Geheime diensten van de VS en Groot-Brittannië hebben de
presidentsverkiezingen in 2016 zonder succes gemanipuleerd….. Larry
C. Johnson, de schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen artikel stelt
dat er overtuigend bewijs is dat de Obama administratie de coördinatie deed voor de afschildering van Trump als een stroman van de Russen….. Die administratie werkte daarvoor samen met andere westerse regeringen en geheime diensten uit binnen- en buitenland
(met medeweten van de belangrijkste van die regeringen in het buitenland, t.w. die van GB….)……..
Het
rapport van Mueller n.a.v. het onderzoek naar een verbintenis van
Trump en de Russen, heeft duidelijk gemaakt dat deze beschuldiging is
gefabriceerd door geheime diensten, politiediensten (zoals de FBI),
de Obama administratie en als voornaamste buitenlandse regering zoals gezegd die van GB, dit nog plus organisaties die
gelieerd waren aan het Clinton campagne team en dat team zelf…..
Johnson
noemt in zijn artikel 8 punten waarop het Mueller onderzoek was
gericht en ontleedt deze punten stuk voor stuk, waarna de conclusie
van Johnson, zoals hiervoor deels verwoord, een terechte beschuldiging
is aan het adres van geheime diensten (waaronder de CIA), de Britse regering, de FBI, de Obama
administratie en het campagne team van Clinton, plus de organisaties
die gelieerd waren aan dat campagneteam.
Lees
het volgende artikel en geeft het door, immers de reguliere westerse
(massa-) media doen net of de neus bloedt, hetzelfde geldt voor het
grootste deel van de westerse politici…… Ondanks dat men weet
meer dan 2 jaar lang leugens en nepnieuws (fake news) te hebben
gebracht, blijft men doen alsof het Russiagate sprookje nog steeds
overeind staat, laat staan dat men daar rectificaties voor plaatst en
wat betreft de politici het maken van excuses naar de bevolking….
Het
kan nog sterker mensen, alle maatregelen gebaseerd op de Russiagate
leugens, zoals censuur door accounts van mensen te blokkeren of zelfs
op te heffen, blijven gehandhaafd en men is al druk bezig om de
volgende ronde van ‘Russische inmenging’, de EU verkiezingen, te
beveiligen tegen Russische bemoeienis…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Intussen stuurt de VS de EU meer en meer en het is zeker dat de VS al bezig is met de manipulatie van de EU verkiezingen later deze maand…..*
In
Nederland hebben we hare D66 leeghoofdigheid Ollongren, die als
minister maatregelen heeft genomen tegen Russische bemoeienis met de
Provinciale verkiezingen en de EU verkiezingen….. ha! ha! ha! ha!
ha!
Alle
maatregelen die men neemt tegen bemoeienissen met verkiezingen door
Rusland, zouden met een naamsverandering alsnog kunnen worden
gebruikt, althans als men de naam Rusland wil inwisselen voor de
Verenigde Staten, immers voor het feit dat de VS zich bemoeit met
verkiezingen elders zijn hele bergen bewijs, niet alleen dat: als de
VS niet blij is met een verkiezingsuitslag elders, is de kans groot
dat dezelfde VS dat land zal destabiliseren, een opstand organiseert
en als dat niet leidt tot de afzetting van de gekozen regering, heeft
de VS nog altijd militair ingrijpen tot haar beschikking, ook
daarvoor bewijzen te over….
De
VS bespioneert en hackt zelfs de regenringen van haar bevriende
landen, ook dat is bewezen……
Het hieronder opgenomen artikel komt van Consortium News, de schrijver, Larry Johnson is een ex-CIA analist en voormalig anti-terreur specialist verbonden aan het VS ministerie van buitenlandse zaken (mijn excuus voor de lay-out van het overgenomen artikel, krijg het niet op orde)
BRITAIN, CAMPAIGN
2016, COMMENTARY, INTELLIGENCE, INTERNATIONAL, RUSSIA
How
US and Foreign Intel Agencies Interfered in a US Election
May
7, 2019
The
evidence is plain—there was a broad, coordinated effort by the
Obama Administration, with the help of foreign governments, to target
Donald Trump and paint him as a Russian stooge, writes Larry Johnson
The
preponderance of evidence makes this very simple–there was a broad,
coordinated effort by the Obama Administration, with the help of
foreign governments, to target Donald Trump and paint him as a stooge
of Russia.
