29 mei 1830 ‘The Indian Removal Act’, de zoveelste stap in de genocide op de oorspronkelijke bevolking van de VS

Het is
vandaag 189 jaar geleden dat de The Indian Removal Act werd
goedgekeurd in het VS Congres. Met deze wet was het toegestaan om de
oorspronkelijke bewoners in het Zuidoosten van de VS met geweld te
verjagen uit hun huizen, dorpen en hun boerderijen…..

Een paar
jaar later werden duizenden mensen van het Cherokee volk en andere
volkeren verdreven uit hun huizen en boerderijen in de staat
Georgia, men hield ze gevangen in gevangenkampen, ofwel
concentratiekampen en werden vandaar op een voettocht gedwongen
richting Oklahoma, waarbij minstens 2.000 van deze mensen in feite
werden vermoord…… (zie de vergelijking met de Armeense Genocide……) Deze tocht noemt men ‘The Trail of Tears’, ofwel de ‘Tocht der Tranen’.

Deze
oorspronkelijke bewoners werden gedwongen om een eenzijdig verdrag te
tekenen, waarbij ze hun prima bewerkte gronden ‘vrijwillig ruilden’ voor gebied
in Oklahoma….. Ondanks dat een rechter gehakt maakte van dit
verdrag, drukte de president, destijds de psychopaat Andrew Jackson,
de gedwongen verhuizingen door…….

Niet
toevallig ook dat de huidige psychopathische VS president Trump een
groot bewonderaar is van Jackson en zelfs een portret van deze
bloedige schoft heeft opgehangen in z’n werkkamer in het Witte
Huis…….

Ongelofelijk
als je deze geschiedenis voor je ziet en intussen weet dat het
grootste deel van de oorspronkelijke bewoners, van wie Noord-Amerika
in feite was, middels een genocide werden uitgemoord door
moorddadige, psychopathische Europeanen…… Ongelofelijk ook als je in ogenschouw
neemt dat de oorspronkelijke volkeren van de VS en Canada nog steeds
moeten ‘vechten’ (figuurlijk) voor hun rechten en keer op keer worden
geschoffeerd, zie het Dakota Acces Pipeline (DAPL) en Keystone XL drama van een paar
jaar geleden……

De VS is
gebouwd op het bloed en de skeletten van de oorspronkelijke volkeren,
dezelfde VS die nu vooral buiten haar grenzen vreselijke
massamoorden begaat, waarbij sinds het eind van WOII maar liefst meer
dan 22,5 miljoen mensen werden vermoord…….

Hoe is
het mogelijk dat men hier de middels een genocide gestolen VS nog
steeds als voorbeeld ziet….???? (alsof je het Derde Rijk van Hitler als groot voorbeeld neemt, een vergelijking die meer en meer op de plaats valt, gezien alle fascistische maatregelen die de VS neemt, zoals de omgang met vluchtelingen en waaraan de privacy van de bewoners in de VS al lang is opgeofferd….)

De VS is als een agressieve kanker die zich over de aarde verspreidt, tijd om deze terreurentiteit terug te sturen naar de VS….. Yankee go home and for god’s sake take care of your native people! 

THE
TRAIL OF TEARS

ANDREW JACKSON’S
LEGACY

THE
INDIAN REMOVAL ACT”


On
this day in 1830, Congress passed “The Indian Removal Act” which
permitted the forceful and sometimes violent removal of Native
Americans from their homes, towns, villages and farms in the
Southeastern United States.

A
few years later, thousands of Cherokee landowners and landowners of
other nations were removed from their homes and farms by the State of
Georgia, held in prison camps and then sent on an 800 mile forced
march to Oklahoma which left at least 2,000 dead.

The
land was theirs.

A
fraudulent treaty had been foisted on them “agreeing” to a
one-sided deal in which they “traded” their prime agricultural
land – which they were farming expertly – for a reservation in
Oklahoma.

The
Cherokee people appealed to the Supreme Court which struck down the
bogus treaty as fraudulent.

Andrew
Jackson’s response: “John Marshall has made his decision; now let
him enforce it.”

15,000
militia descended on the region removing native people from their
homes at gunpoint and under threat of violence.

Speculators
pounced on the stolen land and turned it into an empire of
slavery-fueled plantations.

Andrew
Jackson’s doing. The President Donald Trump says he most admires.
(Jackson’s portrait hangs in Trump’s office.)

Click
here to 
support
Brasscheck

Trumps grote held: Andrew Jackson, een genocidale voorstander van slavernij………

Afgelopen zaterdag ontving ik een artikel van Harvey Wasserman. Hierin vertelt hij over het beest Trump en zijn uitlating dat zijn held, Andrew ‘Andy’ Jackson, de burgeroorlog in de VS had kunnen voorkomen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Jackson was een genocidale voorstander van slavernij, dezelfde slavernij die ten grondslag lag aan die burgeroorlog……… Jackson was democraat en onder zijn presidentschap is een enorm aantal oorspronkelijke bewoners van de VS vermoord, de zogenaamde indianen…….

Eerst als militair en later als president, heeft deze schoft een fikse steen bijgedragen aan de vreselijke en enorme genocide die de leiders van het gestolen land hebben uitgevoerd op de oorspronkelijke bewoners van dat ‘land’. Het gestolen ‘land’ dat wordt aangeduid als de Verenigde Staten van Amerika………

Het gaat hier overigens over een genocide, die een enorm aantal slachtoffers meer heeft gemaakt, dan de genocide van Hitler en zijn psychopathisch tuig op de joden………

Het maakt alweer het e.e.a. duidelijk over Trumps zieke geest….

Hier het artikel van Harvey Wasserman:

How
Trump’s Genocidal Hero Andrew Jackson Might Have “Avoided the
Civil War”

A portrait of former president Andrew Jackson hangs on the wall behind President Donald Trump, accompanied by Vice President Mike Pence, in the Oval Office at the White House in late March. (photo: Andrew Harnik/AP)

A
portrait of former president Andrew Jackson hangs on the wall behind
President Donald Trump, accompanied by Vice President Mike Pence, in
the Oval Office at the White House in late March. (photo: Andrew
Harnik/AP)

By
Harvey Wasserman, Reader Supported News

05
May 17


onald
Trump’s latest insane excursion into US history has been to claim
that his great hero, Andrew Jackson, might have prevented the Civil
War.

Given
his racist, genocidal nature, our seventh president could only have
done that by giving up slavery in the South, spreading it into the
North or giving the Southwest back to Mexico.

Jackson,
of course, would never have given up slavery, which was the cause of
the war and the core of his fortune.

As
a young man, like a cowboy driving cattle, Jackson personally drove
slaves to market. He eventually owned more than a hundred of them,
and defended America’s “peculiar institution” at every
opportunity.

In
addition to their authoritarian temperaments, Jackson and Trump share
“accomplishments” such as trashing the Constitution, personally
profiting from the presidency, and inciting imperial conquest.
Jackson did stand for the Union against South Carolina’s threatened
secession, but that was about tariffs, not slavery.

Trump
rightly says Jackson was “tough.” In 1806, in one of his fourteen
duels, Jackson took a bullet an inch from his heart. He then killed
his opponent in a manner considered most unchivalrous, and became a
social outcast for many years. The bullet stayed in his chest until
his own death four decades later.

Jackson
was also a pioneer homophobe. As Sen. James Buchanan of Pennsylvania
openly lived with his likely lover, Sen. Rufus King of South
Carolina, Jackson loudly referred to him as “Aunt Nancy.” (After
King died, Buchanan became our only “bachelor president.”)

But
mainstream historians have made a hero of “Old Hickory.” Born to
dirt poor Irish immigrants who died early, Jackson’s hardscrabble
upbringing was the opposite of Trump’s.

Trump
inherited millions from his father, who was a Klan (Kukluksklan, of KKK, AP) sympathizer (or
member), a landlord so cruel that the legendary leftie folksinger
Woody Guthrie wrote a song denouncing him.

Andrew
Jackson pre-dated the Klan, but would’ve killed for an estate like
the one Trump inherited. And he did.

As
an orphan, Jackson began his military career at age 13. Rising
through the ranks as an Indian killer, he conquered the Chickasaw by
recruiting their ancient rivals, the Cherokee. Jackson then turned on
the Cherokee as if they had been the enemy. His racism was open,
lethal, and proud.

With
Trump-style “Common Man” rhetoric, Jackson promised to destroy
the National Bank. He then made insider deals with the smaller banks
that replaced it, enriching his backers and himself. These and other
scams helped buy him his 1000-acre slave plantation in Tennessee.

When
he conquered native land for the US, Jackson and his cronies somehow
wound up with the best parcels. His 1830 Indian Removal Act ordered
all eastern tribes to move west of the Mississippi.

The
Appalachian Cherokee had an advanced tribal government, an elected
leader (John Ross), a capitol, a written constitution, and much more.
Most lived in private homes and ran successful farms. Some (like
Ross) owned plantations and slaves. There were seven Cherokee lumber
mills.

The
Cherokee petitioned for statehood. Supreme Court Chief Justice John
Marshall ruled that the Constitution allowed no new state to be
created from existing ones (Abraham Lincoln dodged that technicality
in 1863 to form West Virginia).

But
Marshall also ruled that the Cherokee had sovereignty (a clause later
used to site casinos) and a Constitutional right to stay on their
ancestral lands.

Jackson
replied, Trump-style, that he would ignore the Court. Under Jackson’s
successor, Martin Van Buren, federal troops forced some 14,000
Cherokee out of their homes at gunpoint. Through the summer of 1838
they were held in a concentration camp. Then, along the infamous
“Trail of Tears,” they were marched hundreds of miles to
Oklahoma. About 3,000 died along the way.

Jackson
promised the Cherokee and other tribes the right to live in that
Oklahoma territory “as long as the grass grows and the rivers
flow.” Fifty years later their “excess land” was given to white
“Sooners” who raced in on horseback and covered wagons to claim
homesteads.

As
for the Civil War, its root cause was conflict over Mexican land.
Mexico abolished slavery in its 1821 revolution against Spain. But
American settlers (many from Tennessee) re-established it in 1836,
when (after the Alamo) they made Texas an independent republic.

Jackson
died in 1845. The next year his protégé, James K. Polk, provoked a
war and took from Mexico what became New Mexico, Arizona, California,
Colorado, Nevada and more. US troops marched all the way into Mexico
City, where young soldiers like Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant
fought side-by-side. Americans like Abraham Lincoln and Henry Thoreau
denounced the conquest as a “poison pill.”

The
Civil War broke out when slave owners demanded the right to spread
slavery into the West. California’s 1850 statehood gave free states
a majority in Congress. War erupted in Kansas, where John Brown and
other abolitionists battled slave owners for control.

The
only way Jackson’s “art of the deal” might have avoided the
Civil War was by persuading northerners to embrace slavery, or
southerners to give it up. But both regions were committed to
expansion, and neither wanted the other’s economic system. When
Lincoln said the nation could not exist “half slave and half free,”
he was tragically correct.

Of
course, war might have been avoided if Jackson’s progeny had given
that land back to Mexico, or restored the Carolinas to the Cherokee,
or persuaded the southerners that slavery was never going to work in
the West anyway. Cotton does not grow in Kansas or the Southwest, and
slavery made no economic sense in the desert, corn or wheat fields.

Without
the Jacksonian conquest of Mexico, the “immigrants” Trump now
attacks would merely be living on their own land. The wall Trump
wants to build tracks a border that did not exist before Polk overran
what was once both our southern and our western neighbor.

Sorting
through his often insane pronouncements about US history, Trump has
seemed surprised to discover that Abraham Lincoln was actually his
fellow Republican, while Jackson was a Democrat. Each was the first
president from his respective party. Both were “men of the people.”
But their views on slavery were, literally, at war with each other.

Trump
might also note that when he retired from the presidency in 1837,
Jackson found a trusted relative had squandered his wealth. Much of
what he’d gouged out of slaughtering Indians and whipping slaves
was gone.

Since
Trump has joined Jackson in using the presidency to enrich himself,
he might want to oversee his sons more carefully.

He
might also try doing a better job with the economy. As Trump’s hero
left office in 1837, his immediate “legacy” featured a major
stock market panic followed by four years of depression.

No
doubt the Great Historian would loudly blame that on the Democrats …
until he realized his hero actually was one.


Harvey
Wasserman’s
 History
of the US is at www.solartopia.org,
along with Solartopia! Our Green-Powered Earth.

==================================

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u hieronder terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: John Brown, Chickasaw, A. Jackson en Lincoln.

Oklahoma door fracken voor olie en gas verworden tot aardbevingsgebied als San Francisco………

Anti-Media bracht afgelopen dinsdag het bericht, dat Oklahoma door fracken is verworden tot een aardbevingsgevoelig gebied. Eerder had Oklahoma op jaarbasis met maximaal 3 aardbevingen te maken, daar heeft grootschalige olie- en gaswinning middels fracken, voor een negatieve verandering gezorgd. De kans op een aardbeving is in Oklahoma nu net zo groot als in San Francisco, dat in tegenstelling tot Oklahoma op een breuklijn ligt……..

Intussen ligt de gas- en oliewinning in Oklahoma bijna op de reet, dit vanwege de lage olieprijzen. Lullig dat de door deze prijs werkloos geworden werknemers, nu te maken hebben met veel meer aardbevingen en dat zal nog jarenlang zo blijven…….

