plan 64
(SIOP-64), has not been declassified, as no SIOP has ever been
released to the public by the United States government.

However,
newly declassified documents that record the Pentagon Joint Staff’s
review of SIOP-64 were recently
 made
available
 through
George Washington University’s National Security Archive project.
The documents reveal numerous details about the still-classified plan
that shine light on the Pentagon’s willingness to wage nothing
short of total war against its adversaries at the time.

In
particular, the documents show that the plan sought to accomplish the
destruction of Russian and Chinese society by targeting and
eliminating their industrial potential while also wiping out the
majority of their urban populations. Still more troubling, urban
civilians were proposed to be the main target and
measure of the U.S. nuclear war plan as the Joint Staff sought to use
“population loss as the primary yardstick for effectiveness in
destroying the enemy society, with only collateral attention to
industrial damage.”

This
gambit to use population loss as a “primary yardstick” was
notably developed prior to the 1964 meeting detailed in the newly
released document. The meeting considered studies that had been
jointly conducted by the Joint Staff and the Joint Strategic Target
Planning Staff in order to determine how many Soviet and Chinese
cities and industrial areas needed to be wiped out in order to
destroy both countries as “viable societies.”

In
the case of the Soviet Union, it was determined that destroying 70
percent of the country’s industrial floor space, mostly urban areas
that can be used for industrial activity, would likely result in “the
destruction of the USSR as a viable society.” The plan notes that
targeting such a significant amount of the Soviet Union’s
industrial floor space would put nearby urban populations “at
risk.” Though no estimates for civilian casualties in the Soviet
Union are given in the declassified documents,
 a
1962 estimate
 projected
70 million Soviet fatalities would result from a no-warning U.S.
strike on military and urban-industrial targets.

China
– characterized then by its largely agrarian economy – posed a
challenge, given that an estimated 84 percent of the Chinese
population lived in rural areas away from urban centers, complicating
the plan to target civilian urban populations in order to destroy
China as “a viable nation.” In the case of China, the Joint Staff
ultimately settled on a plan that would destroy 30 of China’s
largest cities, with a goal of 30 percent urban fatalities, or 212
million people, and the destruction of 50 percent of industrial floor
space.

Furthermore,
the plan featured options that included both preemptive and
retaliatory bombings. The university researchers who obtained and
published the documents
 noted
that
 “preemptive”
bombings do not necessarily indicate plans for a first strike but
instead indicated that the U.S. would enact the plan if U.S.
intelligence was able to “produce warning of an impending Soviet
attack that a U.S. strike could avert or at least blunt.”

A
Mad Plan, but Very Much in Character

According
to these same researchers, the influence of then-Secretary of Defense
Robert McNamara on the SIOP-64 is clear, given that McNamara “made
the concept of ‘assured destruction’ basic to the way that top
Pentagon officials sized U.S. strategic forces.”

Furthermore,
the consideration of civilian fatalities as the “primary yardstick”
of the plan’s effectiveness also bears McNamara’s “fingerprints.”
Indeed, McNamara was an “architect” of the U.S.’ War in
Vietnam,
 including
the Gulf of Tonkin “false flag”
 that
initiated it, leading some in the press to call the conflict
“McNamara’s War.” In 1964, McNamara
 stated
that
 he
was “pleased to be identified with” the war, which killed at
least 3 million Vietnamese, a million Cambodians and Laotians and
58,000 Americans, and laid waste to Southern Vietnam through the
chemical warfare campaign that McNamara helped
 develop
and oversee
.

Aside
from Vietnam, McNamara was also
 intimately
involved
 in
the firebombing of 67 Japanese cities shortly before the end of World
War II, which destroyed 50 to 90 percent of all Japanese urban areas.
In
 a
2003 documentary
,
McNamara calmly recounted how, in a single night, “we burned to
death 100,000 Japanese civilians in Tokyo —  men, women, and
children.”

With
architect of mass-destruction McNamara serving as the head of the
Pentagon when SIOP-64 was developed, its consideration of hundreds of
millions of human lives as a “yardstick” for military
effectiveness is unsurprising. It is, however, no less chilling for
being in character, given that the some 300 million civilians that
were estimated to be killed if SIOP-64 had been enacted, dwarfs even
the vast numbers who died as a result of McNamara’s other, enacted
policies.

Unfortunately,
McNamara-esque military policies are hardly a thing of the past.
Indeed, the recent changes to 
the
Nuclear Posture Review
 under
the Trump administration ended the once clear rejection of a nuclear
first strike launched by the U.S. as it states that the U.S. can use
atomic bombs in response to “significant non-nuclear strategic
attacks”, which include alleged cyberattacks. Furthermore, this
year’s National Defense Strategy 
replaced the
U.S. military’s decades-long focus on the “War on Terror” with
a focus on preparing for a “great power war” against both Russia
and China, countries that are
 now
considered
 by
the Pentagon to present the “central challenges” to global U.S.
hegemony.

Though
there may be a temptation to dismiss the SOIP-64 as a relic of the
Cold War past, present circumstances should caution us to think
otherwise.

By Whitney
Webb
 / Creative
Commons
 / MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo

=======================================

* Zie: ‘VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

Zie ook: ‘Kernwapens in Europa: Rode Kruis >> Nederland moet het VN kernwapenverbod tekenen

PS: in Rusland heeft men intussen al een groot aantal atoomschuilkelders ingericht en zoals je hierboven kon lezen, bepaald niet onterecht……. Dit roept meteen de vraag op waarom Rutte 2 en Rutte 3 niet al lang hebben ingezet op het bouwen van dergelijke schuilkelders, immers als je de leugens van deze kabinetten terughoort, is Rusland uiterst agressief en onberekenbaar…… Wel VS kernwapens op onze bodem (kernwapens NB van een land dat niet anders dan als grootste terreurentiteit op aarde kan worden aangemerkt) maar geen verdediging tegen deze wapens in de vorm van schuilkelders, anders dan voor de machthebbers (niet alleen voor politici en ambtenaren maar ook voor de topgraaiers van de grote bedrijven en de financiële maffia)…………..

Eric Prince (oprichter Blackwater en oorlogsmisdadiger) wil oorlog in Afghanistan privatiseren…..

