De VN ondersteunt de VS, het Vierde Rijk……….

De VN is een verlengstuk geworden van de VS, dat je met het grootste gemak het Vierde Rijk kan noemen, gezien de ongeremde agressie en terreur die dit land over een flink deel van de wereld uitstort.

Wel vreemd, als je in ogenschouw neemt, dat de opvolgende VS regeringen en een groot deel van haar gehersenspoelde burgers vinden dat de VN de VS financieel leegzuigt……. Echter als je de geschiedenis van de VN bekijkt, zie je dat de VN keer op keer de terreur van de VS van een legitieme rand voorziet….

Het is intussen al zo zot, dat zelfs de vertegenwoordigingen van China en Rusland in de VN zich nog amper durven te verzetten tegen de ongebreidelde agressie van de VS, zie bijvoorbeeld de sancties die tegen Noord-Korea werden genomen……… Nogal wiedes dat Noord-Korea een atoomwapen wil hebben als bescherming tegen de VS, zeker als je ziet dat de VS dit land tijdens de Koreaanse oorlog volkomen heeft platgebombardeerd (men had op een geven moment geen doelen meer over om te bombarderen…)….

De schrijver van het volgende artikel (van Anti-Media, oorspronkelijk geplaatst op Consortium News), JP Sottile betoogt dat de VS  de VN gebruikt als een regering voor de wereld, een regering waarin de VS de dienst uitmaakt (en mocht die regering niet doen wat de VS wil, grijpt de VS zelf in waarna de VN alsnog haar goedkeuring geeft……..)….

Nooit werd de VS gestraft door de VN, behalve dan ‘een gevalletje mijnen leggen’ voor de havens van Nicaragua, waarvoor de VS alleen werd veroordeeld in de VN, maar niet werd gestraft…… Nu komt de VS zelfs weg met illegale oorlogen en duizenden (illegale) standrechtelijke executies, waarbij meer dan 90% van de vermoorde slachtoffers, veelal vrouwen en kinderen, niet eens werden verdacht…… Het Internationaal Strafhof in Den Haag is te schijterig om ook maar één zaak tegen de VS te beginnen……. Vergeet niet dat de VS sinds het eind van WOII meer dan 22 miljoen mensen ongestraft heeft kunnen vermoorden……

Lees het uitstekende artikel van Sottile, vol met nog veel meer feiten:

How
the United Nations Supports the American Empire

September
21, 2017 at 8:19 am

Written
by 
JP
Sottile

For
decades the American Right has decried the U.N. for encroaching on
American sovereignty, but the truth is that the U.N. is a chief U.S.
accomplice in violating the sovereignty of other nations, notes J.P.
Sottile.

(CN) — President
Trump opened his big United Nations week … and his famous mouth …
with a 
predictable
plug
 for
one of his properties and 
some
playful glad-handing
 with
French President Emmanuel Macron. Trump also 
scolded the
U.N.’s unwieldy scrum for “not living up to its potential.” He
made a passing reference to the U.N.’s wasteful use of American
money. And he called for “reform” of
the 
much-maligned international
forum.

It
was a 
stolid
prelude
 to
what will no doubt be “must-see” TV when he speaks to the 
UN
General Assembly
 on
Tuesday about North Korea and Iran. And it was a far cry from the way
America’s leading “America Firster” spent the
campaign 
lamenting
how unfair the U.N
.
is to the poor schlemiel we call Uncle Sam.

He
is likely to use his speech to throw a little bit of that same red
meat to his base, but his call for reform falls well short of
what 
his
supporters want
 …
which is an abrupt end of U.S. involvement in the international body.
They are motivated by a grab-bag of reasons that point to the U.N.
being a threat to their guns, their bank accounts and their God-given
freedom.

Oddly
enough, these conspiratorial narratives have been around for decades
and they mostly center on a grand plan by U.N. elites to abscond
American sovereignty and dissolve the U.S. into a U.N.-led world
government. And the evidence of this is the way the U.N. harasses and
restricts Uncle Sam while siphoning-off America’s wealth. At least,
that’s what some think.

Most
ominously, many object to the way U.N. funds are being used to
quietly deploy 
gun-grabbing
U.N. soldiers
 in
advance of 
the
big takeover
.
But like so much of Trump’s 
intoxicating
irredentism
 …
this is a grievance more likely rooted in a three-day meth bender in
a Tallahassee trailer park than it is from shocking evidence gathered
from well-traveled observation. It’s paranoia. But really, it’s
worse than that.

Why?
Because the U.N. has basically been the complete opposite of what its
angriest critics claim. It is not out to get the U.S. Rather, it has
largely been America’s tool since its inception and, in particular,
it has repeatedly covered Uncle Sam’s overly-exposed butt as he
(a.k.a. “the royal we”) has gone around the world on a three
decade-long military bender since the end of the Cold War.

Yes,
the Gulf War was U.N. approved and the whole world got behind it
because (
April
Glaspie’s backstory
 notwithstanding)
the 
prima
facie
 case
was strong and it was a fairly clear-cut example of unwarranted
aggression. That was an easy call.

Global
Violence

But
since then, the calls have been nothing short of murky as the U.S.
has bombed and droned and deployed and invaded and covertly-acted and
regime-changed all around the globe. And the unspoken truth is that
the United Nations has been America’s all-too silent partner as
Uncle Sam traipsed around the planet with a loaded gun, remote
control assassination machines and paper-thin rationales for
intervention.

Although
the U.N. occasionally puts a bug up Israeli Prime Minister
Bibi Netanyahu’s ass on the issue of the slow-motion ethnic
cleansing in the West Bank … what other issue is there where the
U.N. has taken a real stand against the U.S. or U.S. policy
objectives?

Where
is the U.N.’s punishment for being lied to by then-Secretary of
State Colin Powell?  And where is the punishment for destroying
a bystander nation under false pretenses? Where is the punishment for
Abu Ghraib or Gitmo?

Where
is the punishment for America’s summary execution of “suspected
militants” around the Muslim world simply because they are of
“military age” and in the wrong place at the right time … and
for the CIA, it is always the right time to kill a suspect no matter
how wrong the place many be. And where is the condemnation of
America’s destabilizing role as the 
world’s
leading supermarket of military hardware
?

