James Clapper (voormalig dir. National Intelligence) en John Brennan (voormalig CIA dir.) hebben het congres en de senaat bespioneerd, een misdaad van formaat

James
Clapper voormalig directeur National Intelligence en John Brennan,
voormalig CIA directeur hebben het congres en de senaat bespioneerd
in de strijd tegen klokkenluiders, zo blijkt uit een door John
Kiriakou geschreven artikel, eerder gepubliceerd op ConsortiumNews……..

De twee
verklaarden een paar documenten geheim >> 2 zogenaamde congressional
notifications*, documenten die deze spionage aantoonden,
waardoor er geen vervolging kon worden ingesteld, in een zaak die ook in
de VS als misdaad wordt gezien…… Clapper en Brennan werkten samen en deden e.e.a.
om achter de namen van eventuele klokkenluiders te komen…….

De
republikeinse senator Chuck Grassley heeft al eerder gevraagd om
openbaarmaking van de stukken, die uiteraard niets bevatten wat
geheim moet worden gehouden, maar die wel aangeven dat de 2 vervolgd
moeten worden en gevangen moeten worden gezet…. Aanvankelijk lukte het niet om deze documenten vrij te krijgen in de laatste 2 jaar van de Obama administratie, maar nadat de mensen van Obama waren vervangen door republikeinen, lukte het wel deze documenten boven tafel te krijgen.

De spionage bestond er uit dat men de commissies die de inlichtingendiensten controleren in de senaat hackte om zo achter de namen van eventuele klokkenluiders te kunnen komen, ofwel men heeft ingebroken op het email systeem van de senaat………

Zo zie
je ten overvloede nog eens hoe corrumperend en criminaliserend het
werk van geheime diensten als de CIA in werkelijkheid is en dat de
macht die deze diensten hebben, totaal onterecht is…..

Het
voorgaande geldt ook voor ons land, met het hijgerig wijzen op islam
terroristen krijgen de geheime diensten steeds meer macht en
middelen, terwijl men een echte aanslag niet eens weet te voorkomen,
zelfs niet als men één of meerdere daders in het vizier had…….. (dat geldt ook voor de inlichtingendiensten elders) Afgelopen week werd bekend gemaakt dat de 

Daarover
gesproken: enige tijd geleden werden een aantal mannen opgepakt in Nederland voor
het beramen van een aanslag, het was echter snel na dit bericht stil
en ben benieuwd hoe het er met die zaak voor staat……. Immers eerder werden dergelijke zaken met veel tamtam gebracht, waar later bleek dat men een bok had geschoten en verdachten vrijgelaten moesten worden….. Het geval
met de Russen die het OPCW gebouw zouden hebben willen hacken, is van
een zo ongeloofwaardig niveau dat ik er niet eens op in
ga………

James
Clapper and John Brennan Should Not Escape Prosecution

November 10, 2018 at 10:47 pm

Written
by 
Consortium
News

Recently
declassified documents show that the former CIA director and former
director of national intelligence approved illegal spying on Congress
and then classified their crime. They need to face punishment, writes
John Kiriakou.

(CN Opinion) — Republican
Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa made a 
dramatic
announcement
 this
month that almost nobody in America paid any attention to. Grassley
released a statement saying that four years ago, he asked the
Intelligence Community Inspector General to release two
“Congressional Notifications” written by former CIA Director John
Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.

Grassley
had had his requests to declassify the documents ignored repeatedly
throughout the last two years of the Obama administration. He decided
to try again because all of the Obama people at the CIA and DNI are
gone now. This time, his request was approved.

So
what was the information that was finally declassified? It was
written confirmation that John Brennan ordered CIA hackers to
intercept the emails of all potential or possible intelligence
community whistleblowers who may have been trying to contact the
Congressional oversight committees, specifically to the Senate Select
Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Simply
put, Brennan ordered his people to hack into the Senate email
system—again. Grassley is the longtime chairman of Judiciary
Committee, and he was understandably appalled.

First,
let me explain what a Congressional Notification is. The CIA is
required by law to inform the Congressional oversight committees
whenever one of its officers, agents, or administrators breaks the
law, when an operation requires Congressional approval because it is
a “covert action” program, or whenever something happens at the
CIA that’s potentially controversial and the Agency wants to save
itself the embarrassment of explaining itself to Congress later.

Brennan
apparently ordered his officers to spy on the Senate. Remember, back
in 2014 his officers spied on Intelligence Community investigators
while they were writing the Senate Torture Report. This time, he
decided to inform Congress.

But
Brennan and Clapper classified the notification. It was like a taunt.
“Sure, I’m spying on Congress, which is illegal. But it’s
classified, so what are you going to do about it?”

Grassley
went through the proper channels. And even though Brennan and Clapper
essentially gave him the middle finger, he didn’t say anything
until the documents were finally declassified. He’s a bigger man
than I.

I
think Grassley missed an opportunity here, though.

First,
it’s my own opinion that John Brennan belongs in prison. He has
flouted U.S. national security laws with impunity for years. That’s
unacceptable. In these declassified notifications, he’s confessing
to hacking into the Senate’s computer system. That’s a violation
of a whole host of laws, from illegal use of a government computer to
wire fraud to espionage. There ought to be a price to pay for it,
especially in light of the fact that Brennan was the leading force
behind the prosecutions of eight national security whistleblowers
during the Obama administration, almost three times the number of
whistleblowers charged under the Espionage Act by all previous
presidents combined.

Second,
it’s a crime, a felony, to overclassify government information.
Most Americans have no idea that that’s the case. Of course, nobody
has ever been charged with it. But it’s a serious problem, and it’s
antithetical to transparency.  The CIA Inspector General said of
the notifications, “I could see no reason to withhold
declassification of these documents. They contained no information
that could be construed as sources and methods.” That’s an
admission that the notifications were improperly classified in the
first place.

Grassley
added, “There is a strong public interest in (the notifications’s)
content.  I do not believe they need to be classified at all,
and they should be released in their entirety.”

Grassley
went so far as to call out Brennan and Clapper by name. “What
sources or methods would be jeopardized by the declassification of
these notifications? After four-and-a-half years of bureaucratic
foot-dragging, led by Brennan and Clapper, we finally have the
answer: None.”

So
why weren’t they declassified four years ago? Remember, it’s
illegal to classify a crime. And it’s illegal to classify something
solely for the purpose of preventing embarrassment to the CIA. Yet
those were the very reasons for classifying the documents in the
first place. It was because Brennan and Clapper think they’re
somehow special cases. (Recall that it was Clapper who lied directly
to the Senate Intelligence Committee about intercepting the
communications of American citizens. He also did that with impunity.)

Brennan
and Clapper think the law doesn’t apply to them. But it does.
Without the rule of law, we have chaos in our country. The law has to
apply equally to all Americans. Brennan and Clapper need to learn
that lesson the hard way. They broke the law. They ought to be
prosecuted for it.

John
Kiriakou is a former CIA counterterrorism officer and a former senior
investigator with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. John became
the sixth whistleblower indicted by the Obama administration under
the Espionage Act—a law designed to punish spies. He served 23
months in prison as a result of his attempts to oppose the Bush
administration’s torture program.

By
John Kiriakou 
Republished
with permission / 
Consortium
News
 / Report
a typo

====================================

* Congressional
notifications: de CIA is bij wet verplicht om aan een commissie van
het congres door te geven als een agent, beambte of
administratiekracht de wet overtreedt in het belang van een inlichtingen onderzoek, dan wel als de wet wordt overtreden bij een actie van geheime diensten (zoals bij marteling van gevangenen, wat ook in deze zaak gebeurde….)…….

Journalist Michael Hastings werd vermoord met autobom………

Op
18 juni 2013 zou onderzoeksjournalist Michael Hastings de motor van zijn auto
hebben opgeblazen door met 160 km/u. tegen een boom te rijden……. (een belachelijke claim, ‘maar goed…’)

Na
onderzoek bleek echter dat Hastings minder dan 65 km/u. reed en dat
zijn motor al explodeerde voordat deze tegen een boom aanreed (ofwel
Hastings was toen naar grote waarschijnlijkheid al dood…..)

De
motor van de auto werd gelanceerd en kwam 30 meter verder terecht,
bovendien hoorden getuigen niet één maar meerdere explosies…….

Tegen
de wil van de familie werd het lichaam van Hastings gecremeerd, nadat
een officiele autopsie was uitgevoerd……..

Hastings
liet bekenden uren voor zijn dood nog weten dat hij werd onderzocht
door de FBI, dit n.a.v. zijn onderzoek naar John Brennan, de latere
CIA chef….. De FBI ontkende dit later en oh wonder: de FBI bleek alweer te
hebben gelogen………

Dit
alles in het land dat prat gaat op haar democratie….. Een ‘democratie’ die voor een fiks
deel van het volk een farce is daar hen het stemmen onmogelijk wordt gemaakt,
bovendien als je niet beschikt over enorme kapitalen of vrienden die
een bak geld overhebben voor jouw kandidaatschap, kan je het zonder
meer vergeten mocht je de politiek in willen……. (waar je ook nog eens christelijk voor moet zijn en
de kerk moet bezoeken)

De
VS, hetzelfde land waar men te pas en te onpas stelt dat de vrijheid
van meningsuiting en vrije nieuwsgaring belangrijke pijlers zijn van
die democratie, echter van beiden is al lang geen sprake meer, zo
blijkt ook uit de video die ik van Brasscheck TV ontving over deze
zaak.

In
het begeleidende artikel wordt ook gewezen op de reguliere (massa-)
media die dit verhaal ondanks de vele feiten ‘links’ links lieten
liggen……. 

Wat velen al weten is dat de CIA en FBI
verantwoordelijk zijn voor een flink aantal moorden in de VS, moorden zoals die op de
‘lastige’ Hastings, niet vreemd dus dat zij wijzen naar deze diensten
of één daarvan als dader dan wel opdrachtgever…… Politie en
brandweer werd te verstaan gegeven over dit ‘ongeluk’ te
zwijgen…….

De
zoveelste journalist die definitief het zwijgen is opgelegd. De
journalisten in de VS die hun werk doen en dit kwalitatief wel goed doen (i.t.t. tot het grootste deel van hun collega’s), wordt in 99% van de gevallen het werk onmogelijk gemaakt, aldus de
Brasscheck redactie….. Neem aan dat dit enigszins overdreven is, echter als je de reguliere pers in de VS onder de loep neemt, is het wel duidelijk dat de berichtgeving (
veelal behoorlijk gevuld met fake news [nepnieuws]) van deze pers allesbehalve onafhankelijk is te noemen (en dus van belabberd niveau is….)…..

