Pentagon betrapt op vervalsen documenten over wapenleveringen aan terreurgroepen in Syrië…….

Weer is het Pentagon betrapt op het leveren van wapens aan terreurgroepen in Syrië, dit keer niet via gelekte documenten op Wikileaks. In een rapport van 2 clubs die de wapenhandel monitoren, t.w.: het ‘Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project’ (OCCRP) en het ‘Balkan Investigative Reporting Network’ (BIRN), valt niet alleen te lezen dat het Pentagon bezig is om (veelal nagemaakte Russische) wapens ter waarde van 2.2 miljard dollar te leveren aan die terreurgroepen, maar ook daadwerkelijk bezig is om de documenten die e.e.a. aantonen te veranderen, zodat het spoor naar het Pentagon niet gevonden kan worden…….

Het OCCRP en BIRN hebben uitvoerig onderzoek gedaan en stuitten daarbij op het feit dat deze wapenleveringen worden geregeld en verzonden vanaf de Balkan en de Caucasus. Het VS ministerie van Defensie heeft voor 2017 en 2018 maar liefst 584 miljoen dollar aan budget gereserveerd voor deze wapenleveringen, daarnaast is er voor 900 miljoen gereserveerd t.b.v. deze terreurgroepen voor de periode van nu tot 2022. Samen met de al uitgegeven kosten komt men op een bedrag van 2,2 miljard (billion) dollar……… (al zou 1,484 miljard dollar ook al geen misselijk bedrag zijn……)

Veel van de wapenhandelaren waar de VS mee samenwerkt en die hen nagemaakte Sovjet wapens leveren, zitten in de Oost-Europese georganiseerde misdaad* en voormalige Sovjet republieken als Kazachstan, Georgië en Oekraïne……. Daarnaast heeft één van de munitiefabrieken in Oost-Europa aangekondigd 1.000 extra personeelsleden aan te trekken, om aan de vraag (van de VS) te kunnen voldoen……….

Lees dit ontluisterende artikel van Tyler Durden, dat eerder verscheen op Zero Hedge, ik nam het over van Anti-Media, waarin verder o.a. aandacht voor het al eerder bewezen feit, dat de CIA wapens heeft geleverd aan Al Qaida………

Pentagon
Caught Falsifying Paperwork for Weapons Transfers to Syrian Rebels

September
13, 2017 at 9:56 am

Written
by 
Tyler
Durden

(ZHE— A
new 
bombshell
joint report
 issued
by two international weapons monitoring groups Tuesday confirms that
the Pentagon continues to ship record breaking amounts of weaponry
into Syria and that 
the
Department of Defense is scrubbing its own paper trail.
 On
Tuesday the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP)
and the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN) produced
conclusive evidence that not only is the Pentagon currently involved
in shipping up to $2.2 billion worth of weapons from a shady network
of private dealers to allied partners in Syria – mostly old Soviet
weaponry – but is actually manipulating paperwork such as end-user
certificates, 
presumably
in order to hide US involvement.

The
OCCRP and BIRN published 
internal
US defense procurement files
 after
an extensive investigation which found that the Pentagon is running a
massive weapons trafficking pipeline which originates in the Balkans
and Caucuses, and ends in Syria and Iraq. The program is ostensibly
part of the US train, equip, and assist campaign for the Syrian
Democratic Forces (SDF, a coalition of YPG/J and Arab FSA groups
operating primarily in Syria’s east). The arms transfers are
massive and the program looks to continue for years. According
to 
Foreign
Policy’s
 (FP)
 coverage
of the report:

The
Department of Defense has budgeted $584 million specifically for this
Syrian operation for the financial years 2017 and 2018, and has
earmarked another $900 million of spending on Soviet-style munitions
between now and 2022. 
The
total, $2.2 billion, likely understates the flow of weapons to Syrian
rebels in the coming years.

But
perhaps more shocking is the following admission that 
Pentagon
suppliers have links with known criminal networks
,
also from 
FP:

According
to the report, many of the weapons suppliers — primarily in
Eastern Europe but also in the former Soviet republics, including
Kazakhstan, Georgia, and Ukraine —
 have
both links to organized crime throughout Eastern Europe and spotty
business records.

The
sheer amount of material necessary for the Pentagon program — 
one
ammunition factory announced it planned to hire 1,000 new employees
in 2016 to help cope with the demand
 — has
reportedly stretched suppliers to the limit, forcing the Defense
Department to relax standards on the materials it’s willing to
accept.

It
is likely that the organized crime association is the reason why the
Pentagon has sought to alter its records. In addition, the sheer
volume of weaponry continuing to ship to the Syrian battlefield
and 
other
parts
 of
the Middle East means 
inevitable
proliferation among unsavory terror groups
 –
a phenomenon which has already been 
exhaustively
documented
 in
connection with the 
now
reportedly closed CIA program
 to
topple the Syrian government. The associations and alliances among
some of the Arab former FSA groups the DoD continues to support in
the north and east remains fluid, which means means 
US-supplied
weapons will continue to pass among groups with no accountability for
where they end up.

One
of the authors of the OCCRP/BIRN report, Ivan Angelovski, told
Foreign Policy that, 
The
Pentagon is removing any evidence in their procurement records that
weapons are actually going to the Syrian opposition.” 
The
report is based on internal US government memos which reveal that
weapons shipment destination locations have been scrubbed from
original documents.

Falsified
and altered Pentagon procurement documents:

      

       

Balkan
Insight
,
which is hosting the original investigative report: 
Seven
US procurement documents were whitewashed to remove reference to
‘Syria’ after reporters contacted the Pentagon to enquire about
whether the exporting countries – Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia,
Ukraine and Georgia – had been informed of the destination.”

The
fact that 
Foreign
Policy
,
which is the foremost establishment national security publication in
the world, would admit that the Pentagon’s Syria weapons
procurement program is tied to East European organized crime is
itself hugely significant. At this point the evidence is simply so
overwhelming that even establishment sources like FP – which itself
has generally been pro-interventionist on Syria – can’t deny it.

FP
further reports that the Pentagon program 
appears
to be turbocharging a shadowy world of Eastern European arms
dealers.”
 And
adds further that, “the Pentagon is reportedly removing
documentary evidence about just who will ultimately be using the
weapons, potentially weakening one of the bulwarks of international
protocols against illicit arms dealing.”

Map/Infographic
produced as part of the OCCRP/BIRN report, itself confirmed by
Foreign Policy magazine. Notice the map denotes that prior CIA
weapons went directly to Idlib province (northwest, section in green)
and the Golan border region (south). Both of these areas were and
continue to be occupied by al-Qaeda (in Idlib, AQ’s Hay’at Tahrir
al-Sham). 
In
Idlib specifically, analysts have 
confirmed
genocidal cleansing of religious minorities
 conducted
by AQ “rebels” directly assisted by CIA weapons.

Late
last month we featured the story of 
Bulgarian
journalist Dilyana Gaytandzhieva, who was fired from her job
 after
being interrogated by national intelligence officials for exposing
the same Pentagon arms network which is the subject of the latest
OCCRP/BIRN investigation. At the time, 
Al
Jazeera
 was
the only major international outlet which covered the story, which
confirmed that Bulgarian agents interrogated Gaytandzhieva and “tried
to find out her sources.” An anonymous source had leaked a
large trove of internal government files connected to the arms
trafficking to the East European-based 
Trud
Newspaper
 journalist,
which was the basis of her reporting. The newest investigation
released Tuesday appears to include some of the same documents,
also 
confirmed by
Gayandzhieva.

Read
the full OCCRP/BIRN investigation here.

Read
Zero Hedge’s original coverage of the Pentagon’s Balkan arms
pipeline here.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

Om de getoonde documenten te vergroten kan u uw browser gebruiken (rechtsboven), of ga naar het originele artikel, waarop u de documenten kan vergroten door erop te klikken.

* Oost-Europese landen die willens en wetens meehelpen aan deze wapenleveranties, weigeren de gevolgen van deze leveringen, waaronder de grote vluchtelingenstromen, onder ogen te zien, sterker nog: ze weigeren deze vluchtelingen zelfs toegang tot hun land………

Hennis-Plasschaert (VVD) ‘bestelde’ atoombommen nieuwe stijl voor Volkel, ‘fijn dat het Nederlandse volk hierin werd gekend…..’

