VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

Kwam gisteren op het blog van Stan van Houcke een lijst met oorlogen tegen, die de VS sinds WOII heeft gevoerd. Voor velen geen nieuws maar het is schokkend om alles nog eens op een rij te zien, een gruwelijk naslagwerk over de daden van de grootste terreur entiteit op aarde: de VS…….

US
Has Killed More Than 20 Million In 37 Nations Since WWII

After
the catastrophic attacks of September 11 2001 monumental sorrow and a
feeling of desperate and understandable anger began to permeate the
American psyche. A few people at that time attempted to promote a
balanced perspective by pointing out that the United States had also
been responsible for causing those same feelings in people in other
nations, but they produced hardly a ripple. Although 

Americans
understand in the abstract the wisdom of people around the world
empathizing with the suffering of one another, such a reminder of
wrongs committed by our nation got little hearing and was soon
overshadowed by an accelerated “war on terrorism.”

But
we must continue our efforts to develop understanding and compassion
in the world. Hopefully, this article will assist in doing that by
addressing the question “How many September 11ths has the United
States caused in other nations since WWII?” This theme is developed
in this report which contains an estimated numbers of such deaths in
37 nations as well as brief explanations of why the U.S. is
considered culpable.

The
causes of wars are complex. In some instances nations other than the
U.S. may have been responsible for more deaths, but if the
involvement of our nation appeared to have been a necessary cause of
a war or conflict it was considered responsible for the deaths in it.
In other words they probably would not have taken place if the U.S.
had not used the heavy hand of its power. The military and economic
power of the United States was crucial.

This
study reveals that U.S. military forces were directly responsible for
about 10 to 15 million deaths during the Korean and Vietnam Wars and
the two Iraq Wars. The Korean War also includes Chinese deaths while
the Vietnam War also includes fatalities in Cambodia and Laos.

The
American public probably is not aware of these numbers and knows even
less about the proxy wars for which the United States is also
responsible. In the latter wars there were between nine and 14
million deaths in Afghanistan, Angola, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, East Timor, Guatemala, Indonesia, Pakistan and Sudan.

But
the victims are not just from big nations or one part of the world.
The remaining deaths were in smaller ones which constitute over half
the total number of nations. Virtually all parts of the world have
been the target of U.S. intervention.

The
overall conclusion reached is that the United States most likely has
been responsible since WWII for the deaths of between 20 and 30
million people in wars and conflicts scattered over the world.

To
the families and friends of these victims it makes little difference
whether the causes were U.S. military action, proxy military forces,
the provision of U.S. military supplies or advisors, or other ways,
such as economic pressures applied by our nation. They had to make
decisions about other things such as finding lost loved ones, whether
to become refugees, and how to survive.

And
the pain and anger is spread even further. Some authorities estimate
that there are as many as 10 wounded for each person who dies in
wars. Their visible, continued suffering is a continuing reminder to
their fellow countrymen.

It
is essential that Americans learn more about this topic so that they
can begin to understand the pain that others feel. Someone once
observed that the Germans during WWII “chose not to know.” We
cannot allow history to say this about our country. The question
posed above was “How many September 11ths has the United States
caused in other nations since WWII?” The answer is: possibly
10,000.

Comments
on Gathering These Numbers


Generally
speaking, the much smaller number of Americans who have died is not
included in this study, not because they are not important, but
because this report focuses on the impact of U.S. actions on its
adversaries.

An
accurate count of the number of deaths is not easy to achieve, and
this collection of data was undertaken with full realization of this
fact. These estimates will probably be revised later either upward or
downward by the reader and the author. But undoubtedly the total will
remain in the millions.

The
difficulty of gathering reliable information is shown by two
estimates in this context. For several years I heard statements on
radio that three million Cambodians had been killed under the rule of
the Khmer Rouge. However, in recent years the figure I heard was one
million. Another example is that the number of persons estimated to
have died in Iraq due to sanctions after the first U.S. Iraq War was
over 1 million, but in more recent years, based on a more recent
study, a lower estimate of around a half a million has emerged.

Often
information about wars is revealed only much later when someone
decides to speak out, when more secret information is revealed due to
persistent efforts of a few, or after special congressional
committees make reports

Both
victorious and defeated nations may have their own reasons for
underreporting the number of deaths. Further, in recent wars
involving the United States it was not uncommon to hear statements
like “we do not do body counts” and references to “collateral
damage” as a euphemism for dead and wounded. Life is cheap for
some, especially those who manipulate people on the battlefield as if
it were a chessboard.

To
say that it is difficult to get exact figures is not to say that we
should not try. Effort was needed to arrive at the figures of 6six
million Jews killed during WWI, but knowledge of that number now is
widespread and it has fueled the determination to prevent future
holocausts. That struggle continues.

The
author can be contacted at 
jlucas511@woh.rr.com

37
VICTIM NATIONS

Afghanistan

The
U.S. is responsible for between 1 and 1.8 million deaths during the
war between the Soviet Union and Afghanistan, by luring the Soviet
Union into invading that nation. (1,2,3,4)

The
Soviet Union had friendly relations its neighbor, Afghanistan, which
had a secular government. The Soviets feared that if that government
became fundamentalist this change could spill over into the Soviet
Union.

In
1998, in an interview with the Parisian publication Le Novel
Observateur, Zbigniew Brzezinski, adviser to President Carter,
admitted that he had been responsible for instigating aid to the
Mujahadeen in Afghanistan which caused the Soviets to invade. In his
own words:

According
to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began
during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded
Afghanistan on 24 December 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded
until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that
President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the
opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I
wrote a note to the President in which I explained to him that in my
opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.”
(5,1,6)

Brzezinski
justified laying this trap, since he said it gave the Soviet Union
its Vietnam and caused the breakup of the Soviet Union. “Regret
what?” he said. “That secret operation was an excellent idea. It
had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you
want me to regret it?” (7)

The
CIA spent 5 to 6 billion dollars on its operation in Afghanistan in
order to bleed the Soviet Union. (1,2,3) When that 10-year war ended
over a million people were dead and Afghan heroin had captured 60% of
the U.S. market. (4)

The
U.S. has been responsible directly for about 12,000 deaths in
Afghanistan many of which resulted from bombing in retaliation for
the attacks on U.S. property on September 11, 2001. Subsequently U.S.
troops invaded that country. (4)

Angola

An
indigenous armed struggle against Portuguese rule in Angola began in
1961. In 1977 an Angolan government was recognized by the U.N.,
although the U.S. was one of the few nations that opposed this
action. In 1986 Uncle Sam approved material assistance to UNITA, a
group that was trying to overthrow the government. Even today this
struggle, which has involved many nations at times, continues.

U.S.
intervention was justified to the U.S. public as a reaction to the
intervention of 50,000 Cuban troops in Angola. However, according to
Piero Gleijeses, a history professor at Johns Hopkins University the
reverse was true. The Cuban intervention came as a result of a CIA –
financed covert invasion via neighboring Zaire and a drive on the
Angolan capital by the U.S. ally, South Africa1,2,3). (Three
estimates of deaths range from 300,000 to 750,000 (4,5,6)

Argentina:
See South America: Operation Condor

Bangladesh:
See Pakistan

Bolivia

Hugo
Banzer was the leader of a repressive regime in Bolivia in the 1970s.
The U.S. had been disturbed when a previous leader nationalized the
tin mines and distributed land to Indian peasants. Later that action
to benefit the poor was reversed.

Banzer,
who was trained at the U.S.-operated School of the Americas in Panama
and later at Fort Hood, Texas, came back from exile frequently to
confer with U.S. Air Force Major Robert Lundin. In 1971 he staged a
successful coup with the help of the U.S. Air Force radio system. In
the first years of his dictatorship he received twice as military
assistance from the U.S. as in the previous dozen years together.

A
few years later the Catholic Church denounced an army massacre of
striking tin workers in 1975, Banzer, assisted by information
provided by the CIA, was able to target and locate leftist priests
and nuns. His anti-clergy strategy, known as the Banzer Plan, was
adopted by nine other Latin American dictatorships in 1977. (2) He
has been accused of being responsible for 400 deaths during his
tenure. (1)

Also
see: See South America: Operation Condor

Brazil:
See South America: Operation Condor

Cambodia

U.S.
bombing of Cambodia had already been underway for several years in
secret under the Johnson and Nixon administrations, but when
President Nixon openly began bombing in preparation for a land
assault on Cambodia it caused major protests in the U.S. against the
Vietnam War.

There
is little awareness today of the scope of these bombings and the
human suffering involved.

Immense
damage was done to the villages and cities of Cambodia, causing
refugees and internal displacement of the population. This unstable
situation enabled the Khmer Rouge, a small political party led by Pol
Pot, to assume power. Over the years we have repeatedly heard about
the Khmer Rouge’s role in the deaths of millions in Cambodia
without any acknowledgement being made this mass killing was made
possible by the the U.S. bombing of that nation which destabilized it
by death , injuries, hunger and dislocation of its people.

So
the U.S. bears responsibility not only for the deaths from the
bombings but also for those resulting from the activities of the
Khmer Rouge – a total of about 2.5 million people. Even when
Vietnam latrer invaded Cambodia in 1979 the CIA was still supporting
the Khmer Rouge. (1,2,3)

Also
see Vietnam

Chad

An
estimated 40,000 people in Chad were killed and as many as 200,000
tortured by a government, headed by Hissen Habre who was brought to
power in June, 1982 with the help of CIA money and arms. He remained
in power for eight years. (1,2)

Human
Rights Watch claimed that Habre was responsible for thousands of
killings. In 2001, while living in Senegal, he was almost tried for
crimes committed by him in Chad. However, a court there blocked these
proceedings. Then human rights people decided to pursue the case in
Belgium, because some of 

Habre’s torture victims lived there. The
U.S., in June 2003, told Belgium that it risked losing its status as
host to NATO’s headquarters if it allowed such a legal proceeding
to happen. So the result was that the law that allowed victims to
file complaints in Belgium for atrocities committed abroad was
repealed. 

However, two months later a new law was passed which made
special provision for the continuation of the case against Habre.

Chile

The
CIA intervened in Chile’s 1958 and 1964 elections. In 1970 a
socialist candidate, Salvador Allende, was elected president. The CIA
wanted to incite a military coup to prevent his inauguration, but the
Chilean army’s chief of staff, General Rene Schneider, opposed this
action. The CIA then planned, along with some people in the Chilean
military, to assassinate Schneider. This plot failed and Allende took
office. President Nixon was not to be dissuaded and he ordered the
CIA to create a coup climate: “Make the economy scream,” he
said.

