Oekraïne, Georgië en Moldavië hebben oud bondgenootschap doen herleven, in voorbereiding op NAVO lidmaatschap en verdere actie tegen Rusland……..

Oekraïne,
Moldavië en Georgië (3 corrupte boevenstaten) hebben besloten een oud
partnerschap te doen herleven, het zogenaamde GUAM-blok. Je hoeft
niet te vragen wie er op de achterhand bezig is geweest om e.e.a. voor
elkaar te krijgen >> juist: de VS!

Nu
de genoemde landen (nog) geen lid kunnen worden van de NAVO, zouden
deze landen (uiteraard zwaar gesteund door de grootste
terreurentiteit op aarde, de VS) samen een vuist kunnen maken tegen
‘Russische agressie……’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Als je nu ziet wie van de
genoemde landen het meest agressief is in haar buitenlandpolitiek, is
het de VS wel!!. 

Oekraïne dat
godbetert een smerige oorlog voert tegen eigen onderdanen, die niet
onder de door de VS geparachuteerde junta wensen te leven, mensen die
kwaad zijn daar de door hen democratisch gekozen president onterecht
werd afgezet, middels machinaties van de VS (Hillary Clinton maakte
daarvoor destijds zelfs 4 miljard dollar vrij…..)…….

Uiteraard
zal de VS allerhande militair materieel leveren en daar een paar
honderd militaire adviseurs aan toevoegen, zoals dit ‘land’ dit nu al doet in Oekraïne……….

Lees
het volgende artikel van Alex Gorka, op 6 maart gepubliceerd op
Strategic Culture Foundation (SCF), daarin vertelt Gorka o.a. over samenkomsten van deze landen (overigens met banden met andere landen, zoals die met Japan). Zo vond er op 2 maart jl. een conferentie van dit GUAM-blok plaats, waar een aantal bobo’s uit de VS natuurlijk niet konden ontbreken, zoals het uiterst rechtse geteisem van de Atlantic Council……. Je snapt dat er vooral veel anti-Russische propaganda werd gevoerd op deze bijeenkomst, niet op feiten gebaseerd, maar gemaakt om Rusland zo 
veel mogelijk zwart te maken en de eigen situatie te promoten en te legaliseren…… Je weet wel, wat betreft Oekraïne de zojuist genoemde smerige strijd tegen de eigen bevolking in het oosten van het land…… Overigens heeft Azerbeidzjan (de A uit GUAM) zich teruggetrokken uit dit verbond, juist vanwege de sterk anti-Russische propaganda op de laatste bijeenkomst, zodat er nu eigenlijk gesproken zou moeten worden van het GUM-blok. (zeer toepasselijk gezien het weg gummen van de eigen kwalijke acties)

Moldova,
Georgia, Ukraine Create New Anti-Russian, Pro-NATO Alliance

Moldova, Georgia, Ukraine Create New Anti-Russian, Pro-NATO Alliance

ALEX
GORKA
 |
06.03.2018 | 
WORLD EUROPE

All
over the world, public attention has been riveted on Russia’s
reemergence as a military superpower, now that President Vladimir
Putin has revealed his new weapon systems in his 
address
to the Federal Assembly
 on
March 2. The US ambitions to attain arms superiority have come to
naught. But its anti-Russian policy cannot be reduced to mere
attempts to achieve military supremacy. The countries of the former
Soviet Union have become a political battlefield, with the US and its
allies doing their best to decrease Russia’s influence.

With
America’s tacit approval, the 
GUAM bloc,
chaired this year by Moldova, is being revived. Last March, the prime
ministers of Georgia, Ukraine, Moldova, and Azerbaijan held a meeting
(Baku was represented by its deputy PM) in Kiev. It was the first
high level meeting since 2008. The cooperation agreement signed by
those foreign ministers last October mentions a free trade zone. The
GUAM organization is expected to hold a summit this June. Three of
its members – Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia – act as tools for
advancing America’s interests in the region. With the blessing of
the US, they signed EU association agreements in 2014. The
2018 
foreign-policy
priorities list
 drafted
by Moldova includes mention of the US, the Visegrad group, and Japan.
According to Chisinau, the countries of the former Soviet Union –
long-standing partners with which it shares historical ties – don’t
deserve such an honor.

The
speakers of parliament from these three countries took part in a
security conference in the Moldovan capital titled “
Georgia,
Moldova and Ukraine: Eastern Partnership and Current Security
Challenges
,”
which was held on March 2 and attended by about 150 senior officials
and experts from different countries. Of course US lawmakers and
pundits were among the participants. As usual, the Atlantic Council,
an American think tank that always supports neo-cons and anything
anti-Russian, could not miss the chance to kindle anti-Moscow
sentiments. Damon Wilson, its executive vice
president, announced that the US was carefully watching over
Moldova, Ukraine, and Georgia, claiming that they “wish to become
part of our family,” as he 
put
it.

The
parliamentary leaders seized the opportunity to issue a 
joint
statement
 condemning
Russia’s military presence in what they believe to be their
respective states’ territories. The document was published in
English to reflect the pro-Western tilt of the three-state group.
They are “
concerned
profoundly

over Russian troops in Moldova (1,000 troops and 500 peacekeepers
stationed in Transnistria) and what they call “occupation” and
“intervention” in some parts of Ukraine and Georgia.

As
usual, Moscow is blamed for supporting “separatist movements” and
other nefarious acts. The speaker of the Georgian parliament, Irakli
Kobakhidze, said an anti-Russian alliance is needed, because only if
they are united can these nations stand up to the “challenges”
coming from Moscow. “We need joint strategies to face Russia’s
aggression,” chimed in Andriy Parubiy, the speaker of the Ukrainian
Rada. To dispell any doubts about the new groups’ allegiance to
NATO, he 
emphasized that
“On this occasion I would like to speak of the threats faced not
only by our region, but also by the Euro-Atlantic zone.”

The
idea of reviving this alliance that was designed to counter Russia
has failed. Azerbaijan refused to take part in any conference with
such a clear anti-Russian agenda. That event demonstrated that there
is no unity on Russia within the ranks of GUAM. So, GUAM is actually
GUM – a group of three states that have been heavily influenced and
pressured by the Americans and which are being used to “contain”
Russia and forced to serve as NATO springboards.

These
three states could maintain friendly relationships with everyone and
stick to a neutral policy. Cooperation with the Eurasian Union could
benefit their economies. Good relations with Moscow would not hinder
their ties with the EU or other institutions or states, including the
US. They could simply refrain from taking sides and concentrate on
the well-being of their people. But no, they have chosen to adopt an
attitude that is hostile to Russia and join those who are
confrontational toward Moscow.

On
March 2 the three member states actually announced the creation of a
new anti-Russian alliance that will negatively affect the political
landscape in Eurasia. The immediate objective is to push Russia out
and pull the US in. Ukraine is a divided nation, plunged in crisis,
and unable to fight its own entrenched corruption. Moldova is facing
an election in the fall and the so-called pro-Russian forces are
predicted to win. In Georgia, the idea of NATO membership does not
have the support of the majority of the population, 
according
to
 a
recent poll. But the governments of these states are pushing the NATO
agenda. They coordinate their political activities in order to
counter Moscow in any way they can. For instance, they always vote
for Ukraine in the PACE
*, strongly oppose the Nord Stream gas project (NS2),
and continue to move closer to NATO.

Moldova
has announced its decision to buy lethal weapons from NATO members.
Its government 
is
chomping at the bit
 to
join “Western institutions.” Ukraine 
is
home to
 a
US naval facility
 and
is scheduled to receive American lethal arms. Tbilisi 
is
pursuing a “more NATO in Georgia and more Georgia in NATO”
policy.

What
brings them together? All three states 
are
ruled by oligarchs who obstruct
 reforms. 
With
their economies in dire straits, the ruling elites promise their
people paradise if they join the EU and NATO and become good friends
of the US. Adopting an anti-Russia policy is their payment for
Western aid and support. Their own national interests and sovereignty
are being exchanged for crumbs dropped from the master’s table. 


Tags: Georgia  Moldova   Ukraine 


* PACE: de Parlementaire Vergadering van de Raad van Europa.

Zie ook:
Porosjenko (Oekraïne) roept de NAVO op tot oorlog tegen Rusland

Oekraïne kondigt staat van beleg af vanwege ‘Russische agressie’ in de Zee van Azov

Election ploy? Poroshenko declares martial law in Ukraine after Kerch standoff

VS senator Rand Paul stelt n.a.v. NAVO-top dat men de zaak moet bekijken vanuit het Russische perspectief

Putin en Trump halen spanning uit de lucht >> de westerse wereld schreeuwt moord en brand……

Afspraken met de VS maken? Voor je het weet heb je te maken met een ‘verspreking’ van de president….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Van Kappen (VVD en ex-opperhoofd mariniers) over de doos van Pandora en Oekraïne……. OEI!!!

Eerder stond in dit mijn schrijven de naam Azarbaijan, de Engelse versie voor Azerbeidzjan. Mijn excuus.

Anti-Russische propaganda, waarin Rusland verantwoordelijk wordt gesteld voor de protesten tegen VS pijpleiding projecten, ook al als onzin doorgeprikt

Niets
weerhoudt een groot deel van de VS ervan Rusland verantwoordelijk te
houden voor alles wat niet lukt, dan wel volkomen fout gaat en voor protesten in de VS tegen
pijpleidingen en het fracken voor schalie-olie- en schaliegaswinning….. Dat laatste: protesten tegen smerige projecten, is de laatste zaak die toegevoegd wordt aan de algemene westerse anti-Russische propaganda leugencarrousel….. 

Het wachten is op een volgend onderwerp dat wordt toegevoegd aan deze propaganda, te denken valt aan protesten tegen de algehele vernieuwde kernwapendoctrine, de inzet van het kernwapen als eerste aanvalswapen, althans als je daar nog mensen voor op straat krijgt…… (waar de VS zelfs een cyberaanval als reden voor die inzet ziet….)  De situatie nu is veel ernstiger dan die in de 70er en 80er jaren van de vorige eeuw, terwijl er toen miljoenen mensen de straat op gingen tegen kernwapens, is er nu zelfs geen aanzet tot het organiseren van (wereldwijde) demonstraties…..

Nu
worden dus ook de anti-pijpleiding protesten van de laatste paar jaar in de VS toegeschreven aan Rusland……… Zelfs hare kwaadaardigheid Hillary
Clinton, die het gore lef heeft zich af te schilderen als
milieubewust, durfde Rusland als verantwoordelijke voor de protesten
aan te wijzen……..

Lees het
volgende hoofdstuk van de Russiagate soap en zie hoe door en door
verrot de VS politiek is:

No,
Russia Didn’t Use Propaganda on Social Media to Incite US Pipeline
Protests

March
6, 2018 at 6:21 am

Written
by 
Kevin
Gosztola

(SP Op-ed) — A
“staff report” from Republicans on the United States House
Science, Space, and Technology Committee offers little evidence to
prove allegations of Russian efforts to influence U.S. energy markets
through “social media propaganda” to incite pipeline protests.

Nonetheless, the
report
,
pushed by Republican chairman Representative Lamar Smith, went
virtually unquestioned when it was covered by U.S. media.

What
the report reveals are several Twitter and Instagram posts that
Republicans claim were posted by “Russian agents” linked to the
Internet Research Agency (IRA), the troll farm which has become a
focus of narratives that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential
election.

The
report recycles unsubstantiated news reporting that strongly
suggested the Russian government was behind anti-fracking activism in
the U.S. It contends these posts and tweets demonstrate the “broad
nature of Russia’s meddling and to reveal Russia’s attempts to
deceive and influence the American public, especially as related to
domestic energy issues.”

Between
2015 and 2017, there were an estimated 9,097 Russian posts or tweets
regarding U.S. energy policy or a current energy event on Twitter,
Facebook and Instagram,” according to the report. “Between 2015
and 2017, there were an estimated 4,334 IRA accounts across Twitter,
Facebook and Instagram.”

To
understand how these numbers are incredibly minuscule, there are
about 95 million posts to Instagram per day and 800 million or more
users, as of September 2017. About 500,000 comments, 293,000 status
updates, and 136,000 photos are posted to Facebook daily. There are
over 2 billion active users on Facebook. On Twitter, about 500
million or more tweets are posted each day. There are 330 million
active monthly users.

House
Republicans did not break down the number of IRA accounts by
platform. But if the 4,334 accounts were all Twitter accounts, it
would mean the number of active Russian accounts represented less
than 0.0013 percent of Twitter users. That percentage would be much
smaller for Facebook and Instagram.