Hennis-Plasschaert heeft de nieuwste nucleaire bom van de VS ‘besteld’ en de VS heeft besloten 20 van deze massavernietigingswapens op Volkel te stationeren………… Het al voor het demissionair waardeloos zijnde kabinet Rutte 2, kan geen geld uittrekken voor leerkrachten, maar wel toestemming geven aan de VS nieuwe massavernietigingswapens* op Volkel te stationeren…….. Dit in een tijd, waarin de VS met haar NAVO aan de lijn, de wereldvrede keer op keer op het spel zetten…… 

Terwijl de wereld hysterisch is over het ‘Noord-Koreaanse kernwapenprogramma’, is de VS bezig met het testen van hun nieuwste nucleaire massavernietigingswapen…….. Hoe zot wil je het hebben en dat door een ‘land’ dat al eens atoombommen tegen burgers heeft gebruikt………. 

Met andere woorden: als de VS een oorlog tegen Rusland begint, of weet uit te lokken, is Volkel één van de eerste Russische doelen……… De kans dat dit gebeurt is levensgroot zoals je wellicht weet uit de berichtgeving en de (recente) geschiedenis, waar de VS er geen probleem mee heeft, de ene na de andere illegale oorlog te beginnen…… Sterker nog de VS en de NAVO zijn al bezig met een scenario te bedenken voor ‘een beperkte nucleaire oorlog in Europa…………’

Ach ja, je moet maar denken: als er een kernoorlog uitbreekt, zijn er daarna nog maar heel weinig docenten nodig, althans als kinderen zo’n oorlog overleven en zoals u begrijpt zullen dat alleen kinderen van welgestelde ouders, dan wel van politici en hoge ambtenaren zijn……… 

Lees het volgende uitstekende artikel van Tyler Durden (Zero Hedge), zoals dit op Anti-Media werd gepubliceerd:

US
Conducts Successful Field Test of New Nuclear Bomb

August
29, 2017 at 10:16 am

Written
by 
Tyler
Durden

(ZHE) —
In
mid-April, 
we
reported that 
just
as tensions over North Korea’s nuclear program and potential US
airstrikes run wild, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) said that in conjunction with the US
Air Force, it had completed the first qualification flight test of
B61-12 gravity nuclear bomb on March 14 at the Tonopah Test Range in
Nevada.”

Four
months later, and just as concerns over North Korea’s provocative
launches have send shockwaves across global markets – again – the
US National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) announced another
successful flight test of B61-12 gravity nuclear bombs in Nevada. The
second qualification flight test for the nuclear bomb was carried out
by the NNSA and the US Air Force.

Frank Klotz @FrankKlotzNNSA

 & @usairforce complete second qualification flight test of B61-12 to validate design & system performance. https://nnsa.energy.gov/mediaroom/pressreleases/b61-12-continues-meet-qualification-test-schedule 

According
to the NNSA
press release
,
two B61-12 gravity bombs (without a nuclear warhead) were dropped
from F-15 fighter jets on August 8 at Tonopah Test Range in Nevada,
and were designed to test the “non-nuclear functions and the
aircraft’s capability to deliver the weapon.” These tests are
part of a series over the next three years to qualify the B61-12 for
service. As we noted
at the time
,
the first qualification flight test occurred in March.

The
B61-12 life extension program is progressing on schedule to meet
national security requirements,” said Phil Calbos, acting NNSA
deputy administrator for Defense Programs. “These realistic flight
qualification tests validate the design of the B61-12 when it comes
to system performance.”

According
to the editor-in-chief of National Defense magazine, Igor
Korotchenko, the second test of the nuclear bomb could indicate that
Washington is speeding up its rearmament program. “The fact of the
test of this modification of the nuclear bomb indicates that the US
continues an accelerated rearmament program of its tactical nuclear
arsenal in Europe, 
as
well as that both Washington and Brussels are considering the
scenario of a limited nuclear war in Europe
,”
he said.

Furthermore,
as 
RT
reminds 
us,
the test comes two months after Politico reported that US senators
were pushing legislation to compel President Donald Trump to take
steps to develop new missiles which would be “the first steps to
jettisoning what is known as the INF treaty.” Moscow said that such
a move would be “ridiculous” and would damage America itself as
well as its European allies.  In July, Republican Senator Tom
Cotton, a member of the House Armed Services Committee, suggested
bypassing the milestone treaty that bans the testing, production and
possession of land-based intermediate-range missiles by both Moscow
and Washington. He urged the White House to “facilitate the
transfer of cruise missile technology to our (American) allies,”
explaining that “only the US and Russia have signed this treaty. No
other country did.”

After
the announcement of the plans to upgrade the B61 nuclear weapon,
Russia expressed its concerns that the move could destabilize global
security. “This means that the armaments threshold could in theory
have been lowered, which of course will destabilize the situation to
a certain extent,”said the deputy head of Russia’s Foreign
Ministry, Sergey Ryabkov, in August 2016.  The program, started
under President Obama means that over the next 30 years Washington
could spend up to $1 trillion to modernize the US nuclear arsenal.
Shortly after his election, president Trump called for the US to
“greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability,” though he
criticized the Obama administration’s costly modernization program
during the election campaign.

The
latest test was the second in a series that will be conducted over
the next three years to qualify the B61-12 for service. Three
successful development flight tests were conducted in 2015.

This
demonstration of effective end-to-end system performance in a
realistic ballistic flight environment marks another on-time
achievement for the B61-12 Life Extension Program,” said Brig. Gen.
Michael Lutton, NNSA’s principal assistant deputy administrator for
military application. “The successful test provides critical
qualification data to validate that the baseline design meets
military requirements. It reflects the nation’s continued
commitment to our national security and that of our allies and
partners.”

The
flight test included hardware designed by Sandia and Los Alamos
National Laboratories, manufactured by the Nuclear Security
Enterprise plants, and mated to the tail-kit assembly section,
designed by the Boeing Company under contract with the Air Force
Nuclear Weapons Center (AFNWC),” the NNSA statement said.

Phil
Hoover, an engineer at Sandia National Laboratories, shows off a
flight test body for a B61-12 nuclear weapon (zie de inhumane schoft trots zijn op zijn massavernietigingswapen)

The
B61-12 consolidates and replaces four B61 bomb variants in the
nation’s nuclear arsenal. The first production unit is scheduled to
be completed by March 2020.

The
original B61 gravity bomb is the mainstay of the Air Force’s
nuclear arsenal and one of the legs of the so-called nuclear triad,
along with the intercontinental ballistic missiles deployed from
either ground-based silos or oceangoing submarines. The B61 nuclear
gravity bomb, deployed from U.S. Air Force and NATO bases, has almost
50 years of service, “making it the oldest and most versatile
weapon in the enduring U.S. stockpile.” Numerous modifications have
been made to improve the B61’s safety, security, and reliability
since the first B61 entered service in 1968, and four B61 variants
remain in the stockpile: the 3, 4, 7, and 11. However, the aging
weapon system requires a life extension to continue deterring
potential adversaries and reassuring our allies and partners of our
security commitments to them.

The
B61-12 LEP will refurbish, reuse, or replace all of the bomb’s
nuclear and non-nuclear components to extend the service life of the
B61 by at least 20 years, “and to improve the bomb’s safety, 
effectiveness, and security” 
according
to the NNSA
.
The B61-12 first production unit will occur in FY 2020. The bomb will
be approximately 12 feet long and weigh approximately 825 pounds. The
bomb will be air-delivered in either ballistic gravity or guided drop
modes, and is being certified for delivery on current strategic
(B-2A) and dual capable aircraft (F-15E, F-16C/D & MLU, PA-200)
as well as future aircraft platforms (F-35, B-21).

President
Trump has endorsed the ambitious and expensive plan to modernize the
US nuclear triad, begun under his predecessor.

The
August test of the B61-12 was the second in a series with the final
design review due in September 2018 and the first production unit
scheduled for completion by March 2020. Once the bomb is authorized
for use in 2020, the US plans to deploy some 180 of the B61-12
precision-guided thermonuclear bombs to five European countries as
follows:

  • Germany
    -20;

  • Italy
    – 70;

  • Netherlands
    – 20;

  • Turkey
    -50;

  • Belgium – 20;


although
in light of the recent deterioration in relations between Washington
and Ankara, it will likely consider reassessing the Turkish
deployment.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

==========================================

* Gegarandeerd dat deze bom straks alleen onder de nieuwe Nederlandse ‘straaljager’, de JSF past. Voordeel voor de Russen: de JSF kan geen jager genoemd worden naar de huidige standaard daarvoor, het toestel klimt, rent en wendt te langzaam en kan zich wat dat betreft nog net met de A-10 Thunderbolt uit de 70er jaren meten…… Bovendien is de stealth technologie al gebroken door de Russen en Chinezen, zodat zij het toestel wel op de radar kunnen zien……… Daarnaast mag het toestel alleen gebruikt worden als de VS akkoord is met het doel, zo niet, kan de VS het toestel op afstand blokkeren voor gebruik………

FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

Het volgende artikel komt van Information Clearing House en komt van ZeroHedge.

