We staan
zeker in Europa te kijken van het nog steeds bestaande racisme in de
VS, de ene politiemoord na de andere op gekleurde burgers (in
verhouding veel meer dan witte burgers). Dit bericht is geen bewerking van een eerder artikel uit 2018* met bijna dezelfde titel, heb besloten dit toch te plaatsen vanwege de langdurige Black Lives Matter (BLM) protesten van vorig jaar en begin dit jaar na alweer koelbloedige moorden van politieagenten op gekleurden in de VS.
Op 4
december 1969, gisteren 51 jaar gelden schoot de politie Fred Hampton
neer. Fred was een charismatische figuur, een mensenrechtenactivist die wist mensen te organiseren, jong en oud, gekleurd of
wit, mensen die het racisme toen al spuugzat waren en verder natuurlijk actie
voerde tegen het racisme en het daar bijbehorende etnisch profileren
door de toen nog hoofdzakelijk witte politie** (en ook
dat is nog voor een groot deel bestaand, ook al doet Hollywood of er een naar verhouding evenwichtige bemensing is van de politie in de VS….)…..
Op basis
van FBI informatie viel de politie, samen met de FBI op 4 december
1969 het appartement binnen waar Hampton verbleef met zijn vriendin,
in de slaapkamer opende men onmiddellijk het vuur op het bed waas
Hampton en zijn vriendin sliepen en mistten daarbij zijn 8 maanden
zwangere vriendin en Hampton, toen de vriendin de kamer uit was
gewerkt schoot men hem van dichtbij 2 maal in het hoofd…….
Hampton
was een vooraanstaand lid van de Black Panthers, een ander aanwezig
lid van de Panthers was Mark Clark en ook hij werd door het geteisem
vermoord en een aantal anderen raakten zwaar gewond……
Eén en
ander was onderdeel van het FBI programma COINTELPRO.
Een civiele
rechtszaak in 1982 leidde tot een schadevergoeding van 1,85 miljoen
dollar voor de nabestaanden van Hampton en Clark……
De
politie verdedigde zich met te stellen dat Hampton zich had verzet
bij zijn arrestatie al was daar geen spoor van te vinden…….
Kortom Hampton werd in koelen bloede vermoord door de politie van
Chicago en de andere hoofdverantwoordelijke: terreurorganisatie
FBI……..
De
verantwoordelijke psychopathische moordende agenten zijn nooit
vervolgd voor deze vreselijke misdaad……..
The
still un-prosecuted murder of Fred Hampton
An
FBI/Chicago Police Production
First degree
murder: Plain and simple
Fred Hampton was well spoken, he
was out spoken, and he was a real community leader.
And he was young. Just 21. He had a
life of social and political action in front of him.
Then, with intelligence provided by
the FBI, Chicago Police raided his apartment in the early morning,
shooting directly at the bed he was known to sleep in. They missed
his eight and a half month pregnant girlfriend – and him.
Then they cleared the room and
finished him off with two close range shots to the head.
The police report said that Hampton
shot at them and refused to surrender.
The evidence shows nothing of the
kind happened. He was murdered in cold blood.
No one has gone to jail for this
yet – but there is no statute of limitations on murder and many of
the people involved in the killing involved are still alive so we can
hope. The law says they’re as guilty as the person who pulled the
trigger.
** Je kan dan ook gerust
stellen dat de Nederlandse politieagenten die zich schuldig maken aan
etnisch profileren, zonder meer racistisch zijn en ik kan dat niet anders zien dan een uitwas van het fascisme……
Voor meer berichten over/met Fred Hampton, Martin Luther King, Black Panthers, BLM, COINTELPRO, FBI en/of Hoover, klik op het desbetreffende label, direct onder dit bericht.
Vreemd
toch dat de FBI nog steeds als een geloofwaardige organisatie wordt
gezien in zo ongeveer het hele westen, terwijl de organisatie
meermaals is ontmaskerd als een bovenwettelijke organisatie, een organisatie die beduidend vaker liegt dan de waarheid spreekt en die
zelfs moord niet uit de weg gaat…. Het is zeker dat de vele tv
series en films waarin de FBI meestal een glansrol speelt, ofwel Hollywood gestuurde FBI-propaganda, met het vertekende beeld over de FBI te maken heeft….
Caitlin
Johnstone schreef het hieronder opgenomen artikel over ex-FBI bons
Terry Turchie, die in een gesprek op Fox zijn gram uitsprak over
progressieve en linkse mensen geplaatst op functies in de VS
regering, terwijl hij zich (‘oh ironie’) kan herinneren dat de FBI
succesvol dit soort figuren uit de regering wist te houden……
Als reden daarvoor gaf Turchie het antwoord dat daarmee de regering
disfunctioneel zou worden gemaakt en deze regering het volk zou misleiden met expres gemaakte misinformatie* en desinformatie (en fake news = nepnieuws)……. Terwijl we nu weten dat juist een VS regering zonder ‘progressieven’ en linkse mensen een garantie is voor enorme misleiding van het volk, waar men zelfs (meervoudige) moord niet schuwt om het misselijkmakend doel te bereiken……. Sterker nog, op die manier worden de vele illegale oorlogen die de VS her en der heeft gevoerd en voert, als noodzakelijk voorgesteld…..
Waar
haalt deze Turchie kwast het gore lef vandaan?? Met zijn praatje geeft hij
juist aan waar de FBI voor heeft gezorgd en voor staat: manipulatie
van de bevolking via leugens, desinformatie en verdraaiing van
feiten, waarmee niet Rusland maar de FBI de verkiezingen manipuleerde en nog manipuleert…. Waaraan toegevoegd moet worden dat de FBI niet schroomt
een false flag operatie uit te voeren, waarmee een haar
onwelgevallige politicus, ambtenaar dan wel burger in een kwaad
daglicht wordt gesteld, zoals de FBI dat heeft gedaan inzake Martin
Luther King (al was het in dat geval zinloos). Mocht dit niet lukken
zoals alweer in ‘de zaak’ Martin Luther King, dan vermoordt de FBI
zo’n figuur, of laat deze vermoorden en als het moet door
maffialeden……
Moet je
nagaan: dan durft ook de FBI Rusland van verkiezingsmanipulatie in de
VS te beschuldigen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!
Lees het artikel van Johnstone, waarin ze o.a. ook Martin Luther King aanhaalt**:
Shocking
Admission by FBI Veteran Shows Why the FBI Shouldn’t Exist
(CJ Opinion) — On
the 18th of November, 1964, the FBI’s appallingly
corrupt boss
J. Edgar Hoover denounced Martin
Luther King Jr. as “the most notorious liar in the country.” A
few days later, a Hoover deputy named William Sullivan wrote
King a letter posing
as a disillusioned follower and using powerful, manipulative language
to urge the civil rights leader to commit suicide before evidence of
his extramarital affair became public. Enclosed was an FBI recording
containing evidence of the affair.
