Thomas
Merton (31 januari 1915 – 10 december 1968), een rk geestelijke die zich actief verzette tegen de
Vietnamoorlog, werd op 10 december 1968 vermoord, in hetzelfde jaar
dat Robert Kennedy en Martin Luther King werden vermoord, alle drie
mensen die zich hebben uitgesproken tegen de Vietnamoorlog….. (al
is daar wat betreft J.F. Kennedy nog steeds discussie over)
Brasscheck
TV bracht vorige week maandag een bericht over de mysterieuze dood
van Merton, die dag 50 jaar eerder. Als men in de VS spreekt over een
mysterieuze dood van een maatschappijcriticus, kan je er donder op
zeggen dat de CIA en/of de FBI het één en ander hebben geregeld om
een dergelijke criticus voorgoed de mond te snoeren………
In
de laatste video in dit artikel aandacht voor het enorme gebruik van heroïne, niet alleen in de VS maar ook in Zuid-Vietnam, waar na 1970 een enorm aantal VS militairen een overdosis hebben genomen (overigens
niet altijd dodelijk). De CIA deed zaken met ‘warlords’ in Cambodja
en transporteerde grote hoeveelheden heroïne in de lijkzakken van gesneuvelde militairen naar de VS……. Eén van de tactieken van de CIA en FBI
tegen opstandige jongeren in de VS was groepen als de Black Panthers
te overspoelen met heroïne…….
Uiteraard
gebruikte de CIA de gelden uit de heroïne verkoop voor zwaar
illegale acties in het buitenland, acties die zelfs de zittende
regeringen te ver gingen (en die regeringen zagen al veel CIA geweld
door de misdadige vingers…..)……
SPECIAL
REPORT – 50th anniversary of the strange death of Thomas Merton
December
10, 2018 is the 50th anniversary of the strange death of Thomas
Merton.
And
the news media is, predictably, ignoring it.
Who
was Thomas Merton?
He
was an immensely popular writer, the most prominent and popular
priest in the Catholic Church – and outspoken against the Vietnam
War.
And
like Martin Luther King and Robert F. Kennedy, he ended up dead – in
1968 – under highly suspicious circumstances.
THE
STRANGE DEATH OF THOMAS MERTON
JANUARY 31, 1915 –
DECEMBER 10, 1968
1968
– KING, KENNEDY, MERTON – ALL KILLED
In
1968, 16,597 American servicemen were killed in Vietnam. This was
50% more than any other year of the war.
Things
were particularly bloody at home too.
Specifically,
the country’s top three anti-war leaders, each of whom represented
a major demographic segment of the country, were murdered:
1.
Martin Luther King – the African-American leader of the Civil
Rights Movement
2. Robert F. Kennedy – the most likely
presidential candidate for the Democrats in ’68
3. Thomas Merton
– the most popular priest at the time in the Catholic Church
Thomas
Merton?
Many
people think that Thomas Merton was electrocuted by a faulty fan in
the bedroom of a retreat center he was staying at in Thailand.
Many
people believe in the Easter Bunny too.
Currently,
there is NOTHING on YouTube that explains the following five points
in a single video:
1
Who Thomas Merton was
2. What he said about the war (and other
issues of justice)
3. How respected and influential he was
4.
How despised he was by the hierarchy of the Catholic Church and
others who were pro-war in 1968
5. The utter preposterousness of
the official “story” of how he died
Facts
about Merton’s death:
1
No autopsy was conducted
2. The only “official” report did
not appear on official stationery and was unsigned
3. A photo
exists of the body as it was reportedly found and no one has been
allowed to see it or publish it
4. Merton’s body had a head
wound with significant blood loss
The
last talk of Thomas Merton…later that day he was dead
Heroin
sales to US troops – A major CIA cash cow
Aan de labels direct onder dit label heb ik ook de namen John Lennon en Berta Cáceres toegevoegd, beiden vermoord vanwege hun
maatschappijkritiek, waar bij Cáceres opgemerkt dient te
worden dat zij vooral bekend stond als milieu-activist (die met haar activisme ook de rechten van de arme oorspronkelijke bewoners in Honduras diende, hetzelfde Honduras waar de CIA onder regie van Hillary Clinton in 2009 een staatsgreep pleegde en waarvan de bewoners nu massaal richting VS vluchten……). Daarover gesproken: milieuactivisten in Latijns Amerika lopen groot gevaar vermoord te worden, voorbeelden te over…..
Bij de moorden op John F. Kennedy (JFK), zijn broer Robert (RFK) en Martin Luther King (MLK), bestaat het officiële verhaal uit een stelling dat een eenling de
moord zou hebben gepleegd, terwijl het voor een ieder duidelijk kan zijn dat
het hier om in de puntjes beraamde moorden gaat, die niet door één persoon kunnen zijn gepland en uitgevoerd.
Het
‘verbazende’ is dat het voorgaande zeker ook voor de moord op John
Lennon opgaat, vorige week was dat 38 jaar geleden (8 december 1980). Hoewel, verbazend? Immers Lennon nam geen blad voor
de mond als het in het openbare debat ging om het kritiek leveren op de maatschappij, kapitalisme en oorlogsvoering in het
bijzonder……
Wanneer je in de VS een bekend persoon bent als Lennon, JFK, MLK of RFK met veel invloed en je stelt je op als zoals deze mensen dat hebben gedaan, bevind je je uiterst snel in de kijker van de CIA en de FBI, waarna je in levensgevaar verkeert……
Al deze
moorden zijn dan ook toe te schrijven aan de CIA (niet zelden in samenwerking met de FBI), die voor dit soort
en andere zaken die verborgen moeten blijven, samenwerkt met de
georganiseerde misdaad (immers daar heeft men ‘de neiging’ de mond te
houden).
Voorts
zijn degenen die meestal opvallend snel na zo’n moord worden aangewezen als
dader, van te voren bewerkt door de CIA en/of andere geheime diensten.
Lees het
volgende artikel van Brasscheck TV en zie de 2 bijgevoegde video’s
(Brasscheck stelt overigens dat ook video’s van haar organisatie
worden gecensureerd door YouTube, ‘leve de Russiagate
leugen……..’)
The
mysterious death of John Lennon
When
John Lennon was shot and killed the news media went into “lone
nut with a gun” mode.
They
left out the “lone nut with intelligence connections, endless
financial resources, and obvious signs of having been brainwashed”
part.
THE
ASSASSINATION OF JOHN LENNON
THE
UNTOLD STORY
1
MIND CONTROL PATSY + 1 MOB HITMAN
Wow,
it was hard getting this one passed the YouTube censors.
If
you like it, best download and repost it elsewhere while it’s still
available.
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/954.html
The
Official Story
Let’s
see…
It’s
1980. There are no cheap air flights. Credit cards are not easily
available.
A
25 year old ex-camp counselor and janitor flies from Hawaii to New
York City, stays in five star luxury hotels (ex. The Waldorf
Astoria), flies to Georgia, back to New York City and then back to
Hawaii.
Back
in Hawaii, he tells his wife he planned to kill John Lennon, hands
her the gun he planned to use and then tells her that he changed his
mind.
Then
he flies back to New York City and with no known marksmanship
training and an avowed aversion to guns shoots and kills John Lennon.
Makes
a lot of sense, doesn’t it?
Disappearing
material witnesses and evidence
The
media sure made the wife disappear and Chapman’s psychiatrist too.
Did
you even know Chapman was married? (What kind of chick marries and
stays with a dude like this?)
Did
you even know Chapman had been under a psychiatrist’s care for
years leading up to the shooting? Whoever he was (and whatever
methods he was using), the public never got his name. Funny how that
works – over and over again.
Lennon’s
autopsy has never been released though an “autopsy report” was
stating he died of shock and loss of blood.