How
about mounting civilian causalities from an ever-widening widening
bombing campaign? The U.N. can say the killings are “
unacceptable,”
but does it really matter if there is no sanction? There haven’t
been any sanctions after children were killed in a “
U.S.-backed
raid

in Somalia.  Go figure, right?

Or
what about America’s complicity in the catastrophe of Yemen? Where
are those sanctions? And what exactly has the U.N. done to punish any
number of extra-legal maneuver by a succession of American presidents
over the course of the “Global War on Terror”? The simple answer
is nothing.

Instead,
the Secretary General is largely beholden to the disproportionate
influence of the United States. The Security Council’s agenda is
basically set by the United States … and that’s particularly true
since the Soviet Union collapsed. At the same time, the U.N.’s
occasionally contentious debates do little more than offer the
imprimatur of international approbation or well-noted disdain despite
the functionally inconsequential nature of those debates.

A
Fig Leaf for Empire

Either
way it is a win for Uncle Sam because the presence of a neutered
United Nations provides the United States with a fig leaf just big
enough to cover the dangly parts of America’s otherwise naked
empire.

The
money that does go from the U.S. Treasury into the minutia around the
margins … like UNESCO programs and United Nations Development
Program (UNDP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) and all the
other little crumbs that get thrown around the world … these are
payoffs. This is what the world gets for mostly keeping its mouth
shut in the face of America’s globe-spanning empire. The tiny
amount of aid that trickles down past the bureaucracy … much like
the bureaucracy itself … is not an example of America “getting
played” by wasteful foreigners with hidden agendas. This is America
paying to play the world like organ grinder with a hurdy-gurdy
monkey.

Frankly,
the “
28.5%
of the overall peacekeeping bill

that Trump calls “unfair” (
about
$2.2 billion of the $3.3 billion the U.S. gives to the UN annually
)
is a pittance … particularly if you want the unchecked right to
tell Persians what they can and cannot do in the Persian Gulf, to
tell the Chinese what they can and cannot build in the South China
Sea, and to tell every other power on the face of the earth why they
cannot have the same nuclear capability America not only has … but
is currently “upgrading” 
to
the tune of $1.5 trillion
.

Even
more amazingly, the U.S. wants to deny these nations the only real
insurance policy against U.S.-led regime change. And why is that?
Because there ain’t a 
Curveball’s chance
in Hell that the U.N. will ever be able to stop Uncle Sam from
marching where he wants, when he wants and for whatever reason he
wants to cook-up. That’s a 
historically
provable fact
.

The
only real check on U.S. power is the ability of an asymmetrical power
to go nuclear. And let’s admit it, they are ALL asymmetrical powers
when compared to America’s gargantuan, 
trillion-dollar
national security beast
.
And this is why the U.N.’s “partnership” with
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is the only U.N.-associated
agency that really matters. They can’t do much, but they can throw
a wrench into another WMD snipe hunt … 
like
they are doing now with the Iran Nuclear Deal
.

But
like it was tested by Team Bush, the IAEA is going to be tested again
as Trump and Netanyahu 
make
their bogus case
 …
without a hint of irony … that Iran is the world’s greatest
threat. But that’s really just par for a course that’s riddled
with falsified flags haphazardly stuck into the shallow holes of a
back nine that’s actually been built by and for a club-wielding
Uncle Sam.

A
Cult of Grievance

And
therein lies the truly pernicious part of the Trumped-up case against
the U.N. … because, like so much of America’s growing cult of
grievance, it reflects an ever-widening gap between America’s
stated ideals and its self-serving behavior around the world.


As
we are learning almost daily, Americans tried to square that circle
by electing a profligate liar who fully embodies America’s
insatiable desire to take credit, particularly where none is due …
and to outsource the blame to scapegoats like the U.N., particularly
when the only alternative is a long look into the mirror.

And
in the case of the U.N., that projected guilt is in spite of the fact
that it is often tasked with quietly cleaning up some of the
collateral damage wrought by their main accuser. They just have to do
so without any real power or the funds to do the job. That’s the
simple truth you won’t hear in Trump’s speech … or any speech,
for that matter.

It’s
the fact that the U.N.’s meager amount of “wasteful spending”
doesn’t even begin to cover the cost of doing business when your
business depends of paying the world to look the other way while you
get away with murder.

JP
Sottile is a freelance journalist, radio co-host, documentary
filmmaker and former broadcast news producer in Washington, D.C. He
blogs at 
Newsvandal.com or
you can 
follow
him on Twitter
.

By
JP Sottile / Republished with permission / 
Consortium
News

Giro d’Italia gaat volgend jaar in Jeruzalem van start, tenzij……….

Zoals al eerder op deze plek bericht: volgend jaar is het de bedoeling dat de Giro ‘d Italia van start zal gaan in Jeruzalem*. Zoals presentator van het onafhankelijke Radio1 Journaal, Jurgen van den Berg, eerder grinnikend opmerkte, een mooie manier voor de promotie van de fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël (u begrijpt waarschijnlijk wel dat de toevoegingen over Israël van mijn hand zijn)

Met deze start in Israël wil de organisator van de Giro een extra feestelijk tintje geven aan het 70 jarig bestaan van de staat Israël; 70 jaar geleden, het moment waarop de ellende voor de Palestijnen (al-Nakba) pas echt ‘goed begon….’

Gisteren ontving ik een schrijven van de Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI), met een verzoek te tekenen voor een petitie aan de organisator van de Giro d’Italia, een verzoek dit onzalige plan af te schieten en de Giro buiten Israël te starten. Lees en teken de petitie a.u.b. en geeft het door!!

Don’t
Pedal for Israeli Crimes: Tell Giro d’Italia to Steer Clear of
Apartheid

Organizers
of the famed Italian cycling race Giro d’Italia have announced the
start of the 2018 edition from Israel, starting in Jerusalem followed
by stages from Haifa to Tel Aviv and in the Naqab (Negev).  
Read
the PACBI press release
.

The
race will ‘celebrate’ the 70th anniversary of Israel’s
establishment on the ruins of the Palestinian homeland and through
the ethnic cleansing, or Nakba, of a majority of the indigenous
Palestinians.

We
have to act 
to
stop this sports-washing of Israel’s occupation and apartheid,
dubbed by the media as “
a
big political coup
 for
[Israel], which has been striving to paint a picture of ‘normal’
life.”  

