Shock & Awe: 15 jaar geleden begon de (illegale) oorlog tegen Irak, dezelfde weg wordt weer gevolgd door de VS (en de massamedia)……..

15 jaar
geleden begon de regering van George W. Bush de oorlog tegen Irak.
Geheel op leugens gebaseerd was dit de aanzet tot een illegale oorlog
die intussen aan meer dan 1,5 miljoen burgers het leven heeft gekost.

Deze
oorlog was niet mogelijk geweest, als de reguliere (massa-) media
niet de leugens van de Bush administratie hadden overgenomen en dat op de
voorpagina’s en prominent in nieuws en actualiteiten uitzendingen, of dat nu op de
radio of tv was. De term ‘fake news’ bestond destijds nog niet, maar
werd wel degelijk op grote schaal gemaakt door de hiervoor genoemde
media. Vergeet niet dat meerdere deskundigen en wapeninspecteurs van
de VN, zoals Blix, keer op keer stelden dat Irak niet meer in het
bezit was van massavernietigingswapens…….

Het
volgende artikel gaat Ron Paul dieper in op alle gevolgen van
deze illegale oorlog die de VS 15 jaar geleden begon. Voorts noemt
hij het huidige tromgeroffel o.l.v. De VS tegen Noord-Korea, waar
senator Graham een paar dagen geleden stelde dat een paar miljoen
doden geen probleem zijn, als met een oorlog tegen dit land ‘stabiliteit’ in de regio wordt bereikt………..

Jammer
dat Paul niet alle andere oorlogsdreigingen van VS en NAVO zijde noemt, zoals een dreigende oorlog tegen Syrië, Iran en Libanon (deze o.l.v. Israël met steun van de VS), waar
nog Oekraïne aan toegevoegd kan worden, daar de VS daar niet alleen
meer ‘militaire adviseurs’, maar ook zware wapens levert aan dit intussen zo
goed als failliete land. Dit nog buiten alle militaire oefeningen
langs de Russische grens, waar de VS in feite oefent op een oorlog
tegen Rusland……. 

Hetzelfde geldt voor China, waar de VS dit land voor een groot deel heeft omringd met militaire bases en waar de Trump administratie dit land meer en meer met militair geweld bedreigt (zoals over de eilandjes die China claimt in de Zuid-Chinese Zee…)…….

Ron
Paul: 15 Years After the US Invaded Iraq, It’s Time to Listen to
the Iraqi People

March
5, 2018 at 1:04 pm

Written
by 
Ron
Paul

(RPI Op-ed) — This
month marks the 15th anniversary of the US war on Iraq. The “shock
and awe” attack was launched based on “stove-piped”
intelligence fed from the CIA and Pentagon through an uncritical and
compliant US mainstream media. The US media was a willing accomplice
to this crime of aggression committed by the George W. Bush
Administration.

Despite
the lies we were constantly bombarded with, Iraq never presented a
threat to the United States. Iraq never had the weapons of mass
destruction that the neocons used to frighten Americans into
supporting the war. How many of them knew all along that there were
no WMDs? We’ll never know. Attacking Iraq and overthrowing its
leader was long a plan in the neocon playbook and they used the 9/11
attack on the US as an excuse to pull the plan off the shelf and put
it into action.

The
US “regime change” war on Iraq has directly resulted in the death
of at least a quarter of a million civilians, and indirectly perhaps
a million Iraqis have been killed. The Iraqi infrastructure was
destroyed and the country was set back many decades in development.
Far from the democratization we were promised, Iraq has been turned
into a hell on earth. Due to the US use of depleted uranium and other
chemical weapons like white phosphorus, Iraqis will continue to
suffer from birth defects and other related illnesses for
generations.

How
did we get there? War propaganda was essential in paving the way for
the Iraq war. Americans are generally skeptical about launching new
wars, so it takes a steady media bombardment about the alleged
depravities of any targeted regime before public opinion begins to
shift in favor of war.

Because
the neocons who helped launch the war have never had to face the
consequences of their actions, they continue to promote war with
impunity. Just this past week, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was pushing
for a US attack on North Korea in which millions may be killed. He
said this weekend, “All the damage that would come from a war would
be worth it in terms of long-term stability and national security.”
That’s just what they said before the US attacked Iraq, and how did
that turn out? I find it disgusting that the media continues to give
airtime almost exclusively to those who promote more US disasters
like Iraq.

The
Iraqi parliament did something extraordinary last week. A majority of
elected Iraqi representatives voted to demand that their prime
minister draw up a timetable for the withdrawal of US troops from the
country. President Obama had withdrawn US troops from Iraq in 2011,
after a status of forces agreement could not be reached with the
Iraqi government, but he returned the US military to Iraq under the
auspices of fighting ISIS.

We
had no business going into Iraq in the first place and we have no
business remaining in Iraq. Al-Qaeda and ISIS emerged in Iraq because
our attack and occupation of the country 15 years ago created fertile
fields for extremism. Nothing will be achieved if we remain. Let’s
listen to the Iraqis and just come home!

Op-ed
by 
Ron
Paul
 /
Republished with permission / 
RPI / Report
a typo

Muellers onzinnige beschuldiging die Russiagate zou bewijzen……..

Muellers ‘troll farm’ verhaal ronduit waanzinnig………

Het is werkelijk om schijtziek van te
worden: de pogingen in de VS (en de rest van het westen) om Rusland te demoniseren en het verlies
van de presidentsverkiezingen door hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton te
wijten aan Russische manipulaties.

Voor al die claims is nul komma nada
bewijs, maar de VS en haar hielenlikkende oorlogshonden van de NAVO
houden deze leugens in de lucht, dit gesteund door de reguliere
media, die NB bijna dagelijks schrijven over ‘fake news’, terwijl
deze media verreweg de grootste leveranciers van dit nepnieuws
zijn…….

De vooralsnog laatste bladzijde in de
wrange komedie werd geschreven door oud-FBI directeur Robert
Mueller…….

Lees hoe David Stockman uitgebreid
gehakt maakt van het ‘troll farm verhaal’. (let op, sommige delen zijn dusdanig komisch dat je op moet passen er niet in te blijven):

Mueller’s
Comic Book Indictment: How to Prosecute A Great Big Nothingburger

By
David Stockman

February
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – We have always heard that a
determined government prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, and now
we know it’s true. After 38 years in the prosecution racket, Robert
Mueller just made his biggest score ever—that is, he nailed
a great big Nothingburger.


But
he also did a lot more than that. Mueller’s 37-page comic book
indictment actually unmasks—inadvertently to be
sure—the 
distinctly
un-terrifying essence
 of
the whole Russian meddling narrative. In fact, the crude social media
emissions (ads and posts) of the so-called troll farm were
generally lame, often laughable and sometimes downright
ludicrous as per this gem cited by Mueller:

a.
On or about October 16, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the ORGANIZATION-controlled Instagram account “Woke Blacks”
to post the following message: 
“[A]
particular hype and hatred for Trump is misleading the people and
forcing Blacks to vote Killary. We cannot resort to the lesser of two
devils. Then we’d surely be better off without voting AT ALL.”

Notwithstanding
the grave nomenclature of BLOCK CAPITALS, endless sinister “on
or about” events and 99 numbered paragraphs of
particulars, the true bill (charging document) is actually just a
random catalogue of social media trivia like the above “Woke
Blacks” post.

Most
of the cited gleanings amounted to crude word bombs, often in
broken English, that presumably even Kim Kardashian’s 59 million
Twitter followers could see through.

“Hillary
is a Satan, and her crimes and lies
 had proved
just how evil she is”

The
lion’s share of these postings and ads probably disappeared into
cyberspace like the sound of a falling tree in an empty
forest, anyway. According to Facebook itself, the seemingly
ubiquitous social media ad campaign despicted in the indictment
was nothing of the kind. It actually amounted to
just 
3,000 placements
at a cost of 
$100,000—more
than half of which were purchased after the election,
and 
25% of
which ended-up in its dead letter office (unread).

Likewise, the
handful of efforts to actually stimulate pro-Trump rallies in
Florida and elsewhere were abject failures. As we document
below, the Russians had absolutely no “ground game” in the
US and any third-rate campaign consultant will tell you that ads
alone do not produce crowds. In fact, there is virtually no evidence
that anyone showed up at the rallies cited by Mueller.

Besides,
the overwhelming share of the pro-Trump social media postings
uncovered by Mueller’s sleuths amounted to “copy and paste”
relays of current partisan talking points. Thus, the
indictment cites such slogans as:

           “Vote
Republican, vote Trump, and support the Second Amendment!”.

“Trump
is our only hope for a better future!”

“Donald
wants to defeat terrorism… Hillary wants to sponsor it”

Really?

It
took a clandestine nest of Russkie imposters and subversives to
pollute the social media with this kind of tripe?


In
fact, RNC, Fox News and the Trump campaign were
already saturating the internet with these messages,
anyway—-along with millions of pro-Trump social medi activists.  T
he 80 Russian operatives
cited by Mueller didn’t add one damn bit to the massive social media
messaging that was already out there.

So
here’s the joker in the whole deck. It seems that the
nefarious”troll farm” in St. Petersburg that comprises
nearly the totality of Mueller’s case is not a Russian
intelligence agency operation at all.


Instead,
it’s the relatively harmless Hobby Farm of a fanatical
Russian oligarch and ultra-nationalist, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who
has a great big beef against Imperial Washington’s demonization
of Russia and Vlad Putin. Apparently, the farm
 was (it’s
apparently being disbanded) the vehicle through which he gave
Washington the middle finger and buttered up his patron.

Prigozhin
is otherwise known as “Putin’s Cook” because he made his
fortune in St. Petersburg restaurants that Putin favored and via
state funded food service operations at Russian schools and military
installations. Like most Russian oligarchs not in jail, he
apparently tithes in gratitude to the Kremlin: In this
case, by bankrolling the rinky-dink operation at 55
Savushkina Street in St Petersburg that is the object of Mueller’s
pretentious foray into the flotsam and jetsam of social media
low life.

Prigozhin’s
trolling farm is grandly called the Internet Research Agency
(IRA), but what it actually does is hire (apparently) unemployed
20-somethings at $4-8 per hour to pound out
ham-handed political messaging on social media sites like
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube etc. They bang away twelve
hours at a shift on a quota-driven
paint-by-the-internet-numbers basis where their output is rated for
engagements, likes, retweets etc.


Whatever
these keyboard drones might be, they are not professional Russian
intel operators
. And
the collection of broken English postings strewn throughout the
indictment are not one bit scary.


Indeed,
the utterly stupid naiveté of the whole St.
Petersburg operation is crystalized by this episode when the
farm purportedly garnered some startling political insight from
an unwitting Trump campaign official in Texas:

80.
On or about August 19, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the false U.S. persona “Matt Skiber” account to write
to the real U.S. person affiliated with a Texas-based grassroots
organization who previously had advised the false persona to focus
on 
“purple
states like Colorado, Virginia & Florida
.”
Defendants and their co-conspirators told that U.S. person, 
We
were thinking about your recommendation to focus on purple states and
this is what we’re organizing in FL.”

Jez
Louise and goodness gracious, too. Who coulda thunk as early
as August that Colorado, Virginia and Florida would be swing
states!


In
any event, even Mueller’s indictment proves that the farm was
strictly amateurville. None of the other 12 Russians charged
has an intelligence background, either.