Ex-FBI oplichter Comey is door de mand gevallen. De topgraaier heeft zelf veel (ook geheime) documenten gelekt naar nu blijkt.

Een goed artikel met mogelijkheid tot vertaling (zie link naar origineel onder het volgende artikel): 

FBI
Director’s Leaked Trump Memos Contained Classified Information

By
Tyler Durden

Amid
the constant media outrage over everything 
Trump,
Trump, Trump
,
some might have forgotten that in the political rollercoaster over
the past 12 months, there were numerous other high-profile
individuals involved, including not 
only
former DOJ head Loretta Lynch
,
whose every interaction with the Clinton campaign is about to be
probed under a Congressional microscope, but the man who some say
started it all: former FBI Director James Comey.

First
loved by the Democrats when he personally absolved Hillary Clinton of
any sins regarding her (ab)use of her personal email server, then
furiously loathed when he reopened the FBI probe into Hillary Clinton
one week before the election, then finally getting into a feud with
President Trump which cost his him job, Comey ultimately admitted to
leaking at least one memo which contained personal recollections of
his conversations with the president, in hopes of launching a special
probe into the president’s alleged Russian collusion. 

There
was just one problem: according to a 
blockbuster
report from The Hill
,
in addition to the leaked memos, 
Comey
also leaked classified information in gross and direct violation of
FBI rules and regulations. 
And
just like that Comey finds himself in trouble. Only not just any
trouble, but the virtually same trouble that Hillary Clinton was in
in the summer of 2016… and which James Comey was tasked to
investigate.

Aside
from once again confirming that Trump may have been right all along
in his accusation of the ex-FBI chief’s motives, this shocking
revelation raises the possibility that 
Comey
broke his own agency’s rules 

by putting his own interests above those of his country – but far
more grotesquely, 
ignored
the same security protocol that he publicly criticized Hillary
Clinton for in the waning days of the 2016 presidential election, in
order to settle his vendetta with President Trump.

Amusingly,
Comey’s alleged flagrant disregard for FBI regulations would explain
why he also found Clinton’s email server transgressions to not be a
material concern, contrary to what most Republicans claimed at the
time. After all, if it was good – or rather not bad enough for
Clinton, maybe it was the same with Comey’s own abuse of confidential
data? 
The
only problem is that while Comey was generous enough to let Hillary
go, now that the ex-FBI chief is facing the president of the US as
his adversary, he may not be quite so lucky.

Lees
het hele artikel op:

FBI Director’s Leaked Trump Memos Contained Classified Information

Zie ook: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump


       en: ‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

       en: ‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

       en: ‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

       en: VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

       en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

       en: ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

       en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

       en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

       en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

       en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘ 

‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

Niet de Russen en Trumps team, maar de gefrustreerde medewerker Seth Rich van het Hillary Clinton campagne team, heeft de documenten die Clinton belastten gelekt naar Wikileaks, zo meldde Anti-Media gisteren. Rich was overigens gefrustreerd door de smerige campagne, die Clinton en haar team voerden tegen Bernie Sanders, de andere presidentskandidaat, tijdens de voorverkiezingen van de Democraten…….

Geen nieuws, dit was al lang bekend*, zo zette Julian Assange vorig jaar al een premie van $ 130,000.– op de tip die tot de aanhouding zouden leiden van de moordenaar(s), die Rich neerschoten. De politie hield het op een roofmoord, terwijl er niets van de eigendommen van Rich werden gestolen, hoewel hij voor een aanzienlijk bedrag aan sieraden droeg………

Er zijn nieuwe bewijzen opgedoken, die van de ‘Rusland manipulatie claim’ gehakt maken. Zo gaf een anonieme FBI bron toe dat men op de computer van Rich meer dan 44.000 mails van Clinton terug heeft gevonden, die Rich doorspeelde naar Wikileaks…..

Kortom: van al het gelul over Russische hacks en manipulaties blijft niets over, een claim die al niet met bewijzen werd en wordt gemaakt…… Ook Nederlandse politici, de Nederlandse geheime diensten AIVD en MIVD en de reguliere Nederlandse (afhankelijke) media, houden deze leugen in de lucht………………..

Zeker de AIVD en MIVD moeten op de hoogte zijn van deze zaak, des te schunniger dat deze waardeloze diensten deze leugens in de lucht houden, je zou dit zelfs ernstig misdadig kunnen noemen!!

In feite was Rich een klokkenluider, die ‘als dank’ werd vermoord……..

Murdered
DNC Staffer Seth Rich Shared 44,053 Democrat 

Emails With WikiLeaks

Murdered DNC Staffer Seth Rich Shared 44,053 Democrat Emails With WikiLeaks

May
16, 2017 at 8:14 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(ZHEFor
the past several months, Democrats have based their “Resist 45”
movement on unsubstantiated assertions that the Trump campaign
coordinated with Russian intelligence officials to undermine the 2016
Presidential Election thereby ‘stealing’ the White House from
Hillary Clinton. Day after day we’ve all suffered through one
anonymously sourced, “shock” story after another from the New
York Times and/or The Washington Post with new allegations of the
‘wrongdoing’.

But,
new evidence surfacing in the Seth Rich murder investigation may just
quash the “Russian hacking” conspiracy theory. According to a new
report from 
Fox
News
,
it was former DNC staffer Seth Rich who supplied 44,000 DNC emails to
WikiLeaks and not some random Russian cyber terrorist, as we’ve all
been led to believe.


According
to Fox News, though admittedly via yet another anonymous FBI source,
Rich made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, an American
investigative reporter and director of WikiLeaks who was living in
London at the time. 
According
to Fox News sources, federal law enforcement investigators found
44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments sent between DNC leaders from
January 2015 to May 2016 that Rich shared with WikiLeaks before he
was gunned down on July 10, 2016. 

The
Democratic National Committee staffer who was gunned down on July 10
on a Washington, D.C., street just steps from his home had leaked
thousands of internal emails to WikiLeaks, law enforcement sources
told Fox News.

A
federal investigator who reviewed an FBI forensic report detailing
the contents of DNC staffer Seth Rich’s computer generated within
96 hours after his murder, said Rich made contact with WikiLeaks
through Gavin MacFadyen,
 a
now-deceased American investigative reporter, documentary filmmaker,
and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time.

I
have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and Wikileaks,” the
federal investigator told Fox News, confirming the MacFadyen
connection. He said the emails are in possession of the FBI, while
the stalled case is in the hands of the Washington Police Department.

Then,
on July 22, just 12 days after Rich was killed, WikiLeaks published
internal DNC emails that appeared to show top party officials
conspiring to stop Bernie Sanders from becoming the party’s
presidential nominee. As we’ve noted before, the DNC’s efforts to
block Sanders resulted in Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigning as DNC
chairperson.

These
new revelations seem to be consistent with the findings of Rod
Wheeler, a former DC homicide detective and Fox News contributor,
whose private investigation firm was hired by Rich’s family to
probe the case.

My
investigation up to this point shows there was some degree of email
exchange between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks,” Wheeler told Fox
News. 
I
do believe that the answers to who murdered Seth Rich sits on his
computer on a shelf at the DC police or FBI headquarters.”

My
investigation shows someone within the D.C. government, Democratic
National Committee or Clinton team is blocking the murder
investigation from going forward,” Wheeler told Fox News. “That
is unfortunate. Seth Rich’s murder is unsolved as a result of
that.”

The
botched robbery theory, which police have pursued for nearly a year,
isn’t panning out, Wheeler said. Two assailants caught on a grainy
video tape from a camera posted outside a grocery mart, shot Rich
twice in his back, but did not take his wallet, cell phone, keys,
watch or necklace worth about $2,000.

As
you’ll recall, Rich’s death has been shrouded in mystery from the
start as he was reportedly shot from behind in the wee hours of the
morning but was not robbed of the nearly $2,000 worth of cash and
jewelry on his body at the time.

Rich
had been at Lou’s City Bar a couple of miles from his home until
about 1:15 a.m. 
He
walked home, calling several people along the way. He called his
father, Joel Rich, who he missed because he had gone to sleep.
He talked with a fraternity brother and his girlfriend, Kelsey Mulka.

Around
4:17 a.m., Rich was about a block from his home when Mulka, still on
the phone with him, heard voices in the background. Rich reassured
her that he was steps away from being at his front door and hung up.

Two
minutes later, Rich was shot twice. Police were on the scene within
three minutes. 
Rich
sustained bruising on his hands and face. He remained conscious, but
died at a nearby hospital less than two hours later.

