Hypocriete demonisering van Ilhan Omar, lid VS Huis van Afgevaardigden: ze zou de VS hebben vergeleken met Hamas

CounterPunch kwam gisteren met een artikel over de demonisering van Ilhan Omar, lid van het VS Huis van Afgevaardigden. Ilhan Omar stelde dat alle misdaden tegen de menselijkheid gelijk moeten worden behandeld wat betreft verantwoordelijkheid en gerechtigheid. (het is daarvoor inderdaad de hoogste tijd, wat zeg ik: we zijn wat dat betreft al zwaar overtijd….*) Daarbij stelde ze dat we ondenkbare wreedheden hebben gezien die zijn gepleegd door de VS, Hamas, Israël, Afghanistan en de Taliban……

Dit schoot zowel een groot deel van de Democraten (de partij van Omar) als de Republikeinen in het verkeerde keelgat en er barstte een storm van verontwaardiging los over haar woorden. Heel smerig stelde men dat Omar de VS vergelijkt met Hamas….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Hamas mocht willen dat het zoveel terreur kon uitoefenen als de VS, dan was het snel afgelopen met de staat Israël!! Ofwel de verontwaardiging is niet alleen hypocriet, maar ook ongelofelijk dom, immers vanaf het moment dat de VS de atoombom onnodig losliet op respectievelijk Hiroshima en Nagasaki heeft deze terreurstaat meer dan 25 miljoen mensen vermoord: -in illegale oorlogen, -door het organiseren van opstanden in derde landen, -door het organiseren van staatsgrepen in landen die niet gehoorzaam aan de hand van de VS liepen, zoals Guatemala, Indonesië, Chili, Honduras, Oekraïne en ga nog maar even door, -het vermoorden van verdachten middels drones, waarbij meer dan 90% van de slachtoffers niet eens werd verdacht en -het opleggen van illegale sancties (illegaal: niet gesteund door de VN) aan ongehoorzame landen, die bijvoorbeeld in Venezuela aan 50.000 mensen het leven heeft gekost….. Vergeleken met het voorgaande is Hamas een padvindersclub……

‘Maar goed’, in de VS tilt men zwaar aan de uitlatingen van Omar, echter op volkomen valse gronden, immers Omar vergeleek met haar uitspraak de VS niet met Hamas, maar noemde landen en organisaties die zich schuldig maken aan misdaden tegen de menselijkheid (jammer trouwens dat Omar Saoedi-Arabië niet noemde, het land dat NB met hulp van de VS een genocide uitvoert op de sjiieten in Jemen….) Voorts moet je dan ook nog kijken naar waarom organisaties als de Taliban en Hamas geweld uitoefenen >> het is immers de taak van elke soevereine natie om zich te verzetten tegen bezetting van haar land tegen buitenlandse indringers en daar is wat betreft Afghanistan en Palestina wel degelijk sprake van….. Anders gezegd of beter gevraagd: was het verzet in Nederland tegen de nazi-Duitse bezetter tijdens WOII terreur of gelegitimeerd verzet?? Dit voorbeeld is des te belangrijker als het gaat om de zogenaamde Politionele Acties van Nederland in Indonesië (een ordinaire koloniale oorlog), uiteraard was Nederland voor de gewone Indonesiërs een bezetter en dan durft men nog steeds te spreken over door Indonesiërs gepleegde oorlogsmisdaden tegen Nederlandse militairen en burgers, terwijl deze mensen als Nederlanders tijdens WOII de bezetter hebben aangevallen……..

Hypocrisie? Zo oud als de mensheid, al maken de ‘moderne machthebbers’ er veel meer werk van!!

Het volgende artikel werd geschreven door Paul Street, hij gaat dieper in op de smerige hypocritische storm die Ilhan Omar over zich heen heeft gekregen:

No Comparison: Thoughtcrime Reflections on the Latest Imperial Smackdown of the Nation’s Best Congressperson

Photograph Source: Fibonacci Blue – CC BY 2.0

United States political culture is an Orwellian nightmare. Two plus
two equals five in the propaganda spectacle that passes for “democratic”
news and debate here.

Take the latest bipartisan establishment disciplining of Rep. Ilhan
Omar (D-MN), the U.S. House’s most courageous and eloquent member, for
saying this: “We must have the same level of accountability and justice
for all victims of crimes against humanity. We have seen unthinkable
atrocities committed by the U.S., Hamas, Israel, Afghanistan, and the
Taliban.”

Omar dared, in the words of The New York Times, “to compare Israel and the United States to Hamas and the Taliban.”

But did she? Look at these two sentences: “There’s nothing quite as
exciting for baseball fans as a no-hitter. We have this season seen no-hitters thrown by
pitchers with the Chicago White Sox, the San Diego Padres, the Detroit
Tigers, the New York Yankees, the Baltimore Orioles, and the Cincinnati
Reds.”

Does this statement compare the White Sox with the Red Sox, the
Padres, the Tigers, the Yankees, the Orioles, and the Reds? No, it makes
an assertion about baseball no-hitters and then includes six teams in a
list of Major League Baseball franchises with a pitcher who threw a
no-hitter this year. For all anyone knows from these 41 words, each one
of these teams is wildly different from the others.

Thoughtcrime 1: Serious Comparison

But, okay, let’s compare. Since Omar’s critics charge comparison, let’s take comparison seriously.
One reason not to make “false equivalencies” between the Taliban (or
Hamas) and the United States is that the former has never been remotely
in the latter’s ballpark when it comes to committing crimes against
humanity. Between direct U.S. slaughter and the U.S. sponsorship,
funding, and equipping of mass slaughter by its client regimes,
prominently including the racist apartheid state of Israel (recipient of
$146 billion in U.S. military and economic funding in FY 2020, helping
make Israel what the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace calls “the largest cumulative recipient
of U.S. assistance since World War II”), Washington has murdered tens
of millions of world citizens since August of 1945, when it criminally
and unnecessarily atom-bombed two major Japanese cities. For an
introduction to this criminal record, which is hiding in plain sight for
those willing to look, Google up the following: “No Gun Ri,” “My Lai,”
“many My Lais,” “Operation Tiger Force,” “Abu Ghraib,” “Nissour Square,”
“Fallujah,” “Guantanamo,” “extraordinary rendition,” the “Highway of
Death,” and “Bola Boluk.” Better yet, read my February 2018 Truthdig essay
“The World Will Not Mourn the Decline of U.S. Hegemony” for a
soul-numbing account of this unmatched record of mass-murderous terror
inflicted both directly (as in Korea during the early 1950s, in
Southeast Asia between 1962 and 1975, in Iraq in 1991 and
2003-2011/2017) and indirectly (as in Indonesia, Latin America,
Palestine, Yemen and in countless nations and regions around the world).

Here are some selections from that essay…

It is difficult, sometimes, to wrap one’s mind around the extent of
the savagery Uncle Sam has unleashed on the world during the last and
the present century. In the early 1950s, for example, the Harry Truman
administration responded to an early challenge to U.S. power in Northern
Korea with a practically genocidal three-year bombing campaign that was
described in soul-numbing terms by the Washington Post years ago:

“The bombing was long, leisurely and merciless, even by the
assessment of America’s own leaders. ‘Over a period of three years or
so, we killed off—what—20 percent of the population,’ Air Force Gen.
Curtis LeMay, head of the Strategic Air Command during the Korean War,
told the Office of Air Force History in 1984. Dean Rusk, a supporter of
the war and later Secretary of State, said the United States bombed
‘everything that moved in North Korea, every brick standing on top of
another.’ After running low on urban targets, U.S. bombers destroyed
hydroelectric and irrigation dams in the later stages of the war,
flooding farmland and destroying crops … The U.S. dropped 635,000 tons
of explosives on North Korea, including 32,557 tons of napalm, an
incendiary liquid that can clear forested areas and cause devastating
burns to human skin.”

This ferocious bombardment, which killed 2 million or more civilians,
began five years after Truman arch-criminally and unnecessarily ordered the atom-bombing of
hundreds of thousands of civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to warn
the Soviet Union to stay out of Japan and Western Europe.

