Democratische Conventie: niet één woord over Russiagate domweg omdat het een leugen is

Tijdens
de gehele Democratische Conventie van 17 t/m 20 augustus, viel
letterlijk niet één keer het woord ‘Russiagate’, terwijl de
Democraten het de laatste 4 jaar wel 1.000 keer werd uitgespuugd door
de hypocriete politici van die partij. Logisch dat men er nu maar mee
is gestopt, immers het is bewezen flauwekul en alleen door de partij
in stelling gebracht om Hillary Clinton uit de wind te houden, die op
een smerige manier de voorverkiezingen van de Democraten in 2016
heeft gewonnen, ofwel:
zij heeft destijds de voorverkiezingen gestolen ten koste van Bernie Sanders……

Een lid
van Clintons verkiezingsteam, Seth Rich was zo pissig over de
handelswijze van Clinton en de top van dat team, dat hij een enorme
stapel mails van Clinton doorspeelde naar Wikileaks…… Een paar weken later
werd Rich vermoord op straat gevonden, volgens de politie een
roofmoord, hoe vreemd dan dat er werkelijk niets was gestolen van
Rich, terwijl hij ook opzichtig dure sieraden droeg……. (bovendien waarom zou je iemand 2 maal in de rug schieten als je deze wilt ontdoen van diens kostbaarheden en geld??)

Nee,
i.p.v. een Russische agent, bleek Trump de figuur die een enorme
legermacht heeft samengetrokken langs delen van de Russische
westgrens, waarbij hij nu ook nog de beschikking heeft over een
raketschild ‘tegen Iran’ maar waarvan de raketten in een mum van tijd
kunnen worden voorzien van meerdere kernkoppen en dat op raketten die
tot 5.000 kilometer kunnen vliegen, waardoor steden als Moskou en
Sint-Petersburg vanaf de voordeur van Rusland kunnen worden geraakt met kernraketten…. 

Met dat schild heeft de Trump administratie het INF-verdrag
geschonden, iets waarvan de VS en haar oorlogshond NAVO Rusland volkomen ten onrechte
beschuldigden……. (Rusland zou nieuwe raketten hebben die volgens
de VS onder dat verdrag vallen, echter op meerdere uitnodigingen van
het Kremlin om te komen inspecteren ging de VS niet in, daar de
duivelse Trump administratie dondersgoed wist en weet dat Rusland de waarheid
sprak……)

Lees het
volgende artikel van Caitlin Johnstone die dieper op deze zaak
ingaat en onder andere de stelling van Max Blumenthal steunt dat Russiagate een manier was om Trump zo onder druk te zetten dat hij wapens leverde aan Oekraïne (ben het daar deels mee eens, zeker daar ook wordt gesteld dat Obama Oekraïne niet wilde bewapenen, terwijl zijn minister van BuZa Joe Biden dat land onder druk zette het strafrechtelijk onderzoek tegen zijn corrupte zoon te stoppen, daar men anders een levering van wapens uit de VS kon vergeten):   

Dem Convention Made No Mention Of Russiagate Or Impeachment, Because They Were Fake

Caitlin
Johnstone <donotreply@wordpress.com>

The
only interesting thing about either of the conventions held by
America’s two mainstream political parties this month was not
anything that was said by the interminable parade of vapid speakers,
but rather what those speakers did not say.

Despite
their dominating mainstream news cycles for years on end, at no time
during the four-day Democratic National Convention was the word
“impeachment” ever uttered, nor was any mention made of the
Mueller investigation into allegations of collusion between Trump and
the Russian government.

Politicoreports:

Eight
months after Democrats mounted a historic effort to remove Donald
Trump from office, not a single speaker uttered the word
“impeachment” during their four-day convention.

For
Democrats to completely omit impeachment from their convention was
once unthinkable. Democrats had mounted a case that Trump had abused
his power to blackmail Ukraine into investigating his political
adversaries, including Biden. And they made an existential argument
that without removing him from office, Trump’s behavior would get
worse and democracy itself would be at risk.

Special
counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of the Trump campaign’s
ties to Russia — which Democrats once thought could topple Trump
for obstruction of justice — also went unmentioned, even as it was
a defining feature of Trump’s nearly four years in office.

  

At
DNC, “the word ‘impeachment’ [was] entirely left out over the
course of the 4-night event. Mueller’s investigation of the Trump
campaign’s ties to Russia… also went unmentioned, even as it was
a defining feature of Trump’s nearly 4 years in office.”
https://t.co/Dgt9WQ3LeApic.twitter.com/q8EvEthwZq

Aaron
Maté (@aaronjmate)
August
28, 2020

“The
fact that Democrats couldn’t bring themselves to even
mention
Russiagate or Ukrainegate (the first-ever sequel to a flop?) at their
convention should maybe hasten some reflection for those who made
these issues the ‘defining feature of Trump’s nearly four years in
office,'”
quipped
incisive Russiagate skeptic Aaron Maté of the omission on Twitter.

“Next
on Unsolved Mysteries: Democrats and media allies accused Donald
Trump of being a Russian agent for four years,” Maté
added.
“They chanted ‘All Roads Lead to Putin’ and ‘The Walls Are
Closing In.’ But at their political convention, they forgot all about
it. Did Russia give them amnesia?”

“I
personally feel like if the President of the US seeking re-election
is beholden to and controlled by an adversarial foreign power, the
opposition party should find a few seconds to squeeze in a mention of
it if, you know, it wasn’t utter bullshit,”
tweetedThe
Intercept
‘s
Glenn Greenwald.

And,
of course, it was utter bullshit. And that is indeed why the
Democrats saw no need to mention it at their own four-day convention
despite dominating news cycles with it for years. Russiagate and
Ukrainegate were never the cataclysmic scandals that the Democrats
and their allied media factions portrayed them as. They weren’t even
actually about getting rid of Trump.


Glenn Greenwald



@ggreenwald

In an extremely strange and confounding development, the Democrats *never once* mentioned what this NYT columnist calls “the biggest lie in American politics” at their Convention.

In fairness, they only had 4 full nights so maybe they couldn’t squeeze in any mention of it. https://twitter.com/michelleinbklyn/status/1295743070672162821 

View image on Twitter

Michelle Goldberg



@michelleinbklyn

The biggest lie in American politics, which you hear from parts of the left as well as the right, is that Russiagate hasn’t been borne out by investigators https://twitter.com/jimsciutto/status/1295720689043939333 



689

Anyone
with an ear to the ground knew that Russiagate would fizzle, and
anyone capable of counting Senate seats knew impeachment would fail
to remove Trump. The drivers of these attention-monopolizing
narratives knew this also.

If
there’d been any solid evidence to find that the Kremlin was
blackmailing Trump, or that his campaign had conspired with the
Russian government to steal the 2016 election, the US intelligence
community would have found some of it and leaked it to
The
Washington Post

long before Trump took office. The Russiagate narrative has been
completely dismantled from the very beginning by journalists like
the
late Robert Parry
,
and then Maté after Parry’s death. There was never any real
evidence for it, and the people pushing Russiagate from the beginning
knew there was never any real evidence for it.

All
you really need to know about Russiagate was that it was started by
unsubstantiated claims by the US intelligence community, and in the
end it facilitated pre-existing plans by the US intelligence
community. Everything else in between those two points is just
empty
narrative fluff
.

In
2017
Parry
documented

how the original assessment that Russia meddled in the US election in
the first place was put forward without proof by just a couple dozen
officers from three intelligence agencies hand-picked by the
notoriously
Russophobic

then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. 
Maté
has documented

that this allegation remains just as
suspicious
and porous

as the day it was first made. Despite having sweeping investigative
powers Mueller indicted not one single American for conspiracy with
the Russian government. The recent evidence-free Senate Select
Committee on Intelligence report
did
nothing to change
 the
flimsy nature of the entire Russiagate narrative.

So
the whole thing has been plainly bogus from the beginning, with the
foundation laid by secretive and unaccountable intelligence agencies
who have
an
extensive history of lying

about exactly this sort of thing. And it just so happens to have
paved the way for operations against a longtime geostrategic foe that
were being unfolded well before Trump’s arrival in 

the White House.

This
is an excerpt from
an
article

by legendary Australian journalist John Pilger from March 2016:

In
the last eighteen months, the greatest build-up of military forces
since World War Two — led by the United States — is taking place
along Russia’s western frontier.  Not since Hitler invaded the
Soviet Union have foreign troops presented such a demonstrable threat
to Russia.

Ukraine
– once part of the Soviet Union –  has become a CIA theme park.
Having orchestrated a coup in Kiev, Washington effectively controls a
regime that is next door and hostile to Russia: a regime rotten with
Nazis, literally. Prominent parliamentary figures in Ukraine are the
political descendants of the notorious OUN and UPA fascists. They
openly praise Hitler and call for the persecution and expulsion of
the Russian speaking minority.

This
is seldom news in the West, or it is inverted to suppress the truth.

In
Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia — next door to Russia – the US
military is deploying combat troops, tanks, heavy weapons. This
extreme provocation of the world’s second nuclear power is met with
silence in the West.

This
was all happening during the Obama administration. But he was still
more doveish than the spooks and cold warriors who drive US foreign
policy would prefer, resisting for example loud calls from the
warmongers to
arm
Ukraine
 against
Moscow and
forcibly
install a no-fly zone

in Russia’s ally Syria.

The
heir apparent to Obama’s throne, Hillary Clinton, did not suffer from
such peacenik scruples. She’d already been
making
people on both sides of the aisle nervous

with her anti-Russia hawkishness, and supported both
arming
Ukraine

and
installing
a no-fly zone

in Syria.

So
these escalations were already underway, and more were being prepared
for.

Then
what happened? Somehow a political neophyte who’d been
talking
about making nice with Russia

got in instead.

We
suddenly found ourselves bombarded with narratives from the US
intelligence community and its mass media stenographers about Russian
election meddling and Trump playing some mysterious role in it. These
narratives were pushed with steadily increasing frequency and
shrillness, with the help of a humiliated Democratic Party that stood
everything to gain by participating, until those of us who expressed
any skepticism of them at all were being accused on a daily basis by
MSM-brainwashed dupes of running psyops for the Russian government.

We
were never at any time presented with any proof of these claims which
rose anywhere near the level required in a post-Iraq invasion world,
but we were hammered with them anyway, day in and day out, year after
year.

This
ended up putting a lot of political pressure on Trump to keep
existing sanctions and military tensions with Russia, and he
ended
up adding dozens more
 new
cold war escalations including further sanctions, shredded nuclear
treaties, NATO expansionism and more. He even
armed
Ukraine
 due
to these pressures, just like the anointed queen was scheduled to do.


Max Blumenthal



@MaxBlumenthal

For years, neocons and arms industry darlings like @RepAdamSchiff have sought to re-arm Ukraine and escalate the conflict in Donbas. By stirring up Russiagate, they finally got their deadly deal. My latest: https://www.truthdig.com/articles/russiagate-helped-secure-dangerous-arms-deal/ 

How ‘Russiagate’ Helped Secure a Dangerous Arms Deal Both
Barack Obama and Donald Trump resisted sending weapons to Ukraine. Then
the investigation into Trump-Russia collusion was launched.

truthdig.com



341

The
cold warriors wanted their escalations, and they got them. From
beginning to the end, that’s all this was ever about. They pushed the
narratives, the media joined in because it was
great
for ratings
,
and the Democrats joined in because it took the focus off their
2016
scandals

and gave them a kayfabe phantom to punch instead of
pushing
for actual progressive changes
.

And
now the
slow
motion third world war

between the US-centralized power alliance and the loose collective of
unabsorbed governments is right on schedule, with Biden all set and
ready to carry the omnicidal torch forward. The 2016 scandals are
well enough forgotten, no progressive changes have been made, and
there is no need to talk about Russiagate or impeachment at the
Democratic National Convention.

Because
everyone already got what they wanted. Everyone except ordinary
people, of course.

____________________

Thanks
for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make
sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list
for at 
my
website
 or on
Substack
,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My
work is 
entirely
reader-supported
,
so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around,
liking me on 
Facebook,
following my antics on 
Twitter, throwing
some money into my tip jar on 
Patreon or Paypal,
purchasing some of my 
sweet
merchandise
,
buying my books 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
 and Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do
with this platform, 
click
here
.
Everyone, racist platforms excluded, 
has
my permission
 to
republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else
I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Caitlin
Johnstone

| August 29, 2020 at 2:54 am | Tags:
#Trump,
convention,
democrats,
DNC,
impeachment,
Mueller,
Russia,
Russiagate
| Categories:
Article,
News
| URL:
https://wp.me/p9tj6M-2hX

Coronavirus: Democratische Partij omarmt oorlogsmisdadiger George W. Bush

Caitlin
Johnstone heeft in een ‘paar toetsen’ aangetoond dat de top van de
Democratische Partij George W. Bush prijst als een geweldige
president…… Ze begint haar kritiek met de opmerking dat deze Bush
weer volop in de aandacht staat, niet vanwege een aanklacht bij het
Internationaal Strafhof (ICC) dat al lang geleden vervolging in had
moeten stellen tegen G.W. Bush wegens oorlogsmisdaden, maar omdat de stem van deze
opperschoft wordt gebruikt in een ‘feel-good’ video over de Coronacrisis…..

‘Laten
we niet vergeten hoe klein onze verschillen zijn tijdens deze door
ons allen gedeelde dreiging (van het Coronavirus, Ap)’, aldus Bush,
die vervolgde met te zeggen dat ‘we’ geen tegenover elkaar staande
strijders zijn, maar mensen die gelijkelijk kwetsbaar en tegelijk even dierbaar zijn in de ogen van god…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Hoe
durft Bush deze woorden in de mond te nemen, terwijl hij het volk van
de VS allesbehalve gelijk heeft behandeld, de armen zijn er ook
tijdens zijn 2 termijnen op achteruitgegaan, waar de welgestelden er tegelijk flink op vooruit zijn gegaan…… Ook de landen die hij
illegaal, op basis van leugens heeft aangevallen, stonden er al veel
slechter voor dan de VS en waren militair geen partij voor deze terreurentiteit (als je het toch over gelijkheid hebt), waar de
volkeren die het aangaat door acties van deze ploert in een nog
veel slechtere toestand zijn beland dan die waarin ze zich al bevonden……. Van de fors meer dan 2,5
miljoen mensen die de VS en haar hielenlikkende NAVO partners hebben
vermoord, vooral in het Midden-Oosten, staat het grootste deel nog altijd op naam van George W.
Bush…… (al zat Nobelprijs voor de Vrede winnaar en tegelijk oorlogsmisdadiger Obama hem bij wijze van spreken op de hielen…)

Johnstone
geeft in 5 punten duidelijk aan waar het aan scheelt als je het over
Bush hebt….. Jammer dat ze niet stelt dat ook de komende
verkiezingen een rol spelen in de plotselinge omarming van Bush,
verkiezingen die in deze de leidraad zijn van de Democraten, immers
Joe Biden stond volledig achter de illegale oorlogen die Bush tegen
Afghanistan en Irak begon……. Zoals Johnstone terecht al vaak
heeft opgemerkt: of Biden dan wel Trump zullen worden gekozen, zal
niet uitmaken voor de bevolking van landen die de VS niet
welgevallig zijn, zoals Iran, Noord-Korea, China, Rusland, Venezuela
en Cuba….. 

