Google helpt Pentagon met ontwikkeling van kunstmatige intelligentie, of anders gezegd met moord en uitwerking van 1984…….

Een paar maanden nadat bekend werd dat
het Pentagon kunstmatige intelligentie (AI) gebruikt om terroristen
op te sporen (en ze dan in ‘eigen land’ te laten lopen zoals telkens weer
blijkt…..), werd bekend gemaakt dat Google het ministerie van
defensie in de VS helpt met het analyseren van drone beelden…. Dit
zeer tegen de zin van veel Google werknemers……

Een woordvoerder van Google stelde dat
Google niet meehelpt aan het vermoorden van mensen, maar puur
technisch kijkt naar de verzamelde beelden en wat daarmee te doen
(anders dan mensen aan flenters te schieten)….. ha! ha! ha! ha! Wat
een bedrieger, het Pentagon is bezig drones te laten ontwikkelen die
zelflerend zijn (middels AI) en uiteindelijk zelf zullen beslissen of iemand wel
dan niet ‘wordt uitgeschakeld’, beter gezegd: vermoord (zo heb je dan niet te maken met
‘drone-piloten’ die last krijgen van hun geweten….)

Met deze samenwerking is Google aan te
klagen voor moord, immers het zijn nog altijd verdachten die worden
doodgeschoten, ofwel: standrechtelijke executies, nogmaals anders gezegd:
moord!! Erger nog: meer dan 90% van de slachtoffers van drone aanvallen zijn niet verdachte personen, veelal vrouwen en kinderen……

De volgende stap is al gezet,
politiekorpsen in de VS en China zijn al voorzien van
gezichtsherkenning brillen, waarmee gezochte personen snel kunnen
worden opgespoord….. Nu nog drones boven mensenmassa’s, steden en
dorpen en ‘we zijn allemaal veilig….’ Niet dus, één verkeerde
regering, zoals hier bijvoorbeeld wellicht onder Wilders of een militaire coup van ons beroepsleger (beide wat ‘god’ verhoede)
en mensen die echt nadenken hebben het nakijken…….

Google op het militaire pad,
ongelofelijk!! (vergeet voorts niet dat Google al lang schijt heeft aan de privacy van haar gebruikers….)

Hey
Google! Who Should the US Government Kill Today?

March
7, 2018 at 11:54 am

Written
by 
Jake
Anderson

(ANTIMEDIA) —
Only months after it was disclosed that the Pentagon was using
artificial intelligence (AI) to 
hunt
for terrorists
,
officials have now acknowledged that Google has been collaborating
with the Department of Defense to use AI in analyzing drone footage.
The 
disclosure comes
amid an uproar among Google employees who aren’t happy to be
assisting in the development of military applications.

While
Google has had controversial contracts with the government before —
most notably with the 
NSA —
this is its “pilot” project with Project Maven, which is itself
the Pentagon’s own flagship weaponized AI program. The purpose of
Project Maven is to implement Big Data and machine learning into the
U.S. military, which officials say is currently in a new AI arms race
with 
China
and Russia
.

According
to information from an internal mailing list, Google will now join
this arms race and assist the DoD with storing and analyzing the
massive troves of data from aerial drones.

When
multiple anonymous Google employees expressed outrage over the
disclosure, as 
Gizmodo first
reported, a company spokesman issued the following statement:

We
have long worked with government agencies to provide technology
solutions. This specific project is a pilot with the Department of
Defense, to provide open source TensorFlow APIs that can assist in
object recognition on unclassified data,”
 the spokesperson said. “The
technology flags images for human review, and is for non-offensive
uses only. Military use of machine learning naturally raises valid
concerns. We’re actively discussing this important topic internally
and with others as we continue to develop policies and safeguards
around the development and use of our machine learning technologies.”

Google’s
military contract with the DoD has thus far shielded its
collaboration with Project Maven by housing it in 
ECS
Federal
,
a North Virginia technology staffing company. Their specific tasks
have included gathering data from a fleet of 1,100 drones to help the
Pentagon better identify terrorists. Google’s deep learning
algorithms can help in object identification, differentiating people
from vehicles in order to maximize the effects of military strikes
against ISIS.

Flirtations
between 
Silicon
Valley and the government
 have
gone on for a while in the age of privatized surveillance during the
War on Terror. However, this may be the first time a tech giant like
Google, which also wields inordinate control over online information,
has been openly integrated into military operations.

As
the 
Intercept noted,
former Executive Chairman of Google, Eric Schmidt, also chaired the
Defense Innovation Board (DIB) and encouraged a collaboration of
military agencies and Silicon Valley, calling for “
an
exchange program and collaboration with industry and academic experts
in the field.”

Air
Force Lt. Gen. John N.T. “Jack” Shanahan, director for defense
intelligence for warfighter support and the Pentagon general running
Project Maven’s AI “prototype warfare,” 
suggested the
same at the GEOINT2017 conference. He joked that someone from Google
should whisper some trade secrets in his ear.

It
appears the two are getting their wish as the United States
government officially conscripts Google into their war against the
Islamic State.

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

Sleepwet: vrijgegeven documenten bewijzen dat de VS gewone burgers bespioneert >> zie ons voorland…….

Onlangs vrijgegeven documenten,
gepubliceerd door ‘The Electronic Border Foundation’ (EFF) en verkregen van
de in opspraak geraakte Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
(FISC), bewiijzen dat de VS wel degelijk gewone burgers bespioneert,
mensen die niets onwettigs hebben gedaan…..

Vooral de NSA en FBI maken zich
schuldig aan het afluisteren van gesprekken tussen mensen die op geen
manier een bedreiging vormen…… Ook aan het publiek in de VS is
meermaals voorgehouden dat met metadata verzameling hun privacy niet
geschonden zou worden, wel dus…….

Overigens bleek eerder al, dat de
geheime diensten in de VS (waartoe ik in deze ook de FBI reken) foto’s en
filmpjes uit internet bestanden van mensen plukken en bekijken……..

‘Onafhankelijke’ rechters besluiten achter gesloten deuren wat wel of niet is toegestaan en daarover is geen enkele openheid…… In Nederland wil de regering met de Sleepwet die stap zelfs achterwege laten bij het verzamelen van data en reken maar dat men wel degelijk telefoongesprekken zal beluisteren, ook al is daar geen enkele reden toe…… De toestemming mag met de Sleepwet in werking, ook achteraf worden gevraagd en gegeven >> de dood in de pot voor ons recht op privacy, onze privacy waar al niet teveel meer van over is……..

Zie in de VS waar wij naar toe gaan met de
nieuwe Sleepwet, die Rutte 3 van plan is erdoor te drukken…… Geloof maar niet dat het referendum, zelfs als de grote meerderheid tegen de Sleepwet stemt, daar enige verandering in zal brengen……. We hebben immers niet voor niets een ‘constitutionele democratie’, met een volksvertegenwoordiging, uh ik bedoel een bedrijven- en welgesteldenvertegenwoordiging…….

Newly
Released Documents Prove the US Gov’t Is Spying on Innocent
Americans

February
26, 2018 at 7:39 am

Written
by 
Derrick
Broze

(AP) — The
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has acquired formerly classified court
orders from the controversial Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
(FISC) which detail how the court violates the privacy of innocent
Americans caught in the crossfire of federal surveillance. The
documents are the result of Freedom of Information Act requests filed
by the EFF as part of an effort to shine light on the inner workings
of the secret court.

The
EFF
 writes:

These
documents raise larger questions about whether the government can
meaningfully protect people’s privacy and free expression rights
under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
(FISA), which permits officials to engage in warrantless mass
surveillance with far less court oversight than is required under the
“traditional” FISA warrant process.
[…]

Although
many of the 13 opinions are heavily redacted — and the government
withheld another 26 in full — the readable portions show several
instances of the court blocking government efforts to expand its
surveillance or ordering the destruction of information obtained
improperly as a result of its spying.

The
documents provided to the EFF detail several cases where
conversations of people not targeted by federal authorities were
swept up in the course of surveillance investigations. Specifically,
the documents show the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal
Bureau of Investigations (FBI) spying on innocent people and
attempting to conceal the practice. A 40-page court opinion from 2004
or 2005 details how FISC Judge Harold Baker declined a proposal from
FBI to save these conversations, often known as incidental
collection. “The opinion demonstrates both the risks of
over-collection as part of targeted surveillance as well as the
benefits of engaged, detailed court oversight,” The EFF notes.

Under
the standards set by section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act (FISA), the FISC approves digital surveillance for
federal agencies who are supposed to follow certain procedures to
prevent the accidental interception of innocent people’s
communications. The new documents highlight how the FBI used
incidental collection to capture the communications of a number of
innocent people.

The
FBI attempted to argue to Judge Baker that the practice has “minimal,
if any” impact on the Fourth Amendment protections against
invasions of privacy. The FISC apparently actually did their job by
attempting to prevent this practice from continuing and becoming
normalized. The surveillance court appeared to admonish the FBI for
expanding the use of incidental communications, rather than deleting
the communications of individuals unrelated to ongoing
investigations.

The
EFF notes that the court “faulted the FBI for failing to account
‘the possibility that overzealous or ill-intentioned personnel
might be inclined to misuse information, if given the opportunity.’
As the court put it, ‘the advantage of minimization at the
acquisition stage is clear. Information that is never acquired in the
first place cannot be misused.’”

The
surveillance court was originally created under the the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) in response to reports
produced by the 1975 Church Committee. The Senate panel was tasked
with investigating the foreign and domestic surveillance operations
by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), NSA, and FBI during the
1970s. The Church Committee also released detailed reports on the
governments Counter Intelligence Programs (COINTELPRO) that were used
against activists and influential voices of opposition during the
1950s and ’60s.

These
newly released documents offer the latest example of how the secret
surveillance court is ripe for abuse. Although this example shows one
judge working to maintain some level of accountability, the vast
majority of the documents were redacted so there is no way to see if
this case is the exception or the norm. Further, this court order is
thirteen to fourteen years old. Take a moment to consider the massive
growth of the U.S. surveillance state and the FISC specifically.
There is simply no way to trust that this single judges effort to
hold the federal government accountable represent the status quo.

Much
of the issues surrounding the secret surveillance court related to
Section 702 of the FISA bill. According the EFF, Section 702 “allows
the NSA to collect emails, browser history and chat logs of
Americans. Section 702 also allows other agencies, like the FBI, to
search through that data without a warrant. Those searches are called
‘backdoor searches.’” As revealed by whistleblower Edward
Snowden in 2013, Section 702 also authorizes two Internet
surveillance programs known as PRISM and Upstream.

PRISM
gathers messaging data sent via Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple,
and other tech companies, while Upstream taps into the so-called
backbone of the Internet to gather data on targets. The NSA began
collecting Americans’ international phone calls and emails without
a warrant immediately after the 9/11 attacks as part of the Stellar
Wind program. Once the public became aware of the program in 2008,
Congress codified the program into law by passing section 702 of
FISA.

The
FISA Court is a glaring example of The Deep State. A secret court run
by secret judges who interpret the law behind closed doors and who
refuse to publicly release their findings or their interpretation.

By Derrick
Broze
 / Republished
with permission / 
Activist
Post
 / Report
a typo

================================

Zie ook: ‘Volkskrant en Nieuwsuur Fake News over ‘Russische hacks…..’

Via Artwave Art de volgende link: ‘Hoe zit het precies met die ‘sleepwet’? In deze vier podcasts leggen we het uit’ (door de Volkskrant, dus let op en geloof vooral niet alles wat je verteld wordt, zo zouden wij ook voordelen hebben van de sleepwet….. ha! ha! ha! ha! Alsof ze je had eraf hakken en dan stellen dat je nu veel beter gebruik van je andere hand zal gaan maken….)

Muellers onzinnige beschuldiging die Russiagate zou bewijzen……..

Muellers ‘troll farm’ verhaal ronduit waanzinnig………

Het is werkelijk om schijtziek van te
worden: de pogingen in de VS (en de rest van het westen) om Rusland te demoniseren en het verlies
van de presidentsverkiezingen door hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton te
wijten aan Russische manipulaties.

Voor al die claims is nul komma nada
bewijs, maar de VS en haar hielenlikkende oorlogshonden van de NAVO
houden deze leugens in de lucht, dit gesteund door de reguliere
media, die NB bijna dagelijks schrijven over ‘fake news’, terwijl
deze media verreweg de grootste leveranciers van dit nepnieuws
zijn…….

De vooralsnog laatste bladzijde in de
wrange komedie werd geschreven door oud-FBI directeur Robert
Mueller…….

Lees hoe David Stockman uitgebreid
gehakt maakt van het ‘troll farm verhaal’. (let op, sommige delen zijn dusdanig komisch dat je op moet passen er niet in te blijven):

Mueller’s
Comic Book Indictment: How to Prosecute A Great Big Nothingburger

By
David Stockman

February
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – We have always heard that a
determined government prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, and now
we know it’s true. After 38 years in the prosecution racket, Robert
Mueller just made his biggest score ever—that is, he nailed
a great big Nothingburger.


But
he also did a lot more than that. Mueller’s 37-page comic book
indictment actually unmasks—inadvertently to be
sure—the 
distinctly
un-terrifying essence
 of
the whole Russian meddling narrative. In fact, the crude social media
emissions (ads and posts) of the so-called troll farm were
generally lame, often laughable and sometimes downright
ludicrous as per this gem cited by Mueller:

a.
On or about October 16, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the ORGANIZATION-controlled Instagram account “Woke Blacks”
to post the following message: 
“[A]
particular hype and hatred for Trump is misleading the people and
forcing Blacks to vote Killary. We cannot resort to the lesser of two
devils. Then we’d surely be better off without voting AT ALL.”

Notwithstanding
the grave nomenclature of BLOCK CAPITALS, endless sinister “on
or about” events and 99 numbered paragraphs of
particulars, the true bill (charging document) is actually just a
random catalogue of social media trivia like the above “Woke
Blacks” post.

