Met nieuw VS ‘vluchtelingenbeleid’ zullen nog meer kinderen seksueel worden misbruikt….

De
nieuwe maatregelen tegen migranten en hun kinderen
* zal
voor een enorme toename van misbruik als verkrachtingen bij die
kinderen leiden……

Rond één derde van de kinderen die in de VS tot vluchtelingen
behoren en die vastzitten, is met hun ouders, dan wel een volwassen
begeleider als oom of tante de VS binnengekomen (niet zelden op de vlucht voor de
ellende die de VS in hun thuisland aanricht…)…… 

Sinds kort worden deze kinderen na aanhouding bij hun ouders dan wel begeleider weggehaald en apart gehuisvest in een zogenaamd opvangcentrum, in de praktijk zijn deze centra echter ‘gewoon’ ordinaire gevangenissen, waar die
kinderen 22 uur per dag binnen zitten….. 

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor How Many Children Will Be Raped Due to Trump’s New Policy?

Juist
de ambtenaren van overheidsbureaus of medewerkers van particuliere organisaties die deze jongeren ‘begeleiden’ en de
leiding in deze zogenaamde opvangcentra, misbruiken deze vaak al getraumatiseerde kinderen op grote
schaal….. Het aantal klachten over seksueel misbruik door de
leiding in die gevangenissen is fiks en dat zou volgens deskundigen nog maar
2% zijn van het werkelijke aantal gevallen van kindermisbruik……

Alleen
tussen 2010 en 2016 was het aantal klachten 33.000 ga maar na wat dit
betekent als dit nog maar 2% is van het totale aantal gevallen van misbruik en andere vormen van ernstige geestelijke en lichamelijke mishandeling…… (over dat laatste spreekt schrijver Justin King van het hieronder opgenomen artikel niet, echter dat is voor veel van deze kinderen en andere gevangenen wel de dagelijkse praktijk….)

Ondanks
deze enorme ellende, die bekend moet zijn bij de Trump administratie, is deze maatregel toch ingevoerd, een maatregel waarbij kinderen worden gescheiden van hun ouders…….. Alles ‘in de strijd tegen vluchtelingen’, die zoals
gezegd veelal op de vlucht zijn als gevolg van terroristisch, illegaal VS ingrijpen in
Midden- en Zuid-Amerika…….

Een
regering die dergelijke maatregelen neemt verdient maar één stempel:
fascistisch!!

The Fifth Column (TFC) 12 juni 2018

How
many children will be raped due to Trump’s new policy?

Gerelateerde afbeelding

by Justin
King
 • June
12, 2018

(TFC)
– We’ve seen the images. Children being torn from their
asylum-seeking families. Kids in cages, like animals caught by the
local animal control agency. It’s horrendous, it’s evil, it’s
against everything America is supposed to represent, but there’s an
even larger problem.

The
agencies involved in this debacle are known for raping and sexually
assaulting detainees. Not in isolated incidents, but by the
thousands. That’s not an exaggeration. 
The
Intercept
 obtained
1224 complaints about sexual abuse in ICE custody. That’s
staggering, but according to the Office of the Inspector General
(OIG), that’s 
only
2% of the total number of complaints.

“…officials
with the DHS Office of Inspector General indicated that the office
received some 33,000 complaints between 2010 and 2016 alleging a wide
range of abuses in immigration detention. The OIG provided records
documenting investigations for just 2 percent of the complaints it
shared with The Intercept.”

33,000.
What kind of abuses were mentioned? The allegations in the complaints
are horrific. A male detainee was forced to perform oral sex on a
male immigration officer. A woman was maced and then forced to endure
a male guard pressing his erect penis into her from behind while
other guards watched. Sodomy. A woman raped by a medical worker. It’s
a never-ending barrage of the most heinous crimes imaginable.

Out
of the 1224 complaints obtained, only 43 were investigated by the
OIG. 
Out
of the full 33,000, only 247 were investigated by the OIG
.
That’s less than 1%. No statement by the government on how
widespread the problem is can be trusted because they simply refuse
to even pretend to investigate themselves.

At
an 
immigration
center in Pennsylvania
,
there are handbooks for detainees. The English version clearly states
there is a zero-tolerance policy in regards to sexual assault and
harassment. The Spanish version? It advises women to not talk about
sex so they can avoid being assaulted. In this particular facility,
the only prosecuted case of sexual assault was a government employee
assaulting a teenaged girl. She had fled Honduras to avoid being
raped. The perpetrator was locked up for only five months.

However,
that case was the exception. It was actually prosecuted, most aren’t
even investigated. At a GEO Group-run facility, a female
minor 
reported
a sexual assault
.
A medical exam said she showed indications of vaginal scarring and a
sexually transmitted disease. ICE declared the complaint “unfounded”
even though there was ample physical evidence.

However,
as is a trend with federal agencies, in many cases when a victim
reports the crime, they are 
placed
in solitary confinement.
 A
tactic, immigrants rights groups say, designed to pressure the victim
into withdrawing the complaint.