Thus,
the CEO is a retired St. Petersburg police officer. The
executive director is a 31-year old website developer and
internet PR promoter who previously had garnered small beans
contracts ($4k-20k each) from St. Petersburg agencies to publish
municipal newspapers, make video reports about their activities or
promote local programs such as one on “tolerance and
prevention of drug addiction”.


Likewise,
two more of the operatives were graduates students in IT and
advertising at St. Petersburg universities.

Then
there is the husband/wife duo, Maria and Robert Bovda, who were
the original heads of the US focused “translator project”.
Both were recent graduates in psychology from local
universities, where Robert’s 2011 thesis had been on
“The Effects of Social-Support Conditions On
Loneliness As Experienced By the Elderly”.


We can’t
help but think they had not yet become hardened spies when
the joined IRA in November 2013 and apparently 
left
in October 2014
. Whatever
they did during their tenure at the farm, cooking up ways to
help Donald Trump’s not yet announced campaign was surely
not among them, but still apparently enough to help fill out
Mueller’s indictment roster.

             Maria Bovda was the 'head' of the translator project, the designated branch of the wider pro-Putin effort which focused on US audiences. She worked there between November 2013 and October 2014
Her husband Robert acted beneath her as the second in charge of the 'translator' project and worked at the company over the same dates. He too is accused of trying to enter the US under false pretenses to collect information but he did not obtain a visa and could not make the trip


Another
was Dzheykhun Aslanov, who was head of the “American department”
and had graduated in 2012 from the Russian State Hydrometeorological
University in St. Petersburg. He had studied economics
and 
wildlife
management!

Likewise,
nowhere in the entire 37 pages is there even a clause linking
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm to the SVR (foreign intelligence service), the
FSB (counter-intelligence and anti-terrorism), the GRU (military
intelligence service), any other agency of the Russian State—-or
even some purported Kremlin back channel to Putin.

Yet
there is every reason to believe that the entire Russian meddling
narrative cooked up by the partisan hacks in Obama’s inner
circle—-John Brennan, Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes—-was based on the
amateurish machinations originating in the nondescript building
pictured below.

As
we will show, the Hobby Farm was no Russian state secret
or clandestine vehicle of its intelligence community. To the
contrary, it had been fully covered in the Russian press for
years as one of numerous such oligarch funded projects designed
to glorify the Putin regime and vilify the Russian opposition.


It
had also been the subject of a lengthy expose in 
The
Guardian
 
of
London, as well as other western media. Even Radio Free Europe
had done a lengthy profile.


All
of this had happened long before Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm
had turned its attentions to US politics. Indeed, the IRA’s
pivot to the US in April 2014 occurred well before Trump’s
candidacy was gleam in anyone’s eye except his own, but 
after a
seminal event had occurred which Mueller’s comic book
narrative completely ignores.


To
wit, what apparently riled up Prigozhin was Washington’s
heavy-handed meddling in the politics of Ukraine during the US
funded and enabled coup on the streets of Kiev in February 2014.

Never
mind that the incumbent pro-Russian government had come to power in
an honest election and had chosen to take a more
attractive economic deal from Moscow than was being offered
by the West. 

Also ignore that fact that Ukraine was Russia’s
next door neighbor and had been an essential element of Greater
Russia—sometimes a full fledged constituent state—for more
than 700 years.

Likewise,
when Crimea elected by 90% referendum vote to “rejoin”
Russia, it didn’t happen at gunpoint. Crimea is 85% Russian and
had been an integral part of the Russian state ever since it
was purchased from the Turks by Catherine the Great for
good money in 1783.

Thereafter,
its major port city of Sevastopol had functioned as the homeport
for Russia’s Black Sea fleet under Czars and Commissars alike.
The only real reason it needed to “rejoin” Russia in March
2014 was because the Ukrainian tyrant who ruled the Soviet Union in
the 1950s, Nikita Khrushchev, had gifted it to his
Ukrainian compatriots during a drunken celebration of his
victory over two deadly rivals who also claimed Stalin’s succession.

Indeed,
when Obama’s neocon Assistant Secretary for European Affairs,
Victoria Nuland, was caught telling the American ambassador in Kiev
that “Yats is the guy” with respect to the new Washington
designated leader of the post-coup government and joined a
chorus of Washington-based vilification of Putin and the Russian
government, the die was cast.

Russian
nationalists like Prigozhin were not going to take it lying down. As
we document below, then and there he began to shift some of the
activities of his trolling farm toward the US.

It amounted
to a tit-for-tat response to the anti-Russian propaganda emanating
from the Washington funded NGOs in Kiev; and also from outright
government agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy
and Radio Free Europe, as well as the Deep State
subservient operations of CNN and its print media imitators.

That
shift was described as the “translator project” by
Mueller’s historically ignorant lawyers. The implication was that out
of sheer aggression the Kremlin had unilaterally decided to
attack America’s democratic process through the IRA.

In
fact, the overwhelming likelihood is that an arriviste
Russian billionaire got a bee in his bonnet after Washington’s
Ukrainian coup–and then went to town on America with his trolling
farm exactly as he and many others had been doing in internal
Russian politics for years.

From
the point of view of US/Russian relations and world peace, however,
the re-direction of activity at Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm could
not have come at a worse time. Its wholly open and widely known
operations permitted Obama’s hatchet-people to quickly seize
on the IRA’s new theatre of focus as evidence of a
massive Russian attack on America’s election process, thereby turning
a molehill into a mountain.

At
length, the partisan leaders of Obama’s national security team,
led by the detestable John Brennan at the
CIA, selectively coopted and abused the resources and
credibility of the vast US intelligence apparatus to put the
imprimatur of a national security threat upon what was in fact
a scary bedtime story of no real significance. That effort
culminated in the phony intelligence assessment published
by four US intel agencies in January 2017 based on the work
of Brennan’s “hand-picked” accomplices.

In
what is surely a fabulous irony, therefore, the Internet
Research Agency amounts to a reverse Potemkin Village. It wasn’t
much to look at and was nothing to worry about until Obama’s
national security posse falsely embellished it’s innocuous
façade into a mortal threat to American democracy and national
security.

And
then Robert Mueller brought in his gang of copywriters and
illustrators to turn this entire tall tale into CNN-ready “news”.

We
will demonstrate below that what happened in this building was a
complete farce and posed no threat to the security and liberty of the
American people whatsoever; nor did it even remotely impact the 2016
election process.


But
with his comic book indictment, Robert Mueller has actually made
himself a mortal threat to America’s democracy and national security
.
That’s because his indictment is unleashing a rabid
anti-Russian mania in the Democratic party and turning flaming
liberals and leftwing progressives, who used to form the backbone of
the peace party in America, into outright war-mongers.

The
Donald tweeted over the weekend about Moscow “laughing its ass
off”  about the Mueller indictment, but we think he
missed the mark. It is the Deep State on the banks of the Potomac
that is bursting with glee—literally licking its collective
chops— about the endless budget boondoggles now assured to be 

coming its way.


The
neocons and military/industrial complex had already
taken control of the GOP lock, stock and barrel. Then,
his campaign rhetoric about “America First”
notwithstanding, Trump abdicated to his empire-minded generals
in order to concentrate on his Twitter account. And now in the
wake of the RussiaGate hysteria being given a powerful new
boost from Mueller’s comic book, the Dems are lining up to say
we will see your 
$700
billion
 budget
and crank it up from there.


The
truth is, there is a screaming fiscal crisis coming hard upon
Imperial Washington. That’s owing to the 
$15
trillion
 of
new deficits that are now built-in for the next decade—at the very
time when the Fed has shut down is massive bond-buying
experiment and the Baby Boom is hitting the social security and
medicare rolls in droves.

Absent
the RussiaGate hoax and the Dems descent into mindless, anti-Putin
hysteria, there would have been a moment of maximum danger for
the Deep State’s hideously inflated military, intelligence and
surveillance operations. In the coming battle against fiscal
collapse, they surely would have been on the fiscal chopping
block like at no time since the aftermath of Vietnam in the 1970s.

But rescue
is now at hand. The Dems have been shell-shocked ever
since the evening of November 8, 2016, and have worked
themselves into deliriums about how it was all a big mistake
enabled by Russian meddling and collusion with the Trump
campaign.

To
a substantial degree, however, those narratives were on their last
legs until the Mueller indictment came along. For anyone who takes
the trouble to read it, of course, it’s just a potpourri of
nonsense, marginalia and irrelevance.

But
the Dems had already gone brain dead on the RussiaGate matter—so
they are now greeting it as a “blockbuster”, as
are the talking heads of CNN and the mainstream media. Consequently,
the drivel that came out of the building pictured below is being
taken as evidence of a far-reaching attack on America that
even rivals Pearl Harbor. As Pat Buchanan noted:

          This
Russian troll farm is “the equivalent (of) Pearl Harbor,”
says Cong. Jerrold Nadler, who would            head up the House Judiciary
Committee, handling any impeachment, if Democrats retake the                    House.

When
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes pressed, Nadler doubled down: The Russians “are
destroying our democratic process.” While the Russian trolling
may not equal Pearl Harbor in its violence, said Nadler, in its
“seriousness, it is very much on a par” with Japan’s
surprise attack.

That’s
right. But unlike the vast Japanese naval armada that stealthily
steamed toward Hawaii in early December 1941, the Facebook
cyber-missiles that allegedly hit America in 2016 came out of
this little joint hiding in plain sight:

55 Savushkina Street, St Petersburg, said to be the headquarters of Russia’s ‘troll army’

So
let’s return to the fact that Prigozhin’s troll farm
doesn’t really look much different than countless others that dot the
Russian internet landscape, and which mushroomed after 2011 in
support of the Putin-ified Russian state and the crony
capitalist economy it shepherds.


New
Yorker
 piece
published by journalist Adrian Chen, no fan of Donald Trump, in
late July 2016 explains about as well as any where the Internet
Research Agency came from:

           The
(Internet Research Agency) has been widely reported in Russian
media to be the brainchild                of Evgeny Prigozhin, an oligarch and ally
of Vladimir Putin. At the time, it employed hundreds of                Russians in a
nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, where they produced
blog posts,                      comments, infographics, and viral videos that pushed the
Kremlin’s narrative on both the Russian              and English Internet.

The
agency is what is known in Russia as a “troll farm,” a nickname
given to outfits that operate armies of sock-puppet social-media
accounts, in order to create the illusion of a rabid grass-roots
movement. Trolling has become a key tool in a comprehensive effort by
Russian authorities to rein in a previously freewheeling Internet
culture, after huge anti-Putin protests in 2011 were organized
largely over social media. It is used by Kremlin apparatchiks at
every level of government in Russia; wherever politics are discussed
online, one can expect a flood of comments from paid trolls.

The
real effect, the Russian activists told me, was not to brainwash
readers but to overwhelm social media with a flood of fake
content, 
seeding
doubt and paranoia, and destroying the possibility of using the
Internet as a democratic space…..

…….toward
the end of last year (2015) I noticed something interesting:
many had begun to promote right-wing news outlets, portraying
themselves as conservative voters who were, increasingly, fans of
Donald Trump. Exposure to even small amounts of Russian politics can
induce severe bouts of paranoia and conspiracy-minded thinking, and
it seemed logical to me that this new pro-Trump bent might well be an
attempt by the agency to undermine the U.S. by helping to elect a
racist reality-show star as our Commander-in-Chief. At the time, I
found it funny. 
The
agency was a well-funded but often hapless operation—it created a
cartoon character that was a giant buttocks to spread anti-Obama
propaganda, for example—and this seemed like another of its
far-fetched schemes to poison the Internet.