Ook onder Biden zullen een aantal van de hiervoor genoemde volkeren het
slachtoffer zijn en worden van sancties, illegaal opgelegd door de VS (in
Venezuela zou de teller van het aantal doden door de sancties van de
VS al zijn opgelopen naar 50.000, in feite vermoord middels een
extreem smerige vorm van terreur…*)…… Johnstone maakt er een punt van vooral de Democratische Partij te bekritiseren, kan echter niet meegaan in deze, kwaad dient hoe dan ook benoemd te worden, of die nu van de Democraten dan wel van de Republikeinen komt, trouwens ik moet zeggen dat ze daar zelf de hand mee licht, gezien haar artikelen over een langere tijd.

De
hiervoor genoemde vorm van terreur, sancties tegen landen die de VS niet welgevallig zijn, staat in het verdrag van Genève
omschreven als misdaad tegen de menselijkheid, te vergelijken met de
belegering en uithongering van steden tijdens de middeleeuwen……..
Wellicht is Biden nog gevaarlijker voor de wereld, daar hij
duidelijke tekenen van dementie vertoont en naast oorlogsmisdaden
zijn handen niet omdraait voor ordinaire misdaad, zoals het chanteren
van een land…… (Biden heeft ervoor gezorgd dat zijn zoon Hunter in
Oekraïne niet langer werd vervolgd voor fraude en witwassen, daar
hij eiste dat de procureur-generaal die dit onderzoek leidde zou
worden ontslagen, daar anders een grote wapenlevering niet door zou
gaan; e.e.a. toen hij minister van buitenlandse zaken was onder
Obama….)

Five
Things That Are Revealed By Democrats’ Rehabilitation Of Bush

by
Caitlin
Johnstone

George
W Bush is
in
the news again

today, and once again it’s not for the only legitimate reason that he
should ever be in the news, namely a war crimes tribunal. No, it’s
because his voice was used in a cutesy feel-good video about unity
during the Covid-19 pandemic.

“Let
us remember how small our differences are in the face of this shared
threat,” Bush is heard saying. “We are not partisan
combatants. We are human beings, equally vulnerable and equally
wonderful in the sight of God.”

And,
needless to say, Democrats are all over social media orgasming in
their pants about it.

“This
video made me ugly cry,”
tweeted
actress-turned-McResistance pundit Alyssa Milano.

“A
REAL president,”
tweeted
the other Alyssa Milano, Debra Messing.

“In
a million years I never thought I’d be crying watching this,
thinking how much better we’d all feel if Bush were president
today,”
tweeted
former Democratic congresswoman Katie Hill to thunderous online
applause.

The
Intercept
‘s
Mehdi Hasan
spent
all day on Twitter

defending his position that Dubya is superior to Trump, at one point
even
arguing
“You can be a sane warmonger. You can be a warmonger but be an
ok human being to your friends and family. You can be a warmonger and
be able to handle a domestic public health crisis.”


Katie Hill



@KatieHill4CA

In a million years I never thought I’d be crying watching this, thinking how much better we’d all feel if Bush were president today. Wtf. https://twitter.com/thebushcenter/status/1256607729151619073 


George W. Bush Presidential Center



@TheBushCenter

A Message from President George W. Bush@TheCalltoUnite

Embedded video


13K

(voor de video in dit Twitterbericht, klik op deze link)

For
years rank-and-file Democrats have been giving the true Butcher of
Baghdad
a
majority approval rating
,
running with
the
common narrative

that while Bush perhaps made some “mistakes”, Trump is
spectacularly worse. Here are five things that are highlighted by
that common perspective:

1. It
shows how little Democrats care about the lives of human beings
overseas.

By
the end of his first term Bush had launched two full-scale ground
invasions, murdered a million Iraqis, destabilized an entire region
in a way that would shortly give rise to ISIS, and ushered in a whole
new level of unprecedented US military expansionism and imperialism.
Trump has done none of these things. He has
inflicted
many evils upon our world

and,
like
Obama
,
has
continued
and expanded the warmongering

of his predecessors. But he has done nothing that rises to the level
of depravity of Bush’s wars.

The
fact that Democrats see Trump’s evils as not only equal to but far in
excess of Bush’s reveals as plain as day that, for all their supposed
bleeding heart liberal sensibilities, they simply do not place much
value on the lives of foreigners. Sure they might enjoy a little
masturbatory melodrama over kids in cages when it shows up on their
doorstep, but kids getting ripped to shreds by cluster bombs and
being born severely disabled from depleted uranium munitions simply
does not register for them, because they don’t have to look at it.

They
do not care. Rude tweets and racism are worse than institutionalized
mass murder for them, because they have to look at one but not the
other.

2. It
shows that Trump-era Democrats are Bush-era Republicans.


Glenn Greenwald



@ggreenwald

The
problem is that Bush and Cheney’s operatives, speechwriters, policy
advisers, propagandistas and top aides are the close friends and
colleagues of media liberals and DC Democrats and their beloved pundits,
so they have to whitewash Bush’s evil to justify themselves: https://twitter.com/jeremyscahill/status/1256951318096347137 


jeremy scahill



@jeremyscahill

The
nice little painter man who passed mints to Michelle Obama at a funeral
is actually a mass murderer who belongs in front of a war crimes
tribunal, not being praised for releasing web videos.

“Dems
have no choice but to rehabilitate George Bush because their core
narrative is the US was a fundamentally good and decent land before
Trump vandalized it,” journalist Glenn Greenwald
tweeted
in response to Democrats’ fawning over Bush, adding, “How do you
join with Bill Kristol, Nicole Wallace, Rick Wilson, David Frum and
the CIA without whitewashing Bush’s crimes?”

Indeed,
Bush-era neocons have been able to fully ingratiate themselves to and
integrate themselves with Democrats in the age of Trump by posing as
moral opposition longing for a more civilized time when presidents
would politely butcher humans by the hundreds of thousands without
using offensive language like “shit hole”. A gentlemanly
time for gentlemanly presidents to unfold gentlemanly Orwellian
surveillance measures all around the world without posting rude
tweets about celebrities they don’t like.

Trump-era
Democrats are Bush-era Republicans. That’s how far to the
authoritarian right the party has moved in the last few years on
important matters like foreign policy. You can see this by the
shrieking, hysterical response they had to Tulsi Gabbard calling for
what more or less amounted to a simple reversion back to pre-9/11 US
foreign policy. It has been necessary for Democrats to gaslight
themselves into this position because for three presidential
campaigns in a row–Obama 2012, Clinton 2016, and now Biden
2020–they’ve had to find ways of convincing themselves that a
politician who has facilitated Bush’s foreign policy agendas would
make a good commander-in-chief.

3. It
shows how the amnesia-inducing effects of the mass media news churn
make it difficult to retain perspective.


Caitlin Johnstone 


@caitoz

The News Churn Memory Hole: How The MSM Lies Even When Telling The Truth

“It’s not enough to simply expose the truth. You must also fully, repeatedly and consistently expose the ones who are telling lies.”https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/the-news-churn-memory-hole-how-the-msm-lies-even-when-telling-the-truth-3662de102ff2 

The News Churn Memory Hole: How The MSM Lies Even When Telling The Truth

“This
goofy ass Trump letter is gonna get more outraged coverage than the
bombshell report on the entire Afghanistan war being a lie and…

medium.com



355

Mass
media propagandists are able to distort perception even while telling
the truth using
the
news churn memory hole
.
Even when forced to report on uncomfortable truths like not finding
any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq or the fact that the
occupation of Afghanistan has been justified by an entire generation
of lies, the memory of that reporting can be made to fade into the
background by frantically reporting on what’s happening right now
without referring back to the previous revelations.

Russiagate
alone did so much to distort people’s perceptions in mainstream
liberal circles.

Having
the baseless narrative breathlessly promoted year after year after
year that the Kremlin had literally seized control of the highest
levels of the US government left rank-and-file Democrats who
subscribed to it without any sense of scale or proportion, because
they were constantly being told that the Most Important Thing Ever
was about to happen.

How
can you hold perspective on a million dead Iraqis when you’re being
told day after day, year after year in myriad ways that Russian
Hitler was controlling your country but Super Mueller is going to
swoop in to the rescue any minute now? It would be very difficult.

4. It
shows the glaring difference between fact and narrative.

Most
of the mass media reporting on Trump has been factual, it’s just had
a ton of narrative spin attached to the facts. It is a fact that
Trump frequently says and does dumb, obnoxious and horrible things.
It is a fact that many racists think he’s the cat’s pajamas. It is a
fact that there was an impeachment and a collusion investigation. But
the narrative overlay that has been heaped upon those facts while
they’re being reported–the urgency, the alarmism, the
hyperbole–leaves viewers with the distinct impression that this US
president is awful in a way that is unique and historically
unprecedented, and he simply isn’t.

Trump
is not worse than Bush, the mass media just yell about him a lot
more. If the narratives matched the facts, mass media consumers would
be aware that nothing Trump has done is as evil as Bush’s invasion of
Iraq alone. In reality Trump didn’t wind up being another Hitler, he
wound up being another Obama (not a compliment). And if the narrative
spin matched the factual reality, people would understand that.


i bless the rains down in castamere


@Chinchillazllla

liberals have the baffling ability to simultaneously believe both that George W. Bush was a good president whom they love and miss dearly AND that Ralph Nader is a piece of shit who’s going to burn in hell for supposedly getting George W. Bush elected




5,500

5. It
shows that this simply is not working.

Imagine
you’re out in the woods with a friend you trust in the dark. You know
there’s a horrible monster out there stalking you, and suddenly you
hear it in the distance coming crashing towards you. It has picked up
your scent and it will be upon you in moments.

You
turn to run, but your friend grabs you and won’t let you move. He
falls to the ground grabbing your legs screaming “No! No! We
must stay here! We mustn’t move an inch!”

Who
do you need to fight first? The monster? Or your “friend”?

That’s
why I focus so much of my criticism on the Democratic Party instead
of the Republicans. Ultimately they’re the party which could actually
allow for positive changes to be made to the world, but instead they
keep moving further and further into the warmongering totalitarianism
they once purported to despise in George W Bush.

Relying
on either head of the two-headed one-party system to make meaningful
changes simply is not working, and will not ever work. No institution
that would so warmly rehabilitate and welcome a bloodthirsty monster
like Bush is going to help humanity one iota. In fact, its sole
purpose is to do the exact opposite.

______________________________

Thanks
for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make
sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list
for my 
website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My
work is 
entirely
reader-supported
,
so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around,
liking me on 
Facebook,
following my antics on
Twitter,
checking out my podcast on either 
YoutubesoundcloudApple
podcasts
 or Spotify,
following me on 
Steemit,
throwing some money into my hat on 
Patreon or Paypal, purchasing
some of my 
sweet
merchandise
,
buying my books 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
 and Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do
with this platform, 
click
here
.
Everyone, racist platforms excluded, 
has
my permission
 to
republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else
I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Caitlin
Johnstone

| May 4, 2020 at 2:26 am | Tags:
approval,
bush,
democrats,
Dubya,
liberals,
Politics,
rehabilitation
| Categories:
Article
| URL:
https://wp.me/p9tj6M-28a

==================================

* Vergeet niet de 500.000 Iraakse kinderen die werden vermoord met de sancties van de VS onder de Democratische regering van Clinton. Hoofdverantwoordelijke daarvoor was Madeleine Albright, destijds minister van BuZa. Deze oorlogshoer durfde een aantal jaren geleden te zeggen dat die 500.000 dode kinderen de moeite waard zijn geweest……. Jonhnstone stelt in haar artikel in feite dat de Democratische Partij pas veel later het sancties en oorlogspad van de Republikeinen is gaan volgen, echter alleen het feit van die sancties tegen Irak toont ook in deze haar ongelijk, verder beging de VS onder Clinton enorme oorlogsmisdaden als bombardementen op civiele doelen…… Toch is het zoals zo vaak een prima artikel van Johnstone.

Zie ook:

Job Cohen (PvdA) prijst Rutte en zijn aanpak van de Coronacrisis…….. Een goed beleid? Lees dit!‘ (met links in dat bericht die meer verwijzen naar de situatie in Nederland)

Bill Gates, CDC, WHO en de farmaceuten anticipeerden op de Coronacrisis in november 2019…..‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht naar meer internationale artikelen over het Cornavirus)

Vervolging van drone klokkenluider Hale moet worden gestopt

Een
‘veteraan’ die meewerkte aan het drone moord programma, heeft zich
tegen zijn voormalige werk en werkgever gekeerd en feiten over het
drone programma aan de grote klok gehangen, vooral het enorme aantal slachtoffers die als ‘collateral damage’ (bijkomende schade) worden aangeduid, was voor Hale de reden om ‘de klok te luiden’.

De VS
overheid laat Daniel Hale vervolgen op grond van de meer dan
belachelijke en inhumane Espionage Act, alleen omdat hij duidelijk
maakte wat men eigenlijk doet met dit programma…. Duizenden mensen
zouden al het slachtoffer zijn van drone-aanvallen, waarbij niet moet worden vergeten dat
zoals gezegd het overgrote deel van de slachtoffers, meer dan 90% (!!), niet eens werd
verdacht van enige misdaad (veelal vrouwen en kinderen…)….

Het gaat
recht tegen internationale verdragen in om mensen zonder vorm van
proces te vermoorden en je kan dan ook stellen dat deze moorden
ingaan tegen de mensenrechten, het internationaal oorlogsrecht en kan
zonder meer aangeduid worden als een misdaad tegen de menselijkheid!!

Hale
loopt de kans te worden veroordeeld tot 50 jaar gevangenisstraf……
Het klokkenluiden door Hale is in het belang van de hele wereld,
immers als de VS jouw land als ongehoorzaam aan haar doctrine acht,
is de kans levensgroot dat de VS ook daar met drone aanvallen
zelfs tegenstanders van de VS buitenlandpolitiek zal vermoorden……..

Zet je
in voor Hale, die volkomen terecht de klok luidde over deze barbaarse
en schunnige moorden, lees en teken de petitie ajb en geeft het
door!!

Stop the prosecution  of a drone whistleblower

RootsAction
DIY info@rootsaction.org

The
prosecution of drone whistleblower Daniel Hale is currently scheduled
to proceed in March.

A
former veteran of the drone assassination program who became an
outspoken activist and critic of it, Hale is being prosecuted under
the draconian Espionage Act because he dared shine a light into a
very dark corner.

Hundreds of journalists, whistleblowers,
and free press advocates have signed onto a demand that this
prosecution be dropped. We hope you’ll stand with us and do the
same.Click
here to add your name to the petition.

Stop the Prosecution of Drone Whistleblower Daniel Hale

Hale
faces a sentence of up to
50
years in prison
. As in
other Espionage Act cases, Hale’s defense will have its hands
significantly tied at trial — he and his attorneys have been barred
from even uttering the words “whistleblower” or “good motive”
in the courtroom.

Please
click here now to sign this petition to the U.S. Department of
Justice:
Stop
the selective and vindictive prosecution of Daniel Hale and bring an
end to the abuse of the Espionage Act to silence whistleblowers and
other truth tellers.

These
prosecutions are unfair, unjust, and undemocratic. It is
unconscionable to use a law, supposedly aimed at actual spies and
saboteurs, against individuals who act in good faith to bring
government misconduct to the attention of the public.

GRAPHIC: Sign here button

This
petition was created by WHISPeR – Whistleblower & Source
Protection Program. Create your own
here.

After
signing the petition, please
use the tools on the next webpage to share it with your
friends
.