Whenever
America celebrates Martin Luther King Jr. Day* we should remind
ourselves that it is a known, undisputed fact that the Federal Bureau
of Investigation engineered a psyop to manipulate one of the world’s
greatest minds into committing suicide. It is also worth reviewing
the compelling
argument for
the case that the FBI was behind King’s assassination as well.
Hoover,
who headed the FBI for decades, obsessively despised King on a deeply
personal level. He kept files on the civil rights leader in which
he’d scribble
hateful comments on
memos he received about King, apparently for no purpose other than
his own gratification and catharsis. On a memo about King receiving
the St. Francis peace medal from the Catholic Church, he wrote “This
is disgusting.” On the news of King’s meeting with the pope, he
scribbled, “I am amazed that the Pope gave an audience to such a
degenerate.”
FBI
headquarters still
wears the name of
this childish pig, a brazen admission by the Bureau that it remains
very much the same institution which tried to end Martin Luther King
Jr.’s life, the same institution which assassinated Black
Panthers leader Fred Hampton***, the same institution which for years
ran the unconstitutional COINTELPRO
campaign to
infiltrate and sabotage dissident political groups, and which
has continued
to infiltrate dissident
political groups, including
Black civil rights groups,
to this very day.
We
received yet another reminder of the FBI’s true face the other day
in an interview with its former Deputy Assistant Director Terry
Turchie on Fox’s Tucker
Carlson Tonight.
In a passing tangent largely unrelated to the rest of the interview,
Turchie made
the following shocking statement in
relation to the ongoing Russiagate saga:
“And
I think we can expect more of this, because quite honestly the
electorate in some places is putting more and more progressives and
self-described socialists in positions. And ironically, years ago,
when I first got into the FBI, one of the missions of the FBI in its
counterintelligence efforts was to try and keep these people out of
government. Why? Because we would end up with massive dysfunction and
massive disinformation and massive misinformation, and it seems to me
that’s where we’re at today.”
Wow.
(Let op: de onderstaande video behoort uiteraard niet bij het Twitterbericht, deze kan ik niet overnemen, echter de YouTube video is aanmerkelijk langer, de video van Twitter is daar onderdeel van)
Andrew Lawrence@ndrew_lawrence
Uhhhhhhh….Fmr FBI Assistant Director just said “When I first got into the FBI one of the missions of the FBI in its counterintelligence efforts was to try to keep” progressives out of government
According
to his
LinkedIn profile,
Turchie joined the FBI in July of 1972. COINTELPRO, the program in
which leftist groups were actively infiltrated and undermined,
officially ended
in 1971,
and Hoover had died
in May of 1972.
This was after “Hoover’s FBI” stopped being Hoover’s FBI, yet
a “counterintelligence effort” was still very much alive and
thriving to undermine the will of the electorate and prevent them
from electing leftists to office.
This
one admission, by itself, is in my opinion more than enough to
justify the FBI’s total dissolution. Leaving aside any of their
other malfeasance that I mentioned earlier, leaving aside the rest of
their other documented malfeasance that I haven’t mentioned, this
one admission by Turchie shows clearly that America’s secret police
should cease to exist.
Think
about it. How can anyone justify the FBI’s continued existence
after such an admission? There is an extremely powerful branch of the
US government which is known to have been actively undermining the
democratic will of the electorate through covert means. Even if you
very trustingly subscribe to the belief that the FBI no longer
engages in any such practices to any extent (and that would be
extremely naive), how can you justify keeping it in power knowing
that it did? Where precisely in the FBI’s history is a clear,
clean, unequivocal break from what it was doing then declared,
documented and evidenced? For what reason was it not razed to the
ground decades ago and any of its actual necessary functions
transferred elsewhere?
Imagine
if the Ku Klux Klan had successfully cleaned up its image in the ’90s
or something. Now you’re seeing members of the KKK interviewed on
CNN and MSNBC as respectable members of society, holding powerful
political positions, treated like heroes, all under the same banner
it held when it was lynching people of color a few decades prior.
Would that not seem weird? Would you not say something like “Wait,
why are we keeping that organization around? At best they’re
probably just putting a nicer face on their previous toxic agendas,
especially since any good intentions existing within it could simply
be taken somewhere with a less horrific history.”
The
only reason the FBI is being treated any differently is because it’s
got such good PR, namely the entire political/media class.
Journalist
Mark Ames documents a
short-lived push by the Carter administration to “transform the FBI
from an extralegal secret police agency to something legal and
defined.” This feeble proposition to give the Bureau an actual
charter to clearly define what it is, what it does, and where the
confines of its operations are was the closest America ever came to
putting any kind of limitations on the powers of its secret police
force, and by the time Reagan rolled around it was long forgotten.
And
now you’ve got this same evil institution essentially
criminalizing the
act of the executive branch pursuing good relations with a nuclear
superpower, launching a secret counterintelligence investigation into
whether a sitting president is a national security threat for his
Russia policy. This cannot be leading anywhere good.
The
FBI has too much power and far too unforgivable a history to be
permitted to control the reigns of the nation with the most powerful
military force in the history of civilization. Get rid of it and move
in a healthy direction.
* Misinformatie ziet men over het algemeen als per ongeluk misleidende informatie, vandaar dat ik dit noem, terwijl reguliere media dagelijks expres misinformatie brengen, met claims die al lang zijn neergehaald als onzin……. Door deze misinformatie (ook bestaand uit ‘fake news’ of zoals wij zeggen nepnieuws) te blijven herhalen, kan men de bevolking ook andere des- of disinformatie door de strot duwen, neem de claims over de ‘noodzaak’van de illegale oorlog van de VS tegen Irak, die de VS in 2003 begon, een oorlog die nog steeds voortduurt en intussen aan meer dan 1,5 miljoen Irakezen het leven heeft gekost, ofwel zij zijn feitelijk vermoord door de VS en haar oorlogshond terreurorganisatie NAVO (Nederland speelt zelfs één van de hoofdrollen, daar een Nederlandse duikboot [met wat VS personeel aan boord] al voor de VS inval in Irak informatie verzamelde over de Iraakse strijdkrachten….. Nog steeds durven de reguliere media deze illegale oorlog als legitiem te verkopen, bijvoorbeeld als er weer sprake is van een Nederlandse militaire missie die naar Irak vertrekt…… (de Nederlandse missie is overigens gestopt op 31 december jl., wat niet wil zeggen dat Nederland niet alsnog een keer naar Irak zal vertrekken als de VS en de NAVO dit nodig achten…..)
Voor meer berichten over de FBI, klik op het betreffende label, direct onder dit bericht., Let wel, na een aantal berichten wordt het laatst gelezen bericht telkens weer herhaald, dan onder het laatst gelezen bericht even opnieuw op het label FBI klikken, enz. enz.