Fracken werd o.a. door Obama en Bush gestimuleerd middels subsidies en ‘makkelijke regelgeving’ t.a.v. winning in natuurgebieden, vervuiling van de bodem, vervuiling van grondwater en vervuiling van rivieren en oceanen…… Wat betreft die rivieren en oceanen: de oliemaatschappijen mogen het zwaar vervuilde water, dat voor fracken werd gebruikt, ‘gewoon’ in de rivier dan wel oceaan dumpen……

Na het fracken, waar men op relatief dicht op elkaar gelegen plekken schaliegas en -olie heeft gewonnen, blijft een maanlandschap achter…… In feite is het ontbreken van regelgeving, een vorm van subsidie, immers er hangt wel degelijk een enorme prijskaart aan, neem alleen al de grondwatervervuiling en de aardbevingen door schalie-olie- en schaliegaswinning…… Daar kan men in Groningen over meespreken…….*

Hier het artikel van Anti-Media:

Fracking
Has Made Oklahoma As Earthquake-Prone As San Francisco

March
7, 2017 at 9:12 am

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(MINTPRESSFor
the last several years, something strange has been going on in
Oklahoma. While the occurrence of earthquakes in the state usually
hovers between one to three quakes annually, Oklahoma is now
averaging one to three significant earthquakes per day.

According
to
 a
newly released USGS earthquake risk map
,
Oklahoma is now just as likely as San Francisco to experience a
disruptive, damaging earthquake over the course of the next year.
However, unlike San Francisco, Oklahoma’s heightened earthquake
risk is not the work of any natural phenomenon, but rather a man-made
one.

Unlike
most earthquake-prone states in the U.S., Oklahoma isn’t located
above an active fault line. Instead, Oklahoma is positioned on top of
the Woodford oil and gas shale, which has been a hotspot for oil and
gas development over the last decade. The Woodford Shale, which
covers nearly the entire state and is known for
 its
geological complexity
,
was among the first domestic natural gas formations to be tapped
using hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” a highly controversial
fossil fuel extraction technique
 proven
to cause damage to the environment
.

Among
the technique’s many negative environmental effects is a rise in
seismic activity, as it literally fractures bedrock through
injections of pressurized liquid, known as “wastewater.” In
addition to 
the
documented toxicity
 of
wastewater, its repeated injection deep into the Earth has been
scientifically proven to stimulate major seismic events.

A
2016 study 
published
in 
Science
 used
Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) to show that
wastewater injection causes a major buildup of pressure beneath the
Earth’s surface by pushing groundwater potentially thousands of
feet deeper underground. The study states that as displaced water
travels down, it induces seismic activity, resulting in man-made
earthquakes. The scientific evidence that fracking increases the
incidence of such quakes is so compelling that the connection is even
recognized by 
state and federal officials,
despite fossil fuel lobbying efforts.

The
U.S. Geological Survey 2107 earthquake forecast map. (U.S. Geological
Survey via AP)

In
Oklahoma, however, these earthquakes have been happening so
frequently that they have been described as “swarms.” The
dramatic spike in significant earthquakes has unsurprisingly
coincided with the expansion of fracking throughout Oklahoma. Ever
since Devon Energy drilled the state’s 
first
fracking well
 in
2005, the number of significant earthquakes – those with a
magnitude of 3.0 or greater – began to average two or more daily
less than 10 years after the state’s fracking boom began.
Earthquakes of that magnitude are easily felt and capable of
inflicting damage on structures. While Oklahoma 
has
introduced restrictions
 on
the volume of wastewater injections, it has not been enough 
to
negate the risk or incidence
 of
earthquakes in the state.

Though
energy companies like Devon Energy and Newfield Exploration have
reaped huge profits by drilling in the Woodford Shale, Oklahoma
residents will continue to feel the drilling’s seismic consequences
long after extraction stops. As indicated in the 2016 Science study,
seismic activity induced by fracking was found to increase even when
injection rates at fracking wells declined, as previous injections at
higher volumes had already caused the worst of the damage. Even if
all fracking wells in the state were shut down tomorrow,
fracking-induced earthquakes in Oklahoma would continue.

The
economic fallout caused by unstable global oil prices has made the
situation in Oklahoma even more complicated. While the price of oil
per barrel was close to 100 dollars near the height of the boom, oil
prices dropped significantly in 2015, reaching about 
37
dollars per barrel in March of that year
.

The
price drop caused Oklahoma’s fossil fuel-dependent economy 
to
contract by 2.4 percent
 in
2015, the worst performance nationwide at the time. Thousands of
workers in Oklahoma were laid off as a result. Even after fracking
becomes unprofitable or unfeasible, Oklahomans will be left with its
unsavory environmental and economic impacts for years to come.

By Whitney
Webb
 /
Republished with permission / 
MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo

* Zie: ‘Rutte: “We hebben de Groningse gaswinning gehalveerd…..” Dus klaar is Mark! AUW!!!

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.