Join
us in telling organizers RCS to #RelocateTheRace

and
cycle away from Israel’s occupation and apartheid.

The
Giro d’Italia will serve to 
institutionalize
Israel’s hold on Jerusalem
.
One Israeli official after another laid claims to Jerusalem as
Israel’s capital during the announcement ceremony, 
something
no other country in the world recognizes
.
The Jerusalem Municipality is actively involved in the illegal
gradual ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, including through home
demolitions and forced expulsions as a 
matter
of policy
.

In
the Naqab (Negev) in the south of present-day Israel, dozens of
Palestinian Bedouin towns are 
refused
recognition and basic services
,
and subjected to 
repeated
demolitions, some 
over
100 times
.
Israel is also 
revoking
the citizenship
 of
Palestinian Bedouins for no reason, leaving them stateless.

Starting
the race anywhere under Israel’s control will serve as a 
stamp
of approval for Israel’s oppression of Palestinians
.
Would the Giro d’Italia have considered starting a race in
apartheid South Africa in the 1980s?

Take
action now
 to
pressure RCS to
respect international law and relocate the race.

Let’s
make sure RCS and cycling teams get the message: stop sports-washing
Israel’s egregious human rights violations, move the race start to
another country!

#RelocateTheRace!

Palestinian
Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel 
  

=====================================

* Zie: ‘Giro d’Italia van start in Jeruzalem, ‘een mooie manier’ om Israël te promoten, aldus NOS presentator van den Berg……..

       en: ‘Sjors Fröhlich (chef BNR): de rechtspraak in Israël is oké……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘‘Israel Anti-Boycott Act’: Dood aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting in de VS >> bij invoering is politiestaat VS volledig!!

Sjors Fröhlich (chef BNR): de rechtspraak in Israël is oké……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

In het kader van ‘de ware christen’ verloochend de fanatieke zionisten niet*, liet Sjors Fröhlich op 8 augustus jl. in het Mediaforum op Radio1 weten, dat de rechtspraak in Israël oké is……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Fröhlich heeft wel lef, hij durft zich ‘onafhankelijk journalist’ te noemen….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Journalist is hij nooit geweest en hetzelfde geldt voor z’n onafhankelijkheid!!

Israël houdt als ik me niet vergis meer dan 1.000 mensen (waaronder kinderen….**) gevangen, die niet eens zijn veroordeeld door de rechter, voorts is een groot aantal Palestijnen niet door de ‘gewone rechter’ veroordeeld, maar door een militaire rechtbank en zoals u weet, die rechtbanken hebben niets met justitie en gerechtigheid te maken en zouden derhalve overal moeten worden afgeschaft….

En wat dacht u van de legitimiteit van een rechtssysteem: -dat niet alleen toestaat dat burgers door een militaire rechtbank worden veroordeeld, -dat kinderen gevangen houdt, -dat mensen zonder veroordeling of rechtszaak gevangen houdt, maar ook toestaat -dat de overheid haar gang laat gaan, Palestijnse burgers het leven onmogelijk te maken en hen heeft gereduceerd tot 3de klas burgers, zonder enig recht……..

Nee, echt ‘geweldige rechtspraak’ in Israël Fröhlich……….

*  Zionisten die uit wraak voor de holocaust in Europa nu een volk barbaars onderdrukken, te weten de Palestijnen die met die holocaust niets van doen hadden…….

** In 2013 zaten er bijvoorbeeld 36 Palestijnse kinderen onder de 16 jaar gevangen in Israëlische cellen, een heftige schending van de Rechten van het Kind (in dat jaar zaten er in totaal 195  Palestijnse kinderen gevangen in de fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël…….).

Zie ook: ‘Giro d’Italia van start in Jeruzalem, een mooie manier om Israël te promoten, aldus NOS presentator van den Berg……..

        en: ‘‘Israel Anti-Boycott Act’: Dood aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting in de VS >> bij invoering is politiestaat VS volledig!!

      en: ‘Giro d’Italia gaat volgend jaar in Jeruzalem van start, tenzij……….

VS hulp aan orkaanslachtoffers Houston en het verschil met hulp aan Israël………

De volgende voor zichzelf sprekende collage, vond ik op het blog van Stan van Houcke:

De hoogste tijd voor een revolutie in de VS, waardoor de wereld eindelijk kan ademhalen zonder de terreur van dit land, het land dat men ‘verkreeg’ (gestolen) middels een enorme genocide op de oorspronkelijke bevolking……

‘Israel Anti-Boycott Act’: Dood aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting in de VS >> bij invoering is politiestaat VS volledig!!

Op 23 maart jl. dienden een paar senatoren de ‘Israel Anti-Boycott Act’ in. Met deze wet wordt de strijd aangebonden met o.a de BDS beweging en ieder ander die een boycot van Israël propageert, dan wel kritiek uit op Israel vanwege het fascistische apartheidsbeleid in dat gestolen land, hetzij in woord of op schrift………

Als deze anti-Israël boycot wet wordt aangenomen, is dat één van de laatste stappen in de hervorming van de VS tot een regelrechte politiestaat. De Washington Post heeft hier een een dik artikel aan gewijd en stelt dat e.e.a. niets met de vrijheid van meningsuiting te maken heeft, dit daar het bedrijven betreft…. Voorts wijst de WaPo op een eerdere antiboycot wet uit ik dacht 1977, waarmee arabische bedrijven worden aangepakt, mochten ze Israël boycotten, zelfs als zo’n bedrijf daartoe door haar overheid wordt gedwongen……..

Echter met deze wet, kan ook de individuele activist vervolgd worden, of zelfs iemand die zich negatief uitlaat over Israël , n.a.v. een gelezen artikel, of het zien van een documentaire, ook al wordt daarin de waarheid getoond……… De vreselijke waarheid over het lot van de Palestijnen, die in feite het leven onmogelijk wordt gemaakt door apartheidsstaat Israël, althans als ze niet tot de tienduizenden dodelijke slachtoffers behoren, die deze staat sinds haar oprichting onder de Palestijnse burgers heeft gemaakt……..

