Beyond Vietnam: tijd om de stilte te doorbreken, een toespraak van Martin Luther King, een les ook voor de huidige tijd

Op 4
april 1967, opvallend* genoeg precies een jaar voor hij onder regie van de FBI werd vermoord,
gaf Martin Luther King (MLK) een toespraak in de Riverside Church
(New York) waarin hij de VS de grootste leverancier van geweld noemde op
de toenmalige wereld…….

Hoe
weinig is er veranderd sindsdien, sterker nog je kan nu zonder meer
stellen dat de VS de grootste terreurentiteit ter wereld is, de VS
ook aangeduid als het Vierde Rijk, met haar meer dan 800 militaire
bases over de wereld, de VS met haar voortdurende illegale oorlogsvoering (sinds het begin van de Obama administraties geen dag meer zonder oorlog…),
de VS met haar geheime militaire acties waar het maar uitkomt en met haar
moordprogramma uitgevoerd middels drones…… Alleen deze eeuw heeft de VS met hulp van haar oorlogshond NAVO al meer dan 5 miljoen mensen
vermoord…..

Het is
dan ook schunnig als je ziet dat de reguliere (westerse) media en
politici het moorddadig optreden van de VS steunen zonder te spreken
over het enorme aantal slachtoffers, terwijl ze tegelijkertijd
Rusland, China en Iran durven te beschuldigen van agressie en het
destabiliseren van de situatie in het Midden-Oosten, Azië en zelfs
het westen, de laatste met leugens over cyberaanvallen, waarvoor geen
flinter aan bewijs kan worden geleverd……

Het is juist ook nu van belang de stilte te doorbreken, de stilte over hoe mensen in massa’s worden vermoord door militairen van de VS en haar NAVO-partners, de stilte over het nog steeds verdrukte gekleurde volk in de VS, zelfs na de gekleurde president Obama die dan ook maar weinig of niets voor de gekleurde bevolking heeft gedaan, de politie vermoordt ze nog steeds op grote schaal…., de stilte over het bloedige beleid van Israël tegen het verdrukte Palestijnse volk, mogelijk gemaakt door de VS, de stilte over de genocide in Jemen uitgevoerd door de Saoedische terreurcoalitie, politiek en militair gesteund door de VS, Groot-Brittannië en Frankrijk (waar de laatste 2 hoofdzakelijk zorgen voor wapenleveranties aan Saoedi-Arabië en de training van soldaten), de stilte over de smerige spelletjes die de VS in veel landen speelt om de boel te destabiliseren en zelfs democratisch gekozen regeringen omver te werpen…… (waarna de VS een dictator aanstelt die braaf doet wat de VS verlangt…)

De stilte ook over de enorme vervuiling door het militaire apparaat, ook daarin is de VS de ‘grootste….’ (bovendien een fikse aanjager van de klimaatverandering, om over de vervuiling middels radioactieve munitie maar te zwijgen, de reden voor veel medische ellende nadat de VS is verdwenen**) De stilte over seismische proeven van de VS marine in de oceanen, die alles wat onderwater leeft in de nabijheid doet sterven en verder walvis- en dolfijnachtigen geheel in verwarring brengen, volgens deskundigen één van de redenen waarom zo nu en dan grote aantallen walvisachtigen stranden……. Tot slot de stilte in de reguliere westerse (massa-) media over de meeste van deze zaken (Black Liver Matter >> BLM is al lang weer vergeten….), een stilte die zelfs bewust wordt gehandhaafd door die media, zie ook hoe zogenaamde journalisten van die media, NB collega’s van Julian Assange die hem hebben besmeurd, hem voor verrader en spion hebben uitgemaakt en hem zelfs een charlatan durfden te noemen, terwijl één van de eerste onthullingen op Wikileaks het neerschieten was van burgers door militairen van de VS vanuit een helikopter, waarbij 2 journalisten van Reuters werden vermoord…… Hoe kan je je als journalist keren tegen een collega die dit soort vreselijke oorlogsmisdaden openbaart…???

Oh vergeet ik nog een belangrijke: laten we de stilte doorbreken die wordt veroorzaakt door de hysterie over het Coronavirus en waarmee in korte tijd een groot aantal burgerrechten geweld werd en wordt aangedaan!!

Lees de
toespraak van MLK en zie hoe weinig er is veranderd:

“Beyond
Vietnam”

A
Time to Break Silence

By
Rev. Martin Luther King

By 1967, King had
become the country’s most prominent opponent of the Vietnam War, and
a staunch critic of overall U.S. foreign policy, which he deemed
militaristic. In his “Beyond Vietnam” speech delivered at
New York’s Riverside Church on April 4, 1967 — a year to the day
before he was murdered — King called the United States “the
greatest purveyor of violence in the world today.”

Time magazine called
the speech “demagogic slander that sounded like a script for
Radio Hanoi,” and the Washington Post declared that King had
“diminished his usefulness to his cause, his country, his
people.”

Beyond
Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence

By Rev. Martin Luther
King
4 April 1967
Speech delivered by Dr. Martin Luther King,
Jr., on April 4, 1967, at a meeting of Clergy and Laity Concerned at
Riverside Church in New York City

I come to this magnificent
house of worship tonight because my conscience leaves me no other
choice. I join with you in this meeting because I am in deepest
agreement with the aims and work of the organization which has
brought us together: Clergy and Laymen Concerned about Vietnam. The
recent statement of your executive committee are the sentiments of my
own heart and I found myself in full accord when I read its opening
lines: “A time comes when silence is betrayal.” That time
has come for us in relation to Vietnam.

The truth of these
words is beyond doubt but the mission to which they call us is a most
difficult one. Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men
do not easily assume the task of opposing their government’s policy,
especially in time of war. Nor does the human spirit move without
great difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within
one’s own bosom and in the surrounding world. Moreover when the
issues at hand seem as perplexed as they often do in the case of this
dreadful conflict we are always on the verge of being mesmerized by
uncertainty; but we must move on.

Some of us who have already
begun to break the silence of the night have found that the calling
to speak is often a vocation of agony, but we must speak. We must
speak with all the humility that is appropriate to our limited
vision, but we must speak. And we must rejoice as well, for surely
this is the first time in our nation’s history that a significant
number of its religious leaders have chosen to move beyond the
prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm
dissent based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of
history. Perhaps a new spirit is rising among us. If it is, let us
trace its movement well and pray that our own inner being may be
sensitive to its guidance, for we are deeply in need of a new way
beyond the darkness that seems so close around us.

Over the
past two years, as I have moved to break the betrayal of my own
silences and to speak from the burnings of my own heart, as I have
called for radical departures from the destruction of Vietnam, many
persons have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. At the heart
of their concerns this query has often loomed large and loud: Why are
you speaking about war, Dr. King? Why are you joining the voices of
dissent? Peace and civil rights don’t mix, they say. Aren’t you
hurting the cause of your people, they ask? And when I hear them,
though I often understand the source of their concern, I am
nevertheless greatly saddened, for such questions mean that the
inquirers have not really known me, my commitment or my calling.
Indeed, their questions suggest that they do not know the world in
which they live.

In the light of such tragic
misunderstandings, I deem it of signal importance to try to state
clearly, and I trust concisely, why I believe that the path from
Dexter Avenue Baptist Church — the church in Montgomery, Alabama,
where I began my pastorate — leads clearly to this sanctuary
tonight.

I come to this platform tonight to make a passionate
plea to my beloved nation. This speech is not addressed to Hanoi or
to the National Liberation Front. It is not addressed to China or to
Russia.

Nor is it an attempt to overlook the ambiguity of the
total situation and the need for a collective solution to the tragedy
of Vietnam. Neither is it an attempt to make North Vietnam or the
National Liberation Front paragons of virtue, nor to overlook the
role they can play in a successful resolution of the problem. While
they both may have justifiable reason to be suspicious of the good
faith of the United States, life and history give eloquent testimony
to the fact that conflicts are never resolved without trustful give
and take on both sides.

Tonight, however, I wish not to speak
with Hanoi and the NLF, but rather to my fellow Americans, who, with
me, bear the greatest responsibility in ending a conflict that has
exacted a heavy price on both continents.

The Importance of
Vietnam
Since I am a preacher by trade, I suppose it is not
surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into
the field of my moral vision. There is at the outset a very obvious
and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the
struggle I, and others, have been waging in America. A few years ago
there was a shining moment in that struggle. It seemed as if there
was a real promise of hope for the poor — both black and white —
through the poverty program. There were experiments, hopes, new
beginnings. Then came the buildup in Vietnam and I watched the
program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political
plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would
never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its
poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and
skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube. So I was
increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to
attack it as such.

Perhaps the more tragic recognition of
reality took place when it became clear to me that the war was doing
far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at home. It was
sending their sons and their brothers and their husbands to fight and
to die in extraordinarily high proportions relative to the rest of
the population. We were taking the black young men who had been
crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to
guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in
southwest Georgia and East Harlem. So we have been repeatedly faced
with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white boys on TV screens
as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to
seat them together in the same schools. So we watch them in brutal
solidarity burning the huts of a poor village, but we realize that
they would never live on the same block in Detroit. I could not be
silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor.

My
third reason moves to an even deeper level of awareness, for it grows
out of my experience in the ghettoes of the North over the last three
years — especially the last three summers. As I have walked among
the desperate, rejected and angry young men I have told them that
Molotov cocktails and rifles would not solve their problems. I have
tried to offer them my deepest compassion while maintaining my
conviction that social change comes most meaningfully through
nonviolent action. But they asked — and rightly so — what about
Vietnam? They asked if our own nation wasn’t using massive doses of
violence to solve its problems, to bring about the changes it wanted.
Their questions hit home, and I knew that I could never again raise
my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without
having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in
the world today — my own government. For the sake of those boys, for
the sake of this government, for the sake of hundreds of thousands
trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent.

For those
who ask the question, “Aren’t you a civil rights leader?”
and thereby mean to exclude me from the movement for peace, I have
this further answer. In 1957 when a group of us formed the Southern
Christian Leadership Conference, we chose as our motto: “To save
the soul of America.” We were convinced that we could not limit
our vision to certain rights for black people, but instead affirmed
the conviction that America would never be free or saved from itself
unless the descendants of its slaves were loosed completely from the
shackles they still wear. In a way we were agreeing with Langston
Hughes, that black bard of Harlem, who had written earlier:

O,
yes,
I say it plain,
America never was America to me,
And
yet I swear this oath–
America will be!

Now, it should be
incandescently clear that no one who has any concern for the
integrity and life of America today can ignore the present war. If
America’s soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must
read Vietnam. It can never be saved so long as it destroys the
deepest hopes of men the world over. So it is that those of us who
are yet determined that America will be are led down the path of
protest and dissent, working for the health of our land.

As if
the weight of such a commitment to the life and health of America
were not enough, another burden of responsibility was placed upon me
in 1964; and I cannot forget that the Nobel Prize for Peace was also
a commission — a commission to work harder than I had ever worked
before for “the brotherhood of man.” This is a calling that
takes me beyond national allegiances, but even if it were not present
I would yet have to live with the meaning of my commitment to the
ministry of Jesus Christ. To me the relationship of this ministry to
the making of peace is so obvious that I sometimes marvel at those
who ask me why I am speaking against the war. Could it be that they
do not know that the good news was meant for all men — for Communist
and capitalist, for their children and ours, for black and for white,
for revolutionary and conservative? Have they forgotten that my
ministry is in obedience to the one who loved his enemies so fully
that he died for them? What then can I say to the “Vietcong”
or to Castro or to Mao as a faithful minister of this one? Can I
threaten them with death or must I not share with them my
life?

Finally, as I try to delineate for you and for myself
the road that leads from Montgomery to this place I would have
offered all that was most valid if I simply said that I must be true
to my conviction that I share with all men the calling to be a son of
the living God. Beyond the calling of race or nation or creed is this
vocation of sonship and brotherhood, and because I believe that the
Father is deeply concerned especially for his suffering and helpless
and outcast children, I come tonight to speak for them.

This I
believe to be the privilege and the burden of all of us who deem
ourselves bound by allegiances and loyalties which are broader and
deeper than nationalism and which go beyond our nation’s self-defined
goals and positions. We are called to speak for the weak, for the
voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy,
for no document from human hands can make these humans any less our
brothers.

Strange Liberators
And as I ponder the madness of
Vietnam and search within myself for ways to understand and respond
to compassion my mind goes constantly to the people of that
peninsula. I speak now not of the soldiers of each side, not of the
junta in Saigon, but simply of the people who have been living under
the curse of war for almost three continuous decades now. I think of
them too because it is clear to me that there will be no meaningful
solution there until some attempt is made to know them and hear their
broken cries.

They must see Americans as strange liberators.
The Vietnamese people proclaimed their own independence in 1945 after
a combined French and Japanese occupation, and before the Communist
revolution in China. They were led by Ho Chi Minh. Even though they
quoted the American Declaration of Independence in their own document
of freedom, we refused to recognize them. Instead, we decided to
support France in its reconquest of her former colony.

Our
government felt then that the Vietnamese people were not “ready”
for independence, and we again fell victim to the deadly Western
arrogance that has poisoned the international atmosphere for so long.
With that tragic decision we rejected a revolutionary government
seeking self-determination, and a government that had been
established not by China (for whom the Vietnamese have no great love)
but by clearly indigenous forces that included some Communists. For
the peasants this new government meant real land reform, one of the
most important needs in their lives.

For nine years following
1945 we denied the people of Vietnam the right of independence. For
nine years we vigorously supported the French in their abortive
effort to recolonize Vietnam.

Before the end of the war we
were meeting eighty percent of the French war costs. Even before the
French were defeated at Dien Bien Phu, they began to despair of the
reckless action, but we did not. We encouraged them with our huge
financial and military supplies to continue the war even after they
had lost the will. Soon we would be paying almost the full costs of
this tragic attempt at recolonization.

After the French were
defeated it looked as if independence and land reform would come
again through the Geneva agreements. But instead there came the
United States, determined that Ho should not unify the temporarily
divided nation, and the peasants watched again as we supported one of
the most vicious modern dictators — our chosen man, Premier Diem.
The peasants watched and cringed as Diem ruthlessly routed out all
opposition, supported their extortionist landlords and refused even
to discuss reunification with the north. The peasants watched as all
this was presided over by U.S. influence and then by increasing
numbers of U.S. troops who came to help quell the insurgency that
Diem’s methods had aroused. When Diem was overthrown they may have
been happy, but the long line of military dictatorships seemed to
offer no real change — especially in terms of their need for land
and peace.

The only change came from America as we increased
our troop commitments in support of governments which were singularly
corrupt, inept and without popular support. All the while the people
read our leaflets and received regular promises of peace and
democracy — and land reform. Now they languish under our bombs and
consider us — not their fellow Vietnamese –the real enemy. They
move sadly and apathetically as we herd them off the land of their
fathers into concentration camps where minimal social needs are
rarely met. They know they must move or be destroyed by our bombs. So
they go — primarily women and children and the aged.

They
watch as we poison their water, as we kill a million acres of their
crops. They must weep as the bulldozers roar through their areas
preparing to destroy the precious trees. They wander into the
hospitals, with at least twenty casualties from American firepower
for one “Vietcong”-inflicted injury. So far we may have
killed a million of them — mostly children. They wander into the
towns and see thousands of the children, homeless, without clothes,
running in packs on the streets like animals. They see the children,
degraded by our soldiers as they beg for food. They see the children
selling their sisters to our soldiers, soliciting for their
mothers.

What do the peasants think as we ally ourselves with
the landlords and as we refuse to put any action into our many words
concerning land reform? What do they think as we test our latest
weapons on them, just as the Germans tested out new medicine and new
tortures in the concentration camps of Europe? Where are the roots of
the independent Vietnam we claim to be building? Is it among these
voiceless ones?

We have destroyed their two most cherished
institutions: the family and the village. We have destroyed their
land and their crops. We have cooperated in the crushing of the
nation’s only non-Communist revolutionary political force — the
unified Buddhist church. We have supported the enemies of the
peasants of Saigon. We have corrupted their women and children and
killed their men. What liberators?

Now there is little left to
build on — save bitterness. Soon the only solid physical foundations
remaining will be found at our military bases and in the concrete of
the concentration camps we call fortified hamlets. The peasants may
well wonder if we plan to build our new Vietnam on such grounds as
these? Could we blame them for such thoughts? We must speak for them
and raise the questions they cannot raise. These too are our
brothers.

Perhaps the more difficult but no less necessary
task is to speak for those who have been designated as our enemies.
What of the National Liberation Front — that strangely anonymous
group we call VC or Communists? What must they think of us in America
when they realize that we permitted the repression and cruelty of
Diem which helped to bring them into being as a resistance group in
the south? What do they think of our condoning the violence which led
to their own taking up of arms? How can they believe in our integrity
when now we speak of “aggression from the north” as if
there were nothing more essential to the war? How can they trust us
when now we charge them with violence after the murderous reign of
Diem and charge them with violence while we pour every new weapon of
death into their land? Surely we must understand their feelings even
if we do not condone their actions. Surely we must see that the men
we supported pressed them to their violence. Surely we must see that
our own computerized plans of destruction simply dwarf their greatest
acts.

How do they judge us when our officials know that their
membership is less than twenty-five percent Communist and yet insist
on giving them the blanket name? What must they be thinking when they
know that we are aware of their control of major sections of Vietnam
and yet we appear ready to allow national elections in which this
highly organized political parallel government will have no part?
They ask how we can speak of free elections when the Saigon press is
censored and controlled by the military junta. And they are surely
right to wonder what kind of new government we plan to help form
without them — the only party in real touch with the peasants. They
question our political goals and they deny the reality of a peace
settlement from which they will be excluded. Their questions are
frighteningly relevant. Is our nation planning to build on political
myth again and then shore it up with the power of new violence?

Here
is the true meaning and value of compassion and nonviolence when it
helps us to see the enemy’s point of view, to hear his questions, to
know his assessment of ourselves. For from his view we may indeed see
the basic weaknesses of our own condition, and if we are mature, we
may learn and grow and profit from the wisdom of the brothers who are
called the opposition.

So, too, with Hanoi. In the north,
where our bombs now pummel the land, and our mines endanger the
waterways, we are met by a deep but understandable mistrust. To speak
for them is to explain this lack of confidence in Western words, and
especially their distrust of American intentions now. In Hanoi are
the men who led the nation to independence against the Japanese and
the French, the men who sought membership in the French commonwealth
and were betrayed by the weakness of Paris and the willfulness of the
colonial armies. It was they who led a second struggle against French
domination at tremendous costs, and then were persuaded to give up
the land they controlled between the thirteenth and seventeenth
parallel as a temporary measure at Geneva. After 1954 they watched us
conspire with Diem to prevent elections which would have surely
brought Ho Chi Minh to power over a united Vietnam, and they realized
they had been betrayed again.

When we ask why they do not leap
to negotiate, these things must be remembered. Also it must be clear
that the leaders of Hanoi considered the presence of American troops
in support of the Diem regime to have been the initial military
breach of the Geneva agreements concerning foreign troops, and they
remind us that they did not begin to send in any large number of
supplies or men until American forces had moved into the tens of
thousands.

Hanoi remembers how our leaders refused to tell us
the truth about the earlier North Vietnamese overtures for peace, how
the president claimed that none existed when they had clearly been
made. Ho Chi Minh has watched as America has spoken of peace and
built up its forces, and now he has surely heard of the increasing
international rumors of American plans for an invasion of the north.
He knows the bombing and shelling and mining we are doing are part of
traditional pre-invasion strategy. Perhaps only his sense of humor
and of irony can save him when he hears the most powerful nation of
the world speaking of aggression as it drops thousands of bombs on a
poor weak nation more than eight thousand miles away from its
shores.

At this point I should make it clear that while I have
tried in these last few minutes to give a voice to the voiceless on
Vietnam and to understand the arguments of those who are called
enemy, I am as deeply concerned about our troops there as anything
else. For it occurs to me that what we are submitting them to in
Vietnam is not simply the brutalizing process that goes on in any war
where armies face each other and seek to destroy. We are adding
cynicism to the process of death, for they must know after a short
period there that none of the things we claim to be fighting for are
really involved. Before long they must know that their government has
sent them into a struggle among Vietnamese, and the more
sophisticated surely realize that we are on the side of the wealthy
and the secure while we create hell for the poor.

This Madness
Must Cease
Somehow this madness must cease. We must stop now. I
speak as a child of God and brother to the suffering poor of Vietnam.
I speak for those whose land is being laid waste, whose homes are
being destroyed, whose culture is being subverted. I speak for the
poor of America who are paying the double price of smashed hopes at
home and death and corruption in Vietnam. I speak as a citizen of the
world, for the world as it stands aghast at the path we have taken. I
speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great
initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be
ours.

This is the message of the great Buddhist leaders of
Vietnam. Recently one of them wrote these words:

“Each
day the war goes on the hatred increases in the heart of the
Vietnamese and in the hearts of those of humanitarian instinct. The
Americans are forcing even their friends into becoming their enemies.
It is curious that the Americans, who calculate so carefully on the
possibilities of military victory, do not realize that in the process
they are incurring deep psychological and political defeat. The image
of America will never again be the image of revolution, freedom and
democracy, but the image of violence and militarism.”

If
we continue, there will be no doubt in my mind and in the mind of the
world that we have no honorable intentions in Vietnam. It will become
clear that our minimal expectation is to occupy it as an American
colony and men will not refrain from thinking that our maximum hope
is to goad China into a war so that we may bomb her nuclear
installations. If we do not stop our war against the people of
Vietnam immediately the world will be left with no other alternative
than to see this as some horribly clumsy and deadly game we have
decided to play.

The world now demands a maturity of America
that we may not be able to achieve. It demands that we admit that we
have been wrong from the beginning of our adventure in Vietnam, that
we have been detrimental to the life of the Vietnamese people. The
situation is one in which we must be ready to turn sharply from our
present ways.

In order to atone for our sins and errors in
Vietnam, we should take the initiative in bringing a halt to this
tragic war. I would like to suggest five concrete things that our
government should do immediately to begin the long and difficult
process of extricating ourselves from this nightmarish
conflict:

End all bombing in North and South
Vietnam.
Declare a unilateral cease-fire in the hope that such
action will create the atmosphere for negotiation.
Take immediate
steps to prevent other battlegrounds in Southeast Asia by curtailing
our military buildup in Thailand and our interference in
Laos.
Realistically accept the fact that the National Liberation
Front has substantial support in South Vietnam and must thereby play
a role in any meaningful negotiations and in any future Vietnam
government.
Set a date that we will remove all foreign troops from
Vietnam in accordance with the 1954 Geneva agreement.

Part of
our ongoing commitment might well express itself in an offer to grant
asylum to any Vietnamese who fears for his life under a new regime
which included the Liberation Front. Then we must make what
reparations we can for the damage we have done. We most provide the
medical aid that is badly needed, making it available in this country
if necessary.

Protesting The War
Meanwhile we in the
churches and synagogues have a continuing task while we urge our
government to disengage itself from a disgraceful commitment. We must
continue to raise our voices if our nation persists in its perverse
ways in Vietnam. We must be prepared to match actions with words by
seeking out every creative means of protest possible.

As we
counsel young men concerning military service we must clarify for
them our nation’s role in Vietnam and challenge them with the
alternative of conscientious objection. I am pleased to say that this
is the path now being chosen by more than seventy students at my own
alma mater, Morehouse College, and I recommend it to all who find the
American course in Vietnam a dishonorable and unjust one. Moreover I
would encourage all ministers of draft age to give up their
ministerial exemptions and seek status as conscientious objectors.
These are the times for real choices and not false ones. We are at
the moment when our lives must be placed on the line if our nation is
to survive its own folly. Every man of humane convictions must decide
on the protest that best suits his convictions, but we must all
protest.

There is something seductively tempting about
stopping there and sending us all off on what in some circles has
become a popular crusade against the war in Vietnam. I say we must
enter the struggle, but I wish to go on now to say something even
more disturbing. The war in Vietnam is but a symptom of a far deeper
malady within the American spirit, and if we ignore this sobering
reality we will find ourselves organizing clergy- and
laymen-concerned committees for the next generation. They will be
concerned about Guatemala and Peru. They will be concerned about
Thailand and Cambodia. They will be concerned about Mozambique and
South Africa. We will be marching for these and a dozen other names
and attending rallies without end unless there is a significant and
profound change in American life and policy. Such thoughts take us
beyond Vietnam, but not beyond our calling as sons of the living
God.

In 1957 a sensitive American official overseas said that
it seemed to him that our nation was on the wrong side of a world
revolution. During the past ten years we have seen emerge a pattern
of suppression which now has justified the presence of U.S. military
“advisors” in Venezuela. This need to maintain social
stability for our investments accounts for the counter-revolutionary
action of American forces in Guatemala. It tells why American
helicopters are being used against guerrillas in Colombia and why
American napalm and green beret forces have already been active
against rebels in Peru. It is with such activity in mind that the
words of the late John F. Kennedy come back to haunt us. Five years
ago he said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will
make violent revolution inevitable.”

Increasingly, by
choice or by accident, this is the role our nation has taken — the
role of those who make peaceful revolution impossible by refusing to
give up the privileges and the pleasures that come from the immense
profits of overseas investment.

I am convinced that if we are
to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must
undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the
shift from a “thing-oriented” society to a
“person-oriented” society. When machines and computers,
profit motives and property rights are considered more important than
people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are
incapable of being conquered.

A true revolution of values will
soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our
past and present policies. n the one hand we are called to play the
good Samaritan on life’s roadside; but that will be only an initial
act. One day we must come to see that the whole Jericho road must be
transformed so that men and women will not be constantly beaten and
robbed as they make their journey on life’s highway. True compassion
is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and
superficial. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars
needs restructuring. A true revolution of values will soon look
uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With
righteous indignation, it will look across the seas and see
individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in
Asia, Africa and South America, only to take the profits out with no
concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say: “This
is not just.” It will look at our alliance with the landed
gentry of Latin America and say: “This is not just.” The
Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others
and nothing to learn from them is not just. A true revolution of
values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: “This
way of settling differences is not just.” This business of
burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation’s homes with
orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into veins
of people normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody
battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged,
cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice and love. A nation that
continues year after year to spend more money on military defense
than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual
death.

America, the richest and most powerful nation in the
world, can well lead the way in this revolution of values. There is
nothing, except a tragic death wish, to prevent us from reordering
our priorities, so that the pursuit of peace will take precedence
over the pursuit of war. There is nothing to keep us from molding a
recalcitrant status quo with bruised hands until we have fashioned it
into a brotherhood.

This kind of positive revolution of values
is our best defense against communism. War is not the answer.
Communism will never be defeated by the use of atomic bombs or
nuclear weapons. Let us not join those who shout war and through
their misguided passions urge the United States to relinquish its
participation in the United Nations. These are days which demand wise
restraint and calm reasonableness. We must not call everyone a
Communist or an appeaser who advocates the seating of Red China in
the United Nations and who recognizes that hate and hysteria are not
the final answers to the problem of these turbulent days. We must not
engage in a negative anti-communism, but rather in a positive thrust
for democracy, realizing that our greatest defense against communism
is to take offensive action in behalf of justice. We must with
positive action seek to remove thosse conditions of poverty,
insecurity and injustice which are the fertile soil in which the seed
of communism grows and develops.

The People Are
Important
These are revolutionary times. All over the globe men
are revolting against old systems of exploitation and oppression and
out of the wombs of a frail world new systems of justice and equality
are being born. The shirtless and barefoot people of the land are
rising up as never before. “The people who sat in darkness have
seen a great light.” We in the West must support these
revolutions. It is a sad fact that, because of comfort, complacency,
a morbid fear of communism, and our proneness to adjust to injustice,
the Western nations that initiated so much of the revolutionary
spirit of the modern world have now become the arch
anti-revolutionaries. This has driven many to feel that only Marxism
has the revolutionary spirit. Therefore, communism is a judgement
against our failure to make democracy real and follow through on the
revolutions we initiated. Our only hope today lies in our ability to
recapture the revolutionary spirit and go out into a sometimes
hostile world declaring eternal hostility to poverty, racism, and
militarism. With this powerful commitment we shall boldly challenge
the status quo and unjust mores and thereby speed the day when “every
valley shall be exalted, and every moutain and hill shall be made
low, and the crooked shall be made straight and the rough places
plain.”

A genuine revolution of values means in the final
analysis that our loyalties must become ecumenical rather than
sectional. Every nation must now develop an overriding loyalty to
mankind as a whole in order to preserve the best in their individual
societies.

This call for a world-wide fellowship that lifts
neighborly concern beyond one’s tribe, race, class and nation is in
reality a call for an all-embracing and unconditional love for all
men. This oft misunderstood and misinterpreted concept — so readily
dismissed by the Nietzsches of the world as a weak and cowardly force
— has now become an absolute necessity for the survival of man. When
I speak of love I am not speaking of some sentimental and weak
response. I am speaking of that force which all of the great
religions have seen as the supreme unifying principle of life. Love
is somehow the key that unlocks the door which leads to ultimate
reality. This Hindu-Moslem-Christian-Jewish-Buddhist belief about
ultimate reality is beautifully summed up in the first epistle of
Saint John:

Let us love one another; for love is God and
everyone that loveth is born of God and knoweth God. He that loveth
not knoweth not God; for God is love. If we love one another God
dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us.

Let us hope
that this spirit will become the order of the day. We can no longer
afford to worship the god of hate or bow before the altar of
retaliation. The oceans of history are made turbulent by the
ever-rising tides of hate. History is cluttered with the wreckage of
nations and individuals that pursued this self-defeating path of
hate. As Arnold Toynbee says : “Love is the ultimate force that
makes for the saving choice of life and good against the damning
choice of death and evil. Therefore the first hope in our inventory
must be the hope that love is going to have the last word.”

We
are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted
with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life
and history there is such a thing as being too late. Procrastination
is still the thief of time. Life often leaves us standing bare, naked
and dejected with a lost opportunity. The “tide in the affairs
of men” does not remain at the flood; it ebbs. We may cry out
deperately for time to pause in her passage, but time is deaf to
every plea and rushes on. Over the bleached bones and jumbled residue
of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words: “Too
late.” There is an invisible book of life that faithfully
records our vigilance or our neglect. “The moving finger writes,
and having writ moves on…” We still have a choice today;
nonviolent coexistence or violent co-annihilation.

We must
move past indecision to action. We must find new ways to speak for
peace in Vietnam and justice throughout the developing world — a
world that borders on our doors. If we do not act we shall surely be
dragged down the long dark and shameful corridors of time reserved
for those who possess power without compassion, might without
morality, and strength without sight.

Now let us begin. Now
let us rededicate ourselves to the long and bitter — but beautiful
— struggle for a new world. This is the callling of the sons of God,
and our brothers wait eagerly for our response. Shall we say the odds
are too great? Shall we tell them the struggle is too hard? Will our
message be that the forces of American life militate against their
arrival as full men, and we send our deepest regrets? Or will there
be another message, of longing, of hope, of solidarity with their
yearnings, of commitment to their cause, whatever the cost? The
choice is ours, and though we might prefer it otherwise we must
choose in this crucial moment of human history.

As that noble
bard of yesterday, James Russell Lowell, eloquently stated:

Once
to every man and nation
Comes the moment to decide,
In the
strife of truth and falsehood,
For the good or evil side;
Some
great cause, God’s new Messiah,
Off’ring each the bloom or
blight,
And the choice goes by forever
Twixt that darkness and
that light.

Though the cause of evil prosper,
Yet ’tis
truth alone is strong;
Though her portion be the scaffold,
And
upon the throne be wrong:
Yet that scaffold sways the future,
And
behind the dim unknown,
Standeth God within the shadow
Keeping
watch above his own.

FBI
‘honors’ Martin Luther King Jr., 50 years after plotting to
‘neutralize’ him

=============================================

*  Ik ben ervan overtuigd dat deze toespraak van Martin Luther King tevens zijn doodvonnis was, niet voor niets dat hij precies een jaar na deze toespraak werd vermoord door de FBI…….. (hoe ongelofelijk cynisch, maar ja wat wil je: de FBI en dan ook nog eens in de 60er jaren, toen Hoover, de topgraaier van deze terreurrorganisatie, zich nog oppermachtig voelde, al werd er al flink aan z’n stoelpoten gezaagd)

** Wat doet denken aan het enorme aantal slachtoffers in Vietnam door het gebruik van Agent Orange door de VS in die smerige door de VS gevoerde illegale oorlog, nog steeds eist dat Agent Orange slachtoffers onder kinderen die een leven vol ellende wacht……

Zie ook: ‘Joe Biden, de nieuwe VS president heeft een ‘grote’ racistische geschiedenis

Martin Luther King: vrede en gelijkheid is mogelijk‘ 

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: 8 wijze lessen!)

Martin Luther King: de moord van 50 jaar geleden door de VS overheid uiterst beperkt herdacht

Als Martin Luther King nog zou leven was hij onderwerp van censuur en was zijn Facebook pagina verwijderd

NAVO, het grootste militaire verbond maakt zich schuldig aan grootschalige terreur i.p.v. de vrede te bewaren‘ (o.a. geluidsfragmenten met het protest van King tegen de oorlog in Vietnam)

Thomas Merton >> een kritische rk geestelijke vermoord in hetzelfde jaar als Robert F. Kennedy en Martin Luther King

Fred Hampton 30 augustus 1948 – 4 december 1969 >> mensenrechtenactivist vermoord door FBI en Chicago politie

Martin Luther King: de moord van 50 jaar geleden door de VS overheid uiterst beperkt herdacht

Martin Luther King jr. vermoord door de overheid, aldus rechter……..

De
langzame moord op de ideeën van Martin Luther King……………..
Ofwel: Dr. Martin Luther Kings lessen willens en wetens verzwegen….

De oorlog tegen het arme deel van de VS bevolking

Nam Kurt Cobain zijn eigen leven? Niet volgens een flink aantal mensen

Martin Luther King misbruikt door Radio1

Paul
Scheffer, het media-orakel met een ‘vlijmscherpe analyse’ over het
racistische optreden van de politie in de VS……… AUW!!!

Willem Post over de zegeningen van het zero tolerance beleid in de VS en ach, het is misschien ietsje doorgeschoten…….  

Voor berichten over Julian Assange, klik op het label met zijn naam, direct onder dit bericht.

Een anti-fascistisch manifest over de vermoorde Chileense politiek activist en protestzanger Victor Jara

Desiree
Hellegers heeft een uitgebreid artikel geschreven over de door de
VS georganiseerde en geregisseerde coup tegen het socialistische
bewind van Salvador Allende op 11 september 1973 (de eerste 9/11).

Hellegers
begint haar artikel met de vraag op Facebook van haar vriendengroep waar zij zich bevonden
gedurende belangrijke gebeurtenissen als de 9/11 aanvallen op de Twin
Towers en de moord op John F. Kennedy in 1963. Ze vraagt zich af of
ze later op de huidige tijd zal terugkijken als een korte pauze in
het afzakken van de VS naar een ‘full blown’ fascistische staat (het
aantreden van Biden als VS president ziet ze dan als pauze*). Als dat gebeurt
zal ook de klimaatverandering verder worden aangejaagd door de VS,
wat overigens ook gebeurde onder Obama, die zelfs toestemming gaf
voor de bouw van een enorme kolencentrale aan de rand van een uiterst
belangrijk natuurgebied de Sundarbans dit over de grens met India in dit natuurgebied, op de kant behorend tot Bangladesh……… 

Onder Obama werd de
VS de op één na grootste steenkoolexporteur, de absolute nummer 1 is het als de VS zo
door de klimaatverandering geteisterde Australië dat nu nog 1
miljoen ton steenkool per dag exporteert en daar binnenkort nog een
fikse schep bovenop doet, als de nieuwste en grootste
steenkoolterminal ter wereld wordt geopend, waarvoor een zeekanaal dwars door het Groot
Barrièrerif werd gegraven…… Het is maar de vraag of Biden inderdaad een andere koers zal inslaan, immers ook hij is een marionet van de oliemaatschappijen, het militair-industrieel complex en de financiële maffia…….*

Ook
besteedt Hellegers aandacht aan de illegale oorlog van de VS tegen
het Noord-Vietnamese volk en bijvoorbeeld de rol van Henry Kissinger,
een uitermate smerige oorlogsmisdadiger die al lang in Scheveningen
gevangen had moeten zitten (na te zijn berecht door het
Internationaal Strafhof >> ICC)… Echter deze schoft, die
schunnig genoeg ook de Nobelprijs voor de Vrede kreeg, zal gewoon in
een bed buiten de gevangenis sterven, zoals zoveel witte
oorlogsmisdadigers……   

Hellegers wijst o.a. op de triomf van het huidige Chileense volk dat in een
referendum eiste dat de grondwet die door Pinochet in 1980 werd
opgesteld wordt vervangen door een nieuwe grondwet en waarmee men nu
bezig is deze op te stellen.

‘Terug
naar Chili van 1973’ en de bloedige coup van fascist,
massamoordenaar, verkrachter en martelbeul Pinochet, die zoals gezegd
werd gesteund door de VS (ofwel de CIA, zonder deze hulp was de coup mislukt!!).
Hellegers spreekt veel over de politiek activist, protestzanger en
schrijver Victor Jara, die eveneens werd vermoord na de bloedige
staatsgreep in 1973, samen met minstens 3.000 anderen, o.a. bestaande
uit intellectuelen, studenten, professoren, advocaten en politiek activisten.

Lees
het uitgebreide artikel van Hellegers en zegt het voort, de reguliere
media hebben amper aandacht voor de enorme invloed van de VS die
zoals gezegd ook de grondslag was voor de coup in het Chili van
1973….. (overigens heeft de VS voor en na die coup nog meer staatsgrepen
met wapens, organisatie en regie gesteund in Latijns Amerika, zoals
die in Guatemala, Honduras, Brazilië en die tegen de socialistische president
Morales van Bolivia….) In het artikel verder een vergelijking van Victor Jara met Martiun Luther King en een korte beschuwing over het ijskoude inhumane neoliberalisme, geïntroduceerd door de duivels Margareth Thatcher, de Britse ex-premier en C-acteur en VS president Ronald Reagan, een politieke ideologie die de meeste westerse landen schunnig genoeg nog steeds volgen….. (‘onze’ huidige valse premier Rutte stelt wel dat hij het neoliberalisme niet meer als leidraad neemt, echter dat is de zoveelste leugen van deze aartsleugenaar!!)

CounterPunch

January
1, 2021

Victor
Jara’s Hands: An Anti-Fascist Memoir-festo and Brief Personal
History of Neoliberalism

by Desiree
Hellegers

You can easily carbon
date your friends on Facebook based on where they were during any
major milestone in U.S. history. As a university professor teaching
now for decades at what we euphemistically call a “land grant”
university, many of my students these days were born after 9-11–into
the U.S.’s seemingly endless “War on Terror.” It’s a war that
some of their family members died in, but one that few of them seem
to know much about.

Last month, older
friends on Facebook who came of age in the 1960s were busy reflecting
on what they were doing when they heard the news that JFK had been
assassinated. Personally, I had only recently graduated from diapers
to plastic pants and was likely occupied with important matters like
trying to do the twist in front of the TV while my grandmother
clapped and sloshed Scotch all over her TV table. But like most
Americans who have not washed down decades of Rush Limbaugh with
great swigs of QAnon Kool-Aid, I can’t help but wonder how we will
look back at this moment in history. Is this the moment we turn the
tide, or is it a brief respite from the country’s descent into
full-blown fascism? The latter scenario would mean, of course, full
speed ahead into climate collapse, given that the U.S. military is
hands down the single largest carbon emissions machine on the planet,
and our collective dust speck is already close to the boiling point.

May you live in
interesting times. You got that right. These times are so interesting
that we’ve had a lame duck president holed up in the White House
consulting with his legal team from the Island of Malevolent Misfit
Toys about the possibilities for declaring martial law to overturn
the results of the election and it’s not the top story.

That stands to reason,
I guess, when you’ve got a pandemic death count equivalent of a
hundred 9-11s, and across the country bodies stacking up like
cordwood in overstuffed mobile morgue units.

It’s hard to sustain
the level of national alert so many of us felt during the run up to
the election and the vote count, when Trump’s
automatic-weapon-waving goon squads were busy battering on windows at
voting precincts or sky-writing “Surrender Gretchen” over the
Michigan State House. A meme was making the rounds at the time on
Facebook: American politics as Night of the Living Dead. Personally,
I was starting to feel like an insomnia-addled Lady Macbeth who’d
been mainlining Halloween candy or days, and as in all things, I
blamed my lovely spouse, who had shopped for Halloween candy like he
was stocking up for Y2K.

Like me, my spouse
knows how to brace for the worst, a skill we bonded over when we met
organizing against the second Gulf War. One of the biggest
misconceptions about the anti-war “movement,” if such a thing
exists right now, is that peace activists somehow hate veterans.
Since well before the war in Vietnam, the U.S. military has given
veterans critical insight into the American war machine, along with
heavy helpings of trauma and self-loathing. Some of my favorite peace
activists are veterans, my spouse chief and foremost among them. We
bonded organizing protests and staging a die-in in front of the
Portland federal building. It was one of those “what are you doing
after the die-in?” kinds of courtships.

I don’t remember
exactly when I began thinking of Victor Jara’s hands and how they’d
been crushed by Chilean soldiers in the early days of the
U.S.-sponsored Chilean coup in 1973. I do know, though, that as my
spouse and I took a left turn to drop our ballots off at our local
library, Victor Jara had been on both our minds. It wasn’t a total
coincidence, given that only a day or two before, on October 25,
Chileans had voted overwhelmingly in favor of drafting a new
constitution.

The referendum was a
concession wrenched from President Sebastian Piñera following a year
of street protests and civil unrest. The vote was a definitive
kiss-off
to the Chilean constitution of 1980
, enacted under the regime of
General Augusto Pinochet.

Living in the U.S.,
you’d never know that Chile had had its own national disaster on
September 11, nearly three decades before the U.S.

Not many Americans can
define neoliberalism, let alone know that on September 11, 1973, it
was ushered into Chile by U.S.-made tanks and at the butt of
U.S.-made guns—automatic weapons of the sort Trump’s “very
fine” friends never seem to tire of waving. And not at all unlike
the militarized Portland Police, and the BORTAC and Homeland Security
armies that spent all summer pounding and traumatizing friends of
mine in the streets of Portland, and spraying them with chemical
weapons
long ago judged too dangerous to use in war, the health
effects being so severe and long term.

It was on September
11, 1973, that Richard Nixon and his henchman Henry Kissinger swept
Pinochet to power as the front man for the U.S.-sponsored
“experiment” in neoliberalism. A folksinger-songwriter, often
referred to as “Chile’s Bob Dylan,” Victor Jara would be the
most visible of more than 3,000 Chileans executed by Pinochet’s
death squads in September, as the coup began. You can get a quick
overview of the horrors that the U.S. helped unleash on Chileans in
the 1970s by watching the 2019 Netflix documentary
Massacre
at the Stadium.

Shortly after
Pinochet’s reign of terror began, an estimated five thousand were
detained at a Santiago stadium—then named Estadio Chile, and since
renamed Estadio Victor Jara—and another twenty thousand at the
Estadio Nacional across town. Professors, students, musicians, farm
and factory workers were crowded shoulder to shoulder and sorted into
lines to live or die, to be interrogated, beaten, tortured, and/or
murdered. At Estadio Chile, more than seventy were executed on site,
while others were “disappeared.” Today a quote painted on the
back of the Estadio Nacional reads: “Un
pueblo sin memoria es un pueblo sin futuro
” – “A people
without memory are a people without a future.”

Jara grew up poor, in
a family of farmworkers, but went on to become a theater director and
teacher, and to achieve international visibility with songs like
“Manifesto,” which speaks to Jara’s understanding of art
as a critical tool in struggles for justice, as an instrument of
decolonizing resistance, of spiritual, material, and ecological
liberation.

I don’t sing for
the love of singing, /or because I have a good voice,” sang
Jara
, “I sing because my guitar/has both feeling and reason. It
has a heart of earth/and the wings of a dove….”

Jara’s music was
inspired by his mother Amanda Martínez’s love of folk music rooted
in her Indigenous Mapuche heritage; his music was also shaped by a
Catholic education that included a brief period in the seminary.
Jara’s music was embraced in the 1960s and ‘70s by American folk
heavies like Pete Seeger and Joan Baez. Arlo Guthrie and Holly Near
are among the American songwriters who have since written tribute
songs. In the run-up to the election of Allende, Jara’s version of
the song “Venceremos” or “We Will Overcome,” became the
anthem of Allende’s Popular Unity Coalition, and also figured
centrally in eyewitness accounts of Jara’s death. Pinochet’s
U.S.-supported forces beat and tortured him, smashing his wrists.

At
some point in the stadium, Jara reportedly sang to the other
prisoners “Venceremos,” a song he’d adapted with new lyrics
that had egged Allende on to victory. Before he was executed, shot
more than 40 times by Pinochet’s U.S.-funded forces, Jara wrote his
final song: “What horror the face of fascism creates!/They carry
out their plans with knife-like precision./Nothing matters to
them./To them, blood equals medals,/slaughter is an act of
heroism./Oh God, is this the world that you created?” 

 

No human cost was too
high to pay to usher in neoliberalism, to eviscerate the gains that
labor had made under Allende’s Popular Unity Coalition, and to
maintain a steady flow of cheap copper, fruit and fish to the U.S.
under the auspices of “trade liberalization.” The new
constitution passed under Pinochet’s dictatorship rolled back the
reforms instituted under Allende. It expanded the power of the
presidency and enshrined private property and corporate profits over
social needs; Pinochet rolled back taxes on corporations and the
wealthy, and eliminated a host of government services. State-owned
companies, public housing, education, health care, and pensions were
all privatized, turned into profit centers for corporations and the
wealthy. The constitution written under Pinochet limited reforms,
and the gap today between rich and poor in Chile is one of the
highest in Latin America.

Jara may be
technically dead, but if you do a bit of digging around on the
internet, you’ll see evidence of his long afterlife; hence the
title of a documentary about his impact on musicians in particular:
The
Resurrection of Victor Jara
.
Tens of thousands of hands have gone on playing Jara’s songs in the
nearly fifty years since his torture and murder in the stadium. Jara,
says Chilean musician Horacio Salinas, in the documentary, “could
create a ceremonial effect with his music.” On youtube, you can
find countless videos of musicians playing Jara’s songs, and songs
written in tribute to him, including my personal favorite, “Victor
Jara’s Hands,” by Joey Burns of the Tucson-based indie-rock
band Calexico, sung alternately in Spanish and English: “Songs of
the birds like hands/ call the earth to witness/ Sever from fear
before taking flight.”

And for the past year,
as across the streets of the U.S. Black Lives Matter activists have
demanded justice for George Floyd and the defunding of police
departments that consume the lion’s share of city budgets across
the country, Jara has been resurrected again and again–in an
all-star Chilean studio recording
–and on the streets of Chile.
At an October 25, 2019 march in Santiago with a crowd estimated at
more than a million, people sang together Jara’s anti-war anthem
“El Derecho De Vivir En Paz,” or “The Right to Live in Peace,”
while countless
people played along on the guitar
.

This past year,
workers in Chile have risen up again to demand a world in which
workers do more than just struggle to survive, one in which everyone
has a right to not just bread, but roses, music, and art.

Over the past year,
Chilean women have created their own distinctive, woman-centered
actions on the streets of Chile, with thousands collectively
performing the song “Un
Violador en Tu Camino,
” or “A Rapist in Your Path,” in a
public rite of resistance to rape culture and femicide.

The song was inspired
by the work of the renowned Argentinian-Brazilian feminist
anthropologist/bioethicist Rita
Laura Segato
. The song calls out the role of police and the
courts in perpetrating and perpetuating sexual violence that repeats,
on a smaller scale, the systemic rape and torture of women that
happened under Pinochet, and that is a central feature of fascism.

If the goal in
Chile—as it would be later in Iraq—was, as Naomi
Klein has argued
–to disorient or “shock” the country into
submitting to a radically different and patently exploitative
economic system, the system that was imposed was also more rigidly
patriarchal.  Sexual violence and degradation were integral
parts of Pinochet’s fascist playbook. But as Chileans battle the
legacy of Pinochet, this rite of feminist resistance, together with
other longstanding organizing, is propelling Chile to break new
ground internationally: Chile will be the first country in the world
with a constitutional assembly comprised equally
of women and men
.

I turned twelve the
month that Pinochet came to power, and I have no memory whatsoever of
hearing about the murder of Jara, the mutilation of his hands, or the
thousands of Chileans who were tortured or disappeared. Looking back,
I find this fact stranger for the fact that I grew up within miles of
the White House. And when I look back on growing up in two very white
suburbs on the edge of Washington D.C., it might as well have been
Apartheid South Africa, the lines of demarcation between the Black
inner city; Georgetown, where my father was a professor; and the
white suburbs, were so clear and stark.

My first inklings of
the Chilean coup came in 1976, when the political violence of the
Pinochet regime erupted in Washington, D.C. I was fifteen, and a
friend of my older sister was dating Pablo Letelier, the son of
Orlando Letelier, when the latter was blown to pieces in a
car bombing
, along with his co-worker Ronni Karpen Moffett.
Orlando Letelier had been a close associate of Allende and remained
until his death an outspoken critic of Pinochet, who was eventually
pegged for the bombing, though a fat lot of good that did.

By the age of fifteen
in 1976, I was not a complete newbie when it came to assassinations.
Just months before the Chilean Coup, in July of 1973, Colonel
Yosef Alon
, a 42-year-old an Israeli Air Force pilot and military
attaché, whose daughter Yael rode the bus with us to school in the
morning, was assassinated in their driveway.

But Alon’s
assassination was not the first to have entered the sphere of my
privileged white childhood. My guess is that would have been the
Yablonski murders on New Year’s Eve, 1969.

We attended a
parochial school at the time called The Little Flower School, which
made the news not too long ago as the grade school alma mater of
Brett Kavanaugh. I was eight and my sister was seven when we learned
that the in-laws of one of the teachers at Little Flower—“Mrs.
Yablonski”—had all
been mowed down
in their Pennsylvania home: Chip Yablonski, the
President of the United Mine Workers Union, his wife Margaret, and
their daughter Charlotte Yablonski.

I imagine this was
around the time I came home one day from school to find myself locked
out of the house, and when I banged on the window and peered inside,
I found my two older siblings had staged their own murder, knives
lying on the floor, a theatrical flourish of ketchup here and there.
Perhaps I’ve coped with my third-grade trauma by picturing myself
as a stony-faced critic who found the scene unconvincing, their
characters lacking in development.

The field of
Epigenetics assumes that stress is genetically transmitted. I don’t
need to know that my genetic fibers are somehow entangled in my
parents’ to understand that I’ve carried some of their trauma
into my own life. I grew up listening to—and, at times taking notes
on—my parents’ stories of trauma. My mother’s stories were
about growing up the child of a working-class single mother too poor
to raise her. She told stories about kids who accidentally jumped off
trains onto chainsaws, and about her experience dressing dead bodies
as a young student nurse on a deserted ward.

My father’s trauma
centered around the May 10, 1940, Nazi invasion of the Netherlands.
Barely a month short of his fourteenth birthday, he ended up lying in
a ditch next to his eighty-year-old grandmother, mortars flying,
trees bursting into flames overhead. His family narrowly made it
across the border before it closed. My father had four brothers,
including twins, one of whom, my Uncle Pierre, had suffered brain
damage from oxygen deprivation during delivery. My father lived with
the knowledge throughout his life that something as small as a hand
visibly shaking as a man pockets his papers, and they might have
landed in Westerbork or Auschwitz rather than in England, and his
brothers might have been medically tortured and dissected.

I know exactly where I
was when my father’s life ended on May 8, V.E. Day, 1979, just
outside Amsterdam. I was accompanying him on his lecture tour, the
chance to see Europe a high school graduation present. I was at my
uncle’s house, my father’s body still warm on the couch before
me, where he’d reclined after diagnosing his own heart attack. He
died just two days before the thirty-ninth anniversary of the Nazi
invasion of the Netherlands in 1940. The last destination I visited
with my father was Anne Frank’s “Secret Annex.” War, as I
learned on that trip, throws out shockwaves and unexploded
ordinance—both physical and emotional—that explode across
generations, and can shave decades off a single life.

While the “Neoliberal
Experiment” began in Chile in 1973 with tanks and guns—and on a
smaller scale in New York City with the manufactured financial crisis
of 1975—Reagan would become its American figurehead, its
presidential mad social scientist. I was in my second year at
Georgetown when Reagan was inaugurated, and I can remember exactly
where I was when Reagan was elected 40 years ago, on November 4,
1980. I was at the Republican election watch party at some tony D.C.
hotel, the details documented somewhere in a newspaper article buried
deep in my office closet.

In the fall of 1980, I
was in my second-year writing for the more liberal of Georgetown’s
two student newspapers,
The
Voice
.
Whether the story was assigned to me or I chose it out of some
perverse curiosity or out of an unshakeable conviction that
Republicans had better hors d’oeuvres, I can’t quite remember.
While I wasn’t the most savvy reporter at the time, I can say that
voting for Reagan was as unthinkable to me then as now. And if memory
serves, I covered the election party with all the rhetorical
gravitas
of a monkey throwing shit at their new zookeepers.

I would go on to
attend the inauguration in D.C., again out of the kind of curiosity
that one might feel toward newly
landed
Martians walking the red carpet from their space capsule. I was a
sophomore and busy running from one panicked deadline to the other,
but Reagan’s inaugural speech got my attention. “[A]mong all the
nations of the earth,” as Reagan
would have it
, “[The U.S. was] special…The freedom and the
dignity of the individual have been more available and assured” in
the U.S. “than in any other place on Earth,” Reagan claimed.

What I missed the
first time around, though, was his distillation of neoliberal
principles: The one barrier to the “individual liberty” of
citizen/workers in a country “without ethnic or racial divisions”
was government itself. “It is time,” Reagan proclaimed, “to
check and reverse the growth of government which shows signs of
having grown beyond the consent of the governed.” While Reagan
deftly tipped his hat to working people—to “men and women who
raise our food, patrol our streets, man our mines and our factories,
teach our children,” and on and on—for Reagan, as for Trump, the
joke was on working people.

The years I spent at
Georgetown in the wake of my father’s death provided a crash course
in the importance of the social safety net that Ronald Reagan was
hell bent on gutting. At the time, if I was somewhat oblivious to the
nuances of Reagan’s political agenda, it was likely because I was
occupied a good bit of the time with trying not to have a nervous
breakdown. My personal social safety net at the time consisted of
Social Security Survivor’s Benefits, four years of free tuition to
Georgetown–where my father had taught for more than a decade–and
something I never thought very much about having: white skin. My
father’s death sent my mother off her fragile rails, and within six
months of Reagan’s inauguration, during the summer of 1981, my
sister and I were homeless.

My sister and I
learned that summer that with white skin, student I.D.’s, and a
keen eye out for security guards, there are ways of getting by on a
college campus rent-free. At the time, I didn’t think much about
the role that whiteness played in stopping us from falling any
further. I was oblivious to the fact that the safety net we found in
sleeping in vacant dorms would not have been available to us had we
been Black or brown. As it was, there would be no cops, no Karens
staring skeptically at our student I.D.’s, no guns pointed in our
faces, no one asking if we were enrolled or if we’d paid summer
rent for the dorm rooms. That experience, together with my father’s
death, would radically remap my life for decades to come.

+++

When neoliberalism
arrived in Chile, Victor Jara and working class supporters of
Socialist President Salvador Allende were under no illusions about
whose benefits the coup would serve.

If neoliberalism was
brought into Chile with guns and tanks, in the U.S., it was done with
smoke and mirrors. Reagan was inaugurated forty years ago this
January on a platform based on the self-interested lies and
deceptions crafted by the so-called “Chicago Boys”­­­­­––the
architects of neoliberalism. Reagan greased his personal path to the
White House on the neoliberal snake oil of “Trickle Down Economics”
and Free
Market Fundamentalism
. And while Jimmy
Carter
had already gotten the ball rolling, Reagan would jump
start the neoliberal bait and switch transfer of funds from public
housing, education, and welfare, to policing, prisons, and endless
war.

Ronald Reagan was as
eager to shill for trickle-down economics and gutting
the social safety net
as he’d been for the House Unamerican
Activities Committee and the warmongers at General Electric.
Meanwhile, in the UK, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was happily
breaking the glass ceiling for women intent on dropping bombs on
babies and exploiting working families. On opposite sides of the
pond, Thatcher
and Reagan
were simultaneously slashing corporate taxes,
deregulating the financial industry—and setting the stage for waves
of future financial crises. And both of them were intent on breaking
labor
.

Though my siblings and
I were all given four years of free tuition, in the 1980s, you didn’t
have to have a scholarship—or a parent who was a professor—to
walk away from a four-year degree debt-free or close to it. In 1983,
the year I graduated, tuition at a public university barely topped a
thousand
a year
.But public universities had already been on Reagan’s hit
list in the 1960s when he was governor of California, and students at
Berkeley were busy mobilizing for free speech, civil rights, and an
end to the Vietnam War.

To Reagan, Berkeley
students were nothing more than unruly “welfare bums”; free
tuition was their dole, and Reagan was hell bent on sending them
back
to work
.”

Defunding higher
education and slapping students with debt was, Reagan understood, a
path to reign in “beatniks, radicals and filthy speech advocates….”
Today California spends more money incarcerating people than it does
educating them—from K-12 through university. In the U.S.
today, tuition at public universities is ten
times higher
than it was when I graduated in 1983. Inflation
counts for less
than a third
of the increase.

Over the past forty
years, public universities have been steadily transformed into
student debt delivery machines operated on the backs of debt-strapped
adjuncts. University presidents, who routinely make five times more
than governors, sell students—as “customers”—on the fiction
that History–along with Literature, Women’s Studies, Comparative
Ethnic Studies, Philosophy, and the Arts–are frivolous luxuries we
can no longer afford to fully fund. The Gipper might be pleased today
to see 18-22-year-olds signing off on documents they’d need MBAs in
finance to understand and then emerging as desperate and pliable
indentured servants for corporations. Even pre-COVID, 48% of
university students in the U.S. were at risk of, or already,
experiencing houselessness.

Historian Howard Zinn
observed, “If you don’t know history, it’s as if you were born
yesterday,” and that lack of knowledge is convenient for corporate
interests intent on red-baiting and enlisting workers to rail against
social programs and benefits that their own grandparents struggled
mightily for. I may have learned nothing while I was at Georgetown
about the U.S.’s role in the Chilean coup that killed Victor Jara,
but I did learn a few things about what can happen to white American
nuns who are labeled Communist sympathizers for getting too cozy with
Indigenous farmworkers in Central America struggling for some very
basic forms of justice.

In 1981, I stumbled
across a talk Daniel Berrigan was giving on campus. Berrigan, I’ve
long since learned was a rock star of the American peace movement. By
the early 1970s, Berrigan,
a Jesuit priest, poet, playwright, and professor, had made the FBI’s
Most Wanted List for burning draft files in the parking lot of the
Catonsville, MD draft board with homemade napalm in 1968, and then
going underground to dodge the charges so he could keep organizing
other actions.

Apologies, good
friends, for the fracture of good order, the burning of paper instead
of children,” Berrigan famously said of the action. The American
banality of evil in a nutshell.

On this particular day
in 1981, though, I knew nothing about Berrigan, who quickly
surrendered the floor anyway to a middle-aged Catholic couple, the
parents of one Jeanne Donovan, a “Maryknoll lay missioner.” And
the story the couple told went something like this: on December 2,
1980, this nice, idealistic young Catholic woman was raped
and murdered
, executed at close range—along with three nuns,
Ita Ford, Maura Clarke, and Dorothy Kazel. And suddenly Donovan’s
parents had a chilling political awakening, as they began to
understand the role that U.S. military advisors and U.S.-funded and
-trained death
squads
played throughout Central–and much of Latin–America in
repressing labor organizing and movements for social justice.
Donovan’s parents were extremely convincing. I couldn’t come up
with any plausible communist plot that would explain these two
straight-laced Catholic squares having to talk about the rape and
murder of their daughter.

If the 1980 crimes
against the nuns and Donovan occurred in the final month of Carter’s
administration, the perpetrators knew that it would be left to Reagan
to answer for it. It would be Reagan’s job to rationalize the rape
and murder of nuns as acceptable collateral damage in the U.S.’s
holy war against Communists. The chief spinner of malevolent tall
tales about Donovan and the nuns would be a professor of political
science at Georgetown, Reagan’s newly appointed ambassador to the
U.N.: Jeane Kirkpatrick. Kirkpatrick is remembered as a “principal
architect
” of the bloodbath the U.S. helped fund and unleash
throughout Central America.

Questioned by
reporters, Kirkpatrick was eager to put the matter to rest, to drive
rhetorical nails into coffins that held the bodies of Donovan and
nuns that had been dragged out of the ground by ropes around their
ankles. The nuns, Kirkpatrick told
TheTampa
Tribune
,
“were not just nuns. The nuns were also political activists.”
They were aligned, she
claimed
, with guerillas of the Farabundo Marti National
Liberation Front—the FMLN.

I have another
somewhat fonder Kirkpatrick-related memory from that same Spring
semester at Georgetown, one in which Kirkpatrick is standing at a
podium delivering a commencement address and, slowly graduating
seniors begin to rise and quietly turn their backs on her. Their
message was clear, impressive, and unapologetic: Kirkpatrick didn’t
deserve an honorary degree, and Georgetown had done them a disservice
by pretending otherwise. What Kirkpatrick did, in fact, deserve–the
student action clearly conveyed
–was to be tried as a war
criminal at the Hague.

There’s a famous
quote from a Brazilian archbishop named Dom Helder Camara that
encapsulates the distinction between charity and social justice:
“When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint; when I ask why
the poor have no food, they call me a Communist.” Union organizing,
demands for the redistribution of stolen Indigenous lands, and
anything else that threatened the profits of U.S. corporations would
be labelled—and battled– under Reagan as part of an international
Communist threat orchestrated by Cuba and the Soviet Union.

By the Fall of ‘81,
having had my own brief and very privileged run-in with
houselessness, I started volunteering at shelters in D.C. That
experience gave me a small window into the

ways in which poverty
served up daily reminders to D.C.’s Black residents of just how
disposable they were to the city’s white elite and any god they
might construct in their own image. Forty years of neoliberalism and
gentrification have only intensified Black poverty in D.C. And
poverty, coupled with the daily toll of racism in the U.S., can shave
years–or decades­­–off a life. Today white privilege in
Washington, D.C. translates into seventeen additional years of
living.
Seventeen
years
.

In 1981, the “Great
Communicator” was busy cranking up his racist propaganda machine to
rally low income white voters against their own best interests.
Reagan managed to sell a sizable portion of the white working class
on the patently obvious lie that the majority of welfare recipients
were not only Black but living as “queens.
It turns out that all kinds of white folks would happily collaborate
in slashing benefits they were desperately going to need in the
future that Reagan’s administration was setting in motion–one in
which jobs would become the U.S’s main global export.

The Gipper”
happily picked up the mantle of Nixon’s War on Drugs and ran with
it. He stoked terror at the prospect of Black crack “fiends”
running amok in inner city war zones, and SWAT teams began invading
and terrorizing Black neighborhoods. As Michelle Alexander explains
in
The
New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Color Blindness
,
Reagan put the U.S. squarely on the path to becoming the global
leader in locking people up. Prisons and militarized policing at home
and abroad would begin sucking up enormous amounts of money that
could have gone to housing, health care, and public education.

As expensive as
in-state college tuition is these days, the annual cost of a prison
bed in most states is equivalent to
four
years of in-state college tuition
.
In 2017 in California, the cost of a
single prison bed
exceeded the cost of a year’s tuition and
living expenses at Harvard.

Prisons and immigrant
detention facilities generate huge profits for a tiny elite, while
brutalizing everyone else, including the people
who work there
.  But Nixon, Kissinger, and Pinochet were all
well aware that once people caught on to the swindle, the bait and
switch trickle-down-free-market government-for-the-corporations game,
there was a good chance they would need guns, tanks, and plenty of
tear gas to hold back the rebellion.

Predictably one of the
first casualties of the “neoliberal Experiment” would be people
living in public housing. They would increasingly land on city
streets and sidewalks, and the lucky ones in shelters like the ones I
worked at in Seattle in the mid ‘80s. Between 1978–midway through
the Carter administration–and 1983, midway through Reagan’s first
term, the HUD budget was slashed by nearly three quarters. It went
from
“$83
billion

to a little more than
$18
billion

(in 2004 constant dollars) and shelters opened throughout the United
States.”

No administration to
date­–Democrat or Republican–has made a serious move to
restore the budget to its level in 1978, which is why today,
prisons—along with military bases—are now by far the country’s
largest supplier of public housing.

And so, decades into
the U.S.’s “neoliberal experiment,” it’s not unusual in
Portland, LA. or Seattle to see walkers and wheelchairs next to tents
on the street. And the real human misery—the economic and housing
fallout–from COVID-19 has yet to fully register. In 2019, 117
people
shuffled off their mortal coils on the streets and
sidewalks of D.C.  In L.A., 1039
died on the street
, no bed to cushion their aching bones, no roof
overhead, no privacy, no sanitation, no dignity.

If speeches by Martin
Luther King, Jr. were high school seniors, hands down, the one voted
least likely to be read by American school children would be his 1967
sermon “Beyond
Vietnam: A Time to Break the Silence
.”

As radical as the
“military industrial complex” might sound the first time
Americans hear it, the term wasn’t the demon spawn of Karl Marx, or
the Weather Underground. President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s speech
writer coined the term in the
farewell speech
he wrote for him.

This was in 1961, back
when the orderly succession of putatively democratically elected
presidents was a given in the U.S., no matter how many coups
Eisenhower and the
Dulles Brother
s had busied themselves orchestrating in Guatemala,
Iran, Indonesia, the Philippines, and God–and historians–only
know where else.  Jack and Jackie and their Camelot myth-making
press machine were about to sweep into the White House, followed by
more military advisors and troops into Vietnam.

MLK would paint the
consequences of the military industrial complex in far starker, more
vivid, human and urgent terms than Eisenhower. The U.S., Dr. King
seems to have suggested, was a war junkie–and it was a given that
war and racism went hand in hand. The Vietnam War, King argued, was
poisoning the country with racism and hatred:

This business of
burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation’s homes
with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into
the veins of peoples normally humane, of sending men home from dark
and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically
deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice, and love.

The sniper fire that
cut King down exactly a year later to the day—on April 4, 1968 in
Memphis—likely said as much about his 1967 speech as it did his
support for Memphis Sanitation workers. In his 1967 speech King
famously compared the war in Vietnam to a “Demonic destructive
suction tube” that vacuumed up funds that might have otherwise gone
to LBJ’s “War on Poverty.”

If you want to get a
really good idea of how much war just cost the U.S. in the time it
took you to read this article, check out the National Priorities
Project. The military budget for 2020 alone at $738
billion
, , would be enough to provide “24.6 million [year-long]
Hospital Stays for COVID-19 Patients,” “20.96 million [four year
] Scholarships for University Students,” or “23.65 million People
receiving $600 weekly unemployment insurance payments for 1 Year.”
There’s plenty of money. It’s just helping the super-rich, who
are profiting at all our expenses.

King condemned in no
uncertain terms the massive aerial spraying of the defoliant Agent
Orange as akin to Nazi medical experimentation. “What do [the
Vietnamese] think as we test out our latest weapons on them,” asked
King, “just as Germans tested out new medicine and new tortures in
the concentration camps of Europe?” Today in the U.S., the test
subjects are the kids in Detroit drinking water contaminated
with lead
, while Nestles is pumping, bottling, and profiting to
the tune of 400
gallons a minute
of fresh Michigan water; the Water Protectors at
Standing Rock drenched for months with pepper spray, tear gas, and
reportedly other chemical agents, along with water in freezing
and subzero temperatures
; the Black Lives Matter activists
sprayed—sprayed along with hundreds of houseless people—all
summer on the streets of Portland with chemical
weapons
banned for use in war; the BIPOC, elderly, and people
with disabilities, dying
at vastly higher rates
of COVID-19.

And meanwhile, Vietnam
is witnessing the third generation born with Agent Orange-related
health effects, from missing eyes and limbs to spinal bifida and
severe intellectual disabilities. The Middle East is littered with
depleted uranium, cancer rates are soaring, and babies are born with
a wide range of “congenital
anomalies
.”

By 1967, King had
struck up a friendship with the Vietnamese Buddhist monk Thich Nhat
Hanh. And by ‘67, King, like every other major organizer in the
Civil Rights Movement, had been pegged by the FBI as a Communist.
Make of it what you will, it seems likely to me that given enough
time on earth, King and Jara might have had long talks, written songs
together, formed a fast and deep friendship. In his song “Derecho
De Vivir En Paz”–or “The Right to Live in Peace”–released
on his 1971 album, Jara wrote of “Indochina… the place/beyond the
wide sea,/where they ruin the flower/ with genocide and napalm.”

He and King were
definitely on the same page about the Vietnam War and so much more.

Feminists, in
particular, have aptly spoken of our collective relationship to Trump
as akin to domestic or intimate partner violence, with Trump a
gaslighting batterer. But as metaphors go, battering and gaslighting
are also fitting descriptions of the Chicago Boys’ neoliberal Magic
Trick— brought into Chile, and later the Middle East, with guns and
tanks. It’s the magic trick ordinary Americans have watched this
year, as we’ve been fleeced of taxes that have gone to fatten the
unimaginable wealth of a handful of billionaires, and to endless
weapons and wars that have made the U.S. the hands down leader of the
global arms trade. Martin Luther King, Jr. warned us in 1967 that “A
nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military
defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual
death.” Fifty years later, at the end of the Trump presidency, we
seem to be rapidly approaching garlic and wooden stake territory.

Still too many
Democrats are breathing a sigh of relief now that the
Batterer-in-Chief has been handed his eviction papers, and they are
looking to Biden as our collective white knight, our national
pater
familias
.
But anyone who knows anything about the dynamics of battering will
tell you that the myth of the White Knight is a racist and
patriarchal set up for repeating the cycle of abuse. We’re sitting
now on the razor’s edge of fascism, and fascism isn’t interested
in electoral cycles. We can’t count on having another four years to
sort the situation out.

The RootsAction “No
Honeymoon for Biden
” campaign, embraced by Nina Turner,
recognizes the urgency of the situation and would go a long way
toward undoing the damage done by fifty years of neoliberalism.  It
would shift funds from militarism and mass incarceration to universal
healthcare and a more inclusive, multi-racial “Green New Deal”
that would fund free higher education. The campaign also calls for a
$15 federal minimum wage and for Biden to cancel student debt across
the board. Research has shown that wiping out existing student debt
would be shot
in the arm
for the economy. We need to pull back from our
domestic and global cycle of battering and make government work for
working people if we are going to stop a free fall into fascism and
climate chaos.

Finally, there are a
lot of lessons the U.S. could draw from the Chilean fight against
fascism and the legacy of Pinochet. The global spark that Las Tesis
set off this past year with street performances that drew thousands
of women to witness collectively to their shared experience of sexual
harassment and assault is a testimony to the power of art to mobilize
resistance and speak truth to power. And the immortal life of Victor
Jara–his presence this past year on the streets of Santiago­,
where thousands of hands fluttered across guitars­­–testifies
to the power of art to preserve history even in the face of guns,
tanks and bullets bent on wiping it out.

Now, more than ever,
we need to demand reinvestment in the arts—from K-12 to higher
education. To paraphrase the quote Woody Guthrie famously scrawled
across his guitar: we need art to kill fascism. What better reminder
than the hollow man in the White House of the frustration life
without art generates? We need art to foster empathy, to remind us of
our collective humanity, to preserve in our national memory records
of those who stood for justice, and those who collaborated to
undermine it. We need art to preserve history, to sustain and
energize us, to give us courage for the long struggle ahead.

Dedicated to the
memory of Roxane Elizabeth Roberts (November 5, 1952-December 24,
2018).

Desiree Hellegers
is a co-founder and affiliated faculty of the Collective for Social
and Environmental Justice at Washington State University Vancouver.
and a member of the Socialist-Feminist Old Mole Variety Hour
Collective on KBOO, Portland, Oregon’s community-supported radio
station.

=====================================

*
‘Beetje dom’ om te geloven dat de situatie in de VS en haar
buitenlandbeleid zal veranderen met oorlogsmisdadiger en
mensenrechtenschender Biden…… Bovendien zit Biden in de zak van
de financiële maffia en daarmee in die van de oliemaatschappijen,
het militair-industrieel complex, de farmaceutische maffia en andere
grote misdadige bedrijven >> hoe kan je ook maar enige
verandering verwachten van zo’n figuur??!!! Toevallig werd vanmorgen op de BBC gemeld dat een aantal grote bedrijven en banken hun steun stoppen aan republikeinen die achter Trump blijven staan, ofwel deze bedrijven kopen de politiek niet alleen voorafgaand aan de verkiezingen, maar doen dat doorlopend, hoe kan je dan nog spreken van een democratie, als de politici volledig in de zak zitten van bedrijven….?? (om nog maar te zwijgen over het belemmeren van de stembusgang voor een groot aantal VS burgers)

Zie ook: ‘Met de winst van Biden is het fascisme in de VS bepaald niet weggestemd‘ (en zie zeker de links in dat bericht over de ‘geweldige’ of beter gezegd gewelddadige oorlogsmisdadiger Joe Biden)

Feest in Chili: fascistische grondwet verdwijnt voor een nieuwe!!

Chili groot aantal (zwaar) gewonden bij voortdurende protesten‘ 

Protesten Chili en Ecuador: geweld tegen demonstranten gesteund door massamedia‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht)

Chili, de protesten en de verslaggeving‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht, o.a. over het Amazonewoud en de strijd van burgers tegen oliemaatschappijen, maar ook over de situatie in Brazilië en Venezuela)

Chili en de gestolen baby’s, alweer met een ‘mooie rol’ van de rk kerk‘ 

Venezuela is nog lang niet verslagen door de VS

Pinochet (ex-dictator Chili) werd 20 jaar geleden gearresteerd in Londen

9/11: de VS heeft niets geleerd……

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

Chileense fascisten vragen rk kerk om vergeving voor vreselijke misdaden begaan onder Pinochet bewind……

De VS, een duivels imperium, dat achter haar psychopathisch moordende troepen staat??

De war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan over het algemeen gedacht

Chili 11 september 1973

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

Voor meer berichten over de steenkoolcentrale in de Sundarbans, vul deze naam in op het zoekvlak rechts bovenin deze pagina. Dat geldt ook voor andere namen en instanties die genoemd woorden in het artikel van Hellegers (de ruimte voor labels is wat mij betreft te klein, t.w. 140 tekens)

2020 het jaar dat de vrijheidsboom in brand werd gestoken

John
Whitehead heeft een artikel geschreven waarin hij betoogt dat 2020
het jaar is waarin de overheid (beter: overheden) de definitieve stap
heeft gezet om onze vrijheid af te nemen. Hij begint met een mooie
uitspraak van John Lennon waarin deze betoogt dat mensen niet bewust
leven, niet opgeleid zijn om te beseffen dat ze macht hebben. Het
systeem werkt zo dat iedereen gelooft dat de overheid alles zal
oplossen. Eindigend met : “Wij zijn de regering” (als we dat willen,
Ap).

Nog even
het volgende : vergeet niet dat de situatie in de VS, waarover
Whitehead spreekt, in feite nog een stuk erger is dan hier, hoewel we
in sneltreinvaart achter de VS aangaan en en paar zaken die Whitehead
aanhaalt zal je ongetwijfeld zelf al hebben bemerkt in ons land, of
welk land dan ook waar je woont, waar je leeft.

Volkomen
terecht merkt Whitehead op dat 2020 ‘een vreselijk, verschrikkelijk
slecht jaar was voor vrijheid’, waar dit jaar ‘een optelsom was van het
laatste vreselijke, verschrikkelijk slechte decennium voor
ons aller vrijheid…….’

Corruptie
op regeringsniveau (hier beter verborgen, maar aanwijsbaar bestaand), tirannie en misbruik, gemixt met een Big Brother weet
alles mentaliteit, samen met de COVID-19 ‘pandemie’ hebben deze zaken ons op
‘warpsnelheid’* gebracht in de richting van een politiestaat, aldus
Whitehead. Daarna noemt hij een aantal zaken die nu al als normaal
worden gezien in de VS: hele staten die op slot zijn gegaan middels
een lockdown, enorm uitgebreide bewaking (van alles en iedereen),
veel fouilleringen langs de kant van de weg, politiemoorden op
meerdere ongewapende burgers, censuur, arrestaties als vergelding,
het criminaliseren van tot nu toe gewoon geoorloofde zaken,
oorlogshitserij, het ‘oneindig vasthouden’ van mensen (bijvoorbeeld
ook in Nederland als het gaat om vluchtelingen), overvallen door arrestatieteams, het in beslag
nemen van zaken (door de politie en/of deurwaarder ), politiegeweld,
winstmakende privé gevangenissen (die in de VS zelfs aan de beurs
zijn genoteerd….) en alom aanwezige corruptie, zelfs in het Witte Huis……

Terecht
is volgens Whitehead het voorgaande een waslijst aan vergrijpen >>
die wreed, brutaal, immoreel, ongrondwettig en onacceptabel zijn.
Zaken waarmee de regering de laatste 2 decennia en zeker het laatste
jaar het volk heeft belast……

Door
de Coronacrisis zijn een aantal van onze burgerrechten gesneuveld, we zouden die terugkrijgen zo werd beloofd, echter de geschiedenis laat zien dat
regeringen, ook in ons land, zaken van dergelijke omvang (ook qua
lengte in tijd) niet snel of helemaal niet terugdraaien. Immers zaken
als ons recht op privacy waren we al bijna kwijt voor de Coronacrisis
en daar blijft nu bijna helemaal niets van over en uiteraard is dat
een geschenk
voor
diezelfde overheid, politie en geheime diensten
waarmee de schending van ook andere burgerrechten heel makkelijk wordt gemaakt**.

Verder
is het ons een stuk moeilijker gemaakt om ons voor één doel te
verenigen, niet alleen dat: zelfs als zou je daadwerkelijk
verzetsdaden willen verrichten is dat door de enorme controle en de
meer dan schandelijke spoedwet een heel stuk moeilijker geworden en
voor velen zelfs onmogelijk…….

Whitehead
gaat uitvoerig in op een aantal onderwerpen, zoals het onvermogen van
de overheid om ons leven, onze vrijheid en ons geluk te beschermen.
Ook schenkt hij aandacht aan het feit dat de opvolgende presidenten in de VS zich meer en
meer gedragen als een keizer van een imperium (nu moet ik zeggen dat
dit al heel lang het geval is in het hysterische VS, het geschreeuw,
gefluit en applaus alsof de president van de VS een beroemde popster
is, hier zie je dat trouwens ook bij een figuur als de GroenLinks
oplichter Jessias Klaver……). En vergeet niet dat de VS in feite als het Vierde Rijk kan worden gezien…… Verder noemt Whitehead de
gemilitariseerde politie in de VS, een macht op zich, die de bevolking terroriseert en beschikt over wapentuig dat op het
slagveld thuishoort…… Ook lijkt het wel of de politie in de VS
willekeurig mensen neerschiet, willekeurige arrestaties uitvoert en mensen fouilleert waarbij ‘de zoektocht’ zelfs doorgaat tot in
het lichaam……..

Lees
het schrijven van John Whitehead, overgenomen van Information
Clearing House
en zegt het voort, de zaken die Whitehead noemt kunnen
hier zomaar over een paar jaar worden doorgevoerd en een paar van die
zaken kennen we hier al…. In een volledige politiestaat leven is
allesbehalve een pretje, zoals je je waarschijnlijk wel kan
voorstellen……

2020:
The Year the Tree of Liberty Was Torched

By
John W. Whitehead

The people
are unaware. They’re not educated to realize that they have power.
The system is so geared that everyone believes the government will
fix everything. We
are the government
.”—John Lennon

December 29, 2020
Information
Clearing House

–  No doubt about it: 2020—a terrible, horrible, no good, very
bad year for freedom—was the culmination of a terrible, horrible,
no good, very bad decade for freedom.

Government corruption,
tyranny, and abuse coupled with a Big Brother-knows-best mindset and
the COVID-19 pandemic propelled us at warp speed towards a full-blown
police state in which nationwide lockdowns, egregious surveillance,
roadside strip searches, police shootings of unarmed citizens,
censorship, retaliatory arrests, the criminalization of lawful
activities, warmongering, indefinite detentions, SWAT team raids,
asset forfeiture, police brutality, profit-driven prisons, and
pay-to-play politicians were accepted as the norm.

Here’s just a small
sampling of the laundry list of abuses—cruel, brutal, immoral,
unconstitutional and unacceptable—that have been heaped upon us by
the government over the past two decades and in the past year, in
particular.

The government
failed to protect our lives, liberty and happiness.

The predators of the police state wreaked havoc on our freedoms, our
communities, and our lives. The government didn’t listen to the
citizenry, refused to abide by the Constitution, and treated the
citizenry as a source of funding and little else. Police officers
shot unarmed citizens and their household pets. Government
agents—including local police—were armed to the teeth and
encouraged to act like soldiers on a battlefield. Bloated government
agencies were allowed to fleece taxpayers. Government technicians
spied on our emails and phone calls. And government contractors made
a killing by waging endless wars abroad.

The American
President became more imperial.

Although the Constitution invests the President with very specific,
limited powers, in recent years, American presidents (Trump, Obama,
Bush, Clinton, etc.) claimed the power to completely and almost
unilaterally alter the landscape of this country for good or for ill.
The powers that have been amassed by each successive president
through the negligence of Congress and the courts—powers which add
up to a toolbox of terror for an imperial ruler—empower whoever
occupies the Oval Office to act as a dictator, above the law and
beyond any real accountability. The presidency itself has become an
imperial one with permanent powers.

Militarized
police became a power unto themselves, 911 calls turned deadly, and
traffic stops took a turn for the worse.
Lacking
in transparency and accountability, protected by the courts and
legislators, and rife with misconduct, America’s police forces
continued to be a menace to the citizenry and the rule of law.
Despite concerns about the government’s steady transformation of
local police into a standing military army, local police agencies
acquired
even more weaponry
, training and equipment suited for the
battlefield. Police officers were also given free range to pull
anyone over for a variety of reasons and subject them to forced
cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws, forced
breath-alcohol tests, forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans,
forced inclusion in biometric databases.

The courts
failed to uphold justice.

With every ruling handed down, it becomes more apparent that we live
in an age of hollow justice, with government courts more concerned
with protecting government agents than upholding the rights of “we
the people.” This is true at all levels of the judiciary, but
especially so in the highest court of the land, the U.S. Supreme
Court, which is seemingly more concerned with establishing order and
protecting government agents than with upholding the rights enshrined
in the Constitution. A review of critical court rulings over the past
two decades, including some ominous ones by the U.S. Supreme Court,
reveals a startling and steady trend towards pro-police state rulings
by an institution concerned more with establishing order and
protecting the ruling class and government agents than with upholding
the rights enshrined in the Constitution.

COVID-19
allowed the Emergency State to expand its powers.

What started out as an apparent effort to prevent a novel coronavirus
from sickening the nation (and the world) became yet another means by
which world governments (including our own) could expand their
powers, abuse their authority, and further oppress their
constituents. While COVID-19 took a significant toll on the nation
emotionally, physically, and economically, it also allowed the
government to trample our rights in the so-called name of national
security, with talk of mass testing for COVID-19 antibodies,
screening checkpoints, contact tracing, immunity passports, forced
vaccinations, snitch tip lines and onerous lockdowns.

The
Surveillance State rendered Americans vulnerable to threats from
government spies, police, hackers and power failures.
Thanks
to the government’s ongoing efforts to build massive databases
using emerging surveillance, DNA and biometrics technologies,
Americans have become sitting ducks for hackers and government spies
alike. Billions
of people have been affected by data breaches and cyberattacks.

On a daily basis, Americans have been made to relinquish the most
intimate details of who we are—our biological makeup, our genetic
blueprints, and our biometrics (facial characteristics and structure,
fingerprints, iris scans, etc.)—in order to navigate
an increasingly technologically-enabled world
.

America became
a red flag nation.

Red flag laws, specifically, and pre-crime laws generally push us
that much closer towards a suspect society where everyone is
potentially guilty of some crime or another and must be preemptively
rendered harmless. Where many Americans go wrong is in naively
assuming that you have to be doing something illegal or harmful in
order to be flagged and targeted for some form of intervention or
detention. In fact, all you need to do these days to end up on a
government watch list or be subjected to heightened scrutiny is use
certain trigger words
(like cloud, pork and pirates), surf the
internet, communicate using a cell phone, limp
or stutter
, drive
a car
, stay at a hotel, attend a political rally, express
yourself on social media
, appear
mentally ill
, serve in the military,
disagree
with a law enforcement official
, call
in sick to work
, purchase materials at a hardware store, take
flying or boating lessons, appear
suspicious
, appear confused or nervous, fidget or whistle or
smell bad, be seen in public waving a toy gun or anything remotely
resembling a gun (such as a water nozzle or a remote control or a
walking cane), stare
at a police officer
, question government authority, appear
to be pro-gun or pro-freedom
, or generally live in the United
States. Be warned: once you get on such a government watch
list—whether it’s a terrorist watch list, a mental health watch
list, a dissident watch list, or a red flag gun watch list—there’s
no clear-cut way to get off, whether or not you should actually be on
there.

The cost of
policing the globe drove the nation deeper into debt.

America’s
war spending has 
already bankrupted
the nation
 to
the tune of more than $20 trillion dollars. Policing the globe and
waging endless wars abroad hasn’t made America—or the rest of the
world—any safer, but it has made the military industrial complex
rich at taxpayer expense. The U.S. military reportedly has more than
1.3
million

men and women on active duty, with more
than 200,000 of them stationed overseas
in nearly every country
in the world. Yet America’s military forces aren’t being deployed
abroad to protect our freedoms here at home. Rather, they’re being
used to guard oil fields, build foreign infrastructure and protect
the financial interests of the corporate elite. In fact, the United
States military spends about $81
billion a year just to protect oil supplies around the world
.
This is how a military empire occupies the globe. Meanwhile,
America’s infrastructure is falling apart.

Free speech
was dealt one knock-out punch after another.

Protest
laws
, free speech zones, bubble zones, trespass zones,
anti-bullying legislation, zero tolerance policies, hate crime laws,
shadow banning on the Internet, and a host of other legalistic
maladies dreamed up by politicians and prosecutors (and championed by
those who want to suppress speech with which they might disagree)
conspired to corrode our core freedoms, purportedly for our own good.
On paper—at least according to the U.S. Constitution—we are
technically free to speak. In reality, however, we are only as free
to speak as a government official—or corporate entities such as
Facebook, Google or YouTube—may allow. The reasons for such
censorship
varied widely from political correctness, so-called safety concerns
and bullying to national security and hate crimes but the end result
remained the same: the complete eradication of free speech.

The Deep State
took over.

The American system of representative government has been overthrown
by the Deep State—a.k.a. the police state a.k.a. the
military/corporate industrial complex—a profit-driven, militaristic
corporate state bent on total control and global domination through
the imposition of martial law here at home and by fomenting wars
abroad. The “government of the people, by the people, for the
people” has perished. In its place is a shadow government, a
corporatized, militarized, entrenched bureaucracy that is fully
operational and staffed by unelected officials who are, in essence,
running the country and calling the shots in Washington DC, no matter
who sits in the White House. Mind you, by “government,” I’m not
referring to the highly partisan, two-party bureaucracy of the
Republicans and Democrats. Rather, I’m referring to “government”
with a capital “G,” the entrenched Deep State that is unaffected
by elections, unaltered by populist movements, and has set itself
beyond the reach of the law. This is the hidden face of a government
that has no respect for the freedom of its citizenry. This shadow
government
, which “operates
according to its own compass heading regardless of who is formally in
power
,” makes a mockery of elections and the entire concept of
a representative government.

The takeaway:
Everything the founders of this country feared has come to dominate
in modern America. “We the people” have been saddled with a
government that is no longer friendly to freedom and is working
overtime to trample the Constitution underfoot and render the
citizenry powerless in the face of the government’s power grabs,
corruption and abusive tactics.

So how do you balance
the scales of justice at a time when Americans are being tasered,
tear-gassed, pepper-sprayed, hit with batons, shot with rubber
bullets and real bullets, blasted with sound cannons, detained
in cages and kennels
, sicced by police dogs, arrested and jailed
for challenging the government’s excesses, abuses and power-grabs,
and then locked down and stripped of any semblance of personal
freedom?

No matter who sits in
the White House, politics won’t fix a system that is broken beyond
repair.

For that matter,
protests and populist movements also haven’t done much to push back
against an authoritarian regime that is deaf to our cries, dumb to
our troubles, blind to our needs, and accountable to no one.

So how do you not only
push back against the government’s bureaucracy, corruption and
cruelty but also launch a counterrevolution aimed at reclaiming
control over the government using nonviolent means?

You start by changing
the rules and engaging in some (nonviolent) guerilla tactics.

Take your cue from the
Tenth Amendment and nullify everything the government does that flies
in the face of the principles on which this nation was founded. If
there is any means left to us for thwarting the government in its
relentless march towards outright dictatorship, it may rest with the
power of juries and local governments to invalidate governmental
laws, tactics and policies that are illegitimate, egregious or
blatantly unconstitutional.

In an age in which
government officials accused of wrongdoing—police officers, elected
officials, etc.—are treated with general leniency, while the
average citizen is prosecuted to the full extent of the law,
nullification is a powerful reminder that, as the Constitution tells
us, “we the people” are the government.

For too long we’ve
allowed our so-called “representatives” to call the shots. Now
it’s time to restore the citizenry to their rightful place in the
republic: as the masters, not the servants.

Nullification is one
way of doing so.

America was meant to
be primarily a system of local governments, which is a far cry from
the colossal federal bureaucracy we have today. Yet if our freedoms
are to be restored, understanding what is transpiring practically in
your own backyard—in one’s home, neighborhood, school district,
town council—and taking action at that local level must be the
starting point.

Responding to unmet
local needs and reacting to injustices is what grassroots activism is
all about. Attend local city council meetings, speak up at town hall
meetings, organize protests and letter-writing campaigns, employ
“militant nonviolent resistance” and civil disobedience, which
Martin Luther King Jr. used to great effect through the use of
sit-ins, boycotts and marches.

The power to change
things for the better rests with us, not the politicians.

As long as we continue
to allow callousness, cruelty, meanness, immorality, ignorance,
hatred, intolerance, racism, militarism, materialism, meanness and
injustice—magnified by an echo chamber of nasty tweets and
government-sanctioned brutality—to trump justice, fairness and
equality, there can be no hope of prevailing against the police
state.

We could transform
this nation if only Americans would work together to harness the
power of their discontent and push back against the government’s
overreach, excesses and abuse.

As I make clear in my
book 
Battlefield
America: The War on the American People
,
the police state is marching forward, more powerful than ever.

If there is to be any
hope for freedom in 2021, it rests with “we the people.”

Constitutional
attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of 
The
Rutherford Institute
.
His new book 
Battlefield
America: The War on the American People
 
is
available at
www.amazon.com.
Whitehead can be contacted at johnw@rutherford.org.

Post
your comment below

Registration
is necessary to post comments. We ask only that you do not use
obscene or offensive language. Please be respectful of others.

=================================================

*  Warpsnelheid een term uit de science fiction: veel sneller dan het licht gaan en daarmee ‘in feite’ tijdreizen.

** En vergeet vooral niet dat de aantasting van het recht op privacy en andere burgerrechten ook ten voordele is van de grote bedrijven!! Bedrijven die al door de reguliere media worden geholpen, neem palmolie waar ten behoeve van palmolieplantages oerwoud in brand wordt gestoken, de reguliere media houden daarbij bedrijven als Unilever uit de wind, immers zij zouden alleen gebruikmaken van duurzame palmolie, terwijl de vraag naar palmolie al zorgt voor het nog meer in brand steken van oerwoud (waarover die media met geen woord spreken…..) Deze media houden verder hun mond over het feit dat palmolie, wat in zoveel etenswaren is verwerkt, uitermate slecht is voor het lichaam…. Overheden houden bedrijven als Unilever de hand boven het hoofd, hoe vroom ze ook spreken over het stoppen van de klimaatverandering….. (wat jammer genoeg niet eens mogelijk is!!!) Het wachten is dan ook op wetgeving zoals die in de VS al wordt gebruikt, waar het aan de paal nagelen van grote bedrijven voor dit soort zware misdaden, kan zorgen dat je strafrechtelijk wordt vervolgd……

Zie ook: ‘Demonisering in (Duitse) media van mensen die zich verzetten tegen de Coronamaatregelen zelfs een terreur expert sprak zich uit….’

‘Coronavirus en schending mensenrechten

Luchtvaart voert Coronapaspoort in

VS vs. Black Lives Matter en links: de federale staatsgreep tegen afzonderlijke staten‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht)

LIMC (leger) nu pas door minister van Defensie Bijleveld op non actief gesteld, na ernstige inbreuk op privacy en schending mensenrechten‘ 

LIMC (landmacht) gaat haar boek wel heel ver te buiten, misdadig en mensenrechtenschendend ver!!

‘Operatie
Zebra Sword van start in Nederland, een militaire oefening op het snel
verplaatsen van militair materieel naar de grenzen van kernmacht Rusland
‘ (en uiteraard het in de hand houden van ‘subversieve krachten’ in Nederland)

RIVM mag locatiegegevens van smartphones inzien i.v.m. het Coronavirus en deze gegevens een jaar lang bewaren‘ (!!!!)

Censuur in Nederland rukt op: de weg naar een nieuwe fascistische wereldorde

Arrestatie Julian Assange: een aanfluiting voor internationale regels en een enorme aanval op onafhankelijke journalistiek
(op de echte journalistiek wel te verstaan, helaas is die bijna geheel
uitgerangeerd in de reguliere westerse media) >> (en zie de links
in dat bericht, naar meer artikelen over Assange)

Ausweis bitte! COVI-PASS ‘noodzakelijk’ bij aantonen ‘immuniteit’ voor Coronavirus‘ 

Zeg nee tegen de Corona spoedwet!‘ (een bericht met daaraan verbonden ‘een petitie tegen die ‘nood-spoedwet’.

Rutte 3 wil ongrondwettelijke noodmaatregelen legitimeren met spoedwet‘ 

The Science of Fear: How The Elitists Use it to Control Us & How to Break Free

Transport nucleair afval via Amsterdam naar uitermate gevaarlijke opslag
(met aandacht voor de aantasting van burgerrechten tijdens de
Coronacrisis, zo mochten in Duitsland maar 35 mensen protesteren tegen
dit transport….)

Coronavirus: we worden behandeld als een kind met een tere ziel dat niet te veel mag weten

Coronavirus: vluchtelingen zonder verblijfsvergunning blijven opgesloten ondanks grote kans op besmetting  

Privacy en vrijheid van meningsuiting slachtoffer van het Coronavirus: neem de verplichte volg-app

Trump vraagt om absolute macht tijdens de Coronacrisis‘ 

 

Coronacrisis: de grootste internationale oefening ooit van politie, geheime diensten en de landstrijdkrachten‘ 

Wereldbevolking moet afhankelijk worden gemaakt van vaccins in combinatie met een ‘vaccinatiepaspoort’‘ (zie ook de video’s in dat bericht, waarvan de hieronder getoonde er één is)

Forced vaccinations for all. And that means you. A triumph for authoritarians (een video uit 2018, zeker zien mensen!):

Politie schiet 13 jarige jongen dood bij handhaven avondklok i.v.m. Coronavirus

Viktor Orbán misbruikt Coronacrisis om het Hongaarse parlement en daarmee de democratie buitenspel te zetten

Ton Wilthagen (universiteit Tilburg) wil dat de verkiezingen voor de Tweede Kamer worden uitgesteld

Joe Biden, de nieuwe VS president heeft een ‘grote’ racistische geschiedenis

Jammer
dat het hieronder opgenomen artikel van CounterPunch niet al
voor de Democratische voorverkiezingen werd gepubliceerd, grote kans
dat oorlogsmisdadiger Joe Biden dan niet door de Democratische Partij zou zijn gekozen als kandidaat voor het
presidentschap Hoewel de grote opzet was om Bernie Sanders de gang
naar het Witte Huis te belemmeren, daar hij te links was en wel eens
werkelijke verandering had kunnen brengen (in tegenstelling tot de
meer dan valse belofte van Barack Obama)……..

Jack
Delaney heeft een uitgebreid artikel geschreven waarin hij Joe Biden neerzet
als een racist en dat al meer dan 40 jaar lang……

Zo was
Biden tegen het federale schoolbusproject waarmee men de integratie
van zwarte en anders gekleurde kinderen op witte scholen wilde
bevorderen…… Uiteraard was dit niet de enige manier waarop Biden
zich inzette om integratie van gekleurde kinderen op witte scholen
te voorkomen, op alle mogelijke (politieke) manieren heeft Biden
zich daartegen verzet……

Biden
heeft zich onder de administratie van oorlogsmisdadiger Bill Clinton
ingezet voor de ‘three strikes out’ wetgeving, waarmee zelfs met
kleine vergrijpen, je na drie van die vergrijpen ‘levenslang’
gevangen kon worden gezet en uiteraard waren het vooral de gekleurden
die hier in verhouding het hardst onder hebben geleden….. Zo werd
het gebruik van crack (cocaïne) t.o.v. gewone cocaïne (een heel
stuk duurder) veel zwaarder gestraft en je raadt het al: vooral de
gekleurden gebruikten crack, daar ze altijd tot het armste deel van
de VS behoorden en behoren…….

Overigens
was het ‘three strikes out’ het gevolg van de inzet van Biden al onder de
totale mafketel en oorlogsmisdadiger (en C-acteur) Ronald Reagan, de
neoliberale republikeinse president in de 80er jaren van de vorige
eeuw….. (die begon met het opschroeven van de VS schulden tot
onaanvaardbaar grote hoogte) Het is zelfs zo dat Biden Reagan heeft
gepord om hardere straffen te zetten op drugsovertredingen. Het
uiteindelijke gevolg van de inzet die Biden liet zien was dat in veel
staten 90% van de veroordeelden door drugsgebruik en andere
drugsgerelateerde zaken gekleurd waren…….

Onder
Clinton was Biden één van de hoofdverantwoordelijken voor het
verhogen van straffen en hij was er trots op dat de Democraten
verantwoordelijk waren voor 60 meer doodstraffen en de verhoging van
straffen. Verder was de Democratische administratie van Clinton
verantwoordelijk voor het aannemen van 100.000 meer politieagenten en het bouwen van 125.000 extra
gevangeniscellen…… Gevolg was dat tegen het jaar 2000 de VS met
5% van de wereldbevolking, de VS een gevangenispopulatie had die 25%
vertegenwoordigde van het totale aantal gevangenen over de wereld……. Gekleurden liepen 5 keer meer kans in de gevangenis te
belanden dan hun witte medeburgers………

Biden
heeft zich van 1984 tot 2018 ingezet voor het snijden in de sociale
bijstand, terwijl juist de gekleurde bevolking daar het meest op was aangewezen…… Voorts was Biden verantwoordelijk voor het opschroeven
van schulden voor studeren en zoals je kan uittekenen, ook hier waren
m.n. de gekleurden het slachtoffer van (hoewel deze schuldenlast nu
zo groot is dat dezelfde schoft nu heeft beloofd daar wat aan te gaan
doen, echter denk daarbij aan de beloften van Obama, die voor het
grootste deel in het ‘grote archief’ verdwenen……)

Over
Obama’s beloften gesproken: ondanks een gekleurde president en een
aantal gekleurden op sleutelposities, is het zijn administratie niet
gelukt om de positie van gekleurden te verbeteren en ook hiervoor was
Biden deels verantwoordelijk…… Sterker nog Black Lives Matter
(BLM) ontstond onder de Obama/Biden administratie…..

Ook de
buitenlandpolitiek van de VS onder Obama en vicepresident Biden was
het ‘business as usual…’ De Obama/Biden administratie was
verantwoordelijk voor het destabiliseren van landen als Jemen,
Honduras (een door de CIA en Hillary Clinton georganiseerde coup),
Syrië, Somalië en Libië (het eens rijkste land van Afrika werd 60
jaar terug in de tijd gebombardeerd en behoort nu tot de armste
landen van dat continent, terwijl er nog steeds oorlog wordt
gevoerd….). Intussen vervolgde deze administratie het bloedige
beleid die de erfenis vormde van het Bush tijdperk: de illegale
oorlogsoperaties in Afghanistan, Pakistan en Irak……

Het
moorden middels drones kreeg ook al een extra duw in de rug van
de Obama/Biden administratie, terwijl zo’n 90% van de vermoorde slachtoffers
niet eens werden verdacht, dus veelal vrouwen en kinderen…….
Biden was ook voor die moorden de tweede
hoofdverantwoordelijke…….

Wat
betreft vluchtelingen uit Latijns-Amerika (o.a. door de coup van 2009
in Honduras) heeft de Obama administratie meer dan 2,5 miljoen
vluchtelingen gedeporteerd en werd er geen onderzoek gedaan naar
massagraven met vluchtelingen uit dat deel van de 3 Amerika’s…….

Tijdens
zijn verkiezingscampagne heeft Biden herhaaldelijk gelogen dat hij
Nelson Mandela ontmoette in Zuid-Afrika en dat hij daarvoor werd
gearresteerd….. Terwijl hij zoals eerder gemeld ronduit een racist
was en eigenlijk nog is (en dan ben je m.i. niets anders dat een fascist)….. Deze fascist
ging zelfs zover om het volk voor te houden dat wanneer ze een
probleem hadden om op hem te stemmen, deze kiezers niet zwart waren,
waarvoor hij later dan wel zijn excuus aanbood…….

Met
Biden zal er niets ten goede veranderen voor de gekleurde bevolking
van de VS en ook het imperialistische buitenlandbeleid van de VS zal niet
veranderen, sterker nog: de kans is groot dat de VS weer nieuwe
oorlogen zal aangaan, zeker als je in gedachten neemt dat Biden al
heeft gesteld dat dit beleid onder Trump slap was als het gaat om
de landen Iran en Venezuela……. Ook de agressieve buitenlandpolitiek t.a.v. China zal niet veranderen, zo heeft Bidens vicepresident Kamala Harris laten weten……. Door de sancties van Trump alleen al tegen
Venezuela, zijn meer dan 50.000 mensen om het leven gekomen, als je
dat slap vindt kan er maar één stap straffer zijn: weer een (illegale)
oorlog……. (overigens ook in Iran moeten grote aantallen mensen, inclusief veel kinderen, zijn overleden als gevolg van de illegale VS sancties……)

December
6, 2020

Jim
Crow Joe

Biden’s Record
On Race

by Jack
Delaney

Photograph
Source: Chuck Kennedy – CC
BY 2.0

It was the days of purple haze and
the post-civil rights movement that President-elect Joe Biden
cemented his political legacy, yet he was rarely on the right side of
history. The era was marked by assassinations of political leaders,
spurred a coalition opposing the Vietnam war, and produced police
violence carried out on demonstrators. The unrest set the stage for
Richard Nixon and advisor Lee Atwater’s southern
strategy
.

Nixon’s ‘68 campaign strategy
relied on polished racist dog whistles and rhetoric promising law and
order, which delivered the southern vote along with the White House.
With a political realignment — where segregationist southern
Democrats found refuge within the GOP — political newcomer, Joe
Biden found opportunity.

Delaware’s Dixiecrat

Before the 1972 elections, then a
city government official, Biden launched a bid for the U.S. Senate.
In his campaign against Delaware’s Republican incumbent, J. Caleb
Boggs, Biden set himself apart from his opponent and supported the
integration of schools through federally mandated busing. Yet in a
few years following his first Senatorial win, he would reverse his
stance and sharpen his words.

After a deciding vote that nixed a
1974
anti-busing amendment
, the freshman Senator faced backlash and
pressure from constituents. Biden’s vote against the ‘74
amendment would stand as his sole exception of supporting school
desegregation through federally mandated busing. After his
controversial vote, constituent outrage ensued. Parents began to
heckle the Senator at a town
hall meeting
and he would promptly change his position to match
his base’s sentiments.

Through 1972 until the end of
federally mandated busing, Biden would join staunch segregationists —
Senators Strom Thurmond, James O. Eastland, Herman E. Talmadge, and
others — backing bills that would prevent the federal government
from enforcing school integration.

After the 1975 white anti-busing
riots in Boston, Biden joined with former Dixiecrat — North
Carolina Republican Jesse Helms — to introduce an anti-busing
amendment
a year later. The proposal’s aim was to handcuff the
enforcement of school desegregation by limiting the federal
government from collecting data on integration. As reported by NPR,
Biden later said in a 1975
interview
he supported a Constitutional amendment to end the
busing mandate.

In support of Helms’s amendment,
Biden would rise on the Senate floor stating,
“I have become convinced that busing is a bankrupt concept.”
Helms’s measure failed but Biden introduced a similar and more
bipartisan amendment
that barred funding for local governments assigning teachers to
schools based on race. Later that year, Biden issued a statement on
busing in an interview, calling
the policy, “[an] asinine concept, the utility of which has never
been proven to me.”

The New
York Times
notes that
Biden proposed a 1976
measure
that would block the Department of Justice (DOJ) from
treating busing as a form of desegregation. A year later the Senator
cosponsored an amendment
that limited federal funding from busing oversight while leading
legislation
that would limit court-ordered busing enforcement.

A year later, in 1977, Biden
remarked that some federal desegregation policies would “cause
his children to grow up in a racialized jungle.
” Biden
continued with rhetoric that echoed Congress’s segregationists,
haranguing against “forced
busing
” and arguing for states’
rights
.

By 1982, Biden joined former
Dixiecrats to vote for a DOJ appropriations amendment that included a
section labeled
“the toughest anti-busing rider ever approved by either chamber of
Congress.” He then voted in favor of an amendment
that granted DOJ the ability “to remove or reduce the requirement
of busing in existing court decrees or judgments.”

A 1991 Supreme
Court decision
would lead to a series of cases that would
ultimately end federally mandated busing. Almost 30 years later, a
2019
report
released by Penn State and UCLA showed that classrooms
are overly segregated
today.

New Jim Crow Joe

From the early 1980s up until
present day, racialized mass incarceration took hold — sponsored
by the war on drugs, heightened sentencing, and through the
empowerment of prosecutors and law enforcement.
The
New Jim Crow
author
Michelle Alexander writes, “Ninety percent of those admitted to
prison for drug offenses in many states were black or Latino, yet the
mass incarceration of communities of color was explained in
race-neutral terms, an adaptation to the needs and demands of the
current political climate. The New Jim Crow was born.”

Biden’s role in the genesis of
the New Jim Crow began during the Reagan years. As reported by
The
Intercept
, Biden
lobbied the Reagan administration to beef up law enforcement and
adopt harsher sentences. While courting Reagan, the Senator reached
across the aisle to find common ground with an old
friend
.

Biden teamed up with Strom Thurmond
to introduce the Comprehensive
Control Act of 1984
. The bill expanded penalties for marijuana
production and trafficking, permitted punitive legal strategies, and
included a civil
asset forfeiture
clause. By 1986
and 1988
he would support and partly author two Anti-Drug Abuse Acts that
imposed stricter sentencing on crack compared to powder cocaine and
bolstered prison sentences for drug offenders.

During Biden’s first bid for the
White House, a 1987
Philadelphia
Inquirer
piece reports
that he gloated about receiving
an award
from Alabama’s former segregationist governor George
Wallace in 1973. Shortly thereafter, Biden delivered a stump
speech
in Alabama, stating, “we [Delawareans] were on the
south’s side in the Civil War.” Continuing on the campaign trail,
he further remarked that he participated as a civil
rights activist
in the 60s, yet the claim was unfounded.

After the Reagan-era, a 1991
peak
in national crime escalated calls for law and order and was
followed by a media frenzy. In the ‘92 Presidential campaign, Bill
Clinton rebranded the Democratic Party as tough on crime, which paid
off and delivered the White House. Shortly after the Clinton victory,
Biden introduced The
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act
, also known as the
‘94 crime bill.

Biden was a substantial contributor
to the legislation and shepherded it through, rising on the Senate
floor boasting
that the liberal wing of the Democratic Party was responsible for 60
new death penalties, 70 enhanced penalties, 100,000 more cops, and
125,000 new prison cells. The Senator continued the next year,
standing
in support
of the bill, “We have predators on our streets who
are beyond the pale….We have no other choice but to take them out
of society.”

The bill passed and was signed into
law by Clinton, imposing mandatory
minimum sentences
, the “three
strikes you’re out rule
”, and increased federal spending for
newly militarized law enforcement and prisons nationwide.

As the policies took shape, the war
on drugs and mass incarceration exploded, delivering the U.S. the
world’s largest prison population. No secret — by the 2000s, with
only 5 percent of the globe’s population, the U.S. had 25
percent
of the world’s prison population. Data from the U.S.
Census shows that black people are five
times more likely
to face incarceration than white people, while
a study
published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine showed
police murders skew excessively towards people of color.

Late Senate and Obama Years

Towards the twilight of Biden’s
Senate career, he pursued neoliberal
economic
reforms and championed financial deregulations. For over
40 years — from 1984 until 2018 — Biden would support proposed
freezes and cuts to Social
Security spending
, while people of color are disproportionately
served
by Social Security income benefits.

He continued with deregulation
through the ‘90s and ‘00s. In 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
was introduced and proposed to eliminate Great Depression-era
financial regulations formed through the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933.
The sweeping deregulatory bill paved the way and further incentivized
finance capital to pursue predatory lending, redlining,
and fiscal trickery which disproportionately
disadvantaged
people of color. Biden supported and voted for the
bill.

Following the erasure of
Glass-Steagall, the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer
Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA), known as the bankruptcy bill, was
introduced. Through BAPCPA’s time in the legislative process, Biden
would offer three
amendments
that hallowed existing statutes. The law would
unequally
impact
people of color, and down the road, exacerbated the
student
debt crisis
, impacting people of color at more
costly levels
.

During the Obama-Biden years,
videos and reports of police murders of black people would surface.
Ferguson and Baltimore became centers of the uprisings that ensued in
2014 and 2015, respectively, and were precursors to the current Black
Lives Matter (BLM) movement. Yet the two-term administration didn’t
deliver the change that was promised in the ‘08 campaign.

Abroad it was also business as
usual for the Obama-Biden White House. The foreign policy apparatus
during the administration actively destabilized
regions, causing crises in Yemen,
Honduras,
Syria,
Somalia,
and Libya,
while continuing W. Bush-era operations in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and
Iraq.

The drone program would also surge
under Biden’s White House years. Since the drone warfare-era, the
administration amassed the highest number of civilian drone strike
casualties. As reported by the
Bureau
of Investigative Journalism
,
at least 380 to 801 civilians in the Middle East and Africa were
killed by drone strikes during Obama and Biden’s tenure.

For Latin Americans, the White
House also managed one of the largest
deportation efforts
in U.S. history, while mass
graves of Latin American migrants
went unchecked by the
administration. Over
two and half million
migrants were deported and the
infrastructure
was left for Trump to inherit and bolster.

A May 2020 CNN
interview
with Harvard professor, Dr. Cornel West, succinctly
summed
up
the Obama-Biden years. “The system cannot reform itself.
We’ve tried black faces in high places. Too often our black
politicians, professional class, middle class become too accommodated
to the capitalist economy.” West continued, “The Black Lives
Matter movement emerged under a black President, a black Attorney
General, and a black Homeland Security, and they couldn’t deliver.”

On The Campaign Trail

Biden didn’t launch his campaign
with much
backing
from the Democratic base, bundlers, or much of a vision.
The core of Biden’s messaging appealed to white
suburbanites
, offering nothing more than a return to normalcy and
an alternative to Trump. Top Democrats, much like the base and
donors, were also initially skeptical of Biden’s path to victory.

According to Politico,
Biden’s former running mate Barack Obama allegedly remarked, “Don’t
underestimate Joe’s ability to fuck things up
.” Obama then
supposedly told one Democratic candidate in Iowa, “And
you know who really doesn’t have it? Joe Biden
.”

Before Biden was thrusted into the
Democratic front runner spotlight, the former Vice President clashed
with future running mate, Kamala Harris, regarding his record on
busing during the debates. While Vice President-elect Harris has her
own controversial
record
on criminal justice, the Biden camp deflected and muddied
the waters.

During the campaign, Biden would
falsely
and repeatedly claim
that he was arrested after meeting with
Nelson Mandela while protesting apartheid in South Africa. He would
also state in an interview, “If you have a problem figuring out
whether you’re for me or Trump, then
you ain’t black
,” which he later apologized for.

Peculiar phrases and malarkey
aside, it didn’t matter for the Biden coalition. The centrist
candidates dropped out and consolidated to crush an insurgent Bernie
Sanders challenge, delivering Biden key wins and the nomination.

Surrounding his primary victory
were potentially the
largest uprisings and movement
in U.S. history. Following the
police murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor, mass rebellions
stormed nationwide — continuing ever since. The majority
of Americans support the BLM movement and the rebellions
against U.S. institutions.

With popular support behind BLM,
Biden didn’t seize the moment like during the post-civil rights
political realignment. Nonetheless, the black vote turned out to
deliver
him the White House. With that said, recent indications show a Biden
administration will take the black vote and the energy around BLM for
granted.

Following the police murder of
Walter
Wallace Jr.
— a young black man experiencing a mental health
episode in Philadelphia — the then Presidential nominee condemned
the uprisings. Biden would then appear for remarks on the campaign
trail to address the hopelessly frustrated crowds, “There is no
excuse whatsoever for the looting and the violence. None whatsoever.”
The campaign also issued a written
statement
in response, adding in a qualifying “but at the
same.”

The President-elect previously
denounced demonstrators in Portland,
Oregon
and elsewhere. Prior to issuing statements, Biden has also
called for police to “shoot
‘em in the leg
” and doubled down on that remark during a town
hall
when asked about police de-escalation techniques.

The Biden transition team was also
considering former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel for a top
cabinet slot
but walked his appointment back after criticism. In
2014, Emanuel attempted to cover
up the police killing
of black Chicagoan, Laquan McDonald, along
with gutting
the city’s social infrastructure for vulnerable communities.

Biden’s “Tranquilizing
Drug Of Gradualism”

Two years before Malcolm X was
assassinated, he delivered
a speech
skewering white liberals, “The white liberal differs
from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more
deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical
than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the
one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and
benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of
the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or
tool in this political “football game” that is constantly raging
between the white liberals and white conservatives.”

Martin Luther King Jr. would share
similar sentiments on white centrists in his letter
from the Birmingham jailhouse
, writing, “I must confess that
over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the
white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that
the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is
not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the
white moderate, who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice;
who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a
positive peace which is the presence of justice.”

The warnings issued by X and King
ring true today.

Opposing full school integration
and using rhetorical pitches reminiscent of Atwater’s southern
strategy gave Biden the political capital he needed to rise through
the ranks and develop bipartisan favor. The racist war on drugs, mass
incarceration, rampant
disenfranchisement
, the prison industrial complex, exploited
labor, and militarized
police
forces didn’t magically appear.

Austerity and financial
deregulation further empowered conservatives and incentivized debt
profiteers to prey on vulnerable people. The continuation of endless
wars and coup d’états, building a mass deportation system, and
failing to leverage power to yield change had someone behind those
policies and inactions.

The policy failures that have
perpetuated a white supremacist society weren’t just lazily passed
and implemented — they were championed and safe-guarded. Biden’s
career has been built on working for white supremacy.

While securing the election by
placating voters of color and appealing to comfortable white
suburbanites — like his strategy in the early throes of his career
— has proven he will not build long-overdue and necessary
systematic justice. Rather than championing a popular and righteous
cause, he has countlessly gone out of his way to support and pay
homage to white supremacist notions and institutions, twisting his
record to the public. Though Biden’s record and words are clear,
nothing
will fundamentally change
.”

Like Biden, the U.S. has yet to
repent for its past and present. For any significant change to occur
in the Biden years and beyond, it will take a sustained mass movement
constantly agitating institutions. During the Biden years and
throughout Democratic strongholds, there will still be brutality,
police murders, and white supremacy. The only possible way for
meaningful change to occur — not symbolic victories — is for all
decent people to continuously take to the streets and, by any means
necessary, demand justice and freedom.

As put by Martin Luther King Jr.,
“this is no time to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism.”

Jack Delaney
is a former policy analyst. He worked on issues relating to health
care, disability, and labor policy, and is a member of the National
Writers Union.

=================================

Zie ook: ‘Nepnieuws en nep media? Hoe de VS echte journalistiek het zwijgen oplegt……….

Fred Hampton 30 augustus 1948 – 4 december 1969, in koelen bloede vermoord door de politie en de FBI

We staan
zeker in Europa te kijken van het nog steeds bestaande racisme in de
VS, de ene politiemoord na de andere op gekleurde burgers (in
verhouding veel meer dan witte burgers). Dit bericht is geen bewerking van een eerder artikel uit 2018* met bijna dezelfde titel, heb besloten dit toch te plaatsen vanwege de langdurige
Black Lives Matter (BLM) protesten van vorig jaar en begin dit jaar na alweer koelbloedige moorden van politieagenten op gekleurden in de VS.

Op 4
december 1969, gisteren 51 jaar gelden schoot de politie Fred Hampton
neer. Fred was een charismatische figuur, een mensenrechtenactivist die wist mensen te organiseren, jong en oud, gekleurd of
wit, mensen die het racisme toen al spuugzat waren en verder natuurlijk actie
voerde tegen het racisme en het daar bijbehorende etnisch profileren
door de toen nog hoofdzakelijk witte politie** (en ook
dat is nog voor een groot deel bestaand, ook al doet Hollywood of er een naar verhouding evenwichtige bemensing is van de politie in de VS….)…..


Op basis
van FBI informatie viel de politie, samen met de FBI op 4 december
1969 het appartement binnen waar Hampton verbleef met zijn vriendin,
in de slaapkamer opende men onmiddellijk het vuur op het bed waas
Hampton en zijn vriendin sliepen en mistten daarbij zijn 8 maanden
zwangere vriendin en Hampton, toen de vriendin de kamer uit was
gewerkt schoot men hem van dichtbij 2 maal in het hoofd…….

Hampton
was een vooraanstaand lid van de Black Panthers, een ander aanwezig
lid van de Panthers was Mark Clark en ook hij werd door het geteisem
vermoord en een aantal anderen raakten zwaar gewond……

Eén en
ander was onderdeel van het FBI programma COINTELPRO. 

Een civiele
rechtszaak in 1982 leidde tot een schadevergoeding van 1,85 miljoen
dollar voor de nabestaanden van Hampton en Clark……

De
politie verdedigde zich met te stellen dat Hampton zich had verzet
bij zijn arrestatie al was daar geen spoor van te vinden…….
Kortom Hampton werd in koelen bloede vermoord door de politie van
Chicago en de andere hoofdverantwoordelijke: terreurorganisatie
FBI……..

De
verantwoordelijke psychopathische moordende agenten zijn nooit
vervolgd voor deze vreselijke misdaad……..

The
still un-prosecuted murder of Fred Hampton

An
FBI/Chicago Police Production

First degree
murder: Plain and simple

Fred Hampton was well spoken, he
was out spoken, and he was a real community leader.

And he was young. Just 21. He had a
life of social and political action in front of him.

Then, with intelligence provided by
the FBI, Chicago Police raided his apartment in the early morning,
shooting directly at the bed he was known to sleep in. They missed
his eight and a half month pregnant girlfriend – and him.

Then they cleared the room and
finished him off with two close range shots to the head.

The police report said that Hampton
shot at them and refused to surrender.

The evidence shows nothing of the
kind happened. He was murdered in cold blood.

No one has gone to jail for this
yet – but there is no statute of limitations on murder and many of
the people involved in the killing involved are still alive so we can
hope. The law says they’re as guilty as the person who pulled the
trigger.

===================================================

*  Zie: ‘Fred Hampton 30 augustus 1948 – 4 december 1969 >> mensenrechtenactivist vermoord door FBI en Chicago politie‘ (ook met aanvullingen op dit bericht)

** Je kan dan ook gerust
stellen dat de Nederlandse politieagenten die zich schuldig maken aan
etnisch profileren, zonder meer racistisch zijn en ik kan dat niet anders zien dan een uitwas van het fascisme……

Voor meer berichten over/met Fred Hampton, Martin Luther King, Black Panthers, BLM, COINTELPRO, FBI en/of Hoover, klik op het desbetreffende label, direct onder dit bericht.

Martin Luther King: vrede en gelijkheid is mogelijk

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor martin luther king

“I
refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the
starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace
and brotherhood can never become a reality…” Martin Luther
King Jr.

 Image

Pinned Tweet

NMHP   @NMBewitched

Met dank aan, ja aan wie? Heb het ”geretweete’ (gadver) bericht per ongeluk weggeklikt, mijn excuus. (zeker mijn dank aan NMHP en uiteraard aan Martin Luther King voor zijn ware woorden in dit standpunt >> zie wat dat betreft ook: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: 8 wijze lessen!)

Zie ook: ‘Martin Luther King: de moord van 50 jaar geleden door de VS overheid uiterst beperkt herdacht

Als Martin Luther King nog zou leven was hij onderwerp van censuur en was zijn Facebook pagina verwijderd

NAVO, het grootste militaire verbond maakt zich schuldig aan grootschalige terreur i.p.v. de vrede te bewaren‘ (o.a. geluidsfragmenten met het protest van King tegen de oorlog in Vietnam)

Thomas Merton >> een kritische rk geestelijke vermoord in hetzelfde jaar als Robert F. Kennedy en Martin Luther King

Fred Hampton 30 augustus 1948 – 4 december 1969 >> mensenrechtenactivist vermoord door FBI en Chicago politie

Martin Luther King: de moord van 50 jaar geleden door de VS overheid uiterst beperkt herdacht

Martin Luther King jr. vermoord door de overheid, aldus rechter……..

De
langzame moord op de ideeën van Martin Luther King……………..
Ofwel: Dr. Martin Luther Kings lessen willens en wetens verzwegen….

De oorlog tegen het arme deel van de VS bevolking

Nam Kurt Cobain zijn eigen leven? Niet volgens een flink aantal mensen

Martin Luther King misbruikt door Radio1

 ‘Paul
Scheffer, het media-orakel met een ‘vlijmscherpe analyse’ over het
racistische optreden van de politie in de VS……… AUW!!!

Willem Post over de zegeningen van het zero tolerance beleid in de VS en ach, het is misschien ietsje doorgeschoten…….  

Het label BLM staat voor Black Lives Matter, klik op dat label, direct onder dit bericht, voor meer artikelen over de recente ‘rassenrellen’ in de VS (er is maar één ‘humaan’ ras op deze planeet en dat is ‘vreemd genoeg’ [voor velen]……. het menselijk ras!!)

Alabama 15 september 1963: vier zwarte meisjes vermoord, met een herdenking door Martin Luther King en John Coltrane

Op
15 september 1963 hebben witte fascisten van de KKK dynamiet laten
ontploffen in een baptistenkerk in Alabama, daarmee vermoordde dit
geteisem vier zwarte meisjes tussen de elf en veertien jaar…..

De ongeëvenaarde en geweldige zwarte voorvechter voor gelijke rechten (tevens dominee) Martin Luther King, plus de legendarische saxofonist John Coltrane (met het nummer Alabama), waren onder de mensen die de
meisjes herdachten met een kerkdienst en een paar concerten.

Vergeet voorts niet dat men in de vorige eeuw tot de 70er jaren in zuidelijke staten van de VS, als Alabama niet zelden gelynchte zwarten in een boom zag hangen…. Dit zou in 1950 zijn gestopt, echter het ging wel degelijk nog door tot ver in de 60er jaren, ook al liep het aantal terug, het was er niet minder gruwelijk en barbaars om…… (er werden overigens ook zwarten levend verbrand en dat samen met het lynchen van zwarten werd voor het overgrote deel door witten gedaan die op zondag in de kerk zaten……)


Hier de ook al legendarische zangeres Billie Holiday met het nummer ‘Strange Fruit’ dat over dat lynchen ging, een live nummer uit 1959:

 

In het bericht van Brasscheck TV een paar video’s, waar de tweede tevens aandacht heeft voor de
aanhouding van
King* in Birmingham, waar eerder dat jaar, april 1963, ‘onlusten waren uitgebroken’, destijds bedoelde men daarmee dat de witte politie tekeerging tegen geweldloze gekleurden die demonstreerden tegen de rassenscheiding….. (delen van het mooie nummer Birmingham van Randy Newman komen nog een paar keer voorbij) Helaas kan ik die video niet overnemen, ondanks dat deze op YouTube zou moeten staan, vandaar voor de echte tweede video zie het origineel.

Alabama

History:
Coltrane and King

Remembering
the intensity of the struggle

Alabama – The Power of
Jazz

On Sunday, September 15, 1963,
twelve sticks of dynamite were placed in the 16th Street Baptist
Church in Birmingham, Alabama. The bomb had been planted by the white
supremacy group, the KKK, and killed four young black girls between
the ages of 11-14.

John
Coltrane wrote the song ‘Alabama’ in response to this event and
patterned his playing in the song after Martin Luther King’s speech
at the funeral for the four girls.

Coltrane also performed in eight
benefit concerts for King in 1964 and recorded several other songs
inspired by the civil rights movement called, ‘Reverend King’,
‘Backs Against the Wall’ and his album Cosmic Music dedicated to
Martin Luther King.

The back
story to the bombing

Most people are aware of the church
bombing in Birmingham that killed four children in 1963.

Missing from the story is why THIS
particular church was targeted.

It’s a triumphant story, but also
sheds a light on the diabolical hatred that infected (and still
infects) many Americans.

=============================

Zoals
gezegd: de tweede video in het origineel kan ik niet overnemen, dus hier een
paar andere video’s over de bomaanslag en met o.a. de toespraak van King
n.a.v. deze aanslag (luisteren mensen, King was een uiterst intelligente activist en zonder meer een begaafd spreker [en schrijver]): 

 

 

De volgende video gaat over de hiervoor al aangehaalde vreedzame demonstratie tegen de rassenscheiding door de gekleurde bevolking van Birmingham, dit gebeurde zoals gezegd eerder dat jaar in april 1963. King sprak daar ook en werd gearresteerd door de witte politie van die stad…:

En nog een door King ingesproken brief vanuit de gevangenis, duurt even maar meer dan de moeite waard:

 

Voor meer berichten over Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, BLM (Black Lives Matter), vervolging minderheden, Black Panthers, en/of racisme, klik op het desbetreffende label, direct onder dit bericht

De militarisering van de VS gaat ten koste van de eigen bevolking, van sociale rechtvaardigheid en van gelijkheid

Melvin
Goodman heeft op CounterPunch een artikel geschreven over de
militarisering van de VS. Daarvoor haalt hij de woorden aan van
Martin Luther King, die precies een jaar voordat hij werd vermoord op
4 april 1967, in een toespraak de volgende zaken met elkaar en racisme verbond:
-de politieke, economische en sociale crisis, -het militarisme plus de Vietnam Oorlog, -de ongelijkheid en
-het materialisme van de VS economie. Daarvoor stelde hij dat er een
beweging nodig was die de VS maatschappij naar sociale
rechtvaardigheid zou leiden, iets wat tot op de dag van vandaag nog
steeds niet is gebeurd…… (in feite tekende Martin Luther King met dergelijke toespraken zijn eigen doodvonnis…..)

Leiders
van burgerrechten van het politieke ‘midden’, zoals Ralph Bunch
vroegen King zijn toespraak radicaal aan te passen: en racisme niet
lange te verbinden aan de Vietnam Oorlog. Ter verduidelijking: in
verhouding werden meer zwarte jongeren uitgezonden naar Vietnam,
jongeren ook uit arme gezinnen die naast de dienstplicht ook werden gelokt met
‘ronselpraatjes…..’ De grote dagbladen van die tijd, zoals de New
York Times en de Washington Post bagatelliseerden de toespraak van
King en stelden dat het een stevige versimpeling was van de problemen
en dat deze de burgerrechtenbeweging en de anti-oorlog beweging
schade zouden toebrengen….. (ha! ha! ha! ha! het gore lef!!) 53 jaar later wordt er nog steeds
gestreden om sociale rechtvaardigheid te bewerkstelligen voor zaken die
racisme, militarisme en materialisme teweegbrengen…… (materialisme dat mede verantoordelijk is voor de klimaatverandering en daarmee voor de vernietiging van een fiks deel van de aarde…..)

King
stelde destijds al dat de VS de grootste leverancier is van geweld in
de wereld, zoals op deze plek vaak neergezet met de constatering dat
de VS de grootste terreurentiteit op onze planeet is, een entiteit
die vanaf het eind van WOII verantwoordelijk is voor de dood van ruim
meer dan 22,5 miljoen mensen…… De laatste 2 decennia is de
VS in feite continu verwikkeld in (illegale) oorlogen die het zelf is begonnen en waarbij meer dan 2,5 mensen zijn omgekomen,
ofwel vermoord door de VS met hulp van haar hielenlikkende
NAVO-partners (waaronder Nederland….)…. Vergeet hierbij niet dat
de VS onder Nobelprijswinnaar voor de Vrede, Obama niet alleen de
eerste licht gekleurde president was van de VS, maar hij was tevens de eerste
president die de VS de volledige 2 termijnen in illegale oorlogen
vasthield, ‘een prestatie vanjewelste…..’ (ter verduidelijking: een
walgelijke prestatie en nogmaals: dat werd bewerkstelligd door een
Nobelprijswinnaar, met de hulp en onder verantwoording van
oorlogsmisdadigers Hillary Clinton en Joe Biden als ministers van
buitenlandse zaken….)

King zei volkomen terecht dat de enorme hoeveelheid geld die
werd gespendeerd aan oorlogen zou moeten worden gebruikt om
sociaal welzijn te bewerkstelligen in de VS. In feite was
oud-president Eisenhower het eens met King, toen hij in 1953 in een
toespraak stelde dat elk wapen dat wordt gefabriceerd en elk
oorlogsschip dat van stapel loopt, diefstal is van degenen die
hongeren maar geen eten hebben en van hen die kou lijden maar geen
kleding hebben. Voorts liet hij in deze toespraak weten, enkele weken
na de dood van Stalin, dat de kosten voor de rivaliteit tussen de VS
en Rusland veel te groot waren, waarbij hij in feite doelde op de
onzinnige expres opgeklopte rivaliteit* (Ap). Eisenhower was ook degene die het militair-industrieel complex gebruikte om aan te geven dat dit een groot gevaar was voor de democratie. Wat
dat betreft is er weinig veranderd, gezien de verhoudingen van de VS
met China (en Rusland, al noemt Goodman in deze die rivaliteit niet),
waarvoor het ‘defensiebudget’ (lees: oorlogsbudget) volkomen uit de
klauwen is gelopen en nu zelfs meer dan 750 miljard dollar groot
is…….

Belachelijk
genoeg is het budget voor buitenlandse zaken uitgekleed ten koste van
dat oorlogsbudget, ofwel; de VS heeft lak aan diplomatie en dicteert
met het geweer in de hand, waarbij voor het grootste deel regeringen
onder druk worden gezet met economische sancties, waar de volkeren
die het aangaat zwaar lijden en waarbij alleen de laatste 23 jaar al
minstens een miljoen mensen zijn omgekomen (waaronder een groot aantal kinderen….)….. Als de opvolgende VS
administraties daarop werden (en de Trump administratie wordt) gewezen liegt men keihard dat
humanitaire goederen als voedsel en medicijnen niet onder de sancties
vallen, terwijl juist daardoor zoveel mensen omkomen….. Zo zijn in
Venezuela al minstens 50.000 mensen omgekomen door die sancties en
lijdt de bevolking in Syrië nu zelfs honger……

De
leugen dat humanitaire goederen niet onder sancties vallen is zo
overduidelijk dat het totaal belachelijk is, immers de bedoeling van
die sancties is de bevolking op te zetten tegen de regering die de VS
wil wippen…….

Goodman stelt dat het wel uiterst cynisch
is dat de militarisering van de VS pas goed van start ging na het
inklappen van de Sovjet-Unie, waar militairen meer politieke macht
kregen ten koste van beambten die zich bezig hielden met ontwapening
en het zoeken naar politieke oplossingen voor problemen elders. Ben het in
deze niet eens met Goodman, immers de VS heeft ook voor het omvallen
van de Sovjet-Unie op grote schaal (illegaal, dus zonder toestemming van een VN resolutie) oorlog gevoerd tegen een groot aantal
landen…..

Om
nog maar te zwijgen over de CIA organisatie van geheime militaire
acties in diverse buitenlanden, het organiseren van (veelal
gewelddadige) opstanden in landen die de VS niet welgevallig waren en
zijn, met zoals gezegd de bedoeling om het volk op te zetten tegen
haar veelal democratisch gekozen regering en uiteindelijk zelfs met
een door het Pentagon georganiseerde militaire inval in dat soort
landen, mochten voorgaande zaken niet lukken, zie bijvoorbeeld Irak,
Libië en Syrië…. (de opstand in Libië lukte doordat troepen van
terreurorganisatie NAVO, o.l.v. de VS de stellingen van het Libische
leger bombardeerden en daarmee o.a. de al inferieure luchtmacht van
Khadaffi aan de grond hielden…… Waar een inval in Irak en Syrië
volgde nadat de VS alweer zoals gezegd het wapen van sancties (en
opstanden) heeft geprobeerd te gebruiken, maar waar dat wel
mislukte…. 

Tot
slot nog dit: Trump heeft met zijn herhaalde oorlogsverklaring aan
‘the left’ in de VS nog eens laten zien dat Goodman met zijn artikel
het gelijk volkomen aan zijn kant heeft….. (een oorlogsverklaring
tegen burgerrechten organisaties als Black Lives Matter, milieu-actie
organisaties en vredesactivisten, al dan niet georganiseerd in organisaties die zich verzetten tegen het VS
imperialisme…)…. In feite heeft Trump met zijn uitlatingen de lont
aangestoken, die een burgeroorlog in de VS heel dichtbij heeft
gebracht…… (één voordeel mocht dat gebeuren: de VS zal dan een
groot deel van haar troepen uit het buitenland terug moeten trekken,
waardoor de wereld eindelijk wat adem kan halen, bevrijd van de
enorme terreur die de VS over een flink deel van de wereld heeft
gebracht en brengt)

Lees
het volgende artikel waarin je veel meer kan lezen over het
imperialisme van de VS dat ten koste gaat van de eigen bevolking en
vorm je eigen mening over e.e.a. Vergeet daarbij niet dat er intussen met meer dan voldoende bewijs kan worden aangetoond dat de
VS het Vierde Rijk is…… Een ‘rijk’ met bijvoorbeeld meer dan 800 militaire bases
over de wereld….. Voorts kan je ook aan het politie apparaat van de
VS zien dat de militarisering letterlijk doorsijpelt in de dagelijkse
‘burgerpraktijk…..’

July
1, 2020

De-Militarizing
the United States

by Melvin
Goodman

Photograph
by Nathaniel St. Clair

More than a half-century ago,
exactly one year before he was assassinated, Martin Luther King Jr.
brilliantly identified the keys to the American political, economic,
and social crisis that has worsened over the years.  At the
Riverside Church in New York City, King linked the militarism of the
Vietnam War; the racism of American society; and the inequality and
materialism of the American economy to demand a movement toward
social justice that we seek today.  The central civil rights
leaders of the time, including Ralph Bunch, asked King to radically
alter the speech and to dissociate racism from the Vietnam War. 
The central newspapers of the time, including the 
New
York Times
 and
the 
Washington Post,
maligned the speech, terming it an “oversimplification” that
would hurt both the civil rights movement and the anti-war movement.
Fifty-three years later, we are still trying to solve the ills of
racism, militarism, and materialism that beg for social justice.

King courageously referred to the
United States as the “greatest purveyor of violence in the world,”
and today we face two decades of permanent war that have cost blood
and treasure.  King believed the resources spent on the Vietnam
War should have been devoted to social welfare at home. 
President Dwight D. Eisenhower, in his Cross of Iron speech in 1953,
argued similarly that “every gun that is made, every warship
launched” is “theft from those who hunger and are not fed—those
who are cold and are not clothed.”  Eisenhower gave the speech
several weeks after the death of Joseph Stalin, warning of the
tremendous costs associated with the rivalry with the Soviet Union. 
We continue to exaggerate the threats from overseas (see China) to
justify bloated defense budgets that restrict economic and social
investment.

The reliance on military
instruments of power to implement foreign policy has expanded the
role of the Department of Defense at the expense of the Department of
State.  The State Department’s budget is less than one-tenth
of the defense budget, and smaller than the budget of the
intelligence community.  There are more soldiers and sailors in
military marching bands than there are Foreign Service Officers. 
The decline of the Agency for International Development, and
President Bill Clinton’s dissolution of the Arms Control and
Disarmament Agency and the United States Information Service have
contributed to the overall decline of civilian influence in national
security policy. John Quincy Adams warned against going abroad
“in search of monsters to destroy,” which is exactly what we have
done in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

Ironically, the increased
militarization of U.S. policy began in the wake of the collapse of
the Soviet Union, which should have inspired a debate on the need for
a new national security strategy.  Instead, the administrations
of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama  catered to
the military, appointed too many general and flag officers to
positions that should be in the hands of civilians, and failed to
control spending on weapons of war.  Donald Trump went further
than his predecessors in this regard, although it turned out that his
generals became the “adults in the room,” and were replaced by
such civilian “Chicken Hawks” as John Bolton and Secretary of
State Mike Pompeo.  Trump’s hands-off style toward the
military has been worsened by his “war cabinet.”

Pompeo and former national security
adviser Bolton killed arms control and disarmament and thus provided
a tremendous boost to militarization of national security policy. 
They successfully lobbied for the destruction of the Iran nuclear
accord, the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, and the Open
Skies Treaty (OST); they dragged their heels on renewing the New START
Treaty, which expires in January 2021.  Their legacy may
eventually include the death of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in
view of Trump’s interest in conducting the first U.S. nuclear test
since 1992, when Washington followed Moscow’s lead and joined a
moratorium on nuclear-weapons testing.  A U.S. resumption of
testing would be the death knell for the Nonproliferation Treaty,
which finds the non-nuclear signers impatient with the failure of
nuclear powers to disarm.

The militarization of the
intelligence community, particularly the Central Intelligence Agency,
has contributed to the misuse of force.  The CIA helped to make
a specious case for war against Iraq, citing nonexistent weapons of
mass destruction and nonexistent links between Saddam Hussein and
Osama bin Laden.  The CIA cherry-picked intelligence to support
the use of force and  corrupted the intelligence process to
convince Congress and the American people of the need for war. No
senior CIA official protested, let alone resigned, in the wake of the
misuse of intelligence or in response to the sadistic torture and
abuse program of the war on terror.  Meanwhile, the CIA has
become a paramilitary organization, and has stepped up its
recruitment of military veterans.  The hiring of military
veterans by the police is similarly noteworthy.

When the Pentagon ended up with
weapons of war that were no longer needed, the Clinton administration
found a way to distribute armored personnel carriers, submachine
guns, and even grenade launchers to urban police departments, which
began to look like forces of occupation and not community support.
The use of tear gas, which was developed by the U.S. Army for riot
control in 1919 and is prohibited by various international treaties,
was widely used against protestors in the wake of the murder of
George Floyd. National Guard helicopters were used in Washington to
rout peaceful protestors by using low flying techniques to create
dangerous downdrafts, a technique developed to rout insurgents in
such places as Iraq. Recent studies indicate that police departments,
which were given sophisticated military equipment in the 1990s, were
more likely to have violent encounters with the public, regardless of
local crime rates.  Militarized police units, moreover, were
more frequently deployed to African-American communities, even after
controlling for local crime rates.

In addition to the use of military
weapons and techniques to implement domestic security, there has been
police misuse of intelligence surveillance at home.  In January
2020, an African-American man in Detroit became the first U.S.
citizen to be arrested as a result of a false facial recognition
match.  Police departments have used facial recognition systems
for the past two decades, but recent studies have demonstrated that
the technology is not accurate for people of color due to a lack of
diversity in the images used to develop the underlying databases. 
The case in Detroit involved a combination of flawed technology and
poor police work.  Fortunately, the American Civil Liberties
Union is working to end the use of invasive surveillance technologies
as the Congress grapples awkwardly with police reform in the wake of
mindless police killings in Minnesota, Colorado, and Kentucky.

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks,
the New York police department hired a former deputy director for
operations at the CIA, David Cohen, as a deputy police commissioner
for intelligence.  Cohen immediately initiated police
surveillance of public events, and declared that the police
department was not required to have a “specific indication” of a
crime before investigating.  In granting the city’s
surveillance requests, a federal judge ruled that the dangers of
terrorism “outweigh any First Amendment cost.”  As a result,
the police department was authorized to conduct investigations of
political, social, and religious groups. The Pentagon and the
Department of Homeland Security orchestrated the use of drones in
fifteen cities to collect intelligence against peaceful protests
after the Floyd murder.  In a violation of the 1878 Posse
Comitatus Act, this information was passed to the FBI for law
enforcement purposes.

King’s voice was prescient in
linking the costs of overseas military adventurism; social and
economic inequality; and institutional racism.  His voice had
support over the past century.  

When Franklin D. Roosevelt
assumed the presidency in 1933, he told advisors that the United
States needed a new vision of domestic security, that we were
“trapped in the ice of our own indifference.”  When
Eisenhower left the presidency in 1961, he warned about the dangers
of unchecked and unmonitored congressional support for defense
spending, intelligence spending, and homeland security.  And in
1999, George F. Kennan, the author of our Cold War containment
strategy against the Soviet Union, warned about over-reliance on the
military in U.S. decision making. The sooner we grapple with the
militarization of our society at home and abroad, the sooner we will
be able to address the ills that militarism has wrought.

 

More articles by:Melvin
Goodman

Melvin A. Goodman is
a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and a
professor of government at Johns Hopkins University.  A former
CIA analyst, Goodman is the author of Failure
of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA
 and National
Insecurity: The Cost of American Militarism
. and A
Whistleblower at the CIA
. His most recent book is “American
Carnage: The Wars of Donald Trump” (Opus Publishing), and he is the
author of the forthcoming “The Dangerous National Security State”
(2020).” Goodman is the national security columnist
for counterpunch.org.

===============================

* Al was e.e.a. behoorlijk hypocriet, immers ook Eisenhower hield zich bezig met illegale oorlogsvoering en een fiks aantal kernproeven…..

Voor meer artikelen over burgerrechten, racisme, G. Floyd, Martin Luther King, militaire basis VS, Vierde Rijk, Eisenhower, Clinton, George W. Bush, Obama en/of imperialisme, klik op het desbetreffende label, direct onder diit bercht.

Malcolm X Day: 19 mei 1925 – 21 februari 1965

Vandaag
is het 55 jaar geleden dat de gekleurde mensenrechtenactivist Malcolm
X werd vermoord door de FBI……

Brasscheck
TV heeft 2 video’s geplaatst over Malcolm X, de eerste bevat een
beroemde speech van Malcolm X, ofwel El-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz, na
zijn terugkeer uit Mekka, de tweede bevat een verslag van de
begrafenis van el-Shabazz…….

Onlangs
heeft een aanklager besloten de moord op el-Shabazz opnieuw te
onderzoeken, ook al is dat minstens 50 jaar te laat, ‘maar goed’ het gebeurt nu daadwerkelijk en dan maar hopen dat de uitkomst niet nu al
bekend is bij de onderzoekers: Malcolm X opnieuw demoniseren als
staatsvijand, zoals ook Martin Luther King werd gezien door de FBI,
de rest van de geheime diensten in de VS en door een groot aantal
politici (er zijn zelfs politici die dat nog steeds vinden, al durft men dat nu niet
meer hardop te zeggen……) 

Nog zo’n voorbeeld: pas in 2008 besloot de VS om Nelson
Mandela van de terreurlijst te halen….. (!!!), terwijl deze een
aantal jaren president was van Zuid-Afrika (en zelfs toen nog op de
terreurlijst van de VS stond!), laat staan hoe men dacht en nog denkt
over el-Shabazz en Martin Luther King, om deze 2
mensenrechtenstrijders nog een keer te noemen……..

Kortom
geen twijfel wie de opdracht voor de moord op al-Shabazz heeft gegeven: de regering van de vereniging van
terreurstaten die als de VS wordt aangeduid (destijds onder presidentschap van oorlogsmisdadiger L.B. Johnson) en uitgevoerd door de FBI……

Malcolm X Day

May
19, 1925 – February 21, 1965

On
this day in 1965, Malcom X was assassinated.

Police who were
surveilling talk about their cooperation with the FBI in keeping an
eye on Malcolm X.

Whatever he’s going to do will
not be beneficial to the powers that be.”

We don’t have an American
problem. We have a human problem.”

Click here to support
Brasscheck

Ex-FBI bons geeft toe dat FBI zich bezighield en houdt met het manipuleren van VS verkiezingen…..

Vreemd
toch dat de FBI nog steeds als een geloofwaardige organisatie wordt
gezien in zo ongeveer het hele westen, terwijl de organisatie
meermaals is ontmaskerd als een bovenwettelijke organisatie, een organisatie die beduidend vaker liegt dan de waarheid spreekt en die
zelfs moord niet uit de weg gaat…. Het is zeker dat de vele tv
series en films waarin de FBI meestal een glansrol speelt, ofwel Hollywood gestuurde FBI-propaganda, met het vertekende beeld over de FBI te maken heeft….

Caitlin
Johnstone schreef het hieronder opgenomen artikel over ex-FBI bons
Terry Turchie, die in een gesprek op Fox zijn gram uitsprak over
progressieve en linkse mensen geplaatst op functies in de VS
regering, terwijl hij zich (‘oh ironie’) kan herinneren dat de FBI
succesvol dit soort figuren uit de regering wist te houden……
Als reden daarvoor gaf Turchie het antwoord dat daarmee de regering
disfunctioneel zou worden gemaakt en deze regering het volk zou misleiden met expres gemaakte misinformatie* en desinformatie (en fake news = nepnieuws)……. Terwijl we nu weten dat juist een VS regering zonder ‘progressieven’ en linkse mensen een garantie is voor enorme misleiding van het volk, waar men zelfs (meervoudige) moord niet schuwt om het misselijkmakend doel te bereiken……. Sterker nog, op die manier worden de vele illegale oorlogen die de VS her en der heeft gevoerd en voert, als noodzakelijk voorgesteld…..

Waar
haalt deze Turchie kwast het gore lef vandaan?? Met zijn praatje geeft hij
juist aan waar de FBI voor heeft gezorgd en voor staat: manipulatie
van de bevolking via leugens, desinformatie en verdraaiing van
feiten, waarmee niet Rusland maar de FBI de verkiezingen manipuleerde en nog manipuleert…. Waaraan toegevoegd moet worden dat de FBI niet schroomt
een false flag operatie uit te voeren, waarmee een haar
onwelgevallige politicus, ambtenaar dan wel burger in een kwaad
daglicht wordt gesteld, zoals de FBI dat heeft gedaan inzake Martin
Luther King (al was het in dat geval zinloos). Mocht dit niet lukken
zoals alweer in ‘de zaak’ Martin Luther King, dan vermoordt de FBI
zo’n figuur, of laat deze vermoorden en als het moet door
maffialeden……

Moet je
nagaan: dan durft ook de FBI Rusland van verkiezingsmanipulatie in de
VS te beschuldigen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Lees het artikel van Johnstone, waarin ze o.a. ook Martin Luther King aanhaalt**:

Shocking
Admission by FBI Veteran Shows Why the FBI Shouldn’t Exist

January
20, 2019 at 9:48 pm

Written
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone

(CJ Opinion) — On
the 18th of November, 1964, the FBI’s 
appallingly
corrupt
 boss
J. Edgar Hoover 
denounced Martin
Luther King Jr. as “the most notorious liar in the country.” A
few days later, a Hoover deputy named William Sullivan 
wrote
King a letter
 posing
as a disillusioned follower and using powerful, manipulative language
to urge the civil rights leader to commit suicide before evidence of
his extramarital affair became public. Enclosed was an FBI recording
containing evidence of the affair.

Whenever
America celebrates Martin Luther King Jr. Day* we should remind
ourselves that it is a known, undisputed fact that the Federal Bureau
of Investigation engineered a psyop to manipulate one of the world’s
greatest minds into committing suicide. It is also worth reviewing
the 
compelling
argument
 for
the case that the FBI was behind King’s assassination as well.

Hoover,
who headed the FBI for decades, obsessively despised King on a deeply
personal level. He kept files on the civil rights leader in which
he’d 
scribble
hateful comments
 on
memos he received about King, apparently for no purpose other than
his own gratification and catharsis. On a memo about King receiving
the St. Francis peace medal from the Catholic Church, he wrote “This
is disgusting.” On the news of King’s meeting with the pope, he
scribbled, “I am amazed that the Pope gave an audience to such a
degenerate.”

FBI
headquarters 
still
wears the name
 of
this childish pig, a brazen admission by the Bureau that it remains
very much the same institution which tried to end Martin Luther King
Jr.’s life, the same institution which 
assassinated Black
Panthers leader Fred Hampton***, the same institution which for years
ran the unconstitutional 
COINTELPRO
campaign
 to
infiltrate and sabotage dissident political groups, and which
has 
continued
to infiltrate
 dissident
political groups, 
including
Black civil rights groups
,
to 
this very day.

We
received yet another reminder of the FBI’s true face the other day
in an interview with its former Deputy Assistant Director Terry
Turchie on Fox’s 
Tucker
Carlson Tonight
.
In a passing tangent largely unrelated to the rest of the interview,
Turchie 
made
the following shocking statement
 in
relation to the ongoing Russiagate saga:

And
I think we can expect more of this, because quite honestly the
electorate in some places is putting more and more progressives and
self-described socialists in positions. And ironically, years ago,
when I first got into the FBI, one of the missions of the FBI in its
counterintelligence efforts was to try and keep these people out of
government. Why? Because we would end up with massive dysfunction and
massive disinformation and massive misinformation, and it seems to me
that’s where we’re at today.”

Wow.

(Let op: de onderstaande video behoort uiteraard niet bij het Twitterbericht, deze kan ik niet overnemen, echter de YouTube video is aanmerkelijk langer, de video van Twitter is daar onderdeel van)

Andrew Lawrence@ndrew_lawrence

Uhhhhhhh….Fmr FBI Assistant Director just said “When I first got into the FBI one of the missions of the FBI in its counterintelligence efforts was to try to keep” progressives out of government

5,870

2:48 AM – Jan 19, 2019

According
to 
his
LinkedIn profile
,
Turchie joined the FBI in July of 1972. COINTELPRO, the program in
which leftist groups were actively infiltrated and undermined,
officially 
ended
in 1971
,
and Hoover had 
died
in May of 1972
.
This was after “Hoover’s FBI” stopped being Hoover’s FBI, yet
a “counterintelligence effort” was still very much alive and
thriving to undermine the will of the electorate and prevent them
from electing leftists to office.

This
one admission, by itself, is in my opinion more than enough to
justify the FBI’s total dissolution. Leaving aside any of their
other malfeasance that I mentioned earlier, leaving aside the rest of
their other documented malfeasance that I haven’t mentioned, this
one admission by Turchie shows clearly that America’s secret police
should cease to exist.

Think
about it. How can anyone justify the FBI’s continued existence
after such an admission? There is an extremely powerful branch of the
US government which is known to have been actively undermining the
democratic will of the electorate through covert means. Even if you
very trustingly subscribe to the belief that the FBI no longer
engages in any such practices to any extent (and that would be
extremely naive), how can you justify keeping it in power knowing
that it did? Where precisely in the FBI’s history is a clear,
clean, unequivocal break from what it was doing then declared,
documented and evidenced? For what reason was it not razed to the
ground decades ago and any of its actual necessary functions
transferred elsewhere?

Imagine
if the Ku Klux Klan had successfully cleaned up its image in the ’90s
or something. Now you’re seeing members of the KKK interviewed on
CNN and MSNBC as respectable members of society, holding powerful
political positions, treated like heroes, all under the same banner
it held when it was lynching people of color a few decades prior.
Would that not seem weird? Would you not say something like “Wait,
why are we keeping that organization around? At best they’re
probably just putting a nicer face on their previous toxic agendas,
especially since any good intentions existing within it could simply
be taken somewhere with a less horrific history.”

The
only reason the FBI is being treated any differently is because it’s
got such good PR, namely the entire political/media class.

Journalist
Mark Ames 
documents a
short-lived push by the Carter administration to “transform the FBI
from an extralegal secret police agency to something legal and
defined.” This feeble proposition to give the Bureau an actual
charter to clearly define what it is, what it does, and where the
confines of its operations are was the closest America ever came to
putting any kind of limitations on the powers of its secret police
force, and by the time Reagan rolled around it was long forgotten.

And
now you’ve got this same evil institution 
essentially
criminalizing
 the
act of the executive branch pursuing good relations with a nuclear
superpower, launching a secret counterintelligence investigation into
whether a sitting president is a national security threat for his
Russia policy. This cannot be leading anywhere good.

The
FBI has too much power and far too unforgivable a history to be
permitted to control the reigns of the nation with the most powerful
military force in the history of civilization. Get rid of it and move
in a healthy direction.

Support
Caitlin’s work on 
Patreon or Paypal.

By Caitlin
Johnstone
 /
Republished with permission / 
Medium

*   Misinformatie ziet men over het algemeen als per ongeluk misleidende informatie, vandaar dat ik dit noem, terwijl reguliere media dagelijks expres misinformatie brengen, met claims die al lang zijn neergehaald als onzin……. Door deze misinformatie (ook bestaand uit ‘fake news’ of zoals wij zeggen nepnieuws) te blijven herhalen, kan men de bevolking ook andere des- of disinformatie door de strot duwen, neem de claims over de ‘noodzaak’van de illegale oorlog van de VS tegen Irak, die de VS in 2003 begon, een oorlog die nog steeds voortduurt en intussen aan meer dan 1,5 miljoen Irakezen het leven heeft gekost, ofwel zij zijn feitelijk vermoord door de VS en haar oorlogshond terreurorganisatie NAVO (Nederland speelt zelfs één van de hoofdrollen, daar een Nederlandse duikboot [met wat VS personeel aan boord] al voor de VS inval in Irak informatie verzamelde over de Iraakse strijdkrachten….. Nog steeds durven de reguliere media deze illegale oorlog als legitiem te verkopen, bijvoorbeeld als er weer sprake is van een Nederlandse militaire missie die naar Irak vertrekt…… (de Nederlandse missie is overigens gestopt op 31 december jl., wat niet wil zeggen dat Nederland niet alsnog een keer naar Irak zal vertrekken als de VS en de NAVO dit nodig achten…..)

**  Zie o.a.: ‘Als Martin Luther King nog zou leven was hij onderwerp van censuur en was zijn Facebook pagina verwijderd‘ (en zie de andere links in dat bericht, o.a. verwijzend naar meer berichten over Martin Luther King)

*** Zie: ‘Fred Hampton 30 augustus 1948 – 4 december 1969 >> mensenrechtenactivist vermoord door FBI en Chicago politie

Zie voor Facebook manipulaties en censuur:

Massamedia VS vallen keihard door de mand met ‘vers’ geschoten Russiagate bok >> publiek wordt om vertrouwen gevraagd

Jacht in VS op alternatief (echt) nieuws in volgend stadium: journalist wordt vastgehouden zonder aanklacht

NewsGuard, het nieuwste wapen van Big Brother VS tegen de alternatieve media

Netflix censureert aflevering van humoristisch programma, ‘na een geldig verzoek’ op grond van Saoedische wetgeving….

Britse militaire geheime dienst bedient zich van moddergooien en andere manipulaties om Europese en VS politiek te manipuleren, zo blijkt uit gelekte documenten

Lichtgelovige ‘atheïst’ gelooft Russiagate leugens….

New York Times te kakken gezet met haar berichtgeving over Russische manipulatie voor midterm verkiezingen

VS begint ‘troll farm’, alsof Hollywood en de massamedia al niet genoeg VS propaganda maken……….


Bedrijf dat voor ‘Russische bots’ waarschuwde, heeft een leger met nep-Russische bots

Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen

Facebooks departement voor censuur: een hoognodige uitleg over een maatregel die alleen in een dictatuur thuishoort

Two More Spiegel Employees Out After Fake News Scandal Expands‘ Ofwel: het zoveelste ‘gevalletje fake news’, gebracht door de reguliere massamedia……..

Facebook censureert foto’s van verhongerende Jemenitische kinderen als ‘sexual content’

Google manipuleerde VS presidentsverkiezingen van 2016 en censureert niet alleen linkse/alternatieve sociale media

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

Google Maps veegt Palestijns gebied van de kaart

Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert

Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen

Bolsonaro, de fascistische nieuwe president van Brazilië, werd volgens Avaaz en fake news brengers als de NYT gekozen door manipulatie via WhatsApp

Facebooks zuivering van de alternatieve (nieuws) media staat nog in de kinderschoenen

Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax‘ (Russiagate, de enorme leugen op basis waaraan we de huidige censuurgolf te danken hebben……)

The US military’s vision for state censorship

Israël en VS werken samen in tegenwerken van critici op beleid t.a.v. Palestijnen

Facebook censureert de waarheid over Columbus en de verovering van de Amerika’s…….

Facebook censuur gestuurd door het westers militair-industrieel complex en de NAVO in het bijzonder……….

Why the Coordinated Alternative Media Purge Should Terrify Everyone‘ (Tyler Durden op Zero Hedge)

First They Came for Alex Jones — We Told You We Were Next — We Were‘ (Matt Agorist op The Free Thought Project)

CNN, de grote brenger van ‘fake news!!!’

Facebook en Twitter verwijderen nu volledige accounts………

Facebook (en Twitter) onderdrukt meningsvorming door het verwijderen van (echt) onafhankelijke media

Wie het nieuws controleert, controleert de wereld……

Facebook en Twitter verwijderen de eerlijke journalistiek en oprechte opinie >> censuur…..

Facebook verlaat ‘tranding news’ voor ‘brekend nieuws’ van 80 reguliere mediaorganen, ofwel nog meer ‘fake news…..’

Facebook komt met nieuwsshows van betrouwbare media als CNN en Fox News…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Censuur op het internet met vliegende start in de VS, ‘het land van het vrije woord….’

Facebook en NAVO werken samen in censuur op niet welgevallig nieuws……

Facebook helpt Saoedi-Arabië: doodstraf door onthoofding van vrouw die het waagde kritiek te uiten…..

Aanval op alternatieve media ‘succesvol’: meer en meer sites worden van het net geweerd………

ThinkProgress eiste censuur van Facebook en werd inderdaad gecensureerd…. ha! ha! ha! ha!

VS staatscensuur op Facebook (ook in de EU)

Facebook stelt perstituee van New York Times aan als censuur-agent…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Het echte Facebook schandaal: manipulatie van de gebruikers en gratis diensten voor eertijds presidentskandidaat Obama…….

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook doneerde aan de politici die hem in de VS aan de tand voelden >> in het EU parlement maakte hij gebruik van megalomane EU politici…..

Facebook wil samen met door Saoedi-Arabië gesubsidieerde denktank censureren…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Media Too Busy Defending John McCain to Report the News That Actually Affects You‘ Onder andere aandacht voor PRISM.

Westerse massa misleiding in aanloop naar WOIII……

VS gebruikt sociale media om ‘fake comment’ te verspreiden en de bevolking te hersenspoelen met leugens, ofwel ‘fake news….’

Eis een nee tegen censuur op het internet!‘ 

Facebook e.a. hebben lak aan AVG (GDPR), misbruik persoonsgegevens gaat gewoon door…….

Jeremy Corbyn wordt gedemoniseerd als antisemiet…….

Facebook: verrijking van oliemaatschappijen en andere grote bedrijven, plus wereldwijde corruptie…….

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Facebook Purges Independent Media for “Political Disinformation”

Facebook Blocks Links to Free Speech Competitor ‘Minds’

Voor meer berichten over de FBI, klik op het betreffende label, direct onder dit bericht., Let wel, na een aantal berichten wordt het laatst gelezen bericht telkens weer herhaald, dan onder het laatst gelezen bericht even opnieuw op het label FBI klikken, enz. enz.