Uitgelekte telefoongesprekken tussen Trump en Putin bewijzen dat ‘Russiagaters gelijk hebben……’

Caitlin
Johnstone heeft op 27 november jl. een sarcastisch, uiterst
humoristisch artikel geschreven, het gaat om gesprekken tussen Trump en
Putin, waarin Trump van Putin instructies krijgt wat te doen.

Lezen
mensen en geeft het door, een betere manier om te laten zien hoe
absurd het hele Russiagate verhaal is, kan m.i. niet gevonden worden, het Russiagate verhaal is van A tot Z is
gelogen!

Genieten mensen:

AUTHOR:
CAITLIN JOHNSTONE
NOVEMBER
27, 2018

Leaked
Transcript Proves Russiagaters Have Been Right All Along

A
transcript of exchanges between US President Donald Trump and Russian
President Vladimir Putin has been leaked to National News
Conglomerate by an anonymous source within the Kremlin. We here at
NNC have confirmed the authenticity of this document using the same
rigorous verification process we’ve been using to authenticate the
evidence for all our other reporting on Russia’s involvement in the
2016 US elections over the last two years. These verification methods
include hunches, gut intuitions, and an introspective assessment of
the way our feelings feel. The following exchanges revealed in this
transcript provide the clearest evidence yet that the President of
the United States has been in collusion with the Russian government
for years.

This
introduction has been authored by the editorial board of the National
News Conglomerate. Obey.

~

11/9/2016

Trump:
I have done as you commanded, my dominant and all-powerful lord. I
have conspired with your hackers to steal the election, and now I’m
going to be president! I want to thank you for not releasing that
video footage of those Russian prostitutes I hired to urinate on a
bed the Obamas once slept in. If that had come out it would have
offended and alienated a lot of people, which is something I never
normally do.

Putin:
Yes that is an old KGB tactic called kompromat, a word which only
extremely intelligent people know about. Keep this line of
communication open. As long as you do as I command, your pee pee tape
will remain secret.

Trump:
One thing I’m curious about though my lord, if you don’t mind my
asking. If you already had an army of hackers targeting Democratic
Party emails, why did you need my help? Couldn’t you just have
hacked the emails and published them on your own? Why did you need me
to interact with them at all?

Putin:
Moral support, mainly. We don’t need to get into specifics.

Trump:
Oh okay.

~

1/20/2017

Trump:
I’m in! Whew! I was really worried that leaked dossier would be the
end of me! What are my instructions, my lord?

Putin:
Begin introducing racism and division to the United States. America
has never experienced these things before, and it will shock and
disorient them. With the US divided against itself, your nation will
be far too weak to stand against my plans of total world domination.

Trump:
That’s a really tall order! America has always been a harmonious
place where everyone gets along up until today. I’ll try my best
though. Anything else?

Putin:
Yes, make them distrust your nation’s large media outlets and
convince them that the US intelligence community is often dishonest.

Trump:
That will be really hard because those institutions have always been
trusted for their unparalleled integrity. But your wish is my
command, oh lord.

~

4/7/2017

Putin:
Bomb a Syrian airbase.

Trump:
What? Really? Aren’t they, like, your allies?

Putin:
Exactly. This will throw inquisitive minds off the scent. We can’t
have them finding out about that pee tape.

Trump:
Are you sure? Some people are saying that chemical attack looks like
it could have been perpetrated by the many terrorist factions in
Syria and not the government.

Putin:
Who cares? Have you seen how relentless they’ve been in exposing
us?? Have you never watched Rachel Maddow? That woman is a psychic
bloodhound, masterfully sniffing out the truth at every turn! We
can’t afford to take chances. Do as I say.

Trump:
Yes sir.

Putin:
And see if you can arrest that WikiLeaks guy.

~

5/14/17

Trump:
Hey do you want me to do anything about Montenegro’s addition to
NATO?

Putin:
No. NATO expansion is good.

Trump:
Uhhh okay.

~

6/28/17

Trump:
Who do you want tapped for Ukraine envoy?

Putin:
Kurt Volker.

Trump:
Volker? He hates you! He’s like the biggest Russia hawk ever.

Putin:
We still need to throw the Russiagaters off the scent. We’re
playing 3-D chess here. This is high-level disinformation, or
dezinformatsiya as very smart people call it. I want as many
Russia hawks in your administration as possible.

Trump:
3-D chess? Alright. I guess you know what you’re doing.

~

8/30/17

Putin:
Shut down the Russian consulate in San Francisco and throw out a
bunch of diplomats. That will confuse the hell out of them.

~

11/21/17

Putin:
Now approve the sale of arms to Ukraine. Not even Obama would do
that. This will throw them off the trail for sure.

~

1/1/18

Putin:
Happy new year. Force RT and Sputnik to register as foreign agents.

~

1/29/18

Putin:
Make sure your Nuclear Posture Review greatly escalates its
aggressive posture toward Russia.

~

2/14/18

Putin:
Happy Valentine’s Day. Don’t worry about those Russians your guys
killed in Syria.

~

2/19/18

Putin: Send
a fleet of war ships to the Black Sea.

~

3/25/18

Putin:
Better expel a few dozen diplomats over the Skripal thing.

~

4/5/18

Putin:
Sanction a bunch of Russian oligarchs.

~

4/10/18

Putin:
Bomb Syria.

Trump:
What?? Again?

Putin:
Yes.

Trump:
What the hell, man? Why’d you even recruit me if you’re just
going to have me do everything all the Russia hawks want?

Putin:
Well, you know how I told you we were playing 3-D chess against the
Russiagate investigation?

Trump:
Yeah?

Putin:
Well that wasn’t enough. Now we’re playing 4-D chess.

Trump:
Fine, whatever, I don’t care. Just don’t release my pee tape.

~

7/17/18

Trump:
Oh man. They’re really making a major fuss about that summit. What
should I do?

Putin:
Play it cool. Don’t let them know about our secret diabolical plot.

Trump:
Right. Remind me what that was again?

Putin:
Make Jim Acosta feel really, really sad.

~

9/2/18

Putin:
Have you arrested Julian Assange yet?

Trump:
Working on it.

~

10/20/18

Putin:
I like John Bolton’s idea. Pull out of the Intermediate-Range
Nuclear Forces Treaty.

~

11/25/18

Putin:
Make sure your administration loudly and aggressively backs Ukraine
in our Kerch Strait spat.

Trump:
OMFG this is getting too weird. Are you just trolling me? What the
hell is this?

Trump:
Hello?

Trump:
Are you there?

Trump:
Answer me!

Putin:
5-D chess.

Thanks
for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make
sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list
for my
 website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My
articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece
please consider sharing it around, liking me on
 Facebook,
following my antics on
 Twitter, throwing
some money into my hat on 
Patreon or Paypalbuying
my new book 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
,
or my previous book 
Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.

=================================

Zie ook:

Democraten deden zich voor als Russen in false flag operatie om Roy Moore (Republikein) zwart te maken tijdens verkiezing…..

Der Spiegel, groot bestrijder van ‘fake news’ bracht zelf jarenlang dit soort ‘nieuws’

Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen

BBC: Rusland ‘misbruikt humor’ om Russiagate te ontkrachten….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate en Assange: The Guardian wordt nu zelfs door collega’s voor zot uitgemaakt

The Guardian: ondanks een enorme misser (fake news) gaat men door met de valse beschuldigingen t.a.v. Assange……

WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….

‘Banden van Trump met Rusland’ gebaseerd op FBI operatie om VS ‘burger’ (CIA) in Iran vrij te krijgen……

Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!

New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax

Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

De Israëlische manipulatie van de VS presidentsverkiezingen, gaat veel verder dan wat men Rusland in de schoenen schuift…..

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen

Britse en VS manipulaties van verkiezingen en stimulatie van conflicten middels psychologische oorlogsvoering‘ (voor VS manipulaties van verkiezingen elders, liggen er ‘metersdikke’ dossiers, o.a. in te zien op WikiLeaks)

FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

‘Russiagate’: Intel-raport over Russische bemoeienis met verkiezingen opgebouwd met leugens en is politiek gemotiveerd, aldus Matlock, voormalig VS ambassadeur in Moskou

Mocking Trump Doesn’t Prove Russia’s Guilt

CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende twee artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat

‘Russiagate’ een nieuwe ongelooflijke aanklacht van de Democraten…….

VS demoniseert Russiagate critici als Jill Stein…..

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

=========================================

En terzijde:

Trump (Republikeinen) wint de midterm verkiezingen, alsook de Democraten, het verschil voor mensen elders in de wereld, die onder VS terreur moeten leven, is nul komma nada…….

The Attack on ‘Fake News’ Is Really an Attack on Alternative Media

The Lie of the 21st Century: How Mainstream Media “Fake News” Led to the U.S. Invasion of Iraq

Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt ‘TV ankers’ propaganda op te lezen (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van ‘lokaal nieuws’)

Ex-CIA agent legt uit hoe de VS schaduwregering en deep state werken, ofwel de machinaties achter de schermen……

New York Times: eerste Israëlische inval in Gazastrook sinds 2014 >> fake news!

Noord-Koreaans ‘bedrog met nucleaire deal’ is fake news o.a. gebracht door de New York Times

‘Fake News’ misbruikt door dictaturen en de reguliere (massa-) media

Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert

Rusland schuldig verklaard voor aanslag op Skripal, echter onafhankelijke controle van ‘het bewijsmateriaal’ wordt geweigerd……

Gisteren werd 23 Russische diplomaten te verstaan gegeven dat zij Groot-Brittannië uitgezet zullen worden als vergelding voor de moordaanslag met ‘novitsjok’ (‘novichok’) op de Russische dubbelspion Sergei Skripal en zijn dochter….. Deze aanslag wordt o.l.v. Groot-Brittannie op het bord van de Russen geschoven, dit terwijl Skripal al langere tijd deel uitmaakte van een .netwerk van in te huren spionnen……. Je weet wel, mensen die worden ingehuurd om andere mensen om te leggen, dan wel ten schande te maken, het maakt niet uit, als het doelwit maar monddood wordt gemaakt, dan wel al diens bronnen vrijgeeft……

Gistermiddag de ex-KGB spion Jack Barsky (schreef het boek ‘Der Falsche Amerikaner: Ein Doppelleben als deutscher KGB-Spion in den USA’) op WDR 5. Hij stelde over deze gifmoord dat de CIA al lang over het zenuwgif beschikt dat gevonden zou zijn na de aanslag op Skripal en zijn dochter. Een gif dat in de 80er jaren werd ontwikkeld in de Sovjet-Unie, maar zoals deze benaming al aangeeft, dat was bepaald niet alleen Rusland, m.a.w. het gif ‘novitsjok’ kan net zo goed uit Oekraïne, Georgië of een ander (Midden-) Oost-Europees, nu zwaar anti-Russisch land komen……

Gezien de (ook recente) VS/CIA geschiedenis kan het hier heel goed om een zogenaamde false flag operatie gaan…… Een operatie om Rusland verder zwart te maken bij de westerse bevolkingen, zodat ze klaar worden gestoomd voor een ‘hete oorlog’ met Rusland…….. (zie wat dat betreft ook, wie er baat heeft bij deze aanslag, dat is op zeker niet Rusland, een land dat de laatste jaren juist laat zien meer diplomatie te gebruiken, dan het westen de afgelopen 30 jaar heeft laten zien…..*)

Afgelopen dinsdagmorgen op Radio1 Margriet Brandsma (na 9.30 u.), ze was te gast in het programma Spraakmakers, dat in werkelijkheid ‘Praatjesmakers’ genoemd zou moeten worden. Brandsma stelde dat Rusland zonder meer schuldig is aan de moordaanslag met een Sovjet zenuwgas. Niet dat daar de bewijzen voor zijn getoond aan deze ‘journalist’, maar gewoon omdat de Britse premier May heeft gezegd dat dit zo is en alle westerse oorlogshitser en Ruslandhaters herhalen haar met grote graagte…… (oorlogshitser en Ruslandhaters als de reguliere westerse massamedia en het grootste deel van de westerse politici) False flag operaties ‘bestaan tenslotte niet….’ Brandsma wist veel van Rusland aldus presentator Plag, daar zij correspondent was in Duitsland voor de NOS…… ha! ha! ha ha! ha! ha! Ja ‘geheel logisch!’