A
big show was made of the fact that Chapman traveled to Georgia (!) to
buy hollow point bullets because he could not buy ammunition in NYC
(WTF? He never heard of Pennsylvania just an hour and a half away by
Greyhound bus?)
Wikipedia
disinformation
The
Wikipedia article about Chapman claims he worked with refugees
through the “YMCA” at Ft. Chafee in Arkansas and that he did
“similar” work in Lebanon. This is BS cubed. He worked for the
CIA front World Vision.
Amazingly,
two years before he visited NYC, this then young twenty-something
year old janitor took a world tour which brought him to Tokyo, Seoul,
Hong Kong, Singapore, Bangkok, Delhi, Israel, Geneva, Paris and
London…in 1978 as a 23 year old…when air fares were sky high…and
kids didn’t get credit cards.
Give
me a fucking break. The official story about this guy as reinforced
by the slime balls at Wikipedia is pure fantasy.
A
CIA/Mob collaboration
Chapman
is probably a brainwashed patsy who thinks he shot Lennon.
He
probably even pointed a gun. (Note: Chapman spent a lot of time
working at a hospital “alone in the printing department”, the
same hospital that treated him after he attempted suicide.)
There
was, quite possibly, another shooter there who got the job done and
just calmly walked away as professional hit men do.
Who
pulled the trigger?
Well,
when the CIA wants to kill people overseas, it uses Special Forces.
When it wants to kill them at home, it often uses the Mob with whom
it has had a long and fruitful relationship. (They used to know how
to keep their mouths shut and provide a kind of “farm team” to
locate world class domestic trigger pullers.)
The
New York Mob was very familiar with the “use a lunatic as a patsy”
routine. They had in fact used the method just a few years earlier in
the murder of Joe Colombo when a street hustler was given a gun and
pushed into the crowd just as Colombo was shot. The street person,
Jerome Johnson who was hired that day by sources unknown to
photograph Colombo, was shot dead on the spot. No investigation. No
bullet check.
RFK
was killed by similar means when a mind control subject was put
several feet in front of Kennedy firing a pistol wildly while the
killing shot came from close range behind Kennedy.
Misdirection.
It’s a old magician’s trick made easier with the chaos of gunfire
and bloodshed.
Anyway,
the odds that the media (i.e. CIA) cover story of this murder
happened the way they claimed are very, very, very slim.
Gisteren
was het 49 jaar gelden dat de 21 jarige Fred Hampton werd vermoord
door de FBI en de politie van Chicago……. Hampton was een
mensenrechtenactivist die jong en oud, wit en gekleurd, middenklasse
en de armen wist te verenigen……
Voldoende
‘gevaarlijk’ in de ogen van misdadiger Hoover (en de corrupte en zeer
foute regering Nixon), die destijds de topgraaier van de FBI was, om
de moord op Hampton te organiseren……
Op 4
december 1969 verschafte de politie van Chicago op aanwijzing van de
FBI zich toegang tot de woning van Hampton en schoten op het bed
waarin Hampton en zijn 8,5 maand zwangere vrouw lagen te slapen, waarbij men de twee mistte. Daarop schoten ze van dichtbij twee kogels in het
hoofd van Hampton……..
Nooit werd er iemand veroordeeld voor de moord op Hampton, hoewel er nog steeds verantwoordelijken rondlopen, zowel van de politie als de FBI…… Nog steeds is het mogelijk dat de verantwoordelijken worden gestraft, echter dat zal niet gebeuren, daar de VS in feite geen rechtsstaat is, onrecht viert hoogtij in deze zieke vereniging van staten, die men Amerika durft te noemen en dat al vele decennia lang……
Hier een
artikel van Brasscheck TV, plus een video over deze zaak.
An
American assassination
Today
is the anniversary of the joint FBI-Chicago Police Department
operation to assassinate Fred Hampton.
Who
was Fred Hampton?
A
charismatic young leader who was very effective at bringing young and
old, black and white, middle class and poor together in opposition to
a corrupt city and national government.
J.
Edgar Hoover, when he wasn’t cavorting with organized crime figures,
was of the opinion that the country would be better off without
people like Hampton.
THE
STILL UN-PROSECUTED MURDER OF FRED HAMPTON
AN
FBI/CHICAGO POLICE PRODUCTION
FIRST
DEGREE MURDER: PLAIN AND SIMPLE
Fred
Hampton was well spoken, he was out spoken, and he was a real
community leader.
And
he was young. Just 21. He had a life of social and political action
in front of him.
Then,
with intelligence provided by the FBI, Chicago Police raided his
apartment in the early morning, shooting directly at the bed he was
known to sleep in. They missed his eight and a half month pregnant
girlfriend – and him.
Then
they cleared the room and finished him off with two close range shots
to the head.
The
police report said that Hampton shot at them and refused to
surrender.
The
evidence shows nothing of the kind happened. He was murdered in cold
blood.
No
one has gone to jail for this yet – but there is no statute of
limitations on murder and many of the people involved in the killing
involved are still alive so we can hope. The law says they’re as
guilty as the person who pulled the trigger.
=====================================
PS: naar aanleiding van deze zaak is het onbegrijpelijk dat er nog steeds mensen zijn die de officiële fantasie over de moord op J.F. Kennedy, zijn broer Robert en Martin
Luther King geloven, terwijl de VS zo vaak heeft laten zien totaal
schijt aan het recht te hebben en mensen die het als een gevaar
beschouwt simpel vermoordt……. Uiteraard geldt dit ook voor de
aanslagen op 11 september 2001 (9/11), terwijl er intussen kilometers
aan bewijzen zijn, die aangeven dat de VS zelf de hand had in het
neerhalen van de Twin Towers en gebouw 7 van het WTC in New York.
Voor de schijn blies men nog een stuk van het Pentagon op, waar ook
zogenaamd een vliegtuig ingevlogen zou zijn, terwijl dat volgens de
beelden niet eens kan, noch zijn daar delen van een vliegtuig
geborgen, zoals alweer de beelden hebben laten zien!! De VS is de
grootste terreurentiteit op aarde en is dat al heel lang, niet alleen oefent het land terreur uit in het buitenland, maar zoals ook dit verhaal weer laat zien, ook in
eigen land werd en wordt het volk geterroriseerd……..
The
Guardian durft te beweren dat Paul Manafort meermaals contact had met
Julian Assange in de Ecuadoraanse ambassade in Londen, dit voorafgaand aan
de verkiezingen in 2016, bovendien zou Manafort Assange eerder hebben
bezocht in 2013 en 2015……..
Blijkbaar
werkt de speciaal aanklager Robert Mueller samen met
The Guardian in het promoten van het sprookje dat men ‘Russia Gate’ noemt, daar hij ‘geheel toevallig’ afgelopen maandag het
bericht naar buiten bracht dat Manafort de voorwaarden voor een plea
bargain had gebroken en meermaals heeft gelogen tegen de FBI
(Manafort zit een gevangenisstraf uit)……. Sterker nog: Manafort
zou volgens Mueller naast te hebben gelogen ook misdaden hebben
begaan in een groot aantal zaken…….
The
Guardian weet te melden dat de Ecuadoraanse inlichtingendienst bewijzen zou hebben van het bezoek dat Manafort bracht
aan de Ecuadoraanse ambassade, dit nog naast dezelfde claim van een
persoon die niet bekend is bij de FBI, ofwel een anonieme ‘bron….’
Volgens
The Guardian heeft Manafort in de lente van 2016 een bezoek van 40
minuten gebracht aan Assange, waar men zelfs weet te vertellen welke
kleding hij droeg (om twijfelaars te overtuigen…)…. Vreemd genoeg
moeten bezoekers aan de Ecuadoraanse ambassade zich registreren,
echter volgens medewerkers van de ambassade staat de naam Manafort niet één
keer genoteerd in het betreffende register……..