This work
is only possible with your financial support. Please
chip in $3 now.

https://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/6503/p/salsa/donation/common/public/?donate_page_KEY=11901&track=e_223703_btn

The
RootsAction.org Team

P.S. RootsAction is an independent online
force endorsed by Jim Hightower, Barbara Ehrenreich, Cornel West,
Daniel Ellsberg, Glenn Greenwald, Naomi Klein, Bill Fletcher Jr.,
Laura Flanders, former U.S. Senator James Abourezk, Frances Fox
Piven, Lila Garrett, Phil Donahue, Sonali Kolhatkar, and many
others.
Background:
>> The
Washington Post:

“Former
Intelligence Analyst Charged with Leaking Drone Details to News
Outlet”


>>
Reason:
“He
Helped Reveal How U.S. Drone Strikes Were Killing Innocents”


>>
Defending Rights &
Dissent:
“Whistleblowers,
Journalists, Condemn Espionage Act Charges”


>>
The
Intercept:
“The
Trump Administration Is Using the Full Power of the U.S. Surveillance
State Against Whistleblowers”

www.RootsAction.org

==========================

Zie ook:

Julian Assange het slachtoffer van de grootste persbreidel in deze eeuw

Julian Assange moet onmiddellijk vrijgelaten worden!(zie ook de links in dat bericht, o.a. naar berichten over Assange en censuur)

Snowden vindt het ongelofelijk dat de media VS politici niet aanspreken op totaal verschillende reacties n.a.v. ‘klokkenluiden’

Trump administratie klaagt weer een klokkenluider aan voor spionage

Glenn Greenwald vervolgd voor het brengen van de waarheid en zijn seksuele geaardheid

Journalist
en schrijver Glenn Greenwald wordt in Brazilië (waar hij woont)
vervolgd voor het aan de man brengen van corruptie tot in de hoogste
regionen….. Zelfs de top van de politie in Brazilië is het niet
eens met zijn vervolging, immers hij doet gewoon zijn werk…..

De
fascistische Bolsonaro regering is verantwoordelijk voor de
vervolging van Greenwald en stelt dat hij heeft gehackt om aan
informatie te komen*.

Bolsonaro,
de president van Brazilië, heeft de pest aan homo’s en heeft dat
zelfs al laten weten voordat ‘hij werd gekozen’ (als Lula had mogen
meedoen aan de verkiezingen, had deze op zeker gewonnen…)…. Ook
het feit dat Greenwald homo is, was reden voor Bolsonaro om tegen hem
tekeer te gaan…. Sterker nog: Greenwald en zijn echtgenoot
adopteerden twee kinderen en dat is voor Bolsonaro al helemaal reden om
hem te demoniseren……

Protest
Greenwald (rechts) kust zijn man David Miranda tijdens een
bijeenkomst in juli, waar werd geprotesteerd tegen Greenwalds
dreigende deportatie uit Brazilië.
Beeld
AP

Voorts
is Bolsonaro een tegenstander van de vrije pers en zelfs de
democratie kan hem niet bekoren, meermaals heeft hij de bloedige
dictatuur geprezen die Brazilië van 1964 tot 1985 in haar greep
hield…..

Nederland
onderhoudt goede banden met Brazilië, ook onder Bolsonaro en ondanks
dat VVD premier Rutte vorig jaar geschokt zei te zijn door de vele branden in
het Braziliaanse Amazonewoud, was dit geen reden Bolsonaro terecht te
wijzen…..** Sterker nog, de leugen dat de bosbranden
die vorig jaar Brazilië teisterden een normaal verschijnsel zijn,
werden omarmd door een aantal Tweede Kamerleden, terwijl het aantal
bosbranden na het aantreden van Bolsonaro met 84% is
toegenomen…….

Ach,
zoals zo vaak gaat bij Rutte 3 het geld ver voor op de
volksgezondheid, het milieu, de natuur en de moraal…….

Lees en
teken de petitie van het RootsAction team ajb en zegt het voort!

Drop the charges against Gleen Greenwald

Brazil
has charged award-winning journalist Glenn Greenwald with a crime for
engaging in journalism.

Please
click here now to sign this petition:

We
stand with Glenn Greenwald and
The
Intercept’
s team
in Brazil and demand that prosecutors respect press freedom and drop
this blatant politically motivated charge.”

Over
40 press freedom and civil liberties groups have signed a letter
denouncing the charging of Greenwald, a letter that reads in part:
“These charges
represent a straightforward attempt to intimidate and retaliate
against Greenwald and The Intercept for their critical reporting on
messages that appeared to show a judge advising federal prosecutors
how to prosecute cases he was presiding over in the ‘Operation Car
Wash’ investigation. Further, by charging Greenwald with a cybercrime
the government has essentially criminalized engaging in legitimate
journalistic practices, which threatens to have a chilling effect on
journalists and sources alike.”
Click
here to add your name to the petition.

Also
raising concern about these charges is former Brazilian President
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva,
who has published these words in the
Washington
Post:

“Imagine
how American history would have unfolded if, in the 1970s, members of
the public and the authorities had been more concerned with attacking
and investigating Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward than with seeking
the truth about the Watergate scandal. If Congress and the FBI had
decided to investigate the Post reporters and their sources, and not
the wrongdoing of the Republican Party.”
Sadly,
U.S. history does provide a recent precedent for Brazil’s action.

Greenwald believes that — given the close relationship of
Trump and Brazil’s far-right president, Jair Bolsonaro — Trump’s
indictment of WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange for the crime of journalistic
publishing provided the green light to Bolsonaro to persecute
Greenwald.

GRAPHIC: Sign here button

After
signing the petition,
please
use the tools on the next webpage to share it with your
friends
.

This work
is only possible with your financial support. Please
chip in $3 now.

https://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/6503/p/salsa/donation/common/public/?donate_page_KEY=11901&track=e_223542_btn

— The
RootsAction.org Team

P.S. RootsAction is an independent online
force endorsed by Jim Hightower, Barbara Ehrenreich, Cornel West,
Daniel Ellsberg, Glenn Greenwald, Naomi Klein, Bill Fletcher Jr.,
Laura Flanders, former U.S. Senator James Abourezk, Frances Fox
Piven, Lila Garrett, Phil Donahue, Sonali Kolhatkar, and many
others.

Background:
>> Freedom of the Press
Foundation: “Over
40 press freedom and civil liberties groups denounce Brazil’s
charges against Glenn Greenwald”

>> Luiz Inácio
Lula da Silva: “Charges
against Glenn Greenwald reveal the rot in Brazil’s democracy”

>>
Rolling Stone: “Glenn
Greenwald: ‘Does the Law in Brazil Even Matter Anymore?’”

>>
New York Times: “Glenn
Greenwald Charged With Cybercrimes in Brazil”

=======================================

*
Hillary Clinton en haar campagneteam hebben deze truc uitgevonden:
als je dreigt gepakt te worden voor misdadig gedrag, stel je dat
juist dat een andere partij misdadig bezig is, daarvoor gaf ze in haar
geval Rusland de schuld…….

**
Bolsonaro had al voor zijn ‘verkiezing’ gezegd dat het Amazonewoud wat hem betreft geheel commercieel kan worden benut, juist dat gaf figuren een carte blanche om nog veel meer oerwoud in de fik te steken…… Rutte
k
on moeilijk
direct kritiek leveren op de Braziliaanse regering, daar de
Nederlandse intensieve veehouderij verantwoordelijk is voor een groot
deel van die branden, immers na de branden teelt men op de
vrijgekomen grond over het algemeen soja voor diervoer…..
(Nederland is na China de nummer 2 importeur van genetisch
gemanipuleerde soja voor dat diervoer…. In totaal 80% van de
wereldsojaproductie gaat naar diervoer….)

Voor meer artikelen over Greenwald, Bollsonaro en Assange, klik op het label met de naam van keuze, direct onder dit bericht.

Ten onrechte stond bij plaatsing minister Blok als één van degenen die stelde dat de bosbranden in Brazilië een normaal verschijnsel zijn, mijn excuus. Al riep Blok tijdens die branden op om te doneren, terwijl hij toch zou moeten weten dat Nederland één van de oorzaken is van die branden (sojateelt) en dus beter zelf een veel groter bedrag ter beschikking had kunnen stellen om die branden te bestrijden…….

Bolsonaro (pres. Brazilië) bedreigt journalist Glenn Greenwald met gevangenisstraf vanwege publiceren gelekte gesprekken

De
Braziliaanse president Bolsonaro is flink ‘over de rooie’ vanwege het
‘Lava Jato lek’ gepubliceerd op The Intercept, wat duidelijk aangeeft
dat hij Brazilië in de richting stuurt van een dictatoriale staat……

Vooral Glenn
Greenwald, de belangrijkste journalist van The Intercept, ligt onder het fascistische vuur van Bolsonaro en zijn corrupte
ultrarechtse kliek…..

‘Car
Wash’ ofwel ‘Lava Jato’, een onderzoek naar politieke corruptie begon
in 2014 en was bedoeld om deze corruptie openbaar te maken en
strafrechtelijk aan te pakken, ongeacht politieke kleur.

In juni
2019 begon The Intercept met publicaties van gesprekken die tijdens het
onderzoek werden gevoerd tussen de hoofdrolspelers, de zogenaamde
onafhankelijke rechter Sérgio Moro, die overleg voert met openbare
aanklagers (als onze officieren van justitie) om Lula da Silva
gevangen te zetten en zo de kans te verkleinen dat zijn partij PT
(arbeiders partij) de verkiezingen zou kunnen winnen…. Zoals we
weten is dat gelukt en heeft zijne fascistische kwaadaardigheid
Bolsonaro de verkiezingen gewonnen…….

Als
beloning werd rechter Moro benoemd tot minister van justitie…….
Niet vreemd dus dat Bolsonaro woedend is over het lekken van de
gevoerde gesprekken, bovendien zet e.e.a. grote vraagtekens bij de
wettigheid van Bolsonaro’s presidentschap…… (immers hij is
middels smerige malversaties aan het bewind gekomen)

Begin
Juli kwam Moro met een decreet tegen ‘gevaarlijke buitenlanders’,
niet moeilijk te bedenken wie Moro daar mee bedoelt, juist:
Glenn Greenwald!! Bolsonaro heeft Greenwald de laatste week bedreigd
en verder gesteld dat hij kan worden veroordeeld tot
gevangenisstraf…. Om nog wat meer haar tegen Greenwald te zaaien,
heeft Bolsonaro gezegd dat Greenwald door een huwelijk deportatie
heeft voorkomen, Greenwald woont al meer dan 10 jaar in Brazilië en is
nu Braziliaans staatsburger…..

Een
journalist die Bolsonaro’s perschef vroeg welke misdaad Greenwald
dan heeft begaan kreeg geen antwoord, de psychopaat keek na een aantal niet ter zake doende woorden alleen op
een intimiderende manier naar de bewuste journalist, Guilherme Mazieiro……

Intussen
krijgt het gezin van Greenwald de ene doodsbedreiging na de
andere…..

The
Intercept heeft geweigerd de bron van de gesprekken weer te geven en
stelt dat de berichtgeving van groot publieke belang is en daar is zoals je zal begrijpen geen speld tussen te krijgen!! The Intercept stelt dan ook dat het
niet onwettig heeft gehandeld.

Op 30
juli sprak Greenwald een grote groep journalisten, activisten en
musici toe, die steun betuigden aan The Intercept en stelde dat hij
het niet toe zal staan dat het land van zijn kinderen verandert in een
dictatuur….. Groot applaus, echter ik vrees dat Greenwald hier
weinig of niets tegen kan doen, vergeet niet dat Brazilië in het
verleden meermaals fascistisch is bestuurd……. Zelfs Tucker Carlson
van Fox News heeft afwezig zijn steun betuigd aan The Intercept,
terwijl hij bepaald geen vriend is van Greenwald.

De
tactiek van Bolsonaro’s kliek is duidelijk: demoniseer en
criminaliseer de boodschapper om zo de berichtgeving weg te houden
van het crimineel handelen door Bolsonaro, justitie en de
rechterlijke macht….

Journalists
threatened with jail in Brazil as president reacts to damning leaks

John
McEvoy
   
31st
July 2019

Links fascist en oorlogsmisdadiger Pompeo naast fascist Bolsonaro

Brazilian
president 
Jair
Bolsonaro
‘s
furious response to the 
Intercept‘s damning ‘Lava
Jato
‘ leaks has
signalled the country’s further descent into authoritarianism. And
journalists face the threat of jail time as a result.

The
leaks

Brazil’s
massive corruption probe – 
Operation
Car Wash
 (Lava
Jato
)
– began in 2014. The Car Wash 
team insisted “that
their only consideration was to expose and punish political
corruption irrespective of party or political faction” in Brazil.
But in June 2019, the 
Intercept began publishing leaked
conversations of officials involved in the probe. The
messages 
revealed that
the supposedly neutral judge, Sérgio Moro, worked together with
various Brazilian prosecutors to jail presidential front-runner Luis
Inácio Lula da Silva, and 
prevent his
Workers’ Party (PT) from securing election victory.

After
winning the election in October 2018, Bolsonaro 
employed Moro
– the man who jailed Lula – as his 
justice
minister
.
The latest leaks are thus deeply embarrassing for the Brazilian
government. In fact, they call into serious question the legitimacy
of Bolsonaro’s presidency.

Furious
response

After
a brief 
leave
of absence
 in
early July, Moro returned to work to issue a new 
decree
against “dangerous foreigners”. Ominously named ‘decree number
666’, it is 
understood as
a thinly veiled 
threat against Intercept co-founder
and editor 
Glenn
Greenwald
 –
a US citizen who has lived in Brazil for over a 
decade.

Bolsonaro,
not shy of revealing his 
fascistic
tendencies
,
has also threatened Greenwald over the past week. On 27 July, he said
Greenwald 
could “do
jail time” and suggested “that he had married a Brazilian citizen
to avoid deportation”.

In
a press conference on 30 July, meanwhile, one journalist challenged
Bolsonaro’s press secretary General Otávio Rêgo Barros to explain
what crime Greenwald was guilty of. His refusal to give any
meaningful answer was chilling:

BrianMier@BrianMteleSUR
Far Right President Jair Bolsonaro recently accused Glenn Greenwald, from the Intercept, of committing a felony. Yesterday his Press Secretary, General Otávio Rêgo Barros, was unable to explain what the crime was, so he tried to stare down journalist Guilherme Mazieiro instead.

Embedded video

(voor de bovenstaande video van 2 minuten, zie het origineel)

Greenwald,
his family, and the 
Intercept team
have also 
received death
threats
.

The
Brazilian federal police, meanwhile, have 
arrested four
people accused of involvement in the leaks.

Classic
public interest journalism”

While
refusing to reveal its source/s, the 
Intercept has
responded to the Brazilian government’s threats, 
defending their
reporting as “classic public interest journalism”. Its
journalists 
added:

The
public interest in reporting this material has been obvious from the
start. These documents revealed serious, systematic, and sustained
improprieties and possible illegality”

For
this reason, the 
Intercept claims
its reporting is 
legal under
the Brazilian constitution.

On
30 July, Greenwald spoke to a packed crowd of journalists, activists,
and musicians gathered in solidarity with the 
Intercept.
To rapturous applause, Greenwald 
said:

I
am not going to let the country of my children turn into a
dictatorship”.