Most
of the cited gleanings amounted to crude word bombs, often in
broken English, that presumably even Kim Kardashian’s 59 million
Twitter followers could see through.

“Hillary
is a Satan, and her crimes and lies
 had proved
just how evil she is”

The
lion’s share of these postings and ads probably disappeared into
cyberspace like the sound of a falling tree in an empty
forest, anyway. According to Facebook itself, the seemingly
ubiquitous social media ad campaign despicted in the indictment
was nothing of the kind. It actually amounted to
just 
3,000 placements
at a cost of 
$100,000—more
than half of which were purchased after the election,
and 
25% of
which ended-up in its dead letter office (unread).

Likewise, the
handful of efforts to actually stimulate pro-Trump rallies in
Florida and elsewhere were abject failures. As we document
below, the Russians had absolutely no “ground game” in the
US and any third-rate campaign consultant will tell you that ads
alone do not produce crowds. In fact, there is virtually no evidence
that anyone showed up at the rallies cited by Mueller.

Besides,
the overwhelming share of the pro-Trump social media postings
uncovered by Mueller’s sleuths amounted to “copy and paste”
relays of current partisan talking points. Thus, the
indictment cites such slogans as:

           “Vote
Republican, vote Trump, and support the Second Amendment!”.

“Trump
is our only hope for a better future!”

“Donald
wants to defeat terrorism… Hillary wants to sponsor it”

Really?

It
took a clandestine nest of Russkie imposters and subversives to
pollute the social media with this kind of tripe?


In
fact, RNC, Fox News and the Trump campaign were
already saturating the internet with these messages,
anyway—-along with millions of pro-Trump social medi activists.  T
he 80 Russian operatives
cited by Mueller didn’t add one damn bit to the massive social media
messaging that was already out there.

So
here’s the joker in the whole deck. It seems that the
nefarious”troll farm” in St. Petersburg that comprises
nearly the totality of Mueller’s case is not a Russian
intelligence agency operation at all.


Instead,
it’s the relatively harmless Hobby Farm of a fanatical
Russian oligarch and ultra-nationalist, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who
has a great big beef against Imperial Washington’s demonization
of Russia and Vlad Putin. Apparently, the farm
 was (it’s
apparently being disbanded) the vehicle through which he gave
Washington the middle finger and buttered up his patron.

Prigozhin
is otherwise known as “Putin’s Cook” because he made his
fortune in St. Petersburg restaurants that Putin favored and via
state funded food service operations at Russian schools and military
installations. Like most Russian oligarchs not in jail, he
apparently tithes in gratitude to the Kremlin: In this
case, by bankrolling the rinky-dink operation at 55
Savushkina Street in St Petersburg that is the object of Mueller’s
pretentious foray into the flotsam and jetsam of social media
low life.

Prigozhin’s
trolling farm is grandly called the Internet Research Agency
(IRA), but what it actually does is hire (apparently) unemployed
20-somethings at $4-8 per hour to pound out
ham-handed political messaging on social media sites like
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube etc. They bang away twelve
hours at a shift on a quota-driven
paint-by-the-internet-numbers basis where their output is rated for
engagements, likes, retweets etc.


Whatever
these keyboard drones might be, they are not professional Russian
intel operators
. And
the collection of broken English postings strewn throughout the
indictment are not one bit scary.


Indeed,
the utterly stupid naiveté of the whole St.
Petersburg operation is crystalized by this episode when the
farm purportedly garnered some startling political insight from
an unwitting Trump campaign official in Texas:

80.
On or about August 19, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the false U.S. persona “Matt Skiber” account to write
to the real U.S. person affiliated with a Texas-based grassroots
organization who previously had advised the false persona to focus
on 
“purple
states like Colorado, Virginia & Florida
.”
Defendants and their co-conspirators told that U.S. person, 
We
were thinking about your recommendation to focus on purple states and
this is what we’re organizing in FL.”

Jez
Louise and goodness gracious, too. Who coulda thunk as early
as August that Colorado, Virginia and Florida would be swing
states!


In
any event, even Mueller’s indictment proves that the farm was
strictly amateurville. None of the other 12 Russians charged
has an intelligence background, either.

Thus,
the CEO is a retired St. Petersburg police officer. The
executive director is a 31-year old website developer and
internet PR promoter who previously had garnered small beans
contracts ($4k-20k each) from St. Petersburg agencies to publish
municipal newspapers, make video reports about their activities or
promote local programs such as one on “tolerance and
prevention of drug addiction”.


Likewise,
two more of the operatives were graduates students in IT and
advertising at St. Petersburg universities.

Then
there is the husband/wife duo, Maria and Robert Bovda, who were
the original heads of the US focused “translator project”.
Both were recent graduates in psychology from local
universities, where Robert’s 2011 thesis had been on
“The Effects of Social-Support Conditions On
Loneliness As Experienced By the Elderly”.


We can’t
help but think they had not yet become hardened spies when
the joined IRA in November 2013 and apparently 
left
in October 2014
. Whatever
they did during their tenure at the farm, cooking up ways to
help Donald Trump’s not yet announced campaign was surely
not among them, but still apparently enough to help fill out
Mueller’s indictment roster.

             Maria Bovda was the 'head' of the translator project, the designated branch of the wider pro-Putin effort which focused on US audiences. She worked there between November 2013 and October 2014
Her husband Robert acted beneath her as the second in charge of the 'translator' project and worked at the company over the same dates. He too is accused of trying to enter the US under false pretenses to collect information but he did not obtain a visa and could not make the trip


Another
was Dzheykhun Aslanov, who was head of the “American department”
and had graduated in 2012 from the Russian State Hydrometeorological
University in St. Petersburg. He had studied economics
and 
wildlife
management!

Likewise,
nowhere in the entire 37 pages is there even a clause linking
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm to the SVR (foreign intelligence service), the
FSB (counter-intelligence and anti-terrorism), the GRU (military
intelligence service), any other agency of the Russian State—-or
even some purported Kremlin back channel to Putin.

Yet
there is every reason to believe that the entire Russian meddling
narrative cooked up by the partisan hacks in Obama’s inner
circle—-John Brennan, Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes—-was based on the
amateurish machinations originating in the nondescript building
pictured below.

As
we will show, the Hobby Farm was no Russian state secret
or clandestine vehicle of its intelligence community. To the
contrary, it had been fully covered in the Russian press for
years as one of numerous such oligarch funded projects designed
to glorify the Putin regime and vilify the Russian opposition.


It
had also been the subject of a lengthy expose in 
The
Guardian
 
of
London, as well as other western media. Even Radio Free Europe
had done a lengthy profile.


All
of this had happened long before Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm
had turned its attentions to US politics. Indeed, the IRA’s
pivot to the US in April 2014 occurred well before Trump’s
candidacy was gleam in anyone’s eye except his own, but 
after a
seminal event had occurred which Mueller’s comic book
narrative completely ignores.


To
wit, what apparently riled up Prigozhin was Washington’s
heavy-handed meddling in the politics of Ukraine during the US
funded and enabled coup on the streets of Kiev in February 2014.

Never
mind that the incumbent pro-Russian government had come to power in
an honest election and had chosen to take a more
attractive economic deal from Moscow than was being offered
by the West. 

Also ignore that fact that Ukraine was Russia’s
next door neighbor and had been an essential element of Greater
Russia—sometimes a full fledged constituent state—for more
than 700 years.

Likewise,
when Crimea elected by 90% referendum vote to “rejoin”
Russia, it didn’t happen at gunpoint. Crimea is 85% Russian and
had been an integral part of the Russian state ever since it
was purchased from the Turks by Catherine the Great for
good money in 1783.

Thereafter,
its major port city of Sevastopol had functioned as the homeport
for Russia’s Black Sea fleet under Czars and Commissars alike.
The only real reason it needed to “rejoin” Russia in March
2014 was because the Ukrainian tyrant who ruled the Soviet Union in
the 1950s, Nikita Khrushchev, had gifted it to his
Ukrainian compatriots during a drunken celebration of his
victory over two deadly rivals who also claimed Stalin’s succession.

Indeed,
when Obama’s neocon Assistant Secretary for European Affairs,
Victoria Nuland, was caught telling the American ambassador in Kiev
that “Yats is the guy” with respect to the new Washington
designated leader of the post-coup government and joined a
chorus of Washington-based vilification of Putin and the Russian
government, the die was cast.

Russian
nationalists like Prigozhin were not going to take it lying down. As
we document below, then and there he began to shift some of the
activities of his trolling farm toward the US.

It amounted
to a tit-for-tat response to the anti-Russian propaganda emanating
from the Washington funded NGOs in Kiev; and also from outright
government agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy
and Radio Free Europe, as well as the Deep State
subservient operations of CNN and its print media imitators.

That
shift was described as the “translator project” by
Mueller’s historically ignorant lawyers. The implication was that out
of sheer aggression the Kremlin had unilaterally decided to
attack America’s democratic process through the IRA.

In
fact, the overwhelming likelihood is that an arriviste
Russian billionaire got a bee in his bonnet after Washington’s
Ukrainian coup–and then went to town on America with his trolling
farm exactly as he and many others had been doing in internal
Russian politics for years.

From
the point of view of US/Russian relations and world peace, however,
the re-direction of activity at Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm could
not have come at a worse time. Its wholly open and widely known
operations permitted Obama’s hatchet-people to quickly seize
on the IRA’s new theatre of focus as evidence of a
massive Russian attack on America’s election process, thereby turning
a molehill into a mountain.

At
length, the partisan leaders of Obama’s national security team,
led by the detestable John Brennan at the
CIA, selectively coopted and abused the resources and
credibility of the vast US intelligence apparatus to put the
imprimatur of a national security threat upon what was in fact
a scary bedtime story of no real significance. That effort
culminated in the phony intelligence assessment published
by four US intel agencies in January 2017 based on the work
of Brennan’s “hand-picked” accomplices.

In
what is surely a fabulous irony, therefore, the Internet
Research Agency amounts to a reverse Potemkin Village. It wasn’t
much to look at and was nothing to worry about until Obama’s
national security posse falsely embellished it’s innocuous
façade into a mortal threat to American democracy and national
security.

And
then Robert Mueller brought in his gang of copywriters and
illustrators to turn this entire tall tale into CNN-ready “news”.

We
will demonstrate below that what happened in this building was a
complete farce and posed no threat to the security and liberty of the
American people whatsoever; nor did it even remotely impact the 2016
election process.


But
with his comic book indictment, Robert Mueller has actually made
himself a mortal threat to America’s democracy and national security
.
That’s because his indictment is unleashing a rabid
anti-Russian mania in the Democratic party and turning flaming
liberals and leftwing progressives, who used to form the backbone of
the peace party in America, into outright war-mongers.

The
Donald tweeted over the weekend about Moscow “laughing its ass
off”  about the Mueller indictment, but we think he
missed the mark. It is the Deep State on the banks of the Potomac
that is bursting with glee—literally licking its collective
chops— about the endless budget boondoggles now assured to be 

coming its way.


The
neocons and military/industrial complex had already
taken control of the GOP lock, stock and barrel. Then,
his campaign rhetoric about “America First”
notwithstanding, Trump abdicated to his empire-minded generals
in order to concentrate on his Twitter account. And now in the
wake of the RussiaGate hysteria being given a powerful new
boost from Mueller’s comic book, the Dems are lining up to say
we will see your 
$700
billion
 budget
and crank it up from there.


The
truth is, there is a screaming fiscal crisis coming hard upon
Imperial Washington. That’s owing to the 
$15
trillion
 of
new deficits that are now built-in for the next decade—at the very
time when the Fed has shut down is massive bond-buying
experiment and the Baby Boom is hitting the social security and
medicare rolls in droves.

Absent
the RussiaGate hoax and the Dems descent into mindless, anti-Putin
hysteria, there would have been a moment of maximum danger for
the Deep State’s hideously inflated military, intelligence and
surveillance operations. In the coming battle against fiscal
collapse, they surely would have been on the fiscal chopping
block like at no time since the aftermath of Vietnam in the 1970s.

But rescue
is now at hand. The Dems have been shell-shocked ever
since the evening of November 8, 2016, and have worked
themselves into deliriums about how it was all a big mistake
enabled by Russian meddling and collusion with the Trump
campaign.

To
a substantial degree, however, those narratives were on their last
legs until the Mueller indictment came along. For anyone who takes
the trouble to read it, of course, it’s just a potpourri of
nonsense, marginalia and irrelevance.

But
the Dems had already gone brain dead on the RussiaGate matter—so
they are now greeting it as a “blockbuster”, as
are the talking heads of CNN and the mainstream media. Consequently,
the drivel that came out of the building pictured below is being
taken as evidence of a far-reaching attack on America that
even rivals Pearl Harbor. As Pat Buchanan noted:

          This
Russian troll farm is “the equivalent (of) Pearl Harbor,”
says Cong. Jerrold Nadler, who would            head up the House Judiciary
Committee, handling any impeachment, if Democrats retake the                    House.

When
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes pressed, Nadler doubled down: The Russians “are
destroying our democratic process.” While the Russian trolling
may not equal Pearl Harbor in its violence, said Nadler, in its
“seriousness, it is very much on a par” with Japan’s
surprise attack.

That’s
right. But unlike the vast Japanese naval armada that stealthily
steamed toward Hawaii in early December 1941, the Facebook
cyber-missiles that allegedly hit America in 2016 came out of
this little joint hiding in plain sight:

55 Savushkina Street, St Petersburg, said to be the headquarters of Russia’s ‘troll army’

So
let’s return to the fact that Prigozhin’s troll farm
doesn’t really look much different than countless others that dot the
Russian internet landscape, and which mushroomed after 2011 in
support of the Putin-ified Russian state and the crony
capitalist economy it shepherds.