De volgende petitie, die wij helaas niet kunnen tekenen, kwam ik gisteren tegen op de US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, lees en huiver:

This
picture is worth a thousand shares

On
March 23, Sens. Ben Cardin (D-MD) and Rob Portman (R-OH), and Reps.
Peter Roskam (R-IL) and Juan Vargas (D-CA), introduced the 
Israel
Anti-Boycott Act
 (S.720
and H.R.1697).

This
bill seeks to impose fines and
 criminal
penalties
,
and deny government loans to corporations refusing to do business
with corporations in illegal Israeli settlements. It 
infringes
on our First Amendment right
 to
promote boycott, divestment and sanctions and seeks to
 legitimize
Israel’s settlements
.

When
politicians refuse to tell the truth on Palestinian rights, it’s up
to us to speak up. We’re doing just that on the Israel Anti-Boycott
Act with a 
new
infographics series
 that
explain how this bill could affect 
you

The
sponsors of the Israel Anti-Boycott Act, a legislative attempt to
criminalize boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) activism,
responded to an avalanche of criticism by 
claiming
that the bill wouldn’t impact
 everyday
activists.
But
in reality, this draconian anti-free speech bill could have severe
consequences for you if you are active, or even just vocal, in the
movement for Palestinian rights. How? That’s what we explain in
series
of four infographics
 using
the examples of a social media user, student group, church
congregation, and private investor. 
These
infographics show you the possible consequences of the Israel
Anti-Boycott Act becoming law, and make the need to 
act
now
 crystal
clear. Please 
spread
them far and wide by sharing on social media
.

US Campaign for Palestinian Rights heeft 4 nieuwe foto’stoegevoegd.

3 uur

If the Israel Anti-Boycott Act becomes law, it could have severe consequences for anyone active – or even vocal – in the movement for Palestinian rights.

TAKE ACTION to stop this bill now: https://goo.gl/ePFwKv

foto van US Campaign for Palestinian Rights.

US Campaign for Palestinian Rights

Vind deze pagina leuk · 3 uurBewerkt 

The Israel Anti-Boycott Act could have far reaching consequences for individuals and groups active, or even just vocal, in the movement for Palestinian rights.

One example is a social media user who expresses intent to boycott companies named in the forthcoming UN Human Rights Council’s (UNHRC) database of settlement corporations.

Take action to stop this bill: https://goo.gl/ePFwKv

foto van US Campaign for Palestinian Rights.

US Campaign for Palestinian Rights

Vind deze pagina leuk · 3 uurBewerkt 

The Israel Anti-Boycott Act could have far reaching consequences for individuals and groups active, or even just vocal, in the movement for Palestinian rights.

One example is a church congregation that votes to divest from corporations named in the forthcoming UN Human Rights Council’s (UNHRC) database of settlement corporations.

Take action to stop this bill: https://goo.gl/ePFwKv

================================

Zie ook: ‘Giro d’Italia van start in Jeruzalem, een mooie manier om Israël te promoten, aldus NOS presentator van den Berg……..

       en: ‘Sjors Fröhlich (chef BNR): de rechtspraak in Israël is oké……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: ‘Giro d’Italia gaat volgend jaar in Jeruzalem van start, tenzij……….

Mijn excuus voor de belabberde weergave.

Giro d’Italia van start in Jeruzalem, een mooie manier om Israël te promoten, aldus NOS presentator van den Berg……..

De Giro d’Italia gaat volgend jaar in Jeruzalem van start met een tijdrit…… Dit was op 8 augustus jl. nog een gerucht en werd op die dag even ‘deskundig’ herkauwd in het ‘onafhankelijke’ NOS-Radio1-Journaal (na 7.30 u.), door zo ongeveer de grootste Radio1 sufferd in tijden, Jurgen van den Berg in gesprek met fanatiek zionist en godbetert correspondent voor de NOS in Israël, Ankie Rechess.

Ik stemde gelukkig wat later af en hoorde Rechess laatste woorden (ik word tegenwoordig onpasselijk als ik de trut hoor bij de ‘onafhankelijke’ NOS). Van den Berg herkauwde de zaak daarna verder met een oud-wielrenner en sportcommentator.

Met veel gelach sprak men over de start van de Giro in Jeruzalem, alsof daar verder niets aan de hand is en het fascistische apartheidsbewind Netanyahu niet bestaat……..

Van den Berg stelde grinnikend dat de start van de Giro d’Italia in Jeruzalem een ‘mooie promotie’ is voor Israël……….

Ja geweldig hè van den Berg, de start van de Giro in een land waar de oorspronkelijke bevolking werd verjaagd (middels excessief geweld zoals moord)…… De Palestijnen zijn willens en wetens teruggebracht tot een minderheid, bovendien maakt Israël de Palestijnen het leven onmogelijk in de openluchtgevangenis Gazastrook (en de West Bank, dat intussen aan de dezelfde kwalificatie van openluchtgevangenis voldoet..)…. Palestijnse boeren wordt de toegang tot hun land onmogelijk gemaakt, zodat ze hun land en boomgaarden niet meer kunnen onderhouden…….

Israël heeft sinds de oprichting van de staat Israël een enorm aantal oorlogsmisdaden begaan, met vele doden tot gevolg (bij de laatste opstand in de Gazastrook kwamen maar liefst meer dan 500 kinderen om het leven, ofwel: werden vermoord door de staat Israël……)….. Voorts heeft Israël, zoals gezegd: -een enorm aantal Palestijnen het land uitgejaagd hun moeder/vaderland waar zij al honderden jaren woonden, -Palestijnse dorpen platgebrand en ga maar door……..

Dezelfde apartheidsstaat Israël die Palestijnen heeft gereduceerd tot 3de klas burgers, die nergens recht op hebben en na vakantie of studie in het buitenland regelmatig het land niet meer in mogen…… Dezelfde apartheidsstaat die Palestijnse kinderen zonder proces opsluit, omdat ze met stenen hebben gegooid, of daarvan worden verdacht………..

Je kan niet anders concluderen dan dat de Palestijnen de wraak moeten ondergaan van joden die hun gram willen halen voor de holocaust in Europa…………..

Nee,de Giro is ‘echt een mooie gelegenheid’ om een fascistische apartheidsstaat te promoten……

Schande!!!

En de NOS doet e.e.a. godverdomme met gebruik van ons belastinggeld……….

