VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

Kwam gisteren op het blog van Stan van Houcke een lijst met oorlogen tegen, die de VS sinds WOII heeft gevoerd. Voor velen geen nieuws maar het is schokkend om alles nog eens op een rij te zien, een gruwelijk naslagwerk over de daden van de grootste terreur entiteit op aarde: de VS…….

US
Has Killed More Than 20 Million In 37 Nations Since WWII

After
the catastrophic attacks of September 11 2001 monumental sorrow and a
feeling of desperate and understandable anger began to permeate the
American psyche. A few people at that time attempted to promote a
balanced perspective by pointing out that the United States had also
been responsible for causing those same feelings in people in other
nations, but they produced hardly a ripple. Although 

Americans
understand in the abstract the wisdom of people around the world
empathizing with the suffering of one another, such a reminder of
wrongs committed by our nation got little hearing and was soon
overshadowed by an accelerated “war on terrorism.”

But
we must continue our efforts to develop understanding and compassion
in the world. Hopefully, this article will assist in doing that by
addressing the question “How many September 11ths has the United
States caused in other nations since WWII?” This theme is developed
in this report which contains an estimated numbers of such deaths in
37 nations as well as brief explanations of why the U.S. is
considered culpable.

The
causes of wars are complex. In some instances nations other than the
U.S. may have been responsible for more deaths, but if the
involvement of our nation appeared to have been a necessary cause of
a war or conflict it was considered responsible for the deaths in it.
In other words they probably would not have taken place if the U.S.
had not used the heavy hand of its power. The military and economic
power of the United States was crucial.

This
study reveals that U.S. military forces were directly responsible for
about 10 to 15 million deaths during the Korean and Vietnam Wars and
the two Iraq Wars. The Korean War also includes Chinese deaths while
the Vietnam War also includes fatalities in Cambodia and Laos.

The
American public probably is not aware of these numbers and knows even
less about the proxy wars for which the United States is also
responsible. In the latter wars there were between nine and 14
million deaths in Afghanistan, Angola, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, East Timor, Guatemala, Indonesia, Pakistan and Sudan.

But
the victims are not just from big nations or one part of the world.
The remaining deaths were in smaller ones which constitute over half
the total number of nations. Virtually all parts of the world have
been the target of U.S. intervention.

The
overall conclusion reached is that the United States most likely has
been responsible since WWII for the deaths of between 20 and 30
million people in wars and conflicts scattered over the world.

To
the families and friends of these victims it makes little difference
whether the causes were U.S. military action, proxy military forces,
the provision of U.S. military supplies or advisors, or other ways,
such as economic pressures applied by our nation. They had to make
decisions about other things such as finding lost loved ones, whether
to become refugees, and how to survive.

And
the pain and anger is spread even further. Some authorities estimate
that there are as many as 10 wounded for each person who dies in
wars. Their visible, continued suffering is a continuing reminder to
their fellow countrymen.

It
is essential that Americans learn more about this topic so that they
can begin to understand the pain that others feel. Someone once
observed that the Germans during WWII “chose not to know.” We
cannot allow history to say this about our country. The question
posed above was “How many September 11ths has the United States
caused in other nations since WWII?” The answer is: possibly
10,000.

Comments
on Gathering These Numbers


Generally
speaking, the much smaller number of Americans who have died is not
included in this study, not because they are not important, but
because this report focuses on the impact of U.S. actions on its
adversaries.

An
accurate count of the number of deaths is not easy to achieve, and
this collection of data was undertaken with full realization of this
fact. These estimates will probably be revised later either upward or
downward by the reader and the author. But undoubtedly the total will
remain in the millions.

The
difficulty of gathering reliable information is shown by two
estimates in this context. For several years I heard statements on
radio that three million Cambodians had been killed under the rule of
the Khmer Rouge. However, in recent years the figure I heard was one
million. Another example is that the number of persons estimated to
have died in Iraq due to sanctions after the first U.S. Iraq War was
over 1 million, but in more recent years, based on a more recent
study, a lower estimate of around a half a million has emerged.

Often
information about wars is revealed only much later when someone
decides to speak out, when more secret information is revealed due to
persistent efforts of a few, or after special congressional
committees make reports

Both
victorious and defeated nations may have their own reasons for
underreporting the number of deaths. Further, in recent wars
involving the United States it was not uncommon to hear statements
like “we do not do body counts” and references to “collateral
damage” as a euphemism for dead and wounded. Life is cheap for
some, especially those who manipulate people on the battlefield as if
it were a chessboard.

To
say that it is difficult to get exact figures is not to say that we
should not try. Effort was needed to arrive at the figures of 6six
million Jews killed during WWI, but knowledge of that number now is
widespread and it has fueled the determination to prevent future
holocausts. That struggle continues.

The
author can be contacted at 
jlucas511@woh.rr.com

37
VICTIM NATIONS

Afghanistan

The
U.S. is responsible for between 1 and 1.8 million deaths during the
war between the Soviet Union and Afghanistan, by luring the Soviet
Union into invading that nation. (1,2,3,4)

The
Soviet Union had friendly relations its neighbor, Afghanistan, which
had a secular government. The Soviets feared that if that government
became fundamentalist this change could spill over into the Soviet
Union.

In
1998, in an interview with the Parisian publication Le Novel
Observateur, Zbigniew Brzezinski, adviser to President Carter,
admitted that he had been responsible for instigating aid to the
Mujahadeen in Afghanistan which caused the Soviets to invade. In his
own words:

According
to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began
during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded
Afghanistan on 24 December 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded
until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that
President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the
opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I
wrote a note to the President in which I explained to him that in my
opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.”
(5,1,6)

Brzezinski
justified laying this trap, since he said it gave the Soviet Union
its Vietnam and caused the breakup of the Soviet Union. “Regret
what?” he said. “That secret operation was an excellent idea. It
had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you
want me to regret it?” (7)

The
CIA spent 5 to 6 billion dollars on its operation in Afghanistan in
order to bleed the Soviet Union. (1,2,3) When that 10-year war ended
over a million people were dead and Afghan heroin had captured 60% of
the U.S. market. (4)

The
U.S. has been responsible directly for about 12,000 deaths in
Afghanistan many of which resulted from bombing in retaliation for
the attacks on U.S. property on September 11, 2001. Subsequently U.S.
troops invaded that country. (4)

Angola

An
indigenous armed struggle against Portuguese rule in Angola began in
1961. In 1977 an Angolan government was recognized by the U.N.,
although the U.S. was one of the few nations that opposed this
action. In 1986 Uncle Sam approved material assistance to UNITA, a
group that was trying to overthrow the government. Even today this
struggle, which has involved many nations at times, continues.

U.S.
intervention was justified to the U.S. public as a reaction to the
intervention of 50,000 Cuban troops in Angola. However, according to
Piero Gleijeses, a history professor at Johns Hopkins University the
reverse was true. The Cuban intervention came as a result of a CIA –
financed covert invasion via neighboring Zaire and a drive on the
Angolan capital by the U.S. ally, South Africa1,2,3). (Three
estimates of deaths range from 300,000 to 750,000 (4,5,6)

Argentina:
See South America: Operation Condor

Bangladesh:
See Pakistan

Bolivia

Hugo
Banzer was the leader of a repressive regime in Bolivia in the 1970s.
The U.S. had been disturbed when a previous leader nationalized the
tin mines and distributed land to Indian peasants. Later that action
to benefit the poor was reversed.

Banzer,
who was trained at the U.S.-operated School of the Americas in Panama
and later at Fort Hood, Texas, came back from exile frequently to
confer with U.S. Air Force Major Robert Lundin. In 1971 he staged a
successful coup with the help of the U.S. Air Force radio system. In
the first years of his dictatorship he received twice as military
assistance from the U.S. as in the previous dozen years together.

A
few years later the Catholic Church denounced an army massacre of
striking tin workers in 1975, Banzer, assisted by information
provided by the CIA, was able to target and locate leftist priests
and nuns. His anti-clergy strategy, known as the Banzer Plan, was
adopted by nine other Latin American dictatorships in 1977. (2) He
has been accused of being responsible for 400 deaths during his
tenure. (1)

Also
see: See South America: Operation Condor

Brazil:
See South America: Operation Condor

Cambodia

U.S.
bombing of Cambodia had already been underway for several years in
secret under the Johnson and Nixon administrations, but when
President Nixon openly began bombing in preparation for a land
assault on Cambodia it caused major protests in the U.S. against the
Vietnam War.

There
is little awareness today of the scope of these bombings and the
human suffering involved.

Immense
damage was done to the villages and cities of Cambodia, causing
refugees and internal displacement of the population. This unstable
situation enabled the Khmer Rouge, a small political party led by Pol
Pot, to assume power. Over the years we have repeatedly heard about
the Khmer Rouge’s role in the deaths of millions in Cambodia
without any acknowledgement being made this mass killing was made
possible by the the U.S. bombing of that nation which destabilized it
by death , injuries, hunger and dislocation of its people.

So
the U.S. bears responsibility not only for the deaths from the
bombings but also for those resulting from the activities of the
Khmer Rouge – a total of about 2.5 million people. Even when
Vietnam latrer invaded Cambodia in 1979 the CIA was still supporting
the Khmer Rouge. (1,2,3)

Also
see Vietnam

Chad

An
estimated 40,000 people in Chad were killed and as many as 200,000
tortured by a government, headed by Hissen Habre who was brought to
power in June, 1982 with the help of CIA money and arms. He remained
in power for eight years. (1,2)

Human
Rights Watch claimed that Habre was responsible for thousands of
killings. In 2001, while living in Senegal, he was almost tried for
crimes committed by him in Chad. However, a court there blocked these
proceedings. Then human rights people decided to pursue the case in
Belgium, because some of 

Habre’s torture victims lived there. The
U.S., in June 2003, told Belgium that it risked losing its status as
host to NATO’s headquarters if it allowed such a legal proceeding
to happen. So the result was that the law that allowed victims to
file complaints in Belgium for atrocities committed abroad was
repealed. 

However, two months later a new law was passed which made
special provision for the continuation of the case against Habre.

Chile

The
CIA intervened in Chile’s 1958 and 1964 elections. In 1970 a
socialist candidate, Salvador Allende, was elected president. The CIA
wanted to incite a military coup to prevent his inauguration, but the
Chilean army’s chief of staff, General Rene Schneider, opposed this
action. The CIA then planned, along with some people in the Chilean
military, to assassinate Schneider. This plot failed and Allende took
office. President Nixon was not to be dissuaded and he ordered the
CIA to create a coup climate: “Make the economy scream,” he
said.

What followed were guerilla warfare, arson, bombing,
sabotage and terror. ITT and other U.S. corporations with Chilean
holdings sponsored demonstrations and strikes. Finally, on September
11, 1973 Allende died either by suicide or by assassination. At that
time Henry Kissinger, U.S. Secretary of State, said the following
regarding Chile: “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a
country go communist because of the irresponsibility of its own
people.” (1)

During
17 years of terror under Allende’s successor, General Augusto
Pinochet, an estimated 3,000 Chileans were killed and many others
were tortured or “disappeared.” (2,3,4,5)

Also
see South America: Operation Condor

China
An estimated 900,000 Chinese died during the Korean War. For more
information, See: Korea.

Colombia

One
estimate is that 67,000 deaths have occurred from the 1960s to recent
years due to support by the U.S. of Colombian state terrorism. (1)

According
to a 1994 Amnesty International report, more than 20,000 people were
killed for political reasons in Colombia since 1986, mainly by the
military and its paramilitary allies. Amnesty alleged that “U.S.-
supplied military equipment, ostensibly delivered for use against
narcotics traffickers, was being used by the Colombian military to
commit abuses in the name of “counter-insurgency.” (2) In 2002
another estimate was made that 3,500 people die each year in a U.S.
funded civilian war in Colombia. (3)

In
1996 Human Rights Watch issued a report “Assassination Squads in
Colombia” which revealed that 

CIA agents went to Colombia in 1991
to help the military to train undercover agents in anti-subversive
activity. (4,5)

In
recent years the U.S. government has provided assistance under Plan
Colombia. The Colombian government has been charged with using most
of the funds for destruction of crops and support of the paramilitary
group.