Shortly
thereafter, Julian Assange implied that Seth Rich was, in fact, a
source for WikiLeaks and offered a $130,000 reward for information
leading to his killer.

Per
the 
Washington
Examiner
,
Rich’s family issued the following statement, via a ‘spokesman’,
regarding the recent Fox News reports saying they have seen no
evidence of the alleged emails between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks:

As
we’ve seen through the past year of unsubstantiated claims, we see
no facts, we have seen no evidence, we have been approached with no
emails and only learned about this when contacted by the press,”
 the
statement said. “Even if tomorrow, an email was found, it is not a
high enough bar of evidence to prove any interactions as emails can
be altered and we’ve seen that those interest in pushing
conspiracies will stop at nothing to do so.”

We
are a family who is committed to facts, not fake evidence that
surfaces every few months to fill the void and distract law
enforcement and the general public from finding Seth’s
murderers.
 The
services of the private investigator who spoke to the press was
offered to the Rich family and paid for by a third party, and
contractually was barred from speaking to press or anyone outside of
law enforcement or the family unless explicitly authorized by the
family.”

But,
as WikiLeaks noted, the family’s “spokesman” is none other than
Democrat crisis PR consultant Brad Bauman.

Seems
that not everyone within the FBI is on board with the “Russian
hacking” narrative and are finally starting to come forward.

Finally,
we find it ‘shocking’ that while the New York Times, Washington
Post, CNN, etc are all too eager to regurgitate each others
anonymously sourced stories that are critical of Trump, not a single
one of them had a single reference of this Fox News bombshell on
their website at the time this article was published.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

=============================

* Zie: ‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Zie ook: ‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

       en: ‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

      en: ‘‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

       en: VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

      en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

       en: ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

       en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

       en: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

       en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

       en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..


 Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u hieronder terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘MacFadyen’.

Bij toevoegen links op 27 oktober 2017, zag ik dat 2 video’s zijn verwijderd……….

Al Jazeera filmde een onderdeel van de ‘gifgasshow’ in Khan Sheikhoun………..

Anti-Media bracht gisteren het bericht, dat Al Jazeera een onderdeel van de mediashow rond Khan Sheikhoun heeft gefilmd….. Het zou gaan om filmbeelden die na de aanval werden gemaakt, dit om de democratisch gekozen regering Assad in een slecht daglicht te plaatsen….. Er zou zelfs opdracht tot het maken van ‘Assad beschadigende’ videobeelden zijn gegeven vanuit een Europees land….. Kortom Khan Sheikhoun was en is een ‘false flag’ operatie………

Hier het artikel van Anti-Media, daaronder vindt u deel van een bericht dat Stan van Houcke op zijn blog plaatste, waarin dieper op deze ‘false flag’ operatie wordt ingegaan, dit n.a.v. een column van George Monbiot (The Guardian).

Al-Jazeera
Said To Film False Flag Chemical Attack Against Syrian Civilians

Al-Jazeera Said To Film False Flag Chemical Attack Against Syrian Civilians

May
4, 2017 at 11:28 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(ZHEOne
month after Trump flip-flopped on his Syrian position, launching
cruise missile strikes on a Syrian airfield 
as
“after dinner entertainment

during Trump’s meeting with the Chinese president, just days after
declaring he would allow the Syrian people to decide the fate of
Assad when another “chemical attack” video emerged at the end of
March, a false flag chemical attack against civilians in Syria
was 
reportedly
filmed recently by al-Jazeera stringers in Syria
.

Around
30 fire engines and ambulances, as well as 70 local residents with
children transported from a refugee camp were used in the filming of
the Al Jazeera clip across three locations in Idlib province,
including Jisr Shughur.

The
“effectiveness” of the White Helmets’ TV-spectacle of accusing
Syrian authorities of attacking civilians in Khan Shaykhun with sarin
inspired terrorists to continue filming the fake ‘series’.
According to info confirmed via several channels, al-Jazeera
television channel stringers have recently filmed a staged, fake
scene of an alleged chemical attack against civilians by the Syrian
Army,” the source told Sputnik.

A
multiple simultaneous uploading of filmed fake footage with
‘screaming’ social media comments was due to take place in the
next few days (by Sunday) at the separate command of a mastermind and
sponsor of the film in one of the European countries.”

This
filming was said to have been ordered from a European country.

It
wouldn’t be the first time – in December 2016, 
Egyptian
police arrested 5 men for making staged 
“wounded
children” photos, which they planned to use to misrepresent on
social media as photos of destruction and injured people in Syria’s
Aleppo.


As
a reminder, on April 4, the National Coalition for Syrian
Revolutionary and Opposition Forces claimed that 80 people were
killed and 200 injured in a suspected chemical attack in Khan
Shaykhun, blaming the Syrian government. Damascus vehemently rejected
the accusations and said militants and their allies were responsible.
That video served as a the basis for Trump to launch 59 Tomahawk
missiles at the Syrian military airfiled in Ash Shairat. Trump said
the attack was a response to the alleged chemical weapon use in
Syria’s Idlib, which Washington has blamed on the Syrian
government.


Meanwhile,
Russia described the attack as an aggression against a sovereign
state, while the Russian Foreign Ministry reminded the Trump
administration that all chemical weapons had been taken out of Syria
in mid-2014 as John Kerry infamously declared in 2014. Discussing the
attack, Syrian President Assad said in an interview with Sputnik that
Western states were blocking attempts to investigate the Idlib
chemical incident because in the event of a probe it will be
established that the “attack” was a false flag and lie.

In January
2016, the OPCW announced that 
Syria’s
weapons arsenal had been destroyed in accordance with an agreement
reached after the 2013 Ghouta attack.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

===============================

A
Response To George Monbiot’s ‘Disavowal’

IN ALERTS
2017
 
POST 04 MAY 2017  LAST UPDATED ON 04 MAY 2017 BY EDITOR

Guardian
columnist George Monbiot has 
responded to
our recent 
media
alert
 on
the alleged gas attack in Khan Sheikhoun, Idlib, Syria, on April 4:

Here’s
a response to the latest attempt by @medialens to dismiss the
mounting evidence on the authorship of the #KhanSheikhoun attack”

This
is a very serious misrepresentation of what we have argued in two
media alerts. We made our position crystal-clear in the 
latest
alert
:

We
have no idea who was responsible for the mass killings in Idlib on
April 4; we are not weapons experts. But it seems obvious to us that
arguments and evidence offered by credible sources like Postol should
at least be aired by the mass media”

To
interpret this as an attempt to ‘dismiss the mounting evidence on the
authorship of the #KhanSheikhoun attack’ is to exactly reverse the
truth, which is frankly outrageous from a high-profile Guardian
journalist. We are precisely calling for journalists to 
not dismiss
evidence on the authorship of the alleged attack. This is why we
quoted investigative reporter 
Robert
Parry
:

The
role of an honest press corps should be to apply skepticism to all
official stories, not carry water for “our side” and reject
anything coming from the “other side,” which is what The
New York Times, The Washington Post and the rest of the Western
mainstream media have done, especially regarding Middle East policies
and now the New Cold War with Russia”

We
have most certainly 
not urged
anyone to ‘dismiss’ the White House version of events. We have asked
journalists to consider that version 
as
well as
 evidence
offered by credible critics like former UN weapons inspectors Hans
Blix and Scott Ritter, and by investigative journalists like
Parry. 
We
are clearly arguing in favour of inclusion of evidence, not
exclusion
.
Monbiot has simply reversed the truth. In an expanded version of his
tweeted response titled, ‘Disavowal’, he 
writes:

There’s
an element on the left that seems determined to produce a mirror
image of the Washington Consensus. Just as the billionaire press and
Western governments downplay and deny the crimes of their allies, so
this element downplays and denies the crimes of the West’s official
enemies “

We
have no interest in downplaying or denying any crimes. We hold no
candle whatever for Assad or Putin, as we held no candle for
Milosevic, Gaddafi or Saddam Hussein. We are simply urging
journalists to consider both ‘Washington Consensus’
arguments 
and serious
counter-arguments offered by credible sources. Monbiot writes:

The
pattern is always the same. They ignore a mountain of compelling
evidence and latch onto one or a few contrarians who tell them what
they want to hear (a similar pattern to the 9/11 conspiracy theories,
and to climate change denial). The lastest [sic] example is an
“alert” published by an organisation called Media Lens, in
response to a tweet of mine “

Our
latest alert was not ‘in response’ to Monbiot’s tweet; it was in
response to Professor Postol’s 
analysis challenging
a White House report on the alleged attacks in Idlib. We simply used
Monbiot’s tweet as a typical example indicating what we described as
the ‘corporate media zeitgeist’.