New
Yorker
 piece
published by journalist Adrian Chen, no fan of Donald Trump, in
late July 2016 explains about as well as any where the Internet
Research Agency came from:

           The
(Internet Research Agency) has been widely reported in Russian
media to be the brainchild                of Evgeny Prigozhin, an oligarch and ally
of Vladimir Putin. At the time, it employed hundreds of                Russians in a
nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, where they produced
blog posts,                      comments, infographics, and viral videos that pushed the
Kremlin’s narrative on both the Russian              and English Internet.

The
agency is what is known in Russia as a “troll farm,” a nickname
given to outfits that operate armies of sock-puppet social-media
accounts, in order to create the illusion of a rabid grass-roots
movement. Trolling has become a key tool in a comprehensive effort by
Russian authorities to rein in a previously freewheeling Internet
culture, after huge anti-Putin protests in 2011 were organized
largely over social media. It is used by Kremlin apparatchiks at
every level of government in Russia; wherever politics are discussed
online, one can expect a flood of comments from paid trolls.

The
real effect, the Russian activists told me, was not to brainwash
readers but to overwhelm social media with a flood of fake
content, 
seeding
doubt and paranoia, and destroying the possibility of using the
Internet as a democratic space…..

…….toward
the end of last year (2015) I noticed something interesting:
many had begun to promote right-wing news outlets, portraying
themselves as conservative voters who were, increasingly, fans of
Donald Trump. Exposure to even small amounts of Russian politics can
induce severe bouts of paranoia and conspiracy-minded thinking, and
it seemed logical to me that this new pro-Trump bent might well be an
attempt by the agency to undermine the U.S. by helping to elect a
racist reality-show star as our Commander-in-Chief. At the time, I
found it funny. 
The
agency was a well-funded but often hapless operation—it created a
cartoon character that was a giant buttocks to spread anti-Obama
propaganda, for example—and this seemed like another of its
far-fetched schemes to poison the Internet.

In
fact, it was. How it became a fearsome Russian intel operation was
entirely due to what happened in Washington DC, not St. Petersburg
or the Kremlin, for that matter.

That
is, in the summer of 2016, when the Obama inner circle and the
Deep State national security establishment alike suddenly were
confronted with the theretofore unthinkable prospect that Donald
Trump might actually be elected US President, they literally
transformed the Hobby Farm of a second tier
Russian oligarch into monumental threat to American
democracy.

And
that took some doing because Prigozhin was essentially a nobody
in the great scheme of national security. Unlike Putin, who cut
his eyeteeth in the old Soviet era KGB, Prigozhin had fancied himself
a ski racer as a privileged young man in a Soviet boarding school.
Failing to make the grade on the slopes, however, he had
subsequently pursued various petty criminal schemes that
landed him nine years in a Soviet prison during the latter’s
dying days.

But
timing is everything—-so when he opened a hot dog stand from
his mother’s kitchen in newly liberated St. Petersburg in the
early 1990s his entprenurial talents in the culinary field
self-evidently flourished. Soon he branched into
convenience stores and then in 1996 into a swank restaurant
(Staraya Tamozhnya or “The Old Customs House”) that
catered to newly monied Russian who were looking for “more than
cutlets with Vodka”.

At
length, a strategic $400k investment in a rusting harbor boat
was turned into a floating hot spot called “The New Island
Restaurant”. From there flowed catering contracts
for lavish state banquets after he gained the
gastronomical favor of the post-Soviet St. Petersburg
political operative, who became prime minister of Russia.


Putin held lavish
state dinners on Prigozhin’s floating emporium, where
he played host to world leaders like George W. Bush and Jacques
Chirac. He also apparently heaped business into Prigozhin’s budding
empire with a $177 million catering contract with Moscow’s schools,
and then the real jackpot: A two year contract in 2012 worth
more than 
$1.6
billion
 to
supply 90% of all food orders to Russian soldiers.

Folks,
that’s where the troll factory came from. It opened the
next year in 2013 as the kind of token of appreciation expected
from oligarchs favored by the Russian state.

Still,
it wasn’t the KGB incarnate—just a tweet-by-the-numbers body
shop designed to flood Russian media and internet
forums with messages extolling Russian greatness, the iniquities and
hypocrisies of the morally corrupt West and the glorious
works of Vlad Putin.


At
this stage the troll farm was involved in strictly Russian
business—-the handiwork of an oligarch who had thrived on Russia’s
particular brand of crony capitalism and was more than happy to shill
for his patron in the Kremlin.


Here
is how the previously referenced 
Guardian
article from mid-2015 described the farm before some of its
modest resources were later shifted to the “American
Department” in 2016:

          Just
after 9pm each day, a long line of workers files out of 55 Savushkina
Street, a modern four-                storey office complex with a small sign outside
that reads “Business centre”. Having spent 12                    hours in the
building, the workers are replaced by another large group, who will
work through the              night.

They
painted a picture of a work environment that was humourless and
draconian, with fines for being a few minutes late or not reaching
the required number of posts each day. Trolls worked in rooms of
about 20 people, each controlled by three editors, who would check
posts and impose fines if they found the words had been cut and
pasted, or were ideologically deviant.

The
LiveJournal blogger, who spent two months working at the centre until
mid-March, said she was paid 45,000 roubles ($790) a month, to run a
number of accounts on the site.

We
had to write ‘ordinary posts’, about 
making
cakes or music tracks
 we
liked, but then every now and then throw in a
 political
post
 about
how the Kiev government is fascist, or that sort of thing,” she
said.

Scrolling
through one of the LiveJournal accounts she ran, the pattern is
clear. There are posts about “Europe’s 20 most beautiful castles”
and “signs that show you are dating the wrong girl”, interspersed
with political posts about 
Ukraine or
suggesting that the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny is
corrupt.

The
desired conclusion of one reads: “The majority of experts agree
that the US is deliberately trying to weaken Russia, and Ukraine is
being used only as a way to achieve this goal. If the Ukrainian
people had not panicked and backed a coup, the west would have found
another way to pressure Russia. But our country is not going to go
ahead with the US plans, and we will fight for our sovereignty on the
international stage.”

To
add colour to their posts, websites have been set up to aid the troll
army. One features 
thousands
of pasteable images
,
mainly of European leaders in humiliating photoshopped incidents or
with captions pointing out their weakness and stupidity, or showing
Putin making hilarious wisecracks and winning the day.

When
I got the job there in 2013 it was a small building, I was working in
the basement, and it was clear they didn’t have enough space,”
said Andrei Soshnikov, a St Petersburg journalist who infiltrated the
company two years ago and has continued to cover it. 
He
linked the move to a much bigger office with increased online
activity around the Ukraine crisis….

As
we explained above, it was only after Washington massively
intervened in the domestic politics of Ukraine in February 2104 that
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm branched into external operations
focused on Russian adversaries like the new anti-Russian Ukrainian
government and the United States.


Even
then, however, the main stream media headline writers, who
have been intellectually lobotomized by a constant diet of
anti-Russian mania, cannot seem to grasp that their hyperbolic
headlines are in no way, shape or form supported by the actual
written words in Mueller’s indictment.


In
a word, 
eighty twenty-somethings
sitting cheek-by-jowl at banks of computer screens and banging out
social media tripe in English as a (third) language did not
impact anything in America, let alone the 2016 election outcome.


That
is to say, what in the world is so hard to understand about the fact
that the pathetic output of this group could not have amounted
to 
0.000001% of
the content that rumbled through these social media channels
during 2016?


Yet
here is Mueller—writing in indictment black and
white—admitting that the troll farm had deployed precious few
trolls to the American department:

“spread
(ing) distrust towards the candidates and the political
system in general…..By approximately July 2016, more
than 
eighty
ORGANIZATION employees
 were
assigned to the translator project”.

Besides
the infinitesimal volume and generally crude and unoriginal nature of
the troll farm’s output, this tiny 80-person contingent points to
another huge flaw in the entire Mueller narrative—especially
as it has been embellished and exaggerated by the main stream media
since last Friday afternoon. To wit, all of these posts were destined
to get lost in the vast sea of cyberspace without a 
ground
game
 in
the US.


Yet
the indictment is clear on that crucial point as well.
The Russian meddlers had “no ground game”
whatsoever aside from a 22 day visit in June 2014 by two
operatives who were not trained spies and who had apparently
never even been to America previously.


Yet
they visited nine states during that brief interval and
thereby “cased-out” the entirety of the American
electoral scene:

Only
KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA received visas, and from approximately June 4,
2014 through June 26, 2014, KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA traveled in and
around the United States, including stops in Nevada, California, New
Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Louisiana, Texas, and New York
to gather intelligence. After the trip, KRYLOVA and BURCHIK exchanged
an intelligence report regarding the trip.

The
above paragraph is itself a smoking bratwurst!


Aside
from sleeping, passing through countless airports, checking into a
dozen or more hotels and 

perhaps visiting the chamber of Commerce in
Dallas or Denver, what possibly could these two travelers have done
to lay the groundwork for “influencing” 133
million voters two years hence?


Mueller
doesn’t say and the talking heads jabber on about this trip as
if it were some kind of invasion, not the
pointless needle-in-the-haystack type of undertaking that it
actually was.


And
that gets us to the ballyhooed efforts to organize and promote Trump
rallies in Florida, Washington DC, New York City and elsewhere. Once
again, however, Mueller spills large amounts of ink citing the emails
and social media posts that describe the aims of these long-distance
media trolls. But there is not a shred of evidence presented
about what actually happened on the ground.


We
would be so bold as to suggest that we know why Mueller didn’t
document this core element of the alleged meddling campaign.
Namely, because nobody came to the rallies and flash mob events
called for by the keyboard jockeys in St. Petersburg.


Take
the case of the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies on August 20,
which the indictment dwells on at length. So doing, it purports to
explain how real Trump supporters in the state were duped into
cooperating, how bloggers back in Russia used social media posts to
promote 13 rallies across the state of Florida and bought ads to the
same end on Facebook.


In
fact, compared to fleeting references with respect to similar rallies
allegedly staged in Washington DC and New York City, the Florida
rallies take up far more ink in the indictment and come across as
exhibit #1  on Russia ground game in the US election
process.


Indeed,
the liberal hatch-people at 
Politico made
the singular importance of the Florida meddling operation
abundantly clear:

But
the document makes clear that the operation in Florida, the nation’s
largest swing state, was in a class by itself. The indictment is
packed with details of how Russian nationals duped Donald Trump
campaign volunteers and grass-roots organizations in Florida into
holding rallies they organized and helped fund with foreign cash.

Here’s
the problem. There seems to be scant evidence that these rallies
actually happened or that anyone showed up to the ones that did
occur. For instance, here is a photo of one in St. Petersburg
(Florida) posted on social media at the time.


We
doubt whether Vlad got his money’s worth on this one:

ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Then
there’s the case of Jim Frishe of Clearwater, Florida. He was a
real estate development consultant and candidate for county
office, who organized a sign-waving event in response to the Russian
entreaties that attracted barely a dozen people:

           Frishe,
68, said he was called by someone identifying themselves as with a
group called                 “Florida for Trump” and asked to organize a
sign-waving rally. He said between 15 and 18               people showed up and
that he didn’t receive any signs or money or other support. He                     never heard from them again.

“I
was going to do what I was going to do anyway. I was a Trump
supporter, they didn’t convince me”.

Then
there is the case of the “Hillary in stripes” caper
allegedly promoted by the Russians. According to the indictment:

           For
example, defendants and their co-conspirators asked one U.S. person
to build a cage on on               a flatbed truck … and another U.S. person to
wear a costume portraying Clinton in a prison                       uniform,”

The
thing is, the main evidence for that is that the “cage”
appeared about a month later as the handiwork of a Trump supporter,
Gary Howd, who did it all on his own–without any prompting,
encouragement or money from the Russians.


Even
the Politico account of the purported Florida invasion by the
Russians let that much slip out:

          The
caged Clinton stunt was a hit among Trump supporters. On Sept. 23,
for                                      instance,
 NBC2 reported
that a Cape Coral man erected a caged Clinton display in his front            yard.

“I
feel like I’m doing my little part at least in my little neck of the
woods,” homeowner Gary Howd said.

As
it happened, even the 
Washington
Post
 admits
that the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies didn’t amount to
much.

          The
efforts in Florida that August day did not turn out to be
particularly impressive. No people                    showed up to at least one of the
proposed rallies, and online photos of some of the other events                reveal ragtag groups with Trump signs staking out patches of grass or
traffic medians.

As
to the “Down With Hillary” demonstration on July 23, 2016,
to take another example, here is what you get from Google on this
particular element of the indictment:

          No
results found for 
“Down
with Hillary” rally in New York City on July 23, 2016
.

Finally,
and as long was we are on the topic, here is what a real troll farm
looks like. Yet this vast suite of offices in Fort
Meade, Maryland, where 20,000 SIGINT spies and technicians work
for the NSA, is only the tip of the iceberg.


The
US actually spends 
$75
billion
 per
year—more than Russia’s entire 
$69
billion 
defense
budget—spying on and meddling in the politics of virtually
every nation on earth. An outfit within NSA called Tailored Access
Operations (TAO) has a multi-billion annual budget and does
nothing put troll the global internet and does so
with highly educated, highly paid professionals, not $4 per
hour keyboard jockeys.


Indeed,
the cafeterias in the NSA buildings pictured below cost far
more per year to operate than did Prigozhin’s troll farm during it
entire short lived existence (its apparently now being closed down
with two of the 3.5 floors already dark).

NSA headquarters

In
that context, Charles Hugh Smith cogently reminds that the real
farce in the Mueller comic book is that it is the ultimate case of
the pot-calling-the-kettle black:

America’s
foreign policy is one of absolute entitlement to influence the
domestic affairs and politics of every nation of interest, which to a
truly global empire includes every nation on the planet to the degree
every nation is a market and/or a potential threat to U.S. interests.

Assassination
of elected leaders–no problem. Funding the emergence of new
U.S.-directed political parties–just another day at the office.
Inciting dissent and discord to destabilize regimes–it’s what we do,
folks. Funding outright propaganda–one of our enduring specialties
.