In
fact, it was. How it became a fearsome Russian intel operation was
entirely due to what happened in Washington DC, not St. Petersburg
or the Kremlin, for that matter.

That
is, in the summer of 2016, when the Obama inner circle and the
Deep State national security establishment alike suddenly were
confronted with the theretofore unthinkable prospect that Donald
Trump might actually be elected US President, they literally
transformed the Hobby Farm of a second tier
Russian oligarch into monumental threat to American
democracy.

And
that took some doing because Prigozhin was essentially a nobody
in the great scheme of national security. Unlike Putin, who cut
his eyeteeth in the old Soviet era KGB, Prigozhin had fancied himself
a ski racer as a privileged young man in a Soviet boarding school.
Failing to make the grade on the slopes, however, he had
subsequently pursued various petty criminal schemes that
landed him nine years in a Soviet prison during the latter’s
dying days.

But
timing is everything—-so when he opened a hot dog stand from
his mother’s kitchen in newly liberated St. Petersburg in the
early 1990s his entprenurial talents in the culinary field
self-evidently flourished. Soon he branched into
convenience stores and then in 1996 into a swank restaurant
(Staraya Tamozhnya or “The Old Customs House”) that
catered to newly monied Russian who were looking for “more than
cutlets with Vodka”.

At
length, a strategic $400k investment in a rusting harbor boat
was turned into a floating hot spot called “The New Island
Restaurant”. From there flowed catering contracts
for lavish state banquets after he gained the
gastronomical favor of the post-Soviet St. Petersburg
political operative, who became prime minister of Russia.


Putin held lavish
state dinners on Prigozhin’s floating emporium, where
he played host to world leaders like George W. Bush and Jacques
Chirac. He also apparently heaped business into Prigozhin’s budding
empire with a $177 million catering contract with Moscow’s schools,
and then the real jackpot: A two year contract in 2012 worth
more than 
$1.6
billion
 to
supply 90% of all food orders to Russian soldiers.

Folks,
that’s where the troll factory came from. It opened the
next year in 2013 as the kind of token of appreciation expected
from oligarchs favored by the Russian state.

Still,
it wasn’t the KGB incarnate—just a tweet-by-the-numbers body
shop designed to flood Russian media and internet
forums with messages extolling Russian greatness, the iniquities and
hypocrisies of the morally corrupt West and the glorious
works of Vlad Putin.


At
this stage the troll farm was involved in strictly Russian
business—-the handiwork of an oligarch who had thrived on Russia’s
particular brand of crony capitalism and was more than happy to shill
for his patron in the Kremlin.


Here
is how the previously referenced 
Guardian
article from mid-2015 described the farm before some of its
modest resources were later shifted to the “American
Department” in 2016:

          Just
after 9pm each day, a long line of workers files out of 55 Savushkina
Street, a modern four-                storey office complex with a small sign outside
that reads “Business centre”. Having spent 12                    hours in the
building, the workers are replaced by another large group, who will
work through the              night.

They
painted a picture of a work environment that was humourless and
draconian, with fines for being a few minutes late or not reaching
the required number of posts each day. Trolls worked in rooms of
about 20 people, each controlled by three editors, who would check
posts and impose fines if they found the words had been cut and
pasted, or were ideologically deviant.

The
LiveJournal blogger, who spent two months working at the centre until
mid-March, said she was paid 45,000 roubles ($790) a month, to run a
number of accounts on the site.

We
had to write ‘ordinary posts’, about 
making
cakes or music tracks
 we
liked, but then every now and then throw in a
 political
post
 about
how the Kiev government is fascist, or that sort of thing,” she
said.

Scrolling
through one of the LiveJournal accounts she ran, the pattern is
clear. There are posts about “Europe’s 20 most beautiful castles”
and “signs that show you are dating the wrong girl”, interspersed
with political posts about 
Ukraine or
suggesting that the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny is
corrupt.

The
desired conclusion of one reads: “The majority of experts agree
that the US is deliberately trying to weaken Russia, and Ukraine is
being used only as a way to achieve this goal. If the Ukrainian
people had not panicked and backed a coup, the west would have found
another way to pressure Russia. But our country is not going to go
ahead with the US plans, and we will fight for our sovereignty on the
international stage.”

To
add colour to their posts, websites have been set up to aid the troll
army. One features 
thousands
of pasteable images
,
mainly of European leaders in humiliating photoshopped incidents or
with captions pointing out their weakness and stupidity, or showing
Putin making hilarious wisecracks and winning the day.

When
I got the job there in 2013 it was a small building, I was working in
the basement, and it was clear they didn’t have enough space,”
said Andrei Soshnikov, a St Petersburg journalist who infiltrated the
company two years ago and has continued to cover it. 
He
linked the move to a much bigger office with increased online
activity around the Ukraine crisis….

As
we explained above, it was only after Washington massively
intervened in the domestic politics of Ukraine in February 2104 that
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm branched into external operations
focused on Russian adversaries like the new anti-Russian Ukrainian
government and the United States.


Even
then, however, the main stream media headline writers, who
have been intellectually lobotomized by a constant diet of
anti-Russian mania, cannot seem to grasp that their hyperbolic
headlines are in no way, shape or form supported by the actual
written words in Mueller’s indictment.


In
a word, 
eighty twenty-somethings
sitting cheek-by-jowl at banks of computer screens and banging out
social media tripe in English as a (third) language did not
impact anything in America, let alone the 2016 election outcome.


That
is to say, what in the world is so hard to understand about the fact
that the pathetic output of this group could not have amounted
to 
0.000001% of
the content that rumbled through these social media channels
during 2016?


Yet
here is Mueller—writing in indictment black and
white—admitting that the troll farm had deployed precious few
trolls to the American department:

“spread
(ing) distrust towards the candidates and the political
system in general…..By approximately July 2016, more
than 
eighty
ORGANIZATION employees
 were
assigned to the translator project”.

Besides
the infinitesimal volume and generally crude and unoriginal nature of
the troll farm’s output, this tiny 80-person contingent points to
another huge flaw in the entire Mueller narrative—especially
as it has been embellished and exaggerated by the main stream media
since last Friday afternoon. To wit, all of these posts were destined
to get lost in the vast sea of cyberspace without a 
ground
game
 in
the US.


Yet
the indictment is clear on that crucial point as well.
The Russian meddlers had “no ground game”
whatsoever aside from a 22 day visit in June 2014 by two
operatives who were not trained spies and who had apparently
never even been to America previously.


Yet
they visited nine states during that brief interval and
thereby “cased-out” the entirety of the American
electoral scene:

Only
KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA received visas, and from approximately June 4,
2014 through June 26, 2014, KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA traveled in and
around the United States, including stops in Nevada, California, New
Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Louisiana, Texas, and New York
to gather intelligence. After the trip, KRYLOVA and BURCHIK exchanged
an intelligence report regarding the trip.

The
above paragraph is itself a smoking bratwurst!


Aside
from sleeping, passing through countless airports, checking into a
dozen or more hotels and 

perhaps visiting the chamber of Commerce in
Dallas or Denver, what possibly could these two travelers have done
to lay the groundwork for “influencing” 133
million voters two years hence?


Mueller
doesn’t say and the talking heads jabber on about this trip as
if it were some kind of invasion, not the
pointless needle-in-the-haystack type of undertaking that it
actually was.


And
that gets us to the ballyhooed efforts to organize and promote Trump
rallies in Florida, Washington DC, New York City and elsewhere. Once
again, however, Mueller spills large amounts of ink citing the emails
and social media posts that describe the aims of these long-distance
media trolls. But there is not a shred of evidence presented
about what actually happened on the ground.


We
would be so bold as to suggest that we know why Mueller didn’t
document this core element of the alleged meddling campaign.
Namely, because nobody came to the rallies and flash mob events
called for by the keyboard jockeys in St. Petersburg.


Take
the case of the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies on August 20,
which the indictment dwells on at length. So doing, it purports to
explain how real Trump supporters in the state were duped into
cooperating, how bloggers back in Russia used social media posts to
promote 13 rallies across the state of Florida and bought ads to the
same end on Facebook.


In
fact, compared to fleeting references with respect to similar rallies
allegedly staged in Washington DC and New York City, the Florida
rallies take up far more ink in the indictment and come across as
exhibit #1  on Russia ground game in the US election
process.


Indeed,
the liberal hatch-people at 
Politico made
the singular importance of the Florida meddling operation
abundantly clear:

But
the document makes clear that the operation in Florida, the nation’s
largest swing state, was in a class by itself. The indictment is
packed with details of how Russian nationals duped Donald Trump
campaign volunteers and grass-roots organizations in Florida into
holding rallies they organized and helped fund with foreign cash.

Here’s
the problem. There seems to be scant evidence that these rallies
actually happened or that anyone showed up to the ones that did
occur. For instance, here is a photo of one in St. Petersburg
(Florida) posted on social media at the time.


We
doubt whether Vlad got his money’s worth on this one:

ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Then
there’s the case of Jim Frishe of Clearwater, Florida. He was a
real estate development consultant and candidate for county
office, who organized a sign-waving event in response to the Russian
entreaties that attracted barely a dozen people:

           Frishe,
68, said he was called by someone identifying themselves as with a
group called                 “Florida for Trump” and asked to organize a
sign-waving rally. He said between 15 and 18               people showed up and
that he didn’t receive any signs or money or other support. He                     never heard from them again.

“I
was going to do what I was going to do anyway. I was a Trump
supporter, they didn’t convince me”.

Then
there is the case of the “Hillary in stripes” caper
allegedly promoted by the Russians. According to the indictment:

           For
example, defendants and their co-conspirators asked one U.S. person
to build a cage on on               a flatbed truck … and another U.S. person to
wear a costume portraying Clinton in a prison                       uniform,”

The
thing is, the main evidence for that is that the “cage”
appeared about a month later as the handiwork of a Trump supporter,
Gary Howd, who did it all on his own–without any prompting,
encouragement or money from the Russians.


Even
the Politico account of the purported Florida invasion by the
Russians let that much slip out:

          The
caged Clinton stunt was a hit among Trump supporters. On Sept. 23,
for                                      instance,
 NBC2 reported
that a Cape Coral man erected a caged Clinton display in his front            yard.

“I
feel like I’m doing my little part at least in my little neck of the
woods,” homeowner Gary Howd said.

As
it happened, even the 
Washington
Post
 admits
that the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies didn’t amount to
much.

          The
efforts in Florida that August day did not turn out to be
particularly impressive. No people                    showed up to at least one of the
proposed rallies, and online photos of some of the other events                reveal ragtag groups with Trump signs staking out patches of grass or
traffic medians.

As
to the “Down With Hillary” demonstration on July 23, 2016,
to take another example, here is what you get from Google on this
particular element of the indictment:

          No
results found for 
“Down
with Hillary” rally in New York City on July 23, 2016
.

Finally,
and as long was we are on the topic, here is what a real troll farm
looks like. Yet this vast suite of offices in Fort
Meade, Maryland, where 20,000 SIGINT spies and technicians work
for the NSA, is only the tip of the iceberg.


The
US actually spends 
$75
billion
 per
year—more than Russia’s entire 
$69
billion 
defense
budget—spying on and meddling in the politics of virtually
every nation on earth. An outfit within NSA called Tailored Access
Operations (TAO) has a multi-billion annual budget and does
nothing put troll the global internet and does so
with highly educated, highly paid professionals, not $4 per
hour keyboard jockeys.


Indeed,
the cafeterias in the NSA buildings pictured below cost far
more per year to operate than did Prigozhin’s troll farm during it
entire short lived existence (its apparently now being closed down
with two of the 3.5 floors already dark).