The
Mueller Report provides irrefutable evidence that the so-called
Russian collusion case against Donald Trump was a deliberate
fabrication by intelligence and law enforcement organizations in the
United States and the United Kingdom and organizations aligned with
the Clinton Campaign.
The
New York Times reported
that a man with a long history of working with the CIA, and a female
FBI informant, traveled to London in September of 2016 and tried
unsuccessfully to entrap George Papadopolous. The biggest curiosity
is that U.S. intelligence or law enforcement officials fully briefed
British intelligence on what they were up to. Quite understandable
given what we now know about British spying on the Trump Campaign.
The
Mueller investigation of Trump “collusion” with Russia prior to
the 2016 Presidential election focused on eight cases:
-
Proposed
Trump Tower Project in Moscow -
George
Papadopolous -
Carter
Page -
Dimitri
Simes -
Veselnetskya
Meeting at Trump Tower (June 16, 2016) -
Events
at Republican Convention -
Post-Convention
Contacts with Russian Ambassador Kislyak -
Paul
Manafort
One
simple fact emerges–of the eight cases or incidents of alleged
Trump Campaign interaction with the Russians investigated by the
Mueller team, the proposals to interact with the Russian Government
or with Putin originated with FBI informants, MI-6 assets or people
paid by Fusion GPS, and not Trump or his people.
There
is not a single instance where Donald Trump or any member of his
campaign team initiated contact with the Russians for the purpose of
gaining derogatory information on Hillary or obtaining support to
boost the Trump campaign. Not one.
Simply
put, Trump and his campaign were the target of an elaborate, wide
ranging covert action designed to entrap him and members of his team
as an agent of Russia.
Let’s
look in detail at each of the cases.
THE
PROPOSED TRUMP TOWER PROJECT IN MOSCOW, according
to Mueller’s report, originated with an FBI Informant–Felix
Sater. Here’s what the Mueller Report states:
“In
the late summer of 2015, the Trump Organization received a new
inquiry about pursuing a Trump Tower project in Moscow. In
approximately September 2015, Felix Sater . . . contacted Cohen
(i.e., Michael Cohen) on behalf of I.C. Expert Investment Company
(I.C. Expert), a Russian real-estate development corporation
controlled by Andrei Vladimirovich Rozov. Sater
had known Rozov since approximately 2007 and, in 2014, had served as
an agent on behalf of Rozov during Rozov’s purchase of a building
in New York City. Sater later contacted Rozov and proposed that
I.C. Expert pursue a Trump Tower Moscow project in which I.C. Expert
would license the name and brand from the Trump Organization but
construct the building on its own. Sater worked on the deal with
Rozov and another employee of I.C. Expert.” (see page 69 of the
Mueller Report).
Sater, FBI Informant
Mueller, as
noted previously, is
downright dishonest in failing to identify Sater as an FBI informant.
Sater was not just a private entrepreneur looking to make some coin.
He was a fully signed up FBI informant. Sater’s status as an FBI
snitch was first exposed in 2012. Sater also was a boyhood chum of
Michael Cohen, the target being baited in this operation. Another
inconvenient fact excluded from the Mueller report is that one of
Mueller’s Chief Prosecutors, Andrew
Weissman, signed the deal with Felix Sater in December 1998 that put
Sater into the FBI Informant business.
All
suggestions for meeting with the Russian Government, including Putin,
originated with Felix Sater. The use of Sater on this particular
project started in September 2015.
[For
more on Sater please see my previous posts, Felix
Sater–The Rosetta Stone for the FBI/CIA Conspiracy Against
Trump?, Felix
Sater and the Steele Dossier.]
GEORGE
PAPADOPOLOUS
Papadopolous
was targeted by British and U.S. intelligence starting in late
December 2015, when he is offered out of the blue a job with
the London
Centre of International Law and Practice Limited (LCILP)?.