Remember
that sexual assault 
is
always underreported
.
There are tens of thousands of these cases. Children will be sexually
assaulted as a result of the President’s policy of separating
children from their families. It’s not a question of if children
will be assaulted, but how many. A dozen? Hundreds? A thousand? How
many kids are you ok with being raped? Is your fear of asylum-seekers
so great that you’ll offer up children to predators like some pimp
in a back alley?

Tags: ice immigration Justin
King
 rape sexual
assault

* Zie: ‘VS sluit zelfs kinderen van 10 jaar op….. Met dat land onderhoudt Nederland hechte banden, een rechteloos land waaraan ‘we’ zelfs mensen uitleveren…..

Zie ook:

13.000 kinderen van vluchtelingen zitten gevangen in VS ‘detentiekampen’

Immigrants& Muslims Are Trump’s Jews … Until He Comes for theActual Jews (van Harvey Wasserman)

A Grandmother Seeking Asylum Separated From Disabled Grandson at the Border. It’s Been 10 Months

Jeff Sessions: ‘asielzoekers zijn alleen welkom in de VS als ze kunnen bewijzen dat ze overleden zijn t.g.v. geweld……….’

VS martelt gevluchte kinderen…..

Concentratiekampen in VS voor migranten…….

Peuter vluchtelingen moeten eigen zaak bepleiten in VS rechtszalen, de VS: het land van de ‘ongekende mogelijkheden….’


VS wil van 3.000 migrantenkinderen DNA afnemen om zo de ouders op te sporen…..


De VS heeft een lange geschiedenis in het ontvoeren van kinderen uit niet witte families…….

Children Drugged, Given Forced Injections at Texas Detention Facility: Lawsuit

Pentagon Accepts Trump’s Call to House 20,000 Children on US Military Bases


De kop van dit bericht op 10 juli 2018 veranderd door het woord ‘worden’ te verplaatsen, dit woord was op de mij typische dyslectische manier verwerkt, mijn excuus.

VS verloor meer dan 21 biljoen dollar, alleen aan oorlogsvoering al meer dan 11 biljoen >> ‘mooi voorbeeld voor ‘zuinige’ NAVO partners….’

Professor
Mark Skidmore van de Michigan State University ging uitzoeken waar
6,5 biljoen dollar was gebleven, 6,5 biljoen die niet waren goedgekeurd door
het Congres en kwam er achter dat het werkelijke bedrag veel groter
was dan eerder aangegeven en uiteindelijk uitkomt op 21 biljoen (in VS aangeduid als 21 triljoen dollar) niet goedgekeurde uitgaven….

Voor het ‘defensie’ budget bedroeg dit bedrag al meer dan 11 biljoen……. En
dan wil Trump dat de andere NAVO partners hun budgetten verder
opschroeven……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Moet je nagaan: de VS het land dat
graag woorden gebruikt als ‘corrupte regering’ en ‘democratie brengen’ als een regime niet
in de smaak valt…… 

Ongelofelijk!

Vergeet voorts niet dat de VS alleen deze eeuw al 4 illegale oorlogen is gestart, oorlogen die een enorm beslag leggen op het defensie uh oorlogsbudget…… De VS geeft alleen al 4 keer zoveel aan defensie uit dan Rusland en China samen! De NAVO lidstaten Groot-Brittannië, Frankrijk, Duitsland en Italië geven al meer dan 3 keer zoveel uit aan defensie dan Rusland……. En maar zeiken om meer geld en dat om de ongebreidelde terreur van de VS en het uitlokken van oorlogen elders te steunen………

Overigens heeft Trump het leger ‘carte blanche’ gegeven om naar eigen goeddunken extra personeel of wapens in te zetten, zodat controle op de uitgegeven gelden nog veel moeilijker zal worden…….

Hier
de video van Brasscheck TV over deze zaak: 

$21
trillion missing from the federal buget

WHERE
DID IT GO?

Government
corruption

FEDERAL
BLACK BUDGETS

Professor
Mark Skidmore of Michigan State University set out to prove Catherine
Austin Fitts and her claims of “missing trillions” and “black
budgets” was wrong.

Instead,
he discovered the hole was even bigger than that.

The
Army alone had $11.5 trillion missing.

Some
individual unsupported journal adjustments are SIX TIMES the total
annual budget of the Army.

A
overall 1% error in government budgets is considered “normal.”

Theese
numbers are astronomical.

How
can you do a proper evaluation of numbers with figures like this? All
spending needs to be a approved by Congress.

It
looks like there’s a whole lot of money flowing in and a whole lot
of money flowing out”…completely outside the rule of law.

===========================

Hier nog een artikel van Forbes over deze zaak:

Has
Our Government Spent $21 Trillion Of Our Money Without Telling Us?

