VS massamedia krijgen van jetje na demoniseren Bernie Sanders (democratisch presidentskandidaat VS)

Nadat
Bernie Sanders de Washington Post (WaPo) volkomen terecht verweet een haatcampagne tegen hem te voeren, hebben de massamedia in de VS
belachelijk en hysterisch gereageerd op deze beschuldiging…….. Lullig voor die media, maar belangrijke
ex-vertegenwoordigers van die media zijn het helemaal zat en hebben
‘een dik boek opengetrokken’ over hun ex-werkgevers en hun voormalige
collega’s.

Met
voorbeelden geeft men aan dat deze massamedia, zonder uitzondering
in handen van plutocraten of investeringsgroepen, zich onderwerpen
aan zelfcensuur, men weet prima welke onderwerpen wel of niet genoemd
kunnen worden, censuur die de eigenaren verwachten van hun
werknemers…… Caitlin Johnstone, de schrijver van het hieronderopgenomen artikel zegt niets over de zelfcensuur die zogenaamde
onafhankelijke journalisten zich opleggen, over berichten die
regeringen wel of niet kunnen schaden, ook die zijn er voldoende……*

Zo is er
zelden of nooit commentaar in de reguliere westerse media op ingrepen
van de VS elders, of het nu gaat om illegale oorlogen, staatsgrepen
of ronduit massamoorden begaan middels drones, aanvallen op verdachte
mensen, die minstens recht hebben op een eerlijk proces…….
Ronduit VS terreur waarbij bovendien meer dan 90% van de vermoorden
niet eens werden verdacht, dus veelal vrouwen en kinderen…….

Gelukkig
ziet ook Caitlin Johnstone, de schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen
artikel, dat langzaam maar zeker een kentering van zaken,
plaatsvindt. Zo gelooft het grootste deel van de VS bevolking terecht
niet dat de uitbater van een kindermisbruiknetwerk, Jeffrey Epstein,
zichzelf het leven heeft benomen (voor berichten over Epstein, klik
op het label met zijn naam direct onder dit bericht).

Johnstone
concludeert m.i. terecht dat de propaganda-oorlog, gevoerd in de
reguliere massamedia steeds minder effect heeft op de publieke opinie,
al verwacht ik niet dat er daarom snel verandering zal komen in die
propaganda, eerder valt te vrezen wat we nu al zien: de brengers van
het echte nieuws, de alternatieve media worden meer en meer
gedemoniseerd door de reguliere westerse massamedia en westerse
politiek, waarbij steeds meer platforms worden geweerd van het
internet…….. De volgende stap is het strafrechtelijk vervolgen
van de alternatieve media, waarbij het eindelijk duidelijk zal
worden wat een smerig spel media en politiek spelen en dat gesteund
door multinationals, de financiële maffia en het militair-industrieel
complex……..

AUGUST
17, 2019
AUTHOR:
CAITLIN JOHNSTONE

Mass
Media’s Phony Freakout Over Bernie’s WaPo Criticism Is Backfiring

After
days of 
ridiculous,
hysterical garment rending
 by
mass media talking heads in response to Senator Bernie
Sanders’ 
utterly
undeniable
 assertion
that 
The
Washington Post
 has
displayed unfair bias against his campaign, people with extensive
experience in the mainstream press who are fed up with the lies are
beginning to push back. Hard.

Former
MSNBC producer Jeff Cohen has 
published
an article in 
Salon
 titled
“Memo to mainstream journalists: Can the phony outrage; Bernie is
right about bias”. Cohen details his experience with the way
corporate media outlets keep a uniform pro-establishment narrative
running throughout all their coverage without their staff having to
be directly told to to do this by their supervisors (though sometimes
that happens, too). He writes as follows:

It
happens because of groupthink. It happens because top editors and
producers know — without being told — which issues and sources
are off limits. No orders need be given, for example, for
rank-and-file journalists to understand that the business of the
corporate boss or top advertisers is off-limits, short of criminal
indictments.

No
memo is needed to achieve the narrowness of perspective — selecting
all the usual experts from all the 
usual
think tanks
 to
say all the usual things. Think 
Tom
Friedman
. Or Barry
McCaffrey
.
Or 
Neera
Tanden
.
Or any of the elite club members who’ve been proven to be absurdly
wrong time and again about national or global affairs.”

Cohen’s
exposé follows 
the
phenomenal segment
 recently
aired on 
The
Hill
‘s
show 
Rising,
in which former MSNBC star Krystal Ball and her co-host Saagar Enjati
both detailed their experience with the way access journalism,
financial incentives, prestige incentives and peer pressure were used
to push them each toward protecting establishment narratives in their
respective mainstream media careers. Ball said at one point she was
literally called into the office and forbidden from doing any
critical Hillary Clinton coverage without prior approval in the
lead-up to the 2016 election, saying that in mainstream journalism
jobs “you are aware of what you’re going to be rewarded for and
what you’re going to be punished for, or not rewarded for.”

It’s
not necessarily that somebody tells you how to do your coverage, it’s
that if you were to do your coverage that way, you would not be hired
at that institution,” Enjati said. “So it’s like if you do not
already fit within this framework, then the system is designed to not
give you a voice. And if you necessarily did do that, all of the
incentive structures around your pay, around your promotion, around
your colleagues that are slapping you on the back, that would all
disappear. So it’s a system of reinforcement, which makes it so
that you wouldn’t go down that path in the first place.”

Rolling
Stone
‘s
Matt Taibbi has also jumped in to push back against the absurd
denials of bias from the establishment media, 
publishing
a new article
 titled
“The Campaign Press: Members of the 10 Percent, Reporting for the
One Percent–Media companies run by the country’s richest people
can’t help but project the mindset of their owners.” Taibbi, an
award-winning journalist with 
lots
of experience
 in
the news media industry, writes that pro-establishment
narratives are advanced in mainstream press not because some explicit
order is handed down by a media-owning oligarch, but because “We
all know what takes will and will not earn attaboys in newsrooms.”

Matt Taibbi

@mtaibbi

Why the Sanders media beef is legit: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/bernie-sanders-washington-post-media-complaint-872349/ 

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) talks to journalists as he walks along Grand Avenue at the Iowa State Fair.


The Campaign Press: Members of the 10 Percent, Reporting for the One Percent

Apart from being described as a lying faux-Leninist Russian stooge who wants to elect Trump, what does Sanders have to complain about?

rollingstone.com


2,475

5:56 PM – Aug 16, 2019

Taibbi
writes the following:

The
news media is now loathed in the same way banks, tobacco companies,
and health insurance companies are, and it refuses to understand
this. Mistakes like WMDs are a problem, but the media’s biggest
issue is exactly its bubble-ness, and clubby inability to respond to
criticism in any way except to denounce it as misinformation and
error. Equating all criticism of media with Trumpism is pouring
gasoline on the fire.

The
public is not stupid. It sees that companies like CNN and NBC are
billion-dollar properties, pushing shows anchored by big-city
millionaires. A Vanderbilt like Anderson Cooper or a half-wit legacy
pledge like Chris Cuomo shoveling coal for Comcast, Amazon, AT&T,
or Rupert Murdoch is the standard setup.”

Taibbi
is correct. Trust in the mass media 
continues
to plummet
,
and these stupid, nonsensical hissy fits they throw whenever
criticized are only making it worse.

What
cracks me up most about all this is that the faux outrage over
Sanders’ criticisms of 
The
Washington Post
 was
completely unnecessary for everyone involved. They could have just
ignored it and let the news churn bury it, but they’re so insulated
in their little echo chambers that they seriously believed they could
get the public rallying to their defense on this. The general
consensus was something like “Ah ha! Bernie did that
media-criticizing thing that we all agreed nobody’s allowed to do
anymore! We’ve got him this time, boys!”

And
all they accomplished in doing this was giving honest journalists an
opportunity to inform the public about the insider tricks of their
trade. You may be absolutely certain that the information that has
been given to the public by Cohen, Ball, Enjati and Taibbi will
remain in high circulation throughout the Sanders campaign in
response to the increasingly shrill torrent of establishment smears,
breaking the spell of mainstream media trust for all who view it.

Currie Dobson@Ventuckyspaz

More than two thirds of Americans don’t believe Epstein died by suicide

Only 29% of Americans believe Epstein died by “suicide” showing that the establishment’s narrative control isn’t working anymore http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/august_2019/americans_say_murder_more_likely_than_suicide_in_epstein_case 

Americans Say Murder More Likely Than Suicide in Epstein Case

Americans aren’t buying that disgraced financier and convicted sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein killed himself in jail last weekend.

rasmussenreports.com


424

11:30 PM – Aug 16, 2019

All
these damning insider criticisms of the mainstream American press are
coming out at the same time 
a
new Rasmussen poll
 finds
that less than one third of the US population believes the story
they’re being told by the corporate media about the highly
suspicious death of accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
Despite 
the
mass media’s mad push
 to
tar anyone questioning the official narrative about Epstein as a
loony “conspiracy theorist”, only 29 percent of those surveyed
reported that they believed Epstein had committed suicide as they’ve
been told, while 42 percent believe he was murdered. Never in my life
have I seen such a widespread and instantaneous rejection of an
establishment-promulgated narrative in the United States.

This
is hugely significant. The entire imperial oppression machine is held
together with aggressive plutocratic propaganda; the ability of the
ruling class to manipulate the way people think, act and vote is the
only thing stopping the public from using the power of their numbers
to force real changes and create a new system that is not built upon
endless war, ecocide and exploitation. The mass media propaganda
engine is now at its weakest and most vulnerable point ever, and the
narrative managers’ attempts to regain control are only exposing
them more severely.

Power
is the ability to control what happens. Absolute power is the ability
to control what people 
thinkabout
what happens. Our rulers are rapidly losing this absolute power.

People
are waking up.

The
best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the
stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my 
website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My
work is 
entirely
reader-supported
,
so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around,
liking me on 
Facebook,
following my antics on
 Twitter, throwing
some money into my hat on 
Patreon or Paypalpurchasing
some of my 
sweet
merchandise
, buying
my new book 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
,
or my previous book 
Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do
with this platform, 
click
here
.
Everyone, racist platforms excluded, 
has
my permission
 to
republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I’ve
written) in any way they like free of charge.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Liked
it? Take a second to support Caitlin Johnstone on Patreon


Become a Patron

=================================

* Zo liet gevierd ‘journalist’ Max van Weezel op Radio1 al eens weten, dat hij zich goed voor kan stellen bepaalde berichten niet te brengen……..

9/11: de VS heeft niets geleerd……

Jon
Jeter schreef op MintPress News een opiniestuk, waarin hij niet
alleen de ‘aanslagen’ op de Twin Towers in 2001 aanhaalt, maar zich
vooral richt op de andere 9/11, die van 1973 in Chili…. Chili waar de CIA
met hulp van massamoordenaar, oorlogsmisdadiger en Nobelprijswinnaar
voor de Vrede* (ha! ha! ha!) Henry Kissinger, de fascist, moordenaar,
verkrachter en martelbeul Pinochet middels een bloedige staatsgreep
aan het bewind hielpen…….. De democratisch gekozen** president Salvador Allende werd vermoord en daarmee begon
de grote ellende voor de Chilenen……

30.000
mensen werden gevangen gehouden en gemarteld, naar schatting 5.000
mensen werden vermoord door het fascistische Pinochet regime…..

Lees
in het volgende artikel hoe Pinochet de economie vakkundig naar de
kloten hielp, zodat in 1982 de buitenlandse schuld van Chili was
opgelopen tot 16 miljard dollar, in hedendaags waarde gaat het om een
bedrag 42 miljard (‘billion’) dollar….. Tegen 1989 was het
gemiddelde loon sinds 1973 met 40% gedaald……. In diezelfde tijd
verdubbelde de armoede tot 40% van de bevolking….. Het aantal
mensen met slechte huisvesting was tegen die tijd ook 40% van de
bevolking, een stijging met 13% sinds het laatste jaar dat
Allende regeerde…… Het aantal calorieën dat arme mensen dagelijks
gebruikten liep vanaf 1973 terug van 2.019 naar 1.629 in 1989…….

‘Gelukkig’
beeft Nederland nadat Joop de Uyl weg was, goede zaken gedaan in
Chili; ‘waar een klein land al niet groot in kan zijn………’ 

Inderdaad de VS heeft niets geleerd van de nasleep die 9/11 liet zien, integendeel deze grootste terreurentiteit op aarde is ‘voortvarend’ doorgegaan met het op grote schaal uitoefenen van terreur in landen waar het niets te zoeken heeft, e.e.a. heeft intussen aan fiks mer dan 2 miljoen mensen het leven gekost……. (al moet nog wel opgemerkt worden dat de aanslagen van 9/11 door de VS zelf zijn geregisseerd >> zie o.a. de links onderaan dit bericht….) 

A
Tale of Two 9/11s and the Lessons America Chooses Never to Learn

After
9/11, Bush famously asked “Why do they hate us?” The answers
might have been found on another 9/11, 28 years before, when the U.S.
in Chile took a decisive step down the road to empire.

by Jon
Jeter

Sept. 11

NEW
YORK —
 Of apartheid South Africa’s myriad atrocities,
one of the most medieval was a system in which white settlers plied
their farmworkers with alcohol in lieu of wages. Known by the
Afrikaans word for tot, or drink, the 
dop not only
kept workers docile — and wages low — but, in fostering
widespread and chronic dependency, the practice bordered on
enslavement, manacling workers to their addictions and hence their
oppression.

A
progressive white South African lawyer told me that shortly after
voters of all races went to the polls to repeal apartheid in 1994, he
managed to purchase a Cape Town vineyard as part of his lifelong
ambition to create award-winning wines. His first order of business
was to professionalize the operations; so, soon after he closed the
deal to buy the vineyard, he gathered up all 15 farmworkers and
announced that he would end the dop and pay their
wages, in full.

Seven
walked off in disgust, he said.

This
story is the perfect metaphor for America in the aftermath of the
terrorist attack that occurred 17 years ago today. An entire nation
stared into the abyss on 9-11 and, like a sloppy drunk waking up in a
pool of his own vomit, saw its image reflected in the wreckage as
though for the first time. But rather than facing our demons, owning
our failures, and acknowledging the outsized role we’ve played in
the suffering of others, we simply sidled up to the bar for another
drink. Like the inebriates who walked off a South African farm, ours
is an Empire in denial and poor health, doubling down on our most
self-destructive impulses, stumbling towards an inevitable, ugly end.

In
an interview months after 9-11, Osama bin Laden warned:

The
U.S. government will lead the American people — and the West in
general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life.”

 A
9/11 less remembered

Ironically,
if we could pinpoint the date that United States took its first drink
it would almost certainly be September 11, 1973, as General Augusto
Pinochet’s troops stormed Chile’s presidential palace. Organized
by Henry Kissinger and the CIA, the coup targeted Chile’s popular
socialist President Salvador Allende, who the Nixon administration
feared was another Fidel Castro in-the-making. As the attack
unfolded, workers in the basement of a Santiago publishing house shop
were hard at work printing what was to be the military junta’s
500-page economic plan.

Believing
himself to be a messianic figure, Pinochet put his faith in a coterie
of young Chilean advisers who had trained under Milton Friedman at
the University of Chicago’s School of Economics, the academic
vanguard of neo-classical economics. With his bloody crackdown on
dissidents, artists, college students and union leaders, Pinochet’s
repressive regime censored the press, banned labor unions and
political opposition parties, murdered an estimated 5,000 leftists,
tortured another 30,000 and handed the “Chicago Boys” – as they
came to be known – a blank check to remake Allende’s nationalized
economy, and return the country at South America’s southwestern
edge into the Empire’s orbit.

Nearly
15 years before economists coined the phrase “Washington
consensus,” and a decade before Reagan’s trickle-down policies
began dismantling the New Deal in the U.S., Chile was the guinea pig
for anti-Keynesian macroeconomic policies designed to fatten
corporations’ share of global wealth. Pinochet slashed duties on
imports, from an average tariff rate of 94 percent in 1973 to 10
percent by 1979. He privatized all but two dozen of Chile’s 300
state-owned banks, as well as utilities and entitlements such as
social security. By 1979, he had cut public spending almost in half
and public investment by nearly 14 percent. He lowered taxes,
restricted union activities and returned more than a third of the
land seized under Allende’s land-reform program.

      Chile Coup Anniversary 

A
woman with a tattoo of Chile’s late Salvador Allende places a
candle in front of Allende’s statue in Santiago, Chile, Sept. 11,
2018. Esteban Felix | AP

Monetary
policy was liberalized on two important fronts. First, Pinochet
allowed “hot money” — speculation on the currency market — to
flow in and out of the country without obstacle. And in 1979 he fixed
the exchange rate for Chile’s peso, requiring the central bank to
keep $1 in reserve for every 39 pesos printed. This kept the bank
from merely printing money to pay bills and curbed an inflation rate
that had soared to nearly 400 percent annually under Allende.

Pinochet’s
reforms worked like a fast-acting virus. A recession in 1975 caused
Chile’s economy to shrink by 13 percent, its greatest decline since
the Great Depression. The recovery that followed was fueled largely
by foreign cash, which poured into the country as investors gobbled
up utilities and stashed money in Chile’s currency markets. The
prices of imports fell sharply; between 1975 and 1982 the number of
foreign cars sold in Chile tripled. Domestic manufacturing shriveled
by 30 percent. Domestic savings plummeted. Wages fell, and the income
gap between rich and poor widened by a factor of 50.

By
1982, Chile had accumulated $16 billion in foreign debt — nearly
$42 billion in today’s dollars — and foreign investment
represented a quarter of the country’s gross domestic product. The
money flowing into the country flowed out just as easily, to pay
debts and bills for imported goods and through capital flight as
investors soured on Chile’s currency market. The economy had
overheated and was now in a meltdown.

With
a third of the workforce unemployed and unrest growing, by 1984
Pinochet began to “reform the reforms,” the Chilean economist
Ricardo Ffrench-Davis said in a 2003 interview.

Pinochet
allowed the peso to float and reinstated restrictions on the movement
of capital in and out of the country. He introduced banking
legislation, and ratcheted up spending on research and development
efforts through quasi-governmental institutions and other
collaborations between the public and private sectors — creating,
as one example, the billion-dollar salmon farming industry out of
whole cloth.

Still,
Chile’s economic woes persisted. By 1989, real wages had declined
by 40 percent from 1973, and the percentage of the population living
in poverty had doubled to 40 percent. The number of Chileans without
adequate housing had also climbed to 40 percent, up 13 percentage
points from Allende’s final year in office. The country’s poor
consumed 1,629 calories per-day-on average, compared to 2,019 in
1973.

Ill-fed,
and ill-housed, Chileans began to refer to the cadre of advisers not
as the Chicago Boys but as Si, Cago; Voy — which
translates to “Yes, I shit; I go.”

A
plebiscite in 1989 ended Pinochet’s rule and Chileans gradually
began to reorganize their economy. Since 1990, it has consistently
been Latin America’s strongest performer. But in its violent,
fascist crackdown on the left and its fealty to Wall Street bankers,
Chile under Pinochet presaged the entirety of the United States’
global class war against workers — in Argentina and Zambia; Flint
and Venezuela; Philadelphia to Greece; Haiti, Iraq, Ukraine,
Honduras; Russia in its post-Cold war transitional period, and South
Africa after the collapse of apartheid.

The
two 9/11s 28 years apart bracket the United States’ descent into
madness. Much like the vintner’s abolition of the dop,
the downing of the Twin Towers should’ve triggered some
soul-searching in the United States, and an examination of our
accumulation of stuff through the dispossession of
other human beings. As we mourn the losses on that Indian-summer day
in 2001, what we need to contemplate is redemption, not revenge —
and how we might begin to rejoin a human community that we’ve
wronged, again and again and again.

God
Bless America. . . . and everyone else too.

Top
Photo | Chrissy Bortz of Latrobe, Pa., pays her respects at the Wall
of Names at the Flight 93 National Memorial in Shanksville, Pa. after
a Service of Remembrance, Sept. 11, 2018, as the nation marks the
17th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. Gene J. Puskar | AP

Jon
Jeter
 is
a published book author and two-time Pulitzer Prize finalist with
more than 20 years of journalistic experience. He is a former
Washington Post bureau chief and award-winning foreign correspondent
on two continents, as well as a former radio and television producer
for Chicago Public Media’s “This American Life.”

Republish
our stories! 
MintPress
News is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 International License.

==============================

*   Kissinger kreeg die prijs godbetert in 1973, het jaar van de coup in Chili….


** In feite werd Allende vermoord door de VS, het land dat altijd de bek vol heeft met democratie brengen……..

Zie
ook:

9/11 forum geblokkeerd, de waarheid mag niet gezegd worden……..

9/11: de leugens over smeltend staal van de Twin Towers

9/11 getuigen totaal genegeerd door media (en overheid)

9/11 Israël nogmaals aangewezen als hulp- bij het neerhalen van de Twin Towers en gebouw 7 van het WTC

9/11: Al Qaida tjokvol agenten van Saoedi-Arabië, VS, Israël en Egypte

9/11 voorafgegaan door CIA visa fraude…..

9/11: Palestijnen hebben niet gejuicht voor de aanslagen op de Twin Towers

9/11 eerst de explosie waarna de ‘vliegtuigen’ de Twin Towers raken

9/11: professor stelt dat WTC-gebouwen gecontroleerd zijn gesloopt, de bewijzen daarvoor zijn overweldigend

Pearl Harbor (7 december 1941) en de aanslagen van 9/11 hebben veel overeenkomsten………

9/11 de verklaring van de VS overheid aangaande het instorten van WTC gebouw 7 is vals……….

911 samenzweringstheorie wint nog meer aan geloofwaardigheid……

911, de beurs en geschiedvervalsing…….

9/11, WikiLeaks, Prism en ‘complottheorieën’

911, een ‘leuk’ feit

Wat betreft de agressie van de VS en de staatsgreep in Chili, zie:

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

Chileense fascisten vragen rk kerk om vergeving voor vreselijke misdaden begaan onder Pinochet bewind……

De VS, een duivels imperium, dat achter haar psychopathisch moordende troepen staat??

De war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan over het algemeen gedacht

Chili 11 september 1973

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………