The LCILP has all of the hallmarks of an intelligence front company.
LCILP began as an offshoot from another company?—?EN Education
Group Limited?—?which describes itself as “a global education
consultancy, facilitating links between students, education providers
and organisations with an interest in education worldwide”.
Papadopolous
EN
Education and LCILP are owned and run by Nagi Khalid Idris, a
48-year-old British citizen of Sudanese origin. For no apparent
reason Idris offers Papadopolous a job as the Director of the
LCILP’s International Energy and Natural Resources Division. Then
in March of 2016, Idris and Arvinder Sambei (who acted as an attorney
for the FBI on a 9-11 extradition case in the UK), insist on
introducing Joseph Mifsud to Papadopolous.
It
is Joseph Mifsud who introduces the idea of meeting Putin following a
lunch in London (from Papadopolous’s book “Deep State Target: How
I Got Caught in the Crosshairs of the Plot to Bring Down President
Trump”):
“The
lunch is booked for March 24 at the Grange Holborn Hotel,. . . .
“When I get there, Mifsud is waiting for me in the lobby with an
attractive, fashionably dressed young woman with dirty blonde hair at
his side. He introduces her as Olga Vinogradova.” (p. 76)
“Mifsud
sells her hard. “Olga is going to be your inside woman to Moscow.
She knows everyone.” He tells me she was a former official at the
Russian Ministry of Trade. Then he waxes on about introducing me to
the Russian ambassador in London.” (p. 77)
“On
April 12, “Olga” writes: “I have already alerted my personal
links to our conversation and your request. The embassy in London is
very much aware of this. As mentioned, we are all very excited by the
possibility of a good relationship with Mr. Trump. The Russian
Federation would love to welcome him once his candidature would be
officially announced.”
And
it is Mifsud who raises the possibility of getting dirt on Hillary:
“Then
Mifsud returns from the Valdai conference. On April 26 we meet for
breakfast at the Andaz Hotel, near Liverpool Street Station, one of
the busiest train stations in London. He’s in an excellent mood and
claims he met with high-level Russian government officials. But once
again, he’s very short on specifics. This is becoming a real
pattern with Mifsud. He hasn’t offered any names besides Timofeev.
Then, he leans across the table in a conspiratorial manner. The
Russians have “dirt” on Hillary Clinton, he tells me. “Emails
of Clinton,” he says. “They have thousands of emails.”
Here
again we encounter the lying and obfuscation of the Mueller team.
They falsely characterize Mifsud as an agent of Russia. In fact, he
has close and longstanding ties to both British and U.S.
intelligence (Disobedient
Media lays
out the Mifsud mystery in detail).
Mifsud: Ties to UK intelligence. (Flickr)
Mifsud
was not alone. The FBI and the CIA also were in the game of trying to
entrap Papadopolous. In September of 2016, Papadopolous was being
wined and dined by Halper (who has longstandingties to
the U.S. intelligence community) and Azra Turk, an FBI
Informant/researcher (see New
York Times).
The
FBI disingenuously claims they ran Azra Turk at Papadopolous because
they were alarmed ostensibly by Russia’s attempts to disrupt the
2016 election. But Papadopolous was not seeking out Russian contacts.
He was being baited. It was Mifsud and others tied to British and
U.S. intelligence who were bringing up the “opportunity” to work
with the Russians.
CARTER
PAGE
The
section of the Mueller report that deals with Carter Page is a total
travesty. Mueller and his team, for example, initially misrepresent
Page’s status with the Trump campaign—he is described as
“working” for the campaign, which implies a paid position, when
he was in fact only a volunteer foreign policy advisor. Mueller also
paints Page’s prior experience and work in Russia as evidence that
Page was being used by Russian intelligence, but says nothing about
the fact that Page was being regularly debriefed by the CIA and the
FBI during the same period. In other words, Page was cooperating with
U.S. intelligence and law enforcement. But this fact is omitted in
the Mueller report.