Those
who couldn’t attend the events in Brazil – including author Naomi
Klein and even 
Fox
News
‘s
Tucker Carlson – also 
sent messages
of support.

The
Brazilian government’s strategy in response to the leaks is clear:
demonise and criminalise the messenger to shift the focus from the
message.

Greenwald
and the 
Intercept deserve
international solidarity.

Featured
image via 
Flickr
– U.S. Department of State

====================================

* Dezelfde tactiek die Hillary Clinton volgde, toen uitkwam dat zij en haar campagneteam het kandidaatschap voor president van de VS in 2016 tijdens de Democratische voorverkiezingen heeft gestolen van Bernie Sanders, het begin van de smerige leugen die Russiagate wordt genoemd……..

Gruwelijke Russische doomsday wapens: o.a. walvissen, krekels en Pokémon

Je zou
wellicht denken dat onze reguliere media bij tijd en wijle knettergek
zijn met het herhalen van bijvoorbeeld aantoonbare VS leugens, maar zelfs dat kan men bij de makers van die leugens, dus de VS, altijd nog veel beter.

Het
volgende uiterst humoristische en sarcastische artikel, geschreven
door Caitlin Johnstone en afgelopen donderdag gepubliceerd, moet je lezen, maar
let op: het gevaar bestaat dat je in een lachstuip blijft!

Whales,
Crickets, And Other Fearsome Russian Doomsday Weapons

Caitlin
Johnstone

Headlines
were blaring the word “Russian” again the other day because
the mass media narrative managers found yet another reason for
westerners to feel terrified of the icy potato patch that we’d barely
ever thought about prior to 2016. I’d like to talk about the
Kremlin’s latest horrifying horrific addition to its fearsome
doomsday artillery, and recap a few of the other incredibly
frightening and terrifying tactics that those strange
Cyrillic-scribbling demons of the East are employing to undermine
truth, justice, and the American way. Just to make sure we’re
all good and scared like we’re supposed to be.

Gather
the kids, clutch your pearls and sign off on hundreds of billions of
dollars of extra military spending, my patriotic brethren! Here are
five super scary ways the Red Menace is trying to destroy you and
everything you hold dear:

1.
Whales

USA TODAY

@USATODAY

Is this beluga whale actually a Russian spy? https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/04/29/beluga-whale-discovered-harness-could-russian-military/3617313002/ 


Spy games? Russia could be using beluga whales for military purposes

A whale  has been discovered in waters near Norway with tight harnesses on it, which could have been attached by the Russian military.

usatoday.com

Headlines
and TV news segments from virtually all mainstream outlets were
falling all over themselves the other day to report the fact that
some Norwegians found a tame beluga whale with a harness on it, and
“experts” attest that the animal may have been part of a
covert espionage program for the Russian navy.

While
there is no indication that this spying cetacean has been trained in
the arts of sonar election meddling or shooting novichok from its
blowhole, 
the Guardian helpfully
informs us
 that
the harness was labeled “Equipment of St. Petersburg”, and
was equipped to hold “a camera or weapon”.

“Marine
experts in Norway believe they have stumbled upon a white
whale that was trained by the Russian navy as part of a programme to
use underwater mammals as a special ops force,”
the 
Guardian reports.

The
Norwegian tabloid 
Verdens
Gang
,
which picked up on the discovery well before the breathless English
headlines began gracing us with their presence, is a teensy bit less
Ian Flemingesque in its reporting on the matter: the harness 
is
equipped for a GoPro camera
.
The words “Equipment of St. Petersburg” 
are
written in English
.

Why
is the Russian military writing “Equipment of St. Petersburg”
in English on the garments of its aquatic special ops forces, you may
ask? If there were indeed a secret beluga espionage squad assembled
by Russian intelligence services, would they not perhaps avoid
writing the home address of the whales on their harnesses altogether,
and maybe, you know, 
not let
them run free in the wild?

And
to that I would say, stop asking so many questions. That’s just what
Putin wants.

2.
Crickets

Glenn Greenwald

@ggreenwald

NBC and MSNBC Blamed Russia for Using “Sophisticated Microwaves” to Cause “Brain Injuries” in U.S. “Diplomats” in Cuba. The Culprits Were Likely Crickets. https://theintercept.com/2019/01/07/nbc-and-msnbc-blamed-russia-for-using-sophisticated-microwaves-to-cause-brain-injuries-in-u-s-diplomats-in-cuba-the-culprits-were-likely-crickets/ 


2,228

6:54 PM – Jan 7, 2019

NBC and MSNBC Blamed Russia for Using “Sophisticated Microwaves” to Cause “Brain Injuries” in U.S….

We now have what might be the most vivid, reckless and dangerous illustration yet of how NBC functions.

theintercept.com

report seeded
throughout the mainstream media by anonymous intelligence officials
last September claimed that US government workers in Cuba had
suffered concussion-like brain damage after hearing strange noises in
homes and hotels with the most likely culprit being “sophisticated
microwaves or another type of electromagnetic weapon” from Russia.
A recording of one such highly sophisticated attack was analyzed by
scientists and 
turned
out to be the mating call of the male indies short-tailed cricket
.
Neurologists and other brain specialists 
have
challenged the claim
 that
any US government workers suffered any neurological damage of any
kind, saying test results on the alleged victims were

misinterpreted.

The
actual story, when stripped of hyperventilating Russia panic, is that
some government workers once heard some horny crickets in Cuba.

*cough*

3.
Puppies

Consortium News@Consortiumnews

Robert Parry explores the strange mystery of the Russia-gate puppies, https://consortiumnews.com/2017/10/04/the-mystery-of-the-russia-gate-puppies/ 


50

11:29 PM – Oct 4, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy


The Mystery of the Russia-gate Puppies

Exclusive: The U.S. mainstream media is determined to prove Russia-gate despite the scandal’s cracking foundation and its inexplicable anomalies, such as why Russia would set up a Facebook “puppies”…

consortiumnews.com

Ye
gads, is is nothing sacred? Is there any weapon these monsters won’t
use to transform the west into a giant, globe-spanning Mordor?

That’s
right, in 2017 puppies became one of the many, many things we’ve been
instructed to fear in the hands of our vodka-swilling enemy to the
east, with mass media outlets reporting that a Facebook group for
animal lovers was one of the sinister, diabolical tactics employed by
St. Petersburg’s notorious Internet Research Agency. As the 
Moon
of Alabama
 blog has
explained
,
the only evidence we’ve seen so far actually indicates that the
Internet Research Agency’s operations in America served no purpose
other than to attract eyeballs for money. As journalist
Aaron Maté 
wrote of
the highly publicized Russian Facebook meddling, “Far from being
a sophisticated propaganda campaign, it was small, amateurish, and
mostly unrelated to the 2016 election.”

The
late, great Robert Parry, one of the earliest and most outspoken
critics of the Russiagate narrative, covered this one for 
Consortium
News
 in
an article
 he
authored a few months before his untimely passing:

“As
Mike Isaac and Scott Shane of The New York Times 
reported in
Tuesday’s editions, “The Russians who posed as Americans on
Facebook last year tried on quite an array of disguises. … There
was even a Facebook group for animal lovers with memes of adorable
puppies that spread across the site with the help of paid ads.”

Now,
there are a lot of controversial issues in America, but I don’t
think any of us would put puppies near the top of the list. Isaac and
Shane reported that there were also supposedly Russia-linked groups
advocating gay rights, gun rights and black civil rights, although
precisely how these divergent groups were “linked” to Russia or
the Kremlin was never fully explained. (Facebook declined to offer
details.)

At
this point, a professional journalist might begin to pose some very
hard questions to the sources, who presumably include many partisan
Democrats and their political allies hyping the evil-Russia
narrative. It would be time for some lectures to the sources about
the consequences for taking reporters on a wild ride in conspiracy
land.

Yet,
instead of starting to question the overall premise of this
“scandal,” journalists at The New York Times, The Washington
Post, CNN, etc. keep making excuses for the nuttiness. The
explanation for the puppy ads was that the nefarious Russians might
be probing to discover Americans who might later be susceptible to
propaganda.

The
goal of the dog lovers’ page was more obscure,” Isaac and Shane
acknowledged. “But some analysts suggested a possible motive: to
build a large following before gradually introducing political
content. Without viewing the entire feed from the page, now closed by
Facebook, it is impossible to say whether the Russian operators tried
such tactics.”

4.
Pokémon

Yes, Pokémon.

This
Russia hysteria has been a long, wild ride, and sometimes it’s
honestly felt like they’re just experimenting on us. Like they’ve
been testing the limits of how ridiculous they can make this thing
and still get mainstream Americans to swallow it. Like the
establishment propagandists are all sitting around in a room smoking
blunts and making bets with each other all,

I’m
telling you, we can sell a Pokémon Go Kremlin conspiracy.”

Do
it!”

No
way. There’s no way they’ll go for it.”

Yeah
well you said that about the puppy dogs!”

And
then they release their latest experiment in social manipulation and
place bets on how many disgruntled Hillary voters they can get
retweeting it saying “God dammit, I 
knew that
jigglypuff looked suspicious!”

The
October 2017
 CNN
report
 which
sparked off a full day of shrieking “OMG THEY’RE EVEN USING
PIKACHU TO ATTACK OUR DEMOCRACY” headlines was titled
“Exclusive: Even Pokémon Go used by extensive Russian-linked
meddling effort”, and it reported that Russia had extended its
“tentacles” into the popular video game for the
purpose of election meddling. Apparently the Internet Research Agency
attempted to hold a contest using the game to highlight police
brutality against unarmed Black men, which of course is something
that only an evil autocracy would ever do. 

Not
until 
the
fifteenth paragraph
 of
the article did we see the information which undercut all the frantic
arm flailing about Russians destroying democracy and warping our
children’s fragile little minds:

“CNN
has not found any evidence that any Pokémon Go users attempted to
enter the contest, or whether any of the Amazon Gift Cards that were
promised were ever awarded — or, indeed, whether the people who
designed the contest ever had any intention of awarding the prizes.”

Mmm
hmm.

5.
Laughter

Mark Ames

@MarkAmesExiled

Turns out jokes are a Russian disinformation conspiracy.

Is nothing safe? What will those barbarian Others think of next? Weaponizing our tears? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46567364 


587

6:45 PM – Dec 15, 2018

Russian President Vladimir Putin smiles during his meeting with athletes at the Russia in October 2018

Russian President Vladimir Putin smiles during his meeting with athletes at the Russia in October 2018

How Putin’s Russia turned humour into a weapon

Russia’s government wants people to have a laugh – as long as it’s at its opponents’ expense, and not Mr Putin’s.

bbc.co.uk

Late
last year the BBC 
published
an article
 titled
“How Putin’s Russia turned humour into a weapon” about yet
another addition to the Kremlin’s horrifying deadly hybrid
warfare arsenal: comedy. The article’s author,
ironically 
titled “Senior
Journalist (Disinformation)” by the BBC, argues that Russia has
suddenly discovered laughter as a way to “deliberately lower
the level of discussion”.

Russia’s
move towards using humour to influence its campaigns is a relatively
recent phenomenon,” the article explained, without speculating as
to why Russians might have suddenly begun laughing at their western
accusers.

Is
it perhaps possible that Russian media have begun mocking the west a
lot more because westerners have made themselves much easier to make
fun of? Could it perhaps be the fact that western mass media have
been doing absolutely insane things like constantly selling us the
idea that the Kremlin could be lurking behind anything in our world,
even really innocuous-looking things like puppy dogs, Pokémon
and whales? Could we perhaps be finding ourselves at the butt end of
jokes now because in 2016 our society went bat shit, pants-on-head,
screaming-at-passing-motor-vehicles insane?

Nahhh.
Couldn’t be. It’s the Russians who’ve gone mad.

Everyone
has my 
unconditional
permission
 to
republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I’ve
written) in any way they like free of charge. My work is 
entirely
reader-supported
,
so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around,
liking me on
 Facebook,
following my antics on
 Twitter, throwing
some money into my hat on 
Patreon or Paypalpurchasing
some of my 
sweet
merchandise
, buying
my new book 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
,
or my previous book 
Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see
the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for
my 
website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish.
For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do
with this platform, 
click
here
.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Caitlin
Johnstone
 |
May 2, 2019 at 12:54 pm |

Tags: hysteriamediaPoliticsPutinRussiawhale |
Categories: 
Article |
URL: 
https://wp.me/p9tj6M-1FG

Russiagate kritiek: Tulsi Gabbard (VS democratisch presidentskandidaat) gedemoniseerd door Democratische Partij en de massamedia

Naar
aanleiding van een Twitterbericht dat Tulsi Gabbard de wereld
instuurde en waarin zij stelt dat kortzichtige politici en hun hulp
in de massamedia, de laatste 2 jaar bezig zijn geweest Trump neer te
zetten als een marionet van Putin, schreef Caitlin Johnstone het hieronder opgenomen artikel….. 

Van Russiagate is intussen geen spaan meer heel, zoveel is wel duidelijk uit de rapportage van Mueller (die nog steeds niet helemaal openbaar is gemaakt), waar de hysterie over ‘Russische manipulaties’ ervoor hebben gezorgd dat de nieuwe koude oorlog verder is opgetuigd, met de daarmee gepaard gaande
peperdure wapenrace en inperking van de privacy, plus censuur op het internet…… Let wel die censuur en inperking van de privacy werden en worden doorgevoerd in zogenaamde westerse democratieën, terwijl dat soort maatregelen ‘thuishoren’ in een dictatuur…..

Gabbard
voegde aan haar Twitterbericht toe dat Trump er alles aan heeft gedaan niet langer te
worden gezien als marionet van Putin, juist door een veel harder
beleid tegen Rusland te voeren, waarbij hij zelfs de kans op een
kernoorlog niet uit de weg is gegaan en zo’n oorlog nog steeds niet uitsluit……

In het Twitterbericht van Gabbard is ‘geen woord Spaans’ opgenomen, bovendien een
waarheid als een koe! Echter de reacties op dit bericht waren niet
misselijk. Gabbard wordt figuurlijk afgemaakt door die massamedia,
politici en opiniemakers van diverse rechtse denktanks……. (de laatste zijn in de VS altijd rechts, ‘maar goed..’)

Zoals gezegd: Caitlin
Johnstone publiceerde op haar site het hieronder opgenomen artikel en
als conclusie stelt ze dat de welgestelden niet voor niets zoveel
geld steken in het beheren van de media, immers als je de
media beheerst, beheers je en regisseer je het denkbeeld dat bij het volk leeft…… 

Plutocraten beheersen de westerse: -media, -politici en -denktanks, zij hebben
belang bij de huidige inhumane neoliberale status quo, ja zelfs bij
de nieuwe koude oorlog en alle andere illegale oorlogen die de VS
voert, immers dit geteisem heeft veel aandelen in de wapenindustrie, waaronder ik
ook de fabrikanten reken die rollend, varend en vliegend
oorlogstuig produceren, een industrie die zoals je begrijpt baat heeft bij zoveel mogelijk oorlog en spanningen in de wereld……

Gezien
het voorgaande kan je dan ook stellen dat elke claim vals is die de VS maakt
als het weer een illegale oorlog voert, of als het een opstand dan
wel coup organiseert en regisseert, de claim dat dit is om democratie te
brengen en een bloedige dictator af te zetten…… In werkelijkheid heeft VS schijt aan democratie en bloedige
dictators, zolang het bewuste land maar de hielen van de VS likt, VS bedrijven toelaat en
in de VS grote ‘defensie orders’ plaatst…. Sterker nog: de VS steunt een aantal dictators, niet in de laatste plaats de reli-fascistische dictaturen van het Midden-Oosten…. (Saoedi-Arabië, de Verenigde Arabische Emiraten >> VAE, Egypte en buiten het Midden-Oosten: Marokko)

Intussen is bekend dat Mueller de hele Russiagate leugen heeft afgeschoten, daar er geen bewijs voor is te vinden….. Met Russiagate werd zoals gezegd niet alleen de vrijheid van meningsuiting zwaar geweld aangedaan middels censuur op het internet, maar werd ook de Koude Oorlog 2.0 opgetuigd….. 