Een mail van een luisteraar werd gebagatelliseerd, een mail waarin die luisteraar stelde dat de NAVO geheel tegen de afspraken langs de Russische grens staat (daarmee zeggend dat het westen eerst eens naar zichzelf moet kijken als het om agressie gaat….).. Ach het domme presentatiewicht en haar gasten kunnen zich niet eens voorstellen wat er zou gebeuren als Rusland militaire oefeningen langs de Mexicaanse en VS grens zou houden, of als Rusland daar een ‘raketschild’ zou plaatsen (een raketschild dat in een mum van tijd kan worden omgevormd tot ‘een schild’ met nucleaire aanvalsraketten, zoals de VS die in de buurt van de Russische grens plaatste……)

Uiteraard wilde men daar niet op ingaan, nee, vooral niet wijzen naar de agressie van het westen en dan m.n. die van de VS en de NAVO….. Niets over de de door de VS en haar oorlogshond de NAVO verbroken overeenkomst met de destijds Sovjet president Gorbatsjov, een overeenkomst waarin de de VS en de NAVO beloofden geen Oost-Europese, ex-Sovjet republieken in te lijven bij de NAVO, waardoor de VS en de NAVO nu voor de grens van Rusland staan…… Gorbatsjov ging akkoord met de hereniging van de twee Duitslanden, juist op die voorwaarde…… (al jaren ontkent door het westen, ‘maar helaas’, de schriftelijke bewijzen liggen er intussen!)

Je snapt natuurlijk wel dat de hele mikmak weer voorbijkwam, Rusland is fout, Rusland heeft De Krim geannexeerd en met dit soort valse cliché’s werd Putin afgeschilderd als een duivel…… De Krim sloot zich aan bij Rusland na een referendum, een referendum dat door internationale waarnemers werd gecontroleerd en als goed en eerlijk werd beoordeeld! Of wat dacht je van de leugen dat het Russische leger in Oost-Oekraïne zou vechten voor de terecht in opstand gekomen bevolking (daar er een staatsgreep plaatsvond tegen de door hen democratisch gekozen regering..), zij wensten niet te leven onder een neonazi-regime (ingesteld door de VS)….. Als Rusland echt met haar leger in Oekraïne zou hebben gevochten, was Oekraïne al lang gezuiverd van neonazi’s en was er vrede geweest in dat land……

Geert Groot Koerkamp, al jaren Rusland correspondent deed ook nog een duit in de Radio1 propaganda zak en stelde zich achter de beschuldiging van Rusland voor de vergiftiging. Als je hem trouwens moet geloven, is Rusland bijna een dictatuur, terwijl hij gewoon zijn werk kan doen vanuit Rusland (wat bijvoorbeeld vanuit Turkije, NB een NAVO lidstaat, niet mogelijk is!)

Natuurlijk vergeleek Koerkamp deze vergiftiging met de Polonium vergiftiging in 2006 op Litvinenko…… Ook daar werd Rusland aangewezen als schuldige, terwijl daar in feite nooit hard bewijs voor werd getoond, ook destijds ging het om gif dat uit voormalige Sovjet republieken, of een VS laboratorium kan zijn gekomen…… Zoals eerder gezegd, vergeet daarnaast niet dat veel Russen zich in het buitenland onder meer bezig houden met (zware) misdaad en als je in dat milieu een verkeerde pas zet, heb je ook je doodvonnis getekend…… Maar nee, Koerkamp weet ‘gewoon’ dat Rusland goed is in dit soort moorden…… Waar slaat ‘t op???

De Britse premier May kwam met de beschuldiging aan het adres van Rusland, hoewel ze Rusland een eigen onderzoek en zelfs een onafhankelijk onderzoek naar het zenuwgif ontzegt……… Hoe kan je in godsnaam na een paar dagen al een ander land beschuldigen, zonder dat bekend is hoe het gif het land is binnengekomen, zonder echt ook maar één echte aanwijzing voor schuld te hebben, of de dader te hebben gearresteerd (of één van de daders, die het gas tegen Skripal gebruikten)……. Echter er is niets anders dan indirecte bewijzen, gebaseerd op van horen zeggen, aangevuld met aannames……. (oh ja, en het gas dat in de Sovjet-unie werd ontwikkeld, al mag dat dan, alweer zoals gezegd, niet onafhankelijk gecontroleerd worden……)

Het was gisteren al zo zot, dat de regering May stelde dat de vraag om een onafhankelijk onderzoek totaal overbodig is, waarom zouden haar woorden betwijfeld moeten worden…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Alsof de regering May nog nooit gelogen heeft….. ha! ha! ha! ha!

May roerde de oorlogstrom door te zeggen dat deze moordaanslag een aanslag op het Britse volk is…… Nogmaals zonder ook maar enig bewijs voor Russische bemoeienis……..

Gistermorgen was het de beurt aan de navigator van de internationale Putin – Trump politiek, de levend geworden BNR rollade Hammelburg, om voor de moordaanslag op Skripal zijn schuldig uit te spreken over Rusland….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Alsof hij een rechter, officier van justitie, een chemische wapens expert en misdaaddeskundige in één is….. Hetzelfde was overigens het geval met de Groot-Brittannië correspondent Lia van Bekhoven, ook zij wist het zeker: Rusland is schuldig, logisch toch als hare inhumane neoliberale kwaadaardigheid, de Britse premier May het zegt??!!! Een ‘mens’ dat NB meermaals heeft gelogen en bewust zaken heeft verzwegen……

Overigens stelde Barsky op WDR 5 dat Rusland al lang niet meer over chemische wapens beschikt…. Ik moet toegeven dat dit zelfs voor mij een schok was, daar ik ervan overtuigd was dat Rusland deze, zoals de VS nog steeds heeft, echter Rusland schijnt op dat gebied voor te lopen op de VS (in het kader van het vernietigen van wapenvoorraden met dit soort kankerzooi)

Nee Rusland zal en moet als fout worden aangemerkt, zoals nu weer bij deze aanslag……. Weet niet meer wie, maar een Nederlandse correspondent, ik dacht Godfroid, voegde nog olie op het vuur toe door een grap te maken over Rusland dat zich ziet als slachtoffer voor alles wat in het westen fout gaat….. In werkelijkheid is dat toch echt zo, voorbeelden te over!! Zelfs de Brexit en de anti-democratische toestand in Spanje, waar het Catalaanse volk democratisch koos voor onafhankelijkheid, worden nu toegewezen aan Rusland…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Zelfs hare D66 leeghoofdigheid Ollongren beticht Rusland van het manipuleren van zaken in Nederland, waar ze vervolgens geen voorbeelden kon en kan noemen…..

In het nieuws vandaag de mededeling van het Witte Huis dat de aanslag op Skripal en zijn dochter aangeeft dat Rusland maling heeft aan de internationale rechtsorde en de democratie probeert te ondermijnen……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Datzelfde Witte Huis is alleen deze eeuw al verantwoordelijk voor meer dan 2 miljoen doden (het grootste deel in Irak, meer dan 1,5 miljoen vermoorde mensen) en dat in illegale oorlogen, verder is dat ‘Huis’ verantwoordelijk voor staatsgrepen tegen democratisch gekozen regeringen, zoals in Oekraïne…

Opperploert en massamoordenaar Stoltenberg, het opperhoofd en topgraaier van de uiterst agressieve NAVO nam de gebeurtenis waar door nogmaals te stellen dat Oekraïne lid van de NAVO mag worden als het dat wil…… Oekraïne het land dat wordt bestuurd door een corrupte neonazi-junta, geparachuteerd door de VS…… Alsof de documenten die onlangs opdoken niet bestaan (documenten over het hiervoor genoemde akkoord waarin de VS en de NAVO beloven niet verder uit te breiden richting Moskou, dit in ruil voor hereniging van de twee Duitslanden)…….

* Barsky begon er niet over; maar wie heeft er voordeel bij deze moorden? Naast de VS (om het militair-industrieel complex met nog hogere winsten te voeren en het VS imperium verder uit te breiden), kom je toch echt uit bij Oost-Europese landen als Oekraïne, Hongarije, Polen, Georgië, Roemenië en de Baltische Staten, dit naast landen als Groot-Brittannië dat al een paar jaar lang bezig is met een zwaar anti-Russische propaganda campagne….. Al de genoemde landen (gesteund door het grootste deel van de westerse politici en de reguliere westerse massamedia) willen het ‘Russische gevaar’ voorgoed uitschakelen….. Dit kan alleen middels een oorlog en de grote drijfveer achter oorlogsvoering is nog steeds kapitalen binnen graaien voor het militair-industrieel complex, kapitalen veilig stellen ook op het gebied van voorraden aan olie, gas, andere grondstoffen en tot slot natuurlijk de eerder genoemde machtsuitoefening van de VS en haar slaafse oorlogshonden op sleutelposities in de wereld, zoals het beheersen van zeestraten enz…..

Zie ook: ‘Novitsjok Skripal sprookje? Lees dit bericht!

        en: ‘Joël Voordewind (ChristenUnie, Tweede Kamer) eist actie n.a.v. false flag actie Skripal

        en: ‘Skripal vergiftiging roept steeds meer vraagtekens op…..

        en: ‘Novitsjok (Novichok) een Russisch chemische wapen >> één grote leugen, zoals de massavernietigingswapen van Saddam Hoessein

        en: ‘Rusland verlangt terecht een excuus van de Britse regering voor valse beschuldiging ‘aanslag’ op Skripal…..

        en: ‘Novitsjok (novichok) uitgelegd door wetenschappers, Groot-Brittannië zit ‘goed fout….’

        en: ‘Skripal: geen (onomstotelijk) bewijs voor Russische schuld en toch stuurt Rutte 2 Russische diplomaten het land uit……..

        en: ‘Stef Blok (VVD minister BuZa): de Russische schuld voor de aanslag op Skripal is ‘plausibel…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: ‘Rusland mag niet deelnemen aan onderzoek naar ‘aanslag met novitsjok’ op Skripal

        en: ‘Brits ministerie van Buitenlandse Zalen geeft toe dat Porton Down niet heeft gezegd dat ‘novitsjok’ uit Rusland komt….. Blok (VVD) alweer met 10 km/u. finaal uit de ‘novitsjok-bocht’

        en: ‘Russisch zenuwgas verhaal is nonsens ook aldus Jeremy Corbyn….. Jimmy Dore met commentaar!

        en: ‘OPCW bevestigt: novitsjok (novichok) van aanslag op Skripal komt uit Rusland……

        en: ‘Skripal: wat journalisten echt zouden moeten vragen aangaande ‘de aanslag met gifgas’

       en: ‘Skripal false flag operatie zakt als soufflé in elkaar…….

       en: ‘Nieuwe ‘novitsjok aanslag’ nadat de Skripal vergiftiging definitief kan worden afgeschreven als false flag operatie

       en: ‘Skripal: GB klaagt 2 Russen aan voor vergiftiging middels een sci-fi techniek: de 2 waren tegelijk op 1 plek, waar 1 Rus te zien was……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Voor meer berichten over het demoniseren van Rusland zie:

       en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

       en: ‘‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

       en: ‘Rusland heeft niets van doen met manipulaties van de VS presidentsverkiezingen via Facebook, wel maakt Facebook meer kapot dan je lief is…….

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

       en: ‘CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

       en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘ (zie ook de andere links onder dat bericht)

       en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!


       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

       en: Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: Wall Street Journal wil punt achter Russiagate


Op 18 maart 2018 de aanduiding novitsjok toegevoegd, daar deze nog ontbrak.

Muellers onzinnige beschuldiging die Russiagate zou bewijzen……..

Muellers ‘troll farm’ verhaal ronduit waanzinnig………

Het is werkelijk om schijtziek van te
worden: de pogingen in de VS (en de rest van het westen) om Rusland te demoniseren en het verlies
van de presidentsverkiezingen door hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton te
wijten aan Russische manipulaties.

Voor al die claims is nul komma nada
bewijs, maar de VS en haar hielenlikkende oorlogshonden van de NAVO
houden deze leugens in de lucht, dit gesteund door de reguliere
media, die NB bijna dagelijks schrijven over ‘fake news’, terwijl
deze media verreweg de grootste leveranciers van dit nepnieuws
zijn…….

De vooralsnog laatste bladzijde in de
wrange komedie werd geschreven door oud-FBI directeur Robert
Mueller…….

Lees hoe David Stockman uitgebreid
gehakt maakt van het ‘troll farm verhaal’. (let op, sommige delen zijn dusdanig komisch dat je op moet passen er niet in te blijven):

Mueller’s
Comic Book Indictment: How to Prosecute A Great Big Nothingburger

By
David Stockman

February
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – We have always heard that a
determined government prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, and now
we know it’s true. After 38 years in the prosecution racket, Robert
Mueller just made his biggest score ever—that is, he nailed
a great big Nothingburger.


But
he also did a lot more than that. Mueller’s 37-page comic book
indictment actually unmasks—inadvertently to be
sure—the 
distinctly
un-terrifying essence
 of
the whole Russian meddling narrative. In fact, the crude social media
emissions (ads and posts) of the so-called troll farm were
generally lame, often laughable and sometimes downright
ludicrous as per this gem cited by Mueller:

a.
On or about October 16, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the ORGANIZATION-controlled Instagram account “Woke Blacks”
to post the following message: 
“[A]
particular hype and hatred for Trump is misleading the people and
forcing Blacks to vote Killary. We cannot resort to the lesser of two
devils. Then we’d surely be better off without voting AT ALL.”

Notwithstanding
the grave nomenclature of BLOCK CAPITALS, endless sinister “on
or about” events and 99 numbered paragraphs of
particulars, the true bill (charging document) is actually just a
random catalogue of social media trivia like the above “Woke
Blacks” post.

Most
of the cited gleanings amounted to crude word bombs, often in
broken English, that presumably even Kim Kardashian’s 59 million
Twitter followers could see through.

“Hillary
is a Satan, and her crimes and lies
 had proved
just how evil she is”

The
lion’s share of these postings and ads probably disappeared into
cyberspace like the sound of a falling tree in an empty
forest, anyway. According to Facebook itself, the seemingly
ubiquitous social media ad campaign despicted in the indictment
was nothing of the kind. It actually amounted to
just 
3,000 placements
at a cost of 
$100,000—more
than half of which were purchased after the election,
and 
25% of
which ended-up in its dead letter office (unread).

Likewise, the
handful of efforts to actually stimulate pro-Trump rallies in
Florida and elsewhere were abject failures. As we document
below, the Russians had absolutely no “ground game” in the
US and any third-rate campaign consultant will tell you that ads
alone do not produce crowds. In fact, there is virtually no evidence
that anyone showed up at the rallies cited by Mueller.

Besides,
the overwhelming share of the pro-Trump social media postings
uncovered by Mueller’s sleuths amounted to “copy and paste”
relays of current partisan talking points. Thus, the
indictment cites such slogans as:

           “Vote
Republican, vote Trump, and support the Second Amendment!”.

“Trump
is our only hope for a better future!”

“Donald
wants to defeat terrorism… Hillary wants to sponsor it”

Really?

It
took a clandestine nest of Russkie imposters and subversives to
pollute the social media with this kind of tripe?


In
fact, RNC, Fox News and the Trump campaign were
already saturating the internet with these messages,
anyway—-along with millions of pro-Trump social medi activists.  T
he 80 Russian operatives
cited by Mueller didn’t add one damn bit to the massive social media
messaging that was already out there.

So
here’s the joker in the whole deck. It seems that the
nefarious”troll farm” in St. Petersburg that comprises
nearly the totality of Mueller’s case is not a Russian
intelligence agency operation at all.


Instead,
it’s the relatively harmless Hobby Farm of a fanatical
Russian oligarch and ultra-nationalist, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who
has a great big beef against Imperial Washington’s demonization
of Russia and Vlad Putin. Apparently, the farm
 was (it’s
apparently being disbanded) the vehicle through which he gave
Washington the middle finger and buttered up his patron.

Prigozhin
is otherwise known as “Putin’s Cook” because he made his
fortune in St. Petersburg restaurants that Putin favored and via
state funded food service operations at Russian schools and military
installations. Like most Russian oligarchs not in jail, he
apparently tithes in gratitude to the Kremlin: In this
case, by bankrolling the rinky-dink operation at 55
Savushkina Street in St Petersburg that is the object of Mueller’s
pretentious foray into the flotsam and jetsam of social media
low life.

Prigozhin’s
trolling farm is grandly called the Internet Research Agency
(IRA), but what it actually does is hire (apparently) unemployed
20-somethings at $4-8 per hour to pound out
ham-handed political messaging on social media sites like
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube etc. They bang away twelve
hours at a shift on a quota-driven
paint-by-the-internet-numbers basis where their output is rated for
engagements, likes, retweets etc.


Whatever
these keyboard drones might be, they are not professional Russian
intel operators
. And
the collection of broken English postings strewn throughout the
indictment are not one bit scary.


Indeed,
the utterly stupid naiveté of the whole St.
Petersburg operation is crystalized by this episode when the
farm purportedly garnered some startling political insight from
an unwitting Trump campaign official in Texas:

80.
On or about August 19, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the false U.S. persona “Matt Skiber” account to write
to the real U.S. person affiliated with a Texas-based grassroots
organization who previously had advised the false persona to focus
on 
“purple
states like Colorado, Virginia & Florida
.”
Defendants and their co-conspirators told that U.S. person, 
We
were thinking about your recommendation to focus on purple states and
this is what we’re organizing in FL.”

Jez
Louise and goodness gracious, too. Who coulda thunk as early
as August that Colorado, Virginia and Florida would be swing
states!


In
any event, even Mueller’s indictment proves that the farm was
strictly amateurville. None of the other 12 Russians charged
has an intelligence background, either.

Thus,
the CEO is a retired St. Petersburg police officer. The
executive director is a 31-year old website developer and
internet PR promoter who previously had garnered small beans
contracts ($4k-20k each) from St. Petersburg agencies to publish
municipal newspapers, make video reports about their activities or
promote local programs such as one on “tolerance and
prevention of drug addiction”.


Likewise,
two more of the operatives were graduates students in IT and
advertising at St. Petersburg universities.

Then
there is the husband/wife duo, Maria and Robert Bovda, who were
the original heads of the US focused “translator project”.
Both were recent graduates in psychology from local
universities, where Robert’s 2011 thesis had been on
“The Effects of Social-Support Conditions On
Loneliness As Experienced By the Elderly”.


We can’t
help but think they had not yet become hardened spies when
the joined IRA in November 2013 and apparently 
left
in October 2014
. Whatever
they did during their tenure at the farm, cooking up ways to
help Donald Trump’s not yet announced campaign was surely
not among them, but still apparently enough to help fill out
Mueller’s indictment roster.

             Maria Bovda was the 'head' of the translator project, the designated branch of the wider pro-Putin effort which focused on US audiences. She worked there between November 2013 and October 2014
Her husband Robert acted beneath her as the second in charge of the 'translator' project and worked at the company over the same dates. He too is accused of trying to enter the US under false pretenses to collect information but he did not obtain a visa and could not make the trip


Another
was Dzheykhun Aslanov, who was head of the “American department”
and had graduated in 2012 from the Russian State Hydrometeorological
University in St. Petersburg. He had studied economics
and 
wildlife
management!

Likewise,
nowhere in the entire 37 pages is there even a clause linking
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm to the SVR (foreign intelligence service), the
FSB (counter-intelligence and anti-terrorism), the GRU (military
intelligence service), any other agency of the Russian State—-or
even some purported Kremlin back channel to Putin.

Yet
there is every reason to believe that the entire Russian meddling
narrative cooked up by the partisan hacks in Obama’s inner
circle—-John Brennan, Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes—-was based on the
amateurish machinations originating in the nondescript building
pictured below.

As
we will show, the Hobby Farm was no Russian state secret
or clandestine vehicle of its intelligence community. To the
contrary, it had been fully covered in the Russian press for
years as one of numerous such oligarch funded projects designed
to glorify the Putin regime and vilify the Russian opposition.


It
had also been the subject of a lengthy expose in 
The
Guardian
 
of
London, as well as other western media. Even Radio Free Europe
had done a lengthy profile.


All
of this had happened long before Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm
had turned its attentions to US politics. Indeed, the IRA’s
pivot to the US in April 2014 occurred well before Trump’s
candidacy was gleam in anyone’s eye except his own, but 
after a
seminal event had occurred which Mueller’s comic book
narrative completely ignores.


To
wit, what apparently riled up Prigozhin was Washington’s
heavy-handed meddling in the politics of Ukraine during the US
funded and enabled coup on the streets of Kiev in February 2014.

Never
mind that the incumbent pro-Russian government had come to power in
an honest election and had chosen to take a more
attractive economic deal from Moscow than was being offered
by the West. 

Also ignore that fact that Ukraine was Russia’s
next door neighbor and had been an essential element of Greater
Russia—sometimes a full fledged constituent state—for more
than 700 years.

Likewise,
when Crimea elected by 90% referendum vote to “rejoin”
Russia, it didn’t happen at gunpoint. Crimea is 85% Russian and
had been an integral part of the Russian state ever since it
was purchased from the Turks by Catherine the Great for
good money in 1783.

Thereafter,
its major port city of Sevastopol had functioned as the homeport
for Russia’s Black Sea fleet under Czars and Commissars alike.
The only real reason it needed to “rejoin” Russia in March
2014 was because the Ukrainian tyrant who ruled the Soviet Union in
the 1950s, Nikita Khrushchev, had gifted it to his
Ukrainian compatriots during a drunken celebration of his
victory over two deadly rivals who also claimed Stalin’s succession.

Indeed,
when Obama’s neocon Assistant Secretary for European Affairs,
Victoria Nuland, was caught telling the American ambassador in Kiev
that “Yats is the guy” with respect to the new Washington
designated leader of the post-coup government and joined a
chorus of Washington-based vilification of Putin and the Russian
government, the die was cast.

Russian
nationalists like Prigozhin were not going to take it lying down. As
we document below, then and there he began to shift some of the
activities of his trolling farm toward the US.

It amounted
to a tit-for-tat response to the anti-Russian propaganda emanating
from the Washington funded NGOs in Kiev; and also from outright
government agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy
and Radio Free Europe, as well as the Deep State
subservient operations of CNN and its print media imitators.

That
shift was described as the “translator project” by
Mueller’s historically ignorant lawyers. The implication was that out
of sheer aggression the Kremlin had unilaterally decided to
attack America’s democratic process through the IRA.

In
fact, the overwhelming likelihood is that an arriviste
Russian billionaire got a bee in his bonnet after Washington’s
Ukrainian coup–and then went to town on America with his trolling
farm exactly as he and many others had been doing in internal
Russian politics for years.

From
the point of view of US/Russian relations and world peace, however,
the re-direction of activity at Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm could
not have come at a worse time. Its wholly open and widely known
operations permitted Obama’s hatchet-people to quickly seize
on the IRA’s new theatre of focus as evidence of a
massive Russian attack on America’s election process, thereby turning
a molehill into a mountain.

At
length, the partisan leaders of Obama’s national security team,
led by the detestable John Brennan at the
CIA, selectively coopted and abused the resources and
credibility of the vast US intelligence apparatus to put the
imprimatur of a national security threat upon what was in fact
a scary bedtime story of no real significance. That effort
culminated in the phony intelligence assessment published
by four US intel agencies in January 2017 based on the work
of Brennan’s “hand-picked” accomplices.

In
what is surely a fabulous irony, therefore, the Internet
Research Agency amounts to a reverse Potemkin Village. It wasn’t
much to look at and was nothing to worry about until Obama’s
national security posse falsely embellished it’s innocuous
façade into a mortal threat to American democracy and national
security.

And
then Robert Mueller brought in his gang of copywriters and
illustrators to turn this entire tall tale into CNN-ready “news”.

We
will demonstrate below that what happened in this building was a
complete farce and posed no threat to the security and liberty of the
American people whatsoever; nor did it even remotely impact the 2016
election process.


But
with his comic book indictment, Robert Mueller has actually made
himself a mortal threat to America’s democracy and national security
.
That’s because his indictment is unleashing a rabid
anti-Russian mania in the Democratic party and turning flaming
liberals and leftwing progressives, who used to form the backbone of
the peace party in America, into outright war-mongers.

The
Donald tweeted over the weekend about Moscow “laughing its ass
off”  about the Mueller indictment, but we think he
missed the mark. It is the Deep State on the banks of the Potomac
that is bursting with glee—literally licking its collective
chops— about the endless budget boondoggles now assured to be 

coming its way.


The
neocons and military/industrial complex had already
taken control of the GOP lock, stock and barrel. Then,
his campaign rhetoric about “America First”
notwithstanding, Trump abdicated to his empire-minded generals
in order to concentrate on his Twitter account. And now in the
wake of the RussiaGate hysteria being given a powerful new
boost from Mueller’s comic book, the Dems are lining up to say
we will see your 
$700
billion
 budget
and crank it up from there.


The
truth is, there is a screaming fiscal crisis coming hard upon
Imperial Washington. That’s owing to the 
$15
trillion
 of
new deficits that are now built-in for the next decade—at the very
time when the Fed has shut down is massive bond-buying
experiment and the Baby Boom is hitting the social security and
medicare rolls in droves.

Absent
the RussiaGate hoax and the Dems descent into mindless, anti-Putin
hysteria, there would have been a moment of maximum danger for
the Deep State’s hideously inflated military, intelligence and
surveillance operations. In the coming battle against fiscal
collapse, they surely would have been on the fiscal chopping
block like at no time since the aftermath of Vietnam in the 1970s.

But rescue
is now at hand. The Dems have been shell-shocked ever
since the evening of November 8, 2016, and have worked
themselves into deliriums about how it was all a big mistake
enabled by Russian meddling and collusion with the Trump
campaign.

To
a substantial degree, however, those narratives were on their last
legs until the Mueller indictment came along. For anyone who takes
the trouble to read it, of course, it’s just a potpourri of
nonsense, marginalia and irrelevance.

But
the Dems had already gone brain dead on the RussiaGate matter—so
they are now greeting it as a “blockbuster”, as
are the talking heads of CNN and the mainstream media. Consequently,
the drivel that came out of the building pictured below is being
taken as evidence of a far-reaching attack on America that
even rivals Pearl Harbor. As Pat Buchanan noted:

          This
Russian troll farm is “the equivalent (of) Pearl Harbor,”
says Cong. Jerrold Nadler, who would            head up the House Judiciary
Committee, handling any impeachment, if Democrats retake the                    House.

When
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes pressed, Nadler doubled down: The Russians “are
destroying our democratic process.” While the Russian trolling
may not equal Pearl Harbor in its violence, said Nadler, in its
“seriousness, it is very much on a par” with Japan’s
surprise attack.

That’s
right. But unlike the vast Japanese naval armada that stealthily
steamed toward Hawaii in early December 1941, the Facebook
cyber-missiles that allegedly hit America in 2016 came out of
this little joint hiding in plain sight:

55 Savushkina Street, St Petersburg, said to be the headquarters of Russia’s ‘troll army’

So
let’s return to the fact that Prigozhin’s troll farm
doesn’t really look much different than countless others that dot the
Russian internet landscape, and which mushroomed after 2011 in
support of the Putin-ified Russian state and the crony
capitalist economy it shepherds.


New
Yorker
 piece
published by journalist Adrian Chen, no fan of Donald Trump, in
late July 2016 explains about as well as any where the Internet
Research Agency came from:

           The
(Internet Research Agency) has been widely reported in Russian
media to be the brainchild                of Evgeny Prigozhin, an oligarch and ally
of Vladimir Putin. At the time, it employed hundreds of                Russians in a
nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, where they produced
blog posts,                      comments, infographics, and viral videos that pushed the
Kremlin’s narrative on both the Russian              and English Internet.

The
agency is what is known in Russia as a “troll farm,” a nickname
given to outfits that operate armies of sock-puppet social-media
accounts, in order to create the illusion of a rabid grass-roots
movement. Trolling has become a key tool in a comprehensive effort by
Russian authorities to rein in a previously freewheeling Internet
culture, after huge anti-Putin protests in 2011 were organized
largely over social media. It is used by Kremlin apparatchiks at
every level of government in Russia; wherever politics are discussed
online, one can expect a flood of comments from paid trolls.

The
real effect, the Russian activists told me, was not to brainwash
readers but to overwhelm social media with a flood of fake
content, 
seeding
doubt and paranoia, and destroying the possibility of using the
Internet as a democratic space…..

…….toward
the end of last year (2015) I noticed something interesting:
many had begun to promote right-wing news outlets, portraying
themselves as conservative voters who were, increasingly, fans of
Donald Trump. Exposure to even small amounts of Russian politics can
induce severe bouts of paranoia and conspiracy-minded thinking, and
it seemed logical to me that this new pro-Trump bent might well be an
attempt by the agency to undermine the U.S. by helping to elect a
racist reality-show star as our Commander-in-Chief. At the time, I
found it funny. 
The
agency was a well-funded but often hapless operation—it created a
cartoon character that was a giant buttocks to spread anti-Obama
propaganda, for example—and this seemed like another of its
far-fetched schemes to poison the Internet.

In
fact, it was. How it became a fearsome Russian intel operation was
entirely due to what happened in Washington DC, not St. Petersburg
or the Kremlin, for that matter.

That
is, in the summer of 2016, when the Obama inner circle and the
Deep State national security establishment alike suddenly were
confronted with the theretofore unthinkable prospect that Donald
Trump might actually be elected US President, they literally
transformed the Hobby Farm of a second tier
Russian oligarch into monumental threat to American
democracy.

And
that took some doing because Prigozhin was essentially a nobody
in the great scheme of national security. Unlike Putin, who cut
his eyeteeth in the old Soviet era KGB, Prigozhin had fancied himself
a ski racer as a privileged young man in a Soviet boarding school.
Failing to make the grade on the slopes, however, he had
subsequently pursued various petty criminal schemes that
landed him nine years in a Soviet prison during the latter’s
dying days.

But
timing is everything—-so when he opened a hot dog stand from
his mother’s kitchen in newly liberated St. Petersburg in the
early 1990s his entprenurial talents in the culinary field
self-evidently flourished. Soon he branched into
convenience stores and then in 1996 into a swank restaurant
(Staraya Tamozhnya or “The Old Customs House”) that
catered to newly monied Russian who were looking for “more than
cutlets with Vodka”.

At
length, a strategic $400k investment in a rusting harbor boat
was turned into a floating hot spot called “The New Island
Restaurant”. From there flowed catering contracts
for lavish state banquets after he gained the
gastronomical favor of the post-Soviet St. Petersburg
political operative, who became prime minister of Russia.


Putin held lavish
state dinners on Prigozhin’s floating emporium, where
he played host to world leaders like George W. Bush and Jacques
Chirac. He also apparently heaped business into Prigozhin’s budding
empire with a $177 million catering contract with Moscow’s schools,
and then the real jackpot: A two year contract in 2012 worth
more than 
$1.6
billion
 to
supply 90% of all food orders to Russian soldiers.

Folks,
that’s where the troll factory came from. It opened the
next year in 2013 as the kind of token of appreciation expected
from oligarchs favored by the Russian state.

Still,
it wasn’t the KGB incarnate—just a tweet-by-the-numbers body
shop designed to flood Russian media and internet
forums with messages extolling Russian greatness, the iniquities and
hypocrisies of the morally corrupt West and the glorious
works of Vlad Putin.


At
this stage the troll farm was involved in strictly Russian
business—-the handiwork of an oligarch who had thrived on Russia’s
particular brand of crony capitalism and was more than happy to shill
for his patron in the Kremlin.


Here
is how the previously referenced 
Guardian
article from mid-2015 described the farm before some of its
modest resources were later shifted to the “American
Department” in 2016:

          Just
after 9pm each day, a long line of workers files out of 55 Savushkina
Street, a modern four-                storey office complex with a small sign outside
that reads “Business centre”. Having spent 12                    hours in the
building, the workers are replaced by another large group, who will
work through the              night.

They
painted a picture of a work environment that was humourless and
draconian, with fines for being a few minutes late or not reaching
the required number of posts each day. Trolls worked in rooms of
about 20 people, each controlled by three editors, who would check
posts and impose fines if they found the words had been cut and
pasted, or were ideologically deviant.

The
LiveJournal blogger, who spent two months working at the centre until
mid-March, said she was paid 45,000 roubles ($790) a month, to run a
number of accounts on the site.

We
had to write ‘ordinary posts’, about 
making
cakes or music tracks
 we
liked, but then every now and then throw in a
 political
post
 about
how the Kiev government is fascist, or that sort of thing,” she
said.

Scrolling
through one of the LiveJournal accounts she ran, the pattern is
clear. There are posts about “Europe’s 20 most beautiful castles”
and “signs that show you are dating the wrong girl”, interspersed
with political posts about 
Ukraine or
suggesting that the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny is
corrupt.

The
desired conclusion of one reads: “The majority of experts agree
that the US is deliberately trying to weaken Russia, and Ukraine is
being used only as a way to achieve this goal. If the Ukrainian
people had not panicked and backed a coup, the west would have found
another way to pressure Russia. But our country is not going to go
ahead with the US plans, and we will fight for our sovereignty on the
international stage.”

To
add colour to their posts, websites have been set up to aid the troll
army. One features 
thousands
of pasteable images
,
mainly of European leaders in humiliating photoshopped incidents or
with captions pointing out their weakness and stupidity, or showing
Putin making hilarious wisecracks and winning the day.

When
I got the job there in 2013 it was a small building, I was working in
the basement, and it was clear they didn’t have enough space,”
said Andrei Soshnikov, a St Petersburg journalist who infiltrated the
company two years ago and has continued to cover it. 
He
linked the move to a much bigger office with increased online
activity around the Ukraine crisis….

As
we explained above, it was only after Washington massively
intervened in the domestic politics of Ukraine in February 2104 that
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm branched into external operations
focused on Russian adversaries like the new anti-Russian Ukrainian
government and the United States.


Even
then, however, the main stream media headline writers, who
have been intellectually lobotomized by a constant diet of
anti-Russian mania, cannot seem to grasp that their hyperbolic
headlines are in no way, shape or form supported by the actual
written words in Mueller’s indictment.


In
a word, 
eighty twenty-somethings
sitting cheek-by-jowl at banks of computer screens and banging out
social media tripe in English as a (third) language did not
impact anything in America, let alone the 2016 election outcome.


That
is to say, what in the world is so hard to understand about the fact
that the pathetic output of this group could not have amounted
to 
0.000001% of
the content that rumbled through these social media channels
during 2016?


Yet
here is Mueller—writing in indictment black and
white—admitting that the troll farm had deployed precious few
trolls to the American department:

“spread
(ing) distrust towards the candidates and the political
system in general…..By approximately July 2016, more
than 
eighty
ORGANIZATION employees
 were
assigned to the translator project”.

Besides
the infinitesimal volume and generally crude and unoriginal nature of
the troll farm’s output, this tiny 80-person contingent points to
another huge flaw in the entire Mueller narrative—especially
as it has been embellished and exaggerated by the main stream media
since last Friday afternoon. To wit, all of these posts were destined
to get lost in the vast sea of cyberspace without a 
ground
game
 in
the US.


Yet
the indictment is clear on that crucial point as well.
The Russian meddlers had “no ground game”
whatsoever aside from a 22 day visit in June 2014 by two
operatives who were not trained spies and who had apparently
never even been to America previously.


Yet
they visited nine states during that brief interval and
thereby “cased-out” the entirety of the American
electoral scene:

Only
KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA received visas, and from approximately June 4,
2014 through June 26, 2014, KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA traveled in and
around the United States, including stops in Nevada, California, New
Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Louisiana, Texas, and New York
to gather intelligence. After the trip, KRYLOVA and BURCHIK exchanged
an intelligence report regarding the trip.

The
above paragraph is itself a smoking bratwurst!


Aside
from sleeping, passing through countless airports, checking into a
dozen or more hotels and 

perhaps visiting the chamber of Commerce in
Dallas or Denver, what possibly could these two travelers have done
to lay the groundwork for “influencing” 133
million voters two years hence?


Mueller
doesn’t say and the talking heads jabber on about this trip as
if it were some kind of invasion, not the
pointless needle-in-the-haystack type of undertaking that it
actually was.


And
that gets us to the ballyhooed efforts to organize and promote Trump
rallies in Florida, Washington DC, New York City and elsewhere. Once
again, however, Mueller spills large amounts of ink citing the emails
and social media posts that describe the aims of these long-distance
media trolls. But there is not a shred of evidence presented
about what actually happened on the ground.


We
would be so bold as to suggest that we know why Mueller didn’t
document this core element of the alleged meddling campaign.
Namely, because nobody came to the rallies and flash mob events
called for by the keyboard jockeys in St. Petersburg.


Take
the case of the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies on August 20,
which the indictment dwells on at length. So doing, it purports to
explain how real Trump supporters in the state were duped into
cooperating, how bloggers back in Russia used social media posts to
promote 13 rallies across the state of Florida and bought ads to the
same end on Facebook.


In
fact, compared to fleeting references with respect to similar rallies
allegedly staged in Washington DC and New York City, the Florida
rallies take up far more ink in the indictment and come across as
exhibit #1  on Russia ground game in the US election
process.


Indeed,
the liberal hatch-people at 
Politico made
the singular importance of the Florida meddling operation
abundantly clear:

But
the document makes clear that the operation in Florida, the nation’s
largest swing state, was in a class by itself. The indictment is
packed with details of how Russian nationals duped Donald Trump
campaign volunteers and grass-roots organizations in Florida into
holding rallies they organized and helped fund with foreign cash.

Here’s
the problem. There seems to be scant evidence that these rallies
actually happened or that anyone showed up to the ones that did
occur. For instance, here is a photo of one in St. Petersburg
(Florida) posted on social media at the time.


We
doubt whether Vlad got his money’s worth on this one:

ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Then
there’s the case of Jim Frishe of Clearwater, Florida. He was a
real estate development consultant and candidate for county
office, who organized a sign-waving event in response to the Russian
entreaties that attracted barely a dozen people:

           Frishe,
68, said he was called by someone identifying themselves as with a
group called                 “Florida for Trump” and asked to organize a
sign-waving rally. He said between 15 and 18               people showed up and
that he didn’t receive any signs or money or other support. He                     never heard from them again.

“I
was going to do what I was going to do anyway. I was a Trump
supporter, they didn’t convince me”.

Then
there is the case of the “Hillary in stripes” caper
allegedly promoted by the Russians. According to the indictment:

           For
example, defendants and their co-conspirators asked one U.S. person
to build a cage on on               a flatbed truck … and another U.S. person to
wear a costume portraying Clinton in a prison                       uniform,”

The
thing is, the main evidence for that is that the “cage”
appeared about a month later as the handiwork of a Trump supporter,
Gary Howd, who did it all on his own–without any prompting,
encouragement or money from the Russians.


Even
the Politico account of the purported Florida invasion by the
Russians let that much slip out:

          The
caged Clinton stunt was a hit among Trump supporters. On Sept. 23,
for                                      instance,
 NBC2 reported
that a Cape Coral man erected a caged Clinton display in his front            yard.

“I
feel like I’m doing my little part at least in my little neck of the
woods,” homeowner Gary Howd said.

As
it happened, even the 
Washington
Post
 admits
that the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies didn’t amount to
much.

          The
efforts in Florida that August day did not turn out to be
particularly impressive. No people                    showed up to at least one of the
proposed rallies, and online photos of some of the other events                reveal ragtag groups with Trump signs staking out patches of grass or
traffic medians.

As
to the “Down With Hillary” demonstration on July 23, 2016,
to take another example, here is what you get from Google on this
particular element of the indictment:

          No
results found for 
“Down
with Hillary” rally in New York City on July 23, 2016
.

Finally,
and as long was we are on the topic, here is what a real troll farm
looks like. Yet this vast suite of offices in Fort
Meade, Maryland, where 20,000 SIGINT spies and technicians work
for the NSA, is only the tip of the iceberg.


The
US actually spends 
$75
billion
 per
year—more than Russia’s entire 
$69
billion 
defense
budget—spying on and meddling in the politics of virtually
every nation on earth. An outfit within NSA called Tailored Access
Operations (TAO) has a multi-billion annual budget and does
nothing put troll the global internet and does so
with highly educated, highly paid professionals, not $4 per
hour keyboard jockeys.


Indeed,
the cafeterias in the NSA buildings pictured below cost far
more per year to operate than did Prigozhin’s troll farm during it
entire short lived existence (its apparently now being closed down
with two of the 3.5 floors already dark).

NSA headquarters

In
that context, Charles Hugh Smith cogently reminds that the real
farce in the Mueller comic book is that it is the ultimate case of
the pot-calling-the-kettle black:

America’s
foreign policy is one of absolute entitlement to influence the
domestic affairs and politics of every nation of interest, which to a
truly global empire includes every nation on the planet to the degree
every nation is a market and/or a potential threat to U.S. interests.

Assassination
of elected leaders–no problem. Funding the emergence of new
U.S.-directed political parties–just another day at the office.
Inciting dissent and discord to destabilize regimes–it’s what we do,
folks. Funding outright propaganda–one of our enduring specialties
.

Finally,
as Pat Buchanan further observed in his post on the Mueller
indictment, political and election meddling is what Imperial
Washington does. And now we are surprised that others do the
same—-even that pathetic efforts of a Russian oligarch laid out in
Mueller’s ham sandwich indictment:

Are
the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try
to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling
regimes we believe we have a stake?

“Have
we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura
Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.

With
a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”

“We
don’t do that anymore though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We
don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”

“Well,”
Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”

Indeed,
what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding
the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?

Did
America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions”
that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?

When
Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime
change” is frequently heard. When the “Green Revolution”
took to the streets of Tehran to protest massively the re-election of
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009, Republicans denounced
President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the
outcome.

When
China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some
have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?

David
Stockman’s Contra Corner is the only place where mainstream delusions
and cant about the Warfare State, the Bailout State, Bubble Finance
and Beltway Banditry are ripped, refuted and
rebuked.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com

=========================

Zie ook:

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands; zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

Is Putin corrupt? De waarheid over ‘handel en wandel’ van de Russische president (en een nieuwe gifgasaanval in Syrië…..)

Over Putin worden de meest vreemde dingen verteld, zo zou hij o.a. corrupt zijn en zich zo verrijken middels zijn functie als president van Rusland.

Niet dat men met bewijzen komt waarmee e.e.a. wordt aangetoond, maar dat maakt niet uit, immers Putin is de kwaaie pier en barbertje moet hangen, daarvoor houdt men met grote graagte leugens in de lucht, of die leugens nu van de media, politiek of de geheime diensten komen (leugens die men uiteraard  van elkaar overneemt en steunt door deze te herhalen…)….

Voorlopig heeft Putin voorkomen dat in Syrie de boel niet veel verder escaleerde, neem de belachelijke beschieting van het vliegveld van Homs, na de zoveelste vermeende gifgasaanval van het Syrische leger, die ook in dit geval niet bleek te kloppen…… Vandaag wordt het Syrische leger weer beschuldigd van het aanvallen van doelen in de provincie Idlib met chlorine (chloorgas)…..

BBC World Service meldde rond 11.35 u. (CET) vanmorgen dat het Syrische leger gifgas zou hebben gebruikt bij een aanval in de provincie Idlib. Het bewijs daarvoor? Een woordvoerder van de White Helmets had e.e.a. van horen zeggen, voorts heeft de BBC correspondent Martin Patience ook van alles gehoord, terwijl hij in Beiroet (Libanon) zit……..

De woordvoerder van de White Helmets voerde de haat tegen Syrië verder op, door te stellen dat het in Idlib om veel vluchtelingen gaat die uit Aleppo zijn gevlucht en wel een kwart miljoen mensen……. Het grootste deel van de bewoners van Aleppo is al lang terug, blij dat de fundamentalistische terreurgroepen (‘gematigde rebellen’) niets meer te vertellen hebben in hun stad….. De bedoelde vluchtelingen zijn dan ook voornamelijk families van de terreurgroepen die in Aleppo op basis van de sharia wetgeving, een ware terreur uitoefenden, voordat het Syrische leger de stad weer innam………

De presentator van het BBC programma had het lef te durven zeggen dat (de bewering dat Syrië gifgas heeft gebruikt): “This is proven (to be true….)”

Door naar een ‘wat eerlijker’ verhaal over Putin:

Is
Putin Profoundly Corrupt or “Incorruptible?”

Sharon
Tennison recounts her personal experience of and observations about
Vladimir Putin

By Sharon Tennison

Sharon
Tennison recounts her personal experience of and observations about
Vladimir Putin. first published in 2014 and first appearing on this
site in April 2017, we are re-airing this alternative analysis in the
year of the Russian presidential election as being of continuing
relevance in the struggle to separate truth from #fakenews. Tennison
presents a view of VVP as essentially “incorruptible”. To those
who get their information from the mainstream media, and even from
many alternative news sites this will seem a slightly incredible
idea. Yet Tennison’s opinion is not unsourced or unconsidered. And
the numerous claims of Putin’s massive personal wealth and
“gangster” mentality remain entirely uncorroborated. Where does
the truth lie?

February
04, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – As the Ukraine situation has
worsened, unconscionable misinformation and hype is being poured on
Russia and Vladimir Putin. Journalists and pundits must scour the
Internet and thesauruses to come up with fiendish new epithets to
describe both. Wherever I make presentations across America, the
first question ominously asked during Q&A is always, “What
about Putin?” It’s time to share my thoughts which follow:

Putin
obviously has his faults and makes mistakes. Based on my earlier
experience with him, and the experiences of trusted people, including
U.S. officials who have worked closely with him over a period of
years, Putin most likely is a straight, reliable and exceptionally
inventive man.

He
is obviously a long-term thinker and planner and has proven to be an
excellent analyst and strategist. He is a leader who can quietly work
toward his goals under mounds of accusations and myths that have been
steadily leveled at him since he became Russia’s second president.

I’ve
stood by silently watching the demonization of Putin grow since it
began in the early 2000s –– I pondered on computer my thoughts
and concerns, hoping eventually to include them in a book (which was
published in 2011). The book explains my observations more thoroughly
than this article.

Like
others who have had direct experience with this little known man,
I’ve tried to no avail to avoid being labeled a “Putin
apologist”. If one is even neutral about him, they are considered
“soft on Putin” by pundits, news hounds and average citizens who
get their news from CNN, Fox and MSNBC.

I
don’t pretend to be an expert, just a program developer in the USSR
and Russia for the past 30 years. But during this time, I’ve have
had far more direct, on-ground contact with Russians of all stripes
across 11 time zones than any of the Western reporters or for that
matter any of Washington’s officials.

I’ve
been in country long enough to ponder on Russian history and culture
deeply, to study their psychology and conditioning, and to understand
the marked differences between American and Russian mentalities which
so complicate our political relations with their leaders.

As
with personalities in a family or a civic club or in a city hall, it
takes understanding and compromise to be able to create workable
relationships when basic conditionings are different. Washington has
been notoriously disinterested in understanding these differences and
attempting to meet Russia halfway.

In
addition to my personal experience with Putin, I’ve had discussions
with numerous American officials and U.S. businessmen who have had
years of experience working with him––I believe it is safe to say
that none would describe him as “brutal” or “thuggish”, or
the other slanderous adjectives and nouns that are repeatedly used in
western media.

I
met Putin years before he ever dreamed of being president of Russia,
as did many of us working in St.Petersburg during the 1990s. Since
all of the slander started, I’ve become nearly obsessed with
understanding his character. I think I’ve read every major speech
he has given (including the full texts of his annual hours-long
telephone “talk-ins” with Russian citizens).

I’ve
been trying to ascertain whether he has changed for the worse since
being elevated to the presidency, or whether he is a straight
character cast into a role he never anticipated––and is using
sheer wits to try to do the best he can to deal with Washington under
extremely difficult circumstances.

If
the latter is the case, and I think it is, he should get high marks
for his performance over the past 14 years. It’s not by accident
that Forbes declared him the most Powerful Leader of 2013, replacing
Obama who was given the title for 2012. The following is my one
personal experience with Putin.

The
year was 1992

It
was two years after the implosion of communism; the place was
St.Petersburg.

For
years I had been creating programs to open up relations between the
two countries and hopefully to help Soviet people to get beyond their
entrenched top-down mentalities. A new program possibility emerged in
my head. Since I expected it might require a signature from the
Marienskii City Hall, an appointment was made.

My
friend Volodya Shestakov and I showed up at a side door entrance to
the Marienskii building. We found ourselves in a small, dull brown
office, facing a rather trim nondescript man in a brown suit.

He
inquired about my reason for coming in. After scanning the proposal I
provided he began asking intelligent questions. After each of my
answers, he asked the next relevant question.

I
became aware that this interviewer was different from other Soviet
bureaucrats who always seemed to fall into chummy conversations with
foreigners with hopes of obtaining bribes in exchange for the
Americans’ requests. 
CCI stood
on the principle that we would never, never give bribes.

This
bureaucrat was open, inquiring, and impersonal in demeanor. After
more than an hour of careful questions and answers, he quietly
explained that he had tried hard to determine if the proposal was
legal, then said that unfortunately at the time it was not. A few
good words about the proposal were uttered. That was all. He simply
and kindly showed us to the door.

Out
on the sidewalk, I said to my colleague, “
Volodya,
this is the first time we have ever dealt with a Soviet bureaucrat
who didn’t ask us for a trip to the US or something valuable!

I
remember looking at his business card in the sunlight––it
read 
Vladimir
Vladimirovich Putin
.

1994

U.S.
Consul General Jack Gosnell put in an SOS call to me in
St.Petersburg. He had 14 Congress members and the new American
Ambassador to Russia, Thomas Pickering, coming to St.Petersburg in
the next three days. He needed immediate help.

I
scurried over to the Consulate and learned that Jack intended me to
brief this auspicious delegation and the incoming ambassador.

I
was stunned but he insisted. They were coming from Moscow and were
furious about how U.S. funding was being wasted there. Jack wanted
them to hear the”good news” about CCI’s programs that were
showing fine results. In the next 24 hours Jack and I also set up
“home” meetings in a dozen Russian entrepreneurs’ small
apartments for the arriving dignitaries (St.Petersburg State
Department people were aghast, since it had never been done
before––but Jack overruled).

Only
later in 2000, did I learn of Jack’s former three-year experience
with Vladimir Putin in the 1990s while the latter was running the
city for Mayor Sobchak. More on this further down.

December
31, 1999

With
no warning, at the turn of the year, President Boris Yeltsin made the
announcement to the world that from the next day forward he was
vacating his office and leaving Russia in the hands of an unknown
Vladimir Putin.

On
hearing the news, I thought surely not the Putin I remembered––he
could never lead Russia. The next day a 
NYTarticle
included a photo.

Yes,
it was the same Putin I’d met years ago! I was shocked and
dismayed, telling friends, “
This
is a disaster for Russia, I’ve spent time with this guy, he is too
introverted and too intelligent––he will never be able to relate
to Russia’s masses
.”

Further,
I lamented: “
For
Russia to get up off of its knees, two things must happen: 1) The
arrogant young oligarchs have to be removed by force from the
Kremlin, and 2) A way must be found to remove the regional bosses
(governors) from their fiefdoms across Russia’s 89 regions
”.

It
was clear to me that the man in the brown suit would never have the
instincts or guts to tackle Russia’s overriding twin challenges.

February
2000

Almost
immediately Putin began putting Russia’s oligarchs on edge. In
February a question about the oligarchs came up; he clarified with a
question and his answer:

What
should be the relationship with the so-called oligarchs? The same as
anyone else. The same as the owner of a small bakery or a shoe repair
shop.

This
was the first signal that the tycoons would no longer be able to
flaunt government regulations or count on special access in the
Kremlin. It also made the West’s capitalists nervous.

After
all, these oligarchs were wealthy untouchable businessmen––good
capitalists, never mind that they got their enterprises illegally and
were putting their profits in offshore banks.

Four
months later Putin called a meeting with the oligarchs and gave them
his deal:

They
could keep their illegally-gained wealth-producing Soviet enterprises
and they would not be nationalized …. IF taxes were paid on their
revenues and if they personally stayed out of politics.

This
was the first of Putin’s “elegant solutions” to the near
impossible challenges facing the new Russia. But the deal also put
Putin in crosshairs with US media and officials who then began to
champion the oligarchs, particularly Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

The
latter became highly political, didn’t pay taxes, and prior to
being apprehended and jailed was in the process of selling a major
portion of Russia’s largest private oil company, Yukos Oil, to
Exxon Mobil. Unfortunately, to U.S. media and governing structures,
Khodorkovsky became a martyr (and remains so up to today).

March
2000

I
arrived in St.Petersburg. A Russian friend (a psychologist) since
1983 came for our usual visit. My first question was, “
Lena
what do you think about your new president?

She laughed and retorted, “
Volodya!
I went to school with him!

She
began to describe Putin as a quiet youngster, poor, fond of martial
arts, who stood up for kids being bullied on the playgrounds. She
remembered him as a patriotic youth who applied for the KGB
prematurely after graduating secondary school (they sent him away and
told him to get an education).

He
went to law school, later reapplied and was accepted. I must have
grimaced at this, because Lena said:

Sharon
in those days we all admired the KGB and believed that those who
worked there were patriots and were keeping the country safe. We
thought it was natural for Volodya to choose this career.

My
next question was:

What
do you think he will do with Yeltsin’s criminals in the Kremlin?

Putting
on her psychologist hat, she pondered and replied:

If
left to his normal behaviors, he will watch them for a while to be
sure what is going on, then he will throw up some flares to let them
know that he is watching. If they don’t respond, he will address
them personally, then if the behaviors don’t change–– some will
be in prison in a couple of years.

I
congratulated her via email when her predictions began to show up in
real time.

Throughout
the 2000s

St.Petersburg’s
many CCI alumni were being interviewed to determine how the PEP
business training program was working and how we could make the U.S.
experience more valuable for their new small businesses. Most
believed that the program had been enormously important, even life
changing. Last, each was asked:

So
what do you think of your new president?

None
responded negatively, even though at that time entrepreneurs hated
Russia’s bureaucrats. Most answered similarly, “Putin registered
my business a few years ago”.

Next
question:

So,
how much did it cost you?

To
a person they replied, “
Putin
didn’t charge anything
”.
One said:

We
went to Putin’s desk because the others providing registrations at
the Marienskii were getting ‘rich on their seats.’

Late
2000

Into
Putin’s first year as Russia’s president, US officials seemed to
me to be suspect that he would be antithetical to America’s
interests––his every move was called into question in American
media. I couldn’t understand why and was chronicling these
happenings in my computer and newsletters.

Year
2001

Jack
Gosnell (former USCG mentioned earlier) explained his relationship
with Putin when the latter was deputy mayor of St.Petersburg. The two
of them worked closely to create joint ventures and other ways to
promote relations between the two countries. Jack related that Putin
was always straight up, courteous and helpful.

When
Putin’s wife, Ludmila, was in a severe auto accident, Jack took the
liberty (before informing Putin) to arrange hospitalization and
airline travel for her to get medical care in Finland. When Jack told
Putin, he reported that the latter was overcome by the generous
offer, but ended saying that he couldn’t accept this favor, that
Ludmila would have to recover in a Russian hospital.

She
did––although medical care in Russia was abominably bad in the
1990s.

A
senior CSIS officer I was friends with in the 2000s worked closely
with Putin on a number of joint ventures during the 1990s. He
reported that he had no dealings with Putin that were questionable,
that he respected him and believed he was getting an undeserved dour
reputation from U.S. media.

Matter
of fact, he closed the door at CSIS when we started talking about
Putin. I guessed his comments wouldn’t be acceptable if others were
listening.

Another
former U.S. official who will go unidentified, also reported working
closely with Putin, saying there was never any hint of bribery,
pressuring, nothing but respectable behaviors and helpfulness.

I
had two encounters in 2013 with State Department officials regarding
Putin:

At
the first one, I felt free to ask the question I had previously
yearned to get answered:

When
did Putin become unacceptable to Washington officials and why??

Without
hesitating the answer came back:

The
knives were drawn’ when it was announced that Putin would be the
next president.”

I
questioned
 WHY? The
answer:

I
could never find out why––maybe because he was KGB.”

I
offered that Bush #I, was head of the CIA. The reply was

That
would have made no difference, he was our guy.

The
second was a former State Department official with whom I recently
shared a radio interview on Russia. Afterward when we were chatting,
I remarked, “You might be interested to know that I’ve collected
experiences of Putin from numerous people, some over a period of
years, and they all say they had no negative experiences with Putin
and there was no evidence of taking bribes”. He firmly replied:

No
one has ever been able to come up with a bribery charge against
Putin.”

From
2001 up to today, I’ve watched the negative U.S. media mounting
against Putin …. even accusations of assassinations, poisonings,
and comparing him to Hitler.

No
one yet has come up with any concrete evidence for these allegations.
During this time, I’ve traveled throughout Russia several times
every year, and have watched the country slowly change under Putin’s
watch. Taxes were lowered, inflation lessened, and laws slowly put in
place. Schools and hospitals began improving. Small businesses were
growing, agriculture was showing improvement, and stores were
becoming stocked with food.

Alcohol
challenges were less obvious, smoking was banned from buildings, and
life expectancy began increasing. Highways were being laid across the
country, new rails and modern trains appeared even in far out places,
and the banking industry was becoming dependable. Russia was
beginning to look like a decent country –– certainly not where
Russians hoped it to be long term, but improving incrementally for
the first time in their memories.

My
2013/14 Trips to Russia
:

In
addition to St.Petersburg and Moscow, in September I traveled out to
the Ural Mountains, spent time in Ekaterinburg, Chelyabinsk and Perm.
We traveled between cities via autos and rail––the fields and
forests look healthy, small towns sport new paint and construction.
Today’s Russians look like Americans (we get the same clothing from
China).

Old
concrete Khrushchev block houses are giving way to new multi-story
private residential complexes which are lovely. High-rise business
centers, fine hotels and great restaurants are now common place––and
ordinary Russians frequent these places. Two and three story private
homes rim these Russian cities far from Moscow.

We
visited new museums, municipal buildings and huge super markets.
Streets are in good repair, highways are new and well marked now,
service stations look like those dotting American highways. In
January I went to Novosibirsk out in Siberia where similar new
architecture was noted. Streets were kept navigable with constant
snowplowing, modern lighting kept the city bright all night, lots of
new traffic lights (with seconds counting down to light change) have
appeared.

It
is astounding to me how much progress Russia has made in the past 14
years since an unknown man with no experience walked into Russia’s
presidency and took over a country that was flat on its belly.

So
why do our leaders and media demean and demonize Putin and Russia???

Like
Lady MacBeth, do they protest too much?

Psychologists
tell us that people (and countries?) project off on others what they
don’t want to face in themselves. Others carry our “shadow”
when we refuse to own it. We confer on others the very traits that we
are horrified to acknowledge in ourselves.

Could
this be why we constantly find fault with Putin and Russia?

Could
it be that we project on to Putin the sins of ourselves and our
leaders?

Could
it be that we condemn Russia’s corruption, acting like the
corruption within our corporate world doesn’t exist?

Could
it be that we condemn their human rights and LGBT issues, not facing
the fact that we haven’t solved our own?

Could
it be that we accuse Russia of “reconstituting the USSR”––because
of what we do to remain the world’s “hegemon”?

Could
it be that we project nationalist behaviors on Russia, because that
is what we have become and we don’t want to face it?

Could
it be that we project warmongering off on Russia, because of what we
have done over the past several administrations?

Some
of you were around Putin in the earlier years. Please share your
opinions, pro and con …. confidentiality will be assured. It’s
important to develop a composite picture of this demonized leader and
get the record straight. I’m quite sure that 99% of those who
excoriate him in mainstream media have had no personal contact with
him at all. They write articles on hearsay, rumors and fabrication,
or they read scripts others have written on their tele-prompters.
This is how our nation gets its “news”, such as it is.

There
is a well known code of ethics among us: Is it the Truth, Is it Fair,
Does it build Friendship and Goodwill, and Will it be Beneficial for
All Concerned?

It
seems to me that if our nation’s leaders would commit to using
these four principles in international relations, the world would
operate in a completely different manner, and human beings across
this planet would live in better conditions than they do today.

As
always your comments will be appreciated. Please resend this report
to as many friends and colleagues as possible.

Sharon
Tennison ran a successful NGO funded by philanthropists, American
foundations, USAID and Department of State, designing new programs
and refining old ones, and evaluating Russian delegates’ U.S.
experiences for over 20 years. Tennison adapted the Marshall Plan
Tours from the 40s/50s, and created the Production Enhancement
Program (PEP) for Russian entrepreneurs, the largest ever business
training program between the U.S. and Russia. Running several large
programs concurrently during the 90s and 2000s, funding disappeared
shortly after the 2008 financial crisis set in. Tennison still runs
an orphanage program in Russia, is President and Founder, Center for
Citizen Initiatives, a member of Rotary Club of Palo Alto,
California, and author of 
The
Power of Impossible Ideas: Ordinary Citizens’ Extraordinary Efforts
to Avert International Crises
.
The author can be contacted at sharon@ccisf.org

This
article was originally published by “
Off Guardian

Marc Jansen zag tijdens de Russische verkiezingen geen onregelmatigheden, die er volgens hem wel waren……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Gistermorgen was ‘Ruslandkenner’ Marc Jansen te gast in de Kots Nieuwsshow (‘NPO‘ Radio1>> ha! ha!). Deze enorme flapdrol beweert dat Putin een nieuw superministerie van staatsveiligheid wil vormen. Uiteraard uiterst angstwekkend als je Jansen moet geloven, die meteen Stalin van stal haalde en deze daardoor vergeleek met Putin…….

Hier de tekst van de ‘Radio1 Gemist’ webpagina over het geheel aan onversneden anti-Russische propaganda:

Een
superministerie van staatsveiligheid; wil Poetin terug naar de oude
KGB?

Russische
president Poetin is van plan en superministerie van staatsveiligheid
op te richten en dat doet denken aan de oude KGB. Het wordt 1
organisatie waarin zowel binnenlandse als buitenlandse
veiligheidsdiensten worden ondergebracht. Het idee alleen al doet
menigeen huiveren. Want een soortgelijk ministerie bestond er onder
het bewind van Stalin. En naar de gruwelen uit die tijd wil niemand
terug.

Marc
Jansen is hier om uitleg te geven. Hij is Ruslandkenner. en net terug
uit Rusland, want hij was er als waarnemer bij de verkiezingen van
vorige week.

Vreemd dat je Jansen nooit hoort over de VS, waar de regering de veiligheidsdiensten keer op keer niet in de hand heeft en waar organisaties als de CIA al groter zijn, dan alle Russische geheime diensten bij elkaar!! Daar behoef je geen ‘Amerikakenner’ te zijn, even verdiepen in de materie is voldoende….. Dan heb je in de VS nog de DIA, (DEA, is ook nog al eens buiten het land bezig), NSA en nog een hele zwik aan geheime overheidsorganisaties (aangevuld met particuliere ‘inlichtingen’ organisaties), die allen schijt hebben mensenrechten, recht op privacy en aan welke rechtstaat dan ook…….. Overigens schijnt zelfs de FBI tegenwoordig wel eens ‘voet op buitenlandse bodem te zetten…’

Dat alles is pas griezelig Jansen, zeker als je daarnaast ziet, wat de VS flikt: de laatste 16 jaar is deze vereniging van terreurstaten 4 keer een illegale oorlog begonnen, waar die in Irak en Syrië intussen aan meer dan 2 miljoen mensen het leven heeft gekost…… Waar de VS ook nog eens de opstand in Oekraïne op poten heeft gezet en geregisseerd, waarna de staatsgreep tegen het democratisch gekozen bewind van Janoekovytsj volgde….. E.e.a. leidde tot de vreselijke burgeroorlog, die de door het westen geparachuteerde corrupte grofgraaier en neonazi-vriend Porosjenko tegen de bevolking in het oosten van dat land voert……… Maar nee, dat vindt Jansen helemaal niet griezelig…….. 

Dat was het nog niet mensen, zoals u in de kop kon lezen, Jansen is een week geleden voor de OVSE ook nog eens als waarnemer bij de Russische verkiezingen geweest. Jansen had zelf geen onregelmatigheden aangetroffen, als enkele kleine incidenten (zoals die ook in Nederland voor kunnen komen). 

U begrijpt dat Jansen niet kon vertrekken, zonder toch even deze verkiezingen door de stront te trekken, dus stelde hij dat het opkomstpercentage veel hoger was, dan werkelijk het geval was….. Nee, dat had Jansen niet zelf geconstateerd, maar dat ‘had hij gehoord……’ Volgens Jansen zou het opkomstpercentage maar 40% zijn, terwijl het officiële cijfer op 48% staat…. Van ‘analisten’ had Jansen begrepen, dat er toch zwaar gerommeld was met de verkiezingen….. U weel wel ‘analisten’ als die van lobby-instituten voor het militair-industrieel complex en voor de NAVO (en daarmee voor het buitenlandbeleid van de VS), zoals Clingendael of Bellingcat……….. (waar men dit ook nog eens van achter het bureau bedenkt……)

De hoogste tijd, dat we de waarnemers voor verkiezingen in het buitenland eens goed onder de loep nemen, jezus christus!! 

Jansen werd door presentatoren Mieke van der Weij en Jan Mom hartelijk bedankt voor het bijpraten ‘over de situatie in Rusland….’  ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Zie ook: ‘Russische verkiezingen in westen dominant verslagen met anti-Putin propaganda……..

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels die u onder dit bericht aantreft, dat geldt net voor het label ‘Bellingcat’. Zie vooral de berichten onder het label Marc Jansen.

Eurovisie Songfestival giftig gemixt met politieke anti-Rusland propaganda

Beste bezoeker, het hele Songfestival kan me gestolen worden en dat is al zo vanaf m’n 12de jaar. Afgelopen zaterdag won Oekraïne het Songfestival met een anti-Russisch lied, gebaseerd op de deportatie van Krim Tartaren in 1944 tijdens WOII. Stalin was een psychopathische moordenaar, die tot het eind van zijn leven, zich vooral te buiten ging aan massamoord en marteling in eigen land.

Voor WOII was een groot deel van Oost-Europa al onder fascistisch bewind en fel anti-communistisch. Niet alleen werden de joden vervolgd in pogroms, zoals die zich daar overigens al een paar eeuwen keer op keer voltrokken, maar ook etnische Russen waren hun leven niet zeker in die contreien….. Zo bezien niet zo vreemd, dat Rusland Oost-Europa bezette en toevoegde als staten van de Sovjet-Unie….

Wat Stalin heeft uitgevreten valt op geen manier goed te praten, maar wel vreemd, dat er nooit liedjes werden ingezonden voor het Songfestival, waarin de onbeschrijfelijke terreur van (nazi-) Duitsland werd bezongen.

Logisch dat dit niet gebeurde, immers het Eurovisie Songfestival was bedoeld om de tegenstellingen tussen de verschillende bevolkingen in West-Europa te verzachten en aan te zetten tot vereniging. Vandaar ook dat politiek getinte teksten verboden waren, was dat niet gebeurd, hadden we zeker in de 50er, 60er en 70er jaren van de vorige eeuw, tijdens de opvolgende afleveringen van het Eurovisie Songfestival, één grote aanklacht tegen (nazi-) Duitsland gehoord.

Ik heb, zoals u al begrepen had, geen verstand van het Eurovisie Songfestival, althans wat betreft hoe puntentellingen enz. In Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten las ik gisteren, dat het Europese publiek massaal voor de Russische inzending had gekozen, iets dat niet terug te zien zou zijn, in de uiteindelijke keuze voor de winnaar…..

Je kan concluderen, dat ook het Eurovisie Songfestival, is verworden tot de zoveelste steunbetuiging en voor het criminaliseren van Rusland en een poging daartoe, dit in het belang van het warm maken van de EU bevolking voor een oorlog tegen Rusland…… Afgelopen week werd gemeld, dat de Russische geheime dienst, de FSB (opvolger KGB) de Russische sporters van doping heeft voorzien……. ha! ha! ha! ha! Via een gat in de muur, zouden Russische atleten schone urine aangereikt hebben gekregen……. Het valt me alles mee, dat Putin zelf niet werd genoemd als pis aangever. Eén ding is duidelijk: Rusland moet en zal gedemoniseerd worden, terwijl de echte agressor, de VS (met de NAVO aan de hand) dood en terreur zaait in een flink deel van de wereld en verantwoordelijk is voor de ontstane toestand in Oekraïne en de oorlog in Oost-Oekraïne…….

Uiteraard was de inzending van Oekraïne bedoeld om Rusland verder te demoniseren (de winnaar gaf toe, dat ze de huidige situatie in Oekraïne vergelijkt met die in 1944), terwijl De Krim niet geannexeerd werd door Rusland, ook al was dit de opzet van de VS……. Dezelfde VS die de opstand en staatsgreep tegen de democratisch gekozen regering Janoekovytsj op poten zette, regisseerde en financierde (met 4 miljard dollar!!!). Uiteraard wist men in de VS en de afzonderlijke NAVO landen, dat Rusland, nadat de NAVO tegen de afspraken in, steeds verder opschoof richting Rusland, in het geval van Oekraïne, De Krim veilig zou stellen, dit daar De Krim de enige ijsvrije Russische marine havens herbergt.

‘Helaas’ voor de VS, mislukte de opzet, daar de bevolking in een internationaal gecontroleerd en gefiatteerd referendum, zelf massaal voor aansluiting bij Rusland koos! Zelfs de oorspronkelijke Oekraïners, kozen massaal voor aansluiting bij Rusland. Als slechte verliezer houdt het westen bij hoog en laag vol, dat Rusland De Krim annexeerde, waar als laatste zelfs het Eurovisie Songfestival afgelopen zaterdag aan heeft bijgedragen…….

Je kan in het westen intussen gerust spreken van ‘volks-hersenspoeling’, als het gaat om de reguliere berichtgeving over Oekraïne en Rusland, berichtgeving veelal ingegeven door politici die zich gedragen als oorlogshitsers en grootlobbyisten van het westerse militair-industrieel complex en daarvoor de hele boel aan elkaar liegen…….

Lullig genoeg marcheren de neonazi’s door de straten van Kiev (en andere steden in Oekraïne), zijn bepaalde politieke partijen verboden, worden kritische journalisten bedreigd en geïntimideerd door de politie, geheime dienst en neonazi’s, terwijl de vrijheid van meningsuiting meer en meer het kind van de rekening wordt……..

Ongelofelijk!!

Zie ook: ‘Zuschauer ausgetrickst: Politiker reißen sich ESC unter den Nagel

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Hans Bax heeft ervaring met de Russen, daarom weet hij, dat ze vlucht MH17 uit de lucht hebben geschoten……….

De berg leugens over rampvlucht MH17 blijft maar groeien, leugens die zich vooral kenmerken, door anti-Russische propaganda. De laatste daarover las ik gisteren in de Ondernemer.nl. Daar had men aandacht voor een Telegraafartikel, waarin ene Bax er flink op los loog en fantaseerde (hij fantaseerde zo hard, dat de ‘leugendrek’ bij wijze van spreken, uit de speakers drupte…). Deze ‘defensie specialist’ en lobbyist voor de NAVO en het militair-industriële complex, durfde het wel aan om maar eens plompverloren te zeggen, dat de mensen die verantwoordelijk zijn, voor het uit de lucht halen van vlucht MH17, allang zijn geliquideerd en begraven door de Russische geheime dienst*. Dit zou de Russische geheime dienst hebben gedaan, om alle sporen richting Moskou te wissen……

Deze oorlogshitser moet dondersgoed weten, dat het hier om straaljagerpiloten gaat, piloten van de Oekraïense luchtmacht (de opstandelingen hebben geen vliegend oorlogstuig), die in feite de opdracht kregen van Porosjenko, daar hij de strijd in Oost-Oekraïne niet kon winnen…….. Dit ondanks alle oorlogsmisdaden begaan door Porosjenko’s  leger en de neonazi bataljons, die aan de kant van deze corrupte boef en topgraaier meevochten (en vechten). Hiermee probeerde Porosjenko de opstandelingen en Rusland in diskrediet te brengen, een poging die grotendeels is gelukt, zoals Bax ten overvloede gisteren weer eens aantoonde….. Deskundigen hebben allang aangetoond dat MH17 door één of meer straaljagers uit de lucht werd geschoten, getuigen hebben verklaard, dat één van de piloten letterlijk in tweeën was geschoten, met een kogeltype, dat alleen straaljagers gebruiken………

Nu even de deskundigheid van die Bax: hij ging als beëdigd tolk van ministers en hoge militairen zo’n 50 keer naar de Sovjet-Unie. Waarop Bax verder vertelde: “De Russen kennende, zeker in de huidige ‘KGB-sfeer’ onder Vladimir Putin, hebben ze afgerekend met de daders…….” Ik zal niet lachen mensen, maar jezus……… KGB? FSB zal de sufferd bedoelen!!! Bovendien sprak Bax over de Sovjet-Unie, misschien weet hij het niet, maar die top bestond voor een aardig deel uit Oekraïners, ook uit het westen van Oekraïne…… Lekkere ‘deskundige’ die Bax…….

Bax verwacht niet, dat ooit nog de onderste steen bovenkomt, dat is de schuld van de Nederlandse regering volgens Bax, die zijn veel te slap opgetreden en hebben een beleid van pappen en nathouden gevolgd……… Hé Bax, smerige oorlogshitser, dat was juist de bedoeling, anders zou het uitkomen, dat Oekraïne de schuldige is in deze en dat moet ten koste van alles voorkomen worden. Vandaar dat Rutte afgelopen zomer, Porosjenko maar één keer waarschuwde, de zoektocht naar stoffelijke overschotten in Oost-Oekraïne niet te frustreren, daarop heeft deze kleuter, die premier mag spelen, ongenadig op z’n donder gehad van Washington, de Britten en de NAVO baas!!!!! Waarom denk je dat er nog steeds geen beeldmateriaal is, van de dag dat MH17 uit de lucht werd geschoten**, of waarom de gegevens van de zwarte doos nog steeds niet zijn vrijgegeven, of beeldmateriaal van alle troepenoverschrijdingen van de Oekraïens-Russische grens (door Russische militairen richting Oekraïne), zoals de NAVO al maanden bij hoog en laag beweerd (vooral hééééél laag…)……..

Rusland is in het pak genaaid, jammer genoeg voor het westen, is dit pak veel te klein en was het op maat gemaakt voor de NAVO en de VS!!

Kijk nu zou de Nederlandse regering in moeten grijpen en Bax terecht wijzen, dit is oprakelen en de zaak verdraaien, Bax denkt toch zeker niet, dat de nabestaanden imbecielen zijn…… Zie wat dit betreft: ‘MH17 ‘dag van nationale rouw’, ingezonden voor International Emmy Awards………..

* Altijd lachen, als je deze kwasten het woord geheime dienst hoort gebruiken, het gaat dan altijd om geheime diensten van niet bevriende naties, in de andere gevallen, gebruikt men de benaming ‘inlichtingen diensten…’

** Terwijl alle satellieten die over dat gebied kwamen, bij wijze van spreken bijna op tilt sloegen,
vanwege het grote aantal foto’s die van het gebied werden genomen

Zie ook: ‘David Jan Godfroid bakt ze bruin vanuit Oekraïne…….

Voor meer berichten aangaande vlucht MH17, klik op ‘vliegramp’ onder dit bericht.