Mueller
eventually accurately describes Page’s role in the Trump campaign
as follows:
“In
January 2016, Page began volunteering on an informal,
unpaid basis for
the Trump Campaign after Ed Cox, a state Republican Party official,
introduced Page to Trump Campaign officials. Page told the Office
that his goal in working on the Campaign was to help candidate Trump
improve relations with Russia. To that end, Page emailed Campaign
officials offering his thoughts on U.S.-Russia relations, prepared
talking points and briefing memos on Russia, and proposed that
candidate Trump meet with President Vladimir Putin in Moscow.
Page: Cooperated with US intel.
“In
communications with Campaign officials, Page also repeatedly touted
his high-level contacts in Russia and his ability to forge
connections between candidate Trump and senior Russian governmental
officials. For example, on January 30, 2016, Page sent an email to
senior Campaign officials stating that he had “spent the past week
in Europe and had been in discussions with some individuals with
close ties to the Kremlin” who recognized that Trump could have a
“game-changing effect . .. in bringing the end of the new Cold War.
The email stated that ” [t]hrough [his] discussions with these high
level contacts,” Page believed that “a direct meeting in Moscow
between Mr. Trump and Putin could be arranged.”
The
Mueller presentation portrays Carter Page in a nefarious, negative
light. His contacts with Russia are characterized as inappropriate
and unjustified. Longstanding business experience in a particular
country is not proof of wrong doing. No consideration is given at all
to Page’s legitimate concerns raising about the dismal state of
U.S./Russia relations following the U.S. backed coup in the Ukraine
and the subsequent annexation of Crimea by Russia.
Page’s
association with the Trump campaign was quite brief—he lasted seven
months, being removed as a foreign policy advisor on Sept. 24. Page
was not identified publicly as a Trump foreign policy advisor until
March of 2016, but the evidence presented in the Mueller report
clearly indicates that Page was already a target of intelligence
agencies, in the U.S. and abroad, long before the FISA warrant of
Oct. 2016.
While
serving on the foreign policy team Page continued his business and
social contacts in Russia, but was never tasked by the Trump team to
pursue or promote contacts with Putin and his team. In fact, Page’s
proposals, suggestions and recommendations were either ignored or
directly rebuffed.
The
timeline reported in the Mueller report regarding Page’s trip to
Russia in early July raises questions about the intel collected on
that trip and the so-called “intel” revealed in the Steele
Dossier with respect to Page. Carter admits to meeting with
individuals, such as Dmitry Peskov and Igor Sechin, who appear in the
Steele Dossier. Page’s meetings in Moscow turned out to be
innocuous and uneventful. Nothing he did resembled clandestine
activity. Yet, the Steele report on that visit suggested just the
opposite and used the tactic of guilt by association to imply that
Page was up to something dirty.
The
bottomline for Mueller is that Page did not do anything wrong and no
one in the Trump Campaign embraced his proposals for closer ties with
Russia.
DMITRI
SIMES
The
targeting and investigation of Dmitri Simes is disgusting and an
abuse of law enforcement authority. Full disclosure. I know Dmitri.
For awhile, in the 2002-2003 time period, I was a regular participant
at Nixon Center events. For example, I was at a round table in
December 2002 on the imminent invasion of Iraq. Colonel Pat Lang sat
on one side of me and Ambassador Joe Wilson on the other. Directly
across the table was Charles Krauthammer. Dmitri ran an honest
seminar.
Dmitri Simes
The
entire section on Dmitri Simes, under other circumstances, could be
viewed as something bizarre and amusing. But the mere idea that Simes
was somehow an agent of Putin and a vehicle for helping Trump work
with the Russians to steal the 2016 election is crazy and idiotic.
Those in the FBI who were so stupid as to buy into this nonsense
should have their badges and guns taken away. They are too dumb to
work in law enforcement.
Dmitri’s
only sin was to speak calmly, intelligently and rationally about
foreign policy dealings with Russia. We now know that in this new
hysteria of the 21st Century Russian scare that qualities such as
reason and rationality are proof of one’s willingness to act as a
puppet of Vladimir Putin.
TRUMP
TOWER MEETING (JUNE 9, 2016)
This
is the clearest example of a plant designed to entrap the Trump team.
Mueller, once again, presents a very disingenuous account:
“On
June 9, 2016, senior representatives of the Trump Campaign met in
Trump Tower with a Russian attorney expecting to receive derogatory
information about Hillary Clinton from the Russian government. The
meeting was proposed to Donald Trump Jr. in an email from Robert
Goldstone, at the request of his then-client Emin Agalarov, the son
of Russian real-estate developer Aras Agalarov. Goldstone relayed to
Trump Jr. that the “Crown prosecutor of Russia … offered to
provide the Trump Campaign with some official documents and
information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with
Russia” as “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr.
Trump.” Trump Jr. immediately responded that “if it’s what you
say I love it,” and arranged the meeting through a series of emails
and telephone calls.” …
The
Russian attorney who spoke at the meeting, Natalia Veselnitskaya, had
previously worked for the Russian government and maintained a
relationship with that government throughout this period oftime. She
claimed that funds derived from illegal activities in Russia were
provided to Hillary Clinton and other Democrats. Trump Jr. requested
evidence to support those claims, but Veselnitskaya did not provide
such information.”
Natalia Veselnitskaya (Wikimedia)
Ignore
for a moment that no information on Hillary was passed or provided
(and doing such a thing is not illegal). The real problem is with
what Mueller does not say and did not investigate. Mueller
conveniently declines to mention the fact that Veselnitskaya was
working closely with the firm Hillary Clinton hired to produce the
Steele Dossier. NBC News reported on Veselnitskaya:
“The
information that a Russian lawyer brought with her when she met
Donald Trump Jr. in June 2016 stemmed from research conducted by
Fusion GPS, the same firm that compiled the infamous Trump dossier,
according to the lawyer and a source familiar with the matter.
In
an interview with NBC News, Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya
says she
first received the supposedly incriminating information she brought
to Trump Tower — describing alleged tax evasion and donations to
Democrats — from Glenn Simpson,
the Fusion GPS owner, who had been hired to conduct research in a New
York federal court case.”
Even
a mediocre investigator would recognize the problem of the
relationship between the lawyer claiming to have dirty, damning info
on Hillary with the firm Hillary hired to dig up dirt on Donald
Trump. This was another botched set up and the Trump folks did not
take the bait.
EVENTS
AT THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION
This
portion of the Mueller report is a complete farce. Foreign
ambassdors, including the Russian (and the Chinese) attend Republican
and Democrat Conventions. Presidential candidates and their advisors
speak to those ambassadors. So, where is the beef? Answer. There
isn’t any. That this “event” was considered something worthy of
a counter intelligence investigation is just one more piece of
evidence that law enforcement and intelligence were weaponized
against the Trump campaign.
POST-CONVENTION
CONTACTS WITH RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR KISLYAK
Ditto.
As noted in the previous paragraph, trying to criminalize normal
diplomatic contacts, especially with a country where we share
important, vital national security interests, is but further evidence
of the crazy anti-Russian hysteria that has infected the
anti-Trumpers. Pathetic.
MANAFORT
If
Paul Manafort had rebuffed Trump’s offer to run his campaign, he
would be walking free today and still buying expensive suits and
evading taxes along with his Clinton buddy, Greg Craig. Instead, he
became another target for DOJ, the intel community and the DNC, which
were desperate to portray Trump as a tool of the Kremlin. Thanks to
John Solomon of The
Hill,
we now know the impetus to target Manafort
came from the DNC:
Manafort at 2016 RNC Convention. (Wikimedia Commons)
The
boomerang from the Democratic Party’s failed attempt to
connect Donald
Trump to
Russia’s 2016 election meddling is picking up speed, and its flight
path crosses right through Moscow’s pesky neighbor, Ukraine. That
is where there is growing evidence a foreign power was asked, and in
some cases tried, to help Hillary
Clinton.
In
its most detailed account yet, Ukraine’s embassy in Washington says
a Democratic National Committee insider during the 2016
election solicited dirt on Donald Trump’s campaign chairman and
even tried to enlist the country’s president to help.