As
for reported posts and tweets, because Republicans are pulling from
contents that appeared between 2015 and 2017, they are essentially
revealing an average of 3,000 or so posts and tweets appeared each
year.

What
is 3,000 out of the 95 million posts to Instagram? What is 3,000 out
of the hundreds of thousands of comments and updates to Facebook?
What is 3,000 out of 500 million or more tweets?

These
are smaller than microscopic numbers. They barely can be said to
represent a broad influence campaign by Russia to undermine U.S.
fossil fuel industries and incite opposition to American “energy
independence.”

The
“Russian tweets” are not even disinformation. They mostly appear
to be messages containing advocacy from Senator Bernie Sanders,
presidential candidate in the 2016 election, and his supporters. For
example:

These
tweets reference the health impact of natural gas fracking. They
mention the link between earthquakes and fracking. They note
political efforts to ban fracking through state ballot initiatives.
What they do not do is promote disinformation, such as falsehoods
about the fossil fuel industry.

The
report continues a blatant agenda by Republicans to discredit climate
activism against oil and gas pipelines. It even argues Russians are
trying to make “useful idiots” of “unwitting
environmental groups and activists in furtherance of its energy
influence operations.”

In
July 2017, Smith and Republican Representative Randy
Weber 
urged Treasury
Secretary Steven Mnuchin to “investigate whether the Kremlin [was]
bankrolling green campaigns against the fracking technology that
helped the U.S. overtake Russia in gas production.”

But
as POLITICO noted, “Allegations have circulated for years that
Moscow has sought to discourage European countries from developing
their own natural gas supplies as an alternative to Russian fuel. And
conservatives have sought to extend those concerns to the U.S.—though
there’s little but innuendo to base them on.”

A
surge in activism against pipeline projects, especially as the
impacts of climate change intensify, has brought pressure to fossil
fuel industry interests. Smith is one of the industry’s most ardent
defenders. He even publicly contends climate change is still subject
to debate when it is settled science.

An
Inside Climate News report 
details how
the fossil fuel industry is a major contributor to science committee
members. It donated $8 million from 2006 to 2016, making it the
leading source of “industry political action committee money.”
The oil and gas industry  is one of Smith’s biggest
contributors, “with $764,000 in donations over the course of his
career in Congress.”

Smith
frequently alleges charges of “secret science” against government
agencies that seek to regulate coal-fired power plants, oil
refineries, and energy pollution in general. He engages in the very
kind of efforts to provoke discord and disruption that the House
science committee report condemns. It is all to manufacture doubt in
order to tie up policy deliberations in debate so they do not affect
companies’ profits.

While
this report is clearly rubbish, Democrats have not said anything to
challenge the allegations. Perhaps, this is because they are fully
invested in the narrative that Russia is meddling in all parts of
American discourse on social media.

Smith
invokes the bipartisan consensus on “Russian manipulation.”
Democratic Senator Ben Cardin recently published a report that
stated, “According to NATO officials, Russian intelligence agencies
also reportedly provide covert support to European environmental
groups to campaign against fracking for natural gas,
thereby keeping the EU more dependent on Russian supplies. A study by
the Wilfried Martens Center for European Studies reports that the
Russian government has invested $95 million in NGOs that seek to
persuade EU governments to end shale gas exploration.”

During
a tinePublic 
speech in
2014, former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton accused
“phony environmental groups” that she believes are funded by the
Russians of being responsible for the opposition to oil pipelines and
natural gas fracking. “I’m a big environmentalist, but these were
funded by the Russians to stand against any effort, oh that pipeline,
that fracking, that whatever will be a problem for you, and a lot of
the money supporting that message was coming from Russia.”

Much
of the notion among conservatives that U.S. climate activism is
funded by Russia stems from a report by a front group, the
Environmental Policy Alliance, operated by Berman & Co., which is
run by Rick Berman.

Berman
is known for 
attacks against
Mothers Against Drunk Driving. He also has defended Big Tobacco from
anti-smoking campaigns. He previously 
boasted,
“If the oil and gas industry wants to prevent its opponents from
slowing its efforts to drill in more places, it must be prepared to
employ tactics like digging up embarrassing tidbits about
environmentalists and liberal celebrities” and urged industry
executives “to exploit emotions like fear, greed and anger and turn
them against the environmental groups.”

Part
of Berman’s efforts to exploit emotions involved accusing U.S.
environmental organization of accepting money from the Sea Change
Foundation, which allegedly accepted funds from a Bermuda-based
company called Klein Limited with executives tied to Russian oil and
gas companies.

We
double-check confirmed that the origin of the funds we’re getting
from Sea Change is through a donor, not from Russia,” Melinda
Pierce, Sierra Club’s legislative director, 
declared.
“It’s a private U.S. citizen who cares about climate change and
has invested in the kind of work that the Sierra Club does to move us
off dirty energy to clean energy.”

This
campaign to smear U.S. environmental organizations as agents of the
Russian oil and gas industry was picked up by Republicans. It
influenced a 2014 
report,
“The Chain of Environmental Command: How a Club of Billionaires and
Their Foundations Control the Environmental Movement and Obama’s
EPA.”

Back
then, it was innuendo and unsubstantiated claims intended to help the
industry defend itself against pipeline activists. It remains
industry-driven propaganda.

The
only difference now is that the current political climate embraces a
bipartisan consensus that Russians will stop at nothing to sow
discord. Democrats do not see conservative political action
committees and right-wing industry front groups as responsible for
political turmoil over issues mired in contentious debate. They see
Russians, and even if they do not deny the reality of climate change,
that leaves U.S. policy vulnerable to actions that are aimed at
protecting fossil fuel companies and drowning out protest from
citizens concerned about climate change.

Op-ed Kevin Gosztola /
Republished with permission / 
Shadow
Proof
 / Report
a typo

==============================

Zie voor de hiervoor genoemde corruptie van Lamar Smith: ‘Exxon lobbyist (politicus) dagvaardt milieugroepen voor kennis bij Exxon over klimaatverandering…….

Ollongren (D66 minister) schiet een levensgrote bok met fake news show

Afgelopen maandag op de publieke tv bij de ‘onafhankelijke zendgemachtigde’ NOS, de fake news show, ofwel het programma: ‘Nieuws of Nonsens’ met D66 volksverlakker Ollongren in de hoofdrol. En dat ‘lekker snel’ nadat ze ons het democratisch gereedschap referendum door de neus boorde, vind je ‘ook niet?’

Waarschijnlijk dacht Ollongren met deze nonsens show haar critici de mond te snoeren, maar helaas voor haarzelf, ze zette zichzelf danig voor paal. Gevraagd naar een voorbeeld van fake news (nepnieuws) in Nederland, moest Ollongren het antwoord schuldig blijven, ze merkte op dat ze die niet kon geven……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! En dat van een flapdrol die al maanden loopt te zeuren over fake news en Russische manipulaties in o.a. ons land!!

Ondanks dat Ollongren geen voorbeeld van fake news kon geven, stelde ze toch dat we er allemaal last van hebben……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Kortom: leeghoofd Ollongren maakte voor de zoveelste keer zelf fake news!

Vreemd trouwens dat Ollongren geen voorbeelden kon geven, daar de reguliere media het ene fake news bericht na het andere brengen, alleen voor de illegale oorlogen van de VS (met oorlogshond NAVO aan de lijn) tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië moeten duizenden voorbeelden te vinden zijn!! (voorbeelden die ook door de ‘onafhankelijke’ NOS werden gepubliceerd dan wel uitgezonden!) Ach je begrijpt ‘t al: fake news van de reguliere (massa-) media wordt niet als dusdanig gezien……. Sterker nog: dit fake news moet beschermd worden tegen de waarheid, die je o.a. op de sociale media kan vinden

De Nederlandse bevolking is met de belachelijke Nieuws of Nonsens show een fiks onzin oor aangenaaid en dat op eigen kosten! (via de belasting)

Zie ook: ‘Ollongren (D66 minister) manipuleerde bevolking met beschuldiging Russische manipulatie door desinformatie en nepnieuws

       en: ‘Grapperhaus (CDA minister) lanceert een veelomvattende strategie tegen spionage en sabotage door ‘buitenlandse staten’

       en: ‘Kasja Ollongren (D66 minister) en de Russische manipulatie van de Provinciale Statenverkiezingen

       en: ‘Privacy: leugens, bedrog, Ollongren (D66 minister) en De Verleiders

       en: ‘Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

Voor meer voorbeelden van aanvallen op zogenaamd fake news en van doorgeprikt nieuws dat het etiket fake news had moeten krijgen:

             ‘Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt ‘TV ankers’ propaganda op te lezen‘ (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van ‘lokaal nieuws’)

       en: ‘The Attack on ‘Fake News’ Is Really an Attack on Alternative Media‘ (via blog Stan van Houcke)

       en: ‘The Lie of the 21st Century: How Mainstream Media “Fake News” Led to the U.S. Invasion of Iraq

       en:  ‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

       en: ‘Mocking Trump Doesn’t Prove Russia’s Guilt‘ (via blog Stan van Houcke)

      en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘ (zie ook de andere links onder dat bericht)

       en: ‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

       en: ‘Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

       en: ‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

      en: ‘‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

      en: ‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

      en: VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

      en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

      en: ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

      en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

      en: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

      en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

      en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

      en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

      en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

       en: ‘Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

       en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

       en: ‘RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

       en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

       en: ‘Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat

       en: ‘Obama wist van bewapenen en ondersteunen terroristen in Syrië…….

       en: ‘De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

Voor meer berichten met Ollongren in andere zaken, klik op het label met haar naam, direct onder dit bericht.

Shock & Awe: 15 jaar geleden begon de (illegale) oorlog tegen Irak, dezelfde weg wordt weer gevolgd door de VS (en de massamedia)……..

15 jaar
geleden begon de regering van George W. Bush de oorlog tegen Irak.
Geheel op leugens gebaseerd was dit de aanzet tot een illegale oorlog
die intussen aan meer dan 1,5 miljoen burgers het leven heeft gekost.

Deze
oorlog was niet mogelijk geweest, als de reguliere (massa-) media
niet de leugens van de Bush administratie hadden overgenomen en dat op de
voorpagina’s en prominent in nieuws en actualiteiten uitzendingen, of dat nu op de
radio of tv was. De term ‘fake news’ bestond destijds nog niet, maar
werd wel degelijk op grote schaal gemaakt door de hiervoor genoemde
media. Vergeet niet dat meerdere deskundigen en wapeninspecteurs van
de VN, zoals Blix, keer op keer stelden dat Irak niet meer in het
bezit was van massavernietigingswapens…….

Het
volgende artikel gaat Ron Paul dieper in op alle gevolgen van
deze illegale oorlog die de VS 15 jaar geleden begon. Voorts noemt
hij het huidige tromgeroffel o.l.v. De VS tegen Noord-Korea, waar
senator Graham een paar dagen geleden stelde dat een paar miljoen
doden geen probleem zijn, als met een oorlog tegen dit land ‘stabiliteit’ in de regio wordt bereikt………..

Jammer
dat Paul niet alle andere oorlogsdreigingen van VS en NAVO zijde noemt, zoals een dreigende oorlog tegen Syrië, Iran en Libanon (deze o.l.v. Israël met steun van de VS), waar
nog Oekraïne aan toegevoegd kan worden, daar de VS daar niet alleen
meer ‘militaire adviseurs’, maar ook zware wapens levert aan dit intussen zo
goed als failliete land. Dit nog buiten alle militaire oefeningen
langs de Russische grens, waar de VS in feite oefent op een oorlog
tegen Rusland……. 

Hetzelfde geldt voor China, waar de VS dit land voor een groot deel heeft omringd met militaire bases en waar de Trump administratie dit land meer en meer met militair geweld bedreigt (zoals over de eilandjes die China claimt in de Zuid-Chinese Zee…)…….

Ron
Paul: 15 Years After the US Invaded Iraq, It’s Time to Listen to
the Iraqi People

March
5, 2018 at 1:04 pm

Written
by 
Ron
Paul

(RPI Op-ed) — This
month marks the 15th anniversary of the US war on Iraq. The “shock
and awe” attack was launched based on “stove-piped”
intelligence fed from the CIA and Pentagon through an uncritical and
compliant US mainstream media. The US media was a willing accomplice
to this crime of aggression committed by the George W. Bush
Administration.

Despite
the lies we were constantly bombarded with, Iraq never presented a
threat to the United States. Iraq never had the weapons of mass
destruction that the neocons used to frighten Americans into
supporting the war. How many of them knew all along that there were
no WMDs? We’ll never know. Attacking Iraq and overthrowing its
leader was long a plan in the neocon playbook and they used the 9/11
attack on the US as an excuse to pull the plan off the shelf and put
it into action.