Finally,
as Pat Buchanan further observed in his post on the Mueller
indictment, political and election meddling is what Imperial
Washington does. And now we are surprised that others do the
same—-even that pathetic efforts of a Russian oligarch laid out in
Mueller’s ham sandwich indictment:

Are
the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try
to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling
regimes we believe we have a stake?

“Have
we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura
Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.

With
a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”

“We
don’t do that anymore though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We
don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”

“Well,”
Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”

Indeed,
what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding
the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?

Did
America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions”
that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?

When
Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime
change” is frequently heard. When the “Green Revolution”
took to the streets of Tehran to protest massively the re-election of
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009, Republicans denounced
President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the
outcome.

When
China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some
have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?

David
Stockman’s Contra Corner is the only place where mainstream delusions
and cant about the Warfare State, the Bailout State, Bubble Finance
and Beltway Banditry are ripped, refuted and
rebuked.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com

=========================

Zie ook:

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands; zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

Volkskrant en Nieuwsuur Fake News over ‘Russische hacks…..’

Mensen, verdere woorden van mij zijn overbodig bij dit verduidelijkende artikel over het nepnieuws van Huib Modderkolk dat de Volkskrant en Nieuwsuur brachten, nepnieuws over zogenaamde ‘Russische hacks…….’

De Stille Waarheid

Wat
de AIVD en de media je niet vertellen over de ‘Russische hacks’

POSTED
ON 
29
JANUARY 2018
 BY DE
STILLE WAARHEID

De
Nederlandse inlichtingendiensten AIVD en de MIVD* blijken een
belangrijke rol te hebben gespeeld bij het FBI-onderzoek naar
‘Russische beïnvloeding’ van de Amerikaanse verkiezingen.
Althans, als we 
Nieuwsuur en
de 
Volkskrant mogen
geloven. Volgens deze ‘betrouwbare’ media gaven de Nederlandse
inlichtingendiensten de Amerikanen ‘cruciale informatie’ die zij
hadden onderschept door de hackgroep Cozy Bear te hacken. Er wordt
geclaimd dat deze hackgroep ‘in opdracht van de Russische overheid’
verschillende Amerikaanse overheidsinstanties zou hebben gehackt.
Keiharde claims, maar er worden opmerkelijk genoeg geen bewijzen
getoond aan de Nederlandse burger. 


Waarom blijven Nederlandse
journalisten aan de Amerikaanse anti-Rusland retoriek vast houden, en
waarom komt dit verhaal nu pas naar buiten? Bevinden we ons te midden
van een cyberoorlog met Rusland, of is hier iets anders aan de hand?

Universiteit

Laten
we beginnen bij het begin. Volgens Nieuwsuur en de Volkskrant heeft
de AIVD in de zomer van 2014 het netwerk van een universiteit in
hartje Moskou gehackt, waardoor ze de hackgroep ‘Cozy Bear’ in de
gaten konden houden. Die zouden daar namelijk – ‘in opdracht van
de Russische overheid’ – grote hackaanvallen uitvoeren op
verschillende Amerikaanse instanties.

Maar
hoe snel het is vergeten: een van de eerste onthullingen van
NSA-klokkenluider Edward Snowden had te maken met de Amerikaanse
inlichtingendienst NSA die een grote Chinese universiteit had
gehackt, wat in juni 2013 door de South China Morning Post
werd 
gepubliceerd. Dit
bericht werd overigens ook door de 
NOS en
de 
Volkskrant gepubliceerd.
Zou de Russische regering echt een hackoperatie laten uitvoeren
vanuit een belangrijke universiteit in het centrum van Moskou,
terwijl het toen al een jaar bekend was dat de NSA zich richtte op
universitaire netwerken in het buitenland? Hier klopt iets niet, en
dit is zeker niet het enige merkwaardige aan het hackverhaal van
Nieuwsuur en de Volkskrant.

Waarschuwingen

Volgens
de media werden de waarschuwingen van de AIVD aan de Amerikaanse
inlichtingendiensten op prijs gesteld maar – opmerkelijk genoeg –
verder niks mee gedaan. Nieuwsuur meldt: ”Waarom de hacks bij de
DNC ondanks de Nederlandse waarschuwingen zo lang kunnen doorgaan, is
niet duidelijk.”

Het
idee dat de VS het netwerkverkeer van een grote Russische
universiteit in het centrum van de hoofdstad Moskou niet al
nauwlettend in de gaten hield, is al onwaarschijnlijk genoeg, maar
het idee dat ze niets deden, terwijl ze wisten dat de hackers in het
netwerk van overheidsinstanties zaten, en e-mails en bestanden van
politieke leiders stalen, is wel erg vergezocht. Rusland staat
bovenaan de lijst van doelwitten van de Verenigde Staten. Het verhaal
dat de Amerikaanse inlichtingendiensten niets deden ondanks de
waarschuwingen, lijkt een poging te zijn om de tijdlijn van het
lekken te verklaren. De e-mails van DNC werden namelijk tussen
januari 2015 en 25 mei 2016 gehackt en gelekt. Terwijl er wordt
geclaimd dat de AIVD sinds 2014 de hackgroep in de gaten hield. Om
dit onzinnige verhaal te laten kloppen, wordt er gedaan alsof de VS
de Nederlandse waarschuwingen negeerde, om zo uit te leggen hoe de
hackers over zo’n lange periode ongestoord hun werk konden doen.

Snowden*

Verder
wordt er geprobeerd het Nederlandse AIVD-hackteam als onafhankelijk
uit te beelden, los van de NSA, terwijl de AIVD een volwaardige
externe partner is van de NSA, die elk detail van zijn
organisatiestructuur, capaciteiten, netwerken, systemen en personeel
aan de NSA onthult in ruil voor geavanceerde analytische
mogelijkheden, verbeteringen en technologische ondersteuning. Dit
blijkt o.a. uit de gegevens die Edward Snowden in 2013 heeft
geopenbaard.


Wikileaks

Als
we de belangrijkste gehackte emails naast elkaar leggen, en daarbij
de media-aandacht hierover, zien we een opmerkelijk patroon naar
voren komen. Terwijl er in de westerse media vanaf het begin
vooral gespeculeerd wordt over de bron van de gelekte emails, praten
de Russische, Chinese en internationale alternatieve media vooral
inhoudelijk over de emails. Zo heeft Nieuwsuur Julian Assange, de
oprichter van Wikileaks, maar één keer geïnterviewd, en zoals
verwacht gingen de vragen voornamelijk over de bron van de
gehackte emails. Met, natuurlijk, een wijzende vinger naar Rusland.
Inhoudelijke vragen werden nagenoeg niet gesteld. Bekijk hieronder de
beelden.

Reactie
Rusland

De
berichten van de Nederlandse media zorgen alleen maar voor een
verdere stimulering van de anti-Russische hysterie in het Westen,”
zei een woordvoerder van het Kremlin, Dmitry Peskov afgelopen
vrijdag. “De Nederlandse kranten voeden de anti-Russische hysterie,
die plaatsvindt in de Verenigde Staten, alleen maar verder op – het
is geen erg nobele activiteit, maar in ieder geval willen we u eraan
herinneren dat wij door de Nederlandse inlichtingendiensten geen
verklaringen hebben gezien of gehoord met betrekking tot dit punt.
Het is ook niet betrouwbaar om de informatie van de Nederlandse
kranten aan te halen, “voegde Peskov toe.

Referendum
sleepwet

We
moeten als burger met opmerkelijke verhalen als deze extreem
voorzichtig zijn, vooral als ze op cruciale momenten uit anonieme
bronnen komen en ‘toevallig’ de belangen behartigen van de
inlichtingendiensten. Er wordt ons verteld over het bestaan van
videobeelden waarop de hackers te zien zijn, maar we zullen die nooit
te zien krijgen. We moeten maar geloven dat het bestaat. Net zoals we
de woorden van de anonieme bronnen waar Nieuwsuur en de Volkskrant
zich op baseren, maar moeten accepteren, ook al zullen ze geen enkel
bewijs leveren die de claims ondersteunen. Dit is precies hoe
regelrechte, gemakkelijk bewijsbare desinformatie wordt verspreidt. 

Laten we niet vergeten dat het referendum over de sleepwet over een
paar maanden plaats zal vinden in Nederland. Onze overheid en
inlichtingendiensten zullen alle middelen inzetten om de bevolking te
overtuigen dat deze wet nodig is. Blijkbaar is vage informatie
verspreiden die niet te verifiëren valt, een onderdeel van deze
strategie. Na het lezen van honderden reacties op de publicaties van
de NOS en de Volkskrant, geloven wij niet dat de Nederlandse
bevolking hier zomaar in zal trappen. Sterker nog, steeds meer
burgers in Nederland worden kritischer en begrijpen dat een claim
zonder bewijs, enkel een claim blijft.

* Edward Snowden is een voormalig CIA- en NSA medewerker die in 2013 documenten naar buiten bracht die vele Amerikaanse staatsgeheimen onthulden. Hieruit bleek dat de Amerikaanse inlichtingendienst, de NSA – door middel van een soort sleepnet -grootschalig de Amerikaanse bevolking bespioneerde. Later bracht hij ook andere zaken aan het licht. Zo heeft hij onder andere onthuld dat de Nederlandse inlichtingendiensten, de AIVD en de MIVD in opdracht van de Amerikanen werken en niet zelfstandig functioneren.

Zie ook:

Dutch ‘Cozy Bear’ Farce Does Not Show DNC Emails Were Hacked By Russians

10 Reasons The Dutch-Russia Hacking Story Is Fake News‘ (via Stan van Houcke: ‘Volkskrant Fake News 3’)

Pompeo (CIA opperhoofd met koperen fluit): heeft alle aanwijzingen dat Rusland de midterm verkiezingen zal manipuleren……‘ (een eerder bericht van deze dag, zie het grote aantal links in dat bericht, betreffende de leugensoap ‘Russiagate’)

Sleepwet: vrijgegeven documenten bewijzen dat de VS gewone burgers bespioneert >> zie ons voorland…….

‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers……… 

FBI beweert dat Lesin, de oprichter van RT, zichzelf heeft doodgeslagen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Dat de gehieme diensten van de VS vooral heel vaak liegen als ze iets beweren is al heel lang bekend, maar de FBI maakt ‘t nu wel helemaal bont……..

De oprichter van RT (Russia Today) en voormalig media adviseur van de Russische regering, Mikhail Lesin, werd in november 2015 dood gevonden in zijn hotelkamer te Washington (DC). De autoriteiten hielden het op een hartaanval, een conclusie die haaks stond op de werkelijkheid, gezien het autopsie rapport dat maanden later verscheen……

Zo had Lesin wonden aan het hoofd en het lichaam die waren toegebracht met een stomp voorwerp…….

De FBI maakte hier later het verhaal van dat Lesin zichzelf had dood geslagen, o.a. door zich herhaaldelijk tegen de grond te werpen, dit onder invloed van ethanol, ofwel alcohol…….. Je snapt ‘t al: kul van groot kaliber! De VS sloot in 2016 het dossier uiteindelijk met de conclusie dat Lesin op een natuurlijke manier aan z’n einde was gekomen……ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Kortom: alweer is ook de FBI verantwoordelijk voor ‘fake news….’

‘Toevallig’ kwamen in de tijd van Lesins dood en  daarna meerdere Russische hoogwaardigheidsbekleders e.d. ‘op een vreemde manier’ aan hun einde……… (zie de links onder het ZeroHedge artikel)

Gezien de agressie van de geheime diensten in de VS, is het de vraag hoe lang het zal duren voordat deze moorden worden toegeschreven aan die geheime diensten, dan wel dat ze door deze diensten werden geïnitieerd……..

Hier het artikel dat Tyler Durden hierover schreef en dat o.a. op ZeroHedge werd geplaatst:

FBI
Releases Docs Claiming RT Founder Beat Himself To Death In His Hotel
Room

by Tyler
Durden

Mon,
01/29/2018 – 04:22

Authored
by Matt Agorist via SHTFplan.com,

The
FBI just released the results of their investigation claiming that
the media mogul and found of RT 
killed
himself by repeatedly smashing his head and upper body into the
ground.

In
November 2015, 
the
Free Thought Project 
reported that
Mikhail Lesin, the former head of media affairs for the Russian
government, and the
 founder
of Russia Today (RT), was found dead in the hotel room that he was
staying at in Washington DC
.

Originally, authorities
announced that Lesin died from a heart attack.

However,
the results of his autopsy released months later indicated a far more
sinister cause of death and the heavily redacted FBI documents that
were just released add to that story.

The
documents, detailing the FBI investigation into Lesin’s death 
were
just released
 Saturday
morning in spite of the investigation ending in October of 2016.

In
spite of the original cause of death noted as a heart attack, a few
months later, the District of Colombia’s Office of the Chief
Medical Examiner (OCME) and Metropolitan Police Department said that
“blunt force injuries of the neck, torso, upper extremities and
lower extremities” contributed to Lesin’s death. 
The
Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) has released the cause
and manner of death for Mikhail Lesin… Cause of Death: blunt force
injuries of the head,”
 the
statement said.

Now,
FBI investigators have released the results of their investigation
claiming that the blunt force trauma all over his body was
self-inflicted.

Mr.
Lesin died as a result of blunt for injuries to his head, with
contributing causes being blunt force injuries of the neck, torso,
upper extremities, and lower extremities, which were induced by
falls, with acute ethanol intoxication,”
 the
report states.

In
other words, the FBI is claiming that Lesin got so drunk that he
repeatedly and violently fell on things until he killed himself.

To
show just how much information the FBI is willing to release on these
findings, here is the version of the amended autopsy report they
released in the report.

Essentially,
all other information in regards to the findings of Lesin’s death
has been scrubbed from the documents as the remaining pages are
almost entirely redacted.

Not
only did the US remain tight-lipped on the investigation but they
also refused to allow Russian authorities to cooperate.