Aan het voorgaande hebben de reguliere media grote steun verleend, met een enorme berg aan fake news (nepnieuws), waarvoor deze media niet worden gestraft middels de al eerder genoemde censuur, hoewel de bewijzen daarvoor letterlijk voor het oprapen liggen…… Waar sociale media die aantoonbaar echt nieuws brengen, worden afgemaakt in die reguliere westerse media en door de westerse politiek en ze worden geblokkeerd op Facebook en Twitter……..

Responses
To This Tweet Show How People Fixate On Narrative Over Fact

Go to the profile of Caitlin Johnstone

by Caitlin
Johnstone

Last
month I 
published
an essay
 about
the importance of understanding the difference between fact and
narrative, and I just want to quickly highlight a perfect
illustration of this importance in a controversy arising from
recent
Tulsi Gabbard tweet
.
The tweet reads as follows:

“Short-sighted
politicians & media pundits who’ve spent last 2 years accusing
Trump as a Putin puppet have brought us the expensive new Cold War &
arms race. How? Because Trump now does everything he can to prove
he’s not Putin’s puppet—even if it brings us closer to nuclear
war.”

Now,
all the facts say that Gabbard’s claim that Trump has been bringing
the world closer to nuclear war with Russia is indisputably true. It
is perhaps possible to dispute the notion that Trump has escalated
tensions with Russia to try and “prove he’s not Putin’s
puppet”; maybe an argument could be made that he’s simply
reckless and violent or that he’s particularly beholden to cold war
profiteers, or that despite all his rhetoric he just really, really
hates Russia for some reason. But it is absolutely not disputable
that Trump has greatly escalated tensions with a nuclear superpower
by implementing a Nuclear Posture


Review
with a 
much
more aggressive stance against Russia
withdrawing
from the INF treaty
,
bombing and illegally occupying Syria, arming Ukraine, staging a coup
in Venezuela, and 
many,
many other hawkish actions
 taken
against the interests of the Russian Federation which his predecessor
Obama never dared to take.

Moon of Alabama@MoonofA

New on MoA:
Putin Asks And Trump Delivers –
A List Of All The Good Things Trump Did For Russiahttps://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/01/putin-asks-and-trump-delivers-here-is-a-list-of-all-the-good-things-trump-did-for-russia.html 

270

8:15 PM – Jan 15, 2019

These
facts are all well documented in the mainstream press and are
entirely beyond dispute. The facts say that Donald Trump has
escalated nuclear tensions with Russia more than any other president
since the fall of the Berlin Wall. But if you 
go
to Gabbard’s tweet
 and
read the responses right now, you’ll find thousands and thousands of

Democratic
establishment loyalists calling her a liar for saying so.

“Gabbard
staking out a bold ‘Trump is *too* tough on Putin’ lane in the
Democratic primary,” 
tweeted former
NSA attorney Susan Hennessey of CNN and the Brookings Institution.
“As predictable as it is absurd.”

“Tulsi
Gabbard’s is the only Twitter account other than Trump’s that I
routinely have to check to make sure it’s actually hers, because
the tweet is so absurdly ridiculous,” 
tweeted #Resistance
pundit John Aravosis. “Now she’s defending Trump on Russia.
Why is she a Democrat? And she’s actually using Kremlin
talking points (nuclear war!). Unbelievable.”

“Tulsi,
you aren’t the first American politician to cozy up to foreign
dictators and to serve as a Putin mouthpiece,” 
tweeted former
CIA officer Evan McMullin. “While you, Putin and Trump fear
monger about nuclear war, we’ll protect our democracy and hold
corrupted politicians accountable.”

Susan Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey

Tulsi Gabbard
@TulsiGabbard

Short-sighted politicians & media pundits who’ve spent last 2 years accusing Trump as a Putin puppet have brought us the expensive new Cold War & arms race. How? Because Trump now does everything he can to prove he’s not Putin’s puppet—even if it brings us closer to nuclear war.

4,214

12:45 PM – Mar 17, 2019


There
are many, many more, but you get the picture. The deluge of responses
to Gabbard’s undeniably true statement about Trump’s dangerous
escalations against a nuclear superpower are largely predicated on
two assumptions: (1) that Trump has not in fact made the escalations
that he has made, and (2) that the danger of nuclear war is not a
real or significant thing. These are both, obviously, bat shit
insane.

The
primary risk of nuclear war is not that one will be planned out and
deliberately started in an attempt to win, but that a warhead will be
deployed amid the chaos of escalating tensions as a result of
miscommunication, misunderstanding or technical failure, as nearly
happened 
on
more than one occasion
 during
the last cold war. Once one nuclear weapon has been deployed in an
already tense situation, it’s unlikely that the full arsenals of both
sides won’t be unleashed upon each other. As journalist Glenn
Greenwald 
pointed
out
 in
response to the uproar over Gabbard’s tweet, “The Bulletin of
Atomic Scientists’ doomsday clock is at 
2
minutes before midnight
.
By far its two greatest threats to *humanity’s existence* are climate
change & US/Russia nuclear war. Yes, how crazy and treasonous to
want to avoid ratcheting up tensions.”

The
US and Russia are 
by
an immensely wide margin
 the
two biggest nuclear powers on the planet, which makes for a lot of
small, unpredictable moving parts with mounting tensions steadily
increasing the probability of something going catastrophically wrong.


Dismissing
a congresswoman’s attempt to point at this potentially world-ending
risk as a “Kremlin talking point” is about the stupidest,
craziest thing that a human brain could possibly come up with.

And
yet here we are.

Ploughshares Fund
@plough_shares

There are still more than 14,000 nuclear weapons left on the planet. Join us in reducing and eliminating nuclear threats today https://www.ploughshares.org/world-nuclear-stockpile-report 

11

10:33 PM – Sep 4, 2018

World Nuclear Weapon Stockpile

Twenty-nine years after the end of the Cold War, the world’s combined stockpiles of nuclear weapons remain at unacceptably high levels.

ploughshares.org


So
what’s up with that? Why is an indisputably true claim about an
indisputably real danger being treated as a lie by Democratic Party
loyalists, even though it attacks the same president they themselves
claim to oppose?

The
answer is because it doesn’t fit the narrative. A consensus has been
built over the last two years that Trump is a Kremlin puppet, so the
indisputable fact that his administration is endangering the life of
every organism on this planet by escalating tensions with Russia
looks like a lie against that backdrop. The facts say one thing, the
narrative says another, and they go with the narrative. For most
people, narrative takes precedence over fact.

And
what’s interesting is that these same facts could have remained
exactly as they are and allowed the exact opposite narrative to be
constructed. If her plutocratic owners had wished it, Rachel Maddow
would have spent every night over the last two years warning everyone
that Donald Trump is taking dangerous actions against Russia that
threaten to wipe all life off the face of the earth, and it would
have worked. If Trump had continued making these escalations in our
hypothetical alternate timeline while the mass media was constantly
selling the “Trump’s going to get us all killed in a nuclear war
with Russia” narrative, all the same blue-checkmarked Twitter
pundits you see yelling at Tulsi Gabbard today would be yelling about
the dangers of nuclear war in our alternate timeline.

Narrative
really is that powerful. You see it in the behavior of social media
users, you see it in the behavior of governments, you see it in
religions, and you see it in abusive relationships which continue
because of the narrative “He’s a good guy underneath it all and
he really loves me” even though the facts say “He beats you
and cheats on you all the time.” If you can control the stories
that people tell themselves about a given situation, then you control
those people on all matters pertaining to that situation. Regardless
of facts.

Which
is why the plutocratic class funnels so much money into buying up
media influence, funding think tanks, and other means of narrative
control: if you can control the narrative, no amount of facts will
deter the mainstream public from going along with your agendas. This
is why the behaviors of governments so consistently move in alignment
with the interests of this same media-buying, think tank-funding,
politician-owning plutocratic class. Whoever controls the narrative
controls the world.

_________________________

Thanks
for reading! My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you
enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me
on
 Facebook,
following my antics on
 Twitter, throwing
some money into my hat on 
Patreon or Paypalpurchasing
some of my 
sweet
merchandise
, buying
my new book 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
,
or my previous book 
Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see
the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for
my 
website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Caitlin
Johnstone
 |
March 18, 2019 at 10:50 pm | Tags: 
#Trumpcold
war
PoliticsRussiaTulsi
Gabbard
tweet |
Categories: 
Article |

URL: https://wp.me/p9tj6M-1Bd

==================================

Zie wat betreft de Nederlandse valse profeet van Russiagate, D66 leeghoofd Ollongren:

Kasja Ollongren (D66 minister) en de Russische manipulatie van de Provinciale Statenverkiezingen
Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ollongren (D66 minister) schiet een levensgrote bok met fake news show

Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

Zie verder: 

Russiagate gelovigen krijgen nieuwe klap: WikiLeaks kreeg de DNC mails van een klokkenluider, niet van Rusland…..‘ (zie ook de links naar de ‘jongste berichten’ over ‘Russische manipulatie’ in dat bericht)

Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen

BBC: Rusland ‘misbruikt humor’ om Russiagate te ontkrachten….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Uitgelekte telefoongesprekken tussen Trump en Putin bewijzen dat ‘Russiagaters gelijk hebben……’

WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….

The Guardian: ondanks een enorme misser (fake news) gaat men door met de valse beschuldigingen t.a.v. Assange……

Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

New York Times: eerste Israëlische inval in Gazastrook sinds 2014 >> fake news!

Noord-Koreaans ‘bedrog met nucleaire deal’ is fake news o.a. gebracht door de New York Times

‘Fake News’ misbruikt door dictaturen en de reguliere (massa-) media

Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert

Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax‘ (Russiagate, de enorme leugen op basis waaraan we de huidige censuurgolf te danken hebben……)

Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen‘ (zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Israëlische manipulatie van de VS presidentsverkiezingen, gaat veel verder dan wat men Rusland in de schoenen schuift…..

‘Russiagate’: Intel-raport over Russische bemoeienis met verkiezingen opgebouwd met leugens en is politiek gemotiveerd, aldus Matlock, voormalig VS ambassadeur in Moskou

The Attack on ‘Fake News’ Is Really an Attack on Alternative Media

The Lie of the 21st Century: How Mainstream Media “Fake News” Led to the U.S. Invasion of Iraq

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

Mocking Trump Doesn’t Prove Russia’s Guilt

CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat

Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt ‘TV ankers’ propaganda op te lezen (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van ‘lokaal nieuws’)

Ex-CIA agent legt uit hoe de VS schaduwregering en deep state werken, ofwel de machinaties achter de schermen……

‘Russiagate’ een nieuwe ongelooflijke aanklacht van de Democraten…….

VS demoniseert Russiagate critici als Jill Stein…..

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

Britse en VS manipulaties van verkiezingen en stimulatie van conflicten middels psychologische oorlogsvoering‘ (voor VS manipulaties van verkiezingen elders, liggen er ‘metersdikke’ dossiers, o.a. in te zien op WikeLeaks)

Jair Bolsonaro (president Brazilië) heeft nauwe banden met fascistische paramilitaire doodseskaders

In
een 
zoals gebruikelijk voor Glenn Greenwald uitgebreid en uitstekend schrijven, vertelt hij in het hieronder opgenomen artikel over
de nauwe banden, die de fascistische president van Brazilië en zijn
zonen hebben met de paramilitaire extreemrechtse
terreurgroepen, of beter gezegd fascistische doodseskaders in dat land…..

Zoals uit het voorgaande al blijkt bestaan deze doodseskaders uit (ex-) politie- en legerpersoneel,  ze zijn o.a. verantwoordelijk voor de moord op de populaire Braziliaanse rechter Patricia Acioli…… (het lijkt wel het Italië uit de 80er en 90er jaren van de vorige eeuw…) Acioli werd vermoord door 2 ex-agenten van de militaire politie, die NB nauwe banden onderhielden met Bolsonaro en zijn misdadige familie……. (zie de berichten onder het hieronder opgenomen artikel)

Ook wethouder van Rio de Janeiro Marielle Franco werd door zo’n doodseskader vermoord….. Deze 2 moorden werden gepleegd omdat Acioli en Franco zich NB bemoeiden met de vervolging van misdaad en corruptie!

Bij het onderzoek naar de moord op Franco vond de politie een groot arsenaal aan wapens en munitie van VS makelij…….

De
zogenaamde strijd van Bolsonaro tegen de misdaad en corruptie in
Brazilië is dan ook een strijd gericht tegen links en de kleine misdadigers onder de Braziliaanse bevolking….. Intussen heeft Bolsonaro een regering met uiterst corrupte figuren gevormd, terwijl hij het presidentschap won door te beloven de corruptie en de misdaad aan te pakken, hebben de grote misdadigers vrij spel, waar de meeste Brazilianen in armoede moeten leven en die grote misdadigers veelal juist verantwoordelijk zijn voor de regie op de kleine misdaad……. (ofwel de misdaad wordt amper aangepakt, zelfs minder dan onder voorgaande regeringen en dan moet je bedenken dat Bolsonaro nog maar relatief kort president is….)

Bolsonaro wordt door de reguliere westerse media en veel westerse politici geprezen voor zijn ‘aanpak van corruptie en misdaad’, zonder dat ze daar voorbeelden van kunnen geven…… Opvallend is de houding van de westerse media wel gezien het feit dat op dodenlijsten van deze paramilitaire groepen naast mensenrechtenactivisten, ook journalisten staan genoemd……

Lees
het volgende artikel, eerder verschenen op The Intercept en geeft het
door, in de reguliere westerse media is er geen aandacht
voor het fascistische gehalte van de huidige Braziliaanse regering,
die nu al meer corrupt is, dan de vorige 2 regeringen in alle jaren bij
elkaar lieten zien (en dan moet nog opgemerkt worden dat die 2
regeringen voor het overgrote deel valselijk werden beschuldigd van
corruptie…)….. Als de linkse ex-president Lula da Silva niet op valse gronden was veroordeeld, had hij op zeker de verkiezingen gewonnen van Bolsonaro….. (er was dus alle belang bij, ook voor de VS, dat Lula vast bleef zitten en dat Bolsonaro daarmee de verkiezingen zou winnen en zo gebeurde….)

Video:
As Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro Prepares to Meet Donald Trump, His
Family’s Close Ties to Notorious Paramilitary Gangs Draw Scrutiny
and Outrage

Glenn
Greenwald
Victor
Pougy

March
18 2019, 4:56 p.m.

LEIA
EM PORTUGUÊS 

Brazil´s
president Jair Bolsonaro

is in Washington to meet U.S. President Donald Trump at the
White House on Tuesday. While the trip officially is focused on
the joint efforts of the U.S. and Brazil to change the government of
Venezuela, it is being billed by the Bolsonaro government as a
“restart” of his presidency and image after 
multiple,
serious scandals
 crippled
the 
first
three months of his presidency
.