Ondanks
Martin Luther King Day op 21 januari in de VS, een officiële vrije
dag, is er verder maar weinig veranderd in de VS, sinds de moord op
MLK (waar maar één dader voor aangewezen kan worden: de FBI).
Wat betreft de discriminatie van de gekleurde bevolking geldt hetzelfde: er is over het geheel gezien weinig veranderd, ondanks de acties van Martin Luther King en de officiële MLK dag, plus 2 termijnen Obama, de eerste gekleurde
president van de VS…… De VS regering en zelfs de FBI eert MLK wel schijnheilig,
maar zou hem haten als hij nog leefde (zie ook het neerschieten van
gekleurden door de VS politie, waarbij de meerderheid van de
slachtoffers niet eens bewapend was en is, immers dit gaat bijna
dagelijks door in de VS…).
King was
niet alleen een mensenrechtenactivist, maar ook een groot leider in
het verzet tegen de VS oorlog in Vietnam, daarmee verdubbelde hij de
inzet van de VS overheid en de FBI hem tot zwijgen te brengen……..
De FBI
begon overigens al met het onderzoeken en dwarsbomen van King in
1955, je kan dan ook niet anders concluderen dan dat King werd gezien als een
staatsvijand in de ogen van FBI en de opvolgende regeringen destijds…..
Vooral de corrupte psychopaat Hoover, hoofd van de FBI had het niet
op met King en dat heeft hij meermaals laten weten…. In de ogen van
Hoover was King een communist…..
De
schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen artikel Matt Agorist, stelt
volkomen terecht dat King ook heden ten dage als een gevaarlijke en
invloedrijke staatsvijand zou zijn behandeld, dat zijn Facebook
pagina al lang verwijderd zou zijn geweest (plus zijn Twitteraccount,
Ap.) en hij te maken zou hebben met censuur en zeker zou zijn gedemoniseerd door de reguliere massamedia in de VS….
Lees het
artikel van Agorist en geeft het door, veel te veel mensen in
Nederland hebben de foute idee dat het allemaal wel goed zit in de VS
wat betreft de behandeling van gekleurden….. Bovendien zijn er hele volksstammen die
geloven dat de sociale media alleen maar kul en poezenfilmpjes laten
zien, terwijl juist daar het echte nieuws is te vinden en waar de betekenis van
dat nieuws wordt gebracht. Intussen lopen de reguliere massamedia braaf aan de
leiband van hun rijke meesters, grote bedrijven en regeringen,
waarbij men geen schroom heeft fake news en desinformatie te brengen,
om zo het volk achter de machthebbers en rustig te houden…… Zelfs
de illegale oorlogen van de VS (en haar terreurorganisatie NAVO) tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en
Syrië worden door de media verdedigd als was het motief
medemenselijkheid, waar het in werkelijkheid gaat om massamoorden en het veilig stellen van westerse belangen, zoals de olieproductie, waarbij alleen deze eeuw al meer dan 2,5
miljoen mensen om het leven werden gebracht…….
Het volgende artikel komt van The Free Thought Porject en werd zoals gezegd geschreven door Matt Agorist (mijn excuus, bij plaatsing vergeten The Free Thought Project te noemen):
If
Dr. King Was Alive Today, His Facebook Page Would Be Deleted, And
He’d Be Censored
Martin
Luther King Jr.’s pro-peace and antiwar stance would have made him an
enemy to today’s establishment and he would have been censored.
When
most people think of the great man, born Michael King on January
15, 1929, they see an advocate for peace, who is celebrated by the US
government — honored every year in January, on the third Monday.
However,
what the government tells us and what this great man did are two
separate stories and had Dr. King been alive today, he would have
been an enemy to the establishment who would have made every move
they could to silence him.
Dr.
King’s position as the leader of the Civil Rights Movement began
after his election as spokesman for the Montgomery Improvement
Association in December of 1955. What also started in that December
of 1955 was
the FBI’s investigation into him.
Like
all those who stand against government-sanctioned violence, Dr. King
was an enemy of the state. The fact that he’s celebrated today by
the same state that persecuted him is quite Orwellian.
According
to a report out of Stanford University titled, Martin
Luther King, Jr. and the Global Freedom Struggle,
the FBI had it out for Dr. King as soon as he began making waves.
The
U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) began monitoring Martin
Luther King, Jr., in December 1955, during his involvement with
the Montgomery
bus boycott,
and engaged in covert operations against him throughout the 1960s.
FBI director J. Edgar Hoover was personally hostile toward King,
believing that the civil rights leader was influenced by Communists.
This animosity increased after April 1964, when King called the FBI
‘‘completely ineffectual in resolving the continued mayhem and
brutality inflicted upon the Negro in the deep South’’ (King, 23
April 1964). Under the FBI’s domestic counterintelligence program
(COINTELPRO) King was subjected to various kinds of FBI surveillance
that produced alleged evidence of extramarital affairs, though no
evidence of Communist influence.
With
a state that owes its very existence to the monopoly it holds on the
use of violence, anyone who is pro-peace is a potential threat. This
was the case in the 20th century just as it is the case in
the 21st century. The fact that Americans take off of work one day in
January, does not negate the reality that this struggle continues.
In
fact, the government is still very engaged in fighting the antiwar
and pro-peace narrative King so eloquently espoused. And they have no
qualms talking about this in the open.
After deleting
the pages of
hundreds of antiwar and pro-peace media and activist outlets in
October, last week, Facebook made
another giant move to silence. This
time, they had no problem noting that they went after pages whose
specific missions were “anti-corruption” or “protest”
movements.
“Some
of the Pages frequently posted about topics like anti-NATO
sentiment, protest movements, and anti-corruption,”
Facebook’s head of cybersecurity policy, Nathaniel Gleicher wrote
in the blog post. “We are constantly
working to detect and stop this type of activity because
we don’t want our services to be used to manipulate people.”
Make
no mistake, because Dr. King broke through the divisive paradigm and
bridged the gap between different cultures so well, he would
undoubtedly been a target of these tech giant censors who aim to keep
you divided. The Atlantic
Council would
have likely had a special committee devoted to solely silencing his
“dangerous” talks of peace.
Like
Dr. King, however, many activists of today are unafraid of speaking
truth to power, even when faced with police action and censorship.
Like
the activists of today, Dr. King’s activism was often met with
brutal backlash from police. Just like the protesters of today, who
peacefully march in solidarity to end police violence and war, the
protesters of the 50s and 60s were met with violence from the police.
Attacks
against non-violent protesters are nothing new. In the 60s, as the
marches increased, so did the attacks against non-violent
demonstrators.
“There
may be some tear gas ahead. But I say to you today, that I’d rather
die on the highways of Alabama, than make a butchery of my
conscience,” said
Dr. King in his famous speech just prior to the Selma-Montgomery
march in which protesters were met with such violence from police
that the day would be forever remembered as “Bloody
Sunday.”