What followed were guerilla warfare, arson, bombing,
sabotage and terror. ITT and other U.S. corporations with Chilean
holdings sponsored demonstrations and strikes. Finally, on September
11, 1973 Allende died either by suicide or by assassination. At that
time Henry Kissinger, U.S. Secretary of State, said the following
regarding Chile: “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a
country go communist because of the irresponsibility of its own
people.” (1)

During
17 years of terror under Allende’s successor, General Augusto
Pinochet, an estimated 3,000 Chileans were killed and many others
were tortured or “disappeared.” (2,3,4,5)

Also
see South America: Operation Condor

China
An estimated 900,000 Chinese died during the Korean War. For more
information, See: Korea.

Colombia

One
estimate is that 67,000 deaths have occurred from the 1960s to recent
years due to support by the U.S. of Colombian state terrorism. (1)

According
to a 1994 Amnesty International report, more than 20,000 people were
killed for political reasons in Colombia since 1986, mainly by the
military and its paramilitary allies. Amnesty alleged that “U.S.-
supplied military equipment, ostensibly delivered for use against
narcotics traffickers, was being used by the Colombian military to
commit abuses in the name of “counter-insurgency.” (2) In 2002
another estimate was made that 3,500 people die each year in a U.S.
funded civilian war in Colombia. (3)

In
1996 Human Rights Watch issued a report “Assassination Squads in
Colombia” which revealed that 

CIA agents went to Colombia in 1991
to help the military to train undercover agents in anti-subversive
activity. (4,5)

In
recent years the U.S. government has provided assistance under Plan
Colombia. The Colombian government has been charged with using most
of the funds for destruction of crops and support of the paramilitary
group.

Cuba

In
the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba on April 18, 1961 which ended after
3 days, 114 of the invading force were killed, 1,189 were taken
prisoners and a few escaped to waiting U.S. ships. (1) The captured
exiles were quickly tried, a few executed and the rest sentenced to
thirty years in prison for treason. These exiles were released after
20 months in exchange for $53 million in food and medicine.

Some
people estimate that the number of Cuban forces killed range from
2,000, to 4,000. Another estimate is that 1,800 Cuban forces were
killed on an open highway by napalm. This appears to have been a
precursor of the Highway of Death in Iraq in 1991 when U.S. forces
mercilessly annihilated large numbers of Iraqis on a highway. (2)

Democratic
Republic of Congo (formerly Zaire)

The
beginning of massive violence was instigated in this country in 1879
by its colonizer King Leopold of Belgium. The Congo’s population
was reduced by 10 million people over a period of 20 years which some
have referred to as “Leopold’s Genocide.” (1) The U.S. has been
responsible for about a third of t

hat many deaths in that nation in
the more recent past. (2)

In
1960 the Congo became an independent state with Patrice Lumumba being
its first prime minister. He was assassinated with the CIA being
implicated, although some say that his murder was actually the
responsibility of Belgium. (3) But nevertheless, the CIA was planning
to kill him. (4) Before his assassination the CIA sent one of its
scientists, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, to the Congo carrying “lethal
biological material” intended for use in Lumumba’s assassination.
This virus would have been able to produce a fatal disease indigenous
to the Congo area of Africa and was transported in a diplomatic
pouch.

Much
of the time in recent years there has been a civil war within the
Democratic Republic of Congo, fomented often by the U.S. and other
nations, including neighboring nations. (5)

In
April 1977, Newsday reported that the CIA was secretly supporting
efforts to recruit several hundred mercenaries in the U.S. and Great
Britain to serve alongside Zaire’s army. In that same year the U.S.
provided $15 million of military supplies to the Zairian President
Mobutu to fend off an invasion by a rival group operating in Angola.
(6)

In
May 1979, the U.S. sent several million dollars of aid to Mobutu who
had been condemned 3 months earlier by the U.S. State Department for
human rights violations. (7) During the Cold War the U.S. funneled
over 300 million dollars in weapons into Zaire (8,9) $100 million in
military training was provided to him. (2) In 2001 it was reported to
a U.S. congressional committee that American companies, including one
linked to former President George Bush Sr., were stoking the Congo
for monetary gains. There is an international battle over resources
in that country with over 125 companies and individuals being
implicated. One of these substances is coltan, which is used in the
manufacture of cell phones. (2)


Dominican
Republic

In
1962, Juan Bosch became president of the Dominican Republic. He
advocated such programs as land reform and public works programs.
This did not bode well for his future relationship with the U.S., and
after only 7 months in office, he was deposed by a CIA coup. In 1965
when a group was trying to reinstall him to his office President
Johnson said, “This Bosch is no good.” Assistant Secretary of
State Thomas Mann replied “He’s no good at all. If we don’t get
a decent government in there, Mr. President, we get another Bosch.
It’s just going to be another sinkhole.” Two days later a U.S.
invasion started and 22,000 soldiers and marines entered the
Dominican Republic and about 3,000 Dominicans died during the
fighting. The cover excuse for doing this was that this was done to
protect foreigners there. (1,2,3,4)

East
Timor

In
December 1975, Indonesia invaded East Timor. This incursion was
launched the day after U.S. President Gerald Ford and Secretary of
State Henry Kissinger had left Indonesia where they had given
President Suharto permission to use American arms, which under U.S.
law, could not be used for aggression. Daniel Moynihan, U.S.
ambassador to the UN. said that the U.S. wanted “things to turn out
as they did.” (1,2) The result was an estimated 200,000 dead out of
a population of 700,000. (1,2)

Sixteen
years later, on November 12, 1991, two hundred and seventeen East
Timorese protesters in Dili, many of them children, marching from a
memorial service, were gunned down by Indonesian Kopassus shock
troops who were headed by U.S.- trained commanders Prabowo Subianto
(son in law of General Suharto) and Kiki Syahnakri. Trucks were seen
dumping bodies into the sea. (5)

El
Salvador

The
civil war from 1981 to1992 in El Salvador was financed by $6 billion
in U.S. aid given to support the government in its efforts to crush a
movement to bring social justice to the people in that nation of
about 8 million people. (1)

During that time U.S. military
advisers demonstrated methods of torture on teenage prisoners,
according to an interview with a deserter from the Salvadoran army
published in the New York Times. This former member of the Salvadoran
National Guard testified that he was a member of a squad of twelve
who found people who they were told were guerillas and tortured them.
Part of the training he received was in torture at a U.S. location
somewhere in Panama. (2)

About
900 villagers were massacred in the village of El Mozote in 1981. Ten
of the twelve El Salvadoran government soldiers cited as
participating in this act were graduates of the School of the
Americas operated by the U.S. (2) They were only a small part of
about 75,000 people killed during that civil war. (1)

According
to a 1993 United Nations’ Truth Commission report, over 96 % of the
human rights violations carried out during the war were committed by
the Salvadoran army or the paramilitary deaths squads associated with
the Salvadoran army. (3)

That
commission linked graduates of the School of the Americas to many
notorious killings. The New York Times and the Washington Post
followed with scathing articles. In 1996, the White House Oversight
Board issued a report that supported many of the charges against that
school made by Rev. Roy Bourgeois, head of the School of the Americas
Watch. That same year the Pentagon released formerly classified
reports indicating that graduates were trained in killing, extortion,
and physical abuse for interrogations, false imprisonment and other
methods of control. (4)

Grenada

The
CIA began to destabilize Grenada in 1979 after Maurice Bishop became
president, partially because he refused to join the quarantine of
Cuba. The campaign against him resulted in his overthrow and the
invasion by the U.S. of Grenada on October 25, 1983, with about 277
people dying. (1,2) It was fallaciously charged that an airport was
being built in Grenada that could be used to attack the U.S. and it
was also erroneously claimed that the lives of American medical
students on that island were in danger.

Guatemala

In
1951 Jacobo Arbenz was elected president of Guatemala. He
appropriated some unused land operated by the United Fruit Company
and compensated the company. (1,2) That company then started a
campaign to paint Arbenz as a tool of an international conspiracy and
hired about 300 mercenaries who sabotaged oil supplies and trains.
(3) In 1954 a CIA-orchestrated coup put him out of office and he left
the country. During the next 40 years various regimes killed
thousands of people.

In
1999 the Washington Post reported that an Historical Clarification
Commission concluded that over 200,000 people had been killed during
the civil war and that there had been 42,000 individual human rights
violations, 29,000 of them fatal, 92% of which were committed by the
army. The commission further reported that the U.S. government and
the CIA had pressured the Guatemalan government into suppressing the
guerilla movement by ruthless means. (4,5)

According
to the Commission between 1981 and 1983 the military government of
Guatemala – financed and supported by the U.S. government –
destroyed some four hundred Mayan villages in a campaign of genocide.
(4)

One of the documents made available to the commission was a
1966 memo from a U.S. State Department official, which described how
a “safe house” was set up in the palace for use by Guatemalan
security agents and their U.S. contacts. This was the headquarters
for the Guatemalan “dirty war” against leftist insurgents and
suspected allies. (2)

Haiti

From
1957 to 1986 Haiti was ruled by Papa Doc Duvalier and later by his
son. During that time their private terrorist force killed between
30,000 and 100,000 people. (1) Millions of dollars in CIA subsidies
flowed into Haiti during that time, mainly to suppress popular
movements, (2) although most American military aid to the country,
according to William Blum, was covertly channeled through Israel.

Reportedly,
governments after the second Duvalier reign were responsible for an
even larger number of fatalities, and the influence on Haiti by the
U.S., particularly through the CIA, has continued. The U.S. later
forced out of the presidential office a black Catholic priest, Jean
Bertrand Aristide, even though he was elected with 67% of the vote in
the early 1990s. The wealthy white class in Haiti opposed him in this
predominantly black nation, because of his social programs designed
to help the poor and end corruption. (3) Later he returned to office,
but that did not last long. He was forced by the U.S. to leave office
and now lives in South Africa.