Cuba

In
the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba on April 18, 1961 which ended after
3 days, 114 of the invading force were killed, 1,189 were taken
prisoners and a few escaped to waiting U.S. ships. (1) The captured
exiles were quickly tried, a few executed and the rest sentenced to
thirty years in prison for treason. These exiles were released after
20 months in exchange for $53 million in food and medicine.

Some
people estimate that the number of Cuban forces killed range from
2,000, to 4,000. Another estimate is that 1,800 Cuban forces were
killed on an open highway by napalm. This appears to have been a
precursor of the Highway of Death in Iraq in 1991 when U.S. forces
mercilessly annihilated large numbers of Iraqis on a highway. (2)

Democratic
Republic of Congo (formerly Zaire)

The
beginning of massive violence was instigated in this country in 1879
by its colonizer King Leopold of Belgium. The Congo’s population
was reduced by 10 million people over a period of 20 years which some
have referred to as “Leopold’s Genocide.” (1) The U.S. has been
responsible for about a third of t

hat many deaths in that nation in
the more recent past. (2)

In
1960 the Congo became an independent state with Patrice Lumumba being
its first prime minister. He was assassinated with the CIA being
implicated, although some say that his murder was actually the
responsibility of Belgium. (3) But nevertheless, the CIA was planning
to kill him. (4) Before his assassination the CIA sent one of its
scientists, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, to the Congo carrying “lethal
biological material” intended for use in Lumumba’s assassination.
This virus would have been able to produce a fatal disease indigenous
to the Congo area of Africa and was transported in a diplomatic
pouch.

Much
of the time in recent years there has been a civil war within the
Democratic Republic of Congo, fomented often by the U.S. and other
nations, including neighboring nations. (5)

In
April 1977, Newsday reported that the CIA was secretly supporting
efforts to recruit several hundred mercenaries in the U.S. and Great
Britain to serve alongside Zaire’s army. In that same year the U.S.
provided $15 million of military supplies to the Zairian President
Mobutu to fend off an invasion by a rival group operating in Angola.
(6)

In
May 1979, the U.S. sent several million dollars of aid to Mobutu who
had been condemned 3 months earlier by the U.S. State Department for
human rights violations. (7) During the Cold War the U.S. funneled
over 300 million dollars in weapons into Zaire (8,9) $100 million in
military training was provided to him. (2) In 2001 it was reported to
a U.S. congressional committee that American companies, including one
linked to former President George Bush Sr., were stoking the Congo
for monetary gains. There is an international battle over resources
in that country with over 125 companies and individuals being
implicated. One of these substances is coltan, which is used in the
manufacture of cell phones. (2)


Dominican
Republic

In
1962, Juan Bosch became president of the Dominican Republic. He
advocated such programs as land reform and public works programs.
This did not bode well for his future relationship with the U.S., and
after only 7 months in office, he was deposed by a CIA coup. In 1965
when a group was trying to reinstall him to his office President
Johnson said, “This Bosch is no good.” Assistant Secretary of
State Thomas Mann replied “He’s no good at all. If we don’t get
a decent government in there, Mr. President, we get another Bosch.
It’s just going to be another sinkhole.” Two days later a U.S.
invasion started and 22,000 soldiers and marines entered the
Dominican Republic and about 3,000 Dominicans died during the
fighting. The cover excuse for doing this was that this was done to
protect foreigners there. (1,2,3,4)

East
Timor

In
December 1975, Indonesia invaded East Timor. This incursion was
launched the day after U.S. President Gerald Ford and Secretary of
State Henry Kissinger had left Indonesia where they had given
President Suharto permission to use American arms, which under U.S.
law, could not be used for aggression. Daniel Moynihan, U.S.
ambassador to the UN. said that the U.S. wanted “things to turn out
as they did.” (1,2) The result was an estimated 200,000 dead out of
a population of 700,000. (1,2)

Sixteen
years later, on November 12, 1991, two hundred and seventeen East
Timorese protesters in Dili, many of them children, marching from a
memorial service, were gunned down by Indonesian Kopassus shock
troops who were headed by U.S.- trained commanders Prabowo Subianto
(son in law of General Suharto) and Kiki Syahnakri. Trucks were seen
dumping bodies into the sea. (5)

El
Salvador

The
civil war from 1981 to1992 in El Salvador was financed by $6 billion
in U.S. aid given to support the government in its efforts to crush a
movement to bring social justice to the people in that nation of
about 8 million people. (1)

During that time U.S. military
advisers demonstrated methods of torture on teenage prisoners,
according to an interview with a deserter from the Salvadoran army
published in the New York Times. This former member of the Salvadoran
National Guard testified that he was a member of a squad of twelve
who found people who they were told were guerillas and tortured them.
Part of the training he received was in torture at a U.S. location
somewhere in Panama. (2)

About
900 villagers were massacred in the village of El Mozote in 1981. Ten
of the twelve El Salvadoran government soldiers cited as
participating in this act were graduates of the School of the
Americas operated by the U.S. (2) They were only a small part of
about 75,000 people killed during that civil war. (1)

According
to a 1993 United Nations’ Truth Commission report, over 96 % of the
human rights violations carried out during the war were committed by
the Salvadoran army or the paramilitary deaths squads associated with
the Salvadoran army. (3)

That
commission linked graduates of the School of the Americas to many
notorious killings. The New York Times and the Washington Post
followed with scathing articles. In 1996, the White House Oversight
Board issued a report that supported many of the charges against that
school made by Rev. Roy Bourgeois, head of the School of the Americas
Watch. That same year the Pentagon released formerly classified
reports indicating that graduates were trained in killing, extortion,
and physical abuse for interrogations, false imprisonment and other
methods of control. (4)

Grenada

The
CIA began to destabilize Grenada in 1979 after Maurice Bishop became
president, partially because he refused to join the quarantine of
Cuba. The campaign against him resulted in his overthrow and the
invasion by the U.S. of Grenada on October 25, 1983, with about 277
people dying. (1,2) It was fallaciously charged that an airport was
being built in Grenada that could be used to attack the U.S. and it
was also erroneously claimed that the lives of American medical
students on that island were in danger.

Guatemala

In
1951 Jacobo Arbenz was elected president of Guatemala. He
appropriated some unused land operated by the United Fruit Company
and compensated the company. (1,2) That company then started a
campaign to paint Arbenz as a tool of an international conspiracy and
hired about 300 mercenaries who sabotaged oil supplies and trains.
(3) In 1954 a CIA-orchestrated coup put him out of office and he left
the country. During the next 40 years various regimes killed
thousands of people.

In
1999 the Washington Post reported that an Historical Clarification
Commission concluded that over 200,000 people had been killed during
the civil war and that there had been 42,000 individual human rights
violations, 29,000 of them fatal, 92% of which were committed by the
army. The commission further reported that the U.S. government and
the CIA had pressured the Guatemalan government into suppressing the
guerilla movement by ruthless means. (4,5)

According
to the Commission between 1981 and 1983 the military government of
Guatemala – financed and supported by the U.S. government –
destroyed some four hundred Mayan villages in a campaign of genocide.
(4)

One of the documents made available to the commission was a
1966 memo from a U.S. State Department official, which described how
a “safe house” was set up in the palace for use by Guatemalan
security agents and their U.S. contacts. This was the headquarters
for the Guatemalan “dirty war” against leftist insurgents and
suspected allies. (2)

Haiti

From
1957 to 1986 Haiti was ruled by Papa Doc Duvalier and later by his
son. During that time their private terrorist force killed between
30,000 and 100,000 people. (1) Millions of dollars in CIA subsidies
flowed into Haiti during that time, mainly to suppress popular
movements, (2) although most American military aid to the country,
according to William Blum, was covertly channeled through Israel.

Reportedly,
governments after the second Duvalier reign were responsible for an
even larger number of fatalities, and the influence on Haiti by the
U.S., particularly through the CIA, has continued. The U.S. later
forced out of the presidential office a black Catholic priest, Jean
Bertrand Aristide, even though he was elected with 67% of the vote in
the early 1990s. The wealthy white class in Haiti opposed him in this
predominantly black nation, because of his social programs designed
to help the poor and end corruption. (3) Later he returned to office,
but that did not last long. He was forced by the U.S. to leave office
and now lives in South Africa.


Honduras

In
the 1980s the CIA supported Battalion 316 in Honduras, which
kidnapped, tortured and killed hundreds of its citizens. Torture
equipment and manuals were provided by CIA Argentinean personnel who
worked with U.S. agents in the training of the Hondurans.
Approximately 400 people lost their lives. (1,2) This is another
instance of torture in the world sponsored by the U.S. (3)

Battalion
316 used shock and suffocation devices in interrogations in the
1980s. Prisoners often were kept naked and, when no longer useful,
killed and buried in unmarked graves. Declassified documents and
other sources show that the CIA and the U.S. Embassy knew of numerous
crimes, including murder and torture, yet continued to support
Battalion 316 and collaborate with its leaders.” (4)

Honduras
was a staging ground in the early 1980s for the Contras who were
trying to overthrow the socialist Sandinista government in Nicaragua.
John D. Negroponte, currently Deputy Secretary of State, was our
embassador when our military aid to Honduras rose from $4 million to
$77.4 million per year. Negroponte denies having had any knowledge of
these atrocities during his tenure. However, his predecessor in that
position, Jack R. Binns, had reported in 1981 that he was deeply
concerned at increasing evidence of officially sponsored/sanctioned
assassinations. (5)

Hungary

In
1956 Hungary, a Soviet satellite nation, revolted against the Soviet
Union. During the uprising broadcasts by the U.S. Radio Free Europe
into Hungary sometimes took on an aggressive tone, encouraging the
rebels to believe that Western support was imminent, and even giving
tactical advice on how to fight the Soviets. Their hopes were raised
then dashed by these broadcasts which cast an even darker shadow over
the Hungarian tragedy.“ (1) The Hungarian and Soviet death toll was
about 3,000 and the revolution was crushed. (2)

Indonesia

In
1965, in Indonesia, a coup replaced General Sukarno with General
Suharto as leader. The U.S. played a role in that change of
government. Robert Martens,a former officer in the U.S. embassy in
Indonesia, described how U.S. diplomats and CIA officers provided up
to 5,000 names to Indonesian Army death squads in 1965 and checked
them off as they were killed or captured. Martens admitted that “I
probably have a lot of blood on my hands, but that’s not all bad.
There’s a time when you have to strike hard at a decisive moment.”
(1,2,3) Estimates of the number of deaths range from 500,000 to 3
million. (4,5,6)

From 1993 to 1997 the U.S. provided Jakarta with
almost $400 million in economic aid and sold tens of million of
dollars of weaponry to that nation. U.S. Green Berets provided
training for the Indonesia’s elite force which was responsible for
many of atrocities in East Timor. (3)

Iran

Iran
lost about 262,000 people in the war against Iraq from 1980 to 1988.
(1) See Iraq for more information about that war.

On
July 3, 1988 the U.S. Navy ship, the Vincennes, was operating withing
Iranian waters providing military support for Iraq during the
Iran-Iraq war. During a battle against Iranian gunboats it fired two
missiles at an Iranian Airbus, which was on a routine civilian
flight. All 290 civilian on board were killed. (2,3)

Iraq

A.
The Iraq-Iran War lasted from 1980 to 1988 and during that time there
were about 105,000 Iraqi deaths according to the Washington Post.
(1,2)

According
to Howard Teicher, a former National Security Council official, the
U.S. provided the Iraqis with billions of dollars in credits and
helped Iraq in other ways such as making sure that Iraq had military
equipment including biological agents This surge of help for Iraq
came as Iran seemed to be winning the war and was close to Basra. (1)
The U.S. was not adverse to both countries weakening themselves as a
result of the war, but it did not appear to want either side to win.

B:
The U.S.-Iraq War and the Sanctions Against Iraq extended from 1990
to 2003.

Iraq
invaded Kuwait on August 2, 1990 and the U.S. responded by demanding
that Iraq withdraw, and four days later the U.N. levied international
sanctions.

Iraq
had reason to believe that the U.S. would not object to its invasion
of Kuwait, since U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, had told
Saddam Hussein that the U.S. had no position on the dispute that his
country had with Kuwait. So the green light was given, but it seemed
to be more of a trap.