Voorts
weet The Guardian te melden dat de de Russiche militaire geheime dienst GROe de Democraten zou hebben
gehackt, een claim waarvan we weten dat die totaal zonder enig bewijs
keer op keer wordt herhaald…… Men wil zelfs niet uitgaan van de
mogelijkheid dat de documenten lokaal, dus in de VS zijn gekopieerd
en aan WikiLeaks zijn verzonden…..
Seth Rich, een medewerker van
het DNC, het democratische campagneteam dat Hillary Clinton bijstond
tijdens de voorverkiezingen, heeft uit frustratie over de smerige
campagne van Clinton tegen de andere democratische kandidaat Bernie
Sanders, een enorm aantal documenten gelekt naar WikiLeaks……
Enige tijd later zou Rich zijn vermoord tijdens een beroving, aldus
de politie, waarbij vreemd genoeg niets van hem werd gestolen……..
Lees
het volgende artikel van Tyler Durden, gepubliceerd op Zero Hedge
(door mij overgenomen van Anti-Media), in de niet eindigende soap die
men ‘Russiagate’ noemt, terwijl intussen duidelijk is geworden dat
m.n. Groot-Brittannië de Democratische Partij heeft geholpen bij het
manipuleren van de presidentsverkiezingen in de VS, ofwel: we moeten spreken
van Britaingate!!! Mensen geeft het door: nog dagelijks hoor je
leugenaars in en op de reguliere media beweren dat Rusland de VS
verkiezingen heeft gemanipuleerd…… Hoe eerder een eind komt aan
deze leugens hoe beter, immers de VS zoekt oorlog met Rusland
(geholpen door de rest van het westers terreurgeteisem en waaronder
ik ook Rutte 2 en 3 versta) en juist dit soort leugens maakt de argeloze
lezer klaar voor een oorlog tegen Rusland, ofwel WOIII……
Nogmaals
laat The Guardian zien dat het een trouwe lobbyist is van het
neoliberalisme, het militair-industrieel complex en de ongebreidelde terreur van de VS…… Verder heeft The Guardian geen moeite om voor deze zaken fake news (nepnieuws) te
verspreiden, zelfs niet als daar meer dan 2 miljoen mensen door omkomen, zoals de valse berichtgeving van The Guardian over de illegale oorlogen van de VS tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië…… Die 1 miljoen dollar kan The Guardian dan ook
vergeten!!
WikiLeaks
Bets the Guardian $1,000,000 That Assange Never Met Paul Manafort
(ZHE) — Update: WikiLeaks
has fired back at the Guardian,
tweeting: “Remember this day when the Guardian permitted a serial
fabricator to totally destroy the paper’s reputation. @WikiLeaks is
willing to bet the Guardian a million dollars and its editor’s head
that Manafort never met Assange.”
Remember this day when the Guardian permitted a serial fabricator to totally destroy the paper’s reputation. @WikiLeaks is willing to bet the Guardian a million dollars and its editor’s head that Manafort never met Assange. https://archive.fo/pUjrj
The
Guardian‘s
report was written by Luke Harding and Dan Collyns, and was based
exclusively on unnamed sources.
Paul
Manafort, Donald Trump’s former campaign manager, held secret
talks with Julian Assange inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London,
right around the time he joined Trump’s campaign, according to The
Guardian, which
as is now the norm in reports of this kind refers to unnamed
“sources.”
***
Sources
have said Manafort
went to see Assange in 2013, 2015 and in spring 2016 –
during the period when he was made a key figure in Trump’s push for
the White House.
It
is unclear why Manafort wanted to see Assange and what was discussed.
But the last meeting is likely to come under scrutiny and could
interest Robert
Mueller,
the special prosecutor who is investigating alleged collusion between
the Trump campaign and Russia.
A
well-placed source has told the Guardian that Manafort went to see
Assange around March 2016. Months later WikiLeaks released
a stash of Democratic emails stolen by Russian intelligence officers.
– The
Guardian
The
69-year-old Manafort has denied any involvement in the release of the
emails, and has said that the claim is “100%
false.”
While
Manafort was jailed this year under a plea agreement with special
counsel Robert Mueller, on Monday, Mueller said that Manafort
had repeatedly
lied to the FBI,
breaching his deal. According to documents filed in court, Manafort
committed “crimes and lies” covering a “variety of subject
matters.”
According
to The
Guardian,
Manafort’s first visit to the Ecuadorian embassy occurred one year
after Assange was granted asylum inside, according to two sources.
To add icing to the cake, “a separate internal document written by
Ecuador’s Senian Intelligence agency and
seen by The
Guardian lists
“Paul Manaford [sic]” as one of Assange’s several well-known
guests, along
with… “Russians.”
According
to two sources, Manafort returned to the embassy in 2015. He paid
another visit in spring 2016, turning up alone, around the time Trump
named him as his convention manager. The visit is tentatively dated
to March.
Manafort’s
2016 visit to Assange lasted about 40 minutes, one source said,
adding that the
American was casually dressed when he exited the embassy, wearing
sandy-coloured chinos, a cardigan and a light-coloured shirt.
Visitors
normally register with embassy security guards and show their
passports. Sources in Ecuador, however, say Manafort was not
logged. – The
Guardian
So
we have Manafort allegedly visiting Assange, in
sandy-coloured chinos, and
that Russians also visited the WikiLeaks founder. And none of this
was known until today.
The
Guardian goes
on to suggest that “The revelation could shed new light on the
sequence of events in the run-up to summer 2016, when WikiLeaks
published tens of thousands of emails hacked by the GRU*,
Russia’s military intelligence agency. Hillary
Clinton has said the hack contributed to her defeat.”
Note
that The
Guardian has
considered the “hack” settled, which agrees with Western
intelligence assessments (the same Western intelligence that
conducted espionage on Donald Trump’s campaign). Nowhere to be
found is the possibility that the emails were copied
locally –
a theory recently bolstered by a fresh
analysis that
flies in the face of a report commissioned by cybersecurity
firm Crowdstrike
– which
was caught fabricating a report on Russia hacking Ukrainian
munitions, and was forced to retract portions of their analysis after
the government of Ukraine admonished them.
The
Guardian goes
on to link Manafort to “black operations” against the political
rival of Ukraine’s former “Moscow-friendly president, Viktor
Yanukovych,” and that Manafort “flew frequently from the US to
Ukraine’s capital, Kiev – usually
via Frankfurt but sometimes through London.”
Manafort
is currently in jail in Alexandria, Virginia. In August a jury
convicted him of crimes arising from his decade-long activities in
Ukraine. They include large-scale money laundering and failure to pay
US tax. Manafort pleaded guilty to further charges in order to avoid
a second trial in Washington.
As
well as accusing him of lying on Monday, the special counsel moved to
set a date for Manafort to be sentenced.
One
person familiar with WikiLeaks said Assange was motivated to damage
the Democrats campaign because he believed a future Trump
administration would be less likely to seek his extradition on
possible charges of espionage. This fate had hung over Assange since
2010, when he released
confidential US state department cables.
It contributed to his decision to take refuge in the embassy. – The
Guardian
And
in perhaps the most shocking part of The
Guardian‘s
reporting, they
refer to the highly salacious and largely discredited “Steele
Dossier,”**saying
that according to the document, Manafort was at the center of a
“well-developed conspiracy of cooperation” between the Trump
campaign and the Kremlin, and that both sides had a mutual interest
in defeating Clinton, wrote former MI6 spy Christopher Steele.
In
a memo written soon after the DNC emails were published, Steele said:
“The [hacking] operation had been conducted with the full knowledge
and support of Trump and senior members of his campaign team.” – The
Guardian
You
know things are desperate when the Steele Dossier makes a guest
appearance to once again bolster unsupported reporting.