In
written answers to questions, Ambassador Valeriy Chaly’s office
says DNC contractor Alexandra Chalupa sought information from the
Ukrainian government on Paul
Manafort’s dealings
inside the country, in hopes of forcing the issue before Congress.
Manafort
was not colluding, but the Clinton campaign and the Obama
Administration most certainly were.
Take
these eight events as a whole a very clear picture emerges—U.S. and
foreign intelligence (especially the UK) and U.S. law enforcement
collaborated in a broad effort to bait the Trump team with ostensible
Russian entreaties in order to paint Trump as a tool of the Kremlin.
That effort is now being exposed and those culpable will hopefully
face justice. This should sicken and alarm every American regardless
of political party. Will justice be served?
Larry
C. Johnson is a former CIA analyst and counterterrorism official at
the State Department. This article first
appeared on Sic
Semper Tyrannis.
Tags: .
Mueller Report Donald
Trump George
Papadopoulos Joseph
Mifsud Larry
Johnson Paul
Manafort Robert
Mueller
===============================
* Zie o.a.: ‘5G netwerk: VS en NAVO lezen EU de les in Praag” en: ‘EU resolutie door de VS opgesteld is aangenomen: Rusland en China zijn vijanden‘
Zie ook:
‘Robert Mueller lijdt aan dementie en maakt van Russiagate een nog belachelijker verhaal‘
‘Belangrijk account voor de verdediging Julian Assange geblokkeerd door Twitter‘
‘Julian Assange: Speciaal VN rapporteur martelen heeft grote twijfels bij onafhankelijkheid rechter‘
‘Het westen vervolgt journalist Assange, Rusland laat journalist vrij na onrust over diens gevangenschap‘ (en nog hadden de reguliere media een grote bek over Rusland, media die niet anders hebben gedaan dan collega Assange besmeuren…..)
‘VN rapport: Assange is gedemoniseerd en psychisch gemarteld‘
‘Media wakker geschrokken en ontwaken in Assange nachtmerrie‘ (zie ook de andere links in dat bericht over de arrestatie van Assange)
‘Putin vraagt en Trump levert: een lijst met ‘alle goede zaken die Trump voor Rusland regelde’‘
‘Russiagate: nog overtuigd van bestaan daarvan? Lees dit!‘
‘Jan Kuitenbrouwer (‘journalist’): Assange is een charlatan en WikiLeaks heeft beelden van de moord op 2 journalisten gemanipuleerd‘ (zie ook de andere links naar berichten met Assange in dat bericht)
‘Bill Binney and Larry Johnson Shred Robert Mueller’s Russian Hack Fable‘
‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia‘
‘De verregaande anti-Russische propaganda in de VS en de rest van het westen‘ (in dat bericht staan meer links naar de Russiagate leugen, dan in dit bericht vermeld)
‘WhatsApp beperking in strijd tegen fake news‘
‘World Economic Forum: de plek waar men elkaar feliciteert met de censuur op de sociale media‘
‘Massamedia VS vallen keihard door de mand met ‘vers’ geschoten Russiagate bok >> publiek wordt om vertrouwen gevraagd‘
‘Lichtgelovige ‘atheïst’ gelooft Russiagate leugens….‘
‘NewsGuard, het nieuwste wapen van Big Brother VS tegen de alternatieve media‘
‘Bedrijf dat voor ‘Russische bots’ waarschuwde, heeft een leger met nep-Russische bots‘
‘VS begint ‘troll farm’, alsof Hollywood en de massamedia al niet genoeg VS propaganda maken……….‘
‘Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen‘
‘De VS heeft Syrië volgepropt met ‘jihadisten’ en wapens‘
‘Der Spiegel, groot bestrijder van ‘fake news’ bracht zelf jarenlang dit soort ‘nieuws’‘
‘Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen‘ (zie ook de links in dat bericht)
‘New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……‘
‘Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax‘ (Russiagate, de enorme leugen op basis waaraan we de huidige censuurgolf te danken hebben……)
‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..‘
‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’‘
