De voormalige Israëlische minister van Defensie Bogie Ya’alon, die in ongenade viel bij Netanyahu, heeft toegegeven, dat Israël samenwerkt met IS…….. Overigens is dit geen nieuws, eerder werd al bekend gemaakt, dat gewonde IS strijders door het Israëlische leger werden opgelapt, op het door Israël illegaal bezette deel van de Golanhoogten, zodat ze na revalidatie konden doorvechten tegen de democratisch gekozen Syrische regering Assad ……. Geen nieuws dus, maar het kan geen kwaad als hoge politici en zeker degenen die verregaande beslissingen namen, hun verhaal doen, zoals Ya’alon in dit geval. Daarnaast is deze Israëlische samenwerking met IS niet verschillend van die met Saoedi-Arabië, Egypte en de Golfstaten…….
Ya’alon is overigens allesbehalve een vredesduif en hij staat nog steeds achter het opportunistische, hypocriete en fascistoïde regeringsbeleid van Netanyahu. Je kan zijn uitlating over IS wat mij betreft niet anders zien dan een ongelukkige verspreking, gezien zijn uitspraak in het Information Clearing House (ICH) artikel hieronder.
Een paar uur geleden werd bekend gemaakt, dat er een grote explosie had plaatsgevonden op het internationale Syrische vliegveld van Damascus. Volgens de huidige Israëlische minister van defensie, was deze Israëlische terreuraanval gericht op een gebouw van Hezbollah, vanwaar wapens zouden worden doorgevoerd vanuit Iran naar Libanon. ‘Toevallig’ is Hezbollah één van de groepen die het terreurtuig van ISIS en Al Qaida bestrijdt…….(Al Qaida, in Syrië onder de naam al-Nusra en nog wat namen die moeten verdoezelen, dat het om Al Qaida gaat)
ICH bracht gisteren het volgende artikel, waarin wordt gesproken over een excuus van IS aan het adres van Israël, vanwege een aanval. Toevallig bracht Anti-Media gisteren dit ‘excuus bericht’ naar buiten, u vindt het onder het (eerste) artikel van ICH. Dit ICH artikel kan u desgewenst laten vertalen door onder dit artikel op ‘Dutch translation’ te klikken (let op de uitspraak van Netanyahu t.a.v. IS, in het begin van het ICH artikel):
Former
Israeli Defense Minister Confirms Israeli Collaboration With ISIS In
Syria
By
Richard Silverstein
April
23, 2017 “Information
Clearing House”
– In
the midst of complaining about the Islamist threat to Israel and the
world, Bibi Netanyahu conveniently forgets that his own
country enjoys a
tacit alliance with ISIS in
Syria. It is an alliance of convenience to be sure and one
that’s not boasted about by either party. But is not terribly
different from one than Israel enjoys with its other Muslim allies
like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.
Bogie Yaalon served as
defence minister in the current government till he had a falling out
with Netanyahu. Now Yaalon plans to form his own party and run
against his former boss. Unfortunately for him, he’s not
polling well and doesn’t appear to be much of a political threat.
So
Yaalon enjoys the position of having little to lose. He can
speak more candidly than the average politician. In this
context, he spoke
at length on
security matters at a public event in Afula. There is always
much that I disagree with whenever I read Yaalon’s views. For
example, while warning about the danger of favoring too heavily one
side over the other, he essentially justifies Israel’s
interventionist approach, which largely has favored Assad’s
opponents. Nor do I like his choice of political
allies–from Pam
Geller to Meir
Kahane’s grandson.
But he did reveal how
closely tied Israel is to ISIS in Syria. I’ve documented, along
with other journalists, Israeli collaboration with al-Nusra, an
affiliate of al-Qaeda. But no Israeli till now has admitted it
has forged an alliance with ISIS as well. Below Yaalon
implicitly confirms this below:
“…Within
Syria there are many factions: the regime, Iran, the Russians, and
even al-Qaeda and ISIS. In such circumstances, one must develop
a responsible, carefully-balanced policy by which you protect your
own interests on the one hand, and on the other hand you don’t
intervene. Because if Israel does intervene on behalf of one
side, it will serve the interests of the other; which is why we’ve
established red lines. Anyone who violates our sovereignty will
immediately feel the full weight of our power. On most
occasions, firing comes from regions under the control of the regime.
But once the firing came from ISIS positions–and it
immediately apologized“.
The attack he refers to
was never reported in Israeli media. Either the information was
placed under gag order or under military censorship. It was
suppressed most certainly because both the firing by an Israeli
Islamist ally on Israeli territory and ISIS’ apology would
embarrass both Israel and the Islamists.
Keep in mind, this is the
same ISIS which beheaded a Jewish-American who’d lived in Israel:
Steven Sotloff. The same ISIS which raped Yazidi women and
threw gay men off buildings. The same ISIS which has rampaged
through the Middle East sowing havoc and rivers of blood wherever it
goes. The same ISIS which Netanyahu routinely excoriates as
being the root of all evil in the world.
It’s common knowledge
that Israeli foreign policy going back to the days of Ben Gurion has
been exceedingly opportunistic and amoral. So I suppose one
shouldn’t be surprised at this new development.
But still it
does momentarily take one’s breath away to contemplate just how
sleazy Israel’s motives can be.
Tikun
Olam (Hebrew: תיקון
עולם tikkun
olam, “repairing the world”) is a Seattle-based political
blog that regularly reports on Israeli security matters. The blog was
created in 2003 by Richard Silverstein and covers the Arab–Israeli
conflict. Silverstein describes it as a “liberal Jewish blog”
that “focuses on exposing the excesses of the Israeli national
security state”.
ISIS/Al-qaeda
airforce:Israel
attack kills 3 pro-government forces in Syria;
: Three members of the pro-government NDF were reportedly killed
while two were wounded; an unnamed militia official was quoted as
saying by news agency AFP.
(ANTIWAR) In
a shocking revelation, former Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon
(Likud), who served from 2013 until mid-2016, revealed that the
November gunbattle between Israeli troops and ISIS forces along the
Golan frontier, materially the only significant fight between the two
sides, was
followed up with an ISIS “apology.”
Being
ISIS generally speaking means never having to say you’re sorry, and
the group has no real allies so it generally doesn’t come up. That
ISIS felt the need to apologize to Israel for the brief clash, which
had no Israeli casualties, speaks volumes about the group’s
position.
Ya’alon
revealed this apology in the context of comments about Israel’s
policy in Syria, and its repeated airstrikes against Syrian military
targets whenever any cross-border fire is reported has led Syria to
repeatedly complain that Israel is a de facto ally of the rebels.
It
appears ISIS may see things this way too, at least for now. Despite
ISIS making public statements playing up their animosity toward
Israel, and their ideology clearly positioning them as an enemy, they
likely see Israel as an ally of convenience.
Israeli
officials have largely treated ISIS the same way, as while they
sometimes express public concerns about the rise of ISIS, they have
already repeatedly made clear that they prefer
Syria to end up under the control of ISIS instead
of being
an ally to
Iran.
Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Ya’alon’.
Wikileaks heeft meer documenten naar buiten gebracht inzake de Vault 7 documenten, die eerder werden gepubliceerd. In deze nieuwste Wikileaks publicatie genaamd ‘Hive’ wordt uitgelegd hoe de CIA via het illegaal installeren van malware (virus) op computers (tot en met telefoons en zelfs CCTV systemen >> cameratoezicht) van derden, men alles kan zien, wat er op een besmette computer gebeurd en deze zelfs kan gebruiken om acties uit te voeren (bijvoorbeeld de verkiezingen in de VS manipuleren en deze manipulatie toeschrijven aan anderen, zoals de Russen, wat uit eerdere Wikileaks documenten bleek…….)…..