Is
it reasonable to describe Postol, one of the world’s ‘leading weapons
experts’, according to the New York Times, as a ‘contrarian’? Is 
Hans
Blix
,
who led the weapons inspections team in Iraq in 2002-2003, a
‘contrarian’? How about former UN weapons inspector 
Scott
Ritter
,
who was 100% vindicated by the failure to find WMD in Iraq? Can Noam
Chomsky also be dismissed as merely a ‘contrarian’ following a
‘pattern’ which is ‘always the same’? Chomsky 
commented recently:

Well,
there are some interesting questions there — you can understand why
Assad would have been pretty crazy [to provoke a US intervention]
because they’re winning the war. The worst thing for him is to bring
the United States in. So why would he turn to a chemical weapons
attack? You can imagine that a dictator with just local interests
might do it, maybe if he thought he had a green light. But why would
the Russians allow it? It doesn’t make any sense. And in fact, there
are some questions about what happened, but there are some pretty
credible people — not conspiracy types — people with solid
intelligence credentials that say it didn’t happen.

Lawrence
Wilkerson said that the US intelligence picked up a plane and
followed that it probably hit an Al-Qaeda warehouse which had some
sort of chemical weapon stored in it and they spread. I don’t know.
But it certainly calls for at least an investigation. And those are
not insignificant people [challenging the official narrative]”

We
are saying no more or less than this – 
it
calls for at least an investigation
.

Chomsky
pointed to 
comments made
by Wilkerson, former chief of staff to General Colin Powell, in a
recent interview on the Real News Network:

I
personally think the provocation was a Tonkin Gulf incident….. Most
of my sources are telling me, including members of the team that
monitors global chemical weapons –including people in Syria,
including people in the US Intelligence Community–that what most
likely happened …was that they hit a warehouse that they had
intended to hit…and this warehouse was alleged to have to [sic]
ISIS supplies in it, and… some of those supplies were precursors
for chemicals….. conventional bombs hit the warehouse, and due to a
strong wind, and the explosive power of the bombs, they dispersed
these ingredients and killed some people”

There
is also the collective 
judgement of
20 former members of the US Intelligence Community, the Steering
Group of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity:

Our
U.S. Army contacts in the area have told us this is not what
happened. There was no Syrian “chemical weapons attack.”
Instead, a Syrian aircraft bombed an al-Qaeda-in-Syria ammunition
depot that turned out to be full of noxious chemicals and a strong
wind blew the chemical-laden cloud over a nearby village where many
consequently died…..This is what the Russians and Syrians have been
saying and – more important –what they appear to believe
happened.’

Monbiot’s
‘one or a few contrarians’ include all of the above, plus
journalists 
John
Pilger
Jonathan
Cook
Peter
Hitchens
Gareth
Porter
Philip
Giraldi
,
and others. They also include Piers Robinson, Professor of Politics,
Society and Political Journalism at the University of Sheffield, who
responded to our request for a comment:

Monbiot
supports the official narrative that the Assad regime is responsible
for the April 4 event when it is alleged that Assad’s forces launched
a chemical weapon attack on civilians. He is presenting this as
factually correct even though some credible commentators have raised
questions regarding these claims and whilst there remains a lack of
compelling evidence. In a recent posting Monbiot quotes recent French
intelligence service claims regarding Assad’s guilt in this matter.

The
problem here is that there are substantial grounds for remaining
cautious of official claims. It is no secret that Western governments
and key allies of theirs (Saudi Arabia, Qatar) have been seeking the
overthrow of Assad for many years now. Indeed, the recently published
Chilcot Inquiry, in section 3.1, revealed discussions between Blair
and Bush which indicate that Syria was considered a potential target
straight after 9/11. Given these objectives it is entirely plausible
that Western intelligence services might be manipulating information
so as to generate the impression that the Assad regime is
responsible. Indeed, this kind of propaganda was well documented in
the run up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq when weak intelligence was
used by US and British politicians to justify their certainty that
Iraq possessed WMD. These are all very good reasons for journalists
and commentators to ask challenging questions rather than to dismiss
out of hand any such attempts in the way Monbiot does” (Email to
Media Lens, May 3, 2017)

Tim
Hayward, Professor of Environmental Political Theory at Edinburgh
University, has also responded to Monbiot’s piece 
here:

There
are serious unsettled questions about every aspect of the incident,
not only the anomalies concerning time of incident, identity of
victims, causes of death, role of White Helmets, and about whose
interests it served, but also concerning the forensic evidence
itself”

And here:

In
a tweeted response, he repeated his opinion that people like me, who
question it, are denying a 
mountain
of evidence
.

So
to state a point that should not need stating: to question is not to
deny – although nor is it to affirm. It is to seek knowledge and
understanding. Being less impressed than George by the 
quantity of
data presented as evidence, I have only ever commented on
its 
quality”

Hayward
adds that in Monbiot’s latest post: ‘he has entrenched more deeply
his defence of the NATO narrative’.

Monbiot
says ‘the pattern is always the same’. In fact, there is indeed a
pattern of ‘mainstream’ media insisting on the need for war in
response to unproven claims that are often later debunked. We gave
several examples in our 
first
alert
 on
the alleged chemical weapons attacks in Idlib. It is absurd for
Monbiot to wearily dismiss our ‘pattern’, when our scepticism over
claims made on Iraq and Libya – and numerous other issues, over many
years – has so obviously been justified. Again, our problem is with
the refusal of ‘mainstream’ media to report or discuss the opinions
of credible experts challenging government claims.

Voor het hele artikel hier de link.

==================================

Zie ook:

White Helmets oprichter overleden, het sein voor nog meer anti-Syrische propaganda

Al-Baghdadi (top ISIS) vermoord, nu nog zijn bazen berechten

Syrische Koerden voor tweede keer verraden: VS blijft vanwege de olie‘ 

Gifgasaanval Douma in elkaar gezet door ‘gematigde rebellen’

Gifgasaanval Douma: OPCW rapport maakt korte metten met de westerse beschuldiging aan adres Syrië, waar de NOS een meer dan levensgrote bok schoot

VS heeft opstand en daarmee de oorlog in Syrië georganiseerd, zo toont WikiLeaks ten overvloede nog eens aan…….

VS heeft opstand en daarmee de oorlog in Syrië georganiseerd, zo toont WikiLeaks ten overvloede nog eens aan…….

Gifgasaanval Idlib: de komende ‘kindslachtoffers’ worden getraind door terreurgroep White Helmets………

John Bolton geeft terreurgroepen in Syrië de opdracht een false flag gifgasaanval uit te voeren

Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!

Bernard Hammelburg (BNR): Assad is een monster waar we mee moeten samenwerken………

Van Kappen (VVD) noemt ‘stapelaanwijzingen’ het bewijs en is blij met raketaanval VS op Syrische basis,  een aanval zonder enig echt bewijs voor Syrische schuld…….

 ‘Sico van der Meer (‘deskundige’ Clingendael) weet niet, dat Israël en Egypte grote hoeveelheden gifgas maken en op voorraad hebben……….

Koenders en SOHR melden gifgasaanval, reguliere media als NOS nemen bericht van SOHR (propaganda en ‘fake news’ orgaan) over

Rutte: raketaanval VS tegen Syrische basis was begrijpelijk en proportioneel, ook al is er geen bewijs voor Syrische schuld……..

Haley (VS ambassadeur bij VN) herhaalde in VN, voorafgaand aan raketaanval, het smerige spel van Powell in 2002, aanleiding tot illegale oorlog tegen Irak…….‘  

‘Koenders (PvdA BuZa): Assad is schuldig aan gifgasaanval en is een ‘criminele recidivist……’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Esther de Lange (CDA): het afschieten door de VS van raketten op een Syrische basis ‘was even nodig………..’

Al Jazeera filmde een onderdeel van de ‘gifgasshow’ in Kahn Sheikhoun………..

Vlaamse pater roept op niet langer de westerse anti-Syrië propaganda te geloven!

Bernard Hammelburg (BNR): Assad is een monster waar we mee moeten samenwerken………

Van Baalen (VVD) het is moeilijk te zien wie je moet steunen: Al Qaida, Al Qaida of Al Qaida……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

VS bereid tot militair ingrijpen tegen de regering Assad >> aanleiding: gifgas leugens van o.a. de VS zelf…….

Roger Waters (Pink Floyd) laat weten hoe White Helmets vips rekruteren met Saoedisch geld….

