De NAVO oorlogsagenda blootgelegd met de Nederlandse leugen over de agressie van Putin……
Op BBC
World Service radio werd vanmorgen in
‘News Hour Extra’ één grote anti-Rusland propaganda show
opgevoerd, uiteraard gecombineerd met het ophemelen van de VS en de
NAVO, plus een groot pleidooi voor meer geld naar defensie, uh
oorlogsvoering….. Dit met een aantal ‘deskundigen’ (allen anti-Rusland), waaronder Clingendael oorlogshitser en flapdrol de luxe Zandee……
De naam
van het programma werd eerder ter discussie gesteld, en naar aanleiding van inzendingen gedaan door luisteraars (dat moet je maar geloven) wordt de naam veranderd van ‘News
Hour Extra’ in ‘The Real Story…..’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Maak er maar ‘Propaganda Hour Extra’ van! Blijkbaar moet de nieuwe naam van te voren al aangeven dat je hier niet met nepnieuws te maken krijgt, belachelijk!!
Op
Information Clearing House bracht men (ook al vandaag) een artikel
over de leugen van Zijlstra, een leugen die volgens de schrijver Finian
Cunningham 2 jaar oud is, echter deze dateert niet alleen uit 2006, maar wordt sinds die tijd regelmatig aangehaald door Zijlstra (plus andere vooral VVD politici) en een aantal reguliere media organen!!
Volgens
Cunningham legt dit ten overvloede nog eens de NAVO oorlogsagenda
bloot. Zo werd de door de VS op poten gezette opstand die in de
Oekraïense coup resulteerde, omgedraaid in agressie en expansiedrift
van Rusland…… Uiteraard overgoten met de VS propagandamachine
leugens over een annexatie van De Krim en het binnenvallen van
Rusland in Oost-Oekraïne…….. Beiden flagrante leugens waar geen nanometer bewijs voor is!
Voorts
komt Cunningham met andere voorbeelden die dit beeld staven, al moet
ik zeggen dat er voorbeelden te over zijn, neem alleen al de expansie
van de NAVO richting Moskou, waar de NAVO nu, in tegenspraak met
gesloten overeenkomsten (met Gorbatsjov), voor een groot deel van de Russische
westgrens staat…….. Cunningham komt met de leugen van de voormalig minister van buitenlandse zaken in Polen, Sikorski: hij zou naar eigen zeggen persoonlijk hebben gehoord dat Rusland en Polen in een overleg Oekraïne onder elkaar verdeeld hadden………. Een leugen die na doorprikken naarstig werd ingetrokken door deze liegende hufter…… Sikorski is overigens een ‘christendemocraat’, die van zijn god blijkbaar keihard mag liegen en ophitsen tot oorlog…….
Terecht stelt Cunningham dat de Nederlandse regering de leugen gebruikt van de geheime diensten dat ze een aan de Russische regering gelieerde groep zou hebben gehackt en hebben gezien dat de Russen de Democraten in de VS hebben gehackt (zodat niet hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton, maar Trump de verkiezingen heeft gewonnen), iets waarvoor alweer geen flinter bewijs is geleverd…….. Een smerige leugen die wordt gebruikt voor het propageren van de ‘Sleepwet’ die hier ter discussie staat en waar volgende maand in een referendum, tegelijk met de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen, over gestemd kan worden.
Ondanks een kleine uitglijder (waar het echte feit het verhaal in feite
alleen nog meer ondersteunt), een prima analyse! Hierin stelt Cunningham onder meer dat de leugen van Zijlstra in feite aanzet tot oorlog en dat is strafbaar onder de ‘Neurenbergse principes…’
Dutch
Lies Over Putin’s ‘Aggression’ Expose NATO War Agenda
By
Finian Cunningham
February
15, 2018 “Information
Clearing House” – Netherlands Prime Minister Mark
Rutte was this week forced to bear a parliamentary vote of no
confidence after his foreign minister finally came clean over a
dangerous lie he has been telling for two years concerning Russian
President Vladimir Putin.
Halbe
Zijlstra quit in shame on Monday as the country’s foreign minister
after admitting that
a story he had peddled about personally hearing Putin plotting to
create a “greater Russia” was false. That then forced premier
Rutte to endure a “no confidence” motion from parliamentarians.
In the end, Rutte survived the
vote. If a majority had voted against his leadership, his coalition
government may have collapsed.
But
the deep damage done to the Dutch authorities will not be so easily
repaired by Rutte’s survival as premier. What has been exposed this
week is a senior member of government recklessly telling bare-faced
lies in an attempt to slander Russia, poison international relations,
and ratchet up already dangerous geopolitical tensions.
Zijlstra
had claimed two years ago, in 2016, that he had personally witnessed
Russian leader Vladimir Putin boasting about creating a “greater
Russia” which, it is claimed, would incorporate Ukraine, the Baltic
states, Belarus and Kazakhstan.
The
newly resigned Dutch top diplomat claimed he heard Putin making the
remarks while present with others at the Russian leader’s dacha
(summer house) back in 2006.
This
week, Zijlstra finally came clean and admitted before parliament that
he hadn’t in fact been present at the alleged gathering. He still
maintains, however, that a confidant who was among the guests at
Putin’s dacha informed him of the alleged “greater Russia”
plan. But how can we now trust the word of a self-confessed liar?
Zijlstra’s
boss, Prime Minister Rutte, also sought to downplay the debacle,
claiming that his foreign minister had made “a big mistake” –
but that “lying was not a deadly sin”.
Rutte
is in for a rude awakening due to his complacent thinking. For indeed
his government has been caught telling a very grave lie whose
ramifications concern issues of war and peace in Europe.