The
first march took place on March 7, 1965, and it gained the
nickname “Bloody Sunday” after its 600 marchers were attacked at
the Edmund Pettus Bridge after leaving Selma; state troopers and
county posse attacked the unarmed marchers with billy clubs and tear
gas.
Does
this type of police reaction to protests sound familiar?
Dr.
King was no stranger to police and being arrested, in fact, during
his 12-year run as the leader of the civil rights movement, he
was arrested 30 times.
Today,
there is a good chance Dr. King would be referred to as a ‘thug’
by a large portion of society — and police — for his activism.
Dr.
King, like many of the protesters of today, stood against state
violence and war. Those who wage the wars and initiate the violence,
delegating a single day in January to honor a man who stood
against their very tactics, is defamatory to this struggle for peace,
to say the least.
So,
while you are out there today, enjoying the day off, remember that
this struggle is far from over. There are countless individuals
continuing to try to live in the way Dr. King advocated for and who
face constant bombardment from the establishment for doing so.
As
long as innocence is lost to those who claim to protect it, the
conflict remains. As long as people of all races are harassed,
kidnapped, locked in cages or killed over victimless crimes, our
strife will persist.
Not
until the corruptions ceases, not until all the troops are
brought home, not until a person can do with their own body as they
see fit, not until the brute force changes to compassion, will the
perpetual struggle of Dr. King and all those before and after him, be
complete.
“Peace
is not merely a distant goal that we seek, but a means by which we
arrive at that goal.” – Martin Luther King, Jr.
Matt
Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former
intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior
experience gives him unique insight into the world of government
corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an
independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on
mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at
Large at the Free Thought Project. Follow
@MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and
now on Facebook.
===========================
Hier nog een korte video waarin het geweld tegen gekleurden wordt weergegeven:
Gisteren
was het 49 jaar gelden dat de 21 jarige Fred Hampton werd vermoord
door de FBI en de politie van Chicago……. Hampton was een
mensenrechtenactivist die jong en oud, wit en gekleurd, middenklasse
en de armen wist te verenigen……
Voldoende
‘gevaarlijk’ in de ogen van misdadiger Hoover (en de corrupte en zeer
foute regering Nixon), die destijds de topgraaier van de FBI was, om
de moord op Hampton te organiseren……
Op 4
december 1969 verschafte de politie van Chicago op aanwijzing van de
FBI zich toegang tot de woning van Hampton en schoten op het bed
waarin Hampton en zijn 8,5 maand zwangere vrouw lagen te slapen, waarbij men de twee mistte. Daarop schoten ze van dichtbij twee kogels in het
hoofd van Hampton……..
Nooit werd er iemand veroordeeld voor de moord op Hampton, hoewel er nog steeds verantwoordelijken rondlopen, zowel van de politie als de FBI…… Nog steeds is het mogelijk dat de verantwoordelijken worden gestraft, echter dat zal niet gebeuren, daar de VS in feite geen rechtsstaat is, onrecht viert hoogtij in deze zieke vereniging van staten, die men Amerika durft te noemen en dat al vele decennia lang……
Hier een
artikel van Brasscheck TV, plus een video over deze zaak.
An
American assassination
Today
is the anniversary of the joint FBI-Chicago Police Department
operation to assassinate Fred Hampton.
Who
was Fred Hampton?
A
charismatic young leader who was very effective at bringing young and
old, black and white, middle class and poor together in opposition to
a corrupt city and national government.
J.
Edgar Hoover, when he wasn’t cavorting with organized crime figures,
was of the opinion that the country would be better off without
people like Hampton.
THE
STILL UN-PROSECUTED MURDER OF FRED HAMPTON
AN
FBI/CHICAGO POLICE PRODUCTION
FIRST
DEGREE MURDER: PLAIN AND SIMPLE
Fred
Hampton was well spoken, he was out spoken, and he was a real
community leader.
And
he was young. Just 21. He had a life of social and political action
in front of him.
Then,
with intelligence provided by the FBI, Chicago Police raided his
apartment in the early morning, shooting directly at the bed he was
known to sleep in. They missed his eight and a half month pregnant
girlfriend – and him.
Then
they cleared the room and finished him off with two close range shots
to the head.
The
police report said that Hampton shot at them and refused to
surrender.
The
evidence shows nothing of the kind happened. He was murdered in cold
blood.
No
one has gone to jail for this yet – but there is no statute of
limitations on murder and many of the people involved in the killing
involved are still alive so we can hope. The law says they’re as
guilty as the person who pulled the trigger.
=====================================
PS: naar aanleiding van deze zaak is het onbegrijpelijk dat er nog steeds mensen zijn die de officiële fantasie over de moord op J.F. Kennedy, zijn broer Robert en Martin
Luther King geloven, terwijl de VS zo vaak heeft laten zien totaal
schijt aan het recht te hebben en mensen die het als een gevaar
beschouwt simpel vermoordt……. Uiteraard geldt dit ook voor de
aanslagen op 11 september 2001 (9/11), terwijl er intussen kilometers
aan bewijzen zijn, die aangeven dat de VS zelf de hand had in het
neerhalen van de Twin Towers en gebouw 7 van het WTC in New York.
Voor de schijn blies men nog een stuk van het Pentagon op, waar ook
zogenaamd een vliegtuig ingevlogen zou zijn, terwijl dat volgens de
beelden niet eens kan, noch zijn daar delen van een vliegtuig
geborgen, zoals alweer de beelden hebben laten zien!! De VS is de
grootste terreurentiteit op aarde en is dat al heel lang, niet alleen oefent het land terreur uit in het buitenland, maar zoals ook dit verhaal weer laat zien, ook in
eigen land werd en wordt het volk geterroriseerd……..
Brasscheck
TV bracht de afgelopen weken 4 artikelen en video’s over de moord op
John F. Kennedy (JFK), op 22 november jl. 55 jaar geleden. Hierbij gaat Brasscheck TV in op de volgende
punten:
Het feest van de samenzweerders de avond voor de moord op Kennedy
met H.L. Hunt (‘olietycoon’), J. Edgar Hoover, Richard Nixon en
Lyndon B. Johnson, ten huize van ‘olietycoon’ C. Murchison.
De
voorbereiding van het volk op de aanstaande moord op Kennedy.
Wat
gebeurde er met de getuigen
De
strijd om het lijk van Kennedy na de moord, waarbij bewijsmateriaal
verdween. Voorts de vreemde samenstelling van de stoet voorafgaand
aan de moord.
Het
‘korte proces’ tegen Lee Harvey Oswald, die ook door de media zonder
enige kritiek werd aangewezen als de moordenaar.