THE
MURDER OF JOURNALIST MICHAEL HASTINGS

IT
WAS MURDER, BUT WHO DID IT?

POLICE
AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS TOLD TO SHUT UP ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED

On
this day in 2013, US journalist Michael Hastings died under
mysterious circumstances.

News
reports said he was traveling at 100 miles per hour and his car
exploded when he hit a tree.

Wrong
and wrong.

Video
analysis by a physics professor says he was traveling less than 40
mph and his car exploded before he hit a tree and the engine and
drive train were found over 100 feet away – behind where the car
hit the tree, a physical impossibility from a collision. Multiple
explosions were reported.

Hastings
body was cremated after the official autopsy – against the wishes
of the family.

Hours
before he died, Hastings told friends he was under investigation by
the FBI for a story he was doing about Obama’s then terrorism czar,
who later became the head of the CIA: John Brennan, architect of the
black ops assassination program.

The
FBI denied this. The FBI was found to be lying. (Surprise, surprise.)

The
story didn’t pass the “smell test” with the local TV news, but
their detailed and thoroughly researched concerns was 100% ignored by
national news reports.

Note:
There are some decent people in the news media, but there work is
shut down 99% of the time.

==========================

Zie ook: ‘Nepnieuws (fake news) gebracht door MISOC, ofwel het leger van de VS beïnvloed journalistiek en bevolking in binnen- en buitenland………….

Washington haalt valse Befehl ist Befehl cliché van stal voor nieuwe CIA directeur ‘Bloody Gina…..’

Tijdens de Neurenberg processen werd het excuus ‘Befehl ist Befehl’
onderuit gehaald als onzin, immers je hebt je ten allen tijde
aan de (internationale) rechtsorde te houden en als dat niet kan valt
het toch echt onder jouw eigen verantwoording als je je schuldig
maakt aan (oorlogs-) misdaden….. Ondanks deze juridische geschiedenis
, gebruikt Washington dit valse ‘Befehl ist Befehl’ excuus voor de nieuwe directeur van de CIA, Gina Haspel…….  

Gina
Haspel, een psychopaat die niet alleen toezag op martelingen, maar ook voor de lol zelf mensen martelde in een geheime
CIA gevangenis in Thailand, is dus door Trump benoemd tot de nieuwe
directeur van de CIA……. Dit nadat Mike Pompeo, tot nu directeur van de CIA, een al even grote psychopaat en voorstander van het disfunctionerende martelen, tot minister van buitenlandse zaken werd benoemd……. 

Pompeo heeft meermaals gezegd
dat martelen wel effectief is (wetenschappelijk bewezen onjuist) en dat alles volgens de (VS) wet is
toegestaan…… (dat is niet zo, maar slimme juristen vinden wel een
zwak punt in de wet, waarmee bij wijze van spreken alles
gerechtvaardigd kan worden, ook als het bijvoorbeeld gaat om
martelen…..)

Lees
de volgende stap van de VS in het proces richting het Vierde Rijk
(dat al net zo fascistisch zal zijn als het Derde Rijk, dat blijkt ten
overvloede weer uit het volgende artikel van The Intercept):

WASHINGTON
BREAKS OUT THE “JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS” NAZI DEFENSE FOR CIA
DIRECTOR-DESIGNATE GINA HASPEL

Written by Jon
Schwarz

Mar.
15

DURING
THE NUREMBERG TRIALS
 after World War II,
several Nazis, including top German generals Alfred Jodl and Wilhelm
Keitel, claimed they were not guilty of the tribunal’s charges
because they had been acting at the directive of their superiors.

Ever
since, this justification has been popularly known as the “Nuremberg
defense,” in which the accused states they were “only following
orders.”

The
Nuremberg judges rejected the Nuremberg defense, and both Jodl and
Keitel were hanged. The United Nations International Law Commission
later codified the 
underlying
principle
 from
Nuremberg as “the fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his
Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility
under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible
to him.”

This
is likely the most famous declaration in the history of international
law and is as settled as anything possibly can be.

However,
many members of the Washington, D.C. elite are now stating that it,
in fact, 
is a
legitimate defense for American officials who violate
international law to claim they were just following orders.

View of some of the nazi leaders accused of war crimes during the world war II during the war crimes trial at Nuremberg International Military Tribunal (IMT) court, held between November 20, 1945 and October 1, 1946. (From L to R) At the first row, Hermann Goering, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, at the Second row, Karl Doenitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur Von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel.  AFP PHOTO        (Photo credit should read STRINGER/AFP/Getty Images)

View
of some of the Nazi leaders accused of war crimes during World War II
during the war crimes trial at Nuremberg International Military
Tribunal court, held between Nov. 20, 1945 and Oct. 1, 1946.Photo:
Stringer/AFP/Getty Images

Specifically,
they say Gina Haspel, a top CIA officer whom President Donald Trump
has designated to be the agency’s next director, bears no
responsibility for the torture she supervised during George W. Bush’s
administration.

Haspel oversaw a
secret “black site” in Thailand, at which prisoners were
waterboarded and subjected to other severe forms of abuse. Haspel
later participated in the destruction of the CIA’s videotapes of
some of its torture sessions. There is 
informed
speculation
 that
part of the CIA’s motivation for destroying these records may have
been that they showed operatives employing torture to generate false
“intelligence” used to justify the invasion of Iraq.

John
Kiriakou, a former CIA operative who helped capture many Al Qaeda
prisoners, 
recently
said
 that
Haspel was known to some at the agency as “Bloody Gina” and that
“Gina and people like Gina did it, I think, because they enjoyed
doing it. They tortured just for the sake of torture, not for the
sake of gathering information.” (In 2012, in a 
convoluted
case
,
Kiriakou 
pleaded
guilty
 to
leaking the identity of a covert CIA officer to the press and spent a
year in prison.)

Some
of Haspel’s champions have used the exact language of the popular
version of the Nuremberg defense, while others have paraphrased it.

One
who paraphrased it is Michael Hayden, former director of both the CIA
and the National Security Agency. In a 
Wednesday
op-ed
,
Hayden endorsed Haspel as head of the CIA, writing that
“Haspel did nothing more and nothing less than what the nation
and the agency asked her to do, and she did it well.”

Hayden
later said 
on
Twitter
 that
Haspel’s actions were “consistent with U.S. law as interpreted by
the department of justice.” This is true: In 2002, the Office of
Legal Counsel at the Justice Department declared in a series
of 
notorious
memos
that
it was legal for the U.S. to engage in “enhanced interrogation
techniques” that were obviously torture. Of course, the
actions of the Nuremberg defendants had also been “legal” under
German law.

John
Brennan, who ran the CIA under President Barack Obama, made similar
remarks on Tuesday when asked about Haspel. The Bush administration
had decided that its torture program was legal, 
said
Brennan
,
and Haspel “tried to carry out her duties at CIA to the best of her
ability, even when the CIA was asked to do some very difficult
things.”

Texas
Republican Rep. Will Hurd used the precise language of the Nuremberg
defense during a Tuesday appearance on CNN when Wolf Blitzer asked
him to respond to a statement from Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.: “The
Senate must do its job in scrutinizing the record and involvement
of Gina Haspel in this disgraceful program.”

Hurd,
a member of the House Intelligence Committee and a former CIA
operative as well, told Blitzer that “this wasn’t Gina’s idea.
She was following orders. … She implemented orders and was doing
her job.”


Hurd
also told Blitzer, “You have to remember where we were at that
moment, thinking that another attack was going to happen.”

This
is another defense that is explicitly illegitimate under
international law. The U.N. Convention Against Torture, which
was 
transmitted to
the Senate by Ronald Reagan in 1988, 
statesthat
“no exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or
a threat or war, internal political instability or any other public
emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.”

Notably,
Blitzer did not have any follow-up questions for Hurd about his
jarring comments.

Samantha
Winograd, who served on President Obama’s National Security Council
and now is an analyst for CNN, likewise used Nuremberg defense
language in an appearance on the network. Haspel, 
she
said
,
“was implementing the lawful orders of the president. 
You
could argue she should have quit because the program was so
abhorrent. But she was following orders.”

Last
but not least there’s Rich Lowry, editor of National Review, who
issued a ringing defense of Haspel in Politico, 
claiming she
was merely acting “in response to what she was told were lawful
orders.”

Remarkably,
this perspective has even seeped into the viewpoint of regular
journalists. At a recent press conference at which Kentucky
Republican Sen. Rand Paul criticized Haspel, a reporter 
asked
him
 to
respond to “the counterargument” that “these policies were
signed off by the Bush administration. … They were considered
lawful at the time.”

It
fell to Paul to make the obvious observation that appears to
have eluded almost everyone else in official Washington: “This
has been historically a question we’ve asked in every war: Is there
a point at which soldiers say ‘no’? … Horrendous things
happened in World War II, and people said, well, the German soldiers
were just obeying orders. … I think there’s a point at which,
even suffering repercussions, that if someone asks you to torture
someone that you should say no.”

(Thank
you to 
@jeanbilly545 and Scott
Horton
 for
telling me about Hurd and Paul’s remarks, respectively.)

Top
photo: Gina Haspel speaks at the 2017 William J. Donovan Award
Dinner.

=======================================

Voor een begeleidende video, zie het origineel



Zie ook:

Ondervragers van de VS zijn aanwezig bij martelingen in Jemenitische gevangenissen

Rapport maakt duidelijk dat VAE 23 gevangenen hebben vermoord in Jemenitische gevangenissen

Michael Hayden (ex-CIA en generaal b.d.): niets mis met martelingen door Gina Haspel…..

Muellers onzinnige beschuldiging die Russiagate zou bewijzen……..

Muellers ‘troll farm’ verhaal ronduit waanzinnig………

Het is werkelijk om schijtziek van te
worden: de pogingen in de VS (en de rest van het westen) om Rusland te demoniseren en het verlies
van de presidentsverkiezingen door hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton te
wijten aan Russische manipulaties.

Voor al die claims is nul komma nada
bewijs, maar de VS en haar hielenlikkende oorlogshonden van de NAVO
houden deze leugens in de lucht, dit gesteund door de reguliere
media, die NB bijna dagelijks schrijven over ‘fake news’, terwijl
deze media verreweg de grootste leveranciers van dit nepnieuws
zijn…….

De vooralsnog laatste bladzijde in de
wrange komedie werd geschreven door oud-FBI directeur Robert
Mueller…….

Lees hoe David Stockman uitgebreid
gehakt maakt van het ‘troll farm verhaal’. (let op, sommige delen zijn dusdanig komisch dat je op moet passen er niet in te blijven):

Mueller’s
Comic Book Indictment: How to Prosecute A Great Big Nothingburger

By
David Stockman

February
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – We have always heard that a
determined government prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, and now
we know it’s true. After 38 years in the prosecution racket, Robert
Mueller just made his biggest score ever—that is, he nailed
a great big Nothingburger.


But
he also did a lot more than that. Mueller’s 37-page comic book
indictment actually unmasks—inadvertently to be
sure—the 
distinctly
un-terrifying essence
 of
the whole Russian meddling narrative. In fact, the crude social media
emissions (ads and posts) of the so-called troll farm were
generally lame, often laughable and sometimes downright
ludicrous as per this gem cited by Mueller:

a.
On or about October 16, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the ORGANIZATION-controlled Instagram account “Woke Blacks”
to post the following message: 
“[A]
particular hype and hatred for Trump is misleading the people and
forcing Blacks to vote Killary. We cannot resort to the lesser of two
devils. Then we’d surely be better off without voting AT ALL.”

Notwithstanding
the grave nomenclature of BLOCK CAPITALS, endless sinister “on
or about” events and 99 numbered paragraphs of
particulars, the true bill (charging document) is actually just a
random catalogue of social media trivia like the above “Woke
Blacks” post.

Most
of the cited gleanings amounted to crude word bombs, often in
broken English, that presumably even Kim Kardashian’s 59 million
Twitter followers could see through.

“Hillary
is a Satan, and her crimes and lies
 had proved
just how evil she is”

The
lion’s share of these postings and ads probably disappeared into
cyberspace like the sound of a falling tree in an empty
forest, anyway. According to Facebook itself, the seemingly
ubiquitous social media ad campaign despicted in the indictment
was nothing of the kind. It actually amounted to
just 
3,000 placements
at a cost of 
$100,000—more
than half of which were purchased after the election,
and 
25% of
which ended-up in its dead letter office (unread).

Likewise, the
handful of efforts to actually stimulate pro-Trump rallies in
Florida and elsewhere were abject failures. As we document
below, the Russians had absolutely no “ground game” in the
US and any third-rate campaign consultant will tell you that ads
alone do not produce crowds. In fact, there is virtually no evidence
that anyone showed up at the rallies cited by Mueller.

Besides,
the overwhelming share of the pro-Trump social media postings
uncovered by Mueller’s sleuths amounted to “copy and paste”
relays of current partisan talking points. Thus, the
indictment cites such slogans as:

           “Vote
Republican, vote Trump, and support the Second Amendment!”.

“Trump
is our only hope for a better future!”

“Donald
wants to defeat terrorism… Hillary wants to sponsor it”

Really?

It
took a clandestine nest of Russkie imposters and subversives to
pollute the social media with this kind of tripe?


In
fact, RNC, Fox News and the Trump campaign were
already saturating the internet with these messages,
anyway—-along with millions of pro-Trump social medi activists.  T
he 80 Russian operatives
cited by Mueller didn’t add one damn bit to the massive social media
messaging that was already out there.

So
here’s the joker in the whole deck. It seems that the
nefarious”troll farm” in St. Petersburg that comprises
nearly the totality of Mueller’s case is not a Russian
intelligence agency operation at all.


Instead,
it’s the relatively harmless Hobby Farm of a fanatical
Russian oligarch and ultra-nationalist, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who
has a great big beef against Imperial Washington’s demonization
of Russia and Vlad Putin. Apparently, the farm
 was (it’s
apparently being disbanded) the vehicle through which he gave
Washington the middle finger and buttered up his patron.

Prigozhin
is otherwise known as “Putin’s Cook” because he made his
fortune in St. Petersburg restaurants that Putin favored and via
state funded food service operations at Russian schools and military
installations. Like most Russian oligarchs not in jail, he
apparently tithes in gratitude to the Kremlin: In this
case, by bankrolling the rinky-dink operation at 55
Savushkina Street in St Petersburg that is the object of Mueller’s
pretentious foray into the flotsam and jetsam of social media
low life.

Prigozhin’s
trolling farm is grandly called the Internet Research Agency
(IRA), but what it actually does is hire (apparently) unemployed
20-somethings at $4-8 per hour to pound out
ham-handed political messaging on social media sites like
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube etc. They bang away twelve
hours at a shift on a quota-driven
paint-by-the-internet-numbers basis where their output is rated for
engagements, likes, retweets etc.


Whatever
these keyboard drones might be, they are not professional Russian
intel operators
. And
the collection of broken English postings strewn throughout the
indictment are not one bit scary.


Indeed,
the utterly stupid naiveté of the whole St.
Petersburg operation is crystalized by this episode when the
farm purportedly garnered some startling political insight from
an unwitting Trump campaign official in Texas:

80.
On or about August 19, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the false U.S. persona “Matt Skiber” account to write
to the real U.S. person affiliated with a Texas-based grassroots
organization who previously had advised the false persona to focus
on 
“purple
states like Colorado, Virginia & Florida
.”
Defendants and their co-conspirators told that U.S. person, 
We
were thinking about your recommendation to focus on purple states and
this is what we’re organizing in FL.”

Jez
Louise and goodness gracious, too. Who coulda thunk as early
as August that Colorado, Virginia and Florida would be swing
states!


In
any event, even Mueller’s indictment proves that the farm was
strictly amateurville. None of the other 12 Russians charged
has an intelligence background, either.

Thus,
the CEO is a retired St. Petersburg police officer. The
executive director is a 31-year old website developer and
internet PR promoter who previously had garnered small beans
contracts ($4k-20k each) from St. Petersburg agencies to publish
municipal newspapers, make video reports about their activities or
promote local programs such as one on “tolerance and
prevention of drug addiction”.


Likewise,
two more of the operatives were graduates students in IT and
advertising at St. Petersburg universities.

Then
there is the husband/wife duo, Maria and Robert Bovda, who were
the original heads of the US focused “translator project”.
Both were recent graduates in psychology from local
universities, where Robert’s 2011 thesis had been on
“The Effects of Social-Support Conditions On
Loneliness As Experienced By the Elderly”.


We can’t
help but think they had not yet become hardened spies when
the joined IRA in November 2013 and apparently 
left
in October 2014
. Whatever
they did during their tenure at the farm, cooking up ways to
help Donald Trump’s not yet announced campaign was surely
not among them, but still apparently enough to help fill out
Mueller’s indictment roster.

             Maria Bovda was the 'head' of the translator project, the designated branch of the wider pro-Putin effort which focused on US audiences. She worked there between November 2013 and October 2014
Her husband Robert acted beneath her as the second in charge of the 'translator' project and worked at the company over the same dates. He too is accused of trying to enter the US under false pretenses to collect information but he did not obtain a visa and could not make the trip


Another
was Dzheykhun Aslanov, who was head of the “American department”
and had graduated in 2012 from the Russian State Hydrometeorological
University in St. Petersburg. He had studied economics
and 
wildlife
management!

Likewise,
nowhere in the entire 37 pages is there even a clause linking
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm to the SVR (foreign intelligence service), the
FSB (counter-intelligence and anti-terrorism), the GRU (military
intelligence service), any other agency of the Russian State—-or
even some purported Kremlin back channel to Putin.

Yet
there is every reason to believe that the entire Russian meddling
narrative cooked up by the partisan hacks in Obama’s inner
circle—-John Brennan, Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes—-was based on the
amateurish machinations originating in the nondescript building
pictured below.

As
we will show, the Hobby Farm was no Russian state secret
or clandestine vehicle of its intelligence community. To the
contrary, it had been fully covered in the Russian press for
years as one of numerous such oligarch funded projects designed
to glorify the Putin regime and vilify the Russian opposition.


It
had also been the subject of a lengthy expose in 
The
Guardian
 
of
London, as well as other western media. Even Radio Free Europe
had done a lengthy profile.


All
of this had happened long before Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm
had turned its attentions to US politics. Indeed, the IRA’s
pivot to the US in April 2014 occurred well before Trump’s
candidacy was gleam in anyone’s eye except his own, but 
after a
seminal event had occurred which Mueller’s comic book
narrative completely ignores.


To
wit, what apparently riled up Prigozhin was Washington’s
heavy-handed meddling in the politics of Ukraine during the US
funded and enabled coup on the streets of Kiev in February 2014.

Never
mind that the incumbent pro-Russian government had come to power in
an honest election and had chosen to take a more
attractive economic deal from Moscow than was being offered
by the West. 

Also ignore that fact that Ukraine was Russia’s
next door neighbor and had been an essential element of Greater
Russia—sometimes a full fledged constituent state—for more
than 700 years.

Likewise,
when Crimea elected by 90% referendum vote to “rejoin”
Russia, it didn’t happen at gunpoint. Crimea is 85% Russian and
had been an integral part of the Russian state ever since it
was purchased from the Turks by Catherine the Great for
good money in 1783.

Thereafter,
its major port city of Sevastopol had functioned as the homeport
for Russia’s Black Sea fleet under Czars and Commissars alike.
The only real reason it needed to “rejoin” Russia in March
2014 was because the Ukrainian tyrant who ruled the Soviet Union in
the 1950s, Nikita Khrushchev, had gifted it to his
Ukrainian compatriots during a drunken celebration of his
victory over two deadly rivals who also claimed Stalin’s succession.

Indeed,
when Obama’s neocon Assistant Secretary for European Affairs,
Victoria Nuland, was caught telling the American ambassador in Kiev
that “Yats is the guy” with respect to the new Washington
designated leader of the post-coup government and joined a
chorus of Washington-based vilification of Putin and the Russian
government, the die was cast.

Russian
nationalists like Prigozhin were not going to take it lying down. As
we document below, then and there he began to shift some of the
activities of his trolling farm toward the US.

It amounted
to a tit-for-tat response to the anti-Russian propaganda emanating
from the Washington funded NGOs in Kiev; and also from outright
government agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy
and Radio Free Europe, as well as the Deep State
subservient operations of CNN and its print media imitators.

That
shift was described as the “translator project” by
Mueller’s historically ignorant lawyers. The implication was that out
of sheer aggression the Kremlin had unilaterally decided to
attack America’s democratic process through the IRA.

In
fact, the overwhelming likelihood is that an arriviste
Russian billionaire got a bee in his bonnet after Washington’s
Ukrainian coup–and then went to town on America with his trolling
farm exactly as he and many others had been doing in internal
Russian politics for years.

From
the point of view of US/Russian relations and world peace, however,
the re-direction of activity at Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm could
not have come at a worse time. Its wholly open and widely known
operations permitted Obama’s hatchet-people to quickly seize
on the IRA’s new theatre of focus as evidence of a
massive Russian attack on America’s election process, thereby turning
a molehill into a mountain.

At
length, the partisan leaders of Obama’s national security team,
led by the detestable John Brennan at the
CIA, selectively coopted and abused the resources and
credibility of the vast US intelligence apparatus to put the
imprimatur of a national security threat upon what was in fact
a scary bedtime story of no real significance. That effort
culminated in the phony intelligence assessment published
by four US intel agencies in January 2017 based on the work
of Brennan’s “hand-picked” accomplices.

In
what is surely a fabulous irony, therefore, the Internet
Research Agency amounts to a reverse Potemkin Village. It wasn’t
much to look at and was nothing to worry about until Obama’s
national security posse falsely embellished it’s innocuous
façade into a mortal threat to American democracy and national
security.

And
then Robert Mueller brought in his gang of copywriters and
illustrators to turn this entire tall tale into CNN-ready “news”.

We
will demonstrate below that what happened in this building was a
complete farce and posed no threat to the security and liberty of the
American people whatsoever; nor did it even remotely impact the 2016
election process.


But
with his comic book indictment, Robert Mueller has actually made
himself a mortal threat to America’s democracy and national security
.
That’s because his indictment is unleashing a rabid
anti-Russian mania in the Democratic party and turning flaming
liberals and leftwing progressives, who used to form the backbone of
the peace party in America, into outright war-mongers.

The
Donald tweeted over the weekend about Moscow “laughing its ass
off”  about the Mueller indictment, but we think he
missed the mark. It is the Deep State on the banks of the Potomac
that is bursting with glee—literally licking its collective
chops— about the endless budget boondoggles now assured to be 

coming its way.


The
neocons and military/industrial complex had already
taken control of the GOP lock, stock and barrel. Then,
his campaign rhetoric about “America First”
notwithstanding, Trump abdicated to his empire-minded generals
in order to concentrate on his Twitter account. And now in the
wake of the RussiaGate hysteria being given a powerful new
boost from Mueller’s comic book, the Dems are lining up to say
we will see your 
$700
billion
 budget
and crank it up from there.


The
truth is, there is a screaming fiscal crisis coming hard upon
Imperial Washington. That’s owing to the 
$15
trillion
 of
new deficits that are now built-in for the next decade—at the very
time when the Fed has shut down is massive bond-buying
experiment and the Baby Boom is hitting the social security and
medicare rolls in droves.

Absent
the RussiaGate hoax and the Dems descent into mindless, anti-Putin
hysteria, there would have been a moment of maximum danger for
the Deep State’s hideously inflated military, intelligence and
surveillance operations. In the coming battle against fiscal
collapse, they surely would have been on the fiscal chopping
block like at no time since the aftermath of Vietnam in the 1970s.

But rescue
is now at hand. The Dems have been shell-shocked ever
since the evening of November 8, 2016, and have worked
themselves into deliriums about how it was all a big mistake
enabled by Russian meddling and collusion with the Trump
campaign.

To
a substantial degree, however, those narratives were on their last
legs until the Mueller indictment came along. For anyone who takes
the trouble to read it, of course, it’s just a potpourri of
nonsense, marginalia and irrelevance.

But
the Dems had already gone brain dead on the RussiaGate matter—so
they are now greeting it as a “blockbuster”, as
are the talking heads of CNN and the mainstream media. Consequently,
the drivel that came out of the building pictured below is being
taken as evidence of a far-reaching attack on America that
even rivals Pearl Harbor. As Pat Buchanan noted:

          This
Russian troll farm is “the equivalent (of) Pearl Harbor,”
says Cong. Jerrold Nadler, who would            head up the House Judiciary
Committee, handling any impeachment, if Democrats retake the                    House.

When
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes pressed, Nadler doubled down: The Russians “are
destroying our democratic process.” While the Russian trolling
may not equal Pearl Harbor in its violence, said Nadler, in its
“seriousness, it is very much on a par” with Japan’s
surprise attack.

That’s
right. But unlike the vast Japanese naval armada that stealthily
steamed toward Hawaii in early December 1941, the Facebook
cyber-missiles that allegedly hit America in 2016 came out of
this little joint hiding in plain sight:

55 Savushkina Street, St Petersburg, said to be the headquarters of Russia’s ‘troll army’

So
let’s return to the fact that Prigozhin’s troll farm
doesn’t really look much different than countless others that dot the
Russian internet landscape, and which mushroomed after 2011 in
support of the Putin-ified Russian state and the crony
capitalist economy it shepherds.


New
Yorker
 piece
published by journalist Adrian Chen, no fan of Donald Trump, in
late July 2016 explains about as well as any where the Internet
Research Agency came from:

           The
(Internet Research Agency) has been widely reported in Russian
media to be the brainchild                of Evgeny Prigozhin, an oligarch and ally
of Vladimir Putin. At the time, it employed hundreds of                Russians in a
nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, where they produced
blog posts,                      comments, infographics, and viral videos that pushed the
Kremlin’s narrative on both the Russian              and English Internet.

The
agency is what is known in Russia as a “troll farm,” a nickname
given to outfits that operate armies of sock-puppet social-media
accounts, in order to create the illusion of a rabid grass-roots
movement. Trolling has become a key tool in a comprehensive effort by
Russian authorities to rein in a previously freewheeling Internet
culture, after huge anti-Putin protests in 2011 were organized
largely over social media. It is used by Kremlin apparatchiks at
every level of government in Russia; wherever politics are discussed
online, one can expect a flood of comments from paid trolls.

The
real effect, the Russian activists told me, was not to brainwash
readers but to overwhelm social media with a flood of fake
content, 
seeding
doubt and paranoia, and destroying the possibility of using the
Internet as a democratic space…..

…….toward
the end of last year (2015) I noticed something interesting:
many had begun to promote right-wing news outlets, portraying
themselves as conservative voters who were, increasingly, fans of
Donald Trump. Exposure to even small amounts of Russian politics can
induce severe bouts of paranoia and conspiracy-minded thinking, and
it seemed logical to me that this new pro-Trump bent might well be an
attempt by the agency to undermine the U.S. by helping to elect a
racist reality-show star as our Commander-in-Chief. At the time, I
found it funny. 
The
agency was a well-funded but often hapless operation—it created a
cartoon character that was a giant buttocks to spread anti-Obama
propaganda, for example—and this seemed like another of its
far-fetched schemes to poison the Internet.

In
fact, it was. How it became a fearsome Russian intel operation was
entirely due to what happened in Washington DC, not St. Petersburg
or the Kremlin, for that matter.

That
is, in the summer of 2016, when the Obama inner circle and the
Deep State national security establishment alike suddenly were
confronted with the theretofore unthinkable prospect that Donald
Trump might actually be elected US President, they literally
transformed the Hobby Farm of a second tier
Russian oligarch into monumental threat to American
democracy.

And
that took some doing because Prigozhin was essentially a nobody
in the great scheme of national security. Unlike Putin, who cut
his eyeteeth in the old Soviet era KGB, Prigozhin had fancied himself
a ski racer as a privileged young man in a Soviet boarding school.
Failing to make the grade on the slopes, however, he had
subsequently pursued various petty criminal schemes that
landed him nine years in a Soviet prison during the latter’s
dying days.

But
timing is everything—-so when he opened a hot dog stand from
his mother’s kitchen in newly liberated St. Petersburg in the
early 1990s his entprenurial talents in the culinary field
self-evidently flourished. Soon he branched into
convenience stores and then in 1996 into a swank restaurant
(Staraya Tamozhnya or “The Old Customs House”) that
catered to newly monied Russian who were looking for “more than
cutlets with Vodka”.

At
length, a strategic $400k investment in a rusting harbor boat
was turned into a floating hot spot called “The New Island
Restaurant”. From there flowed catering contracts
for lavish state banquets after he gained the
gastronomical favor of the post-Soviet St. Petersburg
political operative, who became prime minister of Russia.


Putin held lavish
state dinners on Prigozhin’s floating emporium, where
he played host to world leaders like George W. Bush and Jacques
Chirac. He also apparently heaped business into Prigozhin’s budding
empire with a $177 million catering contract with Moscow’s schools,
and then the real jackpot: A two year contract in 2012 worth
more than 
$1.6
billion
 to
supply 90% of all food orders to Russian soldiers.

Folks,
that’s where the troll factory came from. It opened the
next year in 2013 as the kind of token of appreciation expected
from oligarchs favored by the Russian state.

Still,
it wasn’t the KGB incarnate—just a tweet-by-the-numbers body
shop designed to flood Russian media and internet
forums with messages extolling Russian greatness, the iniquities and
hypocrisies of the morally corrupt West and the glorious
works of Vlad Putin.


At
this stage the troll farm was involved in strictly Russian
business—-the handiwork of an oligarch who had thrived on Russia’s
particular brand of crony capitalism and was more than happy to shill
for his patron in the Kremlin.


Here
is how the previously referenced 
Guardian
article from mid-2015 described the farm before some of its
modest resources were later shifted to the “American
Department” in 2016:

          Just
after 9pm each day, a long line of workers files out of 55 Savushkina
Street, a modern four-                storey office complex with a small sign outside
that reads “Business centre”. Having spent 12                    hours in the
building, the workers are replaced by another large group, who will
work through the              night.

They
painted a picture of a work environment that was humourless and
draconian, with fines for being a few minutes late or not reaching
the required number of posts each day. Trolls worked in rooms of
about 20 people, each controlled by three editors, who would check
posts and impose fines if they found the words had been cut and
pasted, or were ideologically deviant.

The
LiveJournal blogger, who spent two months working at the centre until
mid-March, said she was paid 45,000 roubles ($790) a month, to run a
number of accounts on the site.

We
had to write ‘ordinary posts’, about 
making
cakes or music tracks
 we
liked, but then every now and then throw in a
 political
post
 about
how the Kiev government is fascist, or that sort of thing,” she
said.

Scrolling
through one of the LiveJournal accounts she ran, the pattern is
clear. There are posts about “Europe’s 20 most beautiful castles”
and “signs that show you are dating the wrong girl”, interspersed
with political posts about 
Ukraine or
suggesting that the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny is
corrupt.

The
desired conclusion of one reads: “The majority of experts agree
that the US is deliberately trying to weaken Russia, and Ukraine is
being used only as a way to achieve this goal. If the Ukrainian
people had not panicked and backed a coup, the west would have found
another way to pressure Russia. But our country is not going to go
ahead with the US plans, and we will fight for our sovereignty on the
international stage.”

To
add colour to their posts, websites have been set up to aid the troll
army. One features 
thousands
of pasteable images
,
mainly of European leaders in humiliating photoshopped incidents or
with captions pointing out their weakness and stupidity, or showing
Putin making hilarious wisecracks and winning the day.

When
I got the job there in 2013 it was a small building, I was working in
the basement, and it was clear they didn’t have enough space,”
said Andrei Soshnikov, a St Petersburg journalist who infiltrated the
company two years ago and has continued to cover it. 
He
linked the move to a much bigger office with increased online
activity around the Ukraine crisis….

As
we explained above, it was only after Washington massively
intervened in the domestic politics of Ukraine in February 2104 that
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm branched into external operations
focused on Russian adversaries like the new anti-Russian Ukrainian
government and the United States.


Even
then, however, the main stream media headline writers, who
have been intellectually lobotomized by a constant diet of
anti-Russian mania, cannot seem to grasp that their hyperbolic
headlines are in no way, shape or form supported by the actual
written words in Mueller’s indictment.


In
a word, 
eighty twenty-somethings
sitting cheek-by-jowl at banks of computer screens and banging out
social media tripe in English as a (third) language did not
impact anything in America, let alone the 2016 election outcome.


That
is to say, what in the world is so hard to understand about the fact
that the pathetic output of this group could not have amounted
to 
0.000001% of
the content that rumbled through these social media channels
during 2016?


Yet
here is Mueller—writing in indictment black and
white—admitting that the troll farm had deployed precious few
trolls to the American department:

“spread
(ing) distrust towards the candidates and the political
system in general…..By approximately July 2016, more
than 
eighty
ORGANIZATION employees
 were
assigned to the translator project”.

Besides
the infinitesimal volume and generally crude and unoriginal nature of
the troll farm’s output, this tiny 80-person contingent points to
another huge flaw in the entire Mueller narrative—especially
as it has been embellished and exaggerated by the main stream media
since last Friday afternoon. To wit, all of these posts were destined
to get lost in the vast sea of cyberspace without a 
ground
game
 in
the US.


Yet
the indictment is clear on that crucial point as well.
The Russian meddlers had “no ground game”
whatsoever aside from a 22 day visit in June 2014 by two
operatives who were not trained spies and who had apparently
never even been to America previously.


Yet
they visited nine states during that brief interval and
thereby “cased-out” the entirety of the American
electoral scene:

Only
KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA received visas, and from approximately June 4,
2014 through June 26, 2014, KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA traveled in and
around the United States, including stops in Nevada, California, New
Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Louisiana, Texas, and New York
to gather intelligence. After the trip, KRYLOVA and BURCHIK exchanged
an intelligence report regarding the trip.

The
above paragraph is itself a smoking bratwurst!


Aside
from sleeping, passing through countless airports, checking into a
dozen or more hotels and 

perhaps visiting the chamber of Commerce in
Dallas or Denver, what possibly could these two travelers have done
to lay the groundwork for “influencing” 133
million voters two years hence?


Mueller
doesn’t say and the talking heads jabber on about this trip as
if it were some kind of invasion, not the
pointless needle-in-the-haystack type of undertaking that it
actually was.


And
that gets us to the ballyhooed efforts to organize and promote Trump
rallies in Florida, Washington DC, New York City and elsewhere. Once
again, however, Mueller spills large amounts of ink citing the emails
and social media posts that describe the aims of these long-distance
media trolls. But there is not a shred of evidence presented
about what actually happened on the ground.


We
would be so bold as to suggest that we know why Mueller didn’t
document this core element of the alleged meddling campaign.
Namely, because nobody came to the rallies and flash mob events
called for by the keyboard jockeys in St. Petersburg.


Take
the case of the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies on August 20,
which the indictment dwells on at length. So doing, it purports to
explain how real Trump supporters in the state were duped into
cooperating, how bloggers back in Russia used social media posts to
promote 13 rallies across the state of Florida and bought ads to the
same end on Facebook.


In
fact, compared to fleeting references with respect to similar rallies
allegedly staged in Washington DC and New York City, the Florida
rallies take up far more ink in the indictment and come across as
exhibit #1  on Russia ground game in the US election
process.


Indeed,
the liberal hatch-people at 
Politico made
the singular importance of the Florida meddling operation
abundantly clear:

But
the document makes clear that the operation in Florida, the nation’s
largest swing state, was in a class by itself. The indictment is
packed with details of how Russian nationals duped Donald Trump
campaign volunteers and grass-roots organizations in Florida into
holding rallies they organized and helped fund with foreign cash.

Here’s
the problem. There seems to be scant evidence that these rallies
actually happened or that anyone showed up to the ones that did
occur. For instance, here is a photo of one in St. Petersburg
(Florida) posted on social media at the time.


We
doubt whether Vlad got his money’s worth on this one:

ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Then
there’s the case of Jim Frishe of Clearwater, Florida. He was a
real estate development consultant and candidate for county
office, who organized a sign-waving event in response to the Russian
entreaties that attracted barely a dozen people:

           Frishe,
68, said he was called by someone identifying themselves as with a
group called                 “Florida for Trump” and asked to organize a
sign-waving rally. He said between 15 and 18               people showed up and
that he didn’t receive any signs or money or other support. He                     never heard from them again.

“I
was going to do what I was going to do anyway. I was a Trump
supporter, they didn’t convince me”.

Then
there is the case of the “Hillary in stripes” caper
allegedly promoted by the Russians. According to the indictment:

           For
example, defendants and their co-conspirators asked one U.S. person
to build a cage on on               a flatbed truck … and another U.S. person to
wear a costume portraying Clinton in a prison                       uniform,”

The
thing is, the main evidence for that is that the “cage”
appeared about a month later as the handiwork of a Trump supporter,
Gary Howd, who did it all on his own–without any prompting,
encouragement or money from the Russians.


Even
the Politico account of the purported Florida invasion by the
Russians let that much slip out:

          The
caged Clinton stunt was a hit among Trump supporters. On Sept. 23,
for                                      instance,
 NBC2 reported
that a Cape Coral man erected a caged Clinton display in his front            yard.

“I
feel like I’m doing my little part at least in my little neck of the
woods,” homeowner Gary Howd said.

As
it happened, even the 
Washington
Post
 admits
that the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies didn’t amount to
much.

          The
efforts in Florida that August day did not turn out to be
particularly impressive. No people                    showed up to at least one of the
proposed rallies, and online photos of some of the other events                reveal ragtag groups with Trump signs staking out patches of grass or
traffic medians.

As
to the “Down With Hillary” demonstration on July 23, 2016,
to take another example, here is what you get from Google on this
particular element of the indictment:

          No
results found for 
“Down
with Hillary” rally in New York City on July 23, 2016
.

Finally,
and as long was we are on the topic, here is what a real troll farm
looks like. Yet this vast suite of offices in Fort
Meade, Maryland, where 20,000 SIGINT spies and technicians work
for the NSA, is only the tip of the iceberg.


The
US actually spends 
$75
billion
 per
year—more than Russia’s entire 
$69
billion 
defense
budget—spying on and meddling in the politics of virtually
every nation on earth. An outfit within NSA called Tailored Access
Operations (TAO) has a multi-billion annual budget and does
nothing put troll the global internet and does so
with highly educated, highly paid professionals, not $4 per
hour keyboard jockeys.


Indeed,
the cafeterias in the NSA buildings pictured below cost far
more per year to operate than did Prigozhin’s troll farm during it
entire short lived existence (its apparently now being closed down
with two of the 3.5 floors already dark).

NSA headquarters

In
that context, Charles Hugh Smith cogently reminds that the real
farce in the Mueller comic book is that it is the ultimate case of
the pot-calling-the-kettle black:

America’s
foreign policy is one of absolute entitlement to influence the
domestic affairs and politics of every nation of interest, which to a
truly global empire includes every nation on the planet to the degree
every nation is a market and/or a potential threat to U.S. interests.

Assassination
of elected leaders–no problem. Funding the emergence of new
U.S.-directed political parties–just another day at the office.
Inciting dissent and discord to destabilize regimes–it’s what we do,
folks. Funding outright propaganda–one of our enduring specialties
.

Finally,
as Pat Buchanan further observed in his post on the Mueller
indictment, political and election meddling is what Imperial
Washington does. And now we are surprised that others do the
same—-even that pathetic efforts of a Russian oligarch laid out in
Mueller’s ham sandwich indictment:

Are
the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try
to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling
regimes we believe we have a stake?

“Have
we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura
Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.

With
a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”

“We
don’t do that anymore though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We
don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”

“Well,”
Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”

Indeed,
what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding
the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?

Did
America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions”
that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?

When
Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime
change” is frequently heard. When the “Green Revolution”
took to the streets of Tehran to protest massively the re-election of
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009, Republicans denounced
President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the
outcome.

When
China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some
have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?

David
Stockman’s Contra Corner is the only place where mainstream delusions
and cant about the Warfare State, the Bailout State, Bubble Finance
and Beltway Banditry are ripped, refuted and
rebuked.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com

=========================

Zie ook:

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands; zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

Het volgende artikle vond ik op het blog van Stan van Houcke, die het overnam van LewRockwell.com.

In dit artikel legt Paul Craig Roberts uit, dat ‘Russiagate’ een complot tegen Trump is en werd uitgevoerd door de CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het Democratic National Committee (DNC). 

Trump vormde een gevaar voor de macht en budgetten van het militair-industrieel complex, daar hij de relatie met Rusland wilde normaliseren, hetzelfde Rusland dat onder Obama nog werd afgeschilderd als ‘Amerika’s meest gevaarlijke vijand…..’ Het militair-industrieel complex heeft zoveel mogelijk ‘conflicten’ (oorlogen en dreiging van oorlogen) nodig om haar macht en de enorme winsten te behouden……..

Daarnaast vormde Trump een bedreiging voor de grote geldstromen die de Clinton Foundation genereerde en de beide Clintons (Bill en Hillary) zou dwarszitten bij het worden van multimiljonairs…..

Lees het volgende artikel van Roberts en laat je niet langer wijsmaken dat Rusland de VS presidentsverkiezingen (en verkiezingen elders) zou hebben gemanipuleerd dan wel manipuleert!*

anti-state
anti-war pro-market

Rosenstein
and Mueller Running for Cover Leaving Brennan Exposed

By Paul
Craig Roberts

PaulCraigRoberts.org

February
19, 2018

Now
the Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein confirms what I told you in my
previous post. 
Mueller
found no evidence
 that
Russia had any impact on the outcome of the 2016 election.

So
what was Russiagate all about?

It
was exactly, precisely what I told you it was about from the very
begining. It was a conspiracy orchestrated by the military/security
complex, CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic National
Committee against Donald Trump.

Trump’s
emphasis during his presidential campaign on normalizing relations
with Russia, which the neocon Obama regime had turned into “America’s
most dangerous enemy,” was a threat to the power and budgets of the
military/security complex. Without a demonized enemy, what is the
justification for a 1,000 billion annual budget and the laws passed
in the 21st century that completely destroy the protections provided
by the US Constitution?

From
the Clinton/DNC standpoint, a Trump victory would halt the vast
riches pouring into the Clinton/DNC pockets from “pay to play.”
The Clinton Foundation and the Clintons themselves were on their way
to both being billionaires with the DNC collecting the registration
fees. This was a model for one party rule. And along comes Donald
Trump.

I
doubt Trump knew what he was stepping into. So far he has been unable
to function as President. But now that the FISA** court has on record
Rosenstein and Comey’s confessions that the spy warrants requested
by the FBI to spy on Trump are based on deception of the court, the
conspirators against Trump face indictment, conviction, and prison,
if Trump has the balls, which he might not have. We cannot even be
sure Trump understands the situation.

What
perhaps has surely happened is that former CIA director John Brennan
is now exposed by the total failue of Mueller to find a Trump/Putin
conspiracy against American democracy. Rosenstein’s statement that
“there is no allegation in [Mueller’s] indictment that any
American was a knowing particiipant in this illegal activity [illegal
activity is an unsubstantiated assertion only]. There is no
allegation in the indictment that the [Russians’] conduct altered
the outcome of the election.”

Brennan
as CIA director had lied under oath to Congress to the contrary.

Rosenstein
and Comey are trapped in their confessions to the FISA court that the
FBI obtained spy warrants from the court via deception of the court.
See 
here.

What
we must ask ourselves is how it is possible in the Great American
Democracy that people totally devoid of all integrity, all honesty,
all respect for truth can be confirmed by the US Senate as heads of
the CIA, FBI, and National Intelligence?

How
is it possible that these utterly corrupt people can go before the
House and Senate continuously and tell lies under oath and never be
held accountable?

How
is it possible that American Democracy is so utterly weak that
nothing whatsoever can be done about it?

What
kind of America is it when it is ruled by blatant transparant lies?

In
what sense do The People exist?

The
Best of Paul Craig Roberts

Paul
Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and
former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, has been
reporting shocking cases of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. A
new edition of his book, 
The
Tyranny of Good Intentions
,
co-authored with Lawrence Stratton, a documented account of how
americans lost the protection of law, has been released by Random
House. Visit 
his
website
.

Copyright © 2018 Paul
Craig Roberts

Previous
article by Paul Craig Roberts:  
Russia
Is in the Crosshairs

Why
I Could Never Get an FBI Security Clearance

==================================

*  Voor het tegenovergestelde, de lange rij van VS bemoeienissen bij verkiezingen elders zie: ‘Former CIA Chief Admits US Meddles in Foreign Elections… For Their Own Good‘ (later zal ik hier nog een bericht over brengen)

** FISA: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (uit 1978)

Zie ook:

Geen rectificaties voor meer dan 2 jaar brengen van fake news over het kwaadaardig sprookje Russiagate

Britse militaire geheime dienst bedient zich van moddergooien en andere manipulaties om Europese en VS politiek te manipuleren, zo blijkt uit gelekte documenten

‘Fake news’: alternatieve media en bloggers in het westen zouden onzin brengen, echter niet als dit soort groepen wat roepen in landen die het westen niet welgevallig zijn

Two More Spiegel Employees Out After Fake News Scandal Expands‘ Ofwel: het zoveelste ‘gevalletje fake news’, gebracht door de reguliere massamedia……..

Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen

Der Spiegel, groot bestrijder van ‘fake news’ bracht zelf jarenlang dit soort ‘nieuws’

Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen

Russiagate gelovigen krijgen nieuwe klap: WikiLeaks kreeg de DNC mails van een klokkenluider, niet van Rusland…..

De verregaande anti-Russische propaganda in de VS en de rest van het westen

WhatsApp beperking in strijd tegen fake news

Als Martin Luther King nog zou leven was hij onderwerp van censuur en was zijn Facebook pagina verwijderd

World Economic Forum: de plek waar men elkaar feliciteert met de censuur op de sociale media

Massamedia VS vallen keihard door de mand met ‘vers’ geschoten Russiagate bok >> publiek wordt om vertrouwen gevraagd

Jacht in VS op alternatief (echt) nieuws in volgend stadium: journalist wordt vastgehouden zonder aanklacht

Lichtgelovige ‘atheïst’ gelooft Russiagate leugens….

NewsGuard, het nieuwste wapen van Big Brother VS tegen de alternatieve media

Netflix censureert aflevering van humoristisch programma, ‘na een geldig verzoek’ op grond van Saoedische wetgeving….

Bedrijf dat voor ‘Russische bots’ waarschuwde, heeft een leger met nep-Russische bots

‘Fake news’: alternatieve media en bloggers in het westen zouden onzin brengen, echter niet als dit soort groepen wat roepen in landen die het westen niet welgevallig zijn

Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen

Democraten deden zich voor als Russen in false flag operatie om Roy Moore (Republikein) zwart te maken tijdens verkiezing…..

Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen

BBC: Rusland ‘misbruikt humor’ om Russiagate te ontkrachten….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Uitgelekte telefoongesprekken tussen Trump en Putin bewijzen dat ‘Russiagaters gelijk hebben……’

WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….‘ (zie ook de verdere links over Russiagate in dat bericht)

Russiagate en Assange: The Guardian wordt nu zelfs door collega’s voor zot uitgemaakt

The Guardian: ondanks een enorme misser (fake news) gaat men door met de valse beschuldigingen t.a.v. Assange……

     

 ‘New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……

‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt ‘TV ankers’ propaganda op te lezen‘ (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van ‘lokaal nieuws’)

Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!


Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

CIA de ware hacker en manipulator van verkiezingen, ofwel de laatste Wikileaks documenten……...’

CIA speelt zoals gewoonlijk vuil spel: uit Wikileaks documenten blijkt dat CIA zelf de verkiezingen manipuleerde, waar het Rusland van beschuldigde……..

CIA malware voor manipulaties en spionage >> vervolg Wikileaks Vault 7

Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands)

Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’

False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

Kaspersky Lab (antivirus) aangevallen met agressief ‘Grapperhaus virus’

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………‘ 

Massamedia VS vergeven van CIA ‘veteranen’, alsof die media nog niet genoeg ‘fake news’ ofwel leugens brengen……..

De laatste jaren vinden ‘veteranen’ van de geheime diensten in de VS hun weg naar de reguliere (massa-) media, die toch al niet te klagen hebben over regeringsgetrouwe berichten brengen, om nog maar te zwijgen over het brengen van een enorme berg ‘fake news’ waarmee die media regeringsbeleid ondersteunen, zoals het illegaal oorlogvoeren in landen waar de VS niets, maar dan ook helemaal niets te zoeken heeft……

Wat betreft het ‘regeringsgetrouwe karakter valt nog wel wat te zeggen: het grootste deel van die media, of beter gezegd de multimiljonairs of grote investeerders die deze media in het bezit hebben, lusten Trump niet, maar staan uiteraard pal achter zijn wanbeleid, of dat nu in het binnen- of buitenland wordt gevoerd…. Zo roert men in die media met grote graagte de verdoemde oorlogstrom en is men dolblij met de meer dan schunnige belastinghervormingen, die alleen de welgestelden en grote bedrijven ten goede komen………

Lees het volgende ontluisterende verhaal van Caitlin Johnstone:

Deep
State’ CIA Veterans Finding New Homes in the Mainstream Media

February
5, 2018 at 3:49 pm

Written
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone

(CN Op-ed) — “Former
CIA director John Brennan has become the latest member of the NBC
News and MSNBC family, officially signing with the network as a
contributor,” chirps a 
recent
article
 by
The Wrap, as though that’s a perfectly normal thing to have to
write and not a ghastly symptom of an Orwellian dystopia.
NBC 
reports that
the former head of the 
depravedlying,
torturing
propagandizingdrug
trafficking
coup-stagingwarmongering Central
Intelligence Agency “is now a senior national security and
intelligence analyst.”

Brennan,
who 
played
a key role
 in
the construction of the establishment’s Russia narrative that has
been used to manufacture public consent for 
world-threatening
new cold war escalations
,
is just the latest addition in an 
ongoing
trend
 of
trusted mainstream media outlets being packed to the gills with
stalwarts from the U.S. intelligence community. Brennan joins CIA and
DoD* Chief of Staff 
Jeremy
Bash
 on
the NBC/MSNBC lineup, who is serving there as a national security
analyst, as well as NBC intelligence/national security reporter
and 
known
CIA collaborator
 Ken
Dilanian.

Former
Director of National Intelligence, 
Russiagate
architect, and known Russophobic racist
 James
Clapper 
was
welcomed to the CNN “family”
 last
year by Chris “
It’s
Illegal to Read WikiLeaks

Cuomo and now routinely appears as an expert analyst for the network.
Last year CNN also 
hired
a new national security analyst in Michael Hayden
**, who has served as CIA Director, NSA Director, Principal
Deputy Director of National Intelligence, and an Air Force
general.

Former
CIA analyst and 
now
paid CNN analyst
 Phil
Mudd, who last year caused Cuomo’s show to have to issue
retraction
and apology
 for
a completely baseless claim he 
made
on national television
 asserting
that WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange is “a pedophile”, is once
again 
making
headlines
 for
suggesting that the FBI is entering into a showdown with the current
administration over Trump’s decision to declassify the
controversial Nunes memo***.

More
and more of the outlets from which Americans get their information
are being filled not just with garden variety establishment
loyalists, but with longstanding members of the U.S. intelligence
community. These men got to their positions of power within these
deeply sociopathic institutions based on their willingness to
facilitate any depravity in order to advance the secret agendas of
the U.S. power establishment, and now they’re being paraded in
front of mainstream Americans on cable news on a daily basis. The
words of these “experts” are consistently 
taken and reported
on
 by
smaller news outlets in print and online media in a way that seeds
their authoritative assertions throughout public consciousness.

The
term “deep state” does not refer to a conspiracy theory but to a
simple concept in political analysis which points to the undeniable
reality that (A) plutocrats, (B) intelligence agencies, (C) defense
agencies, and (D) the mainstream media hold large amounts of power in
America despite their not being part of its elected government. You
don’t need to look far to see how these separate groups overlap and
collaborate to advance their own agendas in various ways. Amazon’s
Jeff Bezos, for example, is deeply involved in 
all
of the aforementioned groups
:
(A) as arguably 
the
wealthiest person ever
 he
is clearly a plutocrat, with a company that is 
trying
to control the underlying infrastructure of the economy
; (B)
he 
is
a CIA contractor
;
(C) he is 
part
of a Pentagon advisory board
;
and (D) his 
purchase
of the Washington Post
 in
2013 gave him total control over a major mainstream media outlet.

Bezos
did not purchase the 
Washington
Post
 (WaPo) because
his avaricious brain predicted that newspapers were about to make a
profitable resurgence; he purchased it for the same reason he has
inserted himself so very deeply into America’s unelected power
infrastructure – he wants to ensure a solid foundation for the
empire he is building. He needs a potent propaganda outlet to
manufacture support for the power establishment that he is weaving
his plutocratic tentacles through. This is precisely the same reason
other 
mass
media-controlling plutocrats
 are
stocking their propaganda machines with intelligence community
insiders.

Time
and again you see connections between the plutocratic class which
effectively 
owns
America’s elected government
,
the intelligence and defense agencies which operate behind thick
veils of secrecy in the name of “national security” to advance
agendas which have nothing to do with the wishes of the electorate,
and the mass media machine which is used to 
manufacture
the consent
 of
the people to be governed by this exploitative power structure.

America
is ruled by an elite class which has slowly created a system where
money increasingly 
translates
directly into political power
,
and which is therefore motivated to maintain economic injustice in
order to rule over the masses more completely. The greater the
economic inequality, the greater their power.

Nobody
would willingly consent to such an oppressive system where wealth
inequality keeps growing as expensive bombs from expensive drones are
showered upon strangers on the other side of the planet, so a robust
propaganda machine is needed.

And
that’s where John Brennan’s new job comes in. Expect a consistent
fountain of lies to pour from his mouth on NBC, and expect them to
all prop up this exploitative power establishment and advance
its 
geopolitical
agendas
.
And expect clear-eyed rebels everywhere to keep calling it all what
it is.

Op-ed
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone
 /
Republished with permission / 
Consortium
News
 / Report
a typo

*          DoD >> Department of Defence, ofwel het ministerie van Defensie dat zowel in de VS als in de EU, omgedoopt zou moeten worden tot ministerie van Oorlog……

**  Zie: ‘Michael Hayden (ex-CIA en -NSA): ‘collateral damage’, ofwel burgerslachtoffers, moet je willen maken………



*** Zie: ‘Former CIA Analyst of 27 Years: ‘Nunes Memo’ Reveals Felony Crimes at FBI and DOJ

Zie ook: ‘CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

       en: Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

       en: ‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

       en: ‘De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

       en: ‘Fake News van CNN: ‘American Sniper gedood in Syrie….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Massamedium CBS (VS) tegen reality check. Logisch wel, gezien de hoeveelheid fake news op die zender…..

      en: ‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

       en: ‘Vandalisme na Super Bowl door massamedia o.a. afgedaan als pure poëzie, waar protesten van gekleurden na zoveelste moord door politie worden afgedaan als terreur………

CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

Het Ron
Paul Institute (for Peace and Prosperity) publiceerde afgelopen dinsdag een
artikel van Philip Giraldi, waarin deze uitlegt hoe de CIA al 70 jaar
lang de vinger in de internationale ‘opinepap’ houdt……

Als een
geheime dienst ‘fake news’ verspreidt, noemt men dit ‘desinformatie’,
wat in het geval van landen buiten de VS onder geheime acties valt. Geheime
acties om de publieke opinie te beïnvloeden, of ‘vijandige’
regeringen te destabiliseren en uiteindelijk ten val te brengen (neem
Venezuela, Honduras, Libie, Syrië en Oekraïne)

Lees dit
uitgebreide artikel over de smerige acties die de VS en dan m.n. haar
geheime diensten speelden en spelen in onze wereld……. Russiagate
is gebleken een FBI/Clinton leugen te zijn geweest, terwijl de CIA,
FBI en Clinton aangaven dat Rusland de boel had gemanipuleerd en
gehackt, precies zoals de CIA dat al 70 jaar lang doet*, samen met economische oorlogsvoering, beproefde VS methoden om haar macht te vestigen of te
verstevigen…….

Als je
de ongebreidelde agressie van de VS ziet de laatste 70 jaar, waarbij
‘maar liefst’ meer dan 22 miljoen mensen werden vermoord**, snap je
werkelijk niet waarom men in het westen en dan m.n politici, de
reguliere media en de financiële maffia, nog steeds achter deze
grootste terreurentiteit op aarde aanlopen……..

Lees het zoveelste ontluisterden artikel (met een aantal nieuwe feiten) over terreurorganisatie CIA:

70
Years of Disinformation: How the CIA Funded Opinion Magazines in
Europe

undefined

written
by
 philip
giraldi
tuesday
january 16, 2018

When
an intelligence agency arranges to disseminated fake news it is
called “disinformation” and it is a subset of what is referred to
as covert action, basically secret operations run in a foreign
country to influence opinion or to disrupt the functioning of a
government or group that is considered to be hostile.

During
the Cold War, disinformation operations were run by many of the
leading players in both the 
North
Atlantic Treaty Organization
 and
in the opposition 
Warsaw
Pact
.
Sometimes the activity and the sponsorship were clearly visible, as
when Radio Free Europe and Radio Moscow would exchange barbs about
just how bad daily life was in the opposition alliance. Sometimes,
however, it took the form of clandestinely placing stories in the
media that were clearly untrue but designed to shift public
perceptions of what was taking place in the world. The Vietnam War
provided a perfect proxy playing field, with stories emanating from
the US government and its supporters presenting a narrative of a
fight for democracy against totalitarianism while the Communist bloc
promoted a contrary tale of colonial and capitalist oppression of a
people striving to be free.

The
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) inherited the mantle of covert
action operations as a legacy from its OSS predecessor, which had had
considerable success in conducting disinformation operations during
World War 2. But there was from the start considerable opposition to
continuing such programs as they were both expensive and subject to
devastating blowback when they were identified and exposed. In
Western Europe, powerful domestic communist parties were quick to
publicize US intelligence missteps, but nevertheless the ability to
manipulate the news and information media to place stories critical
of the Soviets and their allies led to major programs that funded
magazines and books while also seeking to acquire a cadre of
journalists that would produce pieces on demand proved too tempting
to ignore.

There
has been considerable ex post facto examination of the CIA’s use of
covert funding mechanisms including the Congress of Cultural Freedom
to fund writers and magazines in Europe, the best known of which
were 
The
Paris Review
 and Encounter out
of London. As there was a low intensity war going on against
communism, a conflict which many patriotic writers supported, funding
magazines and finding contributors to write appropriate material was
relatively easy and hardly challenged. Some senior editors knew or
strongly suspected where their funding was coming from while some did
not, but most didn’t ask any questions because then as now patrons
of literary magazines were in short supply. Many of the writers were
in the dark about the funding, but wrote what they did because of
their own personal political convictions. The CIA, seeking value for
money, would urge certain editorial lines but was not always very
aggressive in doing so as it sought to allow the process to play out
without too much interference.

Opinion
magazines were one thing, but penetrating the newspaper world was
quite a different story. It was easy to find a low or mid-level
journalist and pay him to write certain pieces, but the pathway to
actual publication was and is more complicated than that, going as it
does through several editorial levels before appearing in print. 
A
recent book
 cites
the belief that CIA had “an agent at a newspaper in every world
capital at least since 1977” who could be directed to post or kill
stories. While it is true that US Embassies and intelligence services
had considerable ability to place stories in capitals in Latin
America and parts of Asia, the record in Europe, where I worked, was
somewhat mixed. I knew of only one senior editor of a major European
newspaper who was considered to be an Agency resource, and even he
could not place 
fake
news
 as
he was answerable both to his editorial board and the conglomerate
that owned the paper. He also refused to take a salary from CIA,
which meant that his cooperation was voluntary and he could not be
directed.

CIA did indeed have a considerable number of
journalist “assets” in Europe but they were generally stringers
or mid-level and had only limited capability to actually shape the
news. They frequently wrote for publications that had little or no
impact. Indeed, one might reasonably ask whether the support of
literary magazines in the fifties and sixties which morphed into more
direct operations seeking journalist agents had any significant
impact at all in geopolitical terms or on the Cold War itself.

More
insidious was so-called Operation Mockingbird, which began in the
early 1950s and which more-or-less openly obtained the cooperation of
major American publications and news outlets to help fight communist
“subversion.” The activity was exposed by Seymour Hersh in 1975
and was further described by the Church Commission in 1976, after
which point CIA operations to influence opinion in the United States
became illegal and the use of American journalists as agents was also
generally prohibited. It was also learned that the Agency had been
working outside its founding charter to infiltrate student groups and
antiwar organizations under Operation Chaos, run by the CIA’s
controversial if not completely crazy counterintelligence Czar
James Jesus Angleton
.

As
the wheel of government frequently ends up turning full circle, we
appear to be back in the age of disinformation, where the national
security agencies of the US government, including CIA, are now
suspected of peddling stories that are intended to influence opinion
in the United States and produce a political response. The
Steele Dossier on Donald Trump
 is
a perfect example, a report that surfaced through a deliberate series
of actions by then CIA Director John Brennan, and which was filled
with unverifiable innuendo intended to destroy the president-elect’s
reputation before he took office. It is undeniably a positive
development for all Americans who care about good governance that
Congress is now intending to investigate the dossier to determine who
ordered it, paid for it, and what it was intended to
achieve.

Reprinted
with permission from the 
American
Herald Tribune
.

==========================================

*  Uiteraard voor het digitale tijdperk niet middels hacken, zoals je begrijpt, maar o.a. met ‘false flag’ operaties, of zoals in het besproken artikel middels het beïnvloeden van de media, om zo onrust en en uiteindelijk opstanden te creëren, die moeten leiden tot een staatsgreep, waar de VS wat betreft de opstanden en staatsgrepen, niet schroomt om de regie op zich te nemen (CIA)…….

** Zie: VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

Zie ook: ‘‘VS ‘ministerie van propaganda’ had supervisie over meer dan 800 films en minstens duizend tv series……..

Iran: moderne oorlogspropaganda ingezet door VS tegen ‘ongehoorzaam land…

VS en GB brengen propaganda die moet verdoezelen wat er echt gebeurt in Syrië…….. Door VS gebombardeerde ‘gifgasfabriek’ niet bestaand….

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘ (zie ook de andere links onder dat bericht)

RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

‘Rusland heeft niets van doen met manipulaties van de VS presidentsverkiezingen via Facebook, wel maakt Facebook meer kapot dan je lief is…….

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….



Massamedia VS vergeven van CIA ‘veteranen’, alsof die media nog niet genoeg ‘fake news’ ofwel leugens brengen……..

Bang voor Amerika

Koenders: NYT en Ass. Press gaven toe dat Russia-gate een canard is, waar blijft jouw openlijke schuldbekentenis?

Associated Press (AP) en de New York Times (NYT) hebben toegegeven dat de bewering als zouden alle 17 geheime diensten in de VS achter de claim staan, dat Rusland de VS presidentsverkiezingen zouden hebben beinvloed t.b.v. van het beest Donald Trump.

De directeur van de National Intelligence (DNI), Clapper, die over alle geheime diensten gaat, zou hebben bedoeld dat het om 3 diensten ging, de CIA, de FBI en de NSA. Echter daar deze directeur over 17 diensten gaat, nam men aan, dat het de bevinding van 17 diensten was, dat Rusland de verkiezingen t.g.v. het beest Trump had beïnvloed……..

De democratische kandidaat, hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton stelde dat er geen twijfel is als alle 17 diensten hetzelfde stellen……….

Eerlijk gezegd snap ik al niet, dat er nog iemand is, die ook maar gelooft wat welke geheime VS dienst dan ook verklaart, daarvoor hebben deze diensten, om het zachtjes te stellen, iets te vaak laten zien, dat liegen één van hun belangrijkste eigenschappen is……….

Het is dan ook aan politici als Koenders en Rutte en de reguliere westerse media te danken dat de leugens van de bedoelde VS diensten hier als waarheid worden verkocht…….

Hier kan nog het volgende punt bij opgeteld worden: NB de NSA heeft bewezen ingebroken in computers en telefoons van regeringen in het buitenland, zelfs van haar partners zoals Duitsland (en gegarandeerd ook in Nederland), m.a.w. de zwarte pot verwijt een niet zwarte ketel zwart te zijn!!! Daarnaast is de VS sinds 1945 verantwoordelijk voor een flink aantal staatsgrepen (ook voor 1940, ‘maar goed….’)……

Moet je nagaan, hoeveel onzinnige energie en hysterie er al in de valse claim is gestoken, dat Rusland alles en iedereen zou hacken en manipuleren…….. Als gevolg waarvan men geen maatregelen nam, de boel beter te beveiligen, zo bleek onlangs weer met de 2 ransomware aanvallen…….

Benieuwd hoe lang figuren al Hubert Smeets, Rob de Wijk, Han ten Broeke (VVD hufter), Arend Jan Boekestijn (ook al VVD, maar dan een echte sufferd) en vele anderen uit de politiek en de reguliere westerse media, de leugen blijven volhouden dat Rusland de VS (en andere) verkiezingen heeft gemanipuleerd…….

New
York Times and AP Finally Retract False Claims on Russia Hacking

July
2, 2017 at 7:54 am

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

(ANTIWAR.COM) — Among
the most oft-repeated claims of the entire Russia election hacking
scandal is that of absolute unanimity among US intelligence agencies,
with media and politicians regularly claiming that “
all
17 US intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia tried to
influence the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump
.”
It’s not true.

Nearly
a year into the hacking scandal, both the 
New
York Times
 and
the 
Associated
Press
 are
finally copping to the fact that this allegation is untrue, and
retracting it outright. The AP confirmed falsely making the claim in
at least four distinct articles, 
most
recently on Thursday
.

What
actually happened? The Director of National Intelligence made the
allegation, claiming it was based on information from three US
agencies, the CIA, FBI, and NSA. The Director of National
Intelligence nominally represents all 17 intelligence agencies, and
that was quickly and incorrectly extrapolated into all 17 agencies
being in consensus.

In
practice, however, the DNI is an increasingly politicized office, and
their publications aren’t necessarily in line with actual reality,
let alone proof of a consensus among the intelligence agencies.
Indications are that the overwhelming majority of the US intelligence
agencies were never even involved in assessing the Russia hacks.

Nor
would they be expected to be. It would be bizarre if the Pentagon’s
intelligence agency, for example, was probing US elections, or if the
National Reconnaissance Office, which operates spy satellites looking
for missile launches, was chiming in on the Trump Campaign.

It
sounded better, particularly for those trying to make this into a
bigger scandal, however, to claim that “all 17” US intelligence
agencies had agreed on the narrative, because this would give the
impression that it’s indisputable fact, as opposed to a heavily
politically-motivated assertion backed up by limited circumstantial
evidence dug up by a couple of US spy agencies.

By Jason
Ditz
 /
Republished with permission / 
AntiWar.com / Report
a typo

===============================================

Hier een bericht van Information Clearting House, geschreven door Robert Parry, dat iets uitgebreider bericht over deze zaak (onder dat artikel kan u klikken voor ‘een Dutch vertaling’):

NYT
Finally Retracts Russia-gate Canard
A
founding Russia-gate myth is that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies
agreed that Russia hacked into and distributed Democratic emails, a
falsehood that The New York Times has belatedly retracted, reports
Robert Parry.
By
Robert Parry

June
30, 2017 “Information
Clearing House
” – The New York Times has finally admitted
that one of the favorite Russia-gate canards – that all 17 U.S.
intelligence agencies concurred on the assessment of Russian hacking
of Democratic emails – is false.

On
Thursday, the Times appended 
a
correction to a June 25 article
 that
had repeated the false claim, which has been used by Democrats and
the mainstream media for months to brush aside any doubts about the
foundation of the Russia-gate scandal and portray President Trump as
delusional for doubting what all 17 intelligence agencies supposedly
knew to be true.

In
the Times’ White House Memo of June 25, correspondent Maggie
Haberman mocked Trump for “still refus[ing] to acknowledge a basic
fact agreed upon by 17 American intelligence agencies that he now
oversees: Russia orchestrated the attacks, and did it to help get him
elected.”

However,
on Thursday, the Times – while leaving most of Haberman’s
ridicule of Trump in place – noted in a correction that the
relevant intelligence “assessment was made by four intelligence
agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the
Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and
the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all
17 organizations in the American intelligence community.”

The
Times’ grudging correction was vindication for some Russia-gate
skeptics who had questioned the claim of a full-scale intelligence
assessment, which would usually take the form of a National
Intelligence Estimate (or NIE), a product that seeks out the views of
the entire Intelligence Community and includes dissents.

The
reality of a more narrowly based Russia-gate assessment
was 
admitted in
May by President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James
Clapper and Obama’s CIA Director John Brennan in sworn
congressional testimony.

Clapper testified before
a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on May 8 that the Russia-hacking
claim came from a “special intelligence community assessment” (or
ICA) produced by selected analysts from the CIA, NSA and FBI, “a
coordinated product from three agencies – CIA, NSA, and the FBI –
not all 17 components of the intelligence community,” the former
DNI said.

Clapper
further acknowledged that the analysts who produced the Jan. 6
assessment on alleged Russian hacking were “hand-picked” from the
CIA, FBI and NSA.

Yet,
as any intelligence expert will tell you, if you “hand-pick” the
analysts, you are really hand-picking the conclusion. For instance,
if the analysts were known to be hard-liners on Russia or supporters
of Hillary Clinton, they could be expected to deliver the 
one-sided
report
 that
they did.

Politicized
Intelligence

In
the history of U.S. intelligence, we have seen how this selective
approach has worked, such as the phony determination of the Reagan
administration pinning the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul
II and other acts of terror on the Soviet Union.

CIA
Director William Casey and Deputy Director Robert Gates 
shepherded
the desired findings through the process
 by
putting the assessment under the control of pliable analysts and
sidelining those who objected to this politicization of intelligence.

The
point of enlisting the broader intelligence community – and
incorporating dissents into a final report – is to guard against
such “stove-piping” of intelligence that delivers the politically
desired result but ultimately distorts reality.

Another
painful example of politicized intelligence was President George W.
Bush’s 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq’s WMD
that 
removed
State Department and other dissents
 from
the declassified version that was given to the public.

Since
Clapper’s and Brennan’s testimony in May, the Times and other
mainstream news outlets have avoided a direct contradiction of their
earlier acceptance of the 17-intelligence-agencies canard by simply
referring to a judgment by “the intelligence community.”

That
finessing of their earlier errors has allowed Hillary Clinton and
other senior Democrats to continue referencing this fictional
consensus without challenge, at least in the mainstream media.

For
instance, on May 31 at a technology conference in California, 
Clinton
referred
 to
the Jan. 6 
report,
asserting that “Seventeen agencies, all in agreement, which I know
from my experience as a Senator and Secretary of State, is hard to
get. They concluded with high confidence that the Russians ran an
extensive information war campaign against my campaign, to influence
voters in the election.”

The
failure of the major news organizations to clarify this point about
the 17 agencies may have contributed to Haberman’s mistake on June
25 as she simply repeated the groupthink that nearly all the
Important People in Washington just knew to be true.

But
the Times’ belated correction also underscores the growing sense
that the U.S. mainstream media has joined in a political vendetta
against Trump and has cast aside professional standards to the point
of repeating false claims designed to denigrate him.

That,
in turn, plays into Trump’s Twitter complaints that he and his
administration are the targets of a “witch hunt” led by the “fake
news” media, a grievance that appears to be energizing his
supporters and could discredit whatever ongoing investigations
eventually conclude.

Investigative
reporter Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories for The
Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s. You can buy his latest
book, 
America’s
Stolen Narrative,
 either
in 
print
here
 or
as an e-book (from 
Amazon and barnesandnoble.com).

Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load

==============================

Op 18 december 2017 heb ik de kop en een het label AP aangepast. Waar eerder AP stond, staat nu Ass. Press, (Associated Press), daar de letters ‘AP’ al werden gebruikt voor de Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens.

John Brennan: we wisten niet om te gaan met terreurverdachten na 911…………

De huidige directeur van de CIA, John Brennan, gaf gisteren toe, dat de CIA verhoormethoden heeft gebruikt, die indruisen tegen de wet…… “We wisten niet hoe om te gaan met terreurverdachten na 911”, aldus deze schoft, die tijdens de persconferentie waar hij dit durfde te zeggen, het woord ‘marteling’ niet één keer in de mond nam………. ‘Niet weten hoe om te gaan met verdachten’, alsof hij en z’n ultieme terreurorganisatie niet wisten, dat martelen verboden was…… Moet u nagaan, de CIA heeft over de hele wereld, VS welgevallige dictatoriale regimes geleerd, hoe ze het beste mensen kunnen martelen……..

Brennan durfde nog wel te zeggen, dat de CIA in een tijd, waar geen makkelijke antwoorden waren, veel goed heeft gedaan…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Waar haalt deze ploert het gore lef vandaan? Als hij nog in het bezit was geweest van een beetje moreel en ethisch besef, had hij na het naar buiten komen van de laatste martelschandalen, door zijn terreurinstituut, zijn ontslag aangeboden……..

Ach ja, fatsoen is vaak ver te zoeken in de VS!!