Anti-Media bracht afgelopen maandag het volgende artikel, waar men ook aandacht schenkt aan Pompeo, de topterrorist van de CIA, die onlangs Wikileaks bestempelde als een terroristische organisatie, althans anders kan je zijn woorden niet interpreteren. Daaronder de reactie van Assange, die met een paar simpele woorden, gehakt maakte van het vuil, dat Pompeo durfde te spuien.
Lees en huiver:
Wikileaks
Reveals Hive: The CIA’s Top Secret Virus Control System
Wikileaks Reveals Hive: The CIA’s Top Secret Virus Control System
(MPN) Early
Friday morning, Wikileaks released
its fifth batch of Vault
7 documents
exposing the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency’s hacking techniques.
The latest release, titled “Hive,”
exposes the agency’s multi-platform malware suite that allows the
CIA to monitor targets via malware as well as the ability to realize
specific tasks on compromised machines.
Hive
is said to provide customizable implants for a variety of operating
systems for distinct types of devices, not just computers, tablets,
and phones. Among the platforms vulnerable to Hive include Linux,
Windows, Solaris, MikroTik (used in Internet routers), and AVTech
Network Video Recorders (often used in CCTV recording). First
released in 2010, Hive is essentially an “implant” that functions
as both a beacon and shell, allowing CIA hackers to gain a foothold
in devices that allow them to deploy any number of other tools, such
as those detailed in previous releases.
Wikileaks
has described Hive’s function as
a “back-end infrastructure malware” that uses public HTTPS
interfaces which provide “unsuspicious-looking cover domains” to
hide its presence on infected devices. Each of those domains is
linked to an IP address at a commercial Virtual Private Server (VPS)
provider, which forwards all incoming traffic to what is termed a
“Blot” server. All re-directed traffic is then examined by CIA
hackers to see if it contains a valid beacon. If it does, then a tool
handler – called Honeycomb in the
released documents –
and the CIA then begins initiating other actions on the target
computer. The released
user guide shows
that Hive allows for the uploading and deleting of files as well as
the execution of applications on the device.
Unlike
some other Vault 7 tools which can persist indefinitely on targeted
devices, Hive comes with a “self-delete”
function that
allows the malware to destroy itself if it receives no signal from
the CIA for a set amount of time. The self-deletion leaves only a log
and configuration file, containing only a time-stamp behind.
Apparently this feature posed difficulties to CIA developers as the
self-deletion can “be problematic due to the inability to
accurately assess the reliability of the host’s system clock,”
according to the
Hive Developers Guide.
Wikileaks
noted that anti-virus companies along with forensic experts have
noticed before that malware, potentially originating from a
state-actor, utilized the same back-end infrastructure implantation
that Hive employs. Through the analysis of the communication between
specific implants, these experts and software companies were
able to determine that
the malware’s origin came from a “well-resourced organization
which was involved in intelligence gathering operations.”
However,
there had been unable to attribute the back-end or the implants to
the CIA, though Wikileaks’ release of Hive may change that. Indeed,
Wikileaks noted in its press release that “The documents from this
publication might further enable anti-malware researchers and
forensic experts to analyse this kind of communication between
malware implants and back-end servers used in previous illegal
activities.”
Wikileaks’
latest release comes on the heels of CIA
director Mike Pompeo’s aggressive statements against
the transparency organization in which he labeled them “non-state
hostile intelligence service.” He also condemned Wikileaks’
editor-in-chief, Julian Assange of making “common cause with
dictators.” While other
CIA directors have targeted both
Wikileaks and Assange in the past, Wikileaks now five releases of top
secret CIA hacking tools may have prompted an escalation in Pompeo’s
rhetoric. It remains to be seen if this rhetoric will translate into
action, however.
Assange,
for his part, doesn’t seem too concerned, choosing to respond with
a witty retort that incisively pointed out the CIA’s lack of
credibility in making such accusations:
en: ‘Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)
Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: Hive en M. Pompeo.
Ontving vandaag weer een bericht van Ben Jager, waarin een link opgenomen naar een artikel op 21st Century Wire. In dat artikel van Vanessa Beeley, betoogt professor Francis Boyle dat Saoedi-Arabië, de Verenigde Arabische Emiraten (VAE) en (uiteraard) de VS een genocide oorlog voeren tegen de Houthi’s in Jemen.
Volgens Boyle wil de voornoemde coalitie totale controle over het Arabische Schiereiland, waar Jemen uiterst strategisch is gelegen (Golf van Aden en de uiteindelijke toegang tot de 2 ‘Suezkanalen’).
Politiek commentator Josh Walsh stelt dat men geen aandacht heeft voor de strijd die de Houthi’s voeren tegen IS en Al Qaida (die hij niet bij naam noemt), aan wie door de eerder opgestapte en door de Saoediërs opnieuw geïnstalleerde president, onderdak werd verleend in Jemen. IS en Al Qaida, die door de VS elders ‘worden bestreden’.
Voorts stelt Walsh dat de VS haar economsche en militaire dominantie in die regio koste wat kost wil bewaren.
Jammer dat het woord ‘sjiieten’ niet één keer valt in het artikel van Beeley, daar de Houthi’s deze vorm van islam aanhangen, in tegenstelling tot Saoedi-Arabië en de VAE, die de soennitische tak aanhangen, dezelfde tak die door IS en Al Qaida wordt beleden…….
Nog een vreemde zaak: in het artikel verklaren noch Walsh, noch Boyle, hoe de Saoedische coalitie (nogmaals inclusief de VS) deze genocide veroorzaakt…. Dit gebeurt niet alleen door bombardementen, maar vooral door blokkades…… Door deze blokkades zijn er grote tekorten ontstaan aan voedsel, water, medische hulpgoederen en brandstof…….. Weet u nog de laatste Giro555 actie? Deze was ook t.b.v. Jemen……….
Zie ook de opgenomen staat waar te lezen is, dat er door de oorlog in Jemen tot nu toe meer dan 32.000 slachtoffers te betreuren zijn, naast een enorm aantal vernielde objecten, waaronder ziekenhuizen (onder kop; Health Facilities) en scholen……..
YEMEN:
“Saudis, Emiratis and USA are Inflicting a War of Genocide Against
the Houthis ~ Prof. Francis Boyle
“In
a nutshell the Saudis, Emiratis and the USA are inflicting a war
of genocide against the Houthis,” University of Illinois
Professor of International Law Francis Boyle said on Thursday.
Any
increase in US military support for the Saudi-led coalition
conducting air strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemeni would aid a
military campaign amounting to genocide against the Houthis and
their Zaidi allies in Yemen, analysts told Sputnik.
The
US Department of Defense is considering increasing its support
for Saudi Arabia and its Gulf Arab allies in their support
for the government of Yemen seeking to suppress Houthi
rebel forces, according to US media reports this week.
Accounting
for 700 days of a US/UK/EU/UN supported Saudi Coalition war of
aggression against the Yemeni people. (Photo: Legal
Centre for Rights & Development)
Boyle
explained that the Saudis and their allies in the Gulf Arab
Emirates wanted to establish full control over the entire
Arabian peninsula and also of the choke point region at the
head of the Persian, or Arabian Gulf through which all oil
exports, including those of Iran and Iraq were shipped by sea.