Afgelopen
week hoorde ik op BBC World Service radio nog eens de officiële lezing van de moord op Kennedy, waar men de officiële gelogen lezing over de gang van zaken nog steeds volgt, terwijl het overduidelijk is dat het de moord op Kennedy ‘de vrucht is’ van een echte
samenzwering en niet een theorie, zoals de CIA al snel na de moord de wereld inhielp….. (de CIA noemde de twijfels aan de officiële lezing een ‘samenzweringstheorie’, hiermee werd deze term
zelfs geïntroduceerd……)
Uit het volgende blijkt nogmaals dat niet alleen het militair-industrieel complex een groot belang had en heeft bij het voeren van oorlog, ook de oliemaffia had en heeft daar belang bij >> destijds ging het om de oorlog tegen Noord-Vietnam, die Kennedy zou hebben willen afblazen, daarnaast was er nog veel meer haat tegen hem, o.a. vanwege het Varkensbaai-incident in 1961, de poging om de Cubaanse revolutionaire regering omver te werpen….)…….
The
big party before the JFK assassination
Where
were H.L. Hunt, J. Edgar Hoover, Richard Nixon, and Lyndon B. Johnson
the night before the assassination of John F. Kennedy?
Witnesses
put them all together as a party at the home of Clint Murchison, the
Texas oil tycoon who controlled local law enforcement and J. Edgar
Hoover.
THE
PARTY BEFORE THE ASSASSINATION
AND THE MISSING
FINGERPRINT
THERE’S
NO MYSTERY HERE, NEVER WAS
The
meeting in Dallas the night before the assassination included:
H.L.
Hunt
J. Edgar Hoover
Richard Nixon
Lyndon B. Johnson
…At
the home of Clint Murchison, the Texas oil tycoon.
Murchison
owned J. Edgar Hoover, Lyndon B. Johnson, and State of Texas law
enforcement and stood to lose a fortune if Kennedy changed the oil
depletion allowance and faced the very real possibility of jail time
should then-Vice President Johnson be indicted, which gave the
appearance of being a certainty.
Nixon
and others involved claimed not to remember where he was that night.
The
fingerprint found in the Book Depository sniper’s nest and
suppressed by the FBI belonged to LBJ’s henchman who was convicted
in at least one murder and was suspected of committing several others
on Johnson’s behalf.
But
it doesn’t matter who did what, what weapon they used, and what
position they fired from.
That’s
like asking which janitor they sent and whether he used a wire or
nylon brush.
The
mountains of minutia, endless conferences, books and assassination
experts including Oliver Stone’s artfully loopy movie all obscure
the basic points.
The
CIA was facing a thorough gutting at the hands of Kennedy as were
their close colleagues in organized crime and the oil industry
The
Pentagon and the scumbags who supply them were facing the loss of
billions upon billion of of dollars in profits and payoffs if
Kennedy turned off the Vietnam gravy train.
Hoover
and Johnson knew each other very well, hated Kennedy and had very
strong self-preservation reasons to want him dead. Both had been
involved in political murders separately – and were to collaborate
on future ones.
Recall
that Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King were both assassinated
during the Johnson-Hoover regime and that Johnson was the president
during the infamous USS Liberty incident. Robert Kennedy, like his
brother, and Martin Luther King were murdered after they started
talking against war in Vietnam. Another too rarely mentioned
connection.)
These
people – the CIA, organized crime, the Pentagon, Hoover and Johnson
– were all murderers and they did what murderers do.
With
Hoover in charge of the FBI and Johnson in control of the Federal
government and Texas law enforcement, there was no investigation of
the crime and any evidence that contradicted the manufactured “lone
nut” theory was altered and in some cases outright destroyed.
Ongoing
media suppression was carried out by the CIA and the cooperative and
craven US news media.
It
didn’t matter how good or bad your evidence is if you don’t
control the process and it’s the new leader who controls the
process.
Attorney
Allen Dulles, the CIA head who supervised numerous coups and
assassinations in other countries and had a grudge against Kennedy
for firing him, understood this simple principle better than anyone.
That’s
it. The beginning, middle and end of the story.
Discussions
about the minutia of the specific mechanics of the operation are
nothing more than a distraction and far off the key points which are:
1.
When push comes to shove, the military-industrial complex is in
control of the US
2.
A criminally minded CIA and organized crime figures in the US and
abroad collaborate on projects of mutual interest (drug running,
assassination, the suppression of dissent) on a daily basis as they
have done since WW II.
3.
The US news media – as well as the vast majority of academia –
is an impotent joke.
These
are the three elements that have guided and controlled the US since
Kennedy’s assassination and they can, and continue to, get away
with just about anything.
Preparing
the public mind for the JFK Assassination
This
is easily one of the strangest and most shocking “coincidences”
of the JFK assassination.
A
newscaster was handed this elaborate story to read just hours before
Kennedy was killed.
PREPARING
THE PUBLIC MIND
NORMALIZING THE IDEA
OF PRESIDENTIAL ASSASSINATION
CREATING
EXPECTATIONS
The
week before Kennedy was assassinated the news media, national and
local to Dallas, went into overdrive about two subjects:
How
many people hated the Kennedys and wanted to do them harm
How
“reckless” Kennedy was in not strictly following security
protocols (a similar charge was made about his son’s adherence to
aviation safety and who died in a highly mysterious plane accident
just as he was about to enter political life.)
Just
hours before Kennedy was murdered in cold blood, this bizarre script
was read in the two and a half minutes before Kennedy took the stage
for a breakfast talk in Fort Worth.
Just
think of how strange this is.
Who
would write such a script? Who would order it to be read before a
presidential appearance?
Just
a few hours after this live newscast Kennedy was assassinated by a
“lone nut” just like the one described in the local Texas
newsfeed.
What
happened to witnesses of the JFK assassination?
You’ve
probably heard that many eye witnesses to the Kennedy assassination
had very short lives – after the assassination.
Here’s
the story of one of them: a plainclothes detective with the Dallas
Police Department.
Mind
blowing testimony.
WHY
WEREN’T THERE ANY WITNESSES?
THERE WERE …DOZENS
OF THEM HERE’S ONE THEY KILLED
NO EYEWITNESSES?
BULLSHIT!
There
were dozens of eyewitnesses to the Kennedy assassination including
trained ones like police officers. They were ordered to keep their
mouths shut about what they saw – and most did. Those who did not
were warned, harassed, and if they were persistent enough,
eliminated. One too-seldom discussed example. It was a hyperorganized
coup, all in the name of the Vietnam War’s depopulation agenda.
The
fight over Kennedy’s body
exas
law is pretty simple.
Anyone
murdered in Texas – regardless of who he is – gets a Texas autopsy.
But
when Kennedy was shot, the Secret Service stormed the hospital and
literally battled Texas officials for the casket.
And
that was only the beginning of the strangeness relating to the
post-assassination handling of Kennedy’s body.
STEALING
JFK’S BODY
MAKING THE EVIDENCE GO
AWAY
“WITH
UNSEEMLY HASTE”
The
Dallas police stood down.
The
Secret Service stood down.