De
smerige en uiterst gewelddadige superpsychopaat Eric Prince, oprichter van
privé terreurleger Blackwater, kreeg bij tv zendgemachtigde MSNBC de
kans, zonder enige kritiek, zijn vuige oorlogspraatjes te
spuien……. Prince wil de oorlog in Afghanistan overnemen van het
Pentagon en belooft daarbij succes, een gedachte die goed viel bij
het beest Trump, zeker gezien ‘de resultaten’ van de oorlog die daar de laatste 17 jaar zijn geboekt*

Volkomen
terecht merkte Stephen Miles van ‘Win Without War’ op, dat Prince in
Den Haag terecht zou moeten staan voor het Internationaal Strafhof
(ICC), al geldt dit ook voor een fiks aantal politici en
hooggeplaatste militairen, de CIA, NSA en ga nog maar even
door……. 

Prince is als directeur van Blackwater, na fiks wat smerige oorlogsmisdaden omgedoopt tot Academi (ha! ha! ha! hoe verzint hij het??) en
is als zodanig één op één verantwoordelijk voor de moord en/of
verminking op/van een groot aantal burgers in o.a. Irak en Afghanistan…….. (waar men in de westerse reguliere media liever niet over spreekt….) 

Lees
het volgende artikel van Jake Johnson, eerder gepubliceerd op Common
Dreams en door mij overgenomen van Anti-War en zie hoe  de
geesten in de VS langzaam maar zeker worden klaargemaakt voor oorlogsvoering door
bedrijven als Academi…… Als dit gebeurt en er worden daarna
bovendien warbots ingezet
**,
is het hek helemaal van de VS ‘oorlogsdam…..’ (een dam van ongeveer
5 centimeter hoog…)

Durden wijst op het steeds harder slaan op de ‘oorlogstrommel’ in mediaorganen als MSNBC, waar deze media oorlogshitsers als Prince en anderen hun gif laten spuien, oorlogshitsers die bijvoorbeeld aandringen bij Trump een volledige oorlog tegen Syrië te beginnen…. Terwijl i.p.v. de oorlog tegen de Taliban in Afghanistan te intensiveren met een psychopathisch huurlingenleger, deze oorlog eindelijk te beëindigen, totaal wordt genegeerd door die mediaorganen….. Een pleidooi onder andere gedaan door Stephen Miles van ‘Win Without War’, die kortweg stelde dat i.p.v. de oorlog te privatiseren, het beter is deze te beëindigen’, een waarheid als een koe zoals je begrijpt.

He
Belongs in the Hague’: MSNBC Slammed for Handing Erik Prince
Megaphone to Sell War

August
17, 2018 at 10:07 pm

Written
by 
Jake
Johnson

(CD— Amid reports that
President Donald Trump is “
showing
renewed interest

in Blackwater founder Erik Prince’s plan to hand the war in
Afghanistan over to a private army led by an “
American
viceroy,
” MSNBC on
Friday happily gave the notorious war profiteer a cushy platform to
make his 
nonsensical
and dangerous
 pitch
to the president almost entirely unchallenged.

Shame
on 
MSNBC for
giving Erik Prince a megaphone,” Stephen Miles, director of Win
Without War, 
wrote on
Twitter following Prince’s interview with 
MSNBC‘s
Andrea Mitchell. “He belongs in The Hague, not spewing his
warmongering for profit filth on television.”

Highlighting
the failure of both the deadly “conventional” approach the U.S.
has taken in Afghanistan over the past 16 years and Prince’s plan
to continue the war for profit, Miles went on to suggest an option
that—for obvious reasons—Mitchell and Prince both ignored, one
that is 
virtually
never aired on corporate media networks like 
MSNBC
.

What
if—hear me out—instead of privatizing the war in #Afghanistan, we
ended it,” Miles 
wrote.
“Crazy, I know.”

Stephen Miles

@SPMiles42

What if – hear me out – instead of privatizing the war in , we ended it. Crazy, I know. But, maybe…

MSNBC @MSNBC

NEW: President Trump is showing renewed interest in a proposal by Blackwater founder Erik Prince to privatize the war, officials tell @NBCInvestigates. http://on.msnbc.com/2PfBbiq 

Erik Prince joins @mitchellreports now live on @MSNBC to discuss the details.

View image on Twitter

Watch
Prince’s full appearance on 
MSNBC,
during which the infamous mercenary was asked for his thoughts
on 
Omarosa but
wasn’t once seriously challenged on his “
prescription
for endless war
“:

Prince’s
appearance on 
MSNBC came
shortly after 
NBC
News
 reported
that Trump is growing increasingly impatient with 
his
own administration’s strategy
 and
looking toward Prince—the brother of billionaire Education
Secretary Betsy DeVos—for possible alternatives.

When
Prince’s plan had Trump’s attention in 2017, it had the backing
of his former strategist Steve Bannon and the president’s
son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner,” 
NBC reported.

In
recent meetings, Trump “has pressed his advisers about Afghanistan
progress” and expressed interest in Prince’s plan to privatize
the war, 
NBC noted,
citing anonymous administration officials.

As
usually happens when Prince makes his periodic appearances on
corporate news shows to tout his opportunistic, for-profit war plan,
critics were quick to highlight his 
horrendous
track-record
 and
argue that his plan to privatize the war in Afghanistan would lead to
even less oversight and more bloodshed.

Rep. Ro Khanna


@RepRoKhanna

As head of Blackwater, Erik Prince’s mercenaries committed multiple war crimes in Iraq and were convicted for their involvement in the Nissour Square massacre that killed 17 civilians. He deserves an investigation, not contracts to wage a private war in Afghanistan.

MSNBC

@MSNBC

NEW: Exclusive: President Trump is increasingly venting frustration about US strategy in Afghanistan, and showing renewed interest in a proposal by Blackwater founder Erik Prince to privatize the war, current and former sr. admin. officials tell @NBCNews. https://on.msnbc.com/2PfBbiq 

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Ron Wyden


@RonWyden

Cronyism on the battlefield. This is a prescription for endless war.https://www.nbcnews.com/news/military/officials-worry-trump-may-back-erik-prince-plan-privatize-war-n901401 


Trump eyes Erik Prince plan to privatize U.S. war in Afghanistan

“I know he’s frustrated,” Blackwater founder Prince said of the president. “He gave the Pentagon what they wanted. And they haven’t delivered.”

nbcnews.com

Twitter Ads info and privacy

David Rothkopf


@djrothkopf

Trumponomics: What’s better than an unwinnable war? An unwinnable war your political cronies can profit from on the taxpayer’s dime.