‘Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende twee artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)
MI6,
de Britse geheime dienst doet er alles aan om te voorkomen dat Trump
geheime documenten vrijgeeft, documenten verkregen via een FBI ‘app’
(waarmee één van Trumps campagne adviseurs werd ‘afgeluisterd en afgekeken’)……
MI6 stelt dat elke openbaarmaking het verder vergaren van
inlichtingen zal ondermijnen….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Tja, een andere reactie was dan ook niet te verwachten van dit gespuis.
Trumps
bondgenoten eisen terecht openbaarmaking en stellen dat
Groot-Brittannië ‘iets’ te verbergen heeft met het pleidooi de
documenten niet vrij te geven. Een hoge beambte van de VS
inlichtingendiensten stelt dat MI6 terecht bezorgd is, mochten
bronnen worden geopenbaard als geheime delen van het afluisteren (en
ik neem aan door meekijken op computers) worden vrijgegeven…..
Aanvankelijk eiste ook Trump openbaarmaking, maar de geheime diensten hebben hem weten om te praten……..
MI6
is vooral bezorgd over de link met Steele, de voormalige MI6 agent
die één van de hoofdrolspelers is in het ‘Russiagate’ sprookje, met het ‘Steele dossier’*,
dat al volkomen is doorgeprikt als flauwe kul…..
Eén
ding is zeker, al stelt Tyler Durden, schrijver van het hieronder
opgenomen artikel dat op Zero Hedge werd gepubliceerd, het een stuk
voorzichtiger: Groot-Brittannië heeft zich op grote schaal bemoeit
met de presidentsverkiezingen in 2016, dit in samenwerking met de
Obama administratie…… Dat laatste blijkt wel uit het feit dat één
van de andere hoofdrolspelers, ene Halper in totaal 1 miljoen dollar
ontving van het Pentagon onder die administratie, waarvan
400.000 dollar tijdens de laatste maanden voor (en tijdens) de
presidentsverkiezingen van 2016……
Kortom
mocht je nog steeds zijn overtuigd van Russiagate, waarvoor al zoveel
bewijs is geleverd dat het om een ‘hoax’ gaat, wordt het nu toch echt
de hoogste tijd dat je gaat spreken over Britaingate i.p.v.
Russiagate!! Uiteraard zullen de westerse reguliere media en het
grootste deel van de politici blijven volhouden dat Rusland de grote
schuldige is…… Ach ja, men is dan ook uit op oorlog met Rusland,
goed voor de VS, de NAVO en het militair-industrieel complex, maar
niet voor de wereldbevolking……. (laten we hopen dat het bij een
Koude Oorlog 2.0 blijft, maar alle machinaties van de VS en de NAVO lijken te wijzen op
een ‘warme oorlog’ met Rusland [en China], ofwel WOIII…..)
MI6
Scrambling To Stop Trump From Releasing Classified Docs In Russia
Probe
The
UK’s Secret Intelligence Service, otherwise known as MI6, has been
scrambling to prevent President Trump from publishing classified
materials linked to the Russian election meddling investigation,
according to The Telegraph, stating
that any disclosure would “undermine intelligence gathering if
he releases pages of an FBI application to wiretap one of his former
campaign advisers.”
Trump’s
allies, however, are
fighting back –
demanding transparency and suggesting that the UK wouldn’t want the
documents withheld unless it had something to hide.
The
Telegraph has talked to more than a dozen UK and US officials,
including in American intelligence, who have revealed details about
the row.
British
spy chiefs have “genuine concern” about sources being exposed if
classified parts of the wiretap request were made public, according
to figures familiar with discussions.
“It
boils down to the exposure of people”,
said one US intelligence official, adding: “We
don’t want to reveal sources and methods.”
US intelligence shares the concerns of the UK.
Another
said Britain feared setting a dangerous “precedent” which could
make people less likely to share information, knowing that it could
one day become public. –The Telegraph
The Telegraph adds
that the UK’s dispute with the Trump administration is so politically
sensitive that staff within the British Embassy in D.C. haver been
barred from discussing it with journalists. Theresa May has also
“been kept at arms-length and is understood to have not raised
the issue directly with the US president.”
In
September,
we reported that the British government “expressed grave
concerns” over the material in question after President
Trump issued an order to the DOJ to release a wide swath of
materials,
“immediately” and “without redaction.”
Mr
Trump wants to declassify 21 pages from one of the applications. He
announced the move in September, then backtracked, then this month
said he was “very seriously” considering it again. Both
Britain and Australia are understood to be opposing the move.
I met with the DOJ concerning the declassification of various UNREDACTED documents. They agreed to release them but stated that so doing may have a perceived negative impact on the Russia probe. Also, key Allies’ called to ask not to release. Therefore, the Inspector General…..
….has been asked to review these documents on an expedited basis. I believe he will move quickly on this (and hopefully other things which he is looking at). In the end I can always declassify if it proves necessary. Speed is very important to me – and everyone!
The New
York Timesreported
at the time that the UK’s concern was over
material which “includes
direct references to conversations between American law enforcement
officials and Christopher Steele,” the
former MI6 agent who compiled the infamous “Steele Dossier.”
The UK’s objection, according to former US and British officials, was
over revealing Steele’s identity in an official document, “regardless
of whether he had been named in press reports.”
We
noted in September, however, that Steele’s name was contained
within the Nunes
Memo – the
House Intelligence Committee’s majority opinion in the Trump-Russia
case.
Steele
also had extensive
contacts with
DOJ official Bruce Ohr and his wife Nellie,
who – along with Steele – was paid by opposition research firm Fusion
GPS in the anti-Trump campaign. Trump called for the declassification
of FBI notes of interviews with Ohr, which would ostensibly reveal
more about his relationship with Steele. Ohr was demoted twice within
the Department of Justice for lying
about his contacts with
Fusion GPS.
Perhaps
the Brits are also concerned since much of the espionage performed on
the Trump campaign was conducted on
UK soil throughout 2016.
Recall that Trump aid George Papadopoulos was lured
to London in
March, 2016, where Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud fed him the rumor
that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton. It was later at
a London bar that
Papadopoulos would drunkenly pass the rumor to Australian diplomat
Alexander Downer (who Strzok flew to London to meet with).
Also
recall that CIA/FBI “informant” (spy) Stefan Halper met
with both Carter Page and
Papadopoulos in
London.
Halper,
a veteran of four Republican administrations, reached out to Trump
aide George Papadopoulos in September 2016 with an offer to fly to
London to write an academic paper on energy exploration in the
Mediterranean Sea.
Papadopoulos
accepted a flight to London and a $3,000 honorarium. He
claims that during a meeting in London, Halper asked him whether he
knew anything about Russian hacking of Democrats’ emails.
Papadopoulos
had other contacts on British soil that he now believes were part of
a government-sanctioned surveillance operation. –Daily
Caller
In
total, Halper received over
$1 million from the Obama Pentagon for
“research,” over $400,000 of which was granted before and
during the 2016 election season.
Papadopoulos,
who was sentenced to 14 days in prison for lying about his
conversations with a shadowy Maltese professor and self-professed
member of the Clinton
Foundation, has
publicly claimed he was targeted by UK spies, and told The
Telegraph that
he demands transparency. Trump’s allies in Washington, meanwhile,
have suggested that the facts laid out before us mean that the
ongoing Russia investigation was
invalid from the start.
In
short, it’s understandable that the UK would prefer to hide
their involvement in the “witch hunt” of Donald Trump
since much of the counterintelligence investigation was
conducted on UK soil. And if the Brits had knowledge of the
operation, it will bolster claims that they meddled in the
2016 US election by assisting what appears to have been a set-up
from the start.
Steele’s
ham-handed dossier is a mere embarrassment, as virtually none of the
claims asserted by the former MI6 agent have been proven true.