“They
want to control the entire Saudi Peninsula, all its resources,
and the Bab Al-Mandeb Strait through which all the oil and gas
to Europe must pass,” he said.
Yemeni
child injured in Saudi Coalition airstrike. (Photo: Arwa
Rights)
Political
commentator John Walsh told Sputnik the United States supported the
Saudis and the current Yemeni government against the Houthi
rebels, but it ignored the fact that the Saudis and their Gulf
allies also backed Islamist extremists whom Washington also fights.
“They
[the Saudis] are fighting the Houthis on the excuse that they
are ‘agents of Iran’, part of the fairy tale narrative
fed us,” he said.
US
support of the Saudis and their allies in the Yemen civil
war was ultimately motivated by a determination to maintain
and extend Washington’s military and economic dominance in the
entire region, Walsh stated.
“The
United States is the last great Western Empire desperate to maintain
its dominant position and striking out in every direction to do
so. Its every warlike move is to be resisted. Time to end
this madness before the neo-liberal-con imperialists blow us all
up,” he warned.
Claims
that the Houthis are “agents of Iran’ are a “fairy tale
myth” are propagated by the Washington political
establishment, Walsh said.
Blijkbaar zijn voor de VS baby’s die sterven aan honger, minder erg, dan baby’s die door gifgas om het leven komen, zoals in Syrië onlangs…… Waarvoor de VS ook nog eens een Syrische luchtmachtbasis bombardeerde, zonder enig bewijs voor Syrische schuld te hebben…….
Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: Arabisch Schiereiland, Boyle en Walsh.
BBC World Service radio bracht gistermiddag een verslag vanaf het VS oorlogsschip George H. W. Bush, dat van zins was door de Straat van Hormuz te varen, dit uiteraard zo dicht mogelijk onder de Iraanse kust….
De verslaggever stelde verontrust, dat de Iraanse marine al snel agressief contact zocht met het VS fregat, bovendien gelaste Iran helikopters van een dichtbij varend vliegdekschip, terug te keren naar hun schip en niet meer op te stijgen……..
Een ‘fraai sfeerplaatje’ dat bij de luisteraar onmiddellijk walging moet oproepen, want zeg nu zelf: Iran is het land dat overal en nergens illegale oorlogen begint, opstanden uitlokt en staatsgrepen regisseert….. Oh nee, ik vergis me, dat is de VS, de verreweg grootste terreurentiteit op aarde….. Niet zo vreemd, dat de Iraniërs uitermate gespannen zijn, als deze terreurstaat marine manoeuvres uitvoert vlak voor de Iraanse kust…..
De verslaggever sprak met de kapitein van het schip, ene Will Tillington (al kon ik die naam niet terugvinden in combinatie met de marine van de VS), deze stelde dat Iran een gevaar is voor de stabiliteit in de regio…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Welke stabiliteit? De stabiliteit die de VS heeft veroorzaakt middels o.a. illegale oorlogen tegen Afghanistan, Irak en Libië, landen die nu in grote chaos zijn gedompeld?
Of de stabiliteit door de opstand, die in Syrië uitliep op een oorlog, een opstand door de VS op poten gezet en geregisseerd, maar die ‘helaas’ voor hen misliep (dit daar de opstand had moeten uitmonden in het afzetten van Assad)…… Een oorlog: -waarbij dit land voor een groot deel werd geruïneerd, -waarin een enorm aantal mensen is vermoord en -waardoor een groot deel van de bevolking op de vlucht is geslagen, nogmaals: ‘met dank’ aan hoofdverantwoordelijke en ‘stabilisator’ VS…..
De kapitein bad via de intercom (en riep zijn militairen op mee te bidden) voor een veilige doorgang door de Straat van Hormuz….. Terwijl zijn opperhoofd, het beest Trump, hem en zijn collega’s al had opgeroepen Iran, als het even kan, uit het water te schieten……
Godverdomme walgelijk!!!!
Het schaap van de BBC stelde uiteraard werkelijk niet één kritische vraag, zoals: getuigt het niet van enorme agressie om zo dicht onder de kust van Iran met oorlogsschepen te spelen??? Nee, ze beaamde gewoon het cliché, dat Iran een uiterst gevaarlijk land is……… Dan durft de BBC nog steeds te stellen, dat haar nieuwsgaring onafhankelijk is…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!
Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.
Stan van Houcke bracht gisteren op zijn blog een artikel over Pechtold, beter gezegd over ‘de held’ die Pechtold vereert: massamoordenaar Churchill.
Churchill was een groot voorstander van de EU, al moet je daar wel bij opmerken, dat Churchill gezien zijn geschiedenis geen groot voorstander was van democratie. Dat past dan weer mooi bij de EU, waar de democratie ver te zoeken is en dat deelnemende landen als het zo uitkomt, volkomen uitperst en aan de ketting kan leggen, zie Griekenland……. Een dictatuur kan het niet ‘beter’ doen!
Zoals gezegd: Churchill was in feite een massamoordenaar, waar je zelfs WOII niet als bewijs voor nodig hebt……….
Van Houcke nam een artikel over van ‘Crimes of Britain‘, waarin een opsomming is opgenomen, over de enorme misdaden die Churchill beging.
Oordeel zelf over ‘de held’ van de neoliberale hufter Pechtold:
Alexander
Pechtold’s Inspiratiebron
Wat
inspireert Alexander Pechtold?
Op
de schouw in de werkkamer van Alexander Pechtold staan twee beeldjes
van Winston Churchill. Deze Britse politicus wist na de Tweede
Wereldoorlog één ding zeker: alleen met een verenigd Europa kon
vrede en veiligheid gewaarborgd worden.
Tegen
de tijdgeest in stond hij op voor meer Europese samenwerking, en met
die boodschap reisde hij het hele continent over. Hoe actueel! Hoe
inspirerend! Daarover vertelt Pechtold in Optimist in de politiek én
in deze video! #optimist
MIJN
HELD: Alexander Pechtold over Winston Churchill
D66-leider
Alexander Pechtold is fan van Winston Churchill. Hij roemt Churchill
– premier van Groot-Brittannië van 1940 tot 1945 – als belangrijkste
pleitbezorger van het Europese eenwordingsideaal.
England
celebrates their genocides. The ‘Winston Churchill note’ has
entered circulation. Honouring a man who swilled on champagne
while 4 million men, women and children in Bengal starved due to his
racist colonial policies.
The trial of Churchill:
Churchill
was a genocidal maniac. He is fawned over in Britain and held up as a
hero of the nation. He was voted ‘Greatest Briton’ of all time.
Below is the real history of Churchill, the history of a white
supremacist whose hatred for Indians led to four million
starving to death, the man who loathed Irish people so much he
conceived different ways to terrorise them, the racist thug who waged
war on black people across Africa and in Britain. This is the trial
of Winston Churchill, the enemy of all humanity.
THE
TRIAL OF WINSTON CHURCHILL:
Afghanistan:
Churchill
found his love for war during the time he spent in Afghanistan. While
there he said “all who resist will be killed without quarter”
because the Pashtuns need “recognise the superiority of race”. He
believed the Pashtuns needed to be dealt with, he would reminisce in
his writings about how he partook in the burning villages and peoples
homes:
“We
proceeded systematically, village by village, and we destroyed the
houses, filled up the wells, blew down the towers, cut down the great
shady trees, burned the crops and broke the reservoirs in punitive
devastation.” – Churchill on how the British carried on in
Afghanistan, and he was only too happy to be part of it.