But
when it comes to recreating his image, the timing of this trip
could hardly be worse. Key news events of the last
several weeks — including the 
arrests
of two former Rio de Janeiro police officers
 for
the March 2018 assassination of Rio City Council Councilor Marielle
Franco — have highlighted the most damaging and, to many, most
terrifying revelations about Bolsonaro and his three politician sons:
their extensive, direct, multilayered, and deeply personal ties to
the paramilitary gangs and militias responsible for Brazil’s most
horrific violence. is in Washington to meet U.S. President
Donald Trump at the White House on Tuesday. While the trip
officially is focused on the joint efforts of the U.S. and Brazil to
change the government of Venezuela, it is being billed by the
Bolsonaro government as a “restart” of his presidency and image
after 
multiple,
serious scandals
 crippled
the 
first
three months of his presidency
.

Watch
our video report on the growing, multilevel, personal, and highly
disturbing links between Bolsonaro and his family on the one hand,
and the country’s most violent, lawless, and murderous paramilitary
gangs on the other:

Just
consider how, even before the arrests of Franco’s killers last
week, so many deep ties had already emerged between Bolsonaro and his
sons, who won office principally on an anti-crime and
anti-corruption platform, and the paramilitary gangs composed of
current and former military police officers and military members.
Bolsonaro himself is a former army captain who served during Brazil’s
military dictatorship and left in the 1980s amid allegations of
misconduct; yet, even now as the president, he still has his
friends and aides address him as “Captain.”

In
January, the Rio de Janeiro police executed 
a
full-scale raid
 against
the city’s most dangerous militia, the one that houses within
it the terrifying murder-for-hire team known as “the Crime Office.”
That assassin team is composed of highly trained police officers who
use their specialized knowledge of investigations and assassin skills
to carry out murders with very little possibility of detection,
and they have long been the leading suspects in Franco’s
assassination, given how professional and frighteningly efficient
that murder was carried out.

The
January raid resulted in the arrest of five of the top six commanders
of the militia. The only one who escaped, and is still a fugitive,
was the chief of that militia: ex-police captain Adriano Magalhães
da Nóbrega (pictured under, from a prior arrest). Wanted for other
murders, and subject to an Interpol arrest warrant, he has presided
as the leader of Rio’s most terrifying militia, the one that police
concluded carried out Franco’s assassination with such chilling
precision.


That
raid led to a shocking revelation: Unbeknownst to the public, the
mother and wife of Nóbrega — one of Brazil’s most notorious
gangsters — were both receiving salaries from the state. That’s
because 
both
of them were formally employed by Flávio Bolsonaro
, Jair
Bolsonaro’s oldest son, for the entire last decade as he served as
a state representative in the Rio de Janeiro state legislature. When
Jair Bolsonaro was elected president last November, Flávio moved up
to the Federal Senate as a result of winning his election in Rio with
a massive vote total.

Shortly
after this highly incriminating connection was revealed, a dam
collapsed in the interior of Brazil and 
tragically
killed more than 200 people,
 understandably
replacing news coverage of virtually all other events. That resulted
in far less attention being paid to Flávio’s close connections to
Nóbrega’s family than was deserved. So just reflect on that: Jair
Bolsonaro’s son had on his official government payroll the mother
and wife of one of the country’s most notorious and psychopathic
paramilitary leaders, the fugitive chief of the militia
responsible for the assassination of Marielle Franco, among countless
other murders.

In
February, Flávio’s direct and intimate ties to militias became
even more glaring. Checks 
were
found
 issued
in the name of his campaign account signed by the sister of two
twin-brother militia members, Alan and Alex Rodrigues de
Oliveira, arrested in a large-scale police raid last August. Just
months prior to the arrest of these two militia brothers,
Flávio 
posted
to his Instagram
 a
photo of himself and his father, then a presidential candidate, at a
birthday party for the two militia twins, congratulating them and
heaping praise on the family.

IN
RETROSPECT,
 that
Flávio had such close personal connections to Rio’s
militias that he put the mother and wife of its most notorious chief
on his payroll should not have been surprising. As a state
legislator, he 
twice
bestowed on the top militia leaders
,
then police officers, formal awards and honors, praising them for
their civil service to their communities.

Far
worse, in 2011, Brazilian Judge Patricia Acioli, who, along with
Brazil’s left-wing PSOL party, was overseeing a sweeping criminal
investigation into militias and heroically sent numerous high-ranking
police officers to prison, was 
brutally
murdered
 outside
her home, horrifying not just Brazil but the world. While all
Brazilian politicians expressed horror and disgust at this brazen
attack on the rule of law — showing that militias could just murder
whoever they wanted, even judges sending their leaders to prison —
Flávio posted a tweet that basically blamed her for her own murder,
criticizing her for provoking the militias:

Jair
Bolsonaro himself has a history of multiple ties to Brazil’s
militias and several of its key leaders. He has twice, on the floor
of the Congress, 
explicitly
praised
 their
death squads as good for the country’s security and crime problems.
On one occasion, after various members of Congress from the northern
region of Brazil warned of the growth of death squads and
extrajudicial murders carried out by growing police-composed
militias, Bolsonaro 
stood
to explicitly praise them as crime-fighting patriots
 and
declared them “welcome” in Rio de Janeiro. 
Since
then, those militias have taken over huge swaths of Brazil’s most
critical cities, including Rio. A January investigation from The
Intercept Brasil found that militias have 
virtually
taken over the entire city
.

In
sum, the Bolsonaro movement has been fixated on Brazil’s crime
epidemic, and anger over growing violence was arguably one of the two
main factors in the rise of that movement (the other being anger over
systemic political corruption). But when Bolsonaro and his family
speak of crime, they almost always try to focus attention on the
primarily black drug traffickers who live in the city’s poor
favelas, and virtually never speak of the far more menacing, serious,
and terrifying source of criminality carried out by the Bolsonaros’
ideological companions and heroes of the country’s sophisticated
and skilled militias:

That
Bolsonaro — despite how central his anti-crime posture is to his
political popularity — is eager to praise, rather than condemn and
combat, militias is not hard to understand. Those militias are ruled
by his friends, neighbors, comrades, and closest associates.

The
militia member who worked as Flávio’s driver for the last decade
and whose large money movements — including one 
into
the account of Jair Bolsonaro’s wife
 —
triggered the first scandal of his presidency, ex-police Officer
Fabrício Queiroz, is one of Bolsonaro’s oldest and closest
friends. When police sought to question him about those money
movements to the Bolsonaro family, he unsurprisingly went into
hiding in the precise neighborhood, Rio das Pedras, most notorious
for being commanded most thoroughly by Rio’s most violent militia.

WHEN
TWO OF FRANCO’S KILLERS
 were finally
apprehended last week, just two days shy of the one-year anniversary
of her assassination, nobody was surprised that they had both
been members of Brazil’s military police. The extreme
professionalism with which that murder was carried out, including the
still-unexplained coincidence that numerous public security cameras
on the path they chose to pursue her had been turned off in the days
before the assassination, left no doubt that militias were
responsible.

But
almost immediately after the police announced the identity of the two
assassins they arrested, ties to Bolsonaro emerged. The shooter
himself, police Sgt. Ronnie Lessa, lives on the same street as
Bolsonaro’s Rio house, in an exclusive gated community: an extreme
coincidence given how massive and sprawling of a city Rio de Janeiro
is. In other words, one of Franco’s assassins — the man who
pumped four bullets into her head — turned out to be Bolsonaro’s
neighbor, both of whom lived in close proximity in a very rich
neighborhood despite working their entire adult lives on the
public payroll.

Shortly
thereafter, a photo emerged of Lessa and Bolsonaro together, posted
to Lessa’s social media account. Police then confirmed that
Bolsonaro’s 20-year-old son and Lessa’s daughter had been dating.
While none of those facts are close to dispositive in terms of
linking Bolsonaro to Franco’s murder, those are a lot of
coincidental connections to have between a three-decade member of
Congress and the current president of the Republic, on the one hand,
and the murderers who pumped four bullets into the skull of one of
Rio de Janeiro’s most prominent and inspiring left-wing politicians
on the other.

As
part of the police search of the assassins’ properties, the police
apprehended the single largest collection of armaments in the history
of Brazil’s democracy: 117 M-16 automatic rifles. Notably, they
were apprehended not in the favelas on which the Bolsonaros
obsessively fixate when talking about crime, but in a luxury
condominium owned by a former police officer who is part of the
militia that assassinated Franco and which has multiple ties to the
Bolsonaro family:

m16-1552922172

Armaments
seized from the house of one of the accused assassins of Marielle
Franco, including 117 M-16 automatic rifles, from Rio de Janeiro.
Photo:
Rio Civil Police

Days
later, the police — despite still not having apprehended the people
who ordered and paid for Franco’s assassination — insinuated
a political motive to her killers. Consistent with
Bolsonaro’s denunciation of the sweeping investigation of
militias led by Franco’s political mentor, Marcelo Freixo of the
left-wing PSOL party (the same party of Jean Wyllys, the gay
congressperson who 
last
month fled Brazil
 and
gave up his congressional term under highly specific death threats),
reports emerged that 
Franco’s
assassins were overt Bolsonaro supporters
.

The
police also indicated that they had seized the computers and other
electronic devices of the two killers, and discovered that,
subsequent to Franco’s assassination, the murderous militia pair
had 
searched
and monitored the movements
 of
numerous human rights activists, left-wing journalists, and
politicians (one of those specified by the police was my husband,
David Miranda, now a congressperson from the same left-wing party as
Freixo, Franco, and Wyllys).

All
of this mounting evidence — most of which has been unearthed just
in the 10 weeks since Bolsonaro’s January 1 inauguration — paints
a deeply disturbing and dangerous picture. Brazil — the world’s
fifth-largest country, with massive oil reserves and the world’s
most critical environmental region in the Amazon that the current
government wants to sell off to the highest industrial bidders — is
in the hands of a family with multiple, close, and growing
connections to the country’s most murderous, criminal, and
sociopathic death squads and paramilitary forces.

As Bolsonaro
meets Trump at the White House tomorrow, that meeting should be
understood first and foremost within this context. Bolsonaro has
quickly elevated himself to the top echelon of the world’s most
thuggish, violent, and dangerous leaders. And given the stakes raised
by Brazil — geopolitically, culturally, economically,
environmentally, and militarily — this is clearly one of the most
profoundly disturbing developments of the last year. Whatever else is
true, the media focus on Bolsonaro’s presence in the White
House should feature these facts prominently and centrally if the
reporting is to accurately reflect who he is and what he represents.

zie ook:

Zie ook:

Mensenrechten- en milieuactivisten worden massaal vermoord in Brazilië en Colombia, waar het laatste land NAVO bases heeft…….

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

Bolton geeft toe dat de VS een fascistisch beleid voert……

Bolsonaro, de fascistische nieuwe president van Brazilië, werd volgens Avaaz en fake news brengers als de NYT gekozen door manipulatie via WhatsApp

Bolsonaro wint Braziliaanse verkiezingen >> weer zijn we een fascistisch geleid land ‘rijker…’

Braziliaanse verkiezingen: democratie versus (neo-) fascisme, ook een groot gevaar in Europa

Katy Sherriff (Radio1 correspondent Z-Amerika) brandt socialistische partij Brazilië af……

Russiagate geslaagd: geen impeachment van Trump, waar Clinton en haar team na bewezen misdaden vrijuit gaan…..

Nancy
Pelosi, de ‘Speaker of the House’ (nee, bepaald geen B&O speaker) heeft
laten weten dat ze geen behoefte heeft aan een impeachment (afzetten) van Trump
over Russiagate…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!
ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Na 2
jaar lang schreeuwen over Russiagate, zonder ook maar een flinter aan
bewijs, waar het woord ‘impeachment’ niet van de lucht was, durft
Democraat Pelosi te zeggen dat ze geen reden ziet om Trump af te
zetten…….

Russiagate
was niets anders dan een doofpot voor het misdadig optreden van
Clinton en haar campagneteam, ofwel: Russiagate truc geslaagd: Trump
ten onrechte beschuldigd van samenspannen met Rusland*, (nogmaals) terwijl de
misdaden van Clinton en haar campagne team onder het tapijt zijn
geveegd!! Het gaat hier om de enorme misdaad van de kandidaatstelling diefstal
door Clinton en haar team, de kandidaatstelling voor het presidentschap van de VS van haar partijgenoot Bernie Sanders….. 

Sanders was veel te ‘links’ voor de apparatsjiks van de Democraten, dus voor figuren als Clinton en Obama, vandaar dat de boel zo werd gemanipuleerd dat Sanders deze voorverkiezingen verloor…… De aanduiding ‘Clintongate’ zou dan ook moeten worden gebruikt, i.p.v. Russiagate………. 

Vergeet niet dat de hele Russiagate hysterie heeft gezorgd voor censuur op het internet**, iets waarvoor westerse politici en de reguliere westerse media, regimes als dat in China aan de paal nagelen…… Niet alleen dat, er worden kapitalen uitgegeven ‘om te voorkomen’ dat Russiagate zich kan herhalen….. 

In Nederland heeft hare D66 akeligheid Ollongren het gore lef te stellen dat Rusland hier ook de boel manipuleert en reken maar dat ook aan de bestrijding van die fantasie enorme kapitalen aan belastinggeld worden verspild…….. Waar de schrijvers op sites die vertellen wat er echt gebeurd in de wereld, werden en worden afgeschilderd als Russische trollen……. Denk daaraan als je volgende week en in mei in het stemhok staat, niet alleen D66 is volkomen fout op dit gebied, maar ook partijen als de VVD, CDA, PvdA, CU, SGP en GroenLinks……

Lees het
volgende sarcastische en toch ook humoristische artikel (je gelooft je ogen af en toe niet) van Caitlin Johnstone,
eerder geplaatst op haar website en overgenomen van Anti-Media:

Nancy
Pelosi Tacitly Admits That Russiagate Is Bullshit

March
12, 2019 at 12:34 pm

Written
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone

(CJ Opinion) — In
an 
interview
with the 
Washington
Post
 yesterday,
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that she opposed the impeachment
of President Trump. This comes shortly before Mueller’s
investigation into Trump-Russia collusion is 
expected
to wrap up
.

I’m
not for impeachment,” Pelosi told the Post. “This is news. I’m
going to give you some news right now because I haven’t said this
to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been
thinking about this: Impeachment is so divisive to the country that
unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and
bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it
divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

The
response to Pelosi’s remarks has been swift and strong.

Wrong!” exclaimed MSNBC’s
Russiagate 
con
man
 Malcolm
Nance via Twitter. “What the hell is wrong with the @SpeakerPelosi
Congress that they absolve themselves of their duty! Nothing is
criminal anymore?! Trump can do and say like a dictator as he
pleases? All of his crimes are OK even if you see them? This requires
a public outcry. #Disgraceful”

I
like Speaker Pelosi but this is NOT the right
approach,” 
tweeted Michael
Avenatti of Stormy Daniels fame. “If Trump has committed
impeachable offenses, he must be charged and he must face a trial in
the Senate. Would the Repubs take this approach? Hell no! And this is
why we get outplayed.”

Sorry,
Madam Speaker,” 
tweeted Esquire’s
Charles P Pierce. “If you really believe the president* is an
unprecedented threat to the Constitution, your oath demands that you
begin the process to remove him. It’s your job.”