NSA headquarters

In
that context, Charles Hugh Smith cogently reminds that the real
farce in the Mueller comic book is that it is the ultimate case of
the pot-calling-the-kettle black:

America’s
foreign policy is one of absolute entitlement to influence the
domestic affairs and politics of every nation of interest, which to a
truly global empire includes every nation on the planet to the degree
every nation is a market and/or a potential threat to U.S. interests.

Assassination
of elected leaders–no problem. Funding the emergence of new
U.S.-directed political parties–just another day at the office.
Inciting dissent and discord to destabilize regimes–it’s what we do,
folks. Funding outright propaganda–one of our enduring specialties
.

Finally,
as Pat Buchanan further observed in his post on the Mueller
indictment, political and election meddling is what Imperial
Washington does. And now we are surprised that others do the
same—-even that pathetic efforts of a Russian oligarch laid out in
Mueller’s ham sandwich indictment:

Are
the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try
to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling
regimes we believe we have a stake?

“Have
we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura
Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.

With
a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”

“We
don’t do that anymore though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We
don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”

“Well,”
Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”

Indeed,
what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding
the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?

Did
America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions”
that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?

When
Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime
change” is frequently heard. When the “Green Revolution”
took to the streets of Tehran to protest massively the re-election of
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009, Republicans denounced
President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the
outcome.

When
China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some
have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?

David
Stockman’s Contra Corner is the only place where mainstream delusions
and cant about the Warfare State, the Bailout State, Bubble Finance
and Beltway Banditry are ripped, refuted and
rebuked.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com

=========================

Zie ook:

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands; zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

Zijlstra’s leugen is vervolgbaar onder de Neurenbergse principes……

De NAVO oorlogsagenda blootgelegd met de Nederlandse leugen over de agressie van Putin……

Op BBC
World Service radio werd vanmorgen in
‘News Hour Extra’ één grote anti-Rusland propaganda show
opgevoerd, uiteraard gecombineerd met het ophemelen van de VS en de
NAVO, plus een groot pleidooi voor meer geld naar defensie, uh
oorlogsvoering….. Dit met 
een aantal ‘deskundigen’ (allen anti-Rusland), waaronder Clingendael oorlogshitser en flapdrol de luxe Zandee……

De naam
van het programma werd eerder ter discussie gesteld, en naar aanleiding van inzendingen gedaan door luisteraars (dat moet je maar geloven) wordt de naam veranderd van ‘News
Hour Extra’ in ‘The Real Story…..’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Maak er maar ‘
Propaganda Hour Extra’ van! Blijkbaar moet de nieuwe naam van te voren al aangeven dat je hier niet met nepnieuws te maken krijgt, belachelijk!!

Op
Information Clearing House bracht men (ook al vandaag) een artikel
over de leugen van Zijlstra, een leugen die volgens de schrijver Finian
Cunningham 2 jaar oud is, echter deze dateert niet alleen uit 2006, maar wordt sinds die tijd regelmatig aangehaald door Zijlstra (plus andere vooral VVD politici) en een aantal reguliere media organen!!

Volgens
Cunningham legt dit ten overvloede nog eens de NAVO oorlogsagenda
bloot. Zo werd de door de VS op poten gezette opstand die in de
Oekraïense coup resulteerde, omgedraaid in agressie en expansiedrift
van Rusland…… Uiteraard overgoten met de VS propagandamachine
leugens over een annexatie van De Krim en het binnenvallen van
Rusland in Oost-Oekraïne…….. Beiden flagrante leugens waar geen nanometer bewijs voor is!

Voorts
komt Cunningham met andere voorbeelden die dit beeld staven, al moet
ik zeggen dat er voorbeelden te over zijn, neem alleen al de expansie
van de NAVO richting Moskou, waar de NAVO nu, in tegenspraak met
gesloten overeenkomsten (met Gorbatsjov), voor een groot deel van de Russische
westgrens staat…….. Cunningham komt met de leugen van de voormalig minister van buitenlandse zaken in Polen, Sikorski: hij zou naar eigen zeggen persoonlijk hebben gehoord dat Rusland en Polen in een overleg Oekraïne onder elkaar verdeeld hadden………. Een leugen die na doorprikken naarstig werd ingetrokken door deze liegende hufter…… Sikorski is overigens een ‘christendemocraat’, die van zijn god blijkbaar keihard mag liegen en ophitsen tot oorlog…….  

Terecht stelt Cunningham dat de Nederlandse regering de leugen gebruikt van de geheime diensten dat ze een aan de Russische regering gelieerde groep zou hebben gehackt en hebben gezien dat de Russen de Democraten in de VS hebben gehackt (zodat niet hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton, maar Trump de verkiezingen heeft gewonnen), iets waarvoor alweer geen flinter bewijs is geleverd…….. Een smerige leugen die wordt gebruikt voor het propageren van de ‘Sleepwet’ die hier ter discussie staat en waar volgende maand in een referendum, tegelijk met de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen, over gestemd kan worden.

Ondanks een kleine uitglijder (waar het echte feit het verhaal in feite
alleen nog meer ondersteunt), een prima analyse! Hierin stelt Cunningham onder meer dat de leugen van Zijlstra in feite aanzet tot oorlog en dat is strafbaar onder de ‘Neurenbergse principes…’

Dutch
Lies Over Putin’s ‘Aggression’ Expose NATO War Agenda

By
Finian Cunningham

February
15, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – Netherlands Prime Minister Mark
Rutte was this week forced to bear a parliamentary vote of no
confidence after his foreign minister finally came clean over a
dangerous lie he has been telling for two years concerning Russian
President Vladimir Putin.


Halbe
Zijlstra quit in shame on Monday as the country’s foreign minister
after 
admitting that
a story he had peddled about personally hearing Putin plotting to
create a “greater Russia” was false. That then forced premier
Rutte to endure a “no confidence” motion from parliamentarians.
In the end, Rutte 
survived the
vote. If a majority had voted against his leadership, his coalition
government may have collapsed.

But
the deep damage done to the Dutch authorities will not be so easily
repaired by Rutte’s survival as premier. What has been exposed this
week is a senior member of government recklessly telling bare-faced
lies in an attempt to slander Russia, poison international relations,
and ratchet up already dangerous geopolitical tensions.

Zijlstra
had claimed two years ago, in 2016, that he had personally witnessed
Russian leader Vladimir Putin boasting about creating a “greater
Russia” which, it is claimed, would incorporate Ukraine, the Baltic
states, Belarus and Kazakhstan.

The
newly resigned Dutch top diplomat claimed he heard Putin making the
remarks while present with others at the Russian leader’s dacha
(summer house) back in 2006. 

This
week, Zijlstra finally came clean and admitted before parliament that
he hadn’t in fact been present at the alleged gathering. He still
maintains, however, that a confidant who was among the guests at
Putin’s dacha informed him of the alleged “greater Russia”
plan. But how can we now trust the word of a self-confessed liar?

Zijlstra’s
boss, Prime Minister Rutte, also sought to downplay the debacle,
claiming that his foreign minister had made “a big mistake” –
but that “lying was not a deadly sin”.

Rutte
is in for a rude awakening due to his complacent thinking. For indeed
his government has been caught telling a very grave lie whose
ramifications concern issues of war and peace in Europe.

Disgraced
former minister Zijlstra stands accused of gross distortion of
Russia’s foreign policy.

Since
the US and European-backed illegal coup in Ukraine in early 2014,
geopolitical reality has been turned upside-down. American and
European corporate media have peddled relentless anti-Russia
propaganda accusing Moscow of “aggression” and “expansionism”
in Europe.

This
torrent of Russophobia spewed out by Washington, the Pentagon, NATO
and the European Union has created the worst crisis in relations with
Russia since the Cold War ended nearly three decades ago. There are
real fears that the mounting crisis could escalate into an all-out
war involving nuclear powers.

Zijlstra’s
offense therefore is not merely a “mistaken” lie. His flagrant
public distortion has contributed directly to the grave deterioration
in geopolitical relations. One could even argue such reprehensible
remarks amount to incitement of war, which is a cardinal crime under
Nuremberg legal principles.

Lamentably,
the mendacious senior Dutch politician is not an isolated case.
Recall how former Polish foreign minister Radek Sikorski was caught
out telling similar defamatory lies about Russia in 2014.

Sikorski,
who has been an ardent supporter of NATO force build-up against
Russia, reportedly claimed that he personally overheard Vladimir
Putin in 2008 plotting to annex Ukrainian territory in a covert plot. 

Sikorski claimed that he heard Putin propositioning then Polish Prime
Minister Donald Tusk with a carve-up deal of Ukraine between Poland
and Russia.


Sikorski
was obliged to swiftly 
retract the
claims published in US media, and awkwardly admitting that he was not
present at the alleged meeting with Putin, and that his quoted
remarks were meant as a “surreal joke”.

But,
again, this is no joke or mistake. It is deadly serious
disinformation by senior government officials, which is recklessly
inciting war tensions with Russia. Sikorski is prominently associated
with pro-NATO think-tanks like the hawkish American Enterprise
Institute. He is married to Anne Applebaum who makes a living from
writing anti-Russian screeds for news outlets like the Washington
Post.


Zijlstra
and Sikorski join the ranks of Russophobia regurgitated by other
European foreign ministers like Britain’s Boris Johnson who issued
the outlandish 
claim earlier
this year that Russia is “targeting” British infrastructure; or
French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian who has 
impugned Russia
for chemical weapons use in Syria – only for the French President
Emmanuel Macron to 
admit this
week that his government has actually no evidence about the use of
such weapons in Syria.

Macron
has made his own contribution to Russophobia by leveling
unsubstantiated allegations that his presidential election campaign
last year was “hacked” by Kremlin agents. He has since banned
Russian news media from attending his press conferences.


All
these senior government figures are irresponsibly fueling a climate
of demonization against Russia which is compounding other unhinged
claims made by politicians in Washington and the Baltic states.
Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite, for example,
recently 
claimed that
Russian Iskander missiles based on Russian sovereign territory of
Kaliningrad were targeting half of Europe, an alarmist claim which
has been amplified by US secretary of defense James Mattis in the
Pentagon’s recent 
Nuclear
Posture Review
.

The
climate of hysteria – based on false, fevered official claims –
is militating against normal political and diplomatic relations,
which is, in turn, exacerbating the war in Ukraine and leading to
wider war tensions with Russia across Europe.

A
good question is why the ousted Dutch minister decided to own up this
week to his lies about Putin.

The
answer may be related to the bigger credibility crisis of the Dutch
government and its NATO allies with regard to the whole Russophobia
propaganda war.


Next
month, the Netherlands is to hold a national 
referendum on
extending powers of Dutch state intelligence to monitor public
electronic communications. To convince the Dutch public to vote for
more snooping powers, the authorities are relying on the hackneyed
claims about Russian “meddling” and “interference”.


It
seems significant that Dutch media 
reported last
month that the country’s secret services allegedly “hacked into”
Russian state hackers who were allegedly penetrating the American
Democratic party’s databases during the US presidential elections
back in 2015-2016. As usual, no evidence was provided to support the
claims. We know from other credible 
reports that
the Democratic party was quite possibly not hacked at all, but rather
was leaked from inside by a Democrat staffer. So the Dutch intel
story smearing Russia is highly dubious.

But
it seems that the purported “good deed” performed by the Dutch
intelligence services was pitched in the media as a way to ingratiate
bona fides with the Netherlands public. The aim being to dispose the
public toward voting in the referendum next month to give the Dutch
state more intrusive powers over citizens to “protect” them from
“nefarious Russians”.