As
a part of the public relations strategy to energize the American
public into supporting an attack against Iraq the daughter of the
Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S. falsely testified before Congress that
Iraqi troops were pulling the plugs on incubators in Iraqi hospitals.
(1) This contributed to a war frenzy in the U.S.

The
U.S. air assault started on January 17, 1991 and it lasted for 42
days. On February 23 President H.W. Bush ordered the U.S. ground
assault to begin. The invasion took place with much needless killing
of Iraqi military personnel. Only about 150 American military
personnel died compared to about 200,000 Iraqis. Some of the Iraqis
were mercilessly killed on the Highway of Death and about 400 tons of
depleted uranium were left in that nation by the U.S. (2,3)

Other
deaths later were from delayed deaths due to wounds, civilians
killed, those killed by effects of damage of the Iraqi water
treatment facilities and other aspects of its damaged infrastructure
and by the sanctions.

In
1995 the Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. reported that
U.N sanctions against on Iraq had been responsible for the deaths of
more than 560,000 children since 1990. (5)

Leslie
Stahl on the TV Program 60 Minutes in 1996 mentioned to Madeleine
Albright, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. “We have heard that a half
million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died
in Hiroshima. And – and you know, is the price worth it?”
Albright replied “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price
– we think is worth it.” (4)

In
1999 UNICEF reported that 5,000 children died each month as a result
of the sanction and the War with the U.S. (6)

Richard
Garfield later estimated that the more likely number of excess deaths
among children under five years of age from 1990 through March 1998
to be 227,000 – double those of the previous decade. Garfield
estimated that the numbers to be 350,000 through 2000 (based in part
on result of another study). (7)

However,
there are limitations to his study. His figures were not updated for
the remaining three years of the sanctions. Also, two other somewhat
vulnerable age groups were not studied: young children above the age
of five and the elderly.

All
of these reports were considerable indicators of massive numbers of
deaths which the U.S. was aware of and which was a part of its
strategy to cause enough pain and terror among Iraqis to cause them
to revolt against their government.

C:
Iraq-U.S. War started in 2003 and has not been concluded


Just
as the end of the Cold War emboldened the U.S. to attack Iraq in 1991
so the attacks of September 11, 2001 laid the groundwork for the U.S.
to launch the current war against Iraq. While in some other wars we
learned much later about the lies that were used to deceive us, some
of the deceptions that were used to get us into this war became known
almost as soon as they were uttered. There were no weapons of mass
destruction, we were not trying to promote democracy, we were not
trying to save the Iraqi people from a dictator.

The
total number of Iraqi deaths that are a result of our current Iraq
against Iraq War is 654,000, of which 600,000 are attributed to acts
of violence, according to Johns Hopkins researchers. (1,2)

Since
these deaths are a result of the U.S. invasion, our leaders must
accept responsibility for them.

Israeli-Palestinian
War

About
100,000 to 200,000 Israelis and Palestinians, but mostly the latter,
have been killed in the struggle between those two groups. The U.S.
has been a strong supporter of Israel, providing billions of dollars
in aid and supporting its possession of nuclear weapons. (1,2)


Korea,
North and South


The
Korean War started in 1950 when, according to the Truman
administration, North Korea invaded South Korea on June 25th.
However, since then another explanation has emerged which maintains
that the attack by North Korea came during a time of many border
incursions by both sides. South Korea initiated most of the border
clashes with North Korea beginning in 1948. The North Korea
government claimed that by 1949 the South Korean army committed 2,617
armed incursions. It was a myth that the Soviet Union ordered North
Korea to attack South Korea. (1,2)


The
U.S. started its attack before a U.N. resolution was passed
supporting our nation’s intervention, and our military forces added
to the mayhem in the war by introducing the use of napalm. (1)

During
the war the bulk of the deaths were South Koreans, North Koreans and
Chinese. Four sources give deaths counts ranging from 1.8 to 4.5
million. (3,4,5,6) Another source gives a total of 4 million but does
not identify to which nation they belonged. (7)


John
H. Kim, a U.S. Army veteran and the Chair of the Korea Committee of
Veterans for Peace, stated in an article that during the Korean War
“the U.S. Army, Air Force and Navy were directly involved in the
killing of about three million civilians – both South and North
Koreans – at many locations throughout Korea…It is reported that
the U.S. dropped some 650,000 tons of bombs, including 43,000 tons of
napalm bombs, during the Korean War.” It is presumed that this
total does not include Chinese casualties.

Another
source states a total of about 500,000 who were Koreans and
presumably only military. (8,9)


Laos


From
1965 to 1973 during the Vietnam War the U.S. dropped over two million
tons of bombs on Laos – more than was dropped in WWII by both
sides. Over a quarter of the population became refugees. This was
later called a “secret war,” since it occurred at the same time
as the Vietnam War, but got little press. Hundreds of thousands were
killed. Branfman make the only estimate that I am aware of , stating
that hundreds of thousands died. This can be interpeted to mean that
at least 200,000 died. (1,2,3)


U.S.
military intervention in Laos actually began much earlier. A civil
war started in the 1950s when the U.S. recruited a force of 40,000
Laotians to oppose the Pathet Lao, a leftist political party that
ultimately took power in 1975.

Also
See Vietnam

Nepal


Between
8,000 and 12,000 Nepalese have died since a civil war broke out in
1996. The death rate, according to Foreign Policy in Focus, sharply
increased with the arrival of almost 8,400 American M-16 submachine
guns (950 rpm) and U.S. advisers. Nepal is 85 percent rural and badly
in need of land reform. Not surprisingly 42 % of its people live
below the poverty level. (1,2)

In
2002, after another civil war erupted, President George W. Bush
pushed a bill through Congress authorizing $20 million in military
aid to the Nepalese government. (3)


Nicaragua


In
1981 the Sandinistas overthrew the Somoza government in Nicaragua,
(1) and until 1990 about 25,000 Nicaraguans were killed in an armed
struggle between the Sandinista government and Contra rebels who were
formed from the remnants of Somoza’s national government. The use
of assassination manuals by the Contras surfaced in 1984. (2,3)


The
U.S. supported the victorious government regime by providing covert
military aid to the Contras (anti-communist guerillas) starting in
November, 1981. But when Congress discovered that the CIA had
supervised acts of sabotage in Nicaragua without notifying Congress,
it passed the Boland Amendment in 1983 which prohibited the CIA,
Defense Department and any other government agency from providing any
further covert military assistance. (4)


But
ways were found to get around this prohibition. The National Security
Council, which was not explicitly covered by the law, raised private
and foreign funds for the Contras. In addition, arms were sold to
Iran and the proceeds were diverted from those sales to the Contras
engaged in the insurgency against the Sandinista government. (5)
Finally, the Sandinistas were voted out of office in 1990 by voters
who thought that a change in leadership would placate the U.S., which
was causing misery to Nicaragua’s citizenry by it support of the
Contras.


Pakistan


In
1971 West Pakistan, an authoritarian state supported by the U.S.,
brutally invaded East Pakistan. The war ended after India, whose
economy was staggering after admitting about 10 million refugees,
invaded East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and defeated the West
Pakistani forces. (1)

Millions
of people died during that brutal struggle, referred to by some as
genocide committed by West Pakistan. That country had long been an
ally of the U.S., starting with $411 million provided to establish
its armed forces which spent 80% of its budget on its military. $15
million in arms flowed into W. Pakistan during the war. (2,3,4)

Three
sources estimate that 3 million people died and (5,2,6) one source
estimates 1.5 million. (3)


Panama


In
December, 1989 U.S. troops invaded Panama, ostensibly to arrest
Manuel Noriega, that nation’s president. This was an example of the
U.S. view that it is the master of the world and can arrest anyone it
wants to. For a number of years before that he had worked for the
CIA, but fell out of favor partially because he was not an opponent
of the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. (1) It has been estimated that
between 500 and 4,000 people died. (2,3,4)


Paraguay:
See South America: Operation Condor


Philippines


The
Philippines were under the control of the U.S. for over a hundred
years. In about the last 50 to 60 years the U.S. has funded and
otherwise helped various Philippine governments which sought to
suppress the activities of groups working for the welfare of its
people. In 1969 the Symington Committee in the U.S. Congress revealed
how war material was sent there for a counter-insurgency campaign.
U.S. Special Forces and Marines were active in some combat
operations. The estimated number of persons that were executed and
disappeared under President Fernando Marcos was over 100,000. (1,2)


South
America: Operation Condor


This
was a joint operation of 6 despotic South American governments
(Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay) to share
information about their political opponents. An estimated 13,000
people were killed under this plan. (1)


It
was established on November 25, 1975 in Chile by an act of the
Interamerican Reunion on Military Intelligence. According to U.S.
embassy political officer, John Tipton, the CIA and the Chilean
Secret Police were working together, although the CIA did not set up
the operation to make this collaboration work. Reportedly, it ended
in 1983. (2)


On
March 6, 2001 the New York Times reported the existence of a recently
declassified State Department document revealing that the United
States facilitated communications for Operation Condor. (3)


Sudan


Since
1955, when it gained its independence, Sudan has been involved most
of the time in a civil war. Until about 2003 approximately 2 million
people had been killed. It not known if the death toll in Darfur is
part of that total.


Human
rights groups have complained that U.S. policies have helped to
prolong the Sudanese civil war by supporting efforts to overthrow the
central government in Khartoum. In 1999 U.S. Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright met with the leader of the Sudan People’s
Liberation Army (SPLA) who said that she offered him food supplies if
he would reject a peace plan sponsored by Egypt and Libya.

In
1978 the vastness of Sudan’s oil reservers was discovered and
within two years it became the sixth largest recipient of U.S,
military aid. It’s reasonable to assume that if the U.S. aid a
government to come to power it will feel obligated to give the U.S.
part of the oil pie.


A
British group, Christian Aid, has accused foreign oil companies of
complicity in the depopulation of villages. These companies – not
American – receive government protection and in turn allow the
government use of its airstrips and roads.


In
August 1998 the U.S. bombed Khartoum, Sudan with 75 cruise míssiles.
Our government said that the target was a chemical weapons factory
owned by Osama bin Laden. Actually, bin Laden was no longer the
owner, and the plant had been the sole supplier of pharmaceutical
supplies for that poor nation. As a result of the bombing tens of
thousands may have died because of the lack of medicines to treat
malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases. The U.S. settled a lawsuit
filed by the factory’s owner. (1,2)


Uruguay:
See South America: Operation Condor

Vietnam

In
Vietnam, under an agreement several decades ago, there was supposed
to be an election for a unified North and South Vietnam. The U.S.
opposed this and supported the Diem government in South Vietnam. In
August, 1964 the CIA and others helped fabricate a phony Vietnamese
attack on a U.S. ship in the Gulf of Tonkin and this was used as a
pretext for greater U.S. involvement in Vietnam. (1)


During
that war an American assassination operation,called Operation
Phoenix, terrorized the South 

Vietnamese people, and during the war
American troops were responsible in 1968 for the mass slaughter of
the people in the village of My Lai.


According
to a Vietnamese government statement in 1995 the number of deaths of
civilians and military personnel during the Vietnam War was 5.1
million. (2)


Since
deaths in Cambodia and Laos were about 2.7 million (See Cambodia and
Laos) the estimated total for the Vietnam War is 7.8 million.


The
Virtual Truth Commission provides a total for the war of 5 million,
(3) and Robert McNamara, former Secretary Defense, according to the
New York Times Magazine says that the number of Vietnamese dead is
3.4 million. (4,5)


Yugoslavia


Yugoslavia
was a socialist federation of several republics. Since it refused to
be closely tied to the Soviet Union during the Cold War, it gained
some suport from the U.S. But when the Soviet Union dissolved,
Yugoslavia’s usefulness to the U.S. ended, and the U.S and Germany
worked to convert its socialist economy to a capitalist one by a
process primarily of dividing and conquering. There were ethnic and
religious differences between various parts of Yugoslavia which were
manipulated by the U.S. to cause several wars which resulted in the
dissolution of that country.