Ken Dilanian

@KenDilanianNBC

NBC News exclusive: Trump eyes Erik Prince plan to privatize U.S. war in Afghanistan https://www.nbcnews.com/news/military/officials-worry-trump-may-back-erik-prince-plan-privatize-war-n901401 … via @carolelee @ckubenbc @joshNBCNews

Jeffrey St. Clair

@JSCCounterPunch

The fact that Reality Winner is going to be sent to prison for 5 years and Erik Prince is still walking free & poised to send his murderous mercenaries into Afghanistan pretty much sums up where we come to as a country…https://www.nbcnews.com/news/military/officials-worry-trump-may-back-erik-prince-plan-privatize-war-n901401 


Trump eyes Erik Prince plan to privatize U.S. war in Afghanistan

“I know he’s frustrated,” Blackwater founder Prince said of the president. “He gave the Pentagon what they wanted. And they haven’t delivered.”

nbcnews.com

By Jake
Johnson
 / Creative
Commons
 / Common
Dreams
 / Report
a typo

=======================================

*
17 jaar lang is de oorlog in Afghanistan gaande (…) en als de VS en de rest van de NAVO niet vertrekken uit Afghanistan, kan het nog jaren, of zelfs decennia duren voordat de oorlog is
afgelopen…. Moet je nagaan: Afghanistan is door de Nederlandse
regering (al onder Rutte2, dus onder mede hoofdverantwoordelijkheid
van de PvdA) veilig verklaard voor de terugkeer van
vluchtelingen….. Wat een enorme rotschoft moet je zijn, om alleen
al iets dergelijks te suggereren……….

**
Die warbots worden al ontworpen en klaargemaakt voor productie,
waarbij een drone in feite al een warbot is, de menselijke vinger aan
de knop van drones die worden uitgerust met kunstmatige intelligentie
(AI) zal spoedig verdwijnen, daar te veel dronepiloten geestelijk
doordraaien, nadat ze weer vrouwen en kinderen hebben vermoord, die
niet eens verdacht waren….. Het is dan ook zo dat meer dan 90% van
alle slachtoffers bij VS drone aanvallen niet eens verdacht zijn,
inderdaad meestal vrouwen en kinderen (alleen al het vermoorden
van verdachten is tegen internationale wetten en deze standrechtelijke executies, ofwel moorden, zouden moeten worden
behandeld als ernstige oorlogsmisdaden!) 

Vier spelende Palestijnse jongens werden doelbewust vermoord middels een Israëlische drone

Een
geheim Israëlisch rapport toont aan dat de vier Palestijnse jongens, in de leeftijd van 10 en 11 jaar,
spelend op het strand van Gaza (op 16 juli 2014), door het Israël werden vermoord met
gebruikmaking van een drone, zou schrijft Robert Mackey in een
artikel op The Intercept……..

Uitvoerig
wordt ingegaan hoe e.e.a. heeft kunnen gebeuren en de reden waarom
Israël e.e.a. geheim wilde houden >> niet alleen vanwege de wereldwijde
verontwaardiging (al was die buiten het westen een stuk groter..), maar ook om de verkoop van Israëlische drones naar het
buitenland veilig te stellen. Zo stond er een contract met Duitsland
op het spel, een contract voor ‘het leasen’ van drones voor maar
‘liefst’ 600 miljoen euro…..

In
het artikel gaat Mackey in op de stelling van Israël dat er een
vergissing werd gemaakt bij het beoordelen van de beelden waarop de
beslissing werd genomen die tot de dood van de vier jongens leidde.
Echter gezien eerdere gebeurtenissen en de gebeurtenissen sinds maart dit jaar, waarbij vreedzame (nog steeds voortdurende) demonstraties onder de naam ‘The Great Return
March’, doelbewust onder vuur werden genomen, kan je echt niet spreken van ‘vergissingen……..’ Onder vuur genomen door psychopathische Israëlische scherpschutters (met een uitstekend werkend vizier
op hun wapen), die een groot aantal ongewapende mensen hebben vermoord, Palestijnse mensen waaronder duidelijk
herkenbare kinderen en medische hulpverleners………

‘Je
zou bijna gaan denken’ dat Israël dit geheime rapport expres heeft
gelekt om aan te tonen dat men wel degelijk menselijke trekken heeft
en men moeite heeft met dit soort ‘vergissingen’, terwijl de
dagelijkse werkelijkheid laat zien dat Israël er totaal geen moeite
mee heeft om kinderen, vrouwen, gehandicapten en zelfs mensen met het Downsyndroom* (nogmaals: doelbewust) gevangen te nemen, gruwelijk te martelen, dan wel standrechtelijk te vermoorden…..

Lees
het volgende artikel en oordeel zelf:

Secret
Israeli Report Reveals Armed Drone Killed Four Boys Playing on Gaza
Beach in 2014

Robert
Mackey

August
11 2018, 10:09 a.m.

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Secret Israeli Report Reveals Armed Drone Killed Four Boys Playing on Gaza Beach in 2014

A
CONFIDENTIAL REPORT
 by Israeli military police
investigators seen by The Intercept explains how a tragic series of
mistakes by air force, naval, and intelligence officers led to an
airstrike in which four Palestinian boys playing on a beach in Gaza
in 2014 were killed by missiles launched from an armed drone.

Testimony
from the officers involved in the attack, which has been concealed
from the public until now, confirms for the first time that the
children — four cousins ages 10 and 11 — were pursued and killed
by drone operators who somehow mistook them, in broad daylight, for
Hamas militants.