Kennedy’s
car was put at the front of the procession (an absolute violation)
and there were no guards to his side and back to protect him.
In
spite of a heightened security alert, ALL normal security procedures
were toned down.
The
scores of eye witnesses who heard, and in some cases saw, shots from
the right of the President’s car were ignored.
The
rifle that was originally found in the Texas School Book Depository
did not match the casings that were found there.
Then
the President’s body, one of the most important pieces of evidence
in the crime, was literally stolen from the lawful possession of the
State of Texas and handed over to two grossly incompetent career Navy
physicians who had no experience in pathology or performing
autopsies.
That’s
our story so far.
Can
there possibly be any doubt that:
a)
there was more than one shooter on the scene
b)
those in charge of the local police and the Secret Service arranged
things in such a way as to facilitate the shooting and
c) eye witnesses were discouraged from reporting and the forensic exam was deliberately botched to maintain the one man, one bullet theory
The
short trial of Lee Harvey Oswald
What
Lee Harvey Oswald said after he was arrested and how he was
“convicted” by the news media and dishonest prosecutors and
police.
THE
SHORT TRIAL OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD
TRIED BY THE PRESS,
EXECUTED BY A FORMER NIXON EMPLOYEE
“NOTHING
TO SEE HERE, MOVE ALONG”
The
last hours of the life of Lee Harvey Oswald before he was executed on
live TV by Jack Ruby.
Jack
Ruby was a gangster, a Chicago guy who was sent to Dallas to operate
and who used a strip club as his headquarters where he interacted
daily with Dallas police giving them free liquor and prostitutes.
Very
rarely spoken about was his role as a major market maker for
narcotics dealing in Dallas
Previous
to that, in Chicago, he’d worked as an enforcer for the Hearst
newspaper chain during the sometimes violent competition for shelf
space on news stands.
In
his spare time away from California’s race tracks which he was
known to frequent, he also spent time as a “campaign worker” for
Richard Nixon’s first Congressional campaign.
Jack
Ruby at the nexus of organized crime, US politics, corrupt police,
the illegal drug trade, and dishonest news media – and most
probably the CIA that works closely with all these parties.
Onder andere CNN, als prominent ‘lid’ van de reguliere media, is bezig met het zwart maken van sociale media, journalisten en
presentatoren als ze zich niet blindelings achter de volgende zaken stellen: -de illegale oorlogen van de VS, -de
staatsgrepen met hulp van en of door de VS, -de geheime militaire CIA acties buiten de VS en -de
standrechtelijke executies van verdachten middels drones…….. Met ‘superlatieven’ als links, fascistisch en pedofilie valt men
journalisten en verslaggevers aan, zo ook Jimmy Dore en zijn show op
YouTube.
Jimmy
Dore stelt onder meer dat CNN advertentie inkomsten steeds verder
teruglopen, terwijl deze inkomsten op YouTube kanalen een stuk hoger
liggen, ofwel een reden om YouTube kanalen te beschuldigen voor het
aanprijzen van pedofilie en fascisme…..
Uiteraard
stelt CNN dat figuren als Jimmy Dore zich daarnaast schuldig maken aan
samenzweringstheorieën, waar Dore erop wijst dat hij deze juist
ontleedt en als onzin neerzet. Zo noemt Dore de leugens over de
massavernietigingswapens van Sadam Hoessein, een samenzweringstheorie
die uiteindelijk leidde tot de illegale oorlog van de VS tegen Irak in 2003,
een oorlog die tot de dood van meer dan 1,5 miljoen Irakezen leidde, ofwel 1,5 miljoen
moorden voornamelijk op conto van de VS, de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde…..
Nog zo’n
samenzweringstheorie is die van Russiagate, na bijna 2 jaar gooien
met stront, is er niet één bewijs geleverd voor de bevestiging van
die theorie…….
Volgens Dore (en vele anderen) is het hele gedoe in de VS, zoals de hypocritische hysterie over Syrië en ‘de oorlog tegen terreur’ ten eerste in het belang van het militair-industrieel complex dat op volle toeren moet blijven draaien. Ten tweede denkt men hiermee alle critici de mond te kunnen snoeren………
Zie de
volgende humoristische video over deze zaak (met Jimmy Dore):
The
bottom line in America today
“PRO-WAR
IN EVERY CASE AND ALL THE TIME”
THE
ENDLESS MANUFACTURE OF CRISIS
What’s
the bottom line in America today?
Here
it is:
If
you want to be a a newscaster or reporter in the US, you better be
pro-war in every case and all the time.
The
recent CNN attack on Jimmy Dore and other people who question war
hysteria…
This
is the Third “Red Scare” in the last 100 years…
The
first one – after WW I – gave J. Edgar Hoover his career and was
used to attack civil rights
The
second one – after WW II – gave groups like the CIA extraordinary
powers, including war waging power in Vietnam.
The
third one – after the bogus “War on Terror” – is on now. The
goal now is to keep the military-industrial complex humming along and
to shut down anyone who questions why our health care, education, and
banking systems are in such bad condition.
De avond voor de moord op J.F. Kennedy, vond er overleg plaats in Dallas, op een feest van oliebaron Clint Murchison. Aanwezig: Edgar Hoover (destijds hoofd FBI), L.B. Johnson (de democratische vicepresident, die door de dood van Kennedy werd benoemd tot president en die in tegenstelling tot Kennedy voor deelname was van de VS aan de oorlog in Vietnam), R. Nixon (de latere republikeinse president, ook al voorstander van de oorlog tegen Noord-Vietnam) en H.L. Hunt (een andere oliebaron).
De oliebaronnen vreesden grote verliezen, door een beslissing van Kennedy over olievoorraden. Het militair-industrieel complex had alle belang bij de VS deelname aan de oorlog tegen Noord-Vietnam, dit complex werd na de dood van Kennedy uiterst kundig bediend door eerst L.B. Johnson en later R. Nixon….. (Overigens is een oorlog altijd goed voor oliemaatschappijen, immers het verbruik van benzine, diesel en kerosine gaat als een pijl omhoog…)
Een aantal belangrijke punten, die ook in de film ‘JFK’ van Oliver Stone terug te vinden zijn: De CIA plus hun collega’s in de georganiseerde misdaad en de olie industrie vreesde te worden aangepakt door de regering Kennedy. Het Pentagon en de wapenindustrie zagen grote toekomstige winsten en steekgelden verdampen, als Kennedy de oorlog tegen Noord-Vietnam zou afblazen. Daarnaast hadden L.B. Johnson en E. Hoover de pest aan Kennedy en hadden persoonlijke belangen bij de dood van Kennedy, beiden waren afzonderlijk betrokken bij een aantal politieke moorden……
De broer van Kennedy, Robert en Martin Luther King werden vermoord onder het bewind van Johnson en Hoover, waarbij het opvallend is dat beiden fel gekant waren tegen de oorlog in Vietnam…….