Churchill
would also write of how “every tribesman caught was speared or cut
down at once”. Proud of the terror he helped inflict on the
people of Afghanistan Churchill was well on the road to becoming a
genocidal maniac.
Greece:
The
British Army under the guidance of Churchill perpetrated a massacre
on the streets of Athens in the month of December 1944. 28 protesters
were shot dead, a further 128 injured. The British demanded that all
guerrilla groups should disarm on the 2nd December 1944. The
following day 200,000 people took to the streets, and this is when
the British Army under Churchill’s orders turned their guns on the
people.
Churchill regarded
ELAS (Greek People’s Liberation Army) and EAM (National Liberation
Front) as “miserable banditti”, these were the very people who
ran the Nazis out. His actions in the month of December were purely
out of his hatred and paranoia for communism.
The
British backed the right-wing government in Greece returned from
exile after the very same partisans of the resistance that Churchill
ordered the murder of had driven out the Nazi occupiers. Soviet
forces were well received in Greece, this deeply worried Churchill.
He
planned to restore the monarchy in Greece to combat any possible
communist influence. The events in December were part of that
strategy.
In
1945, Churchill sent Charles Wickham to Athens where he was in charge
of training the Greek security police. Wickham learned his tricks of
the trade in British occupied Ireland between 1922-1945 where he was
a commander of the colonial RUC, responsible for countless terror.
In
April 1945 Churchill said “the [Nazi] collaborators in Greece in
many cases did the best they could to shelter the Greek population
from German oppression” and went on to say “the Communists are
the main foe”.
India:
“I’d
rather see them have a good civil war”. – Churchill
wishing partition on India
Very
few in Britain know about the genocide in Bengal let alone how
Churchill engineered it. Churchill’s hatred for Indians led to four
million starving to death during the Bengal ‘famine’ of 1943. “I
hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion” he
would say.
Bengal
had a better than normal harvest during the British enforced famine.
The British Army took millions of tons of rice from starving people
to ship to the Middle East – where it wasn’t even needed. When
the starving people of Bengal asked for food, Churchill said the
‘famine’ was their own fault “for breeding like rabbits”. The
Viceroy of India said “Churchill’s attitude towards India and the
famine is negligent, hostile and contemptuous”. Even right wing
imperialist Leo Amery who was the British Secretary of State in India
said he “didn’t see much difference between his [Churchill]
outlook and Hitler’s”. Churchill refused all of the offers to
send aid to Bengal, Canada offered 10,000 tons of rice, the U.S
100,000, he just point blank refused to allow it. Churchill was still
swilling champaign while he caused four million men, women and
children to starve to death in Bengal.
Throughout
WW2 India was forced to ‘lend’ Britain money. Churchill
moaned about “Indian money lenders” the whole time. The truth is
Churchill never waged war against fascism.
He
went to war with Germany to defend the British Empire, he said this
about India during WW2 “are we to incur hundreds of millions of
debt for defending India only to be kicked out by the Indians
afterwards”.
In
1945 Churchill said “the Hindus were race protected by their
mere pullulation from the doom that is due”. The Bengal famine
wasn’t enough for Churchill’s blood lust, he wished his
favourite war criminal Arthur Harris could have bombed them.
Iran:
“A
prize from fairyland beyond our wildest dreams” – Churchill on
Iran’s oil
When
Britain seized Iran’s oil industry Churchill proclaimed it was
“a prize from fairyland beyond our wildest dreams”. Churchill
meddled in Iranian affairs for decades, he helped exclude Iranians
from their natural resources and encouraged the looting when most
lived in severe poverty.
In
June 1914 Churchill proposed a bill in the House of Commons that
would see the British government become the major shareholder
of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. The company would go on to refrain
from paying Iran its share of the dividends before paying tax to
the British exchequer. Essentially the British were illegally taxing
the Iranian government.
When
the nationalist government of Mohammad Mosaddegh threatened British
‘interests’ in Iran, Churchill was there, ready to protect them
at any cost. Even if that meant desecrating democracy. He helped
organise a coup against Mosaddegh in August 1953. He told
the CIA operations officer that helped carry out the plan “if i had
been but a few years younger, I would have loved nothing better than
to have served under your command in this great venture”.
Churchill arranged
for the BBC to send coded messages to let the Shah of Iran know that
they were overthrowing the democratically elected government. Instead
of the BBC ending their Persian language news broadcast with “it is
now midnight in London” they under Churchill’s orders said “it
is now exactly midnight”.
Churchill
went on to privately describe the coup as “the finest operation
since the end of the war [WW2]”. Being a proud product of
imperialism he had no issue ousting Mosaddegh so Britain could
get back to sapping the riches of Iran.
Iraq:
“I
am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against the uncivilized
tribes… it would spread a lively terror.” – Churchill on the
use of gas in the Middle East and India
Churchill
was appointed ‘Secretary of State for the Colonies’ in 1921 and
he formed the ‘Middle East Department’ which was responsible for
Iraq. Determined to have his beloved
empire
on the cheap he decided air power could replace ground troops. A
strategy of bombing any resistance to British rule was now employed.
Several
times in the 1920s various groups in the region now known as Iraq
rose up against the British. The air force was then put into action,
indiscriminately bombing civilian areas so to subdue the population.
Churchill
was also an advocate for the use of mustard and poison gases. Whilst
‘Secretary for War and Air’ he advised that “the provision of
some kind of asphyxiating bombs” should be used “for use in
preliminary operations against turbulent tribes” in order to take
control of Iraq.
When
Iraqi tribes stood up for themselves, under the direction of
Churchill the British unleashed terror on mud, stone and reed
villages.
Churchill’s
bombing of civilians in ‘Mesopotamia’ (Kurdistan and Iraq) was
summed up by war criminal ‘Bomber Harris’:
“The
Arab and Kurd now know what real bombing means within 45 minutes a
full-sized village can be practically wiped out, and a third of its
inhabitants killed or injured, by four or five machines which offer
them no real target, no opportunity for glory as warriors, no
effective means of escape”. – Arthur ‘Bomber’ Harris
Ireland:
“We
have always found the Irish a bit odd. They refuse to be English” –
Churchill
In
1904 Churchill said “I remain of the opinion that a separate
parliament for Ireland would be dangerous and impractical”.
Churchill’s ancestry is linked to loyalism to Britain, he is a
direct descendent of the ‘Marquis of Londonderry’ who helped put
down the 1798 United Irishmen rising. He would live up to his
families reputation when it came to suppressing revolutionary forces
in Ireland.
The
Black and Tans were the brainchild of Churchill, he sent the thugs to
Ireland to terrorise at will. Attacking civilians and civilian
property they done Churchill proud, rampaging across the country
carrying out reprisals. He went on to describe them as “gallant and
honourable officers”. It was also Churchill who conceived the
idea of forming the Auxiliaries who carried out the Croke Park
massacre, firing into the crowd at a Gaelic football match, killing
14. Of course this didn’t fulfill Churchill’s bloodlust to
repress as people who he described as “odd” for their refusal “to
be English”, he went on to advocate the use of air power in
Ireland against Sinn Fein members in 1920. He suggested to his
war advisers that aeroplanes should be dispatched with orders to use
“machine-gun fire or bombs” to “scatter and stampede them”.
Churchill
was an early advocate for the partitioning of Ireland. During the
treaty negotiations he insisted on retaining navy bases in Ireland.
In 1938 those bases were handed back to Ireland. However in 1939
Churchill proposed capturing Berehaven base by force. In 1941
Churchill supported a plan to introduce conscription in the North of
Ireland.