The savagery of U.S. foreign policy in the post-WWII era did not
always require direct U.S. military intervention. Take Indonesia and
Chile, for two examples from the “Golden Age” height of the “American
Century.” In Indonesia, the U.S.-backed dictator Suharto killed millions
of his subjects, targeting communist sympathizers, ethnic Chinese, and
alleged leftists. A senior CIA operations officer in the 1960s later
described Suharto’s 1965-66 U.S.-assisted coup as “the model operation”
for the U.S.-backed coup that eliminated the democratically elected
president of Chile, Salvador Allende, seven years later. “The CIA forged
a document purporting to reveal a leftist plot to murder Chilean
military leaders,” the officer wrote, “[just like] what happened in
Indonesia in 1965.” As John Pilger noted 13 years ago,
“the U.S. embassy in Jakarta supplied Suharto with a ‘zap list’ of
Indonesian Communist party members and crossed off the names when they
were killed or captured. … The deal was that Indonesia under Suharto
would offer up what Richard Nixon had called ‘the richest hoard of
natural resources, the greatest prize in south-east Asia.’” According to
the prolific and brilliant New Left historian Gabriel Kolko, “No single
American action in the period after 1945,” wrote the historian Gabriel
Kolko, “was as bloodthirsty as its role in Indonesia.”

Two years and three months after the U.S-sponsored 1973 Chilean coup, Suharto received a green light from
the Henry Kissinger and Gerald Ford White House to invade the small
island nation of East Timor. With Washington’s approval and backing,
Indonesia carried out genocidal massacres and mass rapes and killed at least 100,000 of the island’s residents.

“To Henry Kissinger,” the human rights attorney Stanley L. Cohen noted five years ago, “the world, particularly Indochina, was very much a small chess game. Civilians were mere pawns ripe for sacrifice through hi-tech weaponry, including biological and chemical warfare, to enforce his worldview at any cost. Millions lost their lives to his cerebral game board” (emphasis added).

Among the countless episodes of mass-murderous U.S. savagery in the
oil-rich Middle East over the last generation, few can match the
barbarous and sadistic cruelty of the “Highway of Death,” where the
“global policeman’s” forces massacred tens of thousands of surrendered
Iraqi troops retreating from Kuwait on Feb. 26 and 27, 1991. Journalist Joyce Chediac testified that:

“U.S. planes trapped the long convoys by disabling vehicles in the front, and at the rear, and then pounded
the resulting traffic jams for hours. ‘It was like shooting fish in a
barrel,’ said one U.S. pilot. On the sixty miles of coastal highway,
Iraqi military units sit in gruesome repose, scorched skeletons of
vehicles and men alike, black and awful under the sun … for 60 miles
every vehicle was strafed or bombed, every windshield is shattered,
every tank is burned, every truck is riddled with shell fragments. No
survivors are known or likely. … ‘Even in Vietnam I didn’t see anything
like this. It’s pathetic,’ said Major Bob Nugent, an Army intelligence
officer. … U.S. pilots took whatever bombs happened to be close to the
flight deck, from cluster bombs to 500-pound bombs. … U.S. forces
continued to drop bombs on the convoys until all humans were killed. So
many jets swarmed over the inland road that it created an aerial traffic
jam, and combat air controllers feared midair collisions. … The victims
were not offering resistance. … [I]t was simply a one-sided massacre of
tens of thousands of people who had no ability to fight back or
defend.”

The victims’ crime was having been conscripted into an army
controlled by a formerly U.S.-backed dictator perceived as a threat to
U.S. control of Middle Eastern oil. President George H.W. Bush welcomed
the so-called Persian Gulf War as an opportunity to demonstrate
America’s unrivaled power and new freedom of action in the post-Cold War
world, where the Soviet Union could no longer deter Washington. Bush heralded the “war” (really
a one-sided imperial assault) as marking the end of the “Vietnam
Syndrome,” the reigning political culture’s curious term for U.S.
citizens’ reluctance to commit U.S. troops to murderous imperial mayhem.
As Noam Chomsky observed in
1992, reflecting on U.S. efforts to maximize suffering in Vietnam by
blocking economic and humanitarian assistance to the nation it had
devastated: “No degree of cruelty is too great for Washington sadists.”

I could go on and on and on some more with terrible tales of
unimaginable horror and mass death inflicted abroad by the U.S.-American
war machine during my lifetime in Southeast Asia (the U.S. killed 3 to 5
million in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos between 1962 and 1975), Iraq
(the “world’s leading democracy” killed at least 1 million Iraqis in the
last eight years of this century’s opening decade) and elsewhere.

Since Afghanistan’s Taliban is part of the Omar drama, it seems
germane to mention a forgotten 2009 crime against Afghan humanity that
then U.S. president Barack Obama tried to blame on the Taliban.

Within less than half a year of his inauguration, Obama’s
depressingly long list of atrocities in the Muslim world would include
the bombing of the Afghan village of Bola Boluk.
Ninety-three of the dead villagers torn apart by U.S. explosives in
Bola Boluk were children. “In a phone call played on a loudspeaker on
Wednesday to outraged members of the Afghan Parliament,” the New York Times
reported, “the governor of Farah Province … said that as many as 130
civilians had been killed.” According to one Afghan legislator and
eyewitness, “the villagers bought two tractor-trailers full of pieces of
human bodies to his office to prove the casualties that had occurred.
Everyone at the governor’s cried, watching that shocking scene.”

The Obama administration refused to issue an apology or to
acknowledge the “global policeman’s” responsibility. It initially blamed
the carnage on – get this – “Taliban grenades.” (See Carlotta Gall and
Taimoor Shah, “Civilian Deaths Imperil Support for Afghan War,” New York
Times, May 6, 2009.)

(By telling and sickening contrast, Obama had just offered a full
apology and fired a White House official because that official had
scared New Yorkers with an ill-advised Air Force One photo-shoot flyover
of Manhattan that reminded people of 9/11. The disparity was
extraordinary: Frightening New Yorkers led to a full presidential
apology and the discharge of a White House staffer. Killing more than
100 Afghan civilians did not require any apology but was falsely blamed
on the Taliban.)

Reflecting on such atrocities the following December, an Afghan villager was moved to comment as
follows: “Peace prize? He’s a killer. … Obama has only brought war to
our country.” The man spoke from the village of Armal, where a crowd of
100 gathered around the bodies of 12 people, one family from a single
home. The 12 were killed, witnesses reported, by U.S. Special Forces
during a late-night raid.

(Obama was only warming up his “killer” powers. He would join with
France and other NATO powers in the imperial decimation of Libya,
helping kill more than 25,000 civilians and unleashing mass carnage in
North Africa. The U.S.-led assault on Libya was a disaster for black
Africans and sparked the biggest refugee crisis since World War II.)

The Taliban, which owes much of its origin to U.S. Cold War
sponsorship of Islamo-terrorist forces on the former Soviet Union’s
southern border, is a despicable terrorist outfit, God knows. There have
long been fully credible reports of its vicious atrocities, including
mass murder, torture, rape, and assassination. Still, it can’t hold a
candle to Superpower (or even to Uncle Sam’s leading client state Israel[1]) when it comes to crippling and killing human beings.

Seat of world history’s most extensive empire, the U.S. has at least 800 military bases spread
across more than 80 foreign countries and “troops or other military
personnel in about 160 foreign countries and territories.” The U.S.
accounts for more than 40 percent of the planet’s military spending and
has more than 5,500 strategic nuclear weapons, enough to blow the world up 5
to 50 times over. Last year it increased its “defense” (military
empire) spending, which was already three times higher than China’s,
and nine times higher than Russia’s.

Comparing the Taliban and Hamas to such a massive military Empire is
indeed truly absurd. Their crimes pale before those of world history’s
most lethal Superpower. There’s no comparison.

Thoughtcrime 2: The U.S. is Not a Democracy

Now for a second U.S.-American thoughtcrime.
As I suspect Rep. Omar knows very well (her political survival requires
pretending not to), the United States is not a “democratic country.”
It’s a capitalist plutocracy, a de facto bourgeois class dictatorship
wherein majority progressive public policy opinion is close to
irrelevant in comparison (there’s that word again) to the vastly
superior power of concentrated wealth. If you are interested in how and
why this is so, order and read my 2014 book They Rule: The 1% v. Democracy
– a detailed analysis of how the U.S. ruling class rules (I argue that
the commonly cited problem of plutocratic campaign finance is just one
tip of a giant, democracy-freezing capitalist-imperialist iceberg) and
why it matters. In the meantime, stop and think about all the programs
and measures most U.S.-Americans support – Single Payer national health
coverage as a human right, serious voter rights protections, serious
progressive taxation, the restoration of union organizing rights, real
gun control, a serious response to the climate catastrophe (which is
merely the biggest issue of our or any time), and more (the list goes
on) – that have zero chance of being implemented because of the
corporate, financial, and imperial/military-industrial kill switch that
is firmly attached to the U.S. system of supposedly democratic
governance and mass consent-manufacture.
U.S.-Americans don’t even directly elect the nation’s powerful chief
executive (try explaining the preposterous undemocratic Electoral
College system to someone from another country). The extremely powerful
upper chamber of the U.S. Congress (the Senate) so vastly and absurdly overrepresents
the nation’s most rural, white, and reactionary regions that it is now
mathematically possible to put together a Trump-Republifascist Senate
majority on the basis of states representing 17.6% of the nation’s
population. (If liberal and diverse California had the same
population-to-U.S. Senator ratio as super-white and right-wing Wyoming,
it would have 136 U.S. Senators.) The Senate joins with the indirectly
elected president to appoint absurdly powerful Supreme Court justices
for life and now regularly cancels popular bills that manage to get past
the badly gerrymandered lower chamber.

With all due respect, it is transparently false and even absurd to
call the U.S. a “democratic country.” It would take an actual American
revolution for it to become any such thing.

Note

1. “Beginning with its mass expulsion, rape and murder [of Arabs] at the onset of the [1948] Nakba (the Catastrophe),” Stanley L. Cohen wrote five years ago,
“Israel has devoted itself to 68 [now 73] years of non-stop genocide
coming up for air only periodically to retool or to change the nature of
its weaponry of choice. What started out with the expulsion, at
gunpoint, of more than 700,000 Palestinians from their ancestral
homeland set in motion a refugee stampede that has grown to more than
seven million displaced and stateless people, providing the world more
than a disturbing glimpse of what was to come decades later in Syria.”
The weapons are largely provided and paid for by the United States. The
is the nuclear-armed judeo-fascist settler and apartheid state opposed
by Hamas, whose crimes pale before those of its enemy and that enemy’s
sponsor, the United States.

Paul Street’s new book is The Hollow Resistance: Obama, Trump, and Politics of Appeasement.

================================

* Neem ook het Internationaal Strafhof, belachelijk te zien dat daar vooral mensen worden bericht die niet lekker liggen in de politiek van de VS en andere westerse landen, terwijl de vreselijke oorlogsmisdaden van de VS en haar NAVO-lidstaten onbestraft blijven, ze worden zelfs amper onderzocht…….. We mogen al blij zijn dat dit hof een aantal van de vreselijke misdaden van Israël tegen het verdrukte Palestijnse volk onderzoekt, al vraag ik me af of dit ooit tot een zaak zal leiden……..

Zie ook: ‘Chris Cuomo (CNN presentator) en Andrew Cuomo (gouverneur) maken zich schuldig aan corruptie en machtsmisbruik

Fox News veroordeelt eigen presentator voor belachelijke uitlatingen aangaande Ilhan Omar‘ 

Coronavirus: miljardairs in de VS zagen sinds half maart hun gezamenlijk inkomen met 30% stijgen

Huis van Afgevaardigden VS stemt massaal voor beperking vrijheid van meningsuiting: BDS in de ban en vrijbaan voor Israëls gewelddadig beleid tegen Palestijnen

Ilhan Omar: Obama zette kinderen in een kooi en kwam weg met moord

Madeline Albright ‘gegrild’ over illegale interventies en sancties van de VS

Congreslid Ilhan Omar fileert het monster Elliot Abrams, de speciale gezant van de VS voor Venezuela

AIPAC, een pro-Israël lobbygroep, koopt leden van het VS congres om met 4 miljoen dollar per jaar

Voor meer berichten over Ilhan Omar, Indonesië, Afghanistan, de Taliban, Israël, Hamas, Irak, Libië, Chili, Hiroshima en/of Jemen, klik op het betreffende label direct onder dit bericht.

‘Great re-sets’, ofwel zaken die tot een onlogische gevolg hebben geleid: neem de hennepauto

Brasscheck
TV kwam afgelopen week met een nieuwsbrief waarin een aantal zaken worden
genoemd die tot een onlogische verandering van o.a.
overheidsbeleid hebben gezorgd.

Bijvoorbeeld
hennep: hennep wordt al minstens 4.000 jaar gebruikt om een aantal
producten van te maken en daarmee wordt niet alleen touw, kleding
en papier bedoeld, echter twee van deze toepassingen, papier en kleding liepen in de weg van de grote
katoenboeren in het zuiden van de VS en van de fabriekseigenaren die van hout papier maakten, daarom werd met hulp van gezondheidsambtenaren
van de overheid (zo corrupt als de pest) hennep tot een gevaar voor de jeugd
gemaakt…….Vergeten bij plaatsing: uiteraard waren en zijn de harddrugsboeren die alcohol maakten en maken tegen het vrijgeven van
cannabisgebruik als genotsmiddel, zoals ook de grote farmaceuten daar tegen waren….

Terwijl men daar zoveel andere toepassingen voor had.
Let wel het gaat hier niet om de cannabis die wordt gerookt, met hennep bedoelt men wel de familie van deze planten, maar de soort die wordt gebruikt voor industriële toepassingen (zoals de genoemde zaken). Om aan te geven waarvoor je deze industriële cannabis zoal kan gebruiken: Ford heeft ooit een auto van hennep gemaakt, veel lichter dan
tijdgenoten en verrassend genoeg 10 keer zo sterk als staal……
Uiteraard was dit tegen het belang van de grote staalfabrikanten en
verdween het plan om auto’s van hennep te maken……* (waarbij de oliemaatschappijen uiteraard een verlies aan inkomsten zagen, immers een lichte auto gebruikt veel minder brandstof, dan een vergelijkbare van staal)

Over
auto’s gesproken, die reden aanvankelijk zowel op benzine als op
alcohol, belangrijk voor een zo groot land als de VS, daar er in de
beginjaren van de auto maar weinig benzine stations waren en het
fabriceren van benzine als het vervoer daarvan bijzonder gevaarlijk
was….. Er waren zelfs auto’s die als de veel latere LPG auto’s een knop hadden
waarmee je van brandstof kon wisselen als je twee verschillende tanks had (al reden de eerste auto’s
zoals gezegd op beiden, dus zowel op alcohol als benzine).

Het
uitrollen van een netwerk van benzinestations vergt veel tijd en
kapitaal, vandaar dat Rockefeller een voorstander werd van de
‘Prohibition’ (Drooglegging) en deze daadwerkelijk werd ingevoerd, dit alcoholverbod duurde van 1920 tot 5 december 1933, op die laatste datum bestond
er inderdaad een groot netwerk aan benzinestations en was
drooglegging niet langer noodzakelijk…… Uiteraard was tegen die tijd
benzine goedkoper dan alcohol en was men alleen om financiële redenen al genoodzaakt om benzine te
tanken…… (overigens is Brasscheck nog vergeten de elektrische auto te noemen, in de 19de eeuw waren er meerdere fabrikanten die elektrische auto’s ontwikkelden, toen men alcohol en benzine ging gebruiken als brandstof was het vaarwel elektrisch aangedreven auto’s, die vreemd genoeg duurder waren dan de met plofmotor aangedreven exemplaren…..)

Ook de
Eerste Wereldoorlog wordt genoemd in de audio die Brasscheck
meestuurde, een oorlog die tot veel zaken leidde, zoals de oprichting
van een geheime dienst, in 1942 omgevormd tot de OSS, de voorloper van de CIA die in 1947 werd opgericht, vreemd genoeg speelde Rockefeller ook hier weer een rol. In de top van de OSS zaten
stromannen van Rockefeller en de dienst was zelfs in de
wolkenkrabber van Rockefeller gehuisvest…….. Uiteraard ging
het grootste deel van dat personeel mee toen de CIA in 1947 werd
opgericht….

Ik weet
‘t, de audioprojecten van Brasscheck zijn niet echt een succes, de
man die dit doet heeft een ietwat vervelende stem en spreekt nu niet direct op een
manier die je aandacht vasthoudt, echter zoals vaker met deze audiobestanden is het ook nu weer meer dan de
moeite waard om te luisteren!!

Onder
het geheel nog een filmpje van Ford en een medewerker, waar de laatste met een
grote hamer op de hennepauto inslaat, maar zelfs geen kras weet te
maken op de carrosserie!!

Great
re-sets of the pasten men

The
untold history

It’s the buzzword of the day:
“Re-Set”

It’s time to take a look at the
history of re-sets.

There have been a lot of major ones
in the last 100 years.

I count at least half a dozen.

A Great Re-Set: Declaring
Hemp a “danger to America’s Youth”

 

Support
Brasscheck TV

=====================================

* In 1978 kwam de eerste lachfilm uit van Cheech & Chong, die wiet smokkelden uit Mexico door de grens over te gaan met  een auto waarvan de carrosserie deels van wiet was gemaakt. De politie en douane konden natuurlijk niets vinden en achtervolgende politie werd stoned daar de carrosserie langzaam in rook opging, de film had dan ook de titel ‘Up in Smoke’. (de regisseur was Lou Adler)

Tot slot nog dit: een groot nadeel van de huidige elektrische auto’s is het feit dat wanneer ze in brand vliegen, de brandweer ze in een grote bak met water moet onderdompelen en dat is een uiterst gevaarlijke klus zoals je begrijpt, één van de grote nadelen van elektrisch rijden, waar bovendien een enorm aantal laadpalen voor nodig zijn….. Over milieuvervuiling gesproken en dan moet je daar ook nog de winning van grondstoffen toe rekenen, ook dat is allesbehalve duurzaam…. (bovendien zijn elektrische auto’s veel zwaarder dan bijvoorbeeld auto’s die op waterstof rijden, dit vanwege de benodigde grote accu’s……)

De mislukte fascistische coup in de VS, een onbekend verhaal, ‘zelfs’ in geschiedenisboeken voor onderwijs

Smedley
Butler was een vaak en hoog onderscheiden officier van het VS leger.
Deze Smedley werd in 1933 gevraagd met een leger van 500.000 soldaten uit WOI
een mars te maken op Washington DC en zo à la Bolsjewistische
revolutie de rest van het land mee te krijgen in het omverwerpen van
de regering Roosevelt…..

Deelnemende
bedrijven aan het complot waren o.a Du Pont,
J.P
Morgan cartels en kregen veel steun van: Andrew Mellon Associates,
Pew (Sun Oil), Rockefeller Associates, E.F. Hutton Associates, U.S.
Steel, General Motors, Chase, Standard Oil en Goodyear Tires. Het complot wordt overigens aangeduid als de ‘Business Plot’.

De eigenaren van grote bedrijven, zoals overgrootvader Bush
(wiens banken van de Union Banking Corporation het financiële beheer
van giften deels voor hun rekening namen) hadden veel sympathie voor
Hitler en bewierookten hem, de toenmalige directeur van Chevrolet, Knudsen noemde Hitler zelfs een wonder…..

De
betrekkingen waren zo goed dat GM al een begin maakte met de bouw van
tanks voor het Duitse leger, ook motoren voor bommenwerpers en
vrachtwagens voor het nazi-leger stonden op de rol……

Niet
voor niets ook dat de topmannen Mooney (GM), Ford (van de
autofabriek) en Tom Watson (IBM) een hoge nazi-onderscheiding kregen
van Hitler……..

Deze
coup was gedoemd te mislukken en op het moment dat Smedley alle namen kende van de betrokken figuren, maakte hij e.e.a. openbaar (inclusief deze namen) en vreemd genoeg werd niemand van de
samenzweerders veroordeeld….. Terwijl men na WOII mensen letterlijk
en figuurlijk het leven onmogelijk maakte, zelfs als ze maar werden
verdacht van linkse sympathie……….. Niet moeilijk te raden wat
hen was overkomen als zij hetzelfde hadden gedaan als de extreem rechtse, of beter gezegd: nazi-samenzweerders eerder poogden, het uitvoeren van een staatsgreep………

Smedley werd voor zijn openbaarmaking geridiculiseerd en zwart gemaakt door de reguliere media ……. (tja er is wat betreft de reguliere massamedia niet veel veranderd sinds die tijd…..)

Het volgende artikel, inclusief video werd door Brasscheck TV gepubliceerd;

The
most important video in modern US history

THIS
IS NOT MAKE-BELIEVE

GENERAL
SMEDLEY BUTLER REVEALS A CORPORATE COUP

THE
FAILED FASCIST COUP IN AMERICA

This
could be the most important video is modern American history and I
can safely bet you’ve never seen it.

But
when it was first screened millions of Americans did…and then they
made the story disappear.

This
is not make-believe.

Who
was Smedley Butler?

By
the end of his career, Butler had received 16 medals, five for
heroism. He is one of 19 men to receive the Medal of Honor twice, one
of three to be awarded both the Marine Corps Brevet Medal (along with
Wendell Neville and David Porter) and the Medal of Honor, and the
only Marine to be awarded the Brevet Medal and two Medals of Honor,
all for separate actions.”

Here’s
the story, they will NEVER teach in history class because it tells
too much about how the country really works:

From: https://www.counterpunch.org/2011/12/02/wall-streets-failed-1934-coup/

Butler
had been approached by Gerald P. MacGuire of Wall Street’s Grayson
M-P Murphy & Co. MacGuire claimed they would assemble an army of
500,000 mostly unemployed WWI veterans and march on DC. The
plutocrats wanted Butler to lead the coup, thinking that, like the
Bolsheviks, taking one major city (DC as Petrograd) would lead to the
fall of the government. They promised to put up $3 million as
starters and dangled a future $300 million as bait. Butler went along
with the plot until he could learn the identities of all the
schemers. Not a one of them was ever called to testify or was charged
with Treason. Virtually all of them were founding members of the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

The
League was headed by the DuPont and J.P Morgan cartels and had major
support from Andrew Mellon Associates, Pew (Sun Oil), Rockefeller
Associates, E.F. Hutton Associates, U.S. Steel, General Motors,
Chase, Standard Oil and Goodyear Tires.

Money
was funneled thru the Sen. Prescott Bush-led Union Banking
Corporation (yes, those Bushes) and the Prescott Bush-led Brown
Brothers Harriman (BBH, yes, that Harriman) to the League (and to Hitler,
but that’s another story). The plotters bragged about Bush’s
Hitler connections and even claimed that Germany had promised Bush
that it would provide materiel for the coup. This claim was entirely
believable: a year earlier, Chevrolet president William S. Knudsen
(who himself had donated $10,000 to the League) went to Germany and
met with Nazi leaders and declared upon his return that Hitler’s
Germany was “the miracle of the twentieth century.” At the time,
GM’s wholly-owned Adam-Opal Co. had already begun producing the
Nazi’s tanks, trucks and bomber engines. James D. Mooney, GM’s
vice-president for foreign operations was joined by Henry Ford and
IBM chief Tom Watson in receiving the Grand Cross of the German Eagle
from Hitler for their considerable efforts on behalf of the Third
Reich.

The
Whitewash

While
the Committee found that Gen. Butler was telling the truth,
discrediting such a stalwart was problematic for the plotters.
Quickly, the corporate press weighed in and sought to raise doubts
about the war hero, settling on branding him naive. The discredit
Knudsen meme was: “it was all idle cocktail party chatter.” This
red herring was trumpeted under the Associated Press headline “The
Cocktail Putsch.” New York Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia dismissed the
plot as “someone at the party had suggested the idea to the
ex-Marine as a joke.”

Click
here to 
support
Brasscheck

CEO General Motors ontvangt 22 miljoen dollar voor het ontslaan van duizenden arbeiders en het sluiten van 5 fabrieken….

Je
ziet pas goed waar aandeelhouders voor staan als het gaat om het
ontslaan van arbeiders, de aandelenkoers van een bepaald bedrijf waar
men flink snijdt in het aantal banen, gaan als een speer de lucht
in…….

De
CEO van General Motors (GM), Mary Barra, heeft 15.000 banen geschrapt,
waarbij uiteraard een groot aantal arbeiders op straat komt te staan
en er 5 fabrieken in Noord-Amerika worden gesloten, terwijl de fabrieken in Mexico en China ongemoeid blijven…..

Alsof
Barra prestaties van niveau heeft neergezet, werd ze in 2017 beloond
met het meer dan achterlijk hoge inkomen van 22 miljoen dollar……
Reken maar gerust dat Barra, ondanks haar belachelijk hoge salaris,
zal worden beloond voor het schrappen van banen en fabrieken….

Dat
de koers van GM na dit nieuws niet fiks de hoogte inging, heeft van
alles te maken met de ‘niet zo florissante positie’ van GM.

Lees
het volgende artikel van J.T. Crowe waarin veel kritiek is te lezen
op GM, dat eerder met staatssteun op de been moest worden gehouden
(tja, soms heeft Trump gelijk)

Appalling:
General Motors CEO Collects $22 Million Salary While Cutting 15,000
Jobs

Posted
by 
JT
Crowe
 | Dec
7, 2018
 News

General
Motors CEO Mary Barra might be the most unpopular CEO in the United
States right now after GM announced it is 
slashing
up to 15,000 jobs
 and
closing up to five plants in North America.

Barra
has been shredded from all sides for the decision, including from
President Donald Trump.

Appalling: General Motors CEO Collects $22 Million Salary While Cutting 15,000 Jobs

(hare kwaadaardigheid Mary Barra)

Very
disappointed with General Motors and their CEO, Mary Barra, for
closing plants in Ohio, Michigan and Maryland. Nothing being closed
in Mexico & China. The U.S. saved General Motors, and this is the
THANKS we get! We are now looking at cutting all @GMsubsidies,
including… for electric cars. General Motors made a big China bet
years ago when they built plants there (and in Mexico) – don’t
think that bet is going to pay off. I am here to protect America’s
Workers!”

On
Tuesday, West Virginia Democrat Richard Ojeda, who is considering a
presidential run in 2020, blasted Barra on Twitter for her $22
million salary, a number that was 
confirmed
by Politifact
.
Barra’s salary is in fact 295 times higher than the average GM
salaried worker’s $74,000.

At
General Motors, CEO Mary Barra ‘took home almost 22 MILLION DOLLARS
last year alone (295x your company’s average employee).” he
tweeted.

He
then slammed Barra and GM in another tweet, lambasting the company
and its CEO for their corporate greed for cutting jobs and closing
plants after receiving a bailout and tax breaks that kept the company
afloat during the Great Recession.

(Let op: bij het volgende Twitterbericht hoort een video van bijna 2 minuten, die ik helaas niet kan overnemen, hier de link naar het origineel op Money & Markets)

Richard N. Ojeda, II

@VoteOjeda2020

I’m in Detroit at General Motors HQ.

We bailed you out.

We gave you tax breaks.

Your workers are the reason your CEO took home almost 22 MILLION DOLLARS last year alone (295x your company’s average employee).

And this is how you repay them?


3,477

9:11 PM – Nov 27, 2018

While
mourners gathered at the Washington National Cathedral to pay their
respects to President George H.W. Bush on Wednesday, Barra met with
members of Congress whose constituencies will be most impacted by the
layoffs and plant closings.

GM
surpassed Ford in 1927 to become the world’s largest automaker and
the company soared for decades. Things began to slow in the 1980s and
1990s before falling apart during the great recession that began in
2008.

GM
abandoned four of its North American brands in exchange for a federal
bailout, and in that bailout is where much of the bad blood toward
Barra and GM now resides.

Per Ozy:

Now,
after a resurgent decade, GM again finds itself in a precarious
position, and so does Barra. GM “has to be the most thoroughly
disliked company in Washington right now,” Rep. Debbie Dingell, a
Michigan Democrat, told CNN. In the past week, Barra has been
publicly scolded by President Donald Trump and now privately
confronted by congressional delegations from each of the three states
where the plants targeted for closure are located — Michigan, Ohio
and Maryland. GM’s shake-up is the result of a variety of factors,
including the massive market shift from sedans to sport utility
vehicles, not to mention the tariffs on imported steel imposed by the
Trump administration earlier this year, which GM claims have cost it
around $1 billion.

The
56-year-old Barra, who Forbes recently ranked as the fifth
most powerful woman in the world, has faced such fire before. Just
days into her new job as GM’s CEO in January 2014, a crisis
involving an ignition switch malfunction in older vehicles resulting
in 124 deaths threatened to upend the company’s post-bailout
success, and Barra was called to publicly testify before Congress on
the matter. But the stark remarks that Barra, a GM lifer who earned a
Stanford MBA on a GM fellowship and spent 33 years with the company
before becoming its CEO, made at an internal town hall meeting at the
time were perhaps more significant. “I never want to put this
behind us,” she told her company. “I want to put this painful
experience permanently in our collective memories.”

The
Michigan native’s subsequent bold actions matched her words as she
used the crisis as an opportunity to fire underperforming executives,
redirect the company’s culture and streamline a bloated
organization the way she had once reduced a 10-page dress code policy
as the company’s head of HR to two words: “Dress appropriately.”

Mary
is as strong as they come,” the legendary investor Warren Buffett
once observed of Barra. “She is as good as I’ve seen.”

Barra,
the first female CEO at a major automaker, has continued to act
decisively to run a smaller, more profitable company, even when that
has meant closing GM’s struggling European operation, abandoning
markets in places like South Africa and Russia, and selling its
Germany subsidiary Opel-Vauxhall. She has also steered the company in
some risky but promising directions, from the $1 billion purchase of
Cruise Automation in 2016 to help the company cement its position in
the autonomous driving market to the recent narrowing
of its manufacturing to SUVs and trucks. “The reality is that in
the sedan market, the Camrys and the Accords and the Civics of the
world have dominated that space forever,” says Kelley Blue Book
executive analyst Akshay Anand. “And that was not something that
was going to change overnight.”

Such
moves, however, can require some ruthlessness. The recent layoffs
blindsided many workers — right before the Thanksgiving holiday.
“These were very difficult decisions,” Barra said in a statement
released Wednesday after meeting with members of Congress, where she
claimed that many hourly employees at the impacted U.S. plants would
have the chance to work at other GM plants. Still, as GM employees
brace for the future after the company endures yet another
cataclysmic event, this particular “painful experience” may be
one that Barra and remaining GM employees want to put behind them and
not commit to their “collective memories.”

================================

Zie ook: ‘GM CEO verdient 22 miljoen dollar voor het sluiten van fabrieken en het ontslaan van arbeiders

Tien bedrijven die Israël helpen bij de massamoord op de Palestijnen

Joe
Catron publiceerde het hieronder opgenomen artikel op MintPress News, ik nam het over van Anti-Media. In zijn artikel schrijft Catron
over de bedrijven die Israël helpen bij haar fascistische
apartheidsbeleid en dan met name bij het geweld de grootschalige terreur tegen de Palestijnse
bevolking in de Gazastrook en op de West Bank, waar Israël vooral in de Gazastrook de ene massamoord na de andere begaat……..

Mij viel vooral Monsanto* op, dat Israël het kankerverwekkende glyfosaat levert waarmee de fascistisch Israëlische apartheidsstaat de Palestijnse akkers van de Gazastrook besproeit in de buurt van de grens met Israël, ook al niets meer of minder dan smerige terreur……. Anders gezegd: Israël besproeit de akkers in feite met een chemisch wapen en dat op het grondgebied van de Palestijnen, zodat de voedselvoorziening van de Palestijnen in hun openluchtgevangenis Gazastrook afhankelijk blijft van o.a. Israëlische import…… Dezelfde akkers worden bij tijd en wijle door Israël gebulldozerd met machines van Caterpillar…….

Uiteraard
worden deze bedrijven ook gefinancierd door banken, jammer dat Catron daarvan niet de namen heeft genoemd. Wel noemt hij de HSBC bank die
grote wapenfabrieken financiert, waaronder die in Israël…….. Deze wapenfabrieken in Israël proberen hun nieuwste wapens in de praktijk uit op Palestijnen……… 

Ook jammer dat Catron Facebook niet noemde, deze organisatie weert Palestijnen al heel lang van haar platform, waar zionisten hun smerige gal wel mogen spuien…..

Meet
Ten Corporate Giants Helping Israel Massacre Gaza Protesters

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Meet Ten Corporate Giants Helping Israel Massacre Gaza Protesters

Zie wat de Israëlische ‘helden’ links aanrichten onder ongewapende demonstranten rechts op deze dubbelfoto…….

October
15, 2018 at 9:52 am

Written
by 
Joe
Catron

(MPN) — As
Israeli soldiers gun down unarmed Palestinian demonstrators in the
Great March of Return, their lethal operations depend on an array of
contractors and suppliers, many of them companies based outside
Israel.

The
Israeli military relies on a network of international companies,
supplying everything from sniper rifles to tear gas, to carry out its
massacres of protesters in Gaza,” Tom Anderson, a researcher
for 
Corporate
Occupation
,
told 
MintPress
News
.
“These companies are knowingly supporting war crimes, and are
complicit in state-orchestrated murder.”

Since
the mobilization began on March 30, Israeli forces have killed 205
Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, the United Nations’ Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in the Occupied Palestinian
Territory 
reported on
October 4.

There
have been 21,288 injured, including 5,345 from live ammunition,
resulting in 11,180 hospitalizations. Thirty-eight of the dead and
4,250 of the wounded were children.

A
press release accompanying a September 25 report by the World
Bank 
warned,
“The economy in Gaza is collapsing,” adding that “the
decade-long blockade is the core issue.”

Corporate
Occupation and the 
American
Friends Service Committee
,
the 
Boycott,
Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Movement
,
and 
Who
Profits
 maintain
comprehensive lists of corporations enabling Israel’s crimes
against Palestinians.

Here
are a few of them:

Caterpillar,
Inc.

Caterpillar
is 
known internationally
for Israel’s use of its bulldozers to demolish Palestinian homes in
the occupied West Bank and inside Israel itself, as well as for its
role in the killing of Rachel Corrie, an International Solidarity
Movement activist from the United States, who was crushed to death by
one of the company’s Israel-operated machines in the southern Gaza
Strip on March 16, 2003. In Gaza, Caterpillar is notorious for
Israel’s 
deployment of
its equipment to reinforce a military barrier around the Strip, as
well as to level Palestinian farmland inside it.
These 
leveling operations
both destroy Palestinian agriculture, keeping Gaza a captive market
for Israeli producers, and maintain a clear line of fire for Israeli
soldiers to shoot Palestinians.

Combined
Systems, Inc.

Combined
Systems — a Jamestown, Pennsylvania-based manufacturer owned by
Point Lookout Capital and the Carlyle Group — supplies light
weaponry and security equipment, such as tear gas and flash grenades,
to repressive governments worldwide. In May, Corporate Occupation
researchers 
spotted an
Israeli vehicle, with police markings but obviously intended for
military use, equipped with the company’s 
‘Venom’ tear
gas launcher next to the Gaza barrier.

Ford
Motor Company

While
other manufacturers, like 
General
Motors
,
also provide vehicles used by the Israeli army to deploy its soldiers
along the Gaza barrier, Ford’s are distinctive for their creative
use. In 2003, Israeli vehicle manufacturer Hatehof
began 
retrofitting Ford
F550 trucks as armored personnel carriers. By 2016, Israel had moved
on to F350s, 
modified by
Israeli military electronics company Elbit Systems as autonomous
unmanned vehicles capable of remotely controlled fire.

Monsanto*

Along
with herbicides from the Dow Chemical Company and ADAMA Agricultural
Solutions, an Israeli unit of China’s state-owned National Chemical
Corporation (ChemChina), Israel 
sprays Bayer
subsidiary Monsanto’s notorious Glyphosate (marketed as Roundup), a
known human carcinogen, on Palestinian fields across its military
barrier with Gaza several times annually. As does its deployment of
Caterpillar bulldozers to level the same fields, the aerial
application, conducted by two civilian Israeli companies under
contract to the army, serves both Israeli economic and military
interests — preventing Palestinian self-sufficiency in agriculture,
while allowing its forces to easily detect and fire upon Palestinian
farmers and other civilians using their own land.

G4S
plc

Formerly
one of Israel’s biggest occupation contractors, G4S 
sold its
major Israeli subsidiary, G4S Israel, in 2016, but 
kept a
stake in the construction and operation of Policity, Israel’s
privatized national police academy. Israel claims that its police
enjoy civilian status, but routinely deploys them in military
operations against Palestinians in both the West Bank and the Gaza
Strip, including their use of both Combined System’s ‘Venon’
tear-gas launcher and weaponized 
drones to
repress the Great March of Return.

Hewlett
Packard

Now
three companies with interlocking operations — HP Inc., Hewlett
Packard Enterprise (HPE), and DXC Technology — HP 
equips the
Israeli military with computers and has undertaken contracts to
“virtualize” IDF operations, starting in 2007 with a pilot
program for the Israeli navy, which enforces the blockade of Gaza.

HSBC
Bank plc

HSBC provides extensive
financing to some of the most notorious military manufacturers in the
world, several of them Israeli.

HSBC
holds over £800m worth of shares in, and is involved in syndicated
loans worth over £19b to, companies that sell weapons and military
equipment to the Israeli government,” Huda Ammori, campaigns
officer for the 
Palestine
Solidarity Campaign
,
told 
MintPress.
“These investments include Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest
private security firm, which markets its weapons as ‘field-tested,’
due to them being tested on Palestinian civilians in Gaza.”

A
leading drone manufacturer, Elbit has played a key role in aerial
attacks on the Great March of Return.

Motorola
Solutions Inc.

Motorola provides the
encrypted smartphones the Israeli military uses to deploy soldiers,
as well as radio and communications services for the Israeli police.

Remington

Among
casualties of the Great March of Return, Amnesty
International 
reports,
some “wounds bear the hallmarks of U.S.-manufactured M24 Remington
sniper rifles shooting 7.62mm hunting ammunition, which expand and
mushroom inside the body,” along with others indicative of Israel
Weapon Industries’ Tavor rifles. “In the United States this is
sold as a hunting rifle to kill deer,” Brian Castner, a weapons
specialist for the human-rights organization, 
said in
April.

Dipping
Company, LLC

The
White Plains, New York-based food manufacturer, co-owned by PepsiCo
and Israeli foodmaker Strauss, has 
donated food
packages to the Israeli Army’s Golani Brigade, notorious for its
human-rights abuses in both Gaza and the West Bank.

We
Must Channel Our Rage”

As
the Great March of Return, now in its 29th week, 
continues,
participants and supporters say targeting firms complicit in its
repression is one of the most effective means of solidarity.

We
must channel our rage at Israel’s atrocities into effective actions
to hold Israel accountable,” the BDS National Committee 
said in
a statement on April 12. “Together, we can escalate Boycott,
Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns.”

Israel
is meeting the Palestinian protesters with live fire, massacring over
190 Palestinians to date,” Ammori told 
MintPress.
“Israel’s racist discrimination and brutal violence is evident,
and the campaign to end complicity is vital.”


By Joe
Catron
 / Creative
Commons
 / MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo

* Monsanto, tegenwoordig van Bayer, het bedrijf dat tijdens WOII in nazi-Duitsland verantwoordelijk was voor medische proeven op concentratiekampgevangenen en daarmee heeft meegewerkt aan de massamoord op o.a. Joden………. ‘Echt een topbedrijf’, dat mede hoofdverantwoordelijk is voor de enorme insectensterfte die in de laatste decennia plaatsvond (twee derde van de insecten is uitgestorven door gebruik van insecticiden en ander landbouwgif) In het bijzonder zijn de bestuivers als bijen en hommels getroffen, zonder wie de mensheid een enorme massasterfte staat te wachten……. ‘Alweer een prestatie van formaat….’

Boycotten die bedrijven!!

Eerste politierobot een feit………

Dat autofabrikanten het nergens nauw mee nemen, zal nog voor niemand een verrassing zijn, echter het kan nog sterker: Ford (VS) heeft een zelflerende politierobot gefabriceerd……. Deze eerste politierobot is nu nog een zelfrijdende politieauto, die autonoom beslissingen neemt op gedrag van automobilisten in het verkeer……. De robotauto zou andere voertuigen op afstand stil kunnen zetten, dat betekent dat het elektronische systeem van afstand kan worden geblokkeerd (dat meldt Jake Anderson, de schrijver van het volgende artikel niet, maar is een al langer bekende technologie)…….. Deze robot kan groeien in de functie, daar deze ook zelflerend is…….

Op zeker dat de politie in de VS deze auto in gebruik zal nemen en niet voor de gebieden waar veel gekleurden wonen, of ze moeten deze robot precies zo instrueren als de ‘gewone agenten…….’ Zo instrueren dat deze robot gekleurden als potentiële misdadigers zal zien, dus etnisch zal profileren en als het even kan gekleurden doodschieten, ofwel standrechtelijk executeren en dat alleen vanwege hun huidskleur……

Ford heeft de eerste stap gemaakt naar een geautomatiseerde nieuwe wereld robotorde, waarmee de gevaarlijk stap is gezet naar andere zelflerende robots, lopende robots voor politie en leger, die al helemaal niet zullen twijfelen of ze iemand wel dan niet zullen vermoorden….. Overigens is men ook al bezig met het ontwerpen van een drone die zelfstandig beslist of doelwitten uitgeschakeld ‘moeten worden…’ (let wel: dat is eigenlijk een zware misdaad!) De controle op die standrechtelijke executies, onder Obama tot vol wasdom gekomen, stelde al niets voor, zoals zojuist gezegd: met robots zal dit moorden nog grotere vormen aannemen, waar onderzoek zelfs wel eens onmogelijk gemaakt kan worden………… Immers wie moet je de schuld nog geven na een schietincident, bijvoorbeeld in een Midden-Oosten gebied, de fabrikant??? (ach, als men nu een onderzoek instelt naar een moordpartij in bijvoorbeeld Irak, komen de VS daders er voor 99% vanaf met een vrijspraak……)

De VS is in feite al een politiestaat, met dergelijke robots kan zo’n dictatuur pas echt vervolmaakt worden……. Op weg naar een wereld die zelfs George Orwell niet kon voorzien………. (al weet ik zeker dat meerdere sciencefiction schrijvers hier wel over hebben verhaald, ben helaas al mijn scifi boeken kwijtgeraakt door een kwaadaardig persoon in mijn verleden……

Patent
Filed for Self-Driving Police Car That Can Take Over Your Vehicle.
Let That Sink In

January
31, 2018 at 9:46 am

Written
by 
Jake
Anderson

(ANTIMEDIA) —
Millions
of jobs are at risk of being 
outsourced to
automated artificial intelligence or robotic applications in the next
decade. These jobs range from baristas and 
supermarket
clerks
 to lawyers and hedge
fund managers
.
Now, a new patent application by automaker Ford suggests law
enforcement agents, too, could soon be replaced by artificially
intelligent autonomous police cars equipped with state of the art
cameras, wireless communication sensors, and surveillance technology.

The
automated cop car would be designed to seek out especially crafty
hiding places, detect driving infractions, 
wirelessly
interface
 with
potentially (automated) lawbreaking vehicles, and even remotely issue
citations. According to 
Techcrunch,
Ford’s patent filing suggests that the new machine learning
algorithm would not only be capable of determining whether the
infraction constitutes a ticket or a warning but would also be able
to manually take control of the vehicle if necessary, although it is
not entirely clear what the patent envisions in the way of manual
takeovers. The AI black-and-white would also have instantaneous
access to any databases necessary to adjudicate suspects and
offenders.

While autonomous
vehicles
 can
and will be programmed to obey traffic laws,”
 the
patent filing states, “
a
human driver can override that programming to control and operate the
vehicle at any time. When a vehicle is under the control of a human
driver there is a possibility of violation of traffic laws. Thus,
there will still be a need to police traffic.”

Vaughn
Highfield of 
Alphr imagined how
this might play out on the road:

In
practice, Ford’s car would establish a direct wireless connection
with a speeding car and then send a message to its dashboard
indicating that it’s going too 
fast and
has been spotted. The 
vehicle would
then reply to Ford’s police car informing it of if it was in
autonomous mode or being driven by a human.”

A
ticket may then be issued to the license of the human driver.

Some
tech and science blogs took a glass half full approach to the
news, 
pointing
out
 that
automating routine police tasks, such as speeding tickets, may free
up human police officers to focus more of their attention on law
enforcement tasks that are not so easily interpreted by an algorithm.
The overriding sentiment, however, seems to be one of caution, as
technologists imagine a world where humans are policed by
artificially intelligent automated law enforcers.

Unsurprisingly,
Ford Global Technologies CEO Jim Hackett is optimistic about what he
describes as a game-changing technology that will transform cities
and communities for the better. During a 
speech at
a Las Vegas conference last month, he pontificated about the utopian
future humans can expect in the ‘city of tomorrow’:

The
car and the system will be talking to each other. And changing one
piece of the system necessarily changes the whole.

A
car obviously is going to learn to drive itself, but the city
transportations grid will mutate around what the cars need.

What
we want is the depiction of the city of tomorrow that demonstrates
the benefits of introducing these smart vehicles in a smart world for
civic life.

It’s
not about the city getting smarter, but about humans having a better
day.”

Stephen
Edelstein, a writer for 
The
Drive
,
however, voiced more concern regarding the 
ethics of
automated law enforcement. “
The
potential pitfalls of machines 
conducting police work
have us feeling especially skeptical about this one.”

While
Ford’s patent doesn’t ensure the technology will come to pass, it
seems exceedingly likely that the country’s law enforcement
agencies and 
military will
soon be embracing the most cutting-edge technologies, which begs the
question:

Do
AI police cars make you more or less concerned about the future? Let
us know in the comments below, which will be moderated by a human
editor. (als je dat wilt, even hieronder op ‘Anti-Media’ klikken, 

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

Malcolm Turnbull (premier Australië) verzekerd het volk dat er geen arbeidsplaatsen verloren gaan, door vertrek autofabrikant…………

Het is de megalomane klootzak Turnbull nu helemaal is de fascistische* bol geslagen, deze hufter reageerde op de aankondiging van een derde autofabrikant, Holden, de fabriek in Australië te sluiten……..

BBC World Service meldde dit vanmorgen en liet de reactie van Turnbull horen, zoals deze het volk in feite toesprak. Volgens de enorme leugenaar Turnbull zal deze sluiting geen banen kosten en zal het de industriële activiteit in Australië niet aantasten, dat geldt wat hem betreft ook voor de eerdere sluiting van twee van deze fabrieken, t.w. die van Ford en Toyota……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Uiteraard zal ook deze sluiting een groot aantal arbeidsplekken kosten, ofwel een groot aantal mensen extra zal op de keien staan……. Voorts zijn er dan nog de toeleveranciers die veelal gebonden zijn aan een dergelijke fabriek, die werkloos zullen worden…….. Zo’n 50.000 mensen verliezen hun baan, als de laatste autofabriek is gesloten…….. Een aantal waarin de zojuist genoemde banen buiten die fabrieken, die van toeleveranciers e.d., niet eens zijn meegerekend……

Dient nog wel opgemerkt te worden dat deze fabrieken werden gesloten, daar de Australische regering besloot niet langer subsidies te verstrekken aan deze fabrieken………….

* Zogenaamd van een liberale partij, de Liberal Party. Echter als je ziet hoe Turnbull omgaat met vluchtelingen, kan je niet anders concluderen dan dat hij een fascist is…… Iets waaraan meer liberale partijen zich schuldig maken…….

WOII >> geallieerden waren wel op de hoogte van de nazi-Duitse doodskampen!!! Collaboratie van de VS en GB met de nazi’s…….

Op 5 mei ontving ik een artikel van Information Clearing House (ICH) over de rol van de VS en GB tijdens WOII en dan m.n. de wetenschap bij de geallieerden over de doodskampen van nazi-Duitsland……

Na decennialange weigering, heeft de VN eindelijk het archief vrijgegeven van een oorlogsmisdaden commissie die de Europese archieven over de holocaust door de nazi’s tijdens WOII onderzocht. Londen en Washington hebben het vrijgeven van dit archief jarenlang proberen tegen te houden.

Niet zo vreemd als je bedenkt dat uit de vrijgegeven documenten blijkt dat er een geheime band bestond tussen de regeringen van de VS en Groot-Brittannië met de leiders van nazi-Duitsland……..

Uit de documenten blijkt verder dat de geallieerden al ver voor het eind van WOII op de hoogte waren van de nazi-vernietigingskampen, iets dat men na die oorlog altijd ontkende……

Voorts werpen de documenten meer licht op de weigering van de geallieerden een front in het westen te openen, zodat de Russen enigszins konden worden ontzet. Niet zo vreemd, daar men de ‘communisten’ weliswaar zag als partner in de strijd tegen de nazi’s, maar men een bijna even grondige afkeer had van de zogenaamd communistische Sovjet Unie…….

Ook nog eens aandacht voor de goede banden van VS multinationals met nazi-Duitsland, waar deze bedrijven fiks hadden geïnvesteerd in o.a. IG Farben, de fabrikant van Zyklon B, het gas waarmee de joden werden vermoord. Firma’s als Ford, IBM (niet genoemd in het artikel), ITT (speelde later een rol in de smerige CIA staatsgreep tegen het Chileense bewind van Allende op 11 september 1973), GM en Du Pont investeerden zwaar in Duitse bedrijven als het hiervoor genoemde IG Farben (waar ook nazi-prins Bernhard, voor werkte, Bernhard, de zelf gedroomde Nederlandse stadhouder van Hitler…), Krupp Stahl en Daimler……..

Verder kan u lezen over de inspanningen van de geallieerden na WOII, om nazi’s Duitsland uit te smokkelen.

De schrijver ziet terecht een overeenkomst met de huidige tijd, waarin Rusland wordt gedemoniseerd, terwijl de NAVO agressief aan haar grens staat…..

Lezen mensen! U kunt desgewenst onder het ICH artikel klikken voor een ‘Dutch vertaling’:

The
Deep History of US, Britain’s Never-Ending Cold War On Russia

By
Finian Cunningham

May
04, 2017 “Information
Clearing House
” – After decades of delaying, the United
Nations finally released archives from the Second World War-era war
crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust. The source of
those archives on Nazi war crimes were Western governments, including
those in exile at the time of the war, such as the Belgian, Polish
and Czechoslovakian. The time period covered is 1943-1949. Washington
and London had long sought to halt the release. Why?

Notably,
the landmark publication of the files last month was given scant
Western media coverage. Surprisingly, perhaps, because the story that
can be gleaned from the documents tells of a hidden history of the
Second World War, namely the systematic collusion between the
American and British governments and the Nazi Third Reich.

As
report in Deutsche
Welle
 remarked
on the released archives: «The files make clear that [Western]
Allied forces knew more about the Nazi concentration camp system
before the end of the war than has generally been thought».

This
revelation points to more than just «knowledge» among the Western
allies of Nazi-era crimes; it points more damningly to state
collusion. This would also explain why Washington and London have
been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

There
has long been a 
controversial
debate
 among
Western nations about why the US and Britain in particular did not do
more to bomb the Nazi infrastructure of death camps and railroads.
Washington and London have often made the claim that they did know
the full extent of the horror being perpetrated by the Nazis until
the very end of the war when extermination centers such as at
Auschwitz and Treblinka were liberated – by the Soviet Red Army, it
should be noted too.

However,
what the latest release of UN Holocaust files shows is that
Washington and London were indeed well aware of the Nazi Final
Solution in which millions of European Jews and Slavic people were
being systematically worked to death or exterminated in gas chambers.
So the question again is: why did the US and Britain not direct more
of their aerial bombing campaign to destroy the Nazi infrastructure?

One
possible answer is that these Western allies had a callous disregard
for the Nazi victims. Washington and London establishments were
themselves accused of harboring antisemitic prejudices, as can be
seen from the scandals when both these governments spurned thousands
of European Jewish refugees during the Second World War, in effect
sending many of them to their deaths under the Nazi regime.

Not
excluding the above factor of Western racist insouciance, there is a
second more disturbing factor. That the Western governments, or at
least powerful sections, were loath to hamper the Nazi war effort
against the Soviet Union. Notwithstanding that the Soviet Union was a
nominal «ally» of the West for the defeat of Nazi Germany.

This
perspective harks to a radically different conception of the Second
World War in contrast to that narrated in official Western versions.
In this alternative historical account, the rise of the Nazi Third
Reich was deliberately fomented by American and British rulers as a
bulwark in Europe against the spread of communism. Adolf Hitler’s
rabid anti-Semitism was matched only by his detest of Marxism and the
Slavic people of the Soviet Union. In the Nazi ideology, they were
all «Untermenschen» (subhumans) to be exterminated in a «Final
Solution».

So,
when Nazi Germany was attacking the Soviet Union and carrying out its
Final Solution from June 1941 until late 1944, little wonder then
that the US and Britain showed a curious reluctance to commit their
military forces fully to open up a Western Front. The Western allies
were evidently content to see the Nazi war machine doing what it was
originally intended to do: to destroy the primary enemy to Western
capitalism as represented by the Soviet Union. This is not to say
that all American and British political leaders shared or were even
aware of this tacit strategic vision. Leaders like President Franklin
Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill appeared to be
genuinely committed to defeating Nazi Germany. Nevertheless, their
individual views must be set against a background of systematic
collusion between powerful Western corporate interests and Nazi
Germany.

As
American author David Talbot 
documented in
his book, The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA and the
Rise of America’s Secret Government (2015), there were massive
financial links between Wall Street and the Third Reich, going back
several years before the outbreak of the Second World War.

Allen
Dulles, who worked for the Wall Street law firm Sullivan and Cromwell
and who later headed up the American Central Intelligence Agency, was
a key player in the linkage between US capital and German industry.
American industrial giants, such as Ford, GM, ITT and Du Pont were
invested heavily in German industrial counterparts like IG Farben
(manufacturer of Zyklon B, the poisonous gas used in the Holocaust),
Krupp Steel and Daimler. American capital, as well as British, was
thus integrated into the Nazi war machine and the latter’s
dependence on the system of slave labor as provided by the Final
Solution.

This
would explain why the Western allies did so little to disrupt the
Nazi infrastructure with their undoubted formidable aerial bombing
capacity. Far more damning than mere inertia or indifference owing to
racist prejudice towards the Nazi victims, what emerges is that the
Americans and British capitalist elite were invested in the Third
Reich. Mainly for the purpose of eliminating the Soviet Union and any
kind of genuinely socialist global movement. Bombing Nazi
infrastructure would have been tantamount to deleting Western assets.

To
this end, as the war was drawing to a close and the Soviet Union
looked poised to roll up the Third Reich singlehandedly, the
Americans and British belatedly stepped up their war efforts from
western and southern Europe. The goal was one of salvaging Western
assets remaining in the Nazi regime. Allen Dulles, the director of
the-soon-to-be-formed American Central Intelligence Agency,
extricated top Nazis and their gold looted from Europe in secret
surrender deals known as Operation Sunrise. Britain’s military
intelligence MI6 was also involved in the clandestine American effort
to salvage Nazi assets via ratlines. The bad faith on display to the
Soviet «allies» heralded the chill of the ensuing Cold War that
immediately followed the Second World War.

Significant
and damning testimony of what was going down was given recently in a
BBC 
interview by
Ben Ferencz, the most senior surviving US prosecutor from the
Nuremberg trials. At age 98, Ferencz was still able to lucidly recall
how scores of Nazi war criminals were let off the hook by the
American and British authorities. Ferencz cited US General George
Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third
Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong
enemy». Patton’s candid expression of deeper animosity towards the
Soviet Union than towards Nazi Germany was consistent with how the US
and British ruling class had been colluding with Hitler’s Third
Reich in a geo-strategic war against the Soviet Union and worker-led
socialist movements arising across Europe and America.

In
other words, the Cold War which the US and Britain embarked on after
1945 was but a continuation of hostile policy towards Moscow that was
already underway well before the Second World War erupted in 1939 in
the form of a build up of Nazi Germany. For various reasons, it
became expedient for the Western powers to liquidate the Nazi war
machine, along with the Soviet Union. But as can be seen, the Western
assets residing in the Nazi machine were recycled into American and
British Cold War posture against the Soviet Union. It is a truly
damning legacy that American and British military intelligence
agencies were consolidated and financed by Nazi crimes.

The
recent release of UN Holocaust files – in spite of American and
British prevarication over many years – add more evidence to the
historical analysis that these Western powers were deeply complicit
in the monumental crimes of the Nazi Third Reich. They knew about
these crimes because they had helped facilitate them. And the
complicity stemmed from Western hostility towards Russia as a
perceived geopolitical rival.

This
is not a mere historical academic exercise. Western complicity with
Nazi Germany also finds a corollary in the present-day ongoing
hostility from Washington, Britain and their NATO allies towards
Moscow. The relentless build up of NATO offensive forces around
Russia’s borders, the endless Russophobia in Western propagandistic
news media, the economic blockade in the form of sanctions based on
tenuous claims, are all deeply rooted in history.

The
West’s Cold War towards Moscow preceded the Second World War,
continued after the defeat of Nazi Germany and persists to this day
regardless of the fact that the Soviet Union no longer exists. Why?
Because Russia is a perceived rival to Anglo-American capitalist
hegemony, as is China or any other emerging power that undermines
that desired unipolar hegemony.

American-British
collusion with Nazi Germany finds its modern-day manifestation in
NATO collusion with the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine and jihadist
terror groups dispatched in proxy wars against Russian interests in
Syria and elsewhere. The players may change over time, but the root
pathology is American-British capitalism and its hegemonic addiction.

The
never-ending Cold War will only end when Anglo-American capitalism is
finally defeated and replaced by a genuinely more democratic system.

This
article was first published by 
SCF –

Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

==================

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: Ferencz en D. Talbot. Heb ook het label ‘Bayer’ toegevoegd, de gentech gifmenger maakte tijdens WOII gebruik van concentratiekampgevangenen voor medicijnproeven. Gegarandeerd dat ook in dat bedrijf ‘westers kapitaal’ werd geïnvesteerd……