Now,
if the Dutch minister had held on to his office any longer there was
a risk that his lies may have become public embarrassingly close to
the March referendum, which could have resulted in the public
rejecting the authorities’ desire for more snooping powers.

Perhaps
then the decision was taken in high office for the minister to take
the fall now in order to get rid sooner of an embarrassing story
concerning his lies over Russia.

Whatever
the explanation about the timing, the admission of Dutch government
lying about Russian aggression in Europe is nevertheless an
illuminating and appalling insight into how Russophobia and war is
being fomented by the US and its European NATO allies.

Abominably,
European government officials are willing to risk plunging millions
of citizens into a war with Russia based on lies and warped,
self-serving prejudices.


This
article was originally published by “
Strategic
Culture Foundation

-See
Also –

U.S.
Democrats push $1 billion bill for election security

=====================================

Zie ook: ‘Zijlstra heeft gelogen, liegt en zal blijven liegen, al helemaal als het over Rusland gaat…….

       en: ‘Zijlstra terecht afgetreden wegens anti-Russische propaganda, nu Rutte nog……..

       en: ‘Zijlstra de VVD leugenaar wordt beweend, nu even de andere kant!‘ (cartoons en prenten)

Mike Pence (vicepresident VS) waarschuwt voor Koreaanse samenwerking op Olympische Spelen…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

BBC World Service kwam vanmorgen met een waarschuwing van VS vicepresident Mike Pence voor de samenwerking tussen Noord- en Zuid-Korea op de Olympische Winterspelen die a.s. vrijdag van start gaan.

Waarvoor Pence waarschuwt? Voor kennis uit het verleden! Pence stelt dat Noord- en Zuid-Korea ook tijdens de Olympische Winterspelen van 2006 samenwerkten en tijdens die spelen deden de Noord-Koreanen voor het eerst een kernproef……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ten eerste is het nog steeds niet duidelijk of Noord-Korea een atoombom heeft, daar niemand tot nu toe radioactieve straling heeft gemeten, boven de plek waaronder de Noord-Koreanen de kernproeven houden (tot een paar dagen na zo’n ondergrondse proef is radioactieve straling te meten boven die plek, ook te meten met satellieten…) Ten tweede: waar slaat het op? Alsof Noord-Korea voor elke ‘kernproef’ een speciale gelegenheid uitzoekt…….

De VS is in ieder geval het land dat voor haar grootschalige terreur geen speciale gelegenheden nodig heeft, dat heeft dit gestolen land al veelvuldig bewezen in het (recente) verleden…… Oh, met één uitzondering: de staatsgreep in Oekraïne, geheel ‘toevallig’ (zo de waard is vertrouwt deze zijn/haar gasten) tijdens de Olympische Winterspelen in Sotsji!! De opstand en de daarop volgende coup werd door Hillary Clinton en de CIA voorbereid, geregisseerd en betaald (met 4 miljard dollar!!)……… Uiteraard had Rusland het veel te druk met die Spelen om in de gaten te houden waar de VS mee bezig was. Al zullen er na die coup wel wat topfiguren uit de FSB (Russische geheime dienst) zijn geschopt, immers die hadden e.e.a moeten zien aankomen…..

Gezien dat laatste mogen de Noord-Koreanen wel uitkijken tijdens de komende Spelen, immers ook Zuid-Korea is tegen een aanval van de VS op Noord-Korea en heeft tijdens die Spelen vast geen tijd om in de gaten te houden wat de VS uitvreet……….

       

Mike Pence, vertegenwoordiger van de VS, de grootste terreurentiteit op onze kleine aarde……

Hier ‘wat’ feiten over VS terreur: ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en:  ‘List of wars involving the United States‘ (vanaf de oprichting van het middels een genocide gestolen land dat men de VS of ‘Amerika’ noemt…)

Het contraproductieve antwoord van Rusland op de corrupte ‘oppositieleider’ Navalny

Ongelofelijk hoe Rusland bezig is tegen de zogenaamde oppositieleider Navalny. Alsof het hier gaat om een figuur en een partij die daadwerkelijk een gevaar zouden zijn voor de Russische president Putin of de Russische samenleving………

Meer dan een paar duizend mensen krijgt de ‘corruptiebestrijder’ Navalny niet op straat….

Waar is de realiteitszin gebleven, de realiteitszin* die Putin aan de dag legde bij de oorlog van de VS** tegen de Syrische regering Assad en vooralsnog heeft kunnen voorkomen dat dit land is veranderd in een chaos zoals we die zien in Libië….. Libië waar de NAVO o.l.v. de VS dit land in één grote chaos heeft gestort, waarbij het eerst rijkste land van Afrika is veranderd in één van de armste landen op dat continent…….

Meneer Putin, laat Navalny begaan, oké als hij een misdaad pleegt moet hij vastzitten, maar zijn politieke partij is in de verste verte geen bedreiging voor u, uw regering of Rusland in het groot! Contraproductief, de manier waarop Rusland nu bezig is, immers deze geeft de anti-Russische propaganda in het westen vleugels……..

*  Realiteitszin die ervoor heeft gezorgd dat de oorlog in Syrië niet is geëscaleerd in een oorlog met de VS of Turkije (althans tot nu toe)

** De VS was al vanaf 2006 bezig met de voorbereiding op een opstand in Syrië die moest uitmonden in een staatsgreep tegen Assad, een tactiek die in Libië en Oekraïne wel is gelukt en waar dit laatst genoemde land in oorlog is tegen de eigen bevolking in het oostelijk deel van dit land…… Een bevolking die voor het overgrote deel bestaat uit mensen, die niet wensen te leven onder de corrupte, door de VS geparachuteerde neonazi Porosjenko…… Ondanks de kapitalen die het westen al in Oekraïne heeft gestoken, heeft Porosjenko het land naar de rand van een faillissement gebracht (terwijl zijn buitenlandse bankrekeningen in het buitenland, ook in Nederland, tegelijkertijd fiks zijn gegroeid…….) Overigens is de VS al een paar jaar met dezelfde tactiek bezig in Venezuela, een economische oorlog die bestaat uit o.a. boycot voor medicijnen en levensmiddelen, plus ‘ontmoediging’ (lees: ‘een verbod) op nieuwe investeringen in het land (ook door investeerders van buiten de VS)….. Daarmee zou de bevolking in opstand moeten komen, waar door de VS betaalde bewapende psychopaten (veelal van buiten Venezuela) zwaar geweld gebruikten en gebruiken in demonstraties, om de regering Maduro in een kwaad daglicht te stellen…..

Trump Hopes a Traumatic “Major Event” Isn’t Needed to Unite America…. Ofwel Trump zoekt een oorlog ‘om het volk te verenigen….’

Trump Hopes a Traumatic “Major Event” Isn’t Needed to Unite America

(Klik op de link in de foto voor het Anti-Media artikel)

En als die gebeurtenis niet snel plaatsvindt zal Donald de aanzet daartoe zelf in gang zetten! (‘t is maar dat je het weet!)

Hier een paar lijsten met ‘enkele’ traumatische gebeurtenissen, waarvoor weliswaar de VS zelf verantwoordelijk was: VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en:  ‘List of wars involving the United States‘ (vanaf de oprichting van het middels een genocide gestolen land dat men de VS of ‘Amerika’ noemt…)

Lula da Silva slachtoffer van juridische lastercampagne……..

Gisteren in het radionieuws van 1.00 u (CET) op BBC World Service radio het bericht dat Lula da Silva in hoger beroep een nog langere gevangenisstraf kreeg opgelegd door omgekochte rechters. (dat laatste werd uiteraard niet gemeld op de BBC radio)……..

Lula da Silva wordt beschuldigd van corruptie terwijl die corruptie niet eens op hem is terug te voeren!! Wel heeft de uiterst corrupte regering Temer het voor elkaar: een tegenstander die Temer zonder meer had verslagen is voorlopig afgeserveerd, immers met een veroordeling mag da Silva niet meedoen aan de verkiezingen in Brazilië……. Gelukkig kan da Silva nog in beroep, echter of hij daar succes mee zal hebben, is maar zeer de vraag……

Onbegrijpelijk dat men in het westen de inhumane, neoliberale regering Temer haar gang laat gaan met het ‘uit de weg ruimen’ van politieke tegenstanders en met de enorme corruptie die het land financieel nog verder onderuit haalt…….

Blijkbaar maken we ons alleen druk als de westerse politici en reguliere media een figuur als de voormalige Oekraïense president Janoekovytsj als corrupt afschilderen, dit terwijl men over zijn opvolger, de neonazi Porosjenko, die intussen bewezen heeft nog tientallen keren corrupter te zijn, de mond stijf dicht houdt…….. Al helpt het in het geval van Brazilië natuurlijk wel dat da Silva en Rousseff ‘links zijn’ en de CIA in feite aan de touwen trekt……… Wat betreft corruptie heeft schoft Porosjenko ‘zijn land’ al zover in de westerse schulden gestoken, dat deze nog de eerste veertig jaar niet afbetaald kunnen worden, terwijl hij zijn gestolen tegoeden o.a. op geheime bankrekeningen in het buitenland heeft staan, ook in ons land……..

Als ik me niet vergis een foto genomen door Carlos Latuff in Porto Alegre, tijdens een toespraak van da Silva op 23 januari jl.

Terug naar Lula da Silva: je snapt zeker wel dat de VS hard heeft meegewerkt aan de onterechte veroordeling van deze min of meer socialist, precies zoals de CIA dat heeft gedaan bij de afzetting van de Braziliaanse president Dilma Rousseff……….. Ach ja, deze twee Braziliaanse politici hebben veel gedaan voor het arme deel van de bevolking en dat zint de werkelijke machthebbers in Brazilië natuurlijk niet, machthebbers als de welgestelden en grote bedrijven

Vanmorgen werd bekend gemaakt dat het paspoort van da Silva is ingenomen, zodat hij niet voor Brazilië kan werken in het buitenland……

BBC publieksmanipulatie via het nieuws: Rusland steunt de slechteriken……

Op deze plek al meermaals weergegeven: het gekleurde nieuws dat de BBC brengt. Ook theCanary heeft hier meermaals over gepubliceerd en voegde daar afgelopen vrijdag weer een bericht aan toe.

In het tien uur nieuws (‘s avonds) op BBC tv sprak presentator Fiona Bruce over ‘de door Rusland gesteunde Syrische troepen’. Uiteraard is dit uiterst negatief bedoeld……. .Dit soort praat hoor je nooit als het gaat om de reli-fascistische dictatuur van Saoedi-Arabië, die door de VS en Groot-Brittannië, wordt gesteund bij de genocide uitvoering op de sjiitische bevolking van Jemen…….

Overigens doet de BBC hetzelfde als het over de Oost-Oekraïense separatisten gaat, routinematig krijg je dan te horen: ‘The Russian backed rebels’, terwijl er NB geen flinter bewijs is voor deze opmerking…… Even routinematig voegt men daar dan ook nog even de leugen aan dat er daadwerkelijk Russische troepen vechten in Oost-Oekraïne…….. Geen bewijs, maar als je het maar genoeg herhaalt wordt het bij de meeste luisteraars/kijkers als waarheid opgeslagen in de hersenpan…… Door deze leugens krijgen die separatisten een slechte naam, immers ze worden door Rusland gesteund en zoals je weet: in de reguliere westerse (massa-) media: Rusland staat zo ongeveer voor al het kwaad in de wereld……..