Voor een totaaloverzicht en verdere details zie de volgende video en tekst daaronder, gepubliceerd door Brasscheck TV:
The
meeting in Dallas the night before the assassination of J.F. Kenedy
included:
H.L.
Hunt
J. Edgar Hoover
Richard Nixon
Lyndon B. Johnson
The
big party before the JFK assassination
…At
the home of Clint Murchison, the Texas oil tycoon.
Murchison
owned J. Edgar Hoover, Lyndon B. Johnson, and State of Texas law
enforcement and stood to lose a fortune if Kennedy changed the oil
depletion allowance and faced the very real possibility of jail time
should then-Vice President Johnson be indicted, which gave the
appearance of being a certainty.
Nixon
and others involved claimed not to remember where he was that night.
The
fingerprint found in the Book Depository sniper’s nest and
suppressed by the FBI belonged to LBJ’s henchman who was convicted
in at least one murder and was suspected of committing several others
on Johnson’s behalf.
But
it doesn’t matter who did what, what weapon they used, and what
position they fired from.
That’s
like asking which janitor they sent and whether he used a wire or
nylon brush.
The
mountains of minutia, endless conferences, books and assassination
experts including Oliver Stone’s artfully loopy movie all obscure
the basic points.
The
CIA was facing a thorough gutting at the hands of Kennedy as were
their close colleagues in organized crime and the oil industry
The
Pentagon and the scumbags who supply them were facing the loss of
billions upon billion of of dollars in profits and payoffs if
Kennedy turned off the Vietnam gravy train.
Hoover
and Johnson knew each other very well, hated Kennedy and had very
strong self-preservation reasons to want him dead. Both had been
involved in political murders separately – and were to collaborate
on future ones.
Recall
that Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King were both assassinated
during the Johnson-Hoover regime and that Johnson was the president
during the infamous USS Liberty incident. Robert Kennedy, like his
brother, and Martin Luther King were murdered after they started
talking against war in Vietnam. Another too rarely mentioned
connection.)
These
people – the CIA, organized crime, the Pentagon, Hoover and Johnson
– were all murderers and they did what murderers do.
With
Hoover in charge of the FBI and Johnson in control of the Federal
government and Texas law enforcement, there was no investigation of
the crime and any evidence that contradicted the manufactured “lone
nut” theory was altered and in some cases outright destroyed.
Ongoing
media suppression was carried out by the CIA and the cooperative and
craven US news media.
It
didn’t matter how good or bad your evidence is if you don’t
control the process and it’s the new leader who controls the
process.
Attorney
Allen Dulles, the CIA head who supervised numerous coups and
assassinations in other countries and had a grudge against Kennedy
for firing him, understood this simple principle better than anyone.
That’s
it. The beginning, middle and end of the story.
Discussions
about the minutia of the specific mechanics of the operation are
nothing more than a distraction and far off the key points which are:
When
push comes to shove, the military-industrial complex is in control
of the US
2.
A criminally minded CIA and organized crime figures in the US and
abroad collaborate on projects of mutual interest (drug running,
assassination, the suppression of dissent) on a daily basis as they
have done since WW II.
3.
The US news media – as well as the vast majority of academia –
is an impotent joke.
These
are the three elements that have guided and controlled the US since
Kennedy’s assassination and they can, and continue to, get away
with just about anything.
Malcolm X, de gekleurde mensenrechtenstrijder uit de VS, werd op 21 februari 1965 doodgeschoten in New York. Brasscheck TV kwam gisteren (Malcolm X Day) met beelden over Malcolm X. In de video wordt o.a. aandacht geschonken aan het schaduwen van Malcolm X door de politie en het infiltreren in de kringen rond Malcolm X door nauwe samenwerking van de politie en de FBI………
Malcolm X, zijn woorden zijn heden ten dage nog even actueel…..
Hier de door Brasschjeck toegevoegde video (duur 6.33 m.) van Shareef Nazeer uit 2014:
Als u de video heeft gezien, krijgt u een aantal andere video’s te zien, die u af kan spelen. Ik koos de volgende video ‘The Assassination of Malcolm X’:
Gisteren was het 36 jaar geleden dat John Lennon werd vermoord en zoals dit bij meerdere vooraanstaande personen in de VS het geval was, ook bij deze moord zijn grote vraagtekens te stellen.
Lennon was een groot denker, daar zal niemand met een gezond verstand nog aan twijfelen. Terecht stelt o.a.John W. Whitehead op Information Clearing House, dat de strijd die John Lennon tegen de instituties voerde, nog steeds actueel is en misschien wel meer actueel dan ooit tevoren…….
Hier het artikel van Whitehead (onder dit artikel kan u klikken voor een ‘Dutch’ vertaling) , daaronder nog een video van Brasscheck over deze zaak:
Power
to the People: John Lennon’s Legacy Lives On
By
John W. Whitehead
“You
gotta remember, establishment,
it’s just a name for evil. The monster doesn’t care whether
it kills all the students or whether there’s a revolution. It’s
not thinking logically, it’s out of control.”– John
Lennon(1969)
Mass
movements with huge numbers of participants work.
Yes,
America, it is possible to use occupations and civil disobedience to
oppose government policies, counter injustice and bring about change
outside the confines of the ballot box.
It
has been done before. It is being done now. It can be done again.
For
example, in May of 1932, more than 43,000 people, dubbed the Bonus
Army—World War I veterans and their families—marched on
Washington. Out of work, destitute and with families to feed, more
than 10,000 veterans set up tent cities in the nation’s capital and
refused to leave until the government agreed to pay the bonuses they
had been promised as a reward for their services.
The
Senate voted against paying them immediately, but the protesters
didn’t budge. Congress adjourned for the summer, and still the
protesters remained encamped. Finally, on July 28, under orders from
President Herbert Hoover, the military descended with tanks and
cavalry and drove the protesters out, setting their makeshift camps
on fire. Still, the protesters returned the following year, and
eventually their efforts not only succeeded in securing payment of
the bonuses but contributed to the passage of the G.I. Bill of
Rights.
Similarly, the Civil Rights Movement mobilized hundreds of thousands
of people to strike at the core of an unjust and discriminatory
society. Likewise, while the 1960s anti-war movement began with a few
thousand perceived radicals, it ended with hundreds of thousands of
protesters, spanning all walks of life, demanding the end of American
military aggression abroad.
This
kind of “power to the people” activism—grassroots, populist and
potent—is exactly the brand of civic engagement John Lennon
advocated throughout his career as a musician and anti-war activist.
It’s
been 36 years since Lennon was gunned
down by an assassin’s bullet on December 8, 1980, but his
legacy and the lessons he imparted in his music and his activism have
not diminished over the years.
All
of the many complaints we have about government today—surveillance,
militarism, corruption, harassment, SWAT team raids, political
persecution, spying, overcriminalization, etc.—were present in
Lennon’s day and formed the basis of his call for social justice,
peace and a populist revolution.
