De rechterhand van Jeffrey Epstein, die zich zogenaamd het leven
benam, is onlangs opgepakt nadat ze lang uit handen van justitie wist
te blijven, wellicht met hulp van boven, immers ze moet veel kennis
hebben van machtige figuren die gebruik maakten van Epsteins
pedofeesten…..
Over die
kennis gesproken: een nicht van prins Andrew (Groot-Brittannië)
beweert dat Ghislaine Maxwell een (compromitterende) video heeft van
de prins….. Maxwell maakte er een gewoonte van om de pedo’s te
filmen tijdens het misbruik van kinderen, ofwel zij moet nog veel meer van deze tapes hebben met machtige mannen die zich vergrijpen aan kinderen…..
Zo zie
je maar weer: de hele smerige soap rond Jeffrey Epstein is nog lang
niet ten einde ook al heeft men hem de mond gesnoerd door hem te
vermoorden; blijft de vraag of Maxwell haar gevangenschap zal overleven, immers ook zij heeft wetenschap en zoals je kan lezen video’s over alle hoogwaardigheidsbekleders die zich hebben vergrepen aan kinderen op de ‘seksfeestjes’ van Epstein…….. (naast prins Andrew o.a. Tony Blair, Bill Clinton en Donald Trump……) Maxwell zou in de gevangenis waar ze wordt vastgehouden papieren kleding dragen dit vanwege ‘suïcide gevaar….’
Hier een artikel van Steve Watson over deze zaak, eerder gepubliceerd op Summit News, ik nam het over van Zero Hedge:
Prince
Andrew’s Cousin Says Ghislaine Maxwell Has ‘Secret Video’ Of
Him
“He is not a victim
here, but Ghislaine was never his friend, she was taping him.”
Published 17 hours ago
on 8 July, 2020
Steve Watson
LINDSEY PARNABY/AFP via Getty Images
An
acquaintance of Ghislaine Maxwell has told reporters that the
socialite has secret video footage of Prince Andrew that was filmed
during her time as Jeffrey Epstein’s so called ‘madam’.
Christina Oxenberg told The
Sun
that Andrew, the British Queen’s son, “is one of many johns, all
of whom were videotaped by Ghislaine.”
“He is not a victim
here, but Ghislaine was never his friend, she was taping him,”
Oxenberg added, noting that “Friends don’t tape friends.”
Oxenberg is the
daughter of Princess Elizabeth of Yugoslavia, making her Prince
Andrew’s cousin.
She told reporters
that she believes Maxwell is seeking to trade information with the
FBI, and possibly the videos to save herself.
“I think she thinks
she can get out, obviously she’s planning on trading
[information],” Oxenberg said.
Oxenberg says she was
interviewed by the FBI last year in regards to the case, and that she
is willing to testify against Maxwell.
The report claims that
the royal said Maxwell previously bragged to her about obtaining
underage girls under Epstein’s influence.
“I will definitely
be there to remind her that in ’97, she told me copious amounts,”
Oxenberg said.
It is not clear if
Oxenberg is the same person who was cited anonymously in another
report this week claiming that Maxwell has secret sex tapes that
“could implicate some twisted movers and shakers.”
“If Ghislaine goes
down, she’s going to take the whole damn lot of them with her,”
the source told
the Daily Mail.
As we highlighted
last week, a lawyer for one of Epstein’s accusers thinks that
Ghislaine Maxwell could reveal a “bigger name” involved in
Epstein’s pedophile network in order to secure a plea deal
following her arrest.
“I’m sure that
Ghislaine’s attorneys will try to make a deal where she speaks
out about a bigger name to get reduced charges for herself,” said
Lisa Bloom.
De soap
die de Democratische voorverkiezingen in de VS nu al zijn geworden, zeker
‘nadat een app niet zou werken’ (wat de tegenstanders van Sanders
wel erg goed uitkwam….), wordt vervolgd door Biden die het slecht deed
bij die verkiezingen…. Biden dreigde met een rechtszaak en wou daarmee dat
de resultaten van de verkiezingen niet bekend zouden worden gemaakt…. Sanders daarentegen was uiteraard voor het zo snel mogelijk bekendmaken van de resultaten en ook hij dreigde even een
zaak te beginnen, het was dan ook vrijwel zeker dat Sanders deze
verkiezingen had gewonnen……..
Zou het inderdaad tot zaken hebben geleid, zouden deze deze waarschijnlijk het hele
jaar hebben geduurd, zeker tot de verkiezingen a.s. november en dat zou in het
nadeel zijn van Sanders, die al een groot voordeel kwijtraakte door
het geklungel met stemmen tellen en de gegevens doorgeven…. De
winnaar van de verkiezingen in Iowa had met de winst opzak een mooie
speech kunnen houden waarin hij/zij het volk zijn/haar beleid als president kan
voorhouden, echter die speech had op de verkiezingsavond gegeven moeten worden……..
Vandaag werd bekend gemaakt dat Buttigieg de verkiezingen heeft gewonnen, hoewel hij heel wat minder stemmen kreeg dan Sanders, het meer dan achterlijke systeem in de VS wijst alsnog Buttigieg aan als winnaar…… Volkomen terecht heeft Sanders de winst opgeëist en nogmaals terecht niet op een hertelling aangedrongen, immers daarmee zou men hem hebben gezien als een slechte verliezer en dat kost altijd een fiks aantal stemmen bij de volgende voorverkiezingen…….
Biden zou zoals gezegd de resultaten zo lang mogelijk hebben willen tegenhouden, daar
deze in zijn nadeel zijn, daarom heeft hij geëist eerst een
volledige uitleg te krijgen over wat er fout is gegaan tijdens deze
voorverkiezingen, voordat de resultaten bekend worden gemaakt……
Als je ziet ‘hoe snel’ de rechterlijke molen in de VS draait, is het
geen wonder dat de uitkomst van die rechtszaak pas in november te
verwachten zou zijn geweest…….
Biden is
echt een heel smerige viezerik, die overigens hetzelfde heeft gedaan als Trump: de Oekraïense president onder druk zetten zijn openbaar
aanklager terug te fluiten, voordat het land weer wapens uit de VS
zou krijgen….. Deze openbaar aanklager onderzocht het bedrijf waar zijn zoon
werkte, t.w. Burisma, waar deze Hunter Biden betrokken zou
zijn geweest bij witwassen en andere misdadige praktijken, terwijl hij in dit arme
land een salaris verdiende van 50.000 dollar per maand!!!
Het is
voor de wereld te hopen dat Sanders de presidentsverkiezingen wint, kan men over de wereld eindelijk weer
ademhalen, echter ik ben bang dat Trump weer zal winnen, zeker na de
domme impeachment poging van de Democraten, die alleen de achterban
van Trump heeft versterkt, een achterban die Trump nog zou steunen
als zou blijken dat hij inderdaad kinderen heeft misbruikt bij zijn
bezoeken aan Epstein…….. De Democraten wisten van te voren dat
de Republikeinen in de Senaat tegen de impeachment van Trump zouden
stemmen, bovendien hadden ze kunnen weten dat het de grote achterban
van Trump niet kan bommen wat hij heeft gedaan, als hij maar blijft
liegen dat de VS het beste land ter wereld is….. Onder die achterban zelfs een aantal mensen, die
afhankelijk zijn van voedselbonnen, waar Trump ook nog eens het mes
in wil zetten………
Biden was niet alleen de grote verliezer van de voorverkiezingen in Iowa, maar nu heeft hij ook nog eens zijn rechtszaak niet gekregen, ofwel dubbel verlies voor deze oorlogsmisdadiger (onder Obama was hij verantwoordelijk voor de illegale oorlogsvoering van de VS).
Beste bezoeker, vergeet de komende tijd niet dat de top van de Democratische Partij Sanders niet als volgende president wil zien, liever zien ze Trump nog 4 jaar regeren…. Trump liet overigens weten dat wat hem betreft hij ook de verkiezingen van 2024, 2028 en 2032 zal winnen…. Ofwel hij wil de grondwet aanpassen, volgens velen was e.e.a. een grap, maar gezien de totale gekte en zelfoverschatting van deze psychopathische oorlogsmisdadiger, zou het me niet bevreemden als hij het kiessysteem in de VS wil aanpassen, zodat hij als president meer dan 2 termijnen kan dienen…….
Het volgende artikel werd geschreven door Tyler Durden, werd eerder gepubliceerd op Zero Hedge, en door mij overgenomen van Anti-Media. In zijn schrijven ging Durden ervan uit dat de resultaten nog niet bekend zouden worden gemaakt:
Biden
Threatens Lawsuit to Halt Release of Real Iowa Caucus Results
(ZH) — The
Democratic candidates appear to be headed for an epic court battle to
determine who won the Iowa caucus – a court battle that could
potentially outlast the entire primary season and ensure that the
real winner of Iowa (cough – Bernie Sanders – cough) is never
revealed.
Following a morning of grumblings
and whispers among the five campaigns – Warren, Klobuchar, Biden,
Buttigieg and Sanders – the Biden campaign has sent a letter to the
Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) warning them that Biden is ready to take the
issue of who actually won the primary all the way to the Supreme
Court.
Biden campaign general counsel Dana
Remus sent a letter to top Iowa party officials demanding “full
explanations and relevant information” about the abysmal breakdown
of the Dems support-tallying app.