De separatisten in Oost Oekraïne hebben groot gelijk dat ze zich afscheidden van Oekraïne, immers zij hadden voor de overgrote meerderheid (democratisch) gekozen voor president Janoekovytsj en niet voor de corrupte neonazi Porosjenko, die door de VS middels een opstand en coup aan het bewind werd gebracht (hoofdverantwoordelijk destijds: VS minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Hillary Clinton, die daar maar liefst 4 miljard dollar voor vrijmaakte……)………….

Uiteraard is dit soort van berichtgeving door de ‘onafhankelijke’ BBC, om de luisteraar/kijker schrik en haat aan te jagen voor/tegen Rusland, we moeten immers klaargestoomd worden voor een oorlog tegen Rusland en daar kunnen niet genoeg leugens voor gebruikt worden dat blijkt wel (voor de zoveelste keer)……

Moet je nagaan: er gaat bijna geen dag voorbij of men doet gewichtig over het kwaad dat ‘fake news’ wordt genoemd……… Je hoeft na het voorgaande niet te vragen ‘wie daar de schuldigen zijn’, juist: de Russen of Rusland trollen…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Terwijl keer op keer blijkt dat deze leugens niet kloppen en de VS zelf niet anders doet dan andere landen hacken en afluisteren (en dan het liefst ‘bewijs’ achterlaat voor de Russische bemoeienis [zie de Vault 7 documenten op Wikileaks], dit nog naast het manipuleren van de boel in een groot aantal landen…………

 The Canary

We
need to talk about what happened on BBC News at Ten [OPINION]

KERRY-ANNE MENDOZA JANUARY 19TH, 2018

BBC
News at Ten
 has
a problem. And so does 
BBC
News
 in
general. It manifestly fails to present a balanced account of global
conflicts where the US or UK have vested interests. And as the US and
UK have some stake in almost every global conflict, this is a very
big problem.

BBC
News at Ten

On
8 January, 
BBC
News at Ten
 covered
the devastating conflict in Syria. And host Fiona Bruce referred to
Syrian government forces being backed by Russia. This happens often
in theatres of war where Russia has an interest. Think Ukraine,
Georgia, and so on. But as 
Media
Lens
 pointed
out that night, rarely is the same approach taken in reverse; when
the superpower influencing events is the US or UK.

View image on Twitter

View image on Twitter

Media Lens@medialens

Fiona Bruce used the phrase, ‘Syrian government forces, backed by Russia’, on last night. Why does @BBCNews not routinely use the phrase, ‘Saudi government forces, backed by the US and the UK’, when reporting on ? http://bit.ly/2EpAPj0 

Media
Lens
 granted
the 
BBC right
of reply, calling on editors to explain the behaviour. Crickets.

Media Lens@medialens

Why won’t the editor of BBC News at Six and Ten, @paulroyall, and the @BBCNews foreign editor, @AndrRoy, respond to huge public concern about biased @BBCNews reporting? https://twitter.com/medialens/status/950667964189151232 

And
this is the
 BBC’s
general response to such criticism. Silence, or the standard claims
of impartiality. Despite such claims, Syrian 
BBC anchor
Dima Izzedin quit in 2016 – citing the broadcaster’s failure
to uphold standards of impartiality when covering the conflict.
She 
said:

The
standards adopted by this great institution are supposed to make it
first class in media, but this [is] not the case…

Unfortunately,
these standards are no longer applied as [they] should be. Eventually
I took from the 
BBC
today I leave it as it is no longer like me nor am I like it. The
news on my wounded homeland departed us.

But
why?

Speaking
at a 
Real
Media
 event
on ‘Media bias and big political events’, the University of
Glasgow’s 
Greg
Philo
 explained
the seemingly rightward shift of 
BBC
News
coverage.
He traced it back to the rise of Blairism and the invasion of Iraq.
From then on, conversations in parliament were based on a
near-universal acceptance of 
neoliberalism,
in both domestic and foreign policy. And as the 
BBC saw
its role as providing balanced reporting of those views, they failed
to make space for broader discussions. As Philo 
explains
[0.49]
:

The BBC,
which is supposed to be public – supposed to be representing a
range of views, interprets its rubric as being simply to report what
goes on in parliament. So if parliament is substantially to the
right, then the 
BBC sees
no reason to report that section of the population which are on the
left. Even if there is a huge number of people who want left-wing
policies in some areas.

And
this is bigger than Syria and 
Yemen.
It affects almost all reporting. And the dominance of establishment
figures in senior roles at the 
BBC perpetuated
this slide.

Former
BBC Trust head 
Rona
Fairhead
 was
an 
old
ally
 of
George Osborne and a board member of HSBC. And 
James
Harding
,
the 
BBC’former Director
of News and Current Affairs, previously worked for the Murdoch
press. While Editor of 
The
Times
newspaper,
he was responsible for 
exposing the
identity of police blogger NightJack by 
hacking the
blogger’s email accounts – which his legal team
then 
failed to
mention during a court case against the action. Harding has also
gone on the record as 
‘pro
Israel’
.

This
filters down into lower-level editorial decisions. Like in the case
of Raffi Berg. In 2013, a devastating 
report by Electronic
Intifada
 revealed
the 
BBC online
editor was instructing journalists to skew reports on
Israel-Palestine in favour of Israel. While hundreds of Palestinians
were losing their lives during Israel’s eight-day assault on
the Gaza Strip in 2012, Berg was 
emailing journalists
with ‘guidance’ to maintain a pro-Israel tone in their reports.

Building
a better 
BBC

Editors
and journalists at the 
BBC reading
this might feel it’s unfair to single them out. They aren’t the
only media outlet doing this, and they aren’t the worst. That is
entirely true. But it is also entirely missing the point. It is
precisely because the wider media landscape is filled with such poor
reporting that the role of the 
BBC is
so necessary. And it’s why silence is not the right course for
change. As Greg Philo 
concludes
[4.04]
:

Attack,
attack, attack them. Because it’s our media. We own the 
BBC. Get
on it and insist that our views are heard.

Licence
fee payers have the right to demand better, and the 
BBC should
take the opportunity to do better.

Zie ook: ‘BBC W.S. anti-Russische propaganda met kritiek op Russische ‘anti-westerse propaganda…..’

      en: ‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

      en: ‘Oekraïense neonazi-junta Porosjenko ontvoert en martelt op grote schaal……..
      en: ‘BBC (nu wel) met geïnterviewde bevrijde burgers van Manbij in Syrië……..

      en:  ‘BBC World Service voert dagelijks campagne tegen Rusland in voorbereiding op WOIII (?!!)…. Oekraïne onder de loep…..

      en: ‘Russische jager werd neergehaald boven de Syrische grens, aldus BBC World Service…….

      en: ‘BBC met opmerkelijk nieuws uit Jemen: een openbare executie, maar geen woord over de honger en de cholera veroorzaakt door S-A……..

      en: ‘Brexit Campaign Plumbs New Depths as British PM Equates Putin with Terrorist Leader‘ Dit bericht komt van het blog van Stan van Houcke, hierin wordt Putin als de grote promotor van een Brexit neergezet, plus een uiterst smakeloze vergelijking…….

      en: ‘BBC anti-Russisch propaganda en verder nepnieuws (of: ‘fake news’)……..

      en: ‘Jonathan Marcus (BBC) met anti-Assad propaganda: Deir ez-Zor ligt op de weg van Teheran naar Libanon…..

      en: ‘BBC leugens, ofwel ‘fake news’ over de smerige oorlog tegen het volk van Jemen……

      en: ‘Mosul ‘bevrijd’ en BBC anti-Assad propaganda……….

      en: ‘BBC World Service met anti-Russische propaganda over het ‘bombardement aan fake news….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: BBC World Service met onversneden anti-Russische propaganda i.z. Syrië……..

      en: ‘BBC World Service ontkent gekleurde informatie over Brexit te hebben verstrekt….. AUW!!

      en: ‘BBC World Service bol van EU propaganda……..

      en: ‘Why The British Said No To Europe

      en: ‘Aleppo, de BBC krijgt de deksel op de propaganda neus!!

      en: ‘BBC kan maar niet ophouden over de Brexit…….

      en: ‘BBC: propaganda-orgaan voor het neoliberalistische beleid van de conservatieven

      en:  ‘BBC heeft met angstzaaien en propaganda de Schotten hun onafhankelijkheid ontnomen………

      en: ‘George Orwell standbeeld voor het BBC hoofdgebouw………. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ruhropstand (1920), waar de SPD al ‘een mooie rol’ speelde……….

Hoorde vanmiddag op WDR 5 (rond 14.10 u.) nog eens over de Ruhropstand die in de lente van 1920 plaatsvond in, zoals je al begrepen had, het Ruhrgebied. Dit n.a.v. een komend hoorspel op de Duitse radio over deze opstand, een hoorspel dat tegelijkertijd als toneelstuk zal worden opgevoerd voor publiek.

Dat de SPD een kwalijke rol had gespeeld was wel bekend, maar dat de overheid zo gruwelijk ingreep tegen deze opstand, was mij onbekend, een opstand die in eerste instantie begon vanwege de honger en de harde overheidsrepressie…….. (‘Brot und Freiheit’, was één van de leuzen)

Mede de SPD was destijds verantwoordelijk voor het gewelddadig optreden tegen deze arbeiders en sympathisanten van deze opstand. Zo vonden er bij overheidsoptreden van militairen met hulp van zogenaamde vrijkorpsen* (Freikorpsen), standrechtelijk executies plaats (ook van gewonden), werden verdachten gefolterd en schoot men met scherp op demonstranten…… Er zijn zelfs bommenwerpers tegen de burgerbevolking ingezet…….

Het volgende artikel geeft (veel) meer duidelijkheid en komt van Wikipedia:

Ruhropstand

Hagen Rembergfriedhof Märzgefallene.JPG

Standbeeld voor de doden die vielen tijdens de Ruhropstand (Duits: Ruhraufstand of: Märzaufstand) van 1920 in aansluiting op de Kapp-Putsch, op het kerkhof Remberg in Hagen

De Ruhropstand (Duits:Ruhraufstand)
was een 
arbeidersopstand in
het 
Ruhrgebied in
de lente van 
1920.
De opstand was een escalatie van de staking die was afgekondigd tegen
de 
Kapp-putsch,
en werd uiteindelijk neergeslagen door het Duitse leger
en 
vrijkorpsen.
De arbeiders hadden zich georganiseerd in het 
Rode
Ruhrleger
 (Rote
Ruhrarmee
).
De Ruhropstand wordt ook wel aangeduid
als 
Maartopstand (Märzaufstand),
hoewel dit eerder betrekking heeft op meerdere linkse opstanden naar
aanleiding van de Kapp-putsch. De Ruhropstand was echter van deze
opstanden verreweg de omvangrijkste.

Inhoud

Op
13 maart 1920 trachtten vrijkorpsen de macht in Duitsland over te
nemen. Daar het leger weigerde tegen de coupplegers op te treden
reageerden de 
SPDKPD en USPD met
een algehele 
staking.
Deze staking bleek zeer effectief en dwong de coupplegers
uiteindelijk het veld te ruimen.