Honduras

In
the 1980s the CIA supported Battalion 316 in Honduras, which
kidnapped, tortured and killed hundreds of its citizens. Torture
equipment and manuals were provided by CIA Argentinean personnel who
worked with U.S. agents in the training of the Hondurans.
Approximately 400 people lost their lives. (1,2) This is another
instance of torture in the world sponsored by the U.S. (3)

Battalion
316 used shock and suffocation devices in interrogations in the
1980s. Prisoners often were kept naked and, when no longer useful,
killed and buried in unmarked graves. Declassified documents and
other sources show that the CIA and the U.S. Embassy knew of numerous
crimes, including murder and torture, yet continued to support
Battalion 316 and collaborate with its leaders.” (4)

Honduras
was a staging ground in the early 1980s for the Contras who were
trying to overthrow the socialist Sandinista government in Nicaragua.
John D. Negroponte, currently Deputy Secretary of State, was our
embassador when our military aid to Honduras rose from $4 million to
$77.4 million per year. Negroponte denies having had any knowledge of
these atrocities during his tenure. However, his predecessor in that
position, Jack R. Binns, had reported in 1981 that he was deeply
concerned at increasing evidence of officially sponsored/sanctioned
assassinations. (5)

Hungary

In
1956 Hungary, a Soviet satellite nation, revolted against the Soviet
Union. During the uprising broadcasts by the U.S. Radio Free Europe
into Hungary sometimes took on an aggressive tone, encouraging the
rebels to believe that Western support was imminent, and even giving
tactical advice on how to fight the Soviets. Their hopes were raised
then dashed by these broadcasts which cast an even darker shadow over
the Hungarian tragedy.“ (1) The Hungarian and Soviet death toll was
about 3,000 and the revolution was crushed. (2)

Indonesia

In
1965, in Indonesia, a coup replaced General Sukarno with General
Suharto as leader. The U.S. played a role in that change of
government. Robert Martens,a former officer in the U.S. embassy in
Indonesia, described how U.S. diplomats and CIA officers provided up
to 5,000 names to Indonesian Army death squads in 1965 and checked
them off as they were killed or captured. Martens admitted that “I
probably have a lot of blood on my hands, but that’s not all bad.
There’s a time when you have to strike hard at a decisive moment.”
(1,2,3) Estimates of the number of deaths range from 500,000 to 3
million. (4,5,6)

From 1993 to 1997 the U.S. provided Jakarta with
almost $400 million in economic aid and sold tens of million of
dollars of weaponry to that nation. U.S. Green Berets provided
training for the Indonesia’s elite force which was responsible for
many of atrocities in East Timor. (3)

Iran

Iran
lost about 262,000 people in the war against Iraq from 1980 to 1988.
(1) See Iraq for more information about that war.

On
July 3, 1988 the U.S. Navy ship, the Vincennes, was operating withing
Iranian waters providing military support for Iraq during the
Iran-Iraq war. During a battle against Iranian gunboats it fired two
missiles at an Iranian Airbus, which was on a routine civilian
flight. All 290 civilian on board were killed. (2,3)

Iraq

A.
The Iraq-Iran War lasted from 1980 to 1988 and during that time there
were about 105,000 Iraqi deaths according to the Washington Post.
(1,2)

According
to Howard Teicher, a former National Security Council official, the
U.S. provided the Iraqis with billions of dollars in credits and
helped Iraq in other ways such as making sure that Iraq had military
equipment including biological agents This surge of help for Iraq
came as Iran seemed to be winning the war and was close to Basra. (1)
The U.S. was not adverse to both countries weakening themselves as a
result of the war, but it did not appear to want either side to win.

B:
The U.S.-Iraq War and the Sanctions Against Iraq extended from 1990
to 2003.

Iraq
invaded Kuwait on August 2, 1990 and the U.S. responded by demanding
that Iraq withdraw, and four days later the U.N. levied international
sanctions.

Iraq
had reason to believe that the U.S. would not object to its invasion
of Kuwait, since U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, had told
Saddam Hussein that the U.S. had no position on the dispute that his
country had with Kuwait. So the green light was given, but it seemed
to be more of a trap.

As
a part of the public relations strategy to energize the American
public into supporting an attack against Iraq the daughter of the
Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S. falsely testified before Congress that
Iraqi troops were pulling the plugs on incubators in Iraqi hospitals.
(1) This contributed to a war frenzy in the U.S.

The
U.S. air assault started on January 17, 1991 and it lasted for 42
days. On February 23 President H.W. Bush ordered the U.S. ground
assault to begin. The invasion took place with much needless killing
of Iraqi military personnel. Only about 150 American military
personnel died compared to about 200,000 Iraqis. Some of the Iraqis
were mercilessly killed on the Highway of Death and about 400 tons of
depleted uranium were left in that nation by the U.S. (2,3)

Other
deaths later were from delayed deaths due to wounds, civilians
killed, those killed by effects of damage of the Iraqi water
treatment facilities and other aspects of its damaged infrastructure
and by the sanctions.

In
1995 the Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. reported that
U.N sanctions against on Iraq had been responsible for the deaths of
more than 560,000 children since 1990. (5)

Leslie
Stahl on the TV Program 60 Minutes in 1996 mentioned to Madeleine
Albright, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. “We have heard that a half
million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died
in Hiroshima. And – and you know, is the price worth it?”
Albright replied “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price
– we think is worth it.” (4)

In
1999 UNICEF reported that 5,000 children died each month as a result
of the sanction and the War with the U.S. (6)

Richard
Garfield later estimated that the more likely number of excess deaths
among children under five years of age from 1990 through March 1998
to be 227,000 – double those of the previous decade. Garfield
estimated that the numbers to be 350,000 through 2000 (based in part
on result of another study). (7)

However,
there are limitations to his study. His figures were not updated for
the remaining three years of the sanctions. Also, two other somewhat
vulnerable age groups were not studied: young children above the age
of five and the elderly.

All
of these reports were considerable indicators of massive numbers of
deaths which the U.S. was aware of and which was a part of its
strategy to cause enough pain and terror among Iraqis to cause them
to revolt against their government.

C:
Iraq-U.S. War started in 2003 and has not been concluded


Just
as the end of the Cold War emboldened the U.S. to attack Iraq in 1991
so the attacks of September 11, 2001 laid the groundwork for the U.S.
to launch the current war against Iraq. While in some other wars we
learned much later about the lies that were used to deceive us, some
of the deceptions that were used to get us into this war became known
almost as soon as they were uttered. There were no weapons of mass
destruction, we were not trying to promote democracy, we were not
trying to save the Iraqi people from a dictator.

The
total number of Iraqi deaths that are a result of our current Iraq
against Iraq War is 654,000, of which 600,000 are attributed to acts
of violence, according to Johns Hopkins researchers. (1,2)

Since
these deaths are a result of the U.S. invasion, our leaders must
accept responsibility for them.

Israeli-Palestinian
War

About
100,000 to 200,000 Israelis and Palestinians, but mostly the latter,
have been killed in the struggle between those two groups. The U.S.
has been a strong supporter of Israel, providing billions of dollars
in aid and supporting its possession of nuclear weapons. (1,2)


Korea,
North and South


The
Korean War started in 1950 when, according to the Truman
administration, North Korea invaded South Korea on June 25th.
However, since then another explanation has emerged which maintains
that the attack by North Korea came during a time of many border
incursions by both sides. South Korea initiated most of the border
clashes with North Korea beginning in 1948. The North Korea
government claimed that by 1949 the South Korean army committed 2,617
armed incursions. It was a myth that the Soviet Union ordered North
Korea to attack South Korea. (1,2)


The
U.S. started its attack before a U.N. resolution was passed
supporting our nation’s intervention, and our military forces added
to the mayhem in the war by introducing the use of napalm. (1)

During
the war the bulk of the deaths were South Koreans, North Koreans and
Chinese. Four sources give deaths counts ranging from 1.8 to 4.5
million. (3,4,5,6) Another source gives a total of 4 million but does
not identify to which nation they belonged. (7)


John
H. Kim, a U.S. Army veteran and the Chair of the Korea Committee of
Veterans for Peace, stated in an article that during the Korean War
“the U.S. Army, Air Force and Navy were directly involved in the
killing of about three million civilians – both South and North
Koreans – at many locations throughout Korea…It is reported that
the U.S. dropped some 650,000 tons of bombs, including 43,000 tons of
napalm bombs, during the Korean War.” It is presumed that this
total does not include Chinese casualties.

Another
source states a total of about 500,000 who were Koreans and
presumably only military. (8,9)


Laos


From
1965 to 1973 during the Vietnam War the U.S. dropped over two million
tons of bombs on Laos – more than was dropped in WWII by both
sides. Over a quarter of the population became refugees. This was
later called a “secret war,” since it occurred at the same time
as the Vietnam War, but got little press. Hundreds of thousands were
killed. Branfman make the only estimate that I am aware of , stating
that hundreds of thousands died. This can be interpeted to mean that
at least 200,000 died. (1,2,3)


U.S.
military intervention in Laos actually began much earlier. A civil
war started in the 1950s when the U.S. recruited a force of 40,000
Laotians to oppose the Pathet Lao, a leftist political party that
ultimately took power in 1975.

Also
See Vietnam

Nepal


Between
8,000 and 12,000 Nepalese have died since a civil war broke out in
1996. The death rate, according to Foreign Policy in Focus, sharply
increased with the arrival of almost 8,400 American M-16 submachine
guns (950 rpm) and U.S. advisers. Nepal is 85 percent rural and badly
in need of land reform. Not surprisingly 42 % of its people live
below the poverty level. (1,2)

In
2002, after another civil war erupted, President George W. Bush
pushed a bill through Congress authorizing $20 million in military
aid to the Nepalese government. (3)


Nicaragua


In
1981 the Sandinistas overthrew the Somoza government in Nicaragua,
(1) and until 1990 about 25,000 Nicaraguans were killed in an armed
struggle between the Sandinista government and Contra rebels who were
formed from the remnants of Somoza’s national government. The use
of assassination manuals by the Contras surfaced in 1984. (2,3)


The
U.S. supported the victorious government regime by providing covert
military aid to the Contras (anti-communist guerillas) starting in
November, 1981. But when Congress discovered that the CIA had
supervised acts of sabotage in Nicaragua without notifying Congress,
it passed the Boland Amendment in 1983 which prohibited the CIA,
Defense Department and any other government agency from providing any
further covert military assistance. (4)


But
ways were found to get around this prohibition. The National Security
Council, which was not explicitly covered by the law, raised private
and foreign funds for the Contras. In addition, arms were sold to
Iran and the proceeds were diverted from those sales to the Contras
engaged in the insurgency against the Sandinista government. (5)
Finally, the Sandinistas were voted out of office in 1990 by voters
who thought that a change in leadership would placate the U.S., which
was causing misery to Nicaragua’s citizenry by it support of the
Contras.