The
testimony raises new questions about whether the attack, which
unfolded in front of dozens of journalists and triggered global
outrage, was carried out with reckless disregard for civilian life
and without proper authorization. After killing the first boy, the
drone operators told investigators, they had sought clarification
from their superiors as to how far along the beach, used by
civilians, they could pursue the fleeing survivors. Less than a
minute later, as the boys ran for their lives, the drone operators
decided to launch a second missile, killing three more children,
despite never getting an answer to their question.

Suhad
Bishara, a lawyer representing the families of the victims, told

The
Intercept that Israel’s use of armed drones to kill Palestinians
poses “many questions concerning human judgment, ethics, and
compliance with international humanitarian law.”

Remotely
piloted bombers “alter the process of human decision-making,”
Bishara said, and the use of the technology in the 2014 beach attack
“expands the circle of people responsible for the actual killing of
the Bakr children.”

Just
hours before the attack, on the morning of July 16, 2014, the public
relations unit of the Israel Defense Forces had been promoting the
idea that the live video feeds provided by drones enabled its air
force to avoid killing Palestinian civilians.

The
PR unit released 
operational
footage
,
apparently taken from 
the
screens of Israeli drone operators
,
which documented how three Israeli airstrikes had been called off
that week because figures, identified as civilians, had appeared
close to targets in the densely populated Gaza Strip.

Those
images were released one week into Israel’s Operation Protective
Edge, a 50-day offensive against Hamas militants in Gaza in which
Israel would eventually kill 
1,391
civilians, including 526 children
.

Later
that same day, at about 3:30 p.m., an Israeli Hermes 450 surveillance
drone hovering over a beach in Gaza City transmitted images of eight
figures clambering from the strand onto a jetty.

A
small shipping container on the jetty had been destroyed by an
Israeli missile the day before, based on intelligence indicating that
it might have been used by Hamas naval commandos to
store weapons. Some analysts have questioned that intelligence,
however, since there were no secondary explosions after the structure
was hit and journalists staying in nearby hotels reported that no
militants had been seen around the jetty that week.

The
Israeli military police report reviewed by The Intercept documents
what happened next. After one of the figures on the jetty entered the
container that had been destroyed the previous day, an Israeli air
force commander at the Palmachim air base, south of Tel Aviv, ordered
the operators of a second drone, which was armed, to fire a missile
at the container.

AS
MY COLLEAGUES
 Cora
Currier and Henrik Moltke reported
 in
2016, although the Israeli government maintains an official stance of
secrecy around its use of drones to carry out airstrikes, 
hacked
Israeli surveillance images
 provided
to The Intercept by former National Security Agency contractor
Edward Snowden showed an Israeli drone armed with missiles in 2010.

Speaking
privately to a visiting American diplomat after Israel’s 2009
offensive in Gaza, Avichai Mandelblit, who was the country’s chief
military prosecutor at the time and now serves as its attorney
general, acknowledged that two missiles that injured civilians in a
mosque had been fired from an unmanned aerial vehicle, according to
leaked
State Department cable
.

One
reason that Israel might decline to acknowledge that its drones have
been used to kill Palestinian children is that such information could
complicate sales of its drones to foreign governments. In June, the
state-owned company Israel Aerospace Industries signed a 
$600
million deal
 to
lease Heron drones to Germany’s defense ministry. That deal was
initially delayed by concerns from German politicians that the
drones, to be used for surveillance, could also be armed. The same
state-owned company has also sold drones to Turkey, a strongly
pro-Palestinian nation, which has nonetheless used the Israeli
technology to bomb Kurds in Iraq.

The
Israeli military police report on the 2014 strike seen by The
Intercept offers the most direct evidence to date that Israel has
used armed drones to launch attacks in Gaza. Testimony from the drone
operators, commanders, and intelligence officers who took part in the
attack confirms that they used an armed drone to fire the missile
that slammed into the jetty, killing the person who had entered the
container, and also to launch a second strike, which killed three of
the survivors as they fled across the beach.

According
to the testimony of one naval officer involved in the strikes, the
mission was initially considered “a great success,” because
the strike team believed, wrongly, that they had killed four Hamas
militants preparing to launch an attack on Israeli forces.

Within
minutes of the two strikes, however, a group of international
journalists who had witnessed the attack from nearby
hotels 
reported that
the victims torn apart by the missiles were not adult militants
but 
four
small boys
,
cousins who were 10 and 11 years old.

Another
four boys from the same family survived the attack, but were left
with shrapnel wounds and 
deep
emotional scars
.

Harrowing
images of the children running desperately across the beach after the
first missile had killed their cousin were quickly shared by
Palestinian
photographer
,
an 
Al
Jazeera reporter
 and
camera
crew from French television
.

A
brutal image of the immediate aftermath captured by Tyler Hicks of
the 
New
York Times
,
one of the journalists who witnessed the attack, made the killing of
the four boys, all of them sons of Gaza fishermen from the Bakr
family, reverberate worldwide.

Anthony Bourdain


@Bourdain

Maybe it’s the fact that I walked on that beach—and have a small child that makes this photo so devastating.

The
French TV correspondent Liseron Boudoul, whose report that day
included 
distressing
video
 of
the boys running along the beach before the second strike, noted that
she and other witnesses to the attack were unclear where, exactly,
the missiles had come from — although initial speculation centered
on Israeli naval vessels seen just offshore.

THE
SECRET TESTIMONY
 from the Israeli military
personnel involved in the attack establishes for the first time that
the drone operators treated the jetty as a free-fire zone on the
mistaken assumption that it was off-limits to anyone but militants.

After
images of the attack prompted widespread outrage, Israel’s army
conducted a review of the mission and recommended that a military
police investigation into possible criminal negligence be conducted.
The testimonies collected by the military police from the strike team
were included in a report presented to Israel’s military advocate
general, Maj. Gen. Danny Efroni, 11 months after the boys were
killed.

Efroni
did not release the testimonies, but did make a 
summary
of the report’s findings
 public
on June 11, 2015, when he 
closed
the investigation

without filing any charges. Israel’s chief military prosecutor
decided that no further criminal or disciplinary measures would be
taken, since the investigators had concluded that “it would not
have been possible for the operational entities involved to have
identified these figures, via aerial surveillance, as children.”