Binnen
de linkse partijen waren de meningen verdeeld. De SPD, die zelf in de
regering zat, wilde de staking steunen om het gezag van de regering
te herstellen. De gematigden binnen de USPD en KPD wilden ook en
vooral in de eerste plaats voorkomen dat een rechts-autoritaire
regering aan de macht zou komen. Velen binnen de KPD en USPD wilden
echter nog verder gaan en een radenrepubliek oprichten, waarbinnen
eventueel ook andere partijen vertegenwoordigd zouden worden. En de
radicale linkervleugel (KPD, 
KAPD)
wilde vanuit de staking een proletarische dictatuur creëren, waarin
slechts 1 partij in de raden vertegenwoordigd zou zijn. Hoe het ook
zij: aan de staking werd algemeen gehoor gegeven en in heel Duitsland
braken bovendien linkse opstanden uit.


In
het Ruhrgebied werd dezelfde dag nog door SPD, KPD en USPD overlegd.
Een gezamenlijke oproep tot staking aan alle arbeiders volgde, maar
dit ging de USPD en KPD niet ver genoeg. Dezelfde dag nog werd het
Rode Ruhrleger opgericht, en namen arbeidersraden de macht over in
verschillende steden in het Ruhrgebied, waarin met name de KPD en
USPD vertegenwoordigd waren. Ook de KAPD (communistische
arbeiderspartij) en de anarcho-socialistische 
FAUD(vrije
arbeiders unie van Duitsland) waren betrokken bij de opstand. Naast
het Ruhrgebied kwamen ook Saksische en Thüringse arbeiders in
opstand.

De
samenstelling van de arbeidersraden was heterogeen en wisselde
voortdurend. Hoewel de opstand in het USPD-gedomineerde oosten van
het Ruhrgebied was begonnen, kon deze in het door vakbonden
gedomineerde westen op veel bredere steun rekenen. In de bezette
steden werd de politie ontwapend en namen arbeidersmilities hun taak
over, terwijl rechtse kopstukken en fabrieksbazen gevangen werden
gezet.


Schermutselingen

Op
17 maart vond de eerste schermutseling plaats. Bij het
plaatsje 
Wetter raakten
eenheden van het Rode Ruhrleger slaags met de voorhoede van
het 
Freikorps
Lichtschlag
,
dat bekendstond als aanhangers van de Kapp-putsch. Het Freikorps werd
verslagen, en zeshonderd freikorpsleden werden gevangengenomen. Het
Rode Ruhrleger marcheerde op naar 
Dortmund en
bezette ook deze stad. Op 20 maart werden ook in Essen en Hagen
arbeidersraden geïnstalleerd die de macht overnamen. Het Rode
Ruhrleger opereerde meestal in kleine groepjes die zich
per 
fiets voortbewogen
en hierdoor relatief snel konden opereren.

Mislukken
van bemiddeling

De
regering trachtte met de arbeiders te onderhandelen in de
stad 
Bielefeld,
om zo een vreedzame oplossing te vinden. Als de opstand vreedzaam
beëindigd zou worden, dan zou het Ruhrgebied niet militair bezet
worden en zouden leiders niet vervolgd worden. Regionaal
bevelhebber 
Oskar
von Watter
 bracht
deze eis echter op een dusdanige wijze over, dat de opstandelingen
dit als een 
ultimatum zagen
en bemiddeling afwezen.

Escalatie
en neerslaan van de opstand

De
opstandelingen reageerden met een nieuwe oproep tot staking. Het Rode
Ruhrleger zwol snel aan tot 50.000 man terwijl ongeveer 300.000
arbeiders in meerdere of mindere mate met de opstand meewerkten of
symphatiseerden. 
Düsseldorf en Elberfeld werden
bezet waardoor het hele Ruhrgebied effectief was veroverd. Men
probeerde ook Wesel te veroveren maar dit mislukte.

De
regering vond het nu welletjes en op 2 april zette de regering het
leger in. Münster werd het hoofdkwartier van Oskar von Watter.
Reichswehreenheden trokken met politie en vrijkorpsen het Ruhrgebied
binnen. Saillant details was dat binnen deze vrijkorpsen zich ook
sympathisanten van de opstand bevonden. Sommige eenheden hadden de
opstandelingen zelfs geholpen, zoals eenheden van 
Marine-Brigade
von Loewenfeld
.
Tegen deze overmacht was het Rode Ruhrleger niet opgewassen, en de
dag erna (3 april) was de opstand al grotendeels de kop in gedrukt.
De KPD en USPD riepen de arbeiders nu op de wapens neer te leggen,
maar de radicalere KAPD hield tot het laatst toe vast aan gewapend
verzet. Na de Ruhropstand was de breuk tussen KPD en KAPD definitief.

Het
leger trad zeer hardvochtig op tegen de opstandelingen. Zo werden
hele menigten beschoten en werd iedereen die met een wapen werd
betrapt zonder pardon doodgeschoten, ook als men gewond was. De
veiligheidspolitie zou zelfs 
bommenwerpers tegen
de eigen burgerbevolking hebben ingezet, terwijl een luchtmacht
volgens het Verdrag van Versailles verboden was. Op 3 april verbood
president Ebert standgerechten en op 12 april verbood generaal Von
Watter ‘wederrechtelijk gedrag’ door soldaten. De troepen hielden
halt aan de Ruhr toen de Britten dreigden met bezetting van
het 
Bergisches
Land
 wegens
schending van het 
Verdrag
van Versailles
.
Tegen die tijd was de Ruhropstand effectief de kop ingedrukt.

===================================

*Vrijkorpsen: tegenwoordig zijn dit neonazi’s zoals die door de corrupte en fascistische Oekraïense Porosjenko-junta worden gebruikt tegen de separatistische burgers in Oost-Oekraïne, .

Oekraïne, wat de reguliere (massa-) media, ‘deskundigen’ en politici u niet vertellen over dit door een junta geregeerd land

Mint
Press News publiceerde gisteren een lang artikel van Darius
Shahtahmasebi over Oekraïne en wat de massamedia (zogenaamd onafhankelijk) u niet vertellen.
Dezelfde media die keer op keer volhouden dat Rusland de VS
presidentsverkiezingen, het Brexit-referendum, het
onafhankelijkheidsreferendum van Catalonië enz. hebben
gemanipuleerd, zonder daar ook maar één steekhoudend bewijs voor te
leveren.

Voor die
zogenaamde Russische bemoeienis wordt ook het beest Trump als
mededader genoemd, terwijl we telkens weer zien, dat Trump
allesbehalve een pro-Russische beleid voert, iets dat Shahtahmasebi
in het volgende artikel uit en te na bewijst.

In het
artikel o.a. De volgende feiten:

  • De
    door de VS georganiseerde opstand in Oekraïne, die tot de
    succesvolle staatsgreep tegen de democratisch gekozen president
    Janoekovytsj moest leiden en leidde, waarna de VS een door haar
    gewilde junta installeerde (met bewijzen van gesprekken daarover
    tussen Nuland (staatssecretaris BuZa onder Obama) en Pyatt, destijds
    ambassadeur voor de VS in Oekraïne ….. Overigens was de VS al
    vanaf 2011 bezig met de voorbereidingen tot die opstand, onder
    eindverantwoording van Hillary Clinton (en Obama), de toenmalige minister van
    Buitenlandse Zaken. Deze coup en de voorbereidingen heeft de VS meer
    dan 4 miljard dollar gekost…… Intussen is duidelijk geworden dat
    Porosjenko ongelofelijk corrupt is en er intussen nog geen 15% van
    de bevolking achter deze juntaleider staat………

  • De
    VS levert zware wapens aan Oekraïne, waarmee de VS de
    ‘burgeroorlog’ in Oekraïne verder aanwakkert en Rusland voor het
    blok zet…. Immers de burgers in Oost-Oekraïne, die niet wensen te
    leven onder de neonazi-dictatuur van Porosjenko, worden al een paar
    jaar gebombardeerd door de neonazi-bataljons van Porosjenko. Rusland
    zou vechten in Oekraïne, een belachelijke weergave van de
    werkelijkheid >> wanneer dit een feit zou zijn, waren deze
    neonazi-bataljons al lang het gebied uit gewerkt. Met deze nieuwe VS
    wapens wordt het steeds moeilijker voor Rusland niet de burgers in
    Oost-Oekraïne te hulp te schieten met militaire hulp……..

  • Het
    door de VS ondersteunen van neonazi’s in Oekraïne. Voordat
    Porosjenko door de VS werd geparachuteerd als ‘president’ van
    Oekraïne, werkte hij al voor BuZa in Washington, hij werd in de VS
    zelfs ‘onze mol’ in Oekraïne genoemd….. Dit alles terwijl de VS
    zogenaamd opkomt voor democratie, waar dit ‘land’ bij herhaling
    democratisch gekozen regeringen aan de kant laat zetten en het
    liefst laat vervangen door fascisten…. Naast Oekraïne: Chili in 1973
    en Honduras in 2009, verder een reeks Midden- en Zuid-Amerikaanse
    landen voor en na 1973, waar de VS uiteraard dikke steun
    verleende aan deze fascistische mensenrechten schendende junta’s……. Voorts nog de staatsgrepen tegen: Syrië (een mislukte poging),
    Brazilië (de staatsgreep tegen president Dilma Rousseff), Libië en
    Iran (waar de staatsgrepen tegen de Braziliaanse president Rousseff
    en president Assad van Syrië, alweer gericht waren tegen democratisch
    gekozen regeringen…….). Om te besluiten met Venezuela waartegen de VS al een aantal jaren een economische oorlog voert en gewelddadige groepen steunt, dit met de opzet president Maduro af te zetten…..

  • De
    uitbreiding van de NAVO, tegen de afspraken in, die in 1991 met
    Gorbatsjov werden gemaakt….. Het niet uitbreiden van de NAVO was zelfs de eis van Gorbatsjov, voor het akkoord gaan met de hereniging van Oost- en
    West-Duitsland……..

Mensen lezenm dit met feiten onderbouwde artikel van
Shahtahmasebi en geeft het door!

What
Trump Is Doing in Ukraine Proves the Mainstream Media Doesn’t Know
Sh*t

January
9, 2018 at 9:38 am

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

The
Russia-obsessed corporate media continues to peddle the narrative
that Donald Trump has turned the United States into a client-state of
Russia, even while he directly provokes the former Soviet Union by
providing Russia’s foe — Urkaine — with the largest lethal
assistance to a country on its border.

(MPN) — Despite
the mainstream media’s 
insistence that
U.S. President Donald Trump is some sort of compromised Russian
lackey, the fact is that at the end of last year, his
 administration
approved
 the
largest U.S. commercial sale of lethal defensive weapons to Ukraine
since 2014. This is a move that clearly
 infuriates
and angers
 Russia,
souring relations between the two countries even more so than
they
 already
had been
 under
the Obama administration (and in
 various
stages
 throughout
Trump’s first year in office).

According to The
Washington Post
,
administration officials confirmed that in December the State
Department had approved a commercial license authorizing the export
of Model M107A1 Sniper Systems, ammunition, and other associated
parts and accessories to Ukraine — a package valued at $41.5
million.

At
first, it was reported there had not yet been approval to export the
heavier weaponry the Ukrainian government had been asking for, such
as anti-tank missiles. However, by the end of

December, reports began
surfacing that the Trump administration was in fact going to
provide 35 FGM-148 Javelin launchers and 210 anti-tank missiles.
The Javelin is allegedly one of the most advanced anti-tank systems
on the market. The total package is now valued at $47 million, and it
wouldn’t be surprising if this figure continues to rise in the
weeks to come.

Even
under the 
2014
Ukraine Freedom Support Act
,
the Obama administration never authorized large commercial or
government arms sales, thereby making the recent announcement the
first time that the U.S. will provide “lethal” weapons to the
Ukraine military.