Pakistan


In
1971 West Pakistan, an authoritarian state supported by the U.S.,
brutally invaded East Pakistan. The war ended after India, whose
economy was staggering after admitting about 10 million refugees,
invaded East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and defeated the West
Pakistani forces. (1)

Millions
of people died during that brutal struggle, referred to by some as
genocide committed by West Pakistan. That country had long been an
ally of the U.S., starting with $411 million provided to establish
its armed forces which spent 80% of its budget on its military. $15
million in arms flowed into W. Pakistan during the war. (2,3,4)

Three
sources estimate that 3 million people died and (5,2,6) one source
estimates 1.5 million. (3)


Panama


In
December, 1989 U.S. troops invaded Panama, ostensibly to arrest
Manuel Noriega, that nation’s president. This was an example of the
U.S. view that it is the master of the world and can arrest anyone it
wants to. For a number of years before that he had worked for the
CIA, but fell out of favor partially because he was not an opponent
of the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. (1) It has been estimated that
between 500 and 4,000 people died. (2,3,4)


Paraguay:
See South America: Operation Condor


Philippines


The
Philippines were under the control of the U.S. for over a hundred
years. In about the last 50 to 60 years the U.S. has funded and
otherwise helped various Philippine governments which sought to
suppress the activities of groups working for the welfare of its
people. In 1969 the Symington Committee in the U.S. Congress revealed
how war material was sent there for a counter-insurgency campaign.
U.S. Special Forces and Marines were active in some combat
operations. The estimated number of persons that were executed and
disappeared under President Fernando Marcos was over 100,000. (1,2)


South
America: Operation Condor


This
was a joint operation of 6 despotic South American governments
(Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay) to share
information about their political opponents. An estimated 13,000
people were killed under this plan. (1)


It
was established on November 25, 1975 in Chile by an act of the
Interamerican Reunion on Military Intelligence. According to U.S.
embassy political officer, John Tipton, the CIA and the Chilean
Secret Police were working together, although the CIA did not set up
the operation to make this collaboration work. Reportedly, it ended
in 1983. (2)


On
March 6, 2001 the New York Times reported the existence of a recently
declassified State Department document revealing that the United
States facilitated communications for Operation Condor. (3)


Sudan


Since
1955, when it gained its independence, Sudan has been involved most
of the time in a civil war. Until about 2003 approximately 2 million
people had been killed. It not known if the death toll in Darfur is
part of that total.


Human
rights groups have complained that U.S. policies have helped to
prolong the Sudanese civil war by supporting efforts to overthrow the
central government in Khartoum. In 1999 U.S. Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright met with the leader of the Sudan People’s
Liberation Army (SPLA) who said that she offered him food supplies if
he would reject a peace plan sponsored by Egypt and Libya.

In
1978 the vastness of Sudan’s oil reservers was discovered and
within two years it became the sixth largest recipient of U.S,
military aid. It’s reasonable to assume that if the U.S. aid a
government to come to power it will feel obligated to give the U.S.
part of the oil pie.


A
British group, Christian Aid, has accused foreign oil companies of
complicity in the depopulation of villages. These companies – not
American – receive government protection and in turn allow the
government use of its airstrips and roads.


In
August 1998 the U.S. bombed Khartoum, Sudan with 75 cruise míssiles.
Our government said that the target was a chemical weapons factory
owned by Osama bin Laden. Actually, bin Laden was no longer the
owner, and the plant had been the sole supplier of pharmaceutical
supplies for that poor nation. As a result of the bombing tens of
thousands may have died because of the lack of medicines to treat
malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases. The U.S. settled a lawsuit
filed by the factory’s owner. (1,2)


Uruguay:
See South America: Operation Condor

Vietnam

In
Vietnam, under an agreement several decades ago, there was supposed
to be an election for a unified North and South Vietnam. The U.S.
opposed this and supported the Diem government in South Vietnam. In
August, 1964 the CIA and others helped fabricate a phony Vietnamese
attack on a U.S. ship in the Gulf of Tonkin and this was used as a
pretext for greater U.S. involvement in Vietnam. (1)


During
that war an American assassination operation,called Operation
Phoenix, terrorized the South 

Vietnamese people, and during the war
American troops were responsible in 1968 for the mass slaughter of
the people in the village of My Lai.


According
to a Vietnamese government statement in 1995 the number of deaths of
civilians and military personnel during the Vietnam War was 5.1
million. (2)


Since
deaths in Cambodia and Laos were about 2.7 million (See Cambodia and
Laos) the estimated total for the Vietnam War is 7.8 million.


The
Virtual Truth Commission provides a total for the war of 5 million,
(3) and Robert McNamara, former Secretary Defense, according to the
New York Times Magazine says that the number of Vietnamese dead is
3.4 million. (4,5)


Yugoslavia


Yugoslavia
was a socialist federation of several republics. Since it refused to
be closely tied to the Soviet Union during the Cold War, it gained
some suport from the U.S. But when the Soviet Union dissolved,
Yugoslavia’s usefulness to the U.S. ended, and the U.S and Germany
worked to convert its socialist economy to a capitalist one by a
process primarily of dividing and conquering. There were ethnic and
religious differences between various parts of Yugoslavia which were
manipulated by the U.S. to cause several wars which resulted in the
dissolution of that country.


From
the early 1990s until now Yugoslavia split into several independent
nations whose lowered income, along with CIA connivance, has made it
a pawn in the hands of capitalist countries. (1) The dissolution of
Yugoslavia was caused primarily by the U.S. (2)


Here
are estimates of some, if not all, of the internal wars in
Yugoslavia. All wars: 107,000; (3,4)

Bosnia
and Krajina: 250,000; (5) Bosnia: 20,000 to 30,000; (5) Croatia:
15,000; (6) and

Kosovo:
500 to 5,000. (7)


NOTES


Afghanistan

1.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003),
p.135.

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_
terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

3.Soviet
War in
Afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

4.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.76

5.U.S
Involvement in Afghanistan,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in
Afghanistan)

6.The
CIA’s Intervention in Afghanistan, Interview with Zbigniew
Brzezinski, Le Nouvel Observateur, Paris, 15-21 January 1998, Posted
at globalresearch.ca 15 October
2001, 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html

7.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.5

8.Unknown
News, 
http://www.unknownnews.net/casualtiesw.html

Angola

1.Howard
W. French “From Old Files, a New Story of the U.S. Role in the
Angolan War” New York Times 3/31/02

2.Angolan
Update, American Friends Service Committee FS, 11/1/99 flyer.

3.Norman
Solomon, War Made Easy, (John Wiley & Sons, 2005) p. 82-83.

4.Lance
Selfa, U.S. Imperialism, A Century of Slaughter, International
Socialist Review Issue 7, Spring 1999 (as appears in Third world
Traveler www.
thirdworldtraveler.com/American_Empire/Century_Imperialism.html)

5.
Jeffress Ramsay, Africa , (Dushkin/McGraw Hill Guilford Connecticut),
1997, p. 144-145.

6.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.54.

Argentina
: See South America: Operation Condor

Bolivia

1.
Phil Gunson, Guardian, 5/6/02,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/archive
/article/0,4273,41-07884,00.html

2.Jerry
Meldon, Return of Bolilvia’s Drug – Stained Dictator,
Consortium,
www.consortiumnews.com/archives/story40.html.

Brazil
See South America: Operation Condor

Cambodia

1.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/ .

2.David
Model, President Richard Nixon, Henry Kissinger, and the Bombing of
Cambodia excerpted from the book Lying for Empire How to Commit War
Crimes With A Straight Face, Common Courage Press, 2005,
paper
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/American_Empire/Nixon_Cambodia_LFE.html.

3.Noam
Chomsky, Chomsky on Cambodia under Pol Pot,
etc.,
http//zmag.org/forums/chomcambodforum.htm.

Chad

1.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
151-152 .

2.Richard
Keeble, Crimes Against Humanity in Chad, Znet/Activism
12/4/06
http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=11560&sectionID=1).

Chile

1.Parenti,
Michael, The Sword and the Dollar (New York, St. Martin’s Press,
1989) p. 56.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
142-143.

3.Moreorless:
Heroes and Killers of the 20th Century, Augusto Pinochet Ugarte,

http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/pinochet.html

4.Associated
Press,Pincohet on 91st Birthday, Takes Responsibility for Regimes’s
Abuses, Dayton Daily News 11/26/06

5.Chalmers
Johnson, Blowback, The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (New
York: Henry Holt and Company, 2000), p. 18.

China:
See Korea

Colombia

1.Chronology
of American State Terrorism, p.2

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html).

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
163.

3.Millions
Killed by Imperialism Washington Post May 6,
2002)
http://www.etext.org./Politics/MIM/rail/impkills.html

4.Gabriella
Gamini, CIA Set Up Death Squads in Colombia Times Newspapers Limited,
Dec. 5,
1996,
www.edu/CommunicationsStudies/ben/news/cia/961205.death.html).

5.Virtual
Truth Commission, 1991

Human
Rights Watch Report: Colombia’s Killer Networks–The
Military-Paramilitary Partnership).

Cuba

1.St.
James Encyclopedia of Popular Culture – on Bay of Pigs
Invasion
http://bookrags.com/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion.

2.Wikipedia http://bookrags.com/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion#Casualties.

Democratic
Republic of Congo (Formerly Zaire)

1.F.
Jeffress Ramsey, Africa (Guilford Connecticut, 1997), p. 85

2.
Anup Shaw The Democratic Republic of Congo,
10/31/2003)
http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/Africa/DRC.asp)

3.Kevin
Whitelaw, A Killing in Congo, U. S. News and World
Report
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/doubleissue/mysteries/patrice.htm

4.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p
158-159.

5.Ibid.,p.
260

6.Ibid.,p.
259

7.Ibid.,p.262

8.David
Pickering, “World War in Africa,
6/26/02,
www.9-11peace.org/bulletin.php3

9.William
D. Hartung and Bridget Moix, Deadly Legacy; U.S. Arms to Africa and
the Congo War, Arms Trade Resource Center, January ,
2000
www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/congo.htm


Dominican
Republic

1.Norman
Solomon, (untitled) Baltimore Sun April 26,
2005
http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/history/2005/0426spincycle.htm
Intervention
Spin Cycle

2.Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Power_Pack

3.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p.
175.

4.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.26-27.


East
Timor

1.Virtual
Truth Commission,
 http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/date4.htm

2.Matthew
Jardine, Unraveling Indonesia, Nonviolent Activist, 1997)

3.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

4.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p.
197.

5.US
trained butchers of Timor, The Guardian, London. Cited by The Drudge
Report, September 19,
1999. 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/indon.htm


El
Salvador

1.Robert
T. Buckman, Latin America 2003, (Stryker-Post Publications Baltimore
2003) p. 152-153.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
54-55.