From
the early 1990s until now Yugoslavia split into several independent
nations whose lowered income, along with CIA connivance, has made it
a pawn in the hands of capitalist countries. (1) The dissolution of
Yugoslavia was caused primarily by the U.S. (2)


Here
are estimates of some, if not all, of the internal wars in
Yugoslavia. All wars: 107,000; (3,4)

Bosnia
and Krajina: 250,000; (5) Bosnia: 20,000 to 30,000; (5) Croatia:
15,000; (6) and

Kosovo:
500 to 5,000. (7)


NOTES


Afghanistan

1.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003),
p.135.

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_
terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

3.Soviet
War in
Afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

4.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.76

5.U.S
Involvement in Afghanistan,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in
Afghanistan)

6.The
CIA’s Intervention in Afghanistan, Interview with Zbigniew
Brzezinski, Le Nouvel Observateur, Paris, 15-21 January 1998, Posted
at globalresearch.ca 15 October
2001, 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html

7.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.5

8.Unknown
News, 
http://www.unknownnews.net/casualtiesw.html

Angola

1.Howard
W. French “From Old Files, a New Story of the U.S. Role in the
Angolan War” New York Times 3/31/02

2.Angolan
Update, American Friends Service Committee FS, 11/1/99 flyer.

3.Norman
Solomon, War Made Easy, (John Wiley & Sons, 2005) p. 82-83.

4.Lance
Selfa, U.S. Imperialism, A Century of Slaughter, International
Socialist Review Issue 7, Spring 1999 (as appears in Third world
Traveler www.
thirdworldtraveler.com/American_Empire/Century_Imperialism.html)

5.
Jeffress Ramsay, Africa , (Dushkin/McGraw Hill Guilford Connecticut),
1997, p. 144-145.

6.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.54.

Argentina
: See South America: Operation Condor

Bolivia

1.
Phil Gunson, Guardian, 5/6/02,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/archive
/article/0,4273,41-07884,00.html

2.Jerry
Meldon, Return of Bolilvia’s Drug – Stained Dictator,
Consortium,
www.consortiumnews.com/archives/story40.html.

Brazil
See South America: Operation Condor

Cambodia

1.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/ .

2.David
Model, President Richard Nixon, Henry Kissinger, and the Bombing of
Cambodia excerpted from the book Lying for Empire How to Commit War
Crimes With A Straight Face, Common Courage Press, 2005,
paper
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/American_Empire/Nixon_Cambodia_LFE.html.

3.Noam
Chomsky, Chomsky on Cambodia under Pol Pot,
etc.,
http//zmag.org/forums/chomcambodforum.htm.

Chad

1.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
151-152 .

2.Richard
Keeble, Crimes Against Humanity in Chad, Znet/Activism
12/4/06
http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=11560&sectionID=1).

Chile

1.Parenti,
Michael, The Sword and the Dollar (New York, St. Martin’s Press,
1989) p. 56.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
142-143.

3.Moreorless:
Heroes and Killers of the 20th Century, Augusto Pinochet Ugarte,

http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/pinochet.html

4.Associated
Press,Pincohet on 91st Birthday, Takes Responsibility for Regimes’s
Abuses, Dayton Daily News 11/26/06

5.Chalmers
Johnson, Blowback, The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (New
York: Henry Holt and Company, 2000), p. 18.

China:
See Korea

Colombia

1.Chronology
of American State Terrorism, p.2

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html).

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
163.

3.Millions
Killed by Imperialism Washington Post May 6,
2002)
http://www.etext.org./Politics/MIM/rail/impkills.html

4.Gabriella
Gamini, CIA Set Up Death Squads in Colombia Times Newspapers Limited,
Dec. 5,
1996,
www.edu/CommunicationsStudies/ben/news/cia/961205.death.html).

5.Virtual
Truth Commission, 1991

Human
Rights Watch Report: Colombia’s Killer Networks–The
Military-Paramilitary Partnership).

Cuba

1.St.
James Encyclopedia of Popular Culture – on Bay of Pigs
Invasion
http://bookrags.com/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion.

2.Wikipedia http://bookrags.com/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion#Casualties.

Democratic
Republic of Congo (Formerly Zaire)

1.F.
Jeffress Ramsey, Africa (Guilford Connecticut, 1997), p. 85

2.
Anup Shaw The Democratic Republic of Congo,
10/31/2003)
http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/Africa/DRC.asp)

3.Kevin
Whitelaw, A Killing in Congo, U. S. News and World
Report
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/doubleissue/mysteries/patrice.htm

4.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p
158-159.

5.Ibid.,p.
260

6.Ibid.,p.
259

7.Ibid.,p.262

8.David
Pickering, “World War in Africa,
6/26/02,
www.9-11peace.org/bulletin.php3

9.William
D. Hartung and Bridget Moix, Deadly Legacy; U.S. Arms to Africa and
the Congo War, Arms Trade Resource Center, January ,
2000
www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/congo.htm


Dominican
Republic

1.Norman
Solomon, (untitled) Baltimore Sun April 26,
2005
http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/history/2005/0426spincycle.htm
Intervention
Spin Cycle

2.Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Power_Pack

3.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p.
175.

4.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.26-27.


East
Timor

1.Virtual
Truth Commission,
 http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/date4.htm

2.Matthew
Jardine, Unraveling Indonesia, Nonviolent Activist, 1997)

3.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

4.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p.
197.

5.US
trained butchers of Timor, The Guardian, London. Cited by The Drudge
Report, September 19,
1999. 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/indon.htm


El
Salvador

1.Robert
T. Buckman, Latin America 2003, (Stryker-Post Publications Baltimore
2003) p. 152-153.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
54-55.

3.El
Salvador,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Salvador#The_20th_century_and_beyond)

4.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.


Grenada

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p. 66-67.

2.Stephen
Zunes, The U.S. Invasion of
Grenada,
http://wwwfpif.org/papers/grenada2003.html .


Guatemala

1.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

2.Ibid.

3.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.2-13.

4.Robert
T. Buckman, Latin America 2003 (Stryker-Post Publications Baltimore
2003) p. 162.

5.Douglas
Farah, Papers Show U.S. Role in Guatemalan Abuses, Washington Post
Foreign Service, March 11, 1999, A 26


Haiti

1.Francois
Duvalier,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Duvalier#Reign_of_terror).

2.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p 87.

3.William
Blum, Haiti 1986-1994: Who Will Rid Me of This Turbulent
Priest,
http://www.doublestandards.org/blum8.html


Honduras

1.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p. 55.

2.Reports
by Country: Honduras, Virtual Truth
Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/honduras.htm

3.James
A. Lucas, Torture Gets The Silence Treatment, Countercurrents, July
26, 2004.

4.Gary
Cohn and Ginger Thompson, Unearthed: Fatal Secrets, Baltimore Sun,
reprint of a series that appeared June 11-18, 1995 in Jack
Nelson-Pallmeyer, School of Assassins, p. 46 Orbis Books 2001.

5.Michael
Dobbs, Negroponte’s Time in Honduras at Issue, Washington Post,
March 21, 2005


Hungary

1.Edited
by Malcolm Byrne, The 1956 Hungarian Revoluiton: A history in
Documents November 4,
2002
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB76/index2.htm

2.Wikipedia
The Free
Encyclopedia,
http://www.answers.com/topic/hungarian-revolution-of-1956


Indonesia

1.Virtual
Truth Commission 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.

2.Editorial,
Indonesia’s Killers, The Nation, March 30, 1998.

3.Matthew
Jardine, Indonesia Unraveling, Non Violent Activist Sept–Oct, 1997
(Amnesty) 2/7/07.

4.Sison,
Jose Maria, Reflections on the 1965 Massacre in Indonesia, p.
5.
http://qc.indymedia.org/mail.php?id=5602;

5.Annie
Pohlman, Women and the Indonesian Killings of 1965-1966: Gender
Variables and Possible Direction for Research,
p.4,
http://coombs.anu.edu.au/SpecialProj/ASAA/biennial-conference/2004/Pohlman-A-ASAA.pdf

6.Peter
Dale Scott, The United States and the Overthrow of Sukarno,
1965-1967, Pacific Affairs, 58, Summer 1985, pages
239-264.
http://www.namebase.org/scott.

7.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.30.


Iran

1.Geoff
Simons, Iraq from Sumer to Saddam, 1996, St. Martins Press, NY p.
317.

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html.

3.BBC
1988: US Warship Shoots Down Iranian
Airliner
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/default.stm )


Iraq

Iran-Iraq
War

1.Michael
Dobbs, U.S. Had Key role in Iraq Buildup, Washington Post December
30, 2002, p
A01 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A52241-2002Dec29?language=printer

2.Global
Security.Org , Iran Iraq War
(1980-1980)
globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/iran-iraq.htm.


U.S.
Iraq War and Sanctions

1.Ramsey
Clark, The Fire This Time (New York, Thunder’s Mouth), 1994,
p.31-32

2.Ibid.,
p. 52-54

3.Ibid.,
p. 43

4.Anthony
Arnove, Iraq Under Siege, (South End Press Cambridge MA 2000). p.
175.

5.Food
and Agricultural Organizaiton, The Children are Dying, 1995 World
View Forum, Internationa Action Center, International Relief
Association, p. 78

6.Anthony
Arnove, Iraq Under Siege, South End Press Cambridge MA 2000. p. 61.

7.David
Cortright, A Hard Look at Iraq Sanctions December 3, 2001, The
Nation.


U.S-Iraq
War 2003-?

1.Jonathan
Bor 654,000 Deaths Tied to Iraq War Baltimore Sun , October 11,2006

2.News http://www.unknownnews.net/casualties.html


Israeli-Palestinian
War

1.Post-1967
Palestinian & Israeli Deaths from Occupation & Violence May
16,
2006 
http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/2006/05/post-1967-palestinian-israeli-deaths.html)

2.Chronology
of American State Terrorism

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html


Korea

1.James
I. Matray Revisiting Korea: Exposing Myths of the Forgotten War,
Korean War Teachers Conference: The Korean War, February 9,
2001
http://www.truman/library.org/Korea/matray1.htm

2.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p. 46

3.Kanako
Tokuno, Chinese Winter Offensive in Korean War – the Debacle of
American Strategy, ICE Case Studies Number 186, May,
2006
http://www.american.edu/ted/ice/chosin.htm.

4.John
G. Stroessinger, Why Nations go to War, (New York; St. Martin’s
Press), p. 99)

5.Britannica
Concise Encyclopedia, as reported in
Answers.com
http://www.answers.com/topic/Korean-war

6.Exploring
the Environment: Korean
Enigma
www.cet.edu/ete/modules/korea/kwar.html)

7.S.
Brian Wilson, Who are the Real Terrorists? Virtual Truth
Commisson
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

8.Korean
War Casualty Statistics 
www.century
china.com/history/krwarcost.html
)

9.S.
Brian Wilson, Documenting U.S. War Crimes in North Korea (Veterans
for Peace Newsletter) Spring, 2002) 
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/


Laos

1.William
Blum Rogue State (Maine, Common Cause Press) p. 136

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

3.Fred
Branfman, War Crimes in Indochina and our Troubled National Soul

www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2004/08/00_branfman_us-warcrimes-indochina.htm).


Nepal

1.Conn
Hallinan, Nepal & the Bush Administration: Into Thin Air,
February 3, 2004

fpif.org/commentary/2004/0402nepal.html.

2.Human
Rights Watch, Nepal’s Civil War: the Conflict Resumes, March 2006 )

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/03/28/nepal13078.htm.

3.Wayne
Madsen, Possible CIA Hand in the Murder of the Nepal Royal Family,
India Independent Media Center, September 25,
2001
http://india.indymedia.org/en/2002/09/2190.shtml.


Nicaragua

1.Virtual
Truth Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.

2.Timeline
Nicaragua
www.stanford.edu/group/arts/nicaragua/discovery_eng/timeline/).

3.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism,
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html.

4.William
Blum, Nicaragua 1981-1990 Destabilization in Slow Motion

www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/Nicaragua_KH.html.

5.Wikipedia,
the Free
Encyclopedia,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Contra_Affair.


Pakistan

1.John
G. Stoessinger, Why Nations Go to War, (New York: St. Martin’s
Press), 1974 pp 157-172.