Zie ook: Sjors Fröhlich (chef BNR): de rechtspraak in Israël is oké……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘‘Israel Anti-Boycott Act’: Dood aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting in de VS >> bij invoering is politiestaat VS volledig!!

      en: ‘Giro d’Italia gaat volgend jaar in Jeruzalem van start, tenzij……….

Google censuur en toch echt nieuws volgen? Gebruik een andere browser naast die van Google, of dump Google helemaal!!

Whitney Webb publiceerde op 25 augustus jl. een artikel op MintPress News, een bericht over het nieuwe censuur beleid van Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Microsoft en Twitter.

Webb geeft in het artikel de alternatieven waarmee je de censoren en geheime onderzoekers (geheime diensten) van de overheid en het bedrijfsleven kan omzeilen, zo kan u uw eigen ‘Virtual Private Network’ (VPN) opzetten, waarmee u zelfs uw IP-adres geheim kan houden.

Google heeft de laatste maanden diverse onafhankelijke mediaorganen geblokkeerd, die niet het algemene westerse politieke (neoliberale) beleid volgen en zich verzetten tegen de enorme berg leugens in de reguliere westerse massamedia……… Google en anderen doen dit in de strijd tegen ‘fake news’, waarbij men voor het gemak even vergeet dat vooral diezelfde massamedia verantwoordelijk zijn voor het brengen van nepnieuws, ofwel ‘fake news……….’ Anders gezegd: Google verzet zich tegen ‘fake news’, door juist de alternatieve media te blokkeren, die ditzelfde ‘fake news’ dag in dag uit aan de paal nagelen!!

‘Fake news’ (of nepnieuws zo je wilt) in de westerse massamedia >> neem de berichtgeving voor en tijdens de illegale oorlogen tegen: Afghanistan, Irak, Libie en nu weer Syrië…….. Om over het tot voor kort lange zwijgen door die media over de oorlog tegen Jemen nog maar te zwijgen… (wat ik nu dus niet doe..) De smerige oorlog en genocide die de reli-fascistische dictatuur van Saoedi-Arabië tegen de sjiitische bevolking van Jemen voert/uitvoert, dit met behulp van een arabische coalitie, aangevuld met de hulp van de VS en Groot-Brittannië……. (en met de stilzwijgende goedkeuring die de meerderheid van westerse politici, als de mislukte PvdA sierkwast Koenders, aan deze oorlog en genocide geven….. Die goedkeuring geven ze door te zwijgen!)

Of wat dacht je van de totaal foute en valse berichtgeving in de westerse massamedia t.a.v. de fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël……

Hier het bewuste artikel van Webb dat ik overnam van Anti-Media, doe er je voordeel mee!

Your
Guide to Avoiding Internet Censorship of Independent News Journalism

August
25, 2017 at 10:43 am

Written
by 
Whitney
Webb

There
are lots of good strategies for beating both corporate and government
Internet censors and snoops. These range from alternatives to Google,
Yahoo, Microsoft, Facebook and Twitter — to direct subscriptions to
authors and pubs — to setting up your own VPN. All are worth the
effort.

(MPN) —
While Google’s
Information Age dominance
 has
long been recognized to have some unsavory consequences, the massive
technology corporation has, in recent months, taken to directly
censoring content and traffic to a variety of independent media
outlets across the political spectrum — essentially muting the
voices of any site or author who does not toe the establishment line.

This
new offensive has coincided with Google efforts to clamp down on
“fake news” and “extremist” content, which – on its
subsidiary, YouTube – led to
 the
categorical blocking
 of
videos portraying war crimes and other disturbing events of the
Syrian conflict and Israel’s occupation of Palestine. Other
independent media figures, such as 
Luke
Rudowski and Carey Wedler
,
on the popular video streaming service, saw 
many
of their videos
 demonetized.

Though
the crackdown on YouTube was more obvious, the Google search engine –
the most popular in the world – is now burying or blocking
independent media sites from its search results.

Conservatives have
long claimed
 that
Google was selectively targeting their content due to the personal
political bias of the company’s executives — but now, since
Google announced its new guidelines, numerous progressive,
transparency, and anti-war websites that act as watchdogs to the
establishment have seen their traffic diminish substantially.

Counterpunch,
World Socialist Website, MintPress News, Democracy Now, American
Civil Liberties Union and Wikileaks are
 just
a handful
 of
the sites that have seen massive drops in their returns from Google
searches. The World Socialist Website alone experienced a 67 percent
decrease in returns from Google following the implementation of
Google’s new algorithm targeting so-called “fake news.”
MintPress News, however, has suffered the steepest decline, having
seen a 76 percent decrease in traffic from Google since the new
algorithm was put into effect.

Why has Google changed its search system to push down publications (left & right) critical of Washington DC?

273 replies3,658 retweets3,623 likes



Google
has its reasons for choosing to censor viewpoints that clash with or
even raise questions about the official narrative. Google shares deep
connections with the U.S.’ political powerbrokers, notably with the
CIA, which 
originally
helped fund
 Google
into existence with the intention of controlling the flow of
information.

Understandably
— in light of its deep connections to those who stand the most to
lose from the actual free flow of information — Google has emerged
as a leader of the “fight” against so-called “fake news.” The
concept of “fake news” took on sudden weight following last
November’s U.S. presidential election: in the tweets and rants of
newly-elected President Donald Trump, media predictions of a Clinton
victory were ridiculed as “FAKE NEWS,” while Clinton supporters
also wound up blaming “fake news” for Clinton’s loss in the
election.

In
short order, the term became a term of derision and dismissal applied
to any and all disagreeable reporting. With the “fake news” net
cast so wide, the ground was fertile for a campaign against the
official story-challenging work of independent media — dependent
for its reach, to a far greater extent than its mainstream media
counterparts, upon the good graces of monster Internet traffic cops
such as Google.

The
following guide offers a variety of solutions and options for those
concerned with Google’s overreach and its decision to become the
Internet’s unelected “Ministry of Truth.”

Dumping
Google Search

Dominating over
80%
 of
global searches made on the Internet, Google’s chokehold on the
flow of information is undeniable. Now that its algorithm has been
shown to target news sites critical of the establishment on both
sides of the aisle, finding an alternative becomes an essential task
irrespective of one’s political leaning.