Voor wapenleveranties e.d. aan terreurgroepen in Syrie, zie de berichten onder de volgende links

Rutte en Koenders verantwoordelijk voor wapenleveranties aan IS!!

CIA valt nogmaals door de mand als wapenleverancier van IS…….

US weapons supplied to Syrian rebels ended up with Islamic State: report

Tracing ISIS’ Weapons Supply Chain—Back to the US

ISIL weapons traced to US and Saudi Arabia

Al Qaida de bondgenoot van de VS in de strijd tegen…… terrorisme! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘ 

VS centraal commando werkt in Syrië samen met IS en verklaarde Rusland de oorlog………

U.S Caught Red Handed Selling Arms to ISIS/AL-Qaeda (Part 1 of 2)

US TRAINED REBELS GIVE WEAPONS TO TERROR GROUP

Made in America: US-Trained ‘Moderate’ Rebels, With Blessing Of Americans, Seling US Weapons to ISIS

Exactly how the US trained and armed ISIS

Lt. General McInerney says Obama helped build ISIS with Weapons from Benghazi

Tulsi Gabbard (VS congres Hawaï): Trump is de beschermende Big Brother van Al Qaida

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

VS wil koste wat kost WOIII >> 3 VS vliegdekschepen plus een enorme vloot richting Noord-Korea………

Een paar dagen geleden meldde BBC World Service radio al tussen neus en lippen door, dat de VS nog 2 vliegdekschepen met een een groot aantal andere marineschepen richting Noord Korea heeft gezonden. Gisteren ontving ik een artikel van Anti-Media, waarin e.e.a. nog eens werd bevestigd……..

Het is dan ook overduidelijk dat de VS een oorlog tegen Noord-Korea aandurft en daarmee China uitdaagt actie te ondernemen…….. De mislukte raketlancering ter ere van de 105de verjaardag van Kim Il-sung zou de VS koud hebben gelaten, althans dat schijnt de eerste reactie uit de VS te zijn geweest, zo meldden de reguliere westerse media. Echter daarna stelden de oorlogshitsers die het psychopathische beest Trump omringen, dat het toch beter is, deze lancering te zien als een definitieve overschrijding van de zoveelste rode lijn die de VS ‘heeft getrokken………..’*

Met de uitlating dat Noord-Korea een direct gevaar vormt voor de VS en het laten ‘opstomen’ van 3 vliegdekschepen, plus een grote vloot aan andere marineschepen richting Noord-Korea, heeft de VS aangegeven alweer een illegale oorlog te willen beginnen……… Dat zou alleen deze eeuw al de 5de enorme oorlogsmisdaad van terreurentiteit VS zijn……. Hieruit is maar één ding te concluderen, deze grootste terreurentiteit op aarde, deinst er zelfs niet voor terug, na zoveel jaren (Hiroshima en Nagasaki), het atoomwapen weer in te zetten, terwijl Noord Korea niet eens beschikt over een atoombom……..

De hysterie in het westen, over het machtsvertoon tijdens de militaire parade ter ere van die 105de verjaardag van Kim Il-sung, is groot. Hysterie over veel raketten, die het meestal niet doen en al helemaal niet beschikken over één of meerdere kernkoppen…….** Zoals eerder op deze plek gezegd: na een ondergrondse atoomproef moet er na een paar dagen straling te meten zijn, boven die plek waar die proef werd genomen, straling die zelfs met een satelliet is te meten, echter daarvoor is tot nu toe nooit bewijs geleverd….. Sterker nog: het Pentagon, waar men het hardst aan ‘de oorlogsbel’ trekt, moet daarvan op de hoogte zijn, maar bedondert het VS volk (en probeert hetzelfde met de rest van de wereld te doen), met de leugen dat Noord-Korea ‘een directe bedreiging is voor de VS………’

Vanmorgen bleek. dat de eerste vloot, die de Trump regering richting Noord-Korea had gestuurd, ‘een verkeerde afslag’ had genomen. Die fout is intussen hersteld en deze vloot bestaande uit een vliegdekschip, plus een aantal marineschepen ‘stoomt’ nu (zoals de eerder genoemde marineschepen van de VS) op richting Noord-Korea…….

Het militair-industrieel complex draait intussen beter dan ooit tevoren……….

Reports:
U.S. Sending Two More Aircraft Carriers to North Korea

Reports: U.S. Sending Two More Aircraft Carriers to North Korea

April
17, 2017 at 11:02 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(ZHE) According
to a report by South Korea’s primary news outlet, 
Yonhap,
the Pentagon has directed a total of three U.S. aircraft carriers
toward the Korean Peninsula, citing a South Korean government source.

Yonhap
reports that in addition to the CVN-70 Carl Vinson, which is expected
to arrive off the South Korean coast on April 25, the CVN-76 Ronald
Reagan and the CVN-68 Nimitz carrier group will enter the Sea of
Japan next week. According to the senior government official, the
U.S. and South Korea are discussing joint drills, which will include
the three aircraft carriers and other ships.

aircraft carriers

USS
Carl Vinson, surrounded by a fleet of US warships, was sent by
Washington toward the Korean Peninsula in the beginning of April.

While
details are scarce, and we would urge confirmation from U.S.-based
sources, 
Yonhap
also reports 
that
according to the government source, the operation of three aircraft
carriers in the same location is unusual, and demonstrates the U.S.
commitment to North Korea. Other sources said the Trump
administration is demonstrating deterrence by acting on its
behalf. 
We
expect it to be completely different from the previous
administration.”

On
Sunday, Pyongyang tried to launch an unidentified projectile, but the
test reportedly failed. South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS)
stated that the attempted launch was conducted from the area near
North Korea’s eastern port city of Sinpo, but likely ended in a
failure.

The
most recent map showing key US naval deployments around the globe is
shown below.

aircraft carriers

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

=====================

*  Dezelfde reguliere westerse media, die eerst stelden, dat de VS niet in de maag zat met de mislukte raketlancering, deden daarna hard hun best te verklaren, dat de VS gelijk heeft en Noord-Korea inderdaad WOIII zou kunnen beginnen en een direct gevaar is voor de VS (en de wereldvrede…)………



** Dit terwijl men beter angst kan hebben voor de VS dat overal en nergens, waar het haar uitkomt, niet alleen dood en vernietiging aanricht met raketten, maar zelfs grondtroepen inzet om grootschalige terreur uit te oefenen en dat in landen waar het niets te zoeken heeft…….. Neem de illegale oorlogen die terreurentiteit VS deze eeuw begon tegen: Afghanistan, Irak (als gevolg daarvan intussen meer dan 1,5 miljoen vermoorde Irakezen), Libië, Syrië en als ‘het meezit’, nu weer tegen Noord-Korea……. De wereld zou eindelijk eens een eind moeten maken aan de smerige terreur van de VS en moeten ‘opstomen’ richting Washington……..

Zie ook: ‘Van Kappen (VVD & koperen fluit van verdienste): Noord-Korea heeft atoomwapens en kan daarmee WOIII starten……….

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Kim Il-sung’.

VS test grootste niet-nucleaire bom in testgebied….. Afghanistan!!

Het militair-industrieel complex heeft een test gedaan met de grootste niet nucleaire bom, de MOAB…… En weet u waar? Juist (u had de kop al gelezen) in het grote testgebied Afghanistan!!!

Tja, daar schijnt een tunnelcomplex te zijn, dat verdachte geuren bevat, dat moeten onze oude vrienden van Daesh (IS) zijn, moeten de VS militairen gedacht hebben, toen ze in een grot het stinkende karkas van een geit over het hoofd zagen, maar wel ‘een vreemde lucht’ bemerkten……..

De VS schrijft ons de wet voor, wat we moeten uitgeven aan defensie, uh oorlogvoering. De VS schrijft ons voor waar en wanneer we mee moeten doen aan een door deze terreurentiteit begonnen illegale oorlog….. Of gelast ons met een legermacht mee te doen aan militaire oefeningen langs de Russische grens, alsof het de normaalste zaak van de wereld is……

Je zou bijna denken, dat de VS zelf een tunnelcomplex heeft gegraven, om zo het nieuwste (terreur) moordwapen uit te kunnen testen (voor het militair-industrieel complex……)……. Immers de grootste grottencomplexen zijn totaal vernield door de VS, in de zinloze jacht op Bin Laden, dit bij en na de aanvang van de illegale oorlog, die de VS tegen Afghanistan begon in 2001…..

De VS spreekt uiteraard van een succesvolle aanval, ook al is dat niet te controleren. Zoals de VS de aanval op de Syrische luchtmachtbasis bij Homs uiterst succesvol noemde, daar was de schade wel te controleren en gezien de feiten, was die melding je reinste kul!!