2.Asad
Ismi, A U.S. – Financed Military Dictatorship, The CCPA Monitor,
June 2002, Canadian Centre for Policy
Alternatives 
http://www.policyaltematives.ca)www.ckln.fm/~asadismi/pakistan.html

3.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003),
p.123, 124.

4.Arjum
Niaz ,When America Look the Other Way by,

www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=2821&sectionID=1

5.Leo
Kuper, Genocide (Yale University Press, 1981), p. 79.

6.Bangladesh
Liberation War , Wikipedia, the Free
Encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Liberation_War#USA_and_USSR)


Panama

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’s Greatest Hits, (Odonian Press 1998) p. 83.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.154.

3.U.S.
Military Charged with Mass Murder, The Winds
9/96,
www.apfn.org/thewinds/archive/war/a102896b.html

4.Mark
Zepezauer, CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.83.

Paraguay
See South America: Operation Condor


Philippines

1.Romeo
T. Capulong, A Century of Crimes Against the Filipino People,
Presentation, Public Interest Law Center, World Tribunal for Iraq
Trial in New York City on August
25,2004.
http://www.peoplejudgebush.org/files/RomeoCapulong.pdf).

2.Roland
B. Simbulan The CIA in Manila – Covert Operations and the CIA’s
Hidden Hisotry in the Philippines Equipo Nizkor Information –
Derechos, derechos.org/nizkor/filipinas/doc/cia.


South
America: Operation Condor

1.John
Dinges, Pulling Back the Veil on Condor, The Nation, July 24, 2000.

2.Virtual
Truth Commission, Telling the Truth for a Better
America
www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/condor.htm)

3.Operation
Condor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Condor#US_involvement).


Sudan

1.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang, (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003), p.
30, 32,34,36.

2.The
Black Commentator, Africa Action The Tale of Two Genocides: The
Failed US Response to Rwanda and Darfur, 11 August
2006
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/091706X.shtml.


Uruguay
See South America: Operation Condor


Vietnam

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine:Common Courage
Press,1994), p 24

2.Casualties
– US vs NVA/VC,
http://www.rjsmith.com/kia_tbl.html.

3.Brian
Wilson, Virtual Truth
Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

4.Fred
Branfman, U.S. War Crimes in Indochiona and our Duty to Truth August
26, 2004

www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=6105&sectionID=1

5.David
K Shipler, Robert McNamara and the Ghosts of
Vietnam
nytimes.com/library/world/asia/081097vietnam-mcnamara.html


Yugoslavia

1.Sara
Flounders, Bosnia Tragedy:The Unknown Role of the Pentagon in NATO in
the Balkans (New York: International Action Center) p. 47-75

2.James
A. Lucas, Media Disinformation on the War in Yugoslavia: The Dayton
Peace Accords Revisited, Global Research, September 7, 2005
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=
viewArticle&code=LUC20050907&articleId=899

3.Yugoslav
Wars in 1990s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_wars.

4.George
Kenney, The Bosnia Calculation: How Many Have Died? Not nearly as
many as some would have you think., NY Times Magazine, April 23, 1995

http://www.balkan-archive.org.yu/politics/
war_crimes/srebrenica/bosnia_numbers.html
)

5.Chronology
of American State Terrorism

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/
ChronologyofTerror.html.

6.Croatian
War of Independence,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatian_War_of_Independence

7.Human
Rights Watch, New Figures on Civilian Deaths in Kosovo War, (February
7, 2000) 
http://www.hrw.org/press/2000/02/nato207.htm.

Related Posts:

https://www.popularresistance.org/us-has-killed-more-than-20-million-in-37-nations-since-wwii/

Jammer dat Oekraïne en Syrie niet werden genoemd in de lijst, bovendien is er nog een groot aantal landen waar de VS tekeer is gegaan, o.a. middels illegale geheime operaties van speciale VS moordcommando’s…….

Zie ook:

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

Bang voor Amerika

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

VS heeft Rusland al 3 keer met oorlog gedreigd, de laatste 2 keer in de afgelopen 1,5 week……‘ (bericht van 5 oktober 2018)

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht aantreft. Helaas kan ik daar maar 140 tekens kwijt en kan dus niet eens alle landen opnemen, die hier werden genoemd (het label illegale oorlog’ duidt op de illegale oorlog tegen Irak).

Na kritiek de tekst in de kop aangepast op 24 november 2016. (toegevoegd: sinds ‘het einde van‘ WOII……..)

Aleppo: ondanks duidelijk gemanipuleerde video met meisje van 8, loopt de reguliere pers ermee weg…….

Rens de Jong, BNR koekwaus en ondernemer (zoals BNR meldt, dus een zzp’er…) was gistermiddag, samen met een andere gast te horen in de show van BNR’s bolle lachzak Hemmen (rond 12.50 u.).

Aan bod o.a. de video van een 8 jarig Syrisch meisje in Aleppo. Een duidelijk gemanipuleerde video, om zo het Syrisch leger en de Russen in een nog kwader daglicht te stellen. Dit meisje gebruikt een woordenschat, die niet past bij een 8 jarige, bovendien spreekt het meisje geen Engels en deed zij haar verhaal fonetisch……

Ondanks dat de Jong het laatste zelf ook vaststelde, vond hij dit een uitermate aangrijpende video, die de wanhoop van de bevolking goed weergeeft en zoals gebruikelijk: als het om een kind gaat, komt de boodschap zo nog veel sterker over……..

Het is dat de situatie in Aleppo te triest voor woorden is, anders zou je je werkelijk doodlachen……. Volgens de Jong kijken wij door een rietje naar de strijd in Aleppo….. Niet zijn bedoeling, maar daar heeft hij een punt: ‘we’ (de reguliere westerse media) kijken door een rietje naar de werkelijkheid, terwijl er een enorm vergrootglas is gericht op alle anti-Syrische en Russische propaganda, die dan ook dag in dag uit wordt verkondigd in de reguliere (afhankelijke) media, zoals bij BNR………

Er is meer dan voldoende bekend, om een heel ander beeld te schetsen, maar dat willen de westerse politici en reguliere media niet. Geen berichten met het feit, dat de bevolking van Aleppo de stad niet mag verlaten, een verbod ingesteld door de ‘gematigde rebellen’ (lees: psychopathische, moorddadige terreurgroepen)…… Op overtreding staat standrechtelijke executie, inclusief eventueel mee vluchtende vrouwen en kinderen…….

Daarover gesproken: men lult in de reguliere westerse media al helemaal niet, over het terreurbewind dat de ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen op de Syrische bevolking in Aleppo uitoefenen middels de sharia wetgeving……

Voedsel, water, medische voorraden en brandstof gaan in hoofdzaak naar de ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen, groepen die tot nu toe altijd de bevelen van de meesters in Riyad (Saoedi-Arabië) en het Pentagon volgen: houd je niet aan een gesloten wapenstilstanden, maar maak er juist gebruik van om je positie te versterken!!!

De bevolking uithongeren en geen toegang tot andere basisbehoeften als water geven, is een wapen in de handen van die terreurgroepen: de beelden van een bevolking in het nauw, een bevolking die honger lijdt en die het aan zo ongeveer alles ontbreekt, zorgt ervoor dat de stemming in het westen in hun voordeel is en blijft……*

De aanval op een hulpkonvooi een paar weken geleden, blijkt door een terreurgroep te zijn begaan en niet middels een Syrisch/Russisch bombardement, toch houden politici en media in het westen vol, dat het de Russen waren. Hetzelfde geldt voor alle gasaanvallen, na onderzoek allemaal toe te schrijven tot de ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen………

Nog ‘een mooi voorbeeld’ van smerige propaganda: vanmorgen op BBC World Service (radio, rond 9.17 u. CET) her bericht dat de laatste week 100 kinderen in Aleppo het slachtoffer zijn geworden van Syrische/Russische bombardementen……. De WHO (Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie) bracht dit bericht gisteren. Men liet bij de BBC kinderen uit Aleppo (althans dat moeten we aannemen) aan het woord, woorden in het Engels (vertaalt en) herhaalt door kinderen uit Groot-Brittannië……. Zo klinkt het nog gruwelijker en zet men de emotioneel gemaakte luisteraar op tegen de Russen en het Syrische bewind…….

*  Over dat beïnvloeden van de stemming: de westerse politici en reguliere westerse media doen net alsof de ‘gematigde’ rebellen (nogmaals : psychopathische moordenaars) geen schot lossen, geen raket of mortiergranaat afschieten, terwijl ze wel degelijk hun wapens richten op de bevolking van Aleppo, als ze stellingen van het Syrische leger beschieten…….. Zoals deze terreurgroepen dit ook tijdens ‘de wapenstilstand(en)’ hebben gedaan……. De BBC maakte vanmorgen trouwens een kapitale fout, door de vertaling van de woorden die de moeder van een kind gaf, zij sprak over afgeschoten raketten, raketten die op de grond worden gebruikt……. (deze raketten van klein kaliber worden voornamelijk door de terreurgroepen gebruikt……) Ach geen mens die het opvalt…….

Zie ook: ‘Rusland en Syrië worden o.a. door Frankrijk beschuldigt van terreur in Aleppo……… De vraag is wie de ware terroristen zijn.

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Anonieme VS regeringsvertegenwoordiger zou Syrië en Rusland hebben gedreigd met raketten voor de ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen……….

Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten kwam gisteren met het bericht, dat een anonieme VS regeringsvertegenwoordiger Syrië en Rusland gedreigd hebben, met levering van luchtdoelraketten aan de door de VS gesteunde ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen (zoals Al Qaida)………. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ofwel: dit was een heel domme regeringsvertegenwoordiger, of deze vertegenwoordiger is heel slim en probeert op deze manier aan te tonen, dat de VS dit soort raketten niet al maanden geleden heeft geleverd aan deze terreurgroepen…….

Overigens, mocht u het nog niet weten: er nemen VS militairen deel aan de illegale Turkse inval in Syrië (een enorme oorlogsmisdaad…), daarmee riskeert de VS een oorlog met Rusland, bovendien is ook de VS illegaal aanwezig op Syrisch grondgebied!!

Zie ook: ‘Russian, Syrian Jets Did Not Conduct Airstrikes on UN Convoy in Aleppo – MoD

        en: ‘Will Russia Surrender?‘ (blog Stan van Houcke)

        en: ‘VS coalitie bombardeert ‘per ongeluk’ het Syrische leger…..‘ en: ‘62 Syrian Troops Killed in US-led Attack

       en:  ‘Hulpkonvooi aangevallen ‘door Syrisch leger…..’ Of toch niet??

       en: ‘Samantha Power Blames Everything on Russia – Defends US Attack On Syrian Troops

       en: ‘Nederland financiert terrorisme in Syrië……..

       en: ‘John Kerry: ‘de VS kan niet alleen de deur naar de vrede openhouden….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: The US Road Map To Balkanize Syria

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

John Kerry: ‘de VS kan niet alleen de deur naar de vrede openhouden….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

In het BBC World Service radionieuws van afgelopen vrijdag (1.30 u. CET), het bericht dat John Kerry teleurgesteld was, door ‘het schenden’ van de wapenstilstand voor Aleppo door Syrië. De oorlogsmisdadiger voegde daar aan toe, dat de VS niet alleen de deur naar de vrede kan openhouden……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Wat een ongelofelijk doorzichtige leugen! De VS kan die deur niet eens vinden, alleen de deur die naar dood en vernietiging leidt, staat wagenwijd open in de VS!!!! De ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen die de VS steunt, kregen van de VS legerleiding te horen, dat ze zich vooral niets moesten aantrekken van de wapenstilstand en er juist gebruik van moesten maken!! Overigens eenzelfde advies, dat Saoedi-Arabië (bondgenoot VS) al meermaals heeft afgegeven aan deze psychopathische moordenaars, als er weer eens ‘een wapenstilstand’ voor Syrië werd getekend……

Lullig genoeg zijn het juist het reguliere Syrische leger en de Russen, die zich aan de wapenstilstand(en) houden……. Op zaterdag de 17de september bombardeerde de VS en haar coalitiegenoten ‘per ongeluk’ stellingen van het Syrische leger, waarbij 90 militairen om het leven kwamen. Uiteraard was dit geen ongeluk van een paar bommen op een verkeerd doel, maar een ‘weloverwogen’ bombardement van bijna een uur!!! Daarbij werd het VS commandocentrum gewaarschuwd, dat het de Syrische troepen aanviel, maakte niets uit, het bombardement werd ‘gewoon’ voortgezet……. De wapenstilstand voor Aleppo werd overigens keer op keer geschonden door die ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen, zelfs al voor de VS dit nog eens grootschalig deed op 17 september jl.