As
RT reports, back in 2016, months before the closing of the case,
Moscow said it was expecting Washington to explain why Russia had not
received any details from the probe into Lesin’s death, despite
repeated requests.

We
are awaiting the related clarifications from Washington and the
official data on the progress of the investigation,”
 Foreign
Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova wrote in a Facebook post at that
time. She added that if the media reports citing the forensic
statement are confirmed,
 Russia
will send an official request to the US
 “for
international legal assistance.”

In
October 2016, the US authorities announced that Lesin died of natural
causes and closed the case. 
Based
on the evidence, including video footage and witness interviews, Mr.
Lesin entered his hotel room on the morning of Wednesday, Nov. 4,
2015, 
after
days of excessive consumption of alcohol and sustained the injuries
that resulted in his death while alone in his hotel room,
 the
US attorney for the District of Columbia 
said in
a statement.

Lesin’s
death came at a time where he was surrounded by controversy,
especially in the US. 
RT,
the Russian-based news source that Lesin founded has become very
controversial in the US—ostensibly for the fake Russiagate
scandal—but in reality, for challenging the western narrative of
foreign policy and privacy issues. Some US politicians have suggested
that RT be banned in the US for “spreading propaganda,” while
others have been blatant enough to attack Lesin personally.

According
to the 
NY
Times,
 until
late 2014 Lesin ran the media wing of the state’s energy
giant, 
Gazprom,
before stepping down or, more likely, being forced out. He ended up
in the United States, where he and his family owned properties in Los
Angeles said to be worth far more than the salary of the former
government minister.

Some
US Senators, including Roger Wicker of Mississippi, had called for
the Department of Justice to open an investigation into Lesin’s
finances prior to his death.

Wicker
was concerned that Lesin made too much money, something that was
really none of his business.

That
a Russian public servant could have amassed the considerable funds
required to acquire and maintain these assets in Europe and the
United States raises serious questions,”
 Wicker
said.

The
original announcement of the heart attack back in November 2015
makes this case all the more ominous considering the fact that the
medical examiner’s office also said Lesin’s body had blunt force
trauma to the neck, torso, arms and legs too. How did
authorities overlook his wounds?

As
RT reports, Lesin was considered one of the most influential
figures in the Russian media landscape.
 A
graduate of Moscow State University with a degree in Civil
Engineering, he served as Minister of Press and Mass Media from 1999
to 2004. He was also a presidential media adviser from 2004 to 2009.
Lesin became chief executive officer at Garprom-Media in 2013 and
remained in the position until early 2015.

Zie ook: ‘Media stilte over dood 4 Russische diplomaten………

        en: ‘Russische diplomaten: 9 verdachte sterfgevallen de afgelopen paar jaar………

VS sluit een nucleaire aanval niet uit als een mogelijke reactie op een ‘cyberaanval…….’

Het wordt met de dag zotter in de VS, gisteren bracht ANTIWAR een artikel met het nieuws dat de VS een nucleaire aanval als een redelijke vergelding voor een cyberaanval ziet……….Een cyberaanval uit de VS wel te verstaan, want alle aanvallen die tot nu toe zogenaamd zijn gedaan tegen de VS, kwamen allen uit VS koker….. Althans als je de figuren uit Macedonië niet meerekent, die gebruik maakten van de algehele hysterie in de VS in aanloop van de verkiezingen en de gekste berichten de wereld instuurden over Trump, dit om zo veel mogelijk te kunnen innen (met genoeg klikken op jouw bericht kan je geld innen van internetaanbieders als Google….)…..

Zo is de VS ook verantwoordelijk voor het grote aantal manieren om een ander op te laten draaien voor een cyberaanval: m.a.w. een ‘false flag’ operatie…… Dit zijn operaties die de VS al veelvuldig heeft gebruikt in het verleden, ofwel een aanleiding creëren om ‘legaal’ een oorlog te kunnen beginnen tegen het land, waar de grootste terreurstaat op aarde, de VS, de pik op heeft………. Voorbeelden hoe de VS dit doet op de digitale manier zijn te vinden in de Vault 7 (en 8) documenten op Wikileaks.

Een nucleaire aanval als reactie op een cyberaanval…… Wat wil je met een totaalidioot in het Witte Huis, die zijn gehoor eerder tot 3 keer toe vroeg:  “If we have nuclear weapons why can’t we use them?” en nee dat was niet een opzet om de kernwapens de wereld uit te helpen, maar om ze daadwerkelijk te gebruiken………

De VS is bezig met het ontwikkelen van zogenaamde kleine kernwapens, waarmee men een stad kan vernietigen…….*

Het platleggen van een groot deel van de infrastructuur in de VS, hetzij op energie gebied, of het uitschakelen van een groot deel van het internet, middels een cyberaanval, zou voldoende moeten zijn om een nucleaire aanval te beginnen, aldus het Pentagon.

Voor alle verhalen over Russische manipulaties en hacks, precies als die over Noord-Korea, is geen flinter bewijs, integendeel er komen bijna dagelijks bewijzen bij waaruit blijkt dat de VS zelf achter deze hacks zit……. Het absolute dieptepunt is wel de beschuldiging, dat Rusland via advertenties tegen minimale bedragen de verkiezingen voor Trump zou hebben gewonnen, zoals via advertenties op Facebook van ‘t vervelende parmantige ventje Zuckerberg, die denkt dat veel geld hebben gelijk staat aan staatsmanschap en politiek inzicht……..

De hoogste tijd voor wereldwijde protesten tegen het gebruik van kernwapens, je weet wel met de leus: ‘Alle kernwapens de wereld uit!’

Lees het volgende artikel van Jason Ditz:

US
Now Sees Nuclear Strike as ‘Realistic’ Response to Cyberattacks

January
17, 2018 at 6:37 am

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

(ANTIWAR.COM— While
much of the early reporting on the Pentagon’s new Nuclear Posture
Review has focused on acquiring smaller nukes and using them much
more often, the details continue to slowly emerge, and show a
scramble to establish more pretexts for nuclear first strikes.

This
includes cyberattacks. In hyping up the threat of major cyberattacks
that might conceivably put lives at risk, the Pentagon’s
document 
proposes the
use of nuclear first strikes against cyber foes, presenting that as
the only “realistic” option to such threats.

The
“massive cyber attack” narrative is built around the assumption
that a particularly severe hack could conceivably knock out a good
portion of the US electricity grid, a major cellphone network, or
even some of the Internet’s backbone.

Obviously
no such hacks have ever happened, but officials have been eager to
play them up as a possibility, both as a way to justify more spending
on cyberwarfare, and to hype threats posed by whatever enemy they
choose to hype.

Which
is another problem. US assignments of blame in cyberattacks are
rarely grounded in evidence or reality, but rather they blame whoever
is politically expedient at the time, whether it’s Russia, China,
or North Korea. Such reckless blame is relatively consequence-free
when the US just responds with angry threats, but nuclear strikes
could quickly start massive, civilization ending nuclear warfare.

Making
nuclear war more likely is the general theme of the Nuclear Posture
Review anyhow though, and while it’s drawing a lot of criticism for
that from former officials and private analysts, it’s not at all
clear that within the current administration, this bellicose and
irresponsible posture isn’t the whole point.

The
Trump Administration has spent its entire time in power easing
restrictions on the military, and giving commanders more and more
leeway on their operations. It might not be such a surprise for that
to spill over into nuclear weapon policy.

By Jason
Ditz
 /
Republished with permission / 
ANTIWAR.COM / Report
a typo

==========================================

* Zie: ‘VS op weg naar daadwerkelijk gebruik van het kernwapen…………..‘ (plus twee andere Engelstalige artikelen)

Zie ook:

Pentagon rapport geeft aan dat VS zich voorbereidt op totale oorlog

Oekraïne het toneel van grootschalige luchtmachtoefeningen met VS en NAVO, naast een enorme militaire VS/NAVO oefening in Noorwegen

Duitsland doet mee in het koor van de wolven: Russische cyberterreur!

VS heeft Rusland al 3 keer met oorlog gedreigd, de laatste 2 keer in de afgelopen 1,5 week…..

Idlib: akkoord Turkije – Rusland leidt tot grote aanval op Syrië….

VS zendt tegen wil van de bevolking in 1.500 militairen naar Duitsland, opbouw voor WOIII?

Groot-Brittannië bezig met volk voor te bereiden op oorlog tegen Rusland

NAVO kan WOIII beginnen waarschuwt de baas van de NAVO >> Trump….. ha! ha! ha! ha!

Stop militaire transporten van de VS en NAVO richting Russische grens >> niet nog een wereldoorlog!

Russische volk wordt geadviseerd zich voor te bereiden op een nucleaire oorlog…….

VS vergroot doelbewust de spanningen met Rusland: een enorme VS troepenopbouw langs de Russische grens……….

NAVO oefent op een nucleaire aanval tegen ‘een denkbeeldige vijand’, ofwel Rusland……….

Rechtse denktank waarschuwt voor een groot risico op een kernoorlog met Rusland…..

Estland stopt militaire oefening na een ‘vergissing’ >> de lancering van een raket in het grensgebied met Rusland……

VN chef Guterres geeft alarmcode rood af voor de wereld in 2018 en niet alleen vanwege het milieu of klimaat……

Top VS generaal stelt dat er een grote oorlog met Rusland op komst is, ofwel: WOIII……

Trumps atoomknop is groter dan die van Kim Yung-un, bovendien werkt de VS knop wel……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Trumps uitlating over de atoomknop en de onverschilligheid bij zijn achterban, een dictatuur waardig………


Trumps beleid t.a.v. kernwapens brengt de VS staatsveiligheid in gevaar (en die van de rest van de wereld)

Dan nog over het bedreigen van Noord-Korea door Trump met ‘Fire and Fury): ‘Noord-Korea verkeerd begrepen: het land wordt bedreigd door de VS, dat alleen deze eeuw al minstens 4 illegale oorlogen begon……..

En om nog even te herinneren aan de enorme agressie van de VS, die niet op een illegale oorlog meer of minder kijkt:  ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en:  ‘List of wars involving the United States‘    

Over de zogenaamde Russische dreiging: ‘NAVO uitbreiding in Oost-Europa is bewezen tegen gesloten overeenkomst met Rusland…….

Links aangepast op 26 januari 2018.

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

Er is al veel geschreven (althans in de alternatieve media) over de ware schuldigen achter Russiagate, met bewijzen werd en wordt aangetoond dat de geheime diensten FBI, CIA en NSA de ware schuldigen zijn achter Russiagate, waar overigens het campagneteam van hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton, aanstichter en mededader is…….

Gisteren op het blog van Stan van Houcke een artikel geschreven door Ray McGovern (ex-CIA) en gepubliceerd op de site van schrijver/journalist Paul Craig Roberts, die het overnam van Consortium News (kan je het nog volgen?). McGovern legt op een gedegen manier uit dat de FBI de ware grote dader is achter Russiagate.

Niet voor niets zegt nu zelfs de Wall Street Journal dat er een punt moet worden gezegd achter het Russiagate verhaal……. ha! Ha! Ha! Eerst liepen de persen van de Wall Street Journal zo hard op deze leugen dat ze bij wijze van spreken bijna vastliepen…….. Waar nu blijkt dat het Clinton campagneteam en de geheime diensten samen hebben gewerkt om te voorkomen dat Trump in het Witte Huis zou komen, wil deze bijna grootste krant van de VS dus een punt achter het enorme leugenverhaal dat Russiagate is………

Nogmaals toont een massamediaorgaan aan ‘fake news’ (of: nepnieuws) te hebben gebracht en daar het volk maandenlang over te hebben voorgelogen……

Lezen mensen, een geweldig stuk over dombo’s Strzak en Page, die dachten in het geheim te kunnen communiceren, maar van wie onlangs een eerste deel van hun lange correspondentie werd vrijgegeven en waardoor ten overvloede de FBI nog eens kan worden aangewezen als spin in het Russiagate web…….

The FBI Hand Behind Russia-gate


By Ray McGovern

January 15, 2018 Paul Craig Roberts.

As I have reported from the beginning, Russiagate is an orchestrated hoax by the security agencies for the purpose of preventing Trump from normalizing relations with Russia and, if necessary, for removing him from office. Russiagate is an act of treason by the security agencies. Those responsible must be arrested, prosecuted, and convicted. — PCR


“After months of breathless searching for ‘evidence’ of Russian-Trump collusion designed to put Trump in the White House, what now exists is actual evidence that senior officials of the Obama administration colluded to keep Trump out of the White House.” — Ray McGovern



Special Report: In the Watergate era, liberals warned about U.S. intelligence agencies manipulating U.S. politics, but now Trump-hatred has blinded many of them to this danger becoming real, as ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern notes. 



January 12, 2017, Information Clearing House

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/48572.htm

The FBI Hand Behind Russia-gate


By Ray McGovern

Russia-gate is becoming FBI-gate, thanks to the official release of unguarded text messages between loose-lipped FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok and his garrulous girlfriend, FBI lawyer Lisa Page. (Ten illustrative texts from their exchange appear at the end of this article.)

Despite his former job as chief of the FBI’s counterintelligence section, Strzok had the naive notion that texting on FBI phones could not be traced. Strzok must have slept through “Security 101.” Or perhaps he was busy texting during that class. Girlfriend Page cannot be happy at being misled by his assurance that using office phones would be a secure way to conduct their affair(s).

It would have been unfortunate enough for Strzok and Page to have their adolescent-sounding texts merely exposed, revealing the reckless abandon of star-crossed lovers hiding (they thought) secrets from cuckolded spouses, office colleagues, and the rest of us. However, for the never-Trump plotters in the FBI, the official release of just a fraction (375) of almost 10,000 messages does incalculably more damage than that.

We suddenly have documentary proof that key elements of the U.S. intelligence community were trying to short-circuit the U.S. democratic process. And that puts in a new and dark context the year-long promotion of Russia-gate. It now appears that it was not the Russians trying to rig the outcome of the U.S. election, but leading officials of the U.S. intelligence community, shadowy characters sometimes called the Deep State.

More of the Strzok-Page texting dialogue is expected to be released. And the Department of Justice Inspector General reportedly has additional damaging texts from others on the team that Special Counsel Robert Mueller selected to help him investigate Russia-gate.

Besides forcing the removal of Strzok and Page, the text exposures also sounded the death knell for the career of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, in whose office some of the plotting took place and who has already announced his plans to retire soon.

But the main casualty is the FBI’s 18-month campaign to sabotage candidate-and-now-President Donald Trump by using the Obama administration’s Russia-gate intelligence “assessment,” electronic surveillance of dubious legality, and a salacious dossier that could never pass the smell test, while at the same time using equally dubious techniques to immunize Hillary Clinton and her closest advisers from crimes that include lying to the FBI and endangering secrets.

Ironically, the Strzok-Page texts provide something that the Russia-gate investigation has been sorely lacking: first-hand evidence of both corrupt intent and action. After months of breathless searching for “evidence” of Russian-Trump collusion designed to put Trump in the White House, what now exists is actual evidence that senior officials of the Obama administration colluded to keep Trump out of the White House – proof of what old-time gumshoes used to call “means, motive and opportunity.”

Even more unfortunately for Russia-gate enthusiasts, the FBI lovers’ correspondence provides factual evidence exposing much of the made-up “Resistance” narrative – the contrived storyline that The New York Times and much of the rest of the U.S. mainstream media deemed fit to print with little skepticism and few if any caveats, a scenario about brilliantly devious Russians that not only lacks actual evidence – relying on unverified hearsay and rumor – but doesn’t make sense on its face.

The Russia-gate narrative always hinged on the preposterous notion that Russian President Vladimir

Putin foresaw years ago what no American political analyst considered even possible, the political ascendancy of Donald Trump. According to the narrative, the fortune-telling Putin then risked creating even worse tensions with a nuclear-armed America that would – by all odds – have been led by a vengeful President Hillary Clinton.

Besides this wildly improbable storyline, there were flat denials from WikiLeaks, which distributed the supposedly “hacked” Democratic emails, that the information came from Russia – and there was the curious inability of the National Security Agency to use its immense powers to supply any technical evidence to support the Russia-hack scenario.

The Trump Shock

But the shock of Trump’s election and the decision of many never-Trumpers to cast their lot with the Resistance led to a situation in which any prudent skepticism or demand for evidence was swept aside.

So, on Jan. 6, 2017, President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper released an evidence-free report that he said was compiled by “hand-picked” analysts from the CIA, FBI and NSA, offering an “assessment” that Russia and President Putin were behind the release of the Democratic emails in a plot to help Trump win the presidency.

Despite the extraordinary gravity of the charge, even New York Times correspondent Scott Shane noted that proof was lacking. He wrote at the time: “What is missing from the [the Jan. 6] public report is what many Americans most eagerly anticipated: hard evidence to back up the agencies’ claims that the Russian government engineered the election attack. … Instead, the message from the agencies essentially amounts to ‘trust us.’”

But the “assessment” served a useful purpose for the never-Trumpers: it applied an official imprimatur on the case for delegitimizing Trump’s election and even raised the long-shot hope that the Electoral College might reverse the outcome and possibly install a compromise candidate, such as former Secretary of State Colin Powell, in the White House. Though the Powell ploy fizzled, the hope of somehow removing Trump from office continued to bubble, fueled by the growing hysteria around Russia-gate.

Virtually all skepticism about the evidence-free “assessment” was banned. For months, the Times and other newspapers of record repeated the lie that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies had concurred in the conclusion about the Russian “hack.” Even when that falsehood was belatedly acknowledged, the major news outlets just shifted the phrasing slightly to say that U.S. intelligence agencies had reached the Russian “hack” conclusion. Shane’s blunt initial recognition about the lack of proof disappeared from the mainstream media’s approved narrative of Russia-gate.

Doubts about the Russian “hack” or dissident suggestions that what we were witnessing was a “soft coup” were scoffed at by leading media commentators. Other warnings from veteran U.S. intelligence professionals about the weaknesses of the Russia-gate narrative and the danger of letting politicized intelligence overturn a constitutional election were also brushed aside in pursuit of the goal of removing Trump from the White House.

It didn’t even seem to matter when new Russia-gate disclosures conflicted with the original narrative that Putin had somehow set Trump up as a Manchurian candidate. All normal journalistic skepticism was jettisoned. It was as if the Russia-gate advocates started with the conclusion that Trump must go and then made the facts fit into that mold, but anyone who noted the violations of normal investigative procedures was dismissed as a “Trump enabler” or a “Moscow stooge.”

The Text Evidence

But then came the FBI text messages, providing documentary evivdence that key FBI officials involved in the Russia-gate investigation were indeed deeply biased and out to get Trump, adding hard proof to Trump’s longstanding lament that he was the subject of a “witch hunt.”

Justified or not, Trump’s feeling of vindication could hardly be more dangerous — particularly at a time when the most urgent need is to drain some testosterone from the self-styled Stable-Genius-in-Chief and his martinet generals.

On the home front, Trump, his wealthy friends, and like-thinkers in Congress may now feel they have an even wider carte blanche to visit untold misery on the poor, the widow, the stranger and other vulnerable humans. That was always an underlying danger of the Resistance’s strategy to seize on whatever weapons were available – no matter how reckless or unfair – to “get Trump.”

Beyond that, Russia-gate has become so central to the Washington establishment’s storyline that there appears to be no room for second-thoughts or turning back. The momentum is such that some Democrats and the media never-Trumpers can’t stop stoking the smoke of Russia-gate and holding out hope against hope that it will somehow justify Trump’s impeachment.

Yet, the sordid process of using legal/investigative means to settle political scores further compromises the principle of the “rule of law” and integrity of journalism in the eyes of many Americans. After a year of Russia-gate, the “rule of law” and “pursuit of truth” appear to have been reduced to high-falutin’ phrases for political score-setttling, a process besmirched by Republicans in earlier pursuits of Democrats and now appearing to be a bipartisan method for punishing political rivals regardless of the lack of evidence.

Strzok and Page

Peter Strzok (pronounced “struck”) has an interesting pedigree with multiple tasks regarding both Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump. As the FBI’s chief of counterespionage during the investigation into then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a personal email server for classified information, Strzok reportedly changed the words “grossly negligent” (which could have triggered legal prosecution) to the far less serious “extremely careless” in FBI Director James Comey’s depiction of Clinton’s actions. This semantic shift cleared the way for Comey to conclude just 20 days before the Democratic National Convention began in July 2016, that “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring charges against Mrs. Clinton.

Then, as Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division, Strzok led the FBI’s investigation into alleged Russian interference in the U.S. election of 2016. It is a safe bet that he took a strong hand in hand-picking the FBI contingent of analysts that joined “hand-picked” counterparts from CIA and NSA in preparing the evidence-free, Jan. 6, 2017 assessment accusing Russian President Vladimir Putin of interfering in the election of 2016. (Although accepted in Establishment groupthink as revealed truth, that poor excuse for analysis reflected the apogee of intelligence politicization — rivaled only by the fraudulent intelligence on “weapons of mass destruction“ in Iraq 15 years ago.)

In June and July 2017 Strzok was the top FBI official working on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible links between the Trump campaign and Russia, but was taken off that job when the Justice Department IG learned of the Strzok-Page text-message exchange and told Mueller.

There is no little irony in the fact that what did in the FBI sweathearts was their visceral disdain for Mr. Trump, their cheerleading-cum-kid-gloves treatment of Mrs. Clinton and her associates, their 1950-ish, James Clapperesque attitude toward Russians as “almost genetically driven” to evil, and their (Strzok/Page) elitist conviction that they know far better what is good for the country than regular American citizens, including those “deplorables” whom Clinton said made up half of Trump’s supporters.

But Strzok/Page had no idea that their hubris, elitism and scheming would be revealed in so tangible a way. Worst of all for them, the very thing that Strzok, in particular, worked so hard to achieve — the sabotaging of Trump and immunization of Mrs. Clinton and her closest advisers is now coming apart at the seams.

Congress: Oversee? or Overlook?

At this point, the $64 question is whether the various congressional oversight committees will remain ensconced in their customarily cozy role as “overlook” committees, or whether they will have the courage to attempt to carry out their Constitutional duty. The latter course would mean confronting a powerful Deep State and its large toolbox of well-practiced retaliatory techniques, including J. Edgar Hoover-style blackmail on steroids, enabled by electronic surveillance of just about everything and everyone. Yes, today’s technology permits blanket collection, and “Collect Everything” has become the motto.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-New York, with almost four decades of membership in the House and Senate, openly warned incoming President Trump in January 2017 against criticizing the U.S. intelligence community because U.S. intelligence officials have “six ways from Sunday to get back at you” if you are “dumb” enough to take them on.

Thanks to the almost 10,000 text messages between Strzok and Page, only a small fraction of which were given to Congress four weeks ago, there is now real evidentiary meat on the bones of the suspicions that there indeed was a “deep-state coup” to “correct” the outcome of the 2016 election. We now know that the supposedly apolitical FBI officials had huge political axes to grind. The Strzok-Page exchanges drip with disdain for Trump and those deemed his smelly deplorable supporters. In one text message, Strzok expressed visceral contempt for those working-class Trump voters, writing on Aug. 26, 2016, “Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support. … it’s scary real down here.”

The texts even show Strzok warning of the need for an “insurance policy” to thwart Trump on the off-chance that his poll numbers closed in on those of Mrs. Clinton.

An Aug. 6, 2016 text message, for example, shows Page giving her knight in shining armor strong affirmation: “Maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace [Trump].” That text to Strzok includes a link to a David Brooks column in The New York Times, in which Brooks concludes with the clarion call: “There comes a time when neutrality and laying low become dishonorable. If you’re not in revolt, you’re in cahoots. When this period and your name are mentioned, decades hence, your grandkids will look away in shame.”

Another text message shows that other senior government officials – alarmed at the possibility of a Trump presidency – joined the discussion. In an apparent reference to an August 2016 meeting with FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Strzok wrote to Page on Aug. 15, 2016, “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk.”  Strzok added, “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event that you die before you’re 40.”

Insurance Policy?

Senate Judiciary Committee chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, says he will ask Strzok to explain the “insurance policy” when he calls him to testify. What seems already clear is that the celebrated “Steele Dossier” was part of the “insurance,” as was the evidence-less legend that Russia hacked the DNC’s and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails and gave them to WikiLeaks.

If congressional investigators have been paying attention, they already know what former weapons inspector Scott Ritter shared with Veteran intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) colleagues this week; namely, that Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson, who commissioned the Russia dossier using Democratic Party money, said he reached out to Steele after June 17, just three days before Steele’s first report was published, drawing on seven sources.

“There is a snowball’s chance in hell that this is raw intelligence gathered by Steele; rather he seems to have drawn on a single ‘trusted intermediary’ to gather unsubstantiated rumor already in existence.”

Another VIPS colleague, Phil Giraldi, writing out of his own experience in private sector consulting, added: “The fact that you do not control your sources frequently means that they will feed you what they think you want to hear. Since they are only doing it for money, the more lurid the details the better, as it increases the apparent value of the information. The private security firm in turn, which is also doing it for the money, will pass on the stories and even embroider them to keep the client happy and to encourage him to come back for more. When I read the Steele dossier it looked awfully familiar to me, like the scores of similar reports I had seen which combined bullshit with enough credible information to make the whole product look respectable.”

It is now widely known that the Democrats ponied up the “insurance premiums,” so to speak, for former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele’s “dossier” of lurid — but largely unproven — “intelligence” on Trump and the Russians. If, as many have concluded, the   dossier was used to help justify a FISA warrant to snoop on the Trump campaign, those involved will be in deep kimchi, if congressional overseers do their job.

How, you might ask, could Strzok and associates undertake these extra-legal steps with such blithe disregard for the possible consequences should they be caught? The answer is easy; Mrs. Clinton was a shoo-in, remember? This was just extra insurance with no expectation of any “death benefit” ever coming into play — save for Trump’s electoral demise in November 2016. The attitude seemed to be that, if abuse of the FISA law should eventually be discovered — there would be little interest in a serious investigation by the editors of The New York Times and other anti-Trump publications and whatever troubles remained could be handled by President Hillary Clinton.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, who chairs the Judiciary Subcommittee of Judiciary on Crime and Terrorism, joined Sen. Grassley in signing the letter referring Christopher Steele to the Justice Department to investigate what appear to be false statements about the dossier. In signing, Graham noted the “many stop signs the Department of Justice ignored in its use of the dossier.” The signature of committee ranking member Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, however, was missing — an early sign that a highly partisan battle royale is in the offing.  On Tuesday, Feinstein unilaterally released a voluminous transcript of Glenn Simpson’s earlier testimony and, as though on cue, Establishment pundits portrayed Steele as a good source and Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson as a victim.

The Donnybrook is now underway; the outcome uncertain.

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington.  He was an Army and CIA intelligence analyst for 30 years; prepared and briefed the President’s Daily Brief for Nixon, Ford, and Reagan; and is co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

+++++++++++++

Sample text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, released to Congress and the media on December 13, 2016

++++++++++++++

03/04/2016

Strzok – God Hillary should win. 100,000,000-0.

Page – I know

++++++++++++

04/02/2016

Page – So look, you say we text on that phone when we talk about Hillary because it can’t be traced, you were just venting, bc you feel bad that you’re gone so much but that can’t be helped right now.

++++++++++

07/08/2016

Strzok – And meanwhile, we have Black Lives Matter protestors, right now, chanting “no justice no peace” around DoJ and the White House…

Page – That’s awful.

+++++++++

07/14/2016

Page – Have you read this? It’s really frightening. For Whites Sensing Decline, Donald Trump Unleashes Words of Resistance http://NYTI/ms/29WCu5!

Strzok – I have not. But I think it’s clear he’s capturing all the white, poor voters who the mainstream republicans abandoned in all but name in the quest for the almighty $$$

Page – Yeah, it’s not good.

Strzok – Poll Finds Emails Weighing on Hillary Clinton, Now Tied With Donald Trump http://nyti.ms/29RV5gf

Page – It is

+++++++++++++

07/26/2016

Strzok – And hey. Congrats on a woman nominated for President in a major party! About damn time! Many many more returns of the day!!

Page – That’s cute. Thanks

++++++++++

08/06/2016

Page – Jesus. You should read this. And Trump should go f himself. Moment in Convention Glare Shakes Up Khans American Life http://nyti.ms/2aHulE0

Strzok – God that’s a great article. Thanks for sharing. And F TRUMP.

++++++++

08/06/2016

Page – And maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace. To that end comma, read this:

Page – Trump Enablers Will Finally Have to Take A Stand http://nyti.ms/2aFakry

Strzok – Thanks. It’s absolutely true that we’re both very fortunate. And of course I’ll try and approach it that way. I just know it will be tough at times. I can protect our country at many levels, not sure if that helps

++++++++++++

08/09/2016

Page – He’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!

Strzok – OMG did you hear what Trump just said?

+++++++++++

08/26/2016

Strzok – Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support…

Page – Yep. Out to lunch with (redacted) We both hate everyone and everything.

Page – Just riffing on the hot mess that is our country.

Strzok – Yeah…it’s scary real down here

+++++++++

10/20/2016

Strzok: I am riled up. Trump is a f***ing idiot, is unable to provide a coherent answer.

Strzok – I CAN’T PULL AWAY, WHAT THE F**K HAPPENED TO OUR COUNTRY (redacted)??!?!

Page– I don’t know. But we’ll get it back. We’re America. We rock.

Strzok– Donald just said “bad hombres”

Strzok– Trump just said what the FBI did is disgraceful.

This article was originally published by Consortium News –

====

Was the DNC/Clinton campaign-funded dossier used to obtain warrants on Trump team from the secret court?

=============================

* Zie: ‘Wall Street Journal wil punt achter Russiagate

Zie ook: ‘WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….

        en: ‘Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!

        en: ‘Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

        en ‘Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax

       en: ‘New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……

       en: ‘Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen

       en: ‘Google, de volgende ‘die advertentieruimte verkocht aan Putin zelf……’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

       en: Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

       en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

       en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘ (zie ook de andere links onder dat bericht)

       en: ‘Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!‘ (ja ook deze D66 plork gaat plat op de bek!)

       en: ‘RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

       en: ‘Rusland heeft niets van doen met manipulaties van de VS presidentsverkiezingen via Facebook, wel maakt Facebook meer kapot dan je lief is…….

       en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

        en:  ‘CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

       en: ‘CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

       en: ‘Pompeo (CIA opperhoofd met koperen fluit): heeft alle aanwijzingen dat Rusland de midterm verkiezingen zal manipuleren……

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..


       en: De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

       en: ‘‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

Newsweek erkent ‘false flag’ operatie van de VS tegen de Sovjet Unie……

Newsweek maakte onlangs bekend dat de VS al eens een false flag operatie overwoog om Rusland daarna van een aanval te kunnen beschuldigen en zo dat land aan te vallen. Oké al bekend, maar altijd ‘leuk’ om zaken nogmaals bevestigd te zien in officiële documenten! Zie ook een dergelijke actie die eind 2016 bekend werd gemaakt*

Dat is nog maar de helft beste bezoeker Newsweek is een van de mediaorganen die nogal eens complottheorie begonnen te schreeuwen als men het over ‘false flag’ operaties had en nu toegeeft dat deze wel degelijk bestaan….. 

Mainstream Media Just Acknowledged Government False Flags

(Zie ook de video’s die na deze van 55 seconden volgen!)

Eerder
werd overigens het volgende al bekend:
‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

* Zie: Aggressor squadron? Pics of US jets painted in Russian colors spark Syria false flag conspiracy

Zie ook: ‘NSA breidt bemoeienis met buitenlandse verkiezingen uit, vanwege ‘angst voor Russische hackers…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘‘Topgeheim’ NSA document bewijst dat Syrische ‘rebellen’ worden aangestuurd door Saoedi-Arabië, met medeweten van VS…….

       en: ‘JFK de moord: de macht van de geheime diensten gecombineerd met die van het militair-industrieel complex

WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’

CounterPunch bracht afgelopen woensdag een
artikel waarin gehakt wordt gemaakt van de bewering dat Noord-Korea
achter de WannaCry ‘cyberaanval’ zou zitten……. Homeland
Security (DHS) adviseur Tom Bossart kwam een paar weken geleden met deze waanzinnige claim (op 19 december 2017). Met deze claim moet het publiek nog verder worden opgezweept in de richting van een (illegale) oorlog tegen Noord-Korea…….

Bewijzen werden weer niet geleverd,
sterker nog: Gregory Elich, de schrijver van het hierna opgenomen
artikel toont middels een indrukwekkend aantal feiten aan dat
Noord-Korea niet achter deze cyberaanval kan zitten, zoals
Noord-Korea ook de Sony hack niet heeft uitgevoerd, de hack waarbij
Contopee malware werd gebruikt door de Lazarus Group….

Zoals eerder gesteld: het is duidelijk dat de Trump
administratie Noord-Korea zoveel mogelijk in een kwaad daglicht wil
stellen en ook deze beschuldiging is gericht op het angst- en
haatzaaien voor resp. tegen Noord-Korea……

De landen die het meest getroffen werden door WannaCry waren Rusland en China; waarom zou Noord-Korea deze landen aanvallen, het gaat immers om de laatste landen die het nog opnemen voor Noord-Korea??!!!

Het is even een zit, maar daarna zal
niemand je nog overtuigen dat Noord-Korea achter WannaCry zit:

The
WannaCry Cyberattack: What the Evidence Says and Why the Trump
Administration Blames North Korea

Photo by Blogtrepreneur | CC BY 2.0

by GREGORY
ELICH
JANUARY
3, 2018

On
December 19, in a Wall Street Journal editorial that drew much
attention, Homeland Security Advisor Tom Bossert asserted that North
Korea was “directly responsible” for the WannaCry cyberattack
that struck more than 300,000 computers worldwide. The virus
encrypted files on infected computers and demanded payment in return
for supposedly providing a decryption key to allow users to regain
access to locked files. Bossert charged that North Korea was “using
cyberattacks to fund its reckless behavior and cause disruption
across the world.” 
[1]

At
a press conference on the same day, Bossert announced that the
attribution was made “with evidence,” and that WannaCry “was
directed by the government of North Korea,” and carried out by
“actors on their behalf, intermediaries.” 
[2] The
evidence that led the U.S. to that conclusion? Bossert was not
saying, perhaps recalling the ridicule that greeted the FBI and
Department of Homeland Security’s misbegotten report on the hacking
of the Democratic National Committee.

The
centerpiece of the claim of North Korean culpability is the
similarity in code between the Contopee malware, which opens backdoor
access to an infected computer, and code in an early variant of
WannaCry. 
[3]

Contopee
has been linked to the Lazarus group, a cybercrime organization that
some believe launched the Sony hack, based on the software tools used
in that attack. Since North Korea is widely considered to be behind
the cyberattack on Sony, at first glance that would appear to seal
the argument.

It
is a logical argument, but is it founded on valid premises? Little is
known about Lazarus, aside from the operations that are attributed to
it. The link between Lazarus and North Korea is a hypothesis based on
limited evidence. It may or may not be true, but the apparent linkage
is far weaker than mainstream media’s conviction would have one
believe. Lazarus appears to be an independent organization possibly
based in China, which North Korea may or may not have contracted to
perform certain operations. That does not necessarily mean that every
action – or even any action at all – Lazarus performs is at North
Korea’s behest.

In
Bossert’s mind as well as that of media reporters, Lazarus – the
intermediaries Bossert refers to – and North Korea are synonymous
when it comes to cyber operations. North Korea gives the orders and
Lazarus carries them out. James Scott, a senior fellow at the
Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology, notes that
“speculation concerning WannaCry attributes the malware to the
Lazarus Group, not to North Korea, and even those connections are
premature and not wholly convincing. Lazarus itself has never been
definitively proven to be a North Korean state-sponsored advanced
persistent threat (APT); in fact, an abundance of evidence suggests
that the Lazarus group may be a sophisticated, well-resourced, and
expansive cyber-criminal and occasional cyber-mercenary collective.”
Furthermore, Scott adds, the evidence used to tie Lazarus to North
Korea, “such as an IP hop or some language indicators, are
circumstantial and could even be intentional false flags” to
misdirect investigators. 
[4]

Whether
an association exists or not between Lazarus and North Korea has
little meaning regarding a specific attack. Joseph Carson of Thycotic
emphasizes “that it is important to be clear that [Lazarus] is a
group and motives can change depending on who is paying. I have found
when researching hacking groups they can one day be working for one
government under one alias and another using a different alias. This
means that association in cyberspace means nothing.” 
[5]

It
is considered a particularly damning piece of evidence that some of
the tools used in an early variant of WannaCry share characteristics
with those deployed in the cyberattack on Sony. 
[6] However,
there is ample cause for doubting North Korea’s role in the Sony
hack, as I have written about before. 
[7] Following
the Sony breach, IT businessman John McAfee revealed that he had
contact with the group that attacked Sony. “It has to do with a
group of hackers” motivated by dislike of the movie industry’s
“controlling the content of art,” he said, and the FBI was wrong
in attributing the attack to North Korea. 
[8]

If
attribution of the Sony hack to North Korea does not hold up, then
linkage based on tool usage falls apart.

Once
malware is deployed, it often appears for sale on the Dark Web, where
it can be purchased by cybercriminals. The reuse of code is a
time-saving measure in building new threats. Indeed, malware can find
its way onto the market quite rapidly, and almost as soon as WannaCry
was wreaking havoc back in May, it was reported that “researchers
are already finding variants” of WannaCry “in the wild.” 
[9]

According
to Peter Stephenson of SC Media, “The most prevailing [theory] uses
blocks of code that were part of known Korean hacks appearing in the
WannaCry code as justification for pinning the attacks on NK. That’s
really not enough. These blocks of code are readily available in the
underground and get reused regularly.” 
[10]

Commonality
of tool usage means less than we are led to believe. “While malware
may initially be developed and used by a single actor,” Digital
Shadows explains, “this does not mean that it will permanently
remain unique to that actor. Malware samples might be accidentally or
intentionally leaked, stolen, sold, or used in independent operations
by individual members of the group.” 
[11]

Shared
code is not the same as attribution. Code can be rewritten and erased
by anyone, and shared code is often reused,” observes Patrick
Howell O’Neill of Cyberscoop. “The same technique could
potentially be used to frame another group as responsible for a hack
but, despite a lot of recent speculation, there is no definitive
proof.” 
[12]

None
of the shared code was present in WannaCry’s widespread attack on
May 12. Although it is more likely than not that the same actor was
behind the early variants of WannaCry and the May version, it is not
certain. Alan Woodward, cybersecurity advisor to Europol, points out,
“It is quite possible for even a relatively inexperienced group to
obtain the malicious WannaCry payload and to have repackaged this.
Hence, the only thing actually tying the May attacks to the earlier
WannaCry attacks is the payload, which criminals often copy.” 
[13]

The
most devastating component WannaCry utilized in its May 12 attack is
EternalBlue, an exploit of Windows vulnerabilities that was developed
by the National Security Agency and leaked by Shadow Brokers. The NSA
informed Microsoft of the vulnerability only after it learned of the
software’s theft. According to Bossert, the NSA informs software
manufacturers about 90 percent of the time when it discovers a
vulnerability in operating software. It keeps quiet about the
remaining ten percent so that it can “use those vulnerabilities to
develop exploits for the purpose of national security for the
classified work we do.” 
[14] Plainly
put, the NSA intentionally leaves individuals and organizations
worldwide exposed to potential security breaches so that it can
conduct its own cyber operations. This is less than reassuring.

The
May variant of WannaCry also implemented DoublePulsar, which is a
backdoor implant developed by the NSA that allows an attacker to gain
full control over a system and load executable malware.

The
two NSA-developed components are what allowed WannaCry to turn
virulent last May. After loading, EternalBlue proceeds to infect
every other vulnerable computer on the same network. It
simultaneously generates many thousands of random IP addresses and
launches 128 threads at two-second intervals, seeking vulnerabilities
in computers that it can exploit at each one of the generated
external IP addresses.
[15]

China
and Russia were among the nations that were most negatively impacted
by the malware. 
[16] WannaCry
initially targeted Russian systems, which would seem an odd thing for
North Korea to do, given that Russia and China are the closest things
it has to allies. 
[17]

Digital
Shadows reports that “the malware appeared to spread virtually
indiscriminately with no control by its operators,” and a more
targeted approach “would have been more consistent with the
activities of a sophisticated criminal outfit or a
technically-competent nation-state actor.” 
[18]

Flashpoint
analyzed the ransom note that appeared on infected computers. There
were two Chinese versions and an English version. The Chinese texts
were written by someone who is fluent, and the English by someone
with a strong but imperfect command of English. Ransom notes in other
languages were apparently translated from the English version using
Google translator. 
[19] It
has been pointed out that this fact does not disprove the U.S.
attribution of North Korea, as that nation could have hired Chinese
cybercriminals. True enough, but then North Korea does not have a
unique ability to do so. If so inclined, anyone could contract
Chinese malware developers.  Or cybercriminals could act on
their own.

Lazarus
and North Korean cyber actors have a reputation for developing
sophisticated code. The hallmark of WannaCry, however, is its sheer
sloppiness, necessitating the release of a series of new versions in
fairly quick succession. Alan Woodward believes that WannaCry’s
poorly designed code reveals that it had been written by “a less
than experienced malware developer.” 
[20]

Important
aspects of the code were so badly bungled that it is difficult to
imagine how any serious organization could be responsible.