Little
wonder, then, that the U.S. government saw him as enemy number one.
Because
he never refrained from speaking truth to power, Lennon became a
prime example of the lengths to which the U.S. government will go to
persecute those who dare to challenge its authority.
Lennon
was the subject of a four-year campaign of surveillance and
harassment by the U.S. government (spearheaded by FBI Director J.
Edgar Hoover), an attempt by President Richard Nixon to have him
“neutralized” and deported. As Adam Cohen of the New
York Times points
out, “The F.B.I.’s surveillance of
Years
after Lennon’s assassination, it would be revealed that the FBI had
collected 281 pages
of surveillance files on him. As the New
York Timesnotes,
“Critics of today’s domestic surveillance object largely on
privacy grounds. They have focused far less on how easily government
surveillance can become an instrument for the people in power to try
to hold on to power. ‘The U.S. vs. John Lennon’ … is the story
not only of one man being harassed, but of a democracy being
undermined.”
Such
government-directed harassment was nothing new.
The
FBI has had a long history of persecuting, prosecuting and generally
harassing activists, politicians, and cultural figures, most notably
among the latter such celebrated
names as folk singer Pete Seeger, painter Pablo Picasso,
comic actor and filmmaker Charlie Chaplin, comedian Lenny Bruce and
poet Allen Ginsberg. Among those most closely watched by the FBI was
Martin Luther King Jr., a man labeled by the FBI as “the most
dangerous and effective Negro leader in the country.”
In
Lennon’s case, the ex-Beatle had learned early on that rock music
could serve a political end by proclaiming a radical message. More
importantly, Lennon saw that his music could mobilize the public and
help to bring about change.
For
instance, in 1971 at a concert in Ann Arbor, Mich., Lennon took to
the stage and in his usual confrontational style belted out “John
Sinclair,” a song he had written about a man sentenced to 10
years in prison for possessing two marijuana cigarettes. Within
days of Lennon’s call for action, the Michigan Supreme Court
ordered Sinclair released.
While
Lennon believed in the power of the people, he also understood the
danger of a power-hungry government. “The trouble with government
as it is, is that it doesn’t represent the people,” observed
Lennon. “It
controls them.”
By
March 1971, when his “Power to the People” single was released,
it was clear where Lennon stood. Having moved to New York City that
same year, Lennon was ready to participate in political activism
against the U. S. government, the “monster” that was financing
the war in Vietnam.
The
release of Lennon’s Sometime
in New York City album,
which contained a radical anti-government message in virtually every
song and depicted President Richard Nixon and Chinese Chairman Mao
Tse-tung dancing together nude on the cover, only fanned the flames
of the conflict to come.
However,
the official U.S. war against Lennon began in earnest in 1972 after
rumors surfaced that Lennon planned to embark on a U.S. concert tour
that would combine rock music with antiwar organizing and voter
registration. Nixon, fearing Lennon’s influence on about 11 million
new voters (1972 was the first year that 18-year-olds could vote),
had the ex-Beatle served with deportation orders “in an effort
to silence him as a voice of the peace movement.”
As
Lennon’s FBI file shows, memos and reports about the FBI’s
surveillance of the anti-war activist had been flying back and forth
between Hoover, the Nixon White House, various senators, the FBI and
the U.S. Immigration Office.
Nixon’s
pursuit of Lennon was relentless and misplaced.
Despite
the fact that Lennon was not plotting to bring down the Nixon
Administration, as the government feared, the government persisted in
its efforts to have him deported. Equally determined to resist,
Lennon dug in and fought back. Every time he was ordered out of the
country, his lawyers delayed the process by filing an appeal.
Finally,
in 1976, Lennon won the battle to stay in the country and by 1980, he
had re-emerged with a new album and plans to become politically
active again. The old radical was back and ready to cause trouble.
Unfortunately,
Lennon’s time as a troublemaker was short-lived.
As
Lennon stepped outside the car to greet the fans congregating
outside, Chapman, in an eerie echo of the FBI’s moniker for Lennon,
called out, “Mr. Lennon!”
Lennon
turned and was met with a barrage of gunfire as Chapman—dropping
into a two-handed combat stance—emptied his .38-caliber pistol and
pumped four hollow-point bullets into his back and left arm. Lennon
stumbled, staggered forward and, with blood pouring from his mouth
and chest, collapsed to the ground.
John
Lennon was pronounced dead on arrival at the hospital.
Much
like Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, Malcolm X, Robert
Kennedy and others who have died attempting to challenge the
powers-that-be, Lennon had finally been “neutralized.”
Still,
you can’t murder a movement with a bullet and a madman: Lennon’s
legacy lives on in his words, his music and his efforts to speak
truth to power.
As
Yoko Ono shared in a 2014 letter to the parole board tasked with
determining whether Chapman should be released: “A man of humble
origin, [John Lennon] brought light and hope to the whole world with
his words and music. He tried to be a good
power for the world, and he was. He gave encouragement,
inspiration and dreams to people regardless of their race, creed and
gender.”
Lennon’s
work to change the world for the better is far from done.
Peace
remains out of reach. Activism and whistleblowers continue to be
prosecuted for challenging the government’s authority. Militarism
is on the rise, all the while the governmental war machine continues
to wreak havoc on innocent lives.
For
those of us who joined with John Lennon to imagine a world of peace,
it’s getting harder to reconcile that dream with the reality of the
American police state. And as I point out in my book Battlefield
America: The War on the American People,
those who do dare to speak up are labeled dissidents, troublemakers,
terrorists, lunatics, or mentally ill and tagged for surveillance,
censorship or, worse, involuntary detention.
As
Lennon shared in a 1968 interview:
I
think all our society is run by insane people for insane objectives…
I think we’re being run by maniacs for maniacal means. If anybody
can put on paper what our government and the American government and
the Russian… Chinese… what they are actually trying to do, and
what they think they’re doing, I’d be very pleased to know what
they think they’re doing. I think they’re all insane. But I’m
liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That’s
what’s insane about it.”
So
what’s the answer?
Lennon
had a multitude of suggestions.
“If
everyone demanded peace instead of another television set, then
there’d be peace.”
“Produce
your own dream. If you want to save Peru, go save Peru. It’s quite
possible to do anything, but not to put it on the leaders….You have
to do it yourself.”
“Peace
is not something you wish for; It’s something you make, Something
you do, Something you are, And something you give away.”
“If
you want peace, you won’t get it with violence.”
“Say
you want a revolution / We better get on right away / Well you get on
your feet / And out on the street / Singing power to the people.”
And
my favorite advice of all: “All you need is love. Love is all you
need.”
When
John Lennon was shot and killed the
news media went into “lone nut with a
gun” mode. They
left out the “lone nut with intelligence connections,
endless financial resources, and
obvious signs of having been brainwashed” part. Here’s
the untold story.