The
US “regime change” war on Iraq has directly resulted in the death
of at least a quarter of a million civilians, and indirectly perhaps
a million Iraqis have been killed. The Iraqi infrastructure was
destroyed and the country was set back many decades in development.
Far from the democratization we were promised, Iraq has been turned
into a hell on earth. Due to the US use of depleted uranium and other
chemical weapons like white phosphorus, Iraqis will continue to
suffer from birth defects and other related illnesses for
generations.

How
did we get there? War propaganda was essential in paving the way for
the Iraq war. Americans are generally skeptical about launching new
wars, so it takes a steady media bombardment about the alleged
depravities of any targeted regime before public opinion begins to
shift in favor of war.

Because
the neocons who helped launch the war have never had to face the
consequences of their actions, they continue to promote war with
impunity. Just this past week, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was pushing
for a US attack on North Korea in which millions may be killed. He
said this weekend, “All the damage that would come from a war would
be worth it in terms of long-term stability and national security.”
That’s just what they said before the US attacked Iraq, and how did
that turn out? I find it disgusting that the media continues to give
airtime almost exclusively to those who promote more US disasters
like Iraq.

The
Iraqi parliament did something extraordinary last week. A majority of
elected Iraqi representatives voted to demand that their prime
minister draw up a timetable for the withdrawal of US troops from the
country. President Obama had withdrawn US troops from Iraq in 2011,
after a status of forces agreement could not be reached with the
Iraqi government, but he returned the US military to Iraq under the
auspices of fighting ISIS.

We
had no business going into Iraq in the first place and we have no
business remaining in Iraq. Al-Qaeda and ISIS emerged in Iraq because
our attack and occupation of the country 15 years ago created fertile
fields for extremism. Nothing will be achieved if we remain. Let’s
listen to the Iraqis and just come home!

Op-ed
by 
Ron
Paul
 /
Republished with permission / 
RPI / Report
a typo

‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

‘Wat je niet verteld wordt over fake news en Russische propaganda’, zo luidt de titel boven een artikel van Clive Murphy op de ‘The Mind Unleashed’.

In dit artikel o.a. aandacht voor journalist Sharyl Attkisson, die zich afvroeg of ‘fake news’ (nepnieuws in de labels direct onder dit bericht) echt is, of zelf een gefabriceerde term is. Ofwel of ‘fake news’ een vehikel is waarmee men terechte kritiek op de berichtgeving van de reguliere (massa-) media en het brengen van artikelen ‘met een iets andere kijk op de waarheid’ (ofwel veelal waarachtig nieuws), als niet ter zake doend en als onzin afschildert……

Zoals de regelmatige lezer van dit blog weet, ben ik overtuigd van het laatste: de term ‘fake news’ is verzonnen om sociale media, die de waarheid blootleggen, de mond te snoeren……

Lees en oordeel zelf:

What
You’re Not Being Told About Fake News and Russian Propaganda

February
19, 2018 at 7:03 am

Written
by 
The
Mind Unleashed

(TMU) — “Is
‘fake news’ real?”
 asked
investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson during a 
Tedx
talk
 this
month — posing the paradoxical question in the context of its
explosion in popularity during the 2016 presidential election — or
is the term, 
fake
news
,
itself, a fabrication?

In
its absurd extreme, identifiably fake news appears on supermarket
shelves as tabloid magazines, in ‘reports’ on human births of
alien hybrid babies and other blatant fabrications; while its more
pernicious iteration, issued by traditional pillars of journalism —
such as the New York Times and Washington
Post
, among many others — manifests in reports citing
unsubstantiated sources and unnamed ‘officials,’ and often favors
corporate sponsors as well as the political establishment.

Fake
news
 isn’t new to the media landscape, in other words, but
the catchphrase, as a descriptor, is.

Thus,
what if fake news — peddled to the public as a pressing problem in
need of solution — is itself a deception,
intentionally constructed to silence legitimate critique, opposing
viewpoints, and dissent?

Attkisson,
who surmised the abrupt entrée of an artificial problem must have
had assistance, investigated the origins of the phrase, ‘fake
news,’ and its employment as accusation and insinuation, whether or
not accompanied by substantiating evidence. And she was frighteningly
on point.

What
if the whole anti-fake news campaign was an effort on somebody’s
part to keep us from seeing or believing certain websites and stories
by controversializing them or labeling them as fake news?”
 the
seasoned journalist and winner of the Edward R. Murrow award for
investigative reporting asks.

Weighing
the evidence, timeline, and money trail Attkisson discovered —
coupled with the resulting heavy-handed crackdown on social media and
video-sharing platforms, as well as by search engines and
advertisers, on the fictitious false information crisis — not only
does it seem likely the term was premeditated and unleashed as a
propaganda device, but as a loaded weapon inherently threatening to
the future of the free press as protectively enshrined in the First
Amendment.

With
decades of experience, Attkisson’s hunch — that the specific term
‘fake news’ did not spread like acrid wildfire of its own
volition — found factual corroboration.

In
mid-September 2016, the nonprofit group, First Draft — funded in
part, 
according
to
 an
archive of the site, by grants from the “
John
S. and James L. Knight Foundation, 
Open
Society Foundation
 and
the Ford Foundation”
 —
announced its mission “
to
tackle malicious hoaxes and fake news reports.”

First
Draft — a project of the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and
Public Policy at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of
Government — uses research-based methods to fight mis- and
disinformation online. Additionally, it provides practical and
ethical guidance in how to find, verify and publish content sourced
from the social web,”
 the
site’s About section 
states.

The
goal was supposedly to separate wheat from chaff,”
 Attkisson
explains, “to
prevent unproven conspiracy talk from figuring prominently in
internet searches. To relegate today’s version of the alien baby
story to a special internet oblivion.”

However
innocuous-sounding that agenda, just one month passed before First
Draft’s battle against fake news found a megaphone in the
president, as Obama abruptly “
insisted in
a speech that he too thought somebody needed to step in and curate
information of this wild, wild west media environment,”
 she
notes.

But
there 
hadn’t been
a ruckus, much less a few lone voices, griping about fake news as an
issue of any import — or even complaining, at all.

Nobody
in the public had been clamoring for any such thing,”
 Attkisson
continues, “yet,
suddenly, the topic of fake news dominates headlines on a daily
basis. It’s as if the media had been given its marching orders.

Fake
news, they insisted, was an imminent threat to American Democracy.”

Aware “few
themes arise”
 in
the mass media environment “
organically,” the
seasoned investigator followed the money to First Draft’s funders —
to discern which interested parties might be backing the rally
against fake news. Google, in fact, financed the group “
around
the start of the election cycle”
 —
Google, whose parent company Alphabet’s CEO 
Eric
Schmidt
 both
acted as adviser and multi-million-dollar donor to the presidential
campaign of Hillary Clinton.

Mirroring
Obama’s lament, Clinton soon championed quashing fake news as a
priority — and her “surrogate, David Brock of Media
Matters, privately told donors he was the one who convinced Facebook
to join the effort,”
 she adds.

I’m
not the only one who thought that the whole thing smacked of the
roll-out of a propaganda campaign.”

Indeed,
the 
nascent fake
news allegation almost exclusively centered around
conservative-leaning outlets, journalists, and articles perceived as
favoring then-candidate Trump — and repeatedly alongside
allegations those media entities were acting directly, indirectly, or
haplessly at the behest of the Russian government — while the
majority of the mud-slinging was 
levied without
proof or the flimsiest of supporting evidence.

To
wit, a succession of pieces published by mass media dispensed with
the indispensable journalistic protocols of source- and fact-checking
— then shied away from accepting responsibility for the incendiary
and damaging claims once a furious backlash ensued.

Although
Attkisson did not mention them specifically in the roughly ten-minute
Tedx talk at the University of Nevada, two lists published at the
height of the Fake News Scare — both of which were either
republished or alluded and linked to by multiple corporate outlets —
came into public purview under highly suspect circumstances, each
lending albeit indirect credence to the hypothesis a propaganda
crusade was underway.

On
November 13, 2016, Merrimack College associate professor Melissa
Zimdars out of the blue made public a Google document entitled,
“False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical ‘News’
Sources,” she later described as essentially a worksheet intended
for colleagues and students to offer one another tips for avoiding
disseminating fake news.

So
… I posted it to Facebook to my friends, you know, ‘Hey, media
and communication people, if you think of other examples you come
across,’”
 she
explained of the list’s creation to 
USA
Today College
 in
an 
interview, “and
so many of them sent me Facebook messages or comments and emails and
I looked through them or through some of the people sent me blogs or
other sources.”

Admittedly,
without vetting whether or not each (or even a few) of the sites
conjured from that Facebook post deserved a place on the inflammatory
list, Zimdars committed the precise journalistic fraud putatively
motivating its formation in the first place — as did the 
Los
Angeles Times
,
whose 
piece,

Want
to keep fake news out of your newsfeed? College professor creates
list of sites to avoid,” let loose the unverified, unchecked, and
unauthenticated aggregation, with its purely subjective guidelines,
onto a populace stirred to frenzy over fake news, to expectedly viral
results.

Critics
and listees — many of which cogently included established if
smaller conservative and pro-Trump outlets, as well as those covering
the deluge of corruption allegations spawned from a series of leaks
against then-candidate Clinton, John Podesta, and the Democratic
National Committee — lambasted Zimdars, the Times, and other
propagators for failing the integrity litmus test. Slapped with
requests for removal and a firestorm of fury, Zimdars temporarily
revoked public access to the contentious list with vows to edit and
update information as appropriate, and authored an 
editorial
defense
,
appearing in the 
Post on
November 18, titled, “My ‘fake news list’ went viral. But
made-up stories are only part of the problem.”

Despite
the mayhem and arguable damage it caused to myriad legitimate sources
listed among the obvious disinformation outlets, Zimdars’ list is
once again open to the public — on 
Google Docs.

After
having established itself as a 
defender of
the associate professor’s worksheet, the 
Washington
Post
 took
the 
L.A.
Times

lead, issuing an article on November 24 almost wholly pertaining to a
list it failed to embed or even link — only the name of the
problematic organization, PropOrNot, provided clues for readers
dedicated enough to search on their own. And they did in droves.

But
the Post’s reckless foray into tabloidesque journalism
— perhaps wary of negative perception beginning to foment against
the anti-fake news brigade — crossed several lines demarcating
standards of journalism; and weaved another narrative of equally
dubious stature into the already unraveling anti-disinformation war:
Russia.

Russian
propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election,
experts say,” the outlet 
proclaimed
in the title
 for
the article — whose un-accompanying blacklist pegged hundreds of
independent, 
conservative,
pro-Bernie Sanders, pro-Trump, and even left-leaning and
award-winning sites as suddenly verboten due to direct or indirect
Russian influence, or for acting as Russia’s “
useful
idiots”
 —
all while vocally preserving the anonymity of the “
four
sets of researchers”
 responsible.
Among them, PropOrNot.

The
flood of ‘fake news’ this election season got support from a
sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign that created and spread
misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Democrat
Hillary Clinton, helping Republican Donald Trump and undermining
faith in American democracy, say independent researchers who tracked
the operation,”
 the
piece’s lede 
contends.

But,
devoid named sources to question, transparency of methodologies, nor
any other potentially mitigating factors which would have allowed
independent verification contained in the original article, outrage
this time included the Post’s competition.

In
fact, several organizations listed as ‘allies’ by PropOrNot
immediately disavowed the claim. Eliot Higgins of research-focused
Bellingcat, one of several entities named as such, 
tweeted
that prior to the Post’s article, he had never heard of PropOrNot —
incidentally indicating a lack of contact by reporters from the media
organization — and, further, he “
never
gave permission to them to call Bellingcat ‘allies.’”

Fortune’s
Mathew Ingram penned an incredulous 
response,
entitled, “No, Russian Agents Are Not

Behind
Every Piece of Fake News You See.” Effectively destroying every
facet of the Post’s anathema piece, Ingram points out there
is “
also
little data available on the PropOrNot report, which describes a
network of 200 sites who it says are ‘routine peddlers of Russian
propaganda,’ which have what it calls a ‘combined audience of 15
million Americans.’ How is that audience measured? We don’t know.
Stories promoted by this network were shared 213 million times, it
says. How do we know this? That’s unclear.”

Ultimately
forced into addressing the resulting chaos, the 
Washington
Post
 article eventually
bore a note from the editor — not a retraction — asserting [with
emphasis added],

The
Washington Post on Nov. 24 published a story on the work of four sets
of researchers who have examined 
what
they say are Russian propaganda efforts to undermine American
democracy and interests
.
One of them was PropOrNot, a group that 
insists
on public anonymity
,
which issued a report identifying more than 200 websites that, in its
view, wittingly or unwittingly published or echoed Russian
propaganda. A number of those sites have objected to being included
on PropOrNot’s list, and some of the sites, as well as others not
on the list, have publicly challenged the group’s methodology and
conclusions. 
The
Post, which did not name any of the sites, does not itself vouch for
the validity of PropOrNot’s findings regarding any individual media
outlet, nor did the article purport to do so.
 Since
publication of The Post’s story, PropOrNot has removed some sites
from its list.”

To
reiterate, the Post did not retract the article abruptly conflating
fake news with Russian propaganda — regardless the brazen if
planned distancing of itself from the content therein — and has
never divulged its justification for publishing such threadbare work,
nor for allowing the empty allegations to remain available for the
world to read online in perpetuity.

On
January 8, 2017, amid continued outrage over specious and vapid fake
news and Russian propaganda accusations, 
Washington
Post
 columnist
Margaret Sullivan declared the entirety of the outlet’s relentless
anti-fake news jihad null, titling an 
article,
“It’s time to retire the tainted term ‘fake news,’”
positing the term’s mere monthslong duration may have served a
purpose at its advent, but “
its
meaning already is lost.”

Attkisson
notably emphasizes, however, the term never imparted a steel
definition nor universally agreed-upon guidelines delineating
precisely what it constitutes. That ambiguity disputably explains
placing the term front and center in a propaganda campaign — as it
is sharply suggested by Attkisson’s funding investigation of First
Draft with bulk of the aforementioned body of evidence — for doubt
before persuasion wields power.

For
its irresponsible reporting of the unsubstantiated blacklist, 
false
claims
 Russia
had 
hacked into
Vermont’s power grid, and all-out push to — for all intents and
purposes — vilify or discredit opposing but legitimate viewpoints,
the 
Washington
Post
 and
its 
controversial owner Jeff
Bezos
,
also CEO of 
Amazon,
garnered praise from failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton,
who professed without a hint of irony to an audience May 31, 2017, at
the annual Code Conference, as 
quoted
by
 CNBC,

I
think Jeff Bezos saved The Washington Post. But newspapers, like the
Post, the Journal, the Times, others — still drive news. … It was
a very good use of his financial resources. Because now we have a
very good newspaper again operating in Washington, and driving news
elsewhere.”

All
bold tit-for-tat back-patting aside, Clinton’s adoration for an
ostensive news organization, which  displayed an egregious lack
of journalistic standards on several occasions might be only telling,
were the audacious effort to mute dissenting and critical voices —
who had reported factually on damning evidence of layers of
corruption plaguing the former secretary of state’s campaign,
officials, and party as divulged by Wikileaks — not also tandemly
gaining momentum.

It
has been theorized the work of journalists not employed by
traditional, corporate mass media organizations had — in wading
through the vitriol of election season to report the avalanche of
information dumped in leaks and pivotal to outcome, yet ignored by
mass media — assisted in stoking rage against the establishment and
was responsible for the concurrent astronomical success of the
Sanders campaign, to the detriment and consternation of Clinton.

Whether
or not that hypothesis holds weight, that responsible reporting
picked up mainstream’s slack, as the big-name outlets instead
trained their audiences’ attentions on questioning Wikileaks,
whistleblowers, and similar diversions. In short, the widely-varied
body of independent media became essential for the dissemination of
accurate information. But that vitality, under the vacuous premise of
combating fake news, is being strangled by oppressive social
media 
algorithms,
yanked 
advertising and
sponsor dollars, and other tactics perhaps comprising the truer
imminent threat to vestiges of democracy: censorship,
through 
suppression and omission,
of a free press.

This
debilitating loss — the neutering of media still upholding its duty
to question government and report facts for their own sake — to a
concerted effort to solve the manufactured fake news problem would be
irrevocable tragedy.

Attkisson
— a 
noted dissenting
voice, 
critical of
lapdog media, herself — stopped short of a definitive conclusion
regarding a coordinated propaganda campaign, warning,

What
you need to remember is that when interests are working this hard to
shape your opinion, 
their
true goal might
just be to add another layer between you and the truth.”

By Clive
Murphy
 /
Republished with permission / 
The
Mind Unleashed
 / Report
a typo

=================================

Zie ook: ‘VS begint ‘troll farm’, alsof Hollywood en de massamedia al niet genoeg VS propaganda maken……….

       en: ‘Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands)

        en: ‘BBC World Service en BNR met ‘fake news’ over Ghouta……..

        en: ‘Syrische nonnen spreken zich uit tegen de oorlogspropaganda van westerse mogendheden en de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

        en: ‘Massamedia VS vergeven van CIA ‘veteranen’, alsof die media nog niet genoeg ‘fake news’ ofwel leugens brengen……..

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

       en: Volkskrant en Nieuwsuur Fake News over ‘Russische hacks…..’

       en: ‘Fake News van CNN: ‘American Sniper gedood in Syrie….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: ‘BBC publieksmanipulatie via het nieuws: Rusland steunt de slechteriken……‘ (met daaronder meerdere links naar BBC propaganda berichten, dan wel berichten over die propaganda)

       en: ‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

       en: ‘Anti-Russische-Putin propaganda op Radio1, ofwel Godfroid uit de bocht met 10 km/u……..

       en: ‘BBC gaat met stafleden scholen af in de strijd tegen ‘fake news…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Trump administratie manipuleert de bevolking middels ‘fake news’ richting oorlog met Iran……………..

       en: ‘RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

       en: ‘Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!‘ (ja ook deze D66 plork gaat plat op de bek!)

       en: ‘Syrië: Vlaamse pater roept op niet langer de westerse anti-Syrië propaganda te geloven!

       en: ‘Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Ollongren (D66 minister) schiet een levensgrote bok met fake news show

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘MSM Create #Fakenews Storm As Rebel Aleppo Vanishes

       en: ‘‘BBC Propaganda’ ‘Ken Loach just proved beyond doubt that the BBC is brainwashing the British public’‘ [VIDEO] 

      en: ‘Fallujah en Aleppo, twee belegerde steden, een opvallend verschil in berichtgeving door de reguliere media………

       en: ‘Extracting Aleppo from the Propaganda: Interviewwith Eva Bartlett, an independent western journalists covering the horrific conflict in Syria‘. (van Information Clearing House, inclusief mogelijkheid tot vertaling)

      en: ‘CIA Chief Admits the Agency’s Role in the Syrian War‘ (de bloedige rol wel te verstaan…..) (een artikel met mogelijkheid tot vertaling)

        en: ‘Former UK Ambassador to Syria Debunks Aleppo Propaganda‘ (met mogelijkheid tot vertaling

       en: ‘Aleppo, de propagandaslag o.a. middels grove leugens in de reguliere westerse media en politiek………..

    en: ‘Iraakse strijdmacht gaf grif toe dat tot hun orders voor West-Mosul ook het vermoorden van vrouwen en kinderen behoorde……..

       en: ‘Raqqa >> BBC World Service en ‘onafhankelijke journalistiek’: ‘Er zijn veel burgers omgekomen bij de strijd in de straten in Raqqa……..’

      en: ‘Massamedium CBS (VS) tegen reality check. Logisch wel, gezien de hoeveelheid fake news op die zender…..


    en: ‘SOHR, het orgaan dat door de reguliere media wordt aangehaald i.z. Syrië, is gevestigd in Coventry


     en: ‘De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers……… 

Mijn excuus voor de belabberde weergave.

VS begint ‘troll farm’, alsof Hollywood en de massamedia al niet genoeg VS propaganda maken……….

Het
VS ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken krijgt 40 miljoen om een ‘troll
farm’ te beginnen…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ik had toch echt de idee dat het
grootste deel van de VS al in een ‘troll farm’ was veranderd, ‘maar goed….’ Dat geldt alvast wel voor de massamedia daar, die door dik en dun het uiterst agressieve, om niet te zeggen terroristische, buitenlandbeleid van hun regering steunen. Op de scholen wordt kinderen een valse voorstelling van zaken gegeven als het om de bloederige geschiedenis van de VS gaat en ga nog maar even door……

Deze ‘troll’ afdeling optuigen valt onder de propaganda en desinformatie campagne
‘Global Engagement Center (GEC)….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Toch tof dat de VS
eindelijk toegeeft bezig te zijn met het verspreiden van
desinformatie (wat gepaard gaat met het brengen van ‘fake news’), en propaganda, Goebbels zou trots zijn als hij zag hoe
zijn erfenis bij de VS ‘in goede handen’ is beland!

Jason
Ditz, de schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen artikel, is bang dat
met een dergelijk instituut de VS bevolking zal worden misleid…..
ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Hé Ditz wordt wakker man, dat doet jouw overheid al
decennia en de laatste 20 jaar op topniveau!

Hollywoodfilms
en VS series zitten propvol geschiedvervalsing, propaganda voor de
VS, plus angst- en haatzaaierij voor/tegen alle ‘vijanden’ van de VS en
dat is nu eenmaal een flink deel van de wereld (waar de VS vooralsnog
gelukkig geen poot aan de grond krijgt). Dat vijand zijn van de VS is niet zo moeilijk, als je je als land verzet tegen de terreur van de VS (ook elders) ben je automatisch een vijand…… (en nee, dat heeft niets te maken met het wel of niet zijn van een democratie, zie de hartelijke banden van de VS met de reli-fascistische dictatuur Saoedi-Arabië….)…..

Uiteraard
zal met dit instituut de haat en angst tegen/voor Rusland nog een
fiks stuk verder worden opgevoerd, maar dat is niet zo vreemd als je ziet
dat de VS in feite bezig is met het uitlokken van een grote oorlog,
niet alleen tegen Iran, of Noord-Korea, maar ook met China en
Rusland, die gelukkig Iran en N-K steunen, anders was het in die landen allang VS-bal geweest….

Terecht
merkt Ditz op dat het maar de vraag is hoe succesvol dit instituut zal
zijn, daar het in alle openbaarheid zal opereren. Daarmee loopt dit
project de kans het zoveelste lachertje (als de JSF) van de VS te
worden……. Lullig genoeg zei men dit ook over Trump en die heeft
intussen bewezen als totaal corrupt, oorlogszuchtig en ronduit imbeciel te kunnen blijven zitten, terwijl hij tegelijkertijd levensgevaarlijk is….. (sommige mensen vonden dat Trump zich tijdens de State of the Union als gewichtig staatsman presenteerde….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!)

State
Department Gets $40 Million to Fund New Propaganda Troll Farm

February
27, 2018 at 6:05 am

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

(ANTIWAR.COM— On
Monday, the US State Department announced that it had obtained $40
million from the Pentagon to fund a new propaganda and disinformation
campaign through the “
Global
Engagement Center.

While
the Global Engagement Center was initially conceived of as resisting
foreign propaganda efforts, the new funding is set to be invested in
going “on the offensive” in global propaganda war with America’s
own disinformation campaigns.

The
US, of course, is no stranger to engaging in overseas propaganda
efforts, but the inexorable nature of global information sharing in
the modern era means that such US propaganda always risks
misinforming the US public.

Congress
has approved the offensive on the grounds that it be used to “counter
Russia.” In practice, this likely means much of the funding will be
used to try to skew global perception of Russia even more hostile
than it already is.

Yet
setting up and funding this troll farm so publicly is highly risky,
both because the US has a history of laughingly embarrassing failures
in online narrative management, and because in publicly going after
Russia, they risk as strong backlash.

By Jason
Ditz
 /
Republished with permission / 
ANTIWAR.COM / Report
a typo


Zie ook: ‘Britse militaire geheime dienst bedient zich van moddergooien en andere manipulaties om Europese en VS politiek te manipuleren, zo blijkt uit gelekte documenten

       en: ‘Bedrijf dat voor ‘Russische bots’ waarschuwde, heeft een leger met nep-Russische bots

        en: ‘Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen

        en: ‘WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….
        en: ‘BBC World Service en BNR met ‘fake news’ over Ghouta……..

        en: ‘Massamedia VS vergeven van CIA ‘veteranen’, alsof die media nog niet genoeg ‘fake news’ ofwel leugens brengen……..

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

       en: Volkskrant en Nieuwsuur Fake News over ‘Russische hacks…..’

       en: ‘Fake News van CNN: ‘American Sniper gedood in Syrie….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: ‘BBC publieksmanipulatie via het nieuws: Rusland steunt de slechteriken……‘ (met daaronder meerdere links naar BBC propaganda berichten, dan wel berichten over die propaganda)

       en: ‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

       en: ‘Anti-Russische-Putin propaganda op Radio1, ofwel Godfroid uit de bocht met 10 km/u……..

       en: ‘BBC gaat met stafleden scholen af in de strijd tegen ‘fake news…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Trump administratie manipuleert de bevolking middels ‘fake news’ richting oorlog met Iran……………..

       en: ‘RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

       en: ‘Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!‘ (ja ook deze D66 plork gaat plat op de bek!)

       en: ‘Syrië: Vlaamse pater roept op niet langer de westerse anti-Syrië propaganda te geloven!

       en: ‘Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘MSM Create #Fakenews Storm As Rebel Aleppo Vanishes

       en: ‘‘BBC Propaganda’ ‘Ken Loach just proved beyond doubt that the BBC is brainwashing the British public’‘ [VIDEO] 

      en: ‘Fallujah en Aleppo, twee belegerde steden, een opvallend verschil in berichtgeving door de reguliere media………

    en: ‘Extracting Aleppo from the Propaganda: Interviewwith Eva Bartlett, an independent western journalists covering the horrific conflict in Syria‘. (van Information Clearing House, inclusief mogelijkheid tot vertaling)

      en: ‘CIA Chief Admits the Agency’s Role in the Syrian War‘ (de bloedige rol wel te verstaan…..) (een artikel met mogelijkheid tot vertaling)

     en: ‘Former UK Ambassador to Syria Debunks Aleppo Propaganda‘ (met mogelijkheid tot vertaling

        en: ‘Aleppo, de propagandaslag o.a. middels grove leugens in de reguliere westerse media en politiek………..

      en: ‘Iraakse strijdmacht gaf grif toe dat tot hun orders voor West-Mosul ook het vermoorden van vrouwen en kinderen behoorde……..

    en: ‘Raqqa >> BBC World Service en ‘onafhankelijke journalistiek’: ‘Er zijn veel burgers omgekomen bij de strijd in de straten in Raqqa……..’

      en: ‘Massamedium CBS (VS) tegen reality check. Logisch wel, gezien de hoeveelheid fake news op die zender…..


        en: ‘‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

BBC World Service en BNR met ‘fake news’ over Ghouta……..

Vanmorgen op BNR Bud Wiggers, de BNR correspondent voor Irak (voor deze keer aangekondigd als correspondent in Syrië) over de belegering van Oost-Ghouta. Uiteraard kwam de hele propaganda leugen weer voorbij, waarin Assad en zijn troepen werden afgeschilderd als moordenaars en waar in Ghouta zo te horen alleen nog burgers zijn…… (en niet de groepen, die NB de bevolking van Oost-Ghouta terroriseerden en terroriseren, terreurgroepen die bovendien beschietingen uitvoeren op andere delen van Ghouta en op Damascus….)

Wiggers had geen moeite met deze leugens en hij verzon er nog één bij: volgens hem heeft een groot deel van de bevolking in Ghouta al weken geen drinken en voedsel gezien………. Hoe komt deze fantast erbij (terwijl hij niet eens in Syrië laat staan in Ghouta is), immers een mens kan geen weken zonder vocht en voedsel en al zeker niet onder dergelijke traumatiserende omstandigheden………

In het BBC World Service radionieuws van 1.00 u. (CET) afgelopen nacht, het bericht dat Syrië en Rusland een vrijgeleide (corridor) hebben voorgesteld t.b.v. de burgers in Oost-Ghouta, waar de één of andere VN-trut durfde te stellen, dat mensen niet gedwongen moeten worden dat stadsdeel te verlaten….. Uiteraard doelde deze kwaadaardige hufter de familie van de terroristen (Al Qaida Syrië, al-Nusra en de White Helmets) die in Oost-Ghouta verblijven……

Zoals eerder in Oost-Aleppo willen juist de terreurgroepen niet, dat de burgers naar veilige gebieden worden overgebracht, men gebruikt ze als menselijk schild, waar men in het geval van Oost-Aleppo (en later in Raqqa en het Iraakse West-Mosul) zelfs mensen vermoordde, die gebruik durfden te maken van de door Syrië en Rusland ingestelde vluchtcorridors (in eerste instantie durfde men in de reguliere westerse media zelfs te beweren dat de Syriërs en Russen verantwoordelijk waren voor deze moorden, een leugen ofwel fake news van een heel smerig formaat…..)….

Daarover gesproken, dezelfde BBC World Service meldde zojuist dat het ingestelde staakt het vuren alweer is geschonden, ‘uiteraard’ door Rusland en Syrië, waarbij werd gesteld dat mensen die voor hulp hun huis of schuilkelder verlaten, worden neergeschoten door sluipschutters van het Syrische leger….. Dit terwijl het overgrote deel van Oost-Ghouta in handen is van terreurgroepen…… Je had waarschijnlijk al begrepen dat deze sluipschutters juist van die terreurgroepen zijn, zoals dit ook in Oost-Aleppo het geval was……… ‘Maakt niet uit’, de bedoeling is weer bereikt: Syrië en Rusland hebben de schuld alweer in de schoenen geschoven gekregen……

Nogmaals: voor al het nieuws dat uit Oost-Ghouta komt is geen bewijs en de ‘getuigenverslagen’ komen voor het grootste deel van de aanwezige terreurgroepen, o.a. verwoord door het SOHR (Syrian Observatory for Human Rights), een organisatie van een gevluchte Syrische misdadiger, die nauwe contacten heeft met de terreurgroepen in Oost-Ghouta……..

Zie voor de leugens die je op de mouw worden gespeld door de reguliere westerse media en het overgrote deel van de westerse politici, aangevuld met commentaar van zogenaamde deskundigen:

Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld

Zie ook: CNN en andere media met doorzichtige oorlogspropaganda tegen de Syrische regering

        en: ‘Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

        en: ‘Syrische nonnen spreken zich uit tegen de oorlogspropaganda van westerse mogendheden en de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

        en: ‘Ghouta: een gifgas false flag en VS chef Guterres eist staakt het vuren van pro-Syrische strijdgroepen op Oost-Ghouta……

        en: ‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

        en: ‘Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!

        en: ‘US Aggression in Syria – an Imperialist Blueprint

        en: ‘Foreign Ministry: Some Western officials are complicit in the crimes of terrorists against civilians in Damascus and its countryside

        en: ‘‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

        en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

        en: ‘Trumps buitenlandbeleid heeft de wereld naar de rand van WOIII gebracht…….

        en: ‘SOHR, het orgaan dat door de reguliere media wordt aangehaald i.z. Syrië, is gevestigd in Coventry

Ghouta: een gifgas false flag en VS chef Guterres eist staakt het vuren van pro-Syrische strijdgroepen op Oost-Ghouta……

Het BBC World Service radionieuws van 12.00 u. vanmiddag, meldde dat VN chef Antonio Guterres (zogenaamd een socialist) eist dat de pro-Syrische strijdgroepen onmiddellijk een staakt het vuren in acht nemen voor oost-Ghouta…..

Dezelfde Guterres smeekte de VS eerder te stoppen met de bombardementen op het Iraakse West-Mosul en het Syrische Raqqa, een smeekbede waar de VS weigerde op in te gaan…… Daarbij werd West-Mosul voor een groot deel platgebombardeerd en waarbij een enorm aantal burgers werd vermoord, deskundigen hebben het over veel meer dan 20.000 doden….. Het werkelijke aantal zal nooit bekend worden, daar de ‘Iraakse coalitie’ (o.l.v. de VS) na ‘de bevrijding’ onmiddellijk zijn begonnen met het bulldozeren van de ruïnes, zonder eerst de doden daaruit te halen….. Daarnaast verplicht de islam dat doden binnen 24 uur moeten worden begraven, dit in een chaotische oorlogssituatie, waardoor controle van het aantal vermoorde burgers uitermate moeilijk is vast te stellen….

Ook over de grote Turkse slachting in Syrië, een slachting op de Koerden in het grensgebied met Turkije, waar Turkije NB illegaal is binnengevallen, hoor je Guterres niet….. Volgens Turkije gaat het om YPG terroristen, dit terwijl de YPG tot nu toe nooit ook maar één aanslag heeft gepleegd in Turkije, het feit dat het om Koerden gaat is dan ook leidend voor de reli-fascistische dictatuur in Ankara…..

Voorts hoor je Guterres met geen woord over de beschietingen vanuit Oost-Ghouta op Damascus en op de stellingen van de pro-Syrische strijdgroepen…….

Waar Guterres al helemaal niet over spreekt, is de terreur waaronder het grootste deel van de burgers in Oost-Ghouta moeten leven, de terreur van Al Qaida Syrië, al-Nusra en hun kompanen in de strijd: de White Helmets.

WDR 5 meldde zojuist dat de pro-Syrische strijdgroepen gifgas (chlorine) zouden hebben ingezet, hierbij zou een baby zijn omgekomen en zouden meerdere gewonden zijn gevallen……. Eerder meldde Moon of Alabama al dat men bezig was een nieuwe ‘false flag’ operatie op te zetten, waarbij andermaal een gifgasaanval op de bevolking in de schoenen van het Syrische bewind zou worden geschoven……*

Al de gifgasaanvallen tot nu toe werden uitgevoerd door de terreurgroepen die in Syrië aanwezig zijn, zo blijkt uit onderzoek van de VN en zelfs de VS heeft toegegeven geen bewijzen te hebben dat Syrië gifgas heeft gebruikt tegen haar bevolking…..** Wel is bij zo ongeveer de hele wereld bekend dat de terreurgroepen in Syrië (in het westen aangeduid als ‘gematigde rebellen) over voorraden gifgas beschikken, waaronder chlorine, terwijl internationale wapeninspecteurs meermaals hebben gezegd dat het Syrische bewind geen voorraden gifgas meer bezit…….

Je snapt natuurlijk wel, dat de melding op WDR 5, de komende dagen het nieuws zal domineren, waarbij men fiks hysterisch naar Assad zal wijzen……. Een gifgasaanval waar zoals gewoonlijk als enige bronnen ‘bewoners’ van Ghouta (terroristen van Al Qaida, al-Nusra, White Helmets en een paar ‘burgers’, ofwel familie van de terroristen) en het SOHR werden genoemd…….. (SOHR is een organisatie van een gevluchte Syrische misdadiger, die zijn informatie NB haalt bij Al Qaida, al-Nusra, White Helmets en andere terreurgroepen….)……

*  Zie: ‘Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

** Zie: ‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

Zie ook: ‘Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld

        en: ‘Rusland beschuldigd GB van het regisseren gifgasaanval Douma en zegt daar bewijzen voor te hebben‘ (klik ook op de links in dat bericht)

        en: ‘US Aggression in Syria – an Imperialist Blueprint

        en: ‘Foreign Ministry: Some Western officials are complicit in the crimes of terrorists against civilians in Damascus and its countryside

        en: ‘BBC World Service en BNR met ‘fake news’ over Ghouta……..

        en: ‘‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

        en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

       en: ‘Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!

       en: ‘Nieuwe ‘as van kwaad’:VS, GB en Frankrijk uit op oorlog met Syrië en Noord-Korea……..

       en: ‘Rusland voorspelde ‘de gifgasaanval’ in Oost-Ghouta en de reactie daarop van de VS…..

Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld

Alweer dagenlang worden we in het westen voorgelogen over wat er in Ghouta, Syrië gebeurt. De kroon op het gebied van valse voorlichting is weer eens weggelegd voor de BBC World Service radio, een station met ongelofelijk veel luisteraars…..

Afgelopen dinsdag was het de hele dag door anti-Syrie,uh ik bedoel anti-Assad propaganda-bal op de BBC W.S. Oost-Ghouta zou het volgende doelwit zijn van het ‘perfide’ Syrische bewind.

De bronnen voor al deze ongecontroleerde beweringen waren vertegenwoordigers van de aanwezige terreurgroepen in Oost-Ghouta, Al Qaida Syrië (door de VS van de terreurlijst gehaald), al-Nusra een zusterorganisatie van deze psychopaten, de White Helmets, een ondersteunende terreurgroep van al-Nusra en Al Qaida (met hoorspel) en SOHR, het Syrian Observatory voor Human Rights, een organisatie van een gevluchte Syrische misdadiger, gehuisvest in Engeland en ondersteund door de Britse overheid. En wie citeerde de SOHR? Precies al de hiervoor genoemde groepen!!

Oh, vergeet ik nog één heel belangrijke bron: een correspondent (v) van de BBC in Beiroet Libanon……. Deze dame had net zo goed haar verslag vanuit Londen kunnen doen…….

De redactie maakte overigens een kapitale fout, daar in één geluidsfragment een man was te horen, die stelde te hopen dat Oost-Ghouta snel bevrijd zou worden door de reguliere Syrische troepen, daar hij de terreur in zijn stad meer dan zat was!!

Daarover gesproken: men weet NB in het westen om welke terreurgroepen het gaat in Oost-Ghouta en men weet dat deze uiterst gewelddadig optreden tegen de bevolking, waarbij gelovigen van het verkeerde geloof of richting met een ‘een beetje geluk’ worden vermoord……… Waar halen de politici en de reguliere media het lef vandaan zo keihard te liegen, en dat door media en politici die de vuilbek vol hebben van ‘fake news’ (of nepnieuws, wat je wilt)……..

Men durft zelfs de bevrijding van Oost-Aleppo aan te halen als voorbeeld voor de slachting in Ghouta. Terwijl er in vergelijking bij de ‘bevrijding’ van West-Mosul door ‘de Iraakse coalitie (o.l.v. de VS) in Irak enorm veel meer doden vielen dan in Oost-Aleppo….. Zo besloten Syrië en Rusland al twee maanden voor de bevrijding van Oost-Aleppo te stoppen met bombardementen om zo burgerslachtoffers te voorkomen, iets waar men in het westen niet over repte……… In West-Mosul ging de VS gewoon door met bombarderen, ondanks meerdere smeekbedes van de VN….. Ook daar was geen belangstelling voor bij de reguliere westerse media en de meeste westerse politici……..

Er werd bij de BBC op die dag zelfs gesteld dat Aleppo ontvolkt is en de burgers zijn gevlucht naar het buitenland, echter na de bevrijding van IS en andere terreurgroepen door het Syrische leger*, trokken de gevluchte burgers in grote getale terug naar de stad………… (niet voor niets ook, dat Assad in 2014 met een grote meerderheid van stemmen werd verkozen tot president, onder zijn beheer was er vrede tussen de verschillende geloven…….)

Verder werden nog opnamen ten gehore gebracht ‘uit een ziekenhuis’, waar de microfoon vlak voor een huilende baby werd gehouden, uiteraard met het commentaar dat ‘Assads troepen’ expres dit ‘kinderziekenhuis’ had aangevallen…. De opnamen kwamen niet van een oorlogscorrespondent maar van de White Helmets, opnamen die men overal in elkaar kan zetten en daar zijn de White Helmets goed in……..

Een ‘hulporganisatie’ uit de VS stelde dat het Syrische bewind elke 24 uur een ziekenhuis bombardeert, dit bericht was te horen op WDR 5………

Het was overigens op de Nederlandse, Franse en Belgische radio al niets beter gesteld met de berichtgeving, walgelijk!

Zoals je zal begrijpen en/of zal hebben vernomen, wordt er met geen woord gerept over de beschietingen door Al Qaida met o.a. raketten en mortiergranaten vanuit Oost-Ghouta op woonwijken in het westen van Ghouta en Damascus; ach als daar slachtoffers bij vallen, inclusief baby’s en oudere kinderen, een kniesoor die daar op let……. Ik vraag me gvd af, waarom Nederlandse jihadstrijders en hun aanhang hier worden vervolgd, als je de politici en media over de situatie in Oost-Ghouta moet geloven, zijn het minstens helden!!

Vreemd is het ontbreken van berichtgeving over de slachtingen die Turkije aanricht in Syrië, blijkbaar is dat ook al niet niet belangrijk, terwijl dit land zich voor de zoveelste keer illegaal op Syrisch grondgebied bevindt, zoals ook de VS en het overgrote deel van de ‘gematigde terreurgroepen’ zich illegaal op Syrische bodem bevinden………

Dan durven landen als de VS, Frankrijk en Israël, die NB Syrië illegaal bombarderen en waar de eerste zich NB illegaal op Syrische bodem bevindt, Iran en Rusland te manen zich uit Syrië terug te trekken, terwijl die zich nu juist volkomen legaal op Syrische bodem bevinden….. Over de VS en Israël gesproken: de aanvallen van deze landen op het Syrische leger zijn als je die analyseert, gericht op het beschermen van terreurgroepen (zo werkt de VS o.a. samen met ‘Al Qaida Syrië….’)

Overigens werd er in Ghouta zogenaamd een gifaanval uitgevoerd in 2013, volgens het westers anti-Syrisch/Russisch propagandatuig, begaan door Assad, een aanval die later na VN onderzoek (zoals daarna keer op keer) aan terreurgroepen werd toegeschreven; valt me nog mee dat men deze ‘hoax’ niet nog een keer van stal haalde……..

Gisteren werd bekend gemaakt dat de Veiligheidsraad van de VN zich voltallig achter een staakt het vuren in Syrië heeft gesteld…… Het is duidelijk dat het Rusland en China dun door de broek loopt….. Ongelofelijk!

Eén ding is zeker: alle ellende in Syrië is te danken aan de VS, dat al vanaf 2006 bezig was met het organiseren van een opstand tegen Assad, waar het einddoel was een staatsgreep tegen Assad uit te lokken…. De redenen daarvoor: o.a. de weigering van Syrië een pijpleiding voor gas vanuit de Golfstaten richting Europa door Syrië toe te staan en natuurlijk de vriendelijke relaties van het regime Assad met Iran…….

Conclusie: alweer worden we zwaar besodemieterd!!

* Het Syrische leger dat door gelovigen van verschillende religies, hand in hand, werd verwelkomd)

Zie ook: CNN en andere media met doorzichtige oorlogspropaganda tegen de Syrische regering

        en: ‘Trumps buitenlandbeleid heeft de wereld naar de rand van WOIII gebracht…….

        en: ‘US Aggression in Syria – an Imperialist Blueprint

        en: ‘Foreign Ministry: Some Western officials are complicit in the crimes of terrorists against civilians in Damascus and its countryside

        en: ‘Syrische nonnen spreken zich uit tegen de oorlogspropaganda van westerse mogendheden en de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

        en: ‘Ghouta: een gifgas false flag en VS chef Guterres eist staakt het vuren van pro-Syrische strijdgroepen op Oost-Ghouta……

        en: ‘Goutha haalt de koppen, terwijl de VS Jemen volpropt met wapens t.g.v. de genocide uitgevoerd door Saoedische coalitie……..

        en: ‘BBC World Service en BNR met ‘fake news’ over Ghouta……..

        en: ‘Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

        en: ‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

        en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

        en: ‘Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!

        en: ‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

         en: ‘SOHR, het orgaan dat door de reguliere media wordt aangehaald i.z. Syrië, is gevestigd in Coventry

PS: het aantal doden in het Iraakse West-Mosul overtreft het aantal doden dat in Oost-Aleppo en andere Syrische steden viel bij bevrijding door het reguliere Syrische leger……. Zelfs dat feit is geen reden voor de reguliere westerse media en politici in te binden met hun blinde kritiek op Syrië…… Voorts is het een normale zaak, dat een soeverein land het eigen grondgebied bevrijd van terreur, stel je iets dergelijks voor in Nederland……….

Beste bezoeker, dat was het voor deze dag, probeer er ondanks alle ellende een mooie dag van te maken, het weer werkt daar gelukkig wel aan mee.

Muellers onzinnige beschuldiging die Russiagate zou bewijzen……..

Muellers ‘troll farm’ verhaal ronduit waanzinnig………

Het is werkelijk om schijtziek van te
worden: de pogingen in de VS (en de rest van het westen) om Rusland te demoniseren en het verlies
van de presidentsverkiezingen door hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton te
wijten aan Russische manipulaties.

Voor al die claims is nul komma nada
bewijs, maar de VS en haar hielenlikkende oorlogshonden van de NAVO
houden deze leugens in de lucht, dit gesteund door de reguliere
media, die NB bijna dagelijks schrijven over ‘fake news’, terwijl
deze media verreweg de grootste leveranciers van dit nepnieuws
zijn…….

De vooralsnog laatste bladzijde in de
wrange komedie werd geschreven door oud-FBI directeur Robert
Mueller…….

Lees hoe David Stockman uitgebreid
gehakt maakt van het ‘troll farm verhaal’. (let op, sommige delen zijn dusdanig komisch dat je op moet passen er niet in te blijven):

Mueller’s
Comic Book Indictment: How to Prosecute A Great Big Nothingburger

By
David Stockman

February
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – We have always heard that a
determined government prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, and now
we know it’s true. After 38 years in the prosecution racket, Robert
Mueller just made his biggest score ever—that is, he nailed
a great big Nothingburger.


But
he also did a lot more than that. Mueller’s 37-page comic book
indictment actually unmasks—inadvertently to be
sure—the 
distinctly
un-terrifying essence
 of
the whole Russian meddling narrative. In fact, the crude social media
emissions (ads and posts) of the so-called troll farm were
generally lame, often laughable and sometimes downright
ludicrous as per this gem cited by Mueller:

a.
On or about October 16, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the ORGANIZATION-controlled Instagram account “Woke Blacks”
to post the following message: 
“[A]
particular hype and hatred for Trump is misleading the people and
forcing Blacks to vote Killary. We cannot resort to the lesser of two
devils. Then we’d surely be better off without voting AT ALL.”

Notwithstanding
the grave nomenclature of BLOCK CAPITALS, endless sinister “on
or about” events and 99 numbered paragraphs of
particulars, the true bill (charging document) is actually just a
random catalogue of social media trivia like the above “Woke
Blacks” post.

Most
of the cited gleanings amounted to crude word bombs, often in
broken English, that presumably even Kim Kardashian’s 59 million
Twitter followers could see through.

“Hillary
is a Satan, and her crimes and lies
 had proved
just how evil she is”

The
lion’s share of these postings and ads probably disappeared into
cyberspace like the sound of a falling tree in an empty
forest, anyway. According to Facebook itself, the seemingly
ubiquitous social media ad campaign despicted in the indictment
was nothing of the kind. It actually amounted to
just 
3,000 placements
at a cost of 
$100,000—more
than half of which were purchased after the election,
and 
25% of
which ended-up in its dead letter office (unread).

Likewise, the
handful of efforts to actually stimulate pro-Trump rallies in
Florida and elsewhere were abject failures. As we document
below, the Russians had absolutely no “ground game” in the
US and any third-rate campaign consultant will tell you that ads
alone do not produce crowds. In fact, there is virtually no evidence
that anyone showed up at the rallies cited by Mueller.

Besides,
the overwhelming share of the pro-Trump social media postings
uncovered by Mueller’s sleuths amounted to “copy and paste”
relays of current partisan talking points. Thus, the
indictment cites such slogans as:

           “Vote
Republican, vote Trump, and support the Second Amendment!”.

“Trump
is our only hope for a better future!”

“Donald
wants to defeat terrorism… Hillary wants to sponsor it”

Really?

It
took a clandestine nest of Russkie imposters and subversives to
pollute the social media with this kind of tripe?


In
fact, RNC, Fox News and the Trump campaign were
already saturating the internet with these messages,
anyway—-along with millions of pro-Trump social medi activists.  T
he 80 Russian operatives
cited by Mueller didn’t add one damn bit to the massive social media
messaging that was already out there.

So
here’s the joker in the whole deck. It seems that the
nefarious”troll farm” in St. Petersburg that comprises
nearly the totality of Mueller’s case is not a Russian
intelligence agency operation at all.


Instead,
it’s the relatively harmless Hobby Farm of a fanatical
Russian oligarch and ultra-nationalist, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who
has a great big beef against Imperial Washington’s demonization
of Russia and Vlad Putin. Apparently, the farm
 was (it’s
apparently being disbanded) the vehicle through which he gave
Washington the middle finger and buttered up his patron.

Prigozhin
is otherwise known as “Putin’s Cook” because he made his
fortune in St. Petersburg restaurants that Putin favored and via
state funded food service operations at Russian schools and military
installations. Like most Russian oligarchs not in jail, he
apparently tithes in gratitude to the Kremlin: In this
case, by bankrolling the rinky-dink operation at 55
Savushkina Street in St Petersburg that is the object of Mueller’s
pretentious foray into the flotsam and jetsam of social media
low life.

Prigozhin’s
trolling farm is grandly called the Internet Research Agency
(IRA), but what it actually does is hire (apparently) unemployed
20-somethings at $4-8 per hour to pound out
ham-handed political messaging on social media sites like
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube etc. They bang away twelve
hours at a shift on a quota-driven
paint-by-the-internet-numbers basis where their output is rated for
engagements, likes, retweets etc.


Whatever
these keyboard drones might be, they are not professional Russian
intel operators
. And
the collection of broken English postings strewn throughout the
indictment are not one bit scary.


Indeed,
the utterly stupid naiveté of the whole St.
Petersburg operation is crystalized by this episode when the
farm purportedly garnered some startling political insight from
an unwitting Trump campaign official in Texas:

80.
On or about August 19, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the false U.S. persona “Matt Skiber” account to write
to the real U.S. person affiliated with a Texas-based grassroots
organization who previously had advised the false persona to focus
on 
“purple
states like Colorado, Virginia & Florida
.”
Defendants and their co-conspirators told that U.S. person, 
We
were thinking about your recommendation to focus on purple states and
this is what we’re organizing in FL.”

Jez
Louise and goodness gracious, too. Who coulda thunk as early
as August that Colorado, Virginia and Florida would be swing
states!


In
any event, even Mueller’s indictment proves that the farm was
strictly amateurville. None of the other 12 Russians charged
has an intelligence background, either.

Thus,
the CEO is a retired St. Petersburg police officer. The
executive director is a 31-year old website developer and
internet PR promoter who previously had garnered small beans
contracts ($4k-20k each) from St. Petersburg agencies to publish
municipal newspapers, make video reports about their activities or
promote local programs such as one on “tolerance and
prevention of drug addiction”.


Likewise,
two more of the operatives were graduates students in IT and
advertising at St. Petersburg universities.

Then
there is the husband/wife duo, Maria and Robert Bovda, who were
the original heads of the US focused “translator project”.
Both were recent graduates in psychology from local
universities, where Robert’s 2011 thesis had been on
“The Effects of Social-Support Conditions On
Loneliness As Experienced By the Elderly”.


We can’t
help but think they had not yet become hardened spies when
the joined IRA in November 2013 and apparently 
left
in October 2014
. Whatever
they did during their tenure at the farm, cooking up ways to
help Donald Trump’s not yet announced campaign was surely
not among them, but still apparently enough to help fill out
Mueller’s indictment roster.

             Maria Bovda was the 'head' of the translator project, the designated branch of the wider pro-Putin effort which focused on US audiences. She worked there between November 2013 and October 2014
Her husband Robert acted beneath her as the second in charge of the 'translator' project and worked at the company over the same dates. He too is accused of trying to enter the US under false pretenses to collect information but he did not obtain a visa and could not make the trip


Another
was Dzheykhun Aslanov, who was head of the “American department”
and had graduated in 2012 from the Russian State Hydrometeorological
University in St. Petersburg. He had studied economics
and 
wildlife
management!

Likewise,
nowhere in the entire 37 pages is there even a clause linking
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm to the SVR (foreign intelligence service), the
FSB (counter-intelligence and anti-terrorism), the GRU (military
intelligence service), any other agency of the Russian State—-or
even some purported Kremlin back channel to Putin.

Yet
there is every reason to believe that the entire Russian meddling
narrative cooked up by the partisan hacks in Obama’s inner
circle—-John Brennan, Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes—-was based on the
amateurish machinations originating in the nondescript building
pictured below.

As
we will show, the Hobby Farm was no Russian state secret
or clandestine vehicle of its intelligence community. To the
contrary, it had been fully covered in the Russian press for
years as one of numerous such oligarch funded projects designed
to glorify the Putin regime and vilify the Russian opposition.


It
had also been the subject of a lengthy expose in 
The
Guardian
 
of
London, as well as other western media. Even Radio Free Europe
had done a lengthy profile.


All
of this had happened long before Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm
had turned its attentions to US politics. Indeed, the IRA’s
pivot to the US in April 2014 occurred well before Trump’s
candidacy was gleam in anyone’s eye except his own, but 
after a
seminal event had occurred which Mueller’s comic book
narrative completely ignores.


To
wit, what apparently riled up Prigozhin was Washington’s
heavy-handed meddling in the politics of Ukraine during the US
funded and enabled coup on the streets of Kiev in February 2014.

Never
mind that the incumbent pro-Russian government had come to power in
an honest election and had chosen to take a more
attractive economic deal from Moscow than was being offered
by the West. 

Also ignore that fact that Ukraine was Russia’s
next door neighbor and had been an essential element of Greater
Russia—sometimes a full fledged constituent state—for more
than 700 years.

Likewise,
when Crimea elected by 90% referendum vote to “rejoin”
Russia, it didn’t happen at gunpoint. Crimea is 85% Russian and
had been an integral part of the Russian state ever since it
was purchased from the Turks by Catherine the Great for
good money in 1783.

Thereafter,
its major port city of Sevastopol had functioned as the homeport
for Russia’s Black Sea fleet under Czars and Commissars alike.
The only real reason it needed to “rejoin” Russia in March
2014 was because the Ukrainian tyrant who ruled the Soviet Union in
the 1950s, Nikita Khrushchev, had gifted it to his
Ukrainian compatriots during a drunken celebration of his
victory over two deadly rivals who also claimed Stalin’s succession.

Indeed,
when Obama’s neocon Assistant Secretary for European Affairs,
Victoria Nuland, was caught telling the American ambassador in Kiev
that “Yats is the guy” with respect to the new Washington
designated leader of the post-coup government and joined a
chorus of Washington-based vilification of Putin and the Russian
government, the die was cast.

Russian
nationalists like Prigozhin were not going to take it lying down. As
we document below, then and there he began to shift some of the
activities of his trolling farm toward the US.

It amounted
to a tit-for-tat response to the anti-Russian propaganda emanating
from the Washington funded NGOs in Kiev; and also from outright
government agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy
and Radio Free Europe, as well as the Deep State
subservient operations of CNN and its print media imitators.

That
shift was described as the “translator project” by
Mueller’s historically ignorant lawyers. The implication was that out
of sheer aggression the Kremlin had unilaterally decided to
attack America’s democratic process through the IRA.

In
fact, the overwhelming likelihood is that an arriviste
Russian billionaire got a bee in his bonnet after Washington’s
Ukrainian coup–and then went to town on America with his trolling
farm exactly as he and many others had been doing in internal
Russian politics for years.

From
the point of view of US/Russian relations and world peace, however,
the re-direction of activity at Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm could
not have come at a worse time. Its wholly open and widely known
operations permitted Obama’s hatchet-people to quickly seize
on the IRA’s new theatre of focus as evidence of a
massive Russian attack on America’s election process, thereby turning
a molehill into a mountain.

At
length, the partisan leaders of Obama’s national security team,
led by the detestable John Brennan at the
CIA, selectively coopted and abused the resources and
credibility of the vast US intelligence apparatus to put the
imprimatur of a national security threat upon what was in fact
a scary bedtime story of no real significance. That effort
culminated in the phony intelligence assessment published
by four US intel agencies in January 2017 based on the work
of Brennan’s “hand-picked” accomplices.

In
what is surely a fabulous irony, therefore, the Internet
Research Agency amounts to a reverse Potemkin Village. It wasn’t
much to look at and was nothing to worry about until Obama’s
national security posse falsely embellished it’s innocuous
façade into a mortal threat to American democracy and national
security.

And
then Robert Mueller brought in his gang of copywriters and
illustrators to turn this entire tall tale into CNN-ready “news”.

We
will demonstrate below that what happened in this building was a
complete farce and posed no threat to the security and liberty of the
American people whatsoever; nor did it even remotely impact the 2016
election process.


But
with his comic book indictment, Robert Mueller has actually made
himself a mortal threat to America’s democracy and national security
.
That’s because his indictment is unleashing a rabid
anti-Russian mania in the Democratic party and turning flaming
liberals and leftwing progressives, who used to form the backbone of
the peace party in America, into outright war-mongers.

The
Donald tweeted over the weekend about Moscow “laughing its ass
off”  about the Mueller indictment, but we think he
missed the mark. It is the Deep State on the banks of the Potomac
that is bursting with glee—literally licking its collective
chops— about the endless budget boondoggles now assured to be 

coming its way.


The
neocons and military/industrial complex had already
taken control of the GOP lock, stock and barrel. Then,
his campaign rhetoric about “America First”
notwithstanding, Trump abdicated to his empire-minded generals
in order to concentrate on his Twitter account. And now in the
wake of the RussiaGate hysteria being given a powerful new
boost from Mueller’s comic book, the Dems are lining up to say
we will see your 
$700
billion
 budget
and crank it up from there.


The
truth is, there is a screaming fiscal crisis coming hard upon
Imperial Washington. That’s owing to the 
$15
trillion
 of
new deficits that are now built-in for the next decade—at the very
time when the Fed has shut down is massive bond-buying
experiment and the Baby Boom is hitting the social security and
medicare rolls in droves.

Absent
the RussiaGate hoax and the Dems descent into mindless, anti-Putin
hysteria, there would have been a moment of maximum danger for
the Deep State’s hideously inflated military, intelligence and
surveillance operations. In the coming battle against fiscal
collapse, they surely would have been on the fiscal chopping
block like at no time since the aftermath of Vietnam in the 1970s.

But rescue
is now at hand. The Dems have been shell-shocked ever
since the evening of November 8, 2016, and have worked
themselves into deliriums about how it was all a big mistake
enabled by Russian meddling and collusion with the Trump
campaign.

To
a substantial degree, however, those narratives were on their last
legs until the Mueller indictment came along. For anyone who takes
the trouble to read it, of course, it’s just a potpourri of
nonsense, marginalia and irrelevance.

But
the Dems had already gone brain dead on the RussiaGate matter—so
they are now greeting it as a “blockbuster”, as
are the talking heads of CNN and the mainstream media. Consequently,
the drivel that came out of the building pictured below is being
taken as evidence of a far-reaching attack on America that
even rivals Pearl Harbor. As Pat Buchanan noted:

          This
Russian troll farm is “the equivalent (of) Pearl Harbor,”
says Cong. Jerrold Nadler, who would            head up the House Judiciary
Committee, handling any impeachment, if Democrats retake the                    House.

When
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes pressed, Nadler doubled down: The Russians “are
destroying our democratic process.” While the Russian trolling
may not equal Pearl Harbor in its violence, said Nadler, in its
“seriousness, it is very much on a par” with Japan’s
surprise attack.

That’s
right. But unlike the vast Japanese naval armada that stealthily
steamed toward Hawaii in early December 1941, the Facebook
cyber-missiles that allegedly hit America in 2016 came out of
this little joint hiding in plain sight:

55 Savushkina Street, St Petersburg, said to be the headquarters of Russia’s ‘troll army’

So
let’s return to the fact that Prigozhin’s troll farm
doesn’t really look much different than countless others that dot the
Russian internet landscape, and which mushroomed after 2011 in
support of the Putin-ified Russian state and the crony
capitalist economy it shepherds.


New
Yorker
 piece
published by journalist Adrian Chen, no fan of Donald Trump, in
late July 2016 explains about as well as any where the Internet
Research Agency came from:

           The
(Internet Research Agency) has been widely reported in Russian
media to be the brainchild                of Evgeny Prigozhin, an oligarch and ally
of Vladimir Putin. At the time, it employed hundreds of                Russians in a
nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, where they produced
blog posts,                      comments, infographics, and viral videos that pushed the
Kremlin’s narrative on both the Russian              and English Internet.

The
agency is what is known in Russia as a “troll farm,” a nickname
given to outfits that operate armies of sock-puppet social-media
accounts, in order to create the illusion of a rabid grass-roots
movement. Trolling has become a key tool in a comprehensive effort by
Russian authorities to rein in a previously freewheeling Internet
culture, after huge anti-Putin protests in 2011 were organized
largely over social media. It is used by Kremlin apparatchiks at
every level of government in Russia; wherever politics are discussed
online, one can expect a flood of comments from paid trolls.

The
real effect, the Russian activists told me, was not to brainwash
readers but to overwhelm social media with a flood of fake
content, 
seeding
doubt and paranoia, and destroying the possibility of using the
Internet as a democratic space…..

…….toward
the end of last year (2015) I noticed something interesting:
many had begun to promote right-wing news outlets, portraying
themselves as conservative voters who were, increasingly, fans of
Donald Trump. Exposure to even small amounts of Russian politics can
induce severe bouts of paranoia and conspiracy-minded thinking, and
it seemed logical to me that this new pro-Trump bent might well be an
attempt by the agency to undermine the U.S. by helping to elect a
racist reality-show star as our Commander-in-Chief. At the time, I
found it funny. 
The
agency was a well-funded but often hapless operation—it created a
cartoon character that was a giant buttocks to spread anti-Obama
propaganda, for example—and this seemed like another of its
far-fetched schemes to poison the Internet.

In
fact, it was. How it became a fearsome Russian intel operation was
entirely due to what happened in Washington DC, not St. Petersburg
or the Kremlin, for that matter.

That
is, in the summer of 2016, when the Obama inner circle and the
Deep State national security establishment alike suddenly were
confronted with the theretofore unthinkable prospect that Donald
Trump might actually be elected US President, they literally
transformed the Hobby Farm of a second tier
Russian oligarch into monumental threat to American
democracy.