JUST IN: Biden campaign general counsel Dana Remus sent a letter to top Iowa Democratic Party officials demanding “full explanations and relevant information” for the “failed” systems the IDP deployed for tonight’s caucuses.
The letter noted that both the primary
system for counting votes – the app made by mysterious Bond-villain
wannabe SHADOW – and the backup system – telephonically phoning
in results – failed. Now, caucus chairs, the leaders of each
individual caucus district, are attempting to report results via
telephone to the party brass, but many of them aren’t getting
through.
But here’s the kicker: The Biden
campaign would like a “full explanation” of what
happened before the
results are released.
That little detail shows exactly
what the Biden campaign is getting at. His team is clearly aware that
the chaos benefited all of the centrists still in the running –
Buttigieg, Biden and Klobuchar – while hurting Sanders (believed to
be the real winner) and Warren.
The letter was sent before a
Tuesday morning conference call between the IDP and the campaigns.
During the call, the party said they would report half of the results
at 5 pm ET (4 pm local time). There were reportedly many objections
to this plan on the call. We imagine most of those objections came
from the Buttigieg and Biden camps.
As Nate
Silver explains, if the results aren’t released immediately, the
winners will be robbed of the post-Iowa bump, giving the moderates in
the race a ‘mulligan’.
There’s a good chance that the candidates who did well in Iowa won’t see their expected bounce, while the candidates who did poorly there get a mulligan.@NateSilver538 on chaos in the Hawkeye State: https://abcn.ws/39aMH86
Other reports claim Bernie campaign
staffers went around recording vote totals at many Iowa precincts –
unbeknownst to the party machine. When their early tallies didn’t
match the recorded results from campaign workers, his campaign sent 5
lawyers to complain.
I am now hearing
that the Sanders campaign sent workers to every caucus to record the
live results.
The DNC was unaware of
this. When their early tallies did not match the recorded results
from campaign workers, his campaign had 5 lawyers contact the DNC.
Now they’re meeting.
Biden just needs to stay in the
game until we get to South Carolina, where Sanders is weakest.
Meanwhile, political talking heads are talking about how this
incident could rob Iowa of its first-in-the-nation status. But if a
legal battle erupts, Biden wins by default: A delay in releasing the
Iowa results is a win for Biden and Buttigieg, and a huge problem for
Bernie – at least in theory.
In reality, his campaign now has
plenty of ammunition to revive the narrative that the primary has
been rigged against him – much to the consternation of party
loyalists.
Weer een nieuw hoofdstuk in het drama Epstein, de eerder al veroordeelde kindermisbruiker en beheerder van een pedonetwerk, die op 10 auguistus dood in zijn cel werd aagetroffen. Volgens de autoriteiten suïcide, echter het is meer dan duidelijk dat Epstein is ‘gesuïcideerd’ (lees: vermoord), zodat machtige vip’s buitenschot konden blijven, figuren als Bill Clinton, Donald Trump en prins Andrew (het Britse koningshuis)…… Ongeveer een maand geleden lekte uit dat de reguliere media al langer op de hoogte waren van dit kindermisbruik schandaal……
Fairness bracht een artikel over ABC ‘nieuwsanker’ Amy Robach, die al 3 jaar geleden een onderzoek had gedaan naar Epstein en zijn machtige pedovrienden, waar de massamedia in de VS al lang wisten van zijn pedonetwerk….. (vergeet niet dat Epstein daar eerder al voor werd veroordeeld!) Robach had o.a. een interview gedaan met Virginia Roberts, één van de vrouwen die Epstein aanklaagde voor meervoudige verkrachting door hemzelf en vrienden van Epstein…… Robach werd ter verantwoording geroepen en daar gaf men haar te verstaan, dat niemand Epstein kent en dat het een dom verhaal was, kortom niet publiceer waardig. ‘Vreemd genoeg’ bemoeide ook het paleis, ofwel het Britse koningshuis zich met de zaak en was men bij ABC als de dood dat hen een interview met kroonprins William (dus de beoogd Brits troonopvolger) en Kate Middleton zou worden ontzegd…. (‘lekker belangrijk ook, een interview met deze groot-uitkeringstrekkers….’)
Robach is zoals verwacht flink pissig over de gang van zaken, volgens haar hebben zij en haar collega’s Virginia Roberts overgehaald de openbaarheid in te gaan, nadat ze 12 jaar lang ‘ondergedoken’ had gezeten. Volgens Robach had Roberts foto’s en andere bewijzen voor haar aantijgingen aan het adres van Epstein en prins Andrew…. Robach verzuchtte dat ze alles had, zelfs dat Bill Clinton gebruik had gemaakt van het pedoseksnetwerk……
In het boek van Edward Herman en Noam Chomsky, ‘Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media’, stellen zij dat er vijf voorwaarden zijn voor hetr publiceren van artikelen, waarvan er twee in het onderstaande artikel worden genoemd: sourcing en flak. Met sourcing wordt bedoeld de afhankelijkheid van de reguliere (massa) media van bronnen waarover ze als een soort subsidie berichten mogen publiceren, dus over machtige figuren als politici, beroemdheden en (grote) bedrijven, maar wel met een ‘nette berichtgeving…..’ Hetzelfde wat we hier zien met de ‘fotoshoot’ van het koningshuis, een beloning voor het niet ‘journalistiek’ lastigvallen van het meer dan belachelijke koningshuis (dat thuishoort in de middeleeuwen)……
Met ‘flak’ bedoelen Herman en Chomsky, negatieve reacties op media berichten die bijvooebeeld slecht uitpakken voor beroemdheden en politici. Iets dat kan uitmonden in het boycotten van media, of agressieve telefoontjes, aanklachten bij justitie, smaadcampagnes tegen journalisten of het medium waar ze voor werken, tot zelfs aanvallen van boze bewonderaars van een beroemdheid die de oren (meestal terecht) in het openbaar zijn gewassen…..
Door deze zaken zullen veel mediaorganen liever geen ruzie krijgen met machtige figuren, daar dit hen geld kan kosten en precies daar draait hem om in medialand, maakt niet uit wat je schrijft als het maar gelezen wordt, zoals het overnemen van alle leugens die de CIA, NSA en andere geheime diensten in de VS en daarbuiten brengen, als de VS weer eens een land illegaal wil binnenvallen…… Je zou zelfs kunnen stellen dat men uit angst deze leugens overneemt, echter dat is pure nonsens, immers de eigenaren van de reguliere (massa-) media, plutoicraten en onvesteringsmaatschappijen hebben belang bij de huidige status quo: zoveel mogelijk oorlogvoeren: goed voor het militair-industrieel complex, waarin aandelen heeft…. Verder totaal vrijbaan voor grote bedrijven waarin men natuurlijk ook aandelen heeft…. (zoals ons koningshuis grootaandeelhouder is van klimaatverkrachter Shell) Bovendien wenst men alleen de in het westen aangehangen neolibarale politiek te steunen, immers altijd goed voor de portemonnee……
Het voorgaande zet nog eens extra vraagtekens bij de leugens van die media en de westerse poltiek over ‘fake news’ (nepnieuws) en andere desinformatie, waarmee men NB de nog overgebleven echte media op het sociale netwerk de mond wil snoeren….. Terwijl diezelfde media, dus de reguliere westerse media, aantoonbaar vele meters aan nepnieuws en andere desinformatie hebben geproduceerd, waarmee het volk wordt bedrogen, bijvoorbeeld om de illegale oorlogen van de VS mee te ‘legitimeren…..’
Het volgende artikel dat zoals gezegd werd gepubliceerd op Fairness, heb ik overgenomen van Antii-Media:
(FAIR) — Multimillionaire
predator Jeffrey Epstein died in suspicious circumstances at a
Manhattan correctional facility on August 10. The wealthy and
powerful New York financier, a convicted sex offender, stands accused
by dozens of women and girls of trafficking, rape and sexual abuse.
“I’ve
known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” said fellow tycoon Donald
Trump (New
York, 10/28/02),
adding: “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I
do, and many of them are on the younger side.” Former President
Bill Clinton was also
close with
Epstein.
New
York (10/28/02)
hyped Jeffrey Epstein as a “relentless brain” with a “keen eye
for the ladies.”
Epstein’s
crimes shocked the public, and his arrest, trial and mysterious death
were major stories for much of 2019. But last month, leaked footage
emerged showing that corporate media knew much about these crimes
years previously. Discussing one of his accusers, ABC
News anchor
Amy Robach was caught
on camera lambasting
executives at her network for killing her investigations into the sex
offender because of Epstein’s connections. The clip was originally
leaked to infamous right-wing troll James O’Keefe, who has a long
history of producing bogus stories
(FAIR.org, 4/1/10, 3/14/11, 12/12/15, 10/21/16),
but ABC employees,
including Robach
herself,
have confirmed its authenticity.
Amy
Robach: “I’ve had the [Epstein] story for three years.”
In
the video, Robach complains:
“I’ve
had the story for three years. I’ve had this interview with
[Epstein complainant] Virginia Roberts. We would not put it on the
air. First of all I was told, “Who is Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows
who that is. This is a stupid story.” Then the palace found out
that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew, and threatened
us in a million different ways. We were so afraid we wouldn’t be
able to interview Kate and Will that it also quashed the story. And
then Alan Dershowitz was also implicated in it because of the
planes.”