However,
don’t expect other brand name search engines like Microsoft’s
Bing or Yahoo to come to the rescue, as these too
 have
been caught
 censoring
search results in the past. Microsoft, in particular, is very
untrustworthy, given its
 eager
participation
 in
the NSA’s PRISM surveillance program — where it illegally shared
the Internet user data, including search queries, of U.S. citizens
without their knowledge.

Given
its willingness to cooperate with the government against the interest
of American citizens, Microsoft would be perhaps more willing even
than Google to censor access to so-called “fake news.”

Yahoo
is little better, as it too was an early adopter of the PRISM
surveillance program, second only to Microsoft. Like Microsoft,
they
 willingly
cooperate
 with
government censorship efforts – as well as the
 outing
of dissidents
 –
in other countries.

Thankfully,
as far as search engines go, there are other options available that
not only respect your privacy but also offer fairer searches,
including some features that even Google doesn’t offer.

DuckDuckGo

Of
all the viable Google alternatives, 
DuckDuckGo is
the most well-known, having been promoted by PCMag.com, the Guardian,
and The New York Times as a “long-term” threat to Google’s
search dominance. It was even one of the top 50 sites of 2011,
according to Time magazine.

However,
the “mainstream” accolades are, in this case, well-deserved.
DuckDuckGo is best known for its motto 
the
search engine that doesn’t track you,” complete with 
Tor
browser
 functionality. While
this is a clear boon for privacy enthusiasts – or anyone concerned
about illegal NSA spying – it also results in search results that
are not filtered based on your search history. In other words, users
are more likely to be presented with search results that challenge
their existing ideas.

DuckDuckGo
also boasts 
an
impressive search algorithm
 that
excludes Google results but includes results from other well-known
search engines, mixed with the data obtained by DuckDuckGo’s
own
 web
crawler
 bot.
The results are filtered for spam and re-ordered using its trademark
“Instant Answers” platform, which places high-quality answers
above other results and advertisements. The “Instant Answers”
platform gathers answers provided by top popular websites, like
Wikipedia, in addition to
 community-built answers.

For
those tech-savvy users who don’t trust the spam filtering or even
the “Instant Answer” platform, these functions — as well as
DuckDuckGo itself — is open-source and also offers
 DuckDuckHack,
where users can create their own plug-ins for use in DuckDuckGo and
even help improve the search engine overall.

For
less savvy tech users, DuckDuckGo conveniently functions like any
other search engine, in addition to providing several features
 even
Google doesn’t offer.
 It
also has a search app for both iPhone and Android, as well as
plug-ins for Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox, and offers support in
several languages.

Ixquick/StartPage

Ixquick is
an American/Dutch meta-search engine, meaning it
 simultaneously
searches
 multiple
databases and other search engines
,
including Google, across the Internet. It uses a “star system” to
rank search results, placing a star next to each result for every
search engine that ranks that result as one of its 10 best for a
given search. A five-star result, for example, means that five search
engines considered that result to be among the 10 most relevant.

Ixquick
— which has now merged with its subsidiary, StartPage — also
tackles the issue of privacy by not storing user-specific details
such as cookies or past search results. Like DuckDuckGo, Ixquick
offers unfiltered search results generated by Google’s
“personalized” searches. Privacy enthusiasts may recognize
Ixquick as the default search engine for the Tor browser.

Ixquick
is supported in 17 languages and offers a plug-in for Mozilla
Firefox. They also offer a privacy-minded, encrypted email server
called 
StartMail.

Gibiru

Gibiru,
like the aforementioned search engines, prides itself on offering
maximum privacy. It avoids tracking its users by providing anonymous
and encrypted searches. It describes itself as “the preferred
Search Engine for Patriots” and offers non-personalized, anonymous
web results while emphasizing the disdain of its developers for the
NSA. Part of what sets Gibiru apart is its claim to offer
“uncensored” searches, as their web crawlers intentionally
include pages that Google has blocked or buried in its search
results.

Gibiru
also has a unique feature called “Uncensored News.” In addition
to aggregating results from other search engines, Gibiru adds its own
algorithm that specifically looks for results from independent media
outlets, particularly those that tend to “promote ‘alternative’
views from the mainstream.”

Recognizing
that mainstream media results are picked up by Google and Bing,
Gibiru does not use its bandwidth searching through these results.
Even up-and-coming independent media sites can gain inclusion in
Uncensored News results by communicating with the Gibiru team.

Gibiru
offers both a toolbar and a plugin for Mozilla Firefox.

Subscribe
directly to your favorite pages

Though
the above search engines can assist in more accurate and less
censored internet searches, the best way to get news you trust is
directly from the source. Anyone who reads independent media
eventually develops preferences for certain sites and authors whose
content they consistently find reliable and interesting.

If
you are concerned with Google’s clampdown on independent media, the
most surefire way to ensure your access to the sites you enjoy is by
subscribing directly to them via email. Most independent media pages
offer you the option to subscribe to their mailing lists, where you
receive their top stories on a daily basis. Some pages charge for
subscriptions, but most – such as
 MintPress
News’ Daily Digest
 –
are free and allow you to unsubscribe at any time. Some websites,
including MintPress,
 also
offer apps
 for
Android or iPhone, which allow users direct and convenient access to
the content of those pages.

If
you are concerned that all of the newsletters and stories of the
pages you want to follow will clutter your email, there are several
good options. Some mail servers allow you to label certain types of
incoming mail, and creating a specific label for “news” can
streamline the process of following all of your favorite pages in one
place. Alternatively, you can create an email account dedicated to
news in order to keep it separate from email accounts more focused on
work or socializing.

In
some cases, however, your favorite writers may not regularly publish
in the same place, making their work difficult to follow via email
subscription. Many authors have either their own web pages dedicated
to their work or publish on websites such as 
Medium —
a site offering both free and premium membership options, that hosts
the writings of many big names in independent news from across the
political spectrum.

Signing
up for Medium allows you to follow any writer you like, even
mainstream ones – a boon, for instance, if you like a certain
writer at, say, The Wall Street Journal but don’t trust the paper
as a whole. Certain popular writers in independent media — such
Nafeez Ahmed’s
 Insurge
Intelligence
 —
even publish some of their biggest stories exclusively on Medium.