3.El
Salvador,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Salvador#The_20th_century_and_beyond)

4.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.


Grenada

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p. 66-67.

2.Stephen
Zunes, The U.S. Invasion of
Grenada,
http://wwwfpif.org/papers/grenada2003.html .


Guatemala

1.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

2.Ibid.

3.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.2-13.

4.Robert
T. Buckman, Latin America 2003 (Stryker-Post Publications Baltimore
2003) p. 162.

5.Douglas
Farah, Papers Show U.S. Role in Guatemalan Abuses, Washington Post
Foreign Service, March 11, 1999, A 26


Haiti

1.Francois
Duvalier,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Duvalier#Reign_of_terror).

2.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p 87.

3.William
Blum, Haiti 1986-1994: Who Will Rid Me of This Turbulent
Priest,
http://www.doublestandards.org/blum8.html


Honduras

1.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p. 55.

2.Reports
by Country: Honduras, Virtual Truth
Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/honduras.htm

3.James
A. Lucas, Torture Gets The Silence Treatment, Countercurrents, July
26, 2004.

4.Gary
Cohn and Ginger Thompson, Unearthed: Fatal Secrets, Baltimore Sun,
reprint of a series that appeared June 11-18, 1995 in Jack
Nelson-Pallmeyer, School of Assassins, p. 46 Orbis Books 2001.

5.Michael
Dobbs, Negroponte’s Time in Honduras at Issue, Washington Post,
March 21, 2005


Hungary

1.Edited
by Malcolm Byrne, The 1956 Hungarian Revoluiton: A history in
Documents November 4,
2002
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB76/index2.htm

2.Wikipedia
The Free
Encyclopedia,
http://www.answers.com/topic/hungarian-revolution-of-1956


Indonesia

1.Virtual
Truth Commission 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.

2.Editorial,
Indonesia’s Killers, The Nation, March 30, 1998.

3.Matthew
Jardine, Indonesia Unraveling, Non Violent Activist Sept–Oct, 1997
(Amnesty) 2/7/07.

4.Sison,
Jose Maria, Reflections on the 1965 Massacre in Indonesia, p.
5.
http://qc.indymedia.org/mail.php?id=5602;

5.Annie
Pohlman, Women and the Indonesian Killings of 1965-1966: Gender
Variables and Possible Direction for Research,
p.4,
http://coombs.anu.edu.au/SpecialProj/ASAA/biennial-conference/2004/Pohlman-A-ASAA.pdf

6.Peter
Dale Scott, The United States and the Overthrow of Sukarno,
1965-1967, Pacific Affairs, 58, Summer 1985, pages
239-264.
http://www.namebase.org/scott.

7.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.30.


Iran

1.Geoff
Simons, Iraq from Sumer to Saddam, 1996, St. Martins Press, NY p.
317.

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html.

3.BBC
1988: US Warship Shoots Down Iranian
Airliner
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/default.stm )


Iraq

Iran-Iraq
War

1.Michael
Dobbs, U.S. Had Key role in Iraq Buildup, Washington Post December
30, 2002, p
A01 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A52241-2002Dec29?language=printer

2.Global
Security.Org , Iran Iraq War
(1980-1980)
globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/iran-iraq.htm.


U.S.
Iraq War and Sanctions

1.Ramsey
Clark, The Fire This Time (New York, Thunder’s Mouth), 1994,
p.31-32

2.Ibid.,
p. 52-54

3.Ibid.,
p. 43

4.Anthony
Arnove, Iraq Under Siege, (South End Press Cambridge MA 2000). p.
175.

5.Food
and Agricultural Organizaiton, The Children are Dying, 1995 World
View Forum, Internationa Action Center, International Relief
Association, p. 78

6.Anthony
Arnove, Iraq Under Siege, South End Press Cambridge MA 2000. p. 61.

7.David
Cortright, A Hard Look at Iraq Sanctions December 3, 2001, The
Nation.


U.S-Iraq
War 2003-?

1.Jonathan
Bor 654,000 Deaths Tied to Iraq War Baltimore Sun , October 11,2006

2.News http://www.unknownnews.net/casualties.html


Israeli-Palestinian
War

1.Post-1967
Palestinian & Israeli Deaths from Occupation & Violence May
16,
2006 
http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/2006/05/post-1967-palestinian-israeli-deaths.html)

2.Chronology
of American State Terrorism

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html


Korea

1.James
I. Matray Revisiting Korea: Exposing Myths of the Forgotten War,
Korean War Teachers Conference: The Korean War, February 9,
2001
http://www.truman/library.org/Korea/matray1.htm

2.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p. 46

3.Kanako
Tokuno, Chinese Winter Offensive in Korean War – the Debacle of
American Strategy, ICE Case Studies Number 186, May,
2006
http://www.american.edu/ted/ice/chosin.htm.

4.John
G. Stroessinger, Why Nations go to War, (New York; St. Martin’s
Press), p. 99)

5.Britannica
Concise Encyclopedia, as reported in
Answers.com
http://www.answers.com/topic/Korean-war

6.Exploring
the Environment: Korean
Enigma
www.cet.edu/ete/modules/korea/kwar.html)

7.S.
Brian Wilson, Who are the Real Terrorists? Virtual Truth
Commisson
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

8.Korean
War Casualty Statistics 
www.century
china.com/history/krwarcost.html
)

9.S.
Brian Wilson, Documenting U.S. War Crimes in North Korea (Veterans
for Peace Newsletter) Spring, 2002) 
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/


Laos

1.William
Blum Rogue State (Maine, Common Cause Press) p. 136

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

3.Fred
Branfman, War Crimes in Indochina and our Troubled National Soul

www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2004/08/00_branfman_us-warcrimes-indochina.htm).


Nepal

1.Conn
Hallinan, Nepal & the Bush Administration: Into Thin Air,
February 3, 2004

fpif.org/commentary/2004/0402nepal.html.

2.Human
Rights Watch, Nepal’s Civil War: the Conflict Resumes, March 2006 )

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/03/28/nepal13078.htm.

3.Wayne
Madsen, Possible CIA Hand in the Murder of the Nepal Royal Family,
India Independent Media Center, September 25,
2001
http://india.indymedia.org/en/2002/09/2190.shtml.


Nicaragua

1.Virtual
Truth Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.

2.Timeline
Nicaragua
www.stanford.edu/group/arts/nicaragua/discovery_eng/timeline/).

3.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism,
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html.

4.William
Blum, Nicaragua 1981-1990 Destabilization in Slow Motion

www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/Nicaragua_KH.html.

5.Wikipedia,
the Free
Encyclopedia,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Contra_Affair.


Pakistan

1.John
G. Stoessinger, Why Nations Go to War, (New York: St. Martin’s
Press), 1974 pp 157-172.

2.Asad
Ismi, A U.S. – Financed Military Dictatorship, The CCPA Monitor,
June 2002, Canadian Centre for Policy
Alternatives 
http://www.policyaltematives.ca)www.ckln.fm/~asadismi/pakistan.html

3.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003),
p.123, 124.

4.Arjum
Niaz ,When America Look the Other Way by,

www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=2821&sectionID=1

5.Leo
Kuper, Genocide (Yale University Press, 1981), p. 79.

6.Bangladesh
Liberation War , Wikipedia, the Free
Encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Liberation_War#USA_and_USSR)


Panama

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’s Greatest Hits, (Odonian Press 1998) p. 83.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.154.

3.U.S.
Military Charged with Mass Murder, The Winds
9/96,
www.apfn.org/thewinds/archive/war/a102896b.html

4.Mark
Zepezauer, CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.83.

Paraguay
See South America: Operation Condor


Philippines

1.Romeo
T. Capulong, A Century of Crimes Against the Filipino People,
Presentation, Public Interest Law Center, World Tribunal for Iraq
Trial in New York City on August
25,2004.
http://www.peoplejudgebush.org/files/RomeoCapulong.pdf).

2.Roland
B. Simbulan The CIA in Manila – Covert Operations and the CIA’s
Hidden Hisotry in the Philippines Equipo Nizkor Information –
Derechos, derechos.org/nizkor/filipinas/doc/cia.


South
America: Operation Condor

1.John
Dinges, Pulling Back the Veil on Condor, The Nation, July 24, 2000.

2.Virtual
Truth Commission, Telling the Truth for a Better
America
www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/condor.htm)

3.Operation
Condor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Condor#US_involvement).


Sudan

1.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang, (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003), p.
30, 32,34,36.

2.The
Black Commentator, Africa Action The Tale of Two Genocides: The
Failed US Response to Rwanda and Darfur, 11 August
2006
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/091706X.shtml.


Uruguay
See South America: Operation Condor


Vietnam

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine:Common Courage
Press,1994), p 24

2.Casualties
– US vs NVA/VC,
http://www.rjsmith.com/kia_tbl.html.

3.Brian
Wilson, Virtual Truth
Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

4.Fred
Branfman, U.S. War Crimes in Indochiona and our Duty to Truth August
26, 2004

www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=6105&sectionID=1

5.David
K Shipler, Robert McNamara and the Ghosts of
Vietnam
nytimes.com/library/world/asia/081097vietnam-mcnamara.html


Yugoslavia

1.Sara
Flounders, Bosnia Tragedy:The Unknown Role of the Pentagon in NATO in
the Balkans (New York: International Action Center) p. 47-75

2.James
A. Lucas, Media Disinformation on the War in Yugoslavia: The Dayton
Peace Accords Revisited, Global Research, September 7, 2005
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=
viewArticle&code=LUC20050907&articleId=899

3.Yugoslav
Wars in 1990s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_wars.

4.George
Kenney, The Bosnia Calculation: How Many Have Died? Not nearly as
many as some would have you think., NY Times Magazine, April 23, 1995

http://www.balkan-archive.org.yu/politics/
war_crimes/srebrenica/bosnia_numbers.html
)

5.Chronology
of American State Terrorism

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/
ChronologyofTerror.html.

6.Croatian
War of Independence,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatian_War_of_Independence

7.Human
Rights Watch, New Figures on Civilian Deaths in Kosovo War, (February
7, 2000) 
http://www.hrw.org/press/2000/02/nato207.htm.

Related Posts:

https://www.popularresistance.org/us-has-killed-more-than-20-million-in-37-nations-since-wwii/

Jammer dat Oekraïne en Syrie niet werden genoemd in de lijst, bovendien is er nog een groot aantal landen waar de VS tekeer is gegaan, o.a. middels illegale geheime operaties van speciale VS moordcommando’s…….