Efroni
did not explain why that was impossible. Two days before the strike
in question, Israel’s military PR unit had released 
another
video clip

in which drone operators could be heard deciding to halt strikes
because they had identified figures in their live feeds as children.

Adalah,
also known as the Haifa-based Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights
in Israel, has spent the past three years fighting on behalf of the
families of the boys — Ismail Bakr, 10; Ahed Bakr, 10; Zakaria
Bakr, 10; and Mohammed Bakr, 11 — to have the decision not to
prosecute the soldiers overturned by an Israeli court.

Much
of that time has been spent 
waiting
for Israel’s attorney general
,
Mandelblit, to simply reply to appeals filed by Adalah and two Gazan
rights groups, the Palestinian Center for Human Rights and Al Mezan
Center for Human Rights.

In
February, Adalah said in a 
statement that
Israel’s own investigation “revealed that the Israeli military
did not take any measures to ascertain whether the targets on the
ground were civilians, let alone children, prior to intentionally
directing the attacks against them.”

Bishara,
one of the Adalah lawyers representing the boys’ families, told The
Intercept in a telephone interview that the Israeli investigation of
the killings, in which the military cleared itself of wrongdoing, was
flawed in several ways. To start with, the testimonies were only
collected by the military police four months after the incident, and
only considered what could be seen of the beach through the drone
cameras. 
No
testimony was taken
 from
the international journalists who witnessed the attack, and the
accounts of Palestinian witnesses, including written affidavits from
boys injured in the strikes, were discounted.

Wall
Street Journal video report
 filed
on the day of the attack by Nick Casey, a correspondent staying
in a hotel close to the jetty, cast doubt on the Israeli intelligence
that designated the site a Hamas compound. Casey’s report, which
featured images of the first young victim’s mangled body being
taken from the jetty, explained that “no one knew why this place
had been bombarded; there have been no Hamas attacks from here and no
rockets that we’ve seen.”

When
the Israeli authorities closed the case in 2015, Alexander Marquardt,
a former ABC Jerusalem correspondent who had also witnessed the
attack, 
disputed the
finding that the jetty was sealed off from the beach, arguing that it
was open to civilians.

Lees verder op ‘The Intercept‘     

============================

* Zie: ‘Palestijnse man met syndroom van Down gearresteerd door ‘dappere’ Israëlische militairen: hand gebroken en 3 dagen opgesloten…….

Zie ook:

Israëls huidige oorlog tegen de Palestijnen: o.a. de etnische zuivering van Oost-Jeruzalem

Israëlische ‘helden’ schieten invalide Palestijn in het achterhoofd

‘Antisemitisch bericht’ >> Sinds 2000 heeft het Israëlische leger 2.070 Palestijnse kinderen vermoord, dit jaar ‘staat de teller’ op 52 kindermoorden………

Ceremoniële beloning voor ‘heldhaftige’ Israëlische scherpschutters die ongewapende Palestijnse demonstranten vermoordden

TUI met reizen naar Israël: “Discover apartheid and the mass murders on Palestinians and smile….”

‘Israëlische helden’ schieten 6 ongewapende Palestijnse demonstranten dood op Gazaans grondgebied, inclusief 2 jongens van 12 en 14 jaar oud…..

VS onder Trump >> een nog grotere stimulator van Israëlische terreur

Jonathan Chandler (Foundation for Defense of Democracies): Palestijns beroep op vluchtelingenstatus staat vrede in Israël in de weg….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Israël bestormt voor de zoveelste keer met groot machtsvertoon de Al-Aqsamoskee……

Israël vermoordt alweer ‘zeer heldhaftig’ 5 ongewapende Palestijnen, waaronder een 12 jarige en een 17 jarige jongen……..

NOS (‘onafhankelijk’ zendgemachtigde) met pro-Israëlische propaganda n.a.v. vrijlating Ahed al-Tamimi…

Israël: gevangenschap voor slaan van militair en vrijspraak voor doelbewust levend verbranden van een Palestijnse baby…….

Het ‘dappere’ Israëlische leger……

Palestijnen: beelden van vernederingen die dit volk zich op dagelijkse basis moet laten welgevallen door Israëlische militairen

Israël blokkeert toegang tot dorp Ahed al-Tamimi……

Israël nu officieel fascistische apartheidsstaat: natiestaat wet aangenomen………

‘Rechter’ houdt Palestijns meisje van 16 jaar in gevangenschap, verder een invalide in rolstoel vermoord: ‘leve het dappere Israëlische leger….’

Israëlische scherpschutters vermoorden met opzet kinderen en de witte westerse wereld blijft wegkijken…….

Israëlische ‘helden’ schieten weer een ongewapend kind dood

Bevrijd de 4 Tamimi vrouwen, inclusief een meisje van 16!‘ 

Israël zet snelle reactiemacht op poten tegen anti-Israëlische kritiek

Israël heeft de energielevering aan Gazastrook alweer gestopt, plus commentaar van de uitermate pro-Israëlische BBC…….’ 

Why Liberal Zionists Have Nothing to Say About Ahed Tamimi’s Slap and Arrest

Jerry Seinfeld valt keihard door de mand als zionist………..‘ (Seinfeld, ‘een liberale zionist’)

Heldhaftige Israelische militair‘, die op verdenking van het gooien met stenen, een 15 jarige jongen vermoordde, gaat vrijuit……..

Ahed al-Tamimi in Volkskrant ‘uitgelegd’ als terrorist, die klappen uitdeelt…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘ 

Ahed al-Tamimi (nu 17 jaar) nog steeds vast na slaan militair en ondergaat intimidatie van ondervragers……

16 jarige Ahed al-Tamimi is volgens militaire rechter te gevaarlijk om op borgtocht vrij te laten……..

Israël martelt 60% van de gevangengehouden Palestijnse kinderen…….

Israël sluit waterkraan voor Gazastrook, een enorme schending van mensenrechten en een misdaad tegen de menselijkheid…..

Israëlische rechtbank besloot proces tegen 17 jarig meisje Ahed al-Tamimi achter gesloten deuren te houden >> voor haar eigen bestwil….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Israël weigert 17 jarig meisje Ahed al-Tamimi vervroegd vrij te laten……..

Israël gebruikt nieuw chemisch wapen tegen Palestijnse demonstranten in de Gazastrook

MSNBC (‘verzetszender’ tegen Trump), bracht in een jaar tijd niet één artikel over de VS steun aan de genocide in Jemen…..

Fair
bracht vorige week dinsdag een bericht over de ‘aandacht’ van MSNBC (een
mediaorgaan in de VS dat als ‘verzetszender’ wordt gezien tegen
Trump) voor de rol van de VS in de oorlog die de Saoedische coalitie
voert tegen de sjiieten in Jemen…… Een oorlog die voor de
sjiieten is uitgedraaid op een ‘volwaardige’ genocide………

Het
gezeur over de relatie van Trump met ‘pornoster’ Stormy Daniels kwam van 2 juli 2017 tot 2 juli 2018 maar liefst 455 keer terug in de MSNBC berichtgeving, tegen 0 keer de VS steun aan de genocide die de Saoedische coalitie in Jemen uitvoert……… 

Vreemd
is het wel, immers MSNBC doet niets liever dan Trump demoniseren, wat
wil je nog meer als je ziet dat hij een genocide tegen de sjiitische
bevolking van Jemen steunt, zowel militair als middels leveringen van rollend en vliegend oorlogstuig, plus ‘natuurlijk’ de levering van wapens en
munitie……. Ach zo vreemd is het nu ook weer niet, immers MSNBC is
o.a. grootlobbyist voor het militair-industrieel complex en zoals je
weet dat complex draait op zoveel mogelijk oorlog, om de winsten voor
de aandeelhouders zo hoog mogelijk te houden…….

Lees
het artikel van Adam Johnson, hieronder overgenomen van Anti-Media, echter wel met een kleine aantekening: Johnson
stelt dat onder Trump de bemoeienis met Jemen veel agressiever is
dan onder Obama, echter onder Obama is de steun voor de genocide
begonnen en onder Obama werden de clusterbommen geleverd die
Saoedi-Arabië heeft afgeworpen op
Jemen…… Onder Obama begon de VS met het in de lucht bijtanken van
de bommenwerpers en straaljagers van de Saoedische coalitie, zodat deze zo efficiënt mogelijk de enorme oorlogsmisdaden konden en kunnen uitvoeren…..

Ook
hebben speciale troepen van de VS onder Obama meerdere keren
ingegrepen op Jemenitische bodem en nam de VS de regie over de
bombardementen voor haar rekening (om nog maar te zwijgen over de het grote aantal moorden in Jemen middels drones*, ook dat werd onder Obama geïntensiveerd…)…. Gezien het voorgaande heeft Trump amper
meer gedaan dan op de Jemenitische winkel letten……..

In
One Year, MSNBC Covered Stormy Daniels 455 Times, War in Yemen 0

ACTION ALERT: It’s Been Over a Year Since MSNBC Has Mentioned US War in Yemen

July
24, 2018 at 11:42 am

Written
by 
Adam
Johnson

Why
is the No. 1 outlet of alleged anti-Trump #resistance completely
ignoring his most devastating war?

(FAIR) As
FAIR has noted before (
1/8/18, 3/20/18),
to 
MSNBC, the
carnage and destruction the US and its Gulf Monarchy allies are
leveling against the poorest country in the Arab world is simply a
non-issue.

On
July 2, a year had passed since the cable network’s last segment
mentioning US participation in the war on Yemen, which has killed in
excess of 15,000 people and resulted in over a 
million
cases of cholera
.
The US is backing a 
Saudi-led
bombing campaign
 with
intelligence, refueling, political cover, military hardware and, as
of March, 
ground
troops
.
None of this matters at all to what 
Adweek (4/3/18)
calls “the network of the Resistance,” which has since its last
mention of the US’s role in the destruction of Yemen found time
to 
run
over a dozen segments
 highlighting
war crimes committed by the Syrian and Russian governments in Syria.

By
way of contrast, as 
MSNBC was
marking a year without mentioning the US role in Yemen, the 
PBS
NewsHour
 was
running a 
three-part
series
 on
the war, with the second part (
7/3/18)
headlined, “American-Made Bombs in Yemen Are Killing Civilians,
Destroying Infrastructure and Fueling Anger at the US.”
The 
NewsHour’s
Jane Ferguson reported:

msnbc pbs

PBS
NewsHour (7/3/18) examining the remains of US-made cluster bombs in
Yemen.

The
aerial bombing campaign has not managed to dislodge the rebels, but
has hit weddings, hospitals and homes. The US military supports the
Saudi coalition with logistics and intelligence. The United States it
also sells the Saudis and coalition partners many of the bombs they
drop on Yemen.”

MSNBC chat
show/Starbucks commercial 
Morning
Joe
 did
run one segment (
4/25/18)
that vaguely mentioned the war on Yemen, but failed to note the US’s
role in it at all, much less that Washington is arming and backing
the conflict’s primary aggressor. Instead, they did the perverse
inversion––previously mastered by 
Washington
Post
’s
Jackson Diehl (
FAIR.org6/27/17)—of
not only ignoring the US’s major role in killing thousands, but
painting the US as a noble haven for refugees. The schlocky segment,
an interview with writer Mohammed Al Samawi, was a shallow mixture of
“interfaith” pablum, poverty porn and self-congratulations to the
US for taking in refugees (without, of course, acknowledging that
they’re seeking refuge from a crisis the US has created).

For
a bit more context, in the time period of July 3, 2017, to July 3,
2018, 
MSNBC dedicated
zero segments to the US’s war in Yemen, but 
455
segments to Stormy Daniels
.
This isn’t to suggest the Stormy Daniels matter isn’t
newsworthy—presidential corruption is per se important. But one has
to wonder if this particular thread of venality is 455 stories more
important than Trump aggressively supporting a war that’s killing
hundreds of people a month, injuring thousands, and subjecting
millions to famine and cholera. Did 
MSNBC editors,
poring over the latest academic foreign policy literature, really
come to the conclusion Trump’s war in Yemen isn’t important? Or
is 
MSNBC simply
fueled by partisan Russia dot-connecting and stories that allow them
to say “porn star” as much as possible?