One
senior congressional official said that he predicted this would be
just the beginning, stating that the U.S. had “
crossed
the Rubicon; this is lethal weapons and I predict more will be
coming,”
 according
to the 
PostForeign
Policy’s
 Michael
Carpenter 
suggested that
NATO countries should follow suit and also provide Ukraine with the
arms it needs to counter the so-called threat of Russia. Considering
that in September 2017 Russia proposed that UN peacekeepers
be 
deployed to
Ukraine, it should be clear that the U.S. is more bent on escalating
this conflict than on resolving it.

Russia
has already 
responded in
kind, with Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov stating that the
U.S. has become an accomplice in the war and that these developments
make it impossible for Russia to remain “indifferent,” thereby
forcing Russia to consider retaliation measures in response.

The
U.S. is the
 world’s
largest arms dealer
.
The U.S. arms so many countries so much of the time that most of us
barely blink. And yet, even taking at face value America’s stated
goals of spreading democracy and promoting human rights, the facts on
the ground appear to run contrary to those ideals and the U.S. is
well aware of these contradictions.

In
reality, the United States intervened covertly in Ukraine in 2014
because Russia and Europe were 
growing
far too close to each other for America’s comfort
,
with Russia supplying at least 30 percent of Europe’s gas supply.
This was an issue particularly in relation to 
Germany’s
growing fondness for Russian gas
,
as Germany is set to 
become
the EU’s major player
.

This
is a deal-breaker for Washington, which would rather support 
known
neo-Nazis
 and
anti-Semites in order to install a right-wing government capable of
opposing Russia as close to the Russian border as one can get.

U.S.
Installed a Puppet Government in Ukraine

John
McCain, center, speaks as Connecticut senator Chris Murphy, second
left, and Opposition leader Oleh Tyahnybok, right, stand around him
during a rally in Kiev, Ukraine, Dec. 15, 2013. (AP/Dmitry Lovetsky)

On
February 7, 2014, the BBC published a
 transcript of
a bugged phone conversation between Assistant Secretary of State
Victoria Nuland and the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt.
In this phone call, the U.S. officials were openly discussing who
should form Ukraine’s government even before the president, Viktor
Yanukovych, had been successfully 
ousted
from power
.
In other words, the U.S. was actively doing to Russia’s neighbour
what the corporate media and various elements of the intelligence
communities have accused Russia of doing to the U.S. during the 2016
elections. As 
The
Nation
 explained:

In
the intercepted phone call between U.S. Assistant Secretary of State
for European Affairs Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine
Geoffrey Pyatt, the two were, as Russian expert 
Stephen
Cohen
 put
it to Democracy Now, 
plotting
a coup d’état against the elected president of
Ukraine.’” 
[emphasis
added]

Good.
I don’t think Klitsch [opposition leader Vitaly Klitschko] should
go into the government. I don’t think it’s necessary, I don’t
think it’s a good idea,”  Nuland said in the call, as
transcribed by the BBC.

Pyatt
responded:

Yeah.
I guess… in terms of him not going into the government, just let
him stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I’m just
thinking in terms of sort of the process moving ahead we want to keep
the moderate democrats together. The problem is going to be Tyahnybok
[Oleh Tyahnybok, an opposition leader] and his guys and I’m sure
that’s part of what [President Viktor] Yanukovych is calculating on
all this.”

Nuland
added:

I
think Yats [opposition leader Arseniy Yatseniuk] is the guy who’s
got the economic experience, the governing experience. He’s the…
what he needs is Klitsch and Tyahnybok on the outside. He needs to be
talking to them four times a week, you know. I just think Klitsch
going in… he’s going to be at that level working for Yatseniuk,
it’s just not going to work.”

Oleh
Tyahnybok, who had met with Senator John McCain
 one
year prior
,
is the leader of the right-wing nationalist party Svoboda. When
Svoboda was founded in 1995, the party
 had a
swastika-like logo. As 
Business
Insider
 explains,
Tyahnybok is also a known anti-Semite:

Tyahnybok
himself was expelled from the Our Ukraine parliamentary faction in
2004 after giving a speech 
demanding
that Ukrainians fight against a
 ‘Muscovite-Jewish
mafia’ (he later clarified 
this
by saying that he actually had Jewish friends
 and
was only against to ‘a group of Jewish oligarchs who control
Ukraine and against Jewish-Bolsheviks [in the past]’). In 2005 he
wrote open letters demanding Ukraine do more to halt ‘criminal
activities’ of ‘organized Jewry,’ and, even now, Svoboda openly
calls for Ukrainian citizens to have their ethnicity printed onto
their passports.”

When
the protests broke out in Ukraine in 2014, the entire movement was
hijacked by these racist elements.

You’d
never know from most of the reporting that far-right nationalists and
fascists have been at the heart of the protests and attacks on
government buildings,” reported Seumas Milne of 
The
Guardian
. Just
days ago,
 thousands
marched
 in
Kiev to celebrate the anniversary of far-right nationalist Stepan
Bandera’s birthday.

It
is revealing that, when the U.S. decided to make a choice between a
president they viewed as a Russian ally and the various ultra-right
nationalist elements of Ukraine, Washington decided to help oust the
former for the benefit of the latter.

The
State Department Promoting Neo-Nazism in Ukraine


A
photo of the Azov Battalion – a regiment of the National Guard of
Ukraine. (Photo: Twitter)

Eventually,
it was reported that a man named Petro Poroshenko would be taking up
the reins after Yanukovych’s abdication. According to a
cable 
obtained by
WikiLeaks, Poroshenko previously worked as a mole for the U.S. State
Department. The State Department even referred to Poroshenko as “our
Ukrainian insider.”

For
those who truly believe the U.S. protects and promotes democracy
while challenging tyranny and dictatorships across the globe, the
truth about Washington’s support for puppet regimes that fail to
garner the support of their own people is even worse than
any 
anti-imperialist
commentator
 could
ever have imagined. In March last year, 
Foreign
Affairs 
reported
that
 Poroshenko had
an approval rating as low as 
17
percent
.
In September last year, the 
Japan
Times
 reported that
his approval rating had dropped to a 
single
digit
.
Some
 reportssay
it was as low as 
2
percent
.
October last year saw his approval rating grow to its highest in
recent times,
 reaching a
stratospheric 
14
percent
.

In
other words, the Trump administration is actively propping up a
failed administration in Europe, which does not have the support of
15 percent of its people. Even the far-right militias in Ukraine
 seem
to have more support
 than
the current government. Meanwhile, the U.S. has done nothing but its
utmost to tear apart the respective democratically elected
governments in
 Syria and Iran, both
of which
 have
far 
greater
approval ratings
 than
do Poroshenko and his administration.

Russian
Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov
 said Washington’s
recent decision to arm Ukraine will only make the conflict more
deadly and suggested that Russia could be forced to respond. “[The
U.S. is] not a mediator. It’s an accomplice in fueling the war,”
Ryabkov said in a statement. Clearly, Russia has a vested interest in
not seeing another NATO ally on its borders, capable of pointing
American missiles in its face on a daily basis.

As The
National Interest
 learned at
the end of last year from recently
 declassified
material
, the
U.S. did indeed break a promise at the end of the Cold War that NATO
would expand “not one inch eastward.” George Washington
University National Security Archives researchers Svetlana
Savranskaya and Tom Blanton 
wrote
in the 
National
Security Archives
:

The
[recently declassified] documents show that multiple national leaders
were considering and rejecting Central and Eastern European
membership in NATO as of early 1990 and through 1991. That
discussions of NATO in the context of German unification negotiations
in 1990 were not at all narrowly limited to the status of East German
territory, and that subsequent Soviet and Russian complaints about
being misled about NATO expansion, were founded in written
contemporaneous memcons and telcons at the highest levels.”

The
documents appear to confirm Russia’s assertion that Soviet leader
Mikhail Gorbachev accepted the proposal for German reunification
(which Gorbachev could have vetoed) only in reliance upon these
assurances from its American counterparts that NATO would not expand
into Eastern Europe. This history is reminiscent of how Russia was
further duped out of using its veto power on a U.N. Security Council
Resolution in Libya in 2011, after having 
received
assurances
 that
the coalition would not pursue regime change.

I
believe that your thoughts about the role of NATO in the current
situation are the result of misunderstanding,” then-British Prime
Minister John Major 
told Gorbachev,
according to British Ambassador Rodric Braithwaite’s diary entry of
March 5, 1991
:

We
are not talking about strengthening of NATO. We are talking about the
coordination of efforts that is already happening in Europe between
NATO and the West European Union, which, as it is envisioned, would
allow all members of the European Community to contribute to enhance
[our] security.”

The
documents also show that Russia had received these assurances from a
number of other high-level officials. These officials included
then-Secretary of State James Baker; President George H.W. Bush; West
German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher; West German
Chancellor Helmut Kohl; former CIA Director Robert Gates; French
leader Francois Mitterrand; Margaret Thatcher; British Foreign
Minister Douglas Hurd; and NATO Secretary-General Manfred Woerner.

U.S.
Army soldiers representing units participating in the the Anaconda-16
military exercise, attend the opening ceremony, in Warsaw, Poland,
Monday, June 6, 2016. Poland and some NATO members launched their
biggest ever exercise, involving some 31,000 troops in a show of
force to neighboring Russia.

Since
that time, NATO has clearly expanded into Europe to the detriment of
Russia. Since the end of the Cold War, NATO has grown to 
include the
Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia,
Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia, Albania and Croatia,
and 
Montenegro.

These
developments are crucial because, when one is honest about America’s
infamous history since World War II, it is clear that NATO 
exists
as an entity
 only
to counter and contain Russian influence. Its sole purpose is to
oppose Russia at every corner and this is no secret even in the
corporate media.

According
to the 
Telegraph
,
NATO was formed in “Washington on 4th April, 1949 after the end of
the Second World War, largely to block Soviet expansion into Europe.”
This can be seen clearly in the complete rejection of the
Soviets’ 
attempt
to join NATO itself
 after
Joseph Stalin’s death.

In
a 2016 
interview
with 
The
New Yorker
,
 Douglas Lute, a former three-star general and then-U.S.
Ambassador to NATO also patently admitted that:

“…NATO
was founded on the premise of preventing an attack by the Soviet
Union in Central Europe, where the U.S. would have to come to the aid
of Europe … For the first forty years, NATO focussed on its
greatest risk—the threat that the Soviet Union posed to Western
European security.”

At
the time the unrest broke out in 2014, then-NATO Secretary General
Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s 
comment that
the proposed IMF-EU package presented to Ukraine would have been “a
major boost for Euro-Atlantic security” suggested that NATO had set
its sights on bringing Ukraine into the military alliance.
 In
July of this year
,
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg met with Poroshenko in Kiev
to further discuss this prospect, already pledging support to Ukraine
on some level.

Now
Ukraine’s bid to join NATO seems almost irrelevant, as the U.S. is
formally involving itself deeper in the Ukrainian conflict and
providing arms to a regime that has flirted with an approval rating
lower than 10 percent, all the while provoking Russia to take further
measures in response.

What
could possibly go wrong?

Meanwhile,
the Russia-obsessed corporate media 
continues
to peddle the narrative
 that
Donald Trump has turned the United States into a client-state of
Russia, even while he directly provokes the former Soviet Union by
providing lethal assistance to a country on its border. Not only is
Trump maintaining an Obama-era policy, he is aggravating and
converting Obama’s Ukraine policy into a much more dangerous one —
ultimately aimed at provoking an aggressive response from Russia in
the weeks or months to come.

By Darius
Shahtahmasebi
 / Creative
Commons
 / MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo