Eindelijk heeft de VS aangegeven dat het Syrische bewind geen gifgaswapens heeft gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking…… Oké, dit was al lang bekend, maar lullig genoeg werd en wordt deze leugen keer op keer herhaald door de reguliere westerse massamedia en het grootste deel van de westerse politici….. Dit geeft ten overvloede nog eens aan dat deze media en politici zich maar al te graag bedienen van ‘fake nieuws……’ (of: ‘nepnieuws, wat je wilt)
Benieuwd hoe lang men deze leugen nog langer in de lucht zal houden, nadat de VS minister van buitenlandse zaken, James ‘mad dog’ Mattis toegaf dat de VS regering totaal geen bewijs heeft dat Assad aanvallen heeft gepleegd met gifgas……. Ach, de grote gifgasaanval uit 2013 in Syrië wordt nog steeds toegeschreven aan Assad, terwijl na VN onderzoek o.l.v. Del Ponte bleek dat het gifgas van de ‘gematigde rebellen kwam…. ‘Gematigde rebellen’, zoals men in het westen de anti-Assad terreurgroepen noemt, groepen die zich naast het gebruik van gifgas schuldig maken aan het in het openbaar executeren van vermeende tegenstanders, verkrachting en marteling………
Hier het Anti-Media artikel over deze zaak:
The
US Now Admits There Is No Evidence Assad Used Sarin Gas in Syria
February
12, 2018 at 12:00 pm
Written
by Truth
In Media
(TIM) — U.S.
Secretary of Defense James Mattis confirmed that the U.S. government
has no evidence that the Syrian government used sarin gas on its
people— a claim that was used by the White House as justification
for an April 2017 launch of
59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Al Shayrat airfield in Syria.
On
Friday, Mattis said that
reports of chemical weapon use by the Syrian government have come
from aid groups and others, but that the U.S. doesn’t have any
evidence to support these assertions.
“We
have other reports from the battlefield from people who claim it’s
been used,” Mattis told reporters at the Pentagon. “We do not
have evidence of it.”
“We’re
looking for evidence of it, since clearly we are dealing with the
Assad regime that has used denial and deceit to hide their outlaw
actions,” Mattis continued. “We’re even more concerned about
the possibility of sarin use.”
Mattis
explained that he was not refuting the third-party reports of
chemical weapons used by the Syrian government led by President
Bashar Assad. Assad has steadfastly denied that his government has
used chemical weapons throughout the conflict.
In
2013, UN investigator Carla Del Ponte made note that Syrian rebels,
not the Assad regime, used chemical weapons in the two-year civil
war, contrary to assessments made by American officials.
According
to a report by
The Times of Israel:
“Carla
Del Ponte, head of the independent UN commission investigating
reports of chemical weapons use in Syria, told a Swiss-Italian
television station that UN investigators gleaned testimony from
victims of Syria’s civil war and medical staff which indicated that
rebel forces used sarin gas — a deadly nerve agent.
‘Our
investigators have been in neighboring countries interviewing
victims, doctors and field hospitals and, according to their report
of last week which I have seen, there are strong, concrete suspicions
but not yet incontrovertible proof of the use of sarin gas, from the
way the victims were treated,’ Del Ponte said in the interview,
translated by Reuters.
‘This
was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the
government authorities,’ she added.”
During
his comments on Friday, Mattis referred to the April 2017 cruise
missile strikes on a Syrian airbase, noting that the Syrian
government would “be ill-advised to go back to violating” the
chemical weapons prohibition.
In
addition to the UN investigation, one of the foremost academic
experts in the field of missile fired chemical weapons, Theodore
Postol, Professor of
Science, Technology and National Security Policy at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT), came forward in a series of
reports to note his opposition to the official Trump administration’s
narrative in regards to the Khan Sheikhoun nerve agent attack in
Syria, blamed on the Assad government, which precipitated the cruise
missile strikes by the U.S., according to a report in
the International Business Times. According to Postol, the Syrian gas
attack was not carried out by the Syrian government.
In
one of his reports, Postol concluded that the US government’s
report does not provide any “concrete” evidence that Assad was
responsible, adding it was more likely that the attack was
perpetrated by players on the ground.
Postol
wrote in his report:
“I
have reviewed the [White House’s] document carefully, and I
believe it can be shown, without doubt, that the document does not
provide any evidence whatsoever that the US government has concrete
knowledge that the government of Syria was the source of the chemical
attack in Khan Sheikhoun, Syria at roughly 6am to 7am on 4 April,
2017.
In
fact, a main piece of evidence that is cited in the document point to
an attack that was executed by individuals on the ground, not from an
aircraft, on the morning of 4 April.
This
conclusion is based on an assumption made by the White House when it
cited the source of the sarin release and the photographs of that
source. My own assessment is that the source was very likely tampered
with or staged, so no serious conclusion could be made from the
photographs cited by the White House.”
Postol noted that
he has “unambiguous evidence that the White House Intelligence
Report (WHR) of April 11, 2017 contains false and misleading claims
that could not possibly have been accepted in any professional review
by impartial intelligence experts.”
Postol
called for an independent investigation into the decision to launch
cruise missile strikes in Syria, concluding:
“It
is now obvious that this incident produced by the WHR, while just as
serious in terms of the dangers it created for US security, was a
clumsy and outright fabrication of a report that was certainly not
supported by the intelligence community.
In
this case, the president, supported by his staff, made a decision to
launch 59 cruise missiles at a Syrian air base. This action was
accompanied by serious risks of creating a confrontation with Russia,
and also undermining cooperative efforts to win the war against the
Islamic State.”
By Jay
Syrmopoulos /
Republished with permission / TruthInMedia.com / Report
a typo
===========================================
Zie ook: ‘Gifgasaanval Douma in elkaar gezet door ‘gematigde rebellen’‘
en: ‘John Bolton geeft terreurgroepen in Syrië de opdracht een false flag gifgasaanval uit te voeren‘
en: ‘VS aanval op Syrische basis, zoals gewoonlijk uitermate voorbarig en bijzonder gevaarlijk!!‘
en: ‘Van Kappen (VVD) noemt ‘stapelaanwijzingen’ het bewijs en is blij met raketaanval VS op Syrische basis, een aanval zonder enig echt bewijs voor Syrische schuld…….‘ (moet je nagaan wat er nu nog overblijft van de stelling die deze oorlogshitser maakte [of poneerde, wat je wilt] >> nul komma nada!)
en: ‘Al Jazeera filmde een onderdeel van de ‘gifgasshow’ in Khan Sheikhoun………..‘
en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….‘
en: ‘Vlaamse pater roept op niet langer de westerse anti-Syrië propaganda te geloven!‘
en: ‘Rusland heeft geen aanval uitgevoerd op VS troepen in Syrië…..‘
en: ‘Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..‘
en: ‘Hondsdolle VS valt Russische tank aan in poging de Russen te provoceren……‘
en: ‘Syrië: VS en Israëlische agressie dreigt de wereld in een oorlog te storten……‘
en: ‘Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld‘
en: ‘Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!‘
en: ‘BBC World Service en BNR met ‘fake news’ over Ghouta……..‘
en: ‘US Aggression in Syria – an Imperialist Blueprint‘
en: ‘SOHR, het orgaan dat door de reguliere media wordt aangehaald i.z. Syrië, is gevestigd in Coventry‘