“The
planes” is a reference to the celebrity attorney’s frequent trips
on Epstein’s infamous
private jet,
which he used for trafficking. A visibly exasperated Robach
continued, revealing the level of detail of her investigation:
She
told me everything, she had pictures, everything. She was in hiding
for 12 years. We convinced her to come out. We convinced her to talk
to us. It was unbelievable what we had; Clinton, we had everything. I
tried for three years to get it on to no avail, and now it’s all
coming out and it’s like these new revelations, and I freaking had
all of it!… What we had was unreal.
Robach’s
comments about being pressured into killing the story by powerful
people ABC relied upon are a perfect example of the
perils of access journalism. In their influential book Manufacturing
Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, Edward Herman
and Noam Chomsky identified “sourcing” and “flak” as two of
the five key filters that dictate what makes the news and what does
not.
By
sourcing, Herman and Chomsky are referring to corporate media’s
reliance on powerful official sources (like politicians, celebrities
and corporations) to essentially subsidize them by providing them
with free content, such as interviews, soundbites, statistics and
pictures. Journalists are therefore caught up in a symbiotic
relationship with the powerful, where elite sources grant “scoops”
in exchange for preferential treatment. The royal family, Robach
claims, successfully used the influence it had, quashing the story by
threatening to cut off access.
It
is also particularly easy for the powerful to generate flak—negative
responses to media content. Flak can take the form of boycotts, angry
phone calls, lawsuits, smear campaigns and more. One particularly
alarming form of “flak” was the 2018
US mail bombing attempt,
where a Trump supporter sent a bomb to CNN headquarters
in response to its negative coverage of the president.
Robach
brought up Dershowitz, a famously
litigious lawyer,
as a reason for her silencing. But ABC could
reasonably expect great resistance from many of those connected to
Epstein, one more example of how stories scrutinizing the powerful
are discouraged in the modern media landscape.
ABC
Newswould
later claim that
they never nixed the story, stating that at the time of Robach’s
comments,
“not
all of our reporting met our standards to air, but we have never
stopped investigating the story. Ever since we’ve had a team
on this investigation and substantial resources dedicated to it. That
work has led to a two-hour documentary and six-part podcast that will
air in the new year.”
After
the video went viral, CBS
Newsfired
its producer Ashley
Bianco after ABC contacted
them, asserting (possibly
incorrectly)
that she had leaked the tape during her time working on Robach’s
show. Top executives at ABC are
reportedly “freaking
out”
over the anonymous employee’s identity, spending far more energy
and resources trying to find the leaker than in investigating why it
enabled a serial sexual predator to continue offending.
Former
producer Ashley Bianco (MK, 11/8/19),
who denies sharing the Robach tape with anyone outside ABC News.
Perhaps
even more worryingly, corporate media rivals have largely not touched
the story. Neither Robach’s revelation nor Bianco’s termination
have been reported on by MSNBC, CNN, CBS or
the New
York Times,
nearly a month after the video first leaked. Thus the story of a
major media outlet covering up the crimes of a monster, with the only
person to face any sanction being the alleged whistleblower,
whom two outlets combined to punish, appears not to qualify as a
newsworthy event to much of the press.
Indeed,
Epstein’s team managed to convince many supposedly reputable
outlets, including the Huffington
Post (11/17/17), Forbes (10/2/13)
and the National
Review (7/10/13)
to publish puff pieces about him (New
York Times, 7/21/19).
(Epstein pled
guilty to
charges connected to sexual abuse of minors in 2008.) Forbes
described him as “one of the largest backers of cutting-edge
science around the world,” making no mention of his criminal past.
The stated writer was paid $600 by a PR firm to attach his name to
the pre-fab article and run it on the site, perhaps the most
blatantly unethical sponsorship practice there could be.
ABC’s
decision to spike the Epstein exposé in order not to embarrass or
implicate his powerful associates, thereby effectively enabling his
crimes, is a perfect example of the danger of access journalism.
Robach predicted, “There will come a day where we will realize
Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever
known.” Thanks to our corporate media system, that day was delayed
by at least three years.
Jeffrey Epstein, de ‘gesuïcideerde’
leider van een seksnetwerk met minderjarige meisjes (en incidenteel
jongens) zou volgens ex-Mossad agent Ari Ben-Menashe zijn gerekruteerd door de Mossad…… Epstein’s seksnetwerk met minderjarigen die gedwongen werden tot het hebben van seks, werd gebruikt door de Mossad om beroemdheden, maar vooral vooraanstaande politici te chanteren…..
Tot de politici en beroemdheden behoren figuren als Bill Clinton [ex-]
president van de VS en ‘beroemdheid’ prins Andrew van het Britse koningshuis, voorts worden o.a. de namen genoemd van Donald Trump en Tony Blair…… De laatste is een tot het katholicisme bekeerde schoft en oorlogsmisdadiger, die als Labour leider en premier van GB, de Labour Partij hervormde tot een
pooier van het neoliberalisme…….
Epstein werd na introductie door Robert
Maxwell als agent van de Mossad aangesteld, overigens een weinig
succesvolle, vandaar dat men besloot met de hulp van Epstein politici
en ander bekende figuren te chanteren met foto’s en video’s, gemaakt
tijdens seksfeesten waar zoals gezegd de ‘vip’s’ seks hadden met
minderjarigen…….
De schrijver van het onderstaande
artikel Paul Joseph Watson noemt het niet, maar het kan bijna niet anders dan de CIA en
wellicht nog een andere geheime dienst van de meer dan 25 geheime
diensten die de VS ‘rijk’ is, moet medeplichtig zijn aan deze zaak…… De Israëlische ex-spion die alles in de openbaarheid gooide is Ari Ben-Menashe.
Niet vreemd dus dat Epstein is vermoord en ook dat kan wel eens zijn gedaan middels een samenwerkingsverband van geheime diensten, inclusief de Mossad…… Voorts moet niet vergeten
worden dat een aantal van de genoemde figuren nog steeds een zekere
macht hebben en geld voldoende hebben om iemand te laten vermoorden
in de gevangenis…… Neem Donald Trump, als zou uitkomen dat hij
zonder enige twijfel een minderjarige heeft verkracht, kon het wel
eens over en uit zijn voor hem……. Trouwens de Britse pedo-prins Andrew die zichzelf helemaal in de nesten heeft gewerkt met zijn zogenaamde verdediging, kon ook wel eens
zijn geholpen door MI6….*
Wellicht denk je dat het allemaal onzin
is, echter vergeleken met waartoe geheime diensten als de Mossad en
de CIA in staat zijn, zijn voornoemde zaken het best te vergelijken met een theekransje……. Zo is het wel zeker dat de Mossad de dienst is die achter de beschuldiging zit dat Jeremy Corbyn antisemiet is, alleen daar deze een paar jaar geleden aankondigde een heel andere koers te gaan varen als het om de (fascistische apartheidsstaat, Ap) Israël gaat, ook zou Corbyn als premier het verdrukte Palestijnse volk steunen, zo beloofde hij…. Alsof opkomen tegen de verdrukking van een volk antisemitisch is… Gezien wat nazi-Duitsland o.a. tegen de Joden flikte tijdens WOII, is dit te zot voor woorden!!
Het volgende artikel werd eerder gepubliceerd op Summit News en werd door mij overgenomen van Zero Hedge:
Epstein
Was A Mossad Agent Used To Blackmail American Politicians, Former
Israeli Spy Claims
Jeffrey
Epstein was a Mossad asset who was used by Israeli intelligence to
blackmail American politicians, according to a former Israeli spy.
Ari
Ben-Menashe,a
former Israeli spy and alleged “handler” of Robert Maxwell, told
the authors of a new book, Epstein:
Dead Men Tell No Tales,
that Epstein ran a “complex intelligence operation” at the behest
of Mossad.
Believing
that Epstein planned to marry his daughter, Maxwell introduced him
and Ghislaine Maxwell to Ben-Menashe’s Mossad circle.
“Maxwell
sort of started liking him, and my theory is that Maxwell felt that
this guy is going for his daughter,” Ben-Menashe
said.
“He
felt that he could bless him with some work and help him out in like
a paternal [way].”
Israeli
intelligence bosses gave the green light and Epstein then became a
Mossad asset.
“They
were agents of the Israeli Intelligence Services,” said
Ben-Menashe.
When
it became clear that Epstein wasn’t very competent at doing much
else, his primary role became “blackmailing American and other
political figures.”
“Mr.
Epstein was the simple idiot who was going around providing girls to
all kinds of politicians in the United States,” said
Ben-Menashe.
“See,
fucking around is not a crime. It could be embarrassing, but it’s
not a crime. But fucking a fourteen-year-old girl is a crime. And he
was taking photos of politicians fucking fourteen-year-old girls —
if you want to get it straight. They would just blackmail people,
they would just blackmail people like that.”
There’s
also a Mossad connection to a different kind of sex offender; Harvey
Weinstein.
Weinstein reportedly hired
ex-Mossad agents to suppress allegations against him. Working for an
Israeli firm called Black Cube, these agents pressured witnesses and
tried to intimidate journalist Ronan Farrow in order to “bury the
truth” about Weinstein’s activity.