Malcolm Nance

@MalcolmNance

Wrong! What the hell is wrong with the @SpeakerPelosi Congress that they absolve themselves of their duty! Nothing is criminal anymore?! Trump can do and say like a dictator as he pleases? All of his crimes are OK even if you see them? This requires a public outcry. .

Jonathan Allen

@jonallendc

Pelosi on impeachment: “He’s just not worth it.”

“Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path…And he’s just not worth it.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2019/03/11/feature/nancy-pelosi-on-impeaching-president-trump-hes-just-not-worth-it/?utm_term=.47dbbad649b2 


14.3K

9:29 PM – Mar 11, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

The
House’s most virulent Russiagater, however, sang a different tune.

If
the evidence isn’t sufficient to win bipartisan support for this,
putting the country through a failed impeachment isn’t a good
idea,” said Congressman Adam Schiff 
told
CNN
 yesterday.

As
you might expect, those voices in alternative media who’ve been
voicing skepticism of the Russiagate narrative since the beginning
have been having a ball with this one.

BREAKING:
The Democrats’ Congressional leadership is realizing that their
two-year Russia conspiracy theory is not going to pan
out,” 
tweeted journalist
Aaron Maté, who has been in my opinion the single most lucid
Russiagate critic for a long time now.

If
Trump is literally controlled by Putin to the point where Trump is
forced to act in the best interests of Russia *at the expense of the
US* — which has been the prevailing claim not of Dem fringes
but its mainstream — how can it be morally justified not to
impeach him???” 
tweeted journalist
Glenn Greenwald in response to Pelosi’s comments.

How
indeed? Pelosi’s comments go completely against the narrative that
mainstream Democrats have been selling America for over two years
now, and this close to the Mueller report amount to a rejection of
that narrative. Her statement is a tacit admission that she knows
Russiagate is bullshit, has always been bullshit, and will continue
to be bullshit.

Glenn Greenwald

@ggreenwald

Anyone who actually believed Putin controls Trump, Trump subordinates US interests to Russia, and that Trump conspired with a foreign adversary to win an election – as Schiff has spent 2 years screaming he’s seen *conclusive* evidence for – would have a duty to try to impeach:

Manu Raju

@mkraju

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff tells me he agrees with Pelosi on impeachment: “If the evidence isn’t sufficient to win bipartisan support for this, putting the country through a failed impeachment isn’t a good idea.”


1,770

1:38 AM – Mar 12, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Is
it possible that Putin has something on Pelosi?” Greenwald 
joked.
“Or perhaps Democratic politicians and their media allies have been
knowingly feeding the party base and cable viewers unadulterated,
deranged, unhinged bullshit that they now can’t carry through on
with the power in their hands because it was all self-serving,
manipulative dreck? Anyone who has ever believed Trump is controlled
and blackmailed by Putin to the point that Putin makes Trump
treasonously sacrifice America’s interests for Russia’s — and
there are a lot of you — should be marching in fury in the
streets over Pelosi’s refusal to impeach Trump.”

But,
of course, they will not. There will be no protest against Pelosi’s
opposition to impeachment because those who would lead it know there
will never be any evidence that could possibly lead to a bipartisan
willingness in the Senate to remove him from office.

Anyone
who’s paid close and intellectually honest attention to the
Russiagate circus has known since the beginning that Trump was never
going to be impeached for a treasonous conspiracy with the Russian
government, despite the endless fantasies inflicted upon the
blinkered Maddow muppets day after day after day for over two years
now. Back in 2017 
I
said
 that
“Mueller will continue finding evidence of corruption throughout
his investigation, since corruption is to DC insiders as water is to
fish, but he will not find evidence of collusion to win the 2016
election that will lead to Trump’s impeachment,” because it was
obvious to anyone who knew anything. And that has proven to be the
case with uninterrupted consistency.

If
those who have been driving the Russiagate conspiracy theory really
believed what 
they’ve
been pushing
,
they would be up in arms at Pelosi’s remarks. Instead, we see
responses like Russiagate 
grifter Bill
Palmer publishing 
a
hilarious article
 titled
“Nancy Pelosi is playing rope-a-dope with Donald Trump on
impeachment”, explaining that her remarks were actually a brilliant
57-D chess maneuver designed to “play this Trump fool like fiddle.”

Instead,
by answering the question in this manner, Pelosi accomplishes two
things,” says the 
Palmer
Report
,
where 
sitting
US senators
 and top
Harvard law professors
 go
for the important updates they need to continue fueling Russia
hysteria in America. “First, she manages to put off the question
until she and her allies have managed to carve Donald Trump up.
Second, she’s messing with him. She just 
insulted him
by saying he’s not worth the trouble of impeachment. Pelosi is
looking to bait Trump into publicly feuding with her over the
question of impeachment. That way it’ll be Trump introducing the
concept, not her. And that’ll serve to help put the impeachment
process on the right track. Just don’t call it ‘impeachment’
quite yet.”

So
that tells you a bit about where the Russiagaters are at today.

This
all comes out, by the way, at the same time as 
a
new 
Wall
Street Journal
report
 that
Trump once attempted to personally cajole German Chancellor Angela
Merkel into ceasing to buy gas from Russia out of fear that “it
will make Europe’s largest economy excessively reliant on Russian
energy.” Hardly the behavior you’d expect from a Putin puppet,
but then neither are the rest of the 
many,
many other actions
 that
this administration has taken against the interests of Moscow.

Aaron Maté

@aaronjmate

As Democratic elites back off impeachment & collusion after pushing it for 2 years, perhaps voters will conclude they’ve been misled. And perhaps a backlash will benefit the wing of the party those same elites have used the Trump-Russia hype to ward off: the actual progressives.


775

1:56 AM – Mar 12, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

It
is right and appropriate that those few voices on the left who’ve
been sharply critical of Russiagate from the beginning are now taking
some time to gloat at and mock its peddlers with increasing scorn.
The centrists who chose to spend more than two years forcing
everyone’s energy into this blatant psyop which 
escalated
a cold war
 against
a nuclear superpower were wrong, and the leftists who objected to it
were right. Trump’s term is more than halfway over, and
Russiagaters chose to suck all the oxygen out of the room for this
brainless, fruitless, worthless endeavor instead of allowing space
for progressive reform and for criticism of Trump’s actual
pernicious policies from the left. And they did it on purpose.

Mock
the Russiagaters. Mock them ruthlessly, and never, ever let them
forget the horrible thing that they did. Never stop making fun of
them and reminding them how stupid and crazy they acted during this
humiliating period of American history. And never stop using it as a
weapon against them. They were wrong, so they should not be leading
the way on what passes for America’s political left today.
Skepticism was the only appropriate response to Russiagate in a
post-Iraq invasion world, and those on the left who made that
appropriate response should be treated with infinitely more respect
and deference than those who did not.

They
were wrong, we were right, and now even Nancy Pelosi is all but
admitting it. Never let them forget it.

Support
Caitlin’s work on 
Patreon or Paypal.

Opinion
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone
 /
Republished with permission / 
Medium / Report
a typo

===================================

*  Door alle tamtam van Pelosi en andere Democratische Partijbonzen zullen velen in de VS blijven geloven dat Trump wel degelijk samenspande met Rusland…… Immers een belachelijk cliché werkt voor velen nog steeds: ‘waar rook is is vuur……’ Begrijp me goed, Trump is een smerige psychopaat, die inderdaad afgezet zou moeten worden, maar juist door het gebruik van valse beschuldigingen komt Trump steeds ‘vaster’ in het zadel te zitten…..



** Hier een ‘paar’ voorbeelden van wat het Russiagate sprookje teweeg heeft gebracht:

Putin vraagt en Trump levert: een lijst met ‘alle goede zaken die Trump voor Rusland regelde’

Twitter verwijdert accounts vanwege ‘propaganda’, maar werkt zelf met een militair propagandist

Australische politie valt kantoor ABC binnen vanwege gelekte documenten

Gelekte documenten tonen aan dat Google en Pinterest censuur uitoefenen

Warren (democratisch presidentskandidaat) toont met hulp van Facebook aan dat dit bedrijf niet hoort te gaan over wat wel en niet is toegestaan

Facebook: uit gelekte documenten worden de steeds veranderende regels voor censuur op dit platform openbaar gemaakt: Facebook als geheime tak van de VS overheid

NewsGuard, het nieuwste wapen van Big Brother VS tegen de alternatieve media

Netflix censureert aflevering van humoristisch programma, ‘na een geldig verzoek’ op grond van Saoedische wetgeving….

Facebooks departement voor censuur: een hoognodige uitleg over een maatregel die alleen in een dictatuur thuishoort

Facebook censureert foto’s van verhongerende Jemenitische kinderen als ‘sexual content’

Google manipuleerde VS presidentsverkiezingen van 2016 en censureert niet alleen linkse/alternatieve sociale media

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

Google Maps veegt Palestijns gebied van de kaart

Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert

Bolsonaro, de fascistische nieuwe president van Brazilië, werd volgens Avaaz en fake news brengers als de NYT gekozen door manipulatie via WhatsApp

Facebooks zuivering van de alternatieve (nieuws) media staat nog in de kinderschoenen

Facebook censureert de waarheid over Columbus en de verovering van de Amerika’s…….

Facebook censuur gestuurd door het westers militair-industrieel complex en de NAVO in het bijzonder……….

Why the Coordinated Alternative Media Purge Should Terrify Everyone‘ (Tyler Durden op Zero Hedge)

Facebook en Twitter verwijderen nu volledige accounts………

Facebook (en Twitter) onderdrukt meningsvorming door het verwijderen van (echt) onafhankelijke media

Wie het nieuws controleert, controleert de wereld……

Facebook en Twitter verwijderen de eerlijke journalistiek en oprechte opinie >> censuur…..

Facebook verlaat ‘tranding news’ voor ‘brekend nieuws’ van 80 reguliere mediaorganen, ofwel nog meer ‘fake news…..’

Facebook komt met nieuwsshows van betrouwbare media als CNN en Fox News…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Censuur op het internet met vliegende start in de VS, ‘het land van het vrije woord….’

Facebook en NAVO werken samen in censuur op niet welgevallig nieuws……

Facebook helpt Saoedi-Arabië: doodstraf door onthoofding van vrouw die het waagde kritiek te uiten…..

Aanval op alternatieve media ‘succesvol’: meer en meer sites worden van het net geweerd………

ThinkProgress eiste censuur van Facebook en werd inderdaad gecensureerd…. ha! ha! ha! ha!

VS staatscensuur op Facebook (ook in de EU)

Facebook stelt perstituee van New York Times aan als censuur-agent…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Het echte Facebook schandaal: manipulatie van de gebruikers en gratis diensten voor eertijds presidentskandidaat Obama…….

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook doneerde aan de politici die hem in de VS aan de tand voelden >> in het EU parlement maakte hij gebruik van megalomane EU politici…..

Facebook wil samen met door Saoedi-Arabië gesubsidieerde denktank censureren…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

VS gebruikt sociale media om ‘fake comment’ te verspreiden en de bevolking te hersenspoelen met leugens, ofwel ‘fake news….’

Eis een nee tegen censuur op het internet!‘ 

Facebook e.a. hebben lak aan AVG (GDPR), misbruik persoonsgegevens gaat gewoon door…….

Facebook: verrijking van oliemaatschappijen en andere grote bedrijven, plus wereldwijde corruptie…….

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Facebook Purges Independent Media for “Political Disinformation”

Facebook Blocks Links to Free Speech Competitor ‘Minds’

AIPAC, een pro-Israël lobbygroep, koopt leden van het VS congres om met 4 miljoen dollar per jaar

Ilhan
Omar en Rashida Tlaib* zijn de eerste vrouwelijke moslim leden van het VS congres en deze 2 timmeren nogal aan de weg. Zo heeft Omar een berg
stront over zich heen gekregen voor het openbaren van het feit dat
AIPAC, een pro-Israëlische lobbygroep, ieder jaar weer congresleden omkoopt met 4 miljoen dollar voor politici die ‘de
goede zaak’ dienen, ofwel die zonder enige kritiek pal staan voor de
fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël en alle enorme oorlogsmisdaden (om niet te zeggen misdaden tegen de menselijkheid) die dit gestolen land begaat tegen de Palestijnen…..

Het
gaat overigens niet alleen om het pal staan voor Israël, maar ook
elke kritiek die op deze terreurstaat wordt geuit afdoen als
antisemitisme, behoort tot de taak van deze omgekochte congresleden en dat heeft Omar gemerkt zoals je
al kon lezen. Het feit dat Omar kritiek durft te hebben op AIPAC is
al reden genoeg om haar als antisemiet weg te zetten……

De
schrijver van dit artikel is Alexander Rubinstein en werd eerder
gepubliceerd op MintPress News, door mij overgenomen van Anti-Media.
Verbaas je zoals ik over de hysterische manier waarop men in de VS
elke komma kritiek op Israël afdoet als antisemitisch, datzelfde geldt overigens voor alle westerse landen, neem de kritiek op Jeremy Corbyn, Labour en oppositieleider in GB….** 

Laten
we hopen dat Omar en Tlaib zich uiteindelijk niet de mond laten
snoeren, de invloed van Israël op de politiek in de VS is ongeëvenaard en zelfs al zou het Russiagate sprookje waar zijn (wat
het niet is), zou die beïnvloeding niet in de schaduw kunnen staan
van de enorme invloed die Israël heeft op de politiek in de VS……
Zo sprak de zwaar corrupte oorlogsmisdadiger Netanyahu in 2015 het VS congres toe, waar hij de richting wilde bepalen van de politiek die de leden zouden moeten volgen inzake
Iran, dit daar hij het niet eens was met Obama…) Daarmee schoffeerde deze Palestijnenslachter niet alleen
Obama, maar schopte hij zelfs tegen het kleine beetje democratie dat nog over is in de VS…..

Ilhan
Omar is Right: AIPAC Influences Congress With $4 Million Every Year

February
11, 2019 at 10:04 pm

Written
by 
Alexander
Rubinstein

(MPN— What
unites Republicans and Democrats, a former Jewish terrorist, the
Republican leader in the House of Representatives, Nikki Haley,
Chelsea Clinton and Liz Cheney? A Muslim lady with a mouth and some
opinions, apparently. Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has been the
subject of bipartisan bullying that has reached a fever pitch since
the lawmaker explicitly called out the number one Israeli lobby group
in the U.S. — the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

Earlier
this year, Omar made heads explode in the halls of power after she
denounced the U.S.-backed coup attempt in Venezuela. Now, even
the leader of her own party in her own chamber of Congress – House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi – is joining a chorus of detractors accusing
Omar of anti-Semitism for correctly characterizing the business of
lobbying.

While
this is not the first time that Omar has come under fire for
criticizing Israel, the current saga began on Sunday when journalist
Glenn Greenwald tweeted an article by the Israeli daily
newspaper Haaretz that trumpeted calls from House
Republican leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to “take action” against
Omar and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI). McCarthy did not specify which
statements he opposed, but called the situation “equal” or worse
than that of Rep. Steve King (R-IA) who was removed from his
committee assignments by his party after he questioned when “white
supremacy” had become “offensive.”

Tlaib
and Omar are the first two Muslim women in Congress, while Tlaib is
the first Palestinian-American. Both have supported the Boycott
Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, a nonviolent campaign to
economically pressure Israel into compliance with international and
humanitarian law.

Glenn Greenwald


@ggreenwald

Replying to @ggreenwald

Equating @IlhanMN & @RashidaTlaib‘s criticism of Israel to Steve King’s long defense of white supremacy is obscene (McCarthy said it’s worse). In the US, we’re allowed to criticize our own government: certainly foreign governments. The GOP House Leader’s priorities are warped.

Glenn Greenwald


@ggreenwald

Sorry, but you’re not going to turn the two first Muslim women to serve in the US Congress into overnight Jew-haters because of their criticisms of Israel. What’s actually anti-Semitic is conflating the Government of Israel with Jews, so those of you doing that should stop.


9,741

1:48 AM – Feb 11, 2019

MintPress
News
 has
previously covered 
dubious
accusations
 of
anti-Semitism against Tlaib after she took a stand against a
free-speech-crushing bill favored by — you guessed it — the
Israel lobby. Meanwhile, other lawmakers are 
attempting
to block
 Tlaib’s
planned delegation to the illegally occupied West Bank.

In
response to the attack from the Republican House leader, ACLU Human
Rights Director Jamil Dakwar 
quipped that
Congressman McCarthy may “want to revive McCarthyism.”

McCarthy
himself received $33,000 from NorPAC, “an AIPAC affiliate, in the
last election cycle,” 
reportedthe
online publication 
Jewish
Worker
.
Meanwhile, McCarthy himself has been accused of spreading
anti-Semitic tropes, warning that three Jewish, liberal mega-donors,
including George Soros, were trying to “buy” the midterm
elections, which were to take place the following day. 
That
tweet
 has
since been deleted.

Kevin McCarthy


@GOPLeader

One of my greatest honors is leading new members on a bipartisan trip to Israel to showcase the shared values and unbreakable bond between our countries.

Kevin McCarthy


@GOPLeader

Anti-Semitic tropes have no place in the halls of Congress. It is dangerous for Democrat leadership to stay silent on this reckless language.


4,809

Twitter Ads info and privacy

3,881 people are talking about this

Kevin McCarthy


@GOPLeader

Replying to @GOPLeader

Anti-Semitic tropes have no place in the halls of Congress. It is dangerous for Democrat leadership to stay silent on this reckless language.

District Sentinel@TheDCSentinel

Weird you would tie trips to Israel with antisemitism. Equating Zionism to Judaism is antisemitic. Almost like you are a disingenuous weasel


45

Twitter Ads info and privacy

About
the Benjamins

Upon
seeing the report, Omar did not pull any punches. In an apparent pun
on a slang term for $100 bills and the prime minister of Israel’s
first name, she tweeted that “it’s all about the Benjamins baby,”
which is a quote from a 1990’s Puff Daddy song.

Then,
an opinion editor at the Jewish magazine The Forward,
Batya Ungar-Sargon, reposted the tweet, telling her followers that
she’d “love to know who Ilhan Omar thinks is paying American
politicians to be pro-Israel, though I think I can guess.”

Mnar A. Muhawesh ⌛@MnarMuh

In 2018 spent ~ $4 Million lobbying our elected officials to support Israel, including quashing Americans first amend right to support BDS.@IlhanMN pointing out how Congress is bought to represent a foreign government over Americans isn’t antisemitic it’s stating facts.


521

9:41 PM – Feb 11, 2019

Omar
clapped back with just six characters, tweeting “AIPAC!” — the
acronym for the largest and most powerful pro-Israel lobby group in
the United States. In fact, AIPAC spends more than 
$3.5
million every year
 to
influence Congress to be more favorable towards Israel.

Eli Valley


@elivalley

This is a disgusting. By the same token one can say “The Forward has won the approval of the KKK.”


674

7:07 PM – Feb 11, 2019

Ungar-Sargon
then attempted to speak on behalf of all American Jews, responding to
Omar that she should “learn how to talk about Jews in a
non-anti-Semitic way.” Anti-Zionist American Jews promptly 
shut
her down
 in
replies.

Sam@halaljew

I know she’s still a Democrat and you should never put too much faith in anyone who’s a member of the Democratic Party, but I like Ilhan Omar. She’s had the balls to stand against the Washington consensus on Israel and on regime change in Venezuela. I’m glad she’s in the House.


809

3:58 AM – Feb 11, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

89 people are talking about this

But
some powerful people with Twitter accounts took exception the the
congresswoman’s identification of a pro-Israel lobby group as an
entity that “is paying American politicians to be pro-Israel.”
One is left to wonder what causes AIPAC doles out the contents of its
propaganda war-chest for if not to influence lawmakers on Israel. The
takeaway from this line of analysis is that money has no influence in
politics, which is patently absurd.

Yet
AIPAC’s own 
mission
statement
 claims
“AIPAC urges all members of Congress to support Israel through
foreign aid, government partnerships, joint anti-terrorism efforts.”

Eli Clifton

@EliClifton

Kudos to @IlhanMN for calling out the role of the GOP’s donors in influencing US foreign policy.

The GOP’s biggest donors, the Adelsons, are hawkishly pro-Israel and advocate using nukes on Iran!

The GOP’s biggest fundraiser, Norm Coleman, is a paid lobbyist for Saudi Arabia!


546

3:00 AM – Feb 11, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Here,
those that charge Omar with anti-Semitism reveal their own. By
leveling charges of bigotry against critics of the Israel lobby,
Israel’s defenders equate Jewishness with allegiance to Israel, or
Zionism. In keeping with this estimation, Jews that do not condone
the apartheid project underway in Palestine are branded
“self-hating.”

Rania Khalek

@RaniaKhalek

Here is Chelsea Clinton accusing Ilhan Omar of anti-semitism for critiquing AIPAC. You hear that? Being anti-AIPAC is now anti-semitism.

Chelsea Clinton

@ChelseaClinton

Replying to @bungarsargon @ReaganBattalion

Co-signed as an American. We should expect all elected officials, regardless of party, and all public figures to not traffic in anti-Semitism.


6,193

8:44 AM – Feb 11, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Despite
Rep. Omar’s statement about AIPAC being self-evident, the remark
riled the likes of former Trump Administration Ambassador to the UN
and pro- Israel 
Nikki
Haley
,
who once said, “When I come to AIPAC, I am with friends.”
Haley’s 
pro-Israel
track record
 at
the international body prompted an Israeli cartoonist to 
satirize her
departure with an image of a United Nations handyman telling Haley,
who is packing her bags, that she forgot her “second flag” — an
Israeli one. Israeli President Reuven Rivlin even called Haley a
“true ambassador” for Israel.

Nikki Haley

@NikkiHaley

To see this at the UN was a fight every day. This CANNOT be tolerated in our own Congress by anyone of either party. In a time of increased anti semitism, we all must be held to account. No excuses. ❤️
🇺🇸

Ilhan Omar

@IlhanMN

AIPAC! https://twitter.com/bungarsargon/status/1094756291803791360 


26.3K

4:22 AM – Feb 11, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

A
major Washington pile-on

Lawmakers
who pounced on Omar include: 
Sen.
Kevin Cramer
 (R-ND), Rep.
Doug Collins
 (R-GA), Sen.
Ted Cruz
 (R-TX), Rep.
Max Rose
 (D-NY), Rep.
Brad Schneider
 (D-IL), Rep.
Sean Maloney
 (D-NY), Rep.
Donna Shalala
 (D-FL), Rep.
Anthony Brindisi
 (D-NY), Rep.
Tom Suozzi
 (D-NY), Sen.
Krysten Sinema
 (D-AZ), Rep.
Lois Frankel
 (D-FL), Rep.
Eric Swalwell
 (D-CA), Sen.
Tom Cotton
 (R-AR), Rep.
Alcee Hastings
 (D-FL), Sen.
Martha McSally
 (R-AZ), Rep.
Liz Cheney
 (R-WY),
Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) and Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA), who are
trying to shore up support for 
a
letter
 to
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) hailing Israel as a “proud and
stable democracy with robust protections for minorities” and
calling for “swift action” to address the “recent rhetoric.”

Pelosi
responded hours later with a 
joint
statement
 with
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD), Majority Whip James Clyburn
(D-SC), Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Rep. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), and
Rep. Katherine Clark (D-MA) “condemning anti-Semitic comments made
over Twitter by Congresswoman Ilhan Omar.”

Also
included in the D.C. dogpiling were the 
Republican
Jewish Coalition
, the
American Jewish Committee
 (which
painted AIPAC as a “Jewish” organization), and Dov Hikind, whom
journalist Dan Cohen 
pointed
out
 is
a former member of the Jewish Defense League 
terrorist
organization
.
Bill and Hillary Clinton’s daughter Chelsea also “co-signed”
Ungar-Sargon’s smears of Omar’s rhetoric as “anti-Semitic.”

Judah Fishmonger@praisegodbarbon

In all seriousness though I am a young Jew who has never more represented on this issue than seeing @IlhanMN be brave enough to call out AIPAC and the Israel Lobby in its efforts to cement anti-Palestinian racism as a litmus test for Congress. She speaks for me, they don’t.


722

6:35 AM – Feb 11, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Chelsea
Clinton assured several on Twitter that she would “reach out to
Omar.” When Omar agreed, saying “we must call out smears from the
GOP and their allies,” Clinton agreed. That was until Ashley
Goldberg stepped in, tweeting that Clinton “outright said there is
a problem with antisemitism [sic] on both sides and Ilhan Omar
clearly said she only cares about what she can do to depict it as
only a problem with the GOP.”

Max Blumenthal

@MaxBlumenthal

Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton have earned over $3.5 million in paid speeches to pro-Israeli apartheid groups. At a $1000 a plate dinner, Bill Clinton said he would “grab a rifle and get in the trench and fight and die” for Israel. https://www.alternet.org/2016/02/clintons-earned-over-35-million-paid-addresses-pro-israel-organizations/amp/ 

Chelsea Clinton

@ChelseaClinton

Replying to @bungarsargon @ReaganBattalion

Co-signed as an American. We should expect all elected officials, regardless of party, and all public figures to not traffic in anti-Semitism.


4,088

3:06 AM – Feb 11, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

But
the conversation took a turn, culminating in Clinton’s 
vowing to
“google people” before engaging with them from then on out, after
journalist Hannah Gais 
pointed
out
 that
Goldberg was photographed at a white supremacist conference in 2016
hosted by Richard Spencer. Goldberg, an anti-communist Jewish media
personality, also 
used
to date
 Neo-Nazi
leader Matthew Heimbach, the founder of the now-defunct
Traditionalist Workers Party.

Mairav Zonszein מרב זונשיין

@MairavZ

Yes but Omar did not talk about Jews, she talked about money and it’s influence on American policy on Israel. What does it say about her accusers that any mention of money and power=Jews?

Michelle Goldberg

@michelleinbklyn

FYI, it’s possible to believe both that AIPAC has a pernicious effect on American politics and that Ilhan Omar’s tweet invoked clear anti-Semitic stereotypes about how Jews buy influence.

AIPAC’s
non-influence in Congress”

Not
everyone bought it hook-line-and-sinker, however. Khaled Elgindy, a
senior fellow at the neoconservative Brookings
Institution, 
tweeted that
he was “in the market for a bridge,” and asked 
The
Forward 
editor
Ungar-Sargon to “please enlighten us on AIPAC’s non-influence in
Congress.”

A
spokesperson for Omar 
told Politico in
response to the firestorm caused by the representative’s

tweets
that the remarks “speak for themselves.”

Rafillionaire


@RafiLetzter

Replying to @RafiLetzter

She has consistently handled it with grace, even in the face of overt racism from GOP congressmen (which has somehow never been a scandal). What she gets in return is “serious reporters” parroting the smears.

Rafillionaire


@RafiLetzter

Things that are vastly more antisemitic than Ilhan Omar’s tweets:

– The belief that AIPAC represents American Jews

– The belief that Israel represents American Jews

– The median American Christian Zionist’s views on Jews

– The president

– All 7 of the Harry Potter Novels


1,496

5:15 AM – Feb 11, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

But
a cursory examination of the legacy AIPAC has left since it opened
shop the DC speak even greater volumes. The lobby group is not
itself run by Israel, allowing it to avoid registration under the
Foreign Agents Registration Act, a law that forces foreign lobby
groups to be more transparent. That’s because I.L. Kenen, the
founder of AIPAC, created a “legal loophole by which AIPAC is
defined not as a lobby for a foreign state but for Americans who
support that state. It’s a critical distinction that makes AIPAC’s
dominance over U.S. Middle East policy possible,” according to
former AIPAC employee M.J. Rosenberg.

AIPAC
continues its practice of using loopholes to further its agenda
today. A recent 
documentaryproduced
by 
Al
Jazeera
 but
censored by Qatar, which funds the outlet, showed how one fundraiser
for a congressional candidate, organized by an unofficial “AIPAC
group,” circumvented laws on maximum individual political
contributions by pooling donors’ grants together and doling out the
official donations evenly among participants.

And
the organization’s sway over Congress is difficult to dispute.
Promotional literature for the annual AIPAC policy conference in
Washington has touted the idea that it would be “attended by more
members of Congress than almost any other event.” Steve Rosen, a
former AIPAC executive, would tell people that he “could take out a
napkin at any Senate hangout and get signatures of support for one
issue or another from scores of senators,” according to Connie
Bruck in 
The
New Yorker
.

As
AIPAC’s former policy director, Rosen and “Iran specialist” at
AIPAC Keith Weissman met with Larry Franklin, a top Pentagon analyst
working on Iran, prior to Franklin leaking a draft presidential
directive “that proposed a tougher policy on Iran, which included
consideration of covert action towards regime change,” according
to 
Democracy
Now
.
That document made its way into AIPAC’s hands, which passed it on
to Israeli officials.

Former
AIPAC President David Steiner was even forced to resign after audio
was leaked of him bragging about how he was negotiating with Bill
Clinton’s presidential campaign to appoint people to key posts in
his administration. Steiner ultimately recanted and apologized to
both AIPAC and Bill Clinton.

By Alexander
Rubinstein
 / Creative
Commons
 / MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo

====================================

Nogmaals: dan te bedenken dat men Rusland op valse gronden beschuldigt van inmenging in de VS politiek….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

*  Ilhan Omar, heeft sinds 2017 een zetel in het lagerhuis van Minnesota voor de Minnesota Demcratic-Farmer-Labor Party. Rashida Tlaib is van de Democratische Partij voor wie zij de vertegenwoordiger is van het 13de (congressionele) district van Michigan. (toevoeging ter verduidelijking gemaakt op 10 maart 2019) 

** Zie o.a.:

Esther Voet (hoofdredacteur Nieuw Israëlietisch Weekblad) over ‘antisemitisme’‘ (zie ook de links in dat bericht)

JeremyCorbyn is definitely a ‘dangerous hero’. Nice one Mail.

Ignorethe
mainstream media, Jeremy Corbyn just played a winning move
.

The Mail on Sunday en Sky News schieten levensgrote antisemitische bok bij het belasteren van Corbyn‘ (voor meer valse anti-Corbyn propaganda, klik op het label met zijn naam, direct onder dit bericht)

Meer berichten met Omar:

Fox News veroordeelt eigen presentator voor belachelijke uitlatingen aangaande Ilhan Omar

Ilhan Omar: Obama zette kinderen in een kooi en kwam weg met moord

Madeline Albright ‘gegrild’ over illegale interventies en sancties van de VS

Congreslid Ilhan Omar fileert het monster Elliot Abrams, de speciale gezant van de VS voor Venezuela