Dump
social media for news

The Wrath Of Facebook: ‘God’ Smote With 30-Day Ban For Criticizing US Military Spending

Facebook’s moderation system, which combines an automated flagging system with limited human oversight, has consistently drawn criticism, once banning a satirical account which criticized U.S. military spending.(AP/Czarek Sokolowski)

Though
some may value their Facebook account for keeping in touch with
friends and family, the social media giant is quickly becoming
unreliable for receiving news content posted by your friends as well
as the people or pages you follow. Facebook and Twitter have each
been caught censoring on several occasions and both now openly patrol
for “fake news” and “hate speech” — burying stories that
users would otherwise see, based on the recommendations of Facebook
or Twitter-approved flaggers. Many of these flaggers have been found
to publish “fake news” themselves or have a strong bias against
particular viewpoints, particularly those critical of conservative
politics.

Just
as with Google, Facebook and Twitter users can no longer be sure that
their newsfeeds contain the news they want to read, just as content
creators and publishers can no longer expect the same scope and reach
they once enjoyed on social media.

Unfortunately,
the alternatives to Facebook and Twitter are few and lack the large
user communities that make a social network successful. However,
there are two notable sites that are attempting to change that.

One
of those sites is Steemit.
 Steemit is
a social media platform that runs a blogging and social network
website built on top of a blockchain database. Steemit now boasts a
decently sized community, though it hardly compares to Facebook in
terms of daily users. Part of its success has been due to the 
site’s
commitment to paying users for creating and curating popular content
on the site
.
Per the site’s system, users receive digital points (“Steem”)
depending on the success of their posts, which they can exchange for
more tangible rewards or payment via online exchanges. With $1 of
Steem
 now
worth
 just
over $4 USD, some people have found using Steemit to be both socially
and economically beneficial.

Another
potential Facebook competitor is 
Minds —
an
 open
source, encrypted, and community-owned social network site that
values free speech
 and
doesn’t bow to government or advertiser pressure. It hosts
individual user profiles and blogs and creates an unfiltered
newsfeed for its users.

Members
can even be paid for posting their content if it garners a
significant number of views and upvotes. Although at present the
Minds community is tiny compared to that of Facebook, it may in years
to come become a more popular alternative, as Facebook continues to
disappoint.

Avoiding
outright censorship if and when It happens

While
censorship has
 long
been a reality
 in
countries like China, Western governments like to tout themselves as
being the guardians of freedom and the free flow of information. But
many of these governments, particularly the United States, have come
to realize in recent years that they are
 on
the losing side
 of
the “information war,” as trust in the corporate-owned media and
the government itself has sunk to historic lows.

Though
Western governments have, so far, outsourced censorship to technology
companies like Google and Facebook, there is little reason to believe
that these governments will refrain from demanding the outright
censorship of information that doesn’t toe the official line.

Take,
for example, the recent rhetoric of U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May
who, in the wake of the Manchester bombing, has pushed for censoring
“extremist propaganda” online. May’s assertion
 concerned
internet watchdog groups
,
who likened her proposals to China’s widespread censorship of the
Internet.

If
official government censorship comes to your country – or if you
suspect that it is already there – the easiest workaround is
setting up a virtual private network, or VPN. A VPN allows you to use
your computer as though it were connected to a network other than the
one you actually use. In the event of government censorship in your
country, a VPN allows you to virtually connect to a network set up in
another country where such censorship is not in effect. Using a VPN
has the added bonus of greater Internet privacy — as effective VPN
protocols encrypt your traffic, helping to protect you from
government surveillance as well as censorship.

VPNs
are provided by VPN service providers, not all of whom are created
equal. VPN providers with good reputations include Strong VPN,
SurfEasy, and TunnelBear.  Of these, TunnelBear is the least
expensive – offering a free service – and SurfEasy the most
expensive at $11.99 per month. However, the Opera browser now
includes SurfEasy’s VPN services for free. A comprehensive guide on
how to choose the best VPN service provider for your needs can be
found
 here.

By Whitney
Webb
 / Creative
Commons
 / MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo

==================================================

Zie
ook: 

Google manipuleerde VS presidentsverkiezingen van 2016 en censureert niet alleen linkse/alternatieve sociale media


Facebook
stelt perstituee van New York Times aan als censuur-agent…… ha!
ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

May,
premier GB, wil als reactie op de aanslagen in Londen en Manchester,
de mensenrechten buiten werking stellen en censuur op het internet
doorvoeren……….

Boris
Johnson wil (sociale) media controleren en censureren…….

Washington
Post medewerkers is verboden grote adverteerders te bekritiseren…..
Of hoe miljonairs en miljardairs de voorheen onafhankelijk pers
beheren

Censuur teistert het internet: video over aanslag Las Vegas verwijderd door YouTube…………. 

Netanyahu: ‘West Bank voor altijd Israëlisch’, in antwoord op roep om geloofwaardig vredesproces

Ja beste bezoeker, dat had Netanyahu te zeggen op de roep van liberale joden, om nu eindelijk eens een geloofwaardig vredesproces op te starten………..

Het ‘leuke’ aan deze schoftenopmerking van Netanyahu is, dat hij hiermee alle westerse politici, zoals PvdA oplichter Koenders te kakken zet!! Dit daar zij zich in het (recente) verleden keer op keer afzijdig hielden bij de zoveelste schoftenstreek van Israël, daar dit anders ‘het vredesproces in gevaar zou brengen……

Hé Koenders, wat zeg je daarvan na 5 jaar lang wanbeleid, ook op dit dossier??!!!

Schaam je klootzak!!!

  Retweeted

  Aug 31

Netanyahu promises West Bank will be occupied Israel “forever”
Cartoon:

Weg met alle muren, van die in Palestina, via die in Hongarije tot de komende in Mexico!!

Gevonden op Twitteraccount van Carlos Latuff:

We’re helping send a delegation of activists resisting the US/Mexico border wall to Palestine. Learn more:

Netanyahu dreigt de Iraanse troepen in Syrië aan te vallen en gebruikt daarbij het woord ‘sjiieten…….’