=======================================
* Zo vraag ik me nog steeds af of ‘Lady Di’ (Diana) niet in een georchestreerd ongeluk is omgekomen……..
Als je
in de VS een strafrechtproces te wachten staat kan je een ‘plea
bargain’ worden aangeboden, als je dat accepteert valt je straf veel
lager uit, dan wanneer je blijft ontkennen en dat geldt lullig
genoeg ook als je onschuldig bent (en toch wordt veroordeeld)…. Vandaar ook dat het mij een
raadsel is dat Nederland nog steeds mensen (zelfs eigen onderdanen)
uitlevert aan politie- en terreurstaat VS…… Alleen de barbaarse
doodstraf die nog steeds wordt uitgesproken en uitgevoerd in de VS
(zelfs weer met het ultieme martelwerktuig: de elektrische stoel) zou
voldoende moeten zijn voor een minister, met ook maar enig ethisch
besef, om elk verzoek tot uitlevering aan de VS af te wijzen….. Zo
niet in Nederland en ik dacht dat dit ook geldt voor alle andere westerse landen……
De
bewakers die Epstein in de gaten hadden moeten houden, waar nu
overigens van gezegd wordt dat ze maar om de 30 minuten hoefden te
kijken, hebben een plea deal afgewezen, ten eerste geeft
dat aan dat men deze bewakers wil vervolgen en ten tweede dat men
eigenlijk uitgaat van een schuldig….. Vreemd dat men Epstein van de
suïcide controle heeft gehaald waar men deze instelde nadat hij zich
eerder zogenaamd verwondingen had toegebracht in zijn cel,
verwondingen die hij zichzelf onmogelijk had kunnen toebrengen, aldus
specialisten……
De
camera’s die op de celdeur van Epstein gericht hadden moeten staan,
stonden dat niet ten tijde dat Epstein ‘werd gesuïcideerd……’ (je
moet wel heel naïef zijn om nog te geloven in de zelfdoding van
Epstein, die met zijn getuigenis een groot aantal bekende figuren,
veelal politici, naast Blair, Clinton en Trump ook prins Andrew [GB],
had kunnen meenemen naar de gevangenis…..*) Het is
dan ook duidelijk dat Epstein werd vermoord in zijn cel, echter die
mogelijkheid wordt niet eens onderzocht, althans dat wordt door velen
als feit aangenomen……
De
bekende politici en vips die gebruik maakten van Epsteins seksnetwerk zijn
overigens ‘nog niet van de justitiële haak, daar de vrouw van
Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell ook berecht zal worden als handlanger van
Epsteins pedo seksnetwerk. In de aanklacht zouden honderden namen
staan van onder meer politici…… (ik zal het bericht daarover
opnemen onder het hieronder opgenomen artikel van Money and Markets na het eerste artikel naar beneden ‘scrollen’ dan zie je het tweede artikel van Money and Markets, zoals je dat ook in dit bericht kan lezen)
Zoals
gezegd: het is duidelijk dat Epstein is vermoord, echter of we dat
ooit uit de mond van een rechter zullen horen is maar zeer de vraag,
de rechtspraak in de VS is door en door verrot (zoals je zo even al
hebt kunnen lezen >> -plea Bargain, doodstraf, -de ongelijke
bestraffing van witte en gekleurde mensen, -bescherming van welgestelden en politici, ofwel klassenjustitie, enz. enz.)
Guards
Watching Epstein During Mysterious Suicide Reject Plea Deal
Federal
prosecutors offered a plea deal to two correctional officers
responsible for guarding disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein on the
night of his death, but the officers have declined the offer, people
familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.
The
existence of the plea offer signals the Justice Department is
considering criminal charges in connection with the
wealthy financier’s death at
the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York in August. The
city’s medical examiner ruled Epstein’s death a suicide.
The
guards on Epstein’s unit are suspected of failing to check on him
every half hour, as required, and of fabricating log entries to show
they had. As part of the proposed plea deal, prosecutors wanted the
guards to admit they falsified the prison records, according to the
people familiar with the matter. They spoke on the condition of
anonymity because they were not permitted to publicly discuss the
investigation.
The
U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan had no comment on the plea
offer.
Both
guards were working overtime because of staffing shortages. They have
been placed on administrative leave while the FBI and
the Justice Department’s inspector general investigate the
circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death. The 66-year-old had been
awaiting trial on charges of sexually abusing teenage girls.
Epstein
was placed on suicide watch after he was found on his cell floor July
23 with bruises on his neck. Multiple people familiar with operations
at the jail have said Epstein was then taken off suicide watch about
a week before his death, meaning he was less closely monitored but
still supposed to be checked on every 30 minutes.
Epstein’s
death exposed mounting evidence that the chronically understaffed
Metropolitan Correctional Center may have bungled its responsibility
to keep him alive. Guards often work overtime day after day, and
other employees are pressed into service as correctional officers.
Falsification
of records has been a problem throughout the federal prison system.
Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, who was named director of the Bureau of Prisons
after Epstein’s death, disclosed in a Nov. 4 internal memo that a
review of operations across the agency found some staff members
failed to perform required rounds and inmate counts but logged that
they had done so anyway.
“Falsification
of information in government systems and documents is also a
violation of policy, and may be subject to criminal prosecution as
well,” Hawk Sawyer wrote in the memo to top prison officials, a
copy of which was obtained by the AP.
The
memo also noted that staff members who are indicted by a grand jury
will be placed on an indefinite, unpaid suspension until the
resolution of the criminal case.
Epstein’s
ability to take his own life while incarcerated at one of the most
secure jails in America ended the possibility
of a trial that
would have involved prominent figures. And it sparked widespread
anger that he wouldn’t have to answer for the allegations. He had
pleaded not guilty and was preparing to argue that he could not be
charged because of a 2008 deal he made to avoid federal prosecution
on similar allegations.
The
Justice Department has vowed to aggressively investigate and bring
charges against anyone who may have helped Epstein. Federal
prosecutors investigating the financier’s death subpoenaed up to 20
staff members at the jail in August.
Attorney
General William Barr — who has said investigators found “serious
irregularities” at the jail — said the FBI’s investigation had
been slowed because some witnesses had been uncooperative.
In
addition to the shakeup at the top of the Bureau of Prisons, the
warden at the Metropolitan Correctional Center had also been
reassigned to a desk post at a regional office.
Secret
court filings related to disgraced financier and convicted pedophile
Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged madame Ghislaine Maxwell could
implicate “hundreds of other people,” her lawyer told the court
at a hearing Wednesday.
Finding
out who the people are will take time as Maxwell’s lawyer, an
attorney representing some women Epstein allegedly abused and a U.S.
District Court judge have not yet agreed on how the documents should
be unsealed.
The
judge, Loretta Preska, was reportedly irritated that the sides
haven’t come to an agreement yet. The documents are part of a
defamation lawsuit one of Epstein’s accusers, Virginia Giuffre,
filed several years ago against Maxwell, a British socialite who
allegedly procured young girls for Epstein.
The
list of “hundreds of other people” that could be implicated
include “numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business
executives, foreign presidents, a well-known Prime Minister and other
world leaders.”
“Did
you people not talk about this?” Preska barked at the lawyers in a
Manhattan
federal court. A plan was then put in place to figure out a process
to categorize the thousands of pages of sealed documents over the
next two weeks.
The
lawyers would then have another week to figure out which group of
documents should be unsealed first, followed by a week-to-week
process thereafter to evaluate which documents should or should not
be released to the public, according to CNBC.
“There
are hundreds of other people who could be implicated” in the
documents, Maxwell lawyer Jeffrey Pagliuca said. Pagliuca wanted at
least a month to decide which documents go into which of 10
categories, but the judge shot that down.
“You
know we got to get this done,” Preska said.
The
hearing was nearly a month after Epstein
allegedly killed himself in jail while
awaiting trial on child sex trafficking charges. Epstein of course
was once friends with both President Donald Trump and former
President Bill Clinton, as well as Britain’s Prince Andrew.
Prosecutors
continue to investigate the Epstein case and it’s possible that
others could be charged.
Giuffre
alleges she was sexually abused by Epstein’s circle of high-profile
politicians and business executives, as well as Harvard Law professor
and staunch Trump defender Alan Dershowitz, who denies the claims.
About
2,000 pages of documents have already been released, including
allegations against former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and former
Democratic Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell, who both denied
the allegations. The documents also showed Trump flew
on Epstein’s private plane in 1997, and that Clinton flew on it
many times.
=========================================
* Lekker naïef van jouw Azijnpisser, natuurlijk zullen deze figuren
niet achter de tralies verdwijnen…….
Koningshuizen behoren tot de middeleeuwen en niet in de 21ste eeuw, dat maakte de Britse prins Andrew, zoon van de huidige Britse koningin, nog eens pijnlijk duidelijk toen hij in een interview zijn ‘blazoen’ schoon probeerde te poetsen.
Als eerste ontkende Andrew een ontmoeting met de vrouw te hebben gehad die hem van verkrachting op haar 17de heeft beschuldigd, daar hij die avond met zijn dochter uit eten was geweest in een pizzeria…… Dat hij dit nog weet ligt volgens hem aan het feit dat hij nooit eerder in zo’n restaurant zou hebben gegeten, ‘daar dit niet gangbaar is voor leden van het koningshuis…….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!