Laurence
Kotlikoff 
CONTRIBUTOR

I
am co-authoring this column with Mark Skidmore, a Professor of
Economics at Michigan State University. 

No
Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of
Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of
the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published
from time to time.”
 ~
Article I, Section 9, Clause 7, The US Constitution

On
July 26, 2016, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) issued a
report “Army General Fund Adjustments Not Adequately Documented or
Supported”.  The report indicates that for fiscal year 2015
the Army failed to provide adequate support for $6.5 trillion in
journal voucher adjustments.  
According to
the GAO’s Comptroller General, “Journal vouchers are
summary-level accounting adjustments made when balances between
systems cannot be reconciled. Often these journal vouchers are
unsupported, meaning they lack supporting documentation to justify
the adjustment or are not tied to specific accounting
transactions…. For an auditor, 
journal
vouchers are a red flag
 for
transactions not being captured, reported, or summarized correctly.”

(Note,
after Mark Skidmore began inquiring about OIG-reported
unsubstantiated adjustments, the OIG’s webpage, which 
documented, albeit in a highly incomplete manner, these unsupported
“accounting adjustments,”  was mysteriously taken
down. Fortunately, Mark copied the July 2016 report and all other
relevant OIG-reports in advance and reposted them 
here.
Mark has repeatedly tried to contact Lorin Venable, Assistant
Inspector General at the Office of the Inspector General.  He
has emailed, phoned, and used LinkedIn to ask Ms. Venable about OIG’s
disclosure of unsubstantiated adjustments, but she has not
responded.)

Given
that the entire Army budget in fiscal year 2015 was $120 billion,
unsupported adjustments were 54 times the level of spending
authorized by Congress.  The July 2016 report indicates that
unsupported adjustments are the result of the Defense Department’s
“failure to correct system deficiencies.” The result,
according to the report, is that data used to prepare the year-­end
financial statements were unreliable and lacked an adequate audit
trail. The report indicates that just 170 transactions accounted for
$2.1 trillion in year—end unsupported adjustments.  No
information is given about these 170 transactions.  In addition
many thousands of transactions with unsubstantiated adjustments 
were, according to the report, removed by the Army.

There
is no explanation concerning why they were removed nor their
magnitude. The July 2016 report states, “In addition, DFAS
(Defense Finance and Accounting Service) Indianapolis personnel did
not document or support why DDRS (The Defense Department Reporting
System) removed at least 16,513 of 1.3 million feeder file records
during the Third Quarter.”

An
appendix to the July 2016 report shows $2 trillion in changes to the
Army General Fund balance sheet due to unsupported adjustments. On
the asset side, there is $794 billion increase in the Army’s Fund
Balance with the U.S. Treasury.  There is also an increase of
$929 billion in the Army’s Accounts Payable. This information raises
additional major questions. First, what is the source of the
additional $794 billion in the Army’s Fund Balance? This adjustment
represents more than six times appropriated spending. 

Second,
do these transfers represent a flow of funds to the Army beyond those
authorized by Congress? Third, were these funds authorized and if so
when and by whom? Fourth, what is the source of these funds? Finally,
the $929 billion in Accounts Payable appears to represent an amount
owed for items or services purchased on credit. What entities have
received or will receive payment?

The
July 2016 report is not the only such report of unsubstantiated
adjustments. Mark Skidmore and Catherine Austin Fitts, former
Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development,  conducted
a search of government websites and found similar reports dating back
to 1998.  While the documents are incomplete, original
government sources indicate
 $21
trillion
 in
unsupported adjustments have been reported for the Department of
Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the
years 1998-2015.

While
government budgets can be complex, our government, like any business,
can track receipts and payments and share this information in ways
that can be understood by the public.  The ongoing occurrence
and gargantuan nature of unsupported, i.e., undocumented, U.S.
federal government expenditures as well as sources of funding for
these expenditures should be a great concern to all tax payers.

Taken
together these reports point to a failure to comply with basic
Constitutional and legislative requirements for spending and
disclosure. We urge the House and Senate Budget Committee to initiate
immediate investigations of unaccounted federal expenditures as well
as the source of their payment.

PS,
On December 11, 2017 we learned that the key documents had been
reposted on the OIG website, but with different URLs. On October 5,
2017 we discovered that the link to the report “Army General Fund
Adjustments Not Adequately Documented or Supported” had been
disabled. Within a several days, the links to other OIG documents we
identified in our search were also disabled. The sequential
non-random nature of this disabling process suggests a purposeful
decision on the part of OIG to make key documents unavailable to the
public via the website, as opposed to website reorganization, etc. We
also revisited the website intermittently to see whether the
documents had been reposted under different URLs—until very
recently they had not been reposted. The OIG link to the most report
“Army General Fund Adjustments Not Adequately Documented or
Supported”, which indicates $6.5 trillion in unsupported
adjustments, can now be found 
here:
We are currently searching the OIG website for the other reports and
will share the links 
here once
we have completed the search.

……….nogmaals: ongelofelijk!!!