              MSNBC

What seems most likely is MSNBC has found that attacking Russia form the right on matters of foreign policy is the most elegant way to preserve its “progressive” image while still serving traditional centers of power—namely, the Democratic Party establishment, corporate sponsors, and their own revolving door of ex-spook and military contractor-funded talking heads (3/26/18). After all, Obama backed the war on Yemen—though not nearly as aggressively as Trump has—and it’s difficult to make a coherent left-wing, anti-war criticism when the current Republican in office is simply carrying out your guy’s policy, but on steroids.

In
any event, it’s not like any Yemenis are going to pull ads, turn
down appearances, or phone Comcast higher-ups
complaining. So, who cares? To be poor and brown—to say nothing of
not serving the immediate partisan interests of the Democratic
party—is evidently to not matter much in the eyes
of MSNBC producers and on-air talent.      

By Adam
Johnson
 / Republished
with permission / 
FAIR.org / Report
a typo

===============================

* Aanvallen met drones op mensen die worden verdacht van zaken die de VS niet zinnen, het gaat dus niet om ter dood veroordeelden!! Waar meer dan 90% van de dodelijke slachtoffers door deze standrechtelijke executies niet eens werden verdacht! Zoals je begrijpt bestaat het overgrote deel van deze vermoorde en niet verdachte (burger-) slachtoffers uit vrouwen en kinderen, ronduit een misdaad tegen de menselijkheid die strafrechtelijk vervolgd zou moeten worden door het Internationaal Strafhof (ICC) in Den Haag………

‘Amerika’ en de werking van politiek en kapitalisme

Kwam
op de site van Caitlin Johnstone een kort maar krachtig artikel tegen
over de werking van het kapitalisme in de VS (en elders), of beter gezegd hoe de samenwerking van politiek
en kapitalisme (of neoliberalisme, de nieuwste inhumane vorm van
kapitalisme) de status quo bewaart en waar in de VS tientallen miljoenen hun invloed op de
politiek (stemrecht) werd afgepakt ten behoeve van de welgestelden, de grote
bedrijven, banken en vooral niet te vergeten het militair-industrieel
complex……. Uiteraard wordt e.e.a. gesteund door de reguliere (massa-) media, die zogenaamd onafhankelijk zou opereren…….

Zoals
gezegd een kort maar krachtig artikel waar weinig of niets tegen in
te brengen is*:

AUTHOR:
CAITLIN JOHNSTONE

July 13, 2018

America

In
America they build flying war robots, but you can’t drink the
water. America is where the empire keeps its billionaires and bombs.

Giant
wars left Europe a mess many years ago, so America rose to the top.
Now it’s where many rich and powerful influencers centralize their
operations. America is the cattle prod** used to compel the world to
march along with the interests of western aristocrats. Governments
which comply are rewarded with military “protection”, while
noncompliant governments are sanctioned and bombed. The Mafia does
this also.

Americans
are kept poor by the aristocracy, because money equals power and
power is relative. The poorer ordinary Americans are kept, the more
powerful the aristocrats are. Agencies like the FBI were invented so
that there will be someone to help shoot and kill ordinary Americans
if they ever decide to start eating the aristocrats for food.

It
is very important that the aristocrats be able to control America,
because they need to be able to protect their assets while directing
its military firepower. This means keeping ordinary Americans poor
and politically impotent while conducting trillion-dollar military
operations overseas, which is a hard sell. The aristocrats engage
that hard sell on a daily basis using the mass media corporations
which they own. And they do so successfully.

Americans
are surrounded by screens which promote capitalism and consumerism
for eight-minute stretches between commercial breaks promoting
capitalism and consumerism. If you ever get a bit uncomfortable about
the expensive planes dropping expensive bombs on people who make less
money in their lifetimes than the military explosives used to kill
them, just turn on any of the screens you own and there will be a
talking head ready to explain to you why you’re just imagining
silly things in that ditzy little head of yours. Relax. Don’t
worry. Uncle Sam has got everything under control. Uncle Sam loves
you. Uncle Sam knows what’s best.

America
is too important to be left in the hands of the Americans. If you
ever wonder why America is behaving in a strange way, that is always
the explanation: America is too important to be left in the
hands of the Americans. The intelligence agencies, military firepower
and massive economic influence that is wielded by anyone who exerts
control over the US government are such valuable tools that there’s
no limit to the horrible things that aristocratic manipulators will
do to secure it. This includes pummeling ordinary Americans with mass
media psyops day in and day out to manufacture their consent for
agendas which do not benefit them. While this is an effective way to
control how Americans think and vote, it also makes them more than a
little crazy.

This
is why there is an opiate epidemic in America. This is why white
supremacy is becoming more brazen. This is why every few weeks an
American grabs a gun and kills as many of his countrymen as possible.
Because of their nation’s strategic significance, Americans are the
most aggressively propagandized people in the tight alliance of
nations that comprises the western empire. But there’s only so far
you can twist a mind away from truth before it snaps. There’s only
so much you can do to convince a populace that mass murder is
perfectly fine overseas before someone gets the idea that it’s
perfectly fine at home, too.

Americans
are in their nature as compassionate and generous a people as you
will ever meet anywhere else on earth; they’ve just got
manipulative sociopaths elbows-deep in their minds conducting psyops
all the time, and it makes them a bit weird. But their
good-naturedness is evident in the fact that even the propaganda used
to manipulate them into consenting to depraved war agendas is always
meant to exploit their caring and compassion: it’s always about
saving children from a monstrous dictator, or spreading freedom and
democracy. Americans are blasted in the face with so many hero
narratives from Hollywood and television that this makes perfect
sense to them, and of course they want their military to do something
heroic and save those poor kids. Even the sick things they consent to
are rooted in basic good intentions. America is a country full of
decent people with propaganda boxes around their brains.

Propaganda
is what makes America America. Without the endless aristocratic
influence campaigns convincing Americans that economic injustice is
economic justice, that war is humanitarian, that insanity is sanity,
and that their government is acting with their best interests at
heart, the nation would be unrecognizable. America is a psyop wearing
a cowboy hat.