Zie ook:

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

Bang voor Amerika

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

VS heeft Rusland al 3 keer met oorlog gedreigd, de laatste 2 keer in de afgelopen 1,5 week……‘ (bericht van 5 oktober 2018)

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht aantreft. Helaas kan ik daar maar 140 tekens kwijt en kan dus niet eens alle landen opnemen, die hier werden genoemd (het label illegale oorlog’ duidt op de illegale oorlog tegen Irak).

Na kritiek de tekst in de kop aangepast op 24 november 2016. (toegevoegd: sinds ‘het einde van‘ WOII……..)

Generaal b.d. van Loon: Defensie budget moet veel hoger en we moeten Syrië in…….

Generaal buiten dienst en ridder in de orde van Oranje Nassau* (ha! ha! ha!) Ton van Loon was gisteren te gast op Radio1 in het KRO-NCRV programma van presentator Plag. Hij was daar om Plag en het Nederlandse volk uit te leggen, dat er veel meer geld naar defensie moet, de structurele verhoging van het Defensie budget is maar een begin, er moet veel meer bij, aldus de woorden van de generaal met de koperen fluit……..

Ongelofelijk te horen, dat Plag zich totaal niet had voorbereid en werkelijk niet één kritische vraag stelde, maar belangstellend de angstzaaierij  van de generaal als de waarheid aanhoorde…….

Waarom er meer geld naar Defensie moet? Simpel vanwege de toestand in Europa, waar de generaal b.d. uiteraard op ‘het uitermate gevaarlijke’ Rusland doelde……. Het is ten slotte Rusland dat haar legers steeds verder richting Amsterdam liet optrekken en niet de NAVO, dat nu aan het grootste deel van de Russische westgrens staat…….

Dezelfde plek waar de baas van de NAVO, de VS, een raketschild bouwt, ‘dat Iraanse raketten moeten tegenhouden’, maar die uitermate snel van atoomkoppen kunnen worden voorzien en bijzonder dicht bij de Russische doelen staat……. Als Rusland dit op vergelijkbare afstand met de VS zou doen, hadden we nu allang midden in WOIII gezeten en waren we voor het grootste deel uitgemoord………

Ook Syrië heeft de ‘dankbare aandacht’ van van Loon, die stelde dat we daar echt met troepen in moeten…. Dat de VS daar een opstand op touw heeft gezet*, interesseert van Loon niet…… Een opstand waarvan de eerste plannen al dateren uit 2006, plannen waarin niet alleen was opgenomen, dat Assad weg moest, maar waar zelfs een opdeling van Syrië werd besproken….. Nog een VS plan, dit keer uit 2012, lekte onlangs naar buiten, waar in het opgedeelde Syrië zelfs een kalifaat was voorzien……… Maar Europa moet veel meer doen in Syrië, aldus van Loon……

Daarover gesproken: van Loon vindt dat we aan veel meer militaire missies moeten meedoen. Interesseert het deze opperhufter, dat de kosten daarvoor niet van het Defensie budget afgaan, maar waarmee dat budget op een smerige manier wel met miljarden wordt verhoogd………

Van Loon stelde NB, dat de totaal zinloze Patriot-missie in Turkije moest worden afgebroken vanwege het geld…….. Terwijl, nogmaals, die hele missie je reinste flauwe kul was, Turkije was de agressor, die het Syrische leger bestookte, daar deze de door hen gesteunde terroristen aanviel…….. U begrijpt natuurlijk wel, dat van Loon het daar al helemaal niet over wilde hebben, voor de steun, ook van de VS, voor ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen als IS en Al Qaida……..

Snels van de militaire vakbond AFMP  kwam nog even aan de telefoon om te zeggen, dat het pleidooi van van Loon, lang niet ver genoeg ging, zij wil nog veel meer geld naar Defensie……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Dit terwijl NAVO landen Groot-Brittannië, Italië, Frankrijk en Duitsland samen al 7 keer meer uitgaven aan Defensie dan Rusland……. Met andere woorden: hoeveel meer moet er naar Defensie om dit soort oorlogshitsers en lobbyisten van het militair-industrieel complex tevreden te stellen????

We moeten wakker worden in Europa, aldus van Loon, daar zou ik het zomaar mee eens zijn, als hij bedoelde, dat we moeten stoppen achter de uiterst agressieve terreurentiteit VS aan te lopen. Uiteraard doelde van Loon daar niet op, nee het gaat hem om het slapen in de EU, terwijl Rusland haar ‘smerige plannen uitvoerde’ (moet zijn: een slapend Rusland, terwijl de NAVO tegen de afspraken in steeds verder uitbreidde richting Moskou en niemand in de EU dit aan de kaak stelde)……

Plag stelde nog even waar het allemaal aan scheelde in Syrië, dus de leugens die ons dagelijks worden voorgeschoteld, leugens die keer op keer worden herhaald in programma’s als die van Plag! Dit terwijl het westen de ‘gematigde’ terreurtroepen steunt, terreurtroepen die hoofdzakelijk bevolkt worden met buitenlanders……

Presentator Plag durfde het defensiebudget en de situatie in Syrië te vergelijken met ‘een roepende in de woestijn….’ Godverdomme, de roep om meer geld voor defensie is alleen al op Radio1, het laatste jaar een keer of 300 voorbijgekomen en de roep om ingrijpen in Syrië op diezelfde zender, moet opgeteld de laatste jaren een keer of 500 voorbij zijn gekomen…….

Wat er nu gebeurt is volgens van Loon veel te weinig en veel te laat……. Terwijl de ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen worden volgepropt met wapens uit het westen en deze groepen van psychopathische moordenaars het ene bloedbad na het andere aanrichten, zelfs gasaanvallen worden niet geschuwd door dit geteisem, dat gesteund wordt door het westen (NAVO landen), Saoedi-Arabië, Turkije en nog wat ‘frisse’ arabische staten……..

Van Loon herhaalde nog eens zijn pleidooi voor meer missies, door te stellen dat we nu al in moeten zetten op Libië en Tunesië… Libië, u weet wel het welvarendste land van Afrika onder Khadaffi, dat nu na Zimbabwe zo ongeveer het armste land van Afrika is, met dank aan de VS en andere NAVO landen…….. Waarschijnlijk wil van Loon Libië nu echt geheel nivelleren, letterlijk wel te verstaan……

U begrijpt natuurlijk wel, dat er met geen woord werd gerept over de totale inefficiëntie op Defensie en haar onderdelen, een inefficiëntie die intussen al vele miljarden moet hebben gekost……

Zojuist in het Mediaforum op Radio1, stelde Plag dat het moeilijk is voor de kijker (en dus ook de luisteraar) om het nieuws te duiden……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja, zeker als figuren als Plag zelf, zonder enige kennis en kritiek oorlogshitsers aan het woord laten en zich als brave lobbyisten van de westerse agressie en het militair-industrieel complex betonen……. Plag zei dit n.a.v. het laatste nieuws over rampvlucht MH17, dat gisteren naar buiten kwam; daarover later meer.

*  Vanwege zijn deelname aan de NAVO oorlogsmisdadigers missie in Kosovo, een lintje waard, niet waar??

** Intussen steunt de VS (zelfs met militairen) de illegale inval van Turkije in Syrië, waar een ‘bufferzone’ van 100 km. breed wordt verovert……… Let wel: de VS als baas van de NAVO en Turkije als NAVO lid, u begrijpt wel, dat wanneer het tot een treffen komt, tussen het reguliere Syrische leger, dat volkomen terecht deze inval zou pareren, de rapen pas echt gaar zijn. Immers dan geldt plotseling artikel 5 van de NAVO: een aanval op één van de leden, zal door alle landen van de NAVO worden beantwoord, ofwel de deur naar WOIII staat op dat moment wijdwagen open…….

Zie ook: ‘BBC World Service met onversneden anti-Russische propaganda i.z. Syrië……..

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Snel’.

Marc Jansen zag tijdens de Russische verkiezingen geen onregelmatigheden, die er volgens hem wel waren……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Gistermorgen was ‘Ruslandkenner’ Marc Jansen te gast in de Kots Nieuwsshow (‘NPO‘ Radio1>> ha! ha!). Deze enorme flapdrol beweert dat Putin een nieuw superministerie van staatsveiligheid wil vormen. Uiteraard uiterst angstwekkend als je Jansen moet geloven, die meteen Stalin van stal haalde en deze daardoor vergeleek met Putin…….

Hier de tekst van de ‘Radio1 Gemist’ webpagina over het geheel aan onversneden anti-Russische propaganda:

Een
superministerie van staatsveiligheid; wil Poetin terug naar de oude
KGB?

Russische
president Poetin is van plan en superministerie van staatsveiligheid
op te richten en dat doet denken aan de oude KGB. Het wordt 1
organisatie waarin zowel binnenlandse als buitenlandse
veiligheidsdiensten worden ondergebracht. Het idee alleen al doet
menigeen huiveren. Want een soortgelijk ministerie bestond er onder
het bewind van Stalin. En naar de gruwelen uit die tijd wil niemand
terug.

Marc
Jansen is hier om uitleg te geven. Hij is Ruslandkenner. en net terug
uit Rusland, want hij was er als waarnemer bij de verkiezingen van
vorige week.

Vreemd dat je Jansen nooit hoort over de VS, waar de regering de veiligheidsdiensten keer op keer niet in de hand heeft en waar organisaties als de CIA al groter zijn, dan alle Russische geheime diensten bij elkaar!! Daar behoef je geen ‘Amerikakenner’ te zijn, even verdiepen in de materie is voldoende….. Dan heb je in de VS nog de DIA, (DEA, is ook nog al eens buiten het land bezig), NSA en nog een hele zwik aan geheime overheidsorganisaties (aangevuld met particuliere ‘inlichtingen’ organisaties), die allen schijt hebben mensenrechten, recht op privacy en aan welke rechtstaat dan ook…….. Overigens schijnt zelfs de FBI tegenwoordig wel eens ‘voet op buitenlandse bodem te zetten…’

Dat alles is pas griezelig Jansen, zeker als je daarnaast ziet, wat de VS flikt: de laatste 16 jaar is deze vereniging van terreurstaten 4 keer een illegale oorlog begonnen, waar die in Irak en Syrië intussen aan meer dan 2 miljoen mensen het leven heeft gekost…… Waar de VS ook nog eens de opstand in Oekraïne op poten heeft gezet en geregisseerd, waarna de staatsgreep tegen het democratisch gekozen bewind van Janoekovytsj volgde….. E.e.a. leidde tot de vreselijke burgeroorlog, die de door het westen geparachuteerde corrupte grofgraaier en neonazi-vriend Porosjenko tegen de bevolking in het oosten van dat land voert……… Maar nee, dat vindt Jansen helemaal niet griezelig…….. 