Het is als met het (MSF) ziekenhuis van Artsen zonder Grenzen in Kunduz, dat de VS in 2015 bombardeerde en waarbij grote helikopters elk mens dat probeerde te ontsnappen doodschoot…… Ook daar duurde het bombardement een uur, in welke tijd het commandocentrum herhaaldelijk werd gevraagd te stoppen met het bombardement, waar geen gehoor aan werd gegeven…. ‘Resultaat’: 12 vermoorde artsen van MSF, 3 kinderen  en 4 volwassen Afghaanse patiënten……..

‘De deur naar de vrede openhouden’, terwijl de VS al vanaf 2006 bezig was met de voorbereiding van een opstand in Syrië, die moest leiden tot het afzetten van Assad, daar deze de Qatar pijpleiding weigerde op Syrisch grondgebied…….

Onlangs lekte een openbaar gemaakt geheim memorandum uit van de DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), waarin een plan tot de opdeling van Syrië stond vermeld, een opdeling met o.a. een deel gereserveerd voor een……. kalifaat!!!* Dit memo stamt uit 2012……

Mensen nogmaals: De VS is verreweg de grootste terreur entiteit op aarde, terreur waar Nederland maar al te graag aan meewerkt. Alsof die terreur al niet genoeg kosten opleveren voor de belastingbetalers in de EU en Nederland…… Om maar te zwijgen over alle Syrische slachtoffers, nu al meer dan een half miljoen volgens voorzichtige schattingen…….

Ban Ki-Moon durfde onlangs middels z’n smerige vingers het reguliere Syrische leger aan te wijzen, als degene die de meeste slachtoffers zou hebben gemaakt…….. Ik heb Ban Ki-Moon nooit gehoord over de anderhalf miljoen Irakezen, die door VS terreur zijn gevallen, NB in een illegale oorlog……. Bovendien wordt het grootste deel van de oorlogsmisdaden in Syrië in de schoenen van het reguliere Syrische leger geschoven, terwijl uit onderzoek blijkt, dat bijvoorbeeld de gasaanvallen die Syrië zou hebben gedaan, door de ‘gematigde rebellen’ zijn uitgevoerd……. Om over de enorme aantallen slachtoffers, die de ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen maken, nog maar te zwijgen………

Over die illegale oorlog gesproken: de VS en haar coalitie zijn ook in Syrië bezig met een illegale oorlog en dan nog een grote bek op durven zetten, zoals Kerry….. Excuseer mensen: GODGLOEIENDEGODVERDOMME!!!

Stan van Houcke bracht vandaag het bericht, waarin aandacht voor John Kerry, die in de VN eiste, dat Rusland en Syrië moeten stoppen met het bombarderen van Al-Nusra stellingen, daar er geen onderscheid kan worden gemaakt, tussen door de VS gesteunde ‘gematigde rebellen’ of Al Qaida leden……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Met andere woorden: daar zit geen verschil tussen!!! Waar haalt deze smerige oorlogsmisdadiger het gore lef vandaan??!!!

Zie: ‘The US Road Map To Balkanize Syria

Zie ook: ‘Russian, Syrian Jets Did Not Conduct Airstrikes on UN Convoy in Aleppo – MoD

       en:  ‘Hulpkonvooi aangevallen ‘door Syrisch leger…..’ Of toch niet??

        en: ‘Will Russia Surrender?‘ (blog Stan van Houcke)

        en: ‘VS coalitie bombardeert ‘per ongeluk’ het Syrische leger…..‘ en: ‘62 Syrian Troops Killed in US-led Attack

       en: ‘Samantha Power Blames Everything on Russia – Defends US Attack On Syrian Troops

       en: ‘Nederland financiert terrorisme in Syrië……..

     en: ‘Anonieme VS regeringsvertegenwoordiger zou Syrië en Rusland hebben gedreigd met raketten voor de ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen……….

      en: ‘De VS en gelieerden begaan enorme oorlogsmisdaden, maar wijzen Rusland en Syrië als de daders aan!

Klik voor meer bericht n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘DIA’.

Frans Timmermans: Turkije voldoet bijna aan de eisen………

Van Links_Huftertje:

Zie ook: ‘Timmermans is trots op zijn ‘vluchtelingen onderhandelingen’ met de Turken…….. AUW!!!

       en: ‘Timmermans trots op akkoord: Turkije schendt mensenrechten vluchtelingen op grote en grove schaal….

       en:  ‘Turkse behandeling van vluchtelingen: inhumaan, barbaars en een schending van het vluchtelingenverdrag!!

       en: ‘Timmermans kan trots zijn, Turkije vraagt visa aan vluchtelingen die het land in willen……..

       en: ‘Timmermans met valse aantijgingen tegen vluchtelingen, normaal toch: haatzaaien tegen een kleine minderheid???

       en: ‘Erdogan neemt controle over grootste krant, demonstranten worden beschoten met rubberkogels en traangas………….

      en: ‘Timmermans trots op schending VN Vluchtelingenverdrag en wil dit in Afrika herhalen……

      en: ‘Erdogan heeft coup zelf op poten gezet om zo de totale macht te grijpen…….

      en: ‘Koenders ging naar Turkije voor 72 punten visumvrij reizen, ondanks grootschalige mensenrechtenschendingen……

      en: ‘Frans Timmermans: Turkije voldoet bijna aan de eisen………

      en: ‘Turks Koerdistan: wie maakt zich nog druk over de verschrikkingen daar?? Koenders zeker niet!

      en: ‘Turkije is als Duitsland na 1933: een fascistische dictatuur…….

      en: ‘Timmermans had niet bedoeld Turkije te decriminaliseren…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: ‘Turkije arresteert 800 politieagenten als Gülen aanhangers……….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. dit bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

‘Het verschil’ tussen de terreur van IS en Saoedi-Arabië……..

Kreeg gisteren de volgende vraag van Brasscheck TV in m’n elektronische brievenbus: What are the differences between ISIS and the rulers of Saudi Arabia?

De feiten (u krijgt geen video met een onthoofding te zien, al is onderstaande afbeelding al gruwelijk genoeg) in een betoog van Kyle Kulinsky:

Moet u nagaan: Saoedi-Arabië, staat niet op de EU terreurlijst, terwijl dit land ook buiten de eigen grenzen grootschalige terreur uitoefent, zoals in buurland Jemen….. Ook voorziet S.A. de Syrische ‘gematigde rebellen’ (lees terreurgroepen) van wapens, geld en adviezen….. Zoals het herhaaldelijke ‘advies’ aan deze terreurgroepen, zich vooral niet aan een wapenstilstand met de Syrische overheid te houden…….. Advies tussen aanhalingstekens, daar deze terreurgroepen, zoals gezegd, voor hun voortbestaan in feite afhankelijk zijn van S.A. (en Turkije)…….

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

‘Turkije-coup’ en invasie Syrië georganiseerd door CIA en…… Erdogan, aldus prof. Chossudovsky

Op deze plek heb ik al eens gewezen op de vraag, wie het meest heeft geprofiteerd van de mislukte ‘coup’ in Turkije, daar is maar één antwoord op: Erdogan*! Deze reli-fascistische psychopaat heeft na de coup in feite de totale macht in Turkije verworven, iets dat het komende jaar vervolmaakt zal worden.

Het volgende artikel werd geschreven door Michel Chossudovsky. Hierin de stelling dat de de ‘mislukte coup’ werd georganiseerd door de de CIA en Erdogan, zodat hij en de totale macht kan grijpen in Turkije en met een lam excuus Syrië kon binnenvallen…..

Hier het volledige artikel (u kan onder het artikel klikken voor een vertaling, dat neemt wel enige tijd in beslag):

US-NATO-Turkey
Invasion of Northern Syria



CIA
“Failed” Turkey Coup Lays Groundwork for Broader Middle East War?



By
Prof Michel Chossudovsky

September
01, 2016 “
Information
Clearing House

– “
GR” – In
mid-July, President Erdogan pointed his finger at the CIA, accusing
US intelligence of having supported a failed coup directed against
his government. Turkish officials pointed to a deterioration of
US-Turkey relations following Washington’s refusal to extradite
Fethullah Gülen, the alleged architect of the failed coup.

Erdogan’s
Justice Minister Bekir Bozdag was categorical:

If
the US does not deliver (Gulen), 
they
will sacrifice relations with Turkey for the sake of a terrorist” 

Public
opinion was led to believe that 
relations
with the US had not only deteriorated, but that Erdogan had vowed to
restore “an axis of friendship” with Moscow, including
“cooperation in the defence sector”. This was a hoax.


Turkey’s
Invasion of Syria

The
implementation of the Turkish invasion required routine consultations
with the US and NATO, coordination of military logistics,
intelligence, communications systems, coordination of ground and air
operations, etc. To be effectively carried out these military
endeavors required a cohesive and “friendly” US-Turkey
relationship.


We
are not dealing with a piecemeal military initiative.
Turkey’s 
Operation
Euphrates Shield 
could
not have taken place without the active support of the Pentagon,
which ultimately calls the shots in the war on Syria.

The
likely scenario is that from mid July to mid-August US, NATO and
Turkish officials were actively involved in planning the next stage
of the war on Syria: an (illegal) invasion led by Turkish
ground-forces, backed by the US and NATO.

Map
of the Turkish-led offensive in the northern Aleppo Governorate,
showing the ongoing developments in west of Euphrates River. Source
Wikipedia

The
Failed Coup Sets the Stage for a Ground Invasion


1.
Massive purges within the armed forces and government were
implemented in the immediate wake of the July coup. They had been
planned well in advance.  ”
Arrested
immediately were 2,839 army personnel with 2,745 Judges and
Prosecutors
 ordered
detained… 
In
under a week 60,000 people had been fired or detained and 2,300
institutions closed” … 

  (See Felicity Arbuthnot, Global
Research,
 August 2, 2016)

2.The
coup was intended to fail. Erdogan had advanced knowledge of the coup
and so did Washington. There was no conspiracy directed by the CIA
against Erdogan. Quite the opposite, the failed coup was in all
likelihood engineered by the CIA in liaison with Erdogan. It was
intended to consolidate and reinforce the Erdogan regime as well as
rally the Turkish people behind their president and his military
agenda “in the name of democracy”.

3.
The purges within the Armed Forces were intended to get rid of
members of the military hierarchy who were opposed to an invasion of
Syria. Did the CIA assist Erdogan in establishing the lists of
military officers, judges and senior government officials to be
arrested or fired? The Turkish media was also targeted, many of which
were closed down.


4.
Erdogan used the July 15 coup to accuse Washington of supporting the
Gulen movement while seeking a fake rapprochement with Moscow. He
flew to St Petersburg on August 9, for a behind closed doors meeting
with President Putin. In all likelihood, the scenario of a rift
between Ankara and Washington coupled with the “my friend Putin”
narrative had been approved by the Obama administration. It was part
of a carefully designed intelligence ploy coupled with media
disinformation. President Erdogan, vowed according to Western media
reports:
to
restore an ‘axis of friendship’ between Ankara and Moscow amid a
growing rift between Turkey and the West.”


5.
While “mending the fence” with Russia, Turkey’s military and
intelligence apparatus was involved in planning the invasion of
Northern Syria in liaison with Washington and NATO headquarters in
Brussels. 
The
underlying objective is to ultimately confront and weaken Syria’s
military allies: Russia, Iran and Hezbollah.

In
St Petersburg in the immediate wake of the July 15 failed coup,
Erdogan thanked his “dear friend” Vladimir Putin.

