Gifmenger Monsanto verzekert al jaren dat haar gif Roundup veilig is, waarbij dit bedrijf de EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) noemt als overheidsorgaan, dat Roundup veilig voor gebruik verklaarde.
Uit vorige week vrijgegeven documenten blijkt nu dat Monsanto en de EPA samenwerkten om onderzoek naar kanker veroorzaakt door Roundup, onderzoek gedaan door de WHO (VN Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie) onderuit te halen……..
De EPA heeft de ‘wetenschappelijke gegevens’ van Monsanto overgenomen, waarbij de EPA ook nog eens alleen naar één chemisch onderdeel van dit gif heeft gekeken!! De top-toxicoloog van Monsanto, Donna Farmer moest zelfs toegeven, dat Monsanto niet had onderzocht of Roundup kankerverwekkend is……….
Hier het bericht dat ik hierover ontving van Anti-Media. Lezen mensen, u gelooft uw ogen niet!
It
Turns out Some Conspiracy Theories About Monsanto and Roundup Are
True
March
15, 2017 at 2:47 pm
Written
by Anti-Media
News Desk
For
years the company has assured farmers that their weed killing product
was absolutely safe to use. As proof, Monsanto touted the approval of
the chemical by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
That
said, newly unsealed court documents released earlier today seemingly
reveal a startling
effort on
the part of both Monsanto and the
EPA to work in concert to kill and/or discredit independent, albeit
inconvenient, cancer research conducted by the World Health
Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer
(IARC)…More on this later.
But,
before we get into the competing studies, here is a brief look at the
‘extensive’ work that Monsanto and the EPA did prior to
originally declaring Roundup safe for use (hint: not much). As the
excerpt below reveals, the EPA effectively declared Roundup safe for
use without even conducting tests on the actual formulation, but
instead relying on industry research on just one of the product’s
active ingredients.
“EPA’s
minimal standards do not require human health data submissions
related to the formulated product – here, Roundup. Instead, EPA
regulations require only studies and data that relate to the active
ingredient, which in the case of Roundup is glyphosate. As a result,
the body of scientific literature EPA has reviewed is not only
primarily provided by the industry, but it also only considers one
part of the chemical ingredients that make up Roundup.”
Meanwhile,
if that’s not enough for you, Donna Farmer, Monsanto’s lead
toxicologist, even admitted in her deposition that she “cannot
say that Roundup does not cause cancer” because “[w]e
[Monsanto] have not done the carcinogenicity studies with Roundup.”
And
just in case you’re the super skeptical type, here is Farmer’s
actual email, from back in 2009, which seems pretty clear:
“you
cannot say that Roundup does not cause cancer..we have not done
carcinogenicity studies with ‘Roundup.’”
And
while the revelations above are quite damning by themselves, this is
where things get really interesting.
In
early 2015, once it became clear that the World Health Organization’s
IARC was working on their own independent study of Roundup, Monsanto
immediately launched their own efforts to preemptively discredit any
results that might be deemed ‘inconvenient.’
That
said, Monsanto, the $60 billion behemoth, couldn’t
possibly afford
the $250,000 bill that would come with conducting a legitimate
scientific study led by accredited scientists. Instead, they
decided to
“ghost-write” key sections of their report themselves and plotted
to then have the independent scientists just “sign their names so
to speak.”
“A
less expensive/more palatable approach might be to involve experts
only for the areas of contention, epidemiology and possibly MOA
(depending on what comes out of the IARC meeting), and we ghost-write
the Exposure Tox & Genetox sections…but we would be keeping the
cost down by us doing the writing and they would just edit & sign
their names so to speak.”
Finally,
when all else fails, you call in those “special favors” in
Washington D.C. that you’ve paid handsomely for over the years.
And
that’s where Jess Rowland, the EPA’s Deputy Division Director for
the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention and chair of
the Agency’s Cancer Assessment Review Committee, comes in to assure
you that he’s fully exploiting his role as the “chair of the
CARC” to kill any potentially damaging research…”if I can kill
this I should get a medal.”
All
of which begs the question of whether the D.C. swamp is just too
large to be drained.
By Tyler
Durden /
Republished with permission / Zero
Hedge / Report
a typo
====================
Zie ook: ‘Bayer oefent druk uit op Nederland voor nieuw ‘bijengif…….’‘
en: ‘TTIP: wat ons te wachten staat >> verboden labeling van o.a. genetisch gemanipuleerde voeding……‘
en: ‘Van Dam (PvdA staatssecretaris), Monsanto lobbyist….. EU tekent waarschijnlijk voor nog 7 jaar lang vergiftiging mens en dier met glyfosaat………‘
en: ‘Monsanto ‘liefdadigheidsorganisatie die zich inzet voor wereldvoedselprobleem……‘‘
en: ‘Timmermans’ Europese Commissie dreigt in strijd met de regels het kankerverwekkend glyfosaat, opnieuw toe te laten op de EU markt………….‘
en: ‘EU: verbiedt het uiterst gevaarlijke glyfosaat voorgoed!‘
en: ‘Kamp (VVD) glyfosaat gifmenger van het jaar!‘
en: ‘Glyfosaat, de leugens van Monsanto over dit kankerverwekkend gif……….‘
en: ‘Bas Eickhout (‘GroenLinks’ EU): het is nodig dat glyfosaat nog 5 jaar gebruikt mag worden……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘
en: ‘Glyfosaat, een kankerverwekkend gif, nu ook gevonden in honing en graan……..‘
en: ‘Op aardbei zes keer meer landbouwgif dan op ander fruit………‘
en: ‘EPA tegenstrijdig over glyfosaat >> EU ‘politici’ laten als ware lobbyisten van o.a. gifmenger Monsanto het kankerverwekkende Roundup nog eens 5 jaar op ons los….‘
Zie daarnaast ook: Verbied gebruik glyfosaat tot er bewijzen zijn (De Standaard)http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20170426_02852617 en: Monsanto koopt wetenschap die de “onschuld” van glyfosaat bewijst.http://www.dewereldmorgen.be/artikel/2017/03/27/monsanto-koopt-wetenschap-die-de-onschuld-van-glyfosaat-bewijs
Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels D. Farmer, MOA en J. Rowland.
PS: u weet toch, dat Bayer tijdens WOII medische proeven heeft uitgevoerd op concentratiekamp gevangenen…??