Churchill
went on to remark ”the bloody Irish, what have they ever done for
our wars”, reducing Ireland’s merit to what it might provide by
way of resources (people) for their imperialist land grabs.
Kenya:
Britain
declared a state of emergency in Kenya in 1952 to protect its system
of institutionalised racism that they established throughout their
colonies so to exploit the indigenous population. Churchill being
your archetypical British supremacist believed that Kenya’s
fertile highlands should be only for white colonial settlers. He
approved the forcible removal of the local population, which he
termed “blackamoors”.
150,000
men, women and children were forced into concentration camps.
Children’s schools were shut by the British who branded them
“training grounds for rebellion”. Rape, castration, cigarettes,
electric shocks and fire all used by the British to torture the
Kenyan people under Churchill’s watch.
In
1954 in a British cabinet meeting Churchill and his men discussed the
forced labour of Kenyan POWs and how to circumvent the constraints of
two treaties they were breaching:
“This
course [detention without trial and forced labour] had been
recommended despite the fact that it was thought to involve a
technical breach of the Forced Labour Convention of 1930 and the
Convention on Human Rights adopted by the Council of Europe”
The
Cowan Plan advocated the use of force and sometimes death against
Kenyan POWs who refused to work. Churchill schemed to allow this to
continue.
Caroline
Elkins book gives a glimpse into the extent that the crimes in Kenya
were known in both official and unofficial circles in Britain and how
Churchill brushed off the terror the colonial British forces
inflicted on the native population. He even ‘punished’ Edwina
Mountbatten for mentioning it, “Edwina Mountbatten was
conversing about the emergency with India’s prime minister,
Jawaharlal Nehru, and the then colonial secretary, Oliver Lyttleton.
When Lyttleton commented on the “terrible savagery” of Mau Mau…
Churchill retaliated, refusing to allow Lord Mountbatten to take his
wife with him on an official visit to Turkey”.
Palestine:
“I
do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the
manger.”
In
2012 Churchill was honoured with a statue in Jerusalem for his
assistance to Zionism.
He
regarded the Arab population Palestine to be a “lower
manifestation”. And that the “dog in a manger has the final right
to the manger”, by this he meant the Arabs of Palestine.
In
1920 Churchill declared “if, as may well happen, there should be
created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State
under the protection of the British Crown which might comprise three
or four millions of Jews, an event will have occurred in the history
of the world which would from every point of view be beneficial”.
A
year later in Jerusalem he told Palestinian leaders that “it
is manifestly right that the Jews, who are scattered all over the
world, should have a national centre and a National Home where some
of them may be reunited. And where else could that be but in this
land of Palestine, with which for more than 3,000 years they have
been intimately and profoundly associated?”.
At
the Palestine Royal Commission (Peel) of 1937, Churchill stated
that he believed in intention of the Balfour Declaration was to make
Palestine an “overwhelmingly Jewish state”.
He
went on to also express to the Peel Commission that he does “not
admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red
Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit
that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a
stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put
it that way, has come in and taken their place”.
Four
years later he wrote of his desire for a ‘Jewish state’to be
established after the second war world. The establishment of the
colonial settler state however was done on the watch of the British
Labour Party under Attlee, who were always there to back their Tory
counterparts when it came to British foreign policy.
Saudi
Arabia:
“My
admiration for him [Ibn Saud] was deep, because of his unfailing
loyalty to us.” – Churchill
Prior
to 1922 the British were paying Ibn Saud a subsidy of £60,000 a
year. Churchill, then Colonial Secretary, raised it to £100,000.
He
knew of the dangers of wahhabism, but was content to use the House of
Saud’s twisted ideology for benefit of British imperialism.
Just as the British had done a few years earlier when they teamed up
with Al-Saud and their wahhabism to wage an internal war in the
Ottoman Empire. He described Ibn Saud’s wahhabis as
“intolerant, well-armed and bloodthirsty’.
Of course, as long as they were on the side of the British, Winston
was happy.
Churchill
went on to write that his “admiration for him [Ibn Saud] was deep,
because of his unfailing loyalty to us”.
Churchill
meeting with Ibn Saud whom he showered with money and gifts. Britain
foisted Wahhabism on the region. He gifted Ibn Saud a special
Rolls-Royce in the mid 1940s.
South Africa:
Thousands
were sent to British run concentration camps during the Boer wars.
Churchill summed up his time in South Africa by saying “it was
great fun galloping about”.
Churchill
wrote that his only “irritation” during the Boer war was “that
Kaffirs should be allowed to fire on white men”.
It
was Churchill who planted the seed to strip voting rights from black
people in South Africa. In June 1906, Churchill argued that
Afrikaners should be allowed a self-rule which would mean black
people would be excluded from voting.
He
went on to state to Parliament that “we must be bound by the
interpretation which the other party places on it and it is undoubted
that the Boers would regard it as a breach of that treaty if the
franchise were in the first instance extended to any persons who are
not white”.
Other mentions:
‘BRITISH
GUIANA’:
Churchill
ordered the overthrowing of the democratically elected leader of
‘British Guiana’. He dispatched troops and warships and suspended
their constitution all to put a stop to the governments
nationalisation plan.
CHINA:
“I
think we shall have to take the Chinese in hand and regulate them”
– Churchill His hope from this was for “Ayran stock to triumph”…
ERICH
VON MANSTIEN:
Churchill
donated funds for this Nazi war criminals defence when he was on
trial after WW2.
IMMIGRATION
TO BRITAIN:
Churchill
suggested the motto “Keep England White” when debating the
adoption of new laws limiting immigration from the Caribbean.
MUSSOLINI:
Churchill
extolled Mussolini – “If I were Italian, I am sure I would have
been with you entirely from the beginning” and “what a man
[Mussolini] ! I have lost my heart!… Fascism has rendered a service
to the entire world”.
ON
HIS OWN PEOPLE:
Churchill
suggested “100,000 degenerate Britons should be forcibly
sterilised/others put in labour camps to halt decline of British
race”. He also went on to suggest that “for tramps and wastrels
there ought to be proper labour colonies where they could be sent”.
SUDAN:
Churchill
bragged that he personally shot at least three “savages” whilst
there.
ROBERT
EMMET (IRISH REPUBLICAN LEADER):
Churchill
plagiarised his famous “we shall fight on the beaches” from
Emmet’s speech from the dock.
RUSSIA:
He
urged the US to “wipe” out the Kremlin with an atomic bomb hoping
it would “handle the balance of Russia”.
WORLD
WAR 1:
“I
love this war. I know it’s smashing and shattering the lives of
thousands every moment”.
WORLD
WAR 2:
Churchill’s
cabinet during WW2 obsessed about British people viewing black GIs
favorably.
Overigens heeft Churchill in het gebied dat nu Irak wordt genoemd, begin 20er jaren van de vorige eeuw inderdaad een paar keer mosterdgas laten gebruiken tegen opstandige stammen…….
Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht aantreft, dit geldt niet voor de labels: A. Harris en RUC.
Somalische piraten gaven het verdacht snel op en krijgen een vrijgeleide op de koop, uh kaping toe……….
Het was al een paar maanden veel te rustig in de Somalische kustwateren en verdomd, vorige week werd er een olietanker door Somalische piraten gekaapt, ook al was deze kaping van verdacht bijzonder korte duur…….
De piraten zouden de gijzeling hebben opgegeven en mochten aan het eind van de gijzeling zonder problemen wegvaren……… ‘Je zou bijna denken’, dat de gijzeling het werk was, van door de VS betaalde ‘piraten…..’
De marines van verschillende westerse landen (waaronder Nederland) hadden een mooi ‘oefenterrein’ voor de kust van Somalië en (2 vliegen in 1 klap) hadden hun schepen relatief dicht in de buurt van Golf van Aden, de Straat van Hormuz en daarmee van de Perzische Golf. Zeegebieden die met alle ellende in het Midden-Oosten (vooral door het westen veroorzaakt, o.l.v. de VS) van extra belang zijn, niet alleen vanwege hun strategische positie, maar ook daar deze zeegebieden ‘toevallig’ grenzen aan Jemen, Somalië, Irak en Iran………..
Op BBC World Service radio sprak men afgelopen zaterdagmiddag (rond 13.20 u.) over de ‘gijzeling’ en de ‘noodzaak’ blijvend actie te ondernemen in de territoriale wateren van Somalië en aangrenzende wateren. Verdomd beste bezoeker, het viel me alles mee, men noemde ook de oorzaak, die de Somalische piraterij op gang bracht: het leegvissen van de kustwateren van Somalië, zodat Somalische vissers brodeloos zijn geworden en zich ten einde raad op piraterij hebben gericht…..
Bijzonder lullig te horen, dat Frank Gardner, een ‘BBC journalist’, de presentator te verstaan gaf, dat dit leegvissen van de Somalische wateren, door Aziatische vissers gebeurt…… Dit terwijl er jarenlang 12 Franse vis-fabrieksschepen voor de kust van Somalië lagen, die daar 365 dagen per jaar 24 uur per dag de wateren leeg hebben gevist. Schepen met Franse mariniers aan boord….. Niet één keer werd dit ter sprake gebracht in de EU, of werd Frankrijk aangeklaagd voor deze schandalige gang van zaken……..
Terug naar de oorlog: het is niet de bedoeling van de VS, Saoedi-Arabië, Israël en Turkije, dat de lont uit kruitvat Midden-Oosten wordt getrokken…….. Het is zelfs in het belang van deze landen (verdeel en heers, zie het Turkse optreden in Syrië en als ‘t zo uitkomt in Irak), het militair-industrieel complex en de andere op macht beluste landen, dat het Midden-Oosten instabiel blijft…….. Het wachten is nog op een illegale oorlog tegen Iran, al meer dan 3 decennia op ‘de verlanglijst’ van de VS en haar grote vrienden in ongekende terreur: Israël en Saoedi-Arabië……….
Eén ding is zeker: na deze ‘kaping’ zal de roep op westerse marineschepen voor de kust van Somalië weer keihard klinken!!
Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: Gardner, Golf van Aden, Perzische Golf en Straat van Hormuz.
De ex-president van Rusland, of beter gezegd de Sovjet-Unie, Gorbatsjov, liet afgelopen januari weten, dat de wereld zich opmaakt voor oorlog. De redactie van Anti-Media zocht daar aanwijzingen voor en vond er 5, die op 1 maart jl. werden gepubliceerd:
5
Signs We’re Headed Toward a Major War
5 Signs We’re Headed Toward a Major War
(ANTIMEDIA) In
January of this year, former Soviet Union leader Mikhail
Gorbachev warned that
the whole world is preparing for war. There are many indicators that
back up Gorbachev’s assertion, but to discuss them in their
entirety would take a dissertation or two. Instead, we have put
together a list of the five most obvious signs of impending war
currently being overlooked by the media. As a result of these
oversights, the public is also missing them.
1.
Travel Ban
The
Trump administration’s travel ban, which targeted seven
majority-Muslim nations, makes little sense in the context of
fighting international terrorism. A Department of Homeland
Security report already
found no evidence of any extra threat posed by the nations on the
travel ban.
Conversely, a Saudi official has admitted Saudi
Arabia’s longstanding practice of supporting terrorism as a
political tool, yet Saudi Arabia managed to escape the list. So did
Turkey, a country that has extensively
aided ISIS fighters;
Qatar, which has spent immense
amounts of
money arming fanatical jihadists; the United
Arab Emirates (where
the majority of the funding for the 9/11 attacks passed through), and
the list goes on.
Instead,
the travel ban was purely
political.
With help
from the anti-Trump media establishment,
the ban worked wonders separating the American public between those
who oppose Trump’s every move and those who support him
wholeheartedly in his quest to “make America great again.” But
little attention was paid to the reality of the ban.
Six
of the seven countries on Trump’s travel ban were featured in a
memo that was adopted shortly after 9/11 that detailed how the U.S.
was going to topple the governments of seven countries, as exposed by
four-star General Wesley Clark. The countries featured on Clark’s
list were Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Iran.
Including
Iran in the travel ban — despite the fact Iran is not currently
embroiled in a major civil conflict of its own, is not currently
bombing any other countries, and is one of the major
partners in the fight against ISIS —
demonstrates something more sinister at play than mere concerns
regarding international terrorism.
2.
Trump’s anti-Iran rhetoric
The
Obama administration, having successfully taken out Libya in 2011,
was tasked with finishing the job in Syria and toppling the Assad
regime. Overwhelming
support for
Syrian rebels battling the Syrian government was replaced
by urgent calls to intervene directly in 2013,
but Obama failed to gain international and public support for
airstrikes on the Syrian government. Russia diplomatically put its
hand up to offer a different proposal altogether, also warning that
“[they]
have [their] plans”
should the American military decide to strike Syria as Obama
intended. Any speculation that the real focus of the Syrian war was
aimed at Iran was proven to be not just mere conjecture; Obama
immediately thereafter warned Iran
that just because the U.S. did not attack Syria did not mean the U.S.
wouldn’t still strike Iran over its alleged nuclear program.
The
Russian military intervened overtly in Syria in 2015, which only
further foiled Washington’s plans for regime change in the country,
as admitted by former Secretary of State John Kerry in a leaked
audio recording.
As
such, the Trump administration has appeared to move the focus away
from Syria and directly back to Iran, in line George
W. Bush’s approach
when he was in office.
Trump
has assembled a
team that is “obsessed with Iran” and has accused Iran
of being the biggest state sponsor of terrorism. Theresa May, the
prime minister of the United Kingdom, also stated that
pushing back on “Iran’s
aggressive efforts” to
increase its “arc
of influence from Tehran through to the Mediterranean” was
a “priority.” Trump
was likely thrilled by these statements, as May
successfully secured 100
percent support for NATO from Trump the next day.
Following
an Iranian missile launch, the Trump administration officially
put “Iran
on notice.” The U.S. government wanted to make sure the
Iranians “understood
we are not going to sit by and not act on their actions.”
Just
this past month, Trump warned in a tweet that
Iran was “playing with fire,” and he vowed he would not be
anywhere near as “kind” as his predecessor was to Iran. This is
important because Trump has accused Iran of breaching its obligations
under the nuclear agreement, though the nuclear agreement does
not prohibit non-nuclear tests.
The
nuclear deal reached in 2015 was viewed as one of Obama’s greatest
diplomatic achievements, but in reality, it was doomed to fail right
from the start. In the same way Libya was coaxed out of rapidly
advancing its weapons programs before
being bombed back
into the Middle Ages in 2011, it may be the case that this diplomatic
approach to Iran was always a smokescreen to give the United States
more ‘reasoned’ leverage when attempting to convince the
international arena that a strike on Iran was justified.