The
fact Mr Putin called me the next day after the coup attempt was a
very strong psychological factor,” he said at a joint press
conference.  “The axis of friendship between Moscow and Ankara
will be restored,” he said.Telegraph,
August 7, 2016

Did
Putin know that the failed coup, covertly supported by the CIA, was
meant to fail?
 One
suspects that Russian intelligence was aware of the ploy and was also
informed regarding Turkey’s invasion plans:

Your
visit today, despite a very difficult situation regarding domestic
politics, indicates that we all want to restart dialogue and restore
relations between Russia and Turkey,” Mr Putin said as
the pair met in the city’s Constantine Palace.


Mr
Putin on Tuesday said Russia would “step by step” lift sanctions,
… Mr Erdogan in turn promised to back major Russian energy projects
in Turkey, including the construction of the country’s first
nuclear power station and a gas pipeline to Europe.

He
also said the two countries would step up 
“cooperation
in the defence sector,” but did not elaborate.

The
Putin-Erdogan Saint Petersburg meeting was interpreted by the media
as a rapprochement with Moscow in response to the alleged involvement
of the CIA in the failed coup.

According
to the Washington
Post
, an improvised about-turn in US-NATO-Turkey relations had
occurred despite Erdogan’s “friendly” encounter with Putin:

NATO
went out of its way Wednesday to insist that Turkey — 
whose
president this week visited Moscow and promised a new level of
cooperation with the man he repeatedly called his “dear
friend,”
 Russian
President Vladi­mir Putin — remains 
a
“valued ally” whose alliance membership “is not in question.”

In
a statement posted on its website, NATO said it was responding to
“speculative press reports regarding NATO’s stance regarding the
failed coup in Turkey and Turkey’s NATO membership.”

A
nonsensical report. In actuality, the Pentagon, NATO, the Turkish
High Command and Israel are in permanent liaison. Israel is a de
facto member of NATO, it has a comprehensive bilateral military and
intelligence relationship with Turkey.

With
the invasion of  the border area of Northern Syria and the
influx of Turkish tanks and armoured vehicles,  the
Turkey-Russia relationship is in crisis. And that is the ultimate
objective of US foreign policy.

Russian
forces are acting on behalf of their Syrian ally.

How
will the Kremlin and Russia’s High Command respond to what
constitutes a US-Turkey-NATO ground invasion of Syria?

How
will they confront Turkish and allied forces? One assumes that Russia
will avoid direct military confrontation.

After
the US, Turkey is NATO’s heavy weight.

Sofar
the Turkish op is limited to a small border territory. Nonetheless it
constitutes and important landmark in the evolution of the Syria war:
invasion of a sovereign country in derogation of international law.
Washington’s endgame remains “regime change” in Damascus.

Is
the military initiative a preamble for a larger military undertaking
on the part of Turkey supported by US-NATO? In many regards, Turkey
is acting as a US proxy:

Turkey’s
incursion was backed by US air-cover, drones, and embedded special
forces per the WSJ. These were there largely to prevent Russia and
Syria from even thinking about taking action against the invading
forces.

Turkey
is moving into Syria not just with its own military, but with
thousands of “rebel opposition groups” including US-backed FSA
brigades allied with AlQaeda/Nusra/Sham and the child head-chopping
al-Zinki who are reported to form the vanguard. 
Syrian
territory is outright being turned over to them by the Turkish
military, simply exchanging control from one group of terrorist
jihadis (ISIS) to others
 who
are more media acceptable and more direct proxies of the Erdogan
regime, the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

That
said, ISIS has not resisted the Turkish advance at all – simply
“melting away” (or exchanging one set of uniforms for
another
?). (Moon
 of Alabama

Do
the SAA Syrian forces have the military capabilities of confronting
Turkish ground forces without Russian and Iranian support? How will
Tehran react to  the influx of Turkish forces? Will it come to
the rescue of its Syrian ally?

An
“incident” could be used as a pretext to justify a broader
NATO-led war. Article 5 of the Washington Treaty (NATO’s founding
document) states under the doctrine of “collective security” that
an attack against one member state of the Atlantic Alliance (e.g.
Turkey) is an attack against all members states of the Atlantic
Alliance.

Dangerous
crossroads. With the incursion of Turkish ground forces, military
confrontation with Syria’s allies, namely Iran and Russia, is a
distinct possibility which could lead to a  process of
escalation beyond Syria’s borders.

The
Erdogan-Jo Biden Meeting
 

From
Washington’s perspective, this ground invasion sets the stage for a
possible annexation of part of Northern Syria by Turkey. It also
opens the door for the deployment of US-NATO ground force operations
directed against central and southern Syria.

Erdogan
met up with Vice President Biden on August 23, following the influx
of Turkish tanks into Northern Syria. The invasion is carefully
coordinated with the US which provided extensive air force
protection. There is no rift between Ankara and Washington, quite the
opposite:

It
[is] difficult to believe that Turkey truly suspected the US of an
attempted decapitation of the nation’s senior leadership in a
violent, abortive coup just last month, only to be conducting joint
operations with the US inside Syria with US military forces still
based within Turkish territory.

What
is much more likely is that the coup was staged to feign a
US-Turkish fallout, draw in Russia and allow Turkey to make sweeping
purges of any elements within the Turkish armed forces that might
oppose a cross-border foray into Syria, a foray that is now
unfolding.  (See The
New Atlas
, Global Research, August 24, 2016)

Media
reports convey the illusion that the Biden-Erdogan meetings were
called to discuss the extradition of the alleged architect of the
failed coup Gulen. This was a smokescreen. Jo Biden who had also met
Erdogan back in January, gave the green-light on behalf of Washington
for a joint US-Turkey-NATO military incursion into Syria.


The
Kurdish Question

The
invasion is not directed against Daesh (ISIS) which is protected by
Ankara, it is geared towards fighting SAA forces as well as Kurdish
YPG forces, which are “officially” supported by the US. The US
supported ISIS-Daesh and Al Qaeda affiliated rebels are working hand
in glove with the Turkish invaders.


The
invasion is also part of a longstanding project by Turkey of 
creating
a “safe-haven” within Northern Syria
 (see
map above) which can be used to extend US-NATO-Turkey military
operations Southwards into Syria’s heartland.

Washington
has warned its
Kurdish allies not to confront Turkish forces:

Biden
said the Kurds, who Turkey claims intend to establish a separate
state along a border corridor in conjunction with Turkey’s own
Kurdish population, “cannot, will not, and under no circumstances
will get American support if they do not keep” what he said was a
commitment to return to the east.

Washington
will no doubt eventually clash with Ankara with regard to Turkey’s
project of territorial expansion in Northern Syria. Washington’s
longstanding objective is to create a Kurdish State in Northern
Syria, within the framework of a territorial breakup of both Syria
and Iraq. (see US National War Academy map below). In a bitter irony,
this “New Middle East” project also consists in annexing part of
Turkey to the proposed Kurdish State. In other words, Turkey’s  New
Ottoman objective of territorial expansion  encroaches upon
Washington’s design to fragment Iraq, Syria, Iran  as well as
Turkey. In other words, America’s ultimate imperial design is to
weaken Turkey as a regional power.

The
Pentagon has defined a military roadmap: “The road to Tehran goes
through Damascus.” The invasion of Northern Syria creates
conditions for a broader war.

Moreover,
on the US agenda is a longstanding objective, namely  to wage
war on Iran. In this regard, US military strategy largely consists in
creating conditions  for America’s staunchest allies (Turkey,
Saudi Arabia, Israel) to confront Iran, and act indirectly on behalf
of US interests. i.e. “do the job for us”.


MAP
OF THE NEW MIDDLE EAST

Note: This map was prepared by Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters. It was
published in the Armed Forces Journal in June 2006, Peters is a
retired colonel of the U.S. National War Academy. (Map Copyright
Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters
2006).  

Although
the map does not officially reflect Pentagon doctrine, it has been
used in a training program at NATO’s Defense College for
senior military officers. This map, as well as other similar maps,
has most probably been used at the National War Academy as well as in
military planning circles.  

The
failed coup was indeed supported by the CIA, but the failure was
coordinated with President Erdogan. It was an intelligence op which
was meant to fail and mislead public opinion.



Michel
Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics
(emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the
Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal, Editor of
Global Research.


Copyright
© Prof
Michel Chossudovsky
, Global Research, 2016


Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

* Zie: ‘Erdogan heeft coup zelf op poten gezet om zo de totale macht te grijpen…….

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op een van de labels, die u onder dit bericht aantreft.

Hammelburg slaat alweer de Syrische plank mis en het Turkse leger nam terroristen van IS op…….

Mensen, ik moet het eerlijk zeggen: Hammelburg was afgelopen maandagmiddag op BNR terecht fiks pissig te horen. De hobbezak maakte zich kwaad op de VS, die de Koerden hebben laten vallen, om bij Turkije in een goed blaadje te komen.

Hammelburg sprak over Turkije en de VS, die de Koerden de wacht aan hebben gezegd, te vertrekken uit Manbij, dat deze groep op IS had herovert (met de hulp van de VS!!).

Echter even later toonde Hammelburg wel begrip voor de Turken, die willen voorkomen dat de Koerden het gebied over de Turks/Syrische grens tot een autonoom Koerdisch gebied willen omvormen……. Alsof het logisch is, dat een buurland zich bemoeit met de binnenlandse aangelegenheden van het andere land……..

Uiteraard weinig commentaar van de bolronde BNR ‘buitenlanddeskundige’ Hammelburg, op de enorme agressie waarmee Turkije Syrië is binnen gewalst….. Laat staan dat hij commentaar leverde op de Turkse bombardementen op twee Koerdische dorpen aan de Syrische kant van de grens met Turkije, dat zal wel normaal zijn…….

Bombardementen waarbij een groot aantal burgerslachtoffers zijn gevallen, o.a. een familie van 15 personen……* Al hoef je niet op te kijken, als deze feiten niet eens bekend zijn bij de ‘buitenlanddeskundige’ Hammelburg…….

U begrijpt natuurlijk wel, dat Hammelburg na het voorgaande, al helemaal niet sprak over de bufferzone, die Turkije, bezig is in te richten op Syrische grondgebied, een zone van 20 tot 30 kilometer breed…….. Nogmaals: Turkije is illegaal aanwezig op Syrisch grondgebied >> een enorme oorlogsmisdaad!!

Volgens Hammelburg zijn door het gedoe in Syrië en het agressieve gedrag van Turkije (ook tegen Koerden in Irak), de spanningen in het zuidoostelijk deel van Turkije opgelopen, een gebied dat door Koerden wordt bewoond…… Volgens Hammelburg pleegt de PKK daarom aanslagen in dat gebied en andere delen van Turkije.

Dit is feitelijk onjuist, immers Turkije voert al jaren oorlog tegen de Koerdische bevolking in dat gebied, een gebied, een gebied waar pottenkijkers niet welkom zijn en waar Turkije het ene bloedbad na het andere aanricht……… Hé Hammelburg, wat denk je? Zou dat niet de reden zijn, dat de Koerden zich verzetten met aanslagen????

Want daar mensen, komt het gelul van Hammelburg op neer, de Koerden plegen aanslagen en de Turken gedragen zich als een normale wetshandhaver in het Koerdisch gebied………..

Hammelburg ga toch naar huis, jouw versheidsdatum is al decennia geleden verstreken en neem je zoon, die plotsklaps weer VS deskundige is (eerder o.a. Midden-Oosten deskundige), mee naar huis, kan je lekker potjes ‘mens erger je nieten’, en hoef je de luisteraar niet meer te ergeren met je gelul!!

Overigens heeft Rusland intussen de illegale inval van Turkije op Syrisch grondgebied veroordeeld. ‘Leuk feit’: bij  het innemen van de stad Jarablus en de omgeving door Turkije: Turkije heeft niet één kogel afgevuurd op de IS strijders……. Sterker nog, het Turkse commando heeft deze psychopathische terroristen gevraagd deel te nemen aan de strijd tegen de Koerden, daar was en is de inval van de Turken dan ook voor bedoeld, de Koerden verdrijven uit dit grensgebied (zoals u onder andere hierboven al kon lezen…)….