Anti-Media meldde gisteravond e.e.a., waar Tyler Durden het scenario opperde, dat deze bom wel eens kan worden ingezet, bij de voorziene illegale oorlog van de VS tegen Noord-Korea……

U.S.
Drops Largest Non-Nuclear Bomb For The First Time In Afghanistan

U.S. Drops Largest Non-Nuclear Bomb For The First Time In Afghanistan

April
13, 2017 at 10:25 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(ZHEPerhaps
in preparation for upcoming events on the Korean Peninsula,
CNN 
reports the
US military has dropped an enormous bomb in Afghanistan, according to
four US military officials with direct knowledge of the mission.

The
GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast Bomb, nicknamed MOAB, was dropped
at 7 p.m. local time Thursday, the sources said. The MOAB is also
known as the “mother of all bombs.” A MOAB is a 21,600-pound,
GPS-guided munition that is America’s most powerful non-nuclear
bomb.

This
is the first time a MOAB, which was developed during the Iraq War,
has been used in the battlefield.

According
to Barbara Starr, the bomb was dropped by an MC-130 aircraft,
operated by Air Force Special Operations Command. 
They
said the target was ISIS tunnels and personnel in the Achin district
of the Nangarhar province.

The
military is currently assessing the damage. Gen. John Nicholson,
commander of US forces in Afghanistan, signed off on the use of the
bomb, according to the sources.

We
expect the Trump administration will promptly released a video of the
bombing, which may serve a secondary purpose of hinting to North
Korea’s Kim what may be coming. Until we wait, here is a video of
the bomb in action.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

===========================

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt (nog) niet voor de volgende labels: illegale oorlog N-K, MOAB, Nangarhar en B. Starr,

PS: de Afghaanse president Ghani heeft intussen terecht zwaar protest aangetekend tegen de VS proef met deze ‘moeder der bommen’ op Afghaans grondgebied.

Zie ook:

Afghanistan: VS gaat terreur vergroten

VS gaf sinds 2001 meer dan 5,9 biljoen dollar uit aan oorlogen, ofwel: $ 5,933.000.000.000…….

VS bombardeert ziekenhuis Artsen zonder Grenzen in Kunduz, 9 medewerkers van deze organisatie kwamen om het leven……..
       

VS bombardeerde het Artsen zonder Grenzen ziekenhuis in Kunduz niet per ongeluk………. Ofwel: VS terreur op grote schaal, over een lange periode!!

Artsen zonder Grenzen ziekenhuis: tijdens bombardement werden vluchtenden vanaf relatief korte afstand beschoten……. Vergissing??

VS standrechtelijke executies: voor de zoveelste keer niet-verdachten slachtoffer drone-aanval >> 15 Afghaanse politieagenten vermoord….

Afghaanse oorlog in het 17de jaar: Taliban nu sterker dan eerder sinds de VS de oorlog van 2001 begon

Ten Broeke (VVD) steunt beslissing Trump de illegale oorlog in Afghanistan te laten voortduren en zo meer terreur te creëren……..

Afghanistan: de VS stelt de papaverteelt veilig voor de komende jaren………..

VS test grootste niet-nucleaire bom in testgebied….. Afghanistan!!‘ (o.a. Afghanistan is een testgebied voor de wapenfabrikanten en daaronder versta ik ook de fabrikanten van rollend, varend en vliegend oorlogstuig)

Military-Industrial Complex Stock Prices Surge After Trump’s Afghan War Speech

Luchtmacht VS gooide in augustus meer dan 500 bommen op Afghanistan……….

Trump gaat oorlog in Afghanistan winnen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

6 Reasons Why Trump’s Afghanistan “Policy” Is Not a Deep State Plot

14 Times Trump Warned Against Doing What He Just Did in Afghanistan

=========================================

Hier nog een paar voorbeelden van VS terreur:

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..‘ (tot het jaar 2000)

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

Bang voor Amerika

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

VS heeft Rusland al 3 keer met oorlog gedreigd, de laatste 2 keer in de afgelopen 1,5 week……‘ (bericht van 5 oktober 2018)

VS laat eigen volk weten, dat raketbeschieting op Syrische luchtmachtbasis ‘uiterst succesvol’ was……

Een woordvoerder van het Pentagon liet gisteren weten, dat de raketbeschieting van de luchtmachtbasis bij het Syrische Homs, een terreuraanval*, uiterst succesvol was.

De woordvoerder stelde, dat 20% van de Syrische luchtmacht is weggevaagd met die aanval…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Er waren nog 6 vliegtuigen aanwezig op die basis, ten tijde van de aanval, conclusie: de Syrische luchtmacht beschikte ten voor die aanval over zo’n 30 vliegtuigen……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ook zouden de landingsbanen zijn vernietigd, daar is echter amper iets van te zien. Wel zou er een radarpost vernietigd.

Het is dan ook duidelijk, dat deze woordvoerder voor de VS bevolking de enorme kosten van deze aanval wilde verdedigen: de aanval kostte de VS (als ik me niet vergis) rond de 100 miljoen dollar (voor 59 gebruikte kruisraketten..)………

Hier een artikel van Anti-Media (die het van Zero Hedge overnam) betreffende de ‘enorme schade’, die de VS aanrichtte:

First
Images Of Aftermath Of “Inefficient” U.S. Missiles Strikes Emerge

April
7, 2017 at 8:03 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(ZHERussia’s
Rossiya 24 news channel has revealed the 
first
footage from the Shayrat airbase,
 which
the United States hit with a volley of 59 Tomahawk missiles after an
alleged “chemical attack” in Idlib earlier this week

Russian
Defence Ministry spokesman Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov said 
the
combat efficiency of the US strike was very low”,
 adding
that only 23 of the 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles reached the Shayrat
air base in the province of Homs and as the following images suggest,
they were not as damaging as some may have hoped…

Runway,
taxi way, parked jets weren’t damaged as a result of U.S.
airstrikes,
 Interfax
reports, citing Russian Defense Ministry.

However,
there was some significant damage…

Additionally,
Russia says Syrian air defense systems will be bolstered after 6 jets
and the radar system was destroyed in the airstrike. 4 Syrian
military are reported dead and 2 missing after the strike.

RELATED: The
U.S. Just Bombed Syria. Here’s What to Do Next If You Want to Stop
It

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

=====================================

* De VS voerde een aanval uit op die Syrische luchtmachtbasis n.a.v. de gifgasaanval op Khan Sheikhoun, terwijl er geen flinter bewijs is voor de schuld van het Syrische leger. M.a.w.: de VS voerde een terreuraanval uit en dat op grondgebied, waar deze grootste terreurentiteit op onze aarde, niets te zoeken heeft.

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Monsanto en EPA hebben samen Roundup veilig verklaart >> Alweer een ‘samenzweringstheorie’ verheven tot waarheid

Gifmenger Monsanto verzekert al jaren dat haar gif Roundup veilig is, waarbij dit bedrijf de EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) noemt als overheidsorgaan, dat Roundup veilig voor gebruik verklaarde.

Uit vorige week vrijgegeven documenten blijkt nu dat Monsanto en de EPA samenwerkten om onderzoek naar kanker veroorzaakt door Roundup, onderzoek gedaan door de WHO (VN Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie) onderuit te halen……..

De EPA heeft de ‘wetenschappelijke gegevens’ van Monsanto overgenomen, waarbij de EPA ook nog eens alleen naar één chemisch onderdeel van dit gif heeft gekeken!! De top-toxicoloog van Monsanto, Donna Farmer moest zelfs toegeven, dat Monsanto niet had onderzocht of Roundup kankerverwekkend is……….

Hier het bericht dat ik hierover ontving van Anti-Media. Lezen mensen, u gelooft uw ogen niet!

It
Turns out Some Conspiracy Theories About Monsanto and Roundup Are
True

March
15, 2017 at 2:47 pm

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

For
years the company has assured farmers that their weed killing product
was absolutely safe to use. As proof, Monsanto touted the approval of
the chemical by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

That
said, newly unsealed court documents released earlier today seemingly
reveal a 
startling
effort
 on
the part of both Monsanto 
and the
EPA to work in concert to kill and/or discredit independent, albeit
inconvenient, cancer research conducted by the World Health
Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer
(IARC)…More on this later.

But,
before we get into the competing studies, here is a brief look at the
‘extensive’ work that Monsanto and the EPA did prior to
originally declaring Roundup safe for use (hint: not much). As the
excerpt below reveals, the EPA effectively declared Roundup safe for
use without even conducting tests on the actual formulation, but
instead relying on industry research on just one of the product’s
active ingredients.