And
that took some doing because Prigozhin was essentially a nobody
in the great scheme of national security. Unlike Putin, who cut
his eyeteeth in the old Soviet era KGB, Prigozhin had fancied himself
a ski racer as a privileged young man in a Soviet boarding school.
Failing to make the grade on the slopes, however, he had
subsequently pursued various petty criminal schemes that
landed him nine years in a Soviet prison during the latter’s
dying days.

But
timing is everything—-so when he opened a hot dog stand from
his mother’s kitchen in newly liberated St. Petersburg in the
early 1990s his entprenurial talents in the culinary field
self-evidently flourished. Soon he branched into
convenience stores and then in 1996 into a swank restaurant
(Staraya Tamozhnya or “The Old Customs House”) that
catered to newly monied Russian who were looking for “more than
cutlets with Vodka”.

At
length, a strategic $400k investment in a rusting harbor boat
was turned into a floating hot spot called “The New Island
Restaurant”. From there flowed catering contracts
for lavish state banquets after he gained the
gastronomical favor of the post-Soviet St. Petersburg
political operative, who became prime minister of Russia.


Putin held lavish
state dinners on Prigozhin’s floating emporium, where
he played host to world leaders like George W. Bush and Jacques
Chirac. He also apparently heaped business into Prigozhin’s budding
empire with a $177 million catering contract with Moscow’s schools,
and then the real jackpot: A two year contract in 2012 worth
more than 
$1.6
billion
 to
supply 90% of all food orders to Russian soldiers.

Folks,
that’s where the troll factory came from. It opened the
next year in 2013 as the kind of token of appreciation expected
from oligarchs favored by the Russian state.

Still,
it wasn’t the KGB incarnate—just a tweet-by-the-numbers body
shop designed to flood Russian media and internet
forums with messages extolling Russian greatness, the iniquities and
hypocrisies of the morally corrupt West and the glorious
works of Vlad Putin.


At
this stage the troll farm was involved in strictly Russian
business—-the handiwork of an oligarch who had thrived on Russia’s
particular brand of crony capitalism and was more than happy to shill
for his patron in the Kremlin.


Here
is how the previously referenced 
Guardian
article from mid-2015 described the farm before some of its
modest resources were later shifted to the “American
Department” in 2016:

          Just
after 9pm each day, a long line of workers files out of 55 Savushkina
Street, a modern four-                storey office complex with a small sign outside
that reads “Business centre”. Having spent 12                    hours in the
building, the workers are replaced by another large group, who will
work through the              night.

They
painted a picture of a work environment that was humourless and
draconian, with fines for being a few minutes late or not reaching
the required number of posts each day. Trolls worked in rooms of
about 20 people, each controlled by three editors, who would check
posts and impose fines if they found the words had been cut and
pasted, or were ideologically deviant.

The
LiveJournal blogger, who spent two months working at the centre until
mid-March, said she was paid 45,000 roubles ($790) a month, to run a
number of accounts on the site.

We
had to write ‘ordinary posts’, about 
making
cakes or music tracks
 we
liked, but then every now and then throw in a
 political
post
 about
how the Kiev government is fascist, or that sort of thing,” she
said.

Scrolling
through one of the LiveJournal accounts she ran, the pattern is
clear. There are posts about “Europe’s 20 most beautiful castles”
and “signs that show you are dating the wrong girl”, interspersed
with political posts about 
Ukraine or
suggesting that the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny is
corrupt.

The
desired conclusion of one reads: “The majority of experts agree
that the US is deliberately trying to weaken Russia, and Ukraine is
being used only as a way to achieve this goal. If the Ukrainian
people had not panicked and backed a coup, the west would have found
another way to pressure Russia. But our country is not going to go
ahead with the US plans, and we will fight for our sovereignty on the
international stage.”

To
add colour to their posts, websites have been set up to aid the troll
army. One features 
thousands
of pasteable images
,
mainly of European leaders in humiliating photoshopped incidents or
with captions pointing out their weakness and stupidity, or showing
Putin making hilarious wisecracks and winning the day.

When
I got the job there in 2013 it was a small building, I was working in
the basement, and it was clear they didn’t have enough space,”
said Andrei Soshnikov, a St Petersburg journalist who infiltrated the
company two years ago and has continued to cover it. 
He
linked the move to a much bigger office with increased online
activity around the Ukraine crisis….

As
we explained above, it was only after Washington massively
intervened in the domestic politics of Ukraine in February 2104 that
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm branched into external operations
focused on Russian adversaries like the new anti-Russian Ukrainian
government and the United States.


Even
then, however, the main stream media headline writers, who
have been intellectually lobotomized by a constant diet of
anti-Russian mania, cannot seem to grasp that their hyperbolic
headlines are in no way, shape or form supported by the actual
written words in Mueller’s indictment.


In
a word, 
eighty twenty-somethings
sitting cheek-by-jowl at banks of computer screens and banging out
social media tripe in English as a (third) language did not
impact anything in America, let alone the 2016 election outcome.


That
is to say, what in the world is so hard to understand about the fact
that the pathetic output of this group could not have amounted
to 
0.000001% of
the content that rumbled through these social media channels
during 2016?


Yet
here is Mueller—writing in indictment black and
white—admitting that the troll farm had deployed precious few
trolls to the American department:

“spread
(ing) distrust towards the candidates and the political
system in general…..By approximately July 2016, more
than 
eighty
ORGANIZATION employees
 were
assigned to the translator project”.

Besides
the infinitesimal volume and generally crude and unoriginal nature of
the troll farm’s output, this tiny 80-person contingent points to
another huge flaw in the entire Mueller narrative—especially
as it has been embellished and exaggerated by the main stream media
since last Friday afternoon. To wit, all of these posts were destined
to get lost in the vast sea of cyberspace without a 
ground
game
 in
the US.


Yet
the indictment is clear on that crucial point as well.
The Russian meddlers had “no ground game”
whatsoever aside from a 22 day visit in June 2014 by two
operatives who were not trained spies and who had apparently
never even been to America previously.


Yet
they visited nine states during that brief interval and
thereby “cased-out” the entirety of the American
electoral scene:

Only
KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA received visas, and from approximately June 4,
2014 through June 26, 2014, KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA traveled in and
around the United States, including stops in Nevada, California, New
Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Louisiana, Texas, and New York
to gather intelligence. After the trip, KRYLOVA and BURCHIK exchanged
an intelligence report regarding the trip.

The
above paragraph is itself a smoking bratwurst!


Aside
from sleeping, passing through countless airports, checking into a
dozen or more hotels and 

perhaps visiting the chamber of Commerce in
Dallas or Denver, what possibly could these two travelers have done
to lay the groundwork for “influencing” 133
million voters two years hence?


Mueller
doesn’t say and the talking heads jabber on about this trip as
if it were some kind of invasion, not the
pointless needle-in-the-haystack type of undertaking that it
actually was.


And
that gets us to the ballyhooed efforts to organize and promote Trump
rallies in Florida, Washington DC, New York City and elsewhere. Once
again, however, Mueller spills large amounts of ink citing the emails
and social media posts that describe the aims of these long-distance
media trolls. But there is not a shred of evidence presented
about what actually happened on the ground.


We
would be so bold as to suggest that we know why Mueller didn’t
document this core element of the alleged meddling campaign.
Namely, because nobody came to the rallies and flash mob events
called for by the keyboard jockeys in St. Petersburg.


Take
the case of the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies on August 20,
which the indictment dwells on at length. So doing, it purports to
explain how real Trump supporters in the state were duped into
cooperating, how bloggers back in Russia used social media posts to
promote 13 rallies across the state of Florida and bought ads to the
same end on Facebook.


In
fact, compared to fleeting references with respect to similar rallies
allegedly staged in Washington DC and New York City, the Florida
rallies take up far more ink in the indictment and come across as
exhibit #1  on Russia ground game in the US election
process.


Indeed,
the liberal hatch-people at 
Politico made
the singular importance of the Florida meddling operation
abundantly clear:

But
the document makes clear that the operation in Florida, the nation’s
largest swing state, was in a class by itself. The indictment is
packed with details of how Russian nationals duped Donald Trump
campaign volunteers and grass-roots organizations in Florida into
holding rallies they organized and helped fund with foreign cash.

Here’s
the problem. There seems to be scant evidence that these rallies
actually happened or that anyone showed up to the ones that did
occur. For instance, here is a photo of one in St. Petersburg
(Florida) posted on social media at the time.


We
doubt whether Vlad got his money’s worth on this one:

ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Then
there’s the case of Jim Frishe of Clearwater, Florida. He was a
real estate development consultant and candidate for county
office, who organized a sign-waving event in response to the Russian
entreaties that attracted barely a dozen people:

           Frishe,
68, said he was called by someone identifying themselves as with a
group called                 “Florida for Trump” and asked to organize a
sign-waving rally. He said between 15 and 18               people showed up and
that he didn’t receive any signs or money or other support. He                     never heard from them again.

“I
was going to do what I was going to do anyway. I was a Trump
supporter, they didn’t convince me”.

Then
there is the case of the “Hillary in stripes” caper
allegedly promoted by the Russians. According to the indictment:

           For
example, defendants and their co-conspirators asked one U.S. person
to build a cage on on               a flatbed truck … and another U.S. person to
wear a costume portraying Clinton in a prison                       uniform,”

The
thing is, the main evidence for that is that the “cage”
appeared about a month later as the handiwork of a Trump supporter,
Gary Howd, who did it all on his own–without any prompting,
encouragement or money from the Russians.


Even
the Politico account of the purported Florida invasion by the
Russians let that much slip out:

          The
caged Clinton stunt was a hit among Trump supporters. On Sept. 23,
for                                      instance,
 NBC2 reported
that a Cape Coral man erected a caged Clinton display in his front            yard.

“I
feel like I’m doing my little part at least in my little neck of the
woods,” homeowner Gary Howd said.

As
it happened, even the 
Washington
Post
 admits
that the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies didn’t amount to
much.

          The
efforts in Florida that August day did not turn out to be
particularly impressive. No people                    showed up to at least one of the
proposed rallies, and online photos of some of the other events                reveal ragtag groups with Trump signs staking out patches of grass or
traffic medians.

As
to the “Down With Hillary” demonstration on July 23, 2016,
to take another example, here is what you get from Google on this
particular element of the indictment:

          No
results found for 
“Down
with Hillary” rally in New York City on July 23, 2016
.

Finally,
and as long was we are on the topic, here is what a real troll farm
looks like. Yet this vast suite of offices in Fort
Meade, Maryland, where 20,000 SIGINT spies and technicians work
for the NSA, is only the tip of the iceberg.


The
US actually spends 
$75
billion
 per
year—more than Russia’s entire 
$69
billion 
defense
budget—spying on and meddling in the politics of virtually
every nation on earth. An outfit within NSA called Tailored Access
Operations (TAO) has a multi-billion annual budget and does
nothing put troll the global internet and does so
with highly educated, highly paid professionals, not $4 per
hour keyboard jockeys.


Indeed,
the cafeterias in the NSA buildings pictured below cost far
more per year to operate than did Prigozhin’s troll farm during it
entire short lived existence (its apparently now being closed down
with two of the 3.5 floors already dark).

NSA headquarters

In
that context, Charles Hugh Smith cogently reminds that the real
farce in the Mueller comic book is that it is the ultimate case of
the pot-calling-the-kettle black:

America’s
foreign policy is one of absolute entitlement to influence the
domestic affairs and politics of every nation of interest, which to a
truly global empire includes every nation on the planet to the degree
every nation is a market and/or a potential threat to U.S. interests.

Assassination
of elected leaders–no problem. Funding the emergence of new
U.S.-directed political parties–just another day at the office.
Inciting dissent and discord to destabilize regimes–it’s what we do,
folks. Funding outright propaganda–one of our enduring specialties
.

Finally,
as Pat Buchanan further observed in his post on the Mueller
indictment, political and election meddling is what Imperial
Washington does. And now we are surprised that others do the
same—-even that pathetic efforts of a Russian oligarch laid out in
Mueller’s ham sandwich indictment:

Are
the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try
to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling
regimes we believe we have a stake?

“Have
we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura
Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.

With
a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”

“We
don’t do that anymore though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We
don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”

“Well,”
Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”

Indeed,
what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding
the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?

Did
America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions”
that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?

When
Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime
change” is frequently heard. When the “Green Revolution”
took to the streets of Tehran to protest massively the re-election of
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009, Republicans denounced
President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the
outcome.

When
China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some
have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?

David
Stockman’s Contra Corner is the only place where mainstream delusions
and cant about the Warfare State, the Bailout State, Bubble Finance
and Beltway Banditry are ripped, refuted and
rebuked.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com

=========================

Zie ook:

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands; zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………