De fascistische psychopaat Netanyahu durfde Rusland te dreigen met aanvallen op de Iraanse troepen, die in Syrië meehelpen de terreur van o.a. IS het land uit te krijgen. Alsof de hele Iraanse strijdkrachten zich in Syrië bevinden, i.p.v. een relatief kleine groep Iraanse commando’s……. Volgens Netanyahu zal Iran nadat IS is verslagen, een veel te grote invloed krijgen in Syrië…….. Uiteraard gelul van een dronken aardbei, dit om het eigen volk angst en haat aan te jagen en alvast het Israëlische volk voor te bereiden op de zoveelste enorme oorlogsmisdaad gepleegd door de eigen regering……

Zoals gezegd, de Israëlische fascistenregering van Netanyahu stelt dat Iran met een grote legermacht in Syrië tegen IS vecht…… Kijk IS is volgens Israël geen gevaar, vandaar ook dat het land op verzoek van IS posities van het reguliere Syrische leger bestookt…… Verder lapt Israël terroristen van IS op, zodat ze na hun revalidatie het weer op kunnen nemen tegen het reguliere leger van Syrië………. (dit gebeurd voor een groot deel op de door Israël illegaal bezette Golanhoogten)

Niet vreemd dat Israël de enorme terreur van IS steunt, immers dit land doet zelf niet anders: neem het uitoefenen van grootscheepse terreur op de Palestijnen in de Gazastrook en op de West Bank…… En zoals u weet: elke kritiek op de smerige, gewelddadige apartheidsstaat Israël, wordt afgedaan als antisemitisch

Netanyahu had zelfs het gore lef om over ‘sjiieten’ te spreken, alsof hij zich alvast van de steun van de soennitische arabieren wil verzekeren…… Jezus wat een schoft!

Er zijn in het Midden-Oosten 3 staten die de stabiliteit daar keer op keer ondergraven (voor zover je in het Midden-Oosten nog van ‘stabiliteit’ kan spreken): Israël, Saoedi-Arabië (plus haar arabische, soennitische hielenlikkers) en de VS (uiteraard aangevuld met een deel van haar NAVO partners, zoals Groot-Brittannië, dat wapens, munitie en training levert aan Saoedi-Arabië, wapens en munitie die voor een fiks deel wordt doorgeleverd aan Al Qaida en andere terreurtroepen…..)…………

Netanyahu spreekt over acties tegen Iraanse troepen in Syrië, echter reken maar dat Israël al bezig is een actie voor te bereiden tegen Iran zelf…….

Hier een artikel over deze zaak van Shahtahmasebi, daarin worden wat zaken genoemd, waar ik het niet mee eens ben, zoals u zo zal merken. Lees en oordeel zelf:

Israel
Warns Russia It’s Prepared to Defend Itself From Iran in Syria

August 26, 2017 at 6:53 am

Written by Darius Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA)  The
post-ISIS Syrian phase of the Syrian war will be unpredictable, to
say the least. 
According to Reuters,
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Russian President
Vladimir Putin on Wednesday that Israel is prepared to take action in
Syria to prevent Iran from dominating the region after ISIS falls.

Iran
is
 public
enemy number one
 for
Israel, and its strong presence in Syria, which was mobilized to help
bolster the Assad government throughout the Syrian conflict, has
Israel fearing a permanent Iranian military presence, which would be
very close to its border.

Iran
is already well on its way to controlling Iraq, Yemen and to a large
extent is already in practice in control of Lebanon,”
 Netanyahu
reportedly told Putin.

We
cannot forget for a single minute that Iran threatens every day to
annihilate Israel. Israel opposes Iran’s continued entrenchment in
Syria. We will be sure to defend ourselves with all means against
this and any threat.”

According
to Reuters, Putin did not make any comments in response
to Netanyahu’s remarks about Iran’s role in Syria or his threat
to take unilateral action in Syria.

Bringing
Shi’ites into the Sunni sphere will surely have many serious
implications both in regard to refugees and to new terrorist
acts,”
 Netanyahu
told Israeli reporters after the three-hour meeting with
Putin, Reuters reported.

Russia
has
 partnered with
Iran and Turkey in recent times to take control of the Syrian
conflict, and it seems unlikely that Vladimir Putin will abandon both
Syria and Iran anytime soon. That being said, if Israel takes a minor
action to defend its direct interests, particularly in the Golan
Heights area, Putin may allow Israel’s acts to go ahead without any
dramatic consequences to a certain extent.

Reuters notes
that Israel’s main concern would be keeping Iranian forces away
from the Golan Heights, which is under Israel’s control. If Israel
pursues this strategy without expanding its presence in Syria
further, Russia may ultimately sit on the sidelines without
intervening.

For
example, Israel has struck Syrian territory multiple times throughout
the Syrian conflict (in 
2012201320142015,
etc), and Russia has not threatened to retaliate against Israel for
these actions. In fact, Russia and Israel have a
 hotline
to prevent their warplanes
 from
colliding, which suggests Russia has accepted Israel’s desire to
involve itself in some capacity in the Syrian conflict.

According
to Reuters, Russia’s ambassador to Israel, Alexander
Petrovich Shein, said Russia would take Israel’s interests into
account, and if it were up to Russia, “the foreign forces
would not stay.”

However, Reuters quoted
Russian U.N. Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia as saying “We
[Russia] know the position of Israel towards Iran but we think that
Iran in Syria is playing a very constructive role.”

In
that context, Russia will not view any unilateral action favorably if
it disrupts the current de-escalation process that Russia has
been 
working to
establish for some time now with the help of regional players Iran
and Turkey.

Essentially,
it will depend on how far Israel or Iran want to provoke one another
after ISIS is defeated. Russia has no desire to see Israel and Iran
go to war in the Syrian battle theater; in fact, it is a scenario
Russia would probably happily avoid. Russia has its own interests
outside of Iran and Israel’s regional ambitions, namely to prop up
the Syrian government against 
foreign-backed jihadists and
to 
protect
its naval base
 –
not to provide air cover for Iranian forces to confront Israel near
its border.

Missing
from any credible assessment of this emerging conflict is the fact
that the Syrian conflict was 
instigated by
world powers in the first place out of concerns that Israel needed to
protect and retain its nuclear monopoly by toppling the Syrian
government, which would, in turn, curb Iranian influence.

This
strategy directly drew Iran into the conflict, and now Israel has to
face the possibility of a permanent Iranian military presence on its
border.

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo