Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

Oorlogsmisdadiger Hillary Clinton* heeft een boek geschreven, het kan u bijna niet zijn ontgaan. In dit boek durft deze leugenaar de schuld voor het verlies van de VS-presidentsverkiezingen bij anderen te leggen, terwijl ze van meet af aan een heel smerige campagne leidde tegen haar mede democratische kandidaat Sanders………

Een lid van haar campagneteam, Seth Rich was het niet eens met deze smerige campagne en hij lekte documenten naar Wikileaks, die aangaven dat Clinton de boel had belogen en bedrogen, dus niet de Russen zoals de reguliere media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici tot op de dag van vandaag volhouden……. Deze Rich werd na het lekken van de documenten ‘toevallig’ vermoord, volgens de politie een roofmoord, hoewel er niets van Rich werd gestolen, zelfs zichtbare sieraden niet……. Je zal begrijpen dat deze moord Clinton wel heel goed uitkwam…….

De reguliere (massa-) media staan voor het overgrote deel nog steeds achter Clinton, ondanks al haar bewezen leugens….. Voorts zou Clinton een kampioen vrouwenemancipatie zijn, dit terwijl het haar geen reet interesseert, dat ze een groot aantal vrouwen in diepe ellende heeft gedompeld en zelfs een groot aantal vrouwen heeft vermoord, middels het vermaledijde en grootschalige terroristische VS buitenlandbeleid…….

Zoals je waarschijnlijk wel weet, gebeurde dit in de illegale oorlogen tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië…… Wat betreft die laatste: van meet af aan, heeft Clinton in haar functie ingezet op het onrust stoken in Syrië, daar Assad moest verdwijnen (een VS plan dat in 2006 weer uit de koelkast werd gehaald). Waar nog aan toegevoegd moet worden, dat Clinton één op één verantwoordelijk was voor de illegale oorlog tegen Libië, een oorlog die aan naar schatting 40.000 mensen het leven heeft gekost (moorden) en waarin de Libische leider Khadaffi gruwelijk werd vermoord…….

Libie is nu één grote chaos en alle ellende die bijvoorbeeld de vluchtelingen uit conflictgebieden in Afrika overkomt (mensen die naar Europa willen vluchten), zoals verkrachting, marteling en slavernij zijn te danken aan het ingrijpen van Clinton…….. Onder Khadaffi was Libië het rijkste land van Afrika en waren huisvesting, energie, gezondheidszorg, scholing en zelfs studie (ook voor vrouwen) in het buitenland, zo goed als gratis…….

Daarnaast was er nog de coup tegen de democratisch gekozen Hondurese regering in 2009, een coup die tot een berg geweld leidde en waarvoor Clinton één van de hoofdverantwoordelijken is………

Mensen ik snap niet waar Clinton het gore lef vandaan haalt, om zichzelf als slachtoffer uit te roepen, ongelofelijk, ongeloofwaardig, onverdraaglijk en ronduit schunnig!!

Mensen lees het uitstekende artikel van John Pilger, die nog meer zaken uit de doeken doet:

Julian
Assange, Hillary Clinton and the War on Truth

October
21, 2017 at 9:03 am

Written
by 
John
Pilger

Australia’s
public broadcasting network gave Hillary Clinton an open mic to
defame WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange as “a tool of Russian
intelligence” without giving him a chance to respond.

(CN— On
Oct. 16, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation aired an interview
with Hillary Clinton: one of many to promote her score-settling book
about why she was not elected President of the United States.

Wading
through the Clinton book, 
What
Happened, 
is
an unpleasant experience, like a stomach upset. Smears and tears.
Threats and enemies. “They” (voters) were brainwashed and herded
against her by the odious Donald Trump in cahoots with sinister Slavs
sent from the great darkness known as Russia, assisted by an
Australian “nihilist,” Julian Assange.

In The New
York Times, 
there
was a striking photograph of a female reporter consoling Clinton,
having just interviewed her. The lost leader was, above all,
“absolutely a feminist.” The thousands of women’s lives this
“feminist” destroyed while in government — Libya, Syria,
Honduras — were of no interest.

In New
York
 magazine,
Rebecca Trainster wrote that Clinton was finally “expressing some
righteous anger.” It was even hard for her to smile: “so hard
that the muscles in her face ache.” Surely, she concluded, “if we
allowed women’s resentments the same bearing we allow men’s
grudges, America would be forced to reckon with the fact that all
these angry women might just have a point.”

Drivel
such as this, trivializing women’s struggles, marks the media
hagiographies of Hillary Clinton. Her political extremism and
warmongering are of no consequence. Her problem, wrote Trainster, was
a “damaging infatuation with the email story.” The truth, in
other words.

The
leaked emails of Clinton’s campaign manager, John Podesta, revealed
a direct connection between Clinton and the foundation and funding of
organized jihadism in the Middle East and Islamic State (known as
ISIS, ISIL or Daesh). The ultimate source of most Islamic terrorism,
Saudi Arabia, was central to her career.

One
email, in 2014, sent by Clinton to Podesta soon after she stepped
down as U.S. Secretary of State, discloses that Islamic State is
funded by the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Clinton accepted
huge donations from both governments for the Clinton Foundation.

As
Secretary of State, she approved the world’s biggest ever arms sale
to her benefactors in Saudi Arabia, worth more than $80 billion.
Thanks to her, U.S. arms sales to the world – for use in stricken
countries like Yemen – doubled.

This
was revealed by WikiLeaks and published by 
The New
York Times. 
No
one doubts the emails are authentic. The subsequent campaign to smear
WikiLeaks and its editor-in-chief, Julian Assange, as “agents of
Russia,” has grown into a spectacular fantasy known as
“Russiagate.” The “plot” is said to have been signed off on
by Vladimir Putin himself. There is not a shred of public evidence.

Smear
and Omission

The
ABC Australia interview with Clinton is an outstanding example of
smear and censorship by omission. I would say it is a model.

No
one,” the interviewer, Sarah Ferguson, says to Clinton, “could
fail to be moved by the pain on your face at that moment [of the
inauguration of Trump] … Do you remember how visceral it was for
you?”

Having
established Clinton’s visceral suffering, Ferguson asks about
“Russia’s role.”

CLINTON:
I think Russia affected the perceptions and views of millions of
voters, we now know. I think that their intention coming from the
very top with Putin was to hurt me and to help Trump.

FERGUSON:
How much of that was a personal vendetta by Vladimir Putin against
you?

CLINTON:
… I mean he wants to destabilize democracy. He wants to undermine
America, he wants to go after the Atlantic Alliance and we consider
Australia kind of a … an extension of that …

(The
opposite is true. It is a combination of Western armies massing on
Russia’s border for the first time since the Russian Revolution 100
years ago.)

FERGUSON:
How much damage did [Julian Assange] do personally to you?

CLINTON:
Well, I had a lot of history with him because I was Secretary of
State when, ah, WikiLeaks published a lot of very sensitive, ah,
information from our State Department and our Defense Department.

(What
Clinton fails to say – and her interviewer fails to remind her –
is that in 2010, WikiLeaks revealed that Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton had ordered a secret intelligence campaign targeted at the
United Nations leadership, including the Secretary General, Ban
Ki-Moon and the permanent Security Council representatives from
China, Russia, France and the U.K. A classified directive, signed by
Clinton, was issued to U.S. diplomats in July 2009, demanding
forensic technical details about the communications systems used by
top U.N. officials, including passwords and personal encryption keys
used in private and commercial networks. This was known as Cablegate.
It was lawless spying.)

CLINTON:
He [Assange] is very clearly a tool of Russian intelligence. And, ah,
he has done their bidding.

(Clinton
offered no evidence to back up this serious accusation, nor did
Ferguson challenge her.)

CLINTON:
You don’t see damaging negative information coming out about the
Kremlin on WikiLeaks. You didn’t see any of that published.

(This
was false. WikiLeaks has published a massive number of documents on
Russia – more than 800,000, most of them critical, many of them
used in books and as evidence in court cases.)

A
‘Nihilistic Opportunist’

CLINTON:
So I think Assange has become a kind of nihilistic opportunist who
does the bidding of a dictator.

FERGUSON: Lots
of people, including in Australia, think that Assange is a martyr for
free speech and freedom of information. How would you describe him?
Well, you’ve just described him as a nihilist.

CLINTON:
Yeah, well, and a tool. I mean he’s a tool of Russian intelligence.
And if he’s such, ah, you know, martyr of free speech, why doesn’t
WikiLeaks ever publish anything coming out of Russia?

(Again,
Ferguson said nothing to challenge this or correct her.)

CLINTON:
There was a concerted operation between WikiLeaks and Russia and most
likely people in the United States to weaponize that information, to
make up stories … to help Trump.

FERGUSON:
Now, along with some of those outlandish stories, there was
information that was revealed about the Clinton Foundation that at
least in some of the voters’ minds seemed to associate you ….

CLINTON:
Yeah, but it was false!

FERGUSON:
… with the peddling of information …

CLINTON:
It was false! It was totally false!  …..

FERGUSON:
Do you understand how difficult it was for some voters to understand
the amounts of money that the [Clinton] Foundation is raising, the
confusion with the consultancy that was also raising money, getting
gifts and travel and so on for Bill Clinton that even Chelsea had
some issues with? …

CLINTON:
Well you know, I’m sorry, Sarah, I mean I, I know the facts….

Generational
‘Icon’

The
ABC interviewer lauded Clinton as “the icon of your generation.”
She asked her nothing about the enormous sums she creamed off from
Wall Street, such as the $675,000 for speaking to Goldman Sachs, one
of the banks at the center of the 2008 crash. Clinton’s greed
deeply upset the kind of voters she abused as “deplorables.”

Clearly
looking for a cheap headline in the Australian press, Ferguson asked
her if Trump was “a clear and present danger to Australia” and
got her predictable response.

This
high-profile journalist made no mention of Clinton’s own “clear
and present danger” to the people of Iran whom she once threatened
to “obliterate totally,” and the 40,000 Libyans who died in the
attack on Libya in 2011 that Clinton orchestrated. Flushed with
excitement, the Secretary of State rejoiced at the gruesome murder of
the Libyan leader, Colonel Gaddafi.

Libya
was Hillary Clinton’s war,” Julian Assange said in a filmed
interview with me last year. “Barack Obama initially opposed it.
Who was the person championing it? Hillary Clinton. That’s
documented throughout her emails … there’s more than 1,700 emails
out of the 33,000 Hillary Clinton emails that we’ve published, just
about Libya. It’s not that Libya has cheap oil. She perceived the
removal of Gaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state —
something that she would use in her run-up to the general election
for President.

So
in late 2011 there is an internal document called the Libya Tick Tock
that was produced for Hillary Clinton, and it’s the chronological
description of how she was the central figure in the destruction of
the Libyan state, which resulted in around 40,000 deaths within
Libya; jihadists moved in, ISIS moved in, leading to the European
refugee and migrant crisis.

Not
only did you have people fleeing Libya, people fleeing Syria, the
destabilization of other African countries as a result of arms flows,
but the Libyan state itself was no longer able to control the
movement of people through it.”

This
– not Clinton’s “visceral” pain in losing to Trump nor the
rest of the self-serving scuttlebutt in her ABC interview – was the
story. Clinton shared responsibility for massively de-stabilizing the
Middle East, which led to the death, suffering and flight of
thousands of women, men and children.

Ferguson
raised not a word of it. Clinton repeatedly defamed Assange, who was
neither defended nor offered a right of reply on his own country’s
state broadcaster.

In
a tweet from London, Assange cited the ABC’s own Code of Practice,
which states: “Where allegations are made about a person or
organisation, make reasonable efforts in the circumstances to provide
a fair opportunity to respond.”

Putin’s
Bitch’

Following
the ABC broadcast, Ferguson’s executive producer, Sally Neighbour,
re-tweeted the following: “Assange is Putin’s bitch. We all know
it!”

The
slander, since deleted, was even used as a link to the ABC interview
captioned ‘Assange is Putins (sic) b****. We all know it!’

In
the years I have known Julian Assange, I have watched a vituperative
personal campaign try to stop him and WikiLeaks. It has been a
frontal assault on whistleblowing, on free speech and free
journalism, all of which are now under sustained attack from
governments and corporate Internet controllers.

The
first serious attacks on Assange came from the Guardian, which, like
a spurned lover, turned on its besieged former source, having hugely
profited from WikiLeaks’ disclosures. With not a penny going to
Assange or WikiLeaks, a Guardian book led to a lucrative Hollywood
movie deal. Assange was portrayed as “callous” and a “damaged
personality.”

It
was as if a rampant jealousy could not accept that his remarkable
achievements stood in marked contrast to that of his detractors in
the “mainstream” media. It is like watching the guardians of the
status quo, regardless of age, struggling to silence real dissent and
prevent the emergence of the new and hopeful.

Today,
Assange remains a political refugee from the war-making dark state of
which Donald Trump is a caricature and Hillary Clinton the
embodiment. His resilience and courage are astonishing. Unlike him,
his tormentors are cowards.

John
Pilger is an Australian-British journalist based in London.
 Pilger’s
Web site is: 
www.johnpilger.com.
His new film, “The Coming War on China,” is available in the U.S.
from 
www.bullfrogfilms.com

By John
Pilger
 /
Republished with permission / 
ConsortiumNews.com / Report
a typo

=========================================================

* Hillary Clinton is o.a. verantwoordelijk voor de illegale oorlog tegen Libië, Syrië en in feite verantwoordelijk voor de oorlog tegen de bevolking in Oost-Oekraïne, daarnaast is ze mede verantwoordelijk voor de in 2009 gepleegde coup tegen de democratisch gekozen regering van Honduras……. Zie wat dat betreft o.a.. ‘Hillary Clinton, huurmoordenaar voor de banken: de ware reden achter de illegale oorlog tegen Libië…..

Zie ook: ‘Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!

        en: ‘CIA speelt zoals gewoonlijk vuil spel: uit Wikileaks documenten blijkt dat CIA zelf de verkiezingen manipuleerde, waar het Rusland van beschuldigde……..

       en: ‘‘Russische bemoeienis’ met de Nederlandse verkiezingen….. Waaruit blijkt nu die manipulatie, gezien de verkiezingsuitslag?

       en: ‘CIA malware voor manipulaties en spionage >> vervolg Wikileaks Vault 7

       en: ‘Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

       en: ‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

       en: ‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

      en: ‘‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

      en: ‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

      en: VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

      en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

      en: ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

      en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

      en: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

      en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

      en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

      en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

      en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

       en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

       en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

       en: ‘WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’

       en:  ‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

       en: ‘Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat

Catalaanse onafhankelijkheid door een andere bril dan die van de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

Het volgende artikel nam ik over van Anti-Media, hierin een gesprek met een VS burger, die meer duidelijkheid geeft over de Catalaanse wil tot onafhankelijkheid.

Terecht wordt in dit artikel een ander beeld geschetst, dan de reguliere media u laten voorschotelen. Bijvoorbeeld dat de wil tot onafhankelijkheid inderdaad een streven is van het grootste deel van de Catalanen. Voorts wordt melding gemaakt van de fascisten die meeliepen in de demonstratie op 7 oktober jl. tegen de Catalaanse onafhankelijkheid…..

Eén van de redenen dat de Catalanen nu onafhankelijkheid wensen, is het feit dat de Spaanse premier Rajoy 14 statuten voor Catalaanse autonomie heeft geschrapt in 2006…….*

What
an American Citizen in Barcelona Wants You to Know About Catalonia

October
10, 2017 at 6:58 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
Team

Anti-Media spoke
with Isabelle Bolla, an American woman who has lived in Catalonia for
the past two years.

(ANTIMEDIA) — On
October 1st, Catalonia held a 
disputed referendum
vote in an attempt to declare independence from Spain. On voting day,
Spanish police were 
documented using
excessive force against Catalans attempting to place their vote.
While the situation in Spain has recently garnered 
much
attention
 from
the media as it reaches a boiling point, tensions between the
governments of Catalonia and Spain have been building 
for
years
.

Just
yesterday, Spain’s ruling party made a 
veiled
threat
 to
assassinate the president of Catalonia, as shared in this tweet from
Julian Assange, who continues to be 
outspoken on
the issue.

a

Zie opmerking over deze video**

Julian Assange 🔹 @JulianAssange

EU silence has now led to this: Spain’s ruling political party just made a barely veiled threat to have Catalonia’s current president shot.

In
light of the 
recent
unrest
 in
Spain surrounding Catalonia’s vote for independence, we spoke by
email with Isabelle Bolla, an American woman who has lived in various
regions of Spain, including living in Catalonia for the past two
years. As an outsider who has spent considerable time in Spain,
Isabelle has a unique perspective on the situation from inside
Barcelona.

Can
you discuss the general atmosphere you have experienced recently in
Catalonia?

Over
the past month, I have seen mass mobilizations of people who have
peacefully gathered to affirm their desire to vote in a referendum.
Many have felt discontent with the Spanish state and its treatment of
Catalonia, and others want a say in their future. While not everyone
may agree or want independence, 80% of Catalans wanted the right to
vote on their future. Prior to October 1st, there was an energy in
the air of excitement. People were ready to vote. I ended up being in
a small town on the night before the election. Numerous people were
camping out and sleeping inside of the designated locations for
voting, to protect them from the possible threat of Guardia Civil
(Spanish national police) which had been deployed to cities and towns
all over the region. People were genuinely scared of what could
happen if the police showed up, but there was a feeling of excitement
– as some have waited their whole lives to vote.”

What
did you witness on the day the referendum was held? You mentioned a
feeling of excitement, did that continue throughout the day?

People
started lining up at 4am, and waited until the polling stations
opened at 9am. Luckily, no police were deployed to the location I was
in, so everything was peaceful and orderly. It was a normal and
completely democratic proc
ess. At
one point the voting systems completely crashed, as they did in ALL
voting stations all over Catalonia, as the Spanish government had
managed to shut them down with court orders. People resorted to
voting manually, and the vote went ahead nonetheless. I saw a 93 year
old man vote, and everyone clapped for him on his way out – it’s
incredible to think of the things he has likely seen in his life, and
that he made the morning walk to vote and have his voice heard.

I
returned to Barcelona the same day, and was filled with emotion at
the devastating brutality which occurred on behalf of the Spanish
police, and resulted in nearly 900 injuries. The videos which
followed only further demonstrated the volatility of the operation. I
attended a few manifestations in Plaza Catalunya and tried to check
out other local polling places, in which people were still officially
voting until 8pm.

Over
the past month, the Spanish state has censored the press, shut down
.CAT domains, sent in police forces, arrested government officials,
and gave the order for riot police to conduct themselves in a violent
manner to voters. Their strategy thus far has been questionable.”

What
happened during the pro-unity 
march held
on October 7th?

Yesterday
in Barcelona and Madrid people who oppose secession gathered to show
support for a united spain. While a majority of these people were
peaceful, it should be noted that there was a large amount
of 
Falange and
far-right attendees (such as 
Vox — another
right wing, anti immigrant, racist group) These groups are notably
fascist, and many were caught on camera doing Nazi salutes (which is
banned in many parts of Europe) and carrying pre-constitutional
Falange flags. Again, I am not alluding that the entire population
was fascist as that certainly wasn’t the case, but rather that
their presence was completely allowed and not explicitly banned,
which in my opinion is an issue in and of itself.

There
was a large turnout for pro-unity demonstration. I think many people
from all over Spain are hurt about what probably feels like the
dissolution of a marriage. It’s hard not to get personal, and feel
a range of emotions. I think that’s why it’s so crucial for both
sides to speak to each other, because ultimately a large standoff
will end up hurting the populations and civilians the most.

It
should also be stated that a majority of attendees were not from
Catalonia, but were 
bussed
in 
from
other regions of Spain. Bus options were available to anyone all over
Spain for a mere 34€. So a large population of those attending were
from other Spanish regions. I personally witnessed an influx of
busses throughout the day coming, and going.

I
also witnessed a car driving past my apartment, covered in Spanish
flags and blasting the “Marcha Real” on the speakers, which is
Franco’s national anthem and 
notoriously
fascist
.

I
would like to be clear again, that not all of the population there
was fascist, but the fascists were not DENOUNCED or told to leave –
which is problematic.

Just
last week
,
thousands gathered in Plaza del Sol in Madrid to sing “Cara Del
Sol,” another fascist tune indoctrinated into the youth during
Franco’s regime.

I
believe in peaceful assembly and peaceful protests, but the
appearance of these far-right exclusive and divisive groups calling
for “unity” only incites intimidation and fear, and produces the
opposite effect to many Catalans, and outsiders like myself.”

Can
you give an example of the difference in attitudes between the
Catalan people and the Spanish police?

On
October 3rd, I attended the “vaga general” which was a general
day of strike in Catalonia. It was called on by unions and approved
by the Catalan government, leading to an entire work stoppage. This
strike was called in solidarity with the Catalan people and against
the unproportional use of force demonstrated by Spanish police on
October 1st. As with all Catalan manifestations, the mood was festive
and it was completely peaceful. I think the force and aggressiveness
of Spanish police and the Spanish government has in turn had the
opposite effect it hoped for, and has only further invigorated the
separatist movement. Given the history in Catalonia, people here do
not react well to force or oppression, as it is reminiscent of life
merely 40 years ago. Another mobilization is called for this week,
and we will likely continue to see more.”

Catalans
attempted to vote in a democratic election for a referendum,
and 
succeeded.
But the Spanish government has maintained that this referendum vote
would not take place. Can you tell us what the referendum is for?

The
referendum was for the right of Catalans to vote if they wanted to
become an independent republic outside of Spain. As polls are
constantly fluctuating, the numbers on who supports independence are
unclear. What can be said is that 80% of the population supported a
referendum to solve the matter. Over the past few years, unofficial
non-binding referendums on the same matters did win overall
support 
— but
again, it’s hard to fully understand these numbers as whole. To get
a full scope, it would be wise to analyze voter turnouts as a whole
in regional and national elections, and cross reference them to
referendum elections. The pressures that Catalans had to deal with to
vote on October 1st should also be taken account. According to
Catalan officials, around 770,000 were unable to vote due to police
interference.

In
Catalonia, 5.3 million or so are eligible to vote in a population of
7.5 million, and around 4.9 are Catalans.. The average turnout has
been between 2-2.5 million people in many referendums, which should
already be a signal of alarm to the Spanish state that nearly half of
the population is voting in favor of independence 
— and
that there is a deep divide present.”

The
Spanish prime minister 
insists that
no referendum was held in Catalonia but officials say, according to
preliminary results, 90% voted for independence. Why does Catalonia
want independence from Spain?

Catalonia
wants independence because of many issues and a variety of reasons.
Many have to do with unfair treatment from the Spanish government,
and the fact that in 2006 PP and namely Spanish PM Mariano Rajoy
reneged on a previous promise made to Catalonia, and subsequently
canceled out nearly 14 statutes of autonomy the region was granted by
his predecessor. Stripping the autonomy of the region and turning its
back on Catalonia left many people very angry
. The following 2008
financial crisis further exasperated these sentiments.

It
also has to do with money, as many Catalans pay more in taxes than
what they receive back, leading them to borrow money from the Spanish
government to provide basic services for its citizens. While this is
always the precedent, that richer regions pay more in taxes;
Catalonia has all together 
paid
more
than
it’s wealthy European counterparts in Paris, London, etc.

I
believe it also boils down to identity, which is a VERY big factor.
Many Catalans do not necessarily feel Spanish, they 
identify as
Catalan.”

Prior
to this referendum, had there been previous effort on the part of the
Catalan government to reach out to the Spanish government to attempt
an agreement?

Over
the past 6 or 7 years, the Catalan government has made numerous
attempts to speak with the Spanish government to discuss more
autonomy, or even to try to agree on a question for a referendum. All
of these attempts have been shut down, leading the Catalan government
to respond with one binding question and referendum.

Studies
have shown that if more than one question was posited, or if Spain
had agreed on the question with Catalans many perhaps would have
voted to 
stay.
I don’t see that necessarily being the case after the events of the
past month, and after October 1st.

Here
in the U.S. almost everything that goes ‘wrong’ is blamed on
Russia. It looks like the 
media
is using Russia
 as
a scapegoat in this instance as well, claiming that Russian meddlers
are to blame for the Catalan crisis. Have you seen this in the media
where you are?

I
have briefly some some content alluding to collusion with Russia,
which seems to be the case worldwide now. As far as I know, these
parallels were drawn by the newspaper El Pais, whom also mentioned
that Julian Assange (who has been vocal about the Catalonia/Spain
situation) is also in works with Russia. While I have no doubt that
seeing a fractured Europe would serve Russia’s best interests, I am
highly speculative of Russia playing any kind of integral role in
matter. The call for a referendum, and the desire for independence
has no correlation to Russia, and it should be noted that mentioning
Russia or attempting to use Russia as a scapegoat is an easy way to
diminish or invalidate the opinions of millions of people.

With
your knowledge of events over the past week and your experience in
Spain, what do you think will happen over the next few days?

Well,
there have been many assumptions and analysis over the possible
endgame steps and strategies that will be implemented. I think the
Spanish government is going to measure which steps it can
incrementally implement to stop or put a halt to a declaration of
independence. Sedition charges, and arrests will likely be made over
the next week and could perhaps be it’s first way of cracking down.
Last week, Spain’s government passed a law which makes it easier
for companies to move their official headquarter base out of
Catalonia and into Spain, as a way of adding economical pressure to
the region.  

Following
this, a few companies and banks 
moved their
HQ address to Spanish cities, out of prudence and as a contingency
plan – although it should be noted that most companies actual
headquarters will remain here, and only the fiscal address has been
moved. Adding economical pressure, and following with a series of
arrests looks like the current course for now.

Up
to this point, the Spanish government has refused any outside
mediation and has also refused to engage in active civil discourse
and dialogue with the Catalan government while “independence is
still on the table.” Of course, this entire problem revolves around
independence, so it seems both governments have been unable to even
sit and meet properly for a discussion.”

Article
8 of the Spanish Constitution allows it to explicitly use its armed
forces to ensure the sovereignty and unity of the country. “The
mission of the Armed Forces, comprising the Army, the Navy and the
Air Force, is to guarantee the sovereignty and independence of Spain
and the constitutional order.”, 
Spanish
Consitution, Article 8
)

Alongside
article 8, it is likely that article 116 and 155 will be implemented
as well following a UDI. Article 116 quite literally invokes MARTIAL
LAW in three stages: Stage of Alarm, State of Emergency, and State of
Siege. (“An organic law shall regulate the states of alarm,
emergency and siege (martial law) and the corresponding competences
and limitations.”

– Article
116, Spanish Constitution
).

Article
155 would revoke the autonomy of a region, and remove the government
in power. The central government in Madrid would therefore presume
control over Catalonia economically and politically. Invoking article
155 has been dubbed the “nuclear option.” The Vice President of
Spain did confirm that this article would be implemented the same day
as a hypothetical UDI.

Both
of these articles will require a congressional majority to pass.

I
think the Catalan government will move to declare independence as it
promised the population it would do. The Catalan Parliament is the
legitimate representative body of Catalans, and they have the
internal power and legitimacy to declare independence. They are
seeking to declare it for a number of reasons, and because a UDI
(unilateral declaration of independence) would allow them to accept
mediation from foreign governments, and recognize Catalan statehood.
There attempts and calls for mediation have been ignored, and Spain
has refused any dialogue up to this point – so this undoubtedly
seems to be the way forward. It’s unclear yet if it will occur
incrementally or all at once.

Following
the UDI, it is highly likely that article 155/116 will come into
play, which is cause for concern. I fear further aggressive tactics
from the Spanish state will cause backlash in the region, and lead to
more strikes and mobilizations. People will absolutely take to the
streets.

I
believe the Spanish government will hold off on instituting 155 for
now UNTIL Catalonia declares independence, which is also likely to
occur in the next few days. It is not only plausible, but highly
likely that this move will trigger a deep disaccord with the
population, and lead to more demonstrations of passive resistance.

In
your opinion what is the ideal outcome for Catalonia?

I
think the ideal situation for Catalans and Catalonia would be
dialogue with the Spanish government with outside mediation, where
they can clearly have their voices heard, with a neutral mediator in
place. This is idealistic, and given how things have played out over
the past month it seems unlikely to happen. Ideally, the Spanish and
Catalan governments would work together towards understanding each
other and reaching an agreement that is suitable for both. Dialogue,
dialogue, dialogue. The main thing missing, is what would help the
situation the most. Countless MEPS, Nobel Peace Prize winners, and
countries have urged Catalonia and Spain to simply talk; but Spain
has refused to this point, choosing force and aggression, against
what it sees as a rebellion.

The
other ideal situation would be a compromise within the Spanish
government to either grant more autonomy, make it a state within a
Federal spain, or give permission to hold a legally binding
referendum (as the U.K did with Scotland.) None of these are
plausible with the current political trajectories in place, but they
would certainly be ideal.

Since
the former situations seem quite lofty and out of reach, then the
other best alternative would likely be the UDI. According to
international law, self-determination is in numerous international
treaties and does denote the legal right of a people to decide their
destiny in international order. With that said, the EU is largely
against secessionist movements, and cannot legally recognize an
independent state unless the parent state itself (Spain) has come to
an agreement or arrangement with the government seeking secession,
and has agreed to recognize their statehood – which is highly
unlikely to happen.

If
Catalonia does break free and leave the EU ( at least temporarily),
it will lose the protection of the EU, however this would leave it
open to mediation that it can legally accept. Just because it leaves
the EU, does not mean it would not be accepted back in.

What
is the most important thing about this situation that you think the
rest of the world needs to know?

Catalonia
is a very 
prosperous region
of Spain, and makes up nearly 22% of its GDP and 17% of its populace.
In 2016 it generated nearly 226 billion, in comparison with Portugal
which produced 180 billion (these numbers may not be exact – but
are close to the figures and estimates.) While no exact economical
analysis has been conducted on viability as an independent region, it
would be foolish to dismiss the overall power of the Catalan
population and region. Barcelona is and has always been one of the
most important ports in the Mediterranean, and the overall 14th most
important in Europe. It accounts for 25% of all exports from Spain,
while Madrid accounts for 11%. Catalonia also represents around 2% of
Europe’s overall GDP, so it is an economic and regional powerhouse.

I
think this is the biggest crisis both Spain and Europe have faced in
a long time, and it’s happening in a digital age which really
changes the way information is spread and received.

What
I can tell you personally is that the movement for secession is not
an extremist agenda; these are normal people, of all ages who just
want a democratic process to decide on a democratic future. A
majority of supporters hail from rural areas, and in metropolitan
cities, like Barcelona there is possibly less desire for it because
the population is mixed – but it is very real and it should not be
dismissed, ignored, or suffocated. I think that Spain has reached a
point of no return, and the current government has used aggressive
tactics which have backfired and left people in Catalonia feeling
more resentment to the central government, and feeling like their
government is not trying to listen to them. All people want here, is
to be heard 
— and for a chance to speak. And they
should have that.”

The
most critical moment for Catalonia 
arrives
in just a few hours
,
when President Carles Puigdemont is expected to issue a declaration
of independence, insisting on Catalonia’s wish to negotiate with
the Spanish government and the need for mediation. 

History
should not be repeated,” 
said Pablo
Casado, a spokesman for Spain’s governing People’s party, the day
before the declaration.

We
hope that tomorrow nothing will be declared, because perhaps the one
who declares it will end up like the one who declared it 83 years
ago.”

Puigdemont
is scheduled to 
speak today
at 6pm local time “to report on the current political situation”
as pressure grows amid warnings by the Spanish government against
secession.

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo



Hoorde zojuist in het BBC Scotland radionieuws van 14.00 u., dat de Spaanse premier en fascist Rajoy de eerste stappen zal zetten tot het terugdraaien van de Catalaanse autonomie………..



** Let wel: de getoonde video is niet dezelfde als in het originele bericht, waar slechts 38 seconden te zien zijn van de video hierboven (de video in het origineel kan ik niet overnemen). In het origineel worden deze eerste seconden ondertiteld, hier de Engelse tekst: “We just saw last october 6 that the 83rd anniversary of Comapnys’ declaration of independence passed almost unnoticed. I believe history shouldn’t be repeated and lets hope tomorrow nothing will be declared, because maybe the one who declared it will end as the one who declared it 83 years ago”. >> Ofwel Hiermee waarschuwde deze fascist van de Partido Popular de president van Catalonië, Carles Puigdemont, dat ook hij vermoord kan worden, zoals de Catalaanse president Lluis Companys i Jover dat 83 jaar geleden overkwam, nadat hij de onafhankelijkheid van Catalonië had uitgeroepen………

Zie ook: Spaanse verkiezingen: Steven Adolf (schrijver, journalist en ‘Spanje kenner’) slaat de plank volkomen mis


       en: ‘Spaanse regering hekelt ‘gewelddadige protesten’ in Catalonië

       en: ‘Catalaanse politici tot lange straffen veroordeeld voor het houden van een referendum en dat in een ‘democratie…’


          en: Catalonië
onafhankelijk: waarom hoor je EU landen (en de EU zelf) niet over de
zware inperking van de democratie in Spanje?


        en: ‘Puigdemont de gevluchte Catalaanse politicus is gearresteerd door de Duitse politie…….

        en: ‘Duitse procureur generaal wil Puigdemont uitleveren……..

        en: ‘Puigdemont mag volgens de Duitse rechter worden uitgeleverd aan Spanje…… Alweer een zwarte dag voor de EU….


 
      en: ‘
Spain’s
Suppression of the Catalonia Independence Movement Is Backfiring

 
     
en:
Spanje
bewijst het gelijk van Catalonië’s wens voor
onafhankelijkheid……

 
     
en:
Spanje
denkt met fascistisch geweld de roep om onafhankelijkheid van
Catalonië de kop in te kunnen drukken…….

 
      en: ‘Spaanse
koning Felipe VI waant zich met commentaar op Catalaanse
onafhankelijkheidsstreven in lang vervlogen tijden……

        en:  ‘Timmermans (PvdA EU) over Catalonië: proportioneel geweld is soms gerechtvaardigd…….. AUW!!!

        en:
Timmermans
(PvdA EU): “There can be no human rights without the rule of
law….”

       en: ‘Bankenmaffia chanteert het Catalaanse volk……..

       en: ‘Rajoy neemt gas terug, maar verklaart in feite tegelijkertijd dat hij het Catalaanse parlement buiten werking zal stellen……….

       en: ‘Geert Mak over Catalonië: de Catalanen slaan aperte nonsens uit…….. Hoor wie het zegt… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘BBC World Service en hoogleraar Radboud met gekleurd ‘Catalaans commentaar…….’

       en: ‘Catalonië: Karel de Gucht >> de EU moet zich uitspreken tegen ondemocratisch Spaans geweld!

       en: ‘Catalonië en Puigdemont gefeliciteerd met de dikke overwinning van de onafhankelijkheid coalitie!

       en: ‘Catalonië: Spaanse koning Flip VI roept Catalanen in zijn kersttoespraak op tot verdraagzaamheid en en eenheid……..

Spanje denkt met fascistisch geweld de roep om onafhankelijkheid van Catalonië de kop in te kunnen drukken…….

Er werd gisteren tijdens het Catalaanse referendum voor onafhankelijkheid, een ongelofelijk staaltje dictatoriaal Spaans geweld opgevoerd……… Met veel geweld onder de regie van de fascistische Guardia Civil, probeerde men het referendum onmogelijk te maken….. Barbaars geweld tegen vreedzame betogers……….Volgens zeggen zijn er zelfs zwaargewonden gevallen door dit geweld tegen vreedzame demonstranten……..

Eindelijk is de EU wakker geworden, lullig dat dit pas gebeurt na veel geweld en sensatie op radio, tv en het internet…………. Lullig ook, dat men nu (internationaal) m.n. wijst op de lage opkomst voor dit referendum….. Vreemd hè, die lage opkomst?? Vreemd dat mensen niet naar de stembus durfden te gaan, nadat de Spaanse overheid de laatste weken niet anders heeft gedaan dan geweld aankondigen, mochten de Catalanen ter stembus trekken……….

Zoals al vaker op deze plek gesteld: met deze manier van handelen bereikt de Spaanse overheid het tegenovergestelde, juist dit schunnige geweld zal een groot aantal Catalanen overhalen zich voor onafhankelijkheid in te zetten en zelfs tegenstanders in het kamp van de voorstanders te trekken…….

Vanmorgen na 9.30 u.op Radio1 de aankondiging van Standpunt NL door hufter Kockelman. Ook hij wees als eerste op de lage opkomst, zonder alle bedreigingen van de Spaanse overheid te noemen……

Te gast in de uitzending Robert van de Roer, ‘diplomatiek deskundige’ (ha! ha! ha!) en zoals verwacht, deze ‘deskundige’ mengde zich in het koor van wolven, die wijst op de lage opkomst in Catalonië, niet representatief…….. Volgens van de Roer ‘komt dit allemaal verkeerd uit….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Het continu hameren op de onrechtmatigheid van het Catalaanse onafhankelijkheidsreferendum (door de premier van Catalonië, Puigdemont bepleit), slaat volgens een inbeller nergens op. Hij wijst op de evolutie in een groot aantal zaken, bijvoorbeeld scheiding. Scheiden was in lang vervlogen tijden zelfs verboden, nu is dit de normaalste zaak van de wereld (jammer genoeg nog lang niet op de hele wereld..). Vandaar dat deze inbeller terecht stelde, dat Spanje feodaal bezig is. Tijdens de paar minuten dat de luisteraar mocht reageren, vond Kockelman het nodig nog even te melden, dat hijzelf ook heeft gesteld er te weinig stemmers waren om het referendum representatief te noemen……..

Als klap op de vuurpijl had Kockelman naast EU-lobbyst van de Roer, ook CDA bedrijven- en EU-lobbyist Knapen in de uitzending, het zal u niet verbazen, dat Knapen het volledig met de Spaanse overheid eens is en het referendum volkomen onwettig noemde……..

Rutte liet vanmorgen weten dat Spanje in haar recht staat (met het tegenhouden van het referendum), alleen de manier waarop is ‘een beetje ongelukkig’, wat hij vertaalde in: niet zo netjes……. Nogmaals wat is er rechtmatig aan om tegen de wil van het volk in te gaan?? Waarom heeft Spanje niet ver voor het referendum geprobeerd de bevolking via een campagne te overtuigen zich niet af te scheiden?? Waarom hebben Rutte en andere EU leiders, inclusief de EU zelf, geen zware kritiek geuit op de Spaanse regering?? Immers het geweld van gisteren ‘kwam bepaald niet uit de lucht vallen’ dat heeft de Spaanse overheid de laatste weken immers keer op keer aangekondigd!!

Het volgende bericht over het Catalaanse onafhankelijkheidsreferendum, kwam ik gisteravond tegen op Anti-Media, daarin een aantal foto’s:

16
Horrific Scenes That Prove All Hell Is Breaking Loose in Spain Right
Now

October
1, 2017 at 11:27 am

Written
by 
Aaron
Nelson

(ANTIMEDIA
It
has been a very long day in Spain, and it is not over yet. At least
465 people attempting to vote were
 injured on
Sunday by Spanish police trying to prevent Catalonia’s independence
referendum.

Violent clashes between Catalans and the Spanish police have led to 216 people injured in Barcelona, 80 in Girona, 64 in Lleida, 53 in Terres de l’Ebre, 27 in Catalunya central and 25 in Tarragona, accordingto the Catalan health ministry. Spanish police have gone so far as to physically attack Catalan firefighters and push back against Catalan police attempting to protect voters.

While
many Catalans were able to successfully cast their ballots in the
referendum declared illegal by Spanish authorities, police violently
prevented hundreds from voting for independence. Barcelona’s
mayor is now 
calling
for
 the
Spanish prime minister to resign amid the violence and chaos. Jeremy
Corbyn is calling on the Spanish government to end its “shocking”
violence used on Catalans who are simply trying to vote.                

Jeremy Corbyn 

@jeremycorbyn

Police violence against citizens in  is shocking. The Spanish government must act to end it now.

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Julian Assange 🔹 @JulianAssange

Map of Catalonian polling stations open vs successfully closed by Spanish state police. Green = open. Red = closed.https://fusiontables.googleusercontent.com/embedviz?q=select+col5+from+1bayUidxGGsTkwobpA57SEN7HsbBM24z45_0HLTdU&viz=MAP&h=false&lat=41.78336845474574&lng=1.9974531000000297&t=1&z=8&l=col5&y=3&tmplt=3&hml=ONE_COL_LAT_LNG 

The
Catalan government has announced that voting will end at 8pm Spanish
time, except for people who are already in line at a polling station.

Here
are some scenes* that show Spanish police violently preventing Catalans
from voting in the independence referendum:

View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Racó Català @racocatala

Les 3 imatges que estan fent la volta al món. 

natza farré @natzafarre

així ens han tractat al cap guinardó. imatges de jordi folch

Patrice Hardy @MisssPatrice

Powerful image of firefighters acting as human shield to protect Catalonian people from Spanish police 

Leigh Jones @leighsus

Just been sent this from a friend in Barcelona. The Guardia Civil are just firing rubber bullets randomly at people. 

Jaume Clotet 

@jaumeclotet

Catalan police try to protect citizens from brutal violence by Spanish military police.  

Patrice Hardy @MisssPatrice

Powerful image of firefighters acting as human shield to protect Catalonian people from Spanish police 

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

* Ik heb een paar Twitterberichten overgenomen, onder de meesten zit een filmpje, waarvan ik bij god niet weet, hoe deze over te nemen. Dus voor alle video’s ga naar het origineel.

Zie voor meer ‘enerverende’ berichten met ploert Knapen, de CDA grofgraaier die de laatste maanden keer op keer werd uitgenodigd door de media, klik op het label met zijn naam, direct onder dit bericht.

Zie ook: ‘Catalonië onafhankelijk: waarom hoor je EU landen (en de EU zelf) niet over de zware inperking van de democratie in Spanje?



        en:  Puigdemont godzijdank vrij burger!!  


        en: ‘Puigdemont de gevluchte Catalaanse politicus is gearresteerd door de Duitse politie…….

        en: ‘Duitse procureur generaal wil Puigdemont uitleveren……..

        en: ‘Puigdemont mag volgens de Duitse rechter worden uitgeleverd aan Spanje…… Alweer een zwarte dag voor de EU….

        en: ‘Spain’s Suppression of the Catalonia Independence Movement Is Backfiring

        en: ‘Spanje bewijst het gelijk van Catalonië’s wens voor onafhankelijkheid……

        en: ‘Spaanse koning Felipe VI waant zich met commentaar op Catalaanse onafhankelijkheidsstreven in lang vervlogen tijden……

        en:  ‘Timmermans (PvdA EU) over Catalonië: proportioneel geweld is soms gerechtvaardigd…….. AUW!!!

        en: ‘Timmermans (PvdA EU): “There can be no human rights without the rule of law….”


        en: ‘Bankenmaffia chanteert het Catalaanse volk……..


        en: ‘Catalaanse onafhankelijkheid door een andere bril dan die van de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

       en: ‘Rajoy neemt gas terug, maar verklaart in feite tegelijkertijd dat hij het Catalaanse parlement buiten werking zal stellen……….

       en: ‘Geert Mak over Catalonië: de Catalanen slaan aperte nonsens uit…….. Hoor wie het zegt… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘BBC World Service en hoogleraar Radboud met gekleurd ‘Catalaans commentaar…….’

       en: ‘Catalonië: Karel de Gucht >> de EU moet zich uitspreken tegen ondemocratisch Spaans geweld!

       en: ‘Catalonië en Puigdemont gefeliciteerd met de dikke overwinning van de onafhankelijkheid coalitie!

       en: ‘Catalonië: Spaanse koning Flip VI roept Catalanen in zijn kersttoespraak op tot verdraagzaamheid en en eenheid……..

New York Times met schaamteloze anti-Russische propaganda en ‘fake news….’

Robert Parry legt op Consortium News uit, in een artikel overgenomen door Anti-Media, waar goed journalistiek werk o.a. aan moet voldoen: een teken dat een artikel het product is van slordige of oneerlijke journalistiek, kan gezien worden als de kern van het verhaal als feit wordt neergezet, terwijl dit niet bewezen is, of onderdeel is van een serieuze discussie. Veelal wordt zo’n artikel het fundament voor andere (niet bewezen) claims, waarmee een verhaal ‘wordt gebouwd’, dat gefundeerd is op los zand….

Dergelijke journalistiek zou niet in de reguliere media terecht mogen komen, echter tegenwoordig is het tegendeel vaak de praktijk, zoals we zien in de reguliere westerse (massa-) media. Neem de berichtgeving over de illegale oorlogen van de VS tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en nu weer tegen Syrië. ‘Voldongen’ leugens werden en worden als feiten en de enige waarheid neergezet…….

Hetzelfde geldt voor alle belachelijke claims, dat Rusland de VS verkiezingen zou hebben gemanipuleerd middels hacken en het publiceren van artikelen door o.a. Sputnik en Russia Today (RT). Daarbij worden  naast een ‘tsunami’ aan berichten op Facebook en Twitter, nu ook advertenties genoemd, die werden geplaatst op Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Voor al deze zogenaamde feiten, is geen nanometer bewijs, maar ze worden desondanks door diezelfde reguliere media en het merendeel van de westerse politici als de enige waarheid gezien, dit terwijl het overtuigende bewijs van het tegendeel terzijde wordt geschoven………

Parry schrijft over een artikel dat afgelopen vrijdag over 3 pagina’s werd geplaatst in the New York Times (NYT). Daarin wordt betoogt dat Rusland ‘een leger van nep-Amerikanen’ heeft gebruikt om de VS verkiezingen te beïnvloeden……. Of wat dacht u van: ‘met een vloed aan Facebook en Twitterberichten hebben bedriegers haat en verdeeldheid gezaaid in de VS…..’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja, ze durven wel hè, terwijl die zogenaamde Amerikanen elkaar al een paar eeuwen de strot kunnen afbijten!! (neem alleen al de nog steeds bestaande grove discriminatie van gekleurden in de VS….)

Facebook weigert intussen nog steeds om de advertenties vrij te geven, die volgens haar door de Russische overheid werden geplaatst……. Kortom Facebook beschuldigt een land van uiterst grove handelingen en stelt daarna vrolijk dat men maar moet geloven op de blauwe ogen van de redactie……..

Lees het volgende uitstekende artikel van Parry en zegt het voort!

Has
the New York Times Gone Completely Insane?

September
16, 2017 at 11:31 am

Written
by 
Robert
Parry

Crossing
a line from recklessness into madness, The New York Times published a
front-page opus suggesting that Russia was behind social media
criticism of Hillary Clinton, reports Robert Parry.

(CN) For
those of us who have taught journalism or worked as editors, a sign
that an article is the product of sloppy or dishonest journalism is
that a key point will be declared as flat fact when it is unproven or
a point in serious dispute – and it then becomes the foundation for
other claims, building a story like a high-rise constructed on sand.

This
use of speculation as fact is something to guard against particularly
in the work of inexperienced or opinionated reporters. But what
happens when this sort of unprofessional work tops page one of The
New York Times one day as a major “investigative” article and
reemerges the next day in even more strident form as a major Times
editorial? Are we dealing then with an inept journalist who got
carried away with his thesis or are we facing institutional
corruption or even a collective madness driven by ideological fervor?

What
is stunning about the 
lede
story
 in
last Friday’s print edition of The New York Times is that it offers
no real evidence to support its provocative claim that – as the
headline states – “To Sway Vote, Russia Used Army of Fake
Americans” or its subhead: “Flooding Twitter and Facebook,
Impostors Helped Fuel Anger in Polarized U.S.”

In
the old days, this wildly speculative article, which spills over
three pages, would have earned an F in a J-school class or gotten a
rookie reporter a stern rebuke from a senior editor. But now such
unprofessionalism is highlighted by The New York Times, which boasts
that it is the standard-setter of American journalism, the nation’s
“newspaper of record.”

In
this case, it allows reporter Scott Shane to introduce his thesis by
citing some Internet accounts that apparently used fake identities,
but he ties none of them to the Russian government. Acting like he
has minimal familiarity with the Internet – yes, a lot of people do
use fake identities – Shane builds his case on the assumption that
accounts that cited references to purloined Democratic emails must be
somehow from an agent or a bot connected to the Kremlin.

For
instance, Shane cites the fake identity of “Melvin Redick,” who
suggested on June 8, 2016, that people visit DCLeaks which, a few
days earlier, had posted some emails from prominent Americans, which
Shane states as fact – not allegation – were “stolen … by
Russian hackers.”

Shane
then adds, also as flat fact, that “The site’s phony promoters
were in the vanguard of a cyberarmy of counterfeit Facebook and
Twitter accounts, a legion of Russian-controlled impostors whose
operations are still being unraveled.”

The
Times’ Version

In
other words, Shane tells us, “The Russian information attack on the
election did not stop with the hacking and leaking of Democratic
emails or the fire hose of stories, true, false and in between, that
battered Mrs. Clinton on Russian outlets like RT and Sputnik. Far
less splashy, and far more difficult to trace, was Russia’s
experimentation on Facebook and Twitter, the American companies that
essentially invented the tools of social media and, in this case, did
not stop them from being turned into engines of deception and
propaganda.”

Besides
the obvious point that very few Americans watch RT and/or Sputnik and
that Shane offers no details about the alleged falsity of those “fire
hose of stories,” let’s examine how his accusations are backed
up:

An
investigation by The New York Times, and new research from the
cybersecurity firm FireEye, reveals some of the mechanisms by which
suspected Russian operators used Twitter and Facebook to spread
anti-Clinton messages and promote the hacked material they had
leaked. On Wednesday, Facebook officials disclosed that they had shut
down several hundred accounts that they believe were created by a
Russian company linked to the Kremlin and used to buy $100,000 in ads
pushing divisive issues during and after the American election
campaign. On Twitter, as on Facebook, Russian fingerprints are on
hundreds or thousands of fake accounts that regularly posted
anti-Clinton messages.”

Note
the weasel words: “suspected”; “believe”; ‘linked”;
“fingerprints.” When you see such equivocation, it means that
these folks – both the Times and FireEye – don’t have hard
evidence; they are speculating.

And
it’s worth noting that the supposed “army of fake Americans”
may amount to hundreds out of Facebook’s 
two
billion or so monthly users
 and
the $100,000 in ads compare to the company’s annual ad revenue
of 
around
$27 billion
.
(I’d do the math but my calculator doesn’t compute such tiny
percentages.)

So,
this “army” is really not an “army” and we don’t even know
that it is “Russian.” But some readers might say that surely we
know that the Kremlin did mastermind the hacking of Democratic
emails!

That
claim is supported by the Jan. 6 “intelligence community
assessment” that was the work of what President Obama’s Director
of National Intelligence James Clapper called “hand-picked”
analysts from three agencies – the Central Intelligence Agency,
National Security Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation. But, as
any intelligence expert will tell you, if you hand-pick the analysts,
you are hand-picking the conclusions.

Agreeing
with Putin

But
some still might protest that the Jan. 6 report surely presented
convincing evidence of this serious charge about Russian President
Vladimir Putin personally intervening in the U.S. election to help
put Donald Trump in the White House. Well, as it turns out, not so
much, and if you don’t believe me, we can call to the witness stand
none other than New York Times reporter Scott Shane.

Shane wrote at
the time: “What is missing from the [the Jan. 6] public report is
what many Americans most eagerly anticipated: hard evidence to back
up the agencies’ claims that the Russian government engineered the
election attack. … Instead, the message from the agencies
essentially amounts to ‘trust us.’”

So,
even Scott Shane, the author of last Friday’s opus, recognized the
lack of “hard evidence” to prove that the Russian government was
behind the release of the Democratic emails, a claim that both Putin
and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who published a trove of the
emails, have denied. While it is surely possible that Putin and
Assange are lying or don’t know the facts, you might think that
their denials would be relevant to this lengthy investigative
article, which also could have benefited from some mention of Shane’s
own skepticism of last January, but, hey, you don’t want
inconvenient details to mess up a cool narrative.

Yet,
if you struggle all the way to the end of last Friday’s article,
you do find out how flimsy the Times’ case actually is. How, for
instance, do we know that “Melvin Redick” is a Russian impostor
posing as an American? The proof, according to Shane, is that “His
posts were never personal, just news articles reflecting a
pro-Russian worldview.”

As
it turns out, the Times now operates with what must be called a
neo-McCarthyistic approach for identifying people as Kremlin stooges,
i.e., anyone who doubts the truthfulness of the State Department’s
narratives on Syria, Ukraine and other international topics.

Unreliable
Source

In
the article’s last section, Shane acknowledges as much in citing
one of his experts, “Andrew Weisburd, an Illinois online researcher
who has written frequently about Russian influence on social media.”
Shane quotes Weisburd as admitting how hard it is to differentiate
Americans who just might oppose Hillary Clinton because they didn’t
think she’d make a good president from supposed Russian operatives:
“Trying to disaggregate the two was difficult, to put it mildly.”

According
to Shane, “Mr. Weisburd said he had labeled some Twitter accounts
‘Kremlin trolls’ based simply on their pro-Russia tweets and with
no proof of Russian government ties. The Times contacted several such
users, who insisted that they had come by their anti-American,
pro-Russian views honestly, without payment or instructions from
Moscow.”

One
of Weisburd’s “Kremlin trolls” turned out to be 66-year-old
Marilyn Justice who lives in Nova Scotia and who 
somehow
reached the conclusion
 that
“Hillary’s a warmonger.” During the 2014 Winter Olympics in
Sochi, Russia, she reached another conclusion: that U.S. commentators
were exhibiting a snide anti-Russia bias perhaps because they indeed
were exhibiting a snide anti-Russia bias.

Shane
tracked down another “Kremlin troll,” 48-year-old Marcel Sardo, a
web producer in Zurich, Switzerland, who dares to dispute the West’s
groupthink that Russia was responsible for shooting down Malaysia
Airlines Flight 17 over Ukraine on July 17, 2014, and the State
Department’s claims that the Syrian government used sarin gas in a
Damascus suburb on Aug. 21, 2013.

Presumably,
if you don’t toe the line on those dubious U.S. government
narratives, you are part of the Kremlin’s propaganda machine. (In
both cases, there actually are serious reasons to doubt the Western
groupthinks which again lack real evidence.)

But
Shane accuses Sardo and his fellow-travelers of spreading “what
American officials consider to be Russian disinformation on election
hacking, Syria, Ukraine and more.” In other words, if you examine
the evidence on MH-17 or the Syrian sarin case and conclude that the
U.S. government’s claims are dubious if not downright false, you
are somehow disloyal and making Russian officials “gleeful at their
success,” as Shane puts it.

But
what kind of a traitor are you if you quote Shane’s initial
judgment after reading the Jan. 6 report on alleged Russian election
meddling? What are you if you agree with his factual observation that
the report lacked anything approaching “hard evidence”? That’s
a point that also dovetails with what Vladimir Putin has been saying
– that “IP addresses can be simply made up. … This is no
proof”?

So
is Scott Shane a “Kremlin troll,” too? Should the Times
immediately fire him as a disloyal foreign agent? What if Putin says
that 2 plus 2 equals 4 and your child is taught the same thing in
elementary school, what does that say about public school teachers?

Out
of such gibberish come the evils of McCarthyism and the death of the
Enlightenment. Instead of encouraging a questioning citizenry, the
new American paradigm is to silence debate and ridicule anyone who
steps out of line.

You
might have thought people would have learned something from the
disastrous groupthink about Iraqi WMD, a canard that the Times and
most of the U.S. mainstream media eagerly promoted.

But
if you’re feeling generous and thinking that the Times’ editors
must have been chastened by their Iraq-WMD fiasco but perhaps had a
bad day last week and somehow allowed an egregious piece of
journalism to lead their front page, your kind-heartedness would be
shattered on Saturday when the Times’ editorial board penned 
a
laudatory reprise
 of
Scott Shane’s big scoop.

Stripping
away even the few caveats that the article had included, the Times’
editors informed us that “a startling investigation by Scott Shane
of The New York Times, and new research by the cybersecurity firm
FireEye, now reveal, the Kremlin’s stealth intrusion into the
election was far broader and more complex, involving a cyberarmy of
bloggers posing as Americans and spreading propaganda and
disinformation to an American electorate on Facebook, Twitter and
other platforms. …

Now
that the scheming is clear, Facebook and Twitter say they are
reviewing the 2016 race and studying how to defend against such
meddling in the future. … Facing the Russian challenge will involve
complicated issues dealing with secret foreign efforts to undermine
American free speech.”

But
what is the real threat to “American free speech”? Is it the
possibility that Russia – in a very mild imitation of what the U.S.
government does all over the world – used some Web sites
clandestinely to get out its side of various stories, an accusation
against Russia that still lacks any real evidence?

Or
is the bigger threat that the nearly year-long Russia-gate hysteria
will be used to clamp down on Americans who dare question fact-lite
or fact-free Official Narratives handed down by the State Department
and The New York Times?

By Robert
Parry
 /
Republished with permission / 
Consortium
News
 / Report
a typo

=================================

Zie ook: ‘JULIAN ASSANGE OFFERS U.S. GOVERNMENT PROOF RUSSIA WASN’T SOURCE OF DEMOCRATIC PARTY LEAKS, SAYS WSJ‘ (op Stan van Houcke die het overnam van Global Research)

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Hier nog meer bewijs dat Rusland niets te maken had met het hacken en manipuleren van de VS verkiezingen, terwijl het merendeel van de westerse politici en de reguliere westerse media glashard het tegengestelde (tegen beter weten in) blijven volhouden….


Information Clearing House (ICH) publiceerde het volgende artikel van Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) op 26 juli jl. Onder het artikel kan u klikken voor het volledige bericht op ICH en onder dat origineel kan u klikken voor een vertaling:

SUBJECT:
Was the “Russian Hack” an Inside Job?

Executive
Summary

Forensic
studies of “Russian hacking” into Democratic National Committee
computers last year reveal that on July 5, 2016, data was 
leaked
(not hacked)
 by
a person with physical access to DNC computers, and then doctored to
incriminate Russia.

After
examining metadata from the “Guccifer 2.0” July 5, 2016 intrusion
into the DNC server, independent cyber investigators have concluded
that an insider copied DNC data onto an external storage device, and
that “telltale signs” implicating Russia were then inserted.

Key
among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the
conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device 
at
a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack
. Of
equal importance, the forensics show that the copying and doctoring
were performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far,
mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent
studies [see 
here and here].

Independent
analyst Skip Folden, a retired IBM Program Manager for Information
Technology US, who examined the recent forensic findings, is a
co-author of this Memorandum. He has drafted a more detailed
technical report titled “Cyber-Forensic Investigation of ‘Russian
Hack’ and Missing Intelligence Community Disclaimers,” and sent
it to the offices of the Special Counsel and the Attorney
General. VIPS member William Binney, a former Technical Director
at the National Security Agency, and other senior NSA “alumni” in
VIPS attest to the professionalism of the independent forensic
findings.

The
recent forensic studies fill in a critical gap. Why the FBI
neglected to perform any independent forensics on the original
“Guccifer 2.0” material remains a mystery – as does the lack of
any sign that the “hand-picked analysts” from the FBI, CIA, and
NSA, who wrote the “Intelligence Community Assessment” dated
January 6, 2017, gave any attention to forensics.

NOTE:
There has been so much conflation of charges about hacking that we
wish to make very clear the primary focus of this Memorandum. We
focus specifically on the July 5, 2016 alleged Guccifer 2.0 “hack”
of the DNC server. In earlier VIPS memoranda we addressed the
lack of any evidence connecting the Guccifer 2.0 alleged hacks and
WikiLeaks, and we asked President Obama specifically to disclose any
evidence that WikiLeaks received DNC data from the
Russians [see 
here and here].

Addressing
this point at his last press conference (January 18), he described
“the conclusions of the intelligence community” as “not
conclusive,” even though the Intelligence Community Assessment of
January 6 expressed “high confidence” that Russian intelligence
“relayed material it acquired from the DNC … to WikiLeaks.”

Obama’s
admission came as no surprise to us. It has long been clear to us
that the reason the U.S. government lacks conclusive evidence of a
transfer of a “Russian hack” to WikiLeaks is because there was no
such transfer. Based mostly on the cumulatively unique technical
experience of our ex-NSA colleagues, we have been saying for almost a
year that the DNC data reached WikiLeaks via a copy/leak by a DNC
insider (but almost certainly not the same person who copied DNC data
on July 5, 2016).

From
the information available, we conclude that the same inside-DNC,
copy/leak 
process was
used at two different times, by two different entities, for two
distinctly different purposes:

-(1)
an inside leak to WikiLeaks before Julian Assange announced on June
12, 2016, that he had DNC documents and planned to publish them
(which he did on July 22) – the presumed objective being to expose
strong DNC bias toward the Clinton candidacy; and

-(2)
a separate leak on July 5, 2016, to pre-emptively taint anything
WikiLeaks might later publish by “showing” it came from a
“Russian hack.”

Voor het volledige artikel en de namen van de deskundigen (plus mogelijkheid tot vertaling), klik op de volgende link:

Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Zie ook: ‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

        en: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

       en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

       en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

       en: ‘CIA speelt zoals gewoonlijk vuil spel: uit Wikileaks documenten blijkt dat CIA zelf de verkiezingen manipuleerde, waar het Rusland van beschuldigde……..

       en: ‘‘Russische bemoeienis’ met de Nederlandse verkiezingen….. Waaruit blijkt nu die manipulatie, gezien de verkiezingsuitslag?

       en: ‘CIA malware voor manipulaties en spionage >> vervolg Wikileaks Vault 7

       en: ‘Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

       en: ‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

       en: ‘Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

       en: ‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

       en: ‘‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

       en: ‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

       en: VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

       en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

       en: ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

       en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

       en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

       en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

       en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

       en: ‘WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

       en:  ‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Het is de VS opperknuppel Pompeo, chef van terreurorganisatie CIA nu werkelijk geheel en al in de smerige bol geslagen.

Pompeo durfde een paar dagen geleden op te merken, dat WikiLeaks in feite een niet-binnenlandse vijandige inlichtingenorganisatie is, die alles op alles zet om de VS onderuit te halen………

De smerige praktijken worden na meer dan een eeuw VS agressie eindelijk naar buiten gebracht door VS klokkenluiders en dat steekt Pompeo, die zich met zijn terreurorganisatie onder andere bezig houdt met: geheime acties in het buitenland, het omverwerpen van VS niet welgevallige regimes (zoals nu onder meer in Venezuela)…… Dezelfde CIA die militaire operaties voorbereid(de) tegen landen als Syrië en Iran, waar de eerste voor een groot deel is mislukt en de tweede wordt voorbereid…….

De VS is zelf bezig met het neerhalen van de VS en dat zoals gezegd al meer dan 100 jaar!! Vanaf 1945 tot het jaar 2000 vermoordde de VS bij illegale oorlogen, staatsgrepen en geheime militaire operaties, meer dan 20 miljoen mensen……….. Voor deze eeuw staat de teller op meer dan 2 miljoen, waar alleen in Irak al meer dan 1,5 miljoen mensen werden vermoord in de illegale oorlog van de VS tegen dat land……

Las vanmorgen op Information Clearing House, dat de VS verantwoordelijk is voor het manipuleren van 81 verkiezingen in 47 landen (dit bericht werd zelfs door CNN gebracht!)……. Voor de leugen dat Rusland de VS verkiezingen heeft gemanipuleerd is geen nanometer bewijs, terwijl daar alle (massa-) media aandacht, inclusief de leugens, naar toe gaat……… Dat de VS alles en iedereen hackt kan intussen iedereen weten, zelfs het bevriende staatshoofd Merkel, de premier van Duitsland, was niet veilig voor de NSA hacks…….

Pompeo wil klokkenluiders nog harder aanpakken en wil ook journalisten vervolgen, die berichten over de WikiLeaks documenten……..

Hier het artikel van Anti-Media over schoft Pompeo en zijn smerige uitlatingen:

CIA
Chief Warns of WikiLeaks Plotting to “Take Down America Any Way
They Can”

July
22, 2017 at 8:32 am

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

(ANTIWAR.COM) — CIA
Director Mike Pompeo remains inconsolably hostile toward
whistleblower organization WikiLeaks, insisting they are a “non-state
hostile intelligence service” and are plotting to 
take
down America any way they can and find any willing partner to achieve
that end.

Hostility
to WikiLeaks has been a mainstay in the US government, as every
administration faces the prospect of their covert misdeeds becoming a
matter of public record, to their general embarrassment albeit rarely
to the end of any meaningful reform.

Pompeo
argued that the US needs to use the Espionage Act much more in going
after leakers who aren’t actually foreign spies, though he stopped
short of openly endorsing Espionage prosecutions against journalists
for reporting on the leaks.

President
Trump had a positive attitude toward WikiLeaks during last year’s
campaign, declaring “I love WikiLeaks.” Pompeo insists he doesn’t
feel the same way, and that US intelligence agencies need to find
ways to fight the organization.


By Jason Ditz / Republished with permission / ANTIWAR.COM / Report a typo

=====================================

Zie ook: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

       en: ‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

       en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

      en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

      en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘ (zie ook de andere links onder dat bericht)

       en: ‘Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

       en: ‘Kaspersky Lab (antivirus) aangevallen met agressief ‘Grapperhaus virus’

‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

Niet de Russen en Trumps team, maar de gefrustreerde medewerker Seth Rich van het Hillary Clinton campagne team, heeft de documenten die Clinton belastten gelekt naar Wikileaks, zo meldde Anti-Media gisteren. Rich was overigens gefrustreerd door de smerige campagne, die Clinton en haar team voerden tegen Bernie Sanders, de andere presidentskandidaat, tijdens de voorverkiezingen van de Democraten…….

Geen nieuws, dit was al lang bekend*, zo zette Julian Assange vorig jaar al een premie van $ 130,000.– op de tip die tot de aanhouding zouden leiden van de moordenaar(s), die Rich neerschoten. De politie hield het op een roofmoord, terwijl er niets van de eigendommen van Rich werden gestolen, hoewel hij voor een aanzienlijk bedrag aan sieraden droeg………

Er zijn nieuwe bewijzen opgedoken, die van de ‘Rusland manipulatie claim’ gehakt maken. Zo gaf een anonieme FBI bron toe dat men op de computer van Rich meer dan 44.000 mails van Clinton terug heeft gevonden, die Rich doorspeelde naar Wikileaks…..

Kortom: van al het gelul over Russische hacks en manipulaties blijft niets over, een claim die al niet met bewijzen werd en wordt gemaakt…… Ook Nederlandse politici, de Nederlandse geheime diensten AIVD en MIVD en de reguliere Nederlandse (afhankelijke) media, houden deze leugen in de lucht………………..

Zeker de AIVD en MIVD moeten op de hoogte zijn van deze zaak, des te schunniger dat deze waardeloze diensten deze leugens in de lucht houden, je zou dit zelfs ernstig misdadig kunnen noemen!!

In feite was Rich een klokkenluider, die ‘als dank’ werd vermoord……..

Murdered
DNC Staffer Seth Rich Shared 44,053 Democrat 

Emails With WikiLeaks

Murdered DNC Staffer Seth Rich Shared 44,053 Democrat Emails With WikiLeaks

May
16, 2017 at 8:14 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(ZHEFor
the past several months, Democrats have based their “Resist 45”
movement on unsubstantiated assertions that the Trump campaign
coordinated with Russian intelligence officials to undermine the 2016
Presidential Election thereby ‘stealing’ the White House from
Hillary Clinton. Day after day we’ve all suffered through one
anonymously sourced, “shock” story after another from the New
York Times and/or The Washington Post with new allegations of the
‘wrongdoing’.

But,
new evidence surfacing in the Seth Rich murder investigation may just
quash the “Russian hacking” conspiracy theory. According to a new
report from 
Fox
News
,
it was former DNC staffer Seth Rich who supplied 44,000 DNC emails to
WikiLeaks and not some random Russian cyber terrorist, as we’ve all
been led to believe.


According
to Fox News, though admittedly via yet another anonymous FBI source,
Rich made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, an American
investigative reporter and director of WikiLeaks who was living in
London at the time. 
According
to Fox News sources, federal law enforcement investigators found
44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments sent between DNC leaders from
January 2015 to May 2016 that Rich shared with WikiLeaks before he
was gunned down on July 10, 2016. 

The
Democratic National Committee staffer who was gunned down on July 10
on a Washington, D.C., street just steps from his home had leaked
thousands of internal emails to WikiLeaks, law enforcement sources
told Fox News.

A
federal investigator who reviewed an FBI forensic report detailing
the contents of DNC staffer Seth Rich’s computer generated within
96 hours after his murder, said Rich made contact with WikiLeaks
through Gavin MacFadyen,
 a
now-deceased American investigative reporter, documentary filmmaker,
and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time.

I
have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and Wikileaks,” the
federal investigator told Fox News, confirming the MacFadyen
connection. He said the emails are in possession of the FBI, while
the stalled case is in the hands of the Washington Police Department.

Then,
on July 22, just 12 days after Rich was killed, WikiLeaks published
internal DNC emails that appeared to show top party officials
conspiring to stop Bernie Sanders from becoming the party’s
presidential nominee. As we’ve noted before, the DNC’s efforts to
block Sanders resulted in Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigning as DNC
chairperson.

These
new revelations seem to be consistent with the findings of Rod
Wheeler, a former DC homicide detective and Fox News contributor,
whose private investigation firm was hired by Rich’s family to
probe the case.

My
investigation up to this point shows there was some degree of email
exchange between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks,” Wheeler told Fox
News. 
I
do believe that the answers to who murdered Seth Rich sits on his
computer on a shelf at the DC police or FBI headquarters.”

My
investigation shows someone within the D.C. government, Democratic
National Committee or Clinton team is blocking the murder
investigation from going forward,” Wheeler told Fox News. “That
is unfortunate. Seth Rich’s murder is unsolved as a result of
that.”

The
botched robbery theory, which police have pursued for nearly a year,
isn’t panning out, Wheeler said. Two assailants caught on a grainy
video tape from a camera posted outside a grocery mart, shot Rich
twice in his back, but did not take his wallet, cell phone, keys,
watch or necklace worth about $2,000.

As
you’ll recall, Rich’s death has been shrouded in mystery from the
start as he was reportedly shot from behind in the wee hours of the
morning but was not robbed of the nearly $2,000 worth of cash and
jewelry on his body at the time.

Rich
had been at Lou’s City Bar a couple of miles from his home until
about 1:15 a.m. 
He
walked home, calling several people along the way. He called his
father, Joel Rich, who he missed because he had gone to sleep.
He talked with a fraternity brother and his girlfriend, Kelsey Mulka.

Around
4:17 a.m., Rich was about a block from his home when Mulka, still on
the phone with him, heard voices in the background. Rich reassured
her that he was steps away from being at his front door and hung up.

Two
minutes later, Rich was shot twice. Police were on the scene within
three minutes. 
Rich
sustained bruising on his hands and face. He remained conscious, but
died at a nearby hospital less than two hours later.

Shortly
thereafter, Julian Assange implied that Seth Rich was, in fact, a
source for WikiLeaks and offered a $130,000 reward for information
leading to his killer.

Per
the 
Washington
Examiner
,
Rich’s family issued the following statement, via a ‘spokesman’,
regarding the recent Fox News reports saying they have seen no
evidence of the alleged emails between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks:

As
we’ve seen through the past year of unsubstantiated claims, we see
no facts, we have seen no evidence, we have been approached with no
emails and only learned about this when contacted by the press,”
 the
statement said. “Even if tomorrow, an email was found, it is not a
high enough bar of evidence to prove any interactions as emails can
be altered and we’ve seen that those interest in pushing
conspiracies will stop at nothing to do so.”

We
are a family who is committed to facts, not fake evidence that
surfaces every few months to fill the void and distract law
enforcement and the general public from finding Seth’s
murderers.
 The
services of the private investigator who spoke to the press was
offered to the Rich family and paid for by a third party, and
contractually was barred from speaking to press or anyone outside of
law enforcement or the family unless explicitly authorized by the
family.”

But,
as WikiLeaks noted, the family’s “spokesman” is none other than
Democrat crisis PR consultant Brad Bauman.

Seems
that not everyone within the FBI is on board with the “Russian
hacking” narrative and are finally starting to come forward.

Finally,
we find it ‘shocking’ that while the New York Times, Washington
Post, CNN, etc are all too eager to regurgitate each others
anonymously sourced stories that are critical of Trump, not a single
one of them had a single reference of this Fox News bombshell on
their website at the time this article was published.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

=============================

* Zie: ‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Zie ook: ‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

       en: ‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

      en: ‘‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

       en: VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

      en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

       en: ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

       en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

       en: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

       en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

       en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..


 Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u hieronder terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘MacFadyen’.

Bij toevoegen links op 27 oktober 2017, zag ik dat 2 video’s zijn verwijderd……….

Julian Assange maakt gehakt van VS oproep hem te arresteren

CIA topgraaier Pompeo, gaf in zijn eerste openbare toespraak Wikileaks (en daarmee Assange) onderuit de zak. Wikileaks zou een vijandige niet-staatsgebonden inlichtingenorganisatie zijn….. Dit terwijl Wikileaks tezelfdertijd de Vault 7 documenten betreffende de smerige zaken van de CIA naar buiten bracht, Documenten waaruit juist blijkt, dat de CIA een uiterst agressieve organisatie is, die onder en boven de wet staat en met haar arsenaal aan cyberoorlog middelen voor elk land (bedrijf of zelfs persoon) op aarde een gevaar is (zoals de geschiedenis van de CIA uit en te na heeft bewezen)……

CNN berichtte uit ‘betrouwbare bron’ dat procureur-generaal van het departement van justitie, Jeff Sessions, bezig is uit te zoeken, hoe Assange te arresteren……..

Wat betreft Pompeo en zijn CIA is het wel duidelijk dat ze de oorlog hebben verklaard aan klokkenluiders en sites als Wikileaks, dit is dan ook het uitgangspunt voor de reactie die Assange gaf op het e.e.a.

Volgens Assange heeft de bevolking van de VS het grondwettelijk recht op openheid en transparantie wat betreft het opereren van haar overheid, met zijn reactie hoopt Assange daarvoor de ogen te openen bij deze bevolking.

Terecht stelde Assange, dat Pompeo de VS vergelijkt met een dictatuur, doordat hij stelde dat Wikileaks wel de VS aanvalt, maar niet dictaturen waar de vrijheid van meningsuiting niet bestaat, terwijl Pompeo nu juist die vrijheid van meningsuiting wil aanpakken…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Nogmaals: de VS bevolking heeft zelfs het grondwettelijk recht te weten, hoe haar regering te werk gaat……. Assange zei bovendien dat Pompeo met een kulargument komt, daar Wikileaks wel degelijk hele dossiers heeft gepubliceerd over buitenlandse machthebbers…..

Assange spreekt over de ‘Pompeo doctrine’, waarmee hij de bedoeling van Pompeo en zijn CIA noemt: het aanpakken van onafhankelijke onderzoeksjournalistiek en mensenrechtenorganisaties, die hij precies als Wikileaks het zwijgen wil opleggen…….

Lees hier het artikel van Webb dat Anti-Media gisteren publiceerde over deze zaak:

Julian
Assange Responds To U.S. Calls For Arrest

Julian Assange Responds To U.S. Calls For Arrest

April
27, 2017 at 11:02 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(MPNIn
his first speech as CIA Director, Mike Pompeo delivered a strong
invective against the pro-transparency organization
WikiLeaks,
 accusing
the group
 of
acting as a “non-state hostile intelligence service.” The
aggressive rhetoric came amid Wikileaks’
 latest
series of releases
,
known as “
Vault
7
,”
which detail how the CIA has lost control of its cyber-warfare
arsenal, as well as outline the agency’s attempts to infect
consumer technology products with spyware.

While
Pompeo’s statements regarding WikiLeaks have made headlines since
he took the CIA position, much has happened in the two weeks since
his remarks. Within a week, CNN – citing anonymous “intelligence
community” sources – announced that the Justice Department, led
by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, was 
seeking
the arrest
 of
Wikileaks editor Julian Assange. According to the report, the
department had found a way to legally charge Assange for the
publishing of classified information.

Sessions
all but confirmed the CNN report soon after stating that
 arresting
Assange was a “priority.”
 Trump,
who only six months ago
 stated
his “love” for WikiLeaks
 during
a campaign speech,
 told
the Associated Press
 a
day later that arresting Assange is “OK with me.”

Assange
had yet to fully respond to the charges until just recently,
responding to the Trump administration’s stance on WikiLeaks only
in tweets. But on Tuesday, Assange gave voice to his position on the
increasing aggressiveness of the Trump administration in
 a
full-length op-ed
 for
the 
Washington
Post
 titled
“The CIA director is waging war on truth-tellers like WikiLeaks.”

With
his editorial, Assange seeks to remind American citizens that they
have a constitutional right to receive honest information about their
government – information that is provided by WikiLeaks and hidden
by government authorities. Assange notes that such attempts to keep
the public in the dark are similar to “attempts throughout history
by bureaucrats seeking, and failing, to criminalize speech that
reveals their own failings.”

Assange
paid particular attention to Pompeo’s assertions that WikiLeaks is
“hostile” for focusing on the “democratic” United States as
opposed to “autocratic regimes in this world that actually suppress
free speech and dissent.” Assange noted that this statement was
quite ironic, comparing the U.S. to autocratic regimes that stifle
free speech.

In
fact, Pompeo finds himself in the unsavory company of Recep Tayyip
Erdogan of Turkey (257,934 documents published by WikiLeaks); Bashar
al-Assad of Syria (2.3 million documents); and the dictatorship in
Saudi Arabia (122,609 documents),” Assange wrote.

The
greatest warning within Assange’s editorial, however, focuses on
the “Pompeo doctrine” laid out in the CIA director’s speech, a
doctrine that “ensnares all serious news and investigative human
rights organizations,” as these groups, like WikiLeaks, seek to
expose government wrongdoing and incompetence. Assange concluded “the
world cannot afford, and the Constitution does not permit, a muzzle
placed on the work that transparency organizations do to inform the
American and global public.”

Assange’s
editorial largely focused on Pompeo’s speech, skimming over the
recent statements by Attorney General Sessions and President Trump.
But 
Session’s
comments
 reveal
that leaks of classified information in general are not necessarily
as problematic as leaks published specifically by WikiLeaks.

We
are going to step up our effort and already are stepping up our
efforts on all leaks,” Sessions said at a news conference last
Thursday. “This is a matter that’s gone beyond anything I’m
aware of. We have professionals that have been in the security
business of the United States for many years that are shocked by the
number of leaks and some of them are quite serious,” he added.

However,
many of these “unprecedented” leaks that have taken place since
the Trump administration came to power were given not to WikiLeaks,
but to the 
Washington
Post
 and
the 
New
York Times
,
organizations that have not been targeted for legal action by
Sessions.

The
leaks 
published
by the 
Post and
the 
Times
 resulted
in major controversy for the Trump administration and cost former
National Security advisor Michael Flynn his job while also putting
Sessions himself in the crosshairs. WikiLeaks’ “Vault 7”
releases, which have exposed negligence and wrong-doing on the part
of the CIA, are the only releases they’ve provided this year that
have explicitly targeted the U.S. government. But they are the only
organization that has come under threat.

Perhaps
what Sessions meant to say last Thursday was that the Justice
Department is stepping up its efforts to contain leaks published by
WikiLeaks. Leaks published by other media outlets, like 
the
CIA-connected 
Washington
Post
,
are apparently not worth their time


By Whitney
Webb
 /
Republished with permission / 
MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo

==============================

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

CIA malware voor manipulaties en spionage >> vervolg Wikileaks Vault 7

Wikileaks heeft meer documenten naar buiten gebracht inzake de Vault 7 documenten, die eerder werden gepubliceerd. In deze nieuwste Wikileaks publicatie genaamd ‘Hive’ wordt uitgelegd hoe de CIA via het illegaal installeren van malware (virus) op computers (tot en met telefoons en zelfs CCTV systemen >> cameratoezicht) van derden, men alles kan zien, wat er op een besmette computer gebeurd en deze zelfs kan gebruiken om acties uit te voeren (bijvoorbeeld de verkiezingen in de VS manipuleren en deze manipulatie toeschrijven aan anderen, zoals de Russen, wat uit eerdere Wikileaks documenten bleek…….)…..

Anti-Media bracht afgelopen maandag het volgende artikel, waar men ook aandacht schenkt aan Pompeo, de topterrorist van de CIA, die onlangs Wikileaks bestempelde als een terroristische organisatie, althans anders kan je zijn woorden niet interpreteren. Daaronder de reactie van Assange, die met een paar simpele woorden, gehakt maakte van het vuil, dat Pompeo durfde te spuien.

Lees en huiver:

Wikileaks
Reveals Hive: The CIA’s Top Secret Virus Control System

Wikileaks Reveals Hive: The CIA’s Top Secret Virus Control System

April
17, 2017 at 9:33 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(MPNEarly
Friday morning, Wikileaks 
released
its fifth batch
 of Vault
documents
exposing the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency’s hacking techniques.
The latest release, titled “
Hive,”
exposes the agency’s multi-platform malware suite that allows the
CIA to monitor targets via malware as well as the ability to realize
specific tasks on compromised machines.

Hive
is said to provide customizable implants for a variety of operating
systems for distinct types of devices, not just computers, tablets,
and phones. Among the platforms vulnerable to Hive include Linux,
Windows, Solaris, MikroTik (used in Internet routers), and AVTech
Network Video Recorders (often used in CCTV recording). First
released in 2010, Hive is essentially an “implant” that functions
as both a beacon and shell, allowing CIA hackers to gain a foothold
in devices that allow them to deploy any number of other tools, such
as those detailed in previous releases.

Wikileaks
has described Hive’s function
 as
a “back-end infrastructure malware” that uses public HTTPS
interfaces which provide “unsuspicious-looking cover domains” to
hide its presence on infected devices. Each of those domains is
linked to an IP address at a commercial Virtual Private Server (VPS)
provider, which forwards all incoming traffic to what is termed a
“Blot” server. All re-directed traffic is then examined by CIA
hackers to see if it contains a valid beacon. If it does, then a tool
handler – called Honeycomb in
 the
released documents
 –
and the CIA then begins initiating other actions on the target
computer. The
 released
user guide
 shows
that Hive allows for the uploading and deleting of files as well as
the execution of applications on the device.

Unlike
some other Vault 7 tools which can persist indefinitely on targeted
devices, Hive comes with a 
“self-delete”
function
 that
allows the malware to destroy itself if it receives no signal from
the CIA for a set amount of time. The self-deletion leaves only a log
and configuration file, containing only a time-stamp behind.
Apparently this feature posed difficulties to CIA developers as the
self-deletion can “be problematic due to the inability to
accurately assess the reliability of the host’s system clock,”
according to
 the
Hive Developers Guide
.

Wikileaks
noted that anti-virus companies along with forensic experts have
noticed before that malware, potentially originating from a
state-actor, utilized the same back-end infrastructure implantation
that Hive employs. Through the analysis of the communication between
specific implants, these experts and software companies
 were
able to determine
 that
the malware’s origin came from a “well-resourced organization
which was involved in intelligence gathering operations.”

However,
there had been unable to attribute the back-end or the implants to
the CIA, though Wikileaks’ release of Hive may change that. Indeed,
Wikileaks noted in its press release that “The documents from this
publication might further enable anti-malware researchers and
forensic experts to analyse this kind of communication between
malware implants and back-end servers used in previous illegal
activities.”

Wikileaks’
latest release comes on the heels of 
CIA
director Mike Pompeo’s aggressive statements
 against
the transparency organization in which he labeled them “non-state
hostile intelligence service.” He also condemned Wikileaks’
editor-in-chief, Julian Assange of making “common cause with
dictators.” While 
other
CIA directors have targeted
 both
Wikileaks and Assange in the past, Wikileaks now five releases of top
secret CIA hacking tools may have prompted an escalation in Pompeo’s
rhetoric. It remains to be seen if this rhetoric will translate into
action, however.

Assange,
for his part, doesn’t seem too concerned, choosing to respond with
a witty retort that incisively pointed out the CIA’s lack of
credibility in making such accusations:

Called a “non-state intelligence service” today by the “state non-intelligence agency” which produced al-Qaeda, ISIS, Iraq, Iran & Pinochet.

315 replies3,146 retweets4,670 likes

By Whitney
Webb
 /
Republished with permission / 
MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo

=========================

Zie ook: ‘CIA de ware hacker en manipulator van verkiezingen, ofwel de laatste Wikileaks documenten……...’

       en: ‘CIA speelt zoals gewoonlijk vuil spel: uit Wikileaks documenten blijkt dat CIA zelf de verkiezingen manipuleerde, waar het Rusland van beschuldigde……..

       en: ‘‘Russische bemoeienis’ met de Nederlandse verkiezingen….. Waaruit blijkt nu die manipulatie, gezien de verkiezingsuitslag?

       en: ‘Eichelsheim (MIVD) ‘waarschuwt voor agressie CIA en NAVO……….’

       en:  ‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

       en: ‘Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

       en: ‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

       en: ‘‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

       en: ‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

       en: VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

       en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

       en: ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

       en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

       en: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

       en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

       en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

       en: ‘WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’

       en:  ‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: Hive en M. Pompeo.

Hillary Clinton en geheime dienst achter ontslag Flynn, en naar voren schuiven Pence, aldus Assange…….

Afgelopen dinsdag ontving ik het volgende artikel van Anti-Media, die het overnam van ZeroHedge. In dit artikel de beschuldiging van Assange, dat de Clinton-kliek in samenwerking met geheime diensten, de positie van Flynn onmogelijk hebben gemaakt…..*

Flynn was voorstander van vriendschapsbanden met Rusland, een enorme fout, in ‘een land’ dat o.a. wordt geregeerd door de geheime diensten en het militair-industrieel complex. Als vervanging voor Flynn schoof men Pence naar voren, een oorlogshitser van formaat en een enorme Rusland hater.

Tyler Durden, de schrijver van het artikel vraagt zich volkomen terecht af, wat er tegen is, om de banden met Rusland te vernieuwen >> hoe kan dit het leven van ‘Amerikaanse burgers’ in gevaar brengen..??? (inderdaad te belachelijk voor woorden!!)

Durden betoogt dat Trump onder druk werd gezet, om Flynn te dwingen af te treden, daar hij anders zelf de kans zou lopen afgezet te worden (‘impeachment’)……… Dat Trump heeft toegegeven blijkt wel uit het feit, dat de VS meer troepen naar Syrië heeft gestuurd, dit om uiteindelijk Assad af te zetten, aldus Durden…… Waar ik aan toe zou willen voegen , dat de VS nog meer troepen naar Europa heeft gestuurd en nog wil sturen, dit tegen het zogenaamde Russische gevaar……..

Hier het artikel, zoals geplaatst op Anti-Media:

Assange:
Hillary, Intel Officials ‘Quietly Pushing A Pence Takeover’ of
the White House

Mike Pence

March
14, 2017 at 10:38 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(ZHELast
week we noted chatter that some saw 
Mike
Pence as “the Deep State’s insurance policy,”
 and
now, judging by tweets from Wikileaks’ Julian Assange, that may
well be the Clinton/Intelligence Officials plan…

Julian Assange @JulianAssange

Clinton stated privately this month that she is quietly pushing for a Pence takeover. She stated that Pence is predictable hence defeatable.

Adding that…

Julian Assange @JulianAssange

Two IC officials close to Pence stated privately this month that they are planning on a Pence takeover. Did not state if Pence agrees.

As The
Daily Caller notes,
 Assange’s
claims appear to come in response to reports that President Trump
authorized the CIA to perform drone strikes on terrorists Monday
evening…

Julian Assange @JulianAssange

By handing unilateral power to the CIA over its drone strikes at this time White House signals that bullying, disloyalty & incompetence pays

As
we concluded previously,
 if
Trump doesn’t adopt the Cold War 2.0 approach of Barack Obama and
Hillary Clinton
 and
is forced out of his own administration in the same manner as Flynn,
it will become clear 
why once
we learn who would replace him: 
Mike
Pence.

No
matter what one makes of Trump – or his administration and the
policies that have been initiated thus far – the fact remains that
Trump won the U.S. election. 
The
people working behind the scenes to oust him are not subject to
democratic controls, nor are they working in the best interests of
the American public. We are left to ask ourselves exactly how
renewing relations with Russia –  a nuclear power –  could
possibly endanger American lives.

Either
way, we are more or less left with two paths ahead of us.
 The
first path involves Trump giving in and adopting an anti-Russian
agenda, as is already apparent in his decision to send more 
ground
troops to Syria
 alongside Saudi
troops
,
who will intentionally oppose the Syrian regime (a close ally of
Russia). The second involves the possibility of another direct coup
within the Trump administration, this time one that may ultimately
force Trump out of the White House so he can be replaced by Mike
Pence, a war hawk who will be more than happy to do the job Hillary
Clinton wanted to do.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

================

* Flynn moest aftreden, daar hij al contact met de Russen zocht voor het aantreden van Trump. Een volkomen normale zaak. Zo hebben adviseurs en ministers van de ‘komende’ president, vrijwel altijd voor het aantreden, contact met Israël, maar ook met NAVO staten en andere landen, die er toe doen. De huidige gang van zaken is dan ook duidelijk gericht tegen de poging van Trump, de spanningen tussen de VS en Rusland weg te werken……….

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.