Steele,
a former MI6 agent, is the author of the infamous and unverified
anti-Trump dossier. He worked as a confidential human source for the
FBI for years before the relationship was severed just before the
election because of Steele’s unauthorized contacts with the press.
He
shared results of his investigation into Trump’s links to Russia
with the FBI beginning in early July 2016.
The
FBI relied heavily on the unverified Steele dossier to fill out
applications for four FISA warrants against Page. Page has denied the
dossier’s claims, which include that he was the Trump campaign’s
back channel to the Kremlin. –Daily
Caller
That
said, Steele hasn’t worked for the British government since 2009, so
for their excuse focusing on the former MI6 agent while ignoring the
multitude of events which occurred on UK soil, is curious.
‘Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende twee artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)
Brasscheck
TV bracht de afgelopen weken 4 artikelen en video’s over de moord op
John F. Kennedy (JFK), op 22 november jl. 55 jaar geleden. Hierbij gaat Brasscheck TV in op de volgende
punten:
Het feest van de samenzweerders de avond voor de moord op Kennedy
met H.L. Hunt (‘olietycoon’), J. Edgar Hoover, Richard Nixon en
Lyndon B. Johnson, ten huize van ‘olietycoon’ C. Murchison.
De
voorbereiding van het volk op de aanstaande moord op Kennedy.
Wat
gebeurde er met de getuigen
De
strijd om het lijk van Kennedy na de moord, waarbij bewijsmateriaal
verdween. Voorts de vreemde samenstelling van de stoet voorafgaand
aan de moord.
Het
‘korte proces’ tegen Lee Harvey Oswald, die ook door de media zonder
enige kritiek werd aangewezen als de moordenaar.
Afgelopen
week hoorde ik op BBC World Service radio nog eens de officiële lezing van de moord op Kennedy, waar men de officiële gelogen lezing over de gang van zaken nog steeds volgt, terwijl het overduidelijk is dat het de moord op Kennedy ‘de vrucht is’ van een echte
samenzwering en niet een theorie, zoals de CIA al snel na de moord de wereld inhielp….. (de CIA noemde de twijfels aan de officiële lezing een ‘samenzweringstheorie’, hiermee werd deze term
zelfs geïntroduceerd……)
Uit het volgende blijkt nogmaals dat niet alleen het militair-industrieel complex een groot belang had en heeft bij het voeren van oorlog, ook de oliemaffia had en heeft daar belang bij >> destijds ging het om de oorlog tegen Noord-Vietnam, die Kennedy zou hebben willen afblazen, daarnaast was er nog veel meer haat tegen hem, o.a. vanwege het Varkensbaai-incident in 1961, de poging om de Cubaanse revolutionaire regering omver te werpen….)…….
The
big party before the JFK assassination
Where
were H.L. Hunt, J. Edgar Hoover, Richard Nixon, and Lyndon B. Johnson
the night before the assassination of John F. Kennedy?
Witnesses
put them all together as a party at the home of Clint Murchison, the
Texas oil tycoon who controlled local law enforcement and J. Edgar
Hoover.
THE
PARTY BEFORE THE ASSASSINATION
AND THE MISSING
FINGERPRINT
THERE’S
NO MYSTERY HERE, NEVER WAS
The
meeting in Dallas the night before the assassination included:
H.L.
Hunt
J. Edgar Hoover
Richard Nixon
Lyndon B. Johnson
…At
the home of Clint Murchison, the Texas oil tycoon.
Murchison
owned J. Edgar Hoover, Lyndon B. Johnson, and State of Texas law
enforcement and stood to lose a fortune if Kennedy changed the oil
depletion allowance and faced the very real possibility of jail time
should then-Vice President Johnson be indicted, which gave the
appearance of being a certainty.
Nixon
and others involved claimed not to remember where he was that night.
The
fingerprint found in the Book Depository sniper’s nest and
suppressed by the FBI belonged to LBJ’s henchman who was convicted
in at least one murder and was suspected of committing several others
on Johnson’s behalf.
But
it doesn’t matter who did what, what weapon they used, and what
position they fired from.
That’s
like asking which janitor they sent and whether he used a wire or
nylon brush.
The
mountains of minutia, endless conferences, books and assassination
experts including Oliver Stone’s artfully loopy movie all obscure
the basic points.
The
CIA was facing a thorough gutting at the hands of Kennedy as were
their close colleagues in organized crime and the oil industry
The
Pentagon and the scumbags who supply them were facing the loss of
billions upon billion of of dollars in profits and payoffs if
Kennedy turned off the Vietnam gravy train.
Hoover
and Johnson knew each other very well, hated Kennedy and had very
strong self-preservation reasons to want him dead. Both had been
involved in political murders separately – and were to collaborate
on future ones.
Recall
that Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King were both assassinated
during the Johnson-Hoover regime and that Johnson was the president
during the infamous USS Liberty incident. Robert Kennedy, like his
brother, and Martin Luther King were murdered after they started
talking against war in Vietnam. Another too rarely mentioned
connection.)
These
people – the CIA, organized crime, the Pentagon, Hoover and Johnson
– were all murderers and they did what murderers do.
With
Hoover in charge of the FBI and Johnson in control of the Federal
government and Texas law enforcement, there was no investigation of
the crime and any evidence that contradicted the manufactured “lone
nut” theory was altered and in some cases outright destroyed.
Ongoing
media suppression was carried out by the CIA and the cooperative and
craven US news media.
It
didn’t matter how good or bad your evidence is if you don’t
control the process and it’s the new leader who controls the
process.
Attorney
Allen Dulles, the CIA head who supervised numerous coups and
assassinations in other countries and had a grudge against Kennedy
for firing him, understood this simple principle better than anyone.
That’s
it. The beginning, middle and end of the story.
Discussions
about the minutia of the specific mechanics of the operation are
nothing more than a distraction and far off the key points which are:
1.
When push comes to shove, the military-industrial complex is in
control of the US
2.
A criminally minded CIA and organized crime figures in the US and
abroad collaborate on projects of mutual interest (drug running,
assassination, the suppression of dissent) on a daily basis as they
have done since WW II.
3.
The US news media – as well as the vast majority of academia –
is an impotent joke.
These
are the three elements that have guided and controlled the US since
Kennedy’s assassination and they can, and continue to, get away
with just about anything.
Preparing
the public mind for the JFK Assassination
This
is easily one of the strangest and most shocking “coincidences”
of the JFK assassination.
A
newscaster was handed this elaborate story to read just hours before
Kennedy was killed.
PREPARING
THE PUBLIC MIND
NORMALIZING THE IDEA
OF PRESIDENTIAL ASSASSINATION
CREATING
EXPECTATIONS
The
week before Kennedy was assassinated the news media, national and
local to Dallas, went into overdrive about two subjects:
How
many people hated the Kennedys and wanted to do them harm
How
“reckless” Kennedy was in not strictly following security
protocols (a similar charge was made about his son’s adherence to
aviation safety and who died in a highly mysterious plane accident
just as he was about to enter political life.)
Just
hours before Kennedy was murdered in cold blood, this bizarre script
was read in the two and a half minutes before Kennedy took the stage
for a breakfast talk in Fort Worth.
Just
think of how strange this is.
Who
would write such a script? Who would order it to be read before a
presidential appearance?
Just
a few hours after this live newscast Kennedy was assassinated by a
“lone nut” just like the one described in the local Texas
newsfeed.
What
happened to witnesses of the JFK assassination?
You’ve
probably heard that many eye witnesses to the Kennedy assassination
had very short lives – after the assassination.
Here’s
the story of one of them: a plainclothes detective with the Dallas
Police Department.
Mind
blowing testimony.
WHY
WEREN’T THERE ANY WITNESSES?
THERE WERE …DOZENS
OF THEM HERE’S ONE THEY KILLED
NO EYEWITNESSES?