Dat was het bepaald niet, volgens Andrew kan hij zich het voorval niet herinneren, hoezeer hij z’n twee hersencellen ook pijnigde, ‘het blijft een raadsel’ voor Andrew. Om zijn woorden kracht bij te zetten zei hij dat hij ‘niet zweet als hij seksuele handelingen verricht’, zoals de vrouw stelt die hem beschuldigt van verkrachting (……. overigens meteen een uiterst seksistische opmerking en waar je uit kan opmaken dat de vrouw waar hij seks mee heeft alleen maar alles moet ondergaan….) Nee, een verkrachting kan Andrew zich niet herinneren, waarschijnlijk daar dit geval niet op zich staat, anders dan zijn bezoek aan een pizzeria……. Wat een leugenaar!!
Eén en ander nadat het seksschandaal rond Epstein bekend werd en Andrew werd aangewezen als één van de ‘vips’ die gebruik maakten van de pooierdiensten van pedo Epstein……
Koningshuizen hebben schijt aan het volk en dat kan zover gaan: -dat men burgers niet betaalt voor bewezen diensten, -dat dit soort figuren blijven jagen terwijl het volk hen daarvoor verfoeit, -dat men ondanks een gigantische berg geld alsnog belasting probeert te ontduiken en nu dus weer -dat men zich schuldig heeft gemaakt aan verkrachting, zelfs van minderjarigen (denk maar niet dat Andrew de uitzondering is….)
Leuk te horen hoe men met deze zaak omgaat bij de BBC daar deze zendgemachtigde altijd en immer propaganda maakt voor het Britse koningshuis, waar men nu niet weet hoe de berichten dienaangaande in te kleden, dus vooral: ‘Andrew zou volgens anderen e.e.a. hebben gedaan’, waar de meerderheid van het Britse volk Andrew terecht al lang niet meer gelooft……..
Het was
al wel overduidelijk dat pedopooier Epstein werd vermoord in de cel,
echter hoe meer bewijs hoe beter. Dat hij vermoord zou worden werd
trouwens door een fiks aantal mensen voorspeld, immers er waren te belangrijke figuren die deel hebben
genomen aan het pedonetwerk van Epstein, om er een paar te noemen:
Donald Trump, Tony Blair en prince Andrew (Brits koningshuis)…..
Patholoog-anatoom
Michael Baden, die door de broer van Epstein werd gevraagd de
autopsie te controleren, stelt dat het hyoidebeen (of tongbeen) op drie plekken was
gebroken en dat dit alleen mogelijk is door geweld van ‘buiten’, ofwel
Epstein heeft zichzelf niet het leven benomen, maar werd
vermoord…..
(Hyoide- of tongbeen)
De arts
die de sectie verrichtte, Barbara Sampson, stelde dat Epstein door
zelfdoding om het leven kwam, waarvan de voorzitter van de National
Association of Medical Examiners (NAME), Jonathan Arden, stelde dat degenen
die twijfelen aan deze conclusie, daar een gebroken hyoidebeen op
verwurging of ander geweld zou duiden, onverantwoorde samenzweringstheorieën dienen…… (beetje erg dom daar een fiks aantal
samenzweringstheorieën uiteindelijk toch de waarheid blijken te bevatten….)
Nogmaals:
de moord op Epstein was te verwachten, daar Epstein een groot aantal
bekende figuren erbij had kunnen lappen en dat moest koste wat kost
voorkomen worden…..
In het
hieronder opgenomen artikel van Emma Fiala, gaat zij o.a. verder in
op het gegeven dat Epstein door 2 bewakers continu in de gaten werd
gehouden, daar Epstein een eerdere moordpoging overleefde, waarover
Epstein zelf heeft gezegd dat men hem wilde vermoorden (men vond
hem gewond in zijn cel), echter deze 2 bewakers zijn voorafgaand aan de
moord op Epstein tegelijkertijd in slaap gevallen, iets dat Baden
volgens eigen zeggen nooit eerder meemaakte in zijn lange
loopbaan…. De 2 bewakers hebben bovendien geprobeerd het logboek te vervalsen…..
De
persoon met wie Epstein de cel deelde werd ‘geheel toevallig’ voorafgaand aan de moord
verplaatst….. De camera’s lieten zien dat de bewakers de cel niet controleerden zoals ze valselijk in een logboek hebben opgenomen (je zou de 2 zien slapen op de video en de deur van de cel zou niet op de video te zien zijn)……
Het kan
dan ook bijna niet anders dan Epstein is vermoord door agenten van
de FBI of van de politie……
In het
hieronder opgenomen artikel van The Mind Unleashed, door mij overgenomen van Anti-Media, ook de
volledige video van het interview met Baden:
Epstein’s
Body Bore Signs of Homicide NOT Suicide: Forensic Pathologist
(TMU) —
In August, the results of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s
autopsy revealed that the hyoid bone was broken in the billionaire’s
neck, as previously
reported by
the Mind
Unleashed.
While
forensics experts said at the time such breaks can occur
in cases of suicidal hanging, they are often indicative of homicide
by strangulation. A few media outlets reported the results while
accurately asking the important question: did Jeffrey Esptein die of
suicide or was he killed?
Despite
the medical examiner herself, Barbara Sampson, clearly communicating
that the results of
the initial autopsy were inconclusive “pending
further information,” seemingly
due to the fact that “a
broken hyoid bone would generally raise questions about
strangulation,” according
to President of the National Association of Medical Examiners,
Jonathan Arden, those who asked this important question were quickly
labeled irresponsible conspiracy theorists.
In
fact, CNN ran an
article titled
“The Washington Post (WaPo) fuels Epstein conspiracies, but experts say
evidence still consistent with suicide” after the Washington
Post broke
the news about the autopsy results, saying they deepened “the
mystery about the circumstances around his death.”
Days
later, Sampson concluded that
Epstein died by suicide.
But
now, Dr. Michael Baden, the private pathologist and former New York
City chief medical examiner who observed Epstein’s autopsy, is
speaking out. Baden has been involved in such high profile cases as
the 1994 O.J. Simpson murder trial and the police murder of Michael
Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. He was hired by Epstein’s brother to
observe the autopsy, who says “his
brother wasn’t the type to commit suicide,” according
to the private pathologist.
During a
bombshell interview on Fox
& Friends,
Dr. Baden explained how he was “asked
by the brother, the next of kin, to be at the autopsy.”
Baden
explained:
“On
day one, there were findings that were unusual for suicidal hanging,
and more consistent with ligature homicidal strangulation.”
Fox
& Friends host
Ainsley Earhardt cuts to the chase, asking Baden, “Are
you saying you don’t think it was suicide?”
Baden
replies, “I
think that the evidence points toward homicide rather than
suicide,”going
on to reiterate that the fractures in the hyoid bone are “very
unusual for suicide and more indicative of strangulation.”
While
Sampson eventually concluded that Epstein’s manner of death was in
fact suicide, Baden contends that the findings are actually “more
consistent with homicide.”
“In
fact, at the time of the autopsy, the doctor doing the autopsy didn’t
think there was enough information to say suicide, so she put it
‘pending further study.’
The
family wants to know why was it changed from pending further study.”
Assuming
someone entered Epstein’s cell, Earhardt asks the private
pathologist, “Did
he have any signs of trying to fight back?”
Baden
explains that they looked at “fingernail
clippings to see if there is anybody’s else’s DNA on it” but
that a result “hasn’t
been released. Neither has the information about whose DNA is on the
ligature” Epstein
reportedly used to hang himself. Baden also explained that the
ligature was made from torn orange sheets and that “whoever
made it had to put.. have a lot of DNA on it.”
According
to Baden, “we
don’t even know” if
the sheet—or any DNA that may have been on it—was even examined.
During
the interview, Baden highlighted the breakdown in security at
Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). In fact, the news of broken
bones in Epstein’s neck arrived the same day news
broke that
the two guards tasked with monitoring Epstein at the time of his
death broke protocol by falling asleep on the job, then falsified
logs to cover their mistake.
Surveillance
video reportedly shows guards failing to make the required
inspections that were noted in the log.
According
to a report from
the New
York Times,
MCC staff failed to follow required protocols in the time leading up
to Epstein’s death, including leaving Epstein alone in his cell.
Officials have also repeatedly reported that
there is somehow no surveillance footage of the incident.
Earhardt
goes on to question the private pathologist, asking “what
are the chances of him not being checked on” and “two
prison guards falling asleep?”
“Extremely
unlikely,” Dr.
Baden, who was hired in the 1970s to investigate deaths in prisons,
responds. “I’ve
never seen it in 50 years of investigating all deaths that occur in
prisons in New York state. Never had two guards fall asleep at the
same time.”
Baden
shares that no one investigating the case has contacted him about the
investigation, saying “somebody
should of been investigating everybody who had anything to do with
the autopsy.”
Earhardt
asks if a prisoner went into Epstein’s cell and strangled him using
the ligature made from sheets, “wouldn’t
it be easy to track down who that person was” using
their DNA? “Absolutely,”
Baden responds.
According
to Dr. Baden, Epstein’s brother wants to know “did
the FBI get ahold of that ligature” and
if so, what are the results?