Dat was het nog niet mensen, zoals u in de kop kon lezen, Jansen is een week geleden voor de OVSE ook nog eens als waarnemer bij de Russische verkiezingen geweest. Jansen had zelf geen onregelmatigheden aangetroffen, als enkele kleine incidenten (zoals die ook in Nederland voor kunnen komen). 

U begrijpt dat Jansen niet kon vertrekken, zonder toch even deze verkiezingen door de stront te trekken, dus stelde hij dat het opkomstpercentage veel hoger was, dan werkelijk het geval was….. Nee, dat had Jansen niet zelf geconstateerd, maar dat ‘had hij gehoord……’ Volgens Jansen zou het opkomstpercentage maar 40% zijn, terwijl het officiële cijfer op 48% staat…. Van ‘analisten’ had Jansen begrepen, dat er toch zwaar gerommeld was met de verkiezingen….. U weel wel ‘analisten’ als die van lobby-instituten voor het militair-industrieel complex en voor de NAVO (en daarmee voor het buitenlandbeleid van de VS), zoals Clingendael of Bellingcat……….. (waar men dit ook nog eens van achter het bureau bedenkt……)

De hoogste tijd, dat we de waarnemers voor verkiezingen in het buitenland eens goed onder de loep nemen, jezus christus!! 

Jansen werd door presentatoren Mieke van der Weij en Jan Mom hartelijk bedankt voor het bijpraten ‘over de situatie in Rusland….’  ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Zie ook: ‘Russische verkiezingen in westen dominant verslagen met anti-Putin propaganda……..

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels die u onder dit bericht aantreft, dat geldt net voor het label ‘Bellingcat’. Zie vooral de berichten onder het label Marc Jansen.

Cameron oorlogsmisdadiger: ‘de Libiërs smeekten ons hen van Khadaffi te bevrijden……….’

Na een parlementair onderzoek, werd gisteren een rapport uitgebracht, waaruit maar één conclusie valt te trekken: de Britse regering en m.n. Cameron hebben volkomen illegaal meegedaan aan oorlogvoering……

Gistermiddag op BNR (rond 16.46 u.) Lia van Bekhoven, die het nodig vond om Cameron uit de wind te houden. Van Bekhoven haalde het excuus van Cameron aan, waarmee hij stelde te hebben gehandeld op een VN mandaat…… Dit terwijl Cameron, Obama en anderen, de resolutie van de VN Veligheidsraad zo hebben verdraaid, dat men kon ingrijpen in Libië………

Dat is toch echt iets anders, dan met een echt mandaat een oorlog beginnen. Met andere woorden, de VS, Groot-Brittannië en anderen (waaronder Nederland) begonnen een illegale oorlog, dan wel steunden die illegale oorlog tegen Libië….. Zoals u wellicht weet, dit is een enorme oorlogsmisdaad!! Tegelijk is het een gigantische terreurdaad!!

Van Bekhoven had het gore lef te zeggen, dat de Libiërs ons (GB en gelieerde landen) smeekten hen te bevrijden van Khadaffi……….

Het is dat het zo triest is, anders zou er je godverdomme moeten lachen, wat een trut: de Libiërs die daar om vroegen, zijn dezelfde figuren die betaald door de VS een opstand op poten zetten, met als hoofddoel Khadaffi wegwerken……..

Voorlopig was Libie onder Khadaffi het meest welvarende land van Afrika, dat was na ingrijpen van het westen bijna totaal omgedraaid: Libie behoort nu tot de armste landen van Afrika, gedompeld in totale chaos, een land waar terreurgroepen als Al Qaida en IS voor een fiks deel vrij baan hebben .

Scholing en zelfs studie was onder Khadaffi gratis, zelfs met een bijlage voor levensonderhoud, ook in het buitenland! Voorts waren de gezondheidszorg, onderdak, water en energie zo goed als gratis, van al deze zaken is na het westers ingrijpen zo goed als niets meer over, je mag blij zijn, als de elektriciteit een dag lang functioneert……..

Hier een artikel van Information Clearing House, betreffende het rapport dat gister uitkwam, let wel, alsnog zitten er bijzonder foute aannames in het rapport en alsnog komt Cameron eruit als een fikse oorlogsmisdadiger (onder het artikel kan u klikken voor een ‘Dutch’ vertaling, duurt wel even:

Cameron
‘Ultimately Responsible’ for Libya Collapse and Rise of Isis:
Commons Report 

The
scathing verdict comes just one day after Mr Cameron’s sudden
announcement that he will leave Westminster immediately



By
Rob Merrick Deputy Political Editor



September
14, 2016 “
Information
Clearing House

– “
Independent “ – The
bloody collapse of Libya – which triggered a refugee crisis and
aided the rise of Isis – is blamed today on David Cameron’s
blunders when he intervened to overthrow Colonel Gaddafi.

A
damning report by MPs condemns the 2011 military campaign for lacking
both “accurate intelligence” and a coherent strategy for the
aftermath of removing the dictator.

The disastrous results
were “political and economic collapse”, tribal warfare, the
refugee crisis, widespread human rights abuses and the rise of
Islamic State (IS) in North Africa, fuelled by weapons abandoned by
the Gaddafi regime.

The
Foreign Affairs Select Committee concludes: “Through his
decision-making in the National Security Council, former prime
minister David Cameron was ultimately responsible for the failure to
develop a coherent Libya strategy.”

The
scathing verdict comes just one day after Mr Cameron’s sudden
announcement that he will leave Westminster immediately, breaking an
earlier pledge to stay on as a backbencher.

In
the report, MPs say:

*
They saw “no evidence that the UK Government carried out a proper
analysis of the nature of the rebellion in Libya”.

*
There was no “defined strategic objective” – which meant a
limited intervention to protect civilians “drifted into a policy of
regime change by military means”.

*
There was no attempt to “pause military action” when Benghazi was
secured and seek a deal to protect civilians and reform Libya, with
the UK instead “focused exclusively on military intervention”.


*
Mr Cameron should have used Tony Blair’s “contacts and influence”
to try to secure Gaddafi’s exit and a “negotiated solution”.

*
Many Libyans had taken part in the Iraq insurgency and fought with
al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, which meant the rise of militant extremist
groups “should not have been the preserve of hindsight”.

*
There was “insufficient action” taken to secure weapons abandoned
by the Gaddafi regime, which contributed to the turmoil and
“increased terrorism” across the region.

*
Mr Cameron should have been required to issue a formal “ministerial
direction” to intervene, noting the Chief of the Defence Staff,
Lord Richards, “dissociated himself from that decision” in
evidence to the inquiry.

*
France led the campaign, noting: “UK policy followed
decision-taking in France”.

Just
six months after sending in the RAF and the Navy, in alliance with
France – after the regime threatened to attack the rebel-held city
of Benghazi – a triumphant Mr Cameron was mobbed by cheering
Libyans on a visit with French president Nicolas Sarkozy

The
two leaders pledged support for the future, proclaiming: “Your
friends in Britain and France will stand with you as you build your
country and build your democracy for the future.”

But
the promise proved empty as Libya collapsed into a power vacuum,
allowing Isis to seize control of part of the country and
people-smugglers to send migrants towards Europe in rickety boats.

Barack
Obama has called Libya the worst mistake of his presidency,
apparently criticising Mr Cameron personally for the UK’s role in
allowing the country to become a “s*** show”.

Crispin
Blunt, the Committee’s Conservative chairman, said: “The UK’s
actions in Libya were part of an ill-conceived intervention, the
results of which are still playing out today. Other political options
were available. Political engagement might have delivered civilian
protection, regime change and reform at a lesser cost to the UK and
Libya.”

The
international community must now get behind the United Nations-backed
Government of National Accord to prevent the country descending into
all-out civil war, Mr Blunt added.

Foreign
and Commonwealth Office spokesman said: “The decision to
intervene was an international one, called for by the Arab League and
authorised by the United Nations Security Council. Muammar
Gaddafi was unpredictable, and he had the means and motivation to
carry out his threats. His actions could not be ignored, and required
decisive and collective international action. Throughout the campaign
we stayed within the United Nations mandate to protect civilians. 

After
four decades of Gaddafi misrule, Libya undoubtedly faces huge
challenges. The UK will continue to play a leading role within the
international community to support the internationally recognised
Libyan Government of National Accord. 

We
have allocated £10million this year to help the new Government to
restore stability, rebuild the economy, defeat Daesh [Isis] and
tackle the criminal gangs that threaten the security of Libyans and
exploit illegal migrants. HMS Enterprise and HMS Diamond are both
currently deployed to support the EU naval operation to tackle
illegal migration, people smuggling and arms trafficking.”

Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

BREKEND NIEUWS: ‘Bill’ blijkt een androïde van Hillary Clinton te zijn!!

Wat velen al een aantal jaren vreesden, nadat Hillary Clinton een jaar had gefunctioneerd als minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, is uitgekomen…… Via Hillaryleaks is naar buiten gekomen, dat Bill Clinton een erg humaan lijkende androïde* is, die volledig door hare kwaadaardigheid en oorlogsduivel Hillary werd en wordt bestuurd…….

Al tijdens diens presidentschap waren er hooggeplaatsten in de Clinton regering die dachten dat Bill niet echt kon zijn. Vandaar ook de grote ‘sigaartruc’ met actrice Monica Lewinsky, met deze truc wilde Hillary Clinton bewijzen, dat Bill Clinton een echt mens was en geen androïde………

Er zijn boze tongen, maar nu begeef ik mij op het niveau van een roddelrubriek, die beweren, dat Lewinsky ook een geprogrammeerde androïde is……..

Daarmee is meteen de oorzaak gevonden, voor het toch redelijk bloedige bewind van Bill Clinton en de gewiekste manier, waarop hij de media bespeelde….. Al zou dit tegenwoordig niet nodig zijn, de grote reguliere media zijn in feite in handen van een beperkt aantal steenrijke schoften en daarmee is de berichtgeving tevens bepaald….. Berichtgeving die op z’n ‘zachtst gezegd behoorlijk’ neoliberaal gelikt is en totaal gericht op de ‘legitimiteit’ van het uiterst agressieve optreden, dat de VS op aarde ten toon spreidt, optreden dat niet anders gezien kan worden, dan als grootschalige terreur…..