Een Turkse opperbevelhebber durfde afgelopen week plompverloren de Koerden met ‘ongedierte’ te vergelijken, ongedierte dat uitgeroeid dient te worden………. Zie wat de Turkse inval betreft, ook het volgende artikel, gevonden op het blog van Stan van Houcke en geschreven door prof. Michel Chossudovsky: ‘Erdogan’s War Crimes – ERDOGAN, YOU ARE A WAR CRIMINAL UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW. TURKEY INVADES SYRIA, KILLS CIVILIANS. THE “INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY” APPLAUDS

Zie ook: ‘Hammelburg met ‘een frisse kijk’ op Aleppo…….. VS neemt terreur-voortouw in Syrië…..

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Jarablus’.

Koenders, Piri, Ploumen en media stil: Turkije bombardeert 2 Syrische dorpen, veel burgerslachtoffers……..

Gistermorgen meldde BBC World Service, dat Turkije 2 (Koerdische) dorpen in Syrië  heeft gebombardeerd…… De dorpen liggen in het gebied, waar Turkije illegaal met een legermacht (o.a. tanks) de Syrische grens overschreed, ‘om IS te bestrijden’, terwijl het echte doel is, te voorkomen dat er een autonoom Koerdisch gebied aan de andere kant van het Turkse grensgebied ontstaat…….

Niemand die het opneemt voor de Koerden, zelfs de VS niet, terwijl dit ‘land’ de Koerden steun gaf, met hun wel echte aanval op de psychopathische fascisten van IS……. Zoals meestal doet ook de opperflaprdol van de VN, Ban-Ki Moon, er het zwijgen toe……

BBC meldde dat er een groot aantal burgerslachtoffers te betreuren is, waaronder 1 familie van 15 personen….. Dit terwijl Turkije beweert, dat de dorpen alleen militaire stellingen van de Koerden herbergen…….

Als het reguliere Syrische leger op haar eigen grondgebied een bom in de buurt van VS terreurgroepen (‘gematigde rebellen’) afwerpt, heeft John Kerry en de rest van de VS politiek een grote bek, maar als Turkije hetzelfde doet en daadwerkelijk veel slachtoffers maakt, is het doodstil in de VS…… Dit gebeurde afgelopen week nog, toen Syrië te dicht in de buurt van dezelfde Koerden kwam, die Turkije nu openlijk bestrijdt’, onmiddellijk begonnen Kerry en anderen in de VS te blazen…….

Jon Kerry heeft de Syrische regering de wacht aangezegd en eiste dat het Syrische leger weg moest blijven uit het desbetreffende gebied en zelfs een ‘no fly zone’ voor de Syrische luchtmacht instelde…….. Dit op Syrisch grondgebied, waar de VS illegaal aanwezig is……. Zojuist werd in het BNR nieuws van 12.00 u. gemeld, dat de Koerden die vorige week de stad Manbij innamen, weigeren op de eisen van Turkije en de VS in te gaan, en deze stad te  verlaten…..

Nul komma nada op de reguliere Nederlandse media, over deze Turkse bombardementen, tot 11.00 u. gistermorgen volgde ik het Radio1 nieuws, maar geen woord……. Ach ja, die Turken hebben het al zo moeilijk na de coup……. Dat Turkije in eigen land het ene bloedbad na het andere aanricht onder de Koerden, daar hoor je de politiek en de reguliere media amper over… BNR meldt zelfs vandaag niet, dat er gisteren veel burgerdoden zijn gevallen, door deze Turkse bombardementen……..

Over dat ‘moeilijk hebben’, daar kwam hare valse PvdA kwaadaardigheid Ploumen als eerste mee, toen ze afgelopen week terecht werd gewezen op haar zakenbezoek aan Turkije…..* Zakendoen terwijl dit land bezig is met enorme mensenrechtenschendingen, zoals detentie zonder aanklacht, barbaarse marteling en zelfs moord…….

Ook PvdA zwetskont Piri kwam afgelopen vrijdag/zaterdag (‘Met het oog op morgen’ >> Radio1) met dezelfde riedel, dus dat we niet begrijpen hoe moeilijk de Turken het nu hebben, alsof er buiten de Koerdische partij, ook nog maar 1 serieuze oppositiepartij is in Turkije, stelt men dat alle Turken na ‘de coup’ achter Erdogan staan…….. ha! ha! ha! ha!

Logisch, als je je niet solidair verklaart, loop je voor 99% kans op illegaal verklaard te worden door de reli-fascist Erdogan….. Illegaal en uiteraard met gevangenneming van de partijtop en veel aanhangers……. Al werd vanmorgen gemeld dat de grootste Turkse ‘oppositie partij’ nu commentaar begint te leveren op de grootschalige mensenrechtenschendingen……

Piri is Turkije rapporteur voor het EU parlement en was in die hoedanigheid in Turkije. Uiteraard om Turkije te laten weten, dat ook de EU tegen ‘de coup’ was en daarmee de Turken (lees: Turkse regering) een hart onder de riem te steken, alsof alles wat Erdogan nu flikt, de normaalste zaak van de wereld is….. Alsof het normaal is, dat Erdogan al voor ‘de coup’  de lijsten met mensen had klaarliggen, die gevangengenomen en gemarteld moesten worden…… Wel heel toevallig hè…??!!!

Volgens Piri heeft de Turkse overheid de verhalen over marteling weersproken, marteling van de onlangs gevangengenomen mensen, die met de coup te maken zouden hebben….. De verwondingen die daarop wijzen, zouden zijn ontstaan bij de arrestatie……. Een EU delegatie krijgt de kans om Turkse gevangenissen te bezoeken, om zo zelf te constateren, dat Turkije geen gevangenen martelt, aldus Piri…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

De vraag is welke gevangenissen, die EU delegatie mag bezoeken (er zijn een fiks aantal geheime, provisorische gevangenissen in Turkije) en welke gevangenen de delegatie mag spreken……. Natuurlijk zal alles tiptop in orde zijn, in de gevangenissen die deze EU delegatie mag bezoeken……

Nee, volgens Piri begrijpen wij in Nederland niet met welk een trauma de Turken zijn achtergebleven na de coup…… U snapt ‘t al: Piri moest even de druk van de PvdA Ploumen/Koenders ketel halen……. Oh ja: ook Koenders is naar Turkije om daar de smerige aars van Erdogan schoon te likken…… Uiteraard heeft deze oplichter gezegd, dat hij achter gesloten deuren de mensenrechten bovenaan z’n lijst heeft staan, naast de inmenging van de Turkse overheid met de binnenlandpolitiek in Nederland……

Of u deze ladelichter maar even op z’n blauwe ogen wil geloven…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! U begrijpt ‘t: Koenders brengt vooral zijn zorgen m.b.t. de situatie in Turkije over aan de meereizende Nederlandse pers en is hij vooral op missie om de Turkije-deal te redden en het NAVO-lidmaatschap van Turkije veilig te stellen……. U snapt uiteraard wel, dat Koenders niets zal zeggen over de illegale grensoverschrijding van Turkije op Syrisch grondgebied……

De PvdA heeft het meer dan verdiend, dat de partij bij de volgende verkiezingen geheel wordt weggevaagd!!!

Overigens was één van de ‘Denk’ leiders, Tunahan Kuzu, gisteren te gast in Buitenhof: deze idioot liet weten waar zijn partij voor staat: Erdogan!! Je zou verwachten dat zo’n hufter van te voren een omzichtig verhaal instudeert, maar nee hoor, alle kritiek op Erdogan na ‘de coup’ is uitermate fout. Alsof een fascist in Nederland bepleit, dat we begrip moeten hebben voor de moordpartijen die in nazi-Duitsland zijn begaan voor WOII……. Godverdomme wat een ploert!!!

* Zie: ‘Ploumen legt geheel hees uit, dat ze in Turkije over mensenrechten sprak….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Segers voor ‘christelijke aanpak’ Syrië-gangers…… AUW!!!

De gewezen zendeling en fundi-‘christen’ van de ‘Christen’Unie, Get-Jan Segers was gisteren te horen in Standpunt NL. ‘Ik viel er midden in’, dus geen idee wat de stelling was en eerlijk gezegd geen zin om dit op te zoeken.

Op het moment dat ik had afgestemd hoorde ik de hypocriete ‘christen’ Segers tekeer gaan over Syrië-gangers. Volgens deze christenbroeder moeten Syrië-gangers minstens 50 dagen kunnen worden vastgehouden, ook al is er geen bewijs voor de verdenking tegen hen…….. De zak wil nog net, dat de rechter daar een handtekening onder zet, maar dat stelt geen flikker meer voor, als de wet dusdanig is aangepast, immers het OM zal in die gevallen, als ze zo’n ‘ganger’ langer willen vasthouden, altijd gelijk krijgen….

Het bewijs daarvoor gaf Segers NB zelf. De lul kwam met een voorbeeld: een Syrië-ganger, die 20 dagen vastzat, moest het OM laten gaan, maar het OM had ‘gerede verdenkingen’ tegen deze figuur…….. Hoe of wat wist Segers natuurlijk niet, maar het is het OM en dat heeft nu eenmaal ‘altijd gelijk..!!!’

Het OM heeft deze Syrië-ganger toen ‘iets anders’ ten laste gelegd om deze figuur toch vast te kunnen houden…….. Met die gang van zaken was ‘christenbroeder’ Segers het nog eens ook………. Let wel: Segers zit in de Tweede Kamer en kan bij tijd en wijle Rutte 2 onder druk zetten, om onfrisse zaken voor elkaar te krijgen……..

Aan de telefoon advocaat Seebregts, die het uiteraard faliekant oneens was met Segers. Volkomen terecht betoogde Seebregts, dat daarmee, het kunnen vasthouden van verdachten voor 50 dagen, de lat voor het OM wel erg laag komt te liggen, m.a.w. waar blijft het recht van de verdachte, of sterker nog hoort dit thuis in een rechtstaat??? De vraag stellen is ‘m beantwoorden………

Beste bezoeker, u zal het misschien niet geloven, maar ‘onze christenbroeder’ schoot uit de religieuze slof en probeerde zelfs Seebregts de les te lezen…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Mocht u het niet weten: Seebregts vertegenwoordigt een aantal van die Syrië-gangers en weet dus meer dan voldoende van de hoed en de rand en op zeker veel meer dan een flapdrol als Segers.

Segers ging al vrij direct onderuit, toen hij beweerde dat er 400 van deze Syrië-gangers zijn in Nederland, dat zijn er volgens Seebregts echter rond de 250. Segers probeerde het nog een paar keer, maar slikte daarna z’n verhaal in……. Segers beriep zich op cijfers van het CBS, zo liet hij weten, het CBS, u weet wel, het cijfergoochelinstituut dat krom regeringsbeleid moet rechtvaardigen. Seebregts beriep zich op cijfers van de Nationaal Coördinator Terrorismebestrijding en Veiligheid. Dit instituut doet zoveel mogelijk om de angst voor terrorisme groot te houden en overdrijft als zodanig keer op keer de dreiging. M.a.w. dit instituut zou de cijfers eerder opblazen, dan het CBS!

De neoliberale hufter-presentator Kockelman vond het nodig een poging te ondernemen om Seebregts onderuit te halen, de schoft stelde, dat de advocaat ook wel ‘erg veel’ cliënten heeft, die beweren ambulances te hebben gereden……. Hoe laag kan je gaan…….

Al zou deze enorme overdrijving van Kockelman waarheid zijn, is het duidelijk dat Kockelman zich blijkbaar niet kan voorstellen dat een ambulance in deze oorlog (door de VS e.a. veroorzaakt) een uitermate belangrijke functie vervult……

Segers probeerde met toegeknepen billen en duidelijk geïrriteerd, z’n ‘christelijke’ haatpraatje vol te houden, o.a. met de opmerking dat de lat helemaal niet laag komt te liggen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! De oetlul werd andermaal door Kockelman geholpen, die hem liet uitrazen, daarna zei dat Segers weg moest en vervolgens naar de ‘bellers’ ging, zonder Seebregts de kans te geven verder te reageren op de leugenachtige praatjes van Segers…….. Er kon nog net een vraag aan Seebregts vanaf, of deze aan de telefoon wilde blijven om te reageren op wat de ‘bellers’ te vertellen hadden……..

Tenenkrommende angst- en haatzaaierij beste lezer…….

Zie ook: ‘Segers bepleit aanrechtsubsidie terwijl ‘Christen’Unie tegen een basisinkomen is……

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht aantreft.