BULLSHIT!
There
were dozens of eyewitnesses to the Kennedy assassination including
trained ones like police officers. They were ordered to keep their
mouths shut about what they saw – and most did. Those who did not
were warned, harassed, and if they were persistent enough,
eliminated. One too-seldom discussed example. It was a hyperorganized
coup, all in the name of the Vietnam War’s depopulation agenda.
The
fight over Kennedy’s body
exas
law is pretty simple.
Anyone
murdered in Texas – regardless of who he is – gets a Texas autopsy.
But
when Kennedy was shot, the Secret Service stormed the hospital and
literally battled Texas officials for the casket.
And
that was only the beginning of the strangeness relating to the
post-assassination handling of Kennedy’s body.
STEALING
JFK’S BODY
MAKING THE EVIDENCE GO
AWAY
“WITH
UNSEEMLY HASTE”
The
Dallas police stood down.
The
Secret Service stood down.
Kennedy’s
car was put at the front of the procession (an absolute violation)
and there were no guards to his side and back to protect him.
In
spite of a heightened security alert, ALL normal security procedures
were toned down.
The
scores of eye witnesses who heard, and in some cases saw, shots from
the right of the President’s car were ignored.
The
rifle that was originally found in the Texas School Book Depository
did not match the casings that were found there.
Then
the President’s body, one of the most important pieces of evidence
in the crime, was literally stolen from the lawful possession of the
State of Texas and handed over to two grossly incompetent career Navy
physicians who had no experience in pathology or performing
autopsies.
That’s
our story so far.
Can
there possibly be any doubt that:
a)
there was more than one shooter on the scene
b)
those in charge of the local police and the Secret Service arranged
things in such a way as to facilitate the shooting and
c) eye witnesses were discouraged from reporting and the forensic exam was deliberately botched to maintain the one man, one bullet theory
The
short trial of Lee Harvey Oswald
What
Lee Harvey Oswald said after he was arrested and how he was
“convicted” by the news media and dishonest prosecutors and
police.
THE
SHORT TRIAL OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD
TRIED BY THE PRESS,
EXECUTED BY A FORMER NIXON EMPLOYEE
“NOTHING
TO SEE HERE, MOVE ALONG”
The
last hours of the life of Lee Harvey Oswald before he was executed on
live TV by Jack Ruby.
Jack
Ruby was a gangster, a Chicago guy who was sent to Dallas to operate
and who used a strip club as his headquarters where he interacted
daily with Dallas police giving them free liquor and prostitutes.
Very
rarely spoken about was his role as a major market maker for
narcotics dealing in Dallas
Previous
to that, in Chicago, he’d worked as an enforcer for the Hearst
newspaper chain during the sometimes violent competition for shelf
space on news stands.
In
his spare time away from California’s race tracks which he was
known to frequent, he also spent time as a “campaign worker” for
Richard Nixon’s first Congressional campaign.
Jack
Ruby at the nexus of organized crime, US politics, corrupt police,
the illegal drug trade, and dishonest news media – and most
probably the CIA that works closely with all these parties.
De
39 jarige Terry James Albury, een voormalig FBI agent, kreeg 4 jaar onvoorwaardelijke
gevangenisstraf opgelegd door een rechter in Saint Paul, de
hoofdstad van Minnesota. Middels het lekken van 50
geheime documenten toonde Albury aan dat de FBI aan etnisch
profileren doet en zoals je begrijpt is dit etnisch profileren ontoelaatbaar, echter niet in de VS….*
Echter
in ‘the land of the free’ is alles mogelijk, dus ook een rechter die
vindt dat Albury met het lekken van deze documenten de
staatsveiligheid in gevaar heeft gebracht…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!
Ja, uiterst gevaarlijk als je bewijst dat de FBI een racistische
dienst is, de witten moeten natuurlijk wel ongestoord en in het geniep de zwarten
onder de duim kunnen houden, op wat voor manier dan ook……..
Onbegrijpelijk dat de rechter Albury schuldig verklaarde, ze is dan ook een witte rechter t.w.: Wilhelmina Wright…..
Inderdaad,
Albury hoort niet in psychopaten organisatie FBI, immers bij die organisatie ontbreekt het
aan elk moreel besef en integriteit!
Ongelofelijk te zien hoe Albury zich heeft gevoegd naar de aanklager en zichzelf de schuld in de schoenen schoof, dit in de hoop gevangenisstraf te ontlopen (het zogenaamde plea bargain**), terwijl deze klokkenluider op de schouders zou moeten worden gehesen door het openbaren van dit zware onrecht…..*** Ach ja, ook met klokkenluiders in Nederland loopt het veel te vaak slecht af……
Lees
het ontluisterende artikel van Tia Berger over deze zaak en zie hoe
een rechter tot conclusies kan komen, die allesbehalve passen in een
echte rechtsstaat, gepubliceerd op Atlantic BlackStar:
Former
FBI Agent Who Outed Bureau’s Racial Profiling Sentenced to 4 Years
for Leaking Classified Documents
A
former Minnesota FBI agent was sentenced to prison on Thursday in
Saint Paul’s U.S. District Court after leaking classified
information.
39-year-old
Terry James Albury left the courthouse as soon as he was handed down
his four year sentence plus an additional three years of supervised
release. He agreed to surrender to a date that will likely be
determined within the next 45-60 days according to KTSP.
Albury
pleads guilty
in April to
one count each of retention of national defense information
and unauthorized disclosure of national defense information. He
worked as a liaison with Border Protection at MSP International
Airport and Department of Customs in 2016-2017 and as an FBI
Special Agent in Minnesota within the same time period.
The
defendant held a Top Secret Information security clearance
because of his work with the FBI and had access to “sensitive and
classified FBI and other U.S. government information” according to
law officials.
The
prosecution claimed Albury stole more than 50 classified documents
and shared national defense information to a reporter from the online
news outlet Intercept. One of the documents classified as “secret”
included information on how to the FBI assesses confidential
informants and a document “relating to threats posed by
certain individuals from a particular Middle Eastern country.”
Albury
told the court he leaked the documents because he felt the FBI
policies were an act of racial profiling which he regarded as
“suspicion” and “disrespect.” His attorneys said Albury acted
out of “conscience” and was troubled by the racism within the
bureau.
U.S.
District Judge Wilhelmina Wright said Albury abused his position as
an FBI agent and placed the United States in danger.
“You
did so knowingly. You did so willingly,” Wright told Albury in
court. “You knew that what you did was a criminal act, and you knew
that you were putting the nation’s security at risk.”
She
added, “I’m not blind to the racism in our society… I’m not
blind to being a minority. … “But that’s not an excuse.”
Before
Wright sentenced the 39-year-old to prison, he told the judge,
“I sincerely wanted to make a difference a difference and
never wanted to put anyone in danger.”
The
defendant said he fully accepted “responsibility for what” he did
and apologized to his “family and former colleagues.”
Albury’s
legal team hoped he’d get probation because of his two young
children and wife. However, Judge Wright said his sentencing reflects
the seriousness of the offenses he committed and should hinder others
from doing the same.
Special
Agent Jill Sanborn who’s in charge of the Minneapolis Field
Division released the following statement:
“Former
Agent Albury’s conduct was an act of selfishness in an organization
full of selfless people and today’s sentence will serve as an
appropriate punishment for his criminal conduct. … He betrayed
his colleagues and the trust the public puts in the men and women of
the FBI to keep them and our communities safe.”
==========================
* Hoewel velen ook in de politiek en politie van ons land vinden dat dit etnisch profileren wel moet kunnen en vindt deze vorm van discriminatie dan ook nog steeds dagelijks plaats in ons land……..
** Plea bargain: je kan je in veel gevallen beter schuldig verklaren, zelfs als je iets niet gedaan hebt, daar je anders een veel hogere straf krijgt…. Naar zo’n land levert Nederland zelfs de eigen burgers uit…..
*** Vergeet daarbij niet dat na aanhouding middels etnisch profileren, jaarlijks ook nog eens een enorm aantal onschuldig mensen in de VS door de politie worden doodgeschoten, ofwel vermoord en dat alleen daar ze ‘de pech hebben’ gekleurd te zijn…… De VS ‘land of the free…’ (althans als je als burger wit bent, geen kritiek levert op de regering en geld op de bank hebt…..)
Terecht
stelt Caitlin Johnstone in het hieronder opgenomen artikel dat het
tegen de verwachtingen in keer op keer nog smeriger kan als je het
over VS politici hebt.
Zo
schrijft Johnstone over een optreden van VS opperploert Giuliani tijdens een bijeenkomst van de al jaren als terreurorganisatie aangemerkte Iraanse
MEK*.
De VS
dwingt met de volkomen onterechte hernieuwde sancties het Iraanse
bewind geweldloos tot aftreden, aldus Giuliani die uiteraard deze sancties wel terecht vindt, waarbij hij wijst op
de wanhoop bij veel Iraniërs, die zelfs
hun organen willen verkopen voor dollars (als dat al waar is trouwens…)…. Voorts zouden
Iraniërs al honger lijden en dat zal ongetwijfeld tot veel
sterfgevallen leiden, aldus de verwachting van Giuliani……
Door de
onvrede zal men de straat opgaan en ondanks dat daarvoor al veel
Iraniërs overleden zullen zijn, heeft duivel Giuliani het gore lef te
stellen dat het dan om een geweldloze revolutie zal gaan…….. Dit nog naast het geweld dat de CIA binnen de Iraanse grenzen gebruikt en stimuleert (de CIA is nog altijd een onderdeel van de VS terreurmachine….), daarover zo meer.
Giuliani
is bepaald geen hoogvlieger en deze superschoft begrijpt dan ook
niet, dat voordat iets dergelijks werkelijk in gang gezet kan worden,
de fundamentalisten de macht zullen grijpen en die krijg je niet weg
met door de VS georganiseerde opstanden…….. Natuurlijk lult
Giuliani daar niet over, echter de CIA is al jaren op Iraans
grondgebied bezig zaken op te stoken, waarbij het geweld niet uit de weg gaat, zo moeten dan ook de zogenaamde vredige
protesten worden gezien die zich eerder in Iran voordeden, waar deze ‘vreedzame demonstranten’ gemaskerd
en gewapend tekeergingen op de straten van o.a. Teheran…… Kortom als de VS zo doorgaat is het afgelopen met de vrijheden die het Iraanse volk de afgelopen decennia heeft afgedwongen…….
Eén ding is intussen meer dan duidelijk geworden: de VS gebruikt sancties als een vorm van (economische) oorlogsvoering.
Genoeg
geluld, lees het artikel van Johnstone en zie de smerige politiek van
‘s werelds grootste terreurentiteit, de VS:
Trump
War Whore Celebrates Starvation Of Iranian Civilians At MEK Rally
Just
when you thought this administration couldn’t get more cartoonishly
villainous, Trump lawyer and Simon Bar Sinister stunt double Rudy
Giuliani takes to the stage and enthuses about how US sanctions are
making Iranian citizens so desperate they are offering to sell their
internal organs for $500 in order to stay alive. “Probably
a fortune in Iran today. This is truly pitiful!” he crowed
triumphantly to
the crowd at the Iran Uprising Summit in New York on Saturday,
pleased as punch by the US government’s success in torturing
everyday Iranians with starvation.
Giuliani,
who is basically what you’d get if necrophilia and racist police
shootings had a baby, fumbled his way through a paid speech for the
MEK terror cult with all the grace of a drunken creepy uncle MCing
his way through a family wedding. In it he not only gloated over the
starvation and severe impoverishment of Iranian civilians, but openly
proclaimed that regime change was coming to Iran due to the actions
of the Trump administration.
“I
don’t know when we’re going to overthrow them. It could be in a
few days, months, a couple of years, but it’s going to happen.
They’re going to be overthrown.” Guiliani said
definitively.
“The people of Iran have obviously now had enough. The sanctions
are working. The currency is going to nothing! They’re where Russia
was. They’re where Poland was. We see signs of young men and women
saying ‘Give me some food!’ We saw a sign of a man trying to sell
his internal organs for five hundred American dollars – probably a
fortune in Iran today! This is truly pitiful. These are the kinds of
conditions that lead to successful revolution, and God willing,
non-violent revolution.”
At the MEK regime change cult’s Iran Uprising Summit, Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani proclaims in paid address, “They will be overthrown!” He then celebrates reports of desperate Iranians seeking to sell their organs and begging for food due to US sanctions.
(zoals je ziet werkt de video niet vandaar een 10 minuten durende video over dezelfde samenkomst met deze gewelddadige ploert Giuliani:)
Truly
pitiful, he reckons. That’s like standing on a patient’s oxygen
hose at the hospital and then making fun of them for gasping for air.
Sanctions are the only legal act of war that deliberately target
innocent civilians, and here is Giuliani mocking people for the
suffering he is gleefully supporting inflicting.
Corpse
bride Nikki Haley was quick
to distance the Trump administration from
Giuliani’s regime change rhetoric, as was the US State
Department in
a statement to
Reuters, because as we saw
them do with Libya and
as we’ve seen
them attempt with Syria,
the US government has ever since the disastrous Iraq invasion had a
standing policy of denying that it is pushing for regime change in
key strategic regions while doing exactly that. But Giuliani has
been repeatedly
appearing at these eventsspouting
the exact
same regime change rhetoric while
retaining employment as Trump’s lawyer, and at no time has the
president or anyone else in the administration made him stop. The
administration can’t actually have that much of a problem with
Giuliani’s schtick; if it did Giuliani would either stop or be
fired.
Neither
has happened. Giuliani keeps getting these lucrative
speaking gigs where
he champions regime change again and again, which was
also done at another such event by
murderous psychopath John Bolton not long before he was hired as
Trump’s National Security Advisor. Giuliani’s words have the
tacit blessing of the Trump administration.
Giuliani
was hired to speak alongside Maryam Rajavi, the leader of the
Mujahideen e Khalq (MEK), a paramilitary cult that
was only recently delisted
by Hillary Clinton as
a designated terror group at the behest of CIA and FBI insiders and
other shadow government stalwarts. The MEK was originally listed as a
terrorist group because it has
killed Americans and has an extensive history of committing acts of
terrorism,
and has recently
been exposed in
operating an extensive social media propaganda campaign to
manufacture support for Iranian regime change in the west.
Rajavi boasted
at the event that
her group has organized special “Units of Rebellion” to run riots
and interference inside Iran, which was a pretty interesting thing to
say on the very same day that there
was a terror attack on
a military parade in the Iranian city of Ahvaz that slaughtered
24 people and wounded many more.
Speaking to NYC crowd, MEK leader Maryam Rajavi claims her regime change cult has organized special Units of Rebellion to cause riots and mayhem inside Iran. pic.twitter.com/dcMYhPQt6D
There
was no inference that the MEK was responsible for this particular
attack, but it’s kind of fascinating that while Nikki Haley
was telling
Iran to
“look in the mirror” with regard to the attack on Ahvaz because
in her view, the attack came from organic civil unrest which is the
fault of the Iranian government, Giuliani was celebrating that the
sanctions applied by the US were working because they were causing
the kind of intense suffering on civilians that leads to civil unrest
and a “successful revolution”, while Rajavi was saying that her
(exiled) group was planning on riots and provocations to stimulate
civil unrest. Not to mention the fact that the
coup-staging CIA recently escalated
covert operations in
that nation.
How
exactly do they think this works? You can’t be boasting about your
success at provoking civil unrest while pretending you’re just an
innocent-but-concerned bystander who had his hands in his pockets the
whole time, officer. Not a thing.
They
think we’re stupid. They must, or they’d never try to get away
with this bullshit. Eyes and ears open, clear-eyed rebels. The veils
are being pulled back almost quicker than we can process.
______________________
Thanks
for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make
sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list
for mywebsite,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My
articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece
please consider sharing it around, liking me onFacebook,
following my antics onTwitter,
checking out mypodcast,
throwing some money into my hat on Patreon orPaypal,buying
my new book Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone,
or my previous book Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.
==========================================
* Voor de Iraanse revolutie heeft de MEK van destijds zich bijna doodgevochten tegen de Sjah en zijn bloedige geheime dienst. Daarna werd de organisatie vervolgt door de Iraanse fundamentalisten van Khomeini….. Echter sinds een fiks aantal jaren gedraagt deze organisatie zich als terreurorganisatie, die verder bijvoorbeeld de vrouwelijke vrijheid geen hoofddoek te hoeven dragen, naast zich heeft neergelegd en draagt zelfs de voorzitter van de MEK, Rajavi een hoofddoek……
Brasscheck
TV bracht een video waarin nog eens een aantal feiten over de
aanslagen op de Twin Towers de revue passeren.
Men
spreekt in deze video van de ‘strategy of tension’, zorgen voor een
fikse aanslag en de schuld bij anderen leggen, ofwel een false flag
operatie om het volk wijs te maken dat er oorlog moet worden gevoerd,
niet alleen in het belang van het militair-industrieel complex, maar
ook van de overheid en de geheime diensten, die alle drie welvaren
bij de zogenaamde oorlog tegen terreur: -de winsten van het
voornoemde complex oppompen, -het volk bang maken zodat ze alle
vertrouwen in de regering stellen dan wel houden, -haatzaaien tegen
regimes die de VS niet welgevallig zijn, -een ‘legitimatie’ om oorlog
te voeren in landen waar de VS (en de rest van het westen) helemaal
niets te zoeken heeft en tot slot -het uitbreiden van de bevoegdheden van de geheime diensten, natuurlijk aangevuld met een groter budget……… Dat laatste, flink grotere budgetten, geldt uiteraard ook voor het Pentagon.
Zie
de video en laat je andermaal verbazen over het uiterst ongeloofwaardige verhaal van de VS overheid aangaande die aanslagen, het 9/11 verhaal betreffende de voorbereiding, de daders en de regie over die aanslagen…… Zo blijkt dat Al Qaida, door de VS verantwoordelijk gehouden voor de 9/11 aanslagen, destijds tjokvol geheimagenten zat uit de VS, S-A, Israël en Egypte…….
Vergeet daarbij niet de vreselijke gevolgen van de 9/11 aanslagen voor de mensen
die het slachtoffers zijn geworden van de daarop volgende VS terreur (met hulp van NAVO landen als Nederland) in Afghanistan en Irak (intussen meer dan 2 miljoen
doden), gevolgen van dit wel heel smerige VS spel.:
9/11,
GLADIO, AND OPERATION NORTHWOODS
QUESTIONING
THE WAR ON TERROR
“STRATEGY
OF TENSION”
The
facts are still open.
The
US had a major terrorist incident on 9/11 and it’s still not clear
who was behind it.
One
thing is clear: governments are in the terror business.
On
9/11:
The
physics were impossible
The logistics were impossible
The
official story is complete BS
So
who did it?
One
thing we know for sure: al Qaeda did not have the capacity to do it.
==========================================
* Operatie Gladio: een in 1952 bedachte operatie die het verzet organiseerde in West-Europese landen voor het geval de communisten of socialisten aan de macht zouden komen, dan wel als Rusland deze landen zou bezetten, ook onder Operatie Gladio werden terreuraanslagen gepleegd….
** Operatie Northwoods: in 1962 vatte de VS regering het plan op om terreuraanslagen in de VS te plegen en de schuld bij Cuba te leggen)
Gisteren
was het 7 laar geleden dat Occupy Wall Street met haar protesten
begon, dezelfde dag (voor ons vandaag) maakte Brasscheck TV bekend dat er een
samenzwering is ontdekt om de leiders van Occupy uit te schakelen en
dat de FBI, dat op de hoogte was, deze VS burgers niet heeft
gewaarschuwd…..
De
(‘justitiele’) mensenrechtenorganisatie Partenrship for Civil Justice
Fund (PCJF) heeft middels de Freedom of Information Act (FOIA; bij ons
wobben genoemd) documenten gevonden waaruit blijkt dat het Department
of Homeland Security (DHS), de FBI, het Pentagon en commerciele
bedrijven (inclusief de financiële maffia), samenwerkten bij het
onderzoeken en monitoren van de Occupy Wall Street beweging, die door
hen als een terroristische en misdadige organisatie werd weggezet…
Terwijl
Occupy volkomen terecht in opstand kwam tegen het vrijwaren van
bankiers voor strafvervolging n.a.v. de bankencrisis (of
kredietcrisis), waarbij Wall Street op de been werd gehouden met
enorme kapitalen (honderden miljarden) aan belastinggeld, die het
godbetert mocht houden, sterker nog: dat bedrag was zelfs 10 keer
hoger dan de werkelijke schade voor Wall Street (waaronder de
bankenmaffia)……….. De grote onderlaag in de VS en elders (ook hier) draaiden op voor de schade, terwijl zij NB het grootste slachtoffer waren van deze meer dan misdadige gang van zaken……..
Uiterst
verontrustend is het feit dat het DHS, FBI, Pentagon grote berdrijven
en de financiele maffia samenspanden in de wil de leiders van de
Occupy beweging uit te laten schakelen door scherpschutters……
Naast de
steeds grotere druk om critici van de ijskoude, inhumane neoliberale
maatschappij de mond te snoeren, middels hen de toegang tot het
internet te ontzeggen en/of zelfs strafrechtelijk te vervolgen, bestaan er dus plannen
om deze critici ‘simpelweg’ te vermoorden…….
Dat laatste, het vermoorden van critici, dan wel mensen die een gevaar zijn voor deep state (zoals je begrijpt meestal ook critici), is niet de enige mogelijkheid om van die mensen af te komen, lees wat dat betreft ook over de eerdere voorbeelden hoe dat te doen en de uitspraak van Fletcher Prouty, zoals deze zijn te vinden in het toegevoegde schrijven van de Brasscheck redactie:
Putting
a target on the back of Occupy
Today
is the anniversary of the founding of the Occupy Movement.
The
movement “failed” because Wall Street not only kept its
bailouts it got 10X more and but also no bankers went to jail.
We’re
just learning what sinister forces Occupy was up against.
PUTTING
A TARGET ON THE BACK OF OCCUPY
A
WALL STREET/FBI/DHS COLLABORATION
NO
WARNING TO OCCUPY LEADERS
Fletcher
Prouty made it clear…
You
don’t have to actively kill a political figure, you just have to
remove security at the critical time.
Thus,
the Secret Service non-protection of John F. Kennedy in Dallas and
the fact the Los Angeles Police didn’t have a single officer at the
Ambassador Hotel the night that Robert F. Kennedy was killed.
Then
there is the fact that the FBI knew that sketchy Saudis were taking
flight training in Florida andMinnesota (9/11),
but ignored the reports of its own field agent and let them proceed.
Then
there is Occupy, the movement that spoke to the American people’s
outrage over the multi-trillion scam that was the Wall Street
bailout. Wall Street partners kept all the money they stole from the
markets and citizens were given the bill to clean up the damage.
Here’s
the punchline:
The
FBI knew that the leaders of Occupy Houston were being targeted for
assassination – and did not warn them.