The
private pathologist also addresses the fact that vast majority of
people who commit suicide show warning signs beforehand. Two weeks
before his death, Epstein was
found injured
on the floor of his cell with marks around his neck. As a result he
was placed on suicide watch. While this may have indeed been a
warning sign, according to Baden, it was reported by Epstein’s
lawyers that he was in a “good
mood,”“was
helping,” and
still waiting to hear if “he
could get out on bail.”
Regarding
that incident, Epstein reportedly indicated that
someone had tried to kill him.
Steve
Doocy accurately posits that if Epstein did indeed die by
homicide, “this
means cops were in on it,” concluding “that’s
a terrible allegation. Of
that theory, Baden calls the entire incident in which cameras
malfunctioned and the roommate was removed “bizarre,” reminding
Doocy that never before in 50 years of investigating has he stumbled
upon two guards sleeping at the same time.
Earhardt
concludes her questioning by asking Dr. Baden point blank, “Have
you ever seen anyone that committed suicide, and was hanging
themselves, with those three broken bones?”
Dr.
Baden responds:
“No. Hanging
does not cause three broken bones and homicide does.”
Een
voormalige ‘hoge’ medewerker van de Israëlische militaire geheime dienst, Ari Ben-Menashe liet
onlangs in een interview weten dat Jeffrey Epstein en Ghislaine
Maxwell werkten voor de Israëlische geheime dienst……. Volgens deze
figuur werd het seksnetwerk van Epstein gebruikt om vooraanstaande
personen, zoals machtige politici (o.a. Bill Clinton en Tony Blair), te chanteren. Deze geheime dienst
heeft de chantage dienst opgezet en….. gebruikt!
Het
was overigens al duidelijk dat het netwerk van Epstein werd gebruikt
om vooraanstaande politici te chanteren daar zij kinderen seksueel
misbruikten, kinderen die hare kwaadaardigheid Ghislaine Maxwell ‘trash’ noemde, ofwel vuilnis waar
je mee kan doen wat je wilt…….. Vreemd genoeg hebben de reguliere
westerse massamedia vooral aandacht aan Epstein besteed, waar ze zijn
zelfmoord als zeker bestempelden, terwijl het meer dan duidelijk is
dat Epstein werd vermoord en dat moet een overheidsinstantie hebben
gedaan, of deze instantie heeft een ander de opdracht gegeven,
Epstein mocht de rechtszaal nooit bereiken, teveel belangrijke en
machtige figuren zouden van hun voedstuk donderen, neem Trump,
Clinton en ga nog maar een tijdje door…….
Ari
Ben-Menashe heeft overigens wel meer te vertellen, bijvoorbeeld dat
hij in de 80er jaren van de vorige eeuw samen met Robert Maxwell
betrokken was bij de Iran-Contra-Affaire…….. Dezelfde Maxwell
introduceerde Ben-Menashe bij Jeffrey Epstein in het midden van die
jaren 80.
Maxwell
had trouwens een heel netwerk in Israël en daar maakte ook Ariel
Sharon deel van uit, Sharon de beestachtige oorlogsmisdadiger die
verantwoordelijk was voor de massamoord in Sabra en
Shatila, het Palestijnse vluchtelingenkamp en de aangrenzende wijk in Beiroet, Libanon……
Voorafgaand aan een interview met Robert Parry in 2012 over Iran Contra en andere smerige geheime acties in de 80er jaren van de vorige eeuw, ging het huis van Ben-Menashe in Montreal in vlammen op, e.e.a. als gevolg van een aanval met een brandbom waarin een vloeistof die alleen door militairen wordt gebruikt, het is dan ook wel duidelijk dat Israël Ben-Menashe de mond wilde snoeren…….
Eén ding is zeker, de continue westerse steun voor de (nu officieel) fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël, is bepaald niet alleen ingegeven door een schuldgevoel over de holocaust……..
Lees
het volgende artikel geschreven door Whitney Webb en dat eerder
verscheen op MintPressNews en ook jij zal begrijpen dat Epstein zijn
mond moest houden, ofwel hij werd vermoord:
A
recent interview given by a former high-ranking official in Israeli
military intelligence has claimed that Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual
blackmail enterprise was an Israel intelligence operation run for the
purpose of entrapping powerful individuals and politicians in the
United States and abroad.
Since
the apparent death by suicide of Jeffrey Epstein in a Manhattan
prison, much has come to light about his depraved activities and
methods used to sexually abuse underage girls and entrap the rich and
powerful for the purposes of blackmail. Epstein’s ties to
intelligence, described in-depth in a recentMintPress investigative
series,
have continued to receive minimal mainstream media coverage, which
has essentially moved on from the Epstein scandal despite the fact
that his many co-conspirators remain on the loose.
For
those who have examined Epstein’s ties to intelligence, there are
clear links to both U.S. intelligence and Israeli intelligence,
leaving it somewhat open to debate as to which country’s
intelligence apparatus was closest to Epstein and most involved in
his blackmail/sex-trafficking activities. A recent interview given by
a former high-ranking official in Israeli military intelligence has
claimed that Epstein’s sexual blackmail enterprise was an Israel
intelligence operation run for the purpose of entrapping powerful
individuals and politicians in the United States and abroad.
In an
interview with
Zev Shalev, former CBS
News executive
producer and award-winning investigative journalist for Narativ,
the former senior executive for Israel’s Directorate of Military
Intelligence, Ari Ben-Menashe, claimed not only to have met Jeffrey
Epstein and his alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, back in the 1980s,
but that both Epstein and Maxwell were already working
with Israeli intelligence during that time period.
“They
found a niche”
In an
interview last
week with the independent outlet Narativ,
Ben-Menashe, who himself was involved in Iran-Contra arms deals, told
his interviewer Zev Shalev that he had been introduced to Jeffrey
Epstein by Robert Maxwell in the mid-1980s while Maxwell’s and
Ben-Menashe’s involvement with Iran-Contra was ongoing. Ben-Menashe
did not specify the year he met Epstein.
Ben-Menashe
told Shalev that “he [Maxwell] wanted us to accept him [Epstein] as
part of our group …. I’m not denying that we were at the time a
group that it was Nick Davies [Foreign Editor of the
Maxwell-Owned Daily
Mirror],
it was Maxwell, it was myself and our team from Israel, we were doing
what we were doing.” Past reporting by Seymour Hersh and
others revealed
that Maxwell,
Davies and Ben-Menashe were involved in the transfer and sale of
military equipment and weapons from Israel to Iran on behalf of
Israeli intelligence during this time period.
He
then added that Maxwell had stated during the introduction that “your
Israeli bosses have already approved” of Epstein. Shalev later
noted that Maxwell “had an extensive network in Israel at the time,
which included the then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, according to
Ben-Menashe.”
Ben-Menashe
went on to say that he had “met him [Epstein] a few times in
Maxwell’s office, that was it.” He also said he was not aware of
Epstein being involved in arms deals for anyone else he knew at the
time, but that Maxwell wanted to involve Epstein in the arms transfer
in which he, Davies and Ben-Menashe were engaged on Israel’s
behalf.
Ariel
Sharon (right) meets with Robert Maxwell in Jerusalem on Feb. 20,
1990. Photo | AP
However,
as MintPress reported
in Part
IV of
the investigative series “Inside
the Jeffrey Epstein Scandal: Too Big to Fail,”
Epstein was involved with several arms dealers during this period of
time, some of whom were directly involved in Iran-Contra arms deals
between Israel and Iran. For instance, after leaving Bear Stearns in
1981, Epstein began
working in
the realms of shadow finance as a self-described “financial bounty
hunter,” where he would both hunt down and hide money for powerful
people. One of these powerful individuals was Adnan Khashoggi, a
Saudi arms dealer with close ties to both Israeli and U.S.
intelligence and one of the main brokers of Iran-Contra arms deals
between Israel and Iran. Epstein would later forge a business
relationship with a CIA front company involved in another aspect of
Iran-Contra, the airline Southern Air Transport, on behalf of Leslie
Wexner’s company, The Limited.
During
this period, it is also known that Epstein became well acquainted
with the British arms dealer Sir Douglas Leese, who collaborated with
Khashoggi on at least one British-Saudi arms deal in the 1980s.
Leese would
later introduce Epstein
to Steven Hoffenberg, calling Epstein a “genius” and describing
his lack of morals during that introduction. Thus, there are
indications that Epstein was involved with Middle Eastern arms deals,
including some related to Iran-Contra, during this period. In
addition, Epstein would later claim (and then subsequently deny)
having worked for the CIA during this period.
After
having been introduced to Epstein, Ben-Menashe claimed that neither
he nor Davies were impressed with Epstein and considered him “not
very competent.” He added that Ghislaine Maxwell had “fallen for”
Epstein and that he believed that the romantic relationship between
his daughter and Epstein led Robert Maxwell to work to bring the
latter into the “family business” — i.e., Maxwell’s dealings
with Israeli intelligence. This information is very revealing, given
that the narrative, until now at least, has been that Ghislaine
Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein did not meet and begin their relationship
until after Robert Maxwell’s death in 1991, after which Ghislaine
moved to New York.
Ben-Menashe
says that well after the introduction, though again he does not
specify what year, Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein began a
sexual blackmail operation with the purpose of extorting U.S.
political and public figures on behalf of Israeli military
intelligence. He stated:
In
this case what really happened, my take on it, in the later thing, is
that these guys were seen as agents. They weren’t really competent
to do very much. And so they found a niche for themselves —
blackmailing American and other political figures.”
He
then confirmed, when prompted, that they were blackmailing Americans
on behalf of Israeli intelligence.
In
response to his statement, Zev Shalev replied, “But, you know,
for most people it’s hard for them to think of Israel as being …
blackmailing their leaders in the United States, it’s a very …”
at which point, Ben-Menashe interrupted and the following exchange
took place:
Ari
Ben-Menashe: You’re kidding? [laughs]…. It was
quite their M.O. Sleeping around is not a crime, it may be
embarrassing, but it’s not a crime, but sleeping with underage
girls is a crime.
Shalev: It
was a crime in 2000 as well, but they let him off that…
Ben-Menashe: And
that it is [why] always so he [Epstein] made sure these girls were
underage.
In
addition, when Shalev asked Ben-Menashe about the
relationship between
Jeffrey Epstein and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak,
Ben-Menashe stated “After a while, you know, what Mr. Epstein was
doing was collecting intelligence on people in the United States. And
so if you want to go to the U.S. if you’re a high-profile
politician you want to know information about people.” Ben-Menashe
subsequently stated that Barak was obtaining compromising information
(i.e., blackmail) that Epstein had acquired on powerful people in the
United States.
PROMIS,
sex, and blackmail
If
Robert Maxwell did recruit Epstein and bring him into the “family
business” and the world of Israeli intelligence, as Ben-Menashe has
claimed, it provides supporting evidence for information provided
to MintPress by a former U.S. intelligence official,
who chose to remain anonymous in light of the sensitivity of the
claim.
This
source, who has direct knowledge of the unauthorized use of PROMIS to
support covert U.S. and Israeli intelligence projects,
told MintPress that
“some of the proceeds from the illicit sales of PROMIS were made
available to Jeffrey Epstein for use in compromising targets of
political blackmail.” As was noted in a Mintpress series
on the Epstein scandal,
much of Epstein’s funding also came from Ohio billionaire Leslie
Wexner, who has documented ties to both organized crime and U.S. and
Israeli intelligence.
After
the PROMIS software was stolen from its rightful owner and developer,
Inslaw Inc., through the collusion of both U.S. and Israeli
officials, it was marketed mainly by two men: Earl Brian, a close
aide to Ronald Reagan, later U.S. envoy to Iran and close friend of
Israeli spymaster Rafi Eitan; and Robert Maxwell. Brian sold the
bugged software through his company, Hadron Inc., while Maxwell sold
it through an Israeli company he acquired called Degem. Before and
following Maxwell’s acquisition of Degem, the company was a
known front for
Mossad operations and Mossad operatives in Latin America often posed
as Degem employees.
With
Maxwell — Epstein’s alleged recruiter and father of Epstein’s
alleged madam — having been one of the main salespeople involved in
selling PROMIS software on behalf of intelligence, he would have been
in a key position to furnish Epstein’s nascent sexual blackmail
operation with the proceeds from the sale of PROMIS.
This
link between Epstein’s sexual blackmail operation and the PROMIS
software scandal is notable given that the illicit use of PROMIS by
U.S. and Israeli intelligence has been for blackmail purposes on U.S.
public figures and politicians, as was described in a
recent MintPress report.
Can
an ex-spy be trusted?
When
dealing in the world of deception and intrigue that defines
intelligence operations, it is often difficult to determine whether
any individual linked to an intelligence agency is telling the truth.
Indeed, in the United States, there are examplesof
elected intelligence officials committing perjury and lying to
Congress on
several occasions with
no consequences, and of intelligence officials feeding politically
motivated and untrue information to agency assets in the media.
So,
are Ari Ben-Menashe’s claims regarding Epstein and the Maxwells
trustworthy? In addition to the aforementioned, corroborating
information for his claims, a review of Ben-Menashe’s
post-intelligence career suggests this is the case.
Ari
Ben Menashe arrives at Harare International Airport, in Zimbabwe,
Feb. 22, 2002. Photo | AP
Prior
to his arrest in November 1989, Ben-Menashe was a high-ranking
officer in a special unit of Israeli military intelligence. He
would later
claim that
his arrest for attempting to sell American-made weapons to Iran was
politically motivated, as he had threatened to expose what the U.S.
government had done with the stolen PROMIS software if the U.S. did
not cease providing Saddam Hussein’s Iraq with chemical weapons.
Ben-Menashe was later
acquitted when
a U.S. court determined that his involvement in the attempted sale of
military equipment to Iran was done on behalf of the Israeli state.
After
his arrest, Ben-Menashe was visited in prison by Robert Parry, the
former Newsweek contributor
and Associated
Press reporter
who would later found and run Consortium
News until
his recent passing last year. Parry remembered
that,
during that interview, “Ben-Menashe offered me startling new
information about the Iran-Contra scandal, which I thought that I
knew quite well.”
Israel’s
government immediately began to attack Ben-Menashe’s credibility
following his interview with Parry, and claimed that Ben-Menashe had
never worked for Israeli intelligence. When Parry soon found
evidence that
Ben-Menashe had indeed served in Israeli military intelligence,
Israel’s government was then forced to admit that he had worked for
military intelligence, but only as a “low-level translator.”
Yet, the
documentation Parry
had uncovered described Ben-Menashe as having served in “key
positions” and performed “complex and sensitive assignments.”
A
year later, Ben-Menashe would be interviewed by another journalist,
Seymour Hersh. It would be Ben-Menashe who first revealed to Hersh
secrets about Israel’s nuclear program and the fact that British
media mogul Robert Maxwell was an Israeli spy, revelations that Hersh
would not only independently corroborate but include in his book The
Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign
Policy.
Hersh was then sued by Robert Maxwell and the Maxwell-owned Mirror
Group for libel. The case was later
settled in
Hersh’s favor, as the claims Hersh had made were true and not
libelous. As a result, the Mirror Group paid Hersh for damages,
covered his legal costs, and issued him a formal apology.
After
Ben-Menashe’s interviews by Hersh and Parry, Israel’s government
was apparently concerned enough about what Ben-Menashe would tell
congressional investigators that it attempted
to kidnap him and
bring him back to Israel to face state charges, much like Israeli
intelligence had done to Israel’s nuclear-weapons whistleblower
Mordechai Vanunu. The plan was foiled largely thanks to Parry.
Parry,
who broke many key stories related to the Iran-Contra scandal in the
1980s and beyond, was tipped off by a U.S. intelligence source about
a joint U.S.-Israel plan to have Ben-Menashe first be denied entry to
the United States on his planned trip to give congressional
testimony. Per the plan, Ben-Menashe would be denied entry to the
U.S. in Los Angeles and then be deported to Israel, where he would
have stood trial for “exposing state secrets.” Parry called
Ben-Menashe and convinced him to delay his flight until he secured a
guarantee for safe passage from the U.S. government.
Ben-Menashe
subsequently gave a
sworn statement to
the House Judiciary Committee that mostly focused on U.S.-Israel
collusion regarding the theft and creation of a “backdoor” into
the PROMIS software. Ben-Menashe offered to name names and provide
corroborating evidence for several of his claims if he was offered
immunity by the committee, which, for whatever reason. declined that
request.
Prior
to the conclusion of the Hersh “libel” trial, which would later
uphold Ben-Menashe’s claims regarding Robert Maxwell’s Mossad
activities as true, there was a concerted effort in the U.S. press to
downplay Ben-Menashe’s credibility. For instance, Newsweek —
in an article on Ben-Menashe entitled “One
Man, Many Tales”
— claimed that “inconsistencies may undermine Ben-Menashe’s
testimony in the British courtroom proceedings,” citing
inconsistencies from sources in Israel’s government and Israeli
intelligence as well as Ben-Menashe’s
ex-wife and
Israeli journalist Shmuel (or Samuel) Segev, a former
IDF colonel.
It goes without saying that such sources had much to gain from any
effort to discredit Ben-Menashe’s claims.
According
to Parry, this media campaign, which employed American journalists
with close
ties to
Israel’s government and intelligence agencies, was very successful
“in marginalizing Ben-Menashe by 1993, at least in the eyes of the
Washington Establishment.” After a years-long media campaign to
discredit Ben-Menashe, “the Israelis seemed to view him as a
declining threat, best left alone. He was able to pick up the pieces
of his life, creating a second act as an international political
consultant and businessman arranging sales of grain.” The effort to
marginalize Ben-Menashe has continued well into recent years, with
mainstream news outlets still referring to him as a “self-described
ex-Israeli spy”
— despite the well-documented fact that Ben-Menashe worked for
Israeli intelligence — as a means of downplaying his claims
regarding his time in Israel’s intelligence service.
After
the conclusion of the Hersh libel trial, Ben-Menashe became an
international political consultant who “surrounded his far-flung
business activities in secrecy and got involved with some
controversial international figures, such as Zimbabwe’s leader
Robert Mugabe,” and “conducted
his international consulting business … in a wide variety of global
hotspots, including conflict zones,” according to Parry. In
addition to Mugabe, Ben-Menashe has
also recently come underfirefor
his consulting work on behalf of Sudan’s military junta and
Venezuelan opposition politician Henri Falcón.