Vast,
sprawling aristocratic kingdoms have been built upon the manipulation
of the American psyche. If those brain boxes ever get shucked off,
those kingdoms will necessarily collapse, and a new world will
emerge. Because those brain boxes are made of lies and manipulation,
the new world which emerges will necessarily be better and healthier.
Health and harmony are born of truth.

It
is not okay that the aristocracy keeps warping and brutalizing the
American psyche. It is not okay that they use their power and
influence to advance inequality and war. Americans need only to turn
around and face their manipulators and tormenters for this all to
end. Once you’ve seen the puppeteer, the puppet show is ruined.

Keep
pointing at those strings, oh clear-eyed rebels. This fight is very
winnable. The spells holding the deception together can be broken.
America belongs in the hands of the Americans. Americans can take
America.

=========================

* Als Azijnpisser heb ik natuurlijk wel wat te zeiken: bijvoorbeeld commentaar op de eerste alinea waarin de stelling dat het (Vierde) rijk, de VS, niet alleen haar miljardairs, maar ook haar bommen op eigen grondgebied herbergt…… Helaas, de VS heeft meer dan 800 militaire bases over de wereld waar naast militairen, wapens, militaire hardware en munitie liggen opgeslagen (en nee die militairen liggen niet opgeslagen, dat kan pas met warbots die op de grond kunnen ‘werken……’)… Ook in Nederland liggen VS bommen, sterker nog hier liggen zelfs ‘atoombommen’ van de VS, daarnaast zal de VS in Limburg militair materieel als tanks opslaan in de opbouw naar een mogelijke VS aanval op Rusland, ofwel het echte begin van WOIII (met hulp van de NAVO, de oorlogshond van de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde, dezelfde VS…)…. Moet je nagaan: dan is Nederland nog maar één van de landen in de EU waar VS wapens, munitie en militaire hardware heeft opgeslagen…….

** Cattle prod: ‘vee prikker’ (….)

Zie ook:

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

Gazastrook is een Israëlisch militair testgebied, waar de Palestijnen de proefdieren zijn…….

Israël
gebruikt de Gazastrook als militair testterrein, waar de Palestijnen als proefdier worden gebruikt, zo kan men de resultaten die in de praktijk werden geboekt met wapens, gebruiken bij de verkoop van die wapens…….. 

In 2015 exporteerde terreurstaat Israël maar liefst voor 5,7 miljard aan wapens en het dondert niet aan wie, althans zolang het niet de Palestijnen of Iran zijn, zo verkocht Israël in 1993 wapens aan Rwanda, wapens waarmee een genocide werd uitgevoerd…… (het is trouwens zeker dat Israël, als de VS en GB, ook wapens levert aan de Saoedische reli-fascistische dictatuur, die een genocide uitvoert in Jemen, Saoedi-Arabië, waarmee Israël vriendelijke banden onderhoudt….) Ook verkocht Israël wapens en munitie aan de neonazi’s in Oekraïne en aan de militaire junta in Birma…..* (terwijl voor de laatste een wapenembargo is ingesteld……)

Niet alleen wapens is een exportproduct van Israël, maar ook de training van politiepersoneel zoals die van de VS en GB, men leert bijvoorbeeld hoe grote mensenmassa’s er onder en gevangen te houden in een getto, ook al in de praktijk getest op de Palestijnen (in de Gazastrook)…… (overigens gebruikte het Israëlische leger eerder SS handboeken voor dit soort ‘technieken’, zo lieten een paar klokkenluidende legerofficieren begin 90 er jaren weten….. Ofwel politie uit een aantal landen wordt door Israël getraind o.a. op basis van SS handboeken…..**

Zo heeft de fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël de volgende tactiek ontwikkeld: het destabiliseren van de Palestijnse samenleving, zodat deze samenleving makkelijker te controleren is…….

Maar ‘liefst’ 60% van de wereldwijde drone export komt voor rekening van…. Israël! Drones die worden gebruikt voor standrechtelijke executies van verdachten, waarbij meer dan 90 % van de slachtoffers niet eens werden verdacht, dus veelal vrouwen en kinderen…….

Israël is voorts exporteur van slimme munitie, bijvoorbeeld granaten die in de lucht dienen te ontploffen om zo in een fiks gebied enorme schade aan te richten door dat kleine explosieve eenheden zich verspreiden bij de ontploffing van die granaat (een voortbouwen op clustermunitie…)….. Europa, ik neem aan dat hier de EU wordt bedoeld, kocht in 2015 voor 1,63 miljard aan wapens van Israël….

Oké niets nieuws
zal je denken, Israël als grote wapenexporteur, echter het is een goede zaak dat Chris Hedges hier op ‘On Contact’ nog eens extra de aandacht op vestigt, hier de video via Brasscheck TV. (zien die video mensen en geeft het door!):

GAZA
IS A TESTING GROUND FOR THE ISRAELI ARMS INDUSTRY

COMBAT
PROVEN” PRODUCTS

THE
“REPRESSION NATION” START UP FACTORY

Chris
Hedges and Rania Khalek talk about the dual purpose of Israel’s
periodic slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza:

    1.
    Destabilize the society to make it easier to control
    2. Test new
    weapons for sale on the international market

Industrial
scale” weapons are used on virtually defenseless people and then
marketed around the world as “battle tested.”

What
Silicon Valley is to computers, Israel is to the business of selling
the tools of repression.

If
that isn’t enough, Israel is becoming a major trainer of US police
departments. Cops are trained to treat Americans like Palestinians.

The
phrase “a cancer on humanity” comes to mind.

===============================

*  Zie: ‘Israël moet stoppen met wapenleveranties aan neonazi’s in Oekraïne

** Israël heeft de SS methodes daartoe vervolmaakt, methodes die de SS godbetert gebruikte tegen de joodse inwoners van het Warschau getto……..

PS: na plaatsing zag ik dat ik vergeten ben te berichten over het feit dat Israël, als Egypte, niet het non-proliferatieverdrag voor chemische wapens heeft getekend en nog steeds van deze wapens ontwikkelt, opslaat en verkoopt…… Naar grote waarschijnlijkheid heeft deze terreurstaat zelfs gifgas geleverd aan de terreurgroepen in Syrië (die met medeweten en instemming van westerse landen chemische wapens in hun bezit hebben……)