As
outlined in the book “Which
Path to Persia? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran”:
“For
those who favor regime change or a military attack on Iran (either by
the United States or Israel), there is a strong argument to be made
for trying this option first. Inciting regime change in Iran would be
greatly assisted by convincing the Iranian people that their
government is so ideologically blinkered that it refuses to do what
is best for the people and instead clings to a policy that could only
bring ruin on the country. The ideal scenario
in this case would be that the United States and the international
community present a package of positive inducements so enticing that
the Iranian citizenry would support the deal, only to have the regime
reject it. In a similar
vein, any military operation against Iran will likely be very
unpopular around the world and require the proper international
context – both to ensure the logistical support the operation would
require and to minimize the blowback from it. The
best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support
(however grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a
widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected
a superb offer – one so good that only a regime determined to
acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would
turn it down.” [emphasis
added]
By
claiming that through its missile tests Iran is violating a deal
that Trump
never supported to
begin with, he can lay the groundwork for an all-out confrontation
with Iran that could garner support from the international community,
as well as the misinformed American public.
3.
Iran dumps dollar
Currency
is a major driving factor behind the wars of our generation. Iraq
reportedly gave up
the U.S. dollar in 2000 for the euro and netted a “handsome profit”
for doing so. The U.S. military invaded in 2003 and
immediately switched oil sales in
Iraq from the euro back to the dollar. Iraq was also under heavy U.S.
sanctions that spanned
the course of at least a decade prior
to the invasion.
Comparatively,
in response to Trump’s anti-Iran rhetoric and the travel ban, Iran
officially dumped the
U.S. dollar. Iran has also been on the receiving
end of sanctions since
the Bush administration, and Trump has slapped fresh
sanctions on Iran over the missile tests.
In
the lead up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, our television sets
were rife with
an unprecedented amount of disinformation regarding Iraq’s nuclear
program and the threat it posed to the world. Conversely, Israel
has been crying wolf over Iran’s nuclear program for
at least two decades, yet no actual evidence of an Iranian nuclear
weapons program has been produced.
The
Trump administration also accused Iran
of attacking a U.S. navy vessel – an attack that never took place.
Make
no mistake. The Trump administration is laying the groundwork for a
war with Iran by sowing the anti-Iranian seeds necessary to take the
American public into another dangerous war in the Middle East.
4.
Syria
While
Trump appeared at first to have heralded
a new approach to the Syrian conflict,
namely that Assad should be left alone and the real focus of American
foreign policy should be on defeating ISIS, the Trump administration
is stepping up its Syria operation behind the curtains. Trump is
reportedly planning to
send troops to Syria, and he is not the only external power doing so.
Iran’s regional arch-rival Saudi Arabia, which has incessantly
accused Tehran of backing rebels in neighboring Yemen without
producing any real evidence,
is also reportedly sending
troops into Syria.
Iranian-backed
regime troops will not look favorably on any foreign invading force,
particularly Saudi troops. Saudi Arabia has already made it clear
that it intends to liberate areas of Syria from ISIS and will be on
the ground to ensure that “liberated areas [do] not fall
under the control of Hizballah, Iran or the regime.”
How
far will they go to ensure this? Not to mention, how can one country
go into another and say that they want to ensure that the land does
not fall back into the hands of the people governing that country?
5.
Military drills and military alliances
The
United States and the United
Kingdom have
already begun military drills that simulate a potential conflict with
Iran. As reported by Russian-state owned news site RT,
Iran has staged a
“massive” military drill of its own, spanning 2 million square
kilometers.
This
preparation for war can be seen across the globe. Russia is
also holding
military drills as NATO
troops and tanks encroach upon
its border. Iran is seeking even closer military relations with
Russia and North
Korea.
The Baltic states that border Russia are running
drills,
too, supposedly out of fear that the Kremlin will invade. Russia’s
longstanding ally, China,
is also currently running drills for its own geostrategic
purposes.
Germany
is reportedly seeking to increase
its troop numbers to
200,000 troops even though such a move may put its neighbors on edge.
The Philippines, having decided to give the political middle finger
to the United States and instead forge closer relations with Russia
and China, welcomed
Russian warships to
its shores in January of this year.
Looking
at these military drills and alliances in the context of the above
developments paints a very grim picture for where humanity is headed.
***
War
with Iran: too unthinkable?
The
only rational criticism pundits have given
regarding Anti-Media’s previous
warnings of war is that because a war with Iran would be so
unthinkable, the Trump administration would never be so reckless as
to pursue it. Critics who hold such a view always neglect two very
important points: firstly, the United States under the Obama
administration was vehemently
opposed to the Assad regime in Syria.
The previous U.S. administration resorted
to directly targeting Syrian troops in
the middle of what was supposed to be a peace process, all with full
knowledge that the Assad regime is bound to Iran by a mutual defense
agreement. Secondly, America’s Middle Eastern power, Israel, has
also attacked Syria multiple
times since 2011,
targeting Iranian military personnel and their proxies.
Those
who think a war with Iran is unthinkable cannot answer the question:
what if Iran were to respond directly?
Think
of it like the current
to and fro between
Floyd Mayweather and UFC champion Conor McGregor. The two sides talk
tough and
attempt to provoke each other to set the mood for the current
conflict. Plenty of speculation occurs about whether one side is
bluffing and whether
or not the fight could possibly occur in the near future.
There is even the idea that such a fight would be so disastrous for
one of the sides (or both) that there is nothing to gain from
pursuing it.
But
all it takes is one wrong move; one reckless, cowardly, ill-advised
decision from either side and the entire Middle Eastern powder
keg could explode.
Trump
ordered a raid on Yemen that even war hawk Barack Obama disapproved
of because it was deemed too risky, and the raid
was an instant failure that
killed multiple civilians. This is the same president who turns down
dinners because he cannot face the torment of the liberal media and
instead forms
his opinions from Fox
News before
taking to Twitter.
De enorme fascist (letterlijk en figuurlijk) Lieberman, heeft zijn pijlen op Iran gericht (oké dat was al zo, maar nu vliegt de papzak echt met 80 uit de bocht!). WDR 5 meldde gistermiddag (rond 13.07 u.), dat Lieberman Iran een groot gevaar voor de stabiliteit in de regio heeft genoemd…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!
Jezus, en dat voor een vertegenwoordiger van een fascistische apartheidsstaat, die aan iedereen die het maar wil wapens verkoopt (ik geloof dat alleen de Palestijnen en Iran zijn uitgezonderd, hoewel als de opbrengsten maar groot genoeg zijn, men die natuurlijk via een omweg kan beleveren……)………
Israël de grote vriend van de twee grootste terreurentiteiten op aarde, te weten de VS en Saoedi-Arabië, waar Israël uiteraard op de derde plek volgt van wat terreur uitoefening betreft…… Bovendien helpt Israël de twee voornoemde landen hun terreur in te zetten, zoals dit land dit doet in Syrië….. Daarnaast heeft Israël meer dan een jaar lang, de gewonde IS strijders uit Syrië opgelapt en dat op de door Israël illegaal bezette Golanhoogten……..
Iran heeft nooit zelf een land aangevallen, maar heeft zich o.a. verdedigd tegen de agressie van de VS en Irak*…… Israël pikt bijna dagelijks land in van machteloze Palestijnse boeren en burgers……… Of neem de enorme bloedbaden, die Israël aanricht in de openluchtgevangenis Gazastrook……..Maar volgens Lieberman is Iran uit op expansie en is het ‘s werelds grootste terreur financier……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Voor deze enorme leugen: zie nogmaals het hiervoorgaande!!
Israël schijnt voorts fascistische bewegingen in het buitenland te financieren, zoals de PVV, waarmee Israël meehelpt aan haat- en angstzaaien tegen minderheden in ons land….. Mede daardoor komen die minderheden bloot te staan aan vervolging door neonazi’s, fascisten en misleidde ‘onderbuikers…………’
* Onder Hoessein, die destijds de steun had van de VS. Waar pleefiguur en VVD oplichter Bolkestein exportvergunningen voor Irak afgaf. Exportvergunningen voor grondstoffen t.b.v. het produceren van gifgas, waarmee vervolgens duizenden Koerden gruwelijk werden vermoord (dit onder het CDA bedrijvenkabinet Lubbers; over waarden en normen gesproken….)….
Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.
Afgelopen zondag heeft Iran een middellangeafstandsraket gelanceerd, waarbij de raket na 900 kilometer actief dan wel passief neerstortte.
Vandaag staat de halve wereld op de kop vanwege deze lancering. Zo ook Nederland, vanmorgen was BNR rollade Bernard Hammelburg te horen, die heel verrassend plotseling ook raketdeskundige is.
Volgens Hammelburg is het zeker, dat deze lancering van alles te maken heeft met het inreisverbod dat Trump afkondigde voor burgers uit een zevental islamlanden (waar het islamland, dat daadwerkelijk een aantal islamterroristen leverde, Saoedi-Arabië, niet genoemd staat…. ha! ha! ha!)……
Helaas is de deskundigheid van Hammelburg op raketgebied niet erg groot, anders had hij geweten, dat het afschieten van een dergelijke raket in ‘vredestijd’, fiks wat voorbereiding kost…… (en nee, ik ben geen raketdeskundige)
Hammelburg stelde verder, dat Iran een dergelijke raket niet mag afschieten, volgens een VN akkoord, nadat Iran een akkoord sloot over kernenergie met een aantal kernmachten en Duitsland. Helaas voor Hammelburg, dat mocht met dit kernenergieakkoord nu juist wel, immers Iran kan nu geen plutonium verrijken en dus geen kernbom fabriceren!!
Wat een gelul mensen: de BBC trekt weer van leer tegen Iran en meldt dat men in Israël enorm bezorgd is, over het afschieten van die raket. Terwijl Israël NB zelf een kernmacht is en uiterst agressief tekeer gaat, niet alleen in eigen land, maar ook in het buitenland als het zo uitkomt, zoals onlangs in Syrië……… Met andere woorden: als er één land agressief is in het midden-Oosten, is het Israël wel!!
‘Uiteraard’ staan in de VS alle seinen weer op rood……..
Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.
In het NOS radionieuws (R1) van gistermiddag 15.30 u. het bericht dat Amnesty International sjiitische milities in Irak, in de strijd tegen IS (zoals in en rond Mosul), zich schuldig maken aan oorlogsmisdaden, gepleegd met wapens uit Iran………
Wist niet, dat Amnesty zich tegenwoordig laat gebruiken voor oorlogshitserij…….. Journalisten mogen Mosul en gebieden rond Mosul niet in, daar het ‘te gevaarlijk’ zou zijn, derhalve is de bron die overblijft bewoners en families van IS strijders en deze strijders zelf………
Op de Engelse ‘website’ van Amnesty een uitvoerig verhaal, waar men in aanvang de landen noemt die wapens leveren aan de milities in Irak, waar A.I. vervolgens de VS, Rusland, ‘Europese landen’ (dat is Rusland deels ook..) en Iran noemt. Overigens wordt in dat bericht één man opgevoerd, met een getuigenis over het gemarteld zijn door sjiitische milities……….
Vervolgens een verhaal waarin die milities plotsklaps zijn gereduceerd tot sjiitische milities en tot slot blijven dan de wapenleveranties van Iran over………
Waar er wordt gevochten door de ‘Irak-coalitie’ (o.l.v. de VS, de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde) in Mosul of daarbuiten, worden oorlogsmisdaden gepleegd, ook door IS, vandaar dat ook de ‘Irak-coalitie’ geen pottenkijkers duldt……..
‘Mooi voorbeeld’ van gekleurde berichtgeving in Nederland, was het optreden van Hans Jaap Melissen een paar weken geleden op Radio1*. De namaak oorlogscorrespondent was embedded bij het Iraakse leger en mocht tijdens zijn bezoek, geen stap in Mosul zetten, terwijl die strijd (waarbij veel burgers om het leven kwamen), het onderwerp van de uitzendingen was…… Over het niet vanuit Mosul kunnen rapporteren, was Melissen vervolgens ook nog enigszins verbaasd………. Uiteraard moest de flapdrol uitvoerig vertellen, hoe gevaarlijk zijn werk ‘wel niet was….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!
Dit is maar één voorbeeld, ik weet niet hoe het met uw kennis over de strijd in Mosul gesteld is, maar ik heb in de reguliere (massa-) media amper berichten over burgerslachtoffers in Mosul gelezen, terwijl die daar op grote schaal zijn omgekomen door de strijd tegen IS………
De oorlogsmisdaden die in Irak worden gepleegd, worden voor het overgrote deel met wapens van Saoedi-Arabië en de VS gepleegd, wapens die ook worden gebruikt door IS, immers die werden hen in grote getale geleverd door de VS, Turkije en S-A, vaak inclusief training………… Dat sjiieten zich te buiten gaan aan geweld tegen soennieten is allang geen nieuws meer; dat dit te wijten is aan de illegale oorlog die de VS tegen Irak begon in 2003, wordt in de reguliere berichtgeving maar verzwegen……
Trouwens naast die gigantische misdaad, het beginnen van een illegale oorlog tegen Irak, heeft de VS zelf de laatste jaren meermaals grote oorlogsmisdaden begaan in Irak, neem de herovering van Fallujah eind juni vorig jaar**, dat was bij mijn weten, de tweede keer dat de VS in die stad vreselijke oorlogsmisdaden beging……….
Nogmaals wordt met dit bericht van Amnesty duidelijk gemaakt, dat na het verlies van Aleppo, de VS coalitie wraak wil, niet alleen tegen de Russen, maar ook tegen Iran, die van alle kanten plots wordt beschuldigd van buitenlandse agressie en het steunen van terreur……. Terwijl alle terreur, van groepen als Al Qaida, al-Nusra, IS en andere ‘ gematigde’ terroristen uit de soennitische hoek komt. Dat geld overigens ook voor de vreselijke terreur die Saoedi-Arabië uitoefent op Jemen, waar o.a. 2 miljoen kinderen dreigen te verhongeren…… Saoedi-Arabië is een reli-fascistische staat, onder soennitische vlag en wordt van alle kanten gesteund door het westen, met de VS voorop………..
Waar was A.I. toen IS in Mosul en andere steden, o.a. Aleppo, samen met andere ‘gematigde rebellen’ een waar terreurbewind uitoefenden op de bevolking in die steden (overigens is dit nog steeds aan de hand in Mosul!!)……… Mosul is maar één van de steden in Irak die met grof geweld tegen de bewoners wordt ontzet, lullig genoeg schrijven de reguliere (massa) media daar niet over, dit in zware tegenstelling tot de leugenachtige propaganda berichtgeving over de bevrijding van Oost-Aleppo……. Kan me bovendien geen commentaar van A.I. herinneren, dit ook alweer in totale tegenstelling met het ontzetten van Aleppo door het reguliere Syrische leger en de Russen……..
Overigens wordt het Iraakse leger geleid en hoofdzakelijk ‘bevolkt’ door sjiieten……..