EPA’s
minimal standards do not require human health data submissions
related to the formulated product – here, Roundup. Instead, EPA
regulations require only studies and data that relate to the active
ingredient, which in the case of Roundup is glyphosate. As a result,
the body of scientific literature EPA has reviewed is not only
primarily provided by the industry, but it also only considers one
part of the chemical ingredients that make up Roundup.”

Meanwhile,
if that’s not enough for you, Donna Farmer, Monsanto’s lead
toxicologist, even admitted in her deposition that she 
cannot
say that Roundup does not cause cancer”
 because [w]e
[Monsanto] have not done the carcinogenicity studies with Roundup.”

monsanto

And
just in case you’re the super skeptical type, here is Farmer’s
actual email, from back in 2009, which seems pretty clear:

you
cannot say that Roundup does not cause cancer..we have not done
carcinogenicity studies with ‘Roundup.’”

monsanto

And
while the revelations above are quite damning by themselves, this is
where things get really interesting.

In
early 2015, once it became clear that the World Health Organization’s
IARC was working on their own independent study of Roundup, Monsanto
immediately launched their own efforts to preemptively discredit any
results that might be deemed ‘inconvenient.’

That
said, Monsanto, the $60 billion behemoth, 
couldn’t
possibly
 afford
the $250,000 bill that would come with conducting a legitimate
scientific study led by accredited scientists. Instead, 
they
decided
 to
“ghost-write” key sections of their report themselves and plotted
to then have the independent scientists just “sign their names so
to speak.”

A
less expensive/more palatable approach might be to involve experts
only for the areas of contention, epidemiology and possibly MOA
(depending on what comes out of the IARC meeting), and we ghost-write
the Exposure Tox & Genetox sections…but we would be keeping the
cost down by us doing the writing and they would just edit & sign
their names so to speak.”

monsanto

Finally,
when all else fails, you call in those “special favors” in
Washington D.C. that you’ve paid handsomely for over the years.

And
that’s where Jess Rowland, the EPA’s Deputy Division Director for
the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention and chair of
the Agency’s Cancer Assessment Review Committee, comes in to assure
you that he’s fully exploiting his role as the “chair of the
CARC” to kill any potentially damaging research…”if I can kill
this I should get a medal.”

monsanto

All
of which begs the question of whether the D.C. swamp is just too
large to be drained.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

====================

Zie ook:  ‘Bayer oefent druk uit op Nederland voor nieuw ‘bijengif…….’

        en: ‘TTIP: wat ons te wachten staat >> verboden labeling van o.a. genetisch gemanipuleerde voeding……

       en: ‘Van Dam (PvdA staatssecretaris), Monsanto lobbyist….. EU tekent waarschijnlijk voor nog 7 jaar lang vergiftiging mens en dier met glyfosaat………

       en: ‘Monsanto ‘liefdadigheidsorganisatie die zich inzet voor wereldvoedselprobleem……

       en: ‘Timmermans’ Europese Commissie dreigt in strijd met de regels het kankerverwekkend glyfosaat, opnieuw toe te laten op de EU markt………….

       en: ‘EU: verbiedt het uiterst gevaarlijke glyfosaat voorgoed!

       en: ‘Kamp (VVD) glyfosaat gifmenger van het jaar!

       en: ‘Glyfosaat, de leugens van Monsanto over dit kankerverwekkend gif……….

       en: ‘Bas Eickhout (‘GroenLinks’ EU): het is nodig dat glyfosaat nog 5 jaar gebruikt mag worden……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Glyfosaat, een kankerverwekkend gif, nu ook gevonden in honing en graan……..

       en: ‘Op aardbei zes keer meer landbouwgif dan op ander fruit………

       en: ‘EPA tegenstrijdig over glyfosaat >> EU ‘politici’ laten als ware lobbyisten van o.a. gifmenger Monsanto het kankerverwekkende Roundup nog eens 5 jaar op ons los….

Zie daarnaast ook: Verbied gebruik glyfosaat tot er bewijzen zijn (De Standaard)http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20170426_02852617 en: Monsanto koopt wetenschap die de “onschuld” van glyfosaat bewijst.http://www.dewereldmorgen.be/artikel/2017/03/27/monsanto-koopt-wetenschap-die-de-onschuld-van-glyfosaat-bewijs

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels D. Farmer, MOA en J. Rowland.

PS: u weet toch, dat Bayer tijdens WOII medische proeven heeft uitgevoerd op concentratiekamp gevangenen…??

Hillary Clinton en geheime dienst achter ontslag Flynn, en naar voren schuiven Pence, aldus Assange…….

Afgelopen dinsdag ontving ik het volgende artikel van Anti-Media, die het overnam van ZeroHedge. In dit artikel de beschuldiging van Assange, dat de Clinton-kliek in samenwerking met geheime diensten, de positie van Flynn onmogelijk hebben gemaakt…..*

Flynn was voorstander van vriendschapsbanden met Rusland, een enorme fout, in ‘een land’ dat o.a. wordt geregeerd door de geheime diensten en het militair-industrieel complex. Als vervanging voor Flynn schoof men Pence naar voren, een oorlogshitser van formaat en een enorme Rusland hater.

Tyler Durden, de schrijver van het artikel vraagt zich volkomen terecht af, wat er tegen is, om de banden met Rusland te vernieuwen >> hoe kan dit het leven van ‘Amerikaanse burgers’ in gevaar brengen..??? (inderdaad te belachelijk voor woorden!!)

Durden betoogt dat Trump onder druk werd gezet, om Flynn te dwingen af te treden, daar hij anders zelf de kans zou lopen afgezet te worden (‘impeachment’)……… Dat Trump heeft toegegeven blijkt wel uit het feit, dat de VS meer troepen naar Syrië heeft gestuurd, dit om uiteindelijk Assad af te zetten, aldus Durden…… Waar ik aan toe zou willen voegen , dat de VS nog meer troepen naar Europa heeft gestuurd en nog wil sturen, dit tegen het zogenaamde Russische gevaar……..

Hier het artikel, zoals geplaatst op Anti-Media:

Assange:
Hillary, Intel Officials ‘Quietly Pushing A Pence Takeover’ of
the White House

Mike Pence

March
14, 2017 at 10:38 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(ZHELast
week we noted chatter that some saw 
Mike
Pence as “the Deep State’s insurance policy,”
 and
now, judging by tweets from Wikileaks’ Julian Assange, that may
well be the Clinton/Intelligence Officials plan…

Julian Assange @JulianAssange

Clinton stated privately this month that she is quietly pushing for a Pence takeover. She stated that Pence is predictable hence defeatable.

Adding that…

Julian Assange @JulianAssange

Two IC officials close to Pence stated privately this month that they are planning on a Pence takeover. Did not state if Pence agrees.

As The
Daily Caller notes,
 Assange’s
claims appear to come in response to reports that President Trump
authorized the CIA to perform drone strikes on terrorists Monday
evening…

Julian Assange @JulianAssange

By handing unilateral power to the CIA over its drone strikes at this time White House signals that bullying, disloyalty & incompetence pays

As
we concluded previously,
 if
Trump doesn’t adopt the Cold War 2.0 approach of Barack Obama and
Hillary Clinton
 and
is forced out of his own administration in the same manner as Flynn,
it will become clear 
why once
we learn who would replace him: 
Mike
Pence.

No
matter what one makes of Trump – or his administration and the
policies that have been initiated thus far – the fact remains that
Trump won the U.S. election. 
The
people working behind the scenes to oust him are not subject to
democratic controls, nor are they working in the best interests of
the American public. We are left to ask ourselves exactly how
renewing relations with Russia –  a nuclear power –  could
possibly endanger American lives.

Either
way, we are more or less left with two paths ahead of us.
 The
first path involves Trump giving in and adopting an anti-Russian
agenda, as is already apparent in his decision to send more 
ground
troops to Syria
 alongside Saudi
troops
,
who will intentionally oppose the Syrian regime (a close ally of
Russia). The second involves the possibility of another direct coup
within the Trump administration, this time one that may ultimately
force Trump out of the White House so he can be replaced by Mike
Pence, a war hawk who will be more than happy to do the job Hillary
Clinton wanted to do.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

================

* Flynn moest aftreden, daar hij al contact met de Russen zocht voor het aantreden van Trump. Een volkomen normale zaak. Zo hebben adviseurs en ministers van de ‘komende’ president, vrijwel altijd voor het aantreden, contact met Israël, maar ook met NAVO staten en andere landen, die er toe doen. De huidige gang van zaken is dan ook duidelijk gericht tegen de poging van Trump, de spanningen tussen de VS en Rusland weg te werken……….

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.