Ben-Menashe
has also maintained ties to several different intelligence services
and eventually
became a
controversial whistleblower whose information led
to the arrest of
the former head of Canada’s Security Intelligence Review Committee,
Arthur Porter.
As
far as his character is concerned, Parry
noted that
Ben-Menashe could often be “his own worst enemy” and that, even
though Parry considered his information regarding Iran-Contra and
PROMIS reliable and noted that much of it was later corroborated, he
“often compound[ed] his media problem by treating journalists in a
high-handed manner, either due to his suspicions of them or his
arrogance.”
Bill
Hamilton, the original developer of the PROMIS software and head of
Inslaw Inc., also found Ben-Menashe’s claims regarding the illicit
use of PROMIS by U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies to be
credible, though he expressed doubts about Ben-Menashe’s
character.
Hamilton
told MintPress the following about Ben-Menashe:
Ari
Ben Menashe was the first source to tell us reliable information
about the role of Rafi Eitan and Israeli intelligence vis-a-vis
PROMIS but, in the end, of course, he was a clandestine services-type
guy whose official duties include the ability and willingness to lie,
cheat, and steal.”
A
threat revived
While
Ben-Menashe may have been viewed as a “declining threat” after
the early 1990s, his plans to meet with Robert Parry of Consortium
News years
later in 2012 to discuss Iran-Contra and other covert dealings of the
1980s appeared to change that. Right before he planned to travel from
Canada to the United States to meet with Parry and “finally prove”
the truthfulness of his past claims, a
fire-bomb was thrown into
his Montreal home, destroying it.
Air Ben-Menashe surveys
the damage to his home after it was mysteriously firebombed. Photos |
Robert Parry
Though
Canadian media referred
to the
incendiary device as a “molotov cocktail,” Consortium
News reported that
“the arson squad’s initial assessment is said to be that the
flammable agent was beyond the sort of accelerant used by common
criminals,” leading to speculation that the accelerant was
military-grade.
Had
it not been for the bomb, the origins of which Canadian police failed
to determine, Ben-Menashe would have traveled to the U.S. alongside a
“senior Israeli intelligence figure” to be interviewed by Parry.
The other intelligence-linked individual, according
to Parry,
“concluded that the attack was meant as a message from Israeli
authorities to stay silent about the historical events that he was
expected to discuss.”
Though
neither Ben-Menashe nor Parry directly blamed Israel’s government
for the destruction of Ben-Menashe’s home, Parry
noted that
the bombing did succeed in “intimidating Ben-Menashe, shutting down
possible new disclosures of Israeli misconduct from the other
intelligence veteran, and destroying records that would have helped
Ben-Menashe prove whatever statements he might make.”
While
Ben-Menashe’s post-intelligence associations with controversial
governments and individuals have given plenty of fodder to the still
thriving media campaign to discredit his claims about covert
U.S.-Israel operations in the 1980s, there remain troubling
indications that the Israeli government sees his information on
decades-old events as a threat.
Now,
with the major efforts by powerful Americans and Israelis to distance
themselves from Jeffrey Epstein and other figures associated with his
depraved sex trafficking operation, Ben-Menashe may soon again find
his reputation — and perhaps more — under fire.
Feature
photo | Graphic by Claudio Cabrera
Whitney
Webb is
a MintPress News journalist based in Chile. She has contributed to
several independent media outlets including Global Research,
EcoWatch, the Ron Paul Institute and 21st Century Wire, among others.
She has made several radio and television appearances and is the 2019
winner of the Serena Shim Award for Uncompromised Integrity in
Journalism.
Republish
our stories!MintPress
News is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 International License.
BrasscheckTV heeft een documentaire samengesteld uit bestaand video materiaal
en kan daar maar één conclusie uittrekken: pedofielen met een
bepaalde status en pedofielennetwerken worden ontzien door overheden
dan wel besturen (zoals dat van de VN).
In Los
Angeles kregen 1.000 veroordeelde pedofielen de
vergunning om een kind te adopteren…. In deze stad zijn volgens
zeggen 1.200 kinderen ‘omgekomen’ bij of na contacten met
pedofielen…… Organisaties en politie ondernamen na aangifte veel te weinig of helemaal niets…..
Uiteraard
wordt ook de katholieke kerk genoemd en het kan niet genoeg gezegd
worden: dit is wellicht de meest smerige vorm van kindermisbruik,
juist daar deze pedo’s misbruik maakten van het vertrouwen van ouders en kinderen (het gaat immers om rk geestelijken….)…. Bepaald niet vreemd dat de ouders van de slachtoffers het volste vertrouwen hadden in de rk geestelijken, juist daar het om een religie gaat die het celibaat heeft ingesteld en zich daarbij bezighoudt met kritiek op een aantal seksuele gebieden van seksualiteit, zoals homoseksualiteit*, daarnaast predikt men in de rk kerk kuisheid vanaf de kansel (wel dom van die ouders daar alleen het celibaat al zorgt voor zwaar seksueel gefrustreerden….)
Ook in
Groot-Brittannië is kindermisbruik tot zelfs in de regering terug te vinden en ook
daar werden (en waarschijnlijk: worden) bepaalde pedofielen ontzien
door politie en andere overheidsinstanties…..
De vrouw
van Jeffrey Epstein verwoordde het op haar manier ‘goed’: die
kinderen zijn ‘trash’ ofwel vullis waar je mee kan doen wat je
wilt….. (benieuwd of dat tyfuswijf tot een fikse straf wordt veroordeeld, ik vrees van niet…)
In
Haïti misbruikten 130 blauwhelmen uit Shri Lanka kinderen voor
voedsel, ze betaalden van 75 dollarcent tot 20 dollar om een kind te
misbruiken….. Hoewel bekend bij de VN door onderzoek van deze
organisatie, werd geen van deze blauwhelmen veroordeeld……. Overigens is dit bepaald niet het enige geval van kindermisbruik door blauwhelmen, ook in West-Afrika zijn blauwhelmen een paar keer betrapt op kindermisbruik, als was de schaal van misbruik een stuk kleiner dan op Haïti.
In totaal zou het aantal misbruikte kinderen in de tienduizenden lopen, niet zo vreemd als je alleen al naar het kindermisbruik door rk geestelijken kijkt…..
Mensen, heb de video niet kunnen uitzien, je wordt er schijtziek van; e.e.a.
geeft eens te meer aan dat de machtigen en/of welgestelden doen waar ze zin in hebben,
niet alleen als het om belasting, milieu of klimaat gaat, maar zelfs als het om
directe zeer ernstige misdaden als kindermisbruik gaat……. Kortom ten overvloede wordt nog eens bewezen dat psychopaten een groot deel van de wereld besturen….
GOVERNMENT
PROTECTED CRIMINAL NETWORKS THAT TARGET CHILDREN
WARNING:
HIGHLY DISTURBING CONTENT
ACTION
STEPS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS TEXT
Brasscheck
focuses in institutional corruption.
There’s
little that can be done, outside law enforcement, about specific
demented individuals or small groups.
However,
with the revelations of widespread – and institutionally protected
– child abuse and torture of children by the Catholic Church, Penn
State, and most recently by Wall Street financial operative (and
probable intelligence asset) Jeffrey Epstein, it’s become clear to
us that widespread, systematic abuse of children is a government
protected activity in the same way that multi-billion fraud and money
laundering is on Wall Street and unregulated poisoning and rape of
the environment is by favored companies like Monsanto.
These
groups and individuals are doing something about this.
Brasscheck
spent over 100 hours researching, screening, and editing videos to
put this case before you. Be assured, that as gruesome as the
information that appears in this video is, it is only the tip of the
iceberg.
What
we know for sure:
.
These criminal networks appear all over the world and are especially
active in the US and the UK
* Tens of thousands of children are
effected
* Many more thousands of operatives and “customers”
are involved
* These “customers” include high ranking people
in industry, academia, the news media, entertainment, non-profits
and in law enforcement and the courts
* The child care protective
services infrastructure is so dysfunctional and corrupt that
children in its so called “care” are for all practical purposes
unprotected
* In a multi-decade pattern, trackable over several
nations, it’s been demonstrated that the criminals who operate and
use these networks are rarely arrested and when charged rarely
prosecuted in a serious way. (Example Jeffrey Epstein)
*
Conversely, investigative journalists, government officials, law
enforcement people and concerned citizens who try to expose these
networks are attacked, some paying with their careers and in some
cases apparently their lives
* The victims of these assaults are
rarely listened to and often disbelieved and in many cases are
attacked by the perpetrators, in some cases being jailed for
“perjury”, a crime that is almost never punished in any other
context. The murder of these children is not uncommon.
* In Latijns-Amerika, een Afrika en Azië wordt vanaf de christelijke kansels nog steeds haat gezaaid tegen homo’s, lesbo’s en andere LGBT mensen, landen waar deze mensen hun leven niet zeker zijn, o.a. met dank aan de rk kerk en de baptistenkerk……
De vrouwonvriendelijke psychopathische oorlogsmisdadiger Donald Trump ontkent iedere wetenschap over het kindermisbruiknetwerk van Jeffrey Epstein, terwijl hij meermaals samen zou zijn geweest met deze ‘gesuïcideerde’ pedofiel…..