IT
security specialists use virtual machines, or sandboxes, to safely
test and analyze malware code. A well-designed piece of malware will
include logic to detect the type of environment it is executing in
and alter its performance in a virtual machine (VM) environment to
appear benign. WannaCry was notably lacking in that regard. 
“The authors did not appear to be concerned with thwarting
analysis, as the samples analyzed have contained little if any
obfuscation, anti-debugging, or VM-aware code,” notes LogRhythm
Labs. 
[21]

James
Scott argues that “every WannaCry attack has lacked the stealth,
sophistication, and resources characteristic of [Lazarus sub-group]
Bluenoroff itself or Lazarus as a whole. If either were behind
WannaCry, the attacks likely would have been more targeted, had more
of an impact, would have been persistent, would have been more
sophisticated, and would have garnered significantly greater
profits.” The EternalBlue exploit was too valuable to waste “on a
prolific and unprofitable campaign” like the May 12 WannaCry
attack. By contrast, Bluenoroff “prefers to silently integrate into
processes, extort them, and invisibly disappear after stealing
massive fiscal gains.” 
[22]Bogdan
Botezatu of Bitdefender, agrees. “The attack wasn’t targeted and
there was no clear gain for them. It’s doubtful they would use such
a powerful exploit for anything else but espionage.” 
[23]

WannaCry
included a “kill switch,” apparently intended as a poorly thought
out anti-VM feature. “For the life of me,” comments Peter
Stephenson, “I can’t see why they might think that would
work.” 
[24]When
the software executes it first attempts to connect to a hostname that
was unregistered. The malware would proceed to run if the domain was
not valid. A cybersecurity researcher managed to disable WannaCry by
registering the domain through NameCheap.com, shutting down with ease
the ability of WannaCry to infect any further computers. 
[25]

Once
WannaCry infected a computer, it demanded a ransom of $300 in bitcoin
to release the files it had encrypted. After three days, the price
doubled. The whole point of WannaCry was to generate income, and it
is here where the code was most inept.

Ideally,
ransomware like WannaCry would use a new account number for each
infected computer, to better ensure anonymity. Instead, WannaCry
hard-coded just three account numbers, which basically informed
authorities what accounts to monitor. 
[26] It
is an astonishing botch.

Incredibly,
WannaCry lacked the capability of automatically identifying which
victims paid the ransom. That meant that determining the source of
each payment required manual effort, a daunting task given the number
of infected computers. 
[27]Inevitably,
decryption keys were not sent to paying victims and once the word got
out, there was no motivation for anyone else to pay.

In
James Scott’s assessment, “The WannaCry attack attracted very
high publicity and very high law-enforcement visibility while
inflicting arguably the least amount of damage a similar campaign
that size could cause and garnering profits lower than even the most
rudimentary script kiddie attacks.” Scott was incredulous over
claims that WannaCry was a Lazarus operation. “There is no logical
rationale defending the theory that the methodical [Lazarus], known
for targeted attacks with tailored software, would suddenly launch a
global campaign dependent on barely functional ransomware.” 
[28]

One
would never know it from news reports, but cybersecurity attribution
is rarely absolute. Hal Berghel, of the Department of Computer
Science at the University of Nevada, comments on the “absence of
detailed strategies to provide justifiable, evidence-based
cyberattribution. There’s a reason for that: there is none. The
most we have is informed opinion.”  The certainty with which
government officials and media assign blame in high-profile
cyberattacks to perceived enemies should at least raise questions.
“So whenever a politician, pundit, or executive tries to attribute
something to one group or another, our first inclination should
always be to look for signs of attribution bias, cognitive bias,
cultural bias, cognitive dissonance, and so forth. Our first
principle should be cui bono: What agendas are hidden? Whose
interests are being represented or defended? What’s the motivation
behind the statement? Where are the incentives behind the leak or
reportage? How many of the claims have been

substantiated
by independent investigators?” 
[29]

IT
security specialist Graham Cluley raises an important question. “I
think in the current hostile climate between USA and North Korea it’s
not unhelpful to retain some skepticism about why this claim might
have been made, and what may have motivated the claim to be made at
the present time.” 
[30]

To
all appearances, WannaCry was the work of amateurish developers who
got hold of NSA software that allowed the malware to spread like
wildfire, but their own code was so poorly written that it failed to
monetize the effort to any meaningful degree.

WannaCry
has its uses, though. The Trump administration’s public attribution
is “more about the administration’s message that North Korea is a
dangerous actor than it is about cybersecurity,” says Ross Rustici,
head of Intelligence Research at Cybereason. “They’re trying to
lay the groundwork for people to feel like North Korea is a threat to
the homeland.” 
[31] It
is part of a campaign by the administration to stampede the public
into supporting harsh measures or possibly even military action
against North Korea.

Notes:

[1] Thomas
P. Bossert, “It’s Official: North Korea is Behind WannaCry,”
Wall Street Journal,” December 19, 2017.

[2] “Press
Briefing on the Attribution of the WannaCry Malware Attack to North
Korea,” Whitehouse.gov, December 19, 2017.

[3] “WannaCry
and Lazarus Group – the Missing Link?” SecureList, May 15, 2017.

[4] James
Scott, “There’s Proof That North Korea Launched the WannaCry
Attack? Not So Fast! – A Warning Against Premature, Inconclusive,
and Distracting Attribution,” Institute for Critical Infrastructure
Technology, May 23, 2017.

[5] Eduard
Kovacs, “Industry Reactions to U.S. Blaming North Korea for
WannaCry,” Security Week, December 22, 2017.

[6] “WannaCry:
Ransomware Attacks Show Strong Links to Lazarus Group,” Symantec
Official Blog, May 22, 2017.

[7] Gregory
Elich, “Who Was Behind the Cyberattack on Sony?” Counterpunch,
December 30, 2014.

[8] David
Gilbert, Gareth Platt, “John McAfee: ‘I Know Who Hacked Sony
Pictures – and it Wasn’t North Korea,” International Business
Times, January 19, 2015.

[9] Amanda
Rousseau, “WCry/WanaCry Ransomware Technical Analysis,” Endgame,
May 14, 2017.

[10] Peter
Stephenson, “WannaCry Attribution: I’m Not Convinced Kim Dunnit,
but a Russian…”, SC Media, May 21, 2017.

[11] Digital
Shadows Analyst Team, “WannaCry: An Analysis of Competing
Hypotheses,” Digital Shadows, May 18, 2017.

[12] Patrick
Howell O’Neill, “Researchers: WannaCry Ransomware Shares Code
with North Korean Malware,” Cyberscoop, May 15, 2017.

[13] Alan
Woodward, “Attribution is Difficult – Consider All the Evidence,”
Cyber Matters, May 24, 2017.

[14] Thomas
P. Bossert, “It’s Official: North Korea is Behind WannaCry,”
Wall Street Journal,” December 19, 2017.

[15] Luke
Somerville, Abel Toro, “WannaCry Post-Outbreak Analysis,”
Forcepoint, May 16, 2017.

Sarah
Maloney, “WannaCry / WCry /WannaCrypt Attack Profile,”
Cybereason, May 16, 2017.

Rohit
Langde, “WannaCry Ransomware: A Detailed Analysis of the Attack,”
Techspective, September 26, 2017.

[16] Eduard
Kovacs, “WannaCry Does Not Fit North Korea’s Style, Interests:
Experts,” Security Week, May 19, 2017.

[17] “A
Technical Analysis of WannaCry Ransomware,” LogRhythm, May 16,
2017.

[18] Digital
Shadows Analyst Team, “WannaCry: An Analysis of Competing
Hypotheses,” Digital Shadows, May 18, 2017.

[19] Jon
Condra, John Costello, Sherman Chu, “Linguistic Analysis of
WannaCry Ransomware Messages Suggests Chinese-Speaking Authors,”
Flashpoint, May 25, 2017.

[20] Alan
Woodward, “Attribution is Difficult – Consider All the Evidence,”
Cyber Matters, May 24, 2017.

[21] Erika
Noerenberg, Andrew Costis, Nathanial Quist, “A Technical Analysis
of WannaCry Ransomware,” LogRhythm, May 16, 2017.

[22] James
Scott, “There’s Proof That North Korea Launched the WannaCry
Attack? Not So Fast! – A Warning Against Premature, Inconclusive,
and Distracting Attribution,” Institute for Critical Infrastructure
Technology, May 23, 2017.

[23] Eduard
Kovacs, “WannaCry Does Not Fit North Korea’s Style, Interests:
Experts,” Security Week, May 19, 2017.

[24] Peter
Stephenson, “WannaCry Attribution: I’m Not Convinced Kim Dunnit,
but a Russian…”, SC Media, May 21, 2017.

[25] Rohit
Langde, “WannaCry Ransomware: A Detailed Analysis of the Attack,”
Techspective, September 26, 2017.

[26] Jesse
Dunietz, “The Imperfect Crime: How the WannaCry Hackers Could Get
Nabbed,” Scientific American, August 16, 2017.

[27] Andy
Greenberg, “The WannaCry Ransomware Hackers Made Some Major
Mistakes,” Wired, May 15, 2017.

[28] James
Scott, “WannaCry Ransomware & the Perils of Shoddy Attribution:
It’s the Russians! No Wait, it’s the North Koreans!” Institute
for Critical Infrastructure Technology, May 18, 2017.

[29] Hal
Berghel, “On the Problem of (Cyber) Attribution,” Computer —
IEEE Computer Society, March 2017.

[30] Scott
Carey, “Should We Believe the White House When it Says North Korea
is Behind WannaCry?” Computer World, December 20, 2017.

[31] John
P. Mello Jr., “US Fingers North Korea for WannaCry Epidemic,”
Tech News World, December 20, 2017.

===================================

Zie ook: ‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

       en: ‘CIA de ware hacker en manipulator van verkiezingen, ofwel de laatste Wikileaks documenten……...’

       en: ‘CIA speelt zoals gewoonlijk vuil spel: uit Wikileaks documenten blijkt dat CIA zelf de verkiezingen manipuleerde, waar het Rusland van beschuldigde……..

       en: ‘‘Russische bemoeienis’ met de Nederlandse verkiezingen….. Waaruit blijkt nu die manipulatie, gezien de verkiezingsuitslag?

      en: ‘CIA malware voor manipulaties en spionage >> vervolg Wikileaks Vault 7

      en: ‘Eichelsheim (MIVD) ‘waarschuwt voor agressie CIA en NAVO……….’

      en: ‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

      en: ‘Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘) Hierover zal ik wellicht later vandaag nog een bericht publiceren.

       en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

      en: ‘‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

      en: ‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

      en: VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

      en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

      en: ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

      en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

      en: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

      en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

      en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

      en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

      en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

       en: ‘Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

Onderbroekbom (25 december 2009) een enorm onzin verhaal, weer zijn we voorgelogen…….

Weet je waarom je tegenwoordig op de meeste vliegvelden door een onveilige lichaamsscanner moet? Juist, vanwege de ‘onderbroekterrorist!’ Op eerste kerstdag 2009 vond het incident met deze ‘onderbroekterrorist’ plaats

Je kon er de klok eigenlijk al op gelijkzetten, een kulverhaal……. Uit een
bericht van Brasschek TV dat ik afgelopen zaterdag ontving, blijkt alweer dat we op grote schaal zijn besodemieterd!

Het begon op Schiphol: 2 advocaten die op dezelfde vlucht zaten als de dader, zagen dat de dader geen papspoort had, waarop een woordenwisseling ontstond. Volgens de 2 stapte daarop een VS beambte naar voren en even later werd de dader, zonder paspoort toegelaten in het vliegtuig…..

De advocaten zijn ervan overtuigd, dat de dader een niet functionerende bom kreeg toegespeeld* door de VS overheid, met maar één doel: de invoering van de volledige lichaamsscan (full bodyscan) op vliegvelden……

De grote ‘spin’ in dit web van bedrog is Micheal Chertoff, ex-Homeland Security (DHS), mede auteur van de Patriot Act, samensteller van het memo ‘Torture is OK’, ook had hij de leiding over de dramatisch slechte hulpverlening in New Orleans, nadat de schermen (‘dijken’) die de stad moesten beschermen tegen hoogwater niet bleken te voldoen (Orkaan Katrina).

Chertoff werkt nu, samen met een aantal voormalige collega’s uit o.a. de CIA, NSA en Homeland Security voor het bedrijf dat deze bodyscanners levert aan vliegvelden in de VS en waarschijnlijk een aantal vliegvelden buiten de VS. Het zal me niet verbazen als ze ook op Schiphol staan, daar spreekt men met geruststellende woorden over deze ondingen, die daar eufemistisch ‘securityscan’ worden genoemd, gevaarlijke ondingen die zoals je kon lezen en in de video’s kan zien, volkomen ten onrechte in gebruik zijn genomen…..

Remember
the underwear bomber?

A
TOTAL FRAUD

Bad
guys
Government
terror

WHEN
WILL MICHAEL CHERTOFF BE INVESTIGATED?

It’s December
22, the anniversary of the “underwear bomber”

He
– and Michael Chertoff – are the reason why air travelers are now
forced to go through medically untested body scanners.

In
case you forgot, the “need” for this “security” equipment was
based on a total fraud.

Good
insight into how the criminals in the FBI make eye witnesses accounts
disappear.

Michael
Chertoff is involved with the company that makes this equipment and
shilled aggressively both before and after this bogus event.

Michael
Chertoff: The profiteer behind the scam.

======================================

* De zoveelste ‘false flag’ operatie van de VS……. Zie ook: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

Zie ook: 

De onderbroekbom-leugen ten behoeve van onveilige body scanners‘ 

De onderbroekbom: één grote leugen, die duizenden vliegveld bodyscanners heeft ‘opgeleverd’‘ 


Azijnpisser eist per direct strengere anti-terreurmaatregelen!!!


Een onderbroekbom

WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..