Disgraced
former minister Zijlstra stands accused of gross distortion of
Russia’s foreign policy.
Since
the US and European-backed illegal coup in Ukraine in early 2014,
geopolitical reality has been turned upside-down. American and
European corporate media have peddled relentless anti-Russia
propaganda accusing Moscow of “aggression” and “expansionism”
in Europe.
This
torrent of Russophobia spewed out by Washington, the Pentagon, NATO
and the European Union has created the worst crisis in relations with
Russia since the Cold War ended nearly three decades ago. There are
real fears that the mounting crisis could escalate into an all-out
war involving nuclear powers.
Zijlstra’s
offense therefore is not merely a “mistaken” lie. His flagrant
public distortion has contributed directly to the grave deterioration
in geopolitical relations. One could even argue such reprehensible
remarks amount to incitement of war, which is a cardinal crime under
Nuremberg legal principles.
Lamentably,
the mendacious senior Dutch politician is not an isolated case.
Recall how former Polish foreign minister Radek Sikorski was caught
out telling similar defamatory lies about Russia in 2014.
Sikorski,
who has been an ardent supporter of NATO force build-up against
Russia, reportedly claimed that he personally overheard Vladimir
Putin in 2008 plotting to annex Ukrainian territory in a covert plot.
Sikorski claimed that he heard Putin propositioning then Polish Prime
Minister Donald Tusk with a carve-up deal of Ukraine between Poland
and Russia.
Sikorski
was obliged to swiftly retract the
claims published in US media, and awkwardly admitting that he was not
present at the alleged meeting with Putin, and that his quoted
remarks were meant as a “surreal joke”.
But,
again, this is no joke or mistake. It is deadly serious
disinformation by senior government officials, which is recklessly
inciting war tensions with Russia. Sikorski is prominently associated
with pro-NATO think-tanks like the hawkish American Enterprise
Institute. He is married to Anne Applebaum who makes a living from
writing anti-Russian screeds for news outlets like the Washington
Post.
Zijlstra
and Sikorski join the ranks of Russophobia regurgitated by other
European foreign ministers like Britain’s Boris Johnson who issued
the outlandish claim earlier
this year that Russia is “targeting” British infrastructure; or
French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian who has impugned Russia
for chemical weapons use in Syria – only for the French President
Emmanuel Macron to admit this
week that his government has actually no evidence about the use of
such weapons in Syria.
Macron
has made his own contribution to Russophobia by leveling
unsubstantiated allegations that his presidential election campaign
last year was “hacked” by Kremlin agents. He has since banned
Russian news media from attending his press conferences.
All
these senior government figures are irresponsibly fueling a climate
of demonization against Russia which is compounding other unhinged
claims made by politicians in Washington and the Baltic states.
Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite, for example,
recently claimed that
Russian Iskander missiles based on Russian sovereign territory of
Kaliningrad were targeting half of Europe, an alarmist claim which
has been amplified by US secretary of defense James Mattis in the
Pentagon’s recent Nuclear
Posture Review.
The
climate of hysteria – based on false, fevered official claims –
is militating against normal political and diplomatic relations,
which is, in turn, exacerbating the war in Ukraine and leading to
wider war tensions with Russia across Europe.
A
good question is why the ousted Dutch minister decided to own up this
week to his lies about Putin.
The
answer may be related to the bigger credibility crisis of the Dutch
government and its NATO allies with regard to the whole Russophobia
propaganda war.
Next
month, the Netherlands is to hold a national referendum on
extending powers of Dutch state intelligence to monitor public
electronic communications. To convince the Dutch public to vote for
more snooping powers, the authorities are relying on the hackneyed
claims about Russian “meddling” and “interference”.
It
seems significant that Dutch media reported last
month that the country’s secret services allegedly “hacked into”
Russian state hackers who were allegedly penetrating the American
Democratic party’s databases during the US presidential elections
back in 2015-2016. As usual, no evidence was provided to support the
claims. We know from other credible reports that
the Democratic party was quite possibly not hacked at all, but rather
was leaked from inside by a Democrat staffer. So the Dutch intel
story smearing Russia is highly dubious.
But
it seems that the purported “good deed” performed by the Dutch
intelligence services was pitched in the media as a way to ingratiate
bona fides with the Netherlands public. The aim being to dispose the
public toward voting in the referendum next month to give the Dutch
state more intrusive powers over citizens to “protect” them from
“nefarious Russians”.
Now,
if the Dutch minister had held on to his office any longer there was
a risk that his lies may have become public embarrassingly close to
the March referendum, which could have resulted in the public
rejecting the authorities’ desire for more snooping powers.
Perhaps
then the decision was taken in high office for the minister to take
the fall now in order to get rid sooner of an embarrassing story
concerning his lies over Russia.
Whatever
the explanation about the timing, the admission of Dutch government
lying about Russian aggression in Europe is nevertheless an
illuminating and appalling insight into how Russophobia and war is
being fomented by the US and its European NATO allies.
Abominably,
European government officials are willing to risk plunging millions
of citizens into a war with Russia based on lies and warped,
self-serving prejudices.
This
article was originally published by “Strategic
Culture Foundation”
–
-See
Also –
U.S.
Democrats push $1 billion bill for election security
=====================================
Zie ook: ‘Zijlstra heeft gelogen, liegt en zal blijven liegen, al helemaal als het over Rusland gaat…….‘
en: ‘Zijlstra terecht afgetreden wegens anti-Russische propaganda, nu Rutte nog……..‘
en: ‘Zijlstra de VVD leugenaar wordt beweend, nu even de andere kant!‘ (cartoons en prenten)