Trouwens je zou je zelfs af kunnen vragen, of Obama niet ook ‘Hillary gestuurd’ is……. Deze Nobelprijswinnaar voor de vrede, is z’n hele presidentschap in oorlog geweest…….

* Een androïde is een sterk op een mens gelijkende robot.

Untitled Post

De wereld danst alweer op de rand van de vulkaan……..

Weer doen ‘we’ mee alsof er niets aan de hand is, of ‘we’ kijken gehypnotiseerd toe…….

Duitse regering maant de burger voedsel en baar geld te hamsteren……… WOIII op uitbreken??

Gisteren meldde Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten (DWN), dat de Duitse regering de bevolking waarschuwt om voedsel, water en baar geld, voor minstens tien dagen op voorraad te houden…….. Of de reden daarvoor de kans op een oorlog (WOIII), dan wel een financiële crisis zou zijn, werd er niet bijverteld, maar bij DWN liep men gezien de actualiteiten een aantal zaken na:

De Duitse regering heeft laten weten, dat het Rusland weer als vijand ziet. Zoals voorafgaand aan Operatie Barabarossa, die nazi-Duitsland in 1941 lanceerde tegen de Sovjet-Unie, staan nu weer Duitse troepen langs de grens met Rusland……..

De NAVO houdt een Russische aanval op het gebied van de Europese bondgenoten voor mogelijk……. Tja, dat is dan ook de bedoeling van de VS, die de NAVO in (en aan) de hand heeft, met de voortdurende grote NAVO oefeningen langs de grens met Rusland, daarvoor zijn ook de extra gelden nodig, die de VS via de NAVO eist van haar bondgenoten, om over de oorlog tegen Syrië en in Irak en Afghanistan nog maar te zwijgen………

Bovendien bouwt de VS een raketschild op een paar plaatsen langs de Russische grens, zogenaamd tegen een Iraanse aanval met raketten. De raketten voor dat schild kunnen in een mum van tijd worden omgebouwd tot aanvalsraketten met kernkoppen………

Om toch over de illegale oorlog tegen Syrië en Irak te spreken: dat is de reden dat de NAVO, de EU en de VS, ook buiten het eigen gebied verdedigt……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! M.a.w.: de illegale oorlog tegen Syrië en Irak waren en zijn ter bescherming van de EU NAVO landen! Ja, ze zijn lekker tekeergegaan bij het laatste NAVO overleg in Polen, precies zoals ze in het Midden-Oosten tekeer gaan, op kosten van de belastingbetaler, jezus!! Nogmaals, de VS (en de NAVO onder VS bevel) is hoofdverantwoordelijk voor de grote ellende in het Midden-Oosten…….

In Polen sprak men overigens ook af, dat civiele ondersteuning van de strijdkrachten weer prioriteit moet worden………* Of dit betekent, dat de dienstplicht weer wordt ingevoerd, weet ik niet, maar het stinkt wel een uur in de wind!!

Terug naar de (Duitse) bondsregering en haar plannen: deze wil ook maatregelen nemen op ‘polizeistaatlichen’ (ja, ja…..) gebied. Uiteraard wordt hier niet het optuigen van een politiestaat mee bedoeld, maar daar komt het godverdomme wel op neer!! Dit i.v.m. ‘de terreurdreiging’ en de verdere ‘instabiele situatie’ in Libië en Syrië, plus de oorlog in Irak…… Deze hebben ‘de veiligheidssituatie in Europa’ (?????) op scherp gezet…… ha! ha! ha! ha!

Nog ‘n ‘mooie’: ‘de coalitie van het westen en de Golfstaten is in het defensief gedrongen, door ingrijpen van Rusland……..’ Men bedoelt hier, zoals u weet, de oorlog in Syrië  mee, een oorlog die het gevolg is van het VS buitenland beleid, dat met hulp van de NAVO Assad probeert weg te krijgen, onder het mom van terreurbestrijding…..** Waarbij de grootste terreurgroepen zelfs werden en vaak nog worden gefinancierd door de VS en Saoedi-Arabië, plus uiteraard van wapens en training voorzien…..

Al-Nusra, ofwel Al Qaida Syrië, gaat nu onder een andere naam door, daar deze terreurgroep teveel vreselijke oorlogsmisdaden op haar naam had….. Onder de nieuwe naam worden deze psychopaten door de VS aangemerkt als ‘gematigde rebellen’ en als zodanig gesteund. Voor de duidelijkheid: dat deed de VS ook al voor die naamsverandering…….

Na een incident, waarbij de Syrische luchtmacht de VS luchtmacht uitdaagde, door boven door de VS verboden gebied te vliegen, is de toon tegen Rusland verscherpt, die zoals u begrijpt aan de kant van Assad vecht. Nogmaals: de VS heeft geen bliksem te zoeken in Syrië en voert daar alweer een illegale oorlog!!!

Een militair adviseur van Clinton, een ex-CIA topman ageert intussen al openlijk tegen de Russen en generaal Breedlove, ex-NAVO commandant, gaf Obama het advies Rusland aan te vallen, waarna hij van het toneel moest verdwijnen….. Nu voorziet hij de VS regering van advies middels de ‘Atlantic Counsil…..’

Door de open grenzen zijn problemen met de immigratie ontstaan, dit opgeteld bij alle andere ‘ problemen’ heeft ervoor gezorgd, dat Duitsland stap voor stap tot een politiestaat moet worden omgevormd, dit is duidelijk te destilleren uit het plan dat de Bondsregering naar buiten bracht…..

Zo moeten er tot 2020 15.000 agenten op straat bijkomen……., het cameratoezicht moet veel meer worden ingezet (zoals te verwachten met gezicht en kentekenplaat herkenning)……, het leger gaat weer (voor het eerst na WOII) in het straatbeeld verschijnen……, supercontrole van het internet door politie, leger en geheime diensten….., jongeren vanaf 14 jaar moeten kunnen worden vervolgd, via een strafrecht dat te vergelijken is met het strafrecht voor volwassenen….., er moet binnen de EU veel beter worden samengewerkt, dat betekent toegang tot data van lidstaten bij andere lidstaten door verschillende diensten, dus niet alleen ‘maar’ de politie (Duitsland is met de Brexit nu echt het machtigste land binnen de EU, dus… luisteren EU lidstaten!)……., enz, enz……..

Dan nog het baar geld: als dit bedoeld is voor het moment dat er een grote financiële crisis zou uitbreken, bijvoorbeeld als de dollar onder de gigantische schuldenlast van het land instort, is het advies totaal belachelijk, daar de euro op hetzelfde moment ‘ook geen’ stuiver meer waard zal zijn….

* Vanmorgen meldde BNR in een mediaoverzicht, dat Duitsland overweegt de militaire dienstplicht weer in te voeren, deze werd in 2010 afgeschaft………

** De VS nam in 2006 het initiatief tot het omverwerpen van het Assad bewind. Samen met Groot-Brittannië, Frankrijk, Turkije, Saoedi-Arabië en nog wat arabische staten besloot men dat Assad koste wat kost moest verdwijnen……. De rest is geschiedenis, inclusief het financieren en regisseren van de opstand in Syrië, plus het financieren, bewapenen en trainen van ‘gematigde rebellen’ (lees: psychopathische reli-fascistische terroristen….)…….

Hier de link naar het artikel op DWN.

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

De psychopaten achter de schermen van de agressieve VS buitenlandpolitiek…..

Mensen, het is even ‘een zit’, maar liefst 1 uur en 32 minuten, waarmee u wel een ‘fraai’ beeld krijgt van wie er op de achtergrond mede verantwoordelijk is voor de uiterst agressieve buitenlandpolitiek van de VS.

‘Mede verantwoordelijk’: daar psychopaten als George W. Bush, sigaarkloot Clinton en Obama, uiteindelijk het laatste woord hebben.

De video zit af en toe wat knullig in elkaar, maar dit doet niets af aan het gedegen verhaal (helaas zonder ondertiteling):

Zie ook:

Jeffrey Epstein: seksueel wangedrag van welgestelden veelal onder de pet gehouden

Psychopaten maken de dienst uit, de hoogste tijd om daar verandering in te brengen!

Psychopathic Behavior and Leaders By James G. Long

The Disturbing Link Between Psychopathy And Leadership By Victor Lipman

Neoliberalisme, ofwel de inhumane, keiharde maatschappij anno 2015

Rutte’s commentaar op Hans de Boer, wat een hypocriet!!

Hans de Boer vindt uitkeringsgerechtigden luie labbekakkers…….

NAVO verder op oorlogspad, dat noemen Rob de Wijk en een groot aantal politici: ‘slapen…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Rob de Wijk verklaart met veel oorlogsretoriek de oorlog aan Kremlintrollen in Europa, ofwel haatzaaien tegen mensen die nadenken!!……….

Milieusceptici zijn gevaarlijke psychopaten

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Killary Clinton heeft al veel gedaan, wat Trump roept………

De volgende video vond ik in mijn elektronische berichtenbeschuitbus. Hierin getoond een aantal zaken, die Trump roept, maar die Clinton al heeft uitgevoerd…….

Vergeet voorts niet dat deze ‘dame’ al drie illegale oorlogen op haar naam heeft staan.

De oorlog tegen het Libië van Khadaffi, met desastreus gevolg……

De oorlog die in Oost-Oekraïne woedt…. De opstand en daarop volgende coup tegen de democratisch gekozen regering van Janoekovytsj: geregisseerd door de VS onder bewind van Clinton en financiering van het geheel met 4 miljard dollar!!

Tot slot de oorlog tegen Syrië, die een nog grotere ramp is, dan die tegen Khadaffi en Janoekovytsj……..

Uiteraard is Clinton nog verantwoordelijk voor een groot aantal andere smerige zaken, zoals stoken in landen, waar men geen VS vriendelijk gezind bewind heeft (klik wat dat betreft o.a. op de labels: USAID, VS buitenlands beleid en CIA, labels die u onder dit bericht terugvindt)……

Hier de video, waar u na de eerste te hebben gezien, nog een aantal andere video’s kan aanklikken met ‘moois’ over Clinton (zie na aanklikken de pijlen links en rechts):

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht aantreft.

Hillary Clinton is letterlijk knettergek!!

Ja, ja mensen en als het ‘meezit’ mag deze psychopathische schoft met haar bebloede poten aan de atoomtrekker zitten……..

Pas op dat u geen lachstuip oploopt, dat heeft mij gisteren een half uur platgelegd……

De video vond ik op het